I. Optimization calculations

The tautomerism of organic compounds has been the subject of extensive theoretical studies by using different quantum chemical methods [37] . The present work aimed to characterize the tautomerization of the molecular structure, reactivity descriptors, frequencies, and chemical shifts of the six tautomers of MBPH. Hartree-Fock and Density Functional Theory computational codes are used in practice to investigate the structural, magnetic, and electronic properties of all tautomers. The stability and chemical reactivity of these tautomers in the gas phase have been predicted by using the well-known quantum-chemical methods described above. However, DFT calculations produce the electron densities of molecules with good results. The title compound was computed using HF/6-311G(d,p), DFT/B3LYP, 6-311G(d,p), DFT/B3PW91, 6-311G(d,p) and DFT/WB97XD, 6-311G(d,p) in the gas phase, this set was chosen to compare results from a standard hybrid functional with a range-separated one would strengthen the methodology. The optimized structure of the computed tautomer calculated at B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) is shown in Figure 3 .

II. Structural Analysis

A detailed analysis of the structural and energetical changes caused by the migration of hydrogen atoms would enable us to understand the different properties of the tautomers. Most of the tautomers were not studied by experiment due to their low concentration and stability. Quantum chemical calculations are the best tools to study the relative stability of such tautomers. In addition to the relative stability, computational studies permit a direct analysis of the physical and chemical properties of the molecules.

II.1. Geometrical Parameters

The internal coordinates describe the position of the atoms in terms of distances (A˚), angles (˚), and torsion angle (˚) concerning an origin atom. The purpose of this investigation is to study the structure and relative stability of six tautomeric forms of MBPH. The optimized DFT geometry by B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) of the tautomers with atom numbering is shown in Figures 4-8 . By the relaxation of all parameters, the calculations converge to optimize geometries, which correspond to true energy minimum, as revealed by the lack of imaginary frequencies in the vibrational mode calculation. Also, the geometrical parameters have various applications in the explanation of the physicochemical properties of intramolecular hydrogen bonds (IHB) in the system investigated here, and these parameters are represented as follows:

N₁-N₂, N₃-N₄, C₁-N₁, C₂=N₄, C₁-C₂, N₂-H₁, N₃-C₉, N₂-C₆, bond lengths, N₁…H₈ bond distance, N₄-C₂-C₁ and N₃…H₈-N₁ angles for tautomer (1a) ( Figure 4 ), for (1b) tautomer these parameters are observed beside O₁-H₁₃, O₁-C₁₅, C₁₅-H₁₁, C₁₅-C₂, C₁-H₁₄, N₂-H₁₂ bond lengths, N₁……H₁₃ bond distance, N₁-C₁-C₂, and C₁₅-O₁-H₁₃ angles as shown in Figure 5 , also some geometrical parameters are shown for tautomers (1c & 1d) as shown in Figure 6 , the structural parameters for (1e) confirm its reactivity as shown in Figure 7 . Also, the geometrical parameters such as bond length (A˚), bond angles (˚), and torsion angles (˚) were investigated to shed more light on the stability of tautomer (1f) ( Figure 8 ).

Stable, reactive.

All the three DFT methods used in the optimization: DFT/B3LYP, DFT/B3PW91, and DFT/WB97XD with the same basis set, predict that among the six tautomeric forms, the diazo-1-enyl-1-ol form (1e) is the most reactive one whereas, the phenyldiazenyl-3-(2-phenylhydrazono)-propane-1-ol (1f) found to be the most stable one, Figure 8 . and all these methods favor the stability orders as 1f ≥ 1b > 1a > 1d > 1c > 1e, 1f ≥ 1b > 1c > 1a > 1d > 1e and 1f ≥ 1b > 1a >1d > 1c > 1e, respectively. The order of stability obtained by the three DFT methods coincides well, with the most stable tautomer and the most reactive one ( Table 1 ). These results are consistent with the energy gap obtained from the optimization of the conformer (1e) with DFT methods. Moreover, the lowering in the HOMO and LUMO energy gap explains the eventual charge transfer interactions that take place within the molecule.

II.2. Mulliken population analysis

The bonding capability of a molecule depends on the electronic charge on the chelating atoms. The Mulliken population analysis obtained the atomic charge values [38] . Mulliken analysis is the most common population analysis method. Mulliken atomic charge calculation has a significant role in applying quantum chemical calculations to molecular systems because atomic charges affect some properties of molecular systems including dipole moment which reflects the molecular charge distribution and acts as a vector in three dimensions. Therefore, it can be used as a descriptor to depict the charge movement across the molecule. It also has been used to describe the electrostatic potential surfaces [39] - [41] . The total atomic charge values of (1f) obtained by Mulliken population analysis in the applied methods are listed in Table 2 all the hydrogen atoms have a net positive charge. The obtained atomic charge shows that the charges on the more stable tautomer’s C1, C2, C8, C18, and C29 atoms are positively charged as they are adjacent to electron acceptor nitrogen atoms. In contrast, the remaining carbons and nitrogen atoms are negatively charged. The results suggest that the atoms bonded to the hydrogen atom and all oxygen atoms are electron acceptors, and indicate the charge transfer from O to H. On the other hand, the hydrogen-bonding length of N4-N3-H…N1-N2 in tautomer (1a) is larger than that of C-O-H…N1-N2. in tautomer (1b). This shows that the charge on the O atom of the H-O bond is less than that on N atom of the N3-H bond in the molecule. At the same time, H34 is more acidic due to more positive charge. As expected, the results show that the nitrogen atom (N4) charge in the imine group is the more negatively charged one. They are considering the applied method used in the atomic charge calculation. Continuously, Table 3 shows the Mulliken population analysis of tautomer (1e) calculated at HF/6-311G(d,p), DFT/B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), DFT/B3PW91/6-311G(d,p) and DFT/WB97XD/6-311G(d,p) which confirm the charge transfer and from this point of view the results reflect the reactivity of tautomer (1e) and the stability of the tautomer (1f), one can conclude that the computed charges are in harmony with the energy gaps tabulated in Table 1 .

III. Frontier Molecular Orbitals

Frontier orbitals (HOMO and LUMO) are the main participants in electronic transitions, and their energy gap depicts the reactivity [42] . Analysis of the frontier molecular orbitals by computational methods is an elegant way to explain the reactivity and electronic transitions within molecules [43] . To evaluate the energetic behavior of the title compounds, we carried out the calculations for six isomers of mesoxaldehyde-1,2-bis phenylhydrazone, The frontier molecular orbitals (HOMOs/LUMOs) along with corresponding energies of the tautomers (1a-1f) were explored at the HF/6-311G(d,p) and DFT (B3LYP, PW91and WB97XD/6-311G(d,p) levels of theory are presented in Table 1 . The plots of frontier molecular orbitals for mexoxadehyde. Energy gaps for the highest occupied and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals were calculated using the equation: Egap = E_LUMO − E_HOMO. Increased LUMO energy level and decreased HOMO energy level result in a higher HOMO-LUMO gap. Higher HOMO-LUMO gap corresponds to higher kinetic stability, thus, lower chemical reactivity [44] - [46] . That is, a small interval between HOMO-LUMO implies low kinetic stability and high chemical reactivity, as it is energetically favorable to add electrons to a LUMO and to extract electrons from a HOMO. Among many others, the energy difference between HOMO and LUMO has been used to predict the activity and intramolecular charge transfer in organic molecules with conjugated П bonds [47] [48] . Chemical bonds are a source of energy and the movement of molecules in the space is kinetic energy. The vibrations and rotations of molecules are another source of chemical energy along with the chemical reaction, which is a rearrangement of atoms. The energy gap between HOMO and LUMO represents the stability of structures and helps to characterize some significant issues including the kinetic stability as well as chemical reactivity of the molecule . A molecule with a small frontier orbital gap is more polarizable and is generally associated with a high chemical reactivity as well as low kinetic stability [49] . The conjugated molecules are characterized by a small highest occupied molecular orbital-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) separation. From Table 1 , it has been found that gap (HOMO-LUMO) of the tautomer (1f) is greater than the gap (HOMO-LUMO) relative to all the other tautomers with all the method used; therefore, it is the most stable one. The frontier orbitals (HOMO and LUMO) of the most reactive tautomer (1e) and the most stable one (1f) are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10 , respectively.

Density functional theory has been successful in providing insights into chemical reactivity and selectivity in terms of global parameters, like electronegativity, hardness, and softness [50] . The concept of hardness/softness is related to the reactivity of the molecules, and it is a property that measures the extent of chemical reactivity to which the addition of a charge stabilizes the system. Molecules with a large HOMO-LUMO energy gap are called “hard” and those with a small HOMO-LUMO energy gap are called “soft”. The hardness vs softness of the tautomers of tittle compound calculated at HF and DFT with the three different methods applied in this study are listed in Table 1 . DFT showed accurate results with B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), B3PW91/6-311G(d,p) and WB97XD/6-311G(d,p), the tautomer (1f) more stable than (1b) are the most stable where their hardness values calculated at DFT/B3LYP/6-311G are 1.8353 and 1.8326 respectively which are high values, these results are consistent with the LUMO-HOMO band gaps of the tautomers (1f) & (1b) are 3.6706 and 3.6651 respectively. On the other hand, the reactive tautomer is (1e) which showed the high value of the softness 1.2669 which consistent with its LUMO-HOMO band gap 1.7682, which confirm its reactivity. Furthermore, the electrophilicity index (ω) is a measure of the energy stabilization that occurs when the system acquires an additional charge from the environment [51] - [54] , increases the electronegativity of tautomer (1e), contributing to lower hardness and higher electrophilicity index 10.661. Also, the chemical potential provides a global reactivity index and is related to charge transfer from a system of higher chemical potential to one of lower chemical potential. Electronegativity is the power to attract electrons, and it is related directly to all above properties mentioned in Table 1 . Furthermore, there are many attempts to define a nucleophilicity index, simple index was chosen for the nucleophilicity (N) which explains the maximum number of electrons that an electrophile can acquire, based on the HOMO energy, within DFT calculations, explaining the reactivity of the organic material towards electrophiles [55] - [57] . The simple nucleophilicity index (N) is defined as N = E_HOMO (ev) + 9.12 (ev), where −9.12 is the energy of the HOMO of tetracyano ethylene (TCE), this nucleophilicity scale is referred to TCE and taken as a reference because TCE exhibits the lowest HOMO energy (=−9.12 eV). From the results depicted in Table 1 we can conclude that, all the tautomers of MBPH calculated at HF/6-311G(d,p), DFT/B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), DFT/B3PW91/6-311G(d,p), and DFT/WB97XD/6-311G(d,p), with high electrophilicity index (ω) and small value of nucleophilicity index is considered to be more likely attacked by a nucleophile, which is in agreement with the suggested mechanisms for the synthesized of heterocyclic compounds from the target compound in this article. Also, the high value of the chemical potential confirms our conclusion.

IV. MEP Surface Mapping

Molecular electrostatic potential (MESP) diagram has been also used to predict the reactive sites for electrophilic and nucleophilic attack, as well as hydrogen bonding interaction [58] - [60] , We have reported and plotted the MEP surface mapping, alpha density, and total density of the MEP of more reactive tautomer (1e) calculated using Gaussian 09 program with HF/6-311G(d,p), DFT/B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), DFT/B3PW91/6-311G(d,p), and DFT/WB97XD/6-311G(d,p), The MEP surface provides us with net electrostatic effect caused due to total charge distribution. It also provides a useful tool to know the relative polarity of the molecule [61] . The surface is color-coded as per the electrostatic potential (red is more electron-rich and blue is more electron-poor area). The total electron density plot of the tautomer (1e) shows a uniform distribution. The order in the increase of the electrostatic potential as per color code will follow as red < orange < yellow < green [62] . At least we can conclude that the investigated molecule has several sites for electrophilic as well as nucleophilic attacks, as shown in MEP surface mapping ( Figure 11 ).

However, it can be seen from the ESP mapping of tautomer 1f ( Figure 12 ), that the negative ESP is localized more over the molecules and is reflected as a yellowish blob. Different values of the electrostatic potential on the surface are indicated by different colors. Potential increases are listed as red < orange < yellow < green < blue. On the molecular electrostatic potential, negative regions (red and yellow) are associated with electrophilic reactivity, and positive areas (blue) are associated with nucleophilic reactivity. It appears that the negative charge covers the carbonyl group and the positive region is above the remaining groups. The highest electronegativity is located in the carbonyl group.

The lines drawn in the contour map clearly show the low electron density in the title molecule ( Figure 13 ). The red color dominating area is found to be highly negative where the nitrogen and the oxygen atoms are located, and other colored parts signify the positive region of the molecule. In the case the three carbon atoms of the tautomers (1a), (1e), and (1f) are highly positive, more positive than any other carbon atom in the molecule.

V. Thermochemistry analysis:

The computed vibration frequency of the six tautomers of mesoxaldehyde, using HF, B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), B3PW91/6-311G(d,p), and WB97XD/6-311G(d,p), shows some thermodynamic parameter values reflecting molecular polarities, reactivity, and the stability of the molecule. To confirm this, the thermodynamic parameters of tautomer (1e & 1f) are tabulated in Table 4 , which shows that. Standard enthalpies of formation are evaluated using calculated energies, zero-point vibration energy (ZPVE), plus thermal contributions (to 298 K). The ZPVE corrects the calculated total energy. We found the energy values were slightly dependent on the different methods used for the optimization, and some differences in the relative thermodynamic stability and reactivity of the tautomers were observed. The restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) method showed a good correlation with the results obtained from the frontier molecular orbitals and the energy gaps.

The nucleophilic and electrophilic activities of mesoxaldehyde, 1,2-bis phenyl hydrazone predicted from the computational studies, attract our attention to the use of it as a starting compound to synthesize different heterocyclic compounds ( Scheme 1 ). The structure of the synthesized compounds was identified using different spectral tools. The intramolecular cyclization of hydrazones using cupric chloride (CuCl₂) is a fascinating area of research in organic chemistry. This reaction typically involves forming a cyclic structure by activating the hydrazone with cupric chloride, facilitating the cyclization process. In this article, we design to use MBPH as strating materials for the synthesis of substituted heterocyclic derivatives via the reaction with different hydrazides, followed by intramolecular cyclization. Firstly, mesoxaldehyde was prepared as shown in the literature [17] , and the structure was confirmed using different spectral tools ( Figure 14 ).

The reaction of mesoxaldehyde with thiosemicarbazide or semicarbazide in the presence of acetic acid gives the corresponding thiosemicarbazone or semicarbazone derivatives ( Scheme 1 ). The structure of the thiocarbazone derivative (2) was identified using different spectral tools, the infra-red spectrum (cm⁻¹) showed the presence of the amino group (NH₂) and the imine (NH) at γ = 3583, 3172 respectively, 1660 for (CN) and 1267 for (CS), and no band between 1800 and 1690 cm⁻¹ attributed the absence of carbonyl group. The proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (¹H-NMR) showed the presence of exchangeable NH at δ = 9.33 ppm, the aromatic protons of the phenyl groups appear as a multiplet at δ = 7.19 - 7.89 ppm, the amino group of the carbazone moiety appears as an exchangeable broad band at δ = 4.55 ppm, also the structure of (2) was confirmed using ¹³C-NMR and elemental analysis (see experimental). Also, the structure of the semicarbazone derivative (3) showed the same spectral data except for the appearance of a carbonyl band in the infrared spectrum instead of the CS band. Continuously, treatment of the thiocarbazone derivative (2) or the carbazone (3) with an ethanolic solution of cupric chloride gave the corresponding triazole derivatives (4) or (5) through intramolecular cyclization. The structures of each (4) and (5) were identified using different spectral tools and alternative synthesis. For example, the structure of (5) was confirmed using the infrared spectrum which showed two bands at γ = 3421, 3290 cm⁻¹ corresponding for NH₂ & NH, 1690 cm⁻¹ for (CO), and 1630 cm⁻¹ for (CN). The ¹H NMR spectra showed a singlet δ = 11.92 ppm exchangeable N-H, δ = 8.32 ppm as a singlet for C-5 triazole proton the amino group appears as a singlet at δ = 7.68 ppm and finally a multiplet at δ = 6.81 - 7.35 for the hydrazide proton and the phenyl ring protons. Also, we can confirm that the cyclization of (2) or (3) to give the corresponding triazole derivatives (4) or (5), and acetylation of the triazoles (4) with boiling acetic anhydride gave the corresponding products (6). The structure of 4-((2-acetyl-2-phenylhydrazono) methyl)-2H-1,2,3-triazole-2-carbothioamide (6) was confirmed using different spectral tools, the infrared spectrum (cm⁻¹) showed characteristic bands at 3583 (NH₂), 1710 (COCH₃), 1660 (CN), 1 270 (CS). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) showed an exchangeable singlet at 8.56 for NH₂, a singlet at 8.32 for C-5 triazole proton, a multiplet at 7.13 - 7.94 for aromatic and hydrazide protons and finally a singlet at 2.04 for the acetyl group protons. On the other hand, acetylation of the thiocarbazone (2) and the carbazone (3) with boiling acetic anhydride gave the corresponding thiadiazol derivative (7) and the oxadiazole (8) respectively. The thiadiazol (7) was separated as yellow needles in good yield (75%). m.p. 257˚C - 258˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3290 (NH), 1710 (COCH₃), 1660 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 9.01 (s, 1H, NHCOCH3, exchangeable), 8.20 (s, 2H, NH-Ph, exchangeable) 6.81 - 7.35 (m, 11H. Ar-H, hydrazide proton), 4.6 (s.1H, C-5 thiadiazol ring), 2.22 (s, 3H, acetyl group), 2.08 (s, 3H, NHCOCH3). ¹³C NMR: δ (ppm) = 169, 167 (2CO), 139 (hydrazide carbon). The oxadiazole (8) has revealed the same spectral data as (7), its infra-red spectra. IR (cm⁻¹, KBr) shows ν = 3290 (NH), 1710 (COCH₃), 1610 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 11.01 (s, 1H, NHCOCH3, exchangeable), 9.20 (s, 2H, NH-Ph, exchangeable) 6.81 - 7.35 (m, 11H. Ar-H & hydrazide protons), 4.6 (s.1H, C-5 oxadiazol ring), 2.22 (s, 3H, N-acetyl group), 2.08 (s, 3H, NHCOCH3). ¹³C NMR: δ (ppm) = 169, 167 (2CO), 139 (hydrazide carbon), 138, 128, 128,128, 124, 143 (C Ar-N), 21.6 (CH₃). Treatment of (7) or (8) with an ethanolic solution of cupric chloride gave the bicyclic compounds (9) or (10). Scheme 1 , the structure of these products was confirmed by alternative synthesis using a different route as follows: Mesoxaldehyde, 1,2-bis phenyl hydrazone was treated with an ethanolic solution of cupric chloride to give the corresponding triazole (11), which reacted with an acidic solution of thiosemicarbazide or semicarbazide to give the corresponding triazole (12) or (13) which differ completely than the triazole (4) or (5), the isolated triazoles were confirmed using different spectral tools and elemental analysis.(see experimental section). Acetylation of the triazole (13) with boiling acetic anhydride gave the corresponding bicyclo compound which is identical with that obtained from the other route. Finally, it has been found that (10) and (14), which were obtained from two different routes, have the same structural formula and were confirmed by using different spectral tools and alternative synthesis. This result confirms that in the first root triazole derivatives (4) or (5) obtained via intramolecular elimination reaction between C-1&C-2 not between C-2&C-3, and this was confirmed by treatment of MBPH, firstly with an ethanolic solution of cupric chloride to give the corresponding triazole aldehyde (11) which reacted with thiosemicarbazide or semicarbazide gave the triazole derivative (12) & (13) which differ completely than the other triazoles (4) or (5) in their color and melting points (see experimental section), also from the computational study section, we conclude that C1, C2 & C3 of MBPH which calculated using the HF& DFT methods are positively charged, but C3 is the more positively one, so the cyclization preferred to occur between C-1&C-2 not between C-2&C3.

A solution of compound (1) (1 g) in 95% ethanol (30 ml) was treated with semicarbazide (1 g), and a few drops of acetic acid, the reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 3 hours, then, concentrated and poured onto crushed ice. The separated crude solid was filtered off, washed successively with water, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol to give (3) yellow needles. The yield of (3) was 70%, m.p. 150˚C - 151˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3470, 3220 (NH2, NH), 1690 (CO); 1660 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 9.33 (s, 3H, NH, exchangeable), 7.19 - 7.89 (m, 12H, Ar-H & 2 hydrazide protons), 4.55 (br s, 2H, NH_2, exchangeable). ¹³C NMR(CDCl₃): 169 (CO), 128 (C-2), 140 (C Ar-N), 143 (C Ar-N), the other signal carbons of the two phenyl rings appear at 113.9, 122, 129.5 Anal. Calcd for C₁₆H₁₇N₇O (323): C, 59.44; H, 5.26; N, 30.34%. Found: C, 59.90; H, 5.40; N, 30.28%.

4-((2-phenylhydrazono) methyl)-2H-1,2,3-triazole-2-carbothioamide (4)

Bis phenyl thiocarbazone (2) (1.1 mmol) was dissolved in (10 ml) of 1:1 absolute ethanol/acetone mixture in a 100 ml beaker and allowed to stir for 10 minutes. Then, an ethanolic solution of Cu (II)chloride (1.1 mmol) was added dropwise to the stirring mixture. The mixture was stirred for 6 hrs at room temperature after which the precipitate formed was filtered and washed using 40% ethanol and dried in a desiccator over calcium chloride. The product was recrystallized from ethanol as yellow needles. The yield of (4) was 60%, m.p. 150˚C - 151˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3421 (NH₂), 3290 (NH), 1270 (CS), 1660 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 11.92 (s, 1H, N-H, exchangeable), 8.56 (s, 2H, NH₂, exchangeable), 8.32 (s, 1H, C-5 triazole proton), 6.81 - 7.35 (m, 6H, Ar-H & hydrazide protons). C¹³NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 174 (CS), 144 (C5-triazole), 143 (Ph-C-N), 130 (C4 triazole), 129, 122, 113 (aromatic ring carbons) 121 (C=N hydrazone moiety). Anal. Calcd for C₁₀H₁₀N₆S (246): C, 48.78; H, 4.07; N, 34.15%. Found: C, 48.90; H, 4.40; N, 34.28%.

4-((2-phenylhydrazono) methyl)-2H-1,2,3-triazole-2-carboxamide (5)

Bis phenyl carbazone (3) (1.1 mmol) was dissolved in (10 ml) of 1:1 absolute ethanol/acetone mixture in a 100 ml beaker and allowed to stir for 10 minutes. Then, an ethanolic solution of Cu (II) chloride (1.1 mmol) was added dropwise to the stirring mixture. The mixture was stirred for 6 hrs at room temperature after which the precipitate formed was filtered and washed using 40% ethanol and dried in a desiccator over calcium chloride. The product was recrystallized from ethanol as colorless needles. The yield of (5) was 65%, m.p. 120˚C - 121˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3421 (NH₂), 3290 (NH), 1690 (CO), 1630 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 11.92 (s, 1H, N-H, exchangeable), 8.32 (s, 1H, C-5 triazole proton), 7.68 (s, 2H, NH₂, exchangeable), 6.81 - 7.35 (m, 6H, Ar-H, hydrazide proton). C¹³NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) 164(CO), 144 (C5-triazole), 143 (Ph-C-N), 130 (C4 triazole), 129, 122, 113 (aromatic ring carbons) 121 (C=N hydrazone moiety) Anal. Calcd for C₁₀H₁₀N₆O (230): C, 52.17; H, 4.38; N, 36.50%. Found: C, 52.90; H, 4.40; N, 36.28%.

4-((2-acetyl-2-phenylhydrazono) methyl)-2H-1,2,3-triazole-2-carbothioamide (6)

A mixture of (4) (5 mmol), acetic anhydride (10 ml), was heated under reflux for 2 h. The reaction mixture was poured into crushed ice, and the solid that separated was filtered off, washed successively with water, dried, and recrystallized from proper solvent to give (6) good yield (75%). m.p. 123˚C - 125˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3583 (NH₂), 1710 (COCH₃), 1660 (CN), 1270 (CS). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 8.56 (s, 2H, NH₂, exchangeable), 8.32 (s,1H, C-5 triazole proton), 7.13 - 7.94 (m, 6H. Ar-H, hydrazide proton), (2.04, 3H, acetyl group). ¹³C NMR: δ (ppm) = 177 (CS), 172 (CO), 145.130 (C₄, C₅ triazole protons), (139, hydrazide carbon), 138, 128, 128, 124, 143 (C Ar-N), 21.6 (CH₃). Anal. Calcd for C₁₂H₁₂N₆OS (288): C, 49.99; H, 4.19; N, 29.15%. Found: C, 49.90; H, 4.40; N, 29.28%.

N-(4-acetyl-5-(1-(2-phenylhydrazono) ethyl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) acetamide (7)

A mixture of (2) (5 mmol), acetic anhydride (10 ml), was heated under reflux for 3 h. The reaction mixture was poured into crushed ice, and the solid that separated was filtered off, washed successively with water, dried, and recrystallized from proper solvent to give (7) as yellow needles in good yield (75%). m.p. 257˚C - 258˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3290 (NH),1710 (COCH₃), 1660 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 9.01 (s, 1H, NHCOCH3, exchangeable), 8.20 (s, 2H, NH-Ph, exchangeable) 6.81 - 7.35 (m, 11H. Ar-H & hydrazide protons), 4.6 (s.1H, C-5 thiadiazol ring), 2.22 (s, 3H, acetyl group), 2.08 (s, 3H, NHCOCH3). ¹³C NMR: δ (ppm) = 169, 167 (2CO), 139 (hydrazide carbon), 138, 128, 128, 128, 124, 143(C Ar-N), 21.6 (CH₃). Anal. Calcd for C₂₀H₂₁N₇O₂S (423): C, 49.99; H, 4.19; N, 29.15%. Found: C, 49.90; H, 4.40; N, 29.28%.

N-(4-acetyl-5-(1-((2,3-bis-phenylhydrazono-ethyl))-4,5-dihydro-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl) acetamide (8)

A mixture of (3) (5 mmol), acetic anhydride (10 ml), was heated under reflux for 2 h. The reaction mixture was poured into crushed ice, and the solid that separated was filtered off, washed successively with water, dried, and recrystallized from proper solvent to give (8) a good yield (75%). m.p. 223˚C - 225˚C. IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3290 (NH), 1710 (COCH₃), 1610 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 11.01 (s, 1H, NHCOCH3, exchangeable), 9.20 (s, 2H, NH-Ph, exchangeable) 6.81 - 7.35 (m, 11H. Ar-H, hydrazide proton), 4.6 (s.1H, C-5 oxadiazol ring), 2.22 (s, 3H, N-acetyl group), 2.08 (s, 3H, NHCOCH3). ¹³C NMR: δ (ppm) = 169, 167 (2CO), 139 (hydrazide carbon), 138, 128, 128, 128, 128, 128, 124, 143(C Ar-N), 21.6 (CH₃). Anal. Calcd for C₂₀H₂₁N₇O₃ (407): C, 58.97; H, 5.16; N, 24.08%. Found: C, 58.90; H, 5.40; N, 24.28%.

N-(4-acetyl-5-(2-phenyl-2H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl) acetamide (9)

Compound (7) (1.1 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL of a 1:1 absolute ethanol/acetone mixture in a 100 mL beaker and stirred for 10 minutes. Then, an ethanolic solution of Cu (II)chloride (1.1 mmol) was added dropwise to the stirring mixture. The mixture was stirred for 6 hrs. at room temperature, after which the precipitate formed was filtered and washed using 40% ethanol and dried in a desiccator over calcium chloride. The product was recrystallized from ethanol as colorless needles. The yield of (9) was 60%, m.p. 157˚C - 158˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3440 (NH), 1730 (COCH₃), 1660 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 11.92 (s, 1H, NHCOCH3, exchangeable), 8.00 (s, 1H, C-5 thiadiazol proton), 7.45 - 8.09 (m, 6H, Ar-H, C-5 triazole ring proton), 2.22 (s, 3H, N-acetyl group), 2.08 (s, 3H, NHCOCH3). C¹³ NMR(CDCl3): 169, 167(2 C=O), 138, 128, 119 (Aromatic ring carbons), 145, 52 (C₂&C₅ thiadiazol ring), 132 (C₄, C₅ triazole) Anal. Calcd for C₁₄H₁₄N₆O₂S (330): C, 50.90; H, 4.27; N, 25.44%. Found: C, 50.95; H, 4.40; N, 25.28%.

N-(4-acetyl-5-(2-phenyl-2H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl) acetamide (10)

Compound (8) (1.1 mmol) was dissolved in (10 ml) of 1:1 absolute ethanol/acetone mixture in a 100 ml beaker and allowed to stir for 10 minutes. Then, an ethanolic solution of Cu (II)chloride (1.1 mmol) was added dropwise to the stirring mixture. The mixture was stirred for 6 hrs at room temperature after which the precipitate formed was filtered and washed using 40% ethanol and dried in a desiccator over calcium chloride. The product was recrystallized from ethanol as colorless needles. The yield of (10) was 70%, m.p. 154˚C - 155˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3440 (NH), 1730 (COCH₃), 1660 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 11.92 (s, 1H, NHCOCH3, exchangeable), 8.00 (s, 1H, C-5 oxadiazole proton), 7.45 - 8.09 (m, 6H, Ar-H, C-5 triazole ring proton) 2.22 (s, 3H, N-acetyl group), 2.08 (s, 3H, NHCOCH3). C¹³ NMR(CDCl3): 169, 167 (2 C=O), 138, 128, 119 (Aromatic ring carbons) 145, 52 (C₂&C₅ oxadiazol ring) 132 (C₄, C₅ triazole). Anal. Calcd for C₁₄H₁₄N₆O₃ (314): C, 53.50; H, 4.45; N, 26.75%. Found: C, 53.95; H, 4.45; N, 26.75%.

2-phenyl-2H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carbaldehyde (11)

Mesoxaldehyde-2,3-bis phenyl hydrazone (1.1 mmol) was dissolved in 10 ml of a 1:1 absolute ethanol/acetone mixture in a 100 ml beaker and stirred for 10 minutes. Then, an ethanolic solution of Cu (II)chloride (1.1 mmol) was added dropwise to the stirring mixture. The mixture was stirred for 6 hours at room temperature, after which the precipitate formed was filtered and washed with 40% ethanol, and then dried in a desiccator over calcium chloride. The product was recrystallized from ethanol as yellow needles. m.p. 178˚C - 179˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 1690 (C=O, aldehyde). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 9.75 (s, 1H, HCO), 7.58 - 8.46 (m, 6H, Ar-H& C-5 triazole ring protons) C¹³ NMR(CDCl3): 185 (CO), 149 (C4 triazole, 139 (C-N), 132 (C5 triazole), 128, 119 (Phenyl ring carbons). Anal. Calcd for C₉H₇N₃O (173): C, 62.42; H, 4.07; N, 24.27%. Found: C, 63.95; H, 4.45; N, 24.75%.

2-phenyl-2H-1,2,3-triazole-4-hydrazine carbothioamide (12)

A solution of compound (11) (1 g) in 95%ethanol (30 ml) was treated with thiosemicarbazide (1 g), and a few drops of acetic acid. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 3 hours, then, concentrated and poured onto crushed ice. The separated crude solid was filtered off, washed successively with water, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol to give (12) colorless needles. The yield of (12) was 77%, m.p. 222˚C - 223˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3470, 3172 (NH₂, NH), 1600 (CN); 1267 (CS). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) = 10.92 (s,1H, N-H, exchangeable), 8.56 (s, 2H, NH₂, exchangeable), 8.32 (s,1H, C-5 triazole proton), 6.81 - 7.35 (m, 6H, Ar-H & hydrazide protons). Anal. Calcd for C₁₀H₁₀N₆S (246): C, 48.78; H, 4.07; N, 34.15%. Found: C, 48.80; H, 4.20; N, 34.25%.

2-phenyl-2H-1,2,3-triazole-4-hydrazine carboxamide (13)

A solution of compound (11) (1 g) in 95% ethanol (30 ml) was treated with semicarbazide (1 g), and a few drops of acetic acid. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 3 hours, then, concentrated and poured onto crushed ice. The separated crude solid was filtered off, washed successively with water, dried, and recrystallized from ethanol to give (3) colorless needles. The yield of (3) was 70%, m.p. 240˚C - 241˚C; IR (cm⁻¹, KBr): ν = 3470,3220 (NH2, NH), 1690 (CO); 1600 (CN). ¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ (ppm) 10.92 (s, 1H, N-H, exchangeable), 8.32 (s, 1H, C-5 triazole proton), 8.00 (s, 2H, NH₂, exchangeable), 6.81 - 7.35 (m, 6H, Ar-H, hydrazide proton). Anal. Calcd for C₁₀H₁₀N₆O (230): C, 52.17; H, 4.38; N, 36.50%. Found: C, 52.70; H, 4.20; N, 36.20%.

N-(4-acetyl-5-(2-phenyl-2H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)acetamide (14)

A mixture of (13) (5 mmol), acetic anhydride (10 ml), was heated under reflux for 2 h. The reaction mixture was poured into crushed ice, and the solid that separated was filtered off, washed successively with water, dried, and recrystallized from proper solvent to give (8) a good yield (75%). The melting point and all the spectral data are shown to be identical with the compound (10).

All calculations for the studied compounds were performed by using the Gaussian 09 software package [22] with a Pentium IV processor personal computer. DFT performed the calculations by using Becke’s three-parameter exchange functional [23] with a hybrid function using the Lee, Yang, and Parr (LYP) correlation functional [24] [25] B3LYP method, Perdew and Wang’s 1991 (PW91) [26] and the range separated hybrid WB97XD [27] Energy optimization of the ground states of the compounds was performed by using the split-valence double zeta basis set 6-311G with two polarized basis functions (d and p), for which the p-type orbital was added to all hydrogen atoms as well as a diffuse function. The gas-phase-optimized structure of the most stable isomer was thus classified as its starting geometry, complete geometry optimization without restriction. The geometries were optimized by minimizing the energies concerning all geometrical parameters. Gauss-View and Chem craft programs [28] [29] were used to get computation results to visualize the optimization structures and draw the frontier molecular orbital (FMOs) and molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) maps [30] .