<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ojn</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Nursing</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2162-5344</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2162-5336</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojn.2026.163015</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ojn-150209</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Medicine</subject>
          <subject>Healthcare</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Stress Management and Resilience among Students Enrolled in the Entry Level Master of Science in Nursing (ELMSN) Program</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0004-2883-0863</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Omolewa</surname>
            <given-names>Pius</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Adedipe</surname>
            <given-names>Adekemi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-8569-5918</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Noureddine</surname>
            <given-names>Nassrine</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Robbins</surname>
            <given-names>Destiny</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> School of Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Sacramento, CA, USA </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS), University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>12</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>03</issue>
      <fpage>232</fpage>
      <lpage>247</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>18</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>14</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>17</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2026.163015">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2026.163015</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p><bold>O</bold><bold>bjectives</bold><bold>:</bold> The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of mindfulness exercises on stress management and resilience among ELMSN students. <bold>Methods</bold><bold>:</bold> The study was a quasi-experimental design that used a paired samples t-test to compare pre-test and post-test of students’ scores on both GAD-7 anxiety screening tool and short version of Grit-scale. Statistical tests were conducted with significance set at p &lt; 0.05 (two-sided). All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 31.0 to compare pre-/post-test scores, determine differences, and statistical significance of interventions among the cohort. And a priori power analysis was conducted to determine the required sample size for a paired samples t-test. With an alpha level of 0.05 and a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.50), a total sample size of N = 34 was determined to be sufficient to achieve a power of 0.80. <bold>Results</bold><bold>:</bold> A convenience sample of 40 students (35 females and 5 males) participated in the study. Students had more anxiety before mindfulness exercises (M = 7.00, SD = 5.5) compared to after the mindfulness exercises (M = 6.2, SD = 3.4), t(39) = 1.41, p = 0.17. The effect size was small, d = 0.22<italic>.</italic> However, the difference in the students’ anxiety levels after the mindfulness exercises was not statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.17<italic>.</italic>On the resilience, students were less resilient before mindfulness exercises (M = 3.58, SD = 0.70) compared to after the mindfulness exercises (M = 3.96, SD = 0.50), t(39) = −2.45, p = 0.02. The effect size was medium, d = −0.39, but statistically significant with a p-value of 0.02. <bold>Conclusions</bold><bold>:</bold> Inadequate stress management among students leads to anxiety that often serves as a barrier to academic success. Students were able to manage their anxiety better with the mindfulness exercises, and it was evident that students were more resilient after the exposure to several mindfulness exercises. Introduction of mindfulness exercises can assist students to be more confident and cope effectively with learning challenges throughout the undergraduate program. The adoption of mindfulness exercises can increase retention, academic success, and graduation rates among students. Practicing mindfulness exercises at home during leisure time by students should be further investigated and quantified. The adoption of mindfulness exercises can increase retention, academic success, and graduation rates among students.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Mindfulness</kwd>
        <kwd>Resilience</kwd>
        <kwd>Anxiety</kwd>
        <kwd>Grit</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction/Background</title>
      <p>The pursuit of academic excellence can be very daunting for pre-licensure nursing students. Nursing students experience heightened stress levels due to the academic and clinical demands placed upon them throughout their education [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. The entry-level Master of Science in nursing program is a fast-paced, accelerated program that must be completed within 24 months. This places a lot of stress on the students to succeed academically in both didactic and clinical dimensions. Stress can be defined as a state that arises when the internal or external demands on an individual exceed the individual’s ability to cope or adapt to a situation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. University students experience high anxiety and stress across programs and some of this stress relates to the extrinsic focus of many students, who see their education as it relates to prestige and earning power, rather than learning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Therefore, addressing the problem of stress at an undergraduate level may have multiple benefits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. The demands of nursing can be met with resilience, a positive response that can be learned [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Stress reduction, cognitive therapy, and relapse prevention programs are based on mindfulness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Mindfulness is an experiential process in which attention is directed purposefully and consciously to what is happening in the body and mind at that moment, and the content that emerges because of these observations is accepted without judgment, analysis, reaction, curiosity, understanding, and compassion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Stress and anxiety are common problems among nursing students, affecting their mental health and academic performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. In a study, it was found that the undergraduate nursing students had a high level of perceived stress and lower levels of psychological well-being [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Stress and anxiety levels have been reported to be significantly higher in nursing students than in students in other disciplines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. Anxiety reduction and ability to focus on what matters most can enhance learning outcomes among students [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. Balancing academic work and clinical work is stressful to many nursing students [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Individuals with a high level of mindfulness display a greater self‐perception of well-being, are much better at coping with stress and are successful in their relations with others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. Mindfulness practices include breathwork, body scan, and awareness of bodily sensations, emotions, and thoughts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>].</p>
      <p>Resilient nurses, who work in stressful environments, report high levels of psychological well-being and low levels of burnout [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Nursing is a highly demanding profession with daily occupational, organizational, physical, and psychological demands, making nurses more vulnerable than other professional groups to low resilience [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Low levels of resilience are associated with poor stress-management skills [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Resilience is the ability of an individual to prepare for or respond to perceived adversities. Stress reduction and resilience can help students respond to and cope with the demands of nursing school, and part of developing resilience is learning positive ways to deal with stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Many nursing programs, due to challenging course work, clinical work, and negative student stress reactions, report high levels of attrition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Resilience enables nurses to adapt positively to stressful working conditions and the associated emotional distress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Resilience drives one’s attention to strengths and opportunities, rather than weaknesses and vulnerability, through reframing one’s perspectives, and has been underlined as a potential factor to help nurses cope with professional difficulties without having an impact on one’s mental well-being [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. </p>
      <p>Inverse correlation between stress and mindfulness has been demonstrated in several studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Mindfulness has been theoretically and empirically associated with psychological health, and indeed, there is a wealth of evidence showing the positive effects of mindfulness-based interventions, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. The Healthy Minds Network has made a case for the economic benefits of counseling service in terms of return on investment for institutions providing mental health services and thereby helping sustain student retention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>], there has been increasing use of mindfulness in occupational contexts since the late 1990s, for not only staff who might be suffering with stress and mental health issues but workers in general. The most prominent operationalization of mindfulness as a mental state/quality is the awareness that arises through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally to the unfolding of experience moment by moment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Therefore, in view of several observations on enrolled Entry Level Master of Science in Nursing (ELMSN) students, we decided to evaluate the effect of Mindfulness exercises on stress management and resilience on a cohort using quasi-experimental design.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Purpose</title>
      <p>The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of mindfulness exercises on stress management and resilience among ELMSN students.</p>
      <p>Research Question (<italic>H1</italic>): Mindfulness exercises have effect on stress management among ELMSN students.</p>
      <p>Null hypothesis (<italic>H01</italic>): Mindfulness exercises do not have effect on stress management among ELMSN students.</p>
      <p>Research Question (<italic>H2</italic>): Mindfulness exercises have effect on resilience among ELMSN students.</p>
      <p>Null hypothesis (<italic>H02</italic>): Mindfulness exercises do not have effect on resilience among ELMSN students.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Method</title>
      <p>All Entry Level Master of Science in Nursing (ELMSN) students in a cohort were purposely selected. The study aim was explained to all students and consent obtained from those willing to participate per the ethics committee. GAD-7 anxiety screening tool and gritty tool were made available to all students via Qualtrics. GAD-7 Anxiety tool is 7-item questionnaires that can be self-administered to determine minimal, mild, moderate, and severe anxiety levels with individuals. The scoring is calculated by assigning rated symptoms on a scale from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21. 0 - 4: minimal anxiety, 5 - 9: mild anxiety, 10 - 14: moderate anxiety, 15 - 21: severe anxiety. Anxiety control and stress management are deeply interconnected, creating a cycle where managing one significantly improves the other. Anxiety is often a reaction to stress, triggered when a person feels they cannot handle a challenge. Self-report questionnaires allow for both professionals and nonprofessionals to identify a probable disorder and assess the severity of symptoms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. Prior psychometric research has shown the GAD-7 to have excellent internal consistency (<italic>α</italic> = 0.92), good test-retest reliability (r = 0.83), construct validity, and good sensitivity/specificity when detecting generalized anxiety disorders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. The interpretation of rating indicates stress management among individuals. </p>
      <p>In a study, the construct validity of GAD-7 tested with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis found a coefficient of 0.915, and the convergent validity Pearson correlation coefficients calculated to examine convergent validity of the GAD-7 with other measures (PHQ-9 and PHQ-ADS) indicated highly and positive correlation of between 0.751 - 0.934 that were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.01) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. The GAD-7 scale has been shown to highly correlate not only with specific anxiety measures but also with disability measures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. Identifying students’ mental health disorders can result in earlier intervention and improve their chances of degree completion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. </p>
      <p>The short version of Grit-Scale, consisting of 8-item questionnaires, was used to collect data on students’ grit level as either not gritty at all or extremely gritty. Scoring based on: </p>
      <p>For questions 2, 4, 7 and 8 assign the following points: </p>
      <p>5 = Very much like me</p>
      <p>4 = Mostly like me</p>
      <p>3 = Somewhat like me </p>
      <p>2 = Not much like me</p>
      <p>1 = Not like me at all</p>
      <p>For questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 assign the following points: </p>
      <p>1 = Very much like me</p>
      <p>2 = Mostly like me</p>
      <p>3 = Somewhat like me</p>
      <p>4 = Not much like me </p>
      <p>5 = Not like me at all</p>
      <p>All points were added and divided by 8. The maximum score on this scale is 5 (extremely gritty), and the lowest score on this scale is 1 (not at all gritty) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. </p>
      <p>The Consistency of Interest factor, and the whole Grit-S showed adequate internal consistency, <italic>α</italic>s = 0.70, 0.77, and 0.82 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. A confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor model of grit based on two subscales of consistency of interest and perseverance of effort (Duckworth and Quinn, 2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. The pre-test survey was collected in the first trimester. This was followed by weekly 30 minutes of mindfulness exercises and instructions that lasted 12 weeks in each trimester, and the post-survey data was collected in the third trimester. A paired samples t-test was used to compare pre-test and post-test of students’ scores on both tools. The study was approved by the University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB2024-390).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Data Collection and Analysis</title>
      <p>Statistical tests were conducted with significance set at p &lt; 0.05 (two-sided). All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 31.0 (IBM, 2025) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>] to compare pre/post test scores, determine mean differences, and statistical significance of interventions among the cohort. And a priori power analysis was conducted to determine the required sample size for a paired samples t-test. With an alpha level of 0.05 and a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.50), a total sample size of N = 34 was determined to be sufficient to achieve a power of 0.80 (<bold>Table 1</bold>). </p>
      <p>A mindfulness curriculum developed by faculty included 30 minutes of mindfulness exercises and instructions that lasted 12 weeks in each trimester (see <bold>Appendix</bold>). On each encounter, students were given handouts and encouraged to practice numerous exercises such as meditation, mindful seeing, mindful listening, five senses exercise, observer meditation, 3-minute breathing space, my self-care plan, body scan, and 3-step mindfulness exercise. The home practice among students was not tracked. All classes were taught by qualified faculty in collaboration with the University’s counsellor, who provided the ZOOM teachings in two weeks of the trimester. All data is stored electronically and encrypted. </p>
      <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Power analysis.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="6">
                <bold>Power Analysis Table</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
              </td>
              <td rowspan="2">
                N
                <sup>b</sup>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="2">
                Actual Power
                <sup>c</sup>
              </td>
              <td colspan="3">Test Assumptions</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Power</td>
              <td>Effect Size</td>
              <td>Sig.</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                Test for Mean Difference
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>34</td>
              <td>0.808</td>
              <td>0.8</td>
              <td>0.5</td>
              <td>0.05</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p><sup>a</sup>Two-sided test. <sup>b</sup>Number of pairs. <sup>c</sup>Based on noncentral t-distribution.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec5dot1">
        <title>Demographic Characteristics of Participants</title>
        <p>A convenience sample of Entry Level Master of Science in Nursing (ELMSN) Cohort in their first trimester participated in the study. Out of 48 only forty students (35 females and 5 males) participated in the study. Thirty-five were single, and 5 were married/partnered. The students were of diverse ethnicity that consisted of 14 Asian, 4 African American/black, 12 white/European, and 10 were of Hispanic/Latinx heritage. Eleven of the students were living on/off campus, 10 renting apartment, 18 living with family, and one student had variable accommodation. Thirty-two of the students have no children, two had one child, four had two children, and two had three or more children. The age of students ranged between 18 - 44 years. Thirty-six of the students had undergraduate science degree while 4 were others. Nineteen of the students were first generation in their families to attend college while 21 students were not. 35 students were on financial aid while five were self-paying. Only 14 of the students did not work while others worked various hours per week, ranging from 1 - 35 hours per week. 31 students were actively engaged with campus activities while 9 were not (see <bold>Table 2</bold> &amp; <bold>Table 3</bold>). </p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Demographic characteristics.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Characteristics</td>
                <td>Frequency (N)</td>
                <td>Total Sample</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Marital status</td>
                <td>Married/partnership = 5, Single = 35</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td># of children</td>
                <td>None = 32, one child = 2, two children = 4, three or more children = 2</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Ethnicity</td>
                <td>Asian = 14, AA/black = 4, White/European = 12, Hispanic/Latinx = 10</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Age</td>
                <td>(18 - 24) = 21, (25 - 34) = 17, (35 - 44) = 2</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td># of children</td>
                <td>None = 32, one child = 2, two children = 4, three or more children = 2</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1st generation to attend college</td>
                <td>Yes = 19, No = 21</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Undergraduate degree</td>
                <td>Science = 36, others = 4</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Financial aid</td>
                <td>Yes = 35, No = 5</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Gender</td>
                <td>Female = 35, Male = 5</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hours worked per week</td>
                <td>No work = 14, 1 - 5 hours = 3, 6 - 10 hours = 7, 11 - 15 hours = 8, 16 - 20 hours = 1, 21 - 35 hours = 7</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Campus involvement</td>
                <td>Yes = 31, No = 9</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Living accommodation</td>
                <td>On/off campus = 11, renting apartment = 10, living with family 18, varies = 1</td>
                <td>40</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 3.</bold> Descriptive statistics.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="6">
                  <bold>Descriptive Statistics</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>N</td>
                <td>Minimum</td>
                <td>Maximum</td>
                <td>Mean</td>
                <td>Std. Deviation</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Marital status</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>1.1250</td>
                <td>0.33493</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td># of children</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>4.00</td>
                <td>1.4000</td>
                <td>0.87119</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Ethnicity</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>4.00</td>
                <td>2.4500</td>
                <td>1.21845</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Age</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>3.00</td>
                <td>1.5250</td>
                <td>0.59861</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1st generation to attend college</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>1.5250</td>
                <td>0.50574</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Undergraduate degree</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>1.1000</td>
                <td>0.30382</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Financial aid</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>1.1250</td>
                <td>0.33493</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Gender</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>1.1250</td>
                <td>0.33493</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hours of work per week</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>6.00</td>
                <td>3.0000</td>
                <td>1.85362</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Campus involvement/activities</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>2.00</td>
                <td>1.2250</td>
                <td>0.42290</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Living accommodation</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>4.00</td>
                <td>2.2250</td>
                <td>0.89120</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Valid N (listwise)</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>To test the effect of mindfulness exercises on stress management, a paired-samples t-test was conducted to compare pre-scores on GAD-7 screening tool to the post-scores on the anxiety levels of students. A Shapiro-wilk test indicated that the differences between the conditions were normally distributed, W = 0.97 (40), p = 0.24 based on p-value &gt; 0.05 (see <bold>Table 4</bold>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Students’ anxiety levels decreased based on pre-test mean and standard deviation of (M = 7.00, SD = 5.5) compared to post-test scores of (M = 6.2, SD = 3.4), t(39) = 1.41, p = 0.17 (see <bold>Table 5</bold> &amp; <bold>Table 6</bold>). The effect size was small, d = 0.22 (<bold>Table 7</bold>). The standard subtraction order for Cohen’s </p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1442707-rId16.jpeg?20260324083007" />
        </fig>
        <p>d is 6.2 - 7.00 = −0.8, which showed the decrease in anxiety level. However, the difference in the students’ anxiety levels after the mindfulness exercises was not statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.17 (see <bold>Table 6</bold>). Therefore, the <italic>Null</italic> hypothesis that stated mindfulness exercises do not have effect on stress management among ELMSN students was accepted and the research hypothesis that stated mindfulness exercises have effect on stress management among ELMSN students was rejected.</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1442707-rId17.jpeg?20260324083008" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold> Normal distribution.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> Test of normality.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="7">
                  <bold>Tests</bold>
                  <bold>of</bold>
                  <bold>Normality</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  Kolmogorov-Smirnov
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">Shapiro-Wilk</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Statistic</td>
                <td>df</td>
                <td>Sig.</td>
                <td>Statistic</td>
                <td>df</td>
                <td>Sig.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Difference</td>
                <td>0.145</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>0.033</td>
                <td>0.965</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>0.239</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><sup>a</sup>Lilliefors significance correction.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5.</bold> Paired samples statistics.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2">
                </td>
                <td>Mean</td>
                <td>N</td>
                <td>Std. Deviation</td>
                <td>Std. Error Mean</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Pair 1</td>
                <td>GAD-7 Anxiety scale</td>
                <td>7.0000</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>5.50058</td>
                <td>0.86972</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>GAD-7 Anxiety scale</td>
                <td>6.2000</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>3.40588</td>
                <td>0.53852</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 6.</bold> Paired samples test.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="12">
                  <bold>Paired</bold>
                  <bold>Samples</bold>
                  <bold>Test</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2" rowspan="3">
                </td>
                <td colspan="5">Paired Differences</td>
                <td rowspan="3">t</td>
                <td rowspan="1">df</td>
                <td colspan="3">Significance</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Mean</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Std. Deviation</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Std. Error Mean</td>
                <td colspan="2">95% Confidence Interval of the Difference</td>
                <td rowspan="2">One-Sided p</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Two-Sided p</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lower</td>
                <td>Upper</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pair 1</td>
                <td>GAD-7 Anxiety scale - GAD-7 Anxiety scale</td>
                <td>0.80000</td>
                <td>3.59629</td>
                <td>0.56862</td>
                <td>−0.35015</td>
                <td>1.95015</td>
                <td>1.407</td>
                <td>39</td>
                <td>0.084</td>
                <td>0.167</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 7.</bold> Paired samples effects sizes.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl7">
          <label>Table 7</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="7">
                  <bold>Paired</bold>
                  <bold>Samples</bold>
                  <bold>Effect</bold>
                  <bold>Sizes</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3" rowspan="2">
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1">
                  Standardizer
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1">Point Estimate</td>
                <td colspan="2">95% Confidence Interval</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lower</td>
                <td>Upper</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Pair 1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">GAD-7 Anxiety scale - GAD-7 Anxiety scale</td>
                <td>Cohen’s d</td>
                <td>3.59629</td>
                <td>0.222</td>
                <td>−0.093</td>
                <td>0.535</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hedges’ correction</td>
                <td>3.66735</td>
                <td>0.218</td>
                <td>−0.091</td>
                <td>0.524</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><sup>a</sup>The denominator used in estimating the effect sizes. Cohen’s d uses the sample standard deviation of the mean difference. Hedges’ correction uses the sample standard deviation of the mean difference, plus a correction factor.</p>
        <p>To evaluate the effect of mindfulness exercises on resilience, a paired-samples t-test was conducted to compare pre-scores on Gritty scale screening tool to the post-scores on the gritty scale. A Shapiro-wilk test indicated that the differences between the conditions were normally distributed, W = 0.981 (40), p = 0.74 an indication of p-value greater than 0.05 confirmed normal distribution of scores (see <bold>Table 8</bold>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Students were less resilient before mindfulness exercises (M = 3.58, SD = 0.70) compared to after the mindfulness exercises (M = 3.96, SD = 0.50), t(39) = −2.45, p = 0.02 (see <bold>Table 9</bold> &amp; <bold>Table 10</bold>). The standard subtraction order for Cohen’s </p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1442707-rId16.jpeg?20260324083007" />
        </fig>
        <p>d is 3.96 - 3.58 = 0.38, which showed the increase in grittiness. The effect size was medium, d = −0.39 (see <bold>Table 11</bold>). Therefore, the <italic>Null</italic> hypothesis that stated mindfulness exercises do not have effect on resilience among ELMSN students was rejected and the research hypothesis that stated mindfulness exercises have effect on resilience among ELMSN students was accepted based on a p-value of 0.02 (<bold>Table 10</bold>).</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1442707-rId18.jpeg?20260324083008" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2.</bold> Normal distribution.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 8.</bold> Tests of normality.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl8">
          <label>Table 8</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="7">
                  <bold>Tests</bold>
                  <bold>of</bold>
                  <bold>Normality</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  Kolmogorov-Smirnov
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">Shapiro-Wilk</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Statistic</td>
                <td>df</td>
                <td>Sig.</td>
                <td>Statistic</td>
                <td>df</td>
                <td>Sig.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Difference 2</td>
                <td>0.094</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>0.200*</td>
                <td>0.981</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>0.736</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>*This is a lower bound of the true significance. <sup>a</sup>Lilliefors significance correction.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 9.</bold> Paired samples statistics.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl9">
          <label>Table 9</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="6">
                  <bold>Paired</bold>
                  <bold>Samples</bold>
                  <bold>Statistics</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2">
                </td>
                <td>Mean</td>
                <td>N</td>
                <td>Std. Deviation</td>
                <td>Std. Error Mean</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Pair 1</td>
                <td>Gritty scores</td>
                <td>3.5795</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>0.69626</td>
                <td>0.11009</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Gritty scores</td>
                <td>3.9640</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>0.49780</td>
                <td>0.07871</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 10.</bold> Paired samples test.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl10">
          <label>Table 10</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="12">
                  <bold>Paired</bold>
                  <bold>Samples</bold>
                  <bold>Test</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2" rowspan="3">
                </td>
                <td colspan="5">Paired Differences</td>
                <td rowspan="3">t</td>
                <td rowspan="1">df</td>
                <td colspan="2">Significance</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Mean</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Std. Deviation</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Std. Error Mean</td>
                <td colspan="2">95% Confidence Interval of the Difference</td>
                <td rowspan="2">One-Sided p</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Two-Sided p</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lower</td>
                <td>Upper</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pair 1</td>
                <td>Gritty scores - Gritty scores</td>
                <td>−0.38450</td>
                <td>0.99212</td>
                <td>0.15687</td>
                <td>−0.70180</td>
                <td>−0.06720</td>
                <td>−2.451</td>
                <td>39</td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>0.019</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 11.</bold> Paired samples effect sizes.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl11">
          <label>Table 11</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="7">
                  <bold>Paired</bold>
                  <bold>Samples</bold>
                  <bold>Effect</bold>
                  <bold>Sizes</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3" rowspan="2">
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1">
                  Standardizer
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1">Point Estimate</td>
                <td colspan="2">95% Confidence Interval</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lower</td>
                <td>Upper</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Pair 1</td>
                <td rowspan="2">Gritty scores - Gritty scores</td>
                <td>Cohen’s d</td>
                <td>0.99212</td>
                <td>−0.388</td>
                <td>−0.707</td>
                <td>−0.064</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hedges’ correction</td>
                <td>1.01172</td>
                <td>−0.380</td>
                <td>−0.693</td>
                <td>−0.062</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><sup>a</sup>The denominator used in estimating the effect sizes. Cohen’s d uses the sample standard deviation of the mean difference. Hedges’ correction uses the sample standard deviation of the mean difference, plus a correction factor.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>6. Discussions</title>
      <p>Anxiety and stress are very common among nursing students, and the course workload of students can be overwhelming but having the resilience to cope with any prevailing situations can be advantageous. Stress reduction and resilience can help students cope with the demands of nursing school, and part of developing resilience is learning positive ways to deal with stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Our intervention used several mindfulness exercises that students can adopt to manage anxiety levels and build resilience. The post survey after series of mindfulness exercises was not statistical significance in terms of anxiety reduction among students. However, with small effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.22, the mean score of 7.0 before mindfulness exercises was higher than the mean score of 6.2 after exposure to several mindful exercises (<bold>Table 5</bold>). The small difference in the mean scores indicates a little positive change in the management of anxiety among the students but the difference was not statistically significant. The small effect size and changes in the mean scores suggest that changes in this dimension are more subtle and may require a more prolonged or intensive approach to allow greater improvements to be observed. Extending the mindfulness exercises for one more trimester may increase the effects on the students’ anxiety management. There could be other extraneous variables affecting the students’ anxiety and stress management for an example out of the 40 participants, 35 students were on financial but only 14 students did not work. Our study was very similar to an earlier study in which the Fall semester and Spring semester comparison of students’ anxiety levels revealed no statistically significant differences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. This is not surprising; the process of being educated as a healthcare professional of any kind is stressful and anxiety-provoking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>], and our students are constantly learning didactically and clinically new concepts of how to be excellent nurses. Another study revealed that mindfulness did not significantly alleviate depression, anxiety, or stress over time, underscoring the need for longitudinal research to evaluate the durability of these effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. It’s obvious that Mindfulness-based approaches enable students to become aware of their emotions and manage their feelings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. The awareness of one’s emotions and feelings correlates with adaptive abilities and well-being, and mindfulness supports the clinical and academic success of student nurses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. </p>
      <p>The findings of our study indicated that the use of mindfulness elevated the students’ resilience. The comparison of pre-scores with the post-scores on the gritty scale revealed that students became grittier after series of the mindfulness exercises based on M = 3.58, SD = 0.70 before, and M = 3.96, SD = 0.50 after with a p-value of 0.02. The effect size was medium, d = −0.39 (approximately 0.4), and this is considered moderate effect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. The grittier a student nurse becomes the more likely of effective coping to reduce stresses and anxiety. From a nursing perspective, resilience has been used to mean an individualized process of development that occurs using personal protective factors to successfully navigate perceived stress and adversities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Mindfulness exercises emphasize self-awareness and self-efficacy. Self-efficacy among nurses has been found to contribute to the development of personal resilience [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. The explanation for the increased grit scores can be due to the persistence for self-awareness and the self-belief that students can achieve their aims through series of mindfulness exercises. In nursing students, resilience is recognized as a critical quality that will enable them to face and solve the challenges encountered in their studies and future careers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Nursing students are expected to meet various academic demands throughout their studies and therefore experience high levels of stress. Consequently, they must acquire the ability to thrive in adversity, and to learn and grow from such experiences. Resilient individuals can mobilize protective factors to help themselves rebound from distress, maintain an openness to change and exhibit pro-social behavior and empathy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Resilient individuals may be affected by difficulties (e.g., trauma, loss); however, they are not lastingly overwhelmed by these experiences, and resilient people cope with these challenges by acquiring new skills, better mental health, potentiating compassion, and self-efficacy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Self-efficacy is considered as a belief in one’s personal competence that enables an individual to decide their degree of effort and persistence when faced with difficulties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Individuals with a high level of mindfulness display a greater self-perception of well-being, are much better at coping with stress and are successful in their relations with others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. Therefore, increased resilience can increase confidence and lower reactional stress due to better coping strategies. Resilience has also been underlined as a potential factor to help nurses cope with professional difficulties without having an impact on one’s mental well-being [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Resilience is a characteristic of the individual that is found in relation to nurses in challenging situations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>7. Strengths and Limitations</title>
      <p>The strengths of this study include the use of credible tools with high reliability and validity. GAD-7 Anxiety has a construct validity of 0.915 co-efficiency, while the Grit tool internal consistency was shown as <italic>α</italic>s = 0.70, 0.77, and 0.82 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. The study revealed the effectiveness of mindfulness exercises in the management of stress and resilience among undergraduate nurses. Limitations of this study include the use of convenience sample of students’ cohort enrolled in the ELMSN program, and it was conducted only in one school, thereby limiting the generalizability of the findings. Most of the participants were females with only five males, but that’s expected because nursing profession is numerically dominated by female gender. However, the sample size of 40 participants was sufficient for the study as evidenced by power analysis (<bold>Table 1</bold>). Another limitation of the study is the lack of a control group, which prevented us from ruling out other extraneous factors that could have influenced the observed results. Future research could consider the use of randomized controlled designs to strengthen the validity of the findings. In addition, we suggest investigating the long-term effects of these interventions, since the impact of mindfulness exercises may increase with time and continued practice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. It would also be relevant to explore how resiliency can reduce stressful experiences and assist with coping, as these factors were not expressly addressed in this study. It is also important to note that the post survey was taken at the end of the third trimester, which coincided with the beginning of obstetrics and gynecology course, which may have contributed to increased stress and anxiety among the students. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec8">
      <title>8. Conclusions</title>
      <p>Inadequate stress management among students leads to anxiety that often serves as a barrier to academic success. Students were able to manage their anxiety better with the mindfulness exercises, and it was evident that students were more resilient after the mindfulness exercises. Introduction of mindfulness exercises can assist students to be more confident and cope effectively with learning challenges throughout the undergraduate program. The adoption of mindfulness exercises can increase retention, academic success, and graduation rates among students. Practicing mindfulness exercises at home during leisure time by students should be further investigated and quantified. The adoption of mindfulness exercises can increase retention, academic success, and graduation rates among students. </p>
      <sec id="sec8dot1">
        <title>Implication for Nursing</title>
        <p>The research findings show that mindfulness exercises have effects on the resilience and stress management among students. Although the effect on stress management was not statistically significant but the difference in the mean scores was observed with small effect size. The standard subtraction order for Cohen’s </p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1442707-rId16.jpeg?20260324083008" />
        </fig>
        <p>d is 6.2 − 7.00 = −0.8, which showed the decrease in anxiety level among students. The effect on resilience based on gritty scores was statistically significant with a p-value of 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.39. Therefore, activities geared to raise the level of mindfulness exercises can be very beneficial if included in the nursing curriculum. Efforts should be directed to determine how students use these mindful exercises at home, because the awareness of what to do and the process of commitment to practice the exercises are two different concepts. More support system should be in place by faculty members to guide and encourage students to perform all those simple but effective mindful exercises. Given nursing students’ challenging formative context and the work context they will face as professionals, it is highly relevant to incorporate and evaluate evidence-based professional subjects to address stress and anxiety as a basis for effective supportive relationships and humanized care [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. Mindfulness can potentially positively impact well-being and resilience in undergraduate nursing students [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. </p>
        <p>Implications for nursing include expanding the body of knowledge regarding nursing students’ resilience and coping strategies. Individuals with stronger dispositional mindfulness are often described as better attuned to the present moment and more capable of controlling their emotions and behaviors, and therefore they have greater psychological well-being [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>] Future studies should focus on challenges students face at the clinical environments and determine the age categories mostly affected as undergraduate nursing students perceived that a mindfulness program has the potential to enhance well-being and future clinical practice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec9">
      <title>Appendix</title>
      <fig id="fig6">
        <label>Figure 6</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1442707-rId39.jpeg?20260324083009" />
      </fig>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fenton, A., Win, R., Ndzi, M. and Neiling, K. (2025) Mindfulness in Nursing Education: An Integrative Review. <italic>BMC Nursing</italic>, 24, Article No. 1473. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04070-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12912-025-04070-0</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04070-0">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04070-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fenton, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Win, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ndzi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Neiling, K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Mindfulness in Nursing Education: An Integrative Review</article-title>
            <source>BMC Nursing</source>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12912-025-04070-0</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Malone, T. (2025) Stress, Resilience, and Student Nurses: Piloting a Mindfulness-Based Intervention. <italic>Whitireia Journal of Nursing</italic>, <italic>Health &amp; Social Services</italic>, 32, 23-41. https://doi.org/10.34074/whit.3202 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34074/whit.3202</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.34074/whit.3202">https://doi.org/10.34074/whit.3202</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Malone, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stress, R</string-name>
              <string-name>Nursing, H</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Stress, Resilience, and Student Nurses: Piloting a Mindfulness-Based Intervention</article-title>
            <source>Whitireia Journal of Nursing</source>
            <volume>32</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34074/whit.3202</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Moore, M.F., Montgomery, L. and Cobbs, T. (2021) Increasing Student Success through In-Class Resilience Education. <italic>Nurse Education in Practice</italic>, 50, Article ID: 102948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102948 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102948</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33316617</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102948">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102948</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Moore, M.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Montgomery, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cobbs, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Increasing Student Success through In-Class Resilience Education</article-title>
            <source>Nurse Education in Practice</source>
            <volume>50</volume>
            <fpage>102948</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102948</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33316617</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bahadir-Yilmaz, E. and Yuksel, A. (2024) Effect of Mindfulness-Based Relaxation and Breathing Exercises on Health, Coping, and Success: A Qualitative Study. <italic>Internat</italic><italic>ional</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Caring</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 17, 718-725.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bahadir-Yilmaz, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yuksel, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Health, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Mindfulness-Based Relaxation and Breathing Exercises on Health, Coping, and Success: A Qualitative Study</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Caring Sciences</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gutiérrez-Carmona, A., González-Pérez, M., Ruiz-Fernández, M.D., Ortega-Galán, A.M. and Henríquez, D. (2024) Effectiveness of Compassion Training on Stress and Anxiety: A Pre-Experimental Study on Nursing Students. <italic>Nursing Reports</italic>, 14, 3667-3676. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040268 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nursrep14040268</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39728629</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040268">https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14040268</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Carmona, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Effectiveness of Compassion Training on Stress and Anxiety: A Pre-Experimental Study on Nursing Students</article-title>
            <source>Nursing Reports</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nursrep14040268</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39728629</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">He, F.X., Turnbull, B., Kirshbaum, M.N., Phillips, B. and Klainin-Yobas, P. (2018) Assessing Stress, Protective Factors and Psychological Well-Being among Undergraduate Nursing Students. <italic>Nurse Education Today</italic>, 68, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.013 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29870871</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>He, F.X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Turnbull, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kirshbaum, M.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Phillips, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Klainin-Yobas, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stress, P</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Assessing Stress, Protective Factors and Psychological Well-Being among Undergraduate Nursing Students</article-title>
            <source>Nurse Education Today</source>
            <volume>68</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.013</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29870871</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Brunner, J.L., McCabe, A.G. and Wallace, D.L. (2024) College Student Preferences for Campus Mental Health Services and Practices. <italic>Journal of College Student Mental Health</italic>, 38, 1011-1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/28367138.2024.2342891 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/28367138.2024.2342891</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/28367138.2024.2342891">https://doi.org/10.1080/28367138.2024.2342891</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Brunner, J.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>McCabe, A.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wallace, D.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>College Student Preferences for Campus Mental Health Services and Practices</article-title>
            <source>Journal of College Student Mental Health</source>
            <volume>38</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/28367138.2024.2342891</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kotera, Y., Cockerill, V., Chircop, J., Kaluzeviciute, G. and Dyson, S. (2021) Predicting Self-Compassion in UK Nursing Students: Relationships with Resilience, Engagement, Motivation, and Mental Wellbeing. <italic>Nurse Education in Practice</italic>, 51, Article ID: 102989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.102989 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nepr.2021.102989</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33607377</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.102989">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.102989</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kotera, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cockerill, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chircop, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kaluzeviciute, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dyson, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Resilience, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Predicting Self-Compassion in UK Nursing Students: Relationships with Resilience, Engagement, Motivation, and Mental Wellbeing</article-title>
            <source>Nurse Education in Practice</source>
            <volume>51</volume>
            <fpage>102989</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nepr.2021.102989</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33607377</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Aşık, E. and Albayrak, S. (2022) The Effect of Mindfulness Levels on the Life Satisfaction of Nursing Students. <italic>Perspectives in Psychiatric Care</italic>, 58, 1055-1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12898 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppc.12898</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34216042</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12898">https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12898</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Albayrak, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>The Effect of Mindfulness Levels on the Life Satisfaction of Nursing Students</article-title>
            <source>Perspectives in Psychiatric Care</source>
            <volume>58</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppc.12898</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34216042</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chow, K.M., Tang, F.W.K., Tang, W.P.Y. and Leung, A.W.Y. (2020) Resilience-building Module for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation. <italic>Nurse</italic><italic>Education in Practice</italic>, 49, Article ID: 102912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102912 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102912</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33186821</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102912">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102912</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chow, K.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tang, F.W.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tang, W.P.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Leung, A.W.Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Resilience-building Module for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation</article-title>
            <source>Nurse Education in Practice</source>
            <volume>49</volume>
            <fpage>102912</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102912</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33186821</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sigalit, W., Sivia, B. and Michal, I. (2017) Factors Associated with Nursing Students’ Resilience: Communication Skills Course, Use of Social Media and Satisfaction with Clinical Placement. <italic>Journal of Professional Nursing</italic>, 33, 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.006 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28363390</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sigalit, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sivia, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Michal, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Course, U</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Factors Associated with Nursing Students’ Resilience: Communication Skills Course, Use of Social Media and Satisfaction with Clinical Placement</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Professional Nursing</source>
            <volume>33</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.08.006</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28363390</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lomas, T., Medina, J.C., Ivtzan, I., Rupprecht, S. and Eiroa-Orosa, F.J. (2018) A Systematic Review of the Impact of Mindfulness on the Well-Being of Healthcare Professionals. <italic>Journal of Clinical Psychology</italic>, 74, 319-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22515 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jclp.22515</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28752554</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22515">https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22515</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lomas, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Medina, J.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ivtzan, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rupprecht, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eiroa-Orosa, F.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>A Systematic Review of the Impact of Mindfulness on the Well-Being of Healthcare Professionals</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Clinical Psychology</source>
            <volume>74</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jclp.22515</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28752554</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Koç, M.S. and Uzun, R.B. (2024) Investigating the Link between Dispositional Mindfulness, Beliefs about Emotions, Emotion Regulation and Psychological Health: A Model Testing Study. <italic>Journal of Rational-Emotive &amp; Cognitive</italic>- <italic>Behavior Therapy</italic>, 42, 475-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-023-00522-1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10942-023-00522-1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-023-00522-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-023-00522-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Uzun, R.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mindfulness, B</string-name>
              <string-name>Emotions, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Investigating the Link between Dispositional Mindfulness, Beliefs about Emotions, Emotion Regulation and Psychological Health: A Model Testing Study</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Rational-Emotive &amp; Cognitive-Behavior Therapy</source>
            <volume>42</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10942-023-00522-1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">White, A.E. and Karr, J.E. (2023) Psychometric Properties of the GAD-7 among College Students: Reliability, Validity, Factor Structure, and Measurement Invariance. Translational Issues in Psychological Science.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>White, A.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Karr, J.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Reliability, V</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Psychometric Properties of the GAD-7 among College Students: Reliability, Validity, Factor Structure, and Measurement Invariance</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dhira, T.A., Rahman, M.A., Sarker, A.R. and Mehareen, J. (2021) Validity and Reliability of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) among University Students of Bangladesh. <italic>PLOS ONE</italic>, 16, e0261590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261590 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0261590</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34914811</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261590">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261590</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dhira, T.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rahman, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sarker, A.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mehareen, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Validity and Reliability of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) among University Students of Bangladesh</article-title>
            <source>PLOS ONE</source>
            <volume>16</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0261590</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34914811</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mehareen, J., Rahman, M.A., Dhira, T.A. and Sarker, A.R. (2021) Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Correlates of Depression, Anxiety, and Co-Morbidity during COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study among Public and Private University Students of Bangladesh. <italic>Journal of Affective Disorders Reports</italic>, 5, Article ID: 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100179 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100179</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100179">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100179</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mehareen, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rahman, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dhira, T.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sarker, A.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Depression, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Prevalence and Socio-Demographic Correlates of Depression, Anxiety, and Co-Morbidity during COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study among Public and Private University Students of Bangladesh</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Affective Disorders Reports</source>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <fpage>100179</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100179</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ruiz, M.A., Zamorano, E., García-Campayo, J., Pardo, A., Freire, O. and Rejas, J. (2011) Validity of the GAD-7 Scale as an Outcome Measure of Disability in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care. <italic>Journal of Affective Disorders</italic>, 128, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.010 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20692043</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ruiz, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zamorano, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Campayo, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pardo, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Freire, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rejas, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Validity of the GAD-7 Scale as an Outcome Measure of Disability in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Affective Disorders</source>
            <volume>128</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.010</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20692043</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Duckworth, A.L. and Quinn, P.D. (2009) Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT-S). <italic>Journal of Personality Assessment</italic>, 91, 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00223890802634290</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19205937</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290">https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Duckworth, A.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Quinn, P.D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT-S)</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Personality Assessment</source>
            <volume>91</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00223890802634290</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19205937</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">IBM Corp (2025) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 31.0) [Computer Software]. IBM Corp.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 31</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bakker, A., Cai, J., English, L., Kaiser, G., Mesa, V. and Van Dooren, W. (2019) Beyond Small, Medium, or Large: Points of Consideration When Interpreting Effect Sizes. <italic>Educational Studies in Mathematics</italic>, 102, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bakker, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cai, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>English, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kaiser, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mesa, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dooren, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Small, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Beyond Small, Medium, or Large: Points of Consideration When Interpreting Effect Sizes</article-title>
            <source>Educational Studies in Mathematics</source>
            <volume>102</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10649-019-09908-4</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fritz, C.O., Morris, P.E. and Richler, J.J. (2012) Effect Size Estimates: Current Use, Calculations, and Interpretation. <italic>Journal of Experimental Psychology</italic>: <italic>General</italic>, 141, 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/a0024338</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21823805</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338">https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fritz, C.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Morris, P.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Richler, J.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Use, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Effect Size Estimates: Current Use, Calculations, and Interpretation</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</source>
            <volume>141</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/a0024338</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21823805</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kalmar, J., Bressler, C., Gruber, E., Baumann, I., Vonderlin, E., Bents, H., <italic>et al</italic>. (2024) Mindfulness Skills in Trainee Child and Adolescent Psychotherapists: Exploring the Effects of Mindfulness-Based Workshops in a Mixed-Methods Study. <italic>Counse</italic><italic>lling and Psychotherapy Research</italic>, 24, 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12619 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/capr.12619</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12619">https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12619</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kalmar, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bressler, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gruber, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baumann, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vonderlin, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bents, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Mindfulness Skills in Trainee Child and Adolescent Psychotherapists: Exploring the Effects of Mindfulness-Based Workshops in a Mixed-Methods Study</article-title>
            <source>Counselling and Psychotherapy Research</source>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/capr.12619</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Veigh, C.M., Reid, J., Carswell, C., Ace, L., Walsh, I., Graham-Wisener, L., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) Mindfulness as a Well-Being Initiative for Future Nurses: A Survey with Undergraduate Nursing Students. <italic>BMC Nursing</italic>, 20, Article No. 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00783-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12912-021-00783-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34930234</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00783-0">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00783-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Veigh, C.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Reid, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Carswell, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ace, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Walsh, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Graham-Wisener, L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Mindfulness as a Well-Being Initiative for Future Nurses: A Survey with Undergraduate Nursing Students</article-title>
            <source>BMC Nursing</source>
            <volume>20</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12912-021-00783-0</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34930234</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>