<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojbm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Business and Management
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2329-3284
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2329-3292
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojbm.2025.136232
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojbm-147627
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Business 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Economics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Transitioning to Cashless Society: Challenges and Opportunities for Small Business
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Walied
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Askarzai
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Bhuvanesh
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Unhelkar
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aChurchill Institute of Higher Education, Sydney, Australia
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aMuma College of Business, University of South Florida, Tempa, Florida, USA
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     28
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    06
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    4292
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    4312
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The concept of a cashless society has emerged as a prominent research subject, with scholars exploring its advantages and disadvantages extensively. A review of the existing literature identifies a significant gap in understanding its positive and negative implications for small businesses. This gap is particularly noteworthy given that small businesses constitute a substantial proportion of gross domestic product (GDP) and experience high levels of foot traffic. Addressing this research gap is essential to generate interest and engagement among stakeholders. This study, by critically examining the effects of a cashless society on small businesses, not only fills this gap but also offers valuable insights into this underexplored area. The study adopts a quantitative research approach. Primary data were collected through an online structure survey questionnaire (N242). The Mann-Whitney Rank, Cronbach’s and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were employed to analyse data using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS). Word Cloud and Excel-generated graphs are also used to analyse data. The study findings suggest that a cashless society has positive implications for small businesses, conditioned continued support is provided throughout the evolving landscape. This should make the audience feel optimistic and hopeful about the future of small businesses in a cashless society. The findings of this study have significant practical implications for small businesses considering operating in a cashless society. By highlighting these implications, the study equips the reader with valuable insights for navigating the future of a cashless society, thereby enhancing their business strategies and operations and making them feel prepared and equipped. 
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Cashless Society
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Small Business
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Business Strategies
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Digital Payment Systems
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Small businesses with limited resources are vulnerable to the adverse effects of a cashless economy. This is due to increased transactional costs, insufficient technological expertise, and reduced customer access (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-35">
     Rahman, Ismail, &amp; Bahri, 2020
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-39">
     Santana, 2019
    </xref>). Conversely, potential advantages of a cashless economy for small businesses include improved financial tracking, operational efficiency, and enhanced security (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-13">
     Deora, 2018
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-34">
     Priyono, Moin, &amp; Putri, 2020
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-39">
     Santana, 2019
    </xref>). The gap in exploring the challenges and opportunities for small businesses leaves policymakers and stakeholders with insufficient insights to address these needs. These gaps in the literature also provide a fascinating area for further research.</p>
   <p>The concept of a cashless society has become more prominent recently, accompanied by certain advantages and disadvantages from different perspectives concerning businesses and customers. On one hand, cashless transactions enhance business efficiency, reduce cash handling risks, and offer better financial transparency. They also provide customers with convenience, speed, and better access to digital services (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-9">
     Busse, 2023
    </xref>). However, the transition to cashless systems brings problems, such as cybersecurity risks, privacy concerns, and exclusion of people and businesses unable to adopt digital payment methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-46">
     Umar, Musalli, &amp; Yusuf, 2023
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The effects a cashless society has on small businesses are multilayered. Small businesses’ financial and technological resources are usually minimal, so investing in digital payment infrastructure is challenging. Additionally, transactional fees related to digital payments could reduce already-thin profit margins. Other technological barriers, such as lack of access to reliable internet or digital literacy, further worsen small businesses’ challenges. Moreover, the digital divide—or the gap between those with access to digital technologies and those without—can decrease customer access for firms relying on a local or underserved population that prefers or needs to make cash-based transactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-8">
     Berkimbayeva
    </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-8">
     , 2019
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Conversely, some gains could be realized if small businesses are willing to go cashless. Cashless systems facilitate better financial record-keeping, improve cash flow management, and reduce risks of theft and counterfeit money. These advantages indicate that exploring avenues to assist small businesses in transitioning to cashless payment systems will help them seize the opportunities while addressing the challenges.</p>
   <p>Despite the growing interest in the implications of a cashless society, there is a notable lack of studies focused on its impact on small businesses that employ between 1 to 20 individuals. The reviewed literature predominantly addresses broader economic or societal effects, often overlooking the specific needs and vulnerabilities of small enterprises. This significant research gap highlights the necessity to explore how small businesses adapt to the transition toward cashless systems, the challenges they encounter, and the strategies they employ for adjustment. This paper aims to address this gap by considering the following research questions: 1) What overall benefits and challenges do small businesses experience within cashless societies? 2) In what ways do cashless payment systems enhance transaction efficiency for small businesses? 3) How does customer satisfaction differ based on the type of cashless payment system utilized (e.g., mobile wallets, credit/debit cards, QR codes)? 4) How do small businesses manage the costs associated with operating in cashless environments to sustain profitability? 5) Is there a significant correlation between the adoption of cashless payment systems and increased sales for small businesses? 6) What key technological challenges do small businesses face when transitioning to cashless transactions? 7) How do existing laws and regulations regarding cashless transactions affect the operations and growth of small businesses?</p>
   <p>The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: Section 2 reviews the literature for gap identification and hypotheses development. Section 3 outlines the research methodology employed in the study. Section 4 presents the research, the results, and analysis, also discussing empirical findings and their implications. Finally, Section 5 concludes the study by summarising key insights, addressing limitations, and offering recommendations for small businesses and future research.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Literature Review</title>
   <p>The concept of money as a medium of exchange has evolved significantly over time. The use of coins, one of the earliest forms of currency, is said to have originated in China around 1000 BC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-43">
     The History of Money, 2023
    </xref>). Paper money, widely accepted as legal tender approximately 300 years ago, further transformed monetary transactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-10">
     Chakravorti, Chakravorti, &amp; Mazzotta, 2016
    </xref>). However, the advent of cashless transactions—payments without physical cash—has transcended traditional norms of economic exchange (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-14">
     Duignan, 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-18">
     Halldenius &amp; Petersén, 2024
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-22">
     Khando, Islam, &amp; Gao, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-25">
     McRea, 2024
    </xref>). The first wave of less-cash transactions can be traced to the introduction of bank checks and, later, credit cards in the 1950s. With the introduction of the Diner’s Club Card and American Express Card during this period, providers could charge transactional fees for customers and businesses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-16">
     Encyclopedia Brittanica, Experian, &amp; The Federal Reserve Bank, 2019
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Over time, technological advancement developed these cashless systems into what has come to be called a “cashless society.” A cashless society refers to a system where money dealings and transactions occur without using physical cash but with cards such as debit and credit cards, electronic money transfers, cryptocurrency, mobile wallets, and platforms such as PayPal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-14">
     Duignan, 2023
    </xref>). Although a completely cashless society is yet to be realised, the increasing use of these methods underscores the movement toward global digital payments. This movement is promoted by increased financial technology, improved smartphone access, and consumer demand for convenience. The road to a cashless economy is paved with several opportunities and challenges for small businesses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-23">
     Kireyev, 2017
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The literature review highlighted that the concept of a cashless society is one of the critical issues influencing economies, institutions, and individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-3">
     ANZ, 2024
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-5">
     Asamoah, 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-8">
     Berkimbayeva, 2019
    </xref>). Research on this topic remains fragmented, with recent studies exploring various dimensions of this phenomenon. This literature review synthesised data from 87 peer-reviewed journal articles, theses, government reports, and related material published between 2017 and 2024. The review identified gaps in existing research, emphasizing the need for further studies on the definition, benefits, drawbacks, prerequisites, and implications of a cashless society.</p>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Definition of a Cashless Society</title>
    <p>This study defines a cashless society based on prior research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-14">
      Duignan, 2023
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-18">
      Halldenius &amp; Petersén, 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-22">
      Khando, Islam, &amp; Gao, 2022
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-25">
      McRea, 2024
     </xref>). A cashless society can be understood as one in which financial transactions are made without physical cash but rely on electronic modes of transaction, such as credit or debit cards, online transfers, cryptocurrency, and mobile payment systems. According to the literature, no country has become entirely cashless; however, the rising usage of digital payment systems illustrates the global trend in this direction, propelled by government policies, financial sector strategies, and public demand.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Merits of a Cashless Society</title>
    <p>Literature elaborates on the merits of transitioning towards a cashless economy, highlighting advantages that are economic, operational, and social.</p>
    <p>Economic Efficiency: In a cashless economy, handling physical currency involves less friction, accelerating economic activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-13">
      Deora, 2018
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-34">
      Priyono, Moin, &amp; Putri, 2020
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-39">
      Santana, 2019
     </xref>). The cost of printing and distributing notes and coins is reduced, saving government expenditures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-15">
      Ekpeyong
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-15">
      , 2023
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-35">
      Rahman, Ismail, &amp; Bahri, 2020
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Transparency and Security: Digital transactions provide a traceable financial footprint, which helps combat corruption, fraud, and the circulation of counterfeit currency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-40">
      Lachlan Schomburgk, Belli, &amp; Hoffmann, 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-19">
      Hidayah et al., 2023
     </xref>). Enhanced security protocols associated with electronic payments reduce the risk of theft compared to physical cash (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-45">
      Thoughtlab
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-45">
      , 2018
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Convenience: Cashless systems facilitate convenience for businesses and consumers, as transactions can be easily made across borders without managing large amounts of physical cash (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-35">
      Rahman, Ismail, &amp; Bahri, 2020
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-39">
      Santana, 2019
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Financial Inclusion: Digital payment systems can enhance financial inclusion by bringing previously excluded populations into formal financial systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-15">
      Ekpeyong
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-15">
      , 2023
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-19">
      Hidayah et al., 2023
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Disadvantages of a Cashless Society</title>
    <p>There are significant challenges associated with a cashless society.</p>
    <p>Cybersecurity Risks: The increased use of digital payment systems exposes users to cybercrimes, such as hacking and identity theft (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-34">
      Priyono
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-34">
      , Moin, &amp; Putri, 2020
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-37">
      Raya &amp; Vargas, 2022
     </xref>). There are also concerns about data privacy and the potential misuse of personal financial information (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-19">
      Hidayah et al., 2023
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Infrastructure and Accessibility: Lack of access to digital infrastructure and the high costs of digital payment products hinder adoption, particularly in developing regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-32">
      Pasini, 2020
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-43">
      The History of Money, 2023
     </xref>). Digital illiteracy and technological exclusion of marginalized populations remain persistent challenges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-7">
      Basid
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-7">
      et al., 2023
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-27">
      Negreiro, 2020
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Economic Inequality: Many small businesses and informal sectors cannot adjust to cashless systems due to costs and infrastructure deficits in these economies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-5">
      Asamoah, 2021
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-29">
      Ong et al., 2023
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Reliability Concerns: Loss of internet connectivity and system failures may disrupt digital payment systems, potentially jeopardizing economic stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-13">
      Deora, 2018
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-24">
      Kitamura &amp; Kitamura, 2022
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Cultural and Psychological Factors: Attachment to cash as a familiar and tangible means of exchange encourages hesitation toward fully adopting cashless systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-44">
      The Mann-Whitney test, 2011
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Conditions Precedent for a Cashless Society</title>
    <p>Critical conditions precedent for a cashless society are identified in the following studies:</p>
    <p>Technological Infrastructure: A robust and ubiquitous digital infrastructure is necessary for electronic payment systems to function effectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-11">
      Chattopadhyay, Gulati, &amp; Bose, 2018
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-17">
      Fabris, 2019
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Public Awareness and Education: Educating the public about digital financial tools and their benefits is crucial for increasing adoption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-36">
      Rahman, Ismail, Bahri, &amp; Rahman, 2022
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-41">
      Shy, 2021
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Policy Support: Government policies must incentivize digital payment methods and address barriers such as cost and accessibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-26">
      Muhibudeen
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-26">
      &amp; Haladu, 2018
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-33">
      Pritchard, 2022
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Cybersecurity Measures: Strengthening cybersecurity frameworks and building public trust in digital systems are vital (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-6">
      Balakrishnan &amp; Shuib, 2021
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-12">
      Cohen, Rubinchik, &amp; Shami, 2019
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Universal Access: Affordable digital payment products should be universally accessible to prevent financial exclusion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-7">
      Basid
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-7">
      et al., 2023
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-31">
      Ozili, 2020
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Impacts of Cashless Society</title>
    <p>The movement toward a cashless society has widespread ramifications.</p>
    <p>Economic Impacts: Mobile banking usage has increased significantly in countries that have embraced cashless systems, resulting in greater financial inclusion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-5">
      Asamoah, 2021
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-21">
      Isah &amp; Babalola, 2019
     </xref>). However, it may negatively impact small businesses that rely heavily on cash transactions if adequate measures are not in place (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-30">
      Ong &amp; Chong, 2023
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Consumer Rights: Maintaining access to cash as an alternative safeguards consumer rights and provides a safety net during economic uncertainties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-37">
      Raya &amp; Vargas, 2022
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-39">
      Santana, 2019
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Social Equity: Cashless systems can help reduce inequality by promoting financial inclusion; however, they may exacerbate inequality if infrastructural and educational disparities are not simultaneously addressed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-20">
      Himberg
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-20">
      , 2023
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-34">
      Priyono, Moin, &amp; Putri, 2020
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Drivers of Cashless Societies</title>
    <p>Technological Innovations: Mobile payment systems, cryptocurrencies, and blockchain technologies are among the innovations driving cashless societies. Fintech startups play a key role in disrupting traditional banking systems and facilitating digital transactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-31">
      Ozili
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-31">
      , 2020
     </xref>). Similarly, widespread smartphone penetration and internet connectivity provide the necessary infrastructure for mobile payments to thrive.</p>
    <p>Government Policies: Governments worldwide have implemented policies to encourage cashless transactions. For example, India’s 2016 demonetisation policy aimed to curb corruption while promoting digital payments. Sweden has emerged as a frontrunner in the cashless movement, with policies that incentivize electronic transactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-4">
      Arvidsson, Hedman, &amp; Segendorf, 2017
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Consumer Behavior: Consumer preferences have shifted toward digital convenience. The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated this trend, as consumers avoided cash for hygiene reasons. Studies indicate a significant increase in digital payment adoption during the pandemic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-34">
      Priyono
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-34">
      , Moin, &amp; Putri, 2020
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_7">
    <title>2.7. Literature Gaps in Cashless Societies</title>
    <p>This literature review has identified the following key gaps in the existing body of research.</p>
    <p>Impact on Small Businesses: The literature lacks sufficient research on how small business owners cope with the transition to a cashless system and their specific challenges.</p>
    <p>Long-Term Socioeconomic Effects: There is a scarcity of studies on the long-term consequences of cashless systems on economic stability, consumer behaviour, and cultural norms.</p>
    <p>Regional Disparities: There are limited comparisons of the reasons behind the adoption of cashless services across different regions and socioeconomic backgrounds.</p>
    <p>Policy Effectiveness: Research on the effectiveness of policies designed to facilitate cashless adoption and overcome barriers is underdeveloped.</p>
    <p>The literature on cashless societies emphasises the complex interactions between technological, economic, and socio-political factors driving the transition to digital economies. While the benefits of a cashless society are significant, challenges such as cybersecurity, accessibility, and public trust remain. A holistic approach is needed to balance innovation with inclusivity and resilience.</p>
    <p>Research must focus on filling the gaps in understanding the impacts on small businesses and the long-term socioeconomic effects. Policymakers must also address the barriers vulnerable groups face, especially small businesses with limited resources, which are at greater risk in a cashless economy. Future empirical studies should focus on the adverse effects on small businesses to offer comprehensive insights into this transformation 2.2. Maintaining the Integrity of the Specifications.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Methodology</title>
   <p>The study tests the following hypothesis:</p>
   <p>Primary Hypothesis:</p>
   <p>Small businesses operating in cashless societies are better off.</p>
   <p>This hypothesis suggests that small businesses benefit from transitioning to or operating in societies where digital payment systems replace cash transactions. The hypothesis implies that the advantages of going cashless—such as improved efficiency, customer satisfaction, and potential sales growth—outweigh any challenges like transaction costs or technological barriers.</p>
   <p>Sub-Hypotheses:</p>
   <p>Hypothesis 1: Cashless societies increase transaction efficiency for small businesses.</p>
   <p>This hypothesis posits that cashless transactions save time and effort compared to handling cash. For example, businesses no longer need to count cash, manage change, or travel to the bank for deposits. Digital payments can also streamline record-keeping, improving financial tracking and accuracy.</p>
   <p>Hypothesis 2: Cashless societies increase customer satisfaction.</p>
   <p>This hypothesis assumes that customers prefer the convenience and speed of cashless payment options. Cashless transactions eliminate the need to carry cash, ensure smoother checkout processes, and may also offer added benefits like reward points or digital receipts.</p>
   <p>Hypothesis 3: Cashless societies do not increase costs associated with cashless transactions.</p>
   <p>This hypothesis addresses concerns about fees or charges linked to cashless payments (e.g., credit card transaction fees or payment processor charges). These costs either remain negligible or are offset by the benefits of going cashless, such as increased sales or operational efficiency.</p>
   <p>Hypothesis 4: Cashless societies increase sales.</p>
   <p>This hypothesis asserts that businesses see higher sales when offering cashless payment options. Customers might spend more when using credit/debit cards or digital wallets than cash, as they are less constrained by the physical limits of their money.</p>
   <p>Hypothesis 5: Small businesses are technologically prepared for cashless transactions.</p>
   <p>This hypothesis assumes that small businesses have access to and are equipped with the necessary infrastructure for cashless transactions, such as point-of-sale systems, card readers, or mobile payment solutions. It also implies that business owners are knowledgeable about using these technologies.</p>
   <p>Hypothesis 6: Laws governing cashless transactions support small businesses.</p>
   <p>This hypothesis suggests that cashless societies’ legal and regulatory environment is favorable to small businesses. Policies may ensure fair transaction fees, protect businesses from fraud, and promote the accessibility of cashless payment systems for smaller enterprises.</p>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Relationship Between Hypotheses</title>
    <p>The primary hypothesis is supported if the sub-hypotheses collectively hold. For instance Efficiency (H1) and customer satisfaction (H2) drive operational improvements. Low costs (H3) and increased sales (H4) contribute to financial benefits. Technological readiness (H5) and supportive laws (H6) ensure businesses can transition smoothly. Each sub-hypothesis highlights a specific aspect of the cashless transition and its impact on small businesses.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Primary Quantitative Data</title>
    <p>The data were collected directly from respondents through a structured online survey questionnaire. This suggests that the data are numerical or categorical, designed for statistical analysis.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Data Collection Method</title>
    <p>An online structured survey questionnaire comprising closed-ended questions, such as Likert scale, multiple-choice, and numeric response items, was used to collect data for this research. These questions were designed to generate quantitative data suitable for statistical testing. A total of 242 valid responses were collected.</p>
    <p>The sampling strategy employed was purposive sampling. Inclusion criteria required respondents to be owners or managers of small businesses.</p>
    <p>The nonparametric Mann-Whitney Rank test was used through SPSS to analyse the quantitative data. In addition to the Mann-Whitney Rank test, Cronbach’s test was performed to check the reliability and validity of the questionnaires as a research instrument.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Analysis Techniques</title>
    <p>Data analysis was conducted using SPSS. Cronbach’s alpha was applied to assess the reliability and validity of the survey instrument. The nonparametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was employed to evaluate distribution assumptions. Finally, the Mann-Whitney Rank test was used to test the null hypotheses and examine group differences.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Additional Data Visualisation</title>
    <p>Word Cloud: A word cloud is employed as a visual representation to highlight the most frequently occurring themes within responses to open-ended questions. This method facilitates the identification of key patterns and recurring concepts in qualitative data, allowing for a more intuitive and immediate understanding of prevalent themes.</p>
    <p>Excel-generated Graphs: Graphs, such as bar charts, are utilised to summarise the data, illustrate trends and display relationships between variables.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results and Discussions</title>
   <p>The results are presented in three sections. The first section presents the responses to three demographic questions: 1) What is your industry? 2) What method of cashless payments is mainly used by your customers? And 3) What percentage of your business transactions are cashless per day? These vital questions still need to be addressed in the current literature. The vitality of information on the type of industry lies in contextual relevance, ensuring that the information is relevant and applicable to specific sectors. Knowing the method of cashless payments is mainly used by customers aids the business in managing the cost of cashless payments, and it can improve the efficiency of the operations. Understating the percentage of business transactions that are cashless per day can provide insight into customer preferences and the trend toward cashless transactions.</p>
   <p>The second section presents the responses to the open-ended question of what challenges businesses have faced in transitioning to cashless transactions. This essential information can assist businesses in making informed decisions in operating in cashless societies.</p>
   <p>The third section presents the quantitative analysis and results. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney Rank test was used through SPSS to analyse the quantitative data. In addition to the Mann-Whitney Rank test, Cronbach’s test was performed to check the reliability and validity of the questionnaires as a research instrument.</p>
   <p>The word cloud shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref> was generated for the responses to the industry-type question. A word cloud is a visual representation of the frequency and/or importance of the words. The large and bold words signify the frequency of the words used in responses.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-"></xref>Figure 1. Word Cloud: Presenting responses to question on the type of industry.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1534861-rId13.jpeg?20251127045032" />
   </fig>
   <p>The word cloud indicates that the participants in this research belong to various industries. Education, technology, finance, and construction are prominent industries in the participants’ responses in this research. These findings may not be generalised to a broader population of small businesses due to the study’s limitations discussed in conclusion section. However, according to the word-cloud, the traditional industry, such as education, and the contemporary industry, such as technology, are both dealing with cashless societies.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref> shows the frequency of different payment methods used by customers. Debit and credit cards are the most popular methods of cashless payments, followed by bank transfers and other methods. The cryptocurrency method is the least used method of cashless payments. The results indicate that consumers prefer to use proven forms of cashless payments, such as debit and credit cards, instead of newer forms, such as cryptocurrency.</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-"></xref>Figure 2. Frequency of different payment methods used by customers.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1534861-rId14.jpeg?20251127045032" />
   </fig>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
     Figure 3
    </xref> shows the percentage distribution of cashless payments per day made by customers. The percentage range of cashless payments made by customers grows, demonstrating the trend towards adoption of cashless payments.</p>
   <p>The question of the challenges faced by businesses in adopting cashless payments is a central focus of this study. Responses from small business owners align with the pros and cons of cashless payments identified in the literature. For instance, businesses report issues such as transaction costs, technical difficulties in processing cashless payments, customer preferences for using cash, and cybersecurity concerns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-11">
     Chattopadhyay, Gulati, &amp; Bose, 2018
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-24">
     Kitamura &amp; Kitamura, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-28">
     Noman et al., 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-33">
     Pritchard, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-38">
     Rivera, 2019
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>While cashless transactions can reduce costs by eliminating the handling of physical currency, transitioning to such systems also improves security and operational efficiency while providing greater convenience for both businesses and consumers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-13">
     Deora, 2018
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-15">
     Ekpeyong, 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-24">
     Kitamura &amp; Kitamura, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-28">
     Noman et al., 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-33">
     Pritchard, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-36">
     Rahman, Ismail, Bahri, &amp; Rahman, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-39">
     Santana, 2019
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-45">
     Thoughtlab, 2018
    </xref>).</p>
   <fig id="fig3" position="float">
    <label>Figure 3</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-"></xref>Figure 3. Percentage of cashless payments per day.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1534861-rId15.jpeg?20251127045032" />
   </fig>
   <p>A Cronbach’s alpha test was conducted to assess the reliability and validity of the questionnaire used as a research instrument. The results, shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>, indicate a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.877, which exceeds the acceptable threshold of 0.70, confirming that the survey instrument is reliable and valid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-42">
     Tavakol
    </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-42">
     &amp; Dennick, 2011
    </xref>).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-"></xref>Table 1. Results of Cronbach’s test.</title>
    </caption>
   </table-wrap>
   <fig id="fig4" position="float">
    <label>Figure 4</label>
    <caption>
     <title>The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was conducted to assess the normality of the data. The significance value (p = .000) for each hypothesis is less than the alpha level of .05, indicating that the data are highly non-normal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-1">
       Centre for Multilevel Modelling, 2018
      </xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref> presents the results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for each hypothesis.Due to the significant deviation from normality indicated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Mann-Whitney test is deemed the suitable statistical method for this research.<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref> shows the results of the Mann-Whitney test for the six sub-hypotheses.For Hypothesis 1 (H1), the significance value (p = .001) is less than the alpha<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-"></xref>Table 2. Results of Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests.<p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1534861-rId17.jpeg?20251127045032" /></p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-"></xref>Table 3. The results of the Mann-Whitney test for the six sub-hypotheses.<p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1534861-rId18.jpeg?20251127045033" /></p>level of .05, indicating that H1 is supported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-1">
       Centre for Multilevel Modelling, 2018
      </xref>). This result suggests that transitioning to cashless systems can significantly reduce operational costs for small businesses and enhance their efficiency, thereby presenting a promising opportunity for the industry.For H2, the significant value (p = .001) is less than a significant (α) level of .05, then alternative hypothesis 1 is accepted, as shown in the following table. This means that customers may prefer cashless transactions and find it a convenient way of paying at small businesses.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1534861-rId16.jpeg?20251127045032" />
   </fig>
   <p>For H3, the significant value (p = .001) is less than a significant (α) level of .05, then alternative hypothesis 1 is accepted, as shown in the following table. This means that the benefits of transitioning to cashless for small businesses may outweigh any additional costs. However, this finding requires careful interpretation. While the statistical analysis supports the claim that cashless societies do not increase costs, the qualitative data highlights “high fees” as one of the most prominent challenges identified by small business owners. This apparent contradiction suggests that, although direct transaction fees are a burden, participants may perceive the broader benefits of cashless adoption—such as operational efficiency, faster transactions, improved security, and increased customer satisfaction—as sufficient to compensate for these costs. In other words, the net effect of going cashless is experienced as positive overall, even though the specific issue of high transaction fees remains a significant concern. Addressing this nuance is important, as it indicates that businesses evaluate costs not in isolation but relative to the perceived advantages gained from the transition. For H4, the significant value (p = .001) is less than a significant (α) level of .05, the alternative hypothesis 1 is accepted, as shown in the following table. This suggests that consumer spending is likely to surge due to the convenience of cashless transactions, potentially boosting the revenue of small businesses and paving the way for a prosperous future.</p>
   <p>For H5, the significant value (p = .001) is less than a significant (α) level of .05, then the alternative hypothesis 1 is accepted as shown in the following table. This indicates that many small businesses are already equipped with the necessary technology to facilitate cashless transactions, underscoring the industry’s preparedness for the transition and its potential for swift adoption.</p>
   <p>For H6, the significant value (p = .001) is less than a significant (α) level of .05, then alternative hypothesis 1 is accepted, as shown in the following table. This means that laws governing cashless transactions are in place and actively support small businesses, providing a secure legal framework for the transition.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
     Table 4
    </xref> summarizes the main hypothesis. Based on the above test, the alternative hypothesis is accepted. This finding indicates that in a cashless society, small businesses will benefit from increased business efficiency, customer satisfaction, increased revenue, and government support while maintaining manageable costs.</p>
   <p>To gain insight into the challenges small businesses face in transitioning to cashless transactions, the participants were asked to describe their challenges.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-"></xref>Table 4. The results of the Mann-Whitney test for the main hypothesis.</title>
    </caption>
   </table-wrap>
   <fig id="fig5" position="float">
    <label>Figure 5</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Thirty-seven participants answered this question. According to free sentiment analysis, too, nine participants made positive statements, and 28 participants made negative statements. These statements reflect small business owners’ experience transitioning to a cashless society. 28 out of 37 statements are negative, focusing on fees, technical problems, and compatibility challenges. The number of positive and negative counts was converted to percentiles.Despite being fewer in number, the positive responses underscore the potential benefits of cashless transactions. These benefits, such as convenience, increased customer satisfaction, and improved transaction speed, not only suggest areas for further exploration but also inspire optimism about the future of small businesses. These benefits signal promising opportunities that could be harnessed with the right policies and support systems in place.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-"></xref>The fact that 28 out of 37 participants expressed negative experiences underscores the significant struggles that small businesses face during this transition. This insight is crucial for policymakers and stakeholders to understand and address the challenges these businesses are dealing with. Common challenges identified are discussed below.High Fees: Many cashless transaction systems, such as credit card payments or mobile payment platforms, come with transaction fees. For small businesses operating on thin profit margins, these fees can significantly impact their bottom line.Technical Problems: Issues like unstable internet connectivity, hardware malfunctions, or lack of access to reliable point-of-sale (POS) systems not only add operational complexity but also underscore the need for better support for small businesses in this transition.Compatibility Challenges: Smaller businesses often struggle to integrate various cashless payment platforms with their existing systems. This may result in inefficiencies or the need to invest in additional technology.The findings reflect that small businesses generally see the transition to a cashless society as burdensome than beneficial. This may indicate insufficient infrastructure or support tailored to their needs. Furthermore, these barriers impact small businesses’ operational efficiency and threaten their financial viability, particularly for those operating on slim profit margins.<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref> shows the positive and negative statements made by the participants and their corresponding percentages.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147627-"></xref>Table 5. Positive and negative statements made by the participants and their corresponding percentages.<p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1534861-rId20.jpeg?20251127045032" /></p></title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1534861-rId19.jpeg?20251127045033" />
   </fig>
   <p>A noteworthy finding in this study is the discrepancy between the quantitative and qualitative results. On the one hand, all six quantitative hypotheses were supported, reinforcing the idea that cashless transactions enhance efficiency, revenue, satisfaction, and preparedness. On the other hand, the majority of qualitative comments 28 out of 37 were negative, stressing high transaction fees, technical barriers, and integration challenges.</p>
   <p>One explanation for this divergence is the nature of structured versus open-ended questioning. In structured survey items, participants are more likely to agree with general statements about efficiency, convenience, and satisfaction, particularly as these reflect perceived long-term benefits. However, when asked to describe their experiences in their own words, participants focused more on the immediate, tangible difficulties they encounter in daily operations. This suggests that while business owners recognize the theoretical advantages of cashless systems, the practical challenges weigh more heavily on their lived experiences.</p>
   <p>This duality highlights the complexity of transitioning to cashless systems. Small businesses may conceptually affirm the benefits but remain constrained by real-world barriers that hinder their ability to fully realize those benefits. The implication is that policymakers and financial service providers must not only promote the macro-level advantages of cashless economies but also directly address micro-level operational issues, such as transaction costs, infrastructure support, and system integration, to align business owners’ perceptions with their lived realities.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion &amp; Future Directions</title>
   <p>This study was designed to determine the effect of a cashless society on the operation of small businesses, as small businesses play a vital role in contributing to the gross domestic product (GDP). The findings suggest that in a cashless society, small businesses can have the advantages of operational efficiency, higher customer satisfaction resulting from convenient cashless payments, increased revenue resulting from increased volume of transactions, government support, and keeping additional costs under control. These results suggest that small businesses operating in cashless societies are better off. The empirical findings in this study provide a new understanding of how small business owners perceive cashless societies. The most important limitation of this study is that it covered small businesses in the context of physical existence, not online. This research has thrown up many questions that need further investigation. For example, how do cashless societies impact the operation of medium to large and online businesses?</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Recommendations</title>
   <p>This study concludes with the following recommendations for Small Businesses:</p>
   <p>Adopt Cashless Payment Systems: Small business owners should prioritize integrating cashless payment systems to enhance operational efficiency and meet customer expectations for convenience.</p>
   <p>Leverage Government Support: Businesses should actively seek out and utilize government incentives, grants, and training programs to support the transition to cashless operations.</p>
   <p>Monitor Financial Performance: Regularly assess the impact of cashless transactions on revenue and operational costs to identify areas for further optimization.</p>
   <p>For Small Businesses:</p>
   <p>For Policymakers and Governments:</p>
   <p>For Technology Providers:</p>
   <p>For Researchers:</p>
   <p>Conduct further studies to understand the challenges and opportunities cashless societies present to online businesses, medium-sized businesses, and large enterprises.</p>
   <p>Investigate the socio-economic impacts of cashless transitions in different regional and cultural contexts to develop more inclusive policies and strategies.</p>
   <p>Explore customer perspectives to complement this study’s business-focused findings and offer a more comprehensive understanding of cashless societies.</p>
   <p>These recommendations aim to guide key stakeholders in maximizing the benefits of cashless societies for small businesses while addressing potential challenges.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     (2018). Centre for Multilevel Modelling Checking for Normality Practical. &gt;https://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/media/research/ba-teaching-ebooks/pdf/Normality%20-%20Practical.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     (2018). Centre for Multilevel Modelling Mann Whitney Test Practical. &gt;https://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/media/research/ba-teaching-ebooks/pdf/Mann%20Whitney%20-%20Practical.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     ANZ (2024). The Digital Payment Revolution: What Businesses Need to Know. ANZ Institutional Insights. &gt;https://www.anz.com/institutional/insights/articles/2024-10/the-digital-payment-revolution/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Arvidsson, N., Hedman, J.,&amp;Segendorf, B. (2017). Cashless Society: When Will Merchants Stop Accepting Cash in Sweden—A Research Model. In S. Feuerriegel,&amp;D. Neumann (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (pp. 105-113). Springer International Publishing. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52764-2_8 &gt;https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/57323370/jonas_hedman_et_al_cashless_society_acceptedversion.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Asamoah, C. (2021). The Economic Importance of Cashless Society. &gt;https://www.idosr.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/IDOSR-JBESS-61-11-16-2021.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Balakrishnan, V.,&amp;Shuib, N. L. M. (2021). Drivers and Inhibitors for Digital Payment Adoption Using the Cashless Society Readiness-Adoption Model in Malaysia. Technology in Society, 65, Article 101554. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101554
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Basid, A, Selvam, M., Raja, M., Santhoshkumar, S.,&amp;Parayitam, S. (2023). Understanding the Determinants of Fintech Adoption: Integrating UTAUT2 with Trust Theoretic Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16, Article 505. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16120505
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Berkimbayeva, A. (2019). Transition to a Cashless Society: Impact on Economic Activity. &gt;https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/107724/120330742.pdf?sequence=1 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Busse, N. (2023). The Impact of Cashless Societies on Business and Society. &gt;https://essay.utwente.nl/95395/1/Busse_BA_BMS_Faculty.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chakravorti, B., Chakravorti, R. S.,&amp;Mazzotta, B. (2016). The Countries That Would Profit Most from a Cashless World. &gt;https://hbr.org/2016/05/the-countries-that-would-profit-most-from-a-cashless-world?utm_source=chatgpt.com 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chattopadhyay, S., Gulati, P.,&amp;Bose, I. (2018). Awareness and Participation of Small Retail Businesses in Cashless Transactions: An Empirical Study. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 6, 209-225. &gt;https://doi.org/10.25019/mdke/6.2.02 &gt;https://ideas.repec.org/a/nup/jrmdke/v6y2018i2209-225.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cohen, N., Rubinchik, A.,&amp;Shami, L. (2019). Towards a Cashless Economy: Economic and Socio-Political Implications. European Journal of Political Economy, 61, Article 101820. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.101820
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Deora, M. (2018). A Study on Impact of Cashless Economy on Banking and Finance. &gt;https://www.inspirajournals.com/uploads/Issues/2019780645.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Duignan, B. (2023). What Is a Cashless Society and How Does It Work? &gt;https://www.britannica.com/story/what-is-a-cashless-society-and-how-does-it-work 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ekpeyong, P. (2023). Analysis of Cashless Economy, Demand for Money and Price Determination: A Possibility for Implementation in Nigeria. MPRA Paper 117823, University Library of Munich. &gt;https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117823/1/CASHLESS%20POLICY.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Encyclopedia Brittanica, Experian, The Federal Reserve Bank. (2019). The History of Credit Cards.&gt;https://illinoistreasurergovprod.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/twocms/media/doc/6-8.6.2%20rfi%20history%20of%20credit%20cards.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fabris, N. (2019). Cashless Society—The Future of Money or a Utopia? Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 8, 53-66. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2019-0003 &gt;https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/jcbtp-2019-0003?utm_source=chatgpt.com 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Halldenius, L.,&amp;Petersén, M. (2024). Sweden Is a Nearly Cashless Society—Here’s How It Affects People Who Are Left Out. The Conversation. &gt;https://portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/sweden-is-a-nearly-cashless-society-heres-how-it-affects-people-w/?utm_source=chatgpt.com 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hidayah, N., Waspada, I.,&amp;Sari, M. (2023). The Dynamics of Cashless Society: A Systematic Review. Advanced International Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (AIJBES), 5, 7-16. &gt;https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.515002 &gt;https://gaexcellence.com/index.php/aijbes/article/view/279?utm_source=chatgpt.com 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Himberg, H, C. (2023). Cashless Societies: The Impact on Spending Habits in Australia and the Nordic Countries. &gt;https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/802700 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Isah, H. A.,&amp;Babalola, A. (2019). Impact of Cashless Economic Policy and Financial Inclusiveness in Nigeria: An Empirical Investigation. &gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359442685_Impact_of_Cashless_Economic_Policy_and_Financial_Inclusiveness_in_Nigeria_An_Empirical_Investigation?utm_source=chatgpt.com 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Khando, K., Islam, M. S.,&amp;Gao, S. (2022). The Emerging Technologies of Digital Payments and Associated Challenges: A Systematic Literature Review. Future Internet, 15, Article 21. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010021
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kireyev, A. (2017). The Macroeconomics of De-Cashing. IMF Working Papers, 17, 26. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475589252.001 &gt;https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2017/03/27/The-Macroeconomics-of-De-Cashing-44768 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kitamura, Y.,&amp;Kitamura, Y. (2022). Quest for Good Money: Past, Present and Future (1st ed.). Springer. &gt;https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-19-5591-4#:~:text=About%20this%20book,value%20and%20unit%20of%20account 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     McRea, K. (2024). Examining the Accessibility of Digital Payment: The Rise of Socioeconomic Inequality Due to the Cashless Revolution. WWU Honors College Senior Projects. &gt;https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/798/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Muhibudeen, L.,&amp;Haladu, A. (2018). The Impact of Cashless Policy Tools on Money Circulating Outside Nigerian Banks. In R. Said, N. Mohd Sidek, Z. Azhar,&amp;K. Anuar Kamarudin (Eds.), State-of-the-Art Theories and Empirical Evidence (pp. 227-238). Springer. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6926-0_14
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Negreiro, M. (2020). The Rise of E-Commerce and the Cashless Society. &gt;https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/649341/EPRS_BRI(2020)649341_EN.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Noman, M., Maydybura, A., Channa, K, A., Wong, W, K.,&amp;Chang, B, H. (2023). Impact of Cashless Bank Payments on Economic Growth: Evidence from G7 Countries. Advances in Decision Sciences, 27, 1-22. &gt;https://ideas.repec.org/a/aag/wpaper/v27y2023i1p1-22.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ong, A., Hanafi, M., Muhammad, Y., Ibrahim, Y., Syafikah, N. (2023). Use and Behavioral Intention Using Digital Payment Systems among Rural Residents: Extending the UTAUT-2 Model. Technology in Society, 74, Article 102305. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102305 &gt;https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v74y2023ics0160791x23001100.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ong, H, B., Chong, L, L. (2023). The Effect of Cashless Payments on the Internet and Mobile Banking. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 28, 178-188. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-022-00145-0 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ozili, P. K. (2020). Theories of Financial Inclusion. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-23. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3526548 &gt;https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3526548 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pasini, F, L. (2020). Is it a Wonderful Life? Cashless Societies and Monetary Exclusion. Review of Banking and Financial Law, 40, 99 p. &gt;https://ssrn.com/abstract=3774865 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pritchard, J. (2022). The Pros and Cons of a Cashless Society: What Do We Gain and Lose When Cash Is No Longer King? &gt;https://www.thebalancemoney.com/pros-and-cons-of-moving-to-a-cashless-society-4160702 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Priyono, A., Moin, A.,&amp;Putri, V. N. A. O. (2020). Identifying Digital Transformation Paths in the Business Model of SMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6, Article 104. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040104
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rahman, M., Ismail, I.,&amp;Bahri, S. (2020). Analysing Consumer Adoption of Cashless Payment in Malaysia. Digital Business, 1, Article 100004. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rahman, M., Ismail, I., Bahri, S.,&amp;Rahman, M. K. (2022). An Empirical Analysis of Cashless Payment Systems for Business Transactions. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8, Article 213. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040213
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Raya, J. M.,&amp;Vargas, C. (2022). How to Become a Cashless Economy and What Are the Determinants of Eliminating Cash. Journal of Applied Economics, 25, 543-562. &gt;https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15140326.2022.2052000 &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2022.2052000
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rivera, J. W. (2019). Potential Negative Effects of a Cashless Society. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 22, 350-358. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/jmlc-04-2018-0035
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Santana, S. (2019). Is the U.S. on Its Way to Becoming a Cashless Society? &gt;https://hbr.org/2019/07/is-the-u-s-on-its-way-to-becoming-a-cashless-society 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schomburgk, L., Belli, A.,&amp;Hoffmann, A. O. I. (2024). Less Cash, More Splash? A Meta-Analysis on the Cashless Effect. Journal of Retailing, 100, 382-403. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2024.05.003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shy, O. (2021). Cashless Stores and Cash Users. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43, 622-638. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.02.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tavakol, M.,&amp;Dennick, R. (2011). Making Sense of Cronbach’s Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     The History of Money (2023). &gt;https://www.forex.com/en-au/news-and-analysis/history-of-money/#:~:text=There%20is%20evidence%20of%20money 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     The Mann-Whitney Test (2021). &gt;https://users.sussex.ac.uk/~grahamh/RM1web/MannWhitneyHandout%202011.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Thoughtlab, R. (2018). Economic Benefits of Going Cashless. Payments Network Malaysia (PayNet). &gt;https://paynet.my/attachments/publications/Economic-Benefits-of-Going-Cashless.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147627-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Umar, H., Musalli, N.,&amp;Yusuf, Y. (2023). Impact of Cashless Policy on the Performance of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Bauchi Metropolis. &gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/836038057/cashless-policy
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>