<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    arsci
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Advances in Reproductive Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2330-0744
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2330-0752
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/arsci.2025.134029
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    arsci-147220
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Impact of Infertility on the Quality of Life of Women in Douala (Cameroon): Assessment Using the FertiQoL Score
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Michèle Florence
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mendoua
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Astrid Ruth Ndolo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kondo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Myrisse
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Andjongo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Christian
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Eyoum
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Haamit
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Abba-Khabir
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Charlotte Tchente
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nguefack
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Emile
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mboudou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     28
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    04
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    344
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    352
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      20,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      11,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      11,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Background: </b>Infertility carries a major psychosocial burden in sub-Saharan Africa, yet women’s quality of life (QoL) is rarely assessed with standardized tools. The Fertility Quality of Life questionnaire (FertiQoL) is internationally validated but had not been used in Cameroon prior to this study. 
    <b>Objective: </b>To assess the impact of infertility on women’s QoL in Douala using FertiQoL and to identify associated determinants.
    <b> Methods: </b>We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study over nine months in four health facilities in Douala. One hundred and seventy-three infertile women aged 25 - 55 years were included. QoL was measured with FertiQoL (emotional, social, relational, and mind–body domains). Associations with impaired QoL were examined using multivariable logistic regression (p &lt; 0.05). 
    <b>Results: </b>Mean age was 37.2 ± 6.1 years; secondary infertility accounted for 76.9%. Over half reported self-medication (63.6%) or phytotherapy (68.2%). Overall, 55.1% had impaired QoL. The most affected domains were emotional (72.3 %), social (71.7%), and mind–body (68.8%), whereas the relational domain was comparatively preserved. Independent determinants of impaired QoL were single marital status (OR = 1.57; p = 0.001), monthly income &lt; 100,000 FCFA (OR = 1.50; p = 0.019), history of STIs (OR = 3.60; p = 0.001), nulliparity (OR = 1.32; p = 0.001), and infertility duration &gt;20 years (OR = 1.48; p = 0.038). 
    <b>Conclusion: </b>This study the first Cameroonian application of FertiQoL shows a substantial negative impact of infertility on women’s QoL in Douala, particularly in the emotional and social domains. Findings support a holistic, multidisciplinary approach that includes psychological support and improved access to reproductive care.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Infertility
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Quality of Life
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      FertiQoL
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Women
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Douala (Cameroon)
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Infertility is defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the inability for a couple to conceive after 12 months of regular, unprotected sexual intercourse <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. It is estimated to affect approximately 48 million couples and 186 million individuals worldwide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Its prevalence is relatively stable in industrialized countries (8% - 12%) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-3">
     [3]
    </xref>, but much higher in low- and middle-income countries, sometimes reaching 25% - 30% in sub-Saharan Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. In Cameroon, several recent studies report a prevalence between 20 and 30% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-6">
     [6]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. In most cases, it is secondary infertility, often linked to a history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), induced abortions in precarious conditions, or surgical complications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. These observations align with those described in other African countries, where infectious causes are more prevalent compared to genetic or endocrine etiologies more commonly observed in Western countries <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. Beyond the biomedical aspect, infertility represents a considerable psychosocial suffering. In African societies where motherhood is a key factor of identity and social recognition, the absence of children can expose a woman to stigma, marital tensions, isolation, and even polygamy or divorce <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-10">
     [10]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. This emotional burden, long underestimated, is now recognized as a central element of the infertility experience <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. To incorporate this dimension, the assessment of quality of life (QoL) has become an essential tool. The FertiQoL (Fertility Quality of Life) questionnaire, developed by Boivin et al. in 2011 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-14">
     [14]
    </xref>, is the international reference tool, validated and widely used in various contexts. It explores four dimensions: emotional, social, relational, and body/mind. However, its use remains rare in Africa, and no study had yet assessed the QoL of infertile women in Cameroon using this instrument. In this context, we conducted a study aimed at evaluating the quality of life of infertile women in Douala using the FertiQoL score. Our objectives were to identify the determinants associated with the alteration of the different dimensions and to evaluate the impact of infertility on the QoL of infertile women in Douala, in order to contribute to a better understanding and management of infertility in the Cameroonian context.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Type and Setting of the Study</title>
    <p>We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study with prospective data collection over a duration of 7 months, from January to July 2025, in four reference healthcare facilities in the city of Douala, the economic capital of Cameroon. These establishments included public and private hospitals with gynecology-obstetrics services and specialized infertility consultations.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Study Population</title>
    <p>The study included women aged 25 to 55 years, consulting for primary or secondary infertility.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Inclusion Criteria</title>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Exclusion Criteria</title>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Sampling and Sample Size</title>
    <p>We conducted an exhaustive sampling of all infertile women meeting the criteria at the four sites during the study period. The final sample size was 173 participants.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Data Collection</title>
    <p>Data were collected using a structured questionnaire administered face-to-face by trained interviewers. Infertility-specific quality of life was assessed using the FertiQoL (Fertility Quality of Life) questionnaire, developed and validated by Boivin et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-14">
      [14]
     </xref>. This tool consists of two parts :</p>
    <p>The optional Treatment module of the FertiQoL questionnaire, which explores patient satisfaction with medical care and staff interactions, was not administered in this study. Responses are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores for each domain are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. Consistent with prior validation studies of the FertiQoL instrument, impaired quality of life was defined as a total score &lt; 50 on a 0-100 scale.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_7">
    <title>2.7. Statistical Analyses</title>
    <p>Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Quantitative variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative variables as frequencies and percentages. Associations between independent variables and quality of life were explored using the Chi-square test and Student’s test. Significant factors in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable logistic regression to identify independent determinants. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_8">
    <title>2.8. Ethical Considerations</title>
    <p>Each participant provided written informed consent. The anonymity and confidentiality of the data were maintained throughout the study.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>)</title>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-"></xref>Figure 1. Flow diagram.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1280353-rId13.jpeg?20251114034213" />
   </fig>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics</title>
    <p>A total of 173 infertile women were included in the study. The average age was 37.2 ± 6.1 years (25 - 55 years). The majority of participants were in a common-law union (55.5%), 30% were single, and 14.5% were formally married. Nearly half (46.2%) had a monthly income of less than 100,000 FCFA. Secondary infertility was predominant (76.9%). More than half of the women reported a history of STIs (53.7%) or abortion (52.6%). Nulliparity affected about 60% of the sample (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-"></xref>Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (N)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentage (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Average Age (± SD)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">37.2 ± 6.1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Single</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">52</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">30.0</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Common-Law Union</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">96</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">55.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Formally Married</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">14.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Higher Education Level</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">77</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">44.7</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Income &lt; 100,000 FCFA</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">80</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">46.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Secondary Infertility</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">133</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">76.9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Nulliparity</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">104</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">60.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">History of STIs</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">93</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">53.7</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.84%"><p style="text-align:center">History of Abortion</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.83%"><p style="text-align:center">91</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.33%"><p style="text-align:center">52.6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Evaluation of Quality of Life (FertiQoL)</title>
    <p>Overall Quality of Life</p>
    <p>The FertiQoL is an objective measure not only of overall quality of life (QoL) but also of the different sub-domains of this QoL. On a scale from 0 to 100, we found that 55.1% of patients had impaired overall quality of life, while 44.9% of women had a significantly satisfactory quality of life.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Dimensions of the FertiQoL Quality of Life Score</title>
    <p>Among the 173 infertile patients included, the evaluation of quality of life according to the different sub-scales highlights a marked overall impact. Similarly, the body/mind dimension (68.8%), the social dimension (71.7%), and the emotional dimension (72.3%) were predominantly compromised. However, the relational dimension stood out, remaining relatively preserved: two-thirds of the women (66.5%) reported satisfactory relational quality, compared to only 33.5% who evaluated it as impaired. These results highlight that while infertility profoundly affects perceived health, emotional and social well-being, as well as overall satisfaction, couple relationships seem to better withstand this burden, representing an important resilience factor in this context (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-"></xref>Table 2. Distribution of FertiQoL domain scores among infertile women in Douala, Cameroon (n = 173).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="43.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Quality of Life Sub-scales</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Satisfactory n (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.58%"><p style="text-align:center">Impaired n (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="43.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Body/Mind</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.36%"><p style="text-align:center">54 (31.2)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.58%"><p style="text-align:center">119 (68.8)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="43.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Social</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.36%"><p style="text-align:center">49 (28.3)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.58%"><p style="text-align:center">124 (71.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="43.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Relational</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.36%"><p style="text-align:center">115 (66.5)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.58%"><p style="text-align:center">58 (33.5)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="43.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Emotional</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.36%"><p style="text-align:center">48 (27.7)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.58%"><p style="text-align:center">125 (72.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Factors Associated with Impairment of Quality of Life</title>
    <p>The analysis highlights several significant determinants of impaired quality of life related to infertility. From a sociodemographic perspective, being single is associated with a notable decrease in the FertiQoL score (OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.26 - 2.22; p = 0.001), reflecting the impact of marital status on the perception of suffering related to infertility. Similarly, a monthly income of less than 100,000 FCFA is correlated with impaired quality of life (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.16 - 1.87; p = 0.019), suggesting that economic constraints exacerbate the psychosocial vulnerability of infertile women. Medical factors play a predominant role: a history of sexually transmitted infections emerges as the most powerful determinant (OR = 3.60; 95% CI: 1.74 - 7.60; p = 0.001), confirming their impact on the psychological and social consequences of infertility. Nulliparity is also significantly associated with a lower FertiQoL score (OR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.14 - 1.65; p = 0.001), highlighting how the absence of motherhood remains a source of suffering in this cultural context. Finally, an infertility duration of more than 20 years exacerbates the deterioration of quality of life (OR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.16 - 1.62; p = 0.038), illustrating the cumulative effect of time and the chronic nature of the psychological burden (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-"></xref>Table 3. Determinants of impaired quality of life (multivariate logistic regression).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="44.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Factors</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.13%"><p style="text-align:center">OR (IC 95 %)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.13%"><p style="text-align:center">p-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="44.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Being Single</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.13%"><p style="text-align:center">1.57 (1.26 - 2.22)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.13%"><p style="text-align:center">0.001</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="44.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Income &lt; 100,000 FCFA</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.13%"><p style="text-align:center">1.50 (1.16 - 1.87)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.13%"><p style="text-align:center">0.019</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="44.74%"><p style="text-align:center">History of STIs (Sexually Transmitted Infections)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.13%"><p style="text-align:center">3.60 (1.74 - 7.60)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.13%"><p style="text-align:center">0.001</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="44.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Nulliparity</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.13%"><p style="text-align:center">1.32 (1.14 - 1.65)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.13%"><p style="text-align:center">0.001</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="44.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Infertility &gt;20 years</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.13%"><p style="text-align:center">1.48 (1.16 - 1.62)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.13%"><p style="text-align:center">0.038</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>In our study population, infertility is associated with a measurable deterioration in quality of life (QoL) as evaluated by FertiQoL, with notable independent determinants: history of STIs (OR = 3.6), being single (OR = 1.6), income &lt; 100,000 FCFA (OR = 1.5), nulliparity (OR = 1.3), and infertility duration &gt;20 years (OR = 1.5). These associations align with regional and global data: in East Africa (Zanzibar), FertiQoL decreases with the duration of infertility and certain clinical factors; in Ethiopia, infertile women exhibit significantly lower QoL scores than fertile controls, and a history of STIs is linked to lower QoL; in Nigeria, recent comparisons confirm marked deficits in psychological and social domains among infertile women compared to controls <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-15">
     [15]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-17">
     [17]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Our findings on marital status fit within pro-natalist contexts where marriage remains a key source of material and emotional support. The stigma of infertility documented in Ghana and summarized in a systematic review degrades QoL through social isolation and avoidance coping strategies; being single may amplify this risk by reducing access to marital and family support <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-6">
     [6]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. This sheds light on the independent contribution of single status to the observed low QoL.</p>
   <p>Economic precarity (income &lt; 100,000 FCFA) as a predictor of low QoL is consistent with the financial burden of fertility treatments: the WHO notes that 1 in 6 people will face infertility during their lifetime, and costs, often paid out-of-pocket, expose households to catastrophic expenditures, particularly in low- or middle-income countries. In such contexts, financial constraints can exacerbate anxiety, delay treatment, and ultimately lower QoL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-18">
     [18]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Regarding the type/duration of infertility, our data (nulliparity and duration &gt; 20 years associated with lower QoL) align with African and international work showing: (i) differences in QoL between primary and secondary infertility (with sometimes less impaired QoL in women who have already given birth), (ii) a gradual decrease in FertiQoL with repeated treatment cycles and prolonged therapeutic journeys <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. These heterogeneities (e.g., Zanzibar vs. Nigeria) highlight the influence of local social norms and past maternity experiences on the perception of QoL.</p>
   <p>Instrumentally and culturally, the use of FertiQoL remains relevant (an internationally validated tool), but recent work in North Africa emphasizes the importance of a culturally sensitive interpretation of scores: some social dimensions poorly capture the specific social pressure in collectivist societies, suggesting needs for contextual adaptations and interpretive support <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-19">
     [19]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Clinical and Public Health Implications</title>
   <p>1. Integrate systematic psychosocial screening (FertiQoL + anxiety-depression screening) into infertility consultations, with referral to psychological support and peer groups to counteract stigma and isolation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-20">
     [20]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>2. Reduce financial barriers: advocate for partial public/insurance funding of care (imaging, surgery, medical assisted reproduction) in line with WHO calls to limit catastrophic expenditures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-18">
     [18]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>3. Proactively prevent and treat STIs (standardized screening/treatment) given their strong association with degraded QoL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-6">
     [6]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>4. Couple/family-centered approach: interventions considering marital status and duration of infertility; therapeutic education on realistic expectations and non-avoidant coping strategies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-6">
     [6]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-9">
     [9]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>5. Cultural adaptation of FertiQoL: train teams to interpret local social domains and consider complementary modules (e.g., financial burden), as suggested by Sudanese experience <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147220-19">
     [19]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Strengths and Limitations</title>
   <p>This study adds local evidence on modifiable levers (STIs, financial constraints, isolation), but its cross-sectional design limits causal inference; a longitudinal cohort and trials of psycho-educational/financial interventions will allow testing the improvement of FertiQoL and its domains. The socio-cultural nuances also call for ongoing contextual validation of FertiQoL.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>7. Conclusion</title>
   <p>This study, the first of its kind in Cameroon using the FertiQoL score, highlights the considerable impact of infertility on the quality of life of women in Douala. More than one in two participants had impaired quality of life, with predominant effects on the emotional, social, and body/mind dimensions, while the relational dimension seemed relatively preserved. The main determinants of diminished quality of life were being single, low income, history of sexually transmitted infections, nulliparity, and prolonged duration of infertility. These factors reflect the particular vulnerability of exposed women, where the absence of children represents not only a medical suffering but also a social and identity-related impact. Beyond the epidemiological findings, this study advocates for a holistic and multidisciplinary approach to infertility care in Cameroon, including: the prevention of genital infections and risky abortions; improvement of financial and geographical accessibility to reproductive care; and, most importantly, systematic psychological support for patients, in order to reduce the associated emotional and social distress.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>Author Contributions</title>
   <p>All authors contributed to the development of this work.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G.D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., de Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., et al. (2017) The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Human Reproduction, 32, 1786-1801. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex234
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mascarenhas, M.N., Flaxman, S.R., Boerma, T., Vanderpoel, S. and Stevens, G.A. (2012) National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys. PLOS Medicine, 9, e1001356. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Inhorn, M.C. and Patrizio, P. (2015) Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Gender, Reproductive Technologies and Global Movements in the 21st Century. Human Reproduction Update, 21, 411-426. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv016
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chimbatata, N.B.W. and Malimba, C. (2016) Infertility in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Woman’s Issue for How Long? A Qualitative Review of Literature. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 96-102. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.48012
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dyer, S.J. (2007) The Value of Children in African Countries—Insights from Studies on Infertility. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 28, 69-77. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820701409959
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Obinchemti Egbe, T., Ngo Mbaki, C., Tendongfor, N., Temfack, E. and Belley-Priso, E. (2020) Infertility and Associated Factors in Three Hospitals in Douala, Cameroon: A Cross-Sectional Study. African Health Sciences, 20, 1985-1995. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v20i4.57
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tiagha, A.R., Ngemenya, M., Enoh, J.E. and Nguedia, J.C.A. (2020) A Retrospective Study of the Prevalence of Female Infertility in the Southwest Region, Cameroon. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10, 1728-1740. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.10120156
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     MAbebe, M., Afework, M. and Abaynew, Y. (2020) Primary and Secondary Infertility in Africa: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Fertility Research and Practice, 6, 20. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00090-3 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Larsen, U. (2000) Primary and Secondary Infertility in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Epidemiology, 29, 285-291. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/29.2.285
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hollos, M. and Larsen, U. (2008) Motherhood in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Social Consequences of Infertility in an Urban Population in Northern Tanzania. Culture, Health &amp; Sexuality, 10, 159-173. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050701656789
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fledderjohann, J.J. (2012) ‘Zero Is Not Good for Me’: Implications of Infertility in Ghana. Human Reproduction, 27, 1383-1390. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des035
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dyer, S.J. and Patel, M. (2012) The Economic and Social Impact of Infertility in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review. International Journal of Gynecology&amp;Obstetrics, 119, S47-S50. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Roomaney, R., van Wyk, B., van der Merwe, K. and Malan, M. (2024) Psychosocial Aspects of In-Fertility in Africa: A Scoping Review. Reproductive Health, 21, Article No. 123. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boivin, J., Takefman, J. and Braverman, A. (2011) The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) Tool: Development and General Psychometric Properties. Human Reproduction, 26, 2084-2091. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der171
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Suleiman, M., August, F., Nanyaro, M.W., Wangwe, P., Kikula, A., Balandya, B., et al. (2023) Quality of Life and Associated Factors among Infertile Women Attending Infertility Clinic at Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar. BMC Women’s Health, 23, Article No. 400. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02536-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wotango, B.Y., Mengiste, B. and Solomon, S. (2024) Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Associated Factors among Infertile Women Compared with Fertile Women in Public Hospital Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Women’s Health, 24, Article No. 417. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03163-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Amadi, L., Raji, F.O. and Odelola, O.I. (2025) The Effects of Infertility on the Quality of Life of Women: A Comparative Study in a Nigerian Tertiary Centre. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 34, 38-44. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/njm.njm_88_24
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     World Health Organization (2023) Infertility Prevalence Estimates, 1990-2021. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bayoumi, R.R., Koert, E., Boivin, J., McConnell, M., Wolde, B., Siddiqui, F., et al. (2024) Enhancing Cultural Sensitivity in the Implementation of the Fertility Quality of Life Tool in Sudan: A Science Diplomacy Perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, Article 1375643. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1375643
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147220-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     van Rooij, F.B. and Bos, H.M.W. (2021) The Relationship between Stigmatisation and Quality of Life in Ghanaian Women and Men with Fertility Problems: Mediating Role of Coping Strategies. Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn, 12, 257-264.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>