<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojbm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Business and Management
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2329-3284
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2329-3292
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojbm.2025.135198
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojbm-145966
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Business 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Economics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Digital Transformation Strategies Used by Church Leaders to Increase Revenues and Meet Budgetary Goals
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Lee
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Riley
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Kim
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Critchlow
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aCollege of Management and Human Potential, Walden University, Minneapolis, USA
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     04
    </day> 
    <month>
     08
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    05
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    3679
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    3696
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      5,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Ineffective strategies to use digital transformation to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals can negatively impact small rural church leadership capabilities. Small rural church leaders who struggle to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals are at high risk of business instability. Grounded in the diffusion of innovations theory, the purpose of this qualitative pragmatic inquiry was to identify and explore effective digital transformation strategies used by small rural church leaders to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals. Participants were eight small rural church leaders who had effectively used digital transformation to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals. Small rural churches are churches that have fewer than 500 members and are not in a metropolitan area. Participants were eight small rural church leaders who had effectively used digital transformation to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals. Data were collected using semistructured interviews, public websites, and current and archival documents. Using thematic analysis, five key themes were identified: leveraging digital platforms, overcoming challenges, leadership and congregational engagement, financial management, and digital presence and visibility. The implications for positive social change include the potential for rural church leaders and nonprofit stakeholders to implement effective digital strategies that foster inclusion, bridge technological divides, and strengthen community resilience in underserved areas.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Digital Transformation
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Church Leaders
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Revenue Growth
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Budgetary Goals
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Financial Management
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Technology Adoption
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Digital Tools
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Resource Allocation
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Strategic Planning
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Organizational Change
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Some church leaders do not know how to use digital transformation to increase revenues, which results in not meeting budgetary goals. Many rely on traditional and face-to-face interactions to engage congregants and raise funds. However, these approaches are no longer sufficient in the digital age, and church leaders face challenges adapting to modern community engagement and fundraising tools. Limited access to high-speed internet, advanced technology, and cultural resistance from clergy hinder progress and create barriers to adopting digital tools effectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-6">
     Campbell, 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-39">
     Ugboh, 2023
    </xref>). Church leaders risk losing relevance with tech-savvy congregants and hindering financial growth without addressing these barriers.</p>
   <p>Economic constraints complicate digital transformation efforts. Limited budgets and reliance on inconsistent donations hinder some small rural churches from investing in technologies and training (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-6">
     Campbell, 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-26">
     Niazi et al., 2024
    </xref>). The COVID-19 pandemic worsened financial vulnerabilities by restricting in-person gatherings, a primary funding source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-26">
     Niazi et al., 2024
    </xref>). Small rural churches are characterized as having memberships below 500 and being geographically located outside of metropolitan areas. Rural churches were affected by technological and educational barriers, unlike urban churches that adapted quickly to online services and digital giving (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-19">
     Holleman et al., 2022
    </xref>). Small rural church leaders must adopt digital tools strategically to modernize operations and expand their reach to maintain financial stability.</p>
   <p>This paper offers three sets of contributions to existing literature. First, I validate the diffusion of innovations (DOI) theory, validating its relevance in digital transformation strategies. Also, the paper expands the theoretical understanding of the DOI in religious organizations. Second, I outline five strategies business leaders may develop to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals. Third, I offer recommendations for future research to enhance business practices by addressing the gaps identified in the paper.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-"></xref>I will proceed as follows. In the following section, I will briefly detail the participant selection criteria, data collection procedures, and the specific steps used to conduct analyses. Next, I will introduce the conceptual framework for developing discussions on the DOI theory in implementing digital transformation strategies in small rural churches in the southeast U.S. Then, I will pose the research question and discuss aspects of the business contributions and recommendations for professional practice, centering on five specific themes and their relevance to the findings. On this basis, I will explore the implications of social change relating to business and organizational leaders and the research-scholar community. Finally, I will identify directions for future research projects related to improved practice in business.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Methods</title>
   <p>The researchers conducted a qualitative pragmatic inquiry to identify effective digital transformation strategies used by small rural church leaders in the southeast United States to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals. The research approach centered on developing practical, actionable insights for church leaders. The project employed purposive sampling to select eight small rural church leaders from churches with fewer than 500 members in nonmetropolitan areas who had successfully implemented digital transformation strategies. The researchers recruited participants through social media, personal connections, and professional associations. The project reached data saturation after seven interviews, with one additional interview conducted for confirmation.</p>
   <p>The primary data collection method was semistructured interviews, with secondary data supplementing findings from public documents, websites, and social media pages. The researchers audio-recorded all interviews and followed a standardized protocol to ensure consistency and reduce bias. Member-checking sessions verified the interpretation accuracy of participant responses. The interview protocol was used to maintain consistency throughout the data collection process while allowing exploration of unique perspectives and experiences.</p>
   <p>The researchers employed thematic analysis to examine patterns and meanings in the dataset. The analytical process involved transcribing interviews, creating codes to categorize data, identifying recurring themes, and consolidating findings to minimize redundancy. The researchers used reflexivity throughout the analysis to account for potential bias from experience as a church administrator. All data was organized using labeled and password-protected files, research logs, and interview transcripts to promote systematic tracking and quality interpretations. The analysis correlated key themes with existing literature and the conceptual framework.</p>
   <p>The researchers enhanced reliability through member-checking, consistent interview protocols, and multiple verification steps for transcription accuracy. Further, the researchers ensured validity through credibility via member-checking and data triangulation, transferability through detailed documentation of procedures, confirmability through reflexive analysis and probing questions, and data saturation confirmation. The comprehensive approach to reliability and validity strengthened the project’s methodological rigor and trustworthiness of findings.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. The DOI Theory in Digital Transformation</title>
   <p>The DOI theory was developed by Rogers in 1962 and expanded in 1995. The theory gained prominence in the late twentieth century and has been used to understand how new ideas, technologies, and practices spread through social systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-32">
     Rogers, 1962, 1995
    </xref>). Rogers described that five key attributes of the DOI determine adoption rate and success: relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. Relative advantage referred to the degree to which the innovation was perceived as better than what it replaced, and compatibility referred to how well the innovation aligned with the values, needs, and experiences of potential adopters. Compatibility referred to the ease of understanding and using the innovation, while trialability referred to the ability to test or experiment with the innovation before fully committing to the implementation of the innovation. Observability referred to the extent to which the results of the innovation were visible to others. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers (1995)
    </xref> explained that these five attributes correspond with perceptions of innovation, which determine adoption likelihood and speed.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers (1995)
    </xref> categorized adopters into five groups based on their willingness to adopt innovations: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. Innovators and early adopters adopt first and influence others, while early and late majorities adopt later cautiously, and laggards often resist change. The five-stage innovation-decision process is the sequence during which an individual first gains knowledge about an innovation to confirming decisions to continue using it (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-16">
     Frei-Landau et al., 2022
    </xref>). The five-stage innovation-decision process for the DOI theory is knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation. Mass media plays a critical role in innovation adoption. Opinion leaders and change agents serve as important intermediaries by providing information, addressing doubts and encouraging innovation adoption, especially when they share characteristics with potential adopters.</p>
   <p>Organizations across diverse sectors actively applied the theory to analyze and facilitate innovation adoption, demonstrating its broad applicability. Healthcare providers implemented telehealth services in rural areas based on competency perceptions and infrastructure capabilities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-42">
     Yarbrough, 2023
    </xref>). Indian businesses adopted digital communication services by addressing infrastructure, costs, and digital literacy challenges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-3">
     Asrani &amp; Kar, 2022
    </xref>). The DOI theory emphasizes successful innovation adoption depends on both innovation characteristics and social context. Organizations must consider how innovations align with target population values and needs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers, 1995
    </xref>). The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated this as organizations rapidly adopted virtual solutions to maintain operations, with educational institutions used virtual learning technologies based on ease of use and perceived usefulness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-27">
     Nik Azman et al., 2021a
    </xref>). Social systems and communication channels significantly influenced adoption rates, as evidenced by businesses that successfully integrate Internet of Things and artificial intelligence technologies by leveraging existing communication networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-11">
     Dymitrowski &amp; Mielcarek, 2021
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Complexity and perceived risks are significant adoption barriers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-21">
     Huong &amp; Doc, 2023
    </xref>). Organizations overcame these barriers by developing tailored strategies that address technological challenges and foster readiness for change. For instance, multinational corporations’ adoption of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) improved capital market performance when organizations carefully considered implementation strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-13">
     Elmghaamez et al., 2022
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Religious organizations have fundamentally transformed their ministry activities through the strategic adoption of digital tools and platforms, revolutionizing traditional approaches to worship and community engagement. Digital platforms enabled congregations to transcend physical boundaries, fostering broader engagement and accessibility through live streaming, mobile applications, and social media integration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-34">
     Roso, 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-36">
     Sadiku et al., 2022
    </xref>). Religious organizations demonstrated the transformation through specific technological implementations. For instance, churches in New York successfully leveraged digital platforms for adult discipleship during the COVID-19 pandemic and maintained robust community engagement despite physical restrictions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-10">
     Dunlow, 2021
    </xref>). Additionally, mobile applications served as essential tools for younger generations who actively prefer digital modes of interaction and spiritual connection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-34">
     Roso, 2023
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Implementing digital transformation in religious contexts required organizations to address multiple dimensions simultaneously. Religious leaders navigated techno-logical adoption, organizational change, and evolving user behaviors to create effective transformation strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-37">
     Shi et al., 2022
    </xref>). The dynamic nature of digital tools necessitated continuous learning and innovation within religious organizations, with success depending heavily on leadership’s willingness to embrace change and congregations’ ability to adapt to new practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-7">
     Cooper et al., 2021
    </xref>). Researchers demonstrated how effective digital strategies renovated traditional operational models while successfully integrating digital tools into organizational processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-8">
     Correani et al., 2020
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Multifaceted transformation extended beyond mere technological implementation to encompass cultural and structural shifts within religious organizations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-40">
     Verhoef et al., 2021
    </xref>). Churches navigated the complexities of digital transformation while maintaining their theological and operational values by aligning digital strategies with organizational missions. Successful digital practices required collaboration across different fields of expertise and ensured that technological advancements enhanced rather than diminished spiritual growth and community connections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-7">
     Cooper et al., 2021
    </xref>). The holistic approach enabled religious organizations to leverage digital transformation effectively while preserving their fundamental mission and values in an increasingly digital world.</p>
   <p>The DOI theory continues to guide digital transformation initiatives across various sectors, providing organizations with a structured approach to understand adoption factors and develop effective implementation strategies. For small rural churches in the southeast United States, the theory was used for implementing digital transformation strategies to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals. Organizations can better navigate complexities of technological change and ensure successful adoption by considering innovation characteristics and social dynamics. The DOI intersects with another theoretical framework, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>). Although the TAM offers valuable insights, the DOI theory is a more comprehensive approach to understanding how digital transformation can be applied in small rural churches in the southeast United States.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-"></xref>Table 1. Theories used to understand digital transformation.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">Theory</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Date</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Theorist</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="62.11%"><p style="text-align:center">Summary</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">DOI</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.87%"><p style="text-align:center">1962</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Rogers</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="62.11%"><p style="text-align:center">Explains how new ideas and technologies spread through social systems over time. It identifies five adopter categories (from innovators to laggards) and key innovation characteristics (e.g., relative advantage, compatibility) that influence the rate of adoption.</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="12.68%"><p style="text-align:center">TAM</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="11.87%"><p style="text-align:center">1989</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="14.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Davis</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="62.11%"><p style="text-align:center">Predicts technology acceptance based on two key factors: Perceived Usefulness (PU)—the belief that the tech improves performance—and Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU)—the belief that the tech is effortless. These factors shape a user’s attitude and intention to use the technology.</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>The TAM in Digital Transformation</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-"></xref>Davis introduced the technology acceptance model (TAM) as a theoretical framework that strengthens and complements the DOI theory by addressing psychological mechanisms driving technology adoption. The TAM’s core constructs, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, aligned directly with the DOI theory’s emphasis on relative advantage and complexity, creating a robust foundation for understanding individual adoption decisions. Researchers demonstrated this theoretical integration by applying the TAM to examine how users evaluate new technologies while simultaneously employing the DOI theory to analyze how these individual choices catalyze broader diffusion patterns within social networks. Synthesis of theoretical frameworks generated a comprehensive understanding of technology adoption that includes individual cognitive processes and systemic social dynamics. The integration of DOI and TAM enabled organizations to develop more effective strategies addressing psychological barriers to individual adoption and social factors influencing widespread technology diffusion.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Professional Practice in the Church Setting</title>
   <p>This paper presents significant contributions to professional practices in the non-profit organization sector, particularly small rural churches in the southeast United States. Therefore, I pose the central question: What are some effective strategies used by small southeast U.S. rural church leaders to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals? Few scholars, if any, have answered this research question. Five main themes emerged in answering the overarching question using the DOI theory (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
     Table 2
    </xref>). Thus, business leaders in professional practice can leverage these insights to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-"></xref>Table 2. Summary of themes.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="4.61%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="37.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Theme</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="57.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Summary</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="4.61%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="37.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Leveraging Digital Platforms</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="57.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Highlights the adoption of digital platforms to enhance accessibility, convenience, and reach in giving and engagement.</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="4.61%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="37.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Overcoming Challenges</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="57.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Highlights the hurdles faced during the adoption of digital tools and the strategies used to overcome them</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="4.61%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="37.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Leadership and Congregational Engagement</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="57.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Emphasizes the role of leadership in fostering trust, casting vision, and encouraging adoption of digital tools.</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="4.61%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="37.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Financial Management</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="57.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Focuses on how digital strategies contributed to increased revenue and financial sustainability.</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="4.61%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="37.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Digital Presence and Visibility</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="57.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Emphasizes the use of digital tools to enhance community engagement and expand the church’s visibility.</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>Leveraging digital platforms emerged as a theme, as participants stated that implementing digital tools helped create innovative financial solutions to overcome traditional revenue challenges in small rural churches. All (100%) participants confirmed the importance of leveraging digital platforms to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals. Participants relied on digital giving tools as members shifted away from cash and in-person attendance. Participants maintained stable revenue streams and addressed changing congregational needs by leveraging digital platforms.</p>
   <p>Religious leaders incorporated digital platforms to sustain religious practices, facilitate online giving, and maintain financial contributions, thereby enhancing accessibility and promoting full engagement among members (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-25">
     Mónika, 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-28">
     Nik Azman et al., 2021b
    </xref>). Integrating digital platforms for donations represented an adaptation to modern financial practices, positioning small rural churches to meet both current and future financial needs. Recent research further underscores that digital platforms serve as vital transformation enablers by providing essential infrastructure for organizations to adapt to evolving stakeholder behaviors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-20">
     Huang &amp; Tang, 2025
    </xref>). However, empirical evidence shows that the success of digital technology implementation in rural religious institutions varies depending on congregation demographics, technological literacy, and implementation strategies, highlighting the need for tailored approaches rather than uniform solutions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-20">
     Huang &amp; Tang, 2025
    </xref>). This nuanced understanding aligns with broader digital transformation literature, which emphasizes that successful digital initiatives must consider organizational context and stakeholder readiness rather than adopting one-size-fits-all strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-18">
     Hanelt et al., 2021
    </xref>). Rural church leaders would therefore benefit from developing contextually sensitive digital strategies that address the unique characteristics and needs of their congregations while maintaining alignment with core ministry values.</p>
   <p>Interview data highlighted participants’ claims about increased donor engagement through multiple digital giving options. Church websites reflected concrete evidence through donation portal screenshots showing various payment methods and donor testimonials praising convenience. Social media posts from congregants sharing positive experiences with digital giving platforms corroborated interview statements about improved donor satisfaction and accessibility. Church livestream archives demonstrated the technical capabilities participants described, showing consistent video quality and interactive features like real-time chat and prayer requests. Online event registration systems displayed on church websites validated claims about streamlined administrative processes and increased participation rates for church activities.</p>
   <p>The leveraging digital platforms theme reflected the DOI theory’s relative advantage attribute while maintaining compatibility with existing values. The leveraging digital platforms theme also connected to the TAM by demonstrating enhanced perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use among congregants. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers (1995)
    </xref> defined relative advantage as the degree to which an innovation is perceived as better than the idea it superseded and explained that adoption increased when users recognized clear benefits. Participants articulated that ministry leaders used digital platforms to support remote contributions as members moved away from cash and in-person attendance. The unanimous confirmation that digital platforms increased revenues and met budgetary goals reflected high perceived usefulness, as congregants recognized clear practical benefits in maintaining stable revenue streams, while the successful shift to digital contributions indicated sufficient perceived ease of use. Small rural church leaders in this project demonstrated that innovations were dispersed most effectively when leaders introduced changes that improved outcomes and respected core values.</p>
   <p>Overcoming challenges was a resounding theme. All the project participants (100%) noted how they overcame challenges of implementing digital transformation strategies in their churches. Project participants developed multiple strategies to address implementation challenges, including incremental adoption, educational support, expert consultation, and peer learning. Small rural church leaders in this project demonstrated adaptability by creating customized solutions that responded to their specific congregational needs and technological barriers.</p>
   <p>Rural church leaders faced significant barriers when adopting digital giving platforms, as the complexity of digital tools and varying levels of technological literacy posed considerable challenges for congregations with limited infrastructure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-1">
     Agugo &amp; Amodu, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-41">
     Vogelsang et al., 2021
    </xref>). Smaller religious organizations often struggled to access sufficient technological resources, and digital literacy gaps—especially among clergy and staff—further impeded successful implementation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-1">
     Agugo &amp; Amodu, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-41">
     Vogelsang et al., 2021
    </xref>). These challenges were compounded by educational and age demographics, which created additional obstacles to digital adoption in rural settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-12">
     Elena-Bucea et al., 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-22">
     Lee, 2024
    </xref>). Despite these difficulties, faith leaders in rural communities demonstrated perseverance by addressing both financial constraints and technological knowledge gaps, implementing support strategies to help members navigate new digital tools. Religious institutions that managed to implement digital giving solutions despite infrastructure limitations often developed stronger operational resilience and expanded their capacity to fulfill their missions within underserved communities.</p>
   <p>The overcoming challenges theme aligned with the DOI theory’s complexity and compatibility attributes of innovation adoption. The overcoming challenges theme also related to the TAM by demonstrating how church leaders addressed barriers that influence technology acceptance, particularly perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Project participants described how they used incremental approaches, educational teams, and expert consultations to reduce complexity and increase compatibility. Church leaders demonstrated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers’ (1995)
    </xref> principles by creating specialized support systems and gradually introducing changes to help congregants adapt to digital tools. Incremental adoption, educational support, and peer learning strategies specifically targeted perceived ease of use by reducing implementation complexity and effort required from congregants, while personalized training enhanced congregants’ confidence and competence with new technologies. Small rural church leaders in this project observed greater acceptance when they provided personalized training and peer learning opportunities, which validated the DOI theory’s emphasis on managing complexity and ensuring compatibility for successful innovation adoption. The customized solutions and gradual change introduction improved both perceived usefulness by demonstrating practical benefits and perceived ease of use through reduced complexity, validating TAM’s premise that addressing barriers leads to greater technology acceptance and sustained usage.</p>
   <p>Leadership and congregational engagement emerged as a theme in this project. All the project participants (100%) mentioned how leadership and congregational engagement helped them implement digital transformation initiatives in their churches. Project participants demonstrated that effective leadership required strategic vision and intentional engagement to build trust during digital transformation. Small rural church leaders in this project recognized that the successful implementation of digital initiatives depended on their ability to guide and connect with congregants throughout the change process.</p>
   <p>Leadership and congregational engagement are central to the successful implementation of digital transformation strategies in rural churches. The authors of scholarly literature confirm that leaders who actively support digital initiatives and foster agility and collaboration are primary catalysts for effective digital transformation outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-2">
     AlNuaimi et al., 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-15">
     Frankowski, 2023
    </xref>). Collaborative leadership practices not only promote engagement and innovation among group members, even in resource-limited settings, but also help congregations adapt to technological changes and maintain strong community connections. Recent research further emphasizes that leadership serves as a crucial mediating factor between digital transformation initiatives and organizational outcomes, with leaders who prioritize collaboration and clear communication strengthening organizational adaptability and supporting successful digital transformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-31">
     Qiao et al., 2024
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-35">
     Sacavém et al., 2025
    </xref>). Rural church leaders guide their congregations through smoother transitions to digital practices and reinforce commitment to ongoing innovation, bridging the gap between technological innovation and practical implementation by emphasizing collaborative leadership.</p>
   <p>The leadership and congregational engagement theme aligned with the DOI theory’s emphasis on change agents and opinion leaders’ influence on innovation adoption. The leadership and congregational engagement theme also aligned with the TAM, as effective church leaders influenced congregants’ perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of digital technologies through strategic communication and trust-building. Project participants demonstrated how church leaders functioned as change agents by strategically communicating digital transformation initiatives to congregations. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers (1995)
    </xref> explained that change agents play a crucial role in guiding innovation adoption through strategic communication and implementation. Project participants recognized when congregants needed time to adjust to changes, demonstrating the DOI principle that adoption occurs through a social process influenced by trusted leaders. The leaders’ collaborative approach and sensitivity to congregational readiness directly impact congregants’ attitudes toward using new technologies, while their guidance in facilitating smoother transitions addresses TAM’s perceived ease of use construct by reducing implementation complexity. Small rural church leaders in this project fulfilled the change agent role by guiding congregations through digital transformation while maintaining sensitivity to congregational readiness and acceptance.</p>
   <p>Financial management was the fourth theme that emerged in this project. All the project participants (100%) indicated financial management was a component of successfully implementing digital transformation in their congregations. Project participants revealed that strategic financial management enabled them to implement and sustain digital initiatives while measuring tangible results. Small rural church leaders in this project recognized that careful financial oversight and data-driven decision-making contributed to successful digital transformation outcomes.</p>
   <p>Church leaders have implemented multiple digital giving options to accommodate varying donor preferences and expand their financial reach beyond the limitations of physical attendance. Effective financial management, supported by digital technology, has become essential for churches seeking to increase accessibility and convenience for donors, resulting in more consistent giving patterns and improved financial outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-29">
     Nyarko, 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-30">
     Obaloluwa et al., 2025
    </xref>). Congregations with robust technological and financial infrastructures have adapted more effectively to disruptions, maintaining financial stability through digital giving platforms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-19">
     Holleman et al., 2022
    </xref>). Recent research further supports that convenient online donation options significantly increase donors’ willingness to contribute to nonprofit organizations, including churches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-23">
     Lin &amp; Hsiung, 2024
    </xref>). Leaders who invest in diverse digital giving platforms and leverage digital financial management strategies enable their congregations to remain financially resilient and responsive to changing circumstances. Church leaders have reported increased contributions and revenue growth, demonstrating the critical role of digital financial management in sustaining church operations and engagement by encouraging donor participation and guiding their congregations through the adoption of digital transformation.</p>
   <p>The financial management theme was also substantiated by data from public websites. For instance, one participant discussed how multiple digital giving options helped maintain financial stability during disruptions. The church’s quarterly newsletters, available on their website, documented specific instances where online donations sustained operations during periods when in-person attendance was limited, providing concrete evidence of the financial resilience described in interviews. The newsletters also included charts showing donation consistency across different digital platforms, which validated the participant’s claims about diversified giving channels reducing financial volatility.</p>
   <p>The financial management theme exemplified several key elements of the DOI theory, particularly the trialability and observability attributes of innovation adoption. The financial management theme also related to the TAM by demonstrating how measurable outcomes enhance both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of digital financial tools. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers (1995)
    </xref> explained that innovations gained acceptance when potential adopters assessed new tools and observed clear benefits. Project participants reported measurable financial improvements after they implemented digital giving platforms. The unanimous recognition that financial management was essential for digital transformation success reflected high perceived usefulness, as leaders observed tangible results, including increased contributions and revenue growth. Small rural church leaders in this project observed that offering multiple digital giving options led to increased contributions, which reflected the observable advantages and successful trials of digital financial tools. Implementing multiple digital giving options to accommodate donor preferences directly addressed perceived ease of use by reducing barriers and increasing convenience, while the emphasis on data-driven decision-making provided clear evidence of digital tools’ benefits, reinforcing perceived usefulness. The tangible financial results highlighted <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers’ (1995)
    </xref> assertion that visible benefits and opportunities to assess innovations accelerate adoption within organizations. The reported increase in donors’ willingness to contribute through convenient online options validated TAM’s premise that ease of use drives behavioral intention and actual system use, leading to sustained technology acceptance among congregants.</p>
   <p>Digital presence and community visibility emerged as the fifth theme in this project. Project participants (62.5%) revealed they used digital tools to create and enhance their visibility in the digital space as well as the community. Project participants demonstrated that strategic use of digital platforms and branded materials created multiple pathways for community engagement and church growth. Small rural church leaders in this project recognized that combining digital presence with physical community involvement strengthened organizational identity and expanded opportunities for ministry outreach.</p>
   <p>Scholarly literature highlights that church leaders use digital media to enhance community engagement and public presence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-5">
     Campbell, 2020
    </xref>). Leaders who develop comprehensive digital strategies increase organizational visibility and strengthen connections with both members and the broader public (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-38">
     Suhner, 2024
    </xref>). By building a strong digital presence and adapting to new communication methods, church leaders expand their reach and foster greater engagement. Recent research confirms that social media serves as a powerful tool for advancing church missions and facilitating connections, proving effective for evangelization and community outreach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-17">
     Galang &amp; Galang, 2022
    </xref>). A robust digital presence and positive brand image in faith-based organizations are linked to higher donor commitment and participation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-9">
     D’Souza et al., 2023
    </xref>). Church leaders maintain relevance and accessibility, reaching wider audiences and building stronger relationships in a rapidly evolving communication landscape by prioritizing digital platforms.</p>
   <p>Interview data emphasized the strategic use of social media and online platforms for community engagement. Church websites displayed professional branding, regular content updates, and integrated social media feeds that reflected the digital presence strategies described by participants. One church’s collaboration with local nonprofits to facilitate a yearly youth football camp was featured on the local news station, with the coverage highlighting how the church used digital platforms to coordinate volunteers, register participants, and promote the event across multiple social media channels. Online event listings, community partnership announcements, and this type of local news coverage provided external validation of the visibility and community impact claimed by participants.</p>
   <p>The digital presence and visibility theme exemplified the DOI theory’s key element of communication channels. The digital presence and visibility theme also related to the TAM by demonstrating how strategic digital engagement influenced perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use through enhanced community connections and organizational outcomes. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers (1995)
    </xref> explained that innovation diffusion depends on effective communication through multiple channels to reach potential adopters. Project participants described how they utilized digital platforms, branded materials, and community partnerships to communicate their church identity and mission. Using social media and digital channels addressed perceived ease of use by providing accessible methods for congregants to connect with the church, while participants recognized that digital platforms provided perceived usefulness by expanding reach, strengthening community engagement, and increasing donor commitment. Church leaders created connections through social media, live streaming, and branded merchandise, which demonstrated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-33">
     Rogers’ (1995)
    </xref> principle that diverse communication channels enhance innovation diffusion. Small rural church leaders in this project observed increased engagement and revenue when they combined digital outreach with physical community presence, which supported the DOI theory’s emphasis on utilizing varied channels to spread innovations throughout social systems. The reported increased engagement and revenue validated TAM’s premise that perceived usefulness and ease of use lead to greater behavioral intention and actual system use, ultimately facilitating sustained technology acceptance and enhanced community engagement.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Social Change in the Business and Scholar Community</title>
   <p>The findings from this paper reveal significant implications for positive social change in rural communities through the digital transformation of small rural churches. Small rural church leaders who implement effective digital transformation strategies create more inclusive and financially sustainable faith communities that better serve their members and broader society. Church leaders enable broader participation and strengthen community connections that extend beyond physical limitations when they successfully integrate digital platforms with traditional ministry practices.</p>
   <p>Digital transformation in rural churches contributes to positive social change by empowering congregations to overcome geographic and technological barriers. Church leaders who provide digital literacy training and support help bridge technological divides, particularly among older congregants who might otherwise face exclusion from digital ministry initiatives. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-19">
     Holleman et al. (2022)
    </xref> found that church leaders who developed comprehensive digital engagement strategies enabled broader participation from previously underserved populations, including elderly, disabled, and geographically distant members. The educational teams and personalized training described by participants demonstrate how rural churches serve as catalysts for digital inclusion and community empowerment.</p>
   <p>Small rural church leaders who implement digital transformation strategies while maintaining transparency and trust contribute to stronger, more resilient communities. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-28">
     Nik Azman et al. (2021b)
    </xref> demonstrated that church leaders who provided easy access to digital platforms experienced significantly higher engagement, which enabled enhanced ministry impact and community service. Church leaders who combine digital outreach with strategic community partnerships create more connected and supportive local environments. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-5">
     Campbell (2020)
    </xref> noted that church leaders who developed comprehensive digital strategies increased their organizations’ visibility and strengthened connections with members and the broader public, which fostered positive social change through expanded community service and support programs. Small rural church leaders who prioritized transparency, digital access, and community collaboration created lasting benefits for their congregations and the wider society.</p>
   <p>Small rural church leaders who embrace digital transformation foster inclusive communities and bridge technological gaps. Leaders strengthen connections within their congregations and with the broader community by integrating digital tools with traditional ministry. Strategic investments in digital literacy and local partnerships drive meaningful social change. Church leaders who prioritize digital innovation, education, and collaboration remain relevant and resilient in an evolving world.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Directions for Future Research</title>
   <p>Small rural church leaders who seek to implement digital transformation strategies would benefit from expanded research addressing the current project’s limitations regarding sample size, data verification, and implementation assessment. Small rural church leaders who adopt digital platforms need more comprehensive evidence from diverse congregational contexts to guide their strategic decisions.</p>
   <p>Future researchers should expand beyond eight participants to better represent the diverse population of small rural church leaders in the southeast US. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-28">
     Nik Azman et al. (2021b)
    </xref> found that church leaders who provided easy access to digital platforms experienced significantly higher engagement when studied across multiple congregational contexts. Researchers who include a broader range of church sizes, denominations, and geographic locations could better capture the full spectrum of digital transformation experiences and strategies. Church leaders would benefit from studies that combine interviews with quantitative financial records, platform analytics, and direct observation to validate implementation strategies.</p>
   <p>Future researchers should conduct longitudinal studies tracking digital transformation implementation over time to address discrepancies between described and implemented strategies. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-5">
     Campbell (2020)
    </xref> noted that church leaders who developed comprehensive digital strategies increased their organizations’ visibility and strengthened connections with members when observed over extended periods. Researchers who follow churches through their digital transformation journey could better identify gaps between planned and actual implementation while documenting factors that influence success rates. Findings from future research can help small rural church leaders gain more knowledge to develop more effective digital strategies while maintaining their core mission and values by offering more generalizable and in-depth insights.</p>
   <p>Previous research indicates that organizational support structures can help address resource constraints in digital transformation, though the role of denominational affiliation remains underexplored. Resource constraints posed challenges to implementing digital transformation strategies, particularly for smaller or rural congregations in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-14">
     Francis et al., 2024
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-24">
     McKenna, 2024
    </xref>). Leaders addressed challenges using active support from denominational leaders and policymakers, including targeted initiatives like training, resource allocation, and infrastructure development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-14">
     Francis et al., 2024
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-24">
     McKenna, 2024
    </xref>). Most participants in this project were independent of denominational affiliation; however, several participants were part of small fellowships and reformations, which provided a sense of community and support. The variation in organizational structures among participants highlights the need to examine how different forms of institutional support influence digital transformation outcomes. Future researchers could explore the potential influence of denominational affiliation on a church’s ability to implement digital transformation, as this could be a key external factor affecting resources and strategies.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>7. Conclusion</title>
   <p>Small rural church leadership capabilities can be negatively impacted because of ineffective strategies to use digital transformation to increase revenues and meet budgetary goals. The project involved semi-structured interviews with eight participants, all leaders of small rural churches located in the southeast United States. Data collection also included information from four church websites and social media sites. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145966-4">
     Braun and Clarke’s (2022)
    </xref> thematic analysis was used to identify five major themes: (a) leveraging digital platforms, (b) overcoming challenges, (c) leadership and congregational engagement, (d) financial management, and (e) digital presence and visibility. The five major themes aligned with the DOI theory’s attributes of innovation, implementation stages, and communication channels.</p>
   <p>Key findings revealed that small southeast United States rural church leaders who adopted digital platforms and integrated them with financial management practices increased revenues, sustained ministry operations, and expanded opportunities for giving. Leaders overcame significant barriers, including generational resistance and digital literacy gaps, by providing incremental training, seeking peer support, and maintaining transparent communication. Project participants reported they built trust and achieved greater buy-in for digital initiatives by fostering collaborative decision-making and engaging congregational input. Small rural church leaders in this project also reported that building a strong digital presence and forming community partnerships expanded their reach, strengthened organizational identity, and increased both engagement and financial contributions.</p>
   <p>The findings extend the current understanding of innovation diffusion and digital transformation in resource-constrained, faith-based settings. The findings also reveal theoretical insight and actionable guidance for practitioners by linking practical strategies to the DOI theory. Small rural church leaders who implement research-supported practices, such as systematic cost-benefit analysis, transparent leadership, and strategic digital outreach, can successfully guide their congregations through digital transformation while preserving core values and mission. Future researchers should build on the findings by expanding sample diversity, verifying self-reported data, and tracking long-term implementation outcomes to further strengthen the evidence base for digital innovation in organizational contexts. Small rural church leaders can leverage digital transformation to achieve financial health, community impact, and enduring relevance in a rapidly evolving environment through continued research and practice.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agugo, A. O.,&amp;Amodu, A. A. (2022). Digitalizing the Church for E-Transformation: Study of Catholic Archdiocese of Ibadan. International Journal of Formal Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends, 23, 140-149. &gt;https://ijfscfrtjournal.isrra.org/index.php/Formal_Sciences_Journal/index 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     AlNuaimi, B. K., Kumar Singh, S., Ren, S., Budhwar, P.,&amp;Vorobyev, D. (2022). Mastering Digital Transformation: The Nexus between Leadership, Agility, and Digital Strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.038
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Asrani, C.,&amp;Kar, A. K. (2022). Diffusion and Adoption of Digital Communications Services in India. Information Technology for Development, 28, 488-510. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2046536
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Braun, V.,&amp;Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis.. Qualitative Psychology, 9, 3-26. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Campbell, H. A. (2020). Introduction: Studying Digital Ecclesiology: How Churches Are Being Informed by Digital Media and Cultures. Ecclesial Practices, 7, 1-10. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1163/22144417-bja10001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Campbell, H. A. (2023). When Churches Discovered the Digital Divide: Overcoming Technological Inaccessibility, Hesitancy&amp;Digital Reluctance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Ecclesial Practices, 10, 36-61. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1163/22144417-bja10046
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cooper, A., Laato, S., Nenonen, S., Pope, N., Tjiharuka, D.,&amp;Sutinen, E. (2021). The Reconfiguration of Social, Digital and Physical Presence: From Online Church to Church Online. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 77, a6286. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i3.6286
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Correani, A., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Petruzzelli, A. M.,&amp;Natalicchio, A. (2020). Implementing a Digital Strategy: Learning from the Experience of Three Digital Transformation Projects. California Management Review, 62, 37-56. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620934864
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     D’Souza, C., Valladares, L., Ratten, V., Nanere, M., Ahmed, T., Nguyen, N. et al. (2023). The Effects of Religious Participation and Brand Image on Commitment to Donate to Faith-Based Charities. Journal of Nonprofit &amp; Public Sector Marketing, 35, 81-109. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2021.1953670
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dunlow, J. (2021). Digital Discipleship: A Study of How Churches in New York Used Technology for Adult Discipleship during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry, 18, 458-472. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/07398913211046364
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dymitrowski, A.,&amp;Mielcarek, P. (2021). Business Model Innovation Based on New Technologies and Its Influence on a Company’s Competitive Advantage. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 2110-2128. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060118
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Elena-Bucea, A., Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T.,&amp;Coelho, P. S. (2021). Assessing the Role of Age, Education, Gender and Income on the Digital Divide: Evidence for the European Union. Information Systems Frontiers, 23, 1007-1021. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10012-9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Elmghaamez, I. K., Attah‐Boakye, R., Adams, K.,&amp;Agyemang, J. (2022). The Diffusion of Innovation Theory and the Effects of IFRS Adoption by Multinational Corporations on Capital Market Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis. Thunderbird International Business Review, 64, 81-108. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22244
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Francis, L. J., McKenna, U.,&amp;Village, A. (2024). Assessing the Fragile Rural Church Hypothesis within the Episcopal Church (USA). Rural Theology, 22, 90-101. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/14704994.2024.2421035
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Frankowski, A. (2023). Collaborative Policy Innovation Despite Competition: A Study of Diffusion of Health Innovations across Dutch Hospitals. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Journal, 28, 2-22. &gt;https://innovation.cc/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Frei-Landau, R., Muchnik-Rozanov, Y.,&amp;Avidov-Ungar, O. (2022). Using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Conceptualize the Mobile-Learning Adoption Process in Teacher Education in the COVID-19 Era. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12811-12838. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11148-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Galang, J. R. F.,&amp;Galang, J. R. F. (2022). Social Media as Tool for the Church’s Mission and Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Public Health, 44, e413-e414. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab263
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D.,&amp;Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. Journal of Management Studies, 58, 1159-1197. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Holleman, A., Roso, J.,&amp;Chaves, M. (2022). Religious Congregations’ Technological and Financial Capacities on the Eve of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Review of Religious Research, 64, 163-188. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-021-00477-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huang, Q.,&amp;Tang, Y. (2025). Enterprise Digital Transformation Strategy: The Impact of Digital Platforms. Entropy, 27, Article 295. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/e27030295
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huong, P. T.,&amp;Duc, N. L. (2023). The Perceptions of Prospective Digital Transformation Adopters: An Extended Diffusion of Innovations Theory. TEM Journal, 12, 459-469. &gt;https://doi.org/10.18421/tem121-56
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lee, Y. (2024). Understanding the Digital Divide among Protestant Churches in the United States. Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry, 21, 328-348. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/07398913241303522
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lin, C.,&amp;Hsiung, H. (2024). Enhancing Donor Engagement: Assessing the Impact of Online Donation Convenience on the Willingness to Donate to Non-Profit Organizations. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8, Article 3925. &gt;https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i5.3925
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     McKenna, U. (2024). Exploring the Challenges and Benefits of Online Worship within Rural Congregations in the Episcopal Church (USA): Listening to Rural Lay People. Rural Theology, 22, 102-119. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/14704994.2024.2421034
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mónika, A. (2021). Trends in Online Religious Processes during the Coronavirus Pandemic in Hungary—Digital Media Use and Generational Differences. Religions, 12, Article 808. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100808
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Niazi, A. G., Ahmed, N., Kifayat, S., Kifayat, S., Niazi, M. A.,&amp;Khan, M. S. (2024). Urban Churches Show an Increase in Attendance, Donations, and Finances during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the USA: Evidence from the United Methodist Church. Journal of Religion and Health, 63, 3206-3232. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02046-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nik Azman, N. A. N., Hanafi, W. N. W.,&amp;Salleh, S. M. (2021a). Exploring Factors for Teachers’ Perceptions towards Virtual Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic Era from the Perspective of Diffusion Innovation Theory. Global Business and Management Re-search, 13, 286-295.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nik Azman, N. A. N., Zahari, N. H. M.,&amp;Salleh, S. M. (2021b). Virtual Learning Adoption Churches among Educators in Malysia during Pandemic Era: A Conceptual Paper. Global Business and Management Research, 13, 277-285. &gt;http://www.gbmrjournal.com/pdf/v13n4s/V13N4s-22.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nyarko, E. (2023). The Church, Digital Technology and Media: A Biblical Reflection on Romans 8:19-23. Journal of Education and Learning Technology, 4, Article 1. &gt;https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.2023411
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Obaloluwa, S., Adeoye, M. A.,&amp;Afolaranmi, A. O. (2025). Ecclesiastical Leadership in the Digital Age: Leveraging Technology for Ministry and Entrepreneurial Success. International Journal of Religions and Peacebuilding, 2, 1-21. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Qiao, G., Li, Y.,&amp;Hong, A. (2024). The Strategic Role of Digital Transformation: Leveraging Digital Leadership to Enhance Employee Performance and Organizational Commitment in the Digital Era. Systems, 12, Article 457. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12110457
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). Free Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Roso, J. (2023). The Uses of Technology in Twenty-First Century Congregational Worship: A Report from the National Congregations Study. Liturgy, 38, 3-10. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063x.2023.2260706
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sacavém, A., de Bem Machado, A., dos Santos, J. R., Palma-Moreira, A., Belchior-Rocha, H.,&amp;Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2025). Leading in the Digital Age: The Role of Leadership in Organizational Digital Transformation. Administrative Sciences, 15, Article 43. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15020043
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sadiku, M. N., Chukwu, U. C., Ajayi-Majebi, A.,&amp;Musa, S. M. (2022). Digital Church: An Introduction. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 6, 993-998. &gt;https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/IJTSRD52538.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shi, L., Mai, Y.,&amp;Wu, Y. J. (2022). Digital Transformation. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 34, 1-20. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.302637
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Suhner, J. (2024). From Shared RE to a Shared Digital RE Strategy: Navigating the Post-Digital Transformation of RE Organizations—Results of a Swiss Participatory Research Project. Religions, 15, Article 1000. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15081000
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ugboh, G. (2023). The Church and Techno-Theology: A Paradigm Shift of Theology and Theological Practice to Overcome Technological Disruptions. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology, 3, 59-78. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/jeet-02-2023-0004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N. et al. (2021). Digital Transformation: A Multidisciplinary Reflection and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vogelsang, K., Packmohr, S.,&amp;Brink, H. (2021). Challenges of the Digital Transformation—Comparing Nonprofit and Industry Organizations. In F. Ahlemann, R. Schütte,&amp;S. Stieglitz (Eds.), Innovation through Information Systems (pp. 297-312). Springer International Publishing. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86790-4_21
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145966-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yarbrough, J. R. W. (2023). Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Examine Providers’ Perceptions of Rural Telehealth Application and Competencies. Rural Society, 32, 201-219. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2023.2270852
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>