<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jss</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Social Sciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2327-5960</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2327-5952</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jss.2026.141029</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jss-149120</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Business</subject>
          <subject>Economics</subject>
          <subject>Social Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Humanities</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Impact of Weekly Videos on Student Engagement and Connectedness in Online Asynchronous Courses</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0004-6817-360X</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Wallingford</surname>
            <given-names>Valerie</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-3383-7643</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Veaux</surname>
            <given-names>Veronica</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> School of Business, Bemidji State University, Bemidji, USA </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>01</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>01</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>01</issue>
      <fpage>484</fpage>
      <lpage>492</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>14</day>
          <month>11</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>23</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2026.141029">https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2026.141029</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>In prior online courses, students conveyed a low sense of connectedness with instructors, peers, and courses. This descriptive, exploratory Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) study examines how weekly instructor-created informational videos influence student engagement and connectedness in asynchronous business administration courses at a Midwestern public university. Instructors created two-to-five-minute videos on course assignments, due dates, informational updates, campus activities, and other course-related information. Fifty-two students completed a Likert-scale survey measuring engagement and connectedness, as a classroom-based inquiry that is bounded by the characteristics of the courses. Student disengagement and feelings of isolation are major barriers to success in asynchronous courses. Understanding what improves connection directly supports student retention and learning outcomes. Prior studies show that instructor-created videos can enhance engagement, motivation, and retention while reducing isolation, especially when they include visible instructor presence and convey relational warmth and approachability, ultimately increasing social presence and fostering classroom connectedness. Participants voluntarily completed an anonymous end-of-semester online survey consisting of elements of connectedness and engagement that the authors defined based on their instructor knowledge and literature review, with IRB approving the study as exempt, and descriptive statistics used to analyze mean responses and standard deviations. Results indicate that weekly videos enhanced students’ sense of connectedness and course engagement, especially regarding course logistics and instructor connection. Findings support the value of instructor presence in asynchronous learning and suggest strategies to further develop community and motivation in online education. Future research should examine how various video types, formats, and accessibility features influence different dimensions of engagement and learning across disciplines, while this study reinforces that even brief personalized weekly videos strengthen instructor presence, reduce ambiguity, and enhance student connectedness in asynchronous courses.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Connected</kwd>
        <kwd>Engaged</kwd>
        <kwd>Online</kwd>
        <kwd>Asynchronous Learning</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Problem and Opportunity</title>
      <p>In our previous online courses, students mentioned not feeling connected to the instructor and the course itself. Research questions included 1) how do students perceive weekly instructor created informational videos and 2) how do these videos impact student engagement and connectedness in online asynchronous business administration courses?</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Literature Review and Historical Context</title>
      <p>“Online education consists of a set of teaching and learning modalities that are carried out remotely, based on forms of communication mediated by synchronous and asynchronous technologies” ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]). This study focuses on asynchronous formats where students learn independently within structured timeframes. Key challenges in such settings include sustaining engagement, reducing isolation, and improving student performance ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]). </p>
      <p>In this study, connectedness refers to students’ affective sense of belonging, relational trust, and perceived social presence within the course, particularly their felt relationship with the instructor and the learning environment. Connectedness is widely recognized as a key contributor to motivation, persistence, and learning satisfaction in online education ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]). Engagement, by contrast, reflects students’ behavioral, cognitive, and functional involvement in course activities, including interaction with course materials, clarity of task completion, and sustained academic effort. Engagement is foundational to student success in online asynchronous environments, where self-regulation and active course participation are essential ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]). These constructs collectively inform how students navigate both the emotional and operational dimensions of online coursework.</p>
      <p>This study draws on the Community of Inquiry (Col) framework ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]), which emphasizes the interplay of teaching presence, cognitive presence, and social presence in creating meaningful online learning experiences. Instructor-created videos directly contribute to teaching and social presence by humanizing communication and reinforcing structure. Within SoTL, connectedness describes the extent to which students feel a sense of belonging, relational trust, and meaningful engagement with their instructor, peers, and course structure; an affective dimension that influences motivation, persistence, and overall learning experience ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]). As such, instructors created brief two-to-five-minute videos that provided guidance on upcoming assignments, clarified due dates, shared informational updates, highlighted relevant campus activities, and offered additional context or reminders to support students in navigating course expectations. </p>
      <p>Prior studies affirm that instructor-created videos can increase student engagement, motivation, and retention, while mitigating feelings of isolation ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]). Videos that include visible instructor presence foster stronger student engagement ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]). Additionally, when students perceive relational warmth and approachability in instructors, learning satisfaction improves. Lastly, instructor-created videos have shown to increase instructor social presence and create classroom connectedness ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]).</p>
      <p>One of the 10 themes of exemplary teaching identified ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]) was a socioemotional connection between the students and the instructor. When students feel like they have a connection with faculty/staff, their educational experiences have positive outcomes for the students, the educators, and the institution ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]).</p>
      <p>Student engagement has always been a challenge in higher education, especially in online asynchronous courses ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]). In addition to engagement, students may struggle with connectedness to a course/instructor in online asynchronous courses. Goals of this study are to determine students’ perceptions whether a brief weekly video created by the instructor briefly explaining assignments and other class information increased students’ overall engagement, connectedness, experience, learning, performance, satisfaction, and motivation in an online asynchronous course.</p>
      <p>As students enter higher education after their high school COVID learning experiences, their expectations and norms have changed. It is our assumption, based on experience, that online students perceive deadlines as guidelines, rather than hard due dates. Research indicates that one expectation of students that has changed is that deadlines will be extended. Some faculty felt students wanted more engagement and short visual information ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]). We believe that video engagement will clarify this misperception.</p>
      <p>Even post-COVID, learning continues to be a social experience and students want to be engaged and want to understand why course content/degree is relevant.</p>
      <p>With online education, “new technologies enable faculty to ‘see’ student learning and thinking in ways that we could not before” ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Methodology</title>
      <p>Participants were undergraduate students enrolled in three upper-level business administration courses (N = 52) at a small public university in the Midwest offering both campus and online programs. Courses ran for 16 weeks and were delivered asynchronously. Students voluntarily completed an anonymous online survey near the end of the semester. Across the three courses, a total of 113 students were enrolled. With 52 students completing the voluntary end-of-semester survey, the study achieved a 46% response rate, which is consistent with, or above typical rates reported in online higher education research. The weekly videos were typically 2 - 5 minutes in length, delivered in a talking-head format recorded via webcam, and distributed to students through the Learning Management System’s weekly announcement feature.</p>
      <p>The survey items were intentionally selected to align with the study’s SoTL-driven focus on understanding how weekly instructor-created videos influence student engagement and connectedness in asynchronous courses. The ten Likert-scale items were adapted from ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]) to maintain conceptual consistency with established measures of online engagement and were reviewed by two faculty colleagues to ensure clarity, relevance, and content validity. Five items were designed to assess engagement, such as understanding assignments, staying on task, and interacting with course materials, because engagement is a central determinant of student success in asynchronous learning environments. The remaining five items measured connectedness, an affective dimension related to students’ sense of belonging, instructor presence, and relational trust, which SoTL literature highlights as essential to motivation, satisfaction, and persistence in online learning. These matter because they provide insight into both functional and emotional dimensions of learning: how students perceive logistical clarity and structural support (function), and how they experience relational and social aspects of the course (connectedness). Collectively, the item structure allowed the study to capture nuanced student perceptions regarding whether weekly videos helped reduce ambiguity, humanize the online environment, and foster a meaningful learning experience, which are key outcomes aligned with the overarching research questions.</p>
      <p>The following five questions focus on students’ sense of belonging, relational rapport, and feelings of being connected to the instructor or course community: Q1: The weekly videos made me feel connected to this course. Q2: The weekly videos helped me feel connected to the instructor. Q4: The weekly videos contributed to course discussions. Q5: The weekly videos helped me engage with the instructor. Q10: The weekly videos helped me feel part of a community. The authors related Connectedness with relational, emotional, and social presence.</p>
      <p>The following five questions focus on student involvement, clarity, task completion, interaction with materials, and functional engagement with the course: Q3: The weekly videos increased my engagement with the course. Q6: The weekly videos helped me engage with the course materials. Q7: The weekly videos clearly communicated assignment deadlines. Q8: The weekly videos helped me understand assignments. Q9: The weekly videos helped me stay on task. The authors related Engagement with the behavioral, cognitive, and functional aspects of course participation. </p>
      <p>The study was approved as exempt by the University’s Institutional Review Board. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze mean responses and standard deviations for each survey item.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Results</title>
      <p>The inquiry aimed to understand student perceptions of weekly instructor-created videos and their impact on student engagement and connectedness in online asynchronous business administration courses. The online survey consisted of ten rating questions exploring the impacts of weekly instructor created information videos. Students responded to rating survey questions using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree; 2 = agree; 3 = neutral; 4 = disagree; 5 = strongly disagree); Using this rating scale students responded to the impact each of the following: course engagement and course connectedness (<bold>Table 1</bold>).</p>
      <p><bold>Table</bold><bold>1</bold><bold>.</bold> Mean scores.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Item</td>
              <td>Statement</td>
              <td>Mean</td>
              <td>SD</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q1</td>
              <td>The weekly videos made me feel connected to this course.</td>
              <td>1.711</td>
              <td>0.60</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q2</td>
              <td>The weekly videos helped me feel connected to the instructor.</td>
              <td>1.711</td>
              <td>0.63</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q3</td>
              <td>The weekly videos increased my engagement with the course.</td>
              <td>1.921</td>
              <td>0.72</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q4</td>
              <td>The weekly videos contributed to course discussions.</td>
              <td>2.026</td>
              <td>0.81</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q5</td>
              <td>The weekly videos helped me engage with the instructor.</td>
              <td>2.000</td>
              <td>0.75</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q6</td>
              <td>The weekly videos helped me engage with the course materials.</td>
              <td>1.868</td>
              <td>0.67</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q7</td>
              <td>The weekly videos clearly communicated assignment deadlines.</td>
              <td>1.395</td>
              <td>0.51</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q8</td>
              <td>The weekly videos helped me understand assignments.</td>
              <td>1.921</td>
              <td>0.70</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q9</td>
              <td>The weekly videos helped me stay on task.</td>
              <td>1.737</td>
              <td>0.65</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Q10</td>
              <td>The weekly videos helped me feel part of a community.</td>
              <td>2.263</td>
              <td>0.83</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>Based on 52 student responses, the following key findings emerged:</p>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Functional Aspects of the Course</title>
        <p>The lowest-rated item (with 1 being strongly agree) was Q7: “<italic>The</italic><italic>weekly</italic><italic>videos</italic><italic>clearly</italic><italic>communicated</italic><italic>important</italic><italic>due</italic><italic>dates/time</italic><italic>frames</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>assignments</italic>”, with a mean score of <bold>1.395</bold>, suggests that students valued the videos as effective for logistical clarity. Additionally, there was a strong indication that the videos helped students stay on task (Q9, Mean = <bold>1.737</bold>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. High Perceived Connection to the Course</title>
        <p>The strongest agreement among students was with the statement: “<italic>The</italic><italic>weekly</italic><italic>videos</italic><italic>made</italic><italic>me</italic><italic>feel</italic><italic>connected</italic><italic>to</italic><italic>this</italic><italic>course</italic>” (Q1 and Q2), with a mean score of <bold>1.711</bold> for each. This suggests that students saw the videos as an important mechanism for enhancing their sense of connectedness to the course content and structure.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Moderate Perceived Connection to the Course and Materials</title>
        <p>Students moderately agreed that “<italic>The</italic><italic>weekly</italic><italic>videos</italic><italic>helped</italic><italic>me</italic><italic>understand</italic><italic>assignments</italic>” (Q8), with a mean of <bold>1.921</bold>, that “<italic>The</italic><italic>weekly</italic><italic>videos</italic><italic>increased</italic><italic>my</italic><italic>engagement</italic><italic>with</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>course</italic>” (Q3, Mean = <bold>1.921</bold>), and “<italic>The</italic><italic>weekly</italic><italic>videos</italic><italic>helped</italic><italic>me</italic><italic>engage</italic><italic>with</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>course</italic><italic>materials</italic>” (Q6, Mean = <bold>1.868</bold>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Community and Engagement-Related Items Received Lower Ratings</title>
        <p>Perceptions of the videos helping students feel a <italic>sense</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>community</italic><italic>in</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>course</italic> (Q10, Mean = <bold>2.263</bold>), <italic>engaging</italic><italic>with</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>instructor</italic> (Q5, Mean = <bold>2.000</bold>), and <italic>contributing</italic><italic>to</italic><italic>course</italic><italic>discussions</italic> (Q4, Mean = <bold>2.026</bold>) were among the lower-rated items. This highlights potential areas where video content could be adapted to foster more interpersonal or course structure.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot5">
        <title>4.5. Consistent Patterns in Responses</title>
        <p>Across all questions, the standard deviations remained under 1.0, indicating relatively consistent responses among students.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot6">
        <title>4.6. Discussion</title>
        <p>The results of this study suggest that weekly instructor-created videos in asynchronous business administration courses meaningfully increase student engagement and connectedness, particularly in areas related to course logistics, motivation, and a sense of connectedness. These findings align closely with the literature reviewed, which highlighted that instructor presence—especially through videos—can reduce isolation and increase satisfaction and learning ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]).</p>
        <p>While the videos were successful in communicating deadlines and reinforcing course structure (Q7, Q9), they were less effective in promoting interpersonal connectedness among students or fostering a sense of community (Q10). This may point to the one-directional nature of informational videos, which emphasize clarity but may fall short in encouraging student interaction.</p>
        <p>The results imply that while students value video content for individual engagement and instructor-student connectedness, additional strategies may be necessary to foster peer-to-peer connections and enhance social presence in online settings. These could include peer video introductions, collaborative assignments, or discussion board prompts tied directly to video content.</p>
        <p>This study informs future teaching by emphasizing the value of intentional, humanizing instructor presence in asynchronous modalities. It also suggests that well-designed videos that balance information with warmth and personality can positively impact student experience.</p>
        <p>An interesting pattern in the data is the contrast between students’ strong agreement that the videos helped them feel “connected to the instructor” (Q2) and their more moderate agreement that the videos helped them “engage with the instructor” (Q5). This distinction suggests that while the videos were effective in conveying instructor presence, warmth, and approachability, they did not function as interactive tools for two-way communication. Students may feel emotionally connected to the instructor without perceiving opportunities for real-time or reciprocal engagement, reinforcing that informational videos primarily strengthen instructor-to-student connection rather than interactive exchange.</p>
        <p>Practical implications emerge from these findings. Instructors teaching asynchronous courses may benefit from incorporating short weekly videos to improve logistical clarity, reduce student uncertainty, and enhance instructor presence. However, because informational videos alone did not significantly enhance perceptions of community or peer interaction, they should be paired with additional community-building strategies. For instance including, structured discussion activities, opportunities for student video responses, or collaborative assignments, to strengthen social presence and overall engagement.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot7">
        <title>4.7. Limitations</title>
        <p>Limitations include a single-institution sample, reliance on self-reported data, and focus on business administration courses. Broader, mixed-method research could deepen understanding of how video-based engagement strategies impact learning outcomes across disciplines.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Future Research</title>
      <p>Future research could explore how different types of video content (e.g., informational, motivational, feedback-based, or discussion-driven) influence distinct aspects of engagement such as cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components. A second study might incorporate video elements that encourage peer interaction, such as student responses to video prompts or collaborative video projects.</p>
      <p>Additionally, applying this research to other disciplines outside of business could assess whether video engagement translates across content types. Research could also examine the effect of video length, format (talking head vs. screen recording), or accessibility features (closed captions, transcripts) on engagement and learning outcomes.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>6. Reflection of Study</title>
      <p>This study reaffirmed the importance of instructor presence in online learning and highlighted how even small changes, like weekly videos, can substantially shift student perceptions. One concrete action for the next academic year will be to embed brief, personalized weekly videos in all asynchronous courses, focusing not only on logistical updates but also on encouragement, check-ins, and relevance to real-world applications.</p>
      <p>Key takeaways include the following: Instructor visibility matters. Students feel more connected when they see and hear from their instructor regularly. Videos help reduce ambiguity and increase structure, which supports self-regulated learning. Community-building, beyond instructor to student relationship building, remains a challenge in asynchronous formats and deserves targeted strategies beyond instructor-created content.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Abbreviations</title>
      <table-wrap id="tbl2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>SoTL</td>
              <td>Scholarship of Teaching and Learning</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bernstein, D., &amp; Bass, R. (2005). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. <italic>Academe, 91,</italic> 37-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/40253429 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/40253429</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/40253429">https://doi.org/10.2307/40253429</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bernstein, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bass, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/40253429</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bledsoe, R. S., Richardson, D. S., &amp; Kalle, A. (2021). Student Perceptions of Great Teaching: A Qualitative Analysis. <italic>Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 21,</italic> 21-32. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v21i3.30661 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14434/josotl.v21i3.30661</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v21i3.30661">https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v21i3.30661</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bledsoe, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Richardson, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kalle, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14434/josotl.v21i3.30661</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Boettcher, M. L. (n.d.). Friday Videos: Building Relationships and Community in Class. <italic>The Scholarly Teacher,</italic> 1-5. https://cengage.widen.net/view/pdf/qt7qh0pylc/faces-of-faculty-2023-infographic-2677511.pdf?t.download=true</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Boettcher, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Carega-Butter, M., Badilla-Quintana, M. G., &amp; Fuentes-Henríquez, C. (2020). Critical and Prospective Analysis of Online Education in Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Contexts. <italic>Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l’Educació i de l’Esport, 38,</italic> 23-32. https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2020.38.2.23-32 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.51698/aloma.2020.38.2.23-32</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2020.38.2.23-32">https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2020.38.2.23-32</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Carega-Butter, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Badilla-Quintana, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Psicologia, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.51698/aloma.2020.38.2.23-32</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Cengage (2023). <italic>Faces of Faculty: The Higher Education Instructor Experience 2023</italic> (p.1-20). https://cengage.widen.net/view/pdf/qt7qh0pylc/faces-of-faculty-2023-infographic-2677511.pdf?t.download=true</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2023</year>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dost, G., &amp; Mazzoli Smith, L. (2023). Understanding Higher Education Students’ Sense of Belonging: A Qualitative Meta-Ethnographic Analysis. <italic>Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47,</italic> 822-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2023.2191176 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/0309877x.2023.2191176</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2023.2191176">https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2023.2191176</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dost, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Smith, L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/0309877x.2023.2191176</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Galikyan, I., &amp; Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ Engagement in Asynchronous Online Discussion: The Relationship between Cognitive Presence, Learner Prominence, and Academic Performance. <italic>The Internet and Higher Education, 43,</italic> Article 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Galikyan, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Admiraal, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Presence, L</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <elocation-id>100692</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Garrison, D. R., &amp; Akyol, Z. (2013). The Community of Inquiry Theoretical Framework. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), <italic>Handbook of Distance Education</italic> (pp. 104-120). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738.ch7 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4324/9780203803738.ch7</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738.ch7">https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738.ch7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Garrison, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akyol, Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4324/9780203803738.ch7</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Love, S., &amp; Marshall, D. (2022). Video Feedback and Instructor Social Presence in an Asynchronous Online Course. <italic>Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 5,</italic> 43-58. https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v5i2.324 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36021/jethe.v5i2.324</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v5i2.324">https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v5i2.324</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Love, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Marshall, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36021/jethe.v5i2.324</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Malhotra, T., Mann, A., Avery, T., &amp; Brett, C. (2019). Exploring the Relationship Between Instructor Created Online Video Characteristics and Pedagogy. In <italic>EDULEARN Proceedings</italic> (pp. 3190-3198). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.0861 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21125/edulearn.2019.0861</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.0861">https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.0861</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Malhotra, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mann, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Avery, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brett, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21125/edulearn.2019.0861</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Martin, F., &amp; Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. <italic>Online Learning, 22,</italic> 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092">https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Martin, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bolliger, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">McAlister, R. B. (2014). Use of Instructor-Produced Youtube® Videos to Supplement Manual Skills Training in Occupational Therapy Education. <italic>The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68,</italic> S67-S72. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.685s04 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5014/ajot.2014.685s04</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25397941</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.685s04">https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.685s04</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>McAlister, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5014/ajot.2014.685s04</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25397941</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Owston, R., York, D. N., &amp; Malhotra, T. (2019). Blended Learning in Large Enrolment Classrooms: Student Perceptions across Four Different Instructional Models. <italic>Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,</italic><italic>35</italic><italic>,</italic> 29-45. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4310 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14742/ajet.4310</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4310">https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4310</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Owston, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>York, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Malhotra, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14742/ajet.4310</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Snijders, I., Wijnia, L., Rikers, R. M. J. P., &amp; Loyens, S. M. M. (2020). Building Bridges in Higher Education: Student-Faculty Relationship Quality, Student Engagement, and Student Loyalty. <italic>International Journal of Educational Research, 100,</italic> Article 101538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101538 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101538</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101538">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101538</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Snijders, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wijnia, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rikers, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Loyens, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Quality, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <elocation-id>101538</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101538</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wang, J., &amp; Antonenko, P. D. (2017). Instructor Presence in Instructional Video: Effects on Visual Attention, Recall, and Perceived Learning. <italic>Computers in Human Behavior, 71,</italic> 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.049  <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.049 </pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.049 ">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.049 </ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wang, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Antonenko, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Attention, R</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.049 </pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>