<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ojapps</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Applied Sciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2165-3925</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2165-3917</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapps.2025.1512276</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ojapps-148397</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Chemistry</subject>
          <subject>Materials Science</subject>
          <subject>Computer Science</subject>
          <subject>Communications</subject>
          <subject>Engineering</subject>
          <subject>Physics</subject>
          <subject>Mathematics</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Long-Term Effects and Carbon Stock of Exploitable Plant Species after Enrichment Planting in the East Region of Cameroon</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-3712-6507</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mokake</surname>
            <given-names>Seraphine Ebenye</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Lyonga</surname>
            <given-names>Litute Mark</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Obennarreyneke</surname>
            <given-names>Berkley Eyongnkongho</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Ngoh</surname>
            <given-names>Micheal Lyonga</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Weyi</surname>
            <given-names>Kingsley Babila</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Otouochiwouo</surname>
            <given-names>Zouberou</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Chuyong</surname>
            <given-names>George Bindeh</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Department of Plant Science, Faculty of Science, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon </aff>
      <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label> Tropical Plant Exploration Group (TROPEG), Mundemba, Cameroon </aff>
      <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label> Société Forestiére Industrielle de Lokoundje (SFIL), Yokadouma, Cameroon </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>27</day>
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>4270</fpage>
      <lpage>4309</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>13</day>
          <month>11</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2025 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2025.1512276">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2025.1512276</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>An increase in the human population causes deforestation, affecting tropical forests’ sustainability. Enrichment planting is the restoration of over-exploited and secondary forests in order to increase the total tree volume and economic value of forests. The purpose of this article was to present the results of enrichment plantings of exploitable species in the East Region of Cameroon. This study was carried out in Log yards (LYs), Skid trails (STs), and under forest canopy in some forest concessions. The seedlings of 15 most exploitable species in Cameroon were selected and planted in 30 enriched plots. A transect of 4 × 50 m<sup>2</sup> was established using a line spacing of 5 × 5 m. The height and diameter of each exploitable seedling species were measured 1.5 and 10 years after enrichment planting. A total of 1288 individuals of 15 species belonging to 8 families were recorded. The most important species was <italic>Erythrophleum</italic><italic>sauveolens</italic> (183.1) that regenerated naturally in the LYs. The most important families were the Fabaceae and Malvaceae. A year and ten years after enrichment planting, growth was highest in the LYs as compared to the STs. Generally, annual mortality was highest in STs, while annual survival was highest in LYs. This may be due to the availability of light after canopy destruction. However, biomass was highest under the forest canopy in the first year, the same for both LYs and STs in the 5<sup>th</sup> year, and highest in the LYs in the 10<sup>th</sup> year. Carbon stock, though low, increased over time, with a Carbon stock of 0.004 t/ha ten years after enrichment planting. The species <italic>Triploch</italic><italic>i</italic><italic>ton scleroxylon</italic> had the highest Carbon stock due to silvicultural management of its plots, emphasizing the necessity of site-species matching before enrichment planting and post-planting silvicultural management for effective forest restoration.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Disturbance</kwd>
        <kwd>Gabs</kwd>
        <kwd>Log Yards</kwd>
        <kwd>Light</kwd>
        <kwd>Skid Trails</kwd>
        <kwd>Sequestration</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Tropical forests have been under threat due to an increase in human population dynamics in the tropics in general and in Africa in particular. This increase in human population causes deforestation for livelihood and shelter, thus affecting the tropical forest’s sustainability. Also, a large and growing percentage of the Congo Basin is under concession to logging and mining companies, which increases the rate of deforestation. Since the 1950s, most of these forests have been granted to private logging companies and have been impacted by selective logging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Due to mismanagement and the conversion of large tracts of West African forests to agricultural production and exploitation, Central African forests are experiencing increased harvesting pressures, and this is particularly true for the few timber species targeted by selective logging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. In spite of the logging regulatory framework and limited extraction put in place by most Central African countries, the sustainable supply of key timber species in Central Africa remains a serious issue.</p>
      <p>Tropical Africa has 21% of the secondary forests that developed after timber extraction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. However, the forests of the Congo Basin have had relatively low annual deforestation rates of less than 0.76 percent between 2000 and 2005, in contrast to deforestation rates in the same period of 2.56 percent in tropical South America and 2.90 percent in tropical Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. Particularly, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>] in 1968 indicated that Cameroon had a forest area of 57,008 million ha, representing 62.84% of the undisturbed forest. In 2008, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] indicated that the forest types cover 22,523,732 ha of land cover in Cameroon. In 2015, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>] indicated that Cameroon has around 18.8 million hectares of forest land, which constitutes about 40% of the total land area. Forest land cover in Cameroon has thus declined in the last 47 years with a loss of around 0.5% - 1% forest cover per year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Putz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>] emphasized that although 85% - 100% of species of mammals, birds, invertebrates, and plants remain after selective logging, timber volumes decline by about 65% after the first harvest if the same species are again harvested. That is why many of the exploitable species are now listed in the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) Red List, e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Post-logging silvicultural treatments, including planting of high-value species, would need to be applied in order to reestablish and/or conserve the timber biodiversity of forest stands. </p>
      <p>Enrichment planting, which is the introduction of valuable species to degraded forests without the elimination of already existing valuable individuals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>], is a technique for the restoration of over-exploited and secondary forests, which increases the total tree volume and the economic value of forests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. Enrichment of natural forests after logging may be appropriate in areas where natural regeneration is insufficient or soil characteristics are not conducive to other uses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Although many authors have suggested enrichment planting in forest fragments as a conservation strategy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>], few studies have tested specific techniques like determining which species is good for which disturbance site according to its growth requirements. Also, forest managers face two major issues: i) the insufficient regeneration of pioneer species that make up most of the harvest because of the natural decline of their populations with increasing stand age, and ii) the difficulty of recovering the timber stock 20 - 30 years after logging (<italic>i</italic>.<italic>e</italic>., after a complete cutting cycle). Plant species used for enrichment planting need to be planted in forest gaps where the light and the moisture content are appropriate for their growth. However, knowledge on the light and moisture requirements of the seedlings of these species, or on the specific ecological needs at early or more advanced stages of development, is scarce. There is insufficient knowledge concerning species selection and site matching [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. There has been little evidence on which to base the selection of species and the way that species are combined as the forest moves from pioneer light-demanding species to non-pioneer species. This is because there is little data on site tolerance and growth in Africa, as emphasized in the meta-analysis of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>], as the light and moisture situation of the log yards and skid trails are different [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. The skid trails have a low light and high moisture content as compared to the log yards with a high light and low moisture content, and under the forest canopy with a low light intensity and the highest moisture content. </p>
      <p>Understanding the dynamics of tree populations for each commercial species is crucial for creating effective and sustainable management plans. Tropical forest tree species each have their own unique patterns of recruitment, growth, and mortality. Vital environmental parameters like light and moisture change depending on the type of forest and its successional stage. Additionally, factors like topography, soil, the specific species, an individual tree’s history, competition with other trees species, and its physical development all play a significant role as interactions among pre-established vegetation and newly-planted seedlings can range from facilitation, through amelioration of harsh growing conditions and increased nutrient availability, to suppression through competition for above- and below-ground resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. While the partially shaded conditions of an enrichment planting setting can improve seedling survival of later-succession species when compared with full-sun conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>], these same shaded conditions may inhibit the growth of more heliotropic desired species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]. Mokake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] indicated that each plant species needs to be planted either in the skid trail and/or log yard, depending on their light and moisture requirements. Nguyen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>] found that over time, shade-intolerant species became less important and native shade-tolerant species increased in importance, with at least part of this change being driven by anthropogenic influences such as harvesting of fast-growing exotic species. Thus, further research needs to be carried out to demonstrate the growth requirements in the various gaps in the forest after selective logging. </p>
      <p>With the presence of climate change, it is becoming necessary to determine the effect of disturbance on the restoration of tropical forests. Though most African timber species are widespread light-demanding species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>] that require high light environments at the seedling stage for survival and growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>], as temperatures are rising, this might affect the growth of certain species, thus reducing the biodiversity of the forests after exploitation. Also, although biomass can recover quickly after logging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>], regaining exploitable wood volume (Carbon stock) is much slower [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>]. Logging creates canopy gaps that may be invaded by vines and pioneer species; thereby increasing the proportion of non-commercial tree species to the detriment of high-value species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>]. This therefore changes the composition of the forest and thus renders the forest unexploitable after the 30-year rotation cycle. In a long-term study at the FMU 10025 and 10052 in the East Region of Cameroon and M’Baïki in the Central African Republic, the number of exploitable species decreased 21 and 24 years after logging, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>]. This will lead to a decrease in the carbon stock content in the long run and thus have a negative effect on climate change, presenting an urgent need to develop silvicultural techniques like enrichment planting to improve the growth of timber species that have been removed through selective logging in the next exploitation cycle. </p>
      <p>Enrichment techniques through the regeneration of light-demanding timber species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>] have been tested in several tropical contexts with promising results for forest restoration while promoting timber resource sustainability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>]. Planting timber species in logging gaps or restoring degraded forest areas are effective techniques that have the potential to maintain ecosystem diversity and resilience while protecting sensitive species of high commercial value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>]. Due to the improvement of the forest composition after exploitation, the timber stock may recover. The recovery process may even be faster with enrichment planting, taking into consideration that though natural regeneration may recover more than half but not all the carbon stock removed during selective logging, as it may take a longer period to do so [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>]. </p>
      <p>The success of enrichment planting as a silvicultural technique can be measured by survival and growth in terms of tree diameter and stand height. Hence, long-term information is required to indicate whether the enrichment plantings are likely to provide a sufficient stocking of merchantable trees within an expected harvesting cycle, and whether the diameter and height development of these trees has not been suppressed by competition. This is because logging gaps are difficult to monitor long-term, and the good performance in the early stage of a tree’s life may be reduced by competition in later stages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>]. The purpose of this article was to present results of enrichment plantings in exploited forests using exploitable species in the East Region of Cameroon, as it improves the forest composition in terms of both quantity and quality of commercially important species, and determine the suitability of species for forest enrichment so as to allow harvests from short and medium cutting cycles (15 - 40 years). Specifically in this study, we analyzed the growth and Carbon stock of timber species years after enrichment planting at the different gaps created during timber exploitation versus under the forest canopy, given that the different species have different environmental requirements. In order to achieve this, the following research questions were asked: What is the difference in the diversity of exploitable species at the different sites created by selective logging? What is the difference in the growth of the different timber species after selective logging? What is the carbon stock change brought by enrichment planting after selective logging?</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Site</title>
        <p>An enrichment planting was carried out in the Forest Management Units (FMU) 10-025 in the East Region of Cameroon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). This study was carried out at the Société Forestiére Industrielle de la Lokoundje (SFIL, Ndeng) in its FMU10-025 belonging to the Groupe Decolvenaere (GDC) timber company located at the Boumba and Ngoko Division of the East Region to establish baseline conditions of the forest. The East Region occupies the Southeastern portion of the Republic of Cameroon. It lies between latitude 3˚08 to 3˚21 North and longitude 14˚31 to 14˚52 East. It is bordered to the East by the Central African Republic, to the South by the Republic of Congo, to the North by the Adamawa Region, and to the West by the Centre and South Regions. It has an area of 109,011 km<sup>2</sup> with its soil predominantly ferrallitic (rich with iron and reddish in colour). The East Region has a wet equatorial climate with high temperatures (24˚C on average) and a lack of traditional seasons. Instead, there is a long dry season from December to May, a light wet season from May to June, a short dry season from July to October, and a heavy wet season from October to November [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>]. Relative humidity and cloud cover are relatively high, and annual mean precipitation is 1500 - 2000 mm except in the extreme eastern and northern portions, where it is slightly less. Relative humidity is highest in the month of June and lasts till the month of December [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. The forest flora is dominated by commercially valuable timber species, <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic>(Ayous), and is heavily targeted for exploitation. Some other important economic plant resources present in the forest include: <italic>En</italic><italic>tandrophragma cylindricum</italic>, <italic>Terminalia superba</italic>, <italic>Entandrophragma utile</italic>, <italic>Erythrophleum suaveolens</italic>, <italic>Eribroma oblonga</italic>, <italic>Guarea cedrata</italic>, <italic>Pterocarpus soyauxii</italic>, and <italic>Enantia chlorantha</italic>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]. The presence of forest savannah transition zones makes the flora unique, with both savannah and forest species coexisting as the forest transitions into savannah, which supports plant species unique to this habitat type [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313519-rId15.jpeg?20260109014707" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold> Study site of enrichment planting in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Site Establishment and Demarcation</title>
        <p>This study was carried out in the forest gaps created after selective logging (Log yards (LYs), Skid trails (STs), and Under forest canopy (UFC) in FMU 10025 in the East Region of Cameroon. The seedlings of 15 from the 20 most exploitable species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>] in Cameroon were selected based on their use as high-value timber and/or non-timber forest products (fruits, edible caterpillars, medicine, etc.) and their availability in the nursery and natural environment after selective logging (<bold>Table 1</bold>). Many of them are considered threatened by the IUCN (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://iucnredlist.org/">http://iucnredlist.org/</ext-link>). Information was gathered on qualitative traits (deciduousness and regeneration guild) from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>]. The FMU 10025 had an average of 34 LYs covering an average area of 864 km<sup>2</sup> with their corresponding STs. However, not all LYs do have corresponding STs; 10 LYs with their corresponding STs of ages 1 year after logging and 20 LYs and their corresponding STs of ages 5 and 10 years after enrichment planting were randomly selected for analyses. All plots had been enriched with exploitable species, and some plots of <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic>received management treatment of yearly weeding. A transect of 4 × 50 m<sup>2</sup> was established along the length of the LYs and STs. The seedlings of the exploitable species were planted during enrichment planting using a line spacing of 5 × 5 m in the LYs and STs after selective logging; stated here as “planted”. However, after logging, some seedlings germinated from the soil seed banks in the LYs and STs, which are natural recruits from the seed bank within plots; considered here as “non-planted”. Under the forest canopy, seedlings that had germinated naturally were considered as seedlings in control areas. Three plots of 4 × 50 m<sup>2</sup> under the forest canopy (UFC) were established to determine the growth of exploitable species under the forest canopy; considered here as “under the forest canopy”. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Site Enumeration</title>
        <p>The 20 LYs and their corresponding STs that were enriched 5 and 10 years ago were measured in 2011 to obtain baseline data on the effects of enrichment planting after selective logging on exploitable species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] and later in 2021 to determine the dynamics of the seedlings of exploitable species after selective logging. Each seedling had a metal number tag attached to it. The 10 LYs and their corresponding STs, enriched 1 year ago, were measured only in 2020 to determine the immediate effect of enrichment planting after selective logging, and a new number tag was attached to them. Under the forest canopy, only the seedlings in the understory were considered. The height, collar diameter, and diameter at breast height (DBH) for each exploitable seedling species were measured in the LYs, STs, and under the forest canopy using a metric tape, a veneer calliper, and a diameter tape, respectively. Collar diameter measurements were taken for all seedlings less than 6 cm with a veneer caliper, while stems greater than 6 cm were measured at 1.3 m with diameter tapes for larger diameters. Each stem was measured to the nearest millimeter. All specimens of the species were identified by a botanist in the field. Unidentified species were taken to the Limbe Botanic Garden Herbarium for proper identification using the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>] classification. Soil samples of depths 0 - 10 cm, 10 - 20 cm, and 20 - 30 cm were collected from all the sites, and later, analysis of soil chemical properties was conducted at the University of Dschang’s soil laboratory.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Data Analyses</title>
        <p>2.4.1. Determination of the Species Composition Following Enrichment Planting </p>
        <p>The species composition was determined by the abundance and species richness, which was used to determine the most important species and family at the level of the seedlings. The abundance of the species was determined as the total number of individuals of all the different species present in each plot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>]. Species richness (S) was the total number of species present in the population considered in a given ecosystem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>]. It is mainly expressed by the total number of species observed per unit area. The important Value Index (IVI) corresponds to the most important species according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>]. It is calculated using the formula: </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>IVI</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>SRDe</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>SRDo</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>SRF</mml:mtext>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where SRDe = Species Relative Density, which is</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD2">
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>SRDe</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>number of individuals of that species</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>total number of individuals</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>100</mml:mtext>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>SRDo = Species Relative Dominance, which is</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD3">
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>SRDo</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>Basal area of that species</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>total basal area</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>100</mml:mtext>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>SRF = Species Relative Frequency, which is </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD4">
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>RF</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>number of quadrats with that species</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>total number of quadrats</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>100</mml:mtext>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The Family Importance Value (FIV) corresponds to the most important family [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>]. It is calculated by the formula:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD5">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>FRDe</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>FRF</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>FRDo</mml:mtext>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where FRDe = Family Relative Density, which is</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD6">
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>FRDe</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>Number of individuals of that family</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>total number of families</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>100</mml:mtext>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>FRDo = Family Relative Dominance, which is </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD7">
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>FRDo</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>Basal area of that family</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>total basal area</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>100</mml:mtext>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>FRF = Family Relative Frequency, which is </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD8">
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>FRF</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>Number of quadrats with that family</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>total number of quadrats</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mtext>100</mml:mtext>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>2.4.2. Determination of the Growth of Exploitable Species after Enrichment Planting</p>
        <p>The absolute and relative growth rate in height and diameter of the different tree species under the different site conditions of LYs, STs, and forest canopy was determined. The absolute growth rates in diameter and height of seedlings were determined as described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>]; </p>
        <disp-formula id="FD9">
          <label>(3)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>Absolute growth rate</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The relative growth rate was determined as:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD10">
          <label>(4)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>Relative growth rate</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:msub>
                        <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msub>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>H</italic><sub>2</sub> and <italic>t</italic><sub>2</sub> are the final diameter or height and time (2020), while <italic>H</italic><sub>1</sub> and time (2011) are the initial diameter or height. </p>
        <p>The rate of mortality was calculated by the formula:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD11">
          <label>(5)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>Mortality</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>10</mml:mn>
              <mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The rate of survival was calculated by the formula:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD12">
          <label>(6)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>Survival</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>The rate of recruitment was calculated by:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD13">
          <label>(7)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>Recruitment</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
                    <mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>N</italic><sub>0</sub> = <italic>number of individuals at</italic><italic>t</italic><sub>0</sub>; <italic>N</italic><italic><sub>t</sub></italic>: number of individuals at <italic>t</italic><italic><sub>n</sub></italic>; Δ<italic><sub>t</sub></italic> = <italic>t</italic><italic><sub>n</sub></italic> − <italic>t</italic><sub>0</sub>: the time between <italic>t</italic><sub>0</sub><italic>and</italic><italic>t</italic><italic><sub>n</sub></italic> or time difference.</p>
        <p>2.4.3. Determination of the Biomass and Carbon Stock after Enrichment Planting</p>
        <p>The above-ground biomass (AGB) was determined through the equation of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>]:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD14">
          <label>(8)</label>
          <mml:math display="inline">
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mtext>AGB</mml:mtext>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>0.0673</mml:mn>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:msup>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi>
                      <mml:msup>
                        <mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
                      </mml:msup>
                      <mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                  </mml:mrow>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mn>0.976</mml:mn>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:msup>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where AGB is the above-ground biomass (kg); <italic>D</italic> is the diameter of the tree (cm); <italic>H</italic> is the height of the tree (m); <italic>ρ</italic> is the specific density of the tree (g·cm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup>). The specific density used for each species was from the Global Wood Density Database [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>].</p>
        <p>The Carbon stock of the different sites was determined by multiplying the above-ground biomass by 0.47 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>] while the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> sequestered was determined by multiplying the total biomass by 3.67 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>]. The chemical properties of the soil analyzed included the pH value, organic C, total N, C/N ratio, P, K, Mn, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and organic matter. A mixture of soil and water extract with a composition of 1:5 was used to measure soil acidity. Walkley-Black method was used to determine C organic content, Kjeldahl method to determine N total, Bray I method to measure P, extraction method to analyze exchangeable base cations (K<sup>+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, and Mg<sup>2+</sup>) with ammonium acetate and acidic cations (Al<sup>3+</sup>, H<sup>+</sup>) with sodium chloride, and Morgan method to determine K, and Mn [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">59</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Statistical Analyses</title>
        <p>The data collected were arranged in Microsoft Excel 2013 and exported to other packages for statistical analysis and graphics. Sorting out was carried out through the package of dplyr of tydiverse of the R software. Tables were done with the help of the R software (R Studio) version 4.2.1. through the ggplot2 and ggpubr packages. The test of Shapiro-Wilk was used to test for normality, the test of Levene’s statistics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>] to test for homogeneity and ANOVA to compare the diameter, height, biomass and carbon stock through the R (R studio) version 4.2.1. In each site, the values for the aboveground biomass and the corresponding carbon stock in standing trees of all the sampling plots were reported as mean (± standard error). The probability threshold was set at a 5% level of significance. </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Stand Composition following Enrichment Planting in the East Region of Cameroon</title>
        <p>A total of 1288 individuals of 15 species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) belonging to 8 families were recorded in the Log yards (LYs), Skid trails (STs), and Under Forest Canopy (UFC) (<bold>Table 1</bold>). Generally, <italic>Erythrophleum suaveolens</italic>had the highest number of individuals (229 individuals). Specifically, the LYs had the highest number of individuals (999 individuals), while the least was found in the STs (186 individuals). <italic>Erythrophleum suaveolens</italic> in the LYs had the highest number of individuals (204 individuals). In the STs, <italic>Pterocarpus santalinoides</italic> had the highest number of individuals (27 individuals), and under the forest canopy, <italic>Afzelia pachyloba</italic> had the highest number of individuals with 122 individuals (<bold>Table 1</bold>). </p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Exploited species after enrichment planting in different stand conditions in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Scientific</bold>
                  <bold>Name</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Family</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Common</bold>
                  <bold>Name</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>LYs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>STs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>UFC</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Total</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>IUCN</bold>
                  <bold>Status</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>1</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Guild</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Afzelia</italic>
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                  Harms
                </td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>Doussie</td>
                <td>67</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>122</bold>
                </td>
                <td>195</td>
                <td>VU</td>
                <td>NPLD</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Aningeria</italic>
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                  (A. Chev.) Aubrev. and Pellegr.
                </td>
                <td>Sapotaceae</td>
                <td>Aningre</td>
                <td>72</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>72</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>NPLD</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Entandrophragma</italic>
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                  (Welw.) C.DC.
                </td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>Tiama</td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>53</td>
                <td>VU</td>
                <td>NPLD</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Entandrophragma</italic>
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                  (Sprague) Sprague
                </td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>Sapelli</td>
                <td>27</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>29</td>
                <td>VU</td>
                <td>NPLD</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Erythrophleum</italic>
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                  A.Chev
                </td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>Tali</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>204</bold>
                </td>
                <td>13</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>229</bold>
                </td>
                <td>NA</td>
                <td>P</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Mansonia</italic>
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                  (A.Chev.) A. Chev
                </td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>Bete</td>
                <td>181</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>190</td>
                <td>NA</td>
                <td>De</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Petersianthus</italic>
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                  (P.Beauv.) Liben
                </td>
                <td>Lecithydaceae</td>
                <td>Abale</td>
                <td>16</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>LC</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Pterocarpus</italic>
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                  L’Her. ex DC.
                </td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>Padouk</td>
                <td>157</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>27</bold>
                </td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>201</td>
                <td>LC</td>
                <td>ST</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Pterocarpus</italic>
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                  Taub
                </td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>Padouk rouge</td>
                <td>21</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>27</td>
                <td>NA</td>
                <td>De</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Terminalia</italic>
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                  Engl. and Diels
                </td>
                <td>Combretaceae</td>
                <td>Frake</td>
                <td>146</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>163</td>
                <td>NA</td>
                <td>De</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Lophira</italic>
                  <italic>alata</italic>
                  Tieg ex Keay
                </td>
                <td>Ochnaceae</td>
                <td>Azobe</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>VU</td>
                <td>P</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Triplochiton</italic>
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                  K. Schum
                </td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>Ayous</td>
                <td>63</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>65</td>
                <td>LC</td>
                <td>De</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Eribroma</italic>
                  <italic>oblongum</italic>
                  Mast. Pierre ex A. Chev
                </td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>Eyong</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>NPLD</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Milicia</italic>
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                  (Welw) C.C.Berg
                </td>
                <td>Moraceae</td>
                <td>Iroko</td>
                <td>9</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>NT</td>
                <td>De</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Entandrophragma</italic>
                  <italic>condollei</italic>
                  Harms
                </td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>Kossipo</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>-</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>VU</td>
                <td>NPLD</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Total</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>999</td>
                <td>103</td>
                <td>186</td>
                <td>1288</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Note:</bold> LY = Lys; SK = STs; UFC = Under Forest Canopy. <sup>1</sup>IUCN Status: CR = Critically Endangered; LC = Least Concern; NT = Near Threatened; VU = Vulnerable; EN = Endangered. <sup>2</sup>Guild: De = Deciduousness; Ev = Evergreen; P = Pioneer; NPLD = Nonpioneer Light Demanding; ST = Shade Tolerance.</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313519-rId45.jpeg?20260109014715" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2</bold><bold>.</bold> Seedlings of exploited timber species in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <p>3.1.1. The Most Important Species (IVI) following Enrichment Planting in the East Region of Cameroon</p>
        <p>The most important species in the LYs was <italic>Erythrophleum</italic><italic>sauveolens</italic> (183.1) that regenerated naturally after enrichment planting. Specifically, the most important species in the LYs that regenerated naturally after five years of enrichment planting was <italic>Terminalia superba</italic>(144.8), and 10 years after was <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic> (119.2). While the most important species planted in the LYs after enrichment planting was <italic>Entandrophragma angolense</italic> (53.8) after a year, <italic>Pterocarpus santalinoides</italic> (76.5) after 5 years, and <italic>Triploch</italic><italic>i</italic><italic>ton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic>(127.5) after 10 years of enrichment planting. Generally in the STs, the most important species was <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> (163.91) after 5 years of enrichment planting. Specifically, the most important species that regenerated naturally after one year was<italic>Aningeria altissima</italic> (73.21), none after 5 years and <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic>(141.5) after 10 years. On the other hand after enrichment planting, <italic>Pterocarpus santalinoides</italic> (81.58) was the most important a year after, <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> (163.91) after 5 years and none survived after 10 years of enrichment planting in the STs. Finally under the forest canopy, <italic>Afzelia pachyloba</italic> (134.6) was the most important species that regenerated naturally (<bold>Table 2</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2</bold><bold>.</bold> The most important species (IVI) after natural regeneration and enrichment plant in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="12">
                  <bold>LYs</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>year</bold>
                  <bold>after</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                  <bold>after</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>10</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                  <bold>after</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Natutal</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Planted</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Natural</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Planted</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Natural</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Planted</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>IVI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>IVI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>IVI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>IVI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>IVI</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>IVI</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>183.1</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>53.8</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>144.8</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>76.5</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>119.2</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>127.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>45.6</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>49.5</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>43.7</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>61.9</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>67.7</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>46.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>20.1</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>47.8</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>41.5</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>40.5</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>57.4</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>42.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>17.5</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>45.4</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>30.0</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>30.3</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>23.2</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>35.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>9.2</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>38.4</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>19.6</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>27.7</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>12.4</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>23.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>8.2</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>31.6</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>7.3</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>24.2</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>7.4</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>10.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>6.2</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>21.9</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>3.9</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>L</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>alata</italic>
                </td>
                <td>12.8</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>5.1</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>8.0</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>5.9</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>6.0</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>3.9</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>11.6</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>3.7</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>4.8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>4.2</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>2.9</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>3.8</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>11.0</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>2.5</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>2.8</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1.6</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>3.6</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="12">
                  <bold>STs</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>73.21</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>81.58</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>163.91</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>141.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>67.63</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>70.84</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>51.14</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>104.6</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>42.43</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>59.99</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>42.50</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>30.4</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>37.67</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>41.34</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>42.46</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>23.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>33.39</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>25.55</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>19.46</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>20.70</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>11.75</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>10.93</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>3.52</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="12">
                  <bold>C</bold>
                  <bold>anopy</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>134.6</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>101.4</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>28.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>13.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>10.4</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>candollei</italic>
                </td>
                <td>5.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>5.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>F</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>oblongum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>3.1.2. The Most Important Family (FIV) following Enrichment Planting in the East Region of Cameroon</p>
        <p>Generally, the most important family was the Fabaceae (199.61) in the LYs that regenerated naturally a year after enrichment planting. 5 and 10 years after enrichment planting, the most important families were Combretaceae (125.18) and Malvaceae (91.89) that regenerated naturally respectively. After enrichment planting, the most important species was Fabaceae a year (149.64) and 5 years (108.30) after, and Malvaceae, 10 years after (135.98). Generally, in the STs, the most important family was the Fabaceae (181.29) a year after enrichment planting. Specifically, the most important family 5 years after enrichment planting was Malvaceae (148.91). The most important family that regenerated naturally was Fabaceae (131.41) a year later, nothing 5 years after and Malvaceae (116.49) 10 years after. Under the forest canopy the most important family was the Fabaceae that regenerated naturally (115.62) (<bold>Table 3</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold><bold>.</bold> The most important family (FIV) after natural regeneration and enrichment plant in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="12">
                  <bold>LYss</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>year</bold>
                  <bold>after</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                  <bold>after</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>10</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                  <bold>after</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Natural</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Planted</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Natural</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Planted</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Natural</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Planted</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Family</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FIV</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Family</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FIV</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Family</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FIV</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Family</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FIV</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Family</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FIV</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Family</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>FIV</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>199.61</td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>149.64</td>
                <td>Combretaceae</td>
                <td>125.18</td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>108.30</td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>91.89</td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>135.98</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Combretaceae</td>
                <td>36.54</td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>58.30</td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>73.17</td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>75.93</td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>87.87</td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>84.52</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sapotaceae</td>
                <td>21.30</td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>51.27</td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>31.46</td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>55.15</td>
                <td>Combretaceae</td>
                <td>71.28</td>
                <td>Sapotaceae</td>
                <td>34.78</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>14.50</td>
                <td>Combretaceae</td>
                <td>27.97</td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>27.19</td>
                <td>Combretaceae</td>
                <td>30.50</td>
                <td>Moraceae</td>
                <td>18.39</td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>17.42</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>14.36</td>
                <td>Sapotaceae</td>
                <td>12.81</td>
                <td>Lecithydaceae</td>
                <td>20.04</td>
                <td>Ochnaceae</td>
                <td>18.30</td>
                <td>Sapotaceae</td>
                <td>11.06</td>
                <td>Combretaceae</td>
                <td>15.57</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lecithydaceae</td>
                <td>13.69</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Moraceae</td>
                <td>12.15</td>
                <td>Moraceae</td>
                <td>11.81</td>
                <td>Lecithydaceae</td>
                <td>10.30</td>
                <td>Moraceae</td>
                <td>11.74</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Sapotaceae</td>
                <td>10.81</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>9.21</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="12">
                  <bold>STs</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>131.41</td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>181.29</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>148.91</td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>116.49</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sapotaceae</td>
                <td>57.93</td>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>60.24</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>94.95</td>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>138.12</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lecythidaceae</td>
                <td>41.84</td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>58.48</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>Combretaceae</td>
                <td>56.14</td>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>45.39</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Combretaceae</td>
                <td>34.10</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Moraceae</td>
                <td>21.47</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>13.25</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="12">
                  <bold>C</bold>
                  <bold>anopy</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fabaceae</td>
                <td>115.62</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lecithydaceae</td>
                <td>98.23</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Malvaceae</td>
                <td>25.68</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Meliaceae</td>
                <td>31.23</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Growth of Exploitable Species following Enrichment Planting in the East Region of Cameroon</title>
        <p>The growth of species was determined by the average diameter and height of the exploitable species used for enrichment planting. Generally, there was a significant difference (p ≥ 0.05) in the average diameter across sites and species with the LYs (7.33 kg/ha ± 5.4 kg/ha) having the highest diameter a year after enrichment planting. Specifically under the forest canopy, <italic>Petersianthus</italic><italic>macrocarpus</italic> had the highest diameter (14.85 mm/ha ± 18.1 mm/ha), while in the LYs and STs, the species <italic>Entandrophragma angolense</italic>had the highest diameter of 14.16 mm/ha ± 6.3 mm/ha and 12.23 mm/ha ± 1.8 mm/ha respectively. Thus, <italic>Entandrophragma angolense</italic>had the highest average diameter of 14.03 ± 6.2 across the different sites after a year of enrichment planting (<bold>Table 4</bold>). Similarly, there was a significant difference (p ≥ 0.05) in the average height across sites and species. Generally, the average height was highest in LYs (38.98 cm/ha ± 27.8 cm/ha). Specifically, the species <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic> had the highest average height under the forest canopy (38 cm/ha ± 17.4 cm/ha), LYs (55.72 cm/ha ± 26.1 cm/ha) and STs (46.67 cm/ha ± 17 cm/ha); making it the species with the highest average height across sites (53.21 cm/ha ± 25.4 cm/ha) (<bold>Table 4</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Average diameter and height after a year of enrichment planting in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                  <bold>/</bold>
                  <bold>Site</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Diameter</bold>
                  <bold>(mm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>Height</bold>
                  <bold>(cm)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Canopy</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>LYs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>STs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Average</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Canopy</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>LYs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>STs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Average</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1.23 ± 1.5</td>
                <td>8.99 ± 3.7</td>
                <td>4.28 ± 1.2</td>
                <td>2.82 ± 3.7</td>
                <td>11 ± 17.3</td>
                <td>49.29 ± 18.8</td>
                <td>36.5 ± 19.3</td>
                <td>19.11 ± 23.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>4.95 ± 3.3</td>
                <td>3.73 ± 2.3</td>
                <td>4.31 ± 2.9</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>21.29 ± 17</td>
                <td>26.53 ± 12.9</td>
                <td>24.06 ± 15.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>14</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>16</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>3</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>12</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>23</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>8</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>14</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>03</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>40.19 ± 10.3</td>
                <td>55 ± 5</td>
                <td>41.21 ± 10.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>candollei</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1.66 ± 1.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>1.66 ± 1.1</td>
                <td>6.2 ± 3.6</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>6.2 ± 3.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>7.47 ± 5.4</td>
                <td>2.93 ± 2.9</td>
                <td>3.65</td>
                <td>4.57 ± 4.4</td>
                <td>70.17 ± 55.1</td>
                <td>16.8 ± 14.3</td>
                <td>40</td>
                <td>37 ± 42.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>oblongum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>7.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>7.5</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1.08 ± 0.6</td>
                <td>5.35 ± 4.2</td>
                <td>3.67 ± 2.1</td>
                <td>4.95 ± 4.1</td>
                <td>8.83 ± 9.1</td>
                <td>29.77 ± 20.1</td>
                <td>28.64 ± 15.8</td>
                <td>28.25 ± 20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>4.4 ± 2.4</td>
                <td>10.77 ± 4.3</td>
                <td>8.35 ± 0.7</td>
                <td>9.93 ± 4.4</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>38</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>17</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>55</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>72</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>26</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>46</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>67</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>17</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>53</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>21</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>25</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>12.65</td>
                <td>12.65</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>110</td>
                <td>110</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>14</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>85</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>18</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>7.14 ± 5.8</td>
                <td>13.16 ± 16.3</td>
                <td>117.89 ± 108.1</td>
                <td>30</td>
                <td>30 ± 25.3</td>
                <td>96.8 ± 102</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>5.08 ± 7.7</td>
                <td>10.82 ± 6.8</td>
                <td>5.2 ± 4.9</td>
                <td>8.22 ± 7.2</td>
                <td>41.67 ± 61.1</td>
                <td>63.5 ± 41.3</td>
                <td>30.76 ± 25.9</td>
                <td>50.87 ± 45.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>7.04 ± 4.1</td>
                <td>5.98 ± 5.5</td>
                <td>6.81 ± 4.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>38.05 ± 25.5</td>
                <td>30.17 ± 22.8</td>
                <td>36.3 ± 25.1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>5.57 ± 4</td>
                <td>2.04 ± 0.6</td>
                <td>4.87 ± 3.8</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>40.63 ± 32.1</td>
                <td>12.86 ± 3.6</td>
                <td>35.07 ± 30.8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>9.15 ± 0.7</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>9.15 ± 0.7</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>50 ± 10</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>50 ± 10</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Average</td>
                <td>3.23 ± 7.7</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>7</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>33</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>4.61 ± 4</td>
                <td>5.82 ± 6.3</td>
                <td>27.09 ± 54.4</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>38</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>98</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>27</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>8</bold>
                </td>
                <td>28.9 ± 21.7</td>
                <td>34.32 ± 37.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pr(&gt;F)</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.003</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Note:</bold> Figures in bold are the highest.</p>
        <p>Five years after enrichment planting, there was a significant difference (p ≥ 0.05) in the growth of the exploitable species across the different sites. The STs had the highest average diameter (58.76 mm/ha ± 31.7 mm/ha) and height (440 cm/ha ± 220.5 cm/ha). Specifically, in LYs and STs, the species <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic>had the highest average diameter of 94.08 mm/ha ± 22.6 mm/ha and 104.65 mm/ha ± 12.4 mm/ha respectively. Making the species <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic>have the highest diameter across all sites (95.49 mm/ha ± 21.8 mm/ha) (<bold>Table 5</bold>). The average height on the other hand was highest in LYs in the species <italic>Entandrophragma angolense</italic>(389.41 cm/ha ± 106.4 cm/ha) and in STs in the species <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic>(750 cm/ha ± 50 cm/ha). Making <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> have the highest average height across the different sites (590 cm/ha ± 141.7 cm/ha) (<bold>Table 5</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5</bold><bold>.</bold> Average diameter and height after five years of enrichment planting in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                  <bold>/</bold>
                  <bold>Site</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Diametre</bold>
                  <bold>(mm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Height</bold>
                  <bold>(cm)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>LYs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>STs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Average</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>LYs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>STs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Average</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>13.21 ± 14.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>3.49 ± 7.9</td>
                <td>143.45 ± 96.9</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>35.87 ± 69</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>2.7</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>2.7</td>
                <td>80</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>80</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>47.75 ± 26.4</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>47.75 ± 26.4</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>389</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>41</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>106</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>389.41 ± 106.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>candollei</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>1.66 ± 1.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>6.2 ± 3.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>32.03 ± 15.7</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>20.69 ± 17.2</td>
                <td>267.14 ± 99.4</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>176.23 ± 127.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>oblongum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>7.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>22.91 ± 12</td>
                <td>25.5</td>
                <td>14.27 ± 14.1</td>
                <td>277.65 ± 104.6</td>
                <td>230</td>
                <td>168.53 ± 152.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>L</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>alata</italic>
                </td>
                <td>40.44 ± 27.9</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>40.44 ± 27.9</td>
                <td>359.2 ± 137.2</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>359.2 ± 137.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>6.94 ± 3.3</td>
                <td>0.157</td>
                <td>6.65 ± 3.3</td>
                <td>99.36 ± 75.4</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>92.35 ± 73.8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>9.83 ± 4.3</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>9.83 ± 4.3</td>
                <td>170 ± 82.2</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>170 ± 82.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>5.05 ± 1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>11.06 ± 14.9</td>
                <td>67.5 ± 29.8</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>98.39 ± 90</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>26.14 ± 21.7</td>
                <td>25.7</td>
                <td>21.26 ± 21.2</td>
                <td>282.32 ± 143.4</td>
                <td>250</td>
                <td>226.93 ± 162.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>34.22 ± 33.7</td>
                <td>50.27 ± 6</td>
                <td>35.23 ± 32.9</td>
                <td>254.67 ± 175</td>
                <td>366.67 ± 124.7</td>
                <td>261.67 ± 174.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>94</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>08</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>22</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>104</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>65</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>12</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>95</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>49</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>21</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>8</bold>
                </td>
                <td>565.38 ± 135</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>750</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>50</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>590</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>141</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>7</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Average</td>
                <td>27.66 ± 29.4</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>58</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>76</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>31</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>7</bold>
                </td>
                <td>17.6 ± 26.3</td>
                <td>246.57 ± 172.3</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>440</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>220</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                </td>
                <td>154.78 ± 177.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pr(&gt;F)</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.10</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Note:</bold> Figures in bold are the highest.</p>
        <p>Ten years after enrichment planting, there was a significant difference (p ≥ 0.05) in the growth of the exploitable species across sites. The LYs had the highest average diameter (35.94 mm/ha ± 41.5 mm/ha) and height (257.39 mm/ha ± 229.7 mm/ha) respectively. Specifically, in the LYs, the species <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> had the highest average diameter (102.76 mm/ha ± 55.4mm/ha), while in the STs, the species <italic>Pterocarpus</italic><italic>santalinoides</italic>had the highest average diameter (17.73 mm/ha ± 11.1 mm/ha). For the average height, in the LYs, the highest was found in the species <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>sclero</italic><italic>xylon</italic> (595.3 cm/ha ± 270.4 cm/ha) while in the STs, the highest was in the species <italic>Pterocarpus</italic><italic>santalinoides</italic> (200 cm/ha ± 29.4 cm/ha). This made the species <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>sc</italic><italic>leroxylon</italic> the species with the highest average diameter (102.76 mm/ha ± 55.4 mm/ha) and height (595.3 cm/ha ± 270.4 cm/ha) 10 years after enrichment planting (<bold>Table 6</bold>). </p>
        <p><bold>Table 6</bold><bold>.</bold> Average diameter and height after ten years of enrichment planting in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                  <bold>/</bold>
                  <bold>Site</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Diametre</bold>
                  <bold>(mm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Height</bold>
                  <bold>(cm)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>LYs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>STs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Average</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>LYs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>STs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Average</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>10.36 ± 7.8</td>
                <td>11 ± 1</td>
                <td>1.76 ± 3.1</td>
                <td>135 ± 59.7</td>
                <td>120</td>
                <td>17.74 ± 35.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>28.19 ± 21.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>28.19 ± 21.5</td>
                <td>223.96 ± 98.8</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>223.96 ± 98.8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>candollei</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>1.66 ± 1.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>6.2 ± 3.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>47.35 ± 17.9</td>
                <td>17.5</td>
                <td>29.41 ± 23.6</td>
                <td>385 ± 133</td>
                <td>180</td>
                <td>245.4 ± 183.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>oblongum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>7.5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>35.3 ± 23.2</td>
                <td>10.2</td>
                <td>26.41 ± 24.8</td>
                <td>277.36 ± 166</td>
                <td>200</td>
                <td>210.02 ± 183</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>10.13 ± 13</td>
                <td>15.13 ± 4</td>
                <td>10.15 ± 12.7</td>
                <td>86.54 ± 77.8</td>
                <td>166 ± 80.4</td>
                <td>88.19 ± 78.8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>28 ± 28.2</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>28 ± 28.2</td>
                <td>314 ± 207.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>314 ± 207.1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>7.2 ± 3.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>13.81 ± 17</td>
                <td>72.33 ± 39.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>111.68 ± 102.7</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>42.52 ± 25.2</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>17</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>73</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>11</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>32.47 ± 27.2</td>
                <td>331.18 ± 155.8</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>200</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>29</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>256.66 ± 182.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>27.83 ± 28.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>27.83 ± 28.1</td>
                <td>233.67 ± 167.9</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>233.67 ± 167.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>102</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>76</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>55</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>102</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>76</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>55</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>595</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>3</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>270</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>595</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>3</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>270</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Average</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>35</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>94</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>41</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                </td>
                <td>14.88 ± 6.7</td>
                <td>24.14 ± 36.8</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>257</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>39</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>229</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>7</bold>
                </td>
                <td>170.83 ± 60.3</td>
                <td>175.69 ± 215.1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pr(&gt;F)</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>1.0</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>1.0</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Note:</bold>Figures in bold are the highest.</p>
        <p>In this study, though more individuals died in the LYs than in the STs, the annual mortality was highest in the STs, 5 and 10 years after enrichment planting. Also in both sites, the number of individuals who died decreased with time. Contrarily, the survival rate was highest in the LYs, 5 and 10 years after enrichment planting (<bold>Table 7</bold>). </p>
        <p><bold>Table 7</bold><bold>.</bold> Annual mortality and survival rate of disturbed sites after enrichment planting in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl7">
          <label>Table 7</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Time</bold>
                  <bold>(Years)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Annual</bold>
                  <bold>Mortality</bold>
                  <bold>Rate</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Annual</bold>
                  <bold>Survival</bold>
                  <bold>Rate</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sites</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>1 - 5 years</td>
                <td>1 - 10 years</td>
                <td>1 - 5 years</td>
                <td>1 - 10 years</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Log yards</td>
                <td>385</td>
                <td>237</td>
                <td>339</td>
                <td>9.6</td>
                <td>1.3</td>
                <td>61.6</td>
                <td>88.1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Skid trails</td>
                <td>83</td>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>22.9</td>
                <td>9.5</td>
                <td>8.4</td>
                <td>14.5</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>In the LYs mortality was highest in the species <italic>Aningeria altissima</italic>(23.5%), 5 years after enrichment planting. Ten years after enrichment planting, mortality was highest in <italic>Entandrophragma angolense</italic> (11.1%) and <italic>Pterocarpus soyauxii</italic>(11.1%). Total survival was least in <italic>Pterocarpus soyauxii</italic>(0.0%) and <italic>Entand</italic><italic>rophragma angolense</italic>(0.0%), 5 and 10 years respectively. Five and ten years after enrichment planting, recruitement was highest in <italic>Petersianthus macrocarpus</italic> (1100%) and <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> (2400%) respectively (<bold>Table 8</bold>). </p>
        <p><bold>Table 8</bold><bold>.</bold> Species annual mortality rate, total survival and recruitment of exploitable species after enrichment planting in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl8">
          <label>Table 8</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Sites</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Time</bold>
                  <bold>(Years)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Annual</bold>
                  <bold>Mortality</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Total</bold>
                  <bold>Survival</bold>
                  <bold>Rate</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Recrutement</bold>
                  <bold>Total</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>10</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>-</bold>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>-</bold>
                  <bold>10</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>-</bold>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>-</bold>
                  <bold>10</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>-</bold>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>-</bold>
                  <bold>10</bold>
                  <bold>years</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="13">LYs</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Afzelia</italic>
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>31</td>
                <td>29</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>1.6</td>
                <td>9.0</td>
                <td>93.5</td>
                <td>19.4</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Aningeria</italic>
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>36</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>23</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>5.9</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>112</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Entandrophragma</italic>
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>27</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>9.3</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>11</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>63</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Entandrophragma</italic>
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>7.5</td>
                <td>2.2</td>
                <td>70</td>
                <td>80</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Erythrophleum</italic>
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>150</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>36</td>
                <td>22.2</td>
                <td>8.4</td>
                <td>11.3</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Lophira</italic>
                  <italic>alata</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Mansonia</italic>
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>32</td>
                <td>31</td>
                <td>114</td>
                <td>0.8</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>96.9</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>256</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Milicia</italic>
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Petersianthus</italic>
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>200</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Pterocarpus</italic>
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>38</td>
                <td>56</td>
                <td>51</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>47</td>
                <td>34</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Pterocarpus</italic>
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>21</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>11</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Terminalia</italic>
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>56</td>
                <td>45</td>
                <td>30</td>
                <td>4.9</td>
                <td>5.2</td>
                <td>80.4</td>
                <td>53.6</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Triplochiton</italic>
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>13</td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>550</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>2400</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="12">STs</td>
                <td>
                  <italic>Afzelia</italic>
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Aningeria</italic>
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>11.1</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Entandrophragma</italic>
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>11.1</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Entandrophragma</italic>
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Erythrophleum</italic>
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>22.7</td>
                <td>10.1</td>
                <td>9.1</td>
                <td>9.1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Mansonia</italic>
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>100</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>67</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Milicia</italic>
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>11.1</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Petersianthus</italic>
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>11.1</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Pterocarpus</italic>
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>23.5</td>
                <td>9.2</td>
                <td>5.9</td>
                <td>17.6</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Pterocarpus</italic>
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>25</td>
                <td>11.1</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Terminalia</italic>
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>14</td>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>19</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                </td>
                <td>11.1</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>21</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <italic>Triplochiton</italic>
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Note:</bold> Figures in bold are the highest or lowest.</p>
        <p>In the STs, mortality was least in the species <italic>Terminalia superba</italic> (19.6%) with the a highest total survival of 21.4%, 5 years after enrichment planting. Ten years after, the species <italic>Afzelia pachyloba</italic> had the least mortality but the highest total survival was found in the species <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic> and<italic>Entandrophragma cy</italic><italic>lindricum</italic> (100%). Recruitment was highest in <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> (100%) and <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic>(67%), 5 and 10 years respectively (<bold>Table 8</bold>). </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Biomass and Carbon Stock Dynamics after Enrichment Planting in the East Region of Cameroon</title>
        <p>There was a significant difference across sites (p ≥ 0.05) for the mean biomass a year after enrichment planting as the forest canopy had the highest mean biomass (1.163 kg/ha) while the STs had the least biomass (0.014 kg/ha). <italic>Petersianthus macrocarpus</italic>had the highest biomass (10.325 kg/ha) under the forest canopy, <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic>(0.059 kg/ha) in the LYs, and <italic>Milicia excelsa</italic>(0.114 kg/ha) in the STs a year after enrichment planting. However, there was no significant difference for all the species across the sites except for <italic>Terminalia superba</italic> which was significantly different between the LYs and the STs (<bold>Table 7</bold>). Five years after the biomass was the same for both LYs and STs (3.552 kg/ha), with <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> having the highest biomass in both LYs and STs (18.214 and 27.002 kg/ha respectively). Only the species <italic>Afzelia pachyloba</italic> and <italic>Erythrophleum</italic>sauveolens had a significant difference in their biomass across the different sites. Ten years after enrichment planting, the LYs had a higher biomass (7.604 kg/ha) than </p>
        <p><bold>Table 9</bold><bold>.</bold> Biomass dynamics across the different sites after enrichment planting in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl9">
          <label>Table 9</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Years</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>Year</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>Years</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>10</bold>
                  <bold>Years</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sites/Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Canopy</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>LY</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>ST</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pr(&gt;F)</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>LY</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>ST</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pr(&gt;F)</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>LY</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>ST</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pr(&gt;F)</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>2</sup>
                  </bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.024</td>
                <td>0.042</td>
                <td>0.007</td>
                <td>0.893</td>
                <td>0.731</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>4.81e</bold>
                  <bold>−</bold>
                  <bold>07</bold>
                  <bold>*</bold>
                  <bold>**</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.248</td>
                <td>0.115</td>
                <td>0.087</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>0.184</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.057</td>
                <td>0.044</td>
                <td>0.807</td>
                <td>6.469</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>2.293</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>candollei</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.003</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.656</td>
                <td>0.005</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>0.066</td>
                <td>2.433</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.135</td>
                <td>6.443</td>
                <td>0.348</td>
                <td>0.056</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>oblongum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.428</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.003</td>
                <td>0.025</td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>0.385</td>
                <td>2.039</td>
                <td>1.372</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.0212</bold>
                  <bold>*</bold>
                </td>
                <td>6.528</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.059</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.084</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>059</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.021</td>
                <td>0.628</td>
                <td>9.95</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.515</td>
                <td>0.302</td>
                <td>0.967</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>114</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.053</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.474</td>
                <td>5.264</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>10</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>325</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.026</td>
                <td>0.03</td>
                <td>0.548</td>
                <td>0.164</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.042</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.434</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.728</td>
                <td>0.092</td>
                <td>0.019</td>
                <td>0.051</td>
                <td>0.014</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.115</td>
                <td>6.293</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>553</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.152</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.028</td>
                <td>0.033</td>
                <td>0.814</td>
                <td>2.679</td>
                <td>0.928</td>
                <td>0.379</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.018</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.017</bold>
                  <bold>*</bold>
                </td>
                <td>4.887</td>
                <td>4.823</td>
                <td>0.99</td>
                <td>3.701</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.016</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>18</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>214</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>27</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>002</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.244</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>33</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>805</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Biomass (kg·ha
                  <sup>−</sup>
                  <sup>1</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>163</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.036</td>
                <td>0.014</td>
                <td>1.21e−14***</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>3</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>552</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>3</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>552</bold>
                </td>
                <td>&lt;2e−16***</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>7</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>604</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.329</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Biomass (t·ha
                  <sup>−</sup>
                  <sup>1</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                </td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                </td>
                <td>0.008</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Pr(&gt;F)
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.847</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Note:</bold> Figures in bold are the highest. ANOVA: Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1.</p>
        <p>the STs. In the LYs, the highest was in the species <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>s</italic><italic>cleroxylon</italic> (33.805 kg/ha). While in the STs, the highest was in <italic>Pterocarpus santalinoides</italic> (0.553 kg/ha). No species had a significant difference in their biomass across sites 10 years after enrichment planting (<bold>Table 9</bold>).</p>
        <p>There was a significant difference (p ≥ 0.05) across sites and species for the amount of carbon stocked and sequestered. A year after enrichment planting, the forest canopy had the highest carbon stock and sequestration (0.546 kg/ha and 2005 CO<sub>2</sub><sup>–e</sup>/ha respectively). Specifically under the forest canopy, the species <italic>Pterocarpus macrocarpus</italic> had the highest carbon stock and sequestration (4.853 kg/ha and 17,809 CO<sub>2</sub><sup>–e</sup>/ha). In the LYs, the highest carbon stock and sequestration was recorded in <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic> (0.028 kg/ha and 0.101 CO<sub>2</sub><sup>–e</sup>/ha).</p>
        <p>In the STs, the highest Carbon stock and sequestration was recorded in<italic>Milicia excelsa</italic> (0.054kg/ha and 0.197 CO<sub>2</sub><sup>–e</sup>/ha) (<bold>Table 8</bold>). Five and ten years after enrichment planting, the highest Carbon stock and sequestration was recorded in the LYs. <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic>had the highest Carbon stock and sequestration (8.6 kg/ha and 31.4 kg/ha respectively) in the LYs 5 years and 10 years after (15.9 kg/ha and 58.31 CO<sub>2</sub><sup>–e</sup>/ha). In the STs however 10 years after enrichment planting, the species <italic>Pterocarpus santalinoides</italic>stored the most carbon and sequestration (<bold>Table 10</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 10</bold><bold>.</bold> Carbon stock and sequestration across the different sites after enrichment planting in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl10">
          <label>Table 10</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Years</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="6">
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>Year</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>5</bold>
                  <bold>Years</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="4">
                  <bold>10</bold>
                  <bold>Years</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Sites/Species</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Canopy</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>LY</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>ST</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>LY</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>ST</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>LY</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>ST</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Carbon</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Co</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>2</sub>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Carbon</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Co</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>2</sub>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Carbon</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Co</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>2</sub>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Carbon</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Co</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>2</sub>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Carbon</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Co</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>2</sub>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Carbon</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Co</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>2</sub>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Carbon</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Co</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sub>2</sub>
                  </bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>pachyloba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.011</td>
                <td>0.041</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.073</td>
                <td>0.003</td>
                <td>0.012</td>
                <td>0.344</td>
                <td>1.261</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.116</td>
                <td>0.43</td>
                <td>0.054</td>
                <td>0.20</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>A</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>0.015</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>0.006</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>0.007</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>1.078</td>
                <td>3.96</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>angolense</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.027</td>
                <td>0.099</td>
                <td>0.021</td>
                <td>0.076</td>
                <td>3.04</td>
                <td>11.158</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>candollei</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.005</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>cylindricum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.309</td>
                <td>1.132</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>0.008</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>0.006</td>
                <td>1.144</td>
                <td>4.197</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>3.028</td>
                <td>11.11</td>
                <td>0.164</td>
                <td>0.0563</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>oblongum</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.201</td>
                <td>0.738</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>E</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>suaveolens</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.005</td>
                <td>0.012</td>
                <td>0.043</td>
                <td>0.004</td>
                <td>0.015</td>
                <td>0.958</td>
                <td>3.517</td>
                <td>0.645</td>
                <td>2.366</td>
                <td>3.068</td>
                <td>11.26</td>
                <td>0.094</td>
                <td>0.0589</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>altissima</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.039</td>
                <td>0.144</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>028</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>101</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.01</td>
                <td>0.036</td>
                <td>4.676</td>
                <td>17.162</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.242</td>
                <td>0.89</td>
                <td>0.142</td>
                <td>0.967</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>M</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>excelsa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>054</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>197</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.025</td>
                <td>0.091</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>2.474</td>
                <td>9.08</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>macrocarpus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>853</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>17</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>809</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.012</td>
                <td>0.045</td>
                <td>0.014</td>
                <td>0.052</td>
                <td>0.077</td>
                <td>0.282</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>0.072</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.434</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>santalinoides</italic>
                </td>
                <td>0.342</td>
                <td>1.256</td>
                <td>0.043</td>
                <td>0.159</td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>0.033</td>
                <td>0.007</td>
                <td>0.024</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>2.958</td>
                <td>10.85</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>26</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.152</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>P</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>soyauxii</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.013</td>
                <td>0.049</td>
                <td>0.015</td>
                <td>0.057</td>
                <td>1.259</td>
                <td>4.621</td>
                <td>0.436</td>
                <td>1.601</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>superba</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.009</td>
                <td>0.032</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>2.297</td>
                <td>8.43</td>
                <td>2.267</td>
                <td>8.319</td>
                <td>1.74</td>
                <td>6.38</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>T</italic>
                  .
                  <italic>scleroxylon</italic>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>0.007</td>
                <td>0.027</td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>8</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>31</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>12</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>7</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>46</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>15</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>9</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>58</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>31</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Biomass (kg·ha
                  <sup>−</sup>
                  <sup>1</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>546</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>2</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>005</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.017</td>
                <td>0.062</td>
                <td>0.006</td>
                <td>0.024</td>
                <td>1.669</td>
                <td>6.127</td>
                <td>4.752</td>
                <td>17.439</td>
                <td>3.574</td>
                <td>13.12</td>
                <td>0.155</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Biomass (t·ha
                  <sup>−</sup>
                  <sup>1</sup>
                  )
                </td>
                <td>0.001</td>
                <td>0.002</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td rowspan="2">0.000</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>002</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>006</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.02</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>004</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0</bold>
                  <bold>.</bold>
                  <bold>013</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  Pr(&gt;F)
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.008</td>
                <td>0.012</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.0894</td>
                <td>0.0894</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
                <td>0.847</td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Note:</bold> Figures in bold are the highest.</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313519-rId46.jpeg?20260109014720" />
        </fig>
        <p>(A)</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313519-rId47.jpeg?20260109014719" />
        </fig>
        <p>(B)</p>
        <p><bold>Figure 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Variation of carbon stock and diameter over time in the LYs (A) and STs (B).</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313519-rId48.jpeg?20260109014719" />
        </fig>
        <p>(A)</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313519-rId49.jpeg?20260109014720" />
        </fig>
        <p>(B)</p>
        <fig id="fig7">
          <label>Figure 7</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313519-rId50.jpeg?20260109014720" />
        </fig>
        <p>(C)</p>
        <p><bold>Figure 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Variation of carbon stock and diameter a year (A) 5 years (B) and 10 years (C) after enrichment planting.</p>
        <p>The variation of the Carbon stock and diameter over time per site indicates that, Carbon stock and diameter increased over time in all the sites. In the LYs, it increased from the first year to the 10<sup>th</sup> year. However, in the STs, there was an increase from the first year to the 5<sup>th</sup> year and as time increased, the carbon stock and diameter decreased in the 10<sup>th</sup> year (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
        <p>A year after enrichment planting, growth was only evident under the forest canopy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(A)</xref>). As time increased, growth became evident in all three sites without a major change under the forest canopy (Linear relationship) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(B)</xref>). Ten years after enrichment planting, the diameter and Carbon stock were maintained under the forest canopy, increased in the LYs and almost nothing in the STs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(C)</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Soil Characteristics after Enrichment Planting</title>
        <p>Soil chemical properties under the forest canopy was not significantly different (p &lt; 0.05) from that of the disturbed sites (Log yards and skid trails) except for Potassium, pH (water), pH(KCL) and Cation exchange capacity (CEC) that were significantly different (p &lt; 0.05). Generally there was an increase in most of the soil properties after selective logging except for Exchanged acidity, Phosphorus and Magnesium. In term of soil properties, the enriched sites had a lower average pH value than that under the canopy, suggesting that the soil in the enriched sites were still more acidic. In addition, the enriched sites had higher values of C organic, C/N ratio, Organic matter, Potassium, Calcium and CEC than those in under the forest canopy, implying that soil fertility in the reclaimed sites was not yet equal as in the forest canopy. The mineral contents showed varying conditions between the forest canopy and the reclamation sites. Both the forest canopy and the reclaimed sites contained a high amount of potassium, with the highest potassium content found at the enriched site. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was categorized as high in the enriched sites. This value indicates that the available cations for plants are high in enriched sites. Based on the soil properties overall, the enriched sites had good soil conditions although these conditions were not far below that of the forest canopy (<bold>Table 11</bold>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 11</bold><bold>.</bold> Soil properties after enrichment planting in the East Region of Cameroon.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl11">
          <label>Table 11</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>SOIL Property</td>
                <td colspan="3">Under Forest Canopy (UFC)</td>
                <td colspan="3">Disturbed Sites</td>
                <td colspan="3">Mean</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Soil Depth</td>
                <td>0 - 10 cm</td>
                <td>10 - 20 cm</td>
                <td>20 - 30 cm</td>
                <td>0 - 10 cm</td>
                <td>10 - 20 cm</td>
                <td>20 - 30 cm</td>
                <td>UFC</td>
                <td>Disturbed Sites</td>
                <td>
                  Pr(&gt;F)
                  <sup>2</sup>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>pH (water)</td>
                <td>5.05</td>
                <td>4.4</td>
                <td>4.6</td>
                <td>6.2</td>
                <td>6.5</td>
                <td>6.4</td>
                <td>4.5 ± 0.3</td>
                <td>6.4 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.001</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>pH (KCL)</td>
                <td>4.1</td>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>3.6</td>
                <td>5.4</td>
                <td>5.8</td>
                <td>5.4</td>
                <td>3.7 ± 0.3</td>
                <td>5.5 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.001</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Exchanged Acidity</td>
                <td>12.9</td>
                <td>13.4</td>
                <td>14.4</td>
                <td>4.1</td>
                <td>4.1</td>
                <td>4.0</td>
                <td>13.6 ± 0.8</td>
                <td>4.1 ± 0.1</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.000</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Organic Carbon (%)</td>
                <td>3.6</td>
                <td>3.5</td>
                <td>3.4</td>
                <td>5.4</td>
                <td>3.9</td>
                <td>3.1</td>
                <td>3.5 ± 0.1</td>
                <td>4.1 ± 1.2</td>
                <td>0.402</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Organic Matter (%)</td>
                <td>6.2</td>
                <td>6.07</td>
                <td>5.8</td>
                <td>9.4</td>
                <td>6.8</td>
                <td>5.3</td>
                <td>6.0 ± 0.2</td>
                <td>7.2 ± 2.1</td>
                <td>0.396</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Nitrogen (%)</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.2</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.2 ± 3.4</td>
                <td>0.2 ± 0.1</td>
                <td>0.643</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Phosphorous (Kg)</td>
                <td>7.1</td>
                <td>6.2</td>
                <td>5.6</td>
                <td>5.9</td>
                <td>2.8</td>
                <td>3.6</td>
                <td>6.3 ± 0.8</td>
                <td>4.1 ± 1.6</td>
                <td>0.100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sodium (Kg)</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
                <td>0.1 ± 0.01</td>
                <td>0.1 ± 0</td>
                <td>0.837</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Potassium (Kg)</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>0.7</td>
                <td>0.4 ± 0.1</td>
                <td>0.7 ± 1.4</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.001</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Calcium (Kg)</td>
                <td>1.8</td>
                <td>4.2</td>
                <td>2.8</td>
                <td>5.6</td>
                <td>4.3</td>
                <td>2.5</td>
                <td>2.9 ± 1.2</td>
                <td>4.1 ± 1.6</td>
                <td>0.351</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Magnesium (Kg)</td>
                <td>2.7</td>
                <td>1.5</td>
                <td>4.3</td>
                <td>4.7</td>
                <td>1.6</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
                <td>2.8 ± 1.4</td>
                <td>2.2 ± 2.2</td>
                <td>0.713</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>C/N Ratio (%)</td>
                <td>16.1</td>
                <td>19.7</td>
                <td>23.1</td>
                <td>20.7</td>
                <td>40.6</td>
                <td>23.4</td>
                <td>19.6 ± 3.5</td>
                <td>28.2 ± 10.8</td>
                <td>0.26</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>CEC (Kg)</td>
                <td>10.8</td>
                <td>10.8</td>
                <td>10.8</td>
                <td>22.2</td>
                <td>23.2</td>
                <td>22.7</td>
                <td>10.8 ± 2.2</td>
                <td>22.7 ± 0.5</td>
                <td>
                  <bold>0.000</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Note:</bold>Figures in bold are significantly different.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Stand Composition after Enrichment Planting in the East Region of Cameroon</title>
        <p><bold>The</bold><bold>Most Important Species</bold><bold>and</bold><bold>Family</bold><bold>after</bold><bold>Enrichment Planting</bold><bold>in the</bold><bold>East Region</bold><bold>of Cameroon</bold></p>
        <p>The stand composition in this study was determined by the abundance and the species richness which was highest in the LYs than in the STs. This may be due to the large space that is usually created for LYs. Log yards are usually large areas created to store wood that has been harvested from nearby forests and pulled through STs. This requires clearing of a large surface area as compared to the STs where much damage is not done to the surrounding vegetation. Thus due to more space of LYs, more seedlings are required for planting. Seedlings used for the enrichment planting were based on their availability in the nursery and forest floor. The species <italic>Erythrophleum sauveolens</italic> was the most available due to its fast germination rate of maximum 3 weeks after sowing or exposure to sunlight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>]. The Important Value Index (IVI) indicates the relative ecological significance of a tree species in a stand. The most important species in this study <italic>Erythrophleum sauveolens</italic>that regenerated naturally, is a species that occurs in moist semi deciduous forests or gallery forests and grows best in fairly open forests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>]. That is why this species was found in the LYs. The species also belongs to the Fabaceae family with its podlike structure ready to spread far and wide at the opening of the forest canopy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>]. That may be the reason why it is the most important just a year after enrichment planting and possibly selective logging. After 5 and 10 years of enrichment planting, the most important species that regenerated naturally were <italic>Termi</italic><italic>nalia superba</italic> and <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic>respectively. The species <italic>Terminalia superba</italic> prefers well-drained soils and does not tolerate prolonged waterlogging, conditions similar to that of LYs and STs after a year of logging and enrichment planting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">66</xref>]. The species <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic>was found to grow naturally in both LYs and STs 10 years after enrichment planting. Ohene-Coffie, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">67</xref>] indicated that in southern Ghana seedlings of this species of up to 1m tall are most common in disturbed forest, while smaller seedlings are more common in undisturbed forest and adult trees are more common in logged or burnt forest than in undisturbed forest. This indicates its preference to be located in disturbed sites and thus considered a light demanding species at the seedling stage. This is further confirmed by the results obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>] who indicated that the family of Sterculiaceae having individuals like <italic>Mansonia altissima w</italic>as the most important family 17 years after enrichment planting. In our study these species were found 10 years after enrichment planting and should be used in LYs during enrichment planting. A year after enrichment planting, in the STs, the most important species was <italic>Aningeria altissima</italic>that regenerated naturally because this species inhabits areas with increased moisture usually found in riverine forest and freshwater swamp forest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">69</xref>]. </p>
        <p>After enrichment planting, the most important species was <italic>Entandrophragma angolense</italic>, a year after in the LYs. This may be due to the fact that this species requires light for growth after the seedling stage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">70</xref>]. The most important species was <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> in the STs. This may be due to the fact that this species is usually found as seedlings in forest gaps because its a light demander [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">71</xref>] and also some plots experienced management treatment of clearing and weeding thus allowing more light in the skid trails. These results are similar to that obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>] who indicated that the family of Sterculiaceae having individuals like <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scl</italic><italic>eroxylon</italic>as the most important family 17 years after enrichment planting. <italic>Terminalia superba</italic> is often found in association with <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> K. Schum. (Kimpouni, 2009), reason why they are found in both LYs and STs in this study.</p>
        <p>The most important family in the early years (1 - 5 years) after enrichment planting was the Fabaceae family. The Fabaceae family is the third largest family with 740 genera and 19,400 species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>]. Our study confirmed the comparable results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">72</xref>] in a semi-tropical forest where the Moraceae, Meliaceae, Apocynaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Ebenaceae, and Fabaceae were found to be the major family species drivers in the restoration status of a tropical semi-evergreen forest of Assam, Northeast India. Ten years after the most important family was the Malvaceae in both LYs and STs, indicating the restoration of the forest towards the mid successional stages of the forests. This was confirmed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>] who indicated that the Malvaceae family was present in both logged forests and forests logged 21 years ago. This therefore is an indication that enrichment planting actually helps in the restoration of the forests after selective logging.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Stand Structure after Enrichment Planting in the East Region of Cameroon</title>
        <p><bold>Growth</bold><bold>of</bold><bold>Exploitable Species</bold><bold>after</bold><bold>Enrichment Planting</bold><bold>in</bold><bold>the</bold><bold>East</bold><bold>Region</bold><bold>of</bold><bold>Cameroon</bold></p>
        <p>Several measures can be used to compare growth performance: diameter, height, volume or biomass, and they all have merits. In this study, diameter increment was preferred, as diameter is the most direct, accessible and reliable measure of tree size, and because the use of increment (rather than diameter) avoids serial correlation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">73</xref>] and thus better satisfies conventional statistical assumptions. In this study the diameter and height were used as a measure of the growth of the exploitable species. A year after enrichment planting, growth was highest in the LYs; however, with time, growth was highest in the STs 5 years after and returned to the LYs 10 years after logging. This is similar to the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] who indicated that growth was higher in the LYs than in the STs in a similar study in the East Region of Cameroon. Tree growth is affected by many factors, such as silvicultural treatment, competition from neighbouring trees, and microclimate. Separating the effect of these factors can be difficult. Thus, the results obtained here may be due to firstly the high light availability after the canopy has been opened by selective logging to create LYs. During photosynthesis, absorbed energy from the sunlight is transferred to the photosynthetic apparatus. This energy required for photosynthesis is obtained from sunlight which is highest in the LYs than the STs and under the forest canopy and thus leads to the growth of the seedlings present. This also means an increase in the growth of other species such as weeds and lianas which have a faster growth rate than the exploitable species used for enrichment planting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">74</xref>]. These undergrowth weeds and lianas are more evident in the STs than in the LYs as they hinder the growth of the exploitable species. Extensive growth of climbers, lianas and other vegetation has been shown in previous studies to hinder regeneration of trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">75</xref>]. Trimato [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>] indicated that the number of understorey species and richness at two reclamation sites was more than that of saplings, suggesting that ground cover plants are more adaptable to the harsh environmental conditions in mine reclamation areas in Indonesia. Montagini [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">77</xref>] indicated that after 4 years of enrichment planting, the number of saplings from natural regeneration was close to or even surpassed the amount of planted seedlings. This aligns with a preliminary enrichment planting trial in Agua Salud teak plantations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">78</xref>] which found that crowding explained more variation in enrichment planting growth than light alone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>]. Also, there might be competition amongst the exploitable species used for the enrichment planting, evident more in the STs which has less space and more likely to suffer from overcrowding. Vanclay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">80</xref>] in the Phillipines indicated that species like <italic>Pterocarpus</italic><italic>indicus</italic> exbibits strong intraspecific, but low inter-specific competition, so appears well-suited for polyculture plantings. It is thus recommended that species should thus be separated as species used for mono and polyculture systems. Montagini [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">77</xref>], however still recommends slow growth timber species for enrichment planting due to their multipurpose. </p>
        <p>Secondly, the soil compaction that is experienced in the STs makes it difficult for the germination and growth of species seedlings as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">81</xref>] indicated higher ground damage in STs (7% - 12%) than in LYs (1%) of the total harvest area in the Eastern Amazon of Brazil. The compaction of the soil also occurs in the LYs but this is usually restored (soil removed during clearing for the formation of the LYs is put back) before enrichment planting as opposed to the STs where this is not done. This compaction slows down the germination of most of the seeds found in the soil seed bank or better still destroys the seeds. </p>
        <p>However, the LYs are exposed to severe sunlight quality and quantity which may not be right for seedlings growth thus improving growth in the STs (conditions similar to medium light and medium moisture) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>]. Both quality, quantity and duration of incident light can have drastic impacts on photosynthetic activity and photosystem adaption to changing light quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">82</xref>] which eventually has an effect on the growth rate. Sensitivity to light is usually different according to the seedling stage and varied also according to the species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">83</xref>]. However, light is not the only factor that determines the growth of species as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>] indicated that light did not significantly affect growth (p &gt; 0.05) of the species <italic>Terminalia</italic><italic>amazonia</italic> after enrichment planting in Panama. In the STs, the amount of light is moderate keeping enough moisture necessary for the growth of seedlings. The best growth of species between 1 - 5 years after enrichment planting in the STs is similar to the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] where no species died in the STs indicating the best growth condition for most seedlings in the STs. </p>
        <p>As time increases to 10 years, the amount of light is reduced in both LYs and STs and the LYs become best for the growth of species. The STs become too dark for the survival of these species which almost becomes like under the forest canopy. Similar results were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">83</xref>] who indicated a highest mean height in an open canopy as opposed to a dense canopy in a forest plantation in Vietnam. The decrease in the growth of the STs may be due to the growth of the remnant cohort which have also increased in height and thus formed a canopy reducing the incident light required for growth. Similar results were found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">84</xref>] who indicated that the survival of enrichment plantings declined with increasing understory vegetation over time in a tropical forest in Australia. Thus the initial level of post-logging understory vegetation did not appear to affect the immediate survival of enrichment plantings, but in the longer term (up to 10 years) survival decreased as post-logging understory vegetation and regrowth increased. This suggests that removal of understory vegetation should take place at the time of enrichment planting. That is why the STs had an increased rate of growth in the first five years but later decreased in growth. Similar results were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">84</xref>] in Australia after 30 years of enrichment planting. Marshall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>] indicated that 30 months after enrichment planting, both crowding pressure and light availability explained a significant amount of variation in growth for all species combined.</p>
        <p>A year after enrichment planting, the diameter and height were highest in the species <italic>Entandrophragma</italic><italic>angolense</italic> and <italic>Mansonia</italic><italic>altissima</italic> respectively. <italic>Mansonia</italic><italic>altissima</italic> had a good growth rate in both the LYs and STs. This is in corroboration with the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] who indicated that the growth of <italic>Mansonia</italic><italic>altissima</italic> was highest in the condition of low light and high moisture and ended up recommending the species to be used in the STs during enrichment planting. <italic>Entandropgrama</italic><italic>angolense</italic> is a species that grows well in forest gaps and its growth is fair under medium-sized gaps [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">85</xref>]; indicating why its growth was best in the LYs than in the STs. Five and ten years later the highest growth was obtained from the species Triplochiton <italic>scleroxylon</italic> in the ST and LYs respectively. Fotso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>] indicated that the forest of the East Region is dominated by this species. This is in corroboration with the studies of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">86</xref>] who indicated that <italic>Trplochyton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> had the fastest growth and highest survival rate of 61.3% after 17 years of enrichment planting. This may be due to the fact that <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> is a light-demanding pioneer species and thus grows very fast after disturbance as the tree is characteristic of secondary forest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">71</xref>]. This was further strengthen by the fact that in this study some plots containing <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> had the silvicultural management practice of weeding and clearing yearly. Weeding involves the removal of other competing vegetation of undergrowth lianas and weeds which hinder the growth of species. Schnitzer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">75</xref>] indicated that extensive growth of climbers, lianas and other vegetation has been shown in previous studies to hinder regeneration of trees. Over time, the undergrwoth of lianas and weeds grows faster than exploitable species which have a slower growth. Weeding thus removes or reduces the competition and hindrance of these undergrowth species for nutrients and light, thereby allowing the species to grow in the light condition created by the gaps. This is thus a limitation of this study as all other plots didn’t receive the same treatment for a better comparism. This also calls for a study to determine the unexploitable species that generate naturally during enrichment planting. </p>
        <p>In our study growth in the LYs increased over time from the 1<sup>st</sup> to the 10<sup>th</sup> year after enrichment planting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). This may be due to the continuous availability of sunlight and enough space for the growth of each and every germinated seedling. The survival rate in the forest was sufficiently high suggesting that their seedling growth conditions in the nursery and then in the forest were appropriate. This is similar to the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">83</xref>] who indicated a survival rate of most species used for enrichment planting three years after especially for the species <italic>Afzelia</italic><italic>xylocarpa</italic> who had a survival rate of 95%. In this study, the species <italic>Afzelia</italic><italic>pachyloba</italic> had the least mortality of 5.6% after 10 years of enrichment planting in the STs. Similarly, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>] indicated that growth was significant 30 months after enrichment planting in Panama. The growth of the species <italic>Milicia</italic><italic>excelsa</italic> only in LYs may be due to the fact that this species is a pioneer species as this species grew from a mean diameter of 9.83 mm/ha ± 4.3 mm/ha 5 years after logging to 28.0 mm/ha ± 28.2 mm/ha 10 years after logging. The survival and growth of <italic>Milicia</italic><italic>excelsa</italic> has been demonstrated to be higher in forest than in a degraded ecosystem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">87</xref>]. This was the contrary in the STs where the growth was only prevalent in the first five years after enrichment planting. This may be due to the reduction of the gap created which closes the canopy on the slow growing exploitable species and the fast growth of weeds that are found in the STs. This may be due to the reason why the mortality was highest in STs and survival was highest in LYs in our study. The highest mortality in the species <italic>Aningeria</italic><italic>altissima</italic> in LYs is similar to the results of Mokake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>], who indicated that <italic>Aningeria</italic><italic>altissima</italic> had the highest mortality under medium light and low moisture condition.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Climate Change Mitigation of Enrichment Planting in the East Region of Cameroon</title>
        <p><bold>Biomass</bold><bold>and</bold><bold>Carbon</bold><bold>Stock</bold><bold>after</bold><bold>Enrichment Planting</bold><bold>in</bold><bold>the</bold><bold>East</bold><bold>Region</bold><bold>of</bold><bold>Cameroon</bold></p>
        <p>Forest biomass serves as the main indicator for monitoring ecosystems and climate conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">88</xref>], thus its accumulation in tropical forests resulting from reforestation and restoration activities is deemed crucial for climate change mitigation efforts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">89</xref>]. On average, around 50% of living biomass in global forests is stored within the most significant 1% of living trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">90</xref>]. The amount of carbon stored and the potential emissions released from various activities such as logging, clearing, degradation, and land conversion are determined by forest biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">91</xref>]. The process of forest degradation may lead to recovery through natural or assisted regeneration, whereas deforestation entails changes in land use that result in the permanent loss of the forest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">92</xref>], making knowledge of the biomass after recovery optimal. </p>
        <p>It is noteworthy that during the initial 1 - 5 years, the biomass and carbon stock was highest under the forest canopy due to already established seedlings as compared to the LYs and STs that are still trying to acclimatize themselves in the new environment after the nursery. The larger already established trees present under the forest canopy in comparison to the newly established seedlings in the LYs and STs, have biomass and CO<sub>2</sub> stocked that have been found to be linked to the diameter and height of the trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">93</xref>]. Thus the species under the forest canopy had a higher diameter as compared to the LYs and STs for though the canopy had a lesser number of individuals (n = 186 individuals) compared to the LYs (n = 999 individuals), it still had the highest biomass and carbon stock which may have contributed to these results in this study. This may suggest that stem density is not a main factor in biomass and Carbon stock accumulation as other factors could have played a role, like species, site, and age. Taking into consideration that the same species were sampled in all sites at the seedling stage, this means the reason for this variation would be in the diameter and wood density clearly stated in this study. This means the amount of Carbon added by enrichment planting should be dependent on the diameter and wood density. Moreover, the LYs and STs had just been established requiring the species time to acclimatize before growth to accumulate more biomass in these sites. One other reason for the lower biomass and carbon stock in the LYs and STs area may be due to intraspecific competition between the exploitable species since the same species that are planted have the same requirements; hence, resource competition is more intense [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">94</xref>]. This therefore calls for site-specific and species-specific information on which species are to be planted in each forest gap. </p>
        <p>This however changed at 5 - 10 years after enrichment planting with more biomass and Carbon stock in the LYs than under the forest canopy. This may be due to the fact that, secondary forests have high rates of biomass productivity, especially during early succession [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">95</xref>]. In fact, secondary forests have been found to have greater potential for Carbon sequestration, and larger Carbon pools, than even primary forests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">96</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">97</xref>]. Ergstrom, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">98</xref>] indicated that both mean diameter of trees and trees per hectare was higher for restored plots compared to the control plots (under forest canopy) in Malaysia, as an analysis of AGC in relation to year since restoration, also show a positive increasing trend of 1.91 Mg C ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. These results also support previous findings from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">99</xref>] which showed that degraded tropical forests that had undergone active restoration treatments recover faster (4.4 Mg C ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) than natural regenerating forests (2.9 Mg C ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>). Wheeler [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">100</xref>] stated similar results but also concluded that initial recovery of AGC after active restoration might be slow but increases over time. Last but not the least, after enrichment planting, there is usually a rapid increase of weeds, lianas and climbers that grow fast and increase the Carbon stock of the degraded enriched forests. This may be the case with our study although the growth of the understory was not determined in the baseline dataset of 2011. This therefore calls for research studies that take into consideration not only the exploitable species but every other species in the LYs and STs.</p>
        <p>Evaluation of the datasets showed that the naturally regenerated seedlings had more importance (IVI) in this study than those that were planted (<bold>Table 2</bold>). Ergstrom [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">98</xref>] indicated that planted seedlings in actively restored plots had a minor impact on AGC accumulation, contributing only 1.5% (1.84 Mg C ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) of the current AGC in Malaysia. Instead, it is more likely that the maintenance practices preformed regularly during a 10 yearly period after planting resulted in increased AGC in already established trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">74</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">101</xref>] (Schnitzer <italic>et</italic><italic>al</italic>. 2000; Schwartz <italic>et</italic><italic>al</italic>. 2013). This might be the case of our study where some plots enriched with <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic> received periodical maintenance practices and thus had the highest biomass 5 and 10 years after enrichment planting. Thus enrichment planting with silvicultural management is necessary for an optimal Carbon storage. However at the establishment of a silvicultural treatment of strip planting about half of the standing C is removed leaving roughly 25 Mg ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> in the remaining stand. Thus, the use of treatment in enrichment planting should be well taken into consideration before implementation. This study presents a picture that fit well with the hypothesis, that severely degraded forests can have difficulties to naturally regenerate especially in the STs where the compactness of the soil and the light reduction drastically reduces the germination and thus growth of species.</p>
        <p>The highest biomass in the species <italic>Pterocarpus</italic><italic>santalinoides</italic> in the STs may be due to the fact that this species is a late successional species. These species have slower initial growth, higher wood density and are a major contribution to the carbon storage in later stages of forest development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">102</xref>]. In comparison, planted trees contribute an average of 0.09ton/carbon annually the first 23 years after restoration. Although, for every year that passes, this number will continue to increase as more and more planted trees reach the threshold dbh of ≥10 cm. As planted trees continue to grow and reach the canopy, an even greater growth is expected. Oclarit, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">103</xref>] indicated that enrichment planting with the species <italic>Pterocarpus</italic><italic>indicus</italic> had a higher biomass that exotic species in the Phillipines. We therefore recommend that this species be used in the STs for enrichment planting. <italic>Triplochiton</italic><italic>scleroxylon</italic>, which is an early successional species, is thus recommended for the LYs so that they can grow faster than the fast-growing weeds and form a canopy, as this species had the highest growth in the LYs in our study. </p>
        <p>The relationship between biomass, diameter, and time indicated a linear relationship in our study, which is similar to the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">104</xref>], who indicated a linear relationship between the diameter and stand age with biomass of a Dipterocarp species in Indonesia. Xanthopoulos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105">105</xref>] also indicated a linear relationship between biomass and age in an enrichment planting in Greece. Hughes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106">106</xref>] indicated that biomass and Carbon accumulation are positively correlated with time since abandonment. The increase in the Carbon stock and biomass may be due to the age of the forest, similar to the results we obtained in this study. The growth in vegetation age demonstrates a linear correlation with an augmented capacity of vegetation to sequester carbon, eventually reaching an equilibrium state [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">107</xref>].</p>
        <p>Forests play a critical role in sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, a role that is indispensable for mitigating climate change [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">108</xref>]. Forest ecosystems serve as an essential tool in climate change mitigation by absorbing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and storing it within tree biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">109</xref>]. Our study indicates a higher Carbon stock of 0.004 t/ha, 10 years after enrichment planting. Ergstrom [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">98</xref>] indicated similar results of a positive increasing trend of 1.91 Mg C/ha in degraded tropical forests in Sabah, Malaysia, which is high when compared to our results of 0.004 t/ha. This might be due to the non-implementation of management activities in most of the plots after enrichment planting, creating competition for nutrients with the undergrowth lianas and weeds. Wheeler [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">100</xref>] stated similar results but also concluded that initial recovery of AGC after active restoration might be slow but increases over time. Furthermore, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">101</xref>] showed that tending naturally established seedlings with liberation, as well as enrichment planting with maintenance, resulted in higher initial growth rates and survival. This calls for further research to be carried out in forest concessions for a longer period of time, with the implementation of silvicultural activities like weeding, as this may be the reason for these differences in the amount of Carbon.</p>
        <p>The insignificant difference in some chemical properties of the soil is similar to the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>], who indicated that most soil properties were not significantly different between the forest and reclaimed sites after mining in Borneo. Specifically, after enrichment planting, the soil became more acidic, similar to the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>] in Borneo. Forest clearing causes a drastic loss of CEC and cations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">110</xref>], degrading the quality of the soils. However, in our study, the log yards were enriched with soil that was removed during forest clearing; thus increasing the CEC and fertility. Several studies have shown that soil conditions can be improved through the addition of organic matter (e.g., animal manure, crop residues, and organic waste) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B111">111</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B113">113</xref>] as Organic compounds activate the microbial population in the reclaimed soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B111">111</xref>]. This is confirmed in our study by the greater fertility in enriched sites than under the forest canopy. </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Accurate measurement of forest area and carbon stock is essential to comprehensively capture the emissions resulting from forest degradation and their subsequent release into the atmosphere. The growth of trees contributes to the biomass accumulation, leading to increased diameter and growth rates, which in turn augment the carbon sequestration process. The high biomass and the presence of families like the Malvaceae in this study are an indication that enrichment planting stores carbon and changes the forest to the mid successional stage years after enrichment. However, the amount of Carbon stock within 10 years of enrichment planting is low, calling for further research over a longer time span. This study has contributed to the knowledge of the site and species specificity involved in enrichment planting, recommended the study of other species present in the LYs and STs during enrichment planting, and proposed further silvicultural management activities to be implemented during enrichment planting. This is an important first step to developing silvicultural guidelines, and those guidelines are currently lacking to develop strategies for the sustainable management of Central African forest stands and species.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We would like to thank Mr Bekolo Bekolo and Mr Njombe Ewusi of the National Forestry Development Agency (ANAFOR) for introducing us to the timber company through cosupervision, Mr Decolvenaere of SFIL-GVI for allowing us to use his forest concessions. We also thank Mr Nakoe Roger for field assistance and the staff of the forest company SFIL-GVI Ndeng. </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ruiz Pérez, M., Ezzine de Blas, D., Nasi, R., Sayer, J.A., Sassen, M., Angoué, C., <italic>et al</italic>. (2005) Logging in the Congo Basin: A Multi-Country Characterization of Timber Companies. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 214, 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.020 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.020</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.020</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Blas, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nasi, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sayer, J.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sassen, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Logging in the Congo Basin: A Multi-Country Characterization of Timber Companies</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>214</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.020</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Nasi, R., Billand, A. and van Vliet, N. (2012) Managing for Timber and Biodiversity in the Congo Basin. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 268, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.005 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.005</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.005</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nasi, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Billand, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vliet, N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Managing for Timber and Biodiversity in the Congo Basin</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>268</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.005</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hall, J.S., Harris, D.J., Medjibe, V. and Ashton, P.M.S. (2003) The Effects of Selective Logging on Forest Structure and Tree Species Composition in a Central African Forest: Implications for Management of Conservation Areas. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 183, 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00107-5 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00107-5</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00107-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00107-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hall, J.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Harris, D.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Medjibe, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ashton, P.M.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>The Effects of Selective Logging on Forest Structure and Tree Species Composition in a Central African Forest: Implications for Management of Conservation Areas</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>1127</volume>
            <issue>03</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00107-5</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Brown, S. and Lugo, A.E. (1990) Tropical Secondary Forests. <italic>Journal of Tropical</italic><italic>Ecology</italic>, 6, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467400003989 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0266467400003989</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467400003989">https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467400003989</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Brown, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lugo, A.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1990</year>
            <article-title>Tropical Secondary Forests</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Tropical Ecology</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0266467400003989</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dkamela, G.P., Félicien, K.M., Kemen, A., Minnemeyer, S. and Stolle, F. (2009) Voices from the Congo Basin: Incorporating the Perspectives of Local Stakeholders for Improved REDD Design. WRI Working Paper, World Resources Institute.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dkamela, G.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kemen, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Minnemeyer, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stolle, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Paper, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Voices from the Congo Basin: Incorporating the Perspectives of Local Stakeholders for Improved REDD Design</article-title>
            <source>WRI Working Paper</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Letouzey, R. (1968) Etude phytogéographique du Cameroun. Lechevalier, 511.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Letouzey, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1968</year>
            <article-title>Etude phytogéographique du Cameroun</article-title>
            <source>Lechevalier</source>
            <volume>511</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife (MINFOF) (2008) La production forestière en chiffres. <italic>Lettre Vert</italic>, 20, 24-42.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>La production forestière en chiffres</article-title>
            <source>Lettre Vert</source>
            <volume>20</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) (2015) Global Forest Resources Assessment. FAO Publications.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Global Forest Resources Assessment</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Putz, F.E., Zuidema, P.A., Synnott, T., Peña-Claros, M., Pinard, M.A., Sheil, D., <italic>et al</italic>. (2012) Sustaining Conservation Values in Selectively Logged Tropical Forests: The Attained and the Attainable. <italic>Conservation Letters</italic>, 5, 296-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00242.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00242.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00242.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00242.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Putz, F.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zuidema, P.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Synnott, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Claros, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pinard, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sheil, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Sustaining Conservation Values in Selectively Logged Tropical Forests: The Attained and the Attainable</article-title>
            <source>Conservation Letters</source>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00242.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bourland, N., Kouadio, Y.L., Fétéké, F., Lejeune, P. and Doucet, J-L. (2012) Ecology and Management of <italic>Pericopsis elata</italic> (Harms) Meeuwen (Fabaceae) Populations: A Review. <italic>Biotechnology Agronomy Society Environment</italic>, 16, 486-498.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bourland, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouadio, Y.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lejeune, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Doucet, J</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Ecology and Management of Pericopsis elata (Harms) Meeuwen (Fabaceae) Populations: A Review</article-title>
            <source>Biotechnology Agronomy Society Environment</source>
            <volume>16</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Lamprecht, H. (1990) Silvicultura en los Tro’picos. Deutsche Gessellschaft fu¨r Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), Eschborn.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lamprecht, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1990</year>
            <article-title>Silvicultura en los Tro’picos</article-title>
            <source>Deutsche Gessellschaft fu¨r Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ)</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ådjers, G., Hadengganan, S., Kuusipalo, J., Nuryanto, K. and Vesa, L. (1995) Enrichment Planting of Dipterocarps in Logged-Over Secondary Forests: Effect of Width, Direction and Maintenance Method of Planting Line on Selected Shorea Species. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 73, 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)03488-i <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1127(94)03488-i</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)03488-i">https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)03488-i</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hadengganan, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kuusipalo, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nuryanto, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vesa, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Width, D</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1995</year>
            <article-title>Enrichment Planting of Dipterocarps in Logged-Over Secondary Forests: Effect of Width, Direction and Maintenance Method of Planting Line on Selected Shorea Species</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>1127</volume>
            <issue>94</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1127(94)03488-i</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Korpelainen, H., Ådjers, G., Kuusipalo, J., Nuryanto, K. and Otsamo, A. (1995) Profitability of Rehabilitation of Overlogged Dipterocarp Forest: A Case Study from South Kalimantan, Indonesia. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 79, 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03600-8 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1127(95)03600-8</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03600-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03600-8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Korpelainen, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kuusipalo, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nuryanto, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Otsamo, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kalimantan, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1995</year>
            <article-title>Profitability of Rehabilitation of Overlogged Dipterocarp Forest: A Case Study from South Kalimantan, Indonesia</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>1127</volume>
            <issue>95</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-1127(95)03600-8</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gardner, T.A., Barlow, J., Chazdon, R., Ewers, R.M., Harvey, C.A., Peres, C.A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2009) Prospects for Tropical Forest Biodiversity in a Human-Modified World. <italic>Ecology Letters</italic>, 12, 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01294.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01294.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19504750</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01294.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01294.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gardner, T.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Barlow, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chazdon, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ewers, R.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Harvey, C.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Peres, C.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Prospects for Tropical Forest Biodiversity in a Human-Modified World</article-title>
            <source>Ecology Letters</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01294.x</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19504750</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Brancalion, P.H.S., Melo, F.P.L., Tabarelli, M. and Rodrigues, R.R. (2013) Biodiversity Persistence in Highly Human-Modified Tropical Landscapes Depends on Ecological Restoration. <italic>Tropical Conservation Science</italic>, 6, 705-710. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600601 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/194008291300600601</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600601">https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600601</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Brancalion, P.H.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Melo, F.P.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tabarelli, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rodrigues, R.R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Biodiversity Persistence in Highly Human-Modified Tropical Landscapes Depends on Ecological Restoration</article-title>
            <source>Tropical Conservation Science</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/194008291300600601</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Melo, F.P.L., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Fahrig, L., Martínez-Ramos, M. and Tabarelli, M. (2013) On the Hope for Biodiversity-Friendly Tropical Landscapes. <italic>Trends in Ecology</italic><italic>&amp; Evolution</italic>, 28, 462-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.001 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23375444</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Melo, F.P.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fahrig, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ramos, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tabarelli, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>On the Hope for Biodiversity-Friendly Tropical Landscapes</article-title>
            <source>Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution</source>
            <volume>28</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.001</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23375444</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Manson, D.G., Schmidt, S., Bristow, M., Erskine, P.D. and Vanclay, J.K. (2012) Species-Site Matching in Mixed Species Plantations of Native Trees in Tropical Australia. <italic>Agroforestry Systems</italic>, 87, 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9538-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10457-012-9538-0</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9538-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9538-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Manson, D.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Schmidt, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bristow, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Erskine, P.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vanclay, J.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Species-Site Matching in Mixed Species Plantations of Native Trees in Tropical Australia</article-title>
            <source>Agroforestry Systems</source>
            <volume>87</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10457-012-9538-0</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Trogisch, S., Liu, X., Rutten, G., Xue, K., Bauhus, J., Brose, U., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) The Significance of Tree-Tree Interactions for Forest Ecosystem Functioning. <italic>Basic and Applied Ecology</italic>, 55, 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.003</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Trogisch, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Liu, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rutten, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Xue, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bauhus, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brose, U.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>The Significance of Tree-Tree Interactions for Forest Ecosystem Functioning</article-title>
            <source>Basic and Applied Ecology</source>
            <volume>55</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.003</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Piotto, D. (2008) A Meta-Analysis Comparing Tree Growth in Monocultures and Mixed Plantations. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 255, 781-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.065 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.065</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.065">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.065</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Piotto, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>A Meta-Analysis Comparing Tree Growth in Monocultures and Mixed Plantations</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>255</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.065</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Seraphine, E.M., George, B.C., Andrew, E.E. and Bruno, N.E. (2022) Silvicultural Assessment of Enrichment Planting with Commercial Tree Species after Selective Logging. <italic>Journal of Ecology and</italic><italic>t</italic><italic>he Natural Environment</italic>, 14, 28-43. https://doi.org/10.5897/jene2021.0919 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/jene2021.0919</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5897/jene2021.0919">https://doi.org/10.5897/jene2021.0919</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Seraphine, E.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>George, B.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Andrew, E.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bruno, N.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Silvicultural Assessment of Enrichment Planting with Commercial Tree Species after Selective Logging</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/jene2021.0919</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Forrester, D.I., Bauhus, J., Cowie, A.L. and Vanclay, J.K. (2006) Mixed-Species Plantations of Eucalyptus with Nitrogen-Fixing Trees: A Review. <italic>Forest Ecology and</italic><italic>Management</italic>, 233, 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Forrester, D.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bauhus, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cowie, A.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vanclay, J.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Mixed-Species Plantations of Eucalyptus with Nitrogen-Fixing Trees: A Review</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>233</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Rappaport, D. and Montagnini, F. (2014) Tree Species Growth under a Rubber ( <italic>Hevea brasiliensis</italic>) Plantation: Native Restoration via Enrichment Planting in Southern Bahia, Brazil. <italic>New Forests</italic>, 45, 715-732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9433-9 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-014-9433-9</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9433-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-014-9433-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Rappaport, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Montagnini, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bahia, B</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Tree Species Growth under a Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantation: Native Restoration via Enrichment Planting in Southern Bahia, Brazil</article-title>
            <source>New Forests</source>
            <volume>45</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-014-9433-9</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Cole, R.J., Holl, K.D., Keene, C.L. and Zahawi, R.A. (2011) Direct Seeding of Late-Successional Trees to Restore Tropical Montane Forest. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 261, 1590-1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.038 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.038</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.038">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.038</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Cole, R.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Holl, K.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Keene, C.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zahawi, R.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Direct Seeding of Late-Successional Trees to Restore Tropical Montane Forest</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>261</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.038</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hooper, E., Condit, R. and Legendre, P. (2002) Responses of 20 Native Tree Species to Reforestation Strategies for Abandoned Farmland in Panama. <italic>Ecological Applications</italic>, 12, 1626-1641. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1626:rontst]2.0.co;2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1626:rontst]2.0.co;2</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1626:rontst]2.0.co;2">https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1626:rontst]2.0.co;2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hooper, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Condit, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Legendre, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Responses of 20 Native Tree Species to Reforestation Strategies for Abandoned Farmland in Panama</article-title>
            <source>Ecological Applications</source>
            <volume>0761</volume>
            <issue>2002</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1626:rontst]2.0.co;2</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Redondo-Brenes, A. and Montagnini, F. (2006) Growth, Productivity, Aboveground Biomass, and Carbon Sequestration of Pure and Mixed Native Tree Plantations in the Caribbean Lowlands of Costa Rica. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 232, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.067 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.067</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.067">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.067</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Redondo-Brenes, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Montagnini, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Growth, P</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Growth, Productivity, Aboveground Biomass, and Carbon Sequestration of Pure and Mixed Native Tree Plantations in the Caribbean Lowlands of Costa Rica</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>232</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.067</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nguyen, H., Lamb, D., Herbohn, J. and Firn, J. (2014) Designing Mixed Species Tree Plantations for the Tropics: Balancing Ecological Attributes of Species with Landholder Preferences in the Philippines. <italic>PLOS ONE</italic>, 9, e95267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095267 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0095267</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24751720</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095267">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095267</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nguyen, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lamb, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Herbohn, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Firn, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Designing Mixed Species Tree Plantations for the Tropics: Balancing Ecological Attributes of Species with Landholder Preferences in the Philippines</article-title>
            <source>PLOS ONE</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0095267</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24751720</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hawthorne, W.D. (1995) Ecological Profiles of Ghanaian Forest Trees. Tropical Forestry Papers, Oxford Forestry Institute, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hawthorne, W.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Papers, O</string-name>
              <string-name>Institute, D</string-name>
              <string-name>Sciences, U</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1995</year>
            <article-title>Ecological Profiles of Ghanaian Forest Trees</article-title>
            <source>Tropical Forestry Papers</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Doucet, J.-L. (2003) L’alliance délicate de la gestion forestière et de la biodiversité dans les forêts du centre du Gabon. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculté Universitaire des Sciences Agronomiques de Gembloux.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Doucet, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, F</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>L’alliance délicate de la gestion forestière et de la biodiversité dans les forêts du centre du Gabon</article-title>
            <source>Ph.D. Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Makana, J. and Thomas, S.C. (2005) Effects of Light Gaps and Litter Removal on the Seedling Performance of Six African Timber Species. <italic>Biotropica</italic>, 37, 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00030.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00030.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00030.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00030.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Makana, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thomas, S.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Light Gaps and Litter Removal on the Seedling Performance of Six African Timber Species</article-title>
            <source>Biotropica</source>
            <volume>37</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00030.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mokake, S.E., Chuyong, G.B. and Egbe, E.A. (2024) Long-Term Impacts of Selective Logging in a Tropical Rainforest in the East Region of Cameroon. <italic>African Journal of Ecology</italic>, 62, e13341. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.13341 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aje.13341</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.13341">https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.13341</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mokake, S.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chuyong, G.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Egbe, E.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Long-Term Impacts of Selective Logging in a Tropical Rainforest in the East Region of Cameroon</article-title>
            <source>African Journal of Ecology</source>
            <volume>62</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aje.13341</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chazdon, R.L. (2003) Tropical Forest Recovery: Legacies of Human Impact and Natural Disturbances. <italic>Perspectives in Plant Ecology</italic>, <italic>Evolution and Systematics</italic>, 6, 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00042 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1078/1433-8319-00042</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00042">https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00042</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chazdon, R.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ecology, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Tropical Forest Recovery: Legacies of Human Impact and Natural Disturbances</article-title>
            <source>Perspectives in Plant Ecology</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1078/1433-8319-00042</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mills, D.J., Bohlman, S.A., Putz, F.E. and Andreu, M.G. (2019) Liberation of Future Crop Trees from Lianas in Belize: Completeness, Costs, and Timber-Yield Benefits. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 439, 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.023 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.023</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.023">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.023</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mills, D.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bohlman, S.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Putz, F.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Andreu, M.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Completeness, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Liberation of Future Crop Trees from Lianas in Belize: Completeness, Costs, and Timber-Yield Benefits</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>439</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.023</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Marshall, A.R., Coates, M.A., Archer, J., Kivambe, E., Mnendendo, H., Mtoka, S., <italic>et al</italic>. (2016) Liana Cutting for Restoring Tropical Forests: A Rare Palaeotropical Trial. <italic>African Journal of Ecology</italic>, 55, 282-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12349 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aje.12349</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12349">https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12349</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Marshall, A.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Coates, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Archer, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kivambe, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mnendendo, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mtoka, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Liana Cutting for Restoring Tropical Forests: A Rare Palaeotropical Trial</article-title>
            <source>African Journal of Ecology</source>
            <volume>55</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aje.12349</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gourlet-Fleury, S., Mortier, F., Fayolle, A., Baya, F., Ouédraogo, D., Bénédet, F., <italic>et al</italic>. (2013) Tropical Forest Recovery from Logging: A 24 Year Silvicultural Experiment from Central Africa. <italic>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B</italic>: <italic>Biological Sciences</italic>, 368, Article ID: 20120302. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0302 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2012.0302</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23878332</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0302">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0302</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gourlet-Fleury, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mortier, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fayolle, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baya, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Tropical Forest Recovery from Logging: A 24 Year Silvicultural Experiment from Central Africa</article-title>
            <source>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</source>
            <volume>368</volume>
            <fpage>201203</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2012.0302</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23878332</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sist, P. and Brown, N. (2004) Silvicultural Intensification for Tropical Forest Conservation: A Response to Fredericksen and Putz. <italic>Biodiversity and Conservation</italic>, 13, 2381-2385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0389-5 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10531-004-0389-5</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0389-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0389-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sist, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brown, N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Silvicultural Intensification for Tropical Forest Conservation: A Response to Fredericksen and Putz</article-title>
            <source>Biodiversity and Conservation</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10531-004-0389-5</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Grogan, J., Landis, R.M., Ashton, M.S. and Galvão, J. (2005) Growth Response by Big-Leaf Mahogany ( <italic>Swietenia macrophylla</italic>) Advance Seedling Regeneration to Overhead Canopy Release in Southeast Pará, Brazil. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 204, 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.013 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.013</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Grogan, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Landis, R.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ashton, M.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Growth Response by Big-Leaf Mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla) Advance Seedling Regeneration to Overhead Canopy Release in Southeast Pará, Brazil</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>204</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2004.09.013</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Lamb, D., Erskine, P.D. and Parrotta, J.A. (2005) Restoration of Degraded Tropical Forest Landscapes. <italic>Science</italic>, 310, 1628-1632. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111773 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1111773</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16339437</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111773">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111773</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lamb, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Erskine, P.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Parrotta, J.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Restoration of Degraded Tropical Forest Landscapes</article-title>
            <source>Science</source>
            <volume>310</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1111773</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16339437</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Schulze, M. (2008) Technical and Financial Analysis of Enrichment Planting in Logging Gaps as a Potential Component of Forest Management in the Eastern Amazon. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 255, 866-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.082 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.082</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.082">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.082</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Schulze, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Technical and Financial Analysis of Enrichment Planting in Logging Gaps as a Potential Component of Forest Management in the Eastern Amazon</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>255</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.082</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Stanturf, J.A., Palik, B.J. and Dumroese, R.K. (2014) Contemporary Forest Restoration: A Review Emphasizing Function. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 331, 292-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.029 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.029</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.029">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.029</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Stanturf, J.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Palik, B.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dumroese, R.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Contemporary Forest Restoration: A Review Emphasizing Function</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>331</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.029</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <label>40.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Keefe, K., Schulze, M.D., Pinheiro, C., Zweede, J.C. and Zarin, D. (2009) Enrichment Planting as a Silvicultural Option in the Eastern Amazon: Case Study of Fazenda Cauaxi. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 258, 1950-1959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.037 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.037</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.037">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.037</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Keefe, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Schulze, M.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pinheiro, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zweede, J.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zarin, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Enrichment Planting as a Silvicultural Option in the Eastern Amazon: Case Study of Fazenda Cauaxi</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>258</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.037</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <label>41.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ashton, M.S., Goodale, U.M., Bawa, K.S., Ashton, P.S. and David Neidel, J. (2014) Restoring Working Forests in Human Dominated Landscapes of Tropical South Asia: An Introduction. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 329, 335-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.029 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.029</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.029">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.029</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ashton, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Goodale, U.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bawa, K.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ashton, P.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Neidel, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Restoring Working Forests in Human Dominated Landscapes of Tropical South Asia: An Introduction</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>329</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.029</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <label>42.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Coates, K.D. and Burton, P.J. (1997) A Gap-Based Approach for Development of Silvicultural Systems to Address Ecosystem Management Objectives. <italic>Forest Ecology</italic><italic>and Management</italic>, 99, 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00113-8 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00113-8</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00113-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00113-8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Coates, K.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Burton, P.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1997</year>
            <article-title>A Gap-Based Approach for Development of Silvicultural Systems to Address Ecosystem Management Objectives</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>1127</volume>
            <issue>97</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00113-8</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <label>43.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Brienen, R.J.W. and Zuidema, P.A. (2005) Lifetime Growth Patterns and Ages of Bolivian Rain Forest Trees Obtained by Tree Ring Analysis. <italic>Journal of Ecology</italic>, 94, 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01080.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01080.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01080.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01080.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Brienen, R.J.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zuidema, P.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Lifetime Growth Patterns and Ages of Bolivian Rain Forest Trees Obtained by Tree Ring Analysis</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Ecology</source>
            <volume>94</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01080.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <label>44.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Fitzpatrick, M. (2002) Cameroon, Lonely Planet West Africa. 5th Edition, Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fitzpatrick, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cameroon, L</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, L</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Cameroon, Lonely Planet West Africa</article-title>
            <source>5th Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <label>45.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fotso, M., Saenger, P. and Priso, R. (2002) Logging Activities in Forests. <italic>African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology</italic>, 2, 22-30.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fotso, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Saenger, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Priso, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Logging Activities in Forests</article-title>
            <source>African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology</source>
            <volume>2</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <label>46.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO) (2002) ITTO Guidelines for the Restoration, Management and Rehabilitation of Degraded and Secondary Tropical Forests. ITTO Policy Development Series No. 13, ITTO.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Restoration, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>ITTO Guidelines for the Restoration, Management and Rehabilitation of Degraded and Secondary Tropical Forests</article-title>
            <source>ITTO Policy Development Series No. 13</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <label>47.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Meunier, Q., Moumbogou, C. and Doucet, J.L. (2015) Les Arbres Utiles du Gabon. Les presses Agronomiques de Gembloux.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Meunier, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moumbogou, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Doucet, J.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Les Arbres Utiles du Gabon</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <label>48.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) II (2009) An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the Orders and Families of Flowering Plants: APG III. <italic>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</italic>, 161, 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the Orders and Families of Flowering Plants: APG III</article-title>
            <source>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society</source>
            <volume>161</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <label>49.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. (1974) Aims and Methods in Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mueller-Dombois, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ellenberg, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sons, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1974</year>
            <article-title>Aims and Methods in Vegetation Ecology</article-title>
            <source>John Wiley and Sons</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <label>50.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ramade, F. (2003) Eléments d’écologie: Écologie fondamentale. 3ème Édition, Dunod, 690 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ramade, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Eléments d’écologie: Écologie fondamentale</article-title>
            <source>3ème Édition</source>
            <volume>690</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <label>51.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Curtis, J.T. and McIntosh, R.P. (1950) The Interrelations of Certain Analytic and Synthetic Phytosociological Characters. <italic>Ecology</italic>, 31, 434-455. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931497 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1931497</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1931497">https://doi.org/10.2307/1931497</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Curtis, J.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>McIntosh, R.P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1950</year>
            <article-title>The Interrelations of Certain Analytic and Synthetic Phytosociological Characters</article-title>
            <source>Ecology</source>
            <volume>31</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1931497</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <label>52.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mori, R., Pastorella, F. and Paletto, A. (1983) Important Value Indices and Applications in Forests (Italy). <italic>Journal of Forest Science</italic>, 59, 159-168.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mori, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pastorella, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Paletto, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1983</year>
            <article-title>Important Value Indices and Applications in Forests (Italy)</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Forest Science</source>
            <volume>59</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <label>53.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hunt, R. (1982) Plant Growth Curves—The Functional Approach to Plant Growth. Edward Arlnold, 248.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hunt, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1982</year>
            <article-title>Plant Growth Curves—The Functional Approach to Plant Growth</article-title>
            <source>Edward Arlnold</source>
            <volume>248</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <label>54.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chave, J., Réjou-Méchain, M., Búrquez, A., Chidumayo, E., Colgan, M.S., Delitti, W.B.C., <italic>et al</italic>. (2014) Improved Allometric Models to Estimate the Aboveground Biomass of Tropical Trees. <italic>Global Change Biology</italic>, 20, 3177-3190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.12629</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24817483</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chave, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chidumayo, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Colgan, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Delitti, W.B.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Improved Allometric Models to Estimate the Aboveground Biomass of Tropical Trees</article-title>
            <source>Global Change Biology</source>
            <volume>20</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.12629</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24817483</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <label>55.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Zanne, A.E., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Coomes, D.A., Ilic, J., Jansen, S., Lewis, S.L., Miller, R.B., Swenson, N.G., Wiemann, M.C. and Chave, J. (2009) Global Wood Density Database. Dryad Digital Repository. https://zenodo.org/records/13322441</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zanne, A.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lopez-Gonzalez, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Coomes, D.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ilic, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jansen, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lewis, S.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Miller, R.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Swenson, N.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wiemann, M.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chave, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Global Wood Density Database</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <label>56.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zapfack, L., Noiha, N.V., Dziedjou, K.P.J., Zemagho, L. and Fomete, N.T. (2013) De-forestation and Carbon Stocks in the Surroundings of Lobéké National Parc (Cameroon) in Congo Basin. <italic>Environment and Natural Resources Research</italic>, 3, 78-86. https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v3n2p78 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/enrr.v3n2p78</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v3n2p78">https://doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v3n2p78</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zapfack, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Noiha, N.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dziedjou, K.P.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zemagho, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fomete, N.T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>De-forestation and Carbon Stocks in the Surroundings of Lobéké National Parc (Cameroon) in Congo Basin</article-title>
            <source>Environment and Natural Resources Research</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/enrr.v3n2p78</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <label>57.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2003) Good Practice Guidance for Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES).</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Land-Use, L</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Good Practice Guidance for Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <label>58.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pearson, T., Brown, S. and Birdsey, R. (2007) Measurement Guidelines for the Sequestration of Forest Carbon Northern Research Station. Department of Agriculture Washington D.C., 6-15.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pearson, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brown, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Birdsey, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Measurement Guidelines for the Sequestration of Forest Carbon Northern Research Station</article-title>
            <source>Department of Agriculture Washington D.C.</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <label>59.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bray, R.H. and Kurtz, L.T. (1945) Determination of Total, Organic, and Available Forms of Phosphorus in Soils. <italic>Soil Science</italic>, 59, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006">https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bray, R.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kurtz, L.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Total, O</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1945</year>
            <article-title>Determination of Total, Organic, and Available Forms of Phosphorus in Soils</article-title>
            <source>Soil Science</source>
            <volume>59</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <label>60.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Jones, J.B. (1973) Soil Testing in the United States. <italic>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</italic>, 4, 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627309366451 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103627309366451</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627309366451">https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627309366451</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Jones, J.B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1973</year>
            <article-title>Soil Testing in the United States</article-title>
            <source>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103627309366451</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61">
        <label>61.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kjeldahl, J. (1883) Neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Stickstoffs in organischen Körpern. <italic>Fresenius</italic>’ <italic>Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie</italic>, 22, 366-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01338151 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf01338151</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01338151">https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01338151</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kjeldahl, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf01338151</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62">
        <label>62.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934) An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. <italic>Soil Science</italic>, 37, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003">https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Walkley, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Black, I.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1934</year>
            <article-title>An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method</article-title>
            <source>Soil Science</source>
            <volume>37</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B63">
        <label>63.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. Freeman.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sokal, R.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rohlf, F.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1981</year>
            <article-title>Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B64">
        <label>64.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Okeyo, J.M. (2006) <italic>Erythrophleum suaveolens</italic> (Guill. and Perr.) Brenan. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Schmelzer, G.H. and Gurib-Fakim, A. (Editors). PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa/Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, Netherlands. https://prota.prota4u.org/protav8.asp?g=pe&amp;p=Erythrophleum+suaveolens</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Okeyo, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Schmelzer, G.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gurib-Fakim, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wageningen, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Erythrophleum suaveolens (Guill</article-title>
            <source>and Perr.) Brenan. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Schmelzer</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B65">
        <label>65.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Christenhusz, M.J.M. and Byng, J.W. (2016) The Number of Known Plants Species in the World and Its Annual Increase. <italic>Phytotaxa</italic>, 261, 201-217. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1">https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Christenhusz, M.J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Byng, J.W.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>The Number of Known Plants Species in the World and Its Annual Increase</article-title>
            <source>Phytotaxa</source>
            <volume>261</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B66">
        <label>66.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Kimpouni, V. (2009) <italic>Terminalia superba</italic> Engl. &amp; Diels. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Lemmens, R.H.M.J., Louppe, D. &amp; Oteng-Amoako, A.A. (Editors). PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa/Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, Netherlands. https://prota.prota4u.org/protav8.asp?g=pe&amp;p=Terminalia+superba</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kimpouni, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lemmens, R.H.M.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Louppe, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oteng-Amoako, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wageningen, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Terminalia superba Engl</article-title>
            <source>&amp; Diels. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Lemmens</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B67">
        <label>67.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Ohene-Coffie, F. (2008) <italic>Mansonia altissima</italic> (A.Chev.) A.Chev. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Louppe, D., Oteng-Amoako, A.A. &amp; Brink, M. (Editors). PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa/Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, Netherlands. https://prota.prota4u.org/protav8.asp?h=M4&amp;t=Mansonia,altissima&amp;p=Mansonia+altissima</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ohene-Coffie, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Louppe, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oteng-Amoako, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brink, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wageningen, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Mansonia altissima (A</article-title>
            <source>Chev.) A.Chev. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Louppe</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B68">
        <label>68.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bernard, O.E., Gbenga, A.F. and Leah, B.S. (2021) A 17 Year Successional Enrichment Plantation of Tree Recruitment and Restoration in a Tropical Rainforest Forest. <italic>Vegetos</italic>, 34, 750-760.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bernard, O.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gbenga, A.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Leah, B.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>A 17 Year Successional Enrichment Plantation of Tree Recruitment and Restoration in a Tropical Rainforest Forest</article-title>
            <source>Vegetos</source>
            <volume>34</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B69">
        <label>69.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Lemmens, R.H.M.J. (2007) <italic>Pouteria altissima</italic> (A.Chev.) Baehni. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Louppe, D., Oteng-Amoako, A.A. &amp; Brink, M. (Editors). PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa/Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, Netherlands. https://prota.prota4u.org/protav8.asp?g=pe&amp;p=Pouteria+altissima</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lemmens, R.H.M.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Louppe, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oteng-Amoako, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brink, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wageningen, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Pouteria altissima (A</article-title>
            <source>Chev.) Baehni. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Louppe</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B70">
        <label>70.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Voorhoeve, A.G. (1979) Liberian High Forest Trees. A Systematic Botanical Study of the 75 Most Important or Frequent High Forest Trees, with Reference to Numerous Related Species. Agricultural Research Reports 652, 2nd Impression. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, 416 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Voorhoeve, A.G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1979</year>
            <article-title>Liberian High Forest Trees</article-title>
            <source>A Systematic Botanical Study of the 75 Most Important or Frequent High Forest Trees</source>
            <volume>416</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B71">
        <label>71.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Bosu, P.P. and Krampah, E. (2005) <italic>Triplochiton scleroxylon</italic> K.Schum. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Louppe, D., Oteng-Amoako, A.A. &amp; Brink, M. (Editors). PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa/Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, Netherlands. https://prota.prota4u.org/protav8.asp?g=pe&amp;p=Triplochiton+scleroxylon</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bosu, P.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Krampah, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Louppe, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oteng-Amoako, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brink, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wageningen, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Triplochiton scleroxylon K</article-title>
            <source>Schum. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Louppe</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B72">
        <label>72.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sharkar, M. and Devi, A. (2014) Assessment of Diversity, Population Structure and Regeneration Status of Tree Species in Hollongapar Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, Northeast India. <italic>Tropical Plant Research</italic>, 1, 26-36.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sharkar, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Devi, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diversity, P</string-name>
              <string-name>Sanctuary, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Assessment of Diversity, Population Structure and Regeneration Status of Tree Species in Hollongapar Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, Northeast India</article-title>
            <source>Tropical Plant Research</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B73">
        <label>73.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vanclay, J.K. (1994) Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests. CAB International, 312 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vanclay, J.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1994</year>
            <article-title>Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests</article-title>
            <source>CAB International</source>
            <volume>312</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B74">
        <label>74.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ne win, R., Suzuki, R. and Akeda, S.T. (2012) Effects of Selective Logging on the Re-generation of Two Commercial Tree Species in the Kabaung Reserved Forest, Bago Mountains, Myanmar. <italic>Journal of Tropical Forest Science</italic>, 24, 312-321.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Suzuki, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akeda, S.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Forest, B</string-name>
              <string-name>Mountains, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Selective Logging on the Re-generation of Two Commercial Tree Species in the Kabaung Reserved Forest, Bago Mountains, Myanmar</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Tropical Forest Science</source>
            <volume>24</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B75">
        <label>75.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schnitzer, S.A., Dalling, J.W. and Carson, W.P. (2000) The Impact of Lianas on Tree Regeneration in Tropical Forest Canopy Gaps: Evidence for an Alternative Pathway of Gap-Phase Regeneration. <italic>Journal of Ecology</italic>, 88, 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00489.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00489.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00489.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00489.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Schnitzer, S.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dalling, J.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Carson, W.P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>The Impact of Lianas on Tree Regeneration in Tropical Forest Canopy Gaps: Evidence for an Alternative Pathway of Gap-Phase Regeneration</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Ecology</source>
            <volume>88</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00489.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B76">
        <label>76.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Trimanto, T., Hapsari, L. and Budiharta, S. (2021) Integrating Indicators of Natural Regeneration, Enrichment Planting, Above-Ground Carbon Stock, Micro-Climate and Soil to Assess Vegetation Succession in Postmining Reclamation in Tropical Forest. <italic>Turkish Journal of Botany</italic>, 45, 457-467. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-2103-35 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3906/bot-2103-35</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-2103-35">https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-2103-35</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Trimanto, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hapsari, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Budiharta, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Regeneration, E</string-name>
              <string-name>Planting, A</string-name>
              <string-name>Stock, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Integrating Indicators of Natural Regeneration, Enrichment Planting, Above-Ground Carbon Stock, Micro-Climate and Soil to Assess Vegetation Succession in Postmining Reclamation in Tropical Forest</article-title>
            <source>Turkish Journal of Botany</source>
            <volume>45</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3906/bot-2103-35</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B77">
        <label>77.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Montagnini, F., Eibl, B., Grance, L., Maiocco, D. and Nozzi, D. (1997) Enrichment Planting in Overexploited Subtropical Forests of the Paranaense Region of Misiones, Argentina. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 99, 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00209-0 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00209-0</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00209-0">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00209-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Montagnini, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eibl, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Grance, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maiocco, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nozzi, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Misiones, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1997</year>
            <article-title>Enrichment Planting in Overexploited Subtropical Forests of the Paranaense Region of Misiones, Argentina</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>1127</volume>
            <issue>97</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00209-0</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B78">
        <label>78.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Marshall, A., McLaughlin, B.P., Zerr, C., Yanguas-Fernández, E. and Hall, J.S. (2020) Early Indications of Success Rehabilitating an Underperforming Teak ( <italic>Tectona grandis</italic>) Plantation in Panama through Enrichment Planting. <italic>New Forests</italic>, 52, 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09801-6 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-020-09801-6</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09801-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09801-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Marshall, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>McLaughlin, B.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zerr, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hall, J.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Early Indications of Success Rehabilitating an Underperforming Teak (Tectona grandis) Plantation in Panama through Enrichment Planting</article-title>
            <source>New Forests</source>
            <volume>52</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-020-09801-6</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B79">
        <label>79.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Marshall, A., Nelson, C.R. and Hall, J.S. (2022) Species Selection and Plantation Management in Enrichment Planting with Native Timber Species in the Panama Canal Watershed. <italic>Frontiers in Forests and Global Change</italic>, 5, Article ID: 925877. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.925877 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2022.925877</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.925877">https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.925877</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Marshall, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nelson, C.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hall, J.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Species Selection and Plantation Management in Enrichment Planting with Native Timber Species in the Panama Canal Watershed</article-title>
            <source>Frontiers in Forests and Global Change</source>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <fpage>925877</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2022.925877</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B80">
        <label>80.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Vanclay, J., Gregorio, N. and Herbohn, J. (2021) Competition in a Mixed-Species Planting with Four Contrasting Species.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Vanclay, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gregorio, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Herbohn, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Competition in a Mixed-Species Planting with Four Contrasting Species</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B81">
        <label>81.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Asner, G.P., Keller, M., Pereira Jr., R., Zweede, J.C. and Silva, J.N.M. (2004) Canopy Damage and Recovery after Selective Logging in Amazonia: Field and Satellite Studies. <italic>Ecological Applications</italic>, 14, 280-298. https://doi.org/10.1890/01-6019 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/01-6019</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/01-6019">https://doi.org/10.1890/01-6019</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Asner, G.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Keller, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zweede, J.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Silva, J.N.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Canopy Damage and Recovery after Selective Logging in Amazonia: Field and Satellite Studies</article-title>
            <source>Ecological Applications</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/01-6019</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B82">
        <label>82.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Belkov, V., Garnik, E.Y. and Konstantinov, Y.M. (2019) Mechanism of Plant Adaptation to Changing Illumination by Rearrangements of Their Photosynthetic Apparatus. <italic>Current Challenged in Plant Genet Genomics</italic>, <italic>Bioinformatics</italic>, <italic>and Biotechnology</italic>, 24, 101-103.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Belkov, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Garnik, E.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Konstantinov, Y.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Genomics, B</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Mechanism of Plant Adaptation to Changing Illumination by Rearrangements of Their Photosynthetic Apparatus</article-title>
            <source>Current Challenged in Plant Genet Genomics</source>
            <volume>24</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B83">
        <label>83.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Millet, J., Tran, N., Vien Ngoc, N., Tran Thi, T. and Prat, D. (2012) Enrichment Planting of Native Species for Biodiversity Conservation in a Logged Tree Plantation in Vietnam. <italic>New Forests</italic>, 44, 369-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9344-6 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-012-9344-6</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9344-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9344-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Millet, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tran, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngoc, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thi, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Prat, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Enrichment Planting of Native Species for Biodiversity Conservation in a Logged Tree Plantation in Vietnam</article-title>
            <source>New Forests</source>
            <volume>44</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-012-9344-6</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B84">
        <label>84.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Minh Quang, P., Baynes, J., Herbohn, J., Applegate, G. and Keys, M. (2020) The Long-Term Survival and Growth of Enrichment Plantings in Logged Tropical Rainforest in North Queensland, Australia. <italic>Forests</italic>, 11, Article No. 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040386 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f11040386</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040386">https://doi.org/10.3390/f11040386</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Quang, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baynes, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Herbohn, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Applegate, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Keys, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Queensland, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>The Long-Term Survival and Growth of Enrichment Plantings in Logged Tropical Rainforest in North Queensland, Australia</article-title>
            <source>Forests</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f11040386</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B85">
        <label>85.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Tchinda, A.T. (2008) <italic>Entandrophragma angolense</italic> (Welw.) C.DC. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Louppe, D., Oteng-Amoako, A.A. &amp; Brink, M. (Editors). PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa/Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale), Wageningen, Netherlands. https://prota.prota4u.org/protav8.asp?g=pe&amp;p=Entandrophragma+angolense</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tchinda, A.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Louppe, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Oteng-Amoako, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brink, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wageningen, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Entandrophragma angolense (Welw</article-title>
            <source>) C.DC. [Internet] Record from PROTA4U. Louppe</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B86">
        <label>86.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Doucet, J., Daïnou, K., Ligot, G., Ouédraogo, D., Bourland, N., Ward, S.E., <italic>et al</italic>. (2016) Enrichment of Central African Logged Forests with High-Value Tree Species: Testing a New Approach to Regenerating Degraded Forests. <italic>International Journal of Biodiversity Science</italic>, <italic>Ecosystem Services &amp; Management</italic>, 12, 83-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1168868 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/21513732.2016.1168868</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1168868">https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1168868</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Doucet, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ligot, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bourland, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ward, S.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Science, E</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Enrichment of Central African Logged Forests with High-Value Tree Species: Testing a New Approach to Regenerating Degraded Forests</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Biodiversity Science</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/21513732.2016.1168868</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B87">
        <label>87.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fayolle, A., Ouédraogo, D., Ligot, G., Daïnou, K., Bourland, N., Tekam, P., <italic>et al</italic>. (2015) Differential Performance between Two Timber Species in Forest Logging Gaps and in Plantations in Central Africa. <italic>Forests</italic>, 6, 380-394. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6020380 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f6020380</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f6020380">https://doi.org/10.3390/f6020380</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fayolle, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ligot, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bourland, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tekam, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Differential Performance between Two Timber Species in Forest Logging Gaps and in Plantations in Central Africa</article-title>
            <source>Forests</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f6020380</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B88">
        <label>88.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Schepaschenko, D., Chave, J., Phillips, O.L., Lewis, S.L., Davies, S.J., RéjouMéchain, M., Sist, P., Scipal, K., Perger, C., Herault, B. and Labrière, N. (2019) The Forest Observation System, Building a Global Reference Dataset for Remote Sensing of Forest Biomass. <italic>Scientific Data</italic>, 6, 1-11.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Schepaschenko, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chave, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Phillips, O.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lewis, S.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Davies, S.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sist, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Scipal, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Perger, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Herault, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>System, B</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>The Forest Observation System, Building a Global Reference Dataset for Remote Sensing of Forest Biomass</article-title>
            <source>Scientific Data</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B89">
        <label>89.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Brancalion, P.H.S., Campoe, O., Mendes, J.C.T., Noel, C., Moreira, G.G., van Melis, J., <italic>et al</italic>. (2019) Intensive Silviculture Enhances Biomass Accumulation and Tree Diversity Recovery in Tropical Forest Restoration. <italic>Ecological Applications</italic>, 29, e01847. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1847 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/eap.1847</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30779867</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1847">https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1847</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Brancalion, P.H.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Campoe, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mendes, J.C.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Noel, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moreira, G.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Melis, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Intensive Silviculture Enhances Biomass Accumulation and Tree Diversity Recovery in Tropical Forest Restoration</article-title>
            <source>Ecological Applications</source>
            <volume>29</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/eap.1847</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30779867</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B90">
        <label>90.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mildrexler, D.J., Berner, L.T., Law, B.E., Birdsey, R.A. and Moomaw, W.R. (2020) Large Trees Dominate Carbon Storage in Forests East of the Cascade Crest in the United States Pacific Northwest. <italic>Frontiers in Forests and Global Change</italic>, 3, Article ID: 594274. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.594274 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2020.594274</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.594274">https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.594274</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mildrexler, D.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Berner, L.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Law, B.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Birdsey, R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moomaw, W.R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Large Trees Dominate Carbon Storage in Forests East of the Cascade Crest in the United States Pacific Northwest</article-title>
            <source>Frontiers in Forests and Global Change</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <fpage>594274</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2020.594274</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B91">
        <label>91.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Krisnawati, H., Adinugroho, W.C., Imanuddin, R. and Hutabarat, S. (2014) Estimation of Forest Biomass for Quantifying CO <sub>2</sub> Emissions in Central Kalimantan. A Comprehensive Approach in Determining Forest Carbon Emission Factors. Research and Development Center for Conservation and Rehabilitation.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Krisnawati, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Adinugroho, W.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Imanuddin, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hutabarat, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Estimation of Forest Biomass for Quantifying CO2 Emissions in Central Kalimantan</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B92">
        <label>92.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Adinugroho, W.C., Prasetyo, L.B., Kusmana, C. and Krisnawati, H. (2019) Contribution of Forest Degradation in Indonesia’s GHG Emissions: Profile and Opportunity to Improve Its Estimation Accuracy. <italic>IOP Conference Series</italic>: <italic>Earth and Environmental Science</italic>, 399, Article ID: 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012025 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012025</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012025">https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012025</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Adinugroho, W.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Prasetyo, L.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kusmana, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Krisnawati, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Contribution of Forest Degradation in Indonesia’s GHG Emissions: Profile and Opportunity to Improve Its Estimation Accuracy</article-title>
            <source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source>
            <volume>399</volume>
            <fpage>012025</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012025</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B93">
        <label>93.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Mukul, S.A. and Herbohn, J. (2016) The Impacts of Shifting Cultivation on Secondary Forests Dynamics in Tropics: A Synthesis of the Key Findings and Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Research. <italic>Environmental Science &amp; Policy</italic>, 55, 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.005 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.005</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.005</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mukul, S.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Herbohn, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>The Impacts of Shifting Cultivation on Secondary Forests Dynamics in Tropics: A Synthesis of the Key Findings and Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Research</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Science &amp; Policy</source>
            <volume>55</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.005</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B94">
        <label>94.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kumar, A., van Duijnen, R., Delory, B.M., Reichel, R., Brüggemann, N. and Temperton, V.M. (2020) Barley Shoot Biomass Responds Strongly to N:P Stoichiometry and Intraspecific Competition, Whereas Roots Only Alter Their Foraging. <italic>Plant and Soil</italic>, 453, 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04626-w <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-020-04626-w</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04626-w">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04626-w</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kumar, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Duijnen, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Delory, B.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Reichel, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Temperton, V.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Competition, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Barley Shoot Biomass Responds Strongly to N:P Stoichiometry and Intraspecific Competition, Whereas Roots Only Alter Their Foraging</article-title>
            <source>Plant and Soil</source>
            <volume>453</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-020-04626-w</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B95">
        <label>95.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Silver, W.L., Ostertag, R. and Lugo, A.E. (2000) The Potential for Carbon Sequestration through Reforestation of Abandoned Tropical Agricultural and Pasture Lands. <italic>Restoration Ecology</italic>, 8, 394-407. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80054.x <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80054.x</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80054.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80054.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Silver, W.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ostertag, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lugo, A.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>The Potential for Carbon Sequestration through Reforestation of Abandoned Tropical Agricultural and Pasture Lands</article-title>
            <source>Restoration Ecology</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80054.x</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B96">
        <label>96.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Marín-Spiotta, E., Silver, W.L. and Ostertag, R. (2007) Long-Term Patterns in Tropical Reforestation: Plant Community Composition and Aboveground Biomass Accumulation. <italic>Ecological Applications</italic>, 17, 828-839. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1268 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/06-1268</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17494400</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1268">https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1268</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Spiotta, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Silver, W.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ostertag, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Long-Term Patterns in Tropical Reforestation: Plant Community Composition and Aboveground Biomass Accumulation</article-title>
            <source>Ecological Applications</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/06-1268</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17494400</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B97">
        <label>97.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Paquette, A., Hawryshyn, J., Senikas, A.V. and Potvin, C. (2009) Enrichment Planting in Secondary Forests: A Promising Clean Development Mechanism to Increase Terrestrial Carbon Sinks. <italic>Ecology and Society</italic>, 14, Article No. 31. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-02781-140131 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5751/es-02781-140131</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5751/es-02781-140131">https://doi.org/10.5751/es-02781-140131</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Paquette, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hawryshyn, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Senikas, A.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Potvin, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Enrichment Planting in Secondary Forests: A Promising Clean Development Mechanism to Increase Terrestrial Carbon Sinks</article-title>
            <source>Ecology and Society</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5751/es-02781-140131</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B98">
        <label>98.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Engström, J. (2023) Increased Carbon Sequestration of Actively Restored Tropical Forests in Sabah, Malaysia: A Comparison of Natural Regeneration and Active Restoration. Master’s Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sabah, M</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Increased Carbon Sequestration of Actively Restored Tropical Forests in Sabah, Malaysia: A Comparison of Natural Regeneration and Active Restoration</article-title>
            <source>Master’s Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B99">
        <label>99.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Philipson, C.D., Cutler, M.E.J., Brodrick, P.G., Asner, G.P., Boyd, D.S., Moura Costa, P., <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) Active Restoration Accelerates the Carbon Recovery of Human-Modified Tropical Forests. <italic>Science</italic>, 369, 838-841. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4490 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aay4490</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32792397</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4490">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4490</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Philipson, C.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cutler, M.E.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brodrick, P.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Asner, G.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Boyd, D.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Costa, P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Active Restoration Accelerates the Carbon Recovery of Human-Modified Tropical Forests</article-title>
            <source>Science</source>
            <volume>369</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aay4490</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32792397</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B100">
        <label>100.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Wheeler, C.E., Omeja, P.A., Chapman, C.A., Glipin, M., Tumwesigye, C. and Lewis, S.L. (2016) Carbon Sequestration and Biodiversity Following 18 Years of Active Tropical Forest Restoration. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 373, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.025 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.025</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.025">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.025</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Wheeler, C.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Omeja, P.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chapman, C.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Glipin, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tumwesigye, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lewis, S.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Carbon Sequestration and Biodiversity Following 18 Years of Active Tropical Forest Restoration</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>373</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.025</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B101">
        <label>101.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Schwartz, G., Lopes, J.C.A., Mohren, G.M.J. and Peña-Claros, M. (2013) Post-Harvesting Silvicultural Treatments in Logging Gaps: A Comparison between Enrichment Planting and Tending of Natural Regeneration. <italic>Forest Ecology and Management</italic>, 293, 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.040 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.040</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.040">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.040</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Schwartz, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lopes, J.C.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mohren, G.M.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Claros, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Post-Harvesting Silvicultural Treatments in Logging Gaps: A Comparison between Enrichment Planting and Tending of Natural Regeneration</article-title>
            <source>Forest Ecology and Management</source>
            <volume>293</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.040</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B102">
        <label>102.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Clark, D.A. and Clark, D.B. (1999) Assessing the Growth of Tropical Rain Forest Trees: Issues for Forest Modeling and Management. <italic>Ecological Applications</italic>, 9, 981-997. https://doi.org/10.2307/2641344 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2641344</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2641344">https://doi.org/10.2307/2641344</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Clark, D.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Clark, D.B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1999</year>
            <article-title>Assessing the Growth of Tropical Rain Forest Trees: Issues for Forest Modeling and Management</article-title>
            <source>Ecological Applications</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2641344</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B103">
        <label>103.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Oclarit, J., Baldos, A. and Peque, D. (2024) Carbon Buildup in Enrichment Planting Sites as Compared to the Secondary Forest in Mt. Pangasugan, Philippines. <italic>Sylvatrop</italic>: <italic>The Technical Journal of Philippine Ecosystems and Natural Resources</italic>, 34, 1-14.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Oclarit, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Baldos, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Peque, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pangasugan, P</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Carbon Buildup in Enrichment Planting Sites as Compared to the Secondary Forest in Mt</article-title>
            <source>Pangasugan</source>
            <volume>34</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B104">
        <label>104.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Iskandar, M., Siregar, I.Z. and Krisnawati, H. (2023) Potential of Carbon Sequestration Enhancement through Intensive Silvicultural Techniques Using <italic>Shorea leprosula</italic> Plantation in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. <italic>Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity</italic>, 24, 4699-4513. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240852 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/biodiv/d240852</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240852">https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240852</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Iskandar, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Siregar, I.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Krisnawati, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kalimantan, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Potential of Carbon Sequestration Enhancement through Intensive Silvicultural Techniques Using Shorea leprosula Plantation in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia</article-title>
            <source>Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity</source>
            <volume>24</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/biodiv/d240852</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B105">
        <label>105.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Xanthopoulos, G., Radoglou, K., Derrien, D., Spyroglou, G., Angeli, N., Tsioni, G., <italic>et al</italic>. (2023) Carbon Sequestration and Soil Nitrogen Enrichment in <italic>Robinia pseudoa</italic><italic>cacia</italic> L. Post-Mining Restoration Plantations. <italic>Frontiers in Forests and Global Change</italic>, 6, Article ID: 1190026. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1190026 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2023.1190026</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1190026">https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1190026</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Xanthopoulos, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Radoglou, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Derrien, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Spyroglou, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Angeli, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tsioni, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Carbon Sequestration and Soil Nitrogen Enrichment in Robinia pseudoacacia L</article-title>
            <source>Post-Mining Restoration Plantations. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <fpage>119002</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2023.1190026</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B106">
        <label>106.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hughes, R.F., Kauffman, J.B. and Jaramillo, V.J. (1999) Biomass, Carbon, and Nutrient Dynamics of Secondary Forests in a Humid Tropical Region of México. <italic>Ecology</italic>, 80, 1892-1907. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1892:bcando]2.0.co;2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1892:bcando]2.0.co;2</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1892:bcando]2.0.co;2">https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1892:bcando]2.0.co;2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hughes, R.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kauffman, J.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jaramillo, V.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Biomass, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1999</year>
            <article-title>Biomass, Carbon, and Nutrient Dynamics of Secondary Forests in a Humid Tropical Region of México</article-title>
            <source>Ecology</source>
            <volume>9658</volume>
            <issue>1999</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1892:bcando]2.0.co;2</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B107">
        <label>107.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Li, L., Fu, W., Luo, M., Chen, J. and Li, Z. (2022) Estimation of Forest Carbon Storage and Carbon Sink Potential in Yunnan Province under the Goal of “Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality”. <italic>IOP Conference Series</italic>: <italic>Earth and Environmental Science</italic>, 1087, Article ID: 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1087/1/012066 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/1087/1/012066</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1087/1/012066">https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1087/1/012066</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Li, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fu, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Luo, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chen, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Estimation of Forest Carbon Storage and Carbon Sink Potential in Yunnan Province under the Goal of “Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality”</article-title>
            <source>IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science</source>
            <volume>1087</volume>
            <fpage>012066</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/1087/1/012066</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B108">
        <label>108.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Shi, X., Wang, T., Lu, S., Chen, K., He, D. and Xu, Z. (2022) Evaluation of China’s Forest Carbon Sink Service Value. <italic>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</italic>, 29, 44668-44677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18958-w <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-022-18958-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35133591</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18958-w">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18958-w</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Shi, X.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wang, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lu, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chen, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>He, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Xu, Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Evaluation of China’s Forest Carbon Sink Service Value</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</source>
            <volume>29</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-022-18958-w</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35133591</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B109">
        <label>109.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Raihan, A., Ara Begum, R. and Mohd Said, M.N. (2021) A Meta-Analysis of the Economic Value of Forest Carbon Stock. <italic>Malaysian Journal of Society and Space</italic>, 17, 321-338. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2021-1704-22 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17576/geo-2021-1704-22</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2021-1704-22">https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2021-1704-22</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Raihan, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Begum, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Said, M.N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>A Meta-Analysis of the Economic Value of Forest Carbon Stock</article-title>
            <source>Malaysian Journal of Society and Space</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17576/geo-2021-1704-22</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B110">
        <label>110.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zajícová, K. and Chuman, T. (2019) Effect of Land Use on Soil Chemical Properties after 190 Years of Forest to Agricultural Land Conversion. <italic>Soil and Water Research</italic>, 14, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.17221/5/2018-swr <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17221/5/2018-swr</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17221/5/2018-swr">https://doi.org/10.17221/5/2018-swr</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chuman, T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Land Use on Soil Chemical Properties after 190 Years of Forest to Agricultural Land Conversion</article-title>
            <source>Soil and Water Research</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17221/5/2018-swr</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B111">
        <label>111.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Zornoza, R., Acosta, J.A., Faz, A. and Bååth, E. (2016) Microbial Growth and Community Structure in Acid Mine Soils after Addition of Different Amendments for Soil Reclamation. <italic>Geoderma</italic>, 272, 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.007 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.007</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.007</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Zornoza, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Acosta, J.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Faz, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Microbial Growth and Community Structure in Acid Mine Soils after Addition of Different Amendments for Soil Reclamation</article-title>
            <source>Geoderma</source>
            <volume>272</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.007</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B112">
        <label>112.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Khalid, A., Arshad, M., Shaharoona, B. and Mahmood, T. (2009) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Sustainable Agriculture. In: Khan, M.S., Zaidi, A. and Musarrat, J., Eds., <italic>Microbial Strategies for Crop Improvement</italic>, Springer, 133-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01979-1_7 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-01979-1_7</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01979-1_7">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01979-1_7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Khalid, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Arshad, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shaharoona, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mahmood, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khan, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zaidi, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Musarrat, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Improvement, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Sustainable Agriculture</article-title>
            <source>In: Khan</source>
            <volume>133</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-01979-1_7</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B113">
        <label>113.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Thavamani, P., Samkumar, R.A., Satheesh, V., Subashchandrabose, S.R., Ramadass, K., Naidu, R., <italic>et al</italic>. (2017) Microbes from Mined Sites: Harnessing Their Potential for Reclamation of Derelict Mine Sites. <italic>Environmental Pollution</italic>, 230, 495-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.056 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.056</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28688926</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.056">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.056</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Thavamani, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Samkumar, R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Satheesh, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Subashchandrabose, S.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ramadass, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Naidu, R.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Microbes from Mined Sites: Harnessing Their Potential for Reclamation of Derelict Mine Sites</article-title>
            <source>Environmental Pollution</source>
            <volume>230</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.056</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28688926</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>