jbm Journal of Biosciences and Medicines 2327-509X 2327-5081 Scientific Research Publishing 10.4236/jbm.2026.142035 jbm-149809 Article Biomedical Life Sciences Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Protocol in 4 Selected Hospitals in Cameroon: A Cross-Sectional Study Design Signe Mary-Magdalene 1 Chichom Alain Mefire 1 Tendongfor Nicholas 1 Fokam Puis 1 Orock George Enow 1 Nana Theophile Chuteng 1 Tsiagadigui Gustave 2 Ferdinand Nyankoué Mebouinz 3 Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon Regional Hospital Annex Edea, Edea, Cameroon Department of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde, Cameroon

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

 02 02 2026 02 2026 14 02 470 486 29 10 2025 24 02 2026 27 02 2026 © 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 2026 This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2026.142035

Background of the Study:Trauma has long been a major public health problem worldwide, particularly affecting developing countries. It is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality and accounts for about 10% of the global burden of disease and over five million deaths, as well as 52 million disability-adjusted life years annually. Despite the impact of the ATLS protocol on injury management, its awareness and use remain questionable. Thus, this study aimed to assess the ATLS knowledge, attitude, and practices of health personnel involved in the management of injuries in 4 hospitals in Cameroon. Methodology:This was a cross-sectional, hospital-based study. A questionnaire was used to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers on the ATLS protocol in four hospitals (Regional Hospital Limbe (RHL), Regional Hospital Bafoussam (RHB), Laquintinie Hospital Douala (HLD), and the Edea Regional Hospital (HRAE)). Results:Out of the 225 personnel enrolled in the study, 155 (71.4%) were females, 65 (29.1%) were state-registered nurses, and 40 (17.9%) were general practitioners. The overall knowledge was poor (71%), while 29% had good knowledge. There was a significant association between health facility personnel and knowledge (γ2 = 20.26, p < 0.001), and the association between qualification and knowledge was also statistically significant (γ2 = 13.14, p = 0.009). Specialist doctors demonstrated significantly higher knowledge than the other cadres involved in the study. The majority of participants (191; 85%) had a good attitude towards ATLS. The association between the health facility and attitude towards ATLS was statistically significant (γ2 = 9.963, P = 0.029). A total of 147 (65%) participants demonstrated good practice of the ATLS protocol. Specialist doctors were four times more likely to have good knowledge compared to other health professionals, AOR 4.737 (95% CI: 1.272 - 17.636, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Knowledge of the ATLS protocol was poor among study participants. However, attitudes and practices towards ATLS were good. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the ATLS were significantly influenced by the level of education and the location of the participants. Training on ATLS is recommended for healthcare personnel to improve care for injured patients.

 Injury and Trauma Adverse Event Health Education ATLS Protocol Impact 1. Introduction

Trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and accounts for about 10% of the global burden of diseases, with over five million deaths [1][2] and 52 million disability-adjusted life years annually [3]. Over 45 million people globally sustain moderate to severe disability each year due to trauma, with more than nine people dying every minute from injuries or violence [4]. Although the identification of trauma as a global health concern can be traced back to the last century [5], trauma still holds a significant share of the global burden of disease. In the United States, more than 50 million patients receive some form of trauma-related medical care annually, and trauma accounts for approximately 30% of all intensive care unit (ICU) admissions [6]. Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected by trauma, with about 90% of injury-related mortality occurring in these settings. Over 90% of the global burden occurs in LMICs, which lack the capacity to address the morbidity and mortality associated with injury [7]. To curb this burden, the use of a standardized and widely accepted method for the initial control of multiple trauma patients and the establishment of treatment priorities is essential. Today, the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol is the most widely accepted method for the initial control and treatment of severe and multiple trauma patients [8].

The ATLS is a training program for medical providers used in the management of acute trauma cases, developed by the American College of Surgeons [9]. The goal is to supply its participants with a safe and reliable method for immediate treatment of injured patients and the basic knowledge necessary to: 1) assess a patient’s condition rapidly and accurately; 2) resuscitate and stabilize patients according to priority; 3) determine whether a patient’s needs exceed the resources of a facility and/or the capability of a provider; 4) arrange appropriately for a patient’s inter-hospital or intra-hospital transfer; and 5) ensure that optimal care is provided and that the level of care does not deteriorate at any point during the evaluation, resuscitation, or transfer process [9]. ATLS is divided into primary, secondary, and tertiary surveys. The primary survey is the first and key part of the assessment of patients presenting with trauma. Life-threatening injuries are identified, and simultaneously, resuscitation is begun following the mnemonic ABCDE (A: Airway, B: Breathing, C: Circulation, D: Disability, E: Exposure), which details the order in which problems should be addressed. The secondary survey involves a head-to-toe evaluation, complete history, physical examination, and reassessment of all vital signs. The tertiary survey involves careful and complete examination to recognize missed injuries, allowing definitive care [10].

In Cameroon, the first practitioners who come in contact with injured patients are nurses and general practitioners; thus, appropriate knowledge of the ATLS protocol is mandatory in order to provide organized and fast lifesaving care to injured patients. Poor adherence to the ATLS protocol by practitioners can be detrimental to the outcome of the patient [11]. Deviations from ATLS guidelines could be due to poor knowledge of practitioners involved in the management of patients [12], leading to poor compliance with established guidelines in the management of the injured [13]. Thus, this study sought to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice of health care workers regarding the ATLS protocol in the management of the injured.

 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Study Site

Cameroon is a sub-Saharan country made up of 10 regions with a population of over 27 million inhabitants [14]. This study was implemented in four hospitals involved in the management of injured patients in Cameroon. They included: the Regional Hospital Limbe (RHL), which is the largest hospital in the Southwest, with more than a 200-bed capacity and the principal referral hospital in the Southwest Region [14]; the Regional Hospital Bafoussam with over 250-bed capacity and the largest in the West region, the Laquintinie Hospital Douala (LDH) and the Regional Hospital Annexe Edea (HREA), both in the Littoral Region. They are found along the Douala-Yaoundé highway, which is known to be among the deadliest roads in Cameroon, as it records the highest number of accidents.

 2.2. Study Design and Population

This was a cross-sectional hospital-based study conducted between May 2023 and October 2023 in four selected hospitals in the South West, Littoral, and West regions of Cameroon. The study involved medical doctors and nurses working in the emergency, surgical unit, theatre, and intensive care (ICU) units and directly involved in the management of injuries. The sample size was calculated using the single population proportion formula for epidemiological cross-sectional studies. A consecutive sampling method was used to recruit participants into the study. To adjust for the design effect of the sample design, the sample size was multiplied by the design effect. The minimum sample size for this study was 145 at 20% attrition. Hence, a total of 225 participants were finally recruited into the study. The number of participants that were sampled in each treatment center was determined based on the probability proportionate to size.

 2.3. Data Collection

Data were collected by trained research assistants (one per hospital) with a minimum qualification of a Bachelor of Science in Nursing Sciences. The data collection tool was a structured questionnaire consisting of 4 sections (demographic data, knowledge of ATLS, attitude towards the ATLS protocol, and practice of the ATLS). The questionnaires were printed in French and English and administered to doctors or nurses involved in care and who consented to participate in the study. Before data collection, the questionnaires were pretested at the District Hospital, Limbe.

 2.4. Data Analysis

Data were entered using a template developed in Kobo Collect and analyzed in SPSS version 26. Knowledge scores were grouped into good and poor knowledge. Poor knowledge referred to scores less than 50%, while good knowledge referred to scores above 50% on the knowledge section. Poor attitude referred to scores less than 50%, while good attitude referred to scores above 50%. This was set at 50% because it is the average. In the case of practice, poor practice referred to scores less than 75%, while good practice referred to scores above 75%. The 75% mark was set because error in practice directly impacts morbidity and mortality outcomes compared to knowledge and attitudes. The Chi-square test was used to determine the associations between demographic data and knowledge, attitude, and practice of the ATLS protocol. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the ATLS protocol.

 3. Results 3.1. Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Medical Personnel Enrolled in the Study

Out of the 225 healthcare personnel interviewed, 76 (33.9%) came from LDH. The majority of the participants (106; 48.6%) were aged 21-30 years old. More than seventy percent (155; 71.4%) were female. Most of the health workers, 100 (44.8%), were nursing assistants, and 40 (17.9%) were general practitioners (Table 1).

 3.2. Knowledge of the ATLS Protocol by Health Care Providers

Our study revealed that only 23 (10.2%) of the study participants considered addressing respiratory insufficiency as the highest priority in managing a patient whose injuries included a closed extremity fracture (Table 2). When assessing knowledge of ATLS, less than half of the participants, 110 (48.9%), did not know the next step in addressing a patient with a deviated trachea and chest pain. The

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants.

Variable Categories Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Health facility HRAE 25 11.2
LDH 76 33.9
RHB 58 25.9
RHL 65 29
Total 224 100
Age (years) 21 - 30 years 106 48.6
31 - 40 years 86 39.4
41 - 50 years 24 11
50+ 2 0.9
Total 218 100
Sex Female 155 71.4
Male 62 28.6
Total 217 100
Qualification Nurse assistant 100 44.8
SRN/B.Sc. in nursing 53 23.8
General practitioner 40 17.9
Specialised nurse 18 8.1
Specialist doctor 12 5.4
Total 223 100
Years of experience 0 - 5 147 67.4
6 - 10 35 16.1
10+ 36 16.5
Total 218 100

SRN: State-registered nurse; B.Sc.: Bachelor of Science.

Table 2. Knowledge of health care providers on ATLS protocol.

Variables Categories Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
The highest priority in managing a patient whose injuries include a closed extremity fracture Correct 23 10.2
Incorrect 202 89.8
An individual with a deviated trachea complains of chest pain, BP 80/50, HR 140, RR 24, %SO2 60. Give the next step Correct 110 48.9
Incorrect 115 51.1
The condition most likely requiring attention in an emergency is Correct 99 44
Incorrect 126 56
The simplest way to open the airway in an unconscious patient Correct 97 43.7
Incorrect 128 56.3
The patient was brought to casualty, bleeding profusely from the thigh wound; immediate management of the wound consists of Correct 130 57.8
Incorrect 95 42.2
Primary measures helpful in preventing further injury in a trauma patient Correct 133 59.1
Incorrect 92 40.9
Size of IV catheter preferred when performing adult resuscitation Correct 102 45.3
Incorrect 123 54.7
Priority in the treatment of an unconscious patient Correct 76 33.8
Incorrect 149 66.2
Last check-in trauma patient in an emergency among the list Correct 147 65.3
Incorrect 78 34.7
The patient who is the highest priority in a mass casualty situation Correct 84 37.7
Incorrect 141 62.3
A patient from a fire has severe respiratory distress, a hoarse voice, soot around the mouth and nares, an RR of 32, and stridor. Which of these is the best intervention? Correct 112 49.8
Incorrect 113 50.2
The next step in the assessment of a traumatic patient after the airway is established Correct 116 51.6
Incorrect 109 48.4
The last step of the primary surveys Correct 89 39.6
Incorrect 136 60.4
A complete history of the trauma event should be obtained prior to the decision for management Correct 83 36.9
Incorrect 142 63. 1
Fluids should be routinely used during resuscitation Correct 173 76.9
Incorrect 52 23.1

overall knowledge of health personnel on the ATLS protocol was poor for the majority of the participants, 160 (71%), while 65 (29%) of participants had good knowledge. The mean knowledge score was 6.44 ± 2.008 on a scale of 10. Mean knowledge score per health facility was highest (7.28) for HRAE and lowest (5.33) for RHB (Figure 1). There was a significant association between the knowledge of ATLS and health facility (γ2 = 20.26, p < 0.001) and between qualification and knowledge (γ2 = 13.144, p = 0.009) (Table 3). The participants from RHB were less likely to have good knowledge of the ATLS protocol than those from RHL (AOR = 0.166: 95% CI = 0.056 - 0.487, p = 0.001). Specialist doctors were 4 times more likely to have good knowledge (AOR = 4.737; 95% CI = 1.272 - 17.636, p = 0.020) than SRN/B.Sc. nurses (Table 4).

 3.3. Attitude of Health Care Personnel towards the ATLS Protocol

In this study, 161 (73.5%) of the participants thought that the most important

Figure 1. Distribution of knowledge scores for the various health facilities.

Table 3. Association between knowledge of the ATLS protocol and demographic characteristics.

Variable Categories n Knowledge Chi-square p -value
Good % Poor %
Health facility HRAE 25 13 5.80 12 5.36 20.263 < 0.001
LDH 76 22 9.82 54 24.11
RHB 58 5 2.23 53 23.66
RHL 65 25 10.71 41 18.30
Age (in years) 21 - 30 106 35 16.06 71 32.57 2.53 0.392
31 - 40 86 22 10.09 64 29.36
41 - 50 24 5 2.29 19 8.72
50+ 2 1 0.46 1 0.46
Sex Female 155 40 18.43 115 53.00 2.032 0.154
Male 62 22 10.14 40 18.43
Qualification Assistant nurse 35 7 3.14 28 12.56 13.144 0.009
General practitioner 40 19 8.52 21 9.42
Specialised nurse 18 6 2.69 12 5.38
Specialist doctor 12 6 2.69 6 2.69
SRN/B.Sc. 118 26 11.66 92 41.26
Years of experience 1 - 5 147 47 21.56 100 45.87 1.345 0.511
6 - 10 35 10 4.59 25 11.47
10+ 36 8 3.67 28 12.84

Table 4. Factors independently associated with knowledge of health personnel on ATLS.

Variable Categories AOR 95% CI Sig.
Lower Upper
Health facility HRAE 1.718 0.645 4.58 0.279
LDH 0.387 0.165 0.908 0.029
RHB 0.166 0.056 0.487 0.001
RHL 1
Qualification Assistant nurse 0.991 0.364 2.7 0.986
General practitioner 4.173 1.693 10.286 0.002
Specialised nurse 1.512 0.445 5.134 0.507
Specialist doctor 4.737 1.272 17.636 0.020
SRN/B.Sc. 1

reason for the ATLS protocol course was that it is important in the management of trauma patients. Up to 83 (37.2%) of the participants think the ATLS protocol is a major advantage on their CV (Table 5). The majority of the participants, 191 (85%), had a good attitude towards the ATLS protocol. The mean attitude score was 6.22 (Figure 2). There was a significant association between health facility and attitude towards ATLS (γ2 = 9.963, p = 0.029) (Table 6).

Table 5. Attitude of health care providers towards ATLS protocol.

Variables Categories Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
ATLS saves lives No 9 4.1
Yes 213 95.9
ATLS knowledge could be useful to you. Yes 203 92.7
No 17 7.3
The ATLS protocol can be useful for your career. A major advantage on your CV 83 37.2
A minor advantage on your CV 36 16.1
Essential for your CV 87 39
No advantage at all on our CV 17 7.6
The most important reason for taking the ATLS course Helpful for CV and career purposes 7 3.2
Mandatory for your proposed career 10 4.6
Very important in the management of trauma patients 161 73.5
Worthwhile as general medical education 42 18.7
Confident in your ability to provide initial trauma care Yes 121 54.5
No 101 45.5
Need for formal training in trauma care in the hospital No 93 41.9
Yes 129 58.1
There is a need for formal training in trauma care in the hospital Yes 196 88.3
No 26 11.7

Figure 2. Variation in overall attitude per health facility.

Table 6. Association between attitude towards ATLS and demographic characteristics of study participants.

Variable Categories n Attitude Chi-square p -value
Negative % Positive %
Health facility HRAE 25 2 0.89 23 10.27 9.963 0.029
LDH 76 10 4.46 66 29.46
RHB 58 16 7.14 42 18.75
RHL 65 6 2.68 59 26.34
Age (years) 21 - 30 106 15 6.88 91 41.74 2.165 0.589
31 - 40 86 13 5.96 73 33.49
41 - 50 24 6 2.75 18 8.26
50+ 2 0 0.00 2 0.92
Sex Female 155 27 12.44 128 58.99 3.083 0.079
Male 62 5 2.30 57 26.27
Qualification Assistant nurse 35 10 4.48 25 11.21 6.367 0.153
General practitioner 40 3 1.35 37 16.59
Specialised nurse 18 2 0.90 16 7.17
Specialist doctor 12 1 0.45 11 4.93
SRN/B.Sc. 118 18 8.07 100 44.84
Years of experience 0 - 5 147 19 8.72 128 58.72 4.13 0.127
6 - 10 35 9 4.13 26 11.93
10+ 36 4 1.83 32 14.68
3.4. Practice of Health Care Providers on the ATLS Protocol

Our study revealed that 57 (26%) participants were very likely to suction the patient in case of trauma with dyspnea, and 59 (26.8%) were very likely to place a neck collar during the primary survey. Only 122 (55.7) were very likely to auscultate the patient’s chest in a trauma case. Also, 142 (64.5%) of health workers were very likely to place 02 large-bore IV access during resuscitation. (Table 7). Overall, 147 (65%) participants had good practice, while 78 (35%) had poor practice. The mean practice score was 20.3 on a scale of 1 to 29 (Figure 3). There was a significant association between the practice of the ATLS and health facility (χ2 = 23.585, p < 0.001). Among health personnel with good practice, 34 (15.2%) were general practitioners, while 3.5% were specialist doctors. There was an association between qualification and practice of ATLS (γ2 = 19.42, p-value 0.002) (Table 8). There was a statistically significant association between knowledge and practice γ2 = 8.681, p-value 0.003. There was also an association between attitude and practice γ2 = 22.819, <0.001 (Table 9). The participants from LDH were less likely to practice the ATLS (AOR = 0.19: 95%CI = 0.077 - 0.471, p < 0.001) compared to those from RHL. General practitioners were 5 times more likely to practice the ATLS protocol (AOR = 0.166: 95%CI = 0.056 - 0.487, p = 0.001) than SRN/B.Sc. nurses. The participants with a negative attitude were less likely to practice ATLS than those with a positive Attitude (AOR = 0.213: 95%CI = 0.089 - 0.509, p < 0.001) (Table 10).

Table 7. Practice of health care providers on ATLS Protocol

Variable Categories Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Suction the patient’s mouth in cases of trauma with dyspnoea. Likely 63 28.9
Unlikely 46 21.1
Very likely 57 26.1
Very unlikely 52 23.9
Place a neck collar on a patient during the primary survey. Likely 75 34.1
Unlikely 49 22.3
Very likely 59 26.8
Very unlikely 37 16.8
Auscultate the patient’s chest in a trauma case. Likely 48 21.9
Unlikely 31 14.2
Very likely 122 55.7
Very unlikely 18 8.2
Place two large-bore IV accesses during resuscitation. Likely 49 22.3
Unlikely 13 5.9
Very likely 142 64.5
Very unlikely 16 7.3
Focused assessment sonography for trauma will be performed in suspected hemoperitoneum. Likely 65 29.8
Unlikely 30 13.8
Very likely 102 46.8
Very unlikely 21 9.6
Completely undress the patient for a full examination following trauma. Likely 68 31.1
Unlikely 26 11.9
Very likely 115 52.5
Very unlikely 10 4.6
Evaluate and record the initial state of consciousness of the trauma patient. Likely 30 15.0
Unlikely 19 9.5
Very likely 136 68
Very unlikely 15 7.5

Figure 3. Distribution of practice variation in overall practice per health facility.

Table 8. Association between practice and demographic characteristics.

Variable Categories n Practice Chi-square p -value
Good % Poor %
Health facility HRAE 25 22 9.82 3 1.34 23.59 0.001
LDH 76 45 20.09 31 13.84
RHB 58 27 12.05 31 13.84
RHL 65 53 23.66 12 5.36
Age (years) 21 - 30 106 73 33.49 33 15.14 1.72 0.549
31 - 40 86 52 23.85 34 15.60
41 - 50 24 15 6.88 9 4.13
50+ 2 1 0.46 1 0.46
Sex Female 155 99 45.62 56 25.81 0.59 0.443
Male 62 43 19.82 19 8.76
Qualification Assistant nurse 35 17 7.62 18 8.07 19.42 0.002
General practitioner 40 34 15.25 6 2.69
Specialized nurse 18 11 4.93 7 3.14
Specialist doctor 12 8 3.59 4 1.79
SRN/B.Sc. 118 75 33.63 43 19.28
Years of experience 1 - 5 147 103 47.35 44 20.18 4.47 0.107
6 - 10 35 18 8.26 17 7.80
10+ 36 23 10.55 13 5.96

Table 9. Association between practice, knowledge, and attitude towards the ATLS protocol.

Variable Categories n Practice Chi-square p -value
Good % Poor %
Knowledge Good 65 52 23.11 13 5.78 8.681 0.003
Poor 160 95 42.22 65 28.89
Total 225 147 65.33 78 34.67
Attitude Negative 34 10 4.44 24 10.67 22.819 < 0.001
Positive 191 137 60.89 54 24.00
Total 225 147 65.33 78 34.67

Table 10. Factors independently associated with the practice of the ATLS protocol among health care providers.

Variable Categories AOR 95% CI Sig.
Lower Upper
Health facility HRAE 1.622 0.38 6.92 0.514
LDH 0.19 0.077 0.471 < 0.001
RHB 0.233 0.098 0.552 0.001
RHL 1
Qualification Assistant nurse 0.634 0.267 1.508 0.303
General practitioner 5.235 1.776 15.428 0.003
Specialized nurse 1.302 0.381 4.447 0.674
Specialist doctor 1.658 0.41 6.708 0.478
SRN/B.Sc. 1
Attitude Negative 0.213 0.089 0.509 < 0.001
Positive 1
4. Discussion

Studies on ATLS knowledge, attitudes, and practices among healthcare workers show a mixed picture, with some revealing deficiencies in knowledge and practice, while others highlight positive attitudes and a desire for training. In this study, the socio-demographic factors of age, gender, and years of experience, in relation to ATLS practices, were similar across the different health facilities involved in the study (p > 0.05). This is similar to the results of the study carried out across three hospitals in Pakistan with a similar demography, where 75% of healthcare workers were female and less than 55% were below 25 years of age [15].

In this study, 65 (29%) of the participants involved in trauma management had adequate knowledge of the ATLS protocol. The knowledge levels were shown to vary significantly (p < 0.05) among staff with different levels of training and from one health facility to another. Reviews of articles examining healthcare workers’ knowledge of the ATLS protocol consistently highlight a significant concern regarding inadequate knowledge and potential associated risks, which can lead to poorer patient outcomes in trauma situations due to missed critical interventions and delayed management. The knowledge level in this study was, however, lower than that obtained in Nigeria by Amaraegbulam et al. in 2013 [12], where 60% of the general practitioners (pre-specialist) with different levels of educational backgrounds had adequate knowledge of the ATLS protocol. The majority of our study participants were nurses, who are usually not very knowledgeable about the ATLS protocol and its applicability when compared to doctors, who probably take ATLS training as a compulsory course during their training. Additionally, this also reflects rote learning, where participants with poor knowledge simply memorized information through repetition and only focused on recall rather than deep understanding, institutional protocols that guide practice, or it may have been a potential limitation in the assessment tools.

According to a study carried out by Campbell et al. in 2020, over 90% of the participants demonstrated a good attitude towards the ATLS [16]. Similarly, Girma et al. in Ethiopia obtained 98.6% of the participants who had a positive attitude towards ATLS [17]. Although there are slight differences in the results obtained in these studies, the overall trends indicate that the overwhelming majority of healthcare workers demonstrate positive attitudes towards the ATLS protocol. A study in Kenya also showed a positive attitude towards ATLS principles among the participants [18]. Research consistently indicates a strong positive association between healthcare providers’ knowledge of the ATLS protocol and their positive attitudes towards it, which often translates into improved practices when managing trauma patients. In this study, observed practices of ATLS protocols by healthcare providers were significantly influenced by the level of participants’ knowledge of the ATLS protocol (p = 0.003) and their attitudes (p = 0.001), because the higher the knowledge on a subject, the better the awareness of its value and its application. In Sudan, a study in a State Hospital showed 77% of the study participants stated that their teaching skills affect how they apply ATLS and demonstrated a positive attitude towards ATLS [19]. Studies have also concluded that by embracing the principles of ATLS, healthcare providers uphold the gold standard for safe, effective, and compassionate trauma management, ultimately saving lives and restoring hope in times of crisis [20], and have also demonstrated the positive relationship of increased knowledge and attitudes with improved practices of the ATLS protocol [21].

 5. Conclusion

Health personnel in the four hospitals had poor knowledge of the ATLS protocol and demonstrated a positive attitude towards ATLS. The study highlights the importance of proper ATLS training among healthcare personnel in the management of trauma and injury. The study recommends investing in ATLS training at the institutional level to reduce the burden of traumatic injuries, as well as incorporating standardized trauma modules into medical and nursing curricula. Other recommendations include incorporating formal ATLS training into medical school or pre-internship curricula, rather than relying on informal learning from seniors during clinical practice. Integrating mandatory ATLS certification for emergency unit staff will also improve injury management.

 Consent and Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Faculty of Health Sciences Institutional Review Board of the University of Buea (Application number: 1517-03). Administrative authorization was obtained from the Regional Delegation of Public Health for the West, Littoral, and South Regions and the directors of the various health facilities where data were collected. All eligible participants were asked to provide their consent by signing an informed consent form before enrollment in this study.

 Limitations of the Study

Reliance on self-reported data for practice, where participants tend to over-report “good” and under-report “bad” behaviors, threatens the internal validity and accuracy of the data because the self-reports may not have reflected actual practices. The sample, drawn from a limited number of specific institutions (four hospitals), may not be representative of the broader population of all hospitals in Cameroon. This limits the external validity of the study, as the results may not apply or be transferable to other settings.

 Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants and each member of our team who participated to ensure the realization of this project.

 Authors’ Contribution

Mary-Magdalene Signe: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, methodology.

Chichom Alain Mefire: project administration, supervision, review, and writing.

Nicholas Tendongfor: supervision, investigation, review, editing.

Puis Fokam: investigation, review, editing.

Gustave Tsiagdigui: investigation, writing, review, editing.

George EnowOrock: investigation, writing, review, editing.

Theophile Chuteng Nana: investigation, writing review, and editing.

Mebouize Nyankoue: investigation, writing, review, editing.

 Funding

This study was funded by D-SINE Africa(P08).

 List of Abbreviations
ATLS Advanced Trauma Life Support
B.Sc. Bachelor of Science
HREA Edea Regional Hospital
ICU Intensive Care Unit
LDH Laquintinie Hospital Douala
LMIC Low- and Middle-Income Countries
RHB Regional Hospital Bafoussam
RHL Regional Hospital Limbe
SRN State-registered nurse
References Bickler, S.W., Weiser, T.G., Kassebaum, N., et al.(2015) Global Burden of Surgical Conditions. In: Debas, H.T., Donkor, P., Gawande, A., Jamison, D.T., Kruk, M.E. and Mock, C.N., Eds., Essential Surgery. Disease Control Priorities(3 rd Edition), International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank, 19-40. Bickler, S.W. Weiser, T.G. Kassebaum, N. Debas, H.T. Donkor, P. Gawande, A. Jamison, D.T. Kruk, M.E. Mock, C.N. 2015 Global Burden of Surgical Conditions In: Debas 19 World Health Organization (2024) Injury and Violence: Key Facts. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/injuries-and-violence 2024 Injury and Violence: Key Facts Haagsma, J.A., Graetz, N., Bolliger, I., Naghavi, M., Higashi, H., Mullany, E.C., et al.(2016) The Global Burden of Injury: Incidence, Mortality, Disability-Adjusted Life Years and Time Trends from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Injury Prevention, 22, 3-18. Haagsma, J.A. Graetz, N. Bolliger, I. Naghavi, M. Higashi, H. Mullany, E.C. Incidence, M 2016 The Global Burden of Injury: Incidence, Mortality, Disability-Adjusted Life Years and Time Trends from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Injury Prevention 22 World Health Organization (2004) The Global Burden of Disease. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/35a591a8-9bf5-4bbe-a7ff-8612ea36fa7f/content 2004 The Global Burden of Disease Mock, C.N., Adzotor, K.E., Conklin, E., Denno, D.M. and Jurkovich, G.J. (1993) Trauma Outcomes in the Rural Developing World. TheJournalofTrauma: Injury, Infection, andCriticalCare, 35, 518-523. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199310000-00004 10.1097/00005373-199310000-000048411273https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199310000-00004 Mock, C.N. Adzotor, K.E. Conklin, E. Denno, D.M. Jurkovich, G.J. Injury, I 1993 Trauma Outcomes in the Rural Developing World The Journal of Trauma: Injury 35 10.1097/00005373-199310000-00004 8411273 World Health Organisation (2015) Global Status Report on Road Safety, 2015. World Health Organisation. 2015 Global Status Report on Road Safety, 2015 Anand, L.K., Singh, M. and Kapoor, D. (2018) Prehospital Trauma Care Services in Developing Countries. Anaesth, Pain & Intensive Care, 17, 65-70. https://www.apicareonline.com/index.php/APIC/article/view/463 Anand, L.K. Singh, M. Kapoor, D. Anaesth, P 2018 Prehospital Trauma Care Services in Developing Countries Anaesth 17 American College of Surgeons (2012) Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS), Vol 9. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. 2012 Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS), Vol 9 Abu-Zidan, F.M. (2016) Advanced Trauma Life Support Training: How Useful It Is? WorldJournalofCriticalCareMedicine, 5, 12-16. https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v5.i1.12 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i1.1226855889https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v5.i1.12 Abu-Zidan, F.M. 2016 Advanced Trauma Life Support Training: How Useful It Is? World Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 5, 12-16 10.5492/wjccm.v5.i1.12 26855889 Bruinink, L.J., Linders, M., de Boode, W.P., Fluit, C.R.M.G. and Hogeveen, M. (2024) The ABCDE Approach in Critically Ill Patients: A Scoping Review of Assessment Tools, Adherence and Reported Outcomes. Resuscitation Plus, 20, Article ID: 100763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100763 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.10076339345661https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100763 Bruinink, L.J. Linders, M. Boode, W.P. Fluit, C.R.M.G. Hogeveen, M. Tools, A 2024 The ABCDE Approach in Critically Ill Patients: A Scoping Review of Assessment Tools, Adherence and Reported Outcomes Resuscitation Plus 20 100763 ID 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100763 39345661 Dheansa, S., Rajwani, K., Pang, G., Bench, S., Kailaya-Vasan, A., Maratos, E., et al.(2023) Relationship between Guideline Adherence and Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 105, 400-406. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2022.0031 10.1308/rcsann.2022.003135617033https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2022.0031 Dheansa, S. Rajwani, K. Pang, G. Bench, S. Kailaya-Vasan, A. Maratos, E. 2023 Relationship between Guideline Adherence and Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 105 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0031 35617033 Amaraegbulam, P. and Nwankwo, O. (2013) The Level of Knowledge of the Advanced Trauma Life Support Protocol among Nonspecialist Doctors Involved in Trauma Care in Enugu Metropolis. NigerianJournalofClinicalPractice, 16, 67-70. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.106769 10.4103/1119-3077.10676923377474https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.106769 Amaraegbulam, P. Nwankwo, O. 2013 The Level of Knowledge of the Advanced Trauma Life Support Protocol among Nonspecialist Doctors Involved in Trauma Care in Enugu Metropolis Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 16 10.4103/1119-3077.106769 23377474 Chichom‐Mefire, A., Mbarga‐Essim, N.T., Monono, M.E. and Ngowe, M.N. (2014) Compliance of District Hospitals in the Center Region of Cameroon with WHO/IATSIC Guidelines for the Care of the Injured: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. WorldJournalofSurgery, 38, 2525-2533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2609-9 10.1007/s00268-014-2609-924838483https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2609-9 Mefire, A. Essim, N.T. Monono, M.E. Ngowe, M.N. 2014 Compliance of District Hospitals in the Center Region of Cameroon with WHO/IATSIC Guidelines for the Care of the Injured: A Cross-Sectional Analysis World Journal of Surgery 38 10.1007/s00268-014-2609-9 24838483 (2025) Populations cibles santé 2025 Cameroun. https://www.scribd.com/document/893586692/Draft-Populations-Cibles-Prioritaires-de-Sante-Publique-2025-v0 2025 Populations cibles santé 2025 Cameroun Mahmood, A., Aftab, A. and Shafiq, M. (2014) Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Healthcare Providers Regarding the Blast Injury Management at Tertiary Care Hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 2, 1727-1733. Mahmood, A. Aftab, A. Shafiq, M. Knowledge, A Karachi, P 2014 Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Healthcare Providers Regarding the Blast Injury Management at Tertiary Care Hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences 2 Campbell, B., Heal, J., Evans, S. and Marriott, S. (2000) What Do Trainees Think about Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)? The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 82, 263-267. Campbell, B. Heal, J. Evans, S. Marriott, S. 2000 What Do Trainees Think about Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)? The Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 82, 263-267 Girma, D.B. (2019) Assessment of Knowledge and Attitude of ATLS among Interns of Three Different Medical Schools of Ethiopia. Master’s Thesis, Addis Ababa University, 29 p. Girma, D.B. Thesis, A 2019 Assessment of Knowledge and Attitude of ATLS among Interns of Three Different Medical Schools of Ethiopia Master’s Thesis 29 Nogaro, M., Pandit, H., Peter, N., Le, G., Oloruntoba, D., Muguti, G., et al.(2015) How Useful Are Primary Trauma Care Courses in Sub-Saharan Africa? Injury, 46, 1293-1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.010 10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.01025907403https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.010 Nogaro, M. Pandit, H. Peter, N. Le, G. Oloruntoba, D. Muguti, G. 2015 How Useful Are Primary Trauma Care Courses in Sub-Saharan Africa? Injury, 46, 1293-1298 10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.010 25907403 Mabrouk, O.E.A., Osman, F.M.A. and Awad, M.S.A. (2024) Knowledge, Attidue and Practice of Advanced Trauma Life Suppoort (ATLS) Protocol among House-Officers in Khartoum State Hospitals, Sudan, 2023. BMCMedicalEducation, 24, Article No. 670. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05657-y 10.1186/s12909-024-05657-y38886758https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05657-y Mabrouk, O.E.A. Osman, F.M.A. Awad, M.S.A. Knowledge, A Hospitals, S 2024 Knowledge, Attidue and Practice of Advanced Trauma Life Suppoort (ATLS) Protocol among House-Officers in Khartoum State Hospitals, Sudan, 2023 BMC Medical Education 24 No 10.1186/s12909-024-05657-y 38886758 Woods, K., Hayanga, J.W.A., Cannon, J., Lemons, W., Philips, M., Schmidt, A., et al.(2021) Staffing in a Level 1 Trauma Center: Quantifying Capacity for Preparedness. DisasterMedicineandPublicHealthPreparedness, 16, 1990-1996. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2021.269 10.1017/dmp.2021.26934523397https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2021.269 Woods, K. Hayanga, J.W.A. Cannon, J. Lemons, W. Philips, M. Schmidt, A. 2021 Staffing in a Level 1 Trauma Center: Quantifying Capacity for Preparedness Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 16 10.1017/dmp.2021.269 34523397 Abu‐Zidan, F.M., Mohammad, A., Jamal, A., Chetty, D., Gautam, S.C., van Dyke, M., et al.(2013) Factors Affecting Success Rate of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Courses. WorldJournalofSurgery, 38, 1405-1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2422-x 10.1007/s00268-013-2422-x24368574https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2422-x Zidan, F.M. Mohammad, A. Jamal, A. Chetty, D. Gautam, S.C. Dyke, M. 2013 Factors Affecting Success Rate of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Courses World Journal of Surgery 38 10.1007/s00268-013-2422-x 24368574