<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jgis
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Geographic Information System
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2151-1950
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2151-1969
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jgis.2025.175015
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jgis-146209
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Land Cover Change Assessment, Prediction Modelling, and Ecosystem Service Implications in Lubigi Wetland, Kampala, Uganda
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Rose Malot
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Waswa
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Paul Thomas
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Obade
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Steven
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Njuguna
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Environmental Science and Education, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aRegional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development, Nairobi, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     28
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    17
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    05
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    324
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    334
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      15,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Urbanization and agricultural expansion often result in the degradation of natural wetlands, leading to significant ecological impacts. This study explored the dynamics of land cover changes and their implications on ecosystem services in Lubigi Wetland, Kampala, Uganda. The objectives were to assess the dynamics of land cover changes between 1999 and 2022, predict future land cover scenarios for 2030, and identify the ecosystem services under threat due to wetland degradation. Sentinel-2 and Landsat imagery were processed using ArcGIS and the Land Change Modeler (LCM) to assess land cover transitions. Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network and Markov Chain analysis were employed to model future land cover scenarios. Land cover transitions were quantitatively calculated in terms of gains, losses, and net change. Regression analysis was used to identify key drivers of wetland degradation. The ecosystem services evaluated were categorized into regulating, provisioning, cultural, and supporting services. The findings reveal significant land cover changes in Lubigi Wetland from 1999 to 2022, with built-up areas increasing by 1140.60% from 10.74 km
    <sup>2</sup> in 1999 to 122.5 km
    <sup>2</sup> in 2022, while wetland areas decreased by 49.5%, from 453.54 km
    <sup>2</sup> to 228.96 km
    <sup>2</sup>. By 2030, built-up areas are predicted to expand further to 279 km
    <sup>2</sup>, and wetland areas are projected to shrink to 200 km
    <sup>2</sup>. The loss of wetland area has had a profound impact on ecosystem services, particularly in flood regulation, water quality, and biodiversity support, all of which have been significantly degraded due to increasing anthropogenic pressures. The results suggest that population growth and urban expansion are major drivers of wetland degradation, and urgent conservation measures are necessary to mitigate further damage. The MLP neural network demonstrated an accuracy rate of 87.64%, supporting its use in land cover change modelling. The study concludes that without intervention, the continued expansion of anthropogenic land cover will exacerbate the loss of critical ecosystem services, further threatening the ecological stability of Lubigi Wetland.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Land Change Modeler
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Land Use Land Cover
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Markov Chain
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Multi-Layer Perceptron
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Wetland degradation
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Remote sensing
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Lubigi Wetland
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Kampala
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Uganda
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Wetlands are among the most productive ecosystems globally, providing provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural services that sustain biodiversity and human well-being <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. They play critical roles in flood regulation, water purification, climate mitigation, and carbon storage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Despite their importance, wetlands have been degraded worldwide due to urban expansion, agriculture, and infrastructure development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-6">
     [6]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In Africa, wetlands are increasingly threatened by unsustainable land use practices and weak policy enforcement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Uganda, with wetlands covering approximately 13% of its total land area, has experienced significant wetland losses, estimated at 2% annually <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-9">
     [9]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. The Lubigi Wetland, located in northwestern Kampala, exemplifies this trend. Once a critical ecological buffer, it has been increasingly encroached upon by settlements, agriculture, and industrial activities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-11">
     [11]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-12">
     [12]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Previous studies on Lubigi have documented ecological functions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-11">
     [11]
    </xref>, land use pressures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-14">
     [14]
    </xref>, and biodiversity values <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-15">
     [15]
    </xref>, but comprehensive analyses integrating historical land cover change, predictive modelling, and ecosystem service implications remain limited. Advances in remote sensing and predictive modelling now allow for robust assessments of land cover dynamics and future trajectories <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-16">
     [16]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-17">
     [17]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>This study aimed to:</p>
   <p>1. Assess historical land cover changes in Lubigi Wetland between 1999 and 2022.</p>
   <p>2. Predict land cover scenarios for 2030 using a Multi-Layer Perceptron neural network and Markov Chain analysis.</p>
   <p>3. Evaluate the implications of land cover change on wetland ecosystem services.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Literature Review</title>
   <p>Wetlands contributed disproportionately to global ecosystem services despite covering only a small fraction of the Earth’s surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. They supported biodiversity, stored carbon, and provided flood regulation, water purification, and food security <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. However, population growth, agriculture, and urban development were identified as major drivers of wetland degradation worldwide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-5">
     [5]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-7">
     [7]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In Africa, wetland resources were under increasing pressure from irrigation projects, land reclamation, and weak institutional frameworks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-8">
     [8]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. Studies highlighted their economic value <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-8">
     [8]
    </xref> and vulnerability to unsustainable exploitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. The Ramsar Convention provided guidelines for sustainable wetland management <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-17">
     [17]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-20">
     [20]
    </xref>, but implementation across many African countries, including Uganda, remained inadequate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-21">
     [21]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-22">
     [22]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In Uganda, wetlands covered about 13% of the country and played critical ecological and socio-economic roles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. Despite this, degradation was accelerating, particularly around urban centers like Kampala <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. The Lubigi Wetland, located within the Kampala-Mukono corridor, had been reported to be heavily encroached upon by agriculture, settlement, and industrial development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-11">
     [11]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. Such degradation reduced its capacity to regulate floods, purify water, and support biodiversity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-11">
     [11]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-14">
     [14]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-15">
     [15]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Remote sensing and Earth Observation tools had increasingly been applied to assess land cover changes and wetland dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-6">
     [6]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. Object-oriented classification and satellite-based monitoring demonstrated strong potential in capturing wetland loss trends <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. Prediction models, including neural networks and Markov Chain analysis, had been successfully applied to project land cover changes under different scenarios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-23">
     [23]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. Nevertheless, few studies integrated these methods with ecosystem service assessment to guide policy and urban planning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-25">
     [25]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-26">
     [26]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Study Area</title>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-"></xref>Figure 1. Study area map (Source: Waswa, 2021).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8402604-rId19.jpeg?20250930085556" />
    </fig>
    <p>The study area as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref> focused on Lubigi Wetland, located in northwestern Kampala, Uganda. The wetland formed part of the greater Lake Victoria Basin and provided ecological services such as flood regulation, water purification, and habitat for biodiversity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-9">
      [9]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-11">
      [11]
     </xref>. However, the wetland had been increasingly encroached upon by settlements, agriculture, and industrial activities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-13">
      [13]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-14">
      [14]
     </xref>. The methodology employed is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-"></xref>Figure 2. Methodology flowchart (Source: Waswa, 2021).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8402604-rId20.jpeg?20250930085556" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Data Sources</title>
    <p>Satellite imagery from Landsat (1999, 2010) and Sentinel-2 (2022) were used to analyze land cover dynamics. Landsat images with a spatial resolution of 30 m were resampled to 10 m to match Sentinel-2 resolution. Ancillary data included population statistics from Uganda Bureau of Statistics and secondary literature on wetland dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-9">
      [9]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-26">
      [26]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Image Processing and Classification</title>
    <p>Preprocessing included geometric and radiometric corrections. Land cover maps were generated using the Maximum Likelihood Classification algorithm, which had been widely applied in wetland and land use studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-3">
      [3]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-6">
      [6]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-16">
      [16]
     </xref>. Five land cover classes were identified: wetlands, built-up areas, cropland, forest, and water bodies.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Accuracy Assessment</title>
    <p>Accuracy of classification was evaluated using ground control points and high-resolution imagery. A confusion matrix and kappa coefficient were generated to determine classification reliability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-27">
      [27]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Prediction Modelling</title>
    <p>The LULC projection process for 2030 used a transition sub-model structure. The analysis was conducted using logistic regression models and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network in the Land Change Modeler <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-23">
      [23]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-24">
      [24]
     </xref>. Driver variables incorporated into the MLP included road networks, settlement distribution, and elevation, which were selected to represent accessibility, demographic pressure, and physical constraints on land cover change. This structured approach enabled the identification of land cover transitions and persistence between 1999 and 2010, thereby supporting 2030 projections. The main findings show that at least 1905 cells changed land cover classes during this time, but a significant number of cells (25,468) remained in the same land cover class. The sample size for the analysis was 1,905, with a 50% split between training and testing data.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>3.6. Ecosystem Service Assessment</title>
    <p>Ecosystem services were assessed by linking land cover categories with provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural functions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-4">
      [4]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-5">
      [5]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-18">
      [18]
     </xref>. Changes in land cover were analyzed to infer impacts on wetland services such as flood regulation, biodiversity, and carbon storage.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Land Cover Change (1999-2022)</title>
    <p>The classified land cover maps for 1999, 2010, and 2022 illustrated significant transformations within the Lubigi Wetland (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>). Between 1999 and 2022, built-up areas expanded from 10.74 km<sup>2</sup> to 122.5 km<sup>2</sup>, representing a 1040% increase. Conversely, wetlands declined from 453.54 km<sup>2</sup> to 228.96 km<sup>2</sup>, a loss of nearly 50%. Cropland expanded significantly, while forest and water bodies remained relatively stable.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-"></xref>Figure 3. Spatial distribution of land cover in Lubigi wetland (1999-2022).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8402604-rId21.jpeg?20250930085601" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-"></xref>Figure 4. Trends in land use and land cover change in km<sup>2</sup> for Lubigi wetland (1999-2022).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8402604-rId22.jpeg?20250930085601" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-"></xref>Table 1. Land use and land cover change in km<sup>2</sup> of Lubigi wetland (1999-2022).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="28.78%"><p style="text-align:center">LULC</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">1999</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">2010</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.46%"><p style="text-align:center">2022</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Built up Area</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">10.74</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">38.80</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.46%"><p style="text-align:center">122.50</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Cropland</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">26.68</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">60.02</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.46%"><p style="text-align:center">92.88</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Forestland</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">297.35</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">298.83</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.46%"><p style="text-align:center">334.83</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Waterbody</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">2.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">10.39</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.46%"><p style="text-align:center">11.19</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Wetland</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">453.54</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">382.33</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.46%"><p style="text-align:center">228.96</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">790.37</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.88%"><p style="text-align:center">790.37</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.46%"><p style="text-align:center">790.37</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The land cover change statistics are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>, which shows the change in each category. Wetlands were the most affected, highlighting the scale of anthropogenic pressure. These results were consistent with earlier studies that identified urban expansion and agriculture as major drivers of wetland degradation in Uganda <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-11">
      [11]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-15">
      [15]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Prediction Modelling (2030 Scenario)</title>
    <p>The Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) classes were merged into three categories, namely: Anthropogenic (Built-up Area and Cropland), Forestland, and Wetland (Waterbody and Wetland). This reclassification was undertaken to reduce model complexity and improve predictive performance by minimizing confusion among spectrally similar classes, while still preserving the ecological and socio-economic relevance of key land cover types. Similar aggregation of LULC classes has been applied in previous modelling studies to enhance robustness and interpretability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-23">
      [23]
     </xref>. Grouping Built-up and Cropland into “Anthropogenic” emphasized human-driven land transformations, whereas Forestland and Wetlands were retained as distinct categories due to their ecological importance and vulnerability to degradation. Using this simplified classification, the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural network and Markov Chain model projected continued wetland decline and urban expansion by 2030 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>). Built-up areas were expected to reach 279 km<sup>2</sup>, while wetlands would shrink further to 200 km<sup>2</sup>. The validation demonstrated strong overlap between observed and predicted land cover, with the model achieving an accuracy of 87.64%. This performance aligned with reported applications of similar predictive approaches in land use modelling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-6">
      [6]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-24">
      [24]
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-"></xref>Figure 5. Projected land use land cover changes in km<sup>2</sup> (2022-2030).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8402604-rId23.jpeg?20250930085602" />
    </fig>
    <p>These projections indicated that without intervention, wetland loss in Kampala would accelerate, intensifying ecological vulnerability.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Drivers of Land Cover Change</title>
    <p>Regression analysis results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>) revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.985, p &lt; 0.05) between population growth and the expansion of built-up areas, based on four paired data points derived from population figures and land cover extent (km<sup>2</sup>) for the analyzed years. This indicates demographic pressure as a key driver of wetland degradation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-9">
      [9]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-26">
      [26]
     </xref>. However, the small sample size (n = 4) represents a limitation, and the results should therefore be interpreted with caution. Infrastructure development, road construction, and informal settlements along the Kampala-Mukono corridor further contributed to the observed wetland losses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-13">
      [13]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-14">
      [14]
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-"></xref>Table 2. Regression analysis results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Parameter</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">0.9854</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">r<sup>2</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">0.971</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">0.01458</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Covariance</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">206522000</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Sample Size (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Statistic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="70.55%"><p style="text-align:center">8.1902</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>4.4. Implications for Ecosystem Services</title>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-"></xref>Figure 6. Ecosystem services related to wetland.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8402604-rId24.jpeg?20250930085603" />
    </fig>
    <p>Ecosystem services were assessed by linking land cover categories with ecosystem functions using a qualitative matrix approach developed from the literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-4">
      [4]
     </xref>. The decline in wetland cover had already undermined critical ecosystem services. Flood regulation capacity was reduced, increasing the frequency and severity of urban flooding (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-11">
      [11]
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-12">
      [12]
     </xref>. Water purification and groundwater recharge functions were diminished, contributing to declining water quality in Kampala <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-4">
      [4]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-18">
      [18]
     </xref>. The loss of wetland vegetation also reduced carbon sequestration potential, undermining climate change mitigation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-1">
      [1]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-2">
      [2]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-12">
      [12]
     </xref>. Biodiversity support functions were threatened, with field-based studies reporting declines in bird and aquatic species populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-15">
      [15]
     </xref>. In addition, the degradation of Lubigi Wetland diminished cultural ecosystem services. Recreational opportunities and access to natural green spaces have declined, cultural heritage and spiritual values associated with wetlands are eroding, and the role of wetlands as outdoor learning environments has been weakened, undermining both social well-being and community engagement in conservation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-4">
      [4]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_5">
    <title>4.5. Comparison with Other Studies</title>
    <p>The observed trends in Lubigi were consistent with global wetland loss patterns, where urbanization and agricultural expansion remained the primary drivers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-2">
      [2]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-5">
      [5]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-6">
      [6]
     </xref>. Comparable studies in Greater Cairo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-6">
      [6]
     </xref> and papyrus swamps in East Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-5">
      [5]
     </xref> reported similar declines in wetland ecosystem services.</p>
    <p>These results reinforced the importance of predictive modelling in anticipating environmental change and informing sustainable urban planning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-3">
      [3]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-16">
      [16]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.146209-17">
      [17]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion and Recommendations</title>
   <p>This study demonstrated that Lubigi Wetland experienced rapid land cover changes between 1999 and 2022, with built-up areas expanding more than tenfold while wetland cover declined by nearly half. Prediction modelling indicated that by 2030, built-up areas were expected to increase further to 279 km<sup>2</sup>, while wetlands would shrink to 200 km<sup>2</sup>. These findings confirmed that urbanization and agricultural encroachment were the main drivers of wetland degradation, strongly correlated with population growth and infrastructure expansion.</p>
   <p>The decline in wetland cover had already reduced the wetland’s capacity to regulate floods, purify water, support biodiversity, and store carbon. Without timely intervention, ecosystem service losses were expected to intensify, undermining both ecological integrity and human well-being in Kampala.</p>
   <p>Based on these findings, the following recommendations were made:</p>
   <p>1. Strengthen wetland protection policies: Enforcement of existing legislation and urban planning regulations should be prioritized to curb illegal encroachment.</p>
   <p>2. Promote community engagement: Local communities should be involved in wetland management through education and sustainable livelihood alternatives.</p>
   <p>3. Integrate predictive modelling into planning: Tools such as MLP and Markov Chain models should inform urban development and conservation strategies.</p>
   <p>4. Restore degraded wetland areas: Rehabilitation of buffer zones and reforestation programs could help recover lost ecological functions.</p>
   <p>5. Mainstream wetland conservation in development planning: National and local governments should integrate wetland conservation into broader urban development frameworks.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors acknowledged the support of Kenyatta University and the Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD). Special appreciation was extended to the GMES and Africa program, Government of Uganda agencies and local authorities for facilitating access to data and field information.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dise, N.B. (2009) Peatland Response to Global Change. Science, 326, 810-811. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1174268
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zedler, J.B. and Kercher, S. (2005) Wetland Resources: Status, Trends, Ecosystem Services, and Restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 39-74. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Prigent, C., Matthews, E., Aires, F. and Rossow, W.B. (2001) Remote Sensing of Global Wetland Dynamics with Multiple Satellite Data Sets. Geophysical Research Letters, 28, 4631-4634. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013263
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xu, T., Weng, B., Yan, D., Wang, K., Li, X., Bi, W., et al. (2019) Wetlands of International Importance: Status, Threats, and Future Protection. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, Article 1818. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101818
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Maclean, I.M.D., Boar, R.R. and Lugo, C. (2011) A Review of the Relative Merits of Conserving, Using, or Draining Papyrus Swamps. Environmental Management, 47, 218-229. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9592-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Megahed, Y., Cabral, P., Silva, J. and Caetano, M. (2015) Land Cover Mapping Analysis and Urban Growth Modelling Using Remote Sensing Techniques in Greater Cairo Region-Egypt. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4, 1750-1769. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4031750
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kabii, T. (n.d.) An Overview of African Wetlands. Ramsar Bureau&amp;East Africa School Server. &gt;https://eastafricaschoolserver.org/content/_public/Environment/Natural%20Habitat/African%20Wetlands.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Turyahabwe, N., Kakuru, W., Tweheyo, M. and Tumusiime, D.M. (2013) Contribution of Wetland Resources to Household Food Security in Uganda. Agriculture&amp;Food Security, 2, 2-12. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/2048-7010-2-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Government of Uganda (2010) Uganda Wetlands Atlas: Volume II. Gou Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     World Bank (2015) Report on Environmental Governance (Draft). World Bank.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Glass, S. (2007) Implementing Uganda’s National Wetlands Policy: A Case Study of Kabale District (Independent Study Project Collection, 101). SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad. &gt;https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/101 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Odeke, C. (2019) Wetland Degradation and Carbon Sequestration Potential: A Case of Lubigi Wetland, Uganda. Doctoral Dissertation, Kyambogo University, Uganda.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gumm, E. (2011) The Use and Misuse of Wetlands in Kampala. Independent Study Collection (ISP), 1022.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wasswa, H., Kakembo, V. and Mugagga, F. (2018) A Spatial and Temporal Assessment of Wetland Loss to Development Projects: The Case of the Kampala-Mukono Corridor Wetlands in Uganda. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 76, 195-212. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2018.1494931
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ainomugisha, E. (2021) Assessment of the Influence of Wetland Modification on Bird Communities of Lubigi in Central Uganda. Doctoral Dissertation, Makerere University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Frohn, R.C., Autrey, B.C., Lane, C.R. and Reif, M. (2011) Segmentation and Object-Oriented Classification of Wetlands in a Karst Florida Landscape Using Multi-Season Landsat-7 ETM + Imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32, 1471-1489. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903559762
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rebelo, L.M., Finlayson, C.M., Strauch, A., Rosenqvist, A., Perennou, C., Tøttrup, C. and Davidson, N. (2018) The Use of Earth Observation for Wetland Inventory, Assessment and Monitoring: An Information Source for the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Ramsar Technical Report No. 10, Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Willbroad, B. and Kiyawa, S.A. (2019) Sustainable Management and Conservation of Wetland Resources in Uganda: A Review. Journal of Environment and Health Science, 5, 47-51. &gt;https://doi.org/10.15436/2378-6841.19.2479 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ramsar Convention Secretariat (2006) The Ramsar Convention Manual: A Guide to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971). 4th Edition, Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     International Union for Conservation of Nature (2006) Guidelines for Aid Agencies for Improved Conservation and Sustainable Use of Tropical and Sub-Tropical Wetlands. OECD.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     WMD-MWE, UBOS, ILRI and WRI (2009) Mapping a Better Future: How Spatial Analysis Can Benefit Wetlands and Reduce Poverty in Uganda.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tateishi, R., Tsend-Ayush, J., Ghar, M. A., Al-Bilbisi, H. and Okatani, T. (2007) Sampling Methods for Validation of Large Area Land Cover Mapping. Journal of The Remote Sensing Society of Japan, 27, 195-204.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fura, G.D. (2013) Analysing and Modelling Urban Land Cover Change for Run-Off Modelling in Kampala, Uganda. Master’s Thesis, University of Twente.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nicholls, R.J., Hanson, S.E., Lowe, J.A., Warrick, R.A., Lu, X., Long, A.J. and Carter, T.R. (2011) Constructing Sea-Level Scenarios for Impact and Adaptation Assessment of Coastal Areas: A Guidance Document. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Task Group on Data and Scenario Support for Impact and Climate Analysis (TGICA), 47.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schuijt, K. (2002) Land and Water Use of Wetlands in Africa: Economic Values of African Wetlands (Interim Report IR-02-063). International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Adam, H.A.K. (2018) The Politics of Natural Resources Governance in Africa: Environment, Conflict and Security Nexus in Nigeria’s Niger Delta Region. Doctoral Dissertation, London South Bank University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.146209-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kayima, J.K., Mayo, A.W. and Norbert, J. (2018) Ecological Characteristics and Morphological Features of the Lubigi Wetland in Uganda. Environment and Ecology Research, 6, 218-228. &gt;https://doi.org/10.13189/eer.2018.060402
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>