<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jmmce</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2327-4085</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2327-4077</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2026.142003</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jmmce-149625</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Chemistry</subject>
          <subject>Materials Science</subject>
          <subject>Engineering</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Determination of Comminution Work Index and Physical Properties of Ebiti Phosphate Rock in Ogun State Southwestern Nigeria</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Sogbesan</surname>
            <given-names>Aishat Opeoluwa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Isadare</surname>
            <given-names>Dayo Adeyemi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Olawale</surname>
            <given-names>John Oluyemi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Adeleke</surname>
            <given-names>Abraham Adewale</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Aogo</surname>
            <given-names>Olajide</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Oyelade</surname>
            <given-names>Olalekan Lateef</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Matrix Fertilizer Limited, Zairia, Nigeria </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI), FCT, Abuja, Nigeria </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>02</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>02</issue>
      <fpage>27</fpage>
      <lpage>38</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>11</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>11</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>14</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2026.142003">https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2026.142003</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>The study determined the physical properties and comminution work index of Ebiti phosphate rock and analysed its particle size and mineralogical properties. These were with a view to generating data baseline for further advanced characterisation of the rock for use in some industrial engineering applications. The phosphate rocks were sourced from Ebiti Village, Ifo Local Government Area, Ogun State. The rocks were crushed and ground with Pascal Engineering crusher and ball mill, respectively. Textural forms, colour, water absorption capacity, specific gravity, Moh hardness tests were performed to determine their physical properties. Comminution work index was also caried out to determine the energy required to reduce the phosphate rock samples to a specific particle size. Thereafter, petrographic analysis was performed to determine their mineralogical and textural features. The study showed that Ebiti phosphate rock occurs as nodular and versicular form with dead white or creamy colour. It has 5.0 hardness on the Moh’s Scale, which indicates a medium resistance to abrasion and crushing. Its apparent specific gravity was 2.65 and water absorption capacity was 12.74%. Particle size analysis showed that percentage of cumulative weight retained increases down the sieve series. Thin Section Microscopy revealed nodules, vesicles with dark spots. The study concluded that Ebiti phosphate rock is sedimentary and has comminution work index of 16.97 Kwh/tons.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Comminution</kwd>
        <kwd>Work Index</kwd>
        <kwd>Specific Gravity</kwd>
        <kwd>Absorption Capacity</kwd>
        <kwd>Phosphate Rock</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Phosphate rock, also known as phosphorite, occurs naturally as sedimentary or igneous ore that contains large amount of phosphate minerals. It represents the major origin of phosphorus, an important element in agriculture and other applications like animal feed, electronics, cosmetics etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. It typically contains 3% - 15% phosphorus and 18 - 40 wt.% P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and can also be a host of rare earth elements and uranium 65 - 200 ppm, sometimes as high as 800 ppm, which adds to its potential for energy-related applications. According to Obaje <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>], the dominant mineral found in phosphate rock is apatite commonly fluorapatite (Ca<sub>5</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>F), along with other forms like chlorapatite [Ca<sub>9</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>6</sub>∙CaCl<sub>2</sub>] and hydroxyapatite [Ca<sub>9</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>6</sub>∙Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>].</p>
      <p>The physico-chemical characterization of Ogun and Sokoto phosphate rocks has been reported by Fayiga and Obigbesan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. The researchers reported that the phosphate rocks in Oja-Odan area of Ogun State exist as nodules, granules, pellets and vesicles with hardness value of 5, specific gravity of 1.52, and water absorption capacity of 24.4. However, out of four phosphate deposits in Eastern Dahomey Basin in Ogun State, Southwestern Nigeria (Igbeme, Oja-Odan, Ososun, Ebiti), this research was carried out on only one deposit (Oja-Odan).</p>
      <p>Adesanwo <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>] wrote that the phosphate rock from junction between Ifo and Ososun areas of Ogun state contained diffused reddish brown iron stain which indicated the presence of primary sedimentary ferrous minerals (siderite, pyrite, and glauconite), while the fine grains found in the thin section revealed nodular phosphorites and presence of shell fragments with bioclastic materials, which confirmed granular phosphorites. The characterization methods were limited to XRF, XRD and petrographic analyses, and the specific phosphate rock deposit among the four found in Ogun state was not specified.</p>
      <p>Olanipenikun and Bolanrinwa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] reported petrographic analysis on phosphate rocks in Eastern Dahomey Basin in Ogun State, Southwestern Nigeria. The result from the study identified fluorapatite as the major phosphate mineral with calcite, quartz, glauconite, gypsum, and hematite. Granular phosphorites which are majorly at Ososun and Ebiti areas were observed to have high to low spherically rounded granules with oolitic and pelletal structures, subangular to angular grains, and clasts of fluorapatite have opaline silica and calcite in them. The study also reported that nodular phosphorites from Ososun and Ebiti areas appear to be coarser than the granular type and have either perfect or imperfect ellipsoidal, spherical, cylindrical, and rectangular shapes which appear to be pebble conglomeratic. They also have dead-white or cream colour and the fluorapatite that contains in them has brown-coloured or yellowish-brown nodules inside sparite and glauconite, among others. However, the researchers based their observations on petrographic analysis alone.</p>
      <p>Comminution, a process whereby a mineral is reduced into smaller sizes required for downstream processing using sequence of blasting, crushing, and grinding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. On the other hand, comminution work index is described as ore grindability or the resistance of a particular ore to crushing and grinding. That is, the ease with which a particular ore is been comminuted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>].</p>
      <p>Comminution work index of Sokoto phosphate rock in Nigeria has been reported to be 56.73 Kwh/t by Umar <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. However, the comminution work index of Ogun phosphate rock has not been reported, even though it has been reported to be economically viable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
      <p>The present research therefore determines the comminution work index and physical properties of Ebiti Phosphate rock in Ogun State Southwestern Nigeria to provide empirical data for further characterization and beneficiation. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Sample Collection</title>
        <p>About 13 kg phosphate rocks used for this research was collected from Ebiti village in Ogun State Nigeria. Ebiti phosphate rock is one of the four phosphate rock locations of the Eastern Dahomey Basin in Southwestern Nigeria (Igbeme, Oja-Odan, Ososun, Ebiti). It is located at Ebiti Village in Ifo Local Government, Ogun State with latitude and longitude of 6.816089˚ and 3.237346˚. The rock samples were collected randomly.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Sample Preparation</title>
        <p>The phosphate rock samples collected above were sorted, washed and oven dried at 100˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>] to remove moisture. Some oven-dried samples were crushed and ground with Pascal Engineering crusher (model number: 18862) and dry ball mill (Sturtevant, London and Manchester, Machine number: C. 374975) respectively for further analysis.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Physical Observation and Mohs’ Hardness Test</title>
        <p>The physical observation of samples was performed after they were sorted and washed for the textural forms and color while hand scratch method was used to determine Mohs’ hardness. Clean, dry and smooth surface rock samples were selected; they were gently scratched with the fingernail (Mohs hardness of 2.5), thereafter iron nail (Mohs hardness of 4.5) and finally steel knife blade (Mohs hardness of 5). After each scratch, the surface of phosphate rock was wiped with clean cloth to confirm the scratch.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Specific Gravity and Water Absorption Capacity Test</title>
        <p>They were performed according to the ASTM C128-15 standard [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. Oven dried phosphate samples crushed with Lab mill were sieved through 4.75 mm sieve and 1 kg of the undersized phosphate samples were soaked for 24 hours in water. They were sieved out, poured into a tray and air-dried with the hand dryer for an hour until it reached saturated surface dry (SSD) condition. 500 g SSD each was weighed as mass A and 500 g SSD poured into the pycnometer plus water as mass B. The content regarded as mass B was poured, filtered, oven dried, weighed and recorded as mass C. Finally, the mass of pycnometer filled with water was weighed and recorded as mass D. Values from each process were tabulated and specific gravity and water absorption test were calculated.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Comminution Work Index</title>
        <p>This was performed based on modified Bond work index method by Bruce and Berry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>] as described by Oji <italic>et al.</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>] which necessitates the use of reference ore of known work index or grindability. In this research granite was used as a reference since the phosphate rock samples were in solid forms. Granite was selected as a reference material because is widely available, hard and crystalline igneous rock with a typically high Bond Work Index (15.13 kWh/t), reflecting its strong interlocking silicate mineral framework. In contrast, sedimentary phosphate rock generally exhibits a lower work index (9 - 13 kWh/t), due to its higher porosity, weaker cementation, and the presence of softer minerals such as apatite and carbonates. This clear and consistent contrast in grindability makes granite an effective upper-bound reference material for this research. Although granite and phosphate rock differ in geological origin; however, both materials undergo brittle fracture under the controlled conditions of the bond crushing work index test. It is mineralogically stable, and exhibits low variability in mechanical properties compared with many sedimentary ores. This makes it a reliable and reproducible reference material. When used consistently, granite provides a stable baseline against which the relative milling behavior of phosphate rock can be evaluated with confidence. The validity of using granite lies in the fact that the comparative work index test does not require identical breakage mechanisms, but rather a consistent testing framework and a reference material with well-characterized grinding behavior. Granite satisfies these criteria, and the observed differences in energy requirement between granite and phosphate rock can be directly attributed to their intrinsic material properties.</p>
        <p>The starting samples for both the test ore (Ebiti phosphate rock) and reference ore were crushed for 15 minutes and allowed to pass through 1.18 mm sieve for homogeneity. 100 g each undersized samples of 1.18 mm sieve were then subjected to sieve analysis for 15 minutes with sieve sizes ranging in descending order from +1000 μm, +710 μm, +500 μm, +355 μm, +200 μm, +150 μm, +106 μm, +75 μm, by Endecott sieve shaker (E.F.L 2 M K 11); each size fraction for test and reference ores were weighed as “feed”. Also, the undersized samples were ground in a ball mill for 15 minutes and 100 g each were subjected to sieve analysis with the same set of sieves for 15 minutes and each fraction for both test and reference sample were weighed as “product”. Finally, the weight from each sieve analysis was tabulated against each sieve size.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot6">
        <title>2.6. Particle Size Analysis</title>
        <p>Sieve analysis was conducted on 300 g of crushed Ebiti phosphate rock, and the sieves were 4750 µm, 2360 µm, 1180 µm, 710 µm, 300 µm, 250 µm, 125 µm, and 75 µm based on the square root of 2 rules. An auto-sieve shaker (MATEST S p. A, Treviolo 24048, Italy with Serial number AC60-01/AC/0154) was used for the analysis and the over-size fraction for each sieve after 10 minutes were recorded.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot7">
        <title>2.7. Petrographic Analysis</title>
        <p>The washed and oven-dried phosphate rock samples of nodular and versicular samples were machined and mounted on a thin section by glazing with araldite glue. The mounted samples thereafter underwent lapping. Lapping is the grinding and polishing of rock into a flat, smooth and uniform surface on a thin section. Finally, they were examined under a microscope, and the photomicrograph was captured.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Physical Observation</title>
        <p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <bold>Table 1</bold>, the textural form of Ebiti phosphate rock is nodular and vesicular represented with N and V respectively, with dead white or creamy colour, with hardness value of 5.0 which indicates that it has high rock strength. These results corroborate that of Olanipekun and Bolarinwa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>], and Fayiga and Obigbesan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>], respectively.</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2711156-rId13.jpeg?20260214103149" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure</bold><bold>1</bold><bold>.</bold> Texture and colour of Ebiti phosphate rock.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1</bold><bold>.</bold> Colour, textural form and hardness value of Ebiti phosphate rock.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Properties</td>
                <td>Ebiti Phosphate Rock</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Color</td>
                <td>Dead white or creamy in color</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Textural form</td>
                <td>Vesicular and nodular</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hardness value</td>
                <td>5.0</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Specific Gravity and Water Absorption Capacity</title>
        <p><bold>Table 2</bold><bold>(</bold><bold>a</bold><bold>)</bold> and <bold>Table 2</bold><bold>(b)</bold> revealed that Ebiti Phosphate rock has bulk specific gravity for saturated surface dry (SSD) of 2.23, bulk specific gravity for oven-dried sample of 1.98 and apparent specific gravity of 2.65 which agrees with the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. The water absorption capacity is 12.74 which is lower than the 24.4 recorded for Oja Odan phosphate rock in the literature. The 12.74% water absorption indicates high strength relative to other specific phosphate deposits, and this value generally suggests significant porosity in rock mechanics contexts. This lower rate in water absorption capacity indicated that Ebiti phosphate rock possesses high strength. However, this water absorption capacity value is good for agricultural purposes as it will aids the dissolution of the phosphate rock during its direct application in agriculture. </p>
        <p><bold>Table 2</bold><bold>.</bold> (a) Readings for specific gravity and water absorption capacity of ground Ebiti phosphate rock; (b) Specific gravity and water absorption capacity of ground Ebiti phosphate rock.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="10">(a)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pycnometer</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Saturated</bold>
                  <bold>Surface-Dry Mass</bold>
                  <bold>(</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>W</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>
                      <sub>i</sub>
                    </bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>) (g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Pycnometer</bold>
                  <bold>Mass + SSD</bold>
                  <bold>Sample +</bold>
                  <bold>Water (</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>W</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>2</sub>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                  <bold>(g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Oven</bold>
                  <bold>-</bold>
                  <bold>Dry</bold>
                  <bold>Mass</bold>
                  <bold>(</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>W</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>3</sub>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                  <bold>(g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Pycnometer</bold>
                  <bold>Mass +</bold>
                  <bold>Water (</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>W</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>4</sub>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                  <bold>(g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Empty</bold>
                  <bold>Pycnometer</bold>
                  <bold>Mass (</bold>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>W</bold>
                  </italic>
                  <italic>
                    <bold>
                      <sub>s</sub>
                    </bold>
                  </italic>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                  <bold>(g)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>A</td>
                <td colspan="2">500</td>
                <td colspan="2">903</td>
                <td colspan="2">443</td>
                <td colspan="2">627</td>
                <td>130</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>B</td>
                <td colspan="2">500</td>
                <td colspan="2">903</td>
                <td colspan="2">444</td>
                <td colspan="2">627</td>
                <td>130</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="10">(b)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Pycnometer</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Bulk Specific Gravity (SSD)</bold>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <mml:math display="inline">
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mfrac>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                          </mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                            <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                            <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                          </mml:mrow>
                        </mml:mfrac>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Bulk Specific Gravity (OD)</bold>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <mml:math>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mfrac>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                          </mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                            <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                            <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                          </mml:mrow>
                        </mml:mfrac>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Apparent Specific Gravity</bold>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <mml:math>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mfrac>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                          </mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                            <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                            <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                          </mml:mrow>
                        </mml:mfrac>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Water Absorption Capacity (%)</bold>
                  <inline-formula>
                    <mml:math>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mfrac>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                            <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                            <mml:mo>
                            </mml:mo>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                          </mml:mrow>
                          <mml:mrow>
                            <mml:msub>
                              <mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
                              <mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
                            </mml:msub>
                          </mml:mrow>
                        </mml:mfrac>
                        <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                        <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                        <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:math>
                  </inline-formula>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2">A</td>
                <td colspan="2">2.23</td>
                <td colspan="2">1.98</td>
                <td colspan="2">2.65</td>
                <td colspan="2">12.87</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2">B</td>
                <td colspan="2">2.23</td>
                <td colspan="2">1.98</td>
                <td colspan="2">2.64</td>
                <td colspan="2">12.61</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2">Average</td>
                <td colspan="2">2.23</td>
                <td colspan="2">1.98</td>
                <td colspan="2">2.65</td>
                <td colspan="2">12.74</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Comminution Work Index</title>
        <p><bold>Tables 3</bold><bold>-</bold><bold>6</bold> show the result for sieve analysis of crushed and ground samples for reference and test ore performed during the comminution work index.</p>
        <p>From the analysis, using Berry and Bruce [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>] method, the comminution work index is 16.97 Kwh/tons, which is above the values (9.92 - 13.00 Kwh/ton) reported in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>], for the work indices of other phosphate ores but lower than the value of 56.73 Kwh/ton for Sokoto phosphate rock as recorded in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. This implies that Ebiti phosphate rock in Ogun requires less energy to comminute than Sokoto phosphate rock. </p>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Sieve analysis of feed to ball mill for test ore.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sieve Size Range (µm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Weight of oversize (g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>% Weight retained</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cumulative % weight of oversize</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cumulative % weight undersize</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1000</td>
                <td>8.08</td>
                <td>8.13</td>
                <td>8.13</td>
                <td>91.87</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−1000+710</td>
                <td>10.32</td>
                <td>10.38</td>
                <td>18.51</td>
                <td>81.49</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−710+500</td>
                <td>13.56</td>
                <td>13.64</td>
                <td>32.16</td>
                <td>67.84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−500+355</td>
                <td>13.64</td>
                <td>13.72</td>
                <td>45.88</td>
                <td>54.12</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−355+200</td>
                <td>5.81</td>
                <td>5.85</td>
                <td>51.73</td>
                <td>48.27</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−200+150</td>
                <td>21.72</td>
                <td>21.85</td>
                <td>73.58</td>
                <td>26.42</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−150+106</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>10.06</td>
                <td>83.64</td>
                <td>16.36</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−106+75</td>
                <td>7.82</td>
                <td>7.87</td>
                <td>91.51</td>
                <td>8.49</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−75</td>
                <td>8.44</td>
                <td>8.49</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Sieve analysis of feed to ball mill for reference ore.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Sieve Size Range (µm)</td>
                <td>Weight retained (g)</td>
                <td>% Weight retained</td>
                <td>Cumulative % weight oversize</td>
                <td>Cumulative % weight undersize</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1000</td>
                <td>8.54</td>
                <td>8.57</td>
                <td>8.57</td>
                <td>91.43</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−1000+710</td>
                <td>11.33</td>
                <td>11.37</td>
                <td>19.94</td>
                <td>80.06</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−710+500</td>
                <td>12.71</td>
                <td>12.75</td>
                <td>32.69</td>
                <td>67.31</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−500+355</td>
                <td>11.66</td>
                <td>11.70</td>
                <td>44.40</td>
                <td>55.60</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−355+200</td>
                <td>2.62</td>
                <td>2.63</td>
                <td>47.02</td>
                <td>52.98</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−200+150</td>
                <td>22.87</td>
                <td>22.95</td>
                <td>69.97</td>
                <td>30.03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−150+106</td>
                <td>12.55</td>
                <td>12.59</td>
                <td>82.57</td>
                <td>17.43</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−106+75</td>
                <td>12.56</td>
                <td>12.60</td>
                <td>95.17</td>
                <td>4.83</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−75</td>
                <td>4.81</td>
                <td>4.83</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 5</bold><bold>.</bold> Sieve analysis of product to ball mill for test ore.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sieve Size Range (µm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Weight retained (g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>% Weight retained</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cumulative % weight oversize</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cumulative % weight undersize</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1000</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>99.85</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−1000+710</td>
                <td>0.93</td>
                <td>0.94</td>
                <td>1.09</td>
                <td>98.91</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−710+500</td>
                <td>3.52</td>
                <td>3.55</td>
                <td>4.64</td>
                <td>95.36</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−500+355</td>
                <td>12.05</td>
                <td>12.16</td>
                <td>16.80</td>
                <td>83.20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−355+200</td>
                <td>7.99</td>
                <td>8.06</td>
                <td>24.86</td>
                <td>75.14</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−200+150</td>
                <td>28.1</td>
                <td>28.35</td>
                <td>53.20</td>
                <td>46.80</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−150+106</td>
                <td>29.74</td>
                <td>30.00</td>
                <td>83.20</td>
                <td>16.80</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−106+75</td>
                <td>13.23</td>
                <td>13.35</td>
                <td>96.55</td>
                <td>3.45</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−75</td>
                <td>3.42</td>
                <td>3.45</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Table 6</bold><bold>.</bold> Sieve analysis of product to ball mill for reference ore.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Sieve Size Range (µm)</td>
                <td>Weight retained (g)</td>
                <td>% Weight retained</td>
                <td>Cumulative % weight oversize</td>
                <td>Cumulative % weight undersize</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1000</td>
                <td>0.22</td>
                <td>0.22</td>
                <td>0.22</td>
                <td>99.78</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−1000+710</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
                <td>0.47</td>
                <td>99.53</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−710+500</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1.00</td>
                <td>1.48</td>
                <td>98.52</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−500+355</td>
                <td>5.35</td>
                <td>5.37</td>
                <td>6.84</td>
                <td>93.16</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−355+200</td>
                <td>3.18</td>
                <td>3.19</td>
                <td>10.03</td>
                <td>89.97</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−200+150</td>
                <td>38.6</td>
                <td>38.73</td>
                <td>48.77</td>
                <td>51.23</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−150+106</td>
                <td>34.22</td>
                <td>34.34</td>
                <td>83.10</td>
                <td>16.90</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−106+75</td>
                <td>13.99</td>
                <td>14.04</td>
                <td>97.14</td>
                <td>2.86</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−75</td>
                <td>2.85</td>
                <td>2.86</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>From <bold>Table 3</bold>, if 710 µm = 81.49%</p>
        <p><italic>X</italic> µm = 80%</p>
        <p><italic>X</italic>= <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 80 </mml:mn><mml:mo> × </mml:mo><mml:mn> 710 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 81.49 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 697.02 µm</p>
        <p>Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> F </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> t </mml:mi><mml:mo></mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 697.02 µm</p>
        <p>From <bold>Table 4</bold>, if 710 µm = 80.06%</p>
        <p><italic>X</italic> µm = 80%</p>
        <p><italic>X</italic> = <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 80 </mml:mn><mml:mo> × </mml:mo><mml:mn> 710 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 80.06 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 709.47 µm, Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> F </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 709.47 µm</p>
        <p>From <bold>Table 5</bold>, if 710 µm = 98.91%</p>
        <p><italic>X</italic> µm = 80 %</p>
        <p><italic>X</italic> = <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 710 </mml:mn><mml:mo> × </mml:mo><mml:mn> 80 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 98.91 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 574.26 µm, Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> P </mml:mi><mml:mi> t </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 574.26 µm</p>
        <p>From <bold>Table 6</bold>, if 710 µm = 99.53%</p>
        <p><italic>X</italic> µm = 80%</p>
        <p><italic>X</italic> = <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 710 </mml:mn><mml:mo> × </mml:mo><mml:mn> 80 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 99.53 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 570.68 µm, Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> P </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 570.68 µm</p>
        <p>where <italic>X</italic> represent sieve in µm.</p>
        <p>The modified bond equation is: <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> W </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> i </mml:mi><mml:mi> t </mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo> = </mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> W </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> i </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> P </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> F </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mi> W </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo> √ </mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi> P </mml:mi><mml:mi> t </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mtext></mml:mtext><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mtext></mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mi> W </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo> √ </mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi> F </mml:mi><mml:mi> t </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo> = </mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> W </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> i </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> P </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> F </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo> √ </mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi> P </mml:mi><mml:mi> t </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mtext></mml:mtext><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mtext></mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo> √ </mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi> F </mml:mi><mml:mi> t </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> , [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]</p>
        <p>where,</p>
        <p><inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> P </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference ore product diameter of 80% passing through 710 µm aperture;</p>
        <p><inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> F </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference ore feed diameter of 80% passing through 710 µm aperture;</p>
        <p><inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> P </mml:mi><mml:mi> t </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the test ore product diameter of 80% passing through 710 µm aperture;</p>
        <p><inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> F </mml:mi><mml:mi> t </mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the test ore feed diameter of 80% passing through 710 µm aperture;</p>
        <p><inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> W </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> i </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = Work index of reference ore (<italic>i.e.</italic> granite) = 15.13 Kwh/tons.</p>
        <p>Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> W </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> i </mml:mi><mml:mi> t </mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo> = </mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi> W </mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi> i </mml:mi><mml:mi> r </mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 570.68 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mn> 7 </mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mn> 09.47 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo> √ </mml:mo><mml:mn> 574.26 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mtext></mml:mtext><mml:mo> − </mml:mo><mml:mtext></mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn> 10 </mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo> √ </mml:mo><mml:mn> 697.02 </mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo> = </mml:mo><mml:mn> 16.97 </mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> Kwh </mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo> / </mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> tons </mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo> . </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p>
        <p>From the analysis, using Berry and Bruce method is 16.97 Kwh/tons which is above the values (9.92 - 13.00 Kwh/ton) for the work indices of other phosphate minerals ores and lower than the value of 56.73 Kwh/ton for Sokoto phosphate rock as recorded in textbook and literature respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Particle Size Analysis</title>
        <p><bold>Table 7</bold> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> show the results for particle size analysis. From the analysis, crushed phosphate rocks are distributed majorly in the coarse particle size range. 10.1% were retained on 4750 µm, 31.80% were retained on −4750+2360 µm range, and 31.56% was retained on −2360+1180 µm range which give 73.46% in the coarse range but in the finer range; 1.07% was retained on −300+250 µm, 3.60% was retained on −250+125 µm, 1.60% was retained on −125+75 µm and 2.14% was retained on −75 µm which resulted to less than 10% in the finer range. The percentage of cumulative weight retained increases down the sieve series which indicated that the size analysis of the sample was completed. Likewise, the cumulative percentage weight passing decreases; indicating that smaller fraction decreases as size decreases and proved that crushed Ebiti phosphate rock is coarse-grained. </p>
        <p>In conclusion, the result revealed that for Ebiti phosphate rock to be used for industrial applications, it needs further grinding to have a higher percentage of finer grains.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 7</bold><bold>.</bold> Sieve analysis for 300 g crushed Ebiti phosphate rock.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl7">
          <label>Table 7</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Range of Sieve Size (µm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Weight retained (g)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>% Weight retained</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cumulative % weight oversize</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cumulative % weight undersize</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4750</td>
                <td>30</td>
                <td>10.01</td>
                <td>10.01</td>
                <td>89.99</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−4750+2360</td>
                <td>95.3</td>
                <td>31.80</td>
                <td>41.81</td>
                <td>58.19</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−2360+1180</td>
                <td>94.6</td>
                <td>31.56</td>
                <td>73.37</td>
                <td>26.63</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−1180+710</td>
                <td>32</td>
                <td>10.68</td>
                <td>84.05</td>
                <td>15.95</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−710+300</td>
                <td>22.6</td>
                <td>7.54</td>
                <td>91.59</td>
                <td>8.41</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−300+250</td>
                <td>3.2</td>
                <td>1.07</td>
                <td>92.66</td>
                <td>7.34</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−250+125</td>
                <td>10.8</td>
                <td>3.60</td>
                <td>96.26</td>
                <td>3.74</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−125+75</td>
                <td>4.8</td>
                <td>1.60</td>
                <td>97.86</td>
                <td>2.14</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>−75</td>
                <td>6.4</td>
                <td>2.14</td>
                <td>100.00</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Petrographic Analysis</title>
        <p>The photomicrographs for nodular, vesicular and ground Ebiti phosphate rocks are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3(a)-(c)</xref> respectively. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(a)</xref> revealed distinct</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2711156-rId52.jpeg?20260214103149" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2</bold><bold>.</bold> Particle size analysis graph.</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2711156-rId53.jpeg?20260214103149" />
        </fig>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2711156-rId54.jpeg?20260214103149" />
        </fig>
        <p>(a) (b)</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2711156-rId55.jpeg?20260214103149" />
        </fig>
        <p>(c)</p>
        <p><bold>Figure 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Photomicrograph of (a) Nodular, (b) Vesicular and (c) Ground Ebiti Phosphate Rock.</p>
        <p>nodule-like structures with some nodules darker than others which confirm the presence of an apatite mineral with light surrounding matrix which signifies possibility of calcite spar. It also revealed pitted surface confirming that it contained fossils. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(b)</xref> revealed distinct vesicles with some vesicles partly filled. It has a dark spot within the vesicle that indicates iron or aluminum replacement minerals such as hematite or wavellite and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(c)</xref> revealed a small equal grain which is closely packed. The identification of specific replacement minerals such as hematite, wavellite is tentative, as the study relies on optical microscopy without confirming it with geochemical analysis such as XRD or XRF.</p>
        <p>These results were in agreement with that of Olanipekun and Bolarinwa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>], who work on petrographic analysis of the four phosphate rock deposits in Ogun State.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Conclusions</title>
      <p>The following conclusion can be drawn from the results of this research:</p>
      <p>a) The comminution work index of Ebiti phosphate rock is 16.97 Kwh/tons, which means that it requires less energy to comminute that Sokoto phosphate rock whose comminution work index is 56.73 Kwh/ton; </p>
      <p>b) The water absorption capacity of Ebiti phosphate rock is12.74, meaning that it is suitable for direct application in agriculture as it will aid the dissolution of the phosphate rock. This lower water absorption capacity indicates lower porosity, which implies better strength for industrial uses. This will also aid beneficiation and industrial handling;</p>
      <p>c) Ebiti phosphate rock requires adequate grinding to generate finer grains for advanced haracterization and beneficiation due to its high hardness value; </p>
      <p>d) The textural form of Ebiti phosphate rock is nodular and vesicular, with dead white or creamy colour.</p>
      <p>The results of this research revealed that Ebiti phosphate rock is suitable for direct use as fertilizer in agriculture. This research would benefit from further advanced characterization, such as x-ray fluorescence, x-ray diffraction analysis, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Scanning electron microscopy/Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy. These analyses would provide better characterisation of this rock for industrial applications.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The authors acknowledged Matrix Energy Group for sponsoring this research, through Abdulkabir Aliu Foundation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Data Availability Statement</title>
      <p>No data was used for the research described.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ryszko, U., Rusek, P. and Kołodyńska, D. (2023) Quality of Phosphate Rocks from Various Deposits Used in Wet Phosphoric Acid and P-Fertilizer Production. <italic>Materials</italic>, 16, Article 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020793 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ma16020793</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36676530</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020793">https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020793</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ryszko, U.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rusek, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Quality of Phosphate Rocks from Various Deposits Used in Wet Phosphoric Acid and P-Fertilizer Production</article-title>
            <source>Materials</source>
            <volume>16</volume>
            <elocation-id>793</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ma16020793</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36676530</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">El Bamiki, R., Raji, O., Ouabid, M., Elghali, A., Khadiri Yazami, O. and Bodinier, J. (2021) Phosphate Rocks: A Review of Sedimentary and Igneous Occurrences in Morocco. <italic>Minerals</italic>, 11, Article 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11101137 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/min11101137</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/min11101137">https://doi.org/10.3390/min11101137</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bamiki, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Raji, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ouabid, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Elghali, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yazami, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bodinier, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Phosphate Rocks: A Review of Sedimentary and Igneous Occurrences in Morocco</article-title>
            <source>Minerals</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <elocation-id>1137</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/min11101137</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fayiga, A.O. and Nwoke, O.C. (2016) Phosphate Rock: Origin, Importance, Environmental Impacts, and Future Roles. <italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Reviews</italic>, 24, 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2016-0003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/er-2016-0003</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2016-0003">https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2016-0003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fayiga, A.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nwoke, O.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Origin, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Phosphate Rock: Origin, Importance, Environmental Impacts, and Future Roles</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Reviews</source>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/er-2016-0003</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Obaje, S.O., Okosun, E.A., Amoka, I.S. and Kwaha, J.Z. (2014) Geochemical Characterization and Ore Dressing Potential of Sokoto Phosphate Rock, Northwestern Nigeria. <italic>Universal</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Geoscience</italic>, 2, 187-194. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujg.2014.020701 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13189/ujg.2014.020701</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13189/ujg.2014.020701">https://doi.org/10.13189/ujg.2014.020701</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Obaje, S.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Okosun, E.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Amoka, I.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kwaha, J.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rock, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Geochemical Characterization and Ore Dressing Potential of Sokoto Phosphate Rock, Northwestern Nigeria</article-title>
            <source>Universal Journal of Geoscience</source>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13189/ujg.2014.020701</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fayiga, A.O. and Obigbesan, G.O. (2017) Physico-Chemical Characterization of Ogun and Sokoto Phosphate Rocks. <italic>Global</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Pure</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Applied</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 23, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v23i1.4 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/gjpas.v23i1.4</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v23i1.4">https://doi.org/10.4314/gjpas.v23i1.4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fayiga, A.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Obigbesan, G.O.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Physico-Chemical Characterization of Ogun and Sokoto Phosphate Rocks</article-title>
            <source>Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences</source>
            <volume>23</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/gjpas.v23i1.4</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Adesanwo, O.O., Dunlevey, J.N., Adetunji, M.T., Adesanwo, J.K., Diatta, S. and Osiname, O.A. (2010) Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Ogun Phosphate Rock. <italic>African</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Science</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Technology</italic>, 4, 698-708.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Adesanwo, O.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dunlevey, J.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Adetunji, M.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Adesanwo, J.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diatta, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Osiname, O.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Ogun Phosphate Rock</article-title>
            <source>African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Olanipekun, T. and Bolarinwa, A. (2020) Petrographic Analysis of the Palaeocene-Eocene Phosphate-Bearing Rocks of Eastern Dahomey Basin, Southwestern Nigeria. Research Square, 1-11.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Olanipekun, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bolarinwa, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Basin, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Petrographic Analysis of the Palaeocene-Eocene Phosphate-Bearing Rocks of Eastern Dahomey Basin, Southwestern Nigeria</article-title>
            <source>Research Square</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fuerstenau, M.C. and Han, K.N. (2003) Principles of Mineral Processing. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Englewood, CO, 185-188.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fuerstenau, M.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Han, K.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mining, M</string-name>
              <string-name>Exploration, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Principles of Mineral Processing</article-title>
            <source>Society for Mining</source>
            <volume>185</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Adeleke, A.A. (2023) Mineral Processing Technology. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003323433 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1201/9781003323433</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003323433">https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003323433</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Adeleke, A.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Mineral Processing Technology</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1201/9781003323433</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Oji, E.O., Omah, A.D. and Onymisi, Y.H. (2023) Ddetermination of Bond Work Index of Bagega Gold Mineral Deposit of Zamfara State, Nigeria. <italic>Nigerian</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Technology</italic>, 42, 244-248. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v42i2.12 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/njt.v42i2.12</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v42i2.12">https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v42i2.12</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Oji, E.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Omah, A.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Onymisi, Y.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>State, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Ddetermination of Bond Work Index of Bagega Gold Mineral Deposit of Zamfara State, Nigeria</article-title>
            <source>Nigerian Journal of Technology</source>
            <volume>42</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/njt.v42i2.12</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Umar, A.H., Yaro, S.A., Abdulwahab, M. and Dodo, M.R. (2016) Characterization of Sokoto Phosphate Rock for Beneficiation. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Raw</italic><italic>Materials</italic><italic>Research</italic>, 10, 74-93.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Umar, A.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yaro, S.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdulwahab, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dodo, M.R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Characterization of Sokoto Phosphate Rock for Beneficiation</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Raw Materials Research</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tikpangi, K.M. and Olonkwoh, S.S. (2015) Major Oxides and Trace Elements Composition of Phosphate-Bearing Sedimentary Rocks. <italic>American</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Environmental</italic><italic>Protection</italic>, 3, 106-111.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tikpangi, K.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Olonkwoh, S.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Major Oxides and Trace Elements Composition of Phosphate-Bearing Sedimentary Rocks</article-title>
            <source>American Journal of Environmental Protection</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">ASTM (2023) C128-15 Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>C128-15 Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Berry, R.C. and Bruce, W. (1966) Work Index Determination and Grinding Efficiency. <italic>Transactions</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>Institution</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Mining</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Metallurgy</italic>, <italic>Section</italic><italic>C</italic>, 75, C56-C65.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Berry, R.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bruce, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Metallurgy, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1966</year>
            <article-title>Work Index Determination and Grinding Efficiency</article-title>
            <source>Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy</source>
            <volume>75</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>