<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jpee
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Power and Energy Engineering
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-588X
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-5901
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jpee.2025.139011
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jpee-145596
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Engineering
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    A Modified Carrier-Based PWM Technique for Cascaded H-Bridge Inverters: Enhanced Harmonic Reduction and DC Bus Utilization
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Syafirul Imran
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Shaharuddin
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Fazlli
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Patkar
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jurifa Mat
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Lazi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Md Hairul Nizam
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Talib
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Azrita
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Alias
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nurul Ain
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Said
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Zainuddin Mat
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Isa
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aFakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Melaka, Malaysia
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aFakulti Kejuruteraan dan Teknologi Elektrik, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Perlis, Malaysia
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     29
    </day> 
    <month>
     08
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    09
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    160
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    175
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      8,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      12,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      12,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Multilevel inverters are a crucial component in renewable energy systems, motor drives, and grid system due to their capability to generate high-quality AC output power. Among various multilevel inverter topologies, Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter (CHB-MLI) is known for its scalability and modularity. However, the main concern in CHB-MLI is the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) caused by the switching algorithm that is not optimized, which can cause harm to the systems due to low power quality and efficiency. This paper addresses the issue of THD in CHB-MLI by proposing a modified Carrier-Based Pulse Width Modulation (CB-PWM) technique, namely the Third Harmonic Injection Square Pulse Width Modulation (THI
    <sup>2</sup>-PWM). The proposed method also aims to improve DC bus utilization. To validate the effectiveness of the THI
    <sup>2</sup>-PWM technique, simulations were carried out using MATLAB Simulink for a 5-level CHB-MLI system. The results demonstrate improved performance compared to conventional CB-PWM methods.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Carrier-Based PWM
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Cascaded H-Bridge
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Multilevel Inverter
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>In modern power electronic systems, the demand for efficient power conversion with low losses is becoming increasingly important. Power electronic devices with high efficiency are more reliable and less likely to fail. One commonly used device is the multilevel inverters, which are essential in high-power applications such as renewable energy systems, electric vehicles, industrial motor drives, and HVDC transmission. The CHB-MLI is widely used for medium and high-power needs because it can produce an output waveform close to a pure sine wave, helping to reduce harmonic distortion and electromagnetic interference <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-1">
     [1]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. However, one of the main challenges with CHB-MLI is reducing Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) to improve power quality. Harmonics can cause power loss, overheating, and lower efficiency, which affects the reliability and lifespan of electrical equipment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. Although multilevel inverters generally have lower THD than two-level inverters due to their smoother waveforms, THD can still increase if the switching control is not optimal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. As the number of levels rises, switching becomes more complex and harder to manage. To solve this, several CBPWM methods like Phase-Shifted and Level-Shifted PWM have been developed to improve switching patterns and reduce THD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. This project aims to evaluate the harmonic reduction and DC bus utilization of 5-level CHB-MLI by comparing conventional CBPWM techniques with a proposed THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM technique. The results are expected to highlight the improvement of the proposed THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM technique over conventional CB-PWM techniques in terms of output waveform quality.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Multilevel Inverter</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter</title>
    <p>The Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter (CHB-MLI) is commonly used in medium- to high-power applications, including renewable energy systems and industrial motor drives <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-2">
      [2]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-3">
      [3]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-9">
      [9]
     </xref>. It consists of multiple single-phase H-bridge power cells, which are typically connected in series on the AC side to generate a stepped output waveform that closely approximates a sinusoidal signal with reduced harmonic distortion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-10">
      [10]
     </xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref> shows the circuit of 5-level CHB-MLI.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 1. Circuit of 5-level CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId13.jpeg?20250915024849" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Total Harmonics Distortion</title>
    <p>Harmonic distortion is a significant issue in electrical power systems, often leading to system disturbances and reduced power quality. The increasing use of power electronic devices, particularly converters and inverters, has contributed to higher levels of Total Harmonic Distortion (THD), which affects electrical power across a wide range of frequencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-11">
      [11]
     </xref>. These distortions are primarily caused by nonlinear loads within the system, where the current waveform deviates from the ideal sinusoidal shape typically seen in linear load conditions. Harmonics can be described as the presence of additional waveforms whose frequencies are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-12">
      [12]
     </xref>. The superposition of these harmonic components on the fundamental waveform results in signal distortion, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 2. The representation of harmonics affecting fundamental signal.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId14.jpeg?20250915024850" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. DC Bus Utilization</title>
    <p>In voltage-source inverters, DC bus utilization is defined as the ratio of the output fundamental voltage amplitude to the available DC link,</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mi>
          η 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           bus 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            V 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
           <mo>
             , 
           </mo> 
           <mtext>
             peak 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            V 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             d 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             c 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             , 
           </mo> 
           <mtext>
             available 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> (1)</p>
    <p>where V<sub>1</sub> is the fundamental of the inverter output voltage, and V<sub>dc</sub><sub>,available</sub> is the total DC link the topology can impress across the output without entering over-modulation. This parameter evaluates how effectively the inverter converts the available DC voltage into useful AC fundamental voltage. A higher fundamental voltage at the same DC link directly implies better utilization, as a larger portion of the DC bus is converted into usable output rather than being limited by the modulation process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-13">
      [13]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Carrier-Based PWM</title>
    <p>Carrier-Based Pulse Width Modulation (CB-PWM) is a widely adopted technique for controlling the switching of power devices in multilevel inverters, particularly in Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverters (CHB-MLI) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-7">
      [7]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-14">
      [14]
     </xref>. The basic principle of CB-PWM involves comparing a modulation signal with one or more carrier signals to generate gate signals that control the ON and OFF states of the power switches. One of the key reasons CB-PWM remains popular is its simplicity of implementation. Unlike Space Vector PWM (SV-PWM) and Model Predictive Control (MPC), CB-PWM is not computationally demanding and does not require high-performance microcontrollers. In addition, CB-PWM has been shown to be effective in reducing the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) of the CHB-MLI output waveform <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-15">
      [15]
     </xref>. There are two main CB-PWM categories: Phase-Shifted PWM (PS-PWM) and Level-Shifted PWM (LS-PWM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-7">
      [7]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-8">
      [8]
     </xref>. In PS-PWM, all carrier signals share the same peak amplitude and frequency but are phase-shifted relative to each other. The phase shift depends on the desired number of voltage levels and the inverter topology. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref> illustrates an example of PS-PWM applied to a 5-level CHB-MLI. On the other hand, in LS-PWM, each carrier signal also has the same peak and frequency, but they are vertically stacked on top of each other. LS-PWM includes three carrier arrangements: In-Phase Disposition PWM (IPD-PWM), where all carriers are in phase (shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>); Alternate Phase Opposition Disposition PWM (APOD-PWM) where carriers are alternately in phase and out of phase (shown on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>); and Phase Opposition Disposition PWM (POD-PWM), where carriers above the zero reference are in phase while those below are out of phase (shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>). Each modulation technique has different implementation characteristics and produces different effects on the inverter’s performance depending on the selected CB-PWM strategy.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 3. PS-PWM for 5-level CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId17.jpeg?20250915024851" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 4. IPD-PWM for 5-level CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId18.jpeg?20250915024852" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 5. POD-PWM for 5-level CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId19.jpeg?20250915024852" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 6. APOD-PWM for 5-level CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId20.jpeg?20250915024852" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Proposed Carrier-Based PWM</title>
    <p>THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM is a unique method developed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-16">
      [16]
     </xref> specifically for a 5-level three-phase Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter (CHB-MLI) used in medium-voltage induction motor drive applications. The motivation behind the development of THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM was to address the issue of high torque ripple, which is a result of the pulsating torque introduced by conventional CB-PWM methods. The distinctive shape of the carrier signals used in this method can be observed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref> illustrates the implementation of THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM in simulation, where the technique employs the Min function combined with Third Harmonic Injection (THI) to generate its unique carrier signal structure. Other advantages of the THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM method include lower output voltage THD, reduced stator current and voltage distortion, decreased power losses, smoother dynamic response in induction motor drives, and minimized torque ripple <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-16">
      [16]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM method presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-16">
      [16]
     </xref> was originally developed for three-phase CHB-MLI systems. In this project, when applied to a single-phase 5-level CHB-MLI, the output waveform exhibited a noticeable DC component, or DC offset, in the frequency spectrum, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref>, with the offset appearing at 0 Hz. In three-phase systems, the triplen (zero-sequence) content that accompanies third-harmonic injection cancels in the line-to-line voltages, so no net DC appears. In a single-phase topology there is no inter-phase cancellation path, and the injected zero-sequence biases the reference around the carrier, causes an imbalance between the positive and negative half cycles of the output waveform, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">
      Figure 10
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 7. THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM for 3-phase 5-level CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId21.jpeg?20250915024853" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 8. Implementation of THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId22.jpeg?20250915024853" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 9. DC offset in frequency spectrum caused by THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM in single-phase CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId23.jpeg?20250915024853" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig10" position="float">
     <label>Figure 10</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 10. DC offset in frequency spectrum caused by THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM in single-phase CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId24.jpeg?20250915024853" />
    </fig>
    <p>This DC bias is undesirable as it can cause DC current injection into the load or grid, violating standards such as IEC 61727 and IEEE 1547 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-17">
      [17]
     </xref>. To mitigate this, the proposed modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM generates a 180˚ phase-shifted twin of the injected reference and applies a Min-function with the lower carriers, ensuring symmetrical clipping and zero average voltage in each carrier period. This approach effectively removes the DC offset while maintaining the third-harmonic peak-flattening effect, thus preserving both the THD reduction and improved DC bus utilization.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Methodology</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>Implementation of THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM</title>
    <p>The implementation of the THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM technique follows a similar procedure to LS-PWM, particularly in determining the carrier signal frequency and calculating the amplitude modulation index (M<sub>a</sub>) for each CHB-MLI level. As a result, the carrier signal parameters used in THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM do not require separate calculation, since they share the same configuration as in conventional LS-PWM. The distinguishing feature of THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM lies in its use of third harmonic injection; a method commonly applied in three-phase inverters to enhance output voltage by modifying the reference signal with a third harmonic component at a specific amplitude. In THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM, however, the third harmonic is injected into the original carrier signal itself, generating the unique waveform required for the proposed modulation technique such as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">
      Figure 11
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The injected signal can be represented as:</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref> 
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mi>
          V 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           c 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           r 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         1.1547 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            A 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             c 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             r 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         sin 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mtext>
           π 
         </mtext> 
         <mo>
           × 
         </mo> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              f 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               c 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               r 
             </mi> 
            </mrow> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.19245 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            A 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             c 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             r 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         sin 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mtext>
           π 
         </mtext> 
         <mo>
           × 
         </mo> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              f 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               c 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               r 
             </mi> 
            </mrow> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> (2)</p>
    <p>where:</p>
    <p>A<sub>cr</sub> = carrier signal amplitude</p>
    <p>f<sub>cr</sub> = carrier signal frequency</p>
    <fig id="fig11" position="float">
     <label>Figure 11</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 11. Third harmonic injection.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId27.jpeg?20250915024854" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig12" position="float">
     <label>Figure 12</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 12. THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM carrier signal generation.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId28.jpeg?20250915024854" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig13" position="float">
     <label>Figure 13</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 13. THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM for single-phase 5-level CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId29.jpeg?20250915024854" />
    </fig>
    <p>After that, the third harmonic injected signal must be phase shifted by 180 degrees and compare it with initial signal using Min function to extract lowest value from both waveforms, such as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">
      Figure 12
     </xref>. Whereas the arrangement of carrier signal for single-phase 5-level CHB-MLI is as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig13">
      Figure 13
     </xref>. Since the original technique injects DC offset into the load, the carrier signals must be modified by changing the arrangement of the bottom two carrier signals, such as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig14">
      Figure 14
     </xref>. The overall block diagram for the modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM method is as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig15">
      Figure 15
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig14" position="float">
     <label>Figure 14</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 14. Modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId30.jpeg?20250915024854" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig15" position="float">
     <label>Figure 15</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 15. Modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM implementation.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId31.jpeg?20250915024854" />
    </fig>
    <p>MATLAB Simulink simulations of single phase 5-level CHB-MLI using conventional CB-PWM and modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM methods are conducted as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig16">
      Figure 16
     </xref>. In the simulation, the total DC supply voltage combined from all H-Bridge cells is 200 V, the load consists of a 10 Ω resistor and a 40 mH inductor, and the output voltage operates at a frequency of 50 Hz and switching frequency of 4 kHz. The switching frequency of 4 kHz was selected as a practical compromise between harmonic performance and switching losses, giving an f<sub>sw</sub>/f<sub>1</sub> ratio of 80 (4 kHz/50 Hz), which is well above the minimum recommended for carrier-based PWM to suppress low-order harmonics while limiting device stress. The total DC link voltage of 200 V was chosen as a safe, laboratory-scale value that ensures realistic device ratings and load sizing without affecting percentage THD, since in the linear modulation region the harmonic spectrum scales proportionally with voltage. The relative THD improvement achieved by the proposed modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM over conventional CB-PWM methods is expected to persist for higher switching frequencies or different DC link voltages, as it originates from the modulation strategy itself rather than the specific operating point.</p>
    <fig id="fig16" position="float">
     <label>Figure 16</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 16. MATLAB Simulink implementation of 5-level CHB-MLI.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId32.jpeg?20250915024855" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results</title>
   <p>The output voltage of the 5-level CHB-MLI was measured and recorded using the Scope block and FFT Analyzer. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig17">
     Figure 17
    </xref>, the waveform represents the output voltage of a 5-level CHB-MLI. The CHB-MLI topology produces a five-step output voltage waveform, which corresponds to the number of voltage levels defined by the inverter configuration.</p>
   <fig id="fig17" position="float">
    <label>Figure 17</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 17. Output voltage of 5-level single-phase CHB-MLI.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId33.jpeg?20250915024856" />
   </fig>
   <p>The frequency spectrum of voltage THD of 5-level CHB-MLI (for M<sub>a</sub> = 0.8) with conventional CB-PWM methods are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig18">
     Figure 18
    </xref> (PS-PWM), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig19">
     Figure 19
    </xref> (IPD-PWM), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig20">
     Figure 20
    </xref> (APOD-PWM), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig21">
     Figure 21
    </xref> (POD-PWM) while <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig22">
     Figure 22
    </xref> shows frequency spectrum of modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM method. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref> summarizes the voltage THDs of all these methods whereas compared to conventional CB-PWM methods, THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM achieves the lowest THD at 28.21%, representing around 5% improvement over the conventional CB-PWM methods. This enhancement is attributed to the spread-out nature of harmonic components and the strategic injection of a third harmonic into the carrier signal, effectively suppressing dominant low-order harmonics.</p>
   <fig id="fig18" position="float">
    <label>Figure 18</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 18. Frequency spectrum of 5-level CHB-MLI for PS-PWM.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId34.jpeg?20250915024856" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig19" position="float">
    <label>Figure 19</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 19. Frequency spectrum of 5-level CHB-MLI for IPD-PWM.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId35.jpeg?20250915024856" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig20" position="float">
    <label>Figure 20</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 20. Frequency spectrum of 5-level CHB-MLI for APOD-PWM.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId36.jpeg?20250915024856" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig21" position="float">
    <label>Figure 21</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 21. Frequency spectrum of 5-level CHB-MLI for POD-PWM.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId37.jpeg?20250915024856" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig22" position="float">
    <label>Figure 22</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 22. Frequency spectrum for modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId38.jpeg?20250915024855" />
   </fig>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Table 1. Output voltage THD at amplitude modulation index, M<sub>a</sub> = 0.8.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Modulation method</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">PS-PWM</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">IPD-PWM</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">APOD-PWM</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">POD-PWM</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM (Modified)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Voltage THD</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">33.95%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">33.98%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">34.02%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">33.97%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">28.21%</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>In addition to the observed reduction in output voltage THD, the modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM technique also showed enhanced DC bus utilization as tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
     Table 2
    </xref>. In the presented results, for the same 200 V DC bus, the conventional CB-PWM methods produces a fundamental of 160 V, whereas the proposed modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM achieves 198.2 V, a 24% increase, thereby indicating a proportional improvement in DC bus utilization. This improvement stems from effect of third-harmonic injection, which flattens the reference waveform peaks and extends the linear modulation range, enabling a higher fundamental voltage before over-modulation occurs. This aligns with theoretical findings in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-16">
     [16]
    </xref>, where harmonic injection methods have been shown to enhance inverter performance and reduce distortion without increasing switching complexity.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Table 2. Comparison of fundamental voltage amplitude for each CB-PWM technique.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Modulation method</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">PS-PWM</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.69%"><p style="text-align:center">IPD-PWM</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.69%"><p style="text-align:center">APOD-PWM</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.69%"><p style="text-align:center">POD_PWM</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.69%"><p style="text-align:center">THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM (Modified)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Fundamental voltage amplitude</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">160 V</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.69%"><p style="text-align:center">160 V</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.69%"><p style="text-align:center">160 V</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.69%"><p style="text-align:center">160 V</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.69%"><p style="text-align:center">198.2 V</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>To complete the analysis, simulation was also conducted for all CB-PWM method for the linear range of modulation index and its results are tabulated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig23">
     Figure 23
    </xref>. It can be observed that the modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM maintains better performance across a range of modulation indices, further validating its robustness. These results confirm the method’s potential for high-performance applications requiring both low THD and high efficiency, such as in renewable energy and motor drive systems.</p>
   <fig id="fig23" position="float">
    <label>Figure 23</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145596-"></xref>Figure 23. 5-level CHB-MLI with CB-PWM comparison for output voltage THD.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771268-rId39.jpeg?20250915024855" />
   </fig>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>This study introduced a modified CB-PWM technique, referred as THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM, aimed at reducing output voltage THD and improving DC bus utilization in a 5-level CHB-MLI. The uniqueness of this method lies in its use of third harmonic injection directly into the carrier signal, enhanced by a signal-clipping Min function, which differentiates it from traditional third harmonic modulation strategies. The technique was implemented in MATLAB Simulink by injecting a third harmonic component into the carrier waveform and shaping it using signal clipping logic. Simulation results validate the superiority of the modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM over conventional methods (PS-PWM, IPD-PWM, APOD-PWM, POD-PWM), with a significant THD reduction to 28.21% and a 24% increase in fundamental voltage amplitude. These findings affirm theoretical claims that harmonic injection and optimized carrier arrangements can lead to better waveform quality and improved energy conversion efficiency while avoiding the complexity of advanced modulation schemes such as Space Vector PWM (SVPWM).</p>
   <p>This study focuses on the conceptual development and numerical evaluation of the modified THI<sup>2</sup>-PWM technique for single-phase cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverters. At this stage, detailed MATLAB/Simulink modeling was used to enable controlled, repeatable comparisons between multiple carrier-based PWM methods under identical operating conditions, which is often not feasible in early experimental setups due to hardware and measurement constraints. The simulation environment incorporates device-level switching behavior, carrier synchronization, and harmonic analysis consistent with established PWM modeling practices reported in literature, allowing for accurate prediction of spectral performance and DC bus utilization trends.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors would like to acknowledge Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM) and Centre for Research and Innovation (CRIM), UTeM for supporting this project.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mali, R., Adam, N., Satpaise, A. and Vaidya, A.P. (2019) Performance Comparison of Two-Level Inverter with Classical Multilevel Inverter Topologies. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT), Coimbatore, 20-22 February 2019, 1-7. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/icecct.2019.8869115
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abd Halim, W., Ganeson, S., Azri, M. and Tengku Azam, T. (2016) Review of Multilevel Inverter Topologies and Its Applications. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8, 51-56. &gt;https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/1278
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kumar, C., Mahato, B., Raushan, R., Maity, T. and Jana, K.C. (2016) Comprehensive Study of Various Configurations of Three-Phase Multilevel Inverter for Different Levels. 2016 3rd International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT), Dhanbad, 3-5 March 2016, 310-315. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/rait.2016.7507922
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wagner, V.E., Balda, J.C., Griffith, D.C., McEachern, A., Barnes, T.M., Hartmann, D.P., et al. (1993) Effects of Harmonics on Equipment. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 8, 672-680. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/61.216874
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ortmeyer, T.H., Chakravarthi, K.R. and Mahmoud, A.A. (1985) The Effects of Power System Harmonics on Power System Equipment and Loads. IEEE Power Engineering Review, 5, 54. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/mper.1985.5526463
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Krishna, R.A. and Suresh, L.P. (2016) A Brief Review on Multi Level Inverter Topologies. 2016 International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), Nagercoil, 18-19 March 2016, 1-6. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/iccpct.2016.7530373
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wu, B. (2005) High-Power Converters and AC Drives. John Wiley&amp;Sons, Inc. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/0471773719
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abu-Rub, H., Iqbal, A. and Guzinski, J. (2021) High Performance Control of AC Drives with Matlab®/Simulink. John Wiley&amp;Sons. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119591313
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Blaabjerg, F., Iov, F., Teodorescu, R. and Chen, Z. (2006) Power Electronics in Renewable Energy Systems. 2006 12th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, Portoroz, 30 August-1 September 2006, 1-17. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/epepemc.2006.4778368
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Balal, A., Dinkhah, S., Shahabi, F., Herrera, M. and Chuang, Y.L. (2022) A Review on Multilevel Inverter Topologies. Emerging Science Journal, 6, 185-200. &gt;https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2022-06-01-014
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Arranz-Gimon, A., Zorita-Lamadrid, A., Morinigo-Sotelo, D. and Duque-Perez, O. (2021) A Review of Total Harmonic Distortion Factors for the Measurement of Harmonic and Interharmonic Pollution in Modern Power Systems. Energies, 14, Article No. 6467. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206467
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ajenikoko, G.A. and Ojerinde, A.I. (2015) Effects of Total Harmonic Distortion on Power System Equipment. Innovative Systems Design and Engineering, 6, 114-120.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhou, L. and Preindl, M. (2022) Zero Sequence Power Balancing Compensation for Third Harmonic Injection of Multi-Stage Grid-Tied Energy Conversion Systems. 2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference&amp;Expo (ITEC), Anaheim, 15-17 June 2022, 351-355. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/itec53557.2022.9813761
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Radan, A., Shahirinia, A.H. and Falahi, M. (2007) Evaluation of Carrier-Based PWM Methods for Multi-Level Inverters. 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Vigo, 4-7 June 2007, 389-394. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/isie.2007.4374629
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sourkounis, C. and Al-Diab, A. (2008) A Comprehensive Analysis and Comparison between Multilevel Space-Vector Modulation and Multilevel Carrier-Based PWM. 2008 13th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, Poznan, 1-3 September 2008, 1710-1715. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/epepemc.2008.4635513
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Biswas, S.P., Anower, M.S., Haq, S., Islam, M.R., Rahman, M.A. and. Muttaqi, K.M. (2021) A New Level Shifted Carrier Based PWM Technique for a 5-Level Multilevel Inverter Used in Induction Motor Drives. 2021 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS), Vancouver, 10-14 October 2021, 1-6. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/ias48185.2021.9677179
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145596-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abobakr, H., Diab, A.A.Z., Hassan, Y.B. and Ashraf, A.M. (2019) Comparison of Egyptian Standards for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Power Plants with IEC and IEEE Standards: A Case Study in Egypt. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 28, 856-870. &gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337907778
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>