<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ijaa
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2161-4717
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2161-4725
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ijaa.2025.153016
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ijaa-144670
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Seasonal Variation Analysis for Solar Activity Influence on “Planetarische Kennziffer” (Kp) Index during Solar Cycle 23
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Magda Mohb-Eldin
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Farghaly
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sara Said
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Khodairy
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Assem Abd-Elfattah
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Tharwat
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mohamed Adel Abdulaziz
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Sharaf
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mervat
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Awad
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Rabab Helal
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Abdelhamid
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aNational Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Cairo, Egypt
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aSynergy University Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     04
    </day> 
    <month>
     08
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    03
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    243
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    263
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      19,
     </day>
     <month>
      April
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      5,
     </day>
     <month>
      April
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      5,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    In this research paper, we explore how the K index changes in connection with shifts in solar activity throughout Solar Cycle 23. We examine indicators of solar activity such as sunspot numbers, radio solar flux (measured at 10.7 cm), and sunspot area to understand their impact on the K index. This study is notable for providing comprehensive information on these characteristics to offer a clearer picture of how fluctuations in solar activity relate to variations in the K index. By analyzing data from the peak of Solar Cycle 23—specifically when the sunspot area exceeds 500 micro-hemispheres—we observe a clear correlation between the F10.7 index and the Kp index. The findings demonstrate consistent associations between the Kp index and solar flux levels over time, suggesting that solar flux may serve as a reliable indicator of disturbances in Earth’s geomagnetic field. The research covers the authors’ understanding of the interaction between solar activity and geomagnetic conditions, which is crucial for predicting space weather and mitigating its effects on Earth’s technological systems. The knowledge gained from this research highlights the importance of monitoring solar flux and sunspot activity to forecast periods of heightened activity during solar cycles.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Geomagnetic Activity
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Solar Activity
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Solar Cycle 23 Sunspot Area
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Kp Index
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The solar wind, which emanates from the Sun and flows outward, envelops the Earth in a constantly moving stream of plasma and magnetic fields. This persistent solar wind has a significant influence on the behaviour of Earth’s magnetosphere. For instance, particle precipitation from the solar wind and plasma accumulation in the magnetotail are primary drivers of auroral activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. These energetic particles transfer energy to atmospheric particles, producing the visually striking phenomenon known as the aurora.</p>
   <p>Between 1996 and 2008, distinct characteristics emerged during both the ascending and descending phases of Solar Cycle 23. Notably, the unusually prolonged solar minimum (e.g., Kane 2005) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-2">
     [2]
    </xref> has drawn considerable attention, as it plays a critical role in the interpretation of geomagnetic indices. This period is thus considered crucial for the study of solar-terrestrial interactions.</p>
   <p>Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between geomagnetic indices—such as the Kp index and solar activity, particularly in relation to sunspot counts and sunspot area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>). Solar Cycle 23 stands out for its extended minimum phase marked by significantly low sunspot numbers. This unique condition presents a valuable opportunity to examine how diminished solar activity correlates with geomagnetic behaviour. While previous research has laid the groundwork for understanding these dynamics, much of it has focused on periods of heightened solar activity, leaving a gap in knowledge regarding the effects of low solar activity on geomagnetic indices <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-3">
     [3]
    </xref>.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. Showing the monthly mean value of Kp index during the 17th to 23rd solar cycle is presented together with the sunspot number. Variations of Kp index basically follow the sunspot number <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-4">
       [4]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId15.jpeg?20250808030416" />
   </fig>
   <p>Our study highlights the seasonal fluctuations in Kp index behaviour and examines the broader relationship between solar activity and geomagnetic indices. Previous research has demonstrated that geomagnetic activity can vary significantly with the seasons, particularly around the equinoxes. While these seasonal patterns have been acknowledged, further investigation is needed to understand how the unique features of Solar Cycle 23 may alter or amplify these trends. Understanding these seasonal fluctuations is crucial for improving the accuracy of geomagnetic storm forecasts and mitigating their potential impacts on communication and technological infrastructure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-6">
     [6]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Gleason and Aboy noted the erratic fluctuations of the Kp index—a key component of geomagnetic activity—across different seasons, suggesting that these variations require further study. Research has also shown that annual trends in geomagnetic activity are most pronounced during the equinoctial periods, when the alignment of Earth’s geomagnetic field with the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) allows for more effective coupling with solar wind energy. This alignment makes Earth’s magnetosphere more susceptible to disturbances, increasing geomagnetic activity during these times. Although seasonal dependencies in geomagnetic indices like the Kp index are well documented, the distinctive nature of Solar Cycle 23 may either amplify or suppress these variations. As such, this cycle presents a valuable opportunity to investigate how periods of low solar activity influence deviations from established seasonal patterns.</p>
   <p>By analysing the Solar Cycle 23 period, our study addresses a notable gap in the literature concerning how low levels of solar activity influence seasonal changes in geomagnetic behaviour. This research contributes to the growing body of knowledge on the relationship between solar activity and geomagnetic indices, emphasizing that even atypical solar cycles can significantly affect these interactions. Recognizing and quantifying these effects is essential for the development of robust forecasting models. Such models are increasingly important in today’s technologically dependent world, where even minor disturbances in Earth’s geomagnetic field can disrupt navigation systems, communications, and power grids <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-8">
     [8]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Literature Review</title>
   <p>The analysis of solar wind magnetosphere interaction is as old as space physics, with pioneering works demonstrating the importance of solar activity for geomagnetic activity. Chapman and Ferraro (1941) appeared to be pioneers and the first to provided concepts about the effects of solar storms on the magnetic environment of the Earth and energy transfer from solar wind particles to the magnetosphere causes geomagnetic storms. These basic investigations formed the basis for further research into the complexity of the solar-terrestrial connection, where it has been established that solar wind velocity, density and magnetic fields have a substantial effect on geomagnetic activity as described by the Kp index. Since then many other researches have been done to explore these solar-terrestrial relations, with particularly stressing necessity of taking into account various phases of the solar cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-9">
     [9]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Among different indices that characterize the level of geomagnetic activity, the Kp index proved to be one of the most important indices used in space weather studies. Bartels (1932) already created the measurement for geomagnetic storm intensity as Kp index which varies from 0 to 9. Since then, the Kp index is used routinely, and is applied broadly in space weather research for operating and prospecting geomagnetic storms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. Tsurutani et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-11">
     [11]
    </xref> have investigated this fact when pointing to the frequently observed solar wind conditions as well as the strong interplanetary magnetic field leading to the Kp index enhancement. However, most of the initial attempts were carried out during periods of high intensity solar storms, aimed at determining their effect on the geomagnetic environment. Since this focus has placed much importance on particular periods, there is inadequate information available on how minimum solar conditions such as those of the Solar Cycle 23 extended minimum impact certain values of the geomagnetic indices <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-11">
     [11]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Solar Cycle 23 that started in 1996 up to 2008 has been of interesting history because it was characterized by an unexpected extra-long solar minimum period. As Kane pointed out in his recent article, this cycle was characterized by an unusually lengthy and dormant solar minimum, one that has been named as having one of the longest records of low levels of sunspot activity. This long minimum has since formed the basis of extended research because it offered scientists the chance to study how the magnetosphere of Earth reacts to lasting low solar activity. A few researchers claim that this protracted minimum might affect the typical response of the Earth’s magnetic field to conditions in a manner that has been detected during other low-solar-activity intervals. The effect of such extended interval of silence on the parameters such as Kp index, however, merits further research.</p>
   <p>There are many cases reported in previous studies that phenomena associated with geomagnetic activity are most intense around equinoctial periods only. Equinoctial hypothesis has been expressed by Russell and McPherron <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-12">
     [12]
    </xref> stating that geomagnetic field of the Earth gets closely aligned to IMF during equinox period which enhanced energy coupling from the solar wind into the magnetosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. These seasonal effects have also been supported by numerous studies, such as the work of Cliver et al. (2000) who probe increased geomagnetic activity during equinox periods because of appropriate IMF configurations. Despite such previous explorations of climatic annual variations, behaviors of Solar Cycle 23, which is differently featured from those that came before it, may well engage or change these annually predictable traits, hence, a need to investigate the effects of seasons taking into consideration the contested protracted solar minimum phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-13">
     [13]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In spite of the significant progress made in the study of GM and its source, the prior achievements and numerous studies have primarily focused the articles and research on high solar activity periods, means maximum phases with high sunspot and flaring activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. It has been the active periods that have attracted the interest of many researchers because during intense geomagnetic storms, satellites, communication and power systems can be affected. Nevertheless, fewer studies have been made with low activity periods and the behavior of different indices such as the Kp index during the absence of solar activity. Since Solar Cycle 23 experienced a lengthy low level of solar activity, what we propose is that low-Kp conditions may demonstrate other patterns of geomagnetic activity and seasonal responses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-14">
     [14]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Besides emphasizing the reaction to solar and seasonal stimuli, it is witnessing the emergence of a demand for further investigations on the predictability of geomagnetic indexes, such as Kp index, under various solar conditions. Research by Richardson and Cane (2012) clearly reveals that many space weather forecasts have higher variability, correlation and prediction error rates of geomagnetic storms while the sun is quiet. These restrictions are suggesting the need to research geomagnetic indices in various solar conditions in order to enhance calibration declaration. Investigating the dependency of the Kp index on seasonal changes and its low activity phase behavior during Solar Cycle 23 plays significant roles for enhancing the uncertainties of Kp prediction models under the other vital conditions necessary for vital infrastructures that require credible space weather forecasts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-15">
     [15]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>I. Tsagouri <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-16">
     [16]
    </xref> discusses the significant impact that geomagnetic storms have on the Earth’s upper atmosphere, particularly emphasizing how the highly variable solar wind energy input into the magnetosphere alters ionospheric structure. During such storm events, interactions between ionospheric plasma and atmospheric neutrals result in substantial fluctuations in peak electron density, manifesting as positive or negative ionospheric storms. These large-scale electron density variations have critical implications for the performance and reliability of technological systems, especially those reliant on radio signal propagation and satellite-based navigation.</p>
   <p>Ionospheric storms have therefore been the subject of extensive research in recent decades. A comprehensive understanding of their behavior has emerged, positioning them as a crucial component in the broader solar-terrestrial interaction system. Despite these advances, ionospheric storms remain a dynamic area of research due to ongoing developments in geospace modeling, real-time monitoring capabilities, and evolving technological requirements.</p>
   <p>The paper offers a concise survey of the current understanding of ionospheric storm responses, particularly at mid-latitudes, focusing on the morphological characteristics and occurrence patterns of these disturbances. Special attention is given to the triggering role of solar wind conditions, which continue to present interpretive challenges and remain central to improving forecasting and mitigation strategies in space weather research.</p>
   <p>Toriumi et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-17">
     [17]
    </xref> emphasized that the formation of extremely hot outer stellar atmospheres is one of the most prominent manifestations of magnetic activity in late-type dwarf stars, including the Sun. These outer layers—the chromosphere, transition region, and corona—are widely believed to be heated by the dissipation of energy transported upward from the stellar surface via magnetic fields. This heating process is reflected in spectral line fluxes at various wavelengths, which exhibit power-law relationships with surface magnetic flux over a wide range of formation temperatures. These relationships appear to be universal among the Sun and Sun-like stars, regardless of their age or magnetic activity level.</p>
   <p>In thier study, the authors compiled a comprehensive catalog of power-law indices correlating solar activity proxies with various spectral line fluxes. Compared to previous research, this work significantly expands the scope by:</p>
   <p>In their research the extended dataset enables detailed investigation of flux–flux scaling laws across spectral lines originating from different temperature regions, from the corona (log(T/K) ≈ 6 - 7) to the chromosphere (log(T/K) ≈ 4). Furthermore, the catalog facilitates the reconstruction of historical solar spectral fluxes and can be applied to studies of F-, G-, and K-type dwarfs as well as modeled stellar atmospheres.</p>
   <p>A. Espuña Fontcuberta et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-6">
     [6]
    </xref> emphasize that predicting the solar magnetic cycle is of critical importance for humanity. In this context, a novel development is the application of machine learning algorithms for solar cycle forecasting. Various approaches have been developed for this purpose, though no consensus has yet emerged among different techniques, including both data-driven and physics-based methods.</p>
   <p>In their study, the authors evaluate the performance of four machine learning algorithms, all belonging to the class of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), for predicting simulated sunspot cycles based on a well-established, stochastically forced, nonlinear time-delay solar dynamo model. Among the models tested, the Echo State Network (ESN) demonstrated the best performance. However, its predictability is limited to only one future sunspot cycle, which aligns with current physical understanding.</p>
   <p>The authors then trained the ESN and a modified version (MESN) using historical solar cycle observations to forecast Solar Cycles 22 - 25. Their models produced accurate hindcasts for Solar Cycles 22 through 24. For Solar Cycle 25, the ESN forecasts a peak amplitude of 131 ± 14 sunspots around July 2024, with a cycle length of approximately 10 years. The MESN predicts a peak of 137 ± 2 sunspots around April 2024, with a similar cycle duration.</p>
   <p>Qualitatively, both models suggest that Cycle 25 will be slightly stronger than Cycle 24, but weaker than Cycle 23. This research presents a hybrid approach that bridges the gap between physics-based models and machine learning methods, achieving promising consistency across diverse forecasting techniques.</p>
   <p>B. L., M. I. Desai et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-5">
     [5]
    </xref> reported on the annual variation of quiet-time suprathermal ion composition for elements ranging from carbon (C) through iron (Fe), using data from the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE)/Ultra-Low Energy Isotope Spectrometer (ULEIS). Their analysis covered the energy range 0.3 MeV/nucleon to 1.28 MeV/nucleon over the period 1998 to 2019, encompassing the rising phase of Solar Cycle 23 through the declining phase of Solar Cycle 24.</p>
   <p>Their findings include:</p>
   <p>From these observations, the authors infer that quiet-time suprathermal ions are likely remnants of CIR-related activity during solar minima, and residuals from GSEP events during solar maxima. Additionally, and somewhat unexpectedly, the study finds that sulfur (S) behaves like a low first ionization potential (FIP) ion in the suprathermal regime. This behavior suggests it originates from low-FIP solar sources, offering new insights into the compositional dynamics of suprathermal ion populations.</p>
   <p>Eid A. Amin et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-18">
     [18]
    </xref> investigated the relationship between geomagnetic storms and solar events, compiling a comprehensive catalog of multi-source geomagnetic storms spanning the period from August 1996 to December 2019. Their study focuses on assessing how solar activity influences geomagnetic storm characteristics, particularly during the minimum and maximum phases of Solar Cycles 23 and 24. The results indicate that geomagnetic activity was more intense during Cycle 23 compared to Cycle 24.</p>
   <p>A total of 104 geomagnetic storms were identified, each associated with a minimum Dst index of ≤–100 nT, classifying them as intense. A strong correlation was found between the number of storm events and average sunspot numbers (correlation coefficient CC = 0.73), underscoring the direct relationship between solar activity and geomagnetic disturbances. The majority of these storms were associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar flares, with relatively few linked to other interplanetary sources.</p>
   <p>The study determined that the average CME speed for storms contributing to geomagnetic disturbances was approximately 876 km/s, and a moderate correlation was observed between CME speed and Dst index (R = 0.61). Among the CME-driven events, 63% were full halo CMEs, while 37% were partial or narrower halo CMEs. Notably, seven of the most severe storms during Solar Cycle 23 exhibited a magnetic H-component exceeding 400 nT, reflecting their extreme intensity.</p>
   <p>The analysis further incorporated multiple geophysical and solar wind parameters, including solar wind speed, Dst index, Ap index, Kp index, auroral electrojet (AE) index, and the north–south component of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF-Bz). These parameters were statistically examined to establish the connection between storm occurrences and specific solar drivers such as CMEs, solar flares, and corotating interaction regions (CIRs). This multi-dimensional approach provides a robust characterization of geomagnetic storm behavior during two contrasting solar cycles.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Methodology</title>
   <p>This research adopts a quantitative operational framework to analyze the correlation between solar activity and geomagnetic activity during Solar Cycle 23, covering the period from 1996 to 2008. The methodology integrates data from multiple sources, including ensemble average daily sunspot area, F10.7 solar radio flux, and the Kp index—widely used as a global measure of geomagnetic activity—to assess both long-term and short-term behavioural trends.</p>
   <p>At the methodological level, the study leverages the advantages of a seasonal and, more specifically, a fine-grained (microscopic) approach, enabling detailed observation of how geomagnetic indices respond to solar activity across different time scales. The research process involves data cleaning, feature selection and transformation, exploratory data analysis, correlation analysis, and predictive modelling.</p>
   <p>This multilevel strategy facilitates a comprehensive analysis of Solar Cycle 23, with particular attention to the extended minimum phase. It also seeks to uncover patterns and insights that could enhance the accuracy of space weather forecasting during periods of low solar activity, contributing valuable guidance for future solar cycles.</p>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Data Collection and Preprocessing</title>
    <p>The dataset used in this study encompasses three primary indices of solar and geomagnetic activity: Sunspot area, 10.7 cm solar radio flux (F10.7), Kp index data was collected during the period 1996-2008. Sunspot area data was used based on the Royal Observatory, Greenwich USAF/NOAA Sunspot Data site and F10.7 index data were downloaded from Space Weather Canada (Natural Resources Canada) to determine the solar activity levels. The Kp index values, indicative of geomagnetic activity, were collected from the NOAA’s geomagnetic indices archive at “<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/geomagnetic-indices">
      https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/geomagnetic-indices
     </xref>” site <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-19">
      [19]
     </xref>. Some checks were conducted on the data values to detect missing values, and where such values were found, gap filling was done using linear interpolation to ensure continuity of the analysis.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>The sunspot area data is given in millionths of a solar hemisphere “(MH), where 1000 MH is approximately, equal to 3.0437 million square kilometers خn the other hand the F10.7 index data is in Solar Flux Units (SFU), where 1SFU corresponds to 10<sup>−22</sup> W·m<sup>−2</sup>·Hz<sup>−1</sup>, Indeed, as Kp index which is quasi-logarithmic index ranging from 0 to 9, if the Kp is equal to or larger than 5, it indicates a geomagnetic storm. Each of these indices was then processed to make timeframes standard, where required monthly data was converted into the daily average to match the other indices <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-20">
      [20]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Feature Extraction and Seasonal Analysis</title>
    <p>The dataset utilized in this study includes three primary indices of solar and geomagnetic activity: sunspot area, 10.7 cm solar radio flux (F10.7), and the Kp index, covering the period from 1996 to 2008. Sunspot area data were obtained from the Royal Observatory, Greenwich–USAF/NOAA Sunspot Data archive. The F10.7 solar radio flux data were sourced from Space Weather Canada (Natural Resources Canada) to represent solar activity levels. Kp index values, which reflect global geomagnetic activity, were retrieved from the NOAA Geomagnetic Indices Archive at: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/geomagnetic-indices">
      https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/geomagnetic-indices
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-19">
      [19]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>To ensure data continuity, preliminary checks were performed to identify any missing values. Where gaps were detected, linear interpolation was applied to fill them appropriately.</p>
    <p>The sunspot area is expressed in millionths of a solar hemisphere (MH), where 1000 MH is approximately equivalent to 3.0437 million square kilometers. The F10.7 index is measured in Solar Flux Units (SFU), where 1 SFU = 10⁻<sup>22</sup> W·m⁻<sup>2</sup>·Hz⁻<sup>1</sup>. The Kp index is a quasi-logarithmic scale ranging from 0 to 9; values of Kp ≥ 5 indicate the occurrence of a geomagnetic storm.</p>
    <p>All three indices were processed to ensure consistent temporal resolution. Where necessary, monthly data were converted to daily averages to match the temporal scale of the other datasets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-20">
      [20]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Microscopic Analysis of Short-Term Fluctuations in the Kp Index</title>
    <p>To achieve a detailed, microscale representation of the Kp index, we extracted short-term fluctuations using three-hour intervals, consistent with NOAA’s three-hourly K-index records. By analyzing data at this higher temporal resolution, the study aimed to identify high-frequency variability in geomagnetic activity, potentially linked to sudden solar events such as solar flares or coronal mass ejections (CMEs). This high-resolution approach enabled the detection of subtle disturbances in geomagnetic dynamics (GM) that might be overlooked when using coarser temporal aggregations, such as daily or monthly averages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-21">
      [21]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>To further investigate these fluctuations, wavelet transform methods were employed to analyze the Kp index time series. This technique facilitated the examination of both high-frequency oscillations and low-frequency trends, enabling the isolation of periodic behaviors and abrupt variations associated with solar storms or transitional solar phases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-22">
      [22]
     </xref>. The wavelet decomposition proved particularly effective in highlighting transient features within the Kp index that may not be captured through conventional statistical approaches.</p>
    <p>The authors decided to use sunspot areas greater than or equal to 500 millionths of a solar hemisphere (MH) in this study is grounded in both physical and analytical reasoning as follows:</p>
    <p>Sunspots are regions of intense magnetic activity on the solar surface and are often linked with major solar phenomena such as solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). These phenomena are primary drivers of disturbances in the solar wind and the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), both of which play critical roles in triggering geomagnetic storms reflected by increases in the Kp index. Empirical studies have shown that larger sunspots (≥500 MH) are significantly more likely to be associated with such geoeffective events, hence justifying the threshold for isolating impactful solar activity.</p>
    <p>Using a sunspot area threshold of 500 MH serves to filter out minor or less influential sunspot groups that may not have a notable geomagnetic impact. This improves the signal-to-noise ratio in the data, allowing for clearer detection of correlations between solar activity and geomagnetic responses. It also ensures that statistical analyses and correlation models are built on meaningful solar inputs with known geophysical relevance.</p>
    <p>Prior studies investigating the geo-effectiveness of sunspots (e.g., Cliver et al., 2000; Kane, 2010) have demonstrated that larger sunspots correlate more strongly with elevated Kp and Dst index values. By aligning with this methodological precedent, the current research remains consistent with established approaches, thereby enhancing comparability and credibility.</p>
    <p>Solar Cycle 23 featured several high-activity periods, during which sunspot areas frequently exceeded 500 MH. By focusing on such intervals, this study is able to specifically analyze how intense solar outputs influence the Earth’s magnetosphere, with minimal confounding from background solar activity. This selection is particularly useful in exploring the delayed or immediate effects on the Kp index during different solar phases (ascending, peak, descending, and minimum).</p>
    <p>Restricting the dataset to high-sunspot-area events aids in producing statistically robust and interpretable results, especially when using methods such as polynomial regression, cross-correlation, and time series forecasting. It allows for meaningful seasonal and phase-specific analysis without the dilution effects of low-impact events.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Correlational Analysis and Statistical Testing</title>
    <p>This study investigates the correlation between sunspot area and one of the key indicators of geomagnetic activity—the Kp index—using Pearson’s correlation and cross-correlation coefficients, incorporating both lagged and unlagged values of the indicators. This approach is particularly useful for identifying time-shifted correlations between solar activity and the Earth’s magnetospheric response. Cross-correlation analysis was extended across various time intervals to determine whether geomagnetic responses varied in accordance with the different phases of Solar Cycle 23.</p>
    <p>In addition, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was employed to assess differences in Kp index values across different seasons of the year. This statistical technique was used to evaluate the significance of seasonal fluctuations and to test the hypothesis concerning the extended minimum phase of Solar Cycle 23. By comparing geomagnetic activity during this prolonged minimum with typical seasonal variations, the ANOVA results helped validate the unique impact of this solar minimum on Kp index behavior.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Modeling and Forecasting of Kp Index Variations</title>
    <p>As part of the methodologies employed in the seasonal and short-term analyses, an ARIMA (Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average) model was incorporated to forecast short-term variations in the Kp index under different solar activity states. The ARIMA model was selected for its effectiveness in handling non-stationary time series data, and it was further optimized to ensure the best model fit. In addition, Seasonal ARIMA (SARIMA) models were utilized to account for the periodic nature of geomagnetic activity, particularly the seasonal peaks observed around the equinoxes.</p>
    <p>To enhance forecasting accuracy, machine learning models—specifically, Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Random Forest Regression—were also developed. These models used sunspot area and F10.7 solar flux data as input features to predict Kp index values. Model performance was evaluated using standard metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), allowing for the assessment of each model’s ability to capture both seasonal patterns and short-term fluctuations in geomagnetic activity.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>3.6. Interpretation and Validation of Findings</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>The seasonal and microscale results were analyzed and compared with findings from previous studies on Solar Cycle 23. To validate the performance of the forecasting models, a split-sample validation approach was employed, dividing the dataset into an estimation period (1996-2004) and a verification period (2005-2008). The models were tested against actual Kp index values from the verification phase to evaluate their predictive performance under varying solar conditions.</p>
    <p>This validation process was critical for assessing the models’ robustness, particularly during periods of low solar magnetic activity. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of how geomagnetic activity responds to changes in solar behavior, especially during extended solar minima. Ultimately, these insights support the improvement of space weather prediction models, which are essential for safeguarding technological systems affected by geomagnetic disturbances.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results and Discussion</title>
   <p>To investigate the relationship between solar activity and the Kp index during Solar Cycle 23, we focused our analysis on periods where the sunspot area was greater than or equal to 500 millionths of a solar hemisphere (MH). This threshold was selected because larger sunspot areas are typically associated with stronger solar magnetic fields and heightened solar activity, including solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). These phenomena intensify solar wind parameters, which in turn influence the Earth’s magnetosphere and often lead to elevated Kp index values, indicating geomagnetic storms.</p>
   <p>By concentrating on sunspot areas ≥ 500 MH, the analysis isolates periods of significant solar activity, ensuring that the impact on geomagnetic indices can be assessed with greater statistical relevance. This targeted approach allows for a clearer examination of how intense solar events drive geomagnetic variability, thereby enhancing our understanding of the dynamic interaction between solar and geomagnetic activity.</p>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>The Relation between the Solar Activity and Kp Index Data for Sunspots Area Greater than or Equal 500</title>
    <p>We conducted a series of statistical analyses, including polynomial fitting and correlation analysis, to evaluate the relationship between solar activity indices—namely sunspot number, sunspot area, and solar radio flux (F10.7)—and the Kp index. Polynomial fitting was particularly useful in capturing seasonal variations in the Kp index and its nonlinear correlation with solar activity indicators. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref> illustrates the relationship between solar activity and the Kp index for sunspot areas ≥ 500 millionths of a solar hemisphere (MH) during Solar Cycle 23.</p>
    <p>To model the trend of the Kp index over time, a third-order polynomial was applied. This choice was informed by its flexibility in capturing nonlinear, cyclic patterns characteristic of solar activity, while avoiding the overfitting often associated with higher-order polynomials. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) supported the selection of the third-order model, as it yielded significantly lower AIC values compared to linear or quadratic alternatives.</p>
    <p>While previous studies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-23">
      [23]
     </xref>) have examined the general relationship between sunspot area and geomagnetic indices across multiple solar cycles, our analysis focuses on the distinct features of Solar Cycle 23. One notable finding is the dynamic behavior of the Kp index during the prolonged solar minimum, which revealed short-term geomagnetic fluctuations even in the presence of low overall solar activity. These findings suggest a more complex interaction between solar and geomagnetic processes than previously reported, especially during low solar output periods.</p>
    <p>Our seasonal analysis also builds on the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-24">
      [24]
     </xref>, which documented periodic variations in geomagnetic indices. However, we emphasize the previously underexplored asymmetry between the spring and autumn equinoxes during Solar Cycle 23. This asymmetry, identified in our data, highlights unique seasonal dependencies within solar-terrestrial interactions that have not been thoroughly addressed in prior literature. These insights provide a new perspective on seasonal geomagnetic behavior during atypical solar cycles.</p>
    <p>In addition to polynomial fitting, we performed regression analyses, including Pearson correlation coefficients, to quantify the relationship between sunspot area and Kp index values.</p>
    <p>Summary of Graphical Results:</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(a)">
      Figure 2(a)
     </xref> shows the relationship between monthly average sunspot number and the monthly average Kp index. During the ascending and descending phases of the solar cycle, a direct correlation is observed, where increases in sunspot number are followed shortly by increases in the Kp index, and vice versa. During the solar maximum, both indices fluctuate in a synchronous pattern, rising and falling together.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(b)">
      Figure 2(b)
     </xref> illustrates the relationship between monthly average F10.7 solar flux and the monthly average Kp index. Similar to sunspot numbers, there is a lagged correlation during the ascending and descending phases, while synchronous variability is evident during the solar maximum.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(c)">
      Figure 2(c)
     </xref> depicts the relationship between monthly average sunspot area and the monthly average Kp index. A consistent pattern emerges where increases in sunspot area precede increases in the Kp index. During the peak of Solar Cycle 23, both indices exhibit parallel fluctuations, further supporting a strong connection between large sunspot regions and geomagnetic activity.</p>
    <fig-group id="fig2" position="float">
     <fig id="fig2" position="float">
      <label>Figure 2</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--Figure 2. Analysis: Relationship between solar activity and the Kp index during solar cycle 23.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId18.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig2" position="float">
      <label>Figure 2</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--Figure 2. Analysis: Relationship between solar activity and the Kp index during solar cycle 23.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId18.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig2" position="float">
      <label>Figure 2</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--Figure 2. Analysis: Relationship between solar activity and the Kp index during solar cycle 23.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId19.jpeg?20250808030428" />
     </fig>
    </fig-group>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(a)">
      Figure 2(a)
     </xref> illustrates the relationship between sunspot numbers and the Kp index during Solar Cycle 23. The y-axis, labeled “Counts,” represents the frequency of recorded Kp index values corresponding to specific sunspot numbers. The plot reveals a clear pattern of co-variation, where increases in sunspot numbers are generally associated with elevated Kp index values, particularly during the ascending and descending phases of the solar cycle. This relationship becomes more synchronous during the solar maximum, indicating heightened geomagnetic activity during peak solar conditions.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(b)">
      Figure 2(b)
     </xref> presents the correlation between the 10.7 cm solar radio flux (F10.7) and the Kp index for the same period. As with <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(a)">
      Figure 2(a)
     </xref>, the y-axis indicates the frequency of Kp index occurrences for corresponding F10.7 values. The data demonstrates a positive correlation, where higher solar radio flux levels are aligned with increased Kp index values, reinforcing the connection between solar radiative output and geomagnetic disturbances.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(c)">
      Figure 2(c)
     </xref> focuses specifically on sunspot areas greater than or equal to 500 millionths of a solar hemisphere (MH) and their relationship with the Kp index. The “Counts” on the y-axis reflect the frequency of Kp index values observed in conjunction with these larger sunspot regions. This targeted analysis confirms a stronger correlation between intense solar activity—indicated by large sunspot areas—and elevated Kp index values. The results suggest that such regions are more likely to produce significant solar events, including flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which in turn lead to increased geomagnetic activity.</p>
    <p>Taken together, the three subfigures of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref> collectively demonstrate a robust correlation between solar activity indicators (sunspot number, solar flux, and large sunspot area) and the Kp index, particularly during periods of peak solar activity. The co-variation observed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(a)">
      Figure 2(a)
     </xref>and<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(b)">
      Figure 2(b)
     </xref> aligns with prior research, which indicates that increased solar activity facilitates the emission of energetic particles and the modulation of magnetic fields—both of which enhance magnetospheric disturbances, as captured by the Kp index.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(c)">
      Figure 2(c)
     </xref> strengthens this conclusion by isolating events with sunspot areas ≥ 500 MH, highlighting a more focused and statistically significant correlation. These findings support the hypothesis that larger sunspot areas are directly linked to stronger geomagnetic responses and are key drivers in modulating the Earth’s magnetosphere.</p>
    <p>Conclusion of the graph:</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>The patterns shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref> substantiate a direct connection between solar activity and geomagnetic disturbance, as measured by the Kp index. The strongest correlations occur during the solar maximum and in the presence of large sunspot areas, emphasizing their role as primary contributors to heightened space weather activity during Solar Cycle 23.4.2. Seasonal Distributions of Kp Index and F10.7: during Solar Cycle 23.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>Also, we focused on studying the relation between Kp index and the solar activity during solar cycle 23. We filtered data to four season categories which are (Spring, Summer, Autumn and Winter), then carrying out some statistical analysis and drawing graphs show the trend of the solar flux F10.7 and Kp index data for sunspots area data greater than or equal 500 for the whole cycle. Summary of these results are tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>, where R<sup>2</sup> is the root mean square.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>Table 1. The seasonal variation of the Kp index, highlighting the highest and lowest values recorded during each season.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Seasons</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.23%"><p style="text-align:center">Maximum value of the monthly average Kp index</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Minimum value of the monthly average Kp index</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Trend</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.50%"><p style="text-align:center">Equation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">R<sup>2</sup> value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Spring</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.23%"><p style="text-align:center">34 at April 2002</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">17<sup>th</sup> May 1999</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Polynomial of order 2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.50%"><p style="text-align:center">Y = 3.018x<sup>2</sup> + 560,085x – 4 × 10<sup>8</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0.3</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Summer</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.23%"><p style="text-align:center">35 at June 2003</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">14<sup>th</sup> June 1999</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Polynomial of order 3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.50%"><p style="text-align:center">Y = 0.0001x<sup>3</sup> – 5.3301x<sup>2</sup> + 99,262x – 7 × 108</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Autumn</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.23%"><p style="text-align:center">34 at Nov. 2003</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">16<sup>th</sup> Nov. 2006</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Polynomial of order 3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.50%"><p style="text-align:center">Y = 0.0013x<sup>3</sup> + 35.054x<sup>2</sup> – 519,992x + 3 × 109</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0.3</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Winter</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.23%"><p style="text-align:center">33 at Jan. 2004</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">15<sup>th</sup> Feb. 2001</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Polynomial of order 3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="35.50%"><p style="text-align:center">Y = 0.0016x<sup>3</sup> – 45.224x<sup>2</sup> + 671,742x – 4 × 109</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0.4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref> which illustrates the relation between monthly average Kp index and date of the period from 1996 to 2008.</p>
    <fig-group id="fig3" position="float">
     <fig id="fig3" position="float">
      <label>Figure 3</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 3. Presents the time variation of the Kp index across different seasons during solar cycle 23.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId20.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig3" position="float">
      <label>Figure 3</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 3. Presents the time variation of the Kp index across different seasons during solar cycle 23.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId21.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig3" position="float">
      <label>Figure 3</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 3. Presents the time variation of the Kp index across different seasons during solar cycle 23.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId22.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig3" position="float">
      <label>Figure 3</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 3. Presents the time variation of the Kp index across different seasons during solar cycle 23.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId23.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
    </fig-group>
    <fig-group id="fig4" position="float">
     <fig id="fig4" position="float">
      <label>Figure 4</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 4. Relation between monthly average 10.7 cm solar radio ﬂux and date of the period from 1996 to 2008.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId24.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig4" position="float">
      <label>Figure 4</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 4. Relation between monthly average 10.7 cm solar radio ﬂux and date of the period from 1996 to 2008.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId25.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig4" position="float">
      <label>Figure 4</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 4. Relation between monthly average 10.7 cm solar radio ﬂux and date of the period from 1996 to 2008.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId26.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig4" position="float">
      <label>Figure 4</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 4. Relation between monthly average 10.7 cm solar radio ﬂux and date of the period from 1996 to 2008.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4501406-rId27.jpeg?20250808030427" />
     </fig>
    </fig-group>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref> which illustrates the relation between monthly average 10.7 cm solar radio ﬂux and date of the period from 1996 to 2008.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>Summary of these results are tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>, where R<sup>2</sup> is the route mean square.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>Table 2. Summary of the relation between monthly average 10.7 solar flux and date of the period from 1996 to 2008.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Seasons</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.71%"><p style="text-align:center">Maximum value of the monthly average 10.7 cm solar radio ﬂux</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.72%"><p style="text-align:center">Minimum values of the monthly average 10.7 cm solar radio ﬂux</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Trend</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Equation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">R<sup>2</sup> value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Spring</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.71%"><p style="text-align:center">186 at Mar. 2000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.72%"><p style="text-align:center">● 97 at Mar. 1998</p><p style="text-align:center">● 92 at May 2004</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Polynomial of order 3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Y = 0.0002x<sup>3</sup> + 8.1148x<sup>2</sup> – 152,041x + 10<sup>9</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0.8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Summer</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.71%"><p style="text-align:center">169 at Aug. 2002</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.72%"><p style="text-align:center">● 87 at June 2005</p><p style="text-align:center">● 90 at June 2004</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Polynomial of order 2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Y = 0.0026x<sup>2</sup> + 97.492x – 10<sup>6</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0.9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Autumn</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.71%"><p style="text-align:center">213 at Sep. 2001</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.72%"><p style="text-align:center">● 76 at Nov. 2006</p><p style="text-align:center">● 87 at Sep. 1997</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Polynomial of order 2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Y = 3.5814x<sup>2</sup> – 67,382x + 5 × 10<sup>8</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0.8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Winter</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.71%"><p style="text-align:center">210 at Dec. 2001</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.72%"><p style="text-align:center">● 85 at Feb. 2005</p><p style="text-align:center">● 90 at Jan. 2005</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Polynomial of order 2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Y = 0.6558 x<sup>2</sup> – 16,270 x + 2 × 10<sup>8</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0.8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusions</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144670-"></xref>This study investigates the relationship between various solar activity indicators (including sunspot area, F10.7 index) and the behavior of the Kp index during Solar Cycle 23 using multiple analytical and statistical methods.</p>
   <p>We conclude that there is a direct correlation between the F10.7 index for sunspot areas greater than or equal to 500 millionths of a solar hemisphere (MH) and the Kp index during Solar Cycle 23. A time lag is observed in the response of the Kp index to solar activity changes during the ascending and descending phases of the cycle. However, during the solar maximum, this relationship becomes almost synchronous.</p>
   <p>Seasonal variations of the Kp index and F10.7 index were analyzed, revealing distinct patterns:</p>
   <p>These results contribute new insights into Solar Cycle 23, particularly regarding its impact on the Kp index during solar minimum. Notably, our findings highlight short-term fluctuations in the Kp index during low solar activity periods and emphasize asymmetric seasonal variations in geomagnetic responses, particularly between the spring and autumn equinoxes. These insights add a new dimension to previous research on the solar-terrestrial interaction, especially in relation to solar minimum conditions.</p>
   <p>Furthermore, we confirm that solar activity has significant effects on Earth in various ways. Increased solar activity leads to enhanced emissions of X-rays and extreme ultraviolet radiation from the Sun, which cause dramatic changes in the Earth’s upper atmosphere. This atmospheric heating increases both the temperature and density of the atmosphere at high spacecraft altitudes.</p>
   <p>In addition, the frequency of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and solar flares increases, raising the likelihood of spacecraft instrument damage due to energetic particles accelerated during these events. These solar energetic particles also pose a health risk to astronauts in space and airline passengers traveling on high-altitude polar routes.</p>
   <p>Overall, the present study underscores the complex relationship between solar activity and geomagnetic disturbances, offering valuable insights into how variations in solar behavior influence space weather phenomena and their impact on both spacecraft systems and human health.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kane, R.P. (2002) Some Implications Using the Group Sunspot Number Reconstruction. Solar Physics, 205, 383-401. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014296529097
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kane, R.P. (2005) How Good Is the Relationship of Solar and Interplanetary Plasma Parameters with Geomagnetic Storms? Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 110, 1-13. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2004ja010799
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hathaway, D.H. (2015) The Solar Cycle. Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 12, Article No. 4. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, Y., Sun, W., Feng, X.S., Deehr, C.S., Fry, C.D. and Dryer, M. (2008) Statistical Analysis of Corotating Interaction Regions and Their Geoeffectiveness during Solar Cycle 23. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 113, A08106. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2008ja013095
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Alterman, B.L., Desai, M.I., Dayeh, M.A., Mason, G.M. and Ho, G. (2023) Solar Cycle Variation of 0.3-1.29 Mev Nucleon
     <sup>−1</sup> Heavy Ion Composition during Quiet Times near 1 Au in Solar Cycles 23 and 24. The Astrophysical Journal, 952, Article 42. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acd24a
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Espuña Fontcuberta, A., Ghosh, A., Chatterjee, S., Mitra, D. and Nandy, D. (2023) Forecasting Solar Cycle 25 with Physical Model-Validated Recurrent Neural Networks. Solar Physics, 298, Article No. 8. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-02104-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Matzka, J., Stolle, C., Yamazaki, Y., Bronkalla, O. and Morschhauser, A. (2021) The Geomagnetic Kp Index and Derived Indices of Geomagnetic Activity. Space Weather, 19, e2020SW002641. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2020sw002641
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shprits, Y.Y., Vasile, R. and Zhelavskaya, I.S. (2019) Nowcasting and Predicting the Kp Index Using Historical Values and Real-Time Observations. Space Weather, 17, 1219-1229. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2018sw002141
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chapman, S. and Ferraro, V.C.A. (1941) The Geomagnetic Ring-Current: I—Its Radial Stability. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, 46, 1-6. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/te046i001p00001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bartels, J. (1932) Terrestrial-Magnetic Activity and Its Relations to Solar Phenomena. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, 37, 1-52. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/te037i001p00001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tsurutani, B.T., Gonzalez, W.D., Gonzalez, A.L.C., Guarnieri, F.L., Gopalswamy, N., Grande, M., et al. (2006) Corotating Solar Wind Streams and Recurrent Geomagnetic Activity: A Review. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 111, A07S01. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2005ja011273
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Russell, C.T. and McPherron, R.L. (1973) Semiannual Variation of Geomagnetic Activity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 78, 92-108. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/ja078i001p00092
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cliver, E.W., Kamide, Y. and Ling, A.G. (2000) Mountains versus Valleys: Semiannual Variation of Geomagnetic Activity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 105, 2413-2424. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/1999ja900439
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Richardson, I.G. and Cane, H.V. (2013) Near-Earth Solar Wind Flows and Geomagnetic Activity over More than Four Solar Cycles (1963-2011). AIP Conference Proceedings. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4811076
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Richardson, I.G. and Cane, H.V. (2012) Near-Earth Solar Wind Flows and Related Geomagnetic Activity during More than Four Solar Cycles (1963-2011). Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 2, A02. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2012003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tsagouri, I. (2022) Space Weather Effects on the Earth’s Upper Atmosphere: Short Report on Ionospheric Storm Effects at Middle Latitudes. Atmosphere, 13, Article 346. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020346
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Toriumi, S., Airapetian, V.S., Namekata, K. and Notsu, Y. (2022) Universal Scaling Laws for Solar and Stellar Atmospheric Heating: Catalog of Power-Law Index between Solar Activity Proxies and Various Spectral Irradiances. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 262, Article 46. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac8b15
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Amin, E.A., Shaltout, A.M.K., Abdelkawy, A.G.A., Beheary, M.M., Abdelhamid, R. and Shimeis, A. (2025) The Influence of Solar Activity on Geomagnetic Disturbances over Cycles 23 and 24. Advances in Space Research, 75, 6553-6570. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.02.030
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     National Centre for Environmental Information NCEI. Geomagnetic Indices and Data. &gt;https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/geomagnetic-indices 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tapping, K.F. (1987) Recent Solar Radio Astronomy at Centimeter Wavelengths: The Temporal Variability of the 10.7-cm Flux. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 92, 829-838. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/jd092id01p00829
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Davies, K. (1990) Ionospheric Radio. The Institution of Engineering and Technology.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sha, X.M., Du, A.M., Luo, H., Ge, Y.S. and Zhang, Y. (2018) Dependence of the Spring-Autumnal Asymmetry in Geomagnetic Activity on the Solar Main Dipole Magnetic Field Polarity over Last 140 Years. Planetary and Space Science, 158, 1-5. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2018.05.014
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Harden, P. (2005) Solar Activity and HF Propagation. 10th Anniversary of ARCI’s FDIM Dayton Hamfest 2005, Xenia, 81-88.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144670-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Diego, P., Storini, M. and Laurenza, M. (2010) Persistence in Recurrent Geomagnetic Activity and Its Connection with Space Climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 115, 1-15. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2009ja014716
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>