<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jbm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Biosciences and Medicines
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-5081
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-509X
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jbm.2025.138037
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jbm-145115
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Study on Optimization of the Extraction Process of Total Flavonoids from Yao Medicine Gnetum parvifolium and Their Antioxidant Activity
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Chenxi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Xin
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Fang
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Huang
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Yan
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Li
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aYoujiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, China
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     31
    </day> 
    <month>
     07
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    08
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    485
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    499
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      14,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      23,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      23,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Objective: </b>To optimize the extraction protocol for total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium, determine their content, and investigate their in vitro antioxidant activity. 
    <b>Methods: </b>Using rutin as a standard, key influencing factors were identified through single-factor experiments. An orthogonal experimental design was then employed to establish the optimal extraction protocol for total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium. The in vitro antioxidant activity was evaluated via a DPPH radical scavenging assay. 
    <b>Results: </b>Scientific analysis of the experimental data indicated that the optimal conditions were ultrasound-assisted extraction with 90% ethanol as the solvent, a sample-to-solvent ratio of 1:60 (w/v), and a total of three extraction cycles. Under these conditions, the highest extraction yield of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium was achieved, reaching 47.79 mg/mL. Moreover, the Gnetum parvifolium total flavonoid extract demonstrated significant radical scavenging activity, with a DPPH radical scavenging rate of 79% in the concentration range of 0.6 - 3.0 μg/mL. 
    <b>Conclusion: </b>This study provides a scientific basis for the further extraction, utilization, and development of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Gnetum parvifolium
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Total Flavonoids
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      UV-Vis Spectrophotometry
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Rate
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Orthogonal Experiment
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Gnetum parvifolium, known as Mai Ma Teng, is a medicinal material consisting of the dried vine stems of the large-leaf and small-leaf species of Gnetum (Gnetaceae). These plants are widely distributed throughout southwestern China <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. First documented in the Supplement to the Compendium of Materia Medica, it is also known by the alias Magufeng. As one of the “seventy-two winds”, it is highly esteemed in Yao medicine <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-2">
     [2]
    </xref> and is officially listed in the Quality Standards of Yao Medicinal Materials in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. With a medicinal history in China spanning over a millennium, the entire plant is considered to have therapeutic value <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. Modern pharmacological studies indicate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-4">
     [4]
    </xref> that Gnetum possesses multiple therapeutic effects—including anti-rheumatic, blood-activating, stasis-resolving, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic properties—beneficial for treating rheumatic and hematological diseases. In folk medicine, it is commonly employed for conditions such as chronic bronchitis, rheumatic arthralgia, closed soft tissue injuries, and hyperuricemic arthritis. The literature indicates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-5">
     [5]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-7">
     [7]
    </xref> that medicinal plants of the Gnetum genus are rich in stilbene derivatives, flavonoid glycosides, and alkaloids. These compounds exhibit significant biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-tumor, anti-rheumatic, and cardioprotective/cerebroprotective effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-8">
     [8]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. To date, research on Gnetum as a traditional Chinese medicine has primarily centered on the analysis of its chemical constituents and the pharmacological activities of its main components, the stilbenes. Therefore, optimizing the extraction process is of great practical importance for the enhanced development and utilization of Gnetum as a medicinal resource. Accordingly, this study aims to optimize the extraction process of total flavonoids from Gnetum and evaluate their in vitro antioxidant activity, thereby providing an experimental and theoretical basis for future research.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>2. Materials and Instruments</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>2.1. Materials</title>
    <p>Dried stems of Gnetum parvifolium from Yulin, Guangxi, are sun-dried, pulverized to pass through a No. 3 sieve, and the powder is stored for later use.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Reagents</title>
    <p>Rutin reference standard (batch No. RP220522, &gt;99% purity; Chengdu Medson Technology Co., Ltd.); DPPH solution (batch No. 20240514; Feijing Biotechnology Co., Ltd.); ascorbic acid (analytical grade, batch No. 2024002; Tianjin Beichen Fangzheng Reagent Factory); aluminum nitrate (analytical grade, batch No. 4104-20-9; Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.); sodium nitrite (analytical grade, batch No. 1401061; Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd.); and sodium hydroxide (analytical grade, batch No. 2112131; Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd.). All other reagents were of analytical grade, and deionized water was used throughout the experiments.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>2.3. Instrument</title>
    <p>TU-1950 double-beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd.); KQ-800KDV ultrasonic cleaner (Kunshan Jielimei Ultrasonic Instrument Co., Ltd.); FA1104N electronic analytical balance (Shanghai Sunny Hengping Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.).</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>3. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>3.1. Preparation of Standard Solution</title>
    <p>Accurately weigh 0.1 g of rutin reference standard into a 50 mL clean and dry volumetric flask, add 70% ethanol solution to dissolve and dilute to the mark to obtain a 0.02% rutin reference standard solution.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>3.2. Preparation of Sample Solution</title>
    <p>Accurately weigh 0.2 g of Gnetum parvifolium fine powder, add 20 mL of 70% ethanol solution to a 50 mL conical flask and mix well, then sonicate at room temperature for 20 min, perform suction filtration with a Büchner funnel, and the filtrate is the sample solution.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>3.3. Determination of Measurement Wavelength</title>
    <p>Aliquots of the standard solution (1.0 mL; Section “3.1”) and the sample solution (0.5 mL; Section “3.2”) were accurately pipetted into separate 25 mL volumetric flasks. To each flask, 1 mL of 5% sodium nitrite solution was added, and the contents were mixed and allowed to stand for 5 min. Subsequently, 1 mL of 10% aluminum nitrate solution was added, followed by mixing and an additional 5-minute standing period. Next, 5 mL of 4% sodium hydroxide solution was added. The solution was then brought to volume with 70% ethanol, mixed thoroughly, and allowed to stand for 15 min. A reagent blank was prepared in the same manner, excluding the standard or sample solution. The absorption spectrum for each solution was then recorded from 200 to 600 nm against the reagent blank.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>3.4 Method Validation</title>
    <p>Aliquots of a 0.02% rutin standard solution (0.40, 0.60, 0.80, 1.00, and 1.20 mL) were individually transferred into five clean, dry 25 mL volumetric flasks. Color was developed using the aluminum nitrate colorimetric method, and the absorbance of each solution was measured with a spectrophotometer at the characteristic absorption wavelength of 345 nm. A standard curve was then constructed by plotting absorbance against rutin mass concentration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-9">
      [9]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>In accordance with the guidelines of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, six 0.2 g samples of Gnetum parvifolium fine powder were precisely weighed using an analytical balance (0.1 mg sensitivity). The samples were processed following the procedure described in Section 3.2. After color development via the aluminum nitrate colorimetric method, the absorbance of each solution was measured with a UV-visible spectrophotometer at a characteristic absorption wavelength of 345 nm. The total flavonoid content of each sample was then calculated, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was determined. The resulting RSD was 1.67%, which falls within the industry standard of ≤2.0% for good repeatability. This demonstrates that the experimental method possesses high repeatability and reliability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-10">
      [10]
     </xref>. These results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>Table 1. Results of repeatability experiments.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Number </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="20.19%"><p style="text-align:left">Sample powder weight (g) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="16.56%"><p style="text-align:left">Absorbance A </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="21.78%"><p style="text-align:left">Total flavonoid content (mg/g) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:left">Average content (mg/g) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="11.70%"><p style="text-align:left">RSD (%) </p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="20.19%"><p style="text-align:left">0.2002</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="16.56%"><p style="text-align:left">0.549</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="21.78%"><p style="text-align:left">29.71</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="11.70%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.19%"><p style="text-align:left">0.2003</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="16.56%"><p style="text-align:left">0.551</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="21.78%"><p style="text-align:left">29.79</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.70%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.19%"><p style="text-align:left">0.2004</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="16.56%"><p style="text-align:left">0.570</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="21.78%"><p style="text-align:left">30.69</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:left">30.33</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.70%"><p style="text-align:left">1.67</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">4</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.19%"><p style="text-align:left">0.2002</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="16.56%"><p style="text-align:left">0.568</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="21.78%"><p style="text-align:left">30.62</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.70%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">5</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.19%"><p style="text-align:left">0.2001</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="16.56%"><p style="text-align:left">0.566</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="21.78%"><p style="text-align:left">30.54</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.70%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">6</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.19%"><p style="text-align:left">0.2002</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="16.56%"><p style="text-align:left">0.568</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="21.78%"><p style="text-align:left">30.62</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.70%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>A 1.0 mL aliquot of the standard solution described in Section 3.1 was precisely pipetted into a 25 mL clean, dry volumetric flask. A color development procedure was then performed according to the aluminum nitrate colorimetric method. The absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 345 nm. Six replicate measurements were performed, and the data were recorded. Statistical analysis of the results yielded a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 1.32%, indicating that the instrument possesses good precision and meets the requirements of the experiment. These results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>Table 2. Results of precision test.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">Number </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">Absorbance A </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">Average absorbance A </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">RSD (%) </p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">0.573</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">0.575</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">0.573</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">0.569</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">1.32</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">4</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">0.572</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">5</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">0.563</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">6</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left">0.556</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>An aliquot of 0.5 mL of the sample solution was accurately pipetted into a 25 mL volumetric flask for color development using the aluminum nitrate colorimetric method. The absorbance of the solution was measured and recorded at a wavelength of 345 nm with a spectrophotometer. Readings were taken at 0.5-hour intervals over a continuous 3-hour period. Analysis of the absorbance data yielded a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 1.48%, indicating that the sample solution remained stable for 3 hours and met the requirements for subsequent analysis. These results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>Table 3. Stability test results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">Determination time (min) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">Absorbance A </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">Average absorbance A </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">RSD (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">30</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">0.540</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">60</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">0.530</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">90</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">0.537</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">0.539</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">1.48</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">120</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">0.547</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">150</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">0.550</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">180</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.10%"><p style="text-align:left">0.532</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Six 0.1 g samples of fine Gnetum parvifolium powder were precisely weighed and transferred to 50 mL ground-mouth conical flasks. To each sample, 4.0 mg of rutin standard, dried to a constant weight, was added. Total flavonoids were extracted according to the procedure in Section “3.2”, followed by color development using the aluminum nitrate colorimetric method. The absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 345 nm with a UV-visible spectrophotometer. Statistical analysis determined the average sample recovery rate to be 98.07% with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 1.85%. This result indicates that the method provides good accuracy and reliable measurements, as detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>Table 4. Sample recovery test result.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="8.86%"><p style="text-align:left">Number </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="18.59%"><p style="text-align:left">Medicinal material sampling amount (g) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Original Amount (mg) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="11.33%"><p style="text-align:left">Amount added (mg) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="13.06%"><p style="text-align:left">Measured amount (mg) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Recovery rate (%) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="15.98%"><p style="text-align:left">Average recovery rate (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="9.09%"><p style="text-align:left">RSD (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="8.86%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="18.59%"><p style="text-align:left">0.1003</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">4.0710</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="11.33%"><p style="text-align:left">4.0000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="13.06%"><p style="text-align:left">8.0298</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">98.97%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="15.98%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="9.09%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="8.86%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.59%"><p style="text-align:left">0.1004</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">4.0422</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.33%"><p style="text-align:left">4.0000</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.06%"><p style="text-align:left">7.9146</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">96.81%</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.98%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.09%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="8.86%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.59%"><p style="text-align:left">0.1004</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">4.1286</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.33%"><p style="text-align:left">4.0000</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.06%"><p style="text-align:left">7.9434</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">95.37%</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.98%"><p style="text-align:left">98.07%</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.09%"><p style="text-align:left">1.85%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="8.86%"><p style="text-align:left">4</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.59%"><p style="text-align:left">0.1005</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">4.2294</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.33%"><p style="text-align:left">4.0000</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.06%"><p style="text-align:left">8.2313</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">100.05%</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.98%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.09%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="8.86%"><p style="text-align:left">5</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.59%"><p style="text-align:left">0.1006</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">4.3733</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.33%"><p style="text-align:left">4.0000</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.06%"><p style="text-align:left">8.2745</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">97.53%</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.98%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.09%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="8.86%"><p style="text-align:left">6</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.59%"><p style="text-align:left">0.1004</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">4.1862</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="11.33%"><p style="text-align:left">4.0000</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.06%"><p style="text-align:left">8.1737</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.73%"><p style="text-align:left">99.69%</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.98%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.09%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Single-Factor Investigation</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>With ethanol as the extractant, the total flavonoid yield from Gnetum parvifolium was used as the evaluation index to compare three methods: room temperature cold maceration (24 h), water bath reflux (0.5 h), and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (0.5 h). Subsequently, a single-factor experimental design was conducted to sequentially analyze the influence of several parameters on the flavonoid yield. With baseline conditions set at a 70% ethanol concentration, 20 minutes of sonication, a 1:100 sample-to-solvent volume ratio, and a single extraction, the effects of the following factors were investigated: solvent concentration (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%), sonication time (20, 30, 40, 60 min), sample-to-solvent volume ratio (1:40, 1:60, 1:80, 1:100), and number of extractions (1, 2, or 3).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>3.6. Orthogonal Experiment</title>
    <p>Based on the results of the single-factor experiments, an L<sup>9</sup> (3<sup>4</sup>) orthogonal experiment was designed to investigate the three main factors that significantly affect the total flavonoid yield from Gnetum parvifolium (extraction solvent concentration, sample-to-solvent volume ratio, and number of extractions) and their interactions. The factor levels for this experiment are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>Table 5. Factor level table.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Level </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="28.87%"><p style="text-align:left">A </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">B </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">C </p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="28.87%"><p style="text-align:left">Ethanol concentration/% </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">Sample-solution volume ratio/mL </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of extractions </p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="28.87%"><p style="text-align:left">50</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">60</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="28.87%"><p style="text-align:left">70</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">80</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="13.36%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="28.87%"><p style="text-align:left">90</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">100</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_7">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>3.7. DPPH in Vitro Antioxidant Activity Study</title>
    <p>The experimental procedure was based on the method of Xu Xianghao et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-11">
      [11]
     </xref>. Aliquots (1 mL) of total flavonoid extracts from Gnetum parvifolium were prepared at various concentrations (0.60, 0.90, 1.20, 1.50, 2.00, and 3.00 μg/mL). Each aliquot was added to 3 mL of 0.200 mmol/L DPPH solution in a brown test tube. The mixtures were incubated for 0.5 h in the dark. Subsequently, absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Vitamin C (Vc) served as the positive control, and the DPPH free radical scavenging rate was calculated using Equation (1).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref> 
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         DPPH radical scavenging rate 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            [ 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mtext>
              A 
            </mtext> 
            <mn>
              0 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ( 
            </mo> 
            <mrow> 
             <msub> 
              <mtext>
                A 
              </mtext> 
              <mn>
                1 
              </mn> 
             </msub> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
             <msub> 
              <mtext>
                A 
              </mtext> 
              <mn>
                2 
              </mn> 
             </msub> 
            </mrow> 
            <mo>
              ) 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ] 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <msub> 
          <mtext>
            A 
          </mtext> 
          <mn>
            0 
          </mn> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         % 
       </mi> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> (1)</p>
    <p>In the formula: A₀ is the absorbance value of 1.0 mL anhydrous ethanol + 3.0 mL DPPH solution; A₁ is the absorbance value of 1.0 mL flavonoid extract + 3.0 mL DPPH ethanol solution; A₂ is the absorbance value of 1.0 mL flavonoid extract + 3.0 mL anhydrous ethanol.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_8">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>3.8. Data Analysis</title>
    <p>All experiments were repeated 3 times, orthogonal experimental design and analysis were performed using software IBS SPSS Statistics 24.0, and data were processed using software Microsoft Excel.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>4. Experimental Results</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>4.1. Wavelength Determination Results</title>
    <p>Spectral scan analysis revealed that both the rutin standard solution and the sample solution exhibited a distinct absorption maximum at a wavelength of 345 nm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>). Given the significant absorption response of the target component at this wavelength, 345 nm was selected as the determination wavelength for this experiment to ensure effective detection.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>Figure 1. UV spectrum of aluminum nitrate colorimetric method. (a) Sample solution of Gnetum parvifolium; (b) Rutin control group solution.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153356-rId15.jpeg?20250826021442" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Standard Curve Plotting</title>
    <p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>, linear regression analysis of the rutin standard curve yielded the equation y = 0.1042x − 0.0708 and a correlation coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.9995. This value indicates a highly significant linear relationship between rutin mass concentration and absorbance within the 0.0032 - 0.0096 mg/mL range, which validates the standard curve as a reliable basis for quantification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-#REF _Ref194897311 r h  * MERGEFORMAT"></xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-12">
      [12]
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Standard curve of rutin.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153356-rId16.jpeg?20250826021442" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>4.3. Single-Factor Experiment Results</title>
    <p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figFigures 3-7">
      Figures 3-7
     </xref>, a systematic analysis of the single-factor variables indicated that the maximum yield of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium was obtained using ultrasound-assisted extraction under the following conditions: a 90% ethanol solvent, a sample-to-solvent volume ratio of 1:100, sonication for 60 minutes, and three extraction cycles. However, prolonged sonication can damage the instrument, and the yield increase from 20 to 60 minutes was minimal. Therefore, to balance extraction efficiency and equipment preservation, a standard sonication time of 20 minutes was adopted for all subsequent experiments.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Effect of extraction methods on the yield of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153356-rId17.jpeg?20250826021443" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Effect of ethanol concentration on the yield of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153356-rId18.jpeg?20250826021443" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Effect of extraction time on the yield of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153356-rId19.jpeg?20250826021443" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. Effect of extraction volume on the yield of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153356-rId20.jpeg?20250826021442" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. Effect of extraction times on the yield of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153356-rId21.jpeg?20250826021443" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>4.4. Orthogonal Experiment Results</title>
    <p>A statistical analysis of the orthogonal test data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref> was performed to determine the influence of three variables—solvent concentration (A), sample-to-solvent volume ratio (B), and number of extractions (C)—on the total flavonoid yield from Gnetum parvifolium. The analysis indicated that the order of factor influence was A &gt; C &gt; B. The optimal extraction protocol was identified as A<sub>3</sub>B<sub>1</sub>C<sub>3</sub>, which corresponds to using a 90% ethanol solution, a 1:60 sample-to-solvent volume ratio, and performing three extraction cycles. This combination of process parameters effectively enhances the extraction efficiency of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>Table 6. Orthogonal test results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">Trial No. </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">A/% </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">B/(mL:g) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">C/Count </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">Total flavonoid content (mg/g) </p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">19.41</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">27.47</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">24.50</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">4</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">33.61</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">5</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">27.53</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">6</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">41.27</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">7</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">47.18</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">8</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">33.60</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">9</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left">31.57</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">k1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">23.79</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">33.40</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">26.17</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">k2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">34.13</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">29.53</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">30.57</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">k3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">37.45</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">32.44</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">38.64</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.59%"><p style="text-align:left">Range R</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.91%"><p style="text-align:left">13.65</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">3.87</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="20.03%"><p style="text-align:left">12.47</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.89%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table7">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>Table 7. Variance analysis of orthogonal experiment.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">Source of variance </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="23.67%"><p style="text-align:left">Sum of squared deviations </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="18.44%"><p style="text-align:left">Degrees of freedom </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:left">Mean square </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left">F value </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left">P-value </p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">A </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="23.67%"><p style="text-align:left">680.288</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="18.44%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:left">340.144</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left">32.777</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left">&lt;0.05</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">B </p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.67%"><p style="text-align:left">88.819</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.44%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:left">44.409</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left">4.279</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left">&gt;0.05</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">C </p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.67%"><p style="text-align:left">167.152</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.44%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:left">83.576</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left">8.054</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left">&gt;0.05</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">Error </p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.67%"><p style="text-align:left">20.755</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.44%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:left">10.378</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.57%"><p style="text-align:left">Sum </p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.67%"><p style="text-align:left">957.014</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.44%"><p style="text-align:left">8</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.53%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Note: P &lt; 0.05 indicates a significant effect.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_5">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>4.5. Verification Test</title>
    <p>To ensure the accuracy, stability, and reproducibility of the results, validation experiments were conducted in triplicate using the optimal combination of conditions. As presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
      Table 8
     </xref>, the average yield of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium was 47.79 mg/g, which aligns with the predicted outcome. This confirms that the process identified through the orthogonal experiment is stable and viable, establishing A<sub>3</sub>B<sub>1</sub>C<sub>3</sub> as the optimal set of conditions for the extraction process.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table8">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
       Table 8
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>Table 8. Verification test results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="9.59%"><p style="text-align:left">ID </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="25.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Sample powder weight (g) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="14.52%"><p style="text-align:left">Absorbance A </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="27.44%"><p style="text-align:left">Total flavonoid content (mg/g) </p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="23.18%"><p style="text-align:left">Average content (mg/g) </p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="9.59%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="25.27%"><p style="text-align:left">0.2004</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="14.52%"><p style="text-align:left">0.479</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="27.44%"><p style="text-align:left">47.39</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="23.18%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.59%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.27%"><p style="text-align:left">0.2001</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.52%"><p style="text-align:left">0.484</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="27.44%"><p style="text-align:left">47.90</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.18%"><p style="text-align:left">47.79</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="9.59%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.27%"><p style="text-align:left">0.2004</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.52%"><p style="text-align:left">0.487</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="27.44%"><p style="text-align:left">48.08</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.18%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_6">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>4.6. DPPH in Vitro Antioxidant Activity Assay Results</title>
    <p>The DPPH free radical scavenging assay is a widely used method for the in vitro evaluation of antioxidant capacity. A DPPH ethanol solution is purple due to the selective light absorption by its stable free radical structure, exhibiting peak absorbance at a wavelength of 517 nm. When an antioxidant reacts with DPPH free radicals via electron or hydrogen atom transfer, the solution’s color fades, and its absorbance decreases. This reduction in absorbance allows for the quantitative assessment of antioxidant activity. The experimental data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref> indicate that within the concentration range of 0.60 - 3.00 μg/mL, flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium exhibit a scavenging effect on DPPH free radicals. Furthermore, this scavenging ability increases with the concentration of total flavonoids. However, their scavenging rate was significantly lower than that of ascorbic acid at the same mass concentration.</p>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. DPPH radical scavenging rate.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153356-rId22.jpeg?20250826021444" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Discussion</title>
   <p>Preliminary phytochemical screening of the medicinal herb Gnetum parvifolium revealed the presence of several types of chemical constituents, including flavonoids, alkaloids, saponins, phenols, and tannins. Widely distributed throughout the plant kingdom, flavonoids possess potent antioxidant properties and are a major focus of research in traditional Chinese medicine. Numerous pharmacological studies have demonstrated the multifaceted therapeutic potential of flavonoids <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-13">
     [13]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-15">
     [15]
    </xref>, which are particularly effective in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. By improving vascular permeability, inhibiting platelet aggregation, and reducing cholesterol synthesis, they exert clear preventive and therapeutic effects against conditions such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, and angina pectoris. Furthermore, flavonoids demonstrate remarkable efficacy in various areas of physiological regulation. Their widely validated pharmacological activities include expectorant, antitussive <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-17">
     [17]
    </xref>, antiasthmatic, and antifungal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-18">
     [18]
    </xref> effects, as well as efficacy in the treatment of acute and chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-19">
     [19]
    </xref>, indicating broad therapeutic prospects.</p>
   <p>In this study, ultrasonic-assisted extraction was employed, which utilizes ultrasonic cavitation and mechanical effects to disrupt plant cell walls, thereby promoting solvent penetration and increasing the total flavonoid extraction rate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. Single-factor experiments, in conjunction with an orthogonal design method, were used to systematically investigate the effects of four key independent variables—extraction solvent concentration, sonication time, sample-to-solution volume ratio, and number of extractions—on the total flavonoid yield from Gnetum parvifolium. An L9 (3<sup>4</sup>) orthogonal experiment was conducted to optimize the process parameters. Statistical analysis of the data indicated that the factors affected the extraction rate to varying degrees. The extraction solvent concentration had the most significant impact, followed by the number of extractions, whereas the influence of the sample-solution volume ratio was relatively weak. Based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subsequent verification experiments, the optimal conditions were established as follows: 90% ethanol as the extraction solvent, a sample-to-solvent volume ratio of 1:60, and three extraction cycles. As flavonoids are generally polar compounds, a higher concentration of ethanol more effectively disrupts the plant cell structure, facilitating their dissolution. Consequently, the total flavonoid extraction rate increased with rising ethanol concentration. A moderate increase in the sample-to-solvent volume ratio creates a favorable concentration gradient that promotes the diffusion of total flavonoids, whereas an excessively high ratio results in solvent waste. Although extending the sonication time can facilitate flavonoid dissolution, prolonged exposure may lead to their decomposition and oxidation, which in turn reduces the extraction rate and can damage the ultrasonic instrument. Therefore, this study focused on optimizing the number of extractions. Increasing the number of extraction cycles enables a more complete extraction of the total flavonoid content. The optimized number of cycles achieves a balance between extraction efficiency and component stability. Accordingly, this process provides a scientific basis and parameter reference for industrial production.</p>
   <p>To investigate antioxidant activity, this study employed the DPPH in vitro antioxidant model, using the free radical scavenging rate as the key indicator to assess the capacity of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium. Statistical analysis of the experimental data revealed that these total flavonoids exhibited significant free radical scavenging efficacy at various concentrations, confirming their potent antioxidant activity. It is further hypothesized that this activity is attributable to the abundance of phenolic hydroxyl groups within the flavonoid structure. These groups can quench free radicals via a hydrogen atom donation mechanism, which interrupts radical chain reactions and thus produces the antioxidant effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-21">
     [21]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.145115-"></xref>6. Conclusions</title>
   <p>This study conducted an in-depth investigation into the total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium. By optimizing the ultrasound-assisted extraction process, an efficient system for extracting total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium was established. The aluminum nitrate colorimetric method was employed to determine the total flavonoid content, and its methodological validation confirmed high accuracy and precision. Using the extraction yield of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium as the evaluation index, the extraction process parameters were optimized through a combination of single-factor experiments and an L9 (3<sup>4</sup>) orthogonal design. The optimal extraction conditions for total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium were determined to be: 90% ethanol as the solvent, a sample-to-solvent volume ratio of 1:60, and three extraction cycles. Under these optimized parameters, the yield of total flavonoids reached 47.79 mg/g. The methodological investigation revealed a relative standard deviation (RSD) of less than 2%, demonstrating the excellent stability and repeatability of the process.</p>
   <p>To investigate antioxidant activity, this study employed the DPPH in vitro antioxidant assay to establish an evaluation model for the in vitro antioxidant capacity of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium. Statistical analysis of the experimental data indicated that these total flavonoids exhibit significant free-radical scavenging efficacy at various concentrations, confirming their potent antioxidant activity and providing a theoretical foundation for the development of natural antioxidants.</p>
   <p>This research not only further elucidates the medicinal value of Gnetum parvifolium but also provides a solid scientific foundation for its comprehensive development and utilization. Future studies should focus on investigating the in vivo antioxidant mechanisms of total flavonoids from Gnetum parvifolium, while also exploring their practical applications in functional foods and pharmaceuticals to fully realize their potential economic and social value.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the project of improving the basic scientific research ability of young and middle-aged teachers in colleges and universities in Guangxi in 2023 (2023KY0545).</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Food and Drug Administration (2016) Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Yao Herbal Medicine Quality Standards, Volume 1. Guangxi Science and Technology Press, 64.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, Y. (2019) Illustrated Encyclopedia of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Volume 1. Qingdao Publishing House, 294.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, Y. (2015) Study on the Chemical Constituents of the Stems of Gnetum parvifolium. Southern Medical University. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yan, Q.W., Su, B.J., He, S., Liao, H.B., Yue, H., Wang, H.S. and Liang, D. (2024) Structurally Diverse Stilbenes from Gnetum parvifolium and Their Anti-Neuroinflammatory Activities. Bioorganic Chemistry, 143, Article ID: 107060. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.107060
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lan, Q., Liu, J.F., Shi, S.Q., et al. (2014) Analysis of Nutritional and Medicinal Components in Seeds of Gnetum parvifolium. Forest Research, 27, 441-444. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yan, Q.W. (2020) Study on the Chemical Constituents and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Gnetum parvifolium. Guangxi Normal University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, Z.C. and Wang, Y.H. (2012) Study on the Extraction and Tyrosinase Inhibitory Activity of Total Flavonoids from Cornus officinalis. Straits Pharmaceutical Journal, 24, 243-245. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wu, H.Z., Yang, J.F., Liu, Y.N., et al. (2025) Study on the Total Flavonoid and Main Active Flavonoid Glycoside Content of Commonly Used Clematis Genus Medicinal Materials. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 53, 38-42.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (2024) WS/T 408-2024. Guideline for Analytical Performance Verification of Quantitative Examination Procedures. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chi, X.J. and Wang, J. (2025) Comparative Study on the Total Flavonoid Content and Antioxidant Activity of Scutellaria barbata from Different Origins. Journal of Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, 26, 35-40. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xu, X.H., Wang, Y., Pang, Q.Y., et al. (2024) Study on the Enrichment of Total Flavonoids from Rhodiola crenulata by Macroporous Resin and Their Antioxidant Activity. Speciality Products Research, No. 2, 103-109, 114. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fan, B.B., Shang, J.P., Bai, X.Y., et al. (2025) Optimization of the Extraction Process of Total Flavonoids from Leonurus japonicus and Study of Their Antioxidant Activity. China Feed, No. 5, 36-43.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, Y., Xiao, F.L., Zhao, X.H., et al. (2024) Research Progress on Chemical Constituents and Pharmacological Activities of Spatholobus suberectus. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 52, 13-16. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yan, X.D. and Guo, M.L. (2022) Research Progress on the Effects of Flavonoid Compounds on Ischemic Diseases of the Heart and Brain. Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice, 40, 97-102.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chu, F., Chen, X.H., Song, B.W., et al. (2025) Sujining Flavonoid Ameliorates Experimental Colitis in Mice by Antagonizing Intestinal Epithelial Cell Apoptosis through Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. Journal of Southern Medical University, 45, 819-828. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shi, J.H., Wang, X.J., Cheng, R.Q., et al. (2024) Research Progress on the Mechanisms of Flavonoids in the Treatment of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases and Their Novel Delivery Systems. Journal of Inner Mongolia Medical University, 46, 84-90. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ye, C., Chen, Z.Y., Song, Y., et al. (2024) Study on the Cough-Suppressing and Expectorant Effects of Perilla frutescens Leaf Extract in Mice. Journal of Jilin Medical University, 45, 246-249. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sun, H. (2024) Study on the Chemical Constituents of Rumex japonicus Leaf and Their Antifungal Activity against Dermatophytosis-Related Fungi. Changchun University of Chinese Medicine.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     She, P.G., Tan, X.W. and Guo, H.L. (2023) Effect of Total Flavonoid Extract of Polygonum perfoliatum on Liver Function and Aquaporins in Rats with Liver Cirrhosis and Ascites. Clinical Rational Drug Use, 16, 84-87. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, Z.H., Xu, X.J., Chen, F.Z., et al. (2023) Study on Compound Enzyme-Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Flavonoids from Pitaya Flower and Their Antioxidant Activity. China Fruit&amp;Vegetable, 43, 29-35.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.145115-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jia, X.L., Aizize, Z., Bi, Y.X., et al. (2024) Analysis of Factors Affecting Two in Vitro Methods for Evaluating Antioxidant Activity: DPPH and ABTS. Daily Chemical Industry (Chinese and English), 54, 866-872.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>