<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jbm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Biosciences and Medicines
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-5081
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-509X
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jbm.2025.138001
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jbm-144504
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Forest Type and Body Size Drive Blood Parasite Infections in Afrotropical Ant-Following Birds
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Elikwo N. F.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Malange
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mélanie
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Tchoumbou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Tiku Regine Claire
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Tabe
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Brice
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Tibab
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jerome
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Fru-Cho
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nota D.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Anong
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sehgal N. M.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ravinder
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"> 
      <sup>5</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aNature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aKonrad-Lorenz Institute for Comparative Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aInqaba Biotec Central Africa Ltd., Yaounde, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff5">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     31
    </day> 
    <month>
     07
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    08
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    1
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    15
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Forest fragmentation due to deforestation is a major threat to biodiversity in the Afrotropics, particularly affecting specialized avian guilds such as ant-following birds. While their population declines have been documented, the influence of habitat disturbance on their prevalence remains poorly understood. This study investigates the prevalence of five blood and tissue parasites (Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon, Trypanosome, and Microfilariae) in ant-following birds across a degraded tropical rainforest in South Western Cameroon, and explores the relationship between infection status, ant-following behavior and bird weight. Blood samples from 520 birds were analyzed using microscopy and PCR, which was run for only microscopy positive samples. Plasmodium was the most commonly encountered parasite genus with a prevalence of 76.5% in Chamaetylas poliocephala, followed by Leucocytozoon with 45.5% in Neocossyphus poensis, Trypanosoma with 40% in Phyllastresphus xavieri, Haemoproteus with 36.4% in Neocossyphus poensis and microfilariae with 27.3% in Alethe castanea. Trypanosoma prevalence was significantly higher in fragmented forests (p = 0.0235) in ant-followers, while the other parasites showed no significant difference across forest types. Ant-following birds consistently had higher parasite prevalence than none ant-followers. The ant-following nature of an avian host influences the prevalence of parasites it harbors. Logistic regression confirmed that higher bird weight significantly increased the odds of infection with several parasites, especially Haemoproteus (p = 0.0009) and Leucocytozoon (p = 0.0022) and Microfilariae (p = 0.0036). These findings underscore the subtle but important effects of habitat disturbance and host physiology on avian parasite ecology.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Neocossyphus poensis
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Alethe castanea
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Chamaetylas poliocephala
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Phyllastrephus xavieri
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Trypanosoma
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Plasmodium
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Tropical rainforests are rapidly disappearing, with serious consequences for birds, ecosystems, and the emergence of infectious diseases. Avian haemosporidians, blood parasites in birds, are often used as models to study human parasites due to their similarities in life cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-1">
     [1]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. These parasites provide important insights into evolutionary and ecological processes. Protozoan blood parasites (or haemoparasites) have been reported in African rainforest birds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-5">
     [5]
    </xref> but there is limited information on how bird traits, such as ant-following behavior and morphology, affect parasite prevalence, particularly in forests undergoing deforestation.</p>
   <p>Protozoan blood parasites belong primarily to the order Haemosporida. Plasmodium species are primarily transmitted by mosquitoes (family Culicidae) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Haemoproteus species are vectored by biting insects including mosquitoes, biting midges (Culicoides), louse flies (Hippoboscidae), and horse flies (Tabanidae). Leucocytozoon species are transmitted by black flies (Simuliidae) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. Microfilariae (larval stages of filarial nematodes) are transmitted by blood-feeding arthropods—mainly Dipterans such as Simulium and Culicoides, but also other bloodsucking insects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-8">
     [8]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. At least 16 genera of filariae are known to infect birds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. Avian trypanosomes are also transmitted by a wide variety of arthropods (Simuliidae, Culicidae, Ceratopogonidae, Hippoboscidae, and Dermanyssidae) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-11">
     [11]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. Compared to their mammalian counterparts, avian trypanosomes are poorly studied, especially in cases of co-infection with other avian haemoparasites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. Despite numerous filarial species found in birds, little is known about their prevalence in ant-following birds.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-"></xref>Ant-following birds, common in tropical ecosystems, exhibit a unique foraging strategy: trailing army ant swarms to catch prey fleeing from the forest floor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. While this behavior offers feeding advantages, it may also increase exposure to parasites. These birds are among the most frequent and dominant swarm attendant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-17">
     [17]
    </xref>. Ant-following specialization is classified into three categories: occasional, regular, and professional <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. Professional followers rely almost exclusively on a single ant species, Eciton burchellii, making them particularly vulnerable to environmental threats such as deforestation and climate change. In Western Kenya, Peters and Okalo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-19">
     [19]
    </xref>, found that the abundance of army ants (Dorylus wilverthi and D. molestus) was positively correlated with the occurrence of specialized ant-followers (Neocossyphus poensis, Alethe poliocephala, and Bleda syndactyla). Craig <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-20">
     [20]
    </xref>, documented 52 regular ant-following bird species in Africa—38 of which belong to three overrepresented families: Muscicapidae (18 spp.), Pycnonotidae (13 spp.), and Turdidae (7 spp.). Because birds have shorter life spans than humans, they are ideal for studying disease dynamics across lifetimes and generations, helping us better understand host-vector-environment interactions.</p>
   <p>Habitat disturbance and conversion to plantations reduce the diversity of birds, ants, and haemosporidian parasites. Forest fragmentation often leads to declines in army ant populations, which in turn impacts the bird species that depend on them <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-21">
     [21]
    </xref>. These cascading effects influence parasite prevalence. Ant diversity generally declines with disturbance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-22">
     [22]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-23">
     [23]
    </xref>, likely due to changes in vegetation and microclimate. Forests converted into mixed-crop fields also show lower ant diversity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. Southern Cameroonian forests had significantly higher ant diversity compared to fallow or crop fields. Long-term Amazonian studies have shown that ant-following bird communities remain stable in undisturbed forests <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-25">
     [25]
    </xref>. In Cameroon, forest degradation has led to sharp declines in insectivorous birds—especially ant-followers—and delayed recolonization of regenerating forests <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-16">
     [16]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-19">
     [19]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-26">
     [26]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-29">
     [29]
    </xref>. Ocampo-Ariza et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-28">
     [28]
    </xref> reported significantly lower ant-following bird richness and encounter rates in oil palm plantations than in protected or agroforestry landscapes. However, no study has examined how parasite prevalence in these birds correlates with body mass.</p>
   <p>Research on bird haemosporidians in Africa has focused largely on Eurillas latirostris and Cyanomitra olivacea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-30">
     [30]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-32">
     [32]
    </xref>, while much less is known about ant-following birds in disturbed habitats. Bonneaud et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-30">
     [30]
    </xref> reported higher Plasmodium prevalence in pristine forests than in disturbed ones. Similarly, Chasar et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-31">
     [31]
    </xref> found higher Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon prevalence in undisturbed areas. Tchoumbou et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-4">
     [4]
    </xref> noted that parasite prevalence decreased with deforestation, but Haemoproteus slightly rebounded following the establishment of palm oil plantations, while Plasmodium continued to decline. There remains a clear knowledge gap regarding protozoan parasite prevalence in ant-following birds in forests undergoing active deforestation.</p>
   <p>In Cameroon, mature forests are shrinking due to logging and slash-and-burn agriculture, while secondary forest cover is expanding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-33">
     [33]
    </xref>. The Talangaye rainforest in the South West region is undergoing rapid deforestation from palm oil development, making it emblematic of the country’s broader deforestation crisis. This loss of forest not only threatens bird biodiversity but may also alter parasite dynamics. While ant-following birds have been well studied in the Neotropics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-34">
     [34]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-38">
     [38]
    </xref>, little is known about their parasite dynamics in African tropical forests undergoing active deforestation.</p>
   <p>This study focuses on five groups of avian blood parasites, Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, Leucocytozoon, trypanosomes, and microfilariae, in ant-following birds. These parasites have important effects on host behavior, fitness, and survival. We hypothesize that:</p>
   <p>1) Parasite prevalence will differ between pristine and fragmented forests in ant-following birds.</p>
   <p>2) Ant-following behavior will influence the prevalence of parasites.</p>
   <p>3) Host body mass will influence the likelihood of parasite infection.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Methodology</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Sample Site and Data Collection</title>
    <p>These samples were collected during large-scale deforestation for the development of a palm oil plantation in the Talangaye rainforest, Koupé-Manengouba sub-division (5˚08'N to 5˚20'N and 9˚22'E to 9˚24'E), in the years 2016 and 2017. Data from Camp 2 (5.17530N, 9.34882E) in January 2016 (pristine forest) and January in 2017 (fragmented forest) were used in this study. All research authorization/ permits were obtained from the competent local administration and authorities of the oil palm plantation</p>
    <p>We captured birds using traditional mist netting technique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-27">
      [27]
     </xref>, weighed, identified, measured, ringed, bled, and released them alive. The banded birds were identified and classified into host families using Borrow and Demey <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-39">
      [39]
     </xref>. Ant-following birds were identified based on previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-19">
      [19]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-20">
      [20]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-40">
      [40]
     </xref>, into three host families Muscicapidae, Pycnonotidae and Turdidae. Approximately 50 μL of blood from the brachial vein of each bird was also collected into cryo tubes containing lysis buffer (10 mMTris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid, 2% sodium dodecyl sulphate) and stored at −20˚C for subsequent molecular analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-41">
      [41]
     </xref> in the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory of the University Buea, Cameroon. In addition, we prepared two thin blood films for each bird, air-dried with the aid of a battery-operated hand fan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-6">
      [6]
     </xref>, fixed in 100% methanol for 1 minute, packed into slide boxes and stained with Giemsa in the laboratory.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Microscopic and Molecular Analysis</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-"></xref>Fixed thin blood smears were stained with Giemsa as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-6">
      [6]
     </xref>. They were then studied using an Olympus BX40 light microscope equipped with a canon microphotographic camera at the highest magnification (1000× for 30 - 45 min) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-2">
      [2]
     </xref> and the intensity of infections determined as recommended by Godfrey et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-42">
      [42]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Microscopy was first done for all samples and then PCR-based methods were employed on all microcopy positive samples to determine the true haemosporidian species composition in each naturally infected individual host. We extracted DNA from blood samples using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Each sample was simultaneously screened for Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon blood parasites using a nested-PCR method described by Hellgren et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-43">
      [43]
     </xref> which amplifies a 479 bp fragment of the parasite’s mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) cytochrome b (cytb) gene. Nested1 Primers set was HaemNF/HaemNR2 which amplified gene segments that are similar in both parasite species; while Nest2 Primers set was HaemF /HaemR2 which amplified specific gene segments to Haemoproteus/Plasmodium spp. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-43">
      [43]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-44">
      [44]
     </xref>. PCR cycling was performed as primary denaturation at 95˚C (5 min), annealing at 50˚C (30 s), extension at 72˚C (45 s), and finally followed by a final extension at 72˚C (10 min) which was run for 20 cycles in 1st nested PCRs and 35 cycles in 2nd nested PCRs. Positive amplicons of the previous study and ultra-pure ddH2O were utilized as positive and negative controls for each PCR reaction set. PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gel. Purification and sequencing were carried out using 15 μl of PCR products (479 bp) by BIONEER, South Korea.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Statistical Analyses</title>
   <p>Prevalence was calculated for each parasite across forest types. Chi-square tests assessed differences in infection prevalence between habitats. T-tests compared bird weights of infected vs. non-infected individuals. Logistic regression models assessed the influence of forest type, ant-following behavior and body weight, on infection probability. All analyses were conducted using R, with significance set at p &lt; 0.05.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Prevalence of Protozoan Parasites across Forest Types</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-"></xref>A total of 520 birds representing 42 species were captured in this study with an overall parasite prevalence of 47%. In the pristine forest 316 birds were sampled and 204 from the fragmented forest with 47% and 49% prevalence of parasites respectively. The protozoan parasites detected in this study were as follows: Plasmodium (P), Haemoproteus (H), Leucocytozoon (L), Microfilariae (M) and Trypanosoma (T). Only Trypanosoma prevalence varied significantly between pristine and fragmented forest (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.37, p = 0.0116). Pristine forest had higher prevalence of infection for Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon parasites while the fragmented forest had higher prevalence for Haemoproteus, Trypanosoma and microfilariae (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>). Plasmodium infections were slightly higher in pristine forests (32.8%) than fragmented ones (29.85%). Trypanosoma infections were more than twice as high in fragmented forests (15.67%) compared to pristine (7.41%). Microfilariae show slightly higher prevalence in fragmented forests (13.43%) than pristine forest (11.11%). Plasmodium was the most commonly encountered parasite genus with a prevalence of 76.5% in Chamaetylas poliocephala, followed by Leucocytozoon with 45.5% in Neocossyphus poensis, Trypanosoma with 40% in Phyllastresphus xavieri, Haemoproteus with 36.4% in Neocossyphus poensis and microfilariae with 27.3% in Alethe castanea (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Prevalence of Parasites by Ant-Follower Behavior</title>
    <p>Sixteen species of birds were identified as ant-followers (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>). Ant-following birds made up 67.5% (351/520) of all the birds sampled. Among these, 47% of ant-following birds tested positive for at least one parasite, compared to 29% prevalence of infection in non ant-following birds. Parasite prevalence varied significantly with ant-following behavior (p &lt; 0.01). The prevalence of protozoan blood</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Prevalence of parasites across forest types. Only Trypanosome was significantly different across forest types.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Prevalence of parasites across forest types. Only Trypanosome was significantly different across forest types.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Prevalence of parasites across forest types. Only Trypanosome was significantly different across forest types.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153370-rId19.jpeg?20250731023529" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Parasite prevalence heat map by bird species. The highest parasite prevalence are written in bold.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153370-rId20.jpeg?20250731023528" />
    </fig>
    <p>parasites in ant-following bird families were as follows; Ant-following birds (Y) showed higher prevalence of Plasmodium, Trypanosome, and Microfilariae and non ant-followers (N) had higher Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon infections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>). We found the highest prevalence in Turdidae, Muscicapidae, and then Pycnonotidae ant-following bird families (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>). Turdidae had the highest prevalence (63.6%) though from a smaller sample size. Significantly higher infection prevalence in ant-followers for Plasmodium (χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.09, p = 0.0044), Haemoproteus (χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.73, p = 0.0031), Leucocytozoon (χ<sup>2</sup> = 9.27, p = 0.0023) and Microfilariae (χ<sup>2</sup> = 12.38, p = 0.0004) were recorded. There was no significant difference in Trypanosome (χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.43, p = 0.1189) prevalence between both groups. Box plot revealed that ant-following birds had higher loads of parasites than non ant-followers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-"></xref>Table 1. Summary of 16 ant-following bird species screened for Protozoan blood parasites.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Species (Scientific Names)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">Examined</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">Infected</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">Prevalence (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Alethe castanea</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">110</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">64</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">36.58</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Bleda notatus</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">49</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">25</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">14.29</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Stiphrornis erythrothorax</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">40</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">9</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">5.14</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Bleda syndactylus</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">25</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">12</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">6.86</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Eurillas latirostris</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">24</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">12</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">6.86</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Neocossyphus poensis</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">22</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">14</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Steidigillas gracilirostris</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">21</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">9</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">5.14</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Calyptocichla serina</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">19</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">7</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Chamaetylas poliocephala</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">17</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">13</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">7.43</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Eurillas virens</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">10</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">1.14</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Phyllastrephus xavieri</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">5</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">4</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">2.29</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Criniger chloronotus</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">2</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">1.14</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Stizorhina fraseri</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">3</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">0.57</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Cossypha cyanocampter</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">0</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">0</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Eurillas curvirostris </p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">0</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">0</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left">Muscicapa sethsmithi</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">1</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left">0.57</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="38.27%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.08%"><p style="text-align:left">351</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:left">175</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.55%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-"></xref>Table 2. Prevalence of Protozoan blood parasites within infected ant-following bird families.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="23.50%"><p style="text-align:left">Host family</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="26.18%"><p style="text-align:left">Number screened</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="26.20%"><p style="text-align:left">Number Positive</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="24.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Prevalence</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="23.50%"><p style="text-align:left">Muscicapidae</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="26.18%"><p style="text-align:left">172</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="26.20%"><p style="text-align:left">88</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="24.12%"><p style="text-align:left">51.2%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.50%"><p style="text-align:left">Pycnonotidae</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="26.18%"><p style="text-align:left">157</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="26.20%"><p style="text-align:left">73</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.12%"><p style="text-align:left">46.5%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="23.50%"><p style="text-align:left">Turdidae</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="26.18%"><p style="text-align:left">22</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="26.20%"><p style="text-align:left">14</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.12%"><p style="text-align:left">63.6%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Prevalence of parasites in ant-following versus non ant-following birds.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153370-rId21.jpeg?20250731023529" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Parasite Prevalence by ant-following behavior.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153370-rId22.jpeg?20250731023528" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Morphometric Traits</title>
    <p>Body mass was measured for all bird species captured and the largest ant-following bird was Neocosyphus poensis (with a mean weight of 52.61 g) and the smallest ant-following bird was Stiphrornis erythrothorax (with a mean weight of 17 g). We analyzed whether birds infected with specific parasites had significantly different weights compared to uninfected birds. For Plasmodium and microfilariae, infected birds were significantly (P &lt; 0.05) heavier than uninfected birds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>). Box plots showing the distribution of bird weights for infected versus uninfected birds for each parasite observed are represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>. Logistic regression confirmed that higher bird weight significantly increased the odds of infection with several parasites, especially Haemoproteus (p = 0.0009) and Leucocytozoon (p = 0.0022).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-"></xref>Table 3. p-values and interpretation of parasites in infected birds.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">Parasite</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Infected birds</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">p-value</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Interpretation</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">Plasmodium</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Slightly heavier</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">0.049</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Significant</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">Haemoproteus</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Slightly lighter</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">0.097</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Not significant</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">Leucocytozoon</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Lighter</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">0.055</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Not significant</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">Trypanosoma</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Heavier</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">0.090</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Not significant</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">Microfilariae</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Much heavier</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">0.000006</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Highly significant</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Distribution of bird weights for infected versus uninfected birds.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153370-rId23.jpeg?20250731023529" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Discussion</title>
   <p>In this study, we examined the prevalence of protozoan blood parasites in the three most common ant-following bird families in Afrotropical forests. Overall, birds from pristine forests exhibited a higher prevalence of protozoan parasites, particularly Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon, except in the case of Haemoproteus, Trypanosoma, and microfilariae. The high prevalence of Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon in undisturbed forests is consistent with previous findings from Cameroon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-30">
     [30]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-31">
     [31]
    </xref>. Interestingly, Trypanosoma prevalence was significantly higher in fragmented forests (p = 0.0235) among ant-following birds, whereas the other parasites did not show significant differences across forest types. Bonneaud et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-30">
     [30]
    </xref> similarly reported that forest type was significantly associated with variation in Plasmodium prevalence in three non ant-following bird species (Andropadus latirostris, Andropadus virens, and Cyanomitra obscura). Our study identified 16 species of regular ant-following birds: 4 in the family Muscicapidae, 7 in Pycnonotidae, and 2 in Turdidae. This represents 42% of the 38 regular ant-followers identified by Craig <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-20">
     [20]
    </xref>, who documented 18 Muscicapidae, 13 Pycnonotidae, and 7 Turdidae species. Notably, members of the Turdidae family have shown haemosporidian prevalence as high as 94% in temperate regions such as Germany <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-45">
     [45]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Ant-following birds are insectivorous species that rely on swarms of army ants, particularly driver ants of the subfamily Dorylinae in tropical Africa, to flush arthropods and small vertebrates from the forest floor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-16">
     [16]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-46">
     [46]
    </xref>. Among African passerines, these species are considered especially vulnerable to forest loss and fragmentation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-16">
     [16]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-26">
     [26]
    </xref>. Because many of the flushed arthropods are vectors of protozoan parasites, this foraging strategy likely increases parasite exposure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-6">
     [6]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-9">
     [9]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Five groups of protozoan blood parasites were detected in this study, with an overall infection prevalence of 47%. All five parasite types have previously been recorded in Afrotropical birds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-46">
     [46]
    </xref>. Specifically, 47% of ant-following birds tested positive for at least one parasite, compared to only 29% in non-ant-following birds. This difference was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.01), supporting earlier suggestions that ant-following behavior increases parasite risk <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-40">
     [40]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Previous studies have reported even higher parasite prevalence in Afrotropical birds (68.8% - 82.8%) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-47">
     [47]
    </xref>. However, Chaisi et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-47">
     [47]
    </xref> relied on qPCR and nested PCR rather than microscopy, which can detect gametocytes and distinguish active from latent infections. In contrast, our study used nested PCR only on samples that tested positive via microscopy. Among the 16 bird species sampled, 14 tested positive for protozoan parasites. Only two species, Cossypha cyanocampter and Eurillas curvirostris, showed no infections, but as only one individual was sampled per species, no conclusions can be drawn regarding their parasite status. Larger sample sizes will be necessary to determine whether these species are truly free of protozoan infections.</p>
   <p>Among ant-following species with a sample size ≥ 15, the most parasite-rich species were Chamaetylas poliocephala, Neocossyphus poensis, Phyllastrephus xavieri, and Alethe castanea. This threshold was used to minimize bias due to differing sample sizes across host species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-48">
     [48]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The high prevalence of microfilariae in Alethe castanea is consistent with previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-40">
     [40]
    </xref>. This ground-dwelling Muscicapid occurs in all forest types. Sehgal et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-1">
     [1]
    </xref> reported a microfilariae prevalence of 61.5% in A. castanea, with none detected in its close relative, Chamaetylas poliocephala (brown-chested alethe). Waltert et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-49">
     [49]
    </xref> also noted that A. castanea was the most frequent and consistent ant-follower at their study site. Given the high prevalence of both filariae and trypanosomes in this species, we recommend it as a candidate model for drug testing and further research on filarial and trypanosomal infections. Additional studies are needed to identify the specific filarial species involved and to better understand the origin and transmission of nematode infections in A. castanea.</p>
   <p>High prevalence of Leucocytozoon and Haemoproteus was also found in Neocossyphus poensis, possibly due to its status as the most specialized African ant-follower in Kenya’s Kakamega Forest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. It is important to note that ant-following specialization varies: occasional ant-followers feed opportunistically when swarms cross their path, while obligate followers rely heavily on this strategy for survival <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-18">
     [18]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-50">
     [50]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>We also observed generally low parasitemia levels. This may be due to the use of mist nets, which are more likely to capture birds in the chronic phase of infection, while acutely infected individuals may be less active and less likely to be sampled <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. However, parasitemia is not necessarily indicative of disease severity, as even low-level infections can disrupt blood cell production and impair fitness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-51">
     [51]
    </xref>. The observed correlation between body mass and parasite load may reflect greater blood volume or immunosuppression in larger birds, or simply longer exposure due to age.</p>
   <p>In summary, our findings provide strong evidence that ant-following behavior significantly increases the risk of protozoan infection in Afrotropical birds. These birds range widely across forest landscapes and forage near the ground, increasing their exposure to blood-feeding vectors such as mosquitoes (Culicidae) and biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-46">
     [46]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144504-50">
     [50]
    </xref>. Further research on these understudied species is crucial to better understand host-vector-parasite interactions in tropical forests undergoing rapid environmental change.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusion</title>
   <p>Forest fragmentation is associated with increased Trypanosome infection in ant-following birds, while heavier birds are more susceptible to several parasite types. Forest type was a significant predictor only for Trypanosomes (p = 0.0125). There were statistically significant differences in the prevalence of four parasites (Microfilariae, Leucocytozoon, Haemoprotues and Plasmodium) between ant-following and non ant-following birds. Higher bird weight significantly increased the odds of infection with several parasites, especially Haemoproteus (p = 0.0009) and Leucocytozoon (p = 0.0022) and Microfilariae (p = 0.0036). Ant-following birds have higher parasitemia than non-ant followers. These results highlight the need to integrate parasitological surveillance into avian conservation strategies.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors are immensely grateful for the international collaboration of Prof. Kevin Njabo which facilitated the completion of this work. We are grateful for authorization and field support in the forest granted by Dr. Blessed Okole and Mr. Akumsi Alfred. The authors are also immensely grateful to Mr. Forzi Francis (ornithologist) for his professional help during fieldwork as well as all the assistance of students and field guides in the PEER project 4-360.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>Funding</title>
   <p>This study received financial support from U.S. Agency for International Development through Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research (project 4-360) awarded to Prof. Anong Damian Nota of the University of Buea, Cameroon and also from a Conservation Action Research Network, USA grant and Idea Wild Equipment, USA grant awarded to Dr. Malange Nanyongo.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sehgal, R.N.M., Jones, H.I. and Smith, T.B. (2005) Blood Parasites of Some West African Rainforest Birds. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 67, 295-301. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.67.295
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Valkiūnas, G., Iezhova, T.A., Loiseau, C., Smith, T.B. and Sehgal, R.N.M. (2008) New Malaria Parasites of the Subgenus Novyella in African Rainforest Birds, with Remarks on Their High Prevalence, Classification and Diagnostics. Parasitology Research, 104, 1061-1077. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1289-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Valkiūnas, G. and Iezhova, T.A. (2018) Keys to the Avian Malaria Parasites. Malaria Journal, 17, Article No. 212. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2359-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tchoumbou, M.A., Mayi, M.P.A., Malange, E.N.F., Foncha, F.D., Kowo, C., Fru-cho, J., et al. (2020) Effect of Deforestation on Prevalence of Avian Haemosporidian Parasites and Mosquito Abundance in a Tropical Rainforest of Cameroon. International Journal for Parasitology, 50, 63-73. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.10.006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Malange, N.F.E., Anong, D.N., Tchoumbou, M.A., Jerome, F.C., Tabe, T.R.C., Tibab, B. and Ravinder, N.M.S. (2020) Effects of Deforestation on Avian Parasitic Co-Infections in Recaptured Birds from an African Tropical Rainforest. Nano-Technology and Applications, 2, 1-13.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Valkiūnas, G. (2005) Avian Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia. CRC Press. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ferraguti, M., Martínez-de la Puente, J., Ruiz, S., Soriguer, R. and Figuerola, J. (2013) On the Study of the Transmission Networks of Blood Parasites from SW Spain: Diversity of Avian Haemosporidians in the Biting Midge Culicoides circumscriptus and Wild Birds. Parasites &amp; Vectors, 6, Article No. 208. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-208
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bartlett, C.M. (2009) Filarioid Nematodes. In: Atkinson, C.T., Thomas, N.J. and Hunter, D.B., Eds., Parasitic Diseases of Wild Birds, Wiley-Blackwell, 439-462.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aliota, M.T., Chen, C., Dagoro, H., Fuchs, J.F. and Christensen, B.M. (2011) Filarial Worms Reduce Plasmodium Infectivity in Mosquitoes. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 5, e963. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000963
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Allen, J.L., Kollias, G.V., Greiner, E.C. and Boyce, W. (1985) Subcutaneous Filariasis (Pelecitus sp.) in a Yellow-Collared Macaw (Ara auricollis). Avian Diseases, 29, 891-894. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/1590686
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Votýpka, J. and Svobodová, M. (2004) Trypanosoma Avium: Experimental Transmission from Black Flies to Canaries. Parasitology Research, 92, 147-151. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-003-1034-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Černý, O., Votýpka, J. and Svobodová, M. (2011) Spatial Feeding Preferences of Ornithophilic Mosquitoes, Blackflies and Biting Midges. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 25, 104-108. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2010.00875.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Valkiūnas, G., Iezhova, T.A., Carlson, J.S. and Sehgal, R.N.M. (2011) Two New Trypanosoma Species from African Birds, with Notes on the Taxonomy of Avian Trypanosomes. Journal of Parasitology, 97, 924-930. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1645/ge-2796.1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ivković, M., Kesić, M., Mihaljević, Z. and KÚDELA, M. (2013) Emergence Patterns and Ecological Associations of Some Haematophagous Blackfly Species along an Oligotrophic Hydrosystem. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 28, 94-102. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12019
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sehgal, R.N.M., Valkiūnas, G., Iezhova, T.A. and Smith, T.B. (2006) Blood Parasites of Chickens in Uganda and Cameroon with Molecular Descriptions of Leucocytozoon schoutedeni and Trypanosoma gallinarum. Journal of Parasitology, 92, 1336-1343. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1645/ge-927r.1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Peters, M.K., Likare, S. and Kraemer, M. (2008) Effects of Habitat Fragmentation and Degradation on Flocks of African Ant-Following Birds. Ecological Applications, 18, 847-858. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1295.1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rettenmeyer, C.W., Rettenmeyer, M.E., Joseph, J. and Berghoff, S.M. (2010) The Largest Animal Association Centered on One Species: The Army Ant Eciton burchellii and Its More than 300 Associates. Insectes Sociaux, 58, 281-292. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-010-0128-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chaves-Campos, J. (2010) Ant Colony Tracking in the Obligate Army Ant-Following Antbird Phaenostictus mcleannani. Journal of Ornithology, 152, 497-504. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0607-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Peters, M.K. and Okalo, B. (2009) Severe Declines of Ant-Following Birds in African Rainforest Fragments Are Facilitated by a Subtle Change in Army Ant Communities. Biological Conservation, 142, 2050-2058. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.035
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Craig, A.J.F.K. (2022) African Birds as Army Ant Followers. Journal of Ornithology, 163, 623-631. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-022-01987-0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Laurance, W.F., Lovejoy, T.E., Vasconcelos, H.L., Bruna, E.M., Didham, R.K., Stouffer, P.C., et al. (2002) Ecosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: A 22‐Year Investigation. Conservation Biology, 16, 605-618. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01025.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Majer, J.D., Orabi, G. and Bisevac, L. (2007) Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Pass the Bioindicator Scorecard. Myrmecological News, 10, 69-76.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gunawardene, N.R., Majer, J.D. and Edirisinghe, J.P. (2010) Investigating Residual Effects of Selective Logging on Ant Species Assemblages in Sinharaja Forest Reserve, Sri Lanka. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 555-562. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.012
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fotso Kuate, A., Hanna, R., Tindo, M., Nanga, S. and Nagel, P. (2014) Ant Diversity in Dominant Vegetation Types of Southern Cameroon. Biotropica, 47, 94-100. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12182
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Stouffer, P.C., Jirinec, V., Rutt, C.L., Bierregaard, R.O., Hernández‐Palma, A., Johnson, E.I., et al. (2020) Long-Term Change in the Avifauna of Undisturbed Amazonian Rainforest: Ground-Foraging Birds Disappear and the Baseline Shifts. Ecology Letters, 24, 186-195. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13628
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Waltert, M., Bobo, K.S., Sainge, N.M., Fermon, H. and Mühlenberg, M. (2005) From Forest to Farmland: Habitat Effects on Afrotropical Forest Bird Diversity. Ecological Applications, 15, 1351-1366. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tchoumbou, M.A., Malange, E.N.F., Tiku, C.T., Tibab, B., Fru-Cho, J., Tchuinkam, T., Awah-Ndukum, J., Anong, D. and Ravinder, N.M.S. (2020) Response of Understory Bird Feeding Groups to Deforestation Gradient in a Tropical Rainforest of Cameroon. Tropical Conservation Science, 13, 1-12.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ocampo-Ariza, C., Denis, K., Njie Motombi, F., Bobo, K.S., Kreft, H. and Waltert, M. (2019) Extinction Thresholds and Negative Responses of Afrotropical Ant-Following Birds to Forest Cover Loss in Oil Palm and Agroforestry Landscapes. Basic and Applied Ecology, 39, 26-37. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2019.06.008
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Powell, L.L., Stouffer, P.C. and Johnson, E.I. (2013) Recovery of Understory Bird Movement across the Interface of Primary and Secondary Amazon Rainforest. The Auk, 130, 459-468. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2013.12202
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bonneaud, C., Sepil, I., Milá, B., Buermann, W., Pollinger, J., Sehgal, R.N.M., et al. (2009) The Prevalence of Avian Plasmodium Is Higher in Undisturbed Tropical Forests of Cameroon. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25, 439-447. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467409006178
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chasar, A., Loiseau, C., Valkiūnas, G., Iezhova, T., Smith, T.B. and Sehgal, R.N.M. (2009) Prevalence and Diversity Patterns of Avian Blood Parasites in Degraded African Rainforest Habitats. Molecular Ecology, 18, 4121-4133. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04346.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Loiseau, C., Iezhova, T., Valkiūnas, G., Chasar, A., Hutchinson, A., Buermann, W., et al. (2010) Spatial Variation of Haemosporidian Parasite Infection in African Rainforest Bird Species. Journal of Parasitology, 96, 21-29. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1645/ge-2123.1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liliane, M.D., Romain, N.J., Caroline, M.S.M., Abigaelle, T. and Loic, T.T.A. (2022) Quantifying Forest Loss in the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve (Center Region, Cameroon). Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 10, 271-288. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2022.109016
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meisel, J.E. (2004) The Influence of Microclimate and Habitat Area on the Ecology of the Army ant Eciton burchellii in Tropical Forest Fragments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin Madison.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brumfield, R.T., Tello, J.G., Cheviron, Z.A., Carling, M.D., Crochet, N. and Rosenberg, K.V. (2007) Phylogenetic Conservatism and Antiquity of a Tropical Specialization: Army-Ant-Following in the Typical Antbirds (Thamnophilidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 45, 1-13. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.07.019
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Borowiec, M. (2016) Generic Revision of the Ant Subfamily Dorylinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys, 608, 1-280. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.608.9427
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Martínez, A.E., Pollock, H.S., Rodrigues, P.F. and Touchton, J.M. (2021) Army-Ant Following in Neotropical Birds: A Review and Prospectus. Ornithology, 138, ukaa078. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithology/ukaa078
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Milloway, O. (2024) Following the Swarm: Making a Short Documentary Film in Panama’s Forest. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Borrow, N. and Demey, R. (2014) Birds of Western Africa. Princeton University Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Peters, M.K. (2010) Ant‐following and the Prevalence of Blood Parasites in Birds of African Rainforests. Journal of Avian Biology, 41, 105-110. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048x.2010.04896.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sehgal, R.N.M., Jones, H.I. and Smith, T.B. (2001) Host Specificity and Incidence of Trypanosoma in Some African Rainforest Birds: A Molecular Approach. Molecular Ecology, 10, 2319-2327. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01339.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Godfrey, R.D., Fedynich, A.M. and Pence, D.B. (1987) Quantification of Hematozoa in Blood Smears. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 23, 558-565. &gt;https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-23.4.558
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hellgren, O., Waldenström, J. and Bensch, S. (2004) A New PCR Assay for Simultaneous Studies of Leucocytozoon, Plasmodium, and Haemoproteus from Avian Blood. Journal of Parasitology, 90, 797-802. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1645/ge-184r1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bensch, S., Stjernman, M., Hasselquist, D., Örjan, Ö., Hannson, B., Westerdahl, H., et al. (2000) Host Specificity in Avian Blood Parasites: A Study of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus Mitochondrial DNA Amplified from Birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267, 1583-1589. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1181
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Strehmann, F., Becker, M., Lindner, K., Masello, J.F., Quillfeldt, P., Schumm, Y.R., et al. (2023) Half of a Forest Bird Community Infected with Haemosporidian Parasites. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, Article 1107736. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1107736
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Willis, E.O. and Oniki, Y. (1978) Birds and Army Ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 9, 243-263. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.001331
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chaisi, M.E., Osinubi, S.T., Dalton, D.L. and Suleman, E. (2019) Occurrence and Diversity of Avian Haemosporidia in Afrotropical Landbirds. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife, 8, 36-44. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.12.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jovani, R. and Tella, J.L. (2006) Parasite Prevalence and Sample Size: Misconceptions and Solutions. Trends in Parasitology, 22, 214-218. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2006.02.011
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Waltert, M., Klug, J., Motombi, F.N., Cejp, B., Bobo, K.S., Soofi, M., et al. (2024) Ant-following Behavior Is Correlated with Plumage Traits in African Understory Birds. The Science of Nature, 111, Article No. 41. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-024-01927-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Willson, S.K. (2004) Obligate Army-Ant-Following Birds: A Study of Ecology, Spatial Movement Patterns, and Behavior in Amazonian Peru. Ornithological Monographs, No. 55, 1-67. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/40166802
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144504-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Palinauskas, V., Žiegytė, R., Iezhova, T.A., Ilgūnas, M., Bernotienė, R. and Valkiūnas, G. (2016) Description, Molecular Characterisation, Diagnostics and Life Cycle of Plasmodium elongatum (Lineage pERIRUB01), the Virulent Avian Malaria Parasite. International Journal for Parasitology, 46, 697-707. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.05.005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>