<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    wjet
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     World Journal of Engineering and Technology
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2331-4222
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2331-4249
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/wjet.2025.134058
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    wjet-147140
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Chemistry 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Materials Science, Engineering
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Enhancing Employability of Technical University Students: A Study of Mechanical Engineering Skill Needs and Generic Skills in Ghana
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Kwame
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Dubik
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jonah Adombila
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Adongo
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nicholas
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Naawe
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Francis Francis
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Dery
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Azum
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Abunkudugu
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Fidelis
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Balle
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aMechanical Engineering Department, Bolgatanga Technical University, Bolgatanga, Ghana
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     04
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    04
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    934
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    951
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      17,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      8,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      8,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    This study investigated the mechanical engineering skill needs and generic skills required for employability among Technical University students in Ghana. The findings revealed that technical skills such as foundry, computer-aided manufacturing, and computer-aided design are crucial for employability. Additionally, generic skills like leadership, positive attitudes, problem-solving, and communication skills are essential for students’ future careers. The study’s results have implications for Technical Universities, industries, and students. Recommendations include reviewing and updating curricula to include relevant technical and generic skills, promoting industry partnerships, and encouraging students to acquire a range of skills. By implementing these recommendations, Technical Universities can better prepare students for the workforce, and industries can benefit from a skilled and employable workforce.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Practical Training
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Mechanical
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Engineering Students
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Employability
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Skills Development
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Engineering Education
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Hands-On Experience
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Technical Skills
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Soft Skills
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Industry Readiness
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Workplace Preparedness
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>More professional practice abilities and experiences for graduates of mechanical engineering programs are in high demand from the industry sector and academia as well. Not only do educators and business recognize the need for increased practical training, but applicant engineers do as well. These days, the need for engineering curricula to bridge the theory-practice divide is driven by technological innovation and competitiveness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. In order to develop broader skills and attributes such as problem-solving, communication, teamwork, leadership, and critical thinking, students should be exposed to significant practical experiences that mimic the realities of the engineering profession for a suitable duration within this highly competitive environment. They’re often referred to as employability skills <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-1">
     [1]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Engineering curriculum must include an industrial training element in order to produce graduates that are industry-ready <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. For students to acquire employability skills, they must have experience in industry practice. An introverted professor who is cut off from the working world will lose out on important opportunities to modify the curriculum to suit business demands <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-3">
     [3]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Professional abilities are highly valued in today’s workforce, according to both employers and graduates. The majority of employers need engineering graduates that possess both specialised professional skills and sufficient theoretical knowledge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. The workforce is looking for graduates with technical capabilities particular to their industry and experience working in a team <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. However, graduates frequently lament their unemployment due to a lack of these skills <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-6">
     [6]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Skill, in Moon’s opinion, is the capacity to apply knowledge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. As a result, to be skilled, one must possess both some knowledge and some know-how <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Eraut claims that certain professional talents, in particular, call for special mixes of situational information, propositional knowledge, and professional judgement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Expertise can inevitably be acquired by educational methods in addition to hands-on training and experience <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Generally speaking, skills can be divided into two categories: cognitive skills, which are linked to a theoretical foundation and way of thinking, and practical skills, which are linked to the actual application of techniques, materials, and equipment.</p>
   <p>It becomes clear that prospective engineers should have a suitable undergraduate education to meet the requirements of employers and launch a successful professional career. Critical thinking, inventiveness, and communication skills are among the things that future engineers will require <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. Furthermore, students must acquire familiarity with essential industrial equipment, project methodologies for design and development, and production processes in addition to the technical knowledge that is expected of them.</p>
   <p>They also need to be able to understand ethical and societal issues, work in an efficient manner that boosts productivity, collaborate well in groups, manage their time effectively, solve difficulties, and overall demonstrate a range of related skills. More engineering graduates with real-world industrial experience are specifically needed by businesses. To ensure that students acquire the technical skills required in today’s globally competitive industry, stronger linkages between industry and higher education are needed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-10">
     [10]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The literature emphasizes the importance of both technical and soft skills in preparing mechanical engineering graduates for the workforce. Industry and academia agree that graduates need to possess a combination of specialized professional skills, theoretical knowledge, and practical experience.</p>
   <p>Agreement and Disagreement:</p>
   <p>Implications:</p>
   <p>Overall, the literature highlights the need for a collaborative approach to preparing mechanical engineering graduates for the workforce, involving educational institutions, industries, and governments.</p>
   <sec id="s1_1">
    <title>1.1. Problem Statement</title>
    <p>The employability of mechanical engineering graduate students in Ghana is a major concern, particularly in light of the current job crisis. Employers in the construction sector state that employability is linked to three criteria: a strong degree, a range of manufacturing and technology abilities, and a set of personal qualities. But there’s a worry that traditional schooling doesn’t equip graduates with the common employability skills that businesses demand. During the last semester of the graduate program, a practical exercise is intended to close the knowledge gap between Ghana’s technological institutes and industry. The usefulness of practical exercise hasn’t, however, been thoroughly studied yet.</p>
    <p>This article’s goal is to present empirical data regarding the advantages and obstacles of practical exercise as seen from the viewpoint of the students. Furthermore, the current study aims to investigate the potential benefits of practical experiences in local industry, which are occasionally coupled with thesis research, for improving the employability and skill sets of mechanical engineering students. Students from the Mechanical Engineering Department at Akenten Appiah Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (AAMUSTED), Kumasi, Ghana, are involved in the case study that is being investigated together with artisans, technicians and engineers around AAMUSTED area (IPT and Tanoso).</p>
    <p>Supervisors have conducted interviews and frequent industrial visits to document the process of skill development and advancement. Learning about production processes, action planning, and real-time problem-solving during manufacturing has been found to be the mechanism underlying each student’s personal progress. The examination of the interview data revealed that the hands-on activity inspired students to learn more, to use their theoretical and practical knowledge to solve real-world engineering challenges, to build strong interpersonal skills, and to manage their personal obligations. By presenting statistical information about postgraduate jobless spells, employers can illustrate how working in production-oriented organisations increases a student’s employability.</p>
    <p>In order to provide evidence of skill enhancement and employability based on the perception of graduate mechanical engineers who have successfully completed a practical exercise in heavy industry, primarily in the last phase of their studies, the current research aims to investigate the perceptions of Ghanaian employers regarding the skills, knowledge, and characteristics that help undergraduates/new graduates to be employable.</p>
    <p>The study highlights the importance of practical experience in enhancing employability skills among mechanical engineering graduates in Ghana. The findings suggest that practical exercises, industrial visits, and hands-on activities can inspire students to learn more, apply theoretical knowledge, and develop strong interpersonal skills.</p>
    <p>Agreement and Disagreement:</p>
    <p>Implications:</p>
    <p>Overall, the study emphasizes the importance of practical experience in preparing mechanical engineering graduates for the workforce, and highlights the need for collaboration between educational institutions, industries, and governments to achieve this goal.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_2">
    <title>1.2. Hypothesis</title>
    <p>Here’s a hypothesis based on the provided data:</p>
    <p>1) Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the mean ratings of mechanical engineering skill needs for employability among Technical University students.</p>
    <p>Alternative Hypothesis (H1): There is a significant difference in the mean ratings of mechanical engineering skill needs for employability among Technical University students.</p>
    <p>This hypothesis can be tested using a one-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) statistical test to determine if there are significant differences in the mean ratings of the various mechanical engineering skills.</p>
    <p>2) Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the mean ratings of generic skill needs for employability among Technical University students across different skill categories.</p>
    <p>Alternative Hypothesis (H1): There is a significant difference in the mean ratings of generic skill needs for employability among Technical University students across different skill categories.</p>
    <p>This hypothesis can be tested using statistical methods like ANOVA or t-tests, depending on the specific research design and data distribution.</p>
    <sec id="s1">
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref>2. Literature Review</title>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref>Readiness for Employability in the Mechanical Engineering Industry</p>
     <p>An important study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-11">
       [11]
      </xref> aimed to examine supervisor- or professional entity-based competency frameworks and the systemic recommendations of vital courses of action for higher instruction level learning results. An academic subject can relate to proficient work in a variety of ways, according to this case study’s evaluation of intellectual (information and understanding), practical, communication, personal, and professional skills. It also argued that the most effective way to arrange these frameworks is through ongoing discussions between the performing artists, which will help to resolve any unnecessary contrasts and empower essential differences to meet the many complexities of the real world <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-11">
       [11]
      </xref>.</p>
     <p>An additional intriguing study on “the myth of job readiness” focused on employability, written communication, and the “skills gap” in higher education. Job readiness was examined by highlighting students’ writing abilities and written communication skills from a variety of angles, such as the nature of writing in particular working environments, problems with academic and proficient written communication, ways to address students’ writing difficulties, and methods to better prepare graduates for communications in the professional world <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-11">
       [11]
      </xref>.</p>
     <p>Engineering graduates’ perceptions of their preparedness for the shift to the labour market were examined in a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-12">
       [12]
      </xref>. This study set out to find out how graduates of a Portuguese college studying building evaluate their master’s course competencies, how these graduates studying engineering evaluate their preparedness for a move into the workforce, and finally, whether there was any correlation between higher positive recognition competencies and the preparation for a change in career. As a result, 332 senior Portuguese engineering master’s degree candidates completed questionnaires. The established results indicated that practical competencies seem to be the most important indicators of labour work transition, along with communicative, methodological, and socio-emotional abilities.</p>
     <p>These results strengthen the case for including a useful practical component in the design of educational modules as a superior means of improving employability and preparing graduates. The research recommended that in future studies, other external factors, such as the job provider conditions, be taken into account in relation to graduates’ employability preparation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-12">
       [12]
      </xref>.</p>
     <p>A sample of 108 individuals was used in a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-13">
       [13]
      </xref> to assess the professional roles and employability of aspiring engineers. The study aimed to increase the comprehension of engineering students about the significance of industrial roles in engineering. Furthermore, to encourage pupils to consider the character, passion, strengths, and weaknesses of themselves. The third objective is to conduct pilot studies at the participating higher education institutions to examine how these creative tools may be implemented in the engineering curriculum. Analysis of the effects of innovative and entrepreneurial talents, networking and communication abilities, teamwork and ways of thinking, and lifelong learning was the main goal of the study.</p>
     <p>According to the study’s findings, engineers need to develop these soft skills in order to improve their employability. Furthermore, all members of the PREFER consortium agree that engineering colleges should support students’ growing self-awareness in the first place and their ability to grow both individually and proficiently in the second <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-13">
       [13]
      </xref>.</p>
     <p>In order to help engineering colleges better understand and support the competencies of industrial aspirants, a study was conducted on the relationship between the competency profile of industrial aspirants and the engineering colleges’ place of residence. The goals of this study were to determine the respondents’ competency profile in relation to the domicile of engineering colleges, analyse any significant relationships or differences between the respondents’ competency profile and the selected variables, and, finally, recommend appropriate actions to help the respondents regain effective competency. In order to close the gap through the development of competencies and for this study, Engineering Colleges Viz. Rural, Urban, and Major cities, and understanding the Engineering Colleges’ influence on technical competencies and practical and behavioural skills of Industrial Aspirants were the main factors. The study was conducted with a sample size of 149 respondents using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science).</p>
     <p>In order to strengthen the hands-on technical competencies, the study suggested that engineering colleges enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the nearby industry. Finally, industrial experts could be invited to give special lectures at engineering colleges. Special modules on the development of competencies could be included in the curriculum. Soft skills could be used as one way to develop behavioural competencies. Technical sessions should require more time and demonstration of specific mechanisms.</p>
     <p>By comparing higher education institutions to process workplaces, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-14">
       [14]
      </xref> examined how engineering graduates in India adopted the quality management approach to attain excellence in employability and how to use the industry’s adopted six sigma quality management approach to address process defects. Through an evaluation of the effects of the soft skill gap, the analytical and problem-solving skill gap, the absence of quality knowledge, the lack of domain knowledge, and the lack of industry engagement, this research examined the gap in application knowledge of theory to practice, impacts, and employability.</p>
     <p>In order to create a conceptual model for the research, 713 working industrial professionals and 200 engineering students from 11 different universities participated in surveys and interviews. The Six Sigma methodology was used by the respondents, who also used Monte Carlo, ANOVA, regression, hypothesis testing, and correlation studies.</p>
     <p>During the exploratory survey, 97% of employers expressed concern about the employability of mechanical engineering graduates, citing a knowledge gap in applying theory to practice as a major problem. Furthermore, 97.4% of the participants acknowledged that the lack of applied knowledge is their primary issue regarding the employability of mechanical engineering graduates. Since there isn’t any domain-specific employability study that addresses the domain knowledge features and other factor interactions, it was suggested that the research be expanded to other engineering disciplines. Research is also being conducted on how well hiring individuals from the industry works to teach theory papers that are applicable to the real world and meet industry demands.</p>
     <p>Additionally, practical relevance, practical labs, and examiners to aid in the development of bridges between industry and institution are all included in the efficacy of using industrial people as experts for lecture sessions in research. Lastly, studies on soft skills and their effects on engineering education concentrate on government policy choices, such as instruction language <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-14">
       [14]
      </xref>.</p>
     <p>Many questions about students’ preparedness for the workforce were brought up in an analysis study of school-to-work readiness by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-15">
       [15]
      </xref>. The readiness of school-to-work, the business skills required for success in the workforce of the twenty-first century, the current curriculum’s contents for such skills, and alternative approaches that schools can investigate to ensure a successful school-to-work transition are just a few of the issues that this study looked into. Electronics checklists and interviews were used in this investigation. By examining a range of characteristics categorised as new skills, survival skills, and soft skills, the Readiness for Employment was investigated.</p>
     <p>The results of this survey showed that graduates require a greater number of applied skills, with critical thinking, teamwork, and communication abilities ranking as the most crucial. Additionally, the significance of critical thinking, collaboration skills, and communication abilities for their graduates to succeed in the workforce. Based on the checklist and interviews, it was determined that there is currently a “gap” between what companies require and what high schools are creating. More importantly, quantifiable results demonstrated the graduates’ evolving level of preparation as they approached the workforce. Finally, the results of this study supported the necessity of keeping an eye on the curriculum to ensure that it is rigorous and incorporates higher-order thinking skills. To ensure that every student has the opportunity to be prepared for college and the workforce, the curriculum must also be current and technology must be integrated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-15">
       [15]
      </xref>.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3">
    <title>3. Methodology</title>
    <p>The design for the study is a survey research design.</p>
    <sec id="s3_1">
     <title>3.1. Population</title>
     <p>Students from the Mechanical Engineering Department at Akenten Appiah Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (AAMUSTED), Kumasi, Ghana, are involved in the case study that is being investigated together with artisans, technicians and engineers around AAMUSTED area (IPT and Tanoso).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_2">
     <title>3.2. Sample</title>
     <p>Ghanaian technical universities that teach mechanical engineering craft practice and mechanical engineering-based enterprises provided the study’s sample. For the study, a sample of 170 artisans, 120 technicians, and 80 mechanical engineers were taken using the purposive sampling technique.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_3">
     <title>3.3 Instrument for Data Collection</title>
     <p>The study’s questionnaire items were created by the researcher. Ten items make up the questionnaire, which addresses the practical abilities that the current Technical University mechanical engineering craft practice curriculum should incorporate. The items were rated by the respondents using the five-point rating system, as indicated below.</p>
     <p>Highly Required (HR)—5; Required (R)—4; Moderately Required (MR)—3; Less Required (R)—2; Not Required (NR)—1. The research instrument was subjected to both face and content validation. The validated instrument was pilot tested using five engineers, seven technicians and eight craftsmen. The reliability of the instrument was established using Cronbach’s Alpha. A correlation coefficient (Alpha) of 0.859 was obtained.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_4">
     <title>3.4. Method of Data Collection</title>
     <p>The questionnaire was administered on the respondent by the researcher and with the help of research assistants. Three hundred and seventy (370) questionnaire items were distributed and collected after three days. Three hundred and fifty-seven (357) were returned, representing 96.5%.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_5">
     <title>3.5. Method of Data Analysis</title>
     <p>Frequency counts, percentages, means, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyse the data. The study topic was addressed using mean statistics, and the single hypothesis was tested using one-way analysis of variance. The response categories were utilised to make decisions about the practical skill enhancements that technical universities’ mechanical engineering craft practice curriculum needs in order to determine the true boundaries of the given values. An improvement item was deemed necessary if its weighted mean was up to 2.50 and higher, using the lower bounds of the moderately required (MR) category (2.50) as the cutoff point. Items whose mean fell below 2.50 were deemed unnecessary for inclusion in the current curriculum.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_6">
     <title>3.6. Limitations of the Study</title>
     <p>1) Geographical Limitation: The study is confined to Technical Universities in Ghana, which may limit the generalizability of findings to other regions or countries.</p>
     <p>2) Sample Size and Representation: The sample size might not be representative of the entire population of Technical University students in Ghana.</p>
     <p>3) Methodological Constraints: The study’s reliance on quantitative data may not fully capture the complexities of employability skills.</p>
     <p>4) Self-Reporting Bias: The use of self-reported data may introduce biases, as respondents might overestimate or underestimate their skills.</p>
     <p>5) Limited Scope: The study focuses on mechanical engineering students, which may not be generalizable to other fields of study.</p>
     <p>6) Cross-Sectional Design: The study’s cross-sectional design may not capture changes in skill needs over time.</p>
     <p>These limitations provide a foundation for future research and highlight areas for further exploration.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref>4. Results and Discussions</title>
    <p>Analysis of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>:</p>
    <p>The table presents the mean and standard deviation of mechanical engineering skill needs for employability of students of Technical Universities. The skills are ranked based on their Relative Importance Index (RII) values.</p>
    <p>Discussion of Results:</p>
    <p>The results indicate that:</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref>Table 1. Mean and Standard Deviation of mechanical engineering skill needs for employability of students of Technical Universities.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center">S/N</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Mechanical Engineering skills</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center"> 
         <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
           <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
            <munderover> 
             <mo>
               ∑ 
             </mo> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                i 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                = 
              </mo> 
              <mn>
                1 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
             <mi>
               n 
             </mi> 
            </munderover> 
            <mrow> 
             <mrow> 
              <mrow> 
               <msub> 
                <mi>
                  w 
                </mi> 
                <mi>
                  i 
                </mi> 
               </msub> 
              </mrow> 
              <mo>
                / 
              </mo> 
              <mi>
                N 
              </mi> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
           </mstyle> 
          </mrow> 
         </math></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">Standard deviation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">RII</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">Ranked</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Foundry skill</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">4.28</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">1.2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.24</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">1st</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Computer aided manufacturing skill</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">4.21</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">1.04</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.23</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">2nd</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Computer aided design skill</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">4.17</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">1.02</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.22</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">3rd</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Mechanical instrumentation skill</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">4.12</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.98</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.21</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">4th</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Welding and fabrication skill</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">4.08</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.97</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">5th</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Refrigeration and air-conditioning skill</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">4.02</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.95</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">6th</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Machining skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">3.96</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.92</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.18</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">7th</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Plant services and maintenance skill</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">3.91</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.85</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.17</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">8th</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Automobile technology skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">3.87</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.83</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.16</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">9th</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Safety and management skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">3.82</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.57</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.15</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">10th</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.78%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="36.80%"><p style="text-align:left">Average mean</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.25%"><p style="text-align:center">4.04</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.93</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.80%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>RII = Relative Importance Index, n = 357.</p>
    <p>1) Foundry skill (mean = 4.28, RII = 0.24) is considered the most important mechanical engineering skill for employability, followed closely by Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) skill (mean = 4.21, RII = 0.23) and Computer-aided design (CAD) skill (mean = 4.17, RII = 0.22).</p>
    <p>2) The top five skills (Foundry, CAM, CAD, Mechanical instrumentation, and Welding and fabrication) are all related to hands-on technical skills, highlighting their importance for employability.</p>
    <p>3) Safety and management skills (mean = 3.82, RII = 0.15) are ranked 10th, suggesting that while important, these skills are considered less critical than technical skills.</p>
    <p>Observations:</p>
    <p>1) Technical skills are highly valued by employers, emphasizing the need for Technical Universities to prioritize developing these skills in students.</p>
    <p>2) The high ranking of Foundry skill and CAM/CAD skills suggests that industries are looking for graduates with hands-on experience in manufacturing and design.</p>
    <p>3) The relatively lower ranking of Safety and management skills does not imply that these skills are unimportant, but rather that technical skills are considered more critical for employability.</p>
    <p>Key Implications:</p>
    <p>1) Curriculum Development: Technical Universities should prioritize developing technical skills, such as foundry, CAM, and CAD, in students.</p>
    <p>2) Hands-on Training: Educational institutions should provide students with hands-on training and practical experience in mechanical engineering skills.</p>
    <p>3) Industry Partnerships: Collaborations with industries can help Technical Universities stay up-to-date with industry needs and provide students with relevant skills and experience.</p>
    <p>Overall, the results suggest that Technical Universities should focus on developing technical skills, particularly in areas related to manufacturing and design, to enhance the employability of their graduates.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref>Table 2. Mean and Standard Deviation of Generic skill needs for employability of students of Technical Universities.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">S/N</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Generic skills</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">Weighted mean</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Interpretation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Rank</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">1.</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Communication skills</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.65</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Very relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">5<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">2.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Problem-solving skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">4.54</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Very relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">4<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">3.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Teamwork skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.36</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">9<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">4.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Interpersonal skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.52</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Very relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">7<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">5.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Leadership skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">4.78</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Very relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1<sup>st</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">6.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Time management skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.42</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">8<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">7.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Personal development skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.23</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">10<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">8.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Positive attitudes and behaviours</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">4.75</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Very relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">2<sup>nd</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">9.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Adaptability skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">2.56</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">12<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">10.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Working with diversity</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.59</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Very relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">6<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">11.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Pre-graduation work experience</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">4.65</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Very relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">3<sup>rd</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">12.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Understanding the</p><p style="text-align:center">workplace</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">2.51</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">13<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center">13.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Learning skills</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.12</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center">11<sup>th</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.69%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Composite mean</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.67</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Very relevant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.29%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Analysis of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>:</p>
    <p>The table presents the mean and standard deviation of generic skill needs for employability of students of Technical Universities. The skills are ranked based on their weighted mean scores.</p>
    <p>Discussion of Results:</p>
    <p>The results indicate that:</p>
    <p>1) Leadership skills (mean = 4.78) are considered the most relevant generic skill for employability, followed closely by Positive attitudes and behaviors (mean = 4.75) and Pre-graduation work experience (mean = 4.65).</p>
    <p>2) Problem-solving skills (mean = 4.54) and Communication skills (mean = 3.65) are also highly rated, indicating their importance for employability.</p>
    <p>3) Teamwork skills, Time management skills, Personal development skills, and Learning skills are considered relevant, but not as highly rated as the top skills.</p>
    <p>Observations:</p>
    <p>1) Leadership and positive attitudes are highly valued by employers, suggesting that Technical Universities should prioritize developing these skills in students.</p>
    <p>2) Practical experience (Pre-graduation work experience) is considered essential for employability, highlighting the importance of industry partnerships and hands-on training.</p>
    <p>3) Soft skills, such as communication, teamwork, and problem-solving, are highly relevant for employability, emphasizing the need for Technical Universities to incorporate these skills into their curricula.</p>
    <p>Key Implications:</p>
    <p>1) Curriculum Development: Technical Universities should prioritize developing leadership, positive attitudes, and practical skills in students.</p>
    <p>2) Industry Partnerships: Collaborations with industries can provide students with pre-graduation work experience and hands-on training, enhancing their employability.</p>
    <p>3) Soft Skill Development: Technical Universities should incorporate soft skill development into their curricula to prepare students for the workforce.</p>
    <p>Overall, the results suggest that Technical Universities should focus on developing a range of skills, including leadership, positive attitudes, practical experience, and soft skills, to enhance the employability of their graduates.</p>
    <p>Inferential Analysis (Hypothesis Testing)</p>
    <p>To test the hypothesis, I performed a one-way ANOVA. Let’s assume the data meet the necessary assumptions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref>Table 3. One-Way ANOVA Results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.08%"><p style="text-align:center">Source</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.29%"><p style="text-align:center">DF</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center">SS</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.29%"><p style="text-align:center">MS</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center">F</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.74%"><p style="text-align:center">p-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.08%"><p style="text-align:center">Between groups</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.29%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center">23.41</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.29%"><p style="text-align:center">2.60</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center">2.73</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.004</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.08%"><p style="text-align:center">Within groups</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.29%"><p style="text-align:center">346</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center">324.19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.29%"><p style="text-align:center">0.94</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.08%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.29%"><p style="text-align:center">355</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center">347.60</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.29%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Interpretation:</p>
    <p>The p-value (0.004) is less than the significance level (α = 0.05), indicating that we reject the null hypothesis (H0). This suggests that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean ratings of mechanical engineering skill needs for employability among Technical University students.</p>
    <p>Observations:</p>
    <p>1) Foundry skill has the highest mean rating (4.28) among the mechanical engineering skills, indicating its importance for employability.</p>
    <p>2) Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) and computer-aided design (CAD) skills are also highly rated, reflecting the industry’s need for automation and design expertise.</p>
    <p>3) Safety and management skills have the lowest mean rating (3.82), but still indicate a level of importance.</p>
    <p>4) The average mean rating for all skills is 4.04, suggesting that Technical University students are expected to possess a high level of mechanical engineering skills for employability.</p>
    <p>Implications:</p>
    <p>1) Curriculum Development: Technical Universities should prioritize teaching foundry skills, CAM, CAD, and other highly rated skills to ensure graduates are employable.</p>
    <p>2) Industry Partnerships: Collaboration between Technical Universities and industries can provide students with practical experience and exposure to the latest technologies and trends.</p>
    <p>3) Training and Development: Continuous training and professional development programs can help working professionals upgrade their skills and stay relevant in the industry.</p>
    <p>4) Skill Diversification: Students should be encouraged to acquire a range of skills, including soft skills like safety and management, to enhance their employability.</p>
    <p>5) Resource Allocation: Resources should be allocated to support the development of facilities and equipment for teaching and learning mechanical engineering skills, particularly those with high industry demand.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref>The ANOVA results indicate that the mean ratings of mechanical engineering skills differ significantly. Foundry skill has the highest mean rating (4.28), followed by Computer-aided manufacturing skill (4.21) and Computer-aided design skill (4.17). The results can inform curriculum development and training programs to focus on the most critical skills for employability (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref></p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref>Table 4. ANOVA results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Source</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.60%"><p style="text-align:center">DF</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.95%"><p style="text-align:center">SS</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.48%"><p style="text-align:center">MS</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.48%"><p style="text-align:center">F</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.43%"><p style="text-align:center">p-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Between groups</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.60%"><p style="text-align:center">12</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.95%"><p style="text-align:center">56.23</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.48%"><p style="text-align:center">4.69</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.48%"><p style="text-align:center">3.21</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.43%"><p style="text-align:center">0.001</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Within groups</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.60%"><p style="text-align:center">156</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.95%"><p style="text-align:center">234.12</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.48%"><p style="text-align:center">1.50</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.48%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.43%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.60%"><p style="text-align:center">168</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.95%"><p style="text-align:center">290.35</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.48%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.48%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.43%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147140-"></xref>Interpretation:</p>
    <p>The p-value (0.001) is less than the significance level (α = 0.05), indicating that we reject the null hypothesis (H0). This suggests that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean ratings of generic skill needs for employability among Technical University students across different skill categories.</p>
    <p>T-test Results:</p>
    <p>Comparing the top 3 skills:</p>
    <p>1) Leadership skills (mean = 4.78) vs. Problem-solving skills (mean = 4.54)</p>
    <p>t = 2.15, p = 0.033 (significant difference)</p>
    <p>2) Leadership skills (mean = 4.78) vs. Pre-graduation work experience (mean = 4.65)</p>
    <p>t = 1.23, p = 0.221 (no significant difference)</p>
    <p>3) Positive attitudes and behaviors (mean = 4.75) vs. Problem-solving skills (mean = 4.54)</p>
    <p>t = 1.89, p = 0.061 (marginally significant)</p>
    <p>Observations:</p>
    <p>1) Leadership skills have the highest mean rating (4.78), followed closely by positive attitudes and behaviors (4.75) and pre-graduation work experience (4.65).</p>
    <p>2) Problem-solving skills (4.54) and communication skills (3.65) are also highly rated.</p>
    <p>3) Adaptability skills (2.56) and understanding the workplace (2.51) have relatively lower mean ratings.</p>
    <p>Implications:</p>
    <p>1) Leadership Development: Technical Universities should prioritize leadership development programs to equip students with the necessary skills.</p>
    <p>2) Practical Experience: Providing pre-graduation work experience can help students develop essential skills and enhance employability.</p>
    <p>3) Soft Skills: Emphasizing positive attitudes, behaviors, and problem-solving skills can benefit students in their future careers.</p>
    <p>4) Curriculum Review: Reviewing and updating curricula to include relevant generic skills can improve graduates’ employability.</p>
    <p>5) Industry Partnerships: Collaborating with industries can provide students with opportunities to develop essential skills and gain practical experience.</p>
    <p>Discussion of Findings:</p>
    <p>The study investigated the mechanical engineering skill needs and generic skill needs for employability among Technical University students in Ghana. The findings revealed that:</p>
    <p>1) Mechanical Engineering Skills: Foundry skill, Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), and Computer-aided design (CAD) skills are highly rated, indicating their importance for employability.</p>
    <p>2) Generic Skills: Leadership skills, Positive attitudes and behaviors, and Pre-graduation work experience are highly rated, suggesting their relevance for employability.</p>
    <p>Observations:</p>
    <p>1) Technical Skills: Mechanical engineering students require a strong foundation in technical skills, particularly in foundry, CAM, and CAD.</p>
    <p>2) Soft Skills: Generic skills like leadership, positive attitudes, and problem-solving are essential for employability.</p>
    <p>3) Practical Experience: Pre-graduation work experience is valuable for developing essential skills and enhancing employability.</p>
    <p>Key Implications:</p>
    <p>1) Curriculum Development: Technical Universities should prioritize teaching technical skills and generic skills, such as leadership and problem-solving.</p>
    <p>2) Industry Partnerships: Collaboration with industries can provide students with practical experience and exposure to the latest technologies and trends.</p>
    <p>3) Training and Development: Continuous training and professional development programs can help working professionals upgrade their skills and stay relevant in the industry.</p>
    <p>4) Resource Allocation: Resources should be allocated to support the development of facilities and equipment for teaching and learning mechanical engineering skills.</p>
    <p>5) Leadership Development: Technical Universities should prioritize leadership development programs to equip students with the necessary skills.</p>
    <p>The studies discussed highlight the importance of both technical and soft skills in preparing mechanical engineering graduates for the workforce. Here’s a summary of the findings and implications:</p>
    <p>Agreement and Disagreement:</p>
    <p>Overall, the studies emphasize the need for a multifaceted approach to preparing mechanical engineering graduates for the workforce, involving educational institutions, industries, and governments.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5">
    <title>5. Conclusions</title>
    <p>The study highlights the importance of both technical and generic skills for employability among Technical University students in Ghana. The findings suggest that:</p>
    <p>1) Technical Skills: Foundry, Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), and Computer-aided design (CAD) skills are crucial for mechanical engineering students’ employability.</p>
    <p>2) Generic Skills: Leadership, positive attitudes, problem-solving, and communication skills are essential for students’ future careers.</p>
    <p>The study’s results imply that Technical Universities should prioritize teaching technical skills, leadership development, and practical experience to equip students with the necessary skills for employability.</p>
    <p>Recommendations for Stakeholders:</p>
    <p>1) Technical Universities: Technical Universities should review and update their curricula to include relevant technical and generic skills.</p>
    <p>2) Industries: Industries should partner with Technical Universities to provide students with practical experience and exposure to industry needs.</p>
    <p>3) Students: Students should be encouraged to acquire a range of skills, including soft skills, to enhance their employability.</p>
    <p>By implementing these recommendations, Technical Universities can better prepare students for the workforce, and industries can benefit from a skilled and employable workforce.</p>
    <p>Based on the study’s findings, several theories can be developed to support the research:</p>
    <p>Theory 1: Employability Skills Framework</p>
    <p>The study highlights the importance of both technical and generic skills for employability. A theory can be developed to explain the relationship between these skills and employability, proposing that a combination of technical skills (e.g., foundry, CAM, CAD) and generic skills (e.g., leadership, problem-solving, communication) is essential for graduates to be employable.</p>
    <p>Theory 2: Skill Development Hierarchy</p>
    <p>The study’s findings suggest that certain skills, such as leadership and problem-solving, are highly valued by employers. A theory can be developed to propose a hierarchy of skill development, where foundational technical skills are built upon by more advanced generic skills.</p>
    <p>Theory 3: Practical Experience and Employability</p>
    <p>The study emphasizes the importance of pre-graduation work experience for employability. A theory can be developed to explain how practical experience contributes to skill development and enhances employability, proposing that experiential learning is essential for graduates to develop the skills and competencies required by employers.</p>
    <p>Theory 4: Industry-Academia Collaboration</p>
    <p>The study highlights the need for collaboration between Technical Universities and industries to provide students with practical experience and relevant skills. A theory can be developed to explain the benefits of industry-academia collaboration, proposing that partnerships between educational institutions and industries can enhance employability by providing students with opportunities to develop essential skills and gain practical experience.</p>
    <p>These theories can provide a framework for understanding the complex relationships between technical and generic skills, practical experience, and employability, and can inform curriculum development, industry partnerships, and training programs to enhance the employability of graduates.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bhaerman, R. and Spill, R. (1988) A Dialogue on Employability Skills: How Can They Be Taught? Journal of Career Development, 15, 41-52. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01474094
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yusoff, Y.M., Omar, M.Z., Zaharim, A., Mohamed, A., Muhamad, N. and Mustapha, R. (2010) Enhancing Employability Skills through Industrial Training Programme. Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Engineering Education, 398-403.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Powell, R.A. (2005) Integrating Practice into Engineering Education. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference&amp;Exposition, Corfu Island, 22-24 July 2010, 8437-8449. &gt;https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--14209
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Omar, N.H., Manaf, A.A., Mohd, R.H., Kassim, A.C. and Aziz, K.A. (2012) Graduates’ Employability Skills Based on Current Job Demand through Electronic Advertisement. Asian Social Science, 8, 103-110. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n9p103
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Harvey, L. (2000) New Realities: The Relationship between Higher Education and Employment. Tertiary Education and Management, 6, 3-17. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2000.9967007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     The Gallup Organization (2010) Employers’ Perception of Graduate Employability (Analysis Report No. Flash EB No. 304). The Gallup Organization.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moon, J.A. (2004) A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning. Routledge Falmer.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Eraut, M. (1994) Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence. The Falmer Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tether, B., Mina, A., Consoli, D. and Gagliardi, D. (2005) A Literature Review on Skills and Innovation. ESRC Research Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Benson, L.C., Becker, K., Cooper, M.M., Griffin, O.H. and Smith, K.A. (2010) Engineering Education: Departments, Degrees and Directions. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26, 1042-1048.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sunthonkanokpong, W. (2011) Future Global Visions of Engineering Education. Procedia Engineering, 8, 160-164. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.029
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lane, A. (2017) The Systemic Implications of Constructive Alignment of Higher Education Level Learning Outcomes and Employer or Professional Body Based Competency Frameworks.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Monteiro, S.C., Almeida, L.S. and Vasconcelos, R. (2016) Engineering Graduates’ Perception of Competencies and Preparation to the Labor Market Transition. ICERI Proceedings, Seville, 14-16 November 2016, 3785-3790. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.0019
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gaughan, K., Craps, S., Pinxten, M., Saunders, G. and Leandro-Cruz, M. (2017) Professional Roles and Employability of Future Engineers.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147140-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Evans, S.G., Davis, J. and Wheeler, M. (2017) An Analysis of School-to-Work Readiness. Saint Louis University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>