<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">abb</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2156-8502</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2156-8456</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/abb.2026.172006</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">abb-149503</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Species Diversity of Brucella spp. Infecting Humans in Tongliao City, China</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Han</surname>
            <given-names>Yu</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Wu</surname>
            <given-names>Shuangzhi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ma</surname>
            <given-names>Li</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            <given-names>Huijie</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Sun</surname>
            <given-names>Xiaokun</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            <given-names>Bo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Geng</surname>
            <given-names>Chao</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Du</surname>
            <given-names>Songnan</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Hu</surname>
            <given-names>Nan</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Yang</surname>
            <given-names>Shuang</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bai</surname>
            <given-names>Jie</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Guo</surname>
            <given-names>Hao</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            <given-names>Zhiguo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">5</xref>
          <xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn-equal">†</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            <given-names>Junjie</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">6</xref>
          <xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn-equal">†</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Microbiology Laboratory, Tongliao Municipal Disease Prevention and Control Center, Tongliao, China </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Department for Infectious Disease Control, Mudanjiang Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Mudanjiang, China </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> Department for Endemic Disease Control, Tongliao Municipal Disease Prevention and Control Center, Tongliao, China </aff>
      <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label> Department for General Outpatient, Tongliao Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tongliao, China </aff>
      <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label> National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Tracking and Forecasting for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China </aff>
      <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label> Mongolian Medicine Research Laboratory, Tongliao Mongolian Medical Hospital (Tongliao Mongolian Medical Research Institute), Tongliao, China </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="equal" id="fn-equal">
          <p>These authors contributed equally to this work.</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>All authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>02</day>
        <month>02</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>02</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>02</issue>
      <fpage>80</fpage>
      <lpage>91</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>08</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>07</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>10</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2026.172006">https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2026.172006</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p><bold>O</bold><bold>bjective</bold><bold>:</bold> Human brucellosis poses a substantial public health threat in Tongliao; however, the species diversity of <italic>Brucella</italic> strains infecting humans remains unclear. <bold>Methods</bold><bold>:</bold> A cross-sectional study was conducted among consecutive outpatients at a brucellosis hospital (August-September 2024). Demographic, clinical, and symptom data were collected via questionnaire. Serum samples were tested with SAT, and <italic>Brucella</italic> species/biovars were identified by nested-PCR. Sequencing data were used for phylogenetic analysis (neighbor-joining tree) to assess strain clustering. <bold>Results</bold><bold>:</bold> The cohort comprised 42.17% (97/230) initial cases, 53.48% (123/230) follow-up cases, and 4.35% (10/230) health examiners. Clinical presentations included fever only (10.43%), fever with limb soreness (18.26%), limb soreness only (43.91%), and asymptomatic infection (26.96%). Serologically, 23.04% (53/230) had serum agglutination test (SAT) titers ≥ 1:100, 22.17% (51/230) had titers of 1:25 - 1:50, and 33.91% (78/230) were negative. Nearly half (49.57%, 114/230) had taken medication prior to consultation. <italic>Brucella</italic> was detected in 43.48% (100/230) of cases by nested-PCR. Species distribution among positive samples was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>abortus</italic> (70.00%), <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> (11.74%), and <italic>B</italic>. <italic>suis</italic> (3.00%), with multiple biovars identified for each species. Phylogenetic analysis of 100 sequences resolved them into 9 distinct clades (Groups 1 - 9), revealing clear biovar-clade associations: <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 clustered in Groups 1 and 8, biovar 2 in Group 2; <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovars 1, 2, and 3 were respectively assigned to Groups 5, 4, and 3/9; <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic> biovars 1 and 2 were placed in Groups 6 and 7.<bold>Conclusion</bold><bold>:</bold> This study first reveals the high species and genetic diversity of <italic>Brucella</italic> infecting humans in Tongliao, showing a dominance by <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> with co-circulation of <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> and <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>. The high diversity indicates complex epidemic origins and control challenges, calling for integrated strategies and enhanced molecular surveillance.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>&lt;i&gt;Brucella&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
        <kwd>Serum Agglutination Testing</kwd>
        <kwd>Clinical Symptoms</kwd>
        <kwd>Molecular Epidemiology</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Brucellosis is a highly prevalent zoonotic disease. The new cases ranged from 5 to 12.5 million every year in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. This systemic zoonotic disease has a series of symptoms such as fever, limb joint soreness, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Brucellosis seriously affected people’s physical health, especially slaughterhouse workers, farmers, shepherds, veterinarians, laboratory technicians, and traders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. PCR testing revealed Brucella infection rates of 13.83% in beef cattle, 9.09% in cows, and 7.68% in sheep, with 14 Brucella strains isolated from positive specimens, comprising 11 <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>, 2 <italic>B</italic>. <italic>abortus</italic>, and 1 <italic>B</italic>. <italic>suis</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. As of 2024, Tongliao City had a cattle inventory of 384.019 million heads and a sheep inventory of 642.301 million heads [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. However, there is currently no available information regarding the<italic>Brucella</italic> antibody positivity rate in the cattle and sheep populations in Tongliao City. The positive rate of <italic>Brucella</italic> serum agglutination test (SAT) was 0.26% (37/13,999) and 1.09% (304/27,947) in sheep and cattle respectively in 2008 according to statistics from national monitoring points in China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. Studies showed that the seropositive rate in humans and animals was positively correlated with the incidence rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. And <italic>Brucella</italic> species and biovars have obvious host specificity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. However, the distribution of <italic>Brucella</italic> species and biovars in human brucellosis was 109:1 based on data from 21 brucellosis monitoring sites in China from 2005 to 2016 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. The above data and research results indicated that the distribution of <italic>Brucella</italic> species and biovars, which were isolated from humans in China, was inconsistent with the infection situation in different animal hosts. In order to understand the distribution pattern of <italic>Brucella</italic> species and biovars in the population of brucellosis, we conducted a cross-sectional study to analyze the distribution of <italic>Brucella</italic> species and biovars in human brucellosis.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Sample Source and Epidemiology Investigation</title>
        <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted from all outpatients who visited the Mongolian Medical Hospital in Tongliao city from August to September 2024. This hospital mainly treats patients with brucellosis. The brucellosis is diagnosed by clinical physicians according to the human brucellosis diagnosis standard (WS 269-2019). Th fresh blood samples were collected from all outpatients. The individual case investigation included patient name, gender, age, date of onset, contact history, medical history, medicant, etc. The clinical symptoms and signs included fever and limb soreness, <italic>etc</italic>. Laboratory tests include serum agglutination test (SAT). Physicians determined who needed to undergo serum tube agglutination test based on their condition.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Clinical Blood Samples</title>
        <p>3 mL venous blood from each outpatient was collected. Of 3 mL venous blood, 1mL was placed into a 3 mL sterile tube containing the anticoagulant (ethylene diamine tetraacetie acid, EDTA). Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μL anticoagulated blood by using Blood/Cell/Tissue genomic DNA extraction kit (DNeasy Blood&amp;Issue Kit QIAGEN, Germany). Remainder 2 mL blood was placed into a sterile tube without anticoagulants. And allowed it to stand at room temperature for 24 hours. The serum was separated and subjected to a tube agglutination test using <italic>Brucella</italic> antigen.</p>
        <p>The DNA extraction from both positive and negative <italic>Brucella</italic> specimens was performed simultaneously during the process of extracting blood samples.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>
          2.3. Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction for
          <italic>IS711</italic>
          Gene
        </title>
        <p>Based on the previously established method (Tian, 2021) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>], a nested-PCR brief description as follows: The first round PCR primers were F1:5'-GCGCATGCGAGATGGACGAA-3' and R1:5'-AGCAGACGAAGCCTTACAGATGAG-3'. The second round PCR primers: F2:5'-GAATGCGGTCAATGTTTTCTCGC-3' and R2:5'-ATATCTTCCGGGGCGAGTTGGTA-3'; the reaction system for the first round PCR included: 2 × Ex Taq Mastermix 12.5 μL, primer F1 and primer R1 each 0.4 μL (10 μ mol/L), DNA template 4 μL from blood, and double distilled water supplemented to 25 μL. PCR amplification reaction conditions: pre-denaturation at 95˚C for 4 min; denaturation at 95˚C for 30 sec, annealing at 55˚C for 30 sec, extension at 72˚C for 30 sec, 30 cycles; extend at 72˚C for 5 min. The reaction system and conditions for the second round were basically the same as those of the first round PCR. Except the primers F2 and R2, and the DNA template was 2 μL from the first round PCR products. The PCR products from the second round PCR will be sequenced using primers F2 and R2. The PCR amplification for positive and negative <italic>Brucella</italic> control samples was performed simultaneously during the process of PCR amplification for the DNA from blood samples. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Data Process and Bioinformation Analysis</title>
        <p>Excel 2017 software was used for data organization and analysis. MEGA 5.1 software was used to construct an adjacent evolutionary tree to analyze the phylogenetic relationships by the unweighted pair group method arithmetic averages (UPGMA).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Basic Characteristics of Study Participants</title>
        <p>A total of 230 outpatients were enrolled in this study, including 156 males and 74 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.1:1. The median age was 47 years (range: 8 - 80 years), and the average age was 45.5 years. Among the participants, 97 (42.2%) were initial cases, 123 (53.5%) were follow-up cases, and 10 (4.3%) were health examiners.</p>
        <p>Clinical presentations included fever only (24 cases, 10.4%), fever with limb soreness (42 cases, 18.3%), limb soreness only (101 cases, 43.9%), and asymptomatic infection (62 cases, 26.9%). One case presented with testicular pain. Regarding serum agglutination test (SAT) results, 53 patients (23.0%) had antibody titers ≥ 1:100, 51 (22.2%) had titers between 1:25 and 1:50, 78 (33.9%) were seronegative, and 48 (20.9%) were not tested. In terms of medication history before consultation, 116 patients (50.4%) had not taken any medication, while 114 (49.6%) reported prior use of medication. The onset duration was less than 1 month in 108 patients (46.9%), 1 - 6 months in 59 (25.7%), 6 months to 1 year in 24 (10.4%), and over 1 year in 29 (12.6%) (<bold>Table 1</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Detection results on time of onset, clinical symptoms, drug in 230 outpatients.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">Disease characteristics</td>
                <td colspan="5">Symptom characteristics</td>
                <td colspan="2">Drug use</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">Onset time</td>
                <td>Total</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fever</td>
                <td>Fever + Limb soreness</td>
                <td>Limb soreness</td>
                <td>Testicular pain</td>
                <td>Asymptomatic</td>
                <td>user</td>
                <td>Unuser</td>
                <td>health examiners</td>
                <td>&lt;1 month</td>
                <td>1 - 6 month</td>
                <td>6 months - 1 year</td>
                <td>&gt;1 year</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Detected cases</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>42</td>
                <td>101</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>62</td>
                <td>116</td>
                <td>114</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>108</td>
                <td>59</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>29</td>
                <td>230</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Positive case</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>41</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>30</td>
                <td>45</td>
                <td>55</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>42</td>
                <td>29</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Positivity rate</td>
                <td>41.67%</td>
                <td>42.86%</td>
                <td>40.59%</td>
                <td>100%</td>
                <td>48.39%</td>
                <td>38.79%</td>
                <td>47.37%</td>
                <td>30.00%</td>
                <td>38.89%</td>
                <td>49.15%</td>
                <td>66.67%</td>
                <td>34.48%</td>
                <td>43.48%</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>
          3.2. Detection and Speciation of
          <italic>Brucella</italic>
          by
          <italic>IS711</italic>
          Gene
        </title>
        <p>Among 230 outpatients, 100 (43.5%) tested positive for the <italic>Brucella</italic><italic>IS711</italic> gene. Of these positive samples, 70 (70.0%) were identified as<italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>, comprising 66 (94.3%) biovar 1 and 4 (5.7%) biovar 2. A total of 27 (27.0%) positive sequences were identified as<italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>, distributed as biovar 1 (n = 2, 7.4%), biovar 2 (n = 3, 11.1%), and biovar 3 (n = 22, 81.5%). The remaining 3 (3.0%) were <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>, including one biovar 1 and two biovar 2 (<bold>Table 2</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2</bold><bold>.</bold> Distribution of 100 <italic>Brucella IS711</italic>-positive samples.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Brucella</italic>
                  species
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <italic>B</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>abortus</italic>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <italic>B</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>melitensis</italic>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <italic>B</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suis</italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Biovars</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>bv. 1</td>
                <td>bv. 2</td>
                <td>bv. 1</td>
                <td>bv. 2</td>
                <td>bv. 3</td>
                <td>bv. 1</td>
                <td>bv. 2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>No.</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>66</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>22</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td colspan="2">70</td>
                <td colspan="3">27</td>
                <td colspan="2">3</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Case Analysis</title>
        <p>Among initial cases (n = 97), the positivity rate was 43.3% (42/97), while among follow-up cases (n = 123), it was 44.7% (55/123). Among asymptomatic health examiners (n = 10), the positivity rate was 30.0% (3/10). Regarding species distribution, initial and follow-up cases demonstrated high consistency: <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> accounted for 69.0% (29/42) and 70.9% (39/55), respectively; <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> accounted for 26.2% (11/42) and 27.3% (15/55), respectively; and <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic> constituted a minor proportion (4.8% in initial cases and 1.8% in follow-up cases). The biovar composition remained similarly stable: <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> was predominantly biovar 1 (96.6% in initial cases and 92.3% in follow-up cases), while <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> was predominantly biovar 3 (63.6% in initial cases and 93.3% in follow-up cases). Among the positive samples from health examiners, two of <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 and one strain of <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovar 3 were identified. Overall, no significant differences in <italic>IS711</italic> detection rates were observed across different case types, and the species/biovar distribution patterns remained consistent, suggesting that this molecular assay demonstrates consistent diagnostic performance across patients with varying clinical statuses and indicating the persistent circulation of dominant strains in this region.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Symptom Analysis</title>
        <p>Of 230 outpatients, 1) 10.43% (24/230) was fever only. 41.67% (10/24) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 60.00% (6/10) was<italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>, 30.00% (3/10) was<italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>, and 10.00% (1/10) was<italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>. 2) 18.26% (42/230) was fever and limb soreness. 42.86% (18/42) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 72.22% (13/18) was<italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>, 22.22% (4/18) was<italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>, and 5.56% (1/18) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>. 3) 43.91% (101/230) was limb soreness only. 40.59% (41/101) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 68.29% (28/41) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> and 31.71% (13/41) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>. 4) 26.96% (62/230) was asymptomatic cases. 48.39% (30/62) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 63.33% (19/30) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus biovars</italic> 1, 10.00% (3/30) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>abortus biovars</italic>2, 20.00% (6/30) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovars</italic> 3, 3.33% (1/30) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovar</italic><italic>s</italic> 1, 3.33% (1/30) was 1 <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis biovars</italic> 2. 5) There was one case had testicular pain, which was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus biovars</italic> 1 (<bold>Table 1</bold>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Serum Antibody Levels Analysis</title>
        <p>Of 230 outpatients, 1) 23.04% (53/230) with serum antibody levels was above 1:100, and 43.40% (23/53) was positive for <italic>IS</italic><italic>711</italic> gene. Among them, 52.17% (12/23) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus biovars</italic> 1, 13.04% (3/23) was<italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus biovars</italic> 2, 4.35% (1/23) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovars</italic> 1, 26.09% (6/23) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovars</italic> 3, 4.35% (1/23) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>suis bio</italic><italic>vars</italic> 1. 2) 22.17% (51/230) with serum antibodies was at 1:25-1:50. And 39.22% (20/51) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 65.00% (13/20) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus biovars</italic> 1, 5.00% (1/20) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus biovars</italic> 2, 5.00% (1/20) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovars</italic> 1, 20.00% (4/20) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovars</italic> 3, 5.00% (1/20) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis biovars</italic> 2. 3) 33.91% (78/230) was negative serum antibodies, and 38.46% (30/78) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene. 70.00% (21/30) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus biovars</italic> 1, 3.33% (1/30) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovars</italic> 1, 6.66% (2/30) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovars</italic>2, 16.67% (5/30) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovars</italic> 3, 3.33% (1/30) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis biovars</italic> 2. 4) 20.87% (48/230) was not tested for SAT, and 56.25% (27/48) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene. Among them, 74.07% (20/27) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus biovars</italic> 1, 25.93% (7/27) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic><italic>biovars</italic> 3 (<bold>Table 3</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Detection results on <italic>IS711</italic> gene in different serum antibody titers.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Serum antibody titer</td>
                <td>1:25 - 1:50</td>
                <td>1:100 and above</td>
                <td>Negative</td>
                <td>Not detected SAT</td>
                <td>Total</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Detected cases</td>
                <td>51</td>
                <td>53</td>
                <td>78</td>
                <td>48</td>
                <td>230</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Positive cases</td>
                <td>20</td>
                <td>23</td>
                <td>31</td>
                <td>27</td>
                <td>100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Positivity rate</td>
                <td>39.22%</td>
                <td>43.40%</td>
                <td>39.74%</td>
                <td>56.25%</td>
                <td>43.48%</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot6">
        <title>3.6. Medicant Analysis</title>
        <p>Of 230 outpatients, 50.43% (116/230) was not use medicant before seeking medical treatment, 38.79% (45/116) was positive for the <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 68.89% (31/45) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>, 26.67% (12/45) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>, and 4.44% (2/45) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>. 49.57% (114/230) was drug users before seeking medical treatment, 48.25% (55/114) was positive for the <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 70.91% (39/55) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>, 27.27% (15/55) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>, and 1.82% (1/55) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot7">
        <title>3.7. Analysis of Onset Time</title>
        <p>Of 230 outpatients, 1) 46.96% (108/230) was less than 1 month for onset time. Among them, 38.89% (42/108) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 71.43% (30/42) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>, 23.81% (10/42) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>, and 4.76% (2/42) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>; 2) 49.15% (29/59) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene in 59 cases with 1 month to 6 months for onset time including 68.97% (20/29) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>, 27.59% (8/29) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>, and 3.45% (1/29) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>; 3) 10.43% (24/230) was 6 months to 1 year for onset time. Among them, 66.67% (16/24) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 56.25% (9/16) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> and 43.75% (7/16) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>; 4) 12.61% (29/230) was over 1 year. Among them, 34.48% (10/29) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 90.00% (9/10) was <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> and 10.00% (1/10) was <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>; 5) 4.35% (10/230) was health examiner. Among them, 30.00% (3/10) was positive for <italic>IS711</italic> gene including 2 <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> and 1 <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot8">
        <title>3.8. Regional Distribution of Cases</title>
        <p>In the Left Banner area of Tongliao city, 52.17% (12/23) of outpatients were <italic>IS711</italic>-positive, comprising 8 <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 and 4 <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovar 3. In Zhalai Banner (Tongliao), 66.67% (4/6) were positive, with equal distribution of <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>and <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>. Kailu region (Tongliao) showed 30.77% (4/13) positivity, all identified as <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>. Notably, all 4 cases from Shenyang (Liaoning province) were <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovar 3, while 3 cases from Heilongjiang province were exclusively <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1. These findings suggest regional variations in both detection rates and species distribution, with mixed <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> and <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> circulation in some Tongliao areas versus single-species dominance in other regions, potentially reflecting distinct epidemiological patterns or exposure sources across geographical areas.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot9">
        <title>
          3.9. Cluster Analysis of
          <italic>IS711</italic>
          Sequences
        </title>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7302250-rId19.jpeg?20260210113200" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1</bold><bold>.</bold> Cluster analysis of 100 sequences of the<italic>Brucella IS711</italic> gene. Note: Cluster analysis revealed that these sequences formed nine distinct groups, with each group corresponding to specific species and biovars. This clustering pattern demonstrates a strong correlation between <italic>IS711</italic> sequence variation and the classical species/biovar classification.</p>
        <p>Cluster analysis of <italic>IS711</italic> sequences from 100 <italic>Brucella</italic> sequences were divided into 9 groups (Group 1 to Group 9) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Group 1 consists of 42 <italic>B</italic>.<italic>a</italic><italic>bortus</italic>biovars 1. Group 2 consists of 4 <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>biovars 2. Group 3 consists of 7 <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovars 3. Group 4 consists of 3 <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovars 2. Group 5 consists of 2 <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovars 1. Group 6 consists of 1 <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>biovars 1. Group 7 consists of 2 <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic> biovars 2. Group 8 consists of 24 <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>biovars 1. Group 9 consists of 15 <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovars 3. This clustering pattern demonstrates a strong correlation between <italic>IS711</italic> sequence variation and the classical species/biovar classification, with each biovar forming distinct phylogenetic clusters, while the separation of <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 into two groups (Group 1 and 8) and <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovar 3 into two groups (Group 3 and 9) suggests potential genetic diversity within these predominant biovars in the study region.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussions</title>
      <p><italic>Brucella</italic> spp. classification is based on factors such as host specificity, pathogenicity, and phenotypic traits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. To date, there are 12 recognized species and 19 biovars within the <italic>Brucella</italic> genus. The most frequently encountered species causing brucellosis in humans and animals are <italic>Brucella</italic><italic>melitensis</italic> and <italic>Brucella abortus</italic>, followed by <italic>Brucella suis</italic>. Other species can occasionally lead to human infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. The clinical manifestations of brucellosis often resemble those of various infectious and non-infectious diseases, which underscores the importance of laboratory testing as the most reliable diagnostic method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>].</p>
      <p>Detection of <italic>Brucella</italic> typically involves microbial culture and serological testing. While bacterial isolation is considered the “gold standard” for diagnosis, it often results in false-negative outcomes influenced by the culture medium, the bacterial load in the specimen, and the specific species of <italic>Brucella</italic> being tested [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. Serological methods, such as the standard serum agglutination test (SAT), remain valuable diagnostic tools despite their limitations, including potential cross-reactions, false positives, and an inability to accurately reflect the severity of the disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>].</p>
      <p>In China, the isolation and cultivation of <italic>Brucella</italic> from blood samples are primarily conducted using fully automated blood culture systems. However, these methods can be labor-intensive and time-consuming. Meeting the required CO<sub>2</sub> levels for optimal growth presents significant challenges, particularly for <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> strains, which require an environment with 5% - 10% CO<sub>2</sub> for initial cultivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. This difficulty may explain the predominance of <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> strains reported in the literature, which contrasts with the species commonly found in livestock such as cattle and sheep.</p>
      <p>In our study, the observed ratio of <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> to <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> was 2.59:1 (70/27), indicating a higher prevalence of <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> in human brucellosis cases. This finding aligns with the distribution patterns of <italic>Brucella</italic> species documented in European countries and South Korea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Specifically, <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>biovar 1 constituted 71.80% of <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> in these regions, while in Tongliao city, <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 accounted for 94.29% (66/70) of the identified <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>, further supporting the consistency with European data.</p>
      <p>The positive rates for initial and follow-up cases were recorded at 43.30% and 44.72%, respectively. Notably, the positive rate among drug users was 48.33% (29/60). Additionally, the positive rates were 66.67% (16/24) for cases with an onset time of 6 months to 1 year and 33.33% (10/30) for those with an onset time exceeding 1 year. This suggests that follow-up cases are particularly important for treatment strategies, as they exhibited a higher positive rate compared to initial diagnosis cases, especially for those within the 6-month to 1-year timeframe.</p>
      <p>Research by Navarro E and Vrioni G suggests that around half of the cases may still test positive for DNA detection after completing the treatment regimen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. The persistence of DNA can last from several months to six months, with some cases extending to 1 - 3 years or longer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]. Our findings are consistent with these observations. A single PCR-positive result, particularly at low viral loads or high Ct values, does not suffice to determine disease activity or infectivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. To evaluate the presence of viable bacteria, both specimen isolation and culture, as well as DNA detection methods, were employed. A reduction in DNA load alongside symptom improvement indicates a scenario of “residual DNA/low-level DNA” during treatment. Conversely, a rebound in DNA load along with symptom recurrence or the emergence of new focal manifestations should raise concerns for relapse or reinfection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>].</p>
      <p>The positive sequences from outpatients in the Left Banner and Kailu regions were predominantly <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>. In contrast, the sequences from patients in Zhalai Banner were evenly split between <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>and <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic>. Cases from Shenyang City, Liaoning province, primarily involved <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovar 3, while those from Heilongjiang province were mainly <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1. Therefore, targeted measures will be implemented to prevent and control brucellosis in cattle and sheep based on the epidemiological context of human brucellosis across different regions.</p>
      <p>Fever and limb soreness were identified as the primary symptoms in human brucellosis, affecting 72.61% (167/230) of patients. The positive detection rate was 48.39% (30/62) among asymptomatic outpatients. Additionally, the positive rates were 38.46% (30/78) for serum antibody-negative individuals and 56.25% (27/48) for those without SAT testing. The strains were mainly <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic>, suggesting that symptoms attributed to <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> strains tend to be milder and may not be taken seriously by clinicians. This could also contribute to the lower detection rates for <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> strains.</p>
      <p>Phylogenetic analysis indicated that <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 could be divided into two distinct groups. Sequences from Group 1 were closely related to REF 2308 and REF LBAB010, the latter of which was isolated from Para state in northwestern Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. Based on the <italic>IS711</italic> gene, <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 in Group 8 was closely related to LBAB025, which was isolated from Rio Grande do Sul state in southwestern Brazil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. All <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 demonstrated associations with Brazilian strains, corroborating previous studies that indicated genetic homology between Chinese and Brazilian strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Similarly, <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovar 3 strains were categorized into two groups (Group 3 and Group 9). Sequences from Group 3 were closely related to the REF-NI strain identified as <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovar 3 in Inner Mongolia, China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. Sequences from Group 9 were closely related to the REF BmW S93 strain, isolated from blood specimens in Ulanqab City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. The geographic distance of approximately 1033 kilometers between Ulanqab City and Tongliao City suggests genetic homology among <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> in Inner Mongolia. The sequence similarity of strains based on the single <italic>IS711</italic> gene should be interpreted with caution, while whole-genome SNP analysis offers insights into genetic relatedness across the entire genome.</p>
      <p>In summary, this study elucidates the distribution patterns of <italic>Brucella</italic> infections within the population of Tongliao City, revealing a predominance of <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> strains, followed by <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> and <italic>B</italic>.<italic>suis</italic>. The predominant species and biovars in this region are <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 and <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> biovar 3. Clinical presentations indicated similar detection rates for fever and limb soreness. In terms of SAT testing, the positive detection rates varied based on serum antibody levels, with the highest rates observed in individuals with antibody levels exceeding 1:100, followed by those with levels of 1:25 - 1:50, and finally, negative serum antibodies. The onset time also influenced detection rates, with the highest rates seen in cases occurring 1 month to 6 months prior, followed by less than 1 month, over 1 year, and finally 6 months to 1 year. Cluster analysis revealed that the 100 positive samples could be categorized into 9 distinct groups corresponding to various <italic>Brucella</italic> species and biovars. Furthermore, <italic>IS711</italic> sequences of <italic>B</italic>.<italic>abortus</italic> biovar 1 exhibited associations with Brazilian strains, while <italic>B</italic>. <italic>melitensis</italic> strains in Inner Mongolia demonstrated genetic homology.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This research was supported by Inner Mongolia Autonomous Regions Central Government-Guided Local Science and Technology Development Funding Projects (Grant number: 2024ZY0053).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Ethical Statements</title>
      <p>This study had approval from Ethics Committee of Tongliao Center for Disease Control and Prevention.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Funding</title>
      <p>This study was funded by the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Regions Central Government-Guided Local Science and Technology Development Funding Projects (Grant number: 2024ZY0053). The sponsor had no involvement in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec8">
      <title>NOTES</title>
      <p>*Co-first author.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fernandez-Georges, I.K., Manalo, S.M., Arede, M., Ciaravino, G., Beltrán-Alcrudo, D., Casal, J., <italic>et al</italic>. (2025) Ruminant and Human Brucellosis Situation in Türkiye and the Caucasus. <italic>Tropical</italic><italic>Animal</italic><italic>Health</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Production</italic>, 57, Article No. 296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04525-1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-025-04525-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40643812</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04525-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04525-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fernandez-Georges, I.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Manalo, S.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Arede, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ciaravino, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Alcrudo, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Casal, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Ruminant and Human Brucellosis Situation in Türkiye and the Caucasus</article-title>
            <source>Tropical Animal Health and Production</source>
            <volume>57</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11250-025-04525-1</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40643812</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bao, G.Y., Chen, J.J., Zhang, T.C., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Relationship of <italic>Brucella</italic> in Blood with Clinical Symptoms and Antibody Levels in Brucellosis. <italic>Disease Surveillance</italic>, 38, 432-435. (in Chinese)</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bao, G.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chen, J.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, T.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Relationship of Brucella in Blood with Clinical Symptoms and Antibody Levels in Brucellosis</article-title>
            <source>Disease Surveillance</source>
            <volume>38</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Harrison, E.R. and Posada, R. (2018) Brucellosis. <italic>Pediatrics</italic><italic>in</italic><italic>Review</italic>, 39, 222-224. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2017-0126 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1542/pir.2017-0126</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29610436</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2017-0126">https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2017-0126</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Harrison, E.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Posada, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Brucellosis</article-title>
            <source>Pediatrics in Review</source>
            <volume>39</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1542/pir.2017-0126</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29610436</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Yin, C., Yang, C., Wu, Y., Di, J., Bai, T., Wang, Y., <italic>et al</italic>. (2025) Molecular Epidemiology of <italic>Brucella</italic> spp. in Aborted Livestock in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. <italic>Veterinary</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 12, Article 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080702 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/vetsci12080702</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080702">https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12080702</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yin, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yang, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wu, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Di, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bai, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Region, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Molecular Epidemiology of Brucella spp</article-title>
            <source>in Aborted Livestock in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <elocation-id>702</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/vetsci12080702</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Statistical Bulletin on National Economic and Social Development of Tongliao City in 2024. (in Chinese)</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2024</year>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Cui, B.Y. and Jiang, H. (2018) Surveillance Data of Brucellosis in China, 2005-2016. <italic>Disease Surveillance</italic>, 33, 188-192. (in Chinese)</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Cui, B.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jiang, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Surveillance Data of Brucellosis in China, 2005-2016</article-title>
            <source>Disease Surveillance</source>
            <volume>33</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Osoro, E.M., Munyua, P., Omulo, S., Ogola, E., Ade, F., Mbatha, P., <italic>et al</italic>. (2015) Strong Association between Human and Animal Brucella Seropositivity in a Linked Study in Kenya, 2012-2013. <italic>The</italic><italic>American</italic><italic>Society</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Tropical</italic><italic>Medicine</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Hygiene</italic>, 93, 224-231. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0113 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4269/ajtmh.15-0113</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26101275</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0113">https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0113</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Osoro, E.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Munyua, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Omulo, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ogola, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ade, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mbatha, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Strong Association between Human and Animal Brucella Seropositivity in a Linked Study in Kenya, 2012-2013</article-title>
            <source>The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene</source>
            <volume>93</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4269/ajtmh.15-0113</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26101275</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tian, G.Z., Lu, D.Y., Piao, D.R., <italic>et al</italic>. (2019) Epidemiological Characteristics of <italic>Brucella</italic> Species Isolated from Different Regions of the World Using the MLVA Genotyping. <italic>Chinese Journal of Epidemiology</italic>, 40, 676-681. (in Chinese)</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tian, G.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lu, D.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Piao, D.R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Epidemiological Characteristics of Brucella Species Isolated from Different Regions of the World Using the MLVA Genotyping</article-title>
            <source>Chinese Journal of Epidemiology</source>
            <volume>40</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jiang, S.Q. (1986) Handbook for Prevention and Control of Brucellosis. People’s Health Publishing House.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Jiang, S.Q.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1986</year>
            <article-title>Handbook for Prevention and Control of Brucellosis</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Tian, G.Z. (2021) A Nested-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay to Identify and Genotype <italic>Brucella</italic>. <italic>Biomedical and Environmental Sciences</italic>, 34, 227-231.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tian, G.Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>A Nested-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay to Identify and Genotype Brucella</article-title>
            <source>Biomedical and Environmental Sciences</source>
            <volume>34</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Franco, M.P., Mulder, M., Gilman, R.H. and Smits, H.L. (2007) Human Brucellosis. <italic>The</italic><italic>Lancet</italic><italic>Infectious</italic><italic>Diseases</italic>, 7, 775-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70286-4 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70286-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18045560</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70286-4">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70286-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Franco, M.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mulder, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gilman, R.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Smits, H.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Human Brucellosis</article-title>
            <source>The Lancet Infectious Diseases</source>
            <volume>3099</volume>
            <issue>07</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70286-4</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18045560</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Liu, Z.G., Gao, L.P., Wang, M., Du, S.N., Yuan, M. and Li, Z.J. (2025) Global Species/Biovars and Genotype Diversity Atlas of <italic>Brucella</italic> spp.-102 Countries, 1923-2020. <italic>China CDC</italic><italic>Wkly</italic>, 7, 144-151.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Liu, Z.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gao, L.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Du, S.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yuan, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, Z.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Global Species/Biovars and Genotype Diversity Atlas of Brucella spp</article-title>
            <source>-102 Countries</source>
            <volume>1923</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Araj, G.F. (2010) Update on Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Antimicrobial</italic><italic>Agents</italic>, 36, S12-S17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.014 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20692128</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.014</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Araj, G.F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Update on Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents</source>
            <volume>36</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.014</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20692128</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bauer, S., Aubert, C.E., Richli, M. and Chuard, C. (2016) Blood Cultures in the Evaluation of Uncomplicated Cellulitis. <italic>European Journal of Internal Medicine</italic>, 36, 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.07.029 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejim.2016.07.029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27527755</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.07.029">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.07.029</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bauer, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Aubert, C.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Richli, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chuard, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Blood Cultures in the Evaluation of Uncomplicated Cellulitis</article-title>
            <source>European Journal of Internal Medicine</source>
            <volume>36</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejim.2016.07.029</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27527755</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Perletta, F., Di Pancrazio, C., Rodomonti, D., Di Febo, T., Luciani, M., Krasteva, I.M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Evaluation of Three Serological Tests for Diagnosis of Canine Brucellosis. <italic>Microorganisms</italic>, 11, Article 2162. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092162 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11092162</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37764006</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092162">https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092162</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Perletta, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pancrazio, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rodomonti, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Febo, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Luciani, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Krasteva, I.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Evaluation of Three Serological Tests for Diagnosis of Canine Brucellosis</article-title>
            <source>Microorganisms</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <elocation-id>2162</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11092162</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37764006</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wang, H., Xu, W., Zhu, K., Zhu, S., Zhang, H., Wang, J., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) Molecular Investigation of Infection Sources and Transmission Chains of Brucellosis in Zhejiang, China. <italic>Emerging Microbes &amp; Infections</italic>, 9, 889-899. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1754137 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/22221751.2020.1754137</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32284015</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1754137">https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1754137</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wang, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Xu, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhu, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhu, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhejiang, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Molecular Investigation of Infection Sources and Transmission Chains of Brucellosis in Zhejiang, China</article-title>
            <source>Emerging Microbes &amp; Infections</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/22221751.2020.1754137</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32284015</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Navarro, E., Segura, J.C., Jesus Castano, M. and Solera, J. (2006) Use of Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction to Monitor the Evolution of <italic>Brucella</italic><italic>melitensis</italic> DNA Load during Therapy and Post-Therapy Follow-Up in Patients with Brucellosis. <italic>Clinical Infectious Diseases</italic>, 42, 1266-1273.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Navarro, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Segura, J.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Castano, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Solera, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Use of Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction to Monitor the Evolution of Brucella melitensis DNA Load during Therapy and Post-Therapy Follow-Up in Patients with Brucellosis</article-title>
            <source>Clinical Infectious Diseases</source>
            <volume>42</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vrioni, G., Pappas, G., Priavali, E., Gartzonika, C. and Levidiotou, S. (2008) An Eternal Microbe: Brucella DNA Load Persists for Years after Clinical Cure. <italic>Clinical Infectious Diseases</italic>, 46, e131-e136.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vrioni, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pappas, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Priavali, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gartzonika, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Levidiotou, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>An Eternal Microbe: Brucella DNA Load Persists for Years after Clinical Cure</article-title>
            <source>Clinical Infectious Diseases</source>
            <volume>46</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sohrabi, M., Mohabati Mobarez, A., Khoramabadi, N., Hosseini Doust, R. and Behmanesh, M. (2014) Efficient Diagnosis and Treatment Follow-Up of Human Brucellosis by a Novel Quantitative Taqman Real-Time PCR Assay: A Human Clinical Survey. <italic>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</italic>, 52, 4239-4243.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sohrabi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mobarez, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khoramabadi, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Doust, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Behmanesh, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Efficient Diagnosis and Treatment Follow-Up of Human Brucellosis by a Novel Quantitative Taqman Real-Time PCR Assay: A Human Clinical Survey</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</source>
            <volume>52</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hasanjani Roushan, M.R., Marashi, S.M.A. and Moulana, Z. (2016) Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Assays for the Diagnosis of Active and Relapsed Cases of Human Brucellosis. <italic>The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene</italic>, 95, 1272-1276.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Roushan, M.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Marashi, S.M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moulana, Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Assays for the Diagnosis of Active and Relapsed Cases of Human Brucellosis</article-title>
            <source>The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene</source>
            <volume>95</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pereira, C.R., Neia, R.C., Silva, S.B., Williamson, C.H.D., Gillece, J.D., O’Callaghan, D., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Comparison of Brucella Abortus Population Structure Based on Genotyping Methods with Different Levels of Resolution. <italic>Journal of Microbiological Methods</italic>, 211, Article 106772.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pereira, C.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Neia, R.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Silva, S.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Williamson, C.H.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gillece, J.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Callaghan, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Comparison of Brucella Abortus Population Structure Based on Genotyping Methods with Different Levels of Resolution</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Microbiological Methods</source>
            <volume>211</volume>
            <elocation-id>106772</elocation-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Liu, W., Jing, Z., Ou, Q., Cui, B., He, Y. and Wu, Q. (2012) Complete Genome Sequence of <italic>Brucella</italic><italic>melitensis</italic> Biovar 3 Strain NI, Isolated from an Aborted Bovine Fetus. <italic>Journal of Bacteriology</italic>, 194, 6321-6321.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Liu, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jing, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ou, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cui, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>He, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wu, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>NI, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Complete Genome Sequence of Brucella melitensis Biovar 3 Strain NI, Isolated from an Aborted Bovine Fetus</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Bacteriology</source>
            <volume>194</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Liu, Z.G., Cao, X.A., Wang, M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2019) Whole-Genome Sequencing of a <italic>Brucella</italic><italic>melitensis</italic> Strain (BMWS93) Isolated from a Bank Clerk and Exhibiting Complete Resistance to Rifampin. <italic>Microbiology Resource Announcements</italic>, 8, e01645-18.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Liu, Z.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cao, X.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Whole-Genome Sequencing of a Brucella melitensis Strain (BMWS93) Isolated from a Bank Clerk and Exhibiting Complete Resistance to Rifampin</article-title>
            <source>Microbiology Resource Announcements</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>