<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ojrd</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Respiratory Diseases</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2163-9418</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2163-940X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojrd.2026.161002</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ojrd-148678</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Medicine</subject>
          <subject>Healthcare</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Role of Multi-Herbal Menthol Lozenges in the Treatment of Acute Sore Throat, Cough and Associated Symptoms</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mehta</surname>
            <given-names>Kapil</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Jagtap</surname>
            <given-names>Manesh</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Satam</surname>
            <given-names>Ameya</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> J. B. Chemicals &amp; Pharmaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, India </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>08</day>
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>01</issue>
      <fpage>24</fpage>
      <lpage>39</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>11</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>06</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrd.2026.161002">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrd.2026.161002</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p><bold>Background:</bold> Acute sore throat and cough are common complaints in primary care settings. Pharyngeal inflammation often leads to interconnected symptoms including throat pain, hoarseness and cough, which reduce quality of life. Topical therapies offer localised symptomatic relief through direct mucosal application. This study evaluated the efficacy of a multi-herbal menthol lozenge for treating acute sore throat, cough and associated symptoms. <bold>Methods:</bold> This prospective, open-label, single-arm study was conducted in Maharashtra, India (August-October 2010). Two hundred patients aged ≥ 6 years with recent onset sore throat were enrolled in two independent cohorts (N = 100 each) at separate investigation sites. Cohort A included patients with normal and severe disease course, while Cohort B only enrolled patients with normal disease. Patients received one 2.7 g lozenge every 2 hours or as needed (maximum 8 - 10 lozenges daily) for 3 days or up to 3 weeks in severe cases. Primary outcomes included changes from baseline in throat pain, inflammation, exudates, cough, and hoarseness assessed using visual analogue scales (VAS) and four-point rating scales. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and global impression scores. <bold>Results:</bold> All 200 patients completed the study (89% normal disease course in Cohort A, 100% in Cohort B). A statistically significant improvement in throat pain was observed from minute 15 onwards in both cohorts, with mean VAS scores decreasing from 2.85 to 0.03 (Cohort A) and 1.52 to 0.00 (Cohort B) by Day 3. Similar patterns were observed for inflammation (98.8% - 99.2% reduction), cough (91.8% - 97.1% reduction), and hoarseness (90.0% - 100% reduction). Complete symptom resolution was achieved in 92.1% - 97.1% of Cohort A patients and 84% - 100% of Cohort B patients by Day 3. Patients with severe disease (11% of Cohort A) showed progressive improvement, achieving complete recovery by Day 21. Global impression scores rated efficacy and safety as “excellent” or “good” in approximately 98% of cases. Only two patients experienced mild adverse events deemed unrelated to treatment. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The multi-herbal menthol lozenge used in this study demonstrated rapid onset of action with significant symptomatic relief and an excellent safety profile, supporting its use for self-management of acute sore throat, cough and associated symptoms.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Pharyngitis</kwd>
        <kwd>Cough</kwd>
        <kwd>Lozenges</kwd>
        <kwd>Menthol</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Acute sore throat is one of the most common complaints associated with upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) and a frequent reason for seeking medical care in primary care [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. On average, adults experience 13.5 - 14.4 episodes of sore throat per 100 patient-years, while rates in children can reach 82.2 - 82.5 episodes per 100 patient-years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Although acute sore throat is generally a self-limiting condition, its associated physical symptoms can impose a substantial psychosocial burden and reduce the quality of life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. </p>
      <p>Sore throat often involves more than localized discomfort. Pharyngeal inflammation can lead to throat pain, hoarseness, and cough. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>] A study reported that sore throat is typically the most bothersome symptom at the initial start of a cold, followed by nasal congestion and later, cough. While cough is less prominent during the early stages, it is frequently present throughout the course of illness and becomes increasingly disruptive in the later stages. The impact of cough on sleep and daily functioning contributes significantly to overall symptom burden, patient discomfort and reduced quality of life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Notably, 54% - 60% of patients who sought medical care report experiencing moderate-to-severe sore throat and other associated symptoms, frequently accompanied by sleep disturbances and impaired daily functioning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. </p>
      <p>Sore throat aetiology is predominantly infectious, with most cases being of viral origin and group A streptococci (GAS) accounting for most bacterial infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Antibiotic therapy is generally not recommended for uncomplicated sore throat and should be reserved for confirmed GAS pharyngitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Of note, no or delayed antibiotic prescription is recommended in patients with a low-to-moderate clinical probability of GAS pharyngitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. Therefore, the availability of topical throat preparations (e.g., topical lozenges, gargles and sprays) containing analgesics and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plays an increasingly important role in the self-management of sore throat, cough and other symptoms.</p>
      <p>Topical therapies deliver the active ingredients directly to the oropharyngeal mucosa, offering rapid symptomatic relief from acute sore throat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. These formulations differ substantially in delivery efficiency and onset of action. Sprays rely on coarse droplets to target affected areas but lose potency through swallowing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Gargles are limited by the gag reflex, depositing active ingredients only in the anterior oral cavity in the anterior oral cavity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. In contrast, lozenges dissolve slowly, ensuring sustained drug delivery to all affected areas of the throat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>].</p>
      <p>Scintigraphy analyses revealed significantly greater initial drug deposition in oropharyngeal mucosa from solid dosage forms (<italic>i.e.</italic>, lozenge and tablet) compared to liquid formulations (<italic>i.e.</italic>, throat sprays or gargles) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. While both solid forms exhibited similar clearance rates, lozenges maintained significantly higher mucosal drug retention than tablets in the first 20 minutes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. These findings indicate that lozenge formulation provides fast, effective and sustained delivery of active ingredients, offering distinct therapeutic advantages to those who experience pharyngeal inflammation.</p>
      <p>This study investigated the efficacy of a multi-herbal menthol lozenge containing menthol and herbal extracts with analgesic, antiviral, antioxidant, antitussive and immune-boosting properties that could potentially help provide effective relief from acute sore throat and cough due to various aetiologies. Menthol and ginger (<italic>Zingiberaceae</italic>) are used in traditional medicine for pain relief, while liquorice (<italic>Glycyrrhiza</italic><italic>glabra</italic>) acts as an antitussive agent. In addition, amla (<italic>Emblica</italic><italic>officinalis</italic>) is a rich source of vitamin C with antioxidant activities, helping to support the immune system. Two independent patient cohorts (N = 100 each) were prospectively enrolled under the same study protocol to enhance analytical robustness. Results from each study group were analysed separately to evaluate consistency in efficacy and safety trends, providing complementary verification of treatment effects while maintaining analytical independence.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Design</title>
        <p>This prospective, open-label, single-arm, two-cohort study was conducted between 4 Aug 2010 and 7 Oct 2010 in two investigational sites located in Maharashtra, India. An independent ethics committee reviewed and approved the study protocol prior to the study initiation (Protocol ID: IS/06/DML/07/10). The study was conducted in full accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients or their parents/caregivers provided written, informed consent prior to study enrolment.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Subjects</title>
        <p>Patients aged ≥ 6 years with recent onset of sore throat &lt; 4 days who are in good general health and agree to attend regular follow-up visits were enrolled in the study. Patients were ineligible to participate in the study if they had a history of nasal reconstruction surgery; needed antibiotic treatment for respiratory infection; a history of severe or malignant hypertension; hyperpyrexia (<italic>i.e.</italic>, temperature of &gt;40.8˚C); life-threatening illness and were hospitalised; elevated intraocular pressure; hyperthyroidism; a severe form of diabetes mellitus; severe liver (<italic>i.e.</italic>, serum transaminases &gt; 3 × upper limit of normal levels) or renal (<italic>i.e.</italic>, serum creatinine ≥ 250 μmol/L) impairment; previously participated in the same study, or participated in another study parallel to or within 30 days before study entry; and history or suspected of not being able to comply with the study protocol or unable to attend regular follow-up visits.</p>
        <p>To enhance the robustness of our findings, we structured the study into two distinct cohorts: Cohort A, which included patients with a subset of severe cases of sore throat and cough, and Cohort B, consisting of patients with only normal, less severe cases. Patients with severe disease were defined as those suffering from severe throat pain, severe Inflammation, cough or hoarseness of voice at baseline (Refer to the “Assessment” section). This differentiation was made to evaluate the therapy’s effectiveness across a spectrum of symptom severity. By including severe cases in Cohort A, we aimed to assess the treatment’s potential in a population that may benefit from more intensive intervention, while Cohort B allowed us to examine the effects in a typical, less severe patient population. This dual-cohort design facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the therapy’s efficacy and safety, ensuring that results can be generalized to both severe and normal cases of sore throat and cough.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Intervention</title>
        <p>All eligible patients were prescribed one 2.7 g multi-herbal menthol lozenge (containing 15 mg of liquorice, 10 mg of ginger, 10 mg of amla and 7 mg of menthol) every 2 hours or as needed, with a maximum of 8 - 10 lozenges per day, for 3 days or up to 2 - 3 weeks in patients with severe disease. Patients were only allowed to use other nonpharmacological methods to provide pain relief, such as steam inhalation. No anti-inflammatory medications were allowed during the study period. </p>
        <p>On Day 1, patients were asked to suck one lozenge (Minute 0), and symptomatic improvement was assessed at Minutes 5, 10, 15 and 20 after dosing. Subsequently, patients were prescribed the lozenges, which were to be taken at home for the next 2 days. Study assessments were conducted on Days 2 (normal disease) and 3 (normal and severe disease) during the study period. Additional assessments were performed on Days 7, 14 and 21 for patients with severe disease.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Assessment</title>
        <p>Throat pain was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 10 with pain severity graded as: 0 (no pain), 1 (1 to 3 = mild pain), 2 (4 to 6 = moderate pain) and 3 (7 to 10 = severe pain) at every study visit. Inflammation, cough and hoarseness of voice were rated using the four-point scale (0 = no pain to 3 = severe) at every visit. The presence or absence of exudates was also recorded at every visit. At the study endpoint, the global impression of the treatment’s efficacy and safety (1 = poor to 4 = excellent) was completed by both patients (or parents) and investigators.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Outcome Measures</title>
        <p>The primary outcome measures were changes from baseline in throat pain, inflammation, exudates, cough and hoarseness of voice. Secondary outcome measures were the incidence of adverse events (AEs) as well as global impression of treatment’s efficacy and safety by patients and investigators at the study endpoint.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot6">
        <title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>The obtained data were coded, analysed and tabulated. Categorical variables were expressed in counts and percentages. Meanwhile, continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). Student’s T-test was used to compute the association between quantitative variables with normal distribution, while Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normally distributed variables. Wilcoxson signed rank test for repeated measures was used to establish differences in throat pain, cough, hoarseness and inflammation. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Baseline Characteristics</title>
        <p>A total of 100 patients were enrolled in each of two study cohorts (Cohort A &amp; Cohort B) and completed the study (60% female in Cohort A and 44% female in Cohort B). Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics are shown in <bold>Table 1</bold>. In Cohort A, 89 patients (89%) had a normal disease course, while all patients (100%) in Cohort B had a normal disease course. </p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Characteristic</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Cohort</bold>
                  <bold>A</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Cohort</bold>
                  <bold>B</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Normal</bold>
                  <bold>disease</bold>
                  <bold>course</bold>
                  <bold>(n = 89)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Severe</bold>
                  <bold>disease</bold>
                  <bold>course</bold>
                  <bold>(n = 11)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Normal</bold>
                  <bold>disease</bold>
                  <bold>course</bold>
                  <bold>(n = 100)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Gender,</bold>
                  <bold>n</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Female</td>
                <td>52 (58.4)</td>
                <td>8 (72.3)</td>
                <td>44 (44.0)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Male</td>
                <td>37 (41.6)</td>
                <td>3 (27.3)</td>
                <td>56 (56.0)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Age</bold>
                  <bold>(mean),</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                </td>
                <td>12.05</td>
                <td>11.45</td>
                <td>32.04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Aetiology,</bold>
                  <bold>n</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pharyngitis</td>
                <td>37 (41.6)</td>
                <td>4 (36.4)</td>
                <td>57 (57.0)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pharyngolaryngitis</td>
                <td>19 (21.3)</td>
                <td>1 (9.0)</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tonsilitis</td>
                <td>19 (21.3)</td>
                <td>4 (36.4)</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tonsillopharyngitis</td>
                <td>12 (13.5)</td>
                <td>2 (18.2)</td>
                <td>0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Laryngitis</td>
                <td>2 (2.3)</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>17 (17.0)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Bronchitis</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>24 (24.0)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Others</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>2 (2.0)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                  <bold>scores</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Throat pain (mean)</td>
                <td>2.85</td>
                <td>3.00</td>
                <td>1.52</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Inflammation (mean)</td>
                <td>2.60</td>
                <td>3.00</td>
                <td>1.22</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cough (mean)</td>
                <td>2.73</td>
                <td>3.00</td>
                <td>1.95</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Hoarseness of voice (mean)</td>
                <td>0.80</td>
                <td>NA</td>
                <td>0.27</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Presence of exudates, n (%)</td>
                <td>69 (77.5)</td>
                <td>11 (100)</td>
                <td>47 (47.0)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Abbreviation: NA, not available.</p>
        <p>A total of 11 patients (11%) in Cohort A had severe disease requiring extended treatment for up to 3 weeks. These severe cases had high mean scores of throat pain, inflammation and cough at baseline, with pharyngeal exudates observed in all affected patients. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Efficacy Endpoints</title>
        <p>The mean symptom scores showed consistent improvement over time after treatment with the lozenges among patients with a normal disease course in both study cohorts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Most patients in both cohorts achieved complete resolution of all symptoms by Day 3, with 92.1% - 97.1% of patients in Cohort A and 84% - 100% in Cohort B demonstrating complete symptom resolution. All remaining patients reported only mild residual symptoms.</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId15.jpeg?20260109015006" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold> Changes in mean symptom scores from baseline among patients with normal disease course in Cohorts A and B.</p>
        <p>Both cohorts exhibited marked reductions in mean throat pain scores from baseline to Day 3, decreasing from 2.85 to 0.03 for Cohort A and from 1.52 to 0.00 for Cohort B. Statistically significant improvement was observed from Minute 15 onwards for Cohorts A and B, with corresponding reductions of 8.1% and 19.1% that ultimately reached 98.9% and 100% by Day 3, respectively. Mean inflammation scores also demonstrated progressive improvement, decreasing from 2.60 at baseline to 0.03 on Day 3 for Cohort A and from 1.22 at baseline to 0.01 on Day 3 for Cohort B. Significant improvement first occurred at Day 2 for Cohort A and at Minute 15 for Cohort B, with reductions of 64.6% and 19.7%, respectively. By Day 3, mean inflammation scores have reduced by 98.8% for Cohort A and 99.2% for Cohort B.</p>
        <p>Mean cough scores also showed sustained improvement, declining from 2.73 to 0.08 for Cohort A and 1.95 to 0.16 for Cohort B. The mean scores decreased significantly from Minute 15 onwards for both cohorts, with reductions of 11.0% and 17.9% that subsequently reached 97.1% and 91.8% by Day 3 for Cohorts A and B, respectively. Mean scores of voice hoarseness declined from 0.80 at baseline to 0.08 on Day 3 for Cohort A, and from 0.27 at baseline to 0.00 on Day 3 for Cohort B. Statistically significant improvement first occurred at Minute 15 for Cohort A and Minute 5 for Cohort B, with reductions of 7.5% and 25.9%, respectively. By Day 3, mean scores of voice hoarseness have reduced by 90.0% for Cohort A and 100.0% for Cohort B.</p>
        <p>Similarly, mean scores of all symptoms showed consistent improvement from Day 3 onwards among patients with severe disease course in Cohort A (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). All patients recovered from their disease pathology by Day 21, with no patients reporting any pain for all relevant symptoms. Mean scores of throat pain reduced from 3.00 at baseline to 0.00 on Day 21. Statistically significant improvements were observed from Day 3 onwards, with reductions of 33.3% on Day 3, 63.6% on Day 7 and 100% on Days 14 and 21. Mean inflammation scores declined from 3.00 at baseline to 0.00 on Day 21. The mean scores decreased significantly from Day 3 onwards, with reductions of 27.3% on Day 3, 60.6% on Day 7, 93.9% on Day 14 and 100% on Day 21. Mean cough scores also reduced from 3.00 at baseline to 0.00 on Day 21. Statistically significant improvements were observed from Day 3 onwards, with per cent reductions of 27.3% on Day 3, 57.6% on Day 7, 87.9% on Day 14 and 100% on Day 21. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Global Impression</title>
        <p>The global impression of the investigators and patients favoured using the multi-herbal menthol lozenges to treat acute sore throat. Among patients with normal disease course, investigators rated the medication’s efficacy and safety as “excellent” or “good” in nearly 98% of the cases in both cohorts. Similarly, patients or their parents rated the medication’s efficacy and safety as “excellent” or “good” in about 98% of the cases in both cohorts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3(a)-(c)</xref>). Among patients with severe disease, both investigators and patients/parents/caregivers rated the medication’s efficacy and safety as “excellent” or “good” in all cases.</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId16.jpeg?20260109015007" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2.</bold> Changes in mean symptom scores from baseline among patients with severe disease course in Cohort A.</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId17.jpeg?20260109015007" />
        </fig>
        <p>(a)</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId18.jpeg?20260109015007" />
        </fig>
        <p>(b)</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId19.jpeg?20260109015007" />
        </fig>
        <p>(c)</p>
        <p><bold>Figure 3.</bold> (a) Global impression of treatment’s efficacy and safety by investigators and patients/parents in normal disease course in Cohort A; (b) Global impression of treatment’s efficacy and safety by investigators and patients/parents in severe disease course in Cohort A; (c) Global impression of treatment’s efficacy and safety by investigators and patients/parents in normal disease course in Cohort B.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Safety Endpoints</title>
        <p>Overall, two patients (2.2%) from Cohort A developed AEs of mild intensity during the study period. One patient complained of nausea, and the other had throat irritation—both events were deemed unrelated to the study medication. No patients in Cohort B or those with severe disease developed any AEs during the study period.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>This study assessed the efficacy of a multi-herbal menthol lozenge for treating acute sore throat, cough and associated symptoms due to various aetiologies. The lozenges (when administered every 2 hours) demonstrated significant clinical relevance as a local analgesic and antitussive agent, with rapid onset of action that provided effective symptomatic relief and minimal AEs. Patients treated with the lozenges reported significant improvement in throat pain as early as 15 minutes post-administration. </p>
      <p>The lozenges also achieved clinical and statistically significant reductions from baseline in inflammation, cough, hoarseness of voice and presence of exudates from 5 to 15 minutes post-administration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The high global impression scores associated with treatment efficacy and safety that were reported by patients or their parents/caregivers confirmed the overall beneficial effect of the lozenges. Our study also supported the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the lozenges for as-needed use (up to 8 - 10 lozenges per day) throughout the 3-day treatment period. Notably, mild AEs were reported in only two patients, which ultimately were deemed unrelated to the study medication.</p>
      <fig id="fig6">
        <label>Figure 6</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId20.jpeg?20260109015008" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure 4.</bold> Proportion of patients with normal disease course having exudates in Cohorts A (green bars) and B (blue bars).</p>
      <fig id="fig7">
        <label>Figure 7</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId21.jpeg?20260109015008" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure 5.</bold> Proportion of patients with severe disease having exudates in Cohort A.</p>
      <p>Topical therapies serve as a key component in the self-management of acute sore throat and cough, offering localised symptomatic relief through direct mucosal application. This targeted approach facilitates rapid analgesic and antitussive effects while minimising systemic exposure and associated risks. The lozenges contain menthol and herbal extracts with various medicinal properties, including liquorice (<italic>Glycyrrhiza</italic><italic>glabra</italic>), ginger (<italic>Zingiberaceae</italic>) and amla (<italic>Emblica</italic><italic>officinalis</italic>). </p>
      <p>As a topical agent, menthol activates the transient receptor potential melastatin-8 (TRPM8) receptor, which may inhibit respiratory reflexes to mediate pain, reduce irritation and alleviate coughing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. Activation of the TRPM8 channels produces a cooling sensation, which serves as a counter-irritant that reduces pain from inflammation and respiratory irritation response. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>] Menthol’s broad antitussive effects are mediated through a reflex mechanism involving TRPM8-dependent activation of the afferent neurons and modulation of sensory irritant receptors in the airway [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>].</p>
      <p>Meanwhile, liquorice-derived bioactive compounds exhibit anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antiviral and analgesic properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. Its primary role in cough relief is often as part of compound formulations, where it serves as a sweet, palatable demulcent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>]. Traditionally, liquorice has been used to ease sore throats, relieve persistent cough and as an expectorant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]. Its demulcent properties help form a protective film over mucous membranes, thus providing symptomatic relief as an antitussive. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that administering liquorice gargles 5 minutes before induction of anaesthesia significantly reduced the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and cough after tracheal intubation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>].</p>
      <p>Ginger is known as a natural remedy used for common ailments like sore throats, coughs, fevers and digestive issues owing to its rich composition of bioactive compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. These bioactives contribute to ginger’s potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Its expectorant action also helps loosen and expel phlegm, making it an effective option for cough relief [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. A systematic review has highlighted the antioxidant benefits of dried ginger, supporting its use as a home remedy for the prevention and treatment of colds, sore throats and coughs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. Beyond respiratory symptoms, several RCTs have investigated the therapeutic potential of ginger across a range of inflammatory and painful conditions, such as primary dysmenorrhea and muscle pain, knee osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. </p>
      <p>Separately, amla has a long history of use in traditional medicine for several therapeutic actions, including the reduction of sore throat and dryness of the mouth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. Clinical studies have shown its effectiveness in reducing sore throat and hoarseness following general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation, as well as in alleviating cough during endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]. In addition to its antitussive effects, a separate preclinical study also showed that continuous treatment with amla extract significantly alleviated postoperative and neuropathic pain in murine models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>].</p>
      <p>Taken together, there is enough evidence to support the role of a lozenge formulation containing these herbal ingredients in the management of inflammatory conditions, such as acute sore throat and its associated symptoms, as demonstrated through the findings from this study. While this study’s single-arm, open-label design presents inherent limitations in the interpretation of results where we acknowledge the potential for a significant placebo effect—common in trials for cough and sore throat remedies—it is important to note that patients reported significant relief from throat pain and cough within just 15 minutes of administration. This rapid onset of symptom relief suggests that the observed effects are most likely attributable to the effectiveness of the therapy itself, rather than solely to placebo responses. Nonetheless, future studies are warranted to further validate these findings.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>This study shows that a multi-herbal menthol lozenge (administered every 2 hours for up to 8 - 10 lozenges per day over 3 days) is effective in managing acute sore throat, cough and associated symptoms, demonstrating rapid symptomatic relief and good safety profile. This effective symptomatic relief is especially important in the clinical context of managing upper respiratory tract infections, where viral etiologies are common. By alleviating symptoms, such a lozenge could play a crucial role in supporting rational antibiotic stewardship, potentially reducing inappropriate use of antibiotics for viral infections. This approach not only enhances patient comfort but also contributes to broader public health efforts aimed at combating antibiotic resistance.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>Medical writing and editorial support were funded by Procter &amp; Gamble Health and provided by the Healthcare Practice of Weber Shandwick HK.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Funding</title>
      <p>This manuscript was supported by Procter &amp; Gamble, which funded the writing and preparation services of the manuscript. The authors declare that the funding source had no influence on the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec8">
      <title>Disclosure</title>
      <p>All authors are employees of J. B. CHEMICALS &amp; PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED, the manufacturer of the product discussed in this manuscript. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec9">
      <title>Author Contributions</title>
      <p>All authors contributed equally to the conceptualisation, investigation, analysis and review of this study. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec10">
      <title>Informed Consent</title>
      <p>All patients or their parents/caregivers provided written, informed consent prior to study enrolment.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec11">
      <title>Data Availability Statement</title>
      <p>The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec12">
      <title>Ethics Approval</title>
      <p>This study was carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). Approval was granted by an independent ethics committee (Protocol ID: IS/06/DML/07/10).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec13">
      <title>Supporting Information</title>
      <p>Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher’s website (<bold>Figures S1-S3</bold>).</p>
      <fig id="fig8">
        <label>Figure 8</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId45.jpeg?20260109015015" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure S1.</bold> Changes in disease severity among patients with normal disease course over time in Cohort A.</p>
      <fig id="fig9">
        <label>Figure 9</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId46.jpeg?20260109015015" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure S2.</bold> Changes in disease severity among patients with severe disease course over time in Cohort A.</p>
      <fig id="fig10">
        <label>Figure 10</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2110313-rId47.jpeg?20260109015015" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure S3.</bold> Changes in disease severity among patients with normal disease course over time in Cohort B.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Krüger, K., Töpfner, N., Berner, R., Windfuhr, J. and Oltrogge, J.H. (2021) Clinical Practice Guideline: Sore Throat. <italic>Deutsches Ärzteblatt international</italic>, 118, 188-194.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Berner, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Windfuhr, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oltrogge, J.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Clinical Practice Guideline: Sore Throat</article-title>
            <source>Deutsches Ärzteblatt international</source>
            <volume>118</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Campbell, A., Mcgovern, E.M., Millar, H. and Bryson, S.M. (2001) SIGN Guidelines and the Management of Sore Throat in Community Pharmacy. <italic>International Journal of Pharmacy Practice</italic>, 9, 15. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2001.tb01075.x </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.2042-7174.2001.tb01075.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2001.tb01075.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2001.tb01075.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Campbell, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mcgovern, E.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Millar, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bryson, S.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2001</year>
            <article-title>SIGN Guidelines and the Management of Sore Throat in Community Pharmacy</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Pharmacy Practice</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.2042-7174.2001.tb01075.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abdullah, B., Koh, K.C., Mohamed, M., Tan, V., Mohammad, N., Sekawi, Z., <italic>et al.</italic> (2024) Treatment of Acute Sore Throat in Malaysia: A Consensus of Multidisciplinary Recommendations Using Modified Delphi Methodology. <italic>Infection and Drug Resistance</italic>, 17, 4149-4160. <underline> https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s477038 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/idr.s477038</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39347494</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s477038">https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s477038</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abdullah, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Koh, K.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mohamed, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tan, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mohammad, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sekawi, Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Treatment of Acute Sore Throat in Malaysia: A Consensus of Multidisciplinary Recommendations Using Modified Delphi Methodology</article-title>
            <source>Infection and Drug Resistance</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/idr.s477038</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39347494</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Addey, D. and Shephard, A. (2012) Incidence, Causes, Severity and Treatment of Throat Discomfort: A Four-Region Online Questionnaire Survey. <italic>BMC Ear</italic>, <italic>Nose and Throat Disorders</italic>, 12, Article No. 9. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-12-9 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1472-6815-12-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22883470</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-12-9">https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-12-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Addey, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shephard, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Incidence, C</string-name>
              <string-name>Ear, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Incidence, Causes, Severity and Treatment of Throat Discomfort: A Four-Region Online Questionnaire Survey</article-title>
            <source>BMC Ear</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1472-6815-12-9</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22883470</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ware, J.E., Coutinho, G., Smith, A.B., Tselenti, E. and Kulasekaran, A. (2023) The Effects of Greater Frequency of Two Most Prevalent Bothersome Acute Respiratory Symptoms on Health-Related Quality of Life in the 2020 US General Population. <italic>Quality of Life Research</italic>, 32, 1043-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03319-4 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11136-022-03319-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36905563</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03319-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03319-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ware, J.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Coutinho, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Smith, A.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tselenti, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kulasekaran, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>The Effects of Greater Frequency of Two Most Prevalent Bothersome Acute Respiratory Symptoms on Health-Related Quality of Life in the 2020 US General Population</article-title>
            <source>Quality of Life Research</source>
            <volume>32</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11136-022-03319-4</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36905563</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Coutinho, G., Duerden, M., Sessa, A., Caretta‐Barradas, S. and Altiner, A. (2021) Worldwide Comparison of Treatment Guidelines for Sore Throat. <italic>International Journal of Clinical Practice</italic>, 75, e13879. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13879 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ijcp.13879</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13879">https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13879</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Coutinho, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Duerden, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sessa, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Barradas, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Altiner, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Worldwide Comparison of Treatment Guidelines for Sore Throat</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Clinical Practice</source>
            <volume>75</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ijcp.13879</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Witek, T.J., Ramsey, D.L., Carr, A.N. and Riker, D.K. (2015) The Natural History of Community-Acquired Common Colds Symptoms Assessed over 4-Years. <italic>Rhinology journal</italic>, 53, 81-88. <underline> https://doi.org/10.4193/rhino14.149 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4193/rhino14.149</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25756083</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4193/rhino14.149">https://doi.org/10.4193/rhino14.149</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Witek, T.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ramsey, D.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Carr, A.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Riker, D.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>The Natural History of Community-Acquired Common Colds Symptoms Assessed over 4-Years</article-title>
            <source>Rhinology journal</source>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4193/rhino14.149</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25756083</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jin, H.J. and Kim, C. (2020) Understanding the Impact of Chronic Cough on the Quality of Life in the General Population. <italic>Allergy</italic>, <italic>Asthma &amp; Immunology Research</italic>, 12, 906-909. <underline> https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2020.12.6.906 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4168/aair.2020.12.6.906</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32935485</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2020.12.6.906">https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2020.12.6.906</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Jin, H.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kim, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Allergy, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Understanding the Impact of Chronic Cough on the Quality of Life in the General Population</article-title>
            <source>Allergy</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4168/aair.2020.12.6.906</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32935485</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">van der Velden, A.W., Sessa, A., Altiner, A., Pignatari, A.C.C. and Shephard, A. (2020) Patients with Sore Throat: A Survey of Self-Management and Healthcare-Seeking Behavior in 13 Countries Worldwide. <italic>Pragmatic and Observational Research</italic>, 11, 91-102. <underline> https://doi.org/10.2147/por.s255872 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/por.s255872</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32982537</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2147/por.s255872">https://doi.org/10.2147/por.s255872</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Velden, A.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sessa, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Altiner, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pignatari, A.C.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shephard, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Patients with Sore Throat: A Survey of Self-Management and Healthcare-Seeking Behavior in 13 Countries Worldwide</article-title>
            <source>Pragmatic and Observational Research</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/por.s255872</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32982537</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Cots, J.M., Alós, J., Bárcena, M., Boleda, X., Cañada, J.L., Gómez, N., <italic>et al.</italic> (2015) Recommendations for Management of Acute Pharyngitis in Adults. <italic>Acta Otorrinolaringologica</italic>( <italic>English Edition</italic>), 66, 159-170. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2015.05.003 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.otoeng.2015.05.003</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2015.05.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2015.05.003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Cots, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Boleda, X.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Recommendations for Management of Acute Pharyngitis in Adults</article-title>
            <source>Acta Otorrinolaringologica (English Edition)</source>
            <volume>66</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.otoeng.2015.05.003</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Oxford, J.S. and Leuwer, M. (2011) Acute Sore Throat Revisited: Clinical and Experimental Evidence for the Efficacy of Over-The-Counter AMC/DCBA Throat Lozenges. <italic>International Journal of Clinical Practice</italic>, 65, 524-530. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02644.x </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02644.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21489076</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02644.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02644.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Oxford, J.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Leuwer, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Acute Sore Throat Revisited: Clinical and Experimental Evidence for the Efficacy of Over-The-Counter AMC/DCBA Throat Lozenges</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Clinical Practice</source>
            <volume>65</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02644.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21489076</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Limb, M., Connor, A., Pickford, M., Church, A., Mamman, R., Reader, S., <italic>et al.</italic> (2009) Scintigraphy Can Be Used to Compare Delivery of Sore Throat Formulations. <italic>International Journal of Clinical Practice</italic>, 63, 606-612. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01984.x </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01984.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19222617</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01984.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01984.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Limb, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Connor, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pickford, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Church, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mamman, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Reader, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Scintigraphy Can Be Used to Compare Delivery of Sore Throat Formulations</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Clinical Practice</source>
            <volume>63</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01984.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19222617</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Stinson, R.J., Morice, A.H. and Sadofsky, L.R. (2023) Modulation of Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels by Plant Derived Substances Used in Over-The-Counter Cough and Cold Remedies. <italic>Respiratory Research</italic>, 24, Article No. 45. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02347-z </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12931-023-02347-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36755306</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02347-z">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02347-z</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Stinson, R.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Morice, A.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sadofsky, L.R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Modulation of Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels by Plant Derived Substances Used in Over-The-Counter Cough and Cold Remedies</article-title>
            <source>Respiratory Research</source>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12931-023-02347-z</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36755306</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pergolizzi, J.V., Taylor, R., LeQuang, J. and Raffa, R.B. (2018) The Role and Mechanism of Action of Menthol in Topical Analgesic Products. <italic>Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics</italic>, 43, 313-319. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12679 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jcpt.12679</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29524352</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12679">https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12679</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pergolizzi, J.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Taylor, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>LeQuang, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Raffa, R.B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>The Role and Mechanism of Action of Menthol in Topical Analgesic Products</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics</source>
            <volume>43</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jcpt.12679</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29524352</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dicpinigaitis, P.V., Morice, A.H., Birring, S.S., McGarvey, L., Smith, J.A., Canning, B.J., <italic>et al.</italic> (2014) Antitussive Drugs—Past, Present, and Future. <italic>Pharmacological Reviews</italic>, 66, 468-512. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.111.005116 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1124/pr.111.005116</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24671376</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.111.005116">https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.111.005116</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dicpinigaitis, P.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Morice, A.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Birring, S.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>McGarvey, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Smith, J.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Canning, B.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Past, P</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Antitussive Drugs—Past, Present, and Future</article-title>
            <source>Pharmacological Reviews</source>
            <volume>66</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1124/pr.111.005116</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24671376</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bell, R.F., Moreira, V.M., Kalso, E.A. and Yli-Kauhaluoma, J. (2021) Liquorice for pain? <italic>Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology</italic>, 11, 1-13. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253211024873 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/20451253211024873</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34349979</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253211024873">https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253211024873</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bell, R.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moreira, V.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kalso, E.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yli-Kauhaluoma, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Liquorice for pain? Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology, 11, 1-13</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/20451253211024873</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34349979</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ziment, I. (2002) Herbal Antitussives. <italic>Pulmonary Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics</italic>, 15, 327-333. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1006/pupt.2002.0343 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/pupt.2002.0343</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12099787</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/pupt.2002.0343">https://doi.org/10.1006/pupt.2002.0343</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ziment, I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Herbal Antitussives</article-title>
            <source>Pulmonary Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics</source>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/pupt.2002.0343</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12099787</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wahab, S., Annadurai, S., Abullais, S.S., Das, G., Ahmad, W., Ahmad, M.F., <italic>et al.</italic> (2021) <italic>Glycyrrhiza</italic><italic>glabra</italic> (Licorice): A Comprehensive Review on Its Phytochemistry, Biological Activities, Clinical Evidence and Toxicology. <italic>Plants</italic>, 10, Article 2751. <underline> https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122751 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10122751</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34961221</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122751">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122751</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wahab, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Annadurai, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abullais, S.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Das, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ahmad, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ahmad, M.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Phytochemistry, B</string-name>
              <string-name>Activities, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Glycyrrhiza glabra (Licorice): A Comprehensive Review on Its Phytochemistry, Biological Activities, Clinical Evidence and Toxicology</article-title>
            <source>Plants</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <elocation-id>2751</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10122751</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34961221</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kuang, Y., Li, B., Fan, J., Qiao, X. and Ye, M. (2018) Antitussive and Expectorant Activities of Licorice and Its Major Compounds. <italic>Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry</italic>, 26, 278-284. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2017.11.046 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bmc.2017.11.046</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29224994</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2017.11.046">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2017.11.046</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kuang, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fan, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Qiao, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ye, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Antitussive and Expectorant Activities of Licorice and Its Major Compounds</article-title>
            <source>Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry</source>
            <volume>26</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bmc.2017.11.046</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29224994</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Honarmand, A., Safavi, M., Safaei Arani, A. and Shokrani, O. (2016) The Efficacy of Different Doses of Liquorice Gargling for Attenuating Postoperative Sore Throat and Cough after Tracheal Intubation. <italic>European Journal of Anaesthesiology</italic>, 33, 595-596. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000400 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/eja.0000000000000400</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26716864</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000400">https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000400</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Honarmand, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Safavi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Arani, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shokrani, O.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>The Efficacy of Different Doses of Liquorice Gargling for Attenuating Postoperative Sore Throat and Cough after Tracheal Intubation</article-title>
            <source>European Journal of Anaesthesiology</source>
            <volume>33</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/eja.0000000000000400</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26716864</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ayustaningwarno, F., Anjani, G., Ayu, A.M. and Fogliano, V. (2024) A Critical Review of Ginger’s ( <italic>Zingiber officinale</italic>) Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Immunomodulatory Activities. <italic>Frontiers in Nutrition</italic>, 11, Article 1364836. <underline> https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1364836 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2024.1364836</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38903613</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1364836">https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1364836</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ayustaningwarno, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Anjani, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ayu, A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fogliano, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Antioxidant, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>A Critical Review of Ginger’s (Zingiber officinale) Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Immunomodulatory Activities</article-title>
            <source>Frontiers in Nutrition</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <elocation-id>1364836</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2024.1364836</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38903613</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ozkur, M., Benlier, N., Takan, I., Vasileiou, C., Georgakilas, A.G., Pavlopoulou, A., <italic>et al.</italic> (2022) Ginger for Healthy Ageing: A Systematic Review on Current Evidence of Its Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Anticancer Properties. <italic>Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity</italic>, 2022, Article ID: 4748447. <underline> https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4748447 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/4748447</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35585878</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4748447">https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4748447</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ozkur, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Benlier, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Takan, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vasileiou, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Georgakilas, A.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pavlopoulou, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Antioxidant, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Ginger for Healthy Ageing: A Systematic Review on Current Evidence of Its Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Anticancer Properties</article-title>
            <source>Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity</source>
            <volume>2022</volume>
            <fpage>474844</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/4748447</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35585878</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Anh, N.H., Kim, S.J., Long, N.P., Min, J.E., Yoon, Y.C., Lee, E.G., <italic>et al.</italic> (2020) Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials. <italic>Nutrients</italic>, 12, Article 157. <underline> https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010157 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu12010157</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31935866</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010157">https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12010157</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Anh, N.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kim, S.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Long, N.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Min, J.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yoon, Y.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lee, E.G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Ginger on Human Health: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of 109 Randomized Controlled Trials</article-title>
            <source>Nutrients</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <elocation-id>157</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu12010157</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31935866</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Homvisatewongsa, Y. (2017) Effectiveness of Indian Gooseberry Cough Pastilles in Reducing Sore Throat and Hoarseness after Endotracheal Intubation during General Anesthesia. <italic>Journal of Health Science of Thailand</italic>, 23, 75-82.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Homvisatewongsa, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Effectiveness of Indian Gooseberry Cough Pastilles in Reducing Sore Throat and Hoarseness after Endotracheal Intubation during General Anesthesia</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Health Science of Thailand</source>
            <volume>23</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Boonfueang, W. and Sriprasart, T. (2021) Suppression of Cough by Emblica Officinalis Extract, Dextromethorphan versus Placebo during Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Double Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo-Controlled Trial. <italic>European Respiratory Journal</italic>, 58, PA2453.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Boonfueang, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sriprasart, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Extract, D</string-name>
              <string-name>Blind, D</string-name>
              <string-name>Dummy, P</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Suppression of Cough by Emblica Officinalis Extract, Dextromethorphan versus Placebo during Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Double Blind, Double Dummy, Placebo-Controlled Trial</article-title>
            <source>European Respiratory Journal</source>
            <volume>58</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Lim, D., Kim, J. and Kim, Y. (2016) Analgesic Effect of Indian Gooseberry ( <italic>Emblica officinalis</italic> Fruit) Extracts on Postoperative and Neuropathic Pain in Rats. <italic>Nutrients</italic>, 8, Article 760. <underline> https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8120760 </underline><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu8120760</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27898027</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8120760">https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8120760</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lim, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kim, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kim, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Analgesic Effect of Indian Gooseberry (Emblica officinalis Fruit) Extracts on Postoperative and Neuropathic Pain in Rats</article-title>
            <source>Nutrients</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <elocation-id>760</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu8120760</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27898027</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>