<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojce
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Civil Engineering
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2164-3164
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2164-3172
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojce.2025.154042
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojce-147518
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Engineering
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Comparative Geotechnical Analysis of the Properties of Sands from the Major Sandpits in the West Region of Cameroon
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Penka Jules
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bertrand
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Wetka Tchoupe Ulrich Parfait
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Lelong
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nkibeu Jean
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bertin
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aResearch Unit of Civil Engineering and Architecture, National Higher Polytechnic Institute of Bamenda, University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, National Advanced School of Engineering, The University of Yaoundé 1, Yaounde, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     30
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    04
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    771
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    785
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      26,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      23,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      23,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Sandpits produce sands of different properties, based on the nature of the weathered mother rocks and sand quality directly affects the performance, durability and functionality of products and processes in construction. A comparative analysis was done on the sandpits in the Noun, Mifi, Hauts Plateaux and Koung-Khi Divisions of the West region to assess the geotechnical characteristics and potential uses of the various sands in construction for sustainable infrastructural development. This comparative analysis consisted of identifying and locating the major sandpits in the West region of Cameroon, determining the geotechnical properties of the various sands, and classifying the various sands to determine their potential uses in construction. The geotechnical testing of the sands was carried out in accordance with AFNOR, EN, and ISO standards, whereas the classification of the sands was performed according to EN, ISO, and ASTM standards. The Noun, Mifi, Baleng, Batié and Bandjoun sand had natural moisture content of 12.90%, 12.10%, 9.50%, 11.42% and 6.98% respectively. From the grain size analysis, the coefficient of uniformity (Cu) and curvature (Cc) of the sands were 2.43 and 0.93, 2.71 and 0.83, 12.86 and 0.84, 8.28 and 1.74, 12.50 and 1.45 respectively. The fineness moduli (FM) obtained were 2.43, 2.40, 3.27, 3.78 and 2.96 respectively. The sands had sand equivalent (SE) of 93.15%, 86.65%, 53.80%, 78.60% and 94.90% respectively. The specific gravities obtained were 2.586, 2.394, 2.471, 2.474 and 2.557 g/cm
    <sup>3</sup> respectively. The apparent densities were 1.516, 1.456, 1.713, 1.577 and 1.631 g/cm
    <sup>3</sup> respectively. The compressive strengths of the formulated B25 concrete (That is a concrete designed to achieve a characteristic compressive strength of 25 MPa at 28 days) obtained at 28 days for the various sands were 23.19, 22.32, 20.14, 25.23 and 33.62 MPa respectively. The classification of the various sands according to the USCS showed that the Batié and Bandjoun sand are well graded (SW) while the Noun, Mifi, and Baleng sand are poorly graded (SP). The Batié and Bandjoun sand gave the desired resistance at 28 days, therefore, these sands are good for concrete production. The Noun, Mifi and Baleng sand did not give the desired resistance at 28 days due to their poor gradation and can only be used for light structural applications (15 to 20 MPa). 
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Sands
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Analysis
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Properties
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Classification
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Applications
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Sandpits are of great importance in construction and infrastructure development because they provide sand which is a crucial natural resource (material) in the construction industry and plays a vital role in infrastructure development. Sand is a key component of concrete, which is the most widely used construction material worldwide. It provides bulk, strength, and workability to the concrete mix. Silt-free and well-graded sand is essential for producing high-quality concrete with the desired strength and durability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. Sand is used in various aspects of building construction, such as masonry work, plastering, and rendering. It provides a suitable bedding material for laying bricks, blocks, and stones, ensuring stability and structural integrity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Sand is also used in asphalt production for road construction. It contributes to the stability, strength, and durability of asphalt mixtures. Properly graded sand helps to improve the performance and longevity of asphalt pavements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-3">
     [3]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Sand quality directly affects the properties and performance of construction materials like concrete and asphalt. By studying sand quality, engineers can determine the suitability of local sand for construction purposes. The quality of sand used in construction also influences the structural integrity of buildings, roads, bridges, and other infrastructure. Poor-quality sand can lead to reduced strength, increased porosity, and higher vulnerability to cracking, settlement, or structural failures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. This information helps in selecting appropriate construction materials, ensuring the safety, durability, and longevity of infrastructure projects in the region.</p>
   <p>Understanding the sand quality in the region helps in assessing the availability and sustainability of this important construction material. By studying factors such as grain size distribution, silt and clay content, and density, engineers can estimate the available quantity of suitable sand and plan resource management strategies accordingly. Sand is a critical resource in the construction industry, and constraints on its availability or quality can increase costs and affect project feasibility <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. Local sourcing of sand reduces transportation costs and promotes regional development. By studying sand quality, policymakers and contractors can make informed decisions on sourcing sand locally or from other regions, taking into account cost-effectiveness and the overall economic impact on the West region.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Identification and Location of the Major Sandpits</title>
    <p>The identification and location of the major sandpits in the region was done mainly through inquiries from contractors, builders and quarry workers in the areas. The sandpits (sources) identified were the Noun sandpit, Mifi sandpit, Baleng quarry, Batié quarry and the Bandjoun quarry. A mobile GPS was used to record the geographical coordinates and the ArcMap software was used to bring out the map of the location of the sandpits.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Sampling</title>
    <p>At each sandpit, samples were collected from just removed sand placed in hips beside the pit and the samples were collected at different spots from the hips to ensure the samples were representative of the overall sand deposit. Twenty (20) litres of sand were collected from each pit and placed in labeled bags. A small portion of each sample was then placed in an airtight plastic container to prevent moisture loss for the determination of moisture content. The samples were then transported from the pits to the geotechnical laboratory for testing and analysis.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Geotechnical Properties of the Sand Samples</title>
    <p>Laboratory tests and analysis were conducted on the sand samples collected from the various sandpits to determine their geotechnical properties. The standard geotechnical testing methods that were employed to determine these properties included the natural moisture content, grain size analysis, specific gravity, apparent density, and sand equivalent test. The requirements, procedure and analysis for the various tests followed established French Norm (AFNOR), European Standards (EN), and equivalent International Standards (ISO) to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the results. The geotechnical analysis was carried out at the Société BUNS laboratory at Santa, Mezam Division, working on the rehabilitation of the Babadjou-Bamenda road.</p>
    <p>Quartering was done at the start of every test conducted to ensure accuracy. Quartering is a technique in which a representative sample is reduced to a convenient size for laboratory tests. It ensures that the sample is reduced to a convenient quantity having all the representatives of the material. The NF EN 932-1 standard outlines the methods for sampling including the quartering method.</p>
    <p>The natural moisture content was determined according to NF P94-050, the grain size distribution and finesse modulus (FM) according to NF P94-056, the specific gravity according to NF P 94-054, the apparent density according to NF EN ISO 17892-2, and the sand equivalent (SE) according to NF EN 933-81.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Concrete Formulation</title>
    <p>Since the fineness modulus is an important parameter in concrete mix design, concrete was formulated using the various sands to directly evaluate their performance in practical applications. This approach allowed the assessment of how the fineness modulus reflects the actual quality and suitability of each sand for concrete production. Concrete with characteristics resistance of 25 MPa at 28 days (C25 class of concrete) was formulated using the Dreux-Gorisse method and the NF P18-305 which provides the guidelines for the production and conformity of concrete. Dreux-Gorisse method permits to determine the optimal quantities of materials (water, E; cement, C; sand, S; fine gravel, g; coarse gravel, G) necessary for the confection of one metre cube of concrete in accordance with the specifications. The concrete dosage with the different sands was 350 Kg/m<sup>3</sup> with sand to gravel ratio of 1:2 in general. The testing of the concrete was done according to NF EN 12390 which provides guidelines for the curing and preparation of concrete specimens for compressive strength testing.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Classification of the Sands</title>
    <p>The classification of the various sands was done following the limits specified by the EN, ISO, and ASTM. The key parameters considered for the classification include grain size distribution, finesse modulus, specific gravity and sand equivalent.</p>
    <p>From the grain size analysis, depending on the gradation, sands can be classified as poorly or uniformly graded (short range of sizes) and well graded (good range of sizes). The coefficient of uniformity Cu and curvature Cc provide quantitative information about the gradation and particle size distribution of the sands according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-6">
      [6]
     </xref>. Sand with Cu &gt; 4 is well graded and Cu &lt; 4 is poorly or uniformly graded, while sand with 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3 is well graded and Cc &lt; 1 and Cc &gt; 3 is poorly graded.</p>
    <p>The fineness modulus (FM) is a numerical value that provides a measure of the coarseness or fineness of a sand or aggregate material. It is calculated by adding the cumulative percentages retained on a series of standard sieves and dividing the sum by 100. The specific sieves for calculating fineness modulus of sand as defined in the AFNOR standards are 0.16 mm, 0.315 mm, 0.63 mm, 1.25 mm, 2.5 mm, and 5 mm concrete. The classification of sands based on fineness modulus according <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-7">
      [7]
     </xref> is as follows:</p>
    <p>The sand equivalent (SE) classification is an important consideration in the selection and quality control of sand used in concrete, mortar and other construction materials as it helps ensure the desired performance and consistency of the final product. The sand equivalent is a measure of the relative proportion of fine dust or clay-like materials in the sand. According to the EN ISO 14688-2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-7">
      [7]
     </xref> standard, the classification of sand based on sand equivalent (SE) is as follows:</p>
    <p>The sand equivalent classification provides information about the cleanliness and quality of the sand, which can impact the performance of concrete and other construction materials. Very low and low SE sands have a higher content of fine, clay-like materials, which can negatively affect concrete workability, strength, and durability. Medium SE sands have a balanced amount of fine materials, making them suitable for general construction purposes. High and very high SE sands have a low content of fine materials, resulting in cleaner and higher-quality sand that is preferred for more demanding applications.</p>
    <p>The specific gravity is an important parameter in the classification of sand, as it provides information about the density and composition of the sand particles, which can affect the properties and performance of the material in various applications. This classification system helps engineers and construction professionals to select the appropriate sand for their specific requirements, such as concrete production, soil stabilization, or fill material, based on the desired density and particle characteristics. According to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-7">
      [7]
     </xref> standard, the classification of sand based on specific gravity is as follows:</p>
    <p>The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) uses a two-letter classification system to identify materials. The first letter represents the broad category (G for gravel, S for sand, M for silt and C for clay), and the second letter represents the gradation (W for well-graded, P for poorly-graded, M for silty and C for clayey). The classification of sands in the USCS is primarily based on the gradation and the amount of fines. In general, a material is considered as sand when 50% or more of coarse fraction is smaller than Number 4 (4.75 mm) sieve size. The USCS classifies sands into the following main categories:</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results and Discussions</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Identification and Location of the Major Sandpits</title>
    <p>The Noun sand is sourced from the Noun River basin in Manki II, known locally as the Mvi River, in the Malantouen Subdivision of the Noun Division. The sand source, called Kougbamé in the local language, is located about 3 km from the National Road N6. This sand, derived from alluvial deposits, is fine and rounded due to prolonged water transport, which explains its relatively poor grading and lower strength performance in concrete.</p>
    <p>The Mifi sand, also referred to as black sand because of its dark coloration, is obtained from the alluvial deposits along the Mifi River near Boya and Ndjinga in the Bafoussam II Subdivision. The river expands during the rainy season, making access difficult. Like Noun sand, its alluvial origin results in smooth, rounded particles that reduce inter-particle friction and thus the mechanical strength of concrete.</p>
    <p>The Baleng sand originates from the highlands of Sansang in Baleng, the chief town of Bafoussam II Subdivision, approximately 17 km from Baleng town. The highlands consist primarily of andesite rock masses that are manually excavated and sieved. The resulting sand has more angular particles and a better grain distribution, enhancing interlocking and mechanical resistance compared to river sands.</p>
    <p>The Batié sand is extracted from mountainous areas in Bachepan, Batié Subdivision, Hauts Plateaux Division, about 10 km from Batié town and 1 km off the National Road N5. The parent material is mainly granite with silica and feldspar components. This geological origin produces coarse, angular, and well-graded sand, which contributes to its excellent performance in structural concrete.</p>
    <p>The Bandjoun sand comes from the Bandjoun quarry, a basaltic rock deposit in the Koung-Khi Division. The basaltic rocks are blasted and crushed mechanically to produce the sand. Owing to its crushed, angular nature and dense mineral composition, the Bandjoun sand exhibits superior strength characteristics and grading, making it particularly suitable for high-quality concrete production.</p>
    <p>A map showing the locations of the various sandpits is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Figure 1. Map showing the location of the various sandpits.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1882103-rId15.jpeg?20251126094154" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Geotechnical Properties and Classification of the Sands</title>
    <p>The natural moisture content of the sands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>) ranged from 6.98% to 12.90%, with Bandjoun sand having the lowest and Noun sand having the highest. The range is slightly different from that of the North West sands (8.07% to 15.17%) as investigated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-8">
      [8]
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Figure 2. Natural moisture content of the various sands.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1882103-rId16.jpeg?20251126094155" />
    </fig>
    <p>The coefficient of uniformity (Cu) and curvature (Cc) of the sands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>) obtained from: grain size distribution curves of the various sands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>) ranged</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Figure 3. Coefficients of uniformity (Cᵤ) and curvature (Cc) for the sand samples.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1882103-rId17.jpeg?20251126094156" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Figure 4. Grain size distribution curves of the various sands.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1882103-rId18.jpeg?20251126094156" />
    </fig>
    <p>from 2.43 to 12.86 and 0.83 to 1.74 respectively. Noun sand had the lowest coefficient of uniformity and Baleng sand had the highest, while Mifi sand had the lowest coefficient of curvature and Batié sand had the highest. According to the USCS, Batié and Bandjoun sand were classified as well graded (SW) with Bandjoun sand having a relative amount of fines (silt) similar to studies carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-9">
      [9]
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-10">
      [10]
     </xref>. Noun, Mifi and Baleng sands were classified as poorly graded (SP) with Baleng sand having a relative amount of fines (silt) similar to studies carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-11">
      [11]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-12">
      [12]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The fineness modulus of the sands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>) ranged from 2.40 to 3.78, with Mifi sand having the lowest and Batié sand having the highest. This range is wider than that of the North West sands (2.63 to 2.93) as investigated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-8">
      [8]
     </xref>, due to the mixture of river and quarry sands in the West region. Studies carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-12">
      [12]
     </xref> reported a fineness modulus of 2.35 for Mifi sand which is slightly different from 2.40 obtained. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-9">
      [9]
     </xref> had a fineness modulus ranging from 2.30 to 2.45 for Batié sand which is different from 3.78 obtained. This difference could be as a result of the improvement in the gradation of the quarry sand over time. From the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-7">
      [7]
     </xref> classification (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>), all the sands are coarse grained sands which are suitable for structural applications, where higher strength and durability are required.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Figure 5. Fineness modulus of the various sands.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1882103-rId19.jpeg?20251126094156" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Table 1. Classification of the various sands according to fineness modulus.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Sand</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">PCR</p><p style="text-align:center">0.16</p><p style="text-align:center">mm</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">PCR</p><p style="text-align:center">0.315</p><p style="text-align:center">mm</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">PCR</p><p style="text-align:center">0.63</p><p style="text-align:center">mm</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">PCR</p><p style="text-align:center">1.25</p><p style="text-align:center">mm</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">PCR</p><p style="text-align:center">2.5</p><p style="text-align:center">mm</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.09%"><p style="text-align:center">PCR</p><p style="text-align:center">5</p><p style="text-align:center">mm</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Fineness Modulus (FM)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Classification</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Noun</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">96.1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">85.2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">42.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">14.3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.4</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.8</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">2.43</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Coarse sand</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Mifi</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">96.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">78.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">41.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">17.8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">5.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">2.40</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Coarse sand</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Baleng</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">87.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">79.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">63.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">49.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">31.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.09%"><p style="text-align:center">14.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">3.27</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Coarse sand</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Batié</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">93.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">89.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">79.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">66.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">39.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.09%"><p style="text-align:center">9.8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">3.78</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Coarse sand</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Bandjoun</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">86.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">79.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">65.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">48.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.58%"><p style="text-align:center">15.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">2.96</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Coarse sand</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The specific gravity of the sands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>) ranged from 2.394 to 2.586 g/cm<sup>3</sup> with Mifi having the lowest and Noun sand having the highest. This range is similar to that of the North West sands (2.486 to 2.548 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) as determined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-8">
      [8]
     </xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-12">
      [12]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-13">
      [13]
     </xref> had 2.64 for Mifi and 2.65 g/cm<sup>3</sup> for Noun sand respectively. Based on the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-7">
      [7]
     </xref> standard, all the sands had low specific gravity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>) and would produce concrete of relatively low density and moderate strength, suitable for general-purpose.</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Figure 6. Specific gravity of the various sands.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1882103-rId20.jpeg?20251126094156" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Table 2. Classification of the various sands according to specific gravity.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Sand</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Specific Gravity (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Classification</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Noun</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2.586</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Low specific gravity</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Mifi</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2.394</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Low specific gravity</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Baleng</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2.471</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Low specific gravity</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Batié</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2.474</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Low specific gravity</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Bandjoun</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">2.557</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Low specific gravity</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The apparent densities of the sands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>) ranged from 1.456 to 1.713 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, with Mifi sand showing the lowest value and Baleng sand the highest. These variations can be attributed to differences in particle size distribution, mineral composition, and particle shape among the samples. Sands composed of heavier minerals or more compact, angular grains tend to exhibit higher apparent densities compared to those with lighter minerals or more rounded particles. Apparent density is a key geotechnical parameter that directly influences both material handling and concrete performance. It is particularly useful in estimating the bulk weight of aggregates during batching and storage. In concrete production, sands with higher apparent density generally contribute to denser mixes, resulting in improved compressive strength and reduced voids. Conversely, sands with lower apparent density yield lighter concretes, which can be advantageous in non-load-bearing or lightweight applications where reduced self-weight is desired. The apparent density values obtained in this study fall within the typical range of 1.4 - 1.8 g/cm<sup>3</sup> for natural sands used in construction, indicating that all the sands investigated are suitable for practical use, with variations reflecting their geological origin and degree of compaction.</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Figure 7. Apparent density of various sands.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1882103-rId21.jpeg?20251126094157" />
    </fig>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>The sand equivalent of the sands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref>) ranged from 53.80% to 94.90% with Baleng having the lowest and Bandjoun sand having the highest. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-8">
      [8]
     </xref> reported a range of 65.20% to 91.46% for the North West sands and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-10">
      [10]
     </xref> had 85% for Bandjoun sand. The cleanliness of the sands ranged from dirty to very clean according to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-7">
      [7]
     </xref> standard (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>). Very low and Low SE sands have a higher content of fine, clay-like materials, which can negatively affect concrete workability, strength, and durability. Medium SE sands have a balanced amount of fine materials, making them suitable for general construction purposes. High and very high SE sands have a low content of fine materials, resulting in cleaner and higher-quality sand that is preferred for more demanding applications.</p>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Figure 8. Sand equivalent of the various sands.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1882103-rId22.jpeg?20251126094157" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Table 3. Classification of the various sands according to sand equivalent.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Sand</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Sand Equivalent</p><p style="text-align:center">(%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Classification</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Noun</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">93.15</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Very clean</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Mifi</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">86.65</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Clean</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Baleng</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">53.80</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Dirty</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Batié</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">78.60</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Clean</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Bandjoun</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.09%"><p style="text-align:center">94.90</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Very clean</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>As seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>, according to the USCS, Batié and Bandjoun sand were classified as well graded (SW: Cu &gt; 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3) with Bandjoun sand having a relative amount of fine silt (SM). This is similar to studies carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-9">
      [9]
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-10">
      [10]
     </xref>. Noun, Mifi and Baleng sands were classified as poorly graded (SP: Cu &lt; 4 and 1 ≥ Cc ≥ 3) with Baleng sand having a relative amount of fine silt (SM) which is similar to studies carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-11">
      [11]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-12">
      [12]
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Table 4. Classification of the various sands according to the USCS.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.75%"><p style="text-align:center">Sand</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Cu</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.73%"><p style="text-align:center">Cc</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="46.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentage Passing the 0.08 mm Sieve</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">Classification</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.75%"><p style="text-align:center">Noun</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.79%"><p style="text-align:center">2.43</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.73%"><p style="text-align:center">0.93</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="46.84%"><p style="text-align:center">1.7</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">SP</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.75%"><p style="text-align:center">Mifi</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.79%"><p style="text-align:center">2.71</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.73%"><p style="text-align:center">0.83</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.84%"><p style="text-align:center">1.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">SP</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.75%"><p style="text-align:center">Baleng</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.79%"><p style="text-align:center">12.86</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.73%"><p style="text-align:center">0.84</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.84%"><p style="text-align:center">5.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">SP and SM</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.75%"><p style="text-align:center">Batié</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.79%"><p style="text-align:center">8.28</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.73%"><p style="text-align:center">1.74</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.84%"><p style="text-align:center">3.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">SW</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.75%"><p style="text-align:center">Bandjoun</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.79%"><p style="text-align:center">12.50</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.73%"><p style="text-align:center">1.45</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.84%"><p style="text-align:center">6.7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">SW and SM</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The compressive strength of concrete with the various sands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref>) and summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref> ranged from 9.78 to 14.85 MPa at 3 days with Baleng sand producing the lowest and Noun sand producing the highest. The compressive strength at 7 days ranged from 14.87 to 22.56 MPa with Baleng sand having the lowest and Bandjoun sand having the highest. The compressive strength obtained at 28 days ranged from 20.14 to 33.62 MPa with Baleng sand having the lowest and Bandjoun sand having the highest. The Batié and Bandjoun sand gave resistances equal to and greater than 25 MPa respectively while the Noun, Mifi and Baleng sand gave resistances less than the desired 25 MPa at 28 days due to their poor gradation and low specific gravity. The Bandjoun sand gave the best resistance because of the improved interlocking and bonding characteristics of angular quarry sand particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-14">
      [14]
     </xref>. The Baleng sand gave the least resistance due to its high fine content.</p>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Figure 9. Compressive strength of concrete with various sands.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1882103-rId23.jpeg?20251126094158" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-"></xref>Table 5. Constituent of concrete with the various sands.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Sand</p><p style="text-align:center">Source</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.22%"><p style="text-align:center">Sand</p><p style="text-align:center">(L/m<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.33%"><p style="text-align:center">Gravel 5/15 (L/m<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Gravel 15/25 (L/m<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.77%"><p style="text-align:center">Cement (Kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Water (L/m<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.02%"><p style="text-align:center">Theoretical Density (Kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Noun</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.22%"><p style="text-align:center">254.56</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.33%"><p style="text-align:center">77.78</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">374.76</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.77%"><p style="text-align:center">350</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.86%"><p style="text-align:center">189.19</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.02%"><p style="text-align:center">2.461</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Mifi</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.22%"><p style="text-align:center">261.63</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.33%"><p style="text-align:center">70.71</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">70.71</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.77%"><p style="text-align:center">350</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.86%"><p style="text-align:center">189.19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.02%"><p style="text-align:center">2.408</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Baleng</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.22%"><p style="text-align:center">318.20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.33%"><p style="text-align:center">84.85</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">304.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.77%"><p style="text-align:center">350</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.86%"><p style="text-align:center">189.19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.02%"><p style="text-align:center">2.413</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Batié</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.22%"><p style="text-align:center">325.27</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.33%"><p style="text-align:center">106.07</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">106.07</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.77%"><p style="text-align:center">350</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.86%"><p style="text-align:center">189.19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.02%"><p style="text-align:center">2.414</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Bandjoun</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.22%"><p style="text-align:center">296.98</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.33%"><p style="text-align:center">106.07</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">304.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.77%"><p style="text-align:center">350</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.86%"><p style="text-align:center">189.19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.02%"><p style="text-align:center">2.347</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Conclusions</title>
   <p>The overall objective of this research was to carry out a comparative geotechnical analysis on sands from the major sandpits in the West region of Cameroon to determine their geotechnical properties and classification for their proper and potential uses in construction.</p>
   <p>From the identification and sampling of the sands from the major sandpits, the geotechnical properties of the sands that were analysed in this study are the natural moisture content, grain size distribution, specific gravity, apparent density and sand equivalent. These geotechnical properties were used to classify the sands according to standard norms and concrete was formulated with the different sands to assess their quality for concrete production.</p>
   <p>The classification of the various sands according to the USCS showed that only the Batié and Bandjoun sand are well graded (SW) while the others (Noun, Mifi, and Baleng sand) are poorly graded (SP). The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-7">
     [7]
    </xref> classification according to fineness modulus (FM) proved that all the sands are coarse sand (FM &gt; 2.3) and are suitable for structural applications, where higher strength and durability are required. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-7">
     [7]
    </xref> classification according to sand equivalent (SE) showed that Noun and Bandjoun sand are very clean sands while Mifi and Batié sand are clean sands. Clean and very clean (SE ≥ 70) sands have a low content of fine materials, resulting in cleaner and higher-quality sand that is preferred for more demanding applications. Baleng sand is classified as a dirty sand (SE ≤ 60%) and has a high fine-particle content, clay-like materials, which can negatively affect concrete workability, strength, and durability. The <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147518-7">
     [7]
    </xref> classification according to specific gravity showed that all the sands have a low specific gravity and concrete made with sand having a low specific gravity (1.8 to 2.6 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) would have a relatively low density and moderate strength, suitable for general-purpose, low structural uses.</p>
   <p>The Batié and Bandjoun sand gave the desired resistance at 28 days, regardless of their low specific gravities. These sands have high fineness modulus and sand equivalent that contributed to their good resistance; therefore, the sands are good for concrete production. The Noun, Mifi and Baleng sand did not give the desired resistance at 28 days due to their poor gradation and can only be used for light structural applications (non-load-bearing elements including partition walls, plastering, blinding concrete, and mortar works). The Noun and Mifi sand can be used in mortar production as their fineness modulus falls within the acceptable range as prescribed in the ASTM (2.2 to 2.8). It is important to note that the geotechnical properties of sands may vary with factors such as extraction depth, seasonal changes, and quarrying methods. Therefore, continuous quality control and periodic testing at the sandpits are recommended to ensure consistency and reliability of sand used in construction.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>We thank CER BTP SARL for their collaboration during this research.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mehta, P.K. and Monteiro, P.J. (2013) Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. McGraw-Hill Education.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chudley, R. and Greeno, R. (2013) Building Construction Handbook. Routledge.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fang, M., Park, D., Singuranayo, J.L., Chen, H. and Li, Y. (2018) Aggregate Gradation Theory, Design and Its Impact on Asphalt Pavement Performance: A Review. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20, 1408-1424. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1430365
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     United Nations Environment Programme (2014) Sand, Rarer Than One Thinks. UNEP/GRID-Geneva. &gt;https://unepgrid.ch/storage/app/media/activities/Sand/Sand-as-a-Resource-Paper-FINAL.pdf
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     World Economic Forum (2023) Global Sand Mining: Demand Impacting Environment and Solutions. &gt;https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/09/global-sand-mining-demand-impacting-environment
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     European Committee for Standardisation (2018) EN ISO 14688-1—Geotechnical Investigation and Testing—Identification and Classification of Soil. Part 1: Identification and Description. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     European Committee for Standardisation (2018) EN ISO 14688-2: 2018—Geotechnical Investigation and Testing—Identification and Classification of Soil. Part 2: Principles for a Classification. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mbuh Moses, K., Nsahlai, L.N., Penka, J.B., Mofor, N.A. and Ncham, M.K. (2024) Physical-Mechanical Properties of Sand from Various Sandpits in the North West Region and Their Recommended Domains of Application. Research Square. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ngounou, S.M., Nkendong, C.S. and Fokwa, D. (2017) Geotechnical Characteristics of Sand Deposits from Batié, West Region of Cameroon. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 11, 460-467. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tenkeng, A.F., Nkendong, C.S. and Fokwa, D. (2018) Evaluation of the Geotechnical Properties of Sand from Bandjoun, West Region of Cameroon. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kouam, G.R., Kamdoum, B., Fokam, A. and Ngnikam, E. (2016) Characterization of Sand from the Noun River Basin in Cameroon for Geotechnical Applications. Journal of Materials and Engineering Structures, 3, 65-72.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nkendong, C.S., Fokwa, D. and Tenkeng, A.F. (2018) Geotechnical Characterization of Sand from the Mifi River, West Region of Cameroon. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 12, 369-377. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nkendong, C.S., Fokwa, D. and Ngounou, S.M. (2020) Geotechnical Characterization of Sand from the Noun River, West Region of Cameroon. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 14, 412-420. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147518-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sivalingam, K. and Mathavan, G. (2016) Comparative Study on the Properties of River Sand and Quarry Sand Concrete. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 9, 588-594.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>