<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ojapps</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Applied Sciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2165-3925</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2165-3917</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapps.2025.1512269</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ojapps-148315</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
          <subject>Chemistry</subject>
          <subject>Materials Science</subject>
          <subject>Computer Science</subject>
          <subject>Communications</subject>
          <subject>Engineering</subject>
          <subject>Physics</subject>
          <subject>Mathematics</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Role of Agro-Climatic Factors in the Epidemiological Dynamics of Cocoa Black Pod Rot in Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Assande</surname>
            <given-names>Josiane Victoria Flean</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kouadio</surname>
            <given-names>Théodore Kouakou</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-7877-3079</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Tienebo</surname>
            <given-names>Eric-Olivier</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Coulibaly</surname>
            <given-names>Klotioloma</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kouadia</surname>
            <given-names>Adjoa Marie Josephine</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Yao</surname>
            <given-names>Akissi Sandrine</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Dagnogo</surname>
            <given-names>Massiata</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Allou</surname>
            <given-names>Kouassi</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Abo</surname>
            <given-names>Kouabenan</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Unité Mixte de Recherche et d’Innovation, Sciences Agronomiques et Procédés de Transformation (UMRI-SAPT), Institut National Polytechnique Félix Houphouët-Boigny (INP-HB), Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Centre National de Recherche Agronomique (CNRA) Station de Recherche de Bimbresso, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>27</day>
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>11</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>4158</fpage>
      <lpage>4182</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>16</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2025 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2025.1512269">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2025.1512269</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>Black pod rot of cocoa pods, caused by <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spp., accounts for production losses of up to 30% worldwide. The disease typically emerges at the onset of the rainy season, when pods at all stages of development are present on the trees. However, the role of environmental factors in its epidemiology remains poorly documented in Côte d’Ivoire. This study investigated the effects of rainfall, relative humidity, and temperature on the development of black pod rot, intending to identify predictive climatic indicators in five cocoa-growing localities (Duékoué, Yamoussoukro, Divo, Abengourou, and Aboisso) between June 2021 and June 2024. In each locality, four plots were monitored. On each plot, fruit production was recorded every 15 days on 100 trees, while climate data were collected daily. Statistical analyses included Spearman’s correlation to assess non-linear relationships between climatic variables and disease incidence, autocorrelation to detect temporal dependencies, cross-correlation to evaluate interactions among variables, and logistic regression to model the probability of black pod rot occurrence. Results revealed a significant correlation between rainfall and symptom expression, with a lag of less than 15 days. <italic>Phytophthora palmivora</italic> and <italic>P</italic>. <italic>megakarya</italic> were isolated in all localities. These findings provide a basis for developing an early warning system to enhance phytosanitary management of cocoa.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>&lt;i&gt;Theobroma cacao&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
        <kwd>&lt;i&gt;Phytophthora megakarya&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
        <kwd>Black Pod Rot</kwd>
        <kwd>Rainfall</kwd>
        <kwd>Epidemiology</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Cocoa (<italic>Theobroma cacao</italic>) is a strategic crop for the economic development of Côte d’Ivoire. Global production is estimated at 4.726 million tons, with 76.1% originating from Africa. Since 1970, Côte d’Ivoire has remained the world’s leading producer, supplying 2.150 million tons in 2021 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. At the macroeconomic level, cocoa accounts for approximately 40% of the country’s national export revenues and contributes 15% to its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Socially, approximately 1.100 million farmers sustain the production system, ensuring the livelihoods of nearly 8 million people. </p>
      <p>Despite its importance, cocoa production faces multiple constraints, including environmental, economic, and social factors, as well as pests and diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. Among the latter, black pod rot, caused by species of the genus <italic>Phytophthora</italic>, is the most widespread and destructive disease of cocoa worldwide, responsible for yield losses of up to 30%. In Africa, losses range from 15% to 20% in Ghana to 30% to 75% in Nigeria, and sometimes exceed 50% to 80% in smallholder plots in Cameroon, Gabon, and Equatorial Guinea, where <italic>P</italic>. <italic>megakarya</italic> predominates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. In Côte d’Ivoire, black pod rot is among the most severe diseases, with yield losses estimated between 44% and 80% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>]. Until 1979, <italic>P</italic>. <italic>palmivora</italic> was considered the sole causal agent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>]. Currently, more than seven <italic>Phytophthora</italic> species are recognized as causal agents of black pod rot worldwide, including <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic>, <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic>, <italic>P</italic>.<italic>citrophthora</italic>, <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megasperma</italic>, <italic>P</italic>.<italic>arecae</italic>, <italic>P</italic>.<italic>heveae</italic>, and <italic>P</italic>.<italic>capsici</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>]. In Côte d’Ivoire, however, only <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic> and <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> have been reported and confirmed as the main causal agents.</p>
      <p>The control of black pod rot is therefore a major challenge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. Chemical control has been prioritized, relying mainly on systemic and contact fungicides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. However, their use raises concerns about heavy metal accumulation in cocoa beans and soils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>], with potential consequences for human health and soil microbiota. Agronomic practices such as sanitary harvesting, shade management, and mulching, as well as genetic approaches through breeding and selection, have also been implemented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. Biological control using biopesticides, particularly endophytic fungi naturally present in cocoa, has shown promise [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. However, the effectiveness of all these methods remains highly dependent on local agro-climatic conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. Epidemiological studies on fungal diseases in tropical crops emphasize the importance of climatic thresholds and pathogen incubation periods. For example, <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic> infection is strongly influenced by leaf wetness duration, temperature, and relative humidity, while the incubation period plays a decisive role in epidemic development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. However, these parameters vary depending on strains and specific environmental contexts. In the field, the expression of black pod rot is modulated by multiple interacting factors, particularly rainfall, humidity, and temperature, as well as cropping practices such as planting density and shading.</p>
      <p>This study, therefore, focuses on the influence of agro-climatic factors—rainfall, relative humidity, and temperature—on the development of black pod rot in the major cocoa production zones of Côte d’Ivoire. The objective is to generate epidemiological data that will improve the understanding of disease dynamics, support the design of effective control strategies, and provide a basis for early warning systems to optimize phytosanitary interventions.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Areas Description</title>
        <p>The study was conducted in five major cocoa-producing localities of Côte d’Ivoire. The departments of Aboisso (South-East Côte d’Ivoire), Abengourou (East Côte d’Ivoire), and Yamoussoukro (Centre Côte d’Ivoire) are located in agro-ecological zone I, while Duékoué (West Côte d’Ivoire) and Divo (South-West Côte d’Ivoire) belong to zones III and IV, respectively. These sites represent key cocoa production areas that significantly contribute to national output [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>].</p>
        <p>The climate of the study areas is characterized as a humid tropical one, with mean annual rainfall ranging from 1200 to 1400 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>] and average annual temperatures between 24˚C and 32˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>]. The vegetation is characterized by a mosaic of degraded and semi-deciduous dense forests in the central-western and eastern regions, evergreen dense forests in the south and west, mountain forests in the western highlands, and mangrove forests along the coastline.</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId15.jpeg?20260109014353" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1.</bold> Location of the five study sites in Côte d’Ivoire.</p>
        <p>Soils also vary across zones. The southwestern and southeastern areas are dominated by hyperdystric Ferralsols (pH &gt; 5.5), while the eastern, central-western, and western zones are mainly composed of dystric and eutric Ferralsols, with pH values ranging from 4.5 to 6.5. In general, soil fertility is low to medium, with phosphorus and potassium deficiencies that often limit cocoa growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
        <p>A total of 20 plots were surveyed across the five study sites, with four plots established per locality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Plant Material</title>
        <p>A total of 52 cocoa pods showing symptoms of black pod rot were collected from the surveyed plots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Sampling considered both maturation stages (green and ripe pods) and the presence of characteristic visual symptoms of the disease on the pod surface.</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId16.jpeg?20260109014353" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2.</bold> Cocoa pods affected by black pod rot on the cocoa tree.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Fungal and Laboratory Materials</title>
        <p>The fungal material consisted of 260 isolates, along with reference strains of <italic>Phytophthora palmivora</italic> (BL7 11.2) and <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> (13P30.1). Three types of culture media were used for isolation: water agar (WA), pea agar (PA), and carrot agar (CA). After purification, the isolates were maintained in tubes containing 2% pea agar and stored at 27˚C ± 1˚C in an incubation room.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Technical Equipment</title>
        <p>The technical equipment included collection and preservation materials (coolers, plastic bags, secateurs, and labels) as well as instruments for environmental monitoring (thermohygrometers and rain gauges) installed in each plantation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Selection of Sites and Plots</title>
        <p>To assess disease incidence and the agro-climatic parameters influencing epidemic dynamics, four plantations were selected in each of the five study zones. The plantations were distributed along different axes within each zone, with a minimum spacing of 5 km, in order to capture diverse agro-ecological conditions. Selection criteria for plots included: i) ease of access, ii) a minimum area of 1.5 ha, iii) a density of at least 1000 cocoa trees with homogeneous shade, iv) good field maintenance, and v) willingness of farmers to participate in the study.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot6">
        <title>2.6. Experimental Design</title>
        <p>In each plot, 100 adult cocoa trees (&gt;5 years old) were randomly selected using a grid layout, excluding trees within 10 m of plot borders. Each tree was georeferenced and individually monitored throughout the study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>].</p>
        <p>In plant epidemiology, a sample size of 50 - 100 observation units is commonly used in longitudinal studies to detect significant variations in disease incidence or severity while minimizing selection bias [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>]. Although statistical power analyses can refine sample size determination, the choice of 100 trees was based on empirical recommendations from previous studies on cocoa pod diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>]. This sample size represents a balance between statistical precision and operational feasibility.</p>
        <p>Disease assessments were conducted every 15 days to allow the accumulation of a sufficient number of infected pods between observations, particularly in plots with low disease incidence. During each assessment, the number of healthy ripe pods and pods affected by black or brown rot was recorded. All pods, except those showing black rot symptoms, were removed after counting. Pods with black rot were left on the tree to avoid disrupting disease progress, but were marked by cutting their apex with a secateur to prevent double-counting in subsequent observations.</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId17.jpeg?20260109014359" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 3.</bold> Experimental design for cocoa tree monitoring.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot7">
        <title>2.7. Data Collection</title>
        <p>Data were recorded every two weeks from June 2021 to June 2024. These records enabled the calculation of the incidence of black rot for each observation period. The 15-day rot rate (RR<italic><sub>t</sub></italic>) was calculated using the formula of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>]:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD1">
          <label>(1)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:msub>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>RR</mml:mtext>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
              </mml:msub>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mfrac>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>Number</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>of</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>rotted</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mtext>pods</mml:mtext>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mtext>Number</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>of</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>healthy</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mtext>pods</mml:mtext>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                  <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
                  <mml:mtext>Number</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>of</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>rotted</mml:mtext>
                  <mml:mtext>
                     
                  </mml:mtext>
                  <mml:msub>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mtext>pods</mml:mtext>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
                  </mml:msub>
                </mml:mrow>
              </mml:mfrac>
              <mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
              <mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <italic>t</italic> represents the observation period (<italic>t</italic> = 1 for the first 15 days, 2, …, <italic>n</italic>), RR<italic><sub>t</sub></italic> is the rot rate at time <italic>t</italic>, and the denominator includes the total number of ripe and unripe pods.</p>
        <p>2.7.1. Epidemiological Variables (RR<italic><sub>t</sub></italic>, RRC)</p>
        <p>The rot rate (RR) was transformed into a binary variable to serve as the dependent variable for logistic regression analysis. This transformation produced a coded variable, RRC (Rot Rate Coding), with two levels (<bold>Table 1</bold>).</p>
        <p>The rot pod rate was transformed into the binary variable RRC with a 10% threshold, as this level is a commonly used action threshold in epidemiological modeling for cocoa black pod rot. It defines the critical event that the logistic model is intended to predict: the risk of rotting beyond an economically significant incidence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>].</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Coding of the rot rate in the study areas.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>RR (Rot Rate)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0 ≤ RR ≤ 10%</td>
                <td>RR &gt; 10%</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>RRC (Rot Rate Coding)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>1</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The binary variable RRC follows a Bernoulli distribution, suitable for logistic regression modeling.</p>
        <p>2.7.2. Pedological and Agronomic Data</p>
        <p>Planting density was estimated by randomly selecting four 100 m<sup>2</sup> subplots within each plantation. The average number of cocoa trees per subplot was multiplied by the total plantation area and compared to the reference standard of 1333 trees per hectare.</p>
        <p>Shade level was assessed visually and classified into three categories: low, normal, and high (<bold>Table 2</bold>). Low shade corresponds to prolonged direct sunlight, which reduces humidity and may limit the development of pathogens. High shade creates a warm, humid microclimate with poor air circulation, conditions highly favorable for the production and spread of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spores. Normal shade represents a balance, in line with recommended good agricultural practices.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Agronomic parameters measured in the plots.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Description</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Categories/Levels</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Planting</bold>
                  <bold>Density</bold>
                </td>
                <td>Average number of cocoa trees per hectare</td>
                <td>
                  Compared with the reference density of 1333 trees ha
                  <sup>−1</sup>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Shade</bold>
                  <bold>Level</bold>
                </td>
                <td>Visual assessment of light exposure</td>
                <td>Low, normal, high</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>2.7.3. Climatic Parameters</p>
        <p>Daily meteorological data (minimum, average, and maximum temperatures; rainfall; and relative humidity) were recorded in each of the four plots within the selected localities.</p>
        <p><bold>Rainfall</bold><bold>:</bold> measured with a rain gauge placed at the edge of each plot, with data collected after each rainfall event.<bold>Temperature and relative humidity</bold><bold>:</bold> monitored using four to five thermohygrometers per plot, installed at distinct locations to ensure adequate spatial coverage and minimize the effect of localized microclimates.</p>
        <p>Daily meteorological data (rainfall, temperature, relative humidity) were obtained through automatic weather stations (Campbell CR10X, equipped with ARG 100 sensors for rain and HMP45C for temperature/hygrometry, Campbell Scientific Ltd.), installed directly in each locality and connected online via the website ng.fieldclimate.com.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot8">
        <title>
          2.8. Isolation and Identification of
          <italic>Phytophthora</italic>
        </title>
        <p>2.8.1. Isolation Protocol</p>
        <p><italic>Culture media preparation</italic>. Three culture media were used: water agar (WA), pea agar (PA), and carrot agar (CA).</p>
        <p><bold>WA medium:</bold> 2 g agar was dissolved in 100 ml of distilled water, homogenized in a water bath, and sterilized in an autoclave at 121˚C for 20 min.<bold>PA medium:</bold> 450 g of peas were rinsed, blended into a paste, and boiled with 500 mL of water for 45 minutes. The mixture was filtered three times, adjusted to 1500 mL with distilled water, and supplemented with 10 g of agar per 500 mL of filtrate before autoclaving.<bold>CA medium:</bold> 200 g of carrots were rinsed, boiled in 500 mL of distilled water for 45 min, blended, and filtered three times through cotton and filter paper.</p>
        <p><italic>Inoculation</italic>. Symptomatic cocoa pods were washed with tap water, disinfected with 96% ethanol, and flamed under a laminar flow hood. Small tissue fragments were excised from the lesion margins with a sterile scalpel and placed on 2% WA medium in 90-mm Petri dishes. Fragments were positioned 1 cm from the dish edge along a diametrical axis. Plates were incubated at 27˚C ± 1˚C in crystallizing dishes.</p>
        <p>2.8.2. Purification and Storage</p>
        <p>After four days of growth, mycelial fragments were transferred from WA to PA medium. Subculturing was repeated until pure cultures were obtained. Isolates were stored in tubes containing 2% PA medium at 27˚C ± 1˚C.</p>
        <p>2.8.3. Confrontation Test</p>
        <p>Each isolate was paired with the A2 reference strain <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic> BL7 11.2 on PA medium in 90 mm Petri dishes. Four-day-old mycelial fragments were placed opposite each other, incubated at 27˚C ± 1˚C for 10 days, and observed for interaction.</p>
        <p>2.8.4. Study of Sexual Polarity</p>
        <p>Mycelium sampled at the confrontation zone was mounted in water on glass slides and examined under a light microscope (400×). The presence or absence of oospores determined whether the two isolates were of different mating types. The type of antheridium–oogonium union was recorded as amphigynous or paragynous.</p>
        <p>2.8.5. Morphometric Study</p>
        <p>The length and width of the sporangia and the pedicel length were measured under a light microscope using a micrometer. For each isolate, 15 sporangia were examined to characterize morphological variation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot9">
        <title>2.9. Data Analysis</title>
        <p>All collected data were entered into Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, minima, and maxima) were first computed. Variables measured at 15-day intervals were treated as time series, with a two-week lag unit, implying that the observations were not randomly ordered.</p>
        <p>Autocorrelations were calculated to analyze temporal patterns of disease evolution, defined as the correlation between the original series and its lagged version. Cross-correlations were also performed to determine the lag that maximized the relationship between rainfall and black pod rot incidence, thereby identifying the time interval between rainfall events and disease onset.</p>
        <p>To further examine the influence of climatic factors on disease incidence, a logistic regression model was applied:</p>
        <disp-formula id="FD2">
          <label>(2)</label>
          <mml:math>
            <mml:mrow>
              <mml:mi>log</mml:mi>
              <mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                <mml:mrow>
                  <mml:mfrac>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mtext>π</mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:mrow>
                    <mml:mrow>
                      <mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
                      <mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
                      <mml:mtext>π</mml:mtext>
                      <mml:mrow>
                        <mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
                        <mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
                        <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
                      </mml:mrow>
                    </mml:mrow>
                  </mml:mfrac>
                </mml:mrow>
                <mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
              </mml:mrow>
              <mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
              <mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
              <mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
              <mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
            </mml:mrow>
          </mml:math>
        </disp-formula>
        <p>where <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> π </mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo> ( </mml:mo><mml:mi> X </mml:mi><mml:mo> ) </mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the probability that RRC = 1, <italic>α</italic> and <italic>β</italic> are model coefficients, and <inline-formula><mml:math><mml:mi> X </mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents explanatory climatic variables.</p>
        <p>The coefficient’s significance was assessed using the Wald test:</p>
        <p>p &lt; 0.05: the coefficient is significantly different from 0 (predictor <italic>X</italic> influences the probability of the event).p ≥ 0.05: the coefficient is not significant (predictor <italic>X</italic>does not provide additional information to the model).</p>
        <p>The selection of explanatory variables was based on the Spearman correlation matrix. All statistical analyses were performed using R (RStudio).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>
          3.1. Identification of
          <italic>Phytophthora</italic>
          Species
        </title>
        <p>The confrontation between the isolates collected from affected pods and the reference strain BL7.11.2 (<italic>Phytophthora palmivora</italic>) allowed for the differentiation of two distinct groups of isolates. Overall, 64.84% of the isolates belonged to Group 2, while 35.16% were from Group 1. Isolates that produced oospores were classified in Group 1, corresponding to <italic>Phytophthora megakarya</italic>, while those that did not produce oospores were associated with Group 2, which is characteristic of <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic>.</p>
        <p>3.1.1. Distribution of <italic>Phytophthora</italic>spp.</p>
        <p>A differentiated geographic distribution was observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>): isolates from Yamoussoukro, Duékoué, Divo, and Aboisso primarily belonged to group 2 (<italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic>), whereas in Abengourou, almost all isolates belonged to group 1 (<italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic>). The observed antheridium-oogonium connection type was amphigynous (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), confirming the taxonomic identity. The predominance of P.<italic>megakarya</italic> in the Abengourou area can be attributed to specific climatic factors, including higher annual rainfall and prolonged periods of elevated relative humidity, which favor the sporulation and dissemination of this pathogen.</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId26.jpeg?20260109014415" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Proportion of the two <italic>Phytophthora</italic>spp. species in each study area.</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId27.jpeg?20260109014414" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 5.</bold> Microscopic observation of oospore formation.</p>
        <p>3.1.2. Morphometric Study of Isolates</p>
        <p>Morphometric measurements of the sporangia (<bold>Table 3</bold>) revealed significant differences between the two groups. Group 1 sporangia had an average length of 14.34 µm ± 0.94 µm, a width of 10.67 µm ± 0.53 µm, and a pedicel length of 11.38 µm ± 1.6 µm. In contrast, those from Group 2 had a higher average length (16.74 µm ± 1.45 µm) but a smaller width (9.09 µm ± 0.77 µm), and a significantly shorter pedicel length (1.12 µm ± 0.16 µm).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3.</bold> Measurement of sporangia in the different <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spp. groups.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="21">
                  <bold>Group 1</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Isolate</bold>
                  <bold>Code</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sporangium</bold>
                  <bold>Length</bold>
                  <bold>(µm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sporangium</bold>
                  <bold>Width</bold>
                  <bold>(µm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Length/Width</bold>
                  <bold>Ratio</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pedicel</bold>
                  <bold>Length</bold>
                  <bold>(µm)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>13P30.1</td>
                <td>15.8</td>
                <td>11.6</td>
                <td>1.36</td>
                <td>8.73</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P3.9</td>
                <td>14.6</td>
                <td>9.8</td>
                <td>1.48</td>
                <td>10.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>122P1.28</td>
                <td>14.2</td>
                <td>10.33</td>
                <td>1.37</td>
                <td>10.13</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>222P3.1</td>
                <td>16.53</td>
                <td>10.33</td>
                <td>1.6</td>
                <td>9.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P2.19</td>
                <td>15.26</td>
                <td>11.13</td>
                <td>1.37</td>
                <td>10.06</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>122P3.21</td>
                <td>14.93</td>
                <td>10.73</td>
                <td>1.39</td>
                <td>12.46</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P3.5</td>
                <td>13.53</td>
                <td>10.33</td>
                <td>1.3</td>
                <td>14.13</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>122P1.25</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>10.73</td>
                <td>1.39</td>
                <td>12.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P2.14</td>
                <td>13.6</td>
                <td>10.4</td>
                <td>1.3</td>
                <td>10.53</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>322P3.15</td>
                <td>14.33</td>
                <td>10.8</td>
                <td>1.32</td>
                <td>14.33</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.9</td>
                <td>13.26</td>
                <td>10.4</td>
                <td>1.27</td>
                <td>12.13</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>322P3.19</td>
                <td>14.4</td>
                <td>11.26</td>
                <td>1.27</td>
                <td>13.13</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>322P3.12.1</td>
                <td>14.68</td>
                <td>11.13</td>
                <td>1.31</td>
                <td>11.86</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.7</td>
                <td>13.3</td>
                <td>9.86</td>
                <td>1.34</td>
                <td>10.46</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.2</td>
                <td>14.33</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>1.3</td>
                <td>10.46</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>122P3.16</td>
                <td>14.2</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>1.29</td>
                <td>10.26</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>322P3.6</td>
                <td>14.46</td>
                <td>11.53</td>
                <td>1.25</td>
                <td>12.4</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P2.13</td>
                <td>13.2</td>
                <td>9.93</td>
                <td>1.32</td>
                <td>10.06</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>552P1.19</td>
                <td>12.8</td>
                <td>10.4</td>
                <td>1.23</td>
                <td>12.93</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mean</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>14.34</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>0.94</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>10.67</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>0.53</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1.34</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>0.09</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>11.38</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>1.6</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="20">
                  <bold>Group 2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>BL7.11.2</td>
                <td>16.46</td>
                <td>10.8</td>
                <td>1.52</td>
                <td>1.33</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P3.1</td>
                <td>16.93</td>
                <td>8.8</td>
                <td>1.92</td>
                <td>1.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P4.9</td>
                <td>15.6</td>
                <td>8.86</td>
                <td>1.76</td>
                <td>1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P4.15</td>
                <td>16.66</td>
                <td>8.66</td>
                <td>1.92</td>
                <td>1.13</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.25</td>
                <td>18.66</td>
                <td>9.2</td>
                <td>2.02</td>
                <td>1.06</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.14</td>
                <td>19</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>1.9</td>
                <td>1.06</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.20</td>
                <td>15.06</td>
                <td>8.13</td>
                <td>1.85</td>
                <td>1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.6</td>
                <td>16.46</td>
                <td>9.13</td>
                <td>1.8</td>
                <td>1.06</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>222P4.6</td>
                <td>16.13</td>
                <td>9.26</td>
                <td>1.74</td>
                <td>1.2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P4.4</td>
                <td>16.6</td>
                <td>9.26</td>
                <td>1.79</td>
                <td>1.46</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.13</td>
                <td>17.46</td>
                <td>9.93</td>
                <td>1.75</td>
                <td>1.53</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>222P4.4</td>
                <td>15.53</td>
                <td>8.66</td>
                <td>1.79</td>
                <td>1.13</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P4.3</td>
                <td>15.5</td>
                <td>8.6</td>
                <td>1.8</td>
                <td>1.16</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.21</td>
                <td>20.4</td>
                <td>10</td>
                <td>2.04</td>
                <td>0.96</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>222P2.6</td>
                <td>15.56</td>
                <td>8.66</td>
                <td>1.79</td>
                <td>1.03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P4.16</td>
                <td>16.66</td>
                <td>8.46</td>
                <td>1.96</td>
                <td>0.93</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P4.7</td>
                <td>15.06</td>
                <td>7.4</td>
                <td>2.03</td>
                <td>1.1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>422P4.10</td>
                <td>16.13</td>
                <td>9.46</td>
                <td>1.7</td>
                <td>0.96</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>522P1.15</td>
                <td>18.36</td>
                <td>9.4</td>
                <td>1.95</td>
                <td>1.03</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mean</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>16.74</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>1.45</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>9.09</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>0.77</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1.84</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>0.13</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1.12</bold>
                  <bold>±</bold>
                  <bold>0.16</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Impact of Agro-Climatic Factors on Cocoa Black Pod Rot Disease</title>
        <p>3.2.1. Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Disease Incidence</p>
        <p>The bi-weekly monitoring of black pod rot rates and rainfall, conducted from June 1, 2021, to June 25, 2024, enabled the generation of five epidemic curves, one for each locality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). These curves showed a sigmoidal epidemic dynamic, interspersed with phases of stagnation. In Duékoué and Aboisso, the pre-exponential phase was particularly pronounced between October and November from 2021 to 2023. Epidemic peaks were observed in Abengourou, Divo, and Yamoussoukro during the same periods.</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId28.jpeg?20260109014419" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 6.</bold> Biweekly evolution of cocoa black pod rot rates and daily rainfall at different locations: Abengourou, Aboisso, Divo, D. Duékoué, and Yamoussoukro. BRR = black rot rate, blue bars = rainfall in mm, grey curve = BRR in %.</p>
        <p>Temperatures and relative humidity were not reported, as they remained relatively constant in each locality during the study period. Their variations during the study period were negligible between localities, due to the quasi-stable climate of the cocoa-growing zone during the observation season (rainy season).</p>
        <p>3.2.2. Climate Summary over the Collection Period in Different Localities</p>
        <p>Mean, minimum, and maximum temperatures, as well as relative humidity, varied significantly (p &lt; 0.001) across the study localities over the entire study period. Abengourou recorded the highest temperatures, with a mean of 26.97˚C, a minimum of 22.50˚C, and a maximum of 35.54˚C, while also experiencing the highest relative humidity (92.79%). These results highlighted hotter and more humid climatic conditions in this locality compared to the others.</p>
        <p>Aboisso, although close to Abengourou in terms of temperatures, showed slightly lower values, with a mean temperature of 26.34˚C and a relative humidity of 89.39%. Minimum temperatures were also lower in Aboisso, while remaining comparable to those observed in Divo, Duékoué, and Yamoussoukro.</p>
        <p>Divo and Duékoué shared similar trends, but with lower mean temperatures of 26.08˚C and 25.56˚C, respectively. Duékoué recorded the lowest relative humidity (86.14%) compared to the other localities. Yamoussoukro, on the other hand, showed the lowest maximum temperatures (30.12˚C) and a relative humidity similar to that of Duékoué (86.66%) (<bold>Table 4</bold>).</p>
        <p>The incidence of black pod rot varied significantly (p &lt; 0.001) depending on the localities studied. On average, Duékoué recorded the highest percentage of infection, with 26.4%, followed by Aboisso (21.4%) and Abengourou (18.9%). Divo (19.1%) also showed an incidence similar to Abengourou and Aboisso, while Yamoussoukro displayed the lowest rate at 10.8% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> Ambient temperature and relative humidity during the collection period at the study sites.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Location</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Temperature (</bold>
                  <bold>˚</bold>
                  <bold>C)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Relative</bold>
                  <bold>Humidity</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Minimum ± SD</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mean ± SD</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Maximum ± SD</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Minimum ± SD</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Mean ± SD</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Maximum ± SD</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Abengourou</bold>
                </td>
                <td>22.50 ± 1.59 a</td>
                <td>26.97 ± 1.78 a</td>
                <td>35.54 ± 3.41 a</td>
                <td>71.27±4.98 a</td>
                <td>92.79 ± 5.97 a</td>
                <td>96.76 ± 6.08 a</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Aboisso</bold>
                </td>
                <td>21.68 ± 0.93 b</td>
                <td>26.34 ± 1.44 b</td>
                <td>34.50 ± 2.64 a</td>
                <td>66.49±1.03 b</td>
                <td>89.39 ± 1.87 b</td>
                <td>92.09 ± 1.74 b</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Divo</bold>
                </td>
                <td>21.41 ± 0.98 b</td>
                <td>26.08 ± 1.62 c</td>
                <td>32.88 ± 3.07 b</td>
                <td>61.54±2.29 b</td>
                <td>88.14 ± 3.36 c</td>
                <td>90.76 ± 4.03 b</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Duékoué</bold>
                </td>
                <td>21.24 ± 1.40 b</td>
                <td>25.56 ± 1.43 d</td>
                <td>32.86 ± 2.97 b</td>
                <td>57.38±2.63 d</td>
                <td>86.14 ± 3.39 d</td>
                <td>87.21 ± 4.81 c</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Yamoussoukro</bold>
                </td>
                <td>21.22 ± 1.25 b</td>
                <td>25.55 ± 1.81 d</td>
                <td>30.12 ± 3.21 c</td>
                <td>54.14±4.13 d</td>
                <td>86.66 ± 5.09 d</td>
                <td>88.17 ± 5.43 c</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Note: Values ± SD (Standard Deviation) followed by different letters within a column are significantly different according to the Newmann-Keuls test (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Agronomic Parameters</title>
        <p>The black pod rot (BPR) rates observed in all plots are higher than the local reference rates, which can be explained by the high planting densities, ranging from 1550 to 1925 trees/ha, exceeding the optimal density of 1333 trees/ha generally recommended to limit humidity and disease spread.</p>
        <p>Plot P3 in Duékoué stands out with the highest black pod rot rate (39.63% ± 4.2%), which is significantly higher than the reference rate (26.4%). This plot has an exceptionally high density of 1900 trees/ha, showing a difference of +10.23% compared to the expected rate (<bold>Table 5</bold>). Plot P4 in Aboisso also shows a significant rate (27.74% ± 3.1%), which is 6.34% higher than the reference rate (21.4%), likely due to a density of 1550 trees/ha and high shading that promotes moisture retention (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5.</bold> Agronomic parameters in some plots.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Plot</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>B</bold>
                  <bold>lack</bold>
                  <bold>Rot Rate</bold>
                  <bold>(BRR</bold>
                  <bold>,</bold>
                  <bold>%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Planting</bold>
                  <bold>Density</bold>
                  <bold>(trees/ha)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Shading</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Reference BRR (%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Difference (</bold>
                  <bold>Observed</bold>
                  <bold>BRR</bold>
                  <bold>-</bold>
                  <bold>Reference</bold>
                  <bold>BRR)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>P3 Duékoué</bold>
                </td>
                <td>39.63 ± 4.2 a</td>
                <td>1900</td>
                <td>Heavy</td>
                <td>26.4</td>
                <td>10.23</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>P4 Aboisso</bold>
                </td>
                <td>27.74 ± 3.1 b</td>
                <td>1550</td>
                <td>Heavy</td>
                <td>21.4</td>
                <td>6.34</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>P3 Divo</bold>
                </td>
                <td>23.21 ± 2.8 bc</td>
                <td>1725</td>
                <td>Heavy</td>
                <td>19.1</td>
                <td>4.11</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>P1 Abengourou</bold>
                </td>
                <td>21.01 ± 2.6 bc</td>
                <td>1925</td>
                <td>Heavy</td>
                <td>18.9</td>
                <td>2.11</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>P2 Yamoussoukro</bold>
                </td>
                <td>15.56 ± 2.1 c</td>
                <td>1725</td>
                <td>Heavy</td>
                <td>10.8</td>
                <td>4.76</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Note: Means ± standard deviation followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison test at <italic>α</italic> = 0.05.</p>
        <fig id="fig7">
          <label>Figure 7</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId29.jpeg?20260109014421" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 7.</bold> Overall evolution of black pod rot over the entire data collection period by locality.</p>
        <p>Plot P3 in Divo (23.21% ± 2.8%) and Plot P1 in Abengourou (21.01% ± 2.6%) show intermediate rates, close to local references, with respective deviations of +4.11% and +2.11%. Finally, P2 in Yamoussoukro has the lowest rate (15.56% ± 2.1%), but it is still +4.76% higher than the reference rate of 10.8%. This could be explained by local conditions being slightly less favorable for <italic>Phytophthora</italic>spp. </p>
        <fig id="fig8">
          <label>Figure 8</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId30.jpeg?20260109014422" />
        </fig>
        <fig id="fig9">
          <label>Figure 9</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId31.jpeg?20260109014421" />
        </fig>
        <fig id="fig10">
          <label>Figure 10</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId32.jpeg?20260109014422" />
        </fig>
        <fig id="fig11">
          <label>Figure 11</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId33.jpeg?20260109014422" />
        </fig>
        <fig id="fig12">
          <label>Figure 12</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId34.jpeg?20260109014422" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 8.</bold> Autocorrelations of the cocoa black pod rot rate in the different localities over the entire study period from June 2021 to June 2024.</p>
        <fig id="fig13">
          <label>Figure 13</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId35.jpeg?20260109014422" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 9.</bold> Autocorrelations of rainfall across the different localities over the entire study period from June 2021 to June 2024.</p>
        <p>sporulation, despite a relatively high density of 1725 trees/ha. Plot P3 in Duékoué is significantly more infected than all other plots (p &lt; 0.05), while Yamoussoukro shows the lowest incidence, with the other plots forming an intermediate group.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Temporal Analysis</title>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows the autocorrelations of cocoa black pod rot (BPR%) for the studied localities, with lags ranging from 0 to 80, corresponding to 15-day intervals. Significant autocorrelations, meaning those beyond the blue dotted lines (at a p ≤ 0.05 threshold), were observed at the first few lags for all localities.</p>
        <p>In Yamoussoukro, Duékoué, Divo, and Aboisso, statistically significant autocorrelation peaks were observed primarily at the initial lags (between 0 and 15 lags, corresponding to approximately 0 to 225 days). These localities also exhibited recurrent patterns with alternating positive and negative autocorrelation phases, indicating a seasonal trend in the disease’s progression. The first lag (<italic>i</italic>.<italic>e</italic>., 15 days) exhibited a particularly high autocorrelation, indicating strong short-term persistence of black pod rot. In contrast, in Abengourou, the autocorrelations were significant but less pronounced than in the other localities.</p>
        <p>The results of the simple autocorrelation of rainfall during the overall study period are represented by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>. The correlations were very weak (p &gt; 0.05). This is characteristic of a random process, meaning that rainfall is irregular, with accumulation phases followed by periods of low or no rain.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Effect of Climatic Variables on Black Pod Rot</title>
        <p>3.5.1. Relationship between Rainfall and Cocoa Pod Black Rot Rate</p>
        <p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">Figure 10</xref> presents the cross-correlations between the black pod rot rate and rainfall in each of the localities over the data collection period.</p>
        <p>For each locality, the results showed a significant positive correlation with rainfall for temporal lags close to zero, indicating that a short-term rise in the black pod rot rate followed an increase in rainfall. This immediate lag, observed in the different localities, indicates that the effect of rain on the appearance or increase of black pod rot manifests in less than 15 days.</p>
        <p>This relationship was more pronounced in certain localities, such as Duékoué and Divo, where the correlation peaks were higher. Conversely, beyond these immediate lags, the correlations became non-significant and negative, indicating a decline in the effect of rain on black pod rot over time.</p>
        <p>3.5.2. Choice of Climatic Variables in the Model</p>
        <p>The black pod rot rate (BPR) showed a strong positive correlation with rainfall (r = 0.48), indicating that rainy episodes favored the development of the disease. In contrast, a negative correlation was observed with mean temperature (−0.55) and maximum temperature (−0.60), indicating that high temperatures reduced the severity of black pod rot. Relative humidity also had a moderate positive correlation (0.24) with the BPR [%], but its effect was less pronounced compared to rainfall. </p>
        <fig id="fig14">
          <label>Figure 14</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId36.jpeg?20260109014428" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 10.</bold> Cross-correlation between black pod rot rate and rainfall across the different localities over the entire study period from June 2021 to June 2024.</p>
        <p>For the development of a predictive model, the most important variables to select were rainfall, mean temperature, and maximum temperature, given their significant correlations with the black pod rot rate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">Figure 11</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="fig15">
          <label>Figure 15</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2313462-rId37.jpeg?20260109014428" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 11.</bold> Spearman correlation between black pod rot and climatic variables.</p>
        <p>3.5.3. Logistic Regression between Black Pod Rot and Climatic Factors</p>
        <p>The results of the binary logistic regression show the influence of certain climatic variables on the probability of black pod rot occurrence. The maximum temperature (Tmax) had a significant and negative effect (p = 0.000378, <italic>β</italic> = −0.38), indicating that higher temperatures reduced the likelihood of black pod rot. Rainfall (Rain) had a significant positive effect (p = 0.034, <italic>β</italic> = 0.014), suggesting that an increase in rainfall increased the probability of black pod rot. Mean temperature (Tmean) did not have a significant effect (p = 0.68) (<bold>Table 6</bold>). The equation derived from this model within the scope of this study is:</p>
        <p>π<italic><sub>t</sub></italic>/1 − π = π (<italic>T</italic>max<italic><sub>t</sub></italic> [˚C], Rain [mm]<italic><sub>t</sub></italic><sub>−1</sub>)/[1 − π (<italic>T</italic>max<italic><sub>t</sub></italic> [˚C], Rain [mm]<italic><sub>t</sub></italic><sub>−1</sub>)]</p>
        <p>= exp[(15.573274 − (0.382385) <italic>T</italic>max<italic><sub>t</sub></italic> [˚C]+ (0.014021) Rain [mm]<italic><sub>t</sub></italic><sub>−1</sub>]</p>
        <p>π(ϰ) = Pr(CPD = 1/<italic>X</italic> = ϰ) describes the conditional probability that pods rot beyond 10% at time <italic>t</italic>, given the values of the climate variable.</p>
        <p><bold>Multicollinearity</bold><bold>Diagnostics</bold><bold>:</bold></p>
        <p>Multicollinearity diagnostics were performed on the climatic explanatory variables retained in the logistic regression model (maximum temperature and rainfall) using the variance inflation factor (VIF) and the condition index (CI). These analyses aim to ensure the stability of the regression coefficients. The values obtained for the VIF, which are 2.23 for the maximum temperature and 3.08 for the rainfall, are significantly below the critical threshold of 5 (<bold>Table 7</bold>). These low values confirm the absence of significant collinearity between our two independent variables. Furthermore, the final diagnosis of independent variable collinearity is based on the Condition Index (CI), obtained from the eigenvalues. As a general rule, a CI &lt; 15 signifies low multicollinearity. In our analysis, the maximum Condition Index observed is 2.15 (associated with Dimension 3). The variance proportions (for the dimension with the highest CI) show that the information of the variables is not concentrated: the maximum proportion of the variance of the variables (maximum temperature and rainfall) associated with the highest CI (2.15) is 0.25, or 25%, for both variables. All of these results (<bold>Table 7</bold>) indicate that there is no evidence of significant multicollinearity between the maximum temperature and rainfall.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 6.</bold> Modeling of the black pod rot rate and climatic variables using the logistic model approach.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Coefficients</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Estimate</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Std.Error</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>z value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pr</bold>
                  <bold>(&gt;|z|)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>IC 95%</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>(Intercept)</td>
                <td>15.573 274</td>
                <td>2.715 672</td>
                <td>5.735</td>
                <td>
                  9.77 × 10
                  <sup>−9</sup>
                  ***
                </td>
                <td>[10.25; 20.90]</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tmoy [˚C]</td>
                <td>−0.069 562</td>
                <td>0.169 064</td>
                <td>−0.411</td>
                <td>0.680 739 ns</td>
                <td>[−0.401; 0.262]</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tmax [˚C]</td>
                <td>−0.382 385</td>
                <td>0.107 571</td>
                <td>−3.555</td>
                <td>0.000 378***</td>
                <td>[−0.593; −0.172]</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Rain [mm]</td>
                <td>0.0140 21</td>
                <td>0.006 622</td>
                <td>2.117</td>
                <td>0.034 225*</td>
                <td>[0.001; 0.027]</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Signif. codes: ***Pr(&gt;|z|) &lt; 0.001, **Pr(&gt;|z|) &lt; 0.01, *Pr(&gt;|z|) &lt; 0.05, ns: not significant.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 7.</bold> Collinearity diagnosis.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl7">
          <label>Table 7</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="7">
                  <bold>Collinearity</bold>
                  <bold>Diagnostics</bold>
                  <bold>between the</bold>
                  <bold>Explanatory</bold>
                  <bold>(or</bold>
                  <bold>Independent</bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                  <bold>Variables</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Model</td>
                <td>Dimension</td>
                <td>Eigenvalue</td>
                <td>Condition Index</td>
                <td>Variance Proportions</td>
                <td>Maximum Temperature</td>
                <td>Rainfall</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="3">1</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1.45</td>
                <td>1.65</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.67</td>
                <td>0.67</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>1.01</td>
                <td>2.09</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.08</td>
                <td>0.08</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>3</td>
                <td>0.32</td>
                <td>2.15</td>
                <td>0.00</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>VIF</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>
                </td>
                <td>2.23</td>
                <td>3.08</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>
          4.1. Geographical Distribution of
          <italic>Phytophthora</italic>
          spp.
        </title>
        <p>Laboratory identification revealed the presence of two species. The sporangium measurements of both groups matched the ranges reported by Coulibaly <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>], although ecological differences could explain other morphological variations. Factors such as host type, crop age, and environmental conditions may account for the observed size variations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>].</p>
        <p>The heterothallism observed in our isolates agrees with Martin <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>], who showed that <italic>Phytophthora palmivora</italic> and <italic>Phytophthora megakarya</italic> are heterothallic species with amphigynous antheridia. Based on the classification criteria of Martin <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>], our Group 1 likely corresponds to <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> and Group 2 to <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic>.</p>
        <p>According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>], <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> sporangia measure 20 - 60 × 13 - 41 µm (mean 36 × 25 µm) with a Length/Width (L/W) ratio of about 1.4 (1.2 - 1.6), while <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic> sporangia measure 29 - 115 × 13 - 46 µm (mean 36 - 52 × 23 - 29 µm) with an L/W ratio of 1.2 - 2.0. The overlap in these traits complicates classification and reduces their taxonomic value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>]. However, pedicel length remains a key diagnostic trait [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>].</p>
        <p>The decreasing proportion of <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> from east to west supports the view that this species is still spreading westward across Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>], including Côte d’Ivoire. Both <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> and <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic> colonize all parts of the tree. However, the prevalence of <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> in Abengourou may be linked to higher rainfall and prolonged humidity, which favor sporulation and dissemination.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Effects of Agro-Climatic Conditions on Black Pod Rot Incidence</title>
        <p>The rot rate remained extremely low for much of the year, corresponding to periods of low fruit production. Disease incidence increased with fruit abundance, confirming the strong correlation between fruit availability and rot rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>]. The highest peaks occurred in October and November, while the rates were low from April to September, and from mid-December to March. This seasonality is associated with rainfall patterns that favor the establishment and spread of pathogens, consistent with the findings of Pohé <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>].</p>
        <p>Other contributing factors include planting density and shade. Dense plots with closed canopies reduce light penetration, increase humidity, and thus enhance disease development. These results support those of Pohé <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>], who emphasized the role of cultural practices in disease epidemiology.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. Relationship between Agro-Climatic Factors and Cocoa Pod Black Rot Rate</title>
        <p>A key objective of this study was to assess the relationship between cocoa pod rot caused by <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spp. and environmental variables.</p>
        <p>Temporal analysis revealed strong short-term autocorrelations, reflecting the cyclical and seasonal nature of black pod rot. Significant autocorrelations at 15-day lags in Yamoussoukro, Duékoué, Divo, and Aboisso indicate short-term persistence, likely driven by rainfall. Cross-correlation analyses confirmed that rainfall peaks are followed by disease outbreaks within about 15 days, consistent with Chui <italic>et al</italic>. [41] and Ji <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>], who linked humid conditions to higher fungal infection rates.</p>
        <p>Negative correlations at longer lags (&gt;15 days) suggest that the influence of rainfall diminishes as moisture dissipates or weather conditions vary. This agrees with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>], who showed that climatic effects on fungal diseases weaken over time. Similarly, atypical sigmoidal epidemic curves of <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> reported in Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>] were attributed either to new infection foci [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>] or fruiting dynamics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>].</p>
        <p>Local differences, such as weaker correlations in Abengourou, may reflect ecological variability or microclimatic effects, consistent with Mfegue <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>] and Ndoumbe-Nkeng <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>].</p>
        <p>Finally, higher temperatures appeared to suppress disease development, with negative correlations observed for both mean (−0.55) and maximum temperatures (−0.60). Excessive heat is likely to reduce pathogen survival or delay development. Torres-de la Cruz <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>] similarly demonstrated that hot temperatures shorten the viability of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spores by reducing available moisture.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusions</title>
      <p>Cocoa black pod rot remains a significant constraint to cocoa production, resulting in substantial yield losses. This study, conducted in cocoa-growing areas characterized by multimodal rainfall patterns, aimed to clarify the role of climatic factors in the epidemiology of the disease in order to inform improved control strategies.</p>
      <p>Microscopic analyses confirmed the presence of two <italic>Phytophthora</italic> species responsible for black pod rot: <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic> and <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic>. Morphological traits, such as sporangium dimensions, pedicel length, and the length-to-width ratio, supported this identification. <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic> was the most frequent species overall (64.84%), whereas <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> dominated in Abengourou (97.78%). Plot density and shading were also found to favor disease development.</p>
      <p>Beyond descriptive statistics, cross-correlation analyses and logistic modeling provided new insights into the dynamics of the disease. The results showed that:</p>
      <p>In the presence of fruits, disease symptoms appeared within 15 days of rainy episodes.Disease incidence was strongly correlated with rainfall and maximum ambient temperature.</p>
      <p>These findings provide valuable insights for enhancing cocoa pod rot management in Côte d’Ivoire. Control strategies should include:</p>
      <p>Preventive management and synchronization of treatments with rainfall patterns.Species-specific adaptation of control measures, depending on whether <italic>P</italic>.<italic>palmivora</italic> or <italic>P</italic>.<italic>megakarya</italic> predominates.Microclimate management through cultural practices, particularly regulating shade and planting density.</p>
      <p>The main contribution of this work lies in providing decision-support tools grounded in climatic and epidemiological data. By integrating these parameters, management can shift from reactive, generalized interventions to initiative-taking, targeted, and locally adapted strategies, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of efforts to control black pod rot in Côte d’Ivoire.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">ICCO (2021) ICCO Quarterly Bulletin of Cocoa Statistics, Vol. XLXII, No. 1, Cocoa Year 2020/21. International Cocoa Organization, 1 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Statistics, V</string-name>
              <string-name>XLXII, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>ICCO Quarterly Bulletin of Cocoa Statistics, Vol</article-title>
            <source>XLXII</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hernández-Gómez, E., Hernández-Morales, J., Avendaño-Arrazate, C.H., López-Guillen, G., Garrido-Ramírez, E.R., Romero-Nápoles, J. and Nava-Díaz, C. (2015) Factores so-cieconómicos y parasitológicos que limitan la producción del cacao en Chiapas, México. <italic>Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología</italic>, 33, 232-246.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Morales, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Arrazate, C.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guillen, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chiapas, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Factores so-cieconómicos y parasitológicos que limitan la producción del cacao en Chiapas, México</article-title>
            <source>Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología</source>
            <volume>33</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Muller, R.A. (1974) Effect of Prophylactic Measures on the Dissemination of <italic>Phytophthora palmivora</italic>. In: Gregory, P.H., Ed., <italic>Phytophtora Disease of Cocoa</italic>, Longman, 169-178.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Muller, R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gregory, P.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cocoa, L</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1974</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Prophylactic Measures on the Dissemination of Phytophthora palmivora</article-title>
            <source>In: Gregory</source>
            <volume>169</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Partiot, M. (1975) Horizontal Resistance in Cacao to <italic>Phytophthora</italic> sp. Methods of Early Evaluation. <italic>Café Cacao Thé</italic>, 19, 123-136.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Partiot, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1975</year>
            <article-title>Horizontal Resistance in Cacao to Phytophthora sp</article-title>
            <source>Methods of Early Evaluation. Café Cacao Thé</source>
            <volume>19</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Despréaux, D. (1988) Etude de la pourriture brune des cabosses du cacaoyer au Cameroun. Deuxième partie: Contribution à l’étude de la maladie, groupe de re-cherche sur les maladies à <italic>Phytophthora</italic> sp. du cacaoyer. Rapport interne. Institut de Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <year>1988</year>
            <article-title>Etude de la pourriture brune des cabosses du cacaoyer au Cameroun</article-title>
            <source>Deuxième partie: Contribution à l’étude de la maladie</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Klotioloma, C., Aka Romain, A., Camara, B., Kassin, K.E., Kouakou, K., Boubacar Ismaël, K., <italic>et al</italic>. (2018) Molecular Identification of <italic>Phytophthora palmivora</italic> in the Cocoa Tree Orchard of Côte d’Ivoire and Assessment of the Quantitative Component of Pathogenicity. <italic>International Journal of Sciences</italic>, 4, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.18483/ijsci.1707 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18483/ijsci.1707</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18483/ijsci.1707">https://doi.org/10.18483/ijsci.1707</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Klotioloma, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Romain, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Camara, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kassin, K.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouakou, K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Molecular Identification of Phytophthora palmivora in the Cocoa Tree Orchard of Côte d’Ivoire and Assessment of the Quantitative Component of Pathogenicity</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Sciences</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18483/ijsci.1707</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Koua, S.H., Coulibaly, N.A.M.D. and Alloueboraud, W.A.M. (2018) Caractérisation des vergers et des maladies de cacao de la Côte d’Ivoire: Cas des départements d’Abengourou, Divo et Soubré. <italic>Journal of Animal &amp;</italic><italic>Plant Sciences</italic>, 35, 5706-5714.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Koua, S.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Coulibaly, N.A.M.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Alloueboraud, W.A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abengourou, D</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Caractérisation des vergers et des maladies de cacao de la Côte d’Ivoire: Cas des départements d’Abengourou, Divo et Soubré</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Animal &amp; Plant Sciences</source>
            <volume>35</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Akrofi, A.Y. (2015) <italic>Phytophthora megakarya</italic>: A Review on Its Status as a Pathogen on Cacao in West Africa. <italic>African Crop Science Journal</italic>, 23, 67-87.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Akrofi, A.Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Phytophthora megakarya: A Review on Its Status as a Pathogen on Cacao in West Africa</article-title>
            <source>African Crop Science Journal</source>
            <volume>23</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kroon, L.P.N.M., Brouwer, H., de Cock, A.W.A.M. and Govers, F. (2012) The Genus <italic>Phytophthora</italic> Anno 2012. <italic>Phytopathology</italic>, 102, 348-364. https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-01-11-0025 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/phyto-01-11-0025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22185336</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-01-11-0025">https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-01-11-0025</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kroon, L.P.N.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brouwer, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cock, A.W.A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Govers, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>The Genus Phytophthora Anno 2012</article-title>
            <source>Phytopathology</source>
            <volume>102</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/phyto-01-11-0025</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22185336</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mpika, J., Kebe, I.B., Issali, A.E., N’Guessan, F.K., Druzhinina, S., Komon-Zélazowska, M., Kubicek, C.P. and Aké, S. (2009) Antagonist Potential of Trichoderma Indigenous Isolates for Biological Control of <italic>Phytophthora palmivora</italic> the Causative Agent of Black Pod Disease on Cocoa ( <italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> L.) in Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>African Journal of Biotechnology</italic>, 8, 5280-5293</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mpika, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kebe, I.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Issali, A.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guessan, F.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Druzhinina, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kubicek, C.P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Antagonist Potential of Trichoderma Indigenous Isolates for Biological Control of Phytophthora palmivora the Causative Agent of Black Pod Disease on Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L</article-title>
            <source>) in Côte d’Ivoire. African Journal of Biotechnology</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pohe, J., Koula, J, Rabe, G.R. and Dezai, L. (2013) Agressivité de la pourriture brune des cabosses de cacaoyer dans le sud-est de la Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences</italic>, 20, 3126-3136.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pohe, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Koula, J</string-name>
              <string-name>Rabe, G.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dezai, L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Agressivité de la pourriture brune des cabosses de cacaoyer dans le sud-est de la Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences</source>
            <volume>20</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bailey, B.A., Ali, S.S., Akrofi, A.Y. and Meinhardt, L.W. (2016) <italic>Phytophthora</italic><italic>megakarya</italic>, a Causal Agent of Black Pod Rot in Africa. In: Bailey, B. and Meinhardt, L., Eds., <italic>Cacao Diseases</italic>, Springer, 267-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24789-2_8 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-24789-2_8</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24789-2_8">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24789-2_8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bailey, B.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ali, S.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akrofi, A.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Meinhardt, L.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bailey, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Meinhardt, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diseases, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Phytophthora megakarya, a Causal Agent of Black Pod Rot in Africa</article-title>
            <source>In: Bailey</source>
            <volume>267</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-24789-2_8</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">N’Guessan, A.B.C., Seka, K., N’Cho, A.J., Eba, M., Kouakou, Y.Y.F.R. and Atta Diallo, H. (2025) Epidemiology of Cocoa Pod Rots and Characterization of Causal Agents in Cote d’Ivoire. <italic>Journal of Applied Biological Sciences</italic>, 19, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.71336/jabs.1443 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.71336/jabs.1443</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.71336/jabs.1443">https://doi.org/10.71336/jabs.1443</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Guessan, A.B.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Seka, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cho, A.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eba, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouakou, Y.Y.F.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diallo, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Epidemiology of Cocoa Pod Rots and Characterization of Causal Agents in Cote d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Applied Biological Sciences</source>
            <volume>19</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.71336/jabs.1443</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yapo, K.D. Ouffoue, S.K., N’guessan, B.R., Okpekon, T.A., Dade, J., Say, M. and Kouako, T.H. (2014) Quality Control by the Determination of Heavy Metals in New Variety of Cocoa ( <italic>Cocoa mercedes</italic>), Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>Journal de la Société Ouest</italic>- <italic>Africaine de</italic><italic>Chimie</italic>, 37, 56-64.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yapo, K.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ouffoue, S.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Okpekon, T.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dade, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Say, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouako, T.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Quality Control by the Determination of Heavy Metals in New Variety of Cocoa (Cocoa mercedes), Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>Journal de la Société Ouest-Africaine de Chimie</source>
            <volume>37</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gramlich, A., Tandy, S., Andres, C., Chincheros Paniagua, J., Armengot, L., Schneider, M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2017) Cadmium Uptake by Cocoa Trees in Agroforestry and Monoculture Systems under Conventional and Organic Management. <italic>Science of the Total Environment</italic>, 580, 677-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.014 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28040226</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.014</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gramlich, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tandy, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Andres, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Paniagua, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Armengot, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Schneider, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Cadmium Uptake by Cocoa Trees in Agroforestry and Monoculture Systems under Conventional and Organic Management</article-title>
            <source>Science of the Total Environment</source>
            <volume>580</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.014</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28040226</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kebe, I., Mpika, J., N’guessa, K., Hebbar, P., Samuels, G. and Ake, S. (2009) Isolement et identification de microorganismes indigènes de cacaoyères en côte d’ivoire et mise en évidence de leurs effets antagonistes vis-àvis de <italic>Phytophthora palmivora</italic>, agent de la pourriture brune des cabosses.. <italic>Sciences &amp; Nature</italic>, 6, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.4314/scinat.v6i1.48581 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/scinat.v6i1.48581</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/scinat.v6i1.48581">https://doi.org/10.4314/scinat.v6i1.48581</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kebe, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mpika, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hebbar, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Samuels, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ake, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Isolement et identification de microorganismes indigènes de cacaoyères en côte d’ivoire et mise en évidence de leurs effets antagonistes vis-àvis de Phytophthora palmivora, agent de la pourriture brune des cabosses</article-title>
            <source>. Sciences &amp; Nature</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/scinat.v6i1.48581</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Pokou, N., N’Goran, J., Eskes, A. and Sangare, A. (2009) Cocoa Farm Survey in Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>Proceedings of the International Workshop on Cocoa Breeding for Farmers</italic>’ <italic>needs</italic>, San José, 15-17 October 2006, 26-30.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pokou, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Goran, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eskes, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sangare, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Cocoa Farm Survey in Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>Proceedings of the International Workshop on Cocoa Breeding for Farmers’ needs</source>
            <volume>15</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Tahi, G.M., Trebissou, I.C., Guiraud, S.B., Ribeyre, F., Lachenaud, P., Pokou, N.D., <italic>et al</italic>. (2017) Second Recurrent Cocoa Selection Cycle in Côte d’Ivoire: Genetic Parameters in the Two Constitutive Populations after Thirteen Years of Observations. <italic>International Symposium on Cocoa Research</italic> ( <italic>ISCR</italic>), Lima, 13-17 November 2017, 1-12.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tahi, G.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Trebissou, I.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guiraud, S.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ribeyre, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lachenaud, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pokou, N.D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Second Recurrent Cocoa Selection Cycle in Côte d’Ivoire: Genetic Parameters in the Two Constitutive Populations after Thirteen Years of Observations</article-title>
            <source>International Symposium on Cocoa Research (ISCR)</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Thomas, L., Gupta, A., Gopal, M., ChandraMohanan, R., George, P. and Thomas, G.V. (2011) Evaluation of Rhizospheric and Endophytic <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. and Fluorescent <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. Isolated from <italic>Theobrome cacao</italic> L. for Antagonistic Reaction to <italic>Phytophthora palmivora</italic>, the Causal Organism of Black Pod Disease of Cocoa. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>of Plant Breeding and Crop Science</italic>, 39, 370-376.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Thomas, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gupta, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gopal, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>ChandraMohanan, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>George, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thomas, G.V.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Evaluation of Rhizospheric and Endophytic Bacillus spp</article-title>
            <source>and Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Theobrome cacao L. for Antagonistic Reaction to Phytophthora palmivora</source>
            <volume>39</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Melnick, R.L., Zidack, N.K., Bailey, B.A., Maximova, S.N., Guiltinan, M. and Backman, P.A. (2008) Bacterial Endophytes: <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. from Annual Crops as Potential Biological Control Agents of Black Pod Rot of Cacao. <italic>Biological Control</italic>, 46, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.022 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.022</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.022">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.022</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Melnick, R.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zidack, N.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bailey, B.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maximova, S.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guiltinan, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Backman, P.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Bacterial Endophytes: Bacillus spp</article-title>
            <source>from Annual Crops as Potential Biological Control Agents of Black Pod Rot of Cacao. Biological Control</source>
            <volume>46</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.022</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Senthil-Nathan, S. (2014) A Review of Biopesticides and Their Mode of Action against Insect Pests. In: Thangavel, P. and Sridevi, G., Eds., <italic>Environmental Sustainability</italic>, Springer, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2056-5_3 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-81-322-2056-5_3</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2056-5_3">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2056-5_3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Senthil-Nathan, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thangavel, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sridevi, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sustainability, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>A Review of Biopesticides and Their Mode of Action against Insect Pests</article-title>
            <source>In: Thangavel</source>
            <volume>49</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-81-322-2056-5_3</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Klotioloma, C., Adama, O., Sidoine, E.B., Norbert, K., Françoise, G., Brigitte, G., <italic>et al</italic>. (2022) Efficacy of Three Doses of Fungicide Ridomil Gold 66 WP in the Control of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spp., Agent of Cocoa Tree Black Pod Disease in Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>Journal of Experimental Agriculture International</italic>, 44, 205-211. https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2022/v44i112068 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/jeai/2022/v44i112068</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2022/v44i112068">https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2022/v44i112068</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Klotioloma, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Adama, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sidoine, E.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Norbert, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brigitte, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Efficacy of Three Doses of Fungicide Ridomil Gold 66 WP in the Control of Phytophthora spp</article-title>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/jeai/2022/v44i112068</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Ndoumbe’-Nkeng, M. (2002) Incidence des facteurs agroécologiques sur l’épidémiologie de la pourriture brune des fruits du cacaoyer au Cameroun: Contribution a’ la mise en place d’un modèle d’avertissements agricoles. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut national agronomique Paris Grignon.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nkeng, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>Incidence des facteurs agroécologiques sur l’épidémiologie de la pourriture brune des fruits du cacaoyer au Cameroun: Contribution a’ la mise en place d’un modèle d’avertissements agricoles</article-title>
            <source>Ph.D. Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Yao Sadaiou Sabas, B., Gislain Danmo, K., Akoua Tamia Madeleine, K. and Jan, B. (2020) Cocoa Production and Forest Dynamics in Ivory Coast from 1985 to 2019. <italic>Land</italic>, 9, Article 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120524 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/land9120524</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120524">https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120524</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sabas, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Danmo, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Madeleine, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jan, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Cocoa Production and Forest Dynamics in Ivory Coast from 1985 to 2019</article-title>
            <source>Land</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <elocation-id>524</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/land9120524</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kouassi, Y.D. and Roméo, K.K. (2024) Variabilité climatique actuelle et future dans la ville de Yamoussoukro (Côte d’Ivoire). <italic>Collection Recherches et Regards D</italic>’ <italic>afrique</italic>, 3, 299-327.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kouassi, Y.D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Variabilité climatique actuelle et future dans la ville de Yamoussoukro (Côte d’Ivoire)</article-title>
            <source>Collection Recherches et Regards D’afrique</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kouassi, A.M., Kouao, J. and Kouakou, K.E. (2022) Caractérisation intra-annuelle de la variabilité climatique en Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>Bulletin de l’Association de géographes fran</italic><italic>çais</italic>, 99, 289-306. https://doi.org/10.4000/bagf.9534 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/bagf.9534</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4000/bagf.9534">https://doi.org/10.4000/bagf.9534</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kouassi, A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouao, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kouakou, K.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Caractérisation intra-annuelle de la variabilité climatique en Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>Bulletin de l’Association de géographes français</source>
            <volume>99</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4000/bagf.9534</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Assiri, A.A. (2010) Étude de la régénération cacaoyère en Côte d’Ivoire: Impact des techniques de réhabilitation et de replantation sur le développement et la productivi-té des vergers de cacaoyers ( <italic>Theobroma cacao</italic> L.) en relation avec l’état du sol. Master’s Thesis, Université de Cocody.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Assiri, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, U</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Étude de la régénération cacaoyère en Côte d’Ivoire: Impact des techniques de réhabilitation et de replantation sur le développement et la productivi-té des vergers de cacaoyers (Theobroma cacao L</article-title>
            <source>) en relation avec l’état du sol. Master’s Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ling, A.S.C. (2022) Monitoring Cocoa Black Pod Disease Incidence with Excel Tool. <italic>Malaysian Cocoa Journal</italic>, 14, 15-23.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ling, A.S.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Monitoring Cocoa Black Pod Disease Incidence with Excel Tool</article-title>
            <source>Malaysian Cocoa Journal</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Savary, S., Stetkiewicz, S., Brun, F. and Willocquet, L. (2015) Modelling and Mapping Potential Epidemics of Wheat Diseases—Examples on Leaf Rust and Septoria Tritici Blotch Using Epiwheat. <italic>European Journal of Plant Pathology</italic>, 142, 771-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0650-7 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-015-0650-7</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0650-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0650-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Savary, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Stetkiewicz, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brun, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Willocquet, L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Modelling and Mapping Potential Epidemics of Wheat Diseases—Examples on Leaf Rust and Septoria Tritici Blotch Using Epiwheat</article-title>
            <source>European Journal of Plant Pathology</source>
            <volume>142</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-015-0650-7</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Opoku, I.Y., Akrofi, A.Y. and Appiah, A.A. (2006) Assessment of Sanitation and Fungicide Application Directed at Cocoa Tree Trunks for the Control of <italic>Phytophthora</italic> Black Pod Infections in Pods Growing in the Canopy. <italic>European Journal of Plant Pathology</italic>, 117, 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-006-9082-8 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-006-9082-8</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-006-9082-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-006-9082-8</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Opoku, I.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akrofi, A.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Appiah, A.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Assessment of Sanitation and Fungicide Application Directed at Cocoa Tree Trunks for the Control of Phytophthora Black Pod Infections in Pods Growing in the Canopy</article-title>
            <source>European Journal of Plant Pathology</source>
            <volume>117</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-006-9082-8</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ndoumbè-Nkeng, M., Efombagn, M.I.B., Nyassé, S., Nyemb, E., Sache, I. and Cilas, C. (2009) Relationships between Cocoa <italic>Phytophthora</italic> Pod Rot Disease and Climatic Variables in Cameroon. <italic>Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology</italic>, 31, 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660909507605 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07060660909507605</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660909507605">https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660909507605</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nkeng, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Efombagn, M.I.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nyemb, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sache, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cilas, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Relationships between Cocoa Phytophthora Pod Rot Disease and Climatic Variables in Cameroon</article-title>
            <source>Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology</source>
            <volume>31</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07060660909507605</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ndoumbe-Nkeng, M., Njacheun-Njanzoua, G., Babin, R., Cilas, C. and Nyassé, S. (2010) Influence des facteurs climatiques sur la pourriture brune des fruits du ca-caoyer, due à <italic>Phytophthora megakarya</italic>, dans la province du centre au Cameroun. Cocoa Producers’ Alliance.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ndoumbe-Nkeng, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Njacheun-Njanzoua, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Babin, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cilas, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Influence des facteurs climatiques sur la pourriture brune des fruits du ca-caoyer, due à Phytophthora megakarya, dans la province du centre au Cameroun</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Berry, D. and Cilas, C. (1994) Étude du comportement d’une parcelle diallèle 6 × 6 vis-à-vis de la pourriture brune des cabosses du cacaoyer due à <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spp. au Cameroun. 11 <italic>Conférence internationale sur la recherche cacaoyère</italic>, Yamoussoukro, 18-24 July 1993, 91-96.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Berry, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cilas, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1994</year>
            <article-title>Étude du comportement d’une parcelle diallèle 6 × 6 vis-à-vis de la pourriture brune des cabosses du cacaoyer due à Phytophthora spp</article-title>
            <source>au Cameroun. 11 Conférence internationale sur la recherche cacaoyère</source>
            <volume>18</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Coulibaly, K., Kebe, I., Koffi, N., Mpika, J. and Kone, D. (2013) Caractérisation des isolats de <italic>Phytophthora</italic> spp du verger cacaoyers de Côte d’Ivoire. <italic>Journal of Applied Biosciences</italic>, 70, 5567-5579. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v70i1.98757 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/jab.v70i1.98757</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v70i1.98757">https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v70i1.98757</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Coulibaly, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kebe, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Koffi, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mpika, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kone, D.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Caractérisation des isolats de Phytophthora spp du verger cacaoyers de Côte d’Ivoire</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Applied Biosciences</source>
            <volume>70</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/jab.v70i1.98757</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Drenth, A. and Sendall, B. (2001) Practical Guide to Detection and Identification of <italic>Phytophthora</italic>. CRC for Tropical Plant Protection, 41 p.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Drenth, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sendall, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2001</year>
            <article-title>Practical Guide to Detection and Identification of Phytophthora</article-title>
            <source>CRC for Tropical Plant Protection</source>
            <volume>41</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Martin, F.N., Abad, Z.G., Balci, Y. and Ivors, K. (2012) Identification and Detection of <italic>Phytophthora</italic>: Reviewing Our Progress, Identifying Our Needs. <italic>Plant Disease</italic>, 96, 1080-1103. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-12-11-1036-fe <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-12-11-1036-fe</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30727075</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-12-11-1036-fe">https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-12-11-1036-fe</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Martin, F.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abad, Z.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Balci, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ivors, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Progress, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Identification and Detection of Phytophthora: Reviewing Our Progress, Identifying Our Needs</article-title>
            <source>Plant Disease</source>
            <volume>96</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-12-11-1036-fe</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30727075</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Gerettson-Cornell, L.A. (1994) Compendium and Classification of the Species of the Genus <italic>Phytophthora</italic> de Bary by the Canons of Traditional Taxonomy. Technical Paper-Forestry Commission of New South Wale, No. 45 87.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Gerettson-Cornell, L.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wale, N</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1994</year>
            <article-title>Compendium and Classification of the Species of the Genus Phytophthora de Bary by the Canons of Traditional Taxonomy</article-title>
            <source>Technical Paper-Forestry Commission of New South Wale</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Opoku, I., Appiah, A., Akrofi, A. and Owusu, G. (2000) <italic>Phytophthora megakarya</italic>: A Potential Threat to the Cocoa Industry in Ghana. <italic>Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science</italic>, 33, 237-248. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjas.v33i2.1876 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/gjas.v33i2.1876</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/gjas.v33i2.1876">https://doi.org/10.4314/gjas.v33i2.1876</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Opoku, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Appiah, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akrofi, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Owusu, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>Phytophthora megakarya: A Potential Threat to the Cocoa Industry in Ghana</article-title>
            <source>Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
            <volume>33</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/gjas.v33i2.1876</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="thesis">Mfegue, C.V. (2012) Origine et mécanismes de dispersion des populations de Phy-tophthora megakarya, pathogène du cacaoyer au Cameroun. Master’s Thesis, Uni-versité de Montpellier SUPAGRO.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="thesis">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mfegue, C.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Thesis, U</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Origine et mécanismes de dispersion des populations de Phy-tophthora megakarya, pathogène du cacaoyer au Cameroun</article-title>
            <source>Master’s Thesis</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <label>40.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ndoumbe-Nkeng, M., Cilas, C., Nyemb, E., Nyasse, S., Bieysse, D., Flori, A., <italic>et al</italic>. (2004) Impact of Removing Diseased Pods on Cocoa Black Pod Caused by <italic>Phytophthora megakarya</italic> and on Cocoa Production in Cameroon. <italic>Crop Protection</italic>, 23, 415-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.09.010 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2003.09.010</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.09.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.09.010</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ndoumbe-Nkeng, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cilas, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nyemb, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nyasse, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bieysse, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Flori, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Impact of Removing Diseased Pods on Cocoa Black Pod Caused by Phytophthora megakarya and on Cocoa Production in Cameroon</article-title>
            <source>Crop Protection</source>
            <volume>23</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2003.09.010</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <label>41.</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="web">https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-08139-7</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <label>42.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ji, T., Altieri, V., Salotti, I., Li, M. and Rossi, V. (2024) Role of Rain in the Spore Dispersal of Fungal Pathogens Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases. <italic>Plant Disease</italic>, 108, 1041-1052. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-03-23-0403-re <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-03-23-0403-re</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37822098</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-03-23-0403-re">https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-03-23-0403-re</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ji, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Altieri, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Salotti, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Li, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rossi, V.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Role of Rain in the Spore Dispersal of Fungal Pathogens Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases</article-title>
            <source>Plant Disease</source>
            <volume>108</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-03-23-0403-re</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37822098</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <label>43.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Madden, L.V., Hughes, G. and Vandenbosch, F. (2007) The Study of Plant Disease Epidemics. https://repository.rothamsted.ac.uk/id/eprint/32199/</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Madden, L.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hughes, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vandenbosch, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>The Study of Plant Disease Epidemics</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <label>44.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ndoumbe Nkeng, M., Efombagn Mousseni, I.B., Bidzanga Nomo, L., Sache, I. and Cilas, C. (2016) Spatio-Temporal Dynamics on a Plot Scale of Cocoa Black Pod Rot Caused by <italic>Phytophthora megakarya</italic> in Cameroon. <italic>European Journal of Plant Pathology</italic>, 147, 579-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1027-2 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-016-1027-2</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1027-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1027-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Nkeng, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mousseni, I.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nomo, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sache, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cilas, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Spatio-Temporal Dynamics on a Plot Scale of Cocoa Black Pod Rot Caused by Phytophthora megakarya in Cameroon</article-title>
            <source>European Journal of Plant Pathology</source>
            <volume>147</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-016-1027-2</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <label>45.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ristaino, J.B. and Gumpertz, M.L. (2000) New Frontiers in the Study of Dispersal and Spatial Analysis of Epidemics Caused by Species in the Genus <italic>Phytophthora</italic>. <italic>Annual Review of Phytopathology</italic>, 38, 541-576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.541 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.541</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11701854</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.541">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.541</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ristaino, J.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gumpertz, M.L.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>New Frontiers in the Study of Dispersal and Spatial Analysis of Epidemics Caused by Species in the Genus Phytophthora</article-title>
            <source>Annual Review of Phytopathology</source>
            <volume>38</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.541</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11701854</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <label>46.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Torres-de la Cruz, M., Mora-Aguilera, G., Ortiz-García, C.F., Gaspar-Génico, J.Á., Pérez-de la Cruz, M. and Acencio-Castillo, N. (2022) Climate, Fruiting and Frosty Pod Rot Influence the Epidemic Intensity of <italic>Phytophthora</italic><italic>capsici</italic> in Cacao Plantations in Mexico. <italic>Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología</italic>, <italic>Mexican Journal of Phytopathology</italic>, 41, 26-44. https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2210-3 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18781/r.mex.fit.2210-3</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2210-3">https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2210-3</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Cruz, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mora-Aguilera, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Cruz, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Acencio-Castillo, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Climate, F</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Climate, Fruiting and Frosty Pod Rot Influence the Epidemic Intensity of Phytophthora capsici in Cacao Plantations in Mexico</article-title>
            <source>Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología</source>
            <volume>41</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18781/r.mex.fit.2210-3</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>