For this study, the raw materials used are: Portland cement (which helps bind the soil particles together), pozzolan (which reacts chemically with the cement to form additional binding compounds), laterite (which forms the framework of the bricks), and water (which ensures cement hydration and creates cohesion between the dry particles). The soil samples for our experiments were taken from the West region of Cameroon, in the Bafoussam 1 subdivision, specifically in the Banengo neighborhood (Pont Voltaire), at a depth of 1.00 meter below the surface. The natural Pozzolan, of volcanic origin, comes from a quarry located in the West region, specifically in Foumbot. The cement used is a Portland type (CPJ 42.5) produced by the CIMAF company, with a setting time of 2 hours at 22˚C and a specific weight of 3.10, and the water used for hydration was taken from the CAMWATER potable water distribution network.

After collecting the soil and natural Pozzolan samples from the site, they were air-dried for 4 days and then sieved using a 5 mm mesh. These different materials were identified according to French standards and analyzed at the TWS laboratory in Cameroon. Physical tests were carried out, including visual inspection (to evaluate the number of fine particles), smell test (to detect organic matter), Indentation test (to feel the soil texture), touch test (to assess texture), and washing test (to estimate plasticity). Other tests included natural moisture content, specific and bulk density, particle size distribution (percentages of sand, gravel, and clay), and Atterberg limits. Mechanical tests such as the Proctor test (to determine the optimal moisture content and maximum dry density) were also performed to determine their characteristics.

To improve the mechanical properties of compressed earth bricks, we chose two types of treatment: one using 8% cement, and the other a mixed treatment (cement + Pozzolan). Table 1 below shows the quantity of materials used for each batch of blocks and the sample (M1) with 0% pozzolan is used as the control group. The Proctor test helped us determine the optimal moisture content that corresponds to the maximum dry density for each type of compressed earth brick. Before mixing, we made sure the materials were completely dry. Then, we performed dry mixing of the soil and Pozzolan for 2 minutes, followed by the addition of binders and continued mixing for 1 minute. Water was then added, and the entire mixture was mixed again for 2 minutes. The material was placed into a traditional mold of size 4 × 4 × 16 cm and compacted immediately after mixing using a manual press.

These samples were subjected to three curing methods for the compressed earth bricks (CEBs). The first method used steam curing at 40˚C, 60˚C, and 80˚C for 24 hours. The second method used oven drying at 40˚C, 60˚C, and 80˚C for 24 hours. The third method used ambient temperature, where the bricks were covered with plastic sheeting for 28 days. After curing, the bricks were tested for mechanical properties (compression and flexural strength) and durability (water absorption and porosity).

The results of tests on the laterite used, based on French AFNOR standards, are shown in Table 2 .

In summary, field analysis showed that the soil did not contain organic matter. The touch test revealed that when the soil sample is crumbled, it feels rough, which means the soil has a high sand content. The hand-washing test indicated that the soil was not sticky, and the indentation test showed that it made a gritty sound, suggesting low clay content.

The Atterberg limits showed a liquid limit (LL) of 57.40% at 25 blows and a plastic limit (PL) of 33.33%. These values are lower than those obtained by Djuickouo [5] in Dschang (LL = 63%, PL = 43%). The plasticity index (PI) was 24.07%, which is higher than the values reported by Djuickouo [5] . and Dongmo [6] , 20% and 21.52% respectively. This means our laterite is a plastic and moderately clayey soil.

The particle size distribution showed that the soil is well-graded, with 63.63% gravel, 33.47% coarse sand, and 2.90% fine sand. Therefore, the Banengo laterite can be classified as gravelly lateritic soil. It falls within the grain size range suitable for earthen construction, according to the Cameroonian CEBs standard (NC 102-114, 2002-2006). This material is suitable for making compressed earth bricks, as described in the ORAN standard (1996) and by Mamba [7] .

Regarding the pozzolan, the results of tests performed according to the French AFNOR 1984 standards are shown in Table 3 .

The particle size distribution showed that the Pozzolan is well-graded, with 15.32% gravel and 84.68% sand.

Figure 1 shows steam curing, oven curing, and ambient temperature curing, illustrates the changes in compressive strength for the different samples. From these figures, we observe that compressive strength increases as the percentage of natural pozzolan increases, and also with higher curing temperatures. This result confirms the findings on the physical and mechanical behavior of compressed earth blocks [8] [9] .

Figure 2 , which shows steam curing, oven curing, and ambient temperature curing, illustrates the variations in flexural strength for the different samples. From these figures, we observe that flexural strength increases as the amount of natural pozzolan increases, and also with higher curing temperatures. This result supports previous findings on the physical and mechanical behavior of compressed earth blocks, as reported by Milogo et al. (2011) and Ouedraogo et al. (2017).

The results show that steam curing significantly increases the compressive strength of the bricks compared to bricks cured at ambient temperature for 28 days or in the oven. However, the mechanical strength of CEBs cured with steam for just 24 hours is close to the strength of CEBs cured at ambient temperature for 18 months. This can be explained by the steam curing process, which accelerates cement hydration and the pozzolanic reaction between the cement and the soil [3] .

In this case, water absorption decreases with the addition of pozzolan. The best result is obtained with 32% natural pozzolan. The samples showed an absorption rate below 15%, which meets the limit recommended by the Cameroonian standard (NC 102-114, 2002-2006).