<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojst
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Stomatology
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2160-8709
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2160-8717
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojst.2025.159020
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojst-145895
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Management of Condylar Fractures at the Sylvanus Olympio (SO) University Teaching Hospital in Lomé (Togo)
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Saliou
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Adam
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Amady
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Coulibaly
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mawaba Komlan Mawabah
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bouassalo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Winga
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Foma
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Haréfétéguena
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bissa
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Hamza Doles
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Sama
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Bathokédéou
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Amana
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Essohanam
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Boko
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartement of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sylvanus Olympio University Teaching Hospital, Lomé, Togo
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartement of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU-CNOS Pr Hamady Traore, Bamako, Mali
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Sylvanus Olympio University Teaching Hospital, Lomé, Togo
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculty of Health Science, University of Lomé, Lomé, Togo
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     19
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    09
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    213
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    229
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      26,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      20,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      20,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Introduction:</b> Condylar fractures can cause serious functional and aesthetic sequelae if inadequately treated. The overall objective of this study was to evaluate the management of these fractures in the Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Sylvanus Olympio University Teaching Hospital in Lomé. 
    <b>Patients</b> 
    <b>and</b> 
    <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective and descriptive study based on medical records of patients hospitalized for a fracture involving the mandibular condyle from January 2015 to December 2023. 
    <b>Results:</b> We collected 49 cases of condylar fractures. The annual frequency was 6.77. The average age of the patients was 32.85 ± 13.25 years, with extremes of 7 years and 80 years. The sex ratio was 11.25. The main etiology was road traffic accidents (85.72%), predominantly involving motorcyclists at 92.84%. The average delay in consultation was 48 hours. Fractures associated condylar and symphyseal regions accounted for 75.52% of the fracture topography. Functional treatment was performed on all patients, surgical treatment on 34.69% of patients, orthopedic treatment on 28.57% of patients, and mixed treatment (orthopedic and surgery) on 12.24% of patients. Sequelae were found in 6.12% of patients. 
    <b>Conclusion:</b> Condylar fractures concerned mainly young adult males. Their management is complex and controversial and should be performed early to avoid complications and sequelae. In Africa, their etiologies are primarily dominated by road traffic accidents, mostly involving two-wheeled vehicles. Emphasis must be placed on prevention, particularly the use of full-face helmets by all motorcyclists.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Mandible
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Condylar Fractures
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Management
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Lomé-Togo
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Condylar fractures are very common in maxillofacial trauma, as the mandible acts as a true bumper to the face due to its anterior prominence. They can be unilateral or bilateral, articular or extra-articular. According to the Dingman and Natvig classification of mandibular fractures, 36% of mandibular fractures involve the condyle. They mainly affect young males <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-1">
     [1]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. In our context, road traffic accidents (RTAs) are the main causes . The clinical signs of condylar fractures are pain in the pretragal region, laterodeviation of the mandible toward the fractured side when opening the mouth, and impaired dental articulation . The diagnosis of these fractures is clinical but confirmed by imaging. Orthopantomogram is the key diagnostic test. However, CT Scan still has its place in the diagnosis and choice of treatment method for certain clinical forms, including articular fractures. The method of therapeutic management depends on several parameters, including the patient’s age, the consultation time and the type of fracture. It can be functional, orthopedic, surgical or sometimes combine several of these methods. The treatment of condylar fractures has evolved in recent years, gradually moving from “all functional” to more nuanced approaches: functional treatment for “minimally displaced” fractures, childhood fractures and capital fractures; reduction and osteosynthesis in other cases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. These fractures can go unnoticed during the examination of a facial trauma patient, which leads to functional complications without treatment. In addition, the mandibular growth nucleus is located at the level of the mandibular condyle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Thus, a fracture in this area in a growing child can also lead to aesthetic and functional complications. These complications can be severe, including temporomandibular ankylosis in adults in the case of an intra-articular condylar fracture, mandibular growth disorders in children, including facial asymmetry in the case of a unilateral fracture or more or less severe hypomandibulia in the case of a bilateral fracture, giving a “bird profile” appearance described by Obwegeser . The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of these injuries in our working context.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Patients and Methods</title>
   <p>We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of compiled patient records from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023, a period of nine years. We included in this study all patient records who presented with a mandibular condyle fracture during the study period. We excluded incomplete and unusable records and patients who were lost to follow-up after treatment. Data collection was conducted using a pre-established survey form. The data collected came from the hospitalized patients’ medical records and surgical report registers. We examined sociodemographic data (age, sex, occupation, place of residence, etc.), diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome data. Functional treatment consists of active or passive mobilization of the temporomandibular joints through opening and closing of the mouth, liquid or mixed diet; orthopedic treatment consists of maxillomandibular blocking in correct dental articular on vestibular arches of Dautrey, on Ivy ligatures or on quick-locking screws. Surgical treatment consists of bloody reduction, then stabilization of the fractured bone fragments by titanium plates and screws. Statistical analysis was performed using Excel 2019 and Epi info 7.2.5 software. Access to patients’ medical records was subject to handwritten authorization from the head of the Stomatology and MFS department of the Sylvanus Olympio University Teaching Hospital and the Director of the SO University Teaching Hospital. Patient anonymity was respected throughout the study.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Epidemiological Aspects</title>
    <p>We collected 234 cases of mandibular trauma over our study period (9 years). Sixty-one (61) involved the mandibular condyle region, which equates to an annual frequency of 6.77 cases/year. We finally retained 49 patients for the analysis. Taking into account the exclusion criteria mentioned in the patients and methods section, we excluded 12 files (incomplete records, lost to follow-up).</p>
    <p>In our study, males accounted for 91.83% (45) of cases. The sex ratio was 11.25. The 20 - 40 age group accounted for 69.4% of cases. The average age of patients was 32.85 ± 13.25 [7 years and 80] years. The distribution of patients by age group is summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Figure 1. Distribution of patients by age group.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1461258-rId13.jpeg?20250923040548" />
    </fig>
    <p>Of the 49 patients in our study, 51.02% were from the informal sector. The distribution of patients by occupation is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 1. Distribution of patients by occupation.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.43%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="32.52%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="41.05%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Informal sector</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.52%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="41.05%"><p style="text-align:center">51.02</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Civil servant</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.52%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.05%"><p style="text-align:center">18.36</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.43%"><p style="text-align:center">students</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.52%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.05%"><p style="text-align:center">14.28</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Shopkeeper</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.52%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.05%"><p style="text-align:center">12.24</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.43%"><p style="text-align:center">No specified</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.52%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.05%"><p style="text-align:center">4.10</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.52%"><p style="text-align:center">49</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="41.05%"><p style="text-align:center">100.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were found as the circumstance of occurrence of condylar fractures in 85.72% of cases. The distribution of patients by circumstance of occurrence is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>. Motorcyclists were involved in 92.84% of the RTAs and distributed as follows: motorcycle-motorcycle collision was involved in 33.33%, motorcycle-car collision in 28.57%, motorcycle-obstacle collision in 21.42%, and motorcycle-pedestrian collision in 9.52%.</p>
    <p>It should also be noted that helmet use was not recorded in the files.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 2. Distribution of patients by circumstances of occurrence.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="54.51%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="42.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="41.04%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="54.51%"><p style="text-align:center">RTAs</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="42.39%"><p style="text-align:center">42</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="41.04%"><p style="text-align:center">85.72</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="54.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Workplace accident</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.39%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.04%"><p style="text-align:center">6.12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="54.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Stabling with knife</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.39%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.04%"><p style="text-align:center">6.12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="54.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Sport accident</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.39%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.04%"><p style="text-align:center">2.04</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="54.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.39%"><p style="text-align:center">49</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="41.04%"><p style="text-align:center">100.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>RTAs = Road traffic accident.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Clinical Aspects</title>
    <p>After the injury, 75.51% (n = 37) of patients were taken to the hospital within 24 hours; and 24.49% (n = 12) were admitted after 24 hours. The average consultation time was 48 hours.</p>
    <p>The distribution of patients according to the signs found during the clinical examination is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Fractures concerned low subcondylar in 51.02% of patients. The distribution of patients according to the type of condylar fracture found on imaging is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 3. Distribution of patients according to clinical signs.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Signs</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>Exoral examination</u></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Periauricular pain</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">46</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">93.87</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Mental wound</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">43</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">87.75</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Facial edema</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">33</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">67.34</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Otorrhagia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">8.16</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Labiomental hypoesthesia</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">4.08</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>Intraoralexamination</u></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">limitation of mouth opening</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">47</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">95.91</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Premature molar contact associated with a contralateral open bite</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">38</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">77.58</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Deviation of the interincisal point </p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">38</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">77.58</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Tooth avulsion</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.47%"><p style="text-align:center">14</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.60%"><p style="text-align:center">28.57</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 4. Distribution of patients by type of condylar fracture.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="66.61%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.45%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="66.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Lower subcondylar fracture</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.45%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.87%"><p style="text-align:center">51.02</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Upper subcondylar fracture</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.45%"><p style="text-align:center">16</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.87%"><p style="text-align:center">32.65</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Capital fracture</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.45%"><p style="text-align:center">8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.87%"><p style="text-align:center">16.33</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.45%"><p style="text-align:center">49</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.87%"><p style="text-align:center">100.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>CT scaning of the facial bones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figFigures 2-4">
      Figures 2-4
     </xref>) was performed in 44 patients (89.80%) and an orthopantomogram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>) was performed in 5 patients (10.20%).</p>
    <p>In our study, 85.72% of patients had a condylar fracture associated with a fracture of the symphyseal region.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Figure 2. 3D CT scan of the skull showing a left lower subcondylar fracture (Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, CHU SO).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1461258-rId14.jpeg?20250923040553" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Figure 3. Axial section of a CT scan of the skull showing a right capital condylar fracture (Department of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU SO).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1461258-rId15.jpeg?20250923040553" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Figure 4. Coronal section of a CT scan of the skull showing a bilateral condylar fracture: capital condylar on the right and high subcondylar on the left (Department of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU SO).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1461258-rId16.jpeg?20250923040553" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Figure 5. Orthopantomogram showing a left high subcondylar fracture with detachment of the sigmoid notch associated with a fracture of the left horizontal branch (Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, CHU SO).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1461258-rId17.jpeg?20250923040553" />
    </fig>
    <p>The distribution of patients according to fracture site is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 5. Distribution of patients according to associated lesions on the mandible.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Number(n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>Mandibular Topographic Association</u></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Condyle + symphyseal region</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center">37</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center">75.52</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Condyle + symphyseal region + angle</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center">6.12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Condyle + symphyseal region + angle </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center">4.08</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>Anatomical sites in the non-dentate portion</u></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Condyle alone</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center">10.20</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Condyle + ramus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center">2.04</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Condyle + coronal</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center">2.04</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="76.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.44%"><p style="text-align:center">49</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.59%"><p style="text-align:center">100.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Therapeutic Data</title>
    <p>Of the 49 patients in our study, 46.95% were treated beyond 14 days. The average duration of treatment was 13 days.</p>
    <p>The distribution of patients according to the time to maxillofacial treatment is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Functional treatment was performed in all patients.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 6. Distribution of patients by time to maxillofacial care.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.83%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="46.15%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.83%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 7 days</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.96%"><p style="text-align:center">17</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="46.15%"><p style="text-align:center">34.69</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.83%"><p style="text-align:center">8 - 14 days</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.96%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.15%"><p style="text-align:center">18.36</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.83%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;14 days</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.96%"><p style="text-align:center">23</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.15%"><p style="text-align:center">46.95</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.83%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.96%"><p style="text-align:center">49</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.15%"><p style="text-align:center">100.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The distribution of patients according to the type of treatment received is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table7">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 7. Distribution of patients by type of treatment received.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.99%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="46.08%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Functional</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.86%"><p style="text-align:center">49</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="46.08%"><p style="text-align:center">100.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Surgery alone</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.86%"><p style="text-align:center">17</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.08%"><p style="text-align:center">34.69</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Orthopedics alone</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.86%"><p style="text-align:center">14</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.08%"><p style="text-align:center">28.57</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Surgery + orthopedics</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.86%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.08%"><p style="text-align:center">12.24</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Maxillomandibular blockade (MMB) with an Ivy ligature was performed in 34.69% of cases (n = 17), and maxillomandibular blockade with a quick-release screw in 6.12% of cases (n = 3). The duration of maxillomandibular blockade was between 16 and 24 days in 70% of patients (n = 14) and between 8 and 15 days in 30% of patients (n = 6).</p>
    <p>In our study, mini-Y screw plates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>) were used during osteosynthesis in 34.78% of patients.</p>
    <p>The types of mini-screw plates used during osteosynthesis are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
      Table 8
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The retromandibular approach (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref>) was used during osteosynthesis in 47.82% of patients.</p>
    <p>The distribution of patients according to surgical approach is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
      Table 9
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table8">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
       Table 8
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 8. Distribution of patients by type of mini-screwed plates used during osteosynthesis.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Mini Y-shaped plate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">8</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.43%"><p style="text-align:center">34.78</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Mini Straight plate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.43%"><p style="text-align:center">21.74</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Mini L-shaped plate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.43%"><p style="text-align:center">17.40</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Mini X-shaped plate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.43%"><p style="text-align:center">13.04</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Mini Arcuate plate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.43%"><p style="text-align:center">13.04</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.28%"><p style="text-align:center">23</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.43%"><p style="text-align:center">100.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table9">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
       Table 9
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 9. Distribution of patients by surgical approach.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="51.73%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="51.73%"><p style="text-align:center">Retromandibular approach</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">11</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">47.82</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.73%"><p style="text-align:center">Upper subangulomandibular aproach</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">30.43</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.73%"><p style="text-align:center">Ginestet-type pretragal approach</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">17.40</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.73%"><p style="text-align:center">Lower subangulomandibular approach</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">4.35</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.73%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">23</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">100.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Figure 6. Mini Y screw plate peroperatively (Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, CHU SO).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1461258-rId18.jpeg?20250923040554" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Figure 7. Mini Y-shaped screw plate seen on a post-operative control radiograph (Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, CHU SO).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1461258-rId19.jpeg?20250923040554" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Figure 8. Combined pre-auricular and retro-mandibular approach using the classic Redon “S” approach (Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, CHU SO).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1461258-rId20.jpeg?20250923040553" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Outcome</title>
    <p>The outcome was favorable in 79.60% of patients. The postoperative course was marred by complications in 14.28% of patients. Three patients experienced sequelae (6.12%), including less mouth opening and dental disorders.</p>
    <p>The distribution of patients according to complications and sequelae is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table10">
      Table 10
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table10">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table10">
       Table 10
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-"></xref>Table 10. Distribution of patients by complications and sequelae.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="47.42%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Number (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.71%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentages (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="47.42%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>Complications</u></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="47.42%"><p style="text-align:center">peripheral facial paralysis (PFP)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.71%"><p style="text-align:center">6.12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="47.42%"><p style="text-align:center">Hyperesthesia of the V3 territory</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.71%"><p style="text-align:center">4.08</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="47.42%"><p style="text-align:center">Pseudarthrosis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.71%"><p style="text-align:center">4.08</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="47.42%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>Sequelae</u></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="47.42%"><p style="text-align:center">Temporomandibular joint disorders</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.71%"><p style="text-align:center">4.08</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="47.42%"><p style="text-align:center">Dental disorders</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.71%"><p style="text-align:center">2.04</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Originality, Internal Validity, and Limits of the Study</title>
    <p>The management of condylar fractures is part of the management of maxillofacial trauma pathologies. Previous studies have been conducted in Lome on mandibular fractures in general. They highlighted a predominance of symphyseal and parasymphyseal fractures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-7">
      [7]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-8">
      [8]
     </xref>. However, no study has specifically addressed condylar fractures. A correlation between symphyseal/parasymphyseal fractures and condylar fractures is known. This study is the first in Togo, hence its originality.</p>
    <p>The Department of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery at the SO University Teaching Hospital is the only national referral department in this specialty. As a result, it attracts almost all patients suffering from pathologies falling within this framework and whose treatment needs hospitalization; hence the choice of this setting for our study.</p>
    <p>The results obtained allowed us to highlight the epidemiological, clinical, radiological, and therapeutic aspects of these injuries.</p>
    <p>Our study is of real interest because it sheds light on condylar fractures.</p>
    <p>Our study had limitations due to the retrospective nature of any study, including the incompleteness of medical records, missing tracking data, which reduced the sample size.</p>
    <p>It should also be noted that helmet use was not recorded in the files.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Epidemiological Aspects</title>
    <p>Male was the most represented with 91.83% and a sex ratio of 11.25. Male predominance has been reported by most authors with a sex ratio between 3.2, and 9.83 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-9">
      [9]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-13">
      [13]
     </xref>. This male predominance could be explained by the fact that men are more exposed to trauma, due to their dynamism, their professional activities, and their tendency to take risks.</p>
    <p>The most represented age group was 20 - 40 years (69.4%). This age group represents the most active population, users of motorized vehicles, and is therefore more mobile and more exposed to road traffic accidents. Similar results have been reported by several authors in the literature. Indeed, Zachariades et al. in Greece <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-14">
      [14]
     </xref>, Emmanuelle Vernhet et al. in France <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-15">
      [15]
     </xref>, and Oumayma in Morocco <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-9">
      [9]
     </xref> reported 51.6%, 50%, and 58%, respectively, as the proportion of patients in this age group. Furthermore, all authors, whether from developed or developing countries, agree that maxillofacial trauma is generally the prerogative of young people, and often males <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-16">
      [16]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-17">
      [17]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The most represented socio-professional category in our study was the informal sector, with 51.02% of patients.</p>
    <p>In their series, Bissa et al. in Togo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-7">
      [7]
     </xref> and Tine et al. in Senegal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-18">
      [18]
     </xref> also found the informal sector to be the socio-professional category most affected by mandibular fractures in general, with 41.20% and 25.25%, respectively.</p>
    <p>Our results can be explained by the fact that more than 70% of young people, who represent the working population, are found in the informal sector, which is a major hub of the Togolese economy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-19">
      [19]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Road traffic accidents accounted for 85.71% of the circumstances of condylar fracture occurrence in our study, followed by workplace accidents (6.12%), assaults (6.12%), and one case of a play accident (2.04%). No fall from a tree was found as a circumstance of occurrence. However, a study conducted in Burkina Faso among children aged 3 to 15 years found falls from trees to be the main circumstance of occurrence of mandibular fractures in general <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-20">
      [20]
     </xref>. Motorcyclists were involved in 92.84% of RTAs.</p>
    <p>Most studies in Africa have shown that road traffic accidents, primarily accidents involving two-wheeled vehicles, represent the leading cause of condylar fractures. According to Elmansouri’s study in Morocco, they accounted for 66.67% of the circumstances of condylar fracture occurrence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-11">
      [11]
     </xref>. The same is true of Keita’s study in Mali, where road traffic accidents accounted for 66.66% of the etiologies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-21">
      [21]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>This can be explained in our context by the road safety conditions described as unfavorable, by the non-observance of the systematic wearing of full-face helmets and the non-compliance with the highway code by road users, as well as the rapid increase in the vehicle fleet in recent decades, and the defects of certain public roads.</p>
    <p>In developed countries, assaults are the most frequent causes (57% in France, 79% in the United States) despite a highly developed vehicle fleet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-10">
      [10]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-17">
      [17]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-22">
      [22]
     </xref>. This situation could be explained by the better quality of the road network, the better application of the various policies to raise public awareness about respecting traffic laws, wearing protective equipment, and strictly enforcing road safety regulations . This recommendation is being supported by the high incidence of motorcyclist injuries and established public health knowledge.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Clinical Aspects</title>
    <p>In our study, 24.49% of patients consulted after 24 hours. The average consultation time was 48 hours.</p>
    <p>Tine et al. in Senegal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-18">
      [18]
     </xref> and Edouma et al. in Cameroon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-23">
      [23]
     </xref> reported 6.50% and 39.19% of consultations after 24 hours.</p>
    <p>This delay in consultation could be explained by limited financial accessibility for patients who delay consulting, and by the fact that some patients were referred from other facilities in the interior of the country, with travel time to take into account.</p>
    <p>The diagnosis of mandibular condylar fractures was suspected clinically and confirmed by orthopantomogram or CT scan of the facial bones. We noted, regarding the clinical examination, that periauricular pain was found in 93.87% of patients, limited mouth opening in 95.91% of patients, premature molar contact associated with a contralateral open bite in 77.58% of patients, and a deviation of the interincisal point in 77.58% of patients.</p>
    <p>These results are consistent with those of Ahmedou in Morocco <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-12">
      [12]
     </xref>, who found clinical signs of periauricular pain in 84.31% of patients, limited mouth opening in 90% of patients, and premature molar contact associated with a contralateral open bite in 67.74% of patients. Keita in Mali <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-21">
      [21]
     </xref> also found the main clinical signs to be periauricular pain in 85.17% of patients, limited mouth opening in 90.47% of patients, and dental articulation disorder in 57.14% of patients.</p>
    <p>These signs are the cardinal signs of mandibular condyle fractures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-24">
      [24]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>1) Radiological Examinations Performed</p>
    <p>In our study, CT of the facial mass was performed in 89.80% of patients. This result is close to that of Keita in Mali <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-21">
      [21]
     </xref> and Elmansouri in Morocco <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-11">
      [11]
     </xref> where 100% and 55% of patients benefited from it, respectively.</p>
    <p>Orthopantomogram was performed in 10.20% of patients in our study, which differs from the results of Elmansouri <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-11">
      [11]
     </xref> and Keita <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-21">
      [21]
     </xref>, where 100% of patients benefited from it.</p>
    <p>This difference could be explained in our context by the existence of associated facial fractures, which immediately justified the use of CT of the facial mass.</p>
    <p>2) Fracture Types on Imaging</p>
    <p>We recorded 49 cases of condylar fractures in our study, including 51.02% lower subcondylar fractures, 32.65% upper subcondylar fractures, and 16.33% capital fractures. These results are similar to those of Elmansouri in Morocco <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-11">
      [11]
     </xref>, who recorded 58% of lower subcondylar fractures, 27% of upper subcondylar fractures, and 15% of capital fractures in his series; Zachariades et al. in Greece <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-14">
      [14]
     </xref> also recorded 12% of capital fractures, 31% of upper subcondylar fractures, and 57% of lower subcondylar fractures in their series.</p>
    <p>Indeed, the neck of the condyle is a weak area of the mandible <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-6">
      [6]
     </xref>. Chin trauma therefore tends to lead to subcondylar fractures, through an indirect mechanism.</p>
    <p>3) Mandibular Topographic Associations</p>
    <p>In our study, 85.72% of patients had a condylar fracture associated with a fracture of the symphyseal region. These results are consistent with those of Ahmedou <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-12">
      [12]
     </xref>, who found an association between the condyle and the symphyseal region in 39.21% of cases. Elmansouri <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-11">
      [11]
     </xref> found a condylar fracture associated with a symphyseal fracture in 46% of patients.</p>
    <p>Fractures of the mandibular condyle are often caused by indirect trauma from an impact to the chin. This upward force can cause fractures in the fragile areas of this region, the neck of the condyle, relative to the base of the skull <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-25">
      [25]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>4.4. Therapeutic Data</title>
    <p>Forty-six point ninety-five percent (46.95%) of patients received treatment within more than 14 days, and 34.69% of patients within 7 days. The average treatment time was 13 days. This timeframe is almost similar to that of the Keita study in Mali <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-21">
      [21]
     </xref>, where 52.64% of patients were treated between 6 and 11 days.</p>
    <p>This timeframe was longer compared to that of the Elmansouri study in Morocco, where treatment was completed within an average of 5 days <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-11">
      [11]
     </xref>. Rocton et al. in France found an average timeframe of 30 hours <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-10">
      [10]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>This delayed response time could be explained in our context by, among other things, the existence of associated bone lesions of the limbs, which were initially treated in trauma care, therapeutic errors (referral to private clinics or traditional therapists), or the reduced financial accessibility of patients for their care.</p>
    <p>However, the difference with developed countries could be explained by effective insurance and social security systems that promote access to care, which is not the case in our developing countries. This could also be explained by the existence of a sufficient number of maxillofacial surgeons available at all times to provide rapid treatment in these countries.</p>
    <p>In our study, all patients received functional treatment. All major fractures received functional treatment only. These results are similar to those of Elmansouri and Oumayma in Morocco <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-9">
      [9]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-11">
      [11]
     </xref>. Since mandibular condyle fractures are articular fractures, regardless of the type of treatment, rehabilitation is always associated to restore masticatory function.</p>
    <p>The retromandibular approach was used in 47.82% of cases in our study. Our results are similar to those of Oumayma <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-9">
      [9]
     </xref>, where the retromandibular approach was the most commonly used. In Mali, according to the study by Keita <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-22">
      [22]
     </xref>, the high subangulo-mandibular approach (modified Risdon) was used in 52.63% of patients.</p>
    <p>The approach depends on the fracture topography and its degree of displacement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-26">
      [26]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Trapezoidal condylar osteosynthesis plates are easier to place thanks to their curved shapes that adapt to the anatomy. They are used to treat high and low subcondylar fractures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-27">
      [27]
     </xref>. These plates were not used in our study. However, in the studies by Elmansouri and Ahmedou in Morocco, these plates were used for all osteosynthesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-11">
      [11]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-12">
      [12]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>In Togo, these plates are not available. Ordering them from abroad would be prohibitively expensive for patients due to the low socioeconomic status of the population.</p>
    <p>The minimum duration of MMB in our study was 8 days, with a maximum of 21 days. This result is comparable to that of Keita in Mali <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-22">
      [22]
     </xref>, where the duration of MMB was between 8 and 23 days.</p>
    <p>This maximum period of 21 days is explained by the risk of sequelae of mouth opening limitation due to temporomandibular ankylosis after 3 weeks of maxillomandibular locking <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-28">
      [28]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_5">
    <title>4.5. Outcome</title>
    <p>The outcome was favorable in the majority of cases (79.60%). Seven patients experienced postoperative complications, which were managed. This involved peripheral facial paralysis (PFP) in 6.12% of cases, hypoesthesia of the V3 territory in 4.08% of cases, and non-union in 4.08% of cases. Three patients had sequelae, including temporomandibular joint disorders in two patients and dental disorder in one patient.</p>
    <p>Delayed treatment of condylar fractures leads to delayed healing, malpositioned condylar healing, and/or poor healing of the joint ligaments. This can lead to limited mouth opening, complex joint dysfunction (CRD) of the masticatory system, or, at most, temporomandibular ankylosis.</p>
    <p>In growing children, growth retardation may be observed, with a characteristic facial deformity.</p>
    <p>In Keita’s study in Mali <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-22">
      [22]
     </xref>, postoperative complications were facial nerve paralysis and surgical site infection in 10.52% each. Oumayma and Ahmedou in Morocco found sequelae in 14% and 14.81%, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-9">
      [9]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-12">
      [12]
     </xref>. For Elmansouri <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145895-11">
      [11]
     </xref>, the outcome was favorable in 90% of cases. The occurrence of complications and sequelae could be explained by a long treatment delay, difficult access to the mandibular condyle during the surgical approach, and non-compliance with postoperative instructions.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusions</title>
   <p>We conducted a descriptive study with retrospective data collection over a period of 9 years, which allowed us to describe the management of mandibular condyle fractures in the Department of Stomatology and Maxillofacial Surgery at the University Hospital of Lomé.</p>
   <p>Mandibular condyle fractures were frequently found in young males working in the informal sector. Road traffic accidents caused by two-wheeled vehicles were the leading cause in our series. The outcome of properly managed mandibular condyle fractures was mostly favorable in our study. The retrospective nature of this study, with its usual limitations, constituted the main bias. Many medical records were incomplete, with missing and sometimes unusable data, and other data destroyed by humidity. A prospective study could have provided a real-time assessment of the incidence of these traumatic injuries, assessed their epidemiological, clinical, radiological, and therapeutic aspects, and, above all, addressed these various observed shortcomings.</p>
   <p>To better assess the true prevalence and obtain more reliable data on the management of these injuries and their progression, prospective research should be considered in the future.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Toure, G., Meningaud, J. and Bertrand, J. (2004) Fractures de la mandibule. EMC—Dentisterie, 1, 228-243. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s1762-5661(04)00078-9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhou, H., Liu, Q., Cheng, G. and Li, Z. (2013) Aetiology, Pattern and Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures in 549 Patients: A 22-Year Retrospective Study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 41, 34-41. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rutges, J.P.H.J., Kruizinga, E.H.W., Rosenberg, A. and Koole, R. (2007) Functional Results after Conservative Treatment of Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 45, 30-34. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.12.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Barthélémy, I. and Brix, M. (2017) Chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatology. 4ème édition, Elsevier, 394.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meyer, C. (2006) Fractures de la région condylienne: Traitement fonctionnel ou chirurgie? Revue de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, 107, 133-135. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-1768(06)77005-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Netter, F. (2015) Atlas d’anatomie humaine. 6ème Édition, Elsevier, 624.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bissa, H., Pegbessou, E.P., Adam, S., Foma, W., Essolam, T., Amana, E., et al. (2017) Maxillofacial Trauma at Lomé (TOGO): About 501 Cases. Open Journal of Stomatology, 7, 511-518. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2017.712048
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Essobiyou, T.B., Adam, S., Dargani, M.F., Boko, S.U.R., Ananidjin, G., Keheou, A.P., et al. (2022) Mandibular Fracture in a Regional Area: About 109 Cases in Togo. Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 8, Article ID: 100365. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adoms.2022.100365
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Oumayma, G. (2021) Prise en charge des fractures du condyle mandibulaire: Étude rétrospective et analyse de la littérature. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Sidi Mo-hamed Ben Abdellah.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rocton, S., Chaine, A., Ernenwein, D., Bertolus, C., Rigolet, A., Bertrand, J., et al. (2007) Fractures de la mandibule: Épidémiologie, prise en charge thérapeutique et complications d’une série de 563 cas. Revue de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, 108, 3-10. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stomax.2006.11.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Elmansouri, H. (2019) Les fractures du condyle mandibulaire, notre experience. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Cadi Ayyad.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ahmedou, S. (2021) Prise en charge des fractures du condyle mandibulaire. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Cadi Ayyad.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     El-Sabbagh, A., Mahgoub, M., Abd El-Latif, E. and Elhadidy, M. (2018) Condylar Fractures: Review of 40 Cases. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, 8, 19-27. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_133_17
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zachariades, N., Mezitis, M., Mourouzis, C., Papadakis, D. and Spanou, A. (2006) Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle: A Review of 466 Cases. Literature Review, Reflections on Treatment and Proposals. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 34, 421-432. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2006.07.854
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vernhet, E., De Boutray, M., Hoarau, R., Jammet, P., Galmiche, S. and Breton, I. (2019) Exclusive Functional Treatment for Mandibular Condylar Fractures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 77, 2523.e1-2523.e8. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.188
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bouguila, J., Zairi, I., Khonsari, R.H., Jablaoui, Y., Hellali, M. and Adouani, A. (2008) Epidemiology of Maxillofacial Traumatology in Tunis. Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale, 109, 353-357.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ogundare, B.O., Bonnick, A. and Bayley, N. (2003) Pattern of Mandibular Fractures in an Urban Major Trauma Center. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 61, 713-718. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50118
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tine, S., Tamba, B., Niang, P., Barry, C., Kébé, N. and Guèye, N. (2009) Fractures de la mandibule en pratique odontologique: À propos de 103 cas. MBCB-Journal, 9 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     System, R. (2021) Rapports d’analyse. Institut National de la Statistique et des études économiques et démographiques (INSEED). 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Traoré, I., Coulibaly, T.A., Ouedraogo, R.W.L., Zegbeh, N.E.K., Traoré, Y. and Beogo, R. (2021) Mandibular Fractures in Children: From Epidemiology to Treatment at Souro Sanou University Hospital Center: About 54 Cases in Bobo-Dioulasso. Rev Col Odonto-Stomatol Afr Chir Maxillo-fac, 16, 31-34. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Keita, F. (2023) Fractures du condyle mandibulaire: Aspects épidémiologiques, cliniques et thérapeutiques au CHU-CNOS PR Hamady Traoré de Bamako. Master’s Thesis, Université des sciences techniques et des technologies de Bamako.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fridrich, K.L., Pena-Velasco, G. and Olson, R.A.J. (1992) Changing Trends with Mandibular Fractures: A Review of 1,067 Cases. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 50, 586-589. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90438-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gérard, E., Nicole N.M.O., Adèle-Rose, N.N., Alain, S. and Charles, B. (2021) Aspects Épidémiologiques, Cliniques et Thérapeutiques des Fractures de la Mandibule à l’Hôpital Central de Yaounde. Health Sciences and Diseases, 22, 85-89.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Béziat, J.L. and Cresseau, P. (1994) Fractures of the Facial Bones. Diagnosis. Revue Du Praticien, 44, 10 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lebeau, J. (2011) Chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie: Pour le 2e cycle des études médicales. Elsevier.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meyer, C., Zink, S. and Wilk, A. (2006) La voie d’abord sous-angulo-mandibulaire haute (Voie de Risdon modifiée) pour le traitement des fractures sous-condyliennes de la mandibule. Revue de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, 107, 449-454. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-1768(06)77086-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meyer, C., Martin, E., Kahn, J. and Zink, S. (2007) Development and Biomechanical Testing of a New Osteosynthesis Plate (TCP®) Designed to Stabilize Mandibular Condyle Fractures. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 35, 84-90. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2006.11.006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145895-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moritz, M., Niederdellmann, H. and Dammer, R. (1994) Mandibular Condyle Fractures: Conservative Treatment versus Surgical Treatment. Revue de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-faciale, 95, 268-273.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>