<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">nr</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Natural Resources</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2158-7086</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2158-706X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/nr.2025.1613033</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">nr-148438</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Earth</subject>
          <subject>Environmental Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Contribution to the Study of Three Potentially Invasive Species in the Lesser Antilles: The Case of Martinique</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-7462-2601</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Abati</surname>
            <given-names>Yelji</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Joseph</surname>
            <given-names>Philippe</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Baillard</surname>
            <given-names>Kévine</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Claude</surname>
            <given-names>Jean-Philippe</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Jean-François</surname>
            <given-names>Yanis</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ely-Marius</surname>
            <given-names>Séverine</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Sophie</surname>
            <given-names>Stéphane</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> UMR ESPACE DEV-BIORECA Laboratory, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecology, University of Antilles, Schœlcher, France </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>17</day>
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>672</fpage>
      <lpage>693</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>20</day>
          <month>01</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2025 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2025.1613033">https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2025.1613033</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>The invasive species are the second biggest cause of biodiversity loss. Invasive species are detrimental to the proper functioning of all ecosystems. Island ecosystems are more affected by biological invasions than mainland ecosystems. In Martinique, several potentially invasive plant species are threatening the island’s forests. These species manage to establish themselves in all three bioclimatic levels, leading to monospecific formations in certain regions. The analysis is based on a study of three potentially invasive species: <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic>. A total of 48 floristic inventories were carried out in the island’s three bioclimatic stages. The data obtained enabled us to characterize station individually. In addition, multivariate statistical analyses (AFC and ACP) were carried out using EXCEL and XLSTAT software to highlight similarities between inventories and determine relationships with environmental variables. The results obtained have enabled us to decipher the main life traits of these species, while establishing their ecological profile when they are placed in the same ecological conditions in the forests of Martinique.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Lesser Antilles</kwd>
        <kwd>Martinique</kwd>
        <kwd>Biodiversity</kwd>
        <kwd>Potentially Invasive Species</kwd>
        <kwd>&lt;i&gt;Dichrostachys&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; cinerea&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
        <kwd>&lt;i&gt;Spathodea&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;campanulata&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
        <kwd>&lt;i&gt;Triphasia&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;trifolia&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
        <kwd>Anthropization</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Urbanization has led to the progressive regression of forests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. This regression can be explained by a number of phenomena that erode biodiversity. These include the destruction of natural habitats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>] and the population explosion of invasive alien species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. This proliferation of invasive alien taxa is the second biggest cause of biodiversity loss and is also known as biological invasion. </p>
      <p>Indeed, these taxa possess great ecological plasticity, enabling them to colonize various types of environment and develop ecological niches in a variety of environmental conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. During their expansion, they modify environmental characteristics, such as soil chemistry, and disrupt interactions with native plant communities, leading to a reduction in local biodiversity.</p>
      <p>Because of their geographical isolation, floristic diversity and limited surface area, islands are particularly vulnerable to this phenomenon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. The island of Martinique is subject to the expansion of several potentially invasive plant species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]. Previous work has shown that <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> are plant species with invasion potential in Martinique [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>].</p>
      <p>By studying three potentially invasive species (<italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic>) in the different bioclimatic zones of the island, we will be able to answer the following questions:</p>
      <p>Which of these species, <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> or <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic>, influenced by the same ecological conditions, is the most competitive?What are their ecological profiles?What stages of plant succession do they belong to?</p>
      <p>In order to answer all these questions, we focused our study on the analysis of several phytocenoses in communes on the island of Martinique corresponding to different stages of evolution and bioclimates (lower, middle and upper). </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Area</title>
        <p>Martinique is located at the centre of the Lesser Antilles and has a surface area of 1128 km<sup>2</sup>. It has two main seasons: the dry season (or Lent) and the wet season (or rainy season).</p>
        <p>The island’s highest point is Montagne Pelée, at around 1397 m. Its topography, marked by mountainous massifs, gives rise to a great diversity of vegetation, ranging from dry to hyper-humid zones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The island’s forests, from coast to summit, are influenced by average rainfall variations that oscillate between 1500 mm and 4000 mm of water, or even more (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). These rainfall variations determine several bioclimatic stages: dry, sub-humid-humid, humid and hyper-humid bioclimates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>and <bold>Table 1</bold>). Each bioclimate is associated with a specific forest type and a collection of characteristic species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>].</p>
        <p>Our floristic surveys were carried out in the communes of Prêcheur, Morne Rouge, Schœlcher, Fort-de-France, Marin and Vauclin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Study Species</title>
        <p>2.2.1. <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic></p>
        <p><italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> or Saint-Domingue Acacia, is a shrub or small tree belonging </p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId15.jpeg?20251229034021" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1</bold><bold>.</bold> Bioclimatic grading in the Lesser Antilles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>].</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1</bold><bold>.</bold> Ecosystem potential and bioclimates as a function of mean annual rainfall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>].</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Altitudes</td>
                <td>Average annual rainfall</td>
                <td>Bioclimates</td>
                <td>Ecosystemic potentialities</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>0 - 250 m</td>
                <td>1500 mm</td>
                <td>Dry</td>
                <td>Seasonal evergreen forest of lower horizon and xeric facies (dry forest)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>250 - 500 m</td>
                <td>1500 - 2500 mm</td>
                <td>Moderately humid</td>
                <td>Tropical seasonal evergreen forest (mesophilous forest)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">More than 500 m</td>
                <td>2500 - 4000 mm</td>
                <td>Humid</td>
                <td>Tropical sub-montane ombrophilous forest (hygrophilous forest)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>More than 4000 mm</td>
                <td>Hyperhumid</td>
                <td>Tropical montane rainforest (mountain hygrophilous forest)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId16.jpeg?20251229034020" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2</bold><bold>.</bold> Average annual cumulative rainfall on the island of Martinique.</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId17.jpeg?20251229034020" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 3</bold><bold>.</bold> List of surveyed sites.</p>
        <p>to the Mimosaceae family (including species like <italic>Inga</italic><italic>laurina</italic> or <italic>Samanea</italic><italic>saman</italic>) that was introduced to the Lesser Antilles in the 19th century. The species is native to Southern and Tropical Africa. It thrives in open, highly degraded areas or regions with poor soils. The bark of young shoots is green and densely puberulent, while that of adult shoots is brown with whitish lenticels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. The bipinnate leaves are made up of 10 to 30 pairs of linear-oblong or obtuse-leaflets.</p>
        <p>The fragrant flowers have a bicoloured raceme inflorescence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId18.jpeg?20251229034020" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Inflorescences of <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> (Photo ABATI Y., 2017).</p>
        <p>The fruits are glomerular pods, twisted or more or less curved or compressed, containing dark brown obovate seeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]. The species reproduces by suckering, by barochory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>] and also by zoochory (avichory, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]). It occurs in different stages of vegetation evolution: herbaceous, shrubby, pre-forest, young forest and secondary forest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>].</p>
        <p>Saint-Domingue Acacia also has many virtues. It is used in agroforestry for soil rehabilitation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>].</p>
        <p>The bark, roots and leaves are used to treat headaches and toothaches, snake bites and syphilis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>].</p>
        <p>2.2.2. <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic></p>
        <p><italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> or Gabon Tulip tree is a member of the Bignoniaceae family. It has been cultivated for ornamental purposes and is native to Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>]. The compound leaves are imparipinnate and have 4 to 9 pairs of leaflets with acuminate apices (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The branches are marked with white lenticels. The scarlet-orange flowers with golden yellow margins are arranged in terminal racemes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. The inedible fruits contain a large number of seeds.</p>
        <p>The species reproduces by anemochorous seeds and zoochory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>]. The Gabon Tulip tree establishes itself in the shrub, pre-forest, young forest, and advanced secondary forest stages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId19.jpeg?20251229034021" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 5</bold><bold>.</bold> Leaves and inflorescences of <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> (Left photo by ELY-MARIUS S., 2016; Right photo by ABATI Y., 2016).</p>
        <p>2.2.3. <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic></p>
        <p><italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> or Petite Citronnelle is a shrub in the Rutaceae family that was introduced for ornamental purposes in the 19th century [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>]. The species favors open, shady environments. Twigs are thorny. The trifoliate leaves are broadly rounded at the tip, wedge-shaped or sometimes rounded at the base (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
        <p>Fragrant flowers consist of white petals. Solitary or in axillary cymes, they are composed of six stamens. The ellipsoidal to globular fruits are edible. When ripe, they are dull orange-red or purple [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]. The species thrives in the shrub, pre-forest and young forest stages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>].</p>
        <p><italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> establishes itself in shrub, pre-forest and young forest stages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>] and spreads by seeds that can be easily dispersed by animals, particularly birds (avichory) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]. The species is also used for its antifungal and antibacterial properties to treat colic or diarrhea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>]. The fruits are used for coughs and sore throats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]. In the French West Indies, infused <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> leaves are used as a vermicide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId20.jpeg?20251229034023" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 6</bold><bold>.</bold> Leaves and fruits of Petite Citronnelle (<italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic>) (Photo by ABATI Y., 2016).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Methods</title>
      <p>The proposed method is based on floristic inventories. During these inventories, we delimit a study perimeter called a transect, divided into quadrats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The surface area of the transect varies between 500 and 1000 m<sup>2</sup>, depending on the plant formations. We consider the following descriptors: scientific name, total height, height of 1st branching, and trunk diameter (measured at 1.33 m from the ground according to international standards: diametric class).</p>
      <fig id="fig7">
        <label>Figure 7</label>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId21.jpeg?20251229034024" />
      </fig>
      <p><bold>Figure 7</bold><bold>.</bold> Representation of a transect composed of quadrats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>].</p>
      <p>The ecological and structural parameters considered in this study are as follows:</p>
      <p>Absolute frequency fa, <italic>i.e.</italic> the number of times a given species has been observed in quadrats or stations;Relative frequency fr, the ratio of absolute frequency to the total number of quadrats in a transect or stations;Density corresponds to the number of individuals on the survey surface;The distribution index is defined by the formula: Id = fr * d (density, defined as the ratio between the number of individuals of the species in question and the survey area). It is used to assess how the species population occupies the space at the station;The index of dominance (ID) is used to determine the dominance of species among themselves, and is obtained by the following relationship ID = Id * St (basal area);A factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) using XLSTAT software was used to compare stations;Hierarchical clustering (CAH): Using agglomerative methods to analyze the hierarchical links between individuals and groups.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Studies of Species-Bioclimate Relationships</title>
        <p>4.1.1. Lower Elevation Zone</p>
        <p>The analysis carried out in the lower tier is based on the study of 34 inventories in which we have gathered all the stations <italic>where</italic><italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> have developed. The results obtained for the stations on the lower elevation zone are presented in the following table (<bold>Table 2</bold>):</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2</bold><bold>.</bold> The main ecological and structural parameters for all the sites in the lower elevation zone.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Rank</td>
                <td>Species</td>
                <td>fa</td>
                <td>fr</td>
                <td>Number of individuals per species excluding regenerations and dead trees</td>
                <td>
                  Density (ind/m
                  <sup>2</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>Id</td>
                <td>Total basal area per species</td>
                <td>ID</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Dead trees</td>
                <td>28</td>
                <td>82%</td>
                <td>1740</td>
                <td>0.0859</td>
                <td>0.0708</td>
                <td>5.2268</td>
                <td>3.70E−01</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>Pisonia fragrans</td>
                <td>32</td>
                <td>94%</td>
                <td>1356</td>
                <td>0.0670</td>
                <td>0.0630</td>
                <td>3.1131</td>
                <td>1.96E−01</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>Citharexylum spinosum</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>71%</td>
                <td>634</td>
                <td>0.0313</td>
                <td>0.0221</td>
                <td>5.3962</td>
                <td>1.19E−01</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>Dichrostachys cinerea</td>
                <td>21</td>
                <td>62%</td>
                <td>1263</td>
                <td>0.0624</td>
                <td>0.0385</td>
                <td>1.6066</td>
                <td>6.19E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>Bourreria succulenta</td>
                <td>28</td>
                <td>82%</td>
                <td>1106</td>
                <td>0.0546</td>
                <td>0.0450</td>
                <td>1.2704</td>
                <td>5.71E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>Haematoxylon campechianum</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>44%</td>
                <td>399</td>
                <td>0.0197</td>
                <td>0.0087</td>
                <td>2.6821</td>
                <td>2.33E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>Capparis indica</td>
                <td>27</td>
                <td>79%</td>
                <td>825</td>
                <td>0.0407</td>
                <td>0.0324</td>
                <td>0.6038</td>
                <td>1.95E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>Erythroxylon havanense</td>
                <td>32</td>
                <td>94%</td>
                <td>558</td>
                <td>0.0276</td>
                <td>0.0259</td>
                <td>0.7491</td>
                <td>1.94E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>Croton bixoides</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>71%</td>
                <td>784</td>
                <td>0.0387</td>
                <td>0.0273</td>
                <td>0.6558</td>
                <td>1.79E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>Bursera simaruba</td>
                <td>26</td>
                <td>76%</td>
                <td>116</td>
                <td>0.0057</td>
                <td>0.0044</td>
                <td>1.8025</td>
                <td>7.90E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>Swietenia aubrevilleana</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>76%</td>
                <td>632</td>
                <td>0.0312</td>
                <td>0.0239</td>
                <td>4.1724</td>
                <td>9.96E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>Zanthoxylum monophyllum</td>
                <td>23</td>
                <td>35%</td>
                <td>434</td>
                <td>0.0214</td>
                <td>0.0076</td>
                <td>1.3862</td>
                <td>1.05E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>Tabebuia heterophylla</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>68%</td>
                <td>148</td>
                <td>0.0073</td>
                <td>0.0049</td>
                <td>3.6457</td>
                <td>1.80E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>13</td>
                <td>Leucaena leucocephala</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>32%</td>
                <td>350</td>
                <td>0.0173</td>
                <td>0.0056</td>
                <td>0.8065</td>
                <td>4.51E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>Acacia sp</td>
                <td>13</td>
                <td>38%</td>
                <td>217</td>
                <td>0.0107</td>
                <td>0.0041</td>
                <td>0.9302</td>
                <td>3.81E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>Lonchocarpus punctatus</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>32%</td>
                <td>172</td>
                <td>0.0085</td>
                <td>0.0027</td>
                <td>1.2188</td>
                <td>3.35E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>Capparis flexuosa</td>
                <td>32</td>
                <td>94%</td>
                <td>283</td>
                <td>0.0140</td>
                <td>0.0132</td>
                <td>0.1919</td>
                <td>2.52E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>Gliricidia sepium</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>26%</td>
                <td>91</td>
                <td>0.0045</td>
                <td>0.0012</td>
                <td>1.8815</td>
                <td>2.24E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>Myrcia citrifolia</td>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>21%</td>
                <td>567</td>
                <td>0.0280</td>
                <td>0.0058</td>
                <td>0.3225</td>
                <td>1.86E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>Tabernaemontana citrifolia</td>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>21%</td>
                <td>259</td>
                <td>0.0128</td>
                <td>0.0026</td>
                <td>0.2926</td>
                <td>7.70E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>20</td>
                <td>Swietenia mahagoni</td>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>53%</td>
                <td>96</td>
                <td>0.0047</td>
                <td>0.0025</td>
                <td>1.3656</td>
                <td>3.43E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>21</td>
                <td>Acanthocereus tetragonus</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>15%</td>
                <td>307</td>
                <td>0.0152</td>
                <td>0.0022</td>
                <td>0.5856</td>
                <td>1.31E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>22</td>
                <td>Erithalis fruticosa</td>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>21%</td>
                <td>332</td>
                <td>0.0164</td>
                <td>0.0034</td>
                <td>0.3279</td>
                <td>1.11E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>23</td>
                <td>Ficus citrifolia</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>26%</td>
                <td>30</td>
                <td>0.0015</td>
                <td>0.0004</td>
                <td>2.8132</td>
                <td>1.10E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>Triphasia trifolia</td>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>26%</td>
                <td>387</td>
                <td>0.0191</td>
                <td>0.0051</td>
                <td>0.1914</td>
                <td>9.69E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>77</td>
                <td>Spathodea campanulata</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>18%</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>0.0005</td>
                <td>0.0001</td>
                <td>0.2921</td>
                <td>2.80E−05</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Absolute frequency (fa) = presence of the species in the different quadrats; Relative frequency (fr) = Absolute frequency/by the number of quadrats; Density = number of individuals/survey area; Index of distribution (Id) = Relative Frequency * Density; Index of dominance (ID) = Index of distribution * basal area.</p>
        <p><italic>Pisonia fragrans</italic>, <italic>Citharexylum</italic><italic>spinosum</italic>, <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>, <italic>Bourreria</italic><italic>succulenta</italic>,<italic>Capparis indica</italic>,<italic>Erythroxylon</italic><italic>havanense</italic>,<italic>Croton</italic><italic>bixoides</italic><italic>Bursera</italic><italic>simaruba</italic>,<italic>Swietenia</italic><italic>aubrevilleana</italic>,<italic>Tabebuia heterophylla</italic>,<italic>Capparis</italic><italic>flexuosa</italic>, <italic>Chiococca</italic><italic>alba</italic> and <italic>Pisonia aculeata</italic> are the most widely distributed species. In order of ecological importance,<italic>Pisonia fragrans</italic>, <italic>Citharexylum</italic><italic>spinosum</italic>, <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea and</italic><italic>Bourreria</italic><italic>succulenta</italic> are the dominant species. These taxa have the highest dominance indices (DI) (<bold>Table 2</bold>).</p>
        <p><italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> is relatively well distributed (fr = 62%; <bold>Table 2</bold>) and ranks third in <bold>Table 2</bold> in terms of the Dominance Index. A total of 1263 individuals with diameters ranging from 2.5 to 15 cm were counted. Most of these were 2.5 (73.23%) and 5 cm (21.38%) in diameter. The remaining 5.39% were 10 and 15 cm in diameter.</p>
        <p><italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> is much less widely distributed (fr = 26%; <bold>Table 2</bold>) and ranks 24th. 387 individuals of the species were observed (<bold>Table 2</bold>), most of them with small diameters (2.5 cm).</p>
        <p>The results show that <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> is an erratic species, with 11 individuals observed at a single station (<bold>Table 2</bold>). Although the majority of <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> were found in the 2.5 cm to 5 cm diameter classes, two individuals measuring 45 and 60 cm were also counted.</p>
        <p>The inertia of the first axis (F1) is 10.92% and that of the second axis (F2) is 9.17%. This corresponds to a maximum inertia of 20.09% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). Axis 1 appears to oppose changes in floristic composition, while axis 2 differentiates the gradient of temporal evolution. Station PTB4 stands out from all the lower elevation zone stations, showing little or no similarity to them (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p>
        <p>4.1.2. Middle Elevation Zone</p>
        <p>In the mid-elevation zone, 10 inventories were pooled to study the existing relationships between the three potentially invasive plant species in our study. </p>
        <p><italic>Citharexylum</italic><italic>spinosum</italic>,<italic>Pisonia fragrans</italic> and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> are the most widely distributed species in the middle elevation zone (<bold>Table 3</bold>). In terms of dominance index, <italic>Citharexylum</italic><italic>spinosum</italic>, and secondarily <italic>Swietenia macrophylla</italic> and <italic>Pisonia fragrans</italic>, are the species that make the best use of environmental factors.</p>
        <fig id="fig8">
          <label>Figure 8</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId22.jpeg?20251229034029" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 8</bold><bold>.</bold> Mesological and temporal differentiation of all the stations in the lower elevation zone.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold><bold>.</bold> The main ecological and structural parameters for all the sites in the middle elevation zone.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Rank</td>
                <td>Species</td>
                <td>fa</td>
                <td>fr</td>
                <td>Number of individuals per species excluding regenerations and dead trees</td>
                <td>
                  Density (ind/m
                  <sup>2</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>Id</td>
                <td>Total basal area per species</td>
                <td>ID</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>Citharexylum spinosum</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>60%</td>
                <td>290</td>
                <td>0.0443</td>
                <td>0.0266</td>
                <td>3.6845</td>
                <td>9.79E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>Swietenia macrophylla</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>173</td>
                <td>0.0264</td>
                <td>0.0106</td>
                <td>4.6407</td>
                <td>4.90E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>Pisonia fragrans</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>60%</td>
                <td>553</td>
                <td>0.0844</td>
                <td>0.0507</td>
                <td>0.7393</td>
                <td>3.74E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Dead trees</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>50%</td>
                <td>218</td>
                <td>0.0333</td>
                <td>0.0166</td>
                <td>1.5929</td>
                <td>2.65E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>Mangifera indica</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>75</td>
                <td>0.0115</td>
                <td>0.0034</td>
                <td>3.9422</td>
                <td>1.35E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>Simarouba amara</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>259</td>
                <td>0.0395</td>
                <td>0.0079</td>
                <td>1.6906</td>
                <td>1.34E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>Inga laurina</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>256</td>
                <td>0.0391</td>
                <td>0.0156</td>
                <td>0.5532</td>
                <td>8.65E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>Cordia sulcata</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>171</td>
                <td>0.0261</td>
                <td>0.0052</td>
                <td>1.3902</td>
                <td>7.26E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>Ocotea coriacea</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>308</td>
                <td>0.0470</td>
                <td>0.0141</td>
                <td>0.4732</td>
                <td>6.68E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>Tabernaemontana citrifolia</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>191</td>
                <td>0.0292</td>
                <td>0.0117</td>
                <td>0.2744</td>
                <td>3.20E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>Myrcia splendens</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>316</td>
                <td>0.0482</td>
                <td>0.0096</td>
                <td>0.2528</td>
                <td>2.44E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>Spathodea campanulata</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>52</td>
                <td>0.0079</td>
                <td>0.0024</td>
                <td>0.6813</td>
                <td>1.62E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>Tabebuia heterophylla</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>29</td>
                <td>0.0044</td>
                <td>0.0013</td>
                <td>1.0740</td>
                <td>1.43E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>13</td>
                <td>Samanea saman</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>35</td>
                <td>0.0053</td>
                <td>0.0011</td>
                <td>1.2154</td>
                <td>1.30E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>Andira inermis</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>33</td>
                <td>0.0050</td>
                <td>0.0010</td>
                <td>0.9945</td>
                <td>1.00E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>Haematoxylon campechianum</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>13</td>
                <td>0.0020</td>
                <td>0.0008</td>
                <td>1.1074</td>
                <td>8.79E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>Cecropia schreberiana</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>27</td>
                <td>0.0041</td>
                <td>0.0008</td>
                <td>0.9881</td>
                <td>8.15E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>Eugenia ligustrina</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>179</td>
                <td>0.0273</td>
                <td>0.0082</td>
                <td>0.0879</td>
                <td>7.20E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>18</td>
                <td>Erythroxylon havanense</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>71</td>
                <td>0.0108</td>
                <td>0.0043</td>
                <td>0.1242</td>
                <td>5.38E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>Casearia decandra</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>46</td>
                <td>0.0070</td>
                <td>0.0028</td>
                <td>0.1797</td>
                <td>5.05E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>20</td>
                <td>Swietenia mahagoni</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>0.0021</td>
                <td>0.0004</td>
                <td>1.0755</td>
                <td>4.60E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>21</td>
                <td>Ceiba pentandra</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>39</td>
                <td>0.0060</td>
                <td>0.0012</td>
                <td>0.3721</td>
                <td>4.43E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>22</td>
                <td>Sapium caribaeum</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>10%</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>0.0037</td>
                <td>0.0004</td>
                <td>1.1801</td>
                <td>4.32E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>23</td>
                <td>Chrysophyllum argenteum</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>59</td>
                <td>0.0090</td>
                <td>0.0027</td>
                <td>0.1556</td>
                <td>4.20E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>Terminalia catappa</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>20</td>
                <td>0.0031</td>
                <td>0.0009</td>
                <td>0.4055</td>
                <td>3.71E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>Bursera simaruba</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>62</td>
                <td>0.0095</td>
                <td>0.0038</td>
                <td>0.0962</td>
                <td>3.64E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>26</td>
                <td>Triphasia trifolia</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>50%</td>
                <td>85</td>
                <td>0.0130</td>
                <td>0.0065</td>
                <td>0.0417</td>
                <td>2.71E−04</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>57</td>
                <td>Funtumia elastica</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>10%</td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>0.0029</td>
                <td>0.0003</td>
                <td>0.0417</td>
                <td>1.21E−05</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>75</td>
                <td>Dichrostachys cinerea</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>0.0006</td>
                <td>0.0001</td>
                <td>0.0049</td>
                <td>6.00E−07</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Absolute frequency (fa) = presence of the species in the different quadrats; Relative frequency (fr) = Absolute frequency/by the number of quadrats; Density = number of individuals/survey area; Index of distribution (Id) = Relative Frequency * Density; Index of dominance (ID) = Index of distribution * basal area.</p>
        <p><italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> is sparsely distributed (fr = 30%; <bold>Table 3</bold>) and ranks 11th among mid-elevation zone in terms of Dominance Index (<bold>Table 3</bold>).</p>
        <p>Despite the fact that the population abundance and distribution of <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> is greater than that of <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic>, Petite Citronnelle is ranked 26th in <bold>Table 3</bold>. 85 individuals of the species are distributed in diameter classes between 2.5 and 5 cm. Specimens of the Gabon Tulip tree, on the other hand, fall into larger diameter classes.</p>
        <p>The results show that <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> is an erratic species, with 4 individuals observed at two stations (<bold>Table 3</bold>). In these two phytocenoses, the presence of the species seems to be due to the presence of bovine species displaced by farmers during dry periods.</p>
        <p>The inertia associated with the first axis is 22.01% and that of the second is 17.20%. For these two axes, the maximum inertia is 39.21% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). The F1 axis appears to differentiate floristic compositions, while the F2 axis tends to discriminate the temporal evolutionary dynamics of the stations.</p>
        <p>The distribution of sites and plant species is linked both to the stage of temporal evolution, which varies between the pre-silvicultural stage and the secondary silvicultural stage, and to population variations.</p>
        <p>This AFC made it possible to group together all the stations with similar floristic composition and population structure. The station FROU9 differs from the other middle elevation zone and is characterized by several (11) singular species, including <italic>Funtumia</italic><italic>elastica</italic>, <italic>Homalium</italic><italic>racemosum</italic> and <italic>Licania</italic><italic>ternatensis</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig9">
          <label>Figure 9</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId23.jpeg?20251229034030" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 9</bold><bold>.</bold> Mesological and temporal differentiation of all the stations in the middle elevation zone.</p>
        <p>4.1.3. Upper Elevation Zone</p>
        <p>The northern part of the island, being less affected by anthropogenic impact, is represented by four stations where individuals of <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> have developed (<bold>Table 4</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4</bold><bold>.</bold> The main ecological and structural parameters for all the sites in the upper elevation zone.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Rank</td>
                <td>Species</td>
                <td>fa</td>
                <td>fr</td>
                <td>Number of individuals per species excluding regenerations and dead trees</td>
                <td>
                  Density (ind/m
                  <sup>2</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>Id</td>
                <td>Total basal area per species</td>
                <td>ID</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>Piper aduncum</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>60%</td>
                <td>290</td>
                <td>0.0443</td>
                <td>0.0266</td>
                <td>3.6845</td>
                <td>9.79E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>Dead trees</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>173</td>
                <td>0.0264</td>
                <td>0.0106</td>
                <td>4.6407</td>
                <td>4.90E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>Spathodea campanulata</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>60%</td>
                <td>553</td>
                <td>0.0844</td>
                <td>0.0507</td>
                <td>0.7393</td>
                <td>3.74E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Clidemia umbrosa</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>50%</td>
                <td>218</td>
                <td>0.0333</td>
                <td>0.0166</td>
                <td>1.5929</td>
                <td>2.65E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>Swietenia mahagoni</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>75</td>
                <td>0.0115</td>
                <td>0.0034</td>
                <td>3.9422</td>
                <td>1.35E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>Chimarrhis cymosa</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>259</td>
                <td>0.0395</td>
                <td>0.0079</td>
                <td>1.6906</td>
                <td>1.34E−02</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>Cecropia schreberiana</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>256</td>
                <td>0.0391</td>
                <td>0.0156</td>
                <td>0.5532</td>
                <td>8.65E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>Conostegia icosandra</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>171</td>
                <td>0.0261</td>
                <td>0.0052</td>
                <td>1.3902</td>
                <td>7.26E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>Inga ingoides</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>308</td>
                <td>0.0470</td>
                <td>0.0141</td>
                <td>0.4732</td>
                <td>6.68E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>Cyathea arborea</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>40%</td>
                <td>191</td>
                <td>0.0292</td>
                <td>0.0117</td>
                <td>0.2744</td>
                <td>3.20E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>Cyathea muricata</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>316</td>
                <td>0.0482</td>
                <td>0.0096</td>
                <td>0.2528</td>
                <td>2.44E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>Palicourea crocea</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>52</td>
                <td>0.0079</td>
                <td>0.0024</td>
                <td>0.6813</td>
                <td>1.62E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>Clerodendron buchananii</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>30%</td>
                <td>29</td>
                <td>0.0044</td>
                <td>0.0013</td>
                <td>1.0740</td>
                <td>1.43E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>13</td>
                <td>Ocotea leucoxylon</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>35</td>
                <td>0.0053</td>
                <td>0.0011</td>
                <td>1.2154</td>
                <td>1.30E−03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>Bambusa vulgaris</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>20%</td>
                <td>33</td>
                <td>0.0050</td>
                <td>0.0010</td>
                <td>0.9945</td>
                <td>1.00E−03</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Absolute frequency (fa) = presence of the species in the different quadrats; Relative frequency (fr) = Absolute frequency/by the number of quadrats; Density = number of individuals/survey area; Index of distribution (Id) = Relative Frequency * Density; Index of dominance (ID) = Index of distribution * basal area.</p>
        <p>In the upper elevation zone, individuals of <italic>Piper</italic><italic>aduncum</italic> are numerically dominant (453 specimens observed; <bold>Table 4</bold>). <italic>Piper</italic><italic>aduncum</italic> is numerically dominant (453 specimens observed; <bold>Table 4</bold>). In order of ecological importance, <italic>Piper</italic><italic>aduncum</italic>, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> and secondarily <italic>Clidemia</italic><italic>umbrosa</italic> are the dominant species in terms of distribution index. Despite the large number of <italic>Piper</italic><italic>aduncum</italic> specimens, their trunks do not exceed 5 cm in diameter: 74.4% of them have diameters of 2.5 cm.</p>
        <p><italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> ranks second among all the stations in the upper elevation zone (<bold>Table 4</bold>). A total of 149 individuals were counted (<bold>Table 4</bold>). The species has a good diametric distribution: all diameter and height classes are represented. Although <italic>Bambusa vulgaris</italic> is also well distributed (fr = 100%; <bold>Table 4</bold>) in the upper elevation zone, only 13 specimens with a diameter of 5 cm were observed. </p>
        <p>The inertia associated with the first axis is 77.76%, and that of the second axis is 11.93%. Together, they account for a maximum inertia of 89.69% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">Figure 10</xref>). Axis F1 appears to contrast floristic compositions, while Axis F2 seems to discriminate the evolutionary stages of plant dynamics.</p>
        <fig id="fig10">
          <label>Figure 10</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId24.jpeg?20251229034031" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 10</bold><bold>.</bold> Mesological and temporal differentiation of all the stations in the upper elevation zone.</p>
        <p>In terms of the F2 axis, stations CF1 and MCES2 have values in common, both characterizing phytocenoses at the young sylvatic stage and marked by the presence of species such as <italic>Conostegia</italic><italic>montana</italic>, <italic>Palicourea</italic><italic>crocea</italic>,<italic>Swietenia</italic><italic>mahagoni</italic> and <italic>Talauma</italic><italic>dodecapetala</italic>. However, the great distance observed between the two phytocenoses can be explained by the fact that 27 plant species are specific to station MCES2. Stations CF2 and CF3 have very similar values. They are characterized by species such as <italic>Clidemia</italic><italic>hirta</italic> and <italic>Hibiscus elatus</italic>, which can only be observed in their phytocenosis.</p>
        <p>4.1.4. Global Analysis</p>
        <p>A total of 48 floristic inventories were conducted on the island of Martinique, covering a study area of 29597.3 m<sup>2</sup>. Despite the lower elevation zone being more heavily impacted by anthropogenic activity, the other bioclimatic zones of the island are not spared. In addition to the fact that the three potentially invasive plant species in our study (<italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic>) have developed in this bioclimatic zone, they are also much more numerous. This ability to adapt can be seen for <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> in the upper elevation zone, where the number of individuals is much higher, and for <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> in the middle elevation zone.</p>
        <p>Depending on the altitudinal gradient, we observed a variation in population abundance and plurality of potentially invasive taxa. In the lower tier, we counted 1661 potentially invasive species (all species combined), compared with 160 in the middle tier and 162 individuals in the upper tier (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">Figure 11</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig11">
          <label>Figure 11</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId25.jpeg?20251229034032" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 11</bold><bold>.</bold>Abundance of potentially invasive plant species according to bioclimatic gradation.</p>
        <p>Mesological factors condition the distribution of species and the multiplicity of phytocenoses. In his writings, Professor Philippe JOSEPH indicates that anthropogenic factors dictate the establishment and evolution of vegetation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec5dot1">
        <title>5.1. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)</title>
        <p>Principal component analysis of all the stations studied reveals major disparities in the presence of the three potentially invasive species at certain stations, across all levels (lower, middle and upper) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">Figure 12</xref>).</p>
        <p><italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> seems to favor areas with high rainfall and high altitude. <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>tends to favor areas with high temperatures and low altitudes, while <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> seems to fall somewhere in between (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">Figure 12</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig12">
          <label>Figure 12</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId26.jpeg?20251229034034" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 12</bold><bold>.</bold> Principal Component Analysis of all stations studied. Plu: Rainfall; Alt: Altitude; Ins: Insulation; ETP: Evapotranspiration; Tmin: Mean minimum temperature; Tmax: Mean maximum temperature; Tmoy: Mean temperature.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5dot2">
        <title>5.2. Ecological Profile</title>
        <p>Using Professor Philippe JOSEPH’s representation model, we assigned 5 stages of temporal evolution to the various potentially invasive species, based on their population abundance, frequency and density [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]. This representation was used in all bioclimatic stages.</p>
        <p>5.2.1. Lower Elevation Zone</p>
        <p>In the lower elevation zone, <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> are the most competitive species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig13">Figure 13</xref>). <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> is a sporadic species in this bioclimatic tier. In the pre-sylvatic or pre-sylvatic to young sylvatic plant communities, Petite Citronnelle and Saint-Domingue Acacia compete with each other. In shrubby or even pre-sylvatic plant formations, populations of <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> dominate (<bold>Table 5</bold>). It is able to dominate thanks to its tolerance of degraded soils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. In more advanced stages of evolution (young sylvatic), <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> is dominant.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5</bold><bold>.</bold> Ecological profile of the three potentially invasive species in the lower elevation zone, Table inspired by the representation model of Professor Philippe JOSEPH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Species</td>
                <td>FAB</td>
                <td>FPS</td>
                <td>FSJS</td>
                <td>FSS</td>
                <td>FSST</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Dichrostachys cinerea</td>
                <td>+++</td>
                <td>+++</td>
                <td>++</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Spathodea campanulata</td>
                <td>+</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Triphasia trifolia</td>
                <td>+</td>
                <td>+++</td>
                <td>+++</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>(+) sparse or erratic; (++) abundant; (+++) very abundant. (FAB) Shrub formation; (FPS) Pre-sylvatic formation; (FSJS) Young sylvatic formation; (FSS) Secondary sylvatic formation; (FSST) Late secondary sylvatic formation.</p>
        <fig id="fig13">
          <label>Figure 13</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId27.jpeg?20251229034035" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 13</bold><bold>.</bold>Population distribution of the 3 potentially invasive species of the lower elevation zone according to evolutionary stage. (FAB) Shrub formation; (FPS) Pre-sylvatic formation; (FSJS) Young sylvatic formation; (FSS) Secondary sylvatic formation.</p>
        <p>5.2.2. Middle Elevation Zone</p>
        <p>In the middle elevation zone, <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> is an erratic species. <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> are the most competitive species in this bioclimatic zone: their dominance varies according to the stage of temporal evolution of the sites. In young pre-sylvatic to sylvatic formations, individuals of <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> are in the majority, whereas those of <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> are predominant in more advanced formations. In the young to secondary sylvatic formations in the gaps (<bold>Table 6</bold> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig14">Figure 14</xref>). <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> is better adapted to more advanced formations, such as young to secondary sylvatic forests, and grows mainly in subhumid to humid areas of the island.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 6</bold><bold>.</bold> Ecological profile of the three potentially invasive species in the middle tier, Table inspired by the representation model of Professor Philippe JOSEPH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Species</td>
                <td>FAB</td>
                <td>FPS</td>
                <td>FSJS</td>
                <td>FSS</td>
                <td>FSST</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Dichrostachys cinerea</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>+</td>
                <td>+</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Spathodea campanulata</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>+</td>
                <td>++</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Triphasia trifolia</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>++</td>
                <td>+</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>(+) sparse or erratic; (++) abundant; (+++) very abundant. (FAB) Shrub formation; (FPS) Pre-sylvatic formation; (FSJS) Young sylvatic formation; (FSS) Secondary sylvatic formation; (FSST) Late secondary sylvatic formation.</p>
        <fig id="fig14">
          <label>Figure 14</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId28.jpeg?20251229034036" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 14</bold><bold>.</bold>Population distribution of the 3 potentially invasive species of the middle elevation zone according to stage of evolution. (FAB) Shrub formation; (FPS) Pre-sylvatic formation; (FSJS) Young sylvatic formation; (FSS) Secondary sylvatic formation.</p>
        <p>5.2.3. Upper Elevation Zone</p>
        <p>In the upper elevation zone, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> is the only potentially invasive plant species to develop. In the submontane ombrophilous plant communities, conditions are not favourable for the development of <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> or <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>. At this bioclimatic level, anthropisation is not as prevalent as in the two previous levels and advanced formations are still dominant. In the upper elevation zone, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> is the only potentially invasive plant species to develop. In the submontane ombrophilous plant communities, conditions are not favourable for the development of <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> or <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>. At this bioclimatic level, anthropisation is not as prevalent as in the two previous levels and advanced formations are still dominant. Gabon Tulip tree alone dominates in young to late secondary sylvatic formations and seems to favour areas with high rainfall and high altitude (<bold>Table 7</bold> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig15">Figure 15</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>].</p>
        <p><bold>Table 7</bold><bold>.</bold> Ecological profile of the three potentially invasive species in the upper elevation zone, Table inspired by the representation model of Professor Philippe JOSEPH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl7">
          <label>Table 7</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Species</td>
                <td>FAB</td>
                <td>FPS</td>
                <td>FSJS</td>
                <td>FSS</td>
                <td>FSST</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Dichrostachys cinerea</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Spathodea campanulata</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>++</td>
                <td>++</td>
                <td>++</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Triphasia trifolia</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>(+) sparse or erratic; (++) abundant; (+++) very abundant. (FAB) Shrub formation; (FPS) Pre-sylvatic formation; (FSJS) Young sylvatic formation; (FSS) Secondary sylvatic formation; (FSST) Late secondary sylvatic formation.</p>
        <fig id="fig15">
          <label>Figure 15</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId29.jpeg?20251229034037" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 15</bold><bold>.</bold>Population distribution of the 3 potentially invasive species of the upper elevation zone according to evolutionary stage. (FAB) Shrub formation; (FPS) Pre-sylvatic formation; (FSJS) Young sylvatic formation; (FSS) Secondary sylvatic formation; (FSST) Late secondary sylvatic formation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5dot3">
        <title>5.3. Analysis of Bioclimatic Levels</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig16">Figure 16</xref> shows a variation in the population abundance of the three species according to the stage of temporal evolution of each of the stations in which they were observed. <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> predominates in the lower elevation zone, in shrubby or even pre-silvicultural formations. We counted 960 individuals in the shrubby formations and 195 specimens in the pre-silvicultural plant communities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig16">Figure 16</xref>). In the slightly more advanced formations of the middle level, <italic>i.e.</italic> pre-sylvatic to young sylvatic, the species <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> is dominant.</p>
        <p>In the more advanced formations of the upper, secondary to late secondary sylvatic stage, we observed a decline in <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> and an increase in <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic>.</p>
        <fig id="fig16">
          <label>Figure 16</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2001272-rId30.jpeg?20251229034038" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 16</bold><bold>.</bold> Population distribution of the 3 potentially invasive species according to stage of evolution and bioclimatic stage. (FAB) Shrub formation; (FPS) Pre-sylvatic formation; (FSJS) Young sylvatic formation; (FSS) Secondary sylvatic formation.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>6. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study, conducted on three potentially invasive taxa (<italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic>, and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic>), highlights the significant impact of biological invasions on island ecosystems. These species exhibit distinct ecological profiles and competition dynamics that vary according to the bioclimatic zones of the island, as well as the stage of development of the plant communities within these zones.</p>
      <p>Based on our analysis, <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> proves particularly competitive in young vegetation formations, especially in the shrub and pre-forest stages of the lower elevation zone, where it is highly dominant. In contrast, <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> becomes more competitive in young to secondary forest formations, although its distribution remains more limited compared to <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> in this bioclimatic zone. As for <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic>, although sporadic in the lower zone, it develops more significantly in more advanced forest formations of the upper zone, where it is the only potentially invasive species to be dominant.</p>
      <p>The notable differences in the ecological profiles of the studied species, in terms of distribution, density, and dominance, are largely influenced by the bioclimatic and anthropogenic conditions of each zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]. </p>
      <p>It is crucial to continue monitoring the spread of these species and adopt suitable management strategies to preserve local biodiversity and mitigate the negative impacts on forest ecosystems.</p>
      <p>In conclusion, although <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic>, <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic>, and <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic> are not uniformly invasive across all bioclimatic zones of Martinique, their invasive potential remains a concern. Conservation efforts, as well as measures to control their spread, must be strengthened to prevent further disruption to the ecological balance of the island’s forests.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>I would first like to express my sincere gratitude to Professor Philippe JOSEPH, Director of the BIORECA Laboratory (Biodiversity and Ecological Risks in Insular Caribbean Territories) and the IBE (Institute of Biodiversity and Ecology), for his constant support and for the time he dedicated to me. It is a pleasure for me to express my appreciation and gratitude to the entire BIORECA and IBE team.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Joseph, P. (1997) Dynamique, éco-physiologie végétale en bioclimat sec à la Marti-nique (Antilles françaises). Lille: Atelier National de Reproduction des Thèses. 941 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1997</year>
            <article-title>Dynamique, éco-physiologie végétale en bioclimat sec à la Marti-nique (Antilles françaises)</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Boulanger, L., Héraud, A., Martzloff, D. and Ropital, V. (2020) La science face à l’érosion de la biodiversité. <italic>Biologie</italic><italic>Aujourd</italic>’ <italic>hui</italic>, 214, 105-108. https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2020013 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/jbio/2020013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33357368</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2020013">https://doi.org/10.1051/jbio/2020013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Boulanger, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Martzloff, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ropital, V.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>La science face à l’érosion de la biodiversité</article-title>
            <source>Biologie Aujourd’hui</source>
            <volume>214</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/jbio/2020013</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33357368</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Debray, A. (2011) La notion de réseau écologique en France: Construction scientifique, appropriation par les politiques publiques et traduction territoriale. <italic>VertigO</italic>. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.10687 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/vertigo.10687</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.10687">https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.10687</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Debray, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>La notion de réseau écologique en France: Construction scientifique, appropriation par les politiques publiques et traduction territoriale</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/vertigo.10687</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Powell, K.I., Chase, J.M. and Knight, T.M. (2013) Invasive Plants Have Scale-Dependent Effects on Diversity by Altering Species-Area Relationships. <italic>Science</italic>, 339, 316-318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226817 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1226817</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23329045</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226817">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226817</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Powell, K.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chase, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Knight, T.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Invasive Plants Have Scale-Dependent Effects on Diversity by Altering Species-Area Relationships</article-title>
            <source>Science</source>
            <volume>339</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1226817</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23329045</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Simberloff, D. (2001) Biological Invasions—How Are They Affecting Us, and What Can We Do about Them? <italic>Western North American Naturalist</italic>, 61, 308-315.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Simberloff, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2001</year>
            <article-title>Biological Invasions—How Are They Affecting Us, and What Can We Do about Them? Western North American Naturalist, 61, 308-315</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Simberloff, D. (2003) Confronting Introduced Species Appear to Devastate Islands More than Areas? <italic>Pacific Science</italic>, 49, 87-97.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Simberloff, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Confronting Introduced Species Appear to Devastate Islands More than Areas? Pacific Science, 49, 87-97</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Muller, S. (2000) Les espèces végétales invasives en France: Bilan des connaissances et propositions d’actions. <italic>Revue</italic><italic>d</italic>’ <italic>Écologie</italic><italic>.</italic><italic>Supplément</italic>, 55, 53-69. https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.2000.6292 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3406/revec.2000.6292</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.2000.6292">https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.2000.6292</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Muller, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>Les espèces végétales invasives en France: Bilan des connaissances et propositions d’actions</article-title>
            <source>Revue d’Écologie. Supplément</source>
            <volume>55</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3406/revec.2000.6292</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Williamson, M.H. (1996c) Biological Invasions. Chapman &amp; Hall.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Williamson, M.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vitousek, P., D’Antonio, C. and Loope, L. (1996) Biological Invasions as Global Environmental Change. <italic>American Scientists</italic>, 84, 468-478.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vitousek, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Antonio, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Loope, L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1996</year>
            <article-title>Biological Invasions as Global Environmental Change</article-title>
            <source>American Scientists</source>
            <volume>84</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Elton, C. (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Elton, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1958</year>
            <article-title>The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jakobs, G., Weber, E. and Edwards, P.J. (2004) Introduced Plants of the Invasive <italic>Solidago gigantea</italic> (Asteraceae) Are Larger and Grow Denser than Conspecifics in the Native Range. <italic>Diversity and Distributions</italic>, 10, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00052.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00052.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00052.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00052.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Jakobs, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Weber, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edwards, P.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Introduced Plants of the Invasive Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae) Are Larger and Grow Denser than Conspecifics in the Native Range</article-title>
            <source>Diversity and Distributions</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1472-4642.2004.00052.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Richards, C.L., Bossdorf, O., Muth, N.Z., Gurevitch, J. and Pigliucci, M. (2006) Jack of All Trades, Master of Some? On the Role of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plant Invasions. <italic>Ecology Letters</italic>, 9, 981-993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16913942</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Richards, C.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bossdorf, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Muth, N.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gurevitch, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pigliucci, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Trades, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Jack of All Trades, Master of Some? On the Role of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plant Invasions</article-title>
            <source>Ecology Letters</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16913942</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Terral, J.F. and Ater, M. (2016) Implications écologiques de l’étude de la plasticité de ca-ractères anatomiques du bois d’olivier ( <italic>Olea</italic><italic>europea</italic> L). In: Ater, M., Essalouh, L., Ilbert, H., Moukhili, A. and Khadari, B., Eds., <italic>L</italic>’ <italic>oléiculture</italic><italic>au Maroc de la</italic><italic>préhistoire</italic><italic>à</italic><italic>nos</italic><italic>jours</italic>: <italic>Pratiques</italic>, <italic>diversité</italic>, <italic>adaptation</italic>, <italic>usages</italic>, <italic>commerce et politiques</italic>, CIHEAM, 171-179.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Terral, J.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ater, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ater, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Essalouh, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ilbert, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moukhili, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khadari, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Implications écologiques de l’étude de la plasticité de ca-ractères anatomiques du bois d’olivier (Olea europea L)</article-title>
            <source>In: Ater</source>
            <volume>171</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vitousek, P.M. and Walker, L.R. (1989) Biological Invasion by Myrica Faya in Hawai’i: Plant Demography, Nitrogen Fixation, Ecosystem Effects. <italic>Ecological Monographs</italic>, 59, 247-265. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942601 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1942601</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1942601">https://doi.org/10.2307/1942601</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vitousek, P.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Walker, L.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Demography, N</string-name>
              <string-name>Fixation, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1989</year>
            <article-title>Biological Invasion by Myrica Faya in Hawai’i: Plant Demography, Nitrogen Fixation, Ecosystem Effects</article-title>
            <source>Ecological Monographs</source>
            <volume>59</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1942601</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Larrue, S., Daehler, C., Vautier, F. and Bufford, J.L. (2014) Forest Invasion by the African Tulip Tree ( <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic>) in the Hawaiian Islands: Are Seedlings Shade-Tolerant? <italic>Pacific Science</italic>, 68, 345-358. https://doi.org/10.2984/68.3.4 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2984/68.3.4</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2984/68.3.4">https://doi.org/10.2984/68.3.4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Larrue, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Daehler, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vautier, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bufford, J.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Forest Invasion by the African Tulip Tree (Spathodea campanulata) in the Hawaiian Islands: Are Seedlings Shade-Tolerant? Pacific Science, 68, 345-358</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2984/68.3.4</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Meyer, J.Y. (1993) La situation de <italic>Miconia</italic><italic>calvescens</italic> DC à Raiatea: Origine, répar-tition, abondance, extension et lutte. Institut Mathilde Frébault, 28-40.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Meyer, J.Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1993</year>
            <article-title>La situation de Miconia calvescens DC à Raiatea: Origine, répar-tition, abondance, extension et lutte</article-title>
            <source>Institut Mathilde Frébault</source>
            <volume>28</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Meyer, J.Y. (1994) Mécanismes d’invasion de <italic>Miconia</italic><italic>calvescens</italic> DC. en Polynésie française. Master’s Thesis, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Meyer, J.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, U</string-name>
              <string-name>II, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1994</year>
            <article-title>Mécanismes d’invasion de Miconia calvescens DC</article-title>
            <source>en Polynésie française. Master’s Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Meyer, J.Y. (1996) Status of <italic>Miconia</italic><italic>calvescens</italic> (Melastomataceae), a Dominant Invasive Tree in the Society Island. <italic>Pacific Science</italic>, 50, 66-76.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Meyer, J.Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1996</year>
            <article-title>Status of Miconia calvescens (Melastomataceae), a Dominant Invasive Tree in the Society Island</article-title>
            <source>Pacific Science</source>
            <volume>50</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Meyer, J.Y. (2000) A Preliminary Review of the Invasive Plants in the Pacific Islands (SPREG Member Countries). In: Sherley, G., Ed., <italic>Invasive Species in the Pacific</italic>: <italic>A Technical Review and Draft Regional Strategy</italic>, South Pacific Regional Environment Program Samoa, 85-114.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Meyer, J.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sherley, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Strategy, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>A Preliminary Review of the Invasive Plants in the Pacific Islands (SPREG Member Countries)</article-title>
            <source>In: Sherley</source>
            <volume>85</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Meyer, J. and Florence, J. (1996) Tahiti’s Native Flora Endangered by the Invasion of <italic>Miconia</italic><italic>calvescens</italic> DC. (Melastomataceae). <italic>Journal of Biogeography</italic>, 23, 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996.tb00038.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996.tb00038.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996.tb00038.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996.tb00038.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Meyer, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Florence, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1996</year>
            <article-title>Tahiti’s Native Flora Endangered by the Invasion of Miconia calvescens DC</article-title>
            <source>(Melastomataceae). Journal of Biogeography</source>
            <volume>23</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996.tb00038.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Meyer, J., Loope, L.L., Sheppard, A., Munzinger, J. and Jaffré, T. (2006) Les plantes envahissantes et potentiellement envahissantes dans l’archipel néo-calédonien: Première évaluation et recommandations de gestion. In: Beauvais, M.L., Coléno, A. and Jourdan, H., Eds., <italic>Les</italic><italic>espèces</italic><italic>envahissantes</italic><italic>dans</italic><italic>l</italic>’ <italic>archipel</italic><italic>néo-calédonien</italic>, IRD Éditions, 50-115. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.7658 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/books.irdeditions.7658</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.7658">https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.7658</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Meyer, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Loope, L.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sheppard, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Munzinger, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Beauvais, M.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jourdan, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Les plantes envahissantes et potentiellement envahissantes dans l’archipel néo-calédonien: Première évaluation et recommandations de gestion</article-title>
            <source>In: Beauvais</source>
            <volume>50</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/books.irdeditions.7658</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Abati, Y. (2021) Écologie des principales espèces végétales potentiellement invasives des Petites Antilles: Le cas de la Martinique. Master’s Thesis, Université des Antilles.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abati, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, U</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Écologie des principales espèces végétales potentiellement invasives des Petites Antilles: Le cas de la Martinique</article-title>
            <source>Master’s Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abati, Y. (2024) Écologie des principales espèces végétales potentiellement invasives des Petites Antilles: Le cas de la Martinique. Generis Publishing.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abati, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Écologie des principales espèces végétales potentiellement invasives des Petites Antilles: Le cas de la Martinique</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Abati, Y., Baillard, K., Joseph, P., Ely-Marius, S. and Jean-François, Y. (2017) Ecology of a Potentially Invasive Species in Martinique: <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic>. <italic>Journal of Advances in Biology</italic>, 9, 2000-2016.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abati, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baillard, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ely-Marius, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Ecology of a Potentially Invasive Species in Martinique: Triphasia trifolia</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Advances in Biology</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Abati, Y., Joseph, P., Baillard, K., Claude, J.-P., Jean-François, Y., Ely-Marius, S., <italic>et al.</italic> (2020) Some Aspects of the Ecology of a Potentially Invasive Species in Martinique: The Case of Dichrostachys Cinerea. <italic>International Journal of Sciences</italic>, 9, 8-26. https://doi.org/10.18483/ijsci.2242 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18483/ijsci.2242</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18483/ijsci.2242">https://doi.org/10.18483/ijsci.2242</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abati, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baillard, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Claude, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ely-Marius, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Some Aspects of the Ecology of a Potentially Invasive Species in Martinique: The Case of Dichrostachys Cinerea</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Sciences</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18483/ijsci.2242</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Abati, Y., Joseph, P., Jean-François, Y., Baillard, K., Claude, J.-P., Ely-Marius, S., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Contribution écologique d’une espèce potentiellement invasive des Petites Antilles: <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> P. Beauv. <italic>VertigO</italic>. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.37613 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/vertigo.37613</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.37613">https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.37613</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abati, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baillard, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Claude, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ely-Marius, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Contribution écologique d’une espèce potentiellement invasive des Petites Antilles: Spathodea campanulata P</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/vertigo.37613</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Joseph, P. (2006) La végétation des Petites Antilles: Un comportement atypique au regard de l’agressivité des plantes introduites (l’exemple de la Martinique). In: Joseph, P., <italic>et al.</italic>, Eds., <italic>La</italic><italic>Caraïbe</italic><italic>données</italic><italic>environnementales</italic>, Karthala, 53-83.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>La végétation des Petites Antilles: Un comportement atypique au regard de l’agressivité des plantes introduites (l’exemple de la Martinique)</article-title>
            <source>In: Joseph</source>
            <volume>53</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Joseph, P. (2006) Les Petites Antilles face aux risques d’invasion par les espèces végétales introduites. L’exemple de la Martinique. <italic>Revue</italic><italic>d</italic>’ <italic>Écologie</italic> ( <italic>La Terre et La Vie</italic>), 61, 209-224. https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.2006.1316 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3406/revec.2006.1316</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.2006.1316">https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.2006.1316</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Les Petites Antilles face aux risques d’invasion par les espèces végétales introduites</article-title>
            <source>L’exemple de la Martinique. Revue d’Écologie (La Terre et La Vie)</source>
            <volume>61</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3406/revec.2006.1316</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Joseph, P. (2007) La question des espèces végétales invasives dans les Petites Antil-les: Le cas de l’île de la Martinique. In: Cedpte, C.D., Éd., <italic>Espaces</italic><italic>tropicaux</italic><italic>et</italic><italic>risques</italic><italic>du local au global</italic>, IRD, 328-339.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cedpte, C.D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>La question des espèces végétales invasives dans les Petites Antil-les: Le cas de l’île de la Martinique</article-title>
            <source>In: Cedpte</source>
            <volume>328</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Joseph, P. (2009) La végétation forestière des Petites Antilles: Synthèse bibli-ographique et écologique, bilan et perspectives. Karthala.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>La végétation forestière des Petites Antilles: Synthèse bibli-ographique et écologique, bilan et perspectives</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Joseph, P. (2015) Plausible Ecosystem Responses to Climate Change: The Case of Vegetation in the Lesser Antilles. <italic>International Journal of Advanced Research</italic>, 3, 657-670.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Plausible Ecosystem Responses to Climate Change: The Case of Vegetation in the Lesser Antilles</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Advanced Research</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Joseph, P. (2011) La végétation des Petites Antilles: Principaux traits floristiques et effets plausibles du changement climatique. <italic>VertigO</italic>, 11, 2-16. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.10886 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/vertigo.10886</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.10886">https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.10886</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>La végétation des Petites Antilles: Principaux traits floristiques et effets plausibles du changement climatique</article-title>
            <source>VertigO</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/vertigo.10886</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fournet, J. (2002) Flore illustré des phanérogames de Guadeloupe et de Martinique. CIRAD Éditions.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fournet, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Flore illustré des phanérogames de Guadeloupe et de Martinique</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fernández, M., Alaejos, J., Tapias, R. and Menéndez, J. (2013) Aprovechamiento enegético de la mala hierba Marabu ( <italic>Dichrostachys</italic><italic>cinerea</italic> L.) como ayuda a su control mecánico. In: Osca, J.M., Gomez de Barreda Ferraz, D., Castell-Zeising, V. and Pascual Seva, N., Eds., <italic>XIV Congreso de la Sociedad Española de</italic><italic>Malherbología</italic>, Valencia, 5-7 November 2013, 324 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Alaejos, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tapias, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Osca, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ferraz, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Castell-Zeising, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Seva, N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Aprovechamiento enegético de la mala hierba Marabu (Dichrostachys cinerea L</article-title>
            <source>) como ayuda a su control mecánico. In: Osca</source>
            <volume>5</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wiles, G. (1987) The Status of Fruit Bats on Guam. <italic>Pacific Science</italic>, 41, 148-157.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wiles, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1987</year>
            <article-title>The Status of Fruit Bats on Guam</article-title>
            <source>Pacific Science</source>
            <volume>41</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Bellefontaine, R., Nicolini, E.A. and Petit, S. (1999) Réduction de l’érosion par l’exploitation de l’aptitude à drageonner de certains ligneux des zones tropicales sèches. In: Roose, E., Ed., <italic>Colloque International «L’homme et</italic><italic>l’érosion</italic><italic>»</italic>, Cameroun, 9-18 December 1999, Bulletin du Réseau Erosion, IRD-CTA, No. 19, 608 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bellefontaine, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nicolini, E.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Petit, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Roose, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Erosion, I</string-name>
              <string-name>RD-CTA, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1999</year>
            <article-title>Réduction de l’érosion par l’exploitation de l’aptitude à drageonner de certains ligneux des zones tropicales sèches</article-title>
            <source>In: Roose</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Schulze, E., Gebauer, G., Ziegler, H. and Lange, O.L. (1991) Estimates of Nitrogen Fixation by Trees on an Aridity Gradient in Namibia. <italic>Oecologia</italic>, 88, 451-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00317592 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf00317592</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28313810</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00317592">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00317592</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Schulze, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gebauer, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ziegler, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lange, O.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1991</year>
            <article-title>Estimates of Nitrogen Fixation by Trees on an Aridity Gradient in Namibia</article-title>
            <source>Oecologia</source>
            <volume>88</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf00317592</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28313810</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Von Maydell, H.J. and Brase, J. (1986) Trees and Shrubs of the Sahel: Their Characteristics and Uses. Eschborn.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Maydell, H.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brase, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1986</year>
            <article-title>Trees and Shrubs of the Sahel: Their Characteristics and Uses</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Lim, T.K. (2014) Edible Medicinal and Non-Medicinal Plants. Springer.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lim, T.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Edible Medicinal and Non-Medicinal Plants</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <label>40.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Rangaiah, K., Purnachandra Rao, S. and Solomon Raju, A.J. (2004) Bird-Pollination and Fruiting Phenology in <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> Beauv. (Bignoniaceae). <italic>Beitrage</italic><italic>zur</italic><italic>Biologie</italic><italic>der</italic><italic>Pflanzen</italic>, 73, 395-408.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Rangaiah, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rao, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Raju, A.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Bird-Pollination and Fruiting Phenology in Spathodea campanulata Beauv</article-title>
            <source>(Bignoniaceae). Beitrage zur Biologie der Pflanzen</source>
            <volume>73</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <label>41.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Weber, E.F. (2003) Invasive Plant Species of the World: A Reference Guide to Environmental Weed. CABI Publishing Wallingford. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/book/10.1079/9781780643861.0000 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/9781780643861.0000</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780643861.0000">https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780643861.0000</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Weber, E.F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Invasive Plant Species of the World: A Reference Guide to Environmental Weed</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/9781780643861.0000</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <label>42.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bito, D. (2006) An Alien in an Archipelago: <italic>Spathodea</italic><italic>campanulata</italic> and the Geographic Variability of Its Moth (Lepidoptera) Communities in the New Guinea and Bismarck Islands. <italic>Journal of Biogeography</italic>, 34, 769-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01652.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01652.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01652.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01652.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bito, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>An Alien in an Archipelago: Spathodea campanulata and the Geographic Variability of Its Moth (Lepidoptera) Communities in the New Guinea and Bismarck Islands</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Biogeography</source>
            <volume>34</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01652.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <label>43.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Small, J.K. (1913) Florida Trees: A Handbook of the Native and Naturalized Trees of Florida. John Kunkel Small Botany Collection—Records, 41.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Small, J.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1913</year>
            <article-title>Florida Trees: A Handbook of the Native and Naturalized Trees of Florida</article-title>
            <source>John Kunkel Small Botany Collection—Records</source>
            <volume>41</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <label>44.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Burkill, H. (1994) Useful Plants of the West Tropical Africa: Families M-R. 2nd Edition, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Burkill, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, R</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1994</year>
            <article-title>Useful Plants of the West Tropical Africa: Families M-R</article-title>
            <source>2nd Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <label>45.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Joseph, P. (2012) Quelques traits généraux de la diversité sylvatique des Petites Antilles. <italic>VertigO</italic>, 14. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.12492 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/vertigo.12492</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.12492">https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.12492</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Joseph, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Quelques traits généraux de la diversité sylvatique des Petites Antilles</article-title>
            <source>VertigO</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/vertigo.12492</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <label>46.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dondon, R., Bourgeois, P. and Fery-Forgues, S. (2006) A New Bicoumarin from the Leaves and Stems of <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>Trifolia</italic>. <italic>Fitoterapia</italic>, 77, 129-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2005.11.006 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fitote.2005.11.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16431036</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2005.11.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2005.11.006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dondon, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bourgeois, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fery-Forgues, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>A New Bicoumarin from the Leaves and Stems of Triphasia Trifolia</article-title>
            <source>Fitoterapia</source>
            <volume>77</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fitote.2005.11.006</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16431036</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <label>47.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, Z., Gurib-Fakim, A. and Mahomoodally, M.F. (2016) Kinetic Studies of Tyrosinase Inhibitory Activity of 19 Essential Oils Extracted from Endemic and Exotic Medicinal Plants. <italic>South African Journal of Botany</italic>, 103, 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.010 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.010</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gurib-Fakim, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mahomoodally, M.F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Kinetic Studies of Tyrosinase Inhibitory Activity of 19 Essential Oils Extracted from Endemic and Exotic Medicinal Plants</article-title>
            <source>South African Journal of Botany</source>
            <volume>103</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sajb.2015.09.010</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <label>48.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Abaul, J., Philogène, É., Bourgeois, P., Poupat, C., Ahond, A. and Potier, P. (1994) Contribution à la Connaissance des Rutacées américaines: Étude des Feuilles de <italic>Triphasia</italic><italic>trifolia</italic>. <italic>Journal of Natural Products</italic>, 57, 846-848. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50108a028 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/np50108a028</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/np50108a028">https://doi.org/10.1021/np50108a028</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abaul, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bourgeois, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Poupat, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ahond, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Potier, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1994</year>
            <article-title>Contribution à la Connaissance des Rutacées américaines: Étude des Feuilles de Triphasia trifolia</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Natural Products</source>
            <volume>57</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/np50108a028</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>