<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jwarp
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Water Resource and Protection
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    1945-3094
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    1945-3108
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jwarp.2025.177027
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jwarp-144224
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Impacts of Anthropogenic Activities on the Quality of Dam Lakes in Northern Côte d’Ivoire: The Case of the Korhogo, Boundiali and Katiola Dams 
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jacques Touchard
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Adia
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Blé Anouma Fhorest
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Yao
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Emile Gneneyougo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Soro
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Bi Gouessé Henri
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Briton
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Bi Tié Albert
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Goula
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Yao Salomon
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kouakou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Kasahli
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kailou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory for Chemical, Food and Environmental Process Sciences of National Polytechnic Institute Félix Houphouët Boigny of Yamoussoukro, Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aGeosciences and Environment Laboratory, Training and Research Unit in Environmental Science and Management, Nangui Abrogoua University, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Geosciences, University Peleforo Gon Coulibaly of Korhogo, Korhogo, Cote d’Ivoire
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aUniversity Centre for Research and Application in Remote Sensing, Félix Houphouët Boigny University, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     09
    </day> 
    <month>
     07
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    17
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    07
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    529
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    547
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      5,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The objective of this study is to assess the effect of human activities on the quality of dam waters with a view to sustainable resource management. The processing of Landsat 7 satellite images using ENVI 5.1 software has been used to develop land use mapping and to assess human activities in dams’ watersheds. The rate of change and the annual rate of change were used to characterize the dynamics of land use (OCS). Sampling and analysis campaigns were carried out to assess water quality through the use of the Water Quality Index (WQI). Results show that areas occupied by natural spaces in 2000, on all dams’ watersheds with 59.26%, were reduced in favor of humanized areas in 2024 (77.44% of the total area). These anthropized areas are dominated by agricultural activities with 53.46%, followed by buildings and bare soils (23.23%). In addition, the level of anthropization of dams watersheds are respectively 96.23% in Korhogo, 83.06% in Katiola and 53.04% in Boundiali. The IQE assessment indicates that the overall water quality is poor for all the dams with IQE index = 28 for Korhogo, IQE index = 37 for Katiola and IQE index = 42 for Boundiali. During rainy season, water quality is poor for all dams. However, during dry season, the dams are divided into two quality classes. Poor water quality is found at Korhogo and Katiola dams, while Boundiali dam is in mediocre quality class. The content of COD, BOD, Fe, Mn, Pb, As, Hg, and pesticides have been identified as parameters responsible for water pollution. The implementation of integrated management strategies for different watersheds could reverse the adverse effects of human activities on water quality.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Land Use
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Human Activities
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Pollution
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Dam Water
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Access to fresh water, in sufficient quantity and quality, is essential for all aspects of life and for sustainable development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. Indeed, fresh water is a precious resource indispensable for human health, food and energy security, poverty eradication and many other aspects of sustainable development. However, its availability in quality and quantity is a major concern for countries that must meet their increasingly growing needs for economic development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Indeed, since the 1950s, the Earth’s climate has undergone changes represented, essentially by warming due to greenhouse gases, in close relation with human activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. Global changes, especially climate change, changes in land use and the intensification of human activities, have modified hydrological dynamics and quality of freshwater resources on a global scale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. This situation has increased the imbalance between water resources and uses, particularly for drinking water. In many countries, dam reservoirs represent a strategic source of drinking water supply in a context of high climate variability and water stress. However, the quality of water stored in these reservoirs is increasingly compromised by the intensification of anthropogenic pressures such as unplanned urbanization, extensive agricultural activities, domestic and industrial discharges, as well as deforestation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-6">
     [6]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. The dam reservoirs of Côte d’Ivoire, particularly those located in the northern part, are not spared the effects of global changes. Indeed, since their commissioning in the 1990s, they have been subject to the exacerbated effects of global warming and anthropogenic pressures. These effects seriously compromise the potability of water from the reservoirs, making treatment more complex and costly, and even ineffective in certain situations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. Although these dams play a crucial socio-economic role, few studies have focused on assessing the physicochemical quality of their waters in relation to anthropogenic pressures, particularly land use changes. This situation limits the understanding of the dynamics of dam water quality alteration and thus hinders the implementation of effective integrated water resource management strategies. This study therefore aims to assess the effect of land use dynamics in the supply watersheds on the quality of reservoir waters.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Material</title>
    <p>The study area is located in the northern part of Côte d’Ivoire beyond 8˚ North latitude with eleven regions Bounkani, Gontoungo, Tchologo, Hambol, Bere, Poro, Bagoue, Woroddougou, Kabadougou, Folon and Bafing. The area covers approximately 37% of Ivorian national territory. For this study, only dams in the Katiola, Korhogo and Séguela are concerned. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref> shows the geographical location of the three dams in this study.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Presentation of the study area.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9405161-rId12.jpeg?20250805105147" />
    </fig>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-"></xref>The data used consist of Landsat images, notably Landsat 7 ETM+ from the year 2000 and Landsat 8 OLI from the year 2024 with 30 m spatial resolution (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>). They were used to produce land use maps.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-"></xref>Table 1. Data summary.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Data Types</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Data</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Resolution</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Sources</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">MNT</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">30 × 30 m</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">
         <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-https://www.usgs.gov/products/maps/overview">
          https://www.usgs.gov/products/maps/overview
         </xref> </p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Land use</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">30 m</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">
         <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-http://earthexplorer,usgs,gov">
          http://earthexplorer,usgs,gov
         </xref>.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Methods</title>
    <p>To achieve the objectives of this study, land use has been characterized and impacts of human activities have been evaluated on dam waters.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref> shows the diagram for making maps of different land uses for years 2000, and 2024.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Steps for producing land use maps for 2000 and 2024.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9405161-rId15.jpeg?20250805105150" />
    </fig>
    <p>The inventory of human activities in watersheds of the various dams was carried out by combining results of land use maps and those of the field survey. This survey has been done from January 2022 to December 2023. It consisted of making direct observations and discussing with the various users.</p>
    <p>1) Sampling</p>
    <p>Two sampling campaigns were carried out between 2021 and 2022 during dry and rainy seasons. Samples were taken at two key points of different dams: different inlets and dikes for each dam (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>2) Analysis Methods</p>
    <p>pH, temperature, electrical conductivity, and dissolved oxygen were measured in situ using respectively a HANNA HI 99101 pH meter, a WTW MULTI 3332 conductivity meter, and a Sanxin 8X716 oximeter. Samples were then placed in polyethylene bottles, transported in a cooler at 4˚C, and processed in the laboratory within 24 hours. Analyses of other parameters were performed in the laboratory. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref> shows methods used for water analyses.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Sampling key points at drinking water supply dams: Korhogo, Katiola and Boundiali.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9405161-rId16.jpeg?20250805105151" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-"></xref>Table 2. Parameter analysis methods.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Parameters</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Methods</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">pH</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 10523 V 2008</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Turbidity</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 10523 V 2008</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Temperature</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Pt 100</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Conductivity</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 7888 V 1985</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Dissolved oxygen</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 5814 V 2012</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">DCO</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Closed tubes</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">DBO<sub>5</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Respirometric</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Nitrates</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 7890-3 V 1988</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Nitrites</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Diazotization</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Total cyanides</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Pyrazolone-pyrine</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Dissolved Iron (Fe)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">700 (Flame)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Total manganese (Mn)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 15586 V 2003</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Arsenic (As)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 17378-2 V 2014</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Lead (Pb)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 8288 V 1986</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Mercury (Hg)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 12846 V 2012</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Ammonium ( 
         <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mrow> 
             <mtext>
               NH 
             </mtext> 
            </mrow> 
            <mn>
              4 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
           </msubsup> 
          </mrow> 
         </math>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">NF T 90-015-2 V 2000</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Total phosphorus ( 
         <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mrow> 
             <mtext>
               PO 
             </mtext> 
            </mrow> 
            <mn>
              3 
            </mn> 
            <mrow> 
             <mn>
               4 
             </mn> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </msubsup> 
          </mrow> 
         </math>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">ISO 6878 V 2004</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Organohalogen pesticides</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">IN NF ISO 6468-97</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Organophosphate pesticides</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">EN NF ISO V 11369-97</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Carbonate Pesticides</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">EN NF ISO V 11369-97</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Assessment of the Quality of Dam Water</title>
    <p>Several indices are used to assess the quality of dam water, including the arithmetic weighted index (IAPQE) and CCME water quality index (IQE-CCME). These indices have been used in several studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-10">
      [10]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-14">
      [14]
     </xref>. CCME Water Quality Index (CCME-WQI) has been widely adopted worldwide, and is distinguished by its flexibility and absence of manual weighting of parameters. It has been adopted in several countries around the world such as Turkey, India, Chile, Iran, Indonesia and Romania for water quality assessment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-15">
      [15]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-18">
      [18]
     </xref>. Organic Pollution Index (OPI) has used to assess the pollutant load. Eighteen major parameters were taken into account, including pH, COD, nitrates, heavy metals and pesticides. The maximum concentrations were compared with those in the Official Journal of the French Republic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-19">
      [19]
     </xref>, the Ivorian standard being incomplete. The study took place during the dry and rainy seasons of 2021 and 2022.</p>
    <p>1) Calculation of CCME Water Quality Indices (CCME WQI)</p>
    <p>The CCME WQI consists of three components: extent (F1), the number of water quality variables that do not meet the water quality objective; frequency (F2), the number of times the objectives are not met; and magnitude (F3), the degree to which the objectives are not met. The CCME WQI is calculated using equation (3). In this study, the first factor was modified to account for the frequency of samples with exceedances of quality criteria to balance the factor F1. Indeed, studies conducted by Mercier et al 2004 and 2005 demonstrated the existence of a bias resulting from the use of the current formula of F1, therefore the use of modified form in our study. The CCME WQI equations are as follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-20">
      [20]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-21">
      [21]
     </xref>:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          F 
        </mtext> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           1modifie 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          F 
        </mtext> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           1a 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          F 
        </mtext> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           2b 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> (1)</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          F 
        </mtext> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           1a 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             Number 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             of 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             failed 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             variables 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             Total 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             number 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             of 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             variables 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> (2)</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          F 
        </mtext> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           1b 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             Number 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             of 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             non-compliant 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             samples 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             Total 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             number 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             of 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             samples 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> (3)</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          F 
        </mtext> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             Number 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             of 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             failed 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             tests 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             Total 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             number 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             of 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             tests 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> (4)</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          F 
        </mtext> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             nse 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mn>
             0.01 
           </mn> 
           <mtext>
             nse 
           </mtext> 
           <mo>
             + 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             0.01 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> (5)</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         nse 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
            <msubsup> 
             <mo>
               ∑ 
             </mo> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                i 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                = 
              </mo> 
              <mn>
                1 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
             <mi>
               n 
             </mi> 
            </msubsup> 
            <mrow> 
             <msub> 
              <mrow> 
               <mtext>
                 excursion 
               </mtext> 
              </mrow> 
              <mi>
                i 
              </mi> 
             </msub> 
            </mrow> 
           </mstyle> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             Total 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             number 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             of 
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
               
           </mtext> 
           <mtext>
             test 
           </mtext> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> (6)</p>
    <p>If the measured value (denoted Criterion Exceedance in the following equations) does not exceed the quality criterion:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           excursion 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mtext>
          i 
        </mtext> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mrow> 
             <mtext>
               Objective 
             </mtext> 
            </mrow> 
            <mi>
              i 
            </mi> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mrow> 
             <mtext>
               Failed Test Value 
             </mtext> 
            </mrow> 
            <mi>
              i 
            </mi> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(7)</p>
    <p>If the measured value is not higher than the quality criterion, then the mathematical formula for calculating the CCME IQE value is:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           IQE 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           CCME 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           modified 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <msqrt> 
            <mrow> 
             <msub> 
              <mtext>
                F 
              </mtext> 
              <mrow> 
               <mtext>
                 1modified 
               </mtext> 
              </mrow> 
             </msub> 
             <mo>
               + 
             </mo> 
             <msub> 
              <mtext>
                F 
              </mtext> 
              <mn>
                2 
              </mn> 
             </msub> 
             <mo>
               + 
             </mo> 
             <msub> 
              <mtext>
                F 
              </mtext> 
              <mn>
                3 
              </mn> 
             </msub> 
            </mrow> 
           </msqrt> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mn>
             1.712 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(8)</p>
    <p>The index results range from 0 to 100, ranging from the worst water quality to good water quality. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> shows classification of quality classes according to the WQIs.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-"></xref>Table 3. Classification of surface water quality index (WQI) categories <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-21">
        [21]
       </xref>.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Class</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">WQI value</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Water quality</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">95 ≤ WQI &lt; 100</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft"><p style="text-align:left">Water quality is preserved, with virtually no threats or deterioration detected; conditions are very close to natural or desirable levels.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Good</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">80 ≤ WQI ≤ 94</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft"><p style="text-align:left">Water quality is preserved, with only minor threat or deterioration observed; conditions rarely deviate from natural or desirable levels.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Average</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">65 ≤ WQI ≤ 79</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft"><p style="text-align:left">Water quality is usually preserved, but is occasionally threatened or deteriorated; conditions sometimes deviate from natural or desirable levels.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Poor</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">45 ≤ WQI ≤ 64</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft"><p style="text-align:left">Water quality is frequently threatened or deteriorated; conditions often deviate from natural or desirable levels.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Bad</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">0 ≤ WQI ≤ 44</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft"><p style="text-align:left">Water quality is almost always threatened or deteriorated; conditions generally deviate from natural or desirable levels.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>2) Calculation of the organic pollution index (OPI)</p>
    <p>The organic pollution index (OPI) of dams was determined using the method proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-22">
      [22]
     </xref>. The principle is to first divide the values of the polluting elements (ammonium, nitrate, BOD, and phosphates) into 05 classes after calculating the average of these three polluting elements from the values obtained during laboratory analyses. Then, determine the corresponding class number for each parameter using the average data proposed by Leclercq (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>). Finally, the overall organic pollution index of the dam water is obtained by performing an arithmetic average of the pollution classes of all the parameters.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-"></xref>Table 4. Grid of classes of the organic pollution index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-22">
        [22]
       </xref>.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Classes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center"> 
         <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
           <mi>
             N 
           </mi> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mi>
              H 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              4 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
           </msubsup> 
          </mrow> 
         </math>(mg/l)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center"> 
         <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
           <mi>
             N 
           </mi> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mi>
              H 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              3 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
           </msubsup> 
          </mrow> 
         </math>(μg/l)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">BOD5 (mg/l)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center"> 
         <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
           <mi>
             P 
           </mi> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mi>
              O 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              4 
            </mn> 
            <mrow> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </msubsup> 
          </mrow> 
         </math>(μg/l)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">IPO</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Organic Pollution</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;15</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">4.6 - 5.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">None</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">0.1 - 0.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">6 - 10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2.1 - 5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">16 - 75</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">4 - 4.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Weak</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 2.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">11 - 50</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">5.1 - 10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">76 - 250</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 - 3.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Moderate</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2.5 - 6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">51 - 150</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">10.1 - 15</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">251 - 900</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2.0 - 2.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Forte</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;6</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;150</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;15</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;900</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">1.0 - 1.9</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Very strong</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Anthropogenic Activities in Dam Watersheds</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref> shows for each class the average reliability level and the main confusions observed. Overall, results are similar with overall accuracies of 95.61%. and 94.05% then 98.56% and 99.04% finally 99.90% and 96.91% respectively in Korhogo, Boundiali and Katiola for the 2000 and 2024 images. The Kappa indices are almost perfect, ranging from 0.942 (2000), 0.954 (2014) to 0.926 (2024) for Korhogo, 0.979 (2000), 0.943 (2014) to 0.986 (2024) for Boundiali and from 0.998 (2000), 0.971 (2014) to 0.960 (2024). The overall accuracy values, as well as those of the Kappa coefficients, obtained respectively for the 2000 and 2024 images for each of the dam catchment areas, demonstrate the validity of the occupation maps generated. However, some land use classes showed minor confusions in all carried out treatments. With the exception of these situations, all other types of land are quite clearly differentiated. These results are corroborated by the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-23">
      [23]
     </xref> cited by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-24">
      [24]
     </xref> which showed that a land use study can be validated if the Kappa index is between 50% and 75%. These results are in accordance with those obtained in the studies on the Bonoumin and Gourou basins in Ivory Coast with Kappa indices ranging from 0.89 to 99% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-25">
      [25]
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-"></xref>Table 5. Mapping performance of different basin classifications slopes of dams</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Korhogo</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Boundiali</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Katiola</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Years</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2024</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2024</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2024</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Kappa</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">0.942</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">0.926</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">0.979</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">0.986</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">0.998</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">0.960</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Overall details</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">95.61%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">94.05%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">98.56%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">99.04%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">99.90%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">96.91%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref> presents the land use of the different catchment areas. The different maps highlight a strong anthropization of natural environments in the catchment areas of the Korhogo, Boundiali and Katiola dams between 2000 and 2024. In Korhogo dam catchment area, anthropized escapes areas increased from 56% in 2000 to 96.23% in 2024. In Boundiali, in 2000 natural spaces (85.2%) dominated by wooded savannahs (68.8%) and shrub savannahs (11.3%). However, in 2024 the trend is reversed with 53.3% occupation by humanized spaces composed of crops and fallows (35.4%) and perennial crops (17.6%). In Katiola dam watershed, there was a reduction in natural spaces (48.6%) in 2000 composed of wooded savannahs (47.8%) and water bodies (0.8%) to the detriment of human activities (80.6%) in 2024 dominated by annual crops and fallows and perennial crops (52.6% and 21.6%).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Identification of Human Activities in Dam Basins</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref> shows proportions of natural and human-made areas across the three watersheds feeding the dams. Between 2000 and 2024, natural areas decreased from 33.68% to 15.10%, marking a sharp decline in favor of humanized areas. The latter increased from 48.6% to 72.12%, with a clear increase in buildings and bare soils. This dynamic reflects an intensification of human activities, particularly agricultural and urban. Research carried out in West Africa by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-26">
      [26]
     </xref> in the Tamou</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Dynamics of land use in dams of the Korhogo, Boundiali and Katiola (2000 and 2024).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9405161-rId43.jpeg?20250805105156" />
    </fig>
    <p>Total Wildlife Reserve in Niger, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-27">
      [27]
     </xref> in the Tiogo classified forest in Burkina Faso confirms the trend observed in the present study. Similar results were obtained in Ivory Coast by authors such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-28">
      [28]
     </xref> in the department of Séguéla, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-29">
      [29]
     </xref> in the department of Ferkessédougou or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-30">
      [30]
     </xref> in the sub-prefecture of Sinématiali. Indeed, all these authors observed in these different areas, a regression of vegetation in favor of anthropized areas. The reasons for this transformation of land use units in the dams watersheds are multiple. However, these changes could be attributed to three key factors resulting from the population explosion, namely the expansion of annual crops and fallow land, perennial crops and buildings. This situation could be explained by the conquest of natural space by human activities. Moreover, several elements influence the dynamics of land use in the area between 2000 and 2024, notably agricultural expansion and urbanization. Indeed, the areas of buildings and bare soil have increased fivefold, and those of perennial crops have doubled while those of annual crops and fallow land have increased by 10%. Perennial crops comprise of mango and cashew orchards. According to studies carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-30">
      [30]
     </xref> producers in the region, the reasons for the expansion of perennial crops include marketing costs, soil suitability, fertilizer requirements and worker availability. Indeed, according to the results of this survey, the majority of farmers produce mango and cashew nuts because of their economic profitability, which is higher than food crops and cotton. Also, cotton production is very intensive in terms of inputs (fertilizers and pesticides), compare to cashew and mango orchards, which do not require the use of large quantities of fertilizers and phytosanitary products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-31">
      [31]
     </xref>. The same observations were made by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-32">
      [32]
     </xref> in the department of Katiola, where the development of cashew cultivation is materialized by an extension of production areas and a regression of food production areas. The authors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-30">
      [30]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-33">
      [33]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-34">
      [34]
     </xref> justified this attraction towards the production of cashew nuts by the increase in selling prices, which went from 0.15 US dollars/kg to 0.75 US dollars/kg between 1991 and 2017 and contributed enormously to the multiplication of cashew greenfinch areas. In addition to the factor of agricultural development, populations of these different cities have increased with that of Ivory Coast. Indeed, the Ivorian population has increased from 15,366,672 in 1998 to 29,389,150 peoples.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Summary of average land use in the three dams watersheds 2000 and 2024.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Summary of average land use in the three dams watersheds 2000 and 2024.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9405161-rId44.jpeg?20250805105156" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Summary of average land use in the three dams watersheds 2000 and 2024.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9405161-rId45.jpeg?20250805105156" />
    </fig>
    <p>The field survey results highlighted anthropogenic activities on dams watersheds. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref>indicates that main sources of the dams water pollution are linked to the geographical position of the dams. Indeed, Korhogo dam which is located in the city the main source of pollution remains the lack of sanitation followed by agricultural activities. Katiola dams located on the outskirts of this large city, the main source of pollution is agriculture followed by sanitation, while the main source of pollution remains agriculture at Boundiali dam, located in a rural area.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-"></xref>Table 6. Potential sources of pollution from dam water.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Land use classes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="79.00%" colspan="5"><p style="text-align:center">Potential source of pollution</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Activities</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="23.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Chemical parameters</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">Korhogo</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Boundiali</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Katiola</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Buildings and bare soils</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Wastewater/Solid waste</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.65%"><p style="text-align:center">COD, BOD, heavy metals</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">60.81%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Very weak</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">9.67%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Perennial crops</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Agriculture</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Pesticides, heavy metals</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">10.76%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.81%"><p style="text-align:center">17.60%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">21.55%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Annual crops and fallow</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Agriculture</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Pesticides, heavy metals</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">22.40%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.81%"><p style="text-align:center">35.45%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">48.95%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Career</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Mining gold/panning</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Heavy metals</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">2.27%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Presence</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Presence</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Water</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Farming/Breeding</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Heavy metals/Pesticides</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">Yes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Yes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Yes</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Quality of Dam Water</title>
    <p>The average WQI values for the dams’ water quality indices are 28.5, 37.4 and 42.2 respectively for Korhogo, Katiola and Boundiali, according to the graph in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6(A)">
      Figure 6(A)
     </xref>. This indicates that the water quality is poor for all dams. This could be explained by the human origin contamination showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref>. Actually, urbanization and agriculture are the anthropogenic activities in the watershed. Pesticides and fertilizers, used in farming methods to reduce pests and increase yield, and heavy metals are main pollutants of the water of those dams. The presence of carbamates, organophosphates, and organohalogens showed by pesticides analyses support this finding.</p>
    <p>The overall pesticide concentrations detected in the waters are 3.9 µg/l for Korhogo, 0.8 µg/l for Boundiali, and 0.7 µg/l for Katiola, according to the sums of the three most often used pesticides in the zone. These quantities are higher than the 0.5 µg/l Jorf raw water standards for all dams. Comparing to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-35">
      [35]
     </xref>, these values are the same as those found in surface waters in several West African subregional countries as well as Côte d’Ivoire. Korhogo and Boundiali dams present the most polluted waters with highest pollution level.</p>
    <p>Concerning heavy metals results for manganese, lead, mercury, and arsenic in dam water were higher than Jorf recommended levels. Iron and cyanide levels are below acceptable levels. In fact, the levels of arsenic in dam water vary with respect to Katiola (121.80 µg/L), Korhogo (96.54 µg/L), and Boundiali (45.8 µg/L). All of these concentrations are higher than the 10 µg/L JORF threshold for surface water meant for human consumption. Water from Katiola (9.30 µg/L), Korhogo (10.50 µg/L), and Boundiali (6.1 µg/L) dams had the highest lead concentrations. All of these values are higher than the JORF limits (5 µg/L) for surface waters intended for human consumption. The average levels of mercury Korhogo and Boundiali dams waters dams are respectively 1.77 µg/L and 1.01 µg/L. These values are higher than the standard of 1 µg/L. Regarding manganese, the values in the dams are, respectively, 0.61 mg/L at Boundiali, 0.33 mg/L at Korhogo, and 0.27 mg/L at Katiola. The observed values for all of these dams are higher than the JORF-permitted level of 0.1 mg/L for surface waters intended for human consumption.</p>
    <p>Overall, all three dams contained mercury, lead, cyanides, arsenic, iron and manganese at different levels. Comparable results were also observed in three rivers in Côte d’Ivoire (Bandama, Comoé and Bia). Indeed, the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-36">
      [36]
     </xref> reveals the presence of significant heavy metals such as lead, arsenic and iron in these rivers. The same results were obtained in the Hiré area of Côte d’Ivoire by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-37">
      [37]
     </xref> in artisanal mining areas. These results demonstrate the presence of heavy metals in surface waters, but at levels lower than those found in this study. The presence of these metals in dam water could be explained by the degradation of dam watershed surfaces by anthropogenic activities. Indeed, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-38">
      [38]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-40">
      [40]
     </xref>, increasing urbanization, industrialization and the use of chemical fertilizers in agriculture are factors that contribute significantly to the pollution of surface waters by metal contaminants, through industrial discharges, urban drainage systems and runoff.</p>
    <p>Seasonal variation in water quality in dams indicates a deteriorating trend during rainy season. Indeed, during rainy season, quality indices range from 25.3 in Korhogo to 40.4 in Tengrela, while during dry season, these values vary from 31.7 in Korhogo to 54.9 in Boundiali (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7(A)">
      Figure 7(A)
     </xref>). All dams are classified as poor quality during rainy season according to the CCME classification. During dry season, poor water quality is observed in Korhogo and Katiola dams, and mediocre water quality in Boundiali (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6(A)">
      Figure 6(A)
     </xref>). At the spatial level, the water quality is poor throughout the dams (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6(B)">
      Figure 6(B)
     </xref>). The levels of heavy metals and pesticides detected in dam waters are significantly higher during the rainy season than they are during the dry season. Heavy metals are potentially toxic in large quantities or after long-term exposure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-41">
      [41]
     </xref>. They have the ability to move and concentrate in different organs, leading to a variety of health problems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-42">
      [42]
     </xref>. Additionally, certain types of human health problems, including liver failure, gastric and skin cancer, mental health disorders, detrimental effects on the reproductive system, and potentially cancers as well are caused by water containing heavy metal ions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-40">
      [40]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-43">
      [43]
     </xref>. A study conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-44">
      [44]
     </xref> to assess the water quality of the Kufa River in Iraq corroborates the results of this study. This is explained by the variation in rainfall between different seasons. Indeed, during the rainy season, water quantity increases through runoff, which can lead to the intrusion of polluting materials in dam reservoirs. During rainfall, runoff water carries all the pollutants to dams’ reservoirs. These results corroborate those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-45">
      [45]
     </xref>, who observe that water quality is poor in rainy season than in dry season on the Hamman Group dam in Algeria, thus making the water undrinkable. These conclusions do not agree with the studies of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-46">
      [46]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-47">
      [47]
     </xref> on surface waters of Oued Moulouya, as well as with several authors such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-48">
      [48]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-49">
      [49]
     </xref> who noted a higher pollution of the rivers during the dry season compared to the rainy season. This is mostly related to the discharge of wastewater from urban and industrial sources as well as the effects of agricultural practices on water quality throughout the year.</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. Seasonal (A), Spatial (B) evolution of dams WQI CCME values.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9405161-rId46.jpeg?20250805105158" />
    </fig>
    <p>The calculated OPI values showed that dams waters belong to two pollution classes. These are strong organic pollution and moderate organic pollution. The analysis of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7(A)">
      Figure 7(A)
     </xref> showed that the IPO varied both spatially and temporally. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7(A)">
      Figure 7(A)
     </xref> illustrates the average values of the Organic Pollution Index (OPI) together with the corresponding quality categories. The overall range of these values is 2.38 in Korhogo (strong organic pollution) to 3.1 in Boundiali (moderate organic pollution). The dams in towns or their immediate environs like Korhogo and Katiola are highly contaminated. For the Boundiali the IPO then increases to a value of 3, which indicates moderate organic pollution.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-"></xref>Indeed, the organic pollution is strong during rainy season for all dams except that of Boundiali, which remains moderate. Regarding the dry season, except for Korhogo, which remains in the strong organic pollution class, the others are moderate. However, organic pollution in the Katiola dam is more severe than Boundiali, even though both are in the moderate class (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7(B)">
      Figure 7(B)
     </xref>). This could be explained by the geographical position of the dams. Indeed, these three dams are located in different cities. The Korhogo dam is located inside the city, the Katiola dam on the periphery and the Boundiali dam in the rural area. They receive all the wastewater from cities, which is loaded with organic matter. During rainy season, the amount of water entering in dams increases considerably. Rainfall often results in significant runoff, which can carry organic pollutants such as decaying plant matter, fertilizers, and pesticides, thus increasing the organic pollution index. Indeed, increasing urbanization also contributes to the increase in pollution of dams, particularly from domestic and industrial effluents. Also, the intensification of agricultural activities during rainy season, particularly the use of fertilizers and pesticides, can lead to high nutrient input into dams, promoting eutrophication (excessive nutrient enrichment). This seasonal qualitative variation has been widely reported in the literature by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-50">
      [50]
     </xref>. The qualitative deterioration is mainly of anthropogenic origin in relation to agricultural activities by leaching of soils highly loaded with fertilizers and with the discharge of urban wastewater <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-51">
      [51]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-52">
      [52]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Indeed, the discharge of domestic and industrial wastewater from the city’s effluents causes an increase in the levels of these parameters which promote the degradation of the quality of the dam water. However, similar work has shown that the increase in the level of pollution in dry season would be linked to the reduction in the flow rates of the dam while those of the effluents loaded with wastewater from the city remain significant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-46">
      [46]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-47">
      [47]
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.144224-"></xref>Figure 7. OPI Variation in average (A) and seasonal (B) organic pollution indices (OPI) in dam waters.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/9405161-rId47.jpeg?20250805105158" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Conclusion</title>
   <p>The characterization of land use over the past twenty-four years reveals significant changes in the watersheds of the three dams. The analyses show a significant decline in natural areas in favor of anthropized areas for the three watersheds of the different level. The most anthropized watershed is Korhogo at 96.23%, followed by Katiola at 83.06% and Boundiali at 53.04%. The dominant anthropic activities in the watersheds are buildings and bare soils for Korhogo, annual crops and fallow land and perennial crops for Katiola and Boundiali. The CCME Water Quality Index assessment indicates that the water quality is poor for all dams, with 28.5 for Korhogo, 37.43 for Katiola, and 41.93 for Boundiali. The most polluted waters in the dams are Korhogo, Katiola, and Boundiali, respectively. The main source of water pollution is organic. Indeed, the organic pollution index is high for the Korhogo and Katiola dams and moderate for the Boundiali dam. Agricultural activities are responsible for this pollution, with total pesticide levels exceeding the JORF standards for drinking water supply. These pesticides are composed of organohalogens, organophosphates, and carbamates. Heavy metals from wastewater, pesticides, and soil leaching are also responsible for this pollution. To reduce this pollution of dam waters, it is important to establish protective perimeters around dams. Integrated water resource management is a long-term solution for better dam management.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     UN (2018) Rapport de synthèse sur l’objectif de développement durable 6 relatif à l’eau et à l’assainissement. 16.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yao, A.B. (2015) Evaluation des potentialités en eau du bassin versant de la Lobo en vue d’une gestion rationnelle (centre-ouest de la côte d’Ivoire). Master’s Thesis, Université Nangui Abrogoua.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     GIEC (2013) Changements climatiques 2013. Les éléments scientifiques. OMM/PNUE, 34.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vörösmarty, C.J., McIntyre, P.B., Gessner, M.O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., et al. (2010) Global Threats to Human Water Security and River Biodiversity. Nature, 467, 555-561. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023) Climate Change 2021—The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Allan, J.D. (2004) Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35, 257-284. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     UNESCO (2018) Nature-Based Solutions for Water: The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). &gt;https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261424 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Berardo, R., Formica, F., Reutter, J. and Singh, A. (2017) Impact of Land Use Activities in the Maumee River Watershed on Harmful Algal Blooms in Lake Erie. Case Studies in the Environment, 1, 1-8. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2017.sc.450561
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     David, F., Guérin-Schneider, L. and Dazé, A. (2020) Potabilisation des eaux de sur-face en Afrique de l’Ouest—Guide pratique. GRET, 152.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brown, R.M., McClelland, N.I., Deininger, R.A. and Tozer, R.G. (1970) A Water Quality Index—Do We Dare? Water and Sewage Works, 117, 339-343.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yidana, S.M. and Yidana, A. (2009) Assessing Water Quality Using Water Quality Index and Multivariate Analysis. Environmental Earth Sciences, 59, 1461-1473. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0132-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Salomon, K.Y., Brahima, S. and Maxime, K.N. (2024) Impacts of Anthropogenic Activities on Water Quality of Ouangolodougou Dam, Côte d’Ivoire. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14, 64-81. &gt;https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i124607
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kouassi Serge, G., Séraphin, K.K., Lazare, K.K., Alexis, B.L., Félix, K.K. and Dongui, B.K. (2020) Evaluation de la Contamination Chimique des Eaux Souterraines par les Activités Anthropiques: Cas de la Zone d’Ity-Floleu Sous-Préfecture de Zouan-Hounien, Ouest de la Côte d’Ivoire. European Scientific Journal ESJ, 16, 247-274. &gt;https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n6p247
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Marie Florence Kadjo, M., Seraphin Konan, K., Georges Eblin, S., Alex Kouadio, Z., Herve Akaffou, F. and Kouakou Kouassi, L. (2023) Assessment of the Quality of Domestic Water Resources: Case of the San-Pedro River at the Faye Hydroelectric Dam (Southwest Cote d’Ivoire). International Journal of Advanced Research, 11, 549-564. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/17562
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boyacioglu, H. (2009) Utilization of the Water Quality Index Method as a Classification Tool. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 167, 115-124. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1035-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Espejo, L., Kretschmer, N., Oyarzún, J., Meza, F., Núñez, J., Maturana, H., et al. (2011) Application of Water Quality Indices and Analysis of the Surface Water Quality Monitoring Network in Semiarid North-Central Chile. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184, 5571-5588. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2363-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mostafaei, A. (2014) Application of Multivariate Statistical Methods and Water-Quality Index to Evaluation of Water Quality in the Kashkan River. Environmental Management, 53, 865-881. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0238-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tanjung, R., Yonas, M., Suwito, S., Maury, H., Sarungu, Y. and Hamuna, B. (2022) Analysis of Surface Water Quality of Four Rivers in Jayapura Regency, Indonesia: CCME-WQI Approach. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23, 73-82. &gt;https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/143998
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     JORF (Journal Officiel de la République Française) (2023) Limites de qualité des eaux brutes de toutes origines utilisées pour la production d’eau destinée à la consomma-tion humaine, à l’exclusion des eaux de source conditionnées. Fixées pour l’application des dispositions prévues aux articles r. 1321-7 (ii), r. 1321-17 et r. 1321-38 à r. 1321-42 Ministère de la Santé et des Solidarités. (N°31 du 06 décembre 2007 texte N° 17 modifié par Décret n°2022-1720 du 29 décembre 2022—Article 1 et mise vigueur le 1er janvier 2023).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hébert, S. (2005) Comparaison entre l’indice de la qualité générale de l’eau du Québec (IQBP) et l’indice de qualité des eaux de CCME (IQE) pour la protection de la vie aquatique. Québec, Ministère du développement durable, de l’environnement et des parcs, Direction du suivi de l’état de l’environnement, 11.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) (2017) Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life: CCME Water Quality Index, User’s Manual-2017 Update. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines, 1999; Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. &gt;https://ccme.ca/en/res/wqimanualen.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mubedi, J.I., Devarajan, N., Faucheur, S.L., Mputu, J.K., Atibu, E.K., Sivalingam, P., et al. (2013) Effects of Untreated Hospital Effluents on the Accumulation of Toxic Metals in Sediments of Receiving System under Tropical Conditions: Case of South India and Democratic Republic of Congo. Chemosphere, 93, 1070-1076. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.080
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pontius, R.G. (2000) Quantification Error versus Location in Comparison of Categorical Maps. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66, 1011-1016.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kouman, N.N., Akaffou, S.E.V., Pagny, F.P.J., Tiébré, M.S. and Ouattara, D. (2024) Anthropogenic Pressures and Dynamics of Land Use Change in the Rural Area of Béoumi and the Upper Bandama Wildlife Reserve (North-Central Côte d’Ivoire) from 1989 to 2020. Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 19, 57-72. &gt;http://www.Iosrjournals.Org 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kouadio, P.A., Yao, B.K., Kamagate, A., Ahoussi, K.E. and Kouassi, A.M. (2024) Évolution de l’occupation du sol dans les bassins versants fortement urbanisés et leurs impacts sur les ruissellements de surface: Cas de Bonoumin et du Gourou (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, Afrique de l’Ouest). International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 41, 729-744. &gt;http://www.ijias.issr-journals.org 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mamane, B., Amadou, G., Barage, M., Comby, J. and Ambouta, J.M.K. (2018) Dynamique spatio-temporelle d’occupation du sol dans la Réserve Totale de Faune de Tamou dans un contexte de la variabilité climatique (Ouest du Niger). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 12, 1667-1687. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v12i4.13
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tankoano, B., Hien, M., Dibi, N.H., Sanon, Z., Yameogo, J.T. and Somda, I. (2015) Dynamique spatio-temporelle des savanes boisées de la forêt classée de Tiogo au Burkina Faso. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 9, 1983-2000. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v9i4.23
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Konan-Waidhet, A.B., Kouassi, K.H. and Kanga, K.E. (2022) Land Use Dynamics in the Department of Séguéla, Northwestern Côte d’Ivoire. Advances in Remote Sensing, 11, 63-79. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ars.2022.113005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Coulibaly, L., Kouassi, K.H., Soro, G.E. and Savane, I. (2016) Analyse du processus de savanisation du Nord de la Côte d’Ivoire par télédétection: Cas du département de Ferkessédougou. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 17, 136-143.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tiecoura Hamed, C., Mamadou, K. and Koffi Jean Marius Boris, K. (2023) Apport de la télédétection à l’analyse des mutations du paysage agraire de la sous-préfecture de Sinématiali entre 1988, 1998 et 2021 (Nord de la Côte d’Ivoire). International Journal of Advanced Research, 11, 208-219. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/17522
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Coulibaly, T.H., Coulibaly, H.G. and Siyali, W.I. (2020) Mutations des pratiques agricoles et gouvernance foncière dans la sous-préfecture de Sinématiali (Nord ivoirien). Revue du Laboratoire Africain de Démographie et des Dynamiques Spatiales, 2, 123-133.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Assue, Y.J.A., Koné, F.N. and Kouassi, K.C.V. (2023) Dynamique de la culture de l’anacarde et risque d’insécurité alimentaire dans la sous-préfecture de Katiola (Côte d’Ivoire). Revue ESI Preprints, 16, 441-461.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aloko-N’guessan, J., Koffi-Didia, M.A. and Coulibaly, H.T. (2018) Développement agricole et gouvernance foncière à Tioroniaradougou (Nord de la Côte d’Ivoire). EchoGéo, 43, Article ID: 15192. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.15192
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aloko-N’guessan, J., Koffi-Didia, M.A. and Coulibaly, H.T. (2018) Développement agricole et gouvernance foncière à Tioroniaradougou (Nord de la Côte d’Ivoire). EchoGéo, 43, Article ID: 15192. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.15192
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Traoré, S.K., Mamadou, K., Dembélé, A., et al. (2006) Contamination de l’eau souterraine par les pesticides en régions agricoles en Côte-d’Ivoire (Centre, Sud et Sud-Ouest). Journal africain des sciences de l’environnement, 1, 1-9.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ouattara, A.A., Yao, K.M., Soro, M.P., Diaco, T. and Trokourey, A. (2018) Arsenic and Trace Metals in Three West African Rivers: Concentrations, Partitioning, and Distribution in Particle-Size Fractions. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 75, 449-463. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-018-0543-9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kouassi Serge Aristide, Y.A.O. (2022) Apport de l’hydrochimie et de la géochimie environnementale dans l’évaluation des ressources en eau des environnements miniers du département de Divo (Sud-Ouest de la Côte d’Ivoire). Master’s Thesis, Université Félix Houphouët Boigny de Cocody. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hama Aziz, K.H., Mustafa, F.S., Omer, K.M., Hama, S., Hamarawf, R.F. and Rahman, K.O. (2023) Heavy Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment: Efficient and Low-Cost Removal Approaches to Eliminate Their Toxicity: A Review. RSC Advances, 13, 17595-17610. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra00723e
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xu, F., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Liang, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, F., et al. (2022) Assessing the Environmental Risk and Mobility of Cobalt in Sediment near Nonferrous Metal Mines with Risk Assessment Indexes and the Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films (DGT) Technique. Environmental Research, 212, Article ID: 113456. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113456
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Singh, A., Sharma, A., Verma, R.K., Chopade, R.L., Pandit, P.P., Nagar, V., et al. (2022) Heavy Metal Contamination of Water and Their Toxic Effect on Living Organisms. In: Dorta, D.J. and de Oliveira, Eds., D.P., The Toxicity of Environmental Pollutants, IntechOpen, 1-26. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105075
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nighat, S., Nadeem, M.S., Mahmood, T., Kayani, A.R., Mushtaq, M. and Ul Hassan, M. (2016) Estimation of Heavy Metals in Indian Flying Fox Pteropus giganteus (Brünnich, 1782) from Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 48, 1787-1792.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Oves, M., Khan, M.S., Zaidi, A. and Ahmad, E. (2022) Soil Contamination, Nutritive Value, and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals: An Overview. In: Kumar, J., Gaur, S., Sri-vastava, P.K., Mishra, R.K., Prasad, S.M. and Chaudan, D.K., Eds., Heavy Metals in Plants: Physiological to Molecular Approach, CRC Press Publishing.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, P., Yang, M., Lan, J., Huang, Y., Zhang, J., Huang, S., et al. (2023) Water Quality Degradation Due to Heavy Metal Contamination: Health Impacts and Eco-Friendly Approaches for Heavy Metal Remediation. Toxics, 11, Article 828. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11100828
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kizar, F.M. (2018) A Comparison between Weighted Arithmetic and Canadian Methods for a Drinking Water Quality Index at Selected Locations in Shatt Al-Kufa. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 433, Article ID: 012026. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/433/1/012026
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lalaoui, M. (2021) Contribution à l’Etude Biogéochimique des Eaux du Barrage Ham-mam Grouz. Master’s Thesis, Centre Universitaire A. Boussouf de Mila (Algérie).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Talhaoui, A., El Hmaidi, A., Jaddi, H., Ousmana, H. and Manssouri, I. (2020) Calcul De L’indice De Qualité De L’eau (IQE) Pour L’évaluation De La Qualité Physico-Chimique Des Eaux Superficielles De L’Oued Moulouya (NE, Maroc). European Scientific Journal ESJ, 16, 64-85. &gt;https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n2p64
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     El Hmaidi, A., Talhaoui, A., Manssouri, I., Jaddi, H. and Ousmana, H. (2020) Contribution of the Pollution Index and GIS in the Assessment of the Physico-Chemical Quality of the Surface Waters of Moulouya River (NE, Morocco). La Houille Blanche, 106, 45-54. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2020028
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bordalo, A.A., Teixeira, R. and Wiebe, W.J. (2006) A Water Quality Index Applied to an International Shared River Basin: The Case of the Douro River. Environmental Management, 38, 910-920. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0037-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yogendra, K. and Puttaiah, E.T. (2008) Determination of Water Quality Index and Suitability of an Urban Water Body in Shimoga Town, Karnataka. The 12th World Lake Conference, 342-346.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aristide, Y.K.S. and Ernest, A.K. (2020) Caractérisation Physico-Chimique des Eaux de Surface dans un Environnement Minier Du Centre-Ouest de la Côte d’Ivoire: Cas du Département de Divo. European Scientific Journal (ESJ), 16, 293-315. &gt;https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n12p293
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Taybi, A.F., Mabrouki, Y., Berrahou, A. and Chaabane, K. (2016) Évolution spatiotem-porelle des paramètres physico-chimiques de la Moulouya. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 7, 272-284.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.144224-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vital, S.N.C., Robert, N. and Benoît, N.M. (2018) Pollution de L’eau de Consommation Humaine et Risques Sanitaires a Court Terme: Cas du Bassin Versant de la Menoua (Ouest-Cameroun). European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14, 96-117. &gt;https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n3p96
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>