<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jhepgc
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2380-4327
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2380-4335
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jhepgc.2025.113054
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jhepgc-143951
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    A Quantum Entangled Fractal Superfluid Universe
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Otto
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ziep
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aIndependent Scholar, Berlin, Germany
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     20
    </day> 
    <month>
     05
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    11
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    03
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    850
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    868
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      30,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      8,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      8,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The cosmological redshift, the expansion of the universe, the origin of cosmic rays including the microwave background is set in context to a fractal superfluid universe. Quantum entanglement is explained by highly correlated k-components of quadratic maps of curvature which captures growth of organic matter as well conductivity plateaus in layer structures. A mechanism of controlled ultra-high energy emission is discussed. A fractal superfluid universe model is capable to solve the cosmological constant problem, the Dirac monopole problem and the phenomenon of quantum entanglement for unified forces.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Cosmic Rays
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Cosmic Microwave Background
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Apparent Universe Expansion
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Cosmological Redshift
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Conductivity Plateau
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Air Ionization
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-"></xref>Gravitational field equations allow to regard stress-energy T<sub>μν</sub> as an equilibrium fluid or superfluid state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. From the viewpoint of coupling constants unified dimensionless fields as non-equilibrium, dimensionless states are capable to cover energy ranges of 10<sup>2</sup>…10<sup>3</sup> orders of magnitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. In macrophysics a pseudo-congruence on energy scale above 10<sup>20</sup> eV as a fractal resolved potential difference explains the phenomenon of quantum entanglement (QE) for unified fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. A fractal unified field allows to shift the origin of cosmic rays (CR) to a local bifurcating spacetime which explains also redshift and expansion of the universe by the influence of simplest cycles to vacuum susceptibilities. Experiments concerning the cosmological constant problem (CCP), QE and the Dirac monopole (DM) seem to prevent a unified theory of all forces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-4">
     [4]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. The origin of CR is an open problem which is shifted to galactic forces. The present paper explains e.g. air ionization measured in vegetation areas by a bifurcating spacetime as a persistent non-equilibrium fractal zeta universe (FZU) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Action ℒ as Equation (14) is minimized for simplest cycles of chaotic quadruples of shifts q<sub>sc</sub> = {1, δ<sub>k</sub>, δ<sub>k</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>, δ<sub>k</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>} as q<sub>sc</sub>ℒ = 0 whereas for an elastic continuum only δ<sub>k</sub>ℒ = 0. In an open system ultra-high tensile forces envelop any matter different from elastic fields. Particle clouds of large masses are generated by quadratic in mass iterated forces. Measured diurnal variations of ion concentrations as well as seasonal variations of CR count rates confirm a quantum entangled superfluid universe in Section 10. FZU resolves CCP, QE as well DM by a bifurcating spacetime supposing k-component pseudo-congruences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. The origin of QE is a k-component pseudo-congruent curvature as an alternating current between capacitor-like layers. The heat energy gain arises from superfluid layer-temperature vs. altitude-entropy changes as a Carnot process in Section 9. The origin of charge and mass by Feigenbaum renormalization using Hieb’s hypothesis is an open problem <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-8">
     [8]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. Hieb’s conjecture 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
      <mi>
        π 
      </mi> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         α 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> already had accuracy 9 × 10<sup>−4</sup> with Feigenbaum constant δ<sub>F</sub> and fine structure constant α<sub>f</sub> which is refinable on entropy-surface-area 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mn>
        4 
      </mn> 
      <mi>
        π 
      </mi> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mo>
           ⋮ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             g 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             n 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> by optimizing 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        ⋯ 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         n 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-10">
     [10]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Vacuum energy ρ<sub>vac</sub> in quantum statistics (QS) ρ<sub>QS</sub> is hundreds of orders of magnitude greater than the experimental value ρ<sub>exp</sub> (CCP) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-6">
     [6]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. Contrary, QS measures QE as a spooky action at distance. However, high-precision nanostructure measurements are in good agreement with QS. DM requires a B-field line pole in the complex electromagnetic field E + iB realized e.g. by a ball of segments as a large cloud (monopole) mass where the quadratic in mass interaction dominates over linear rest mass <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. The aim of the present note is to describe meV semiconductor experiments to clarify both fundamental problems. Charge quanta are experimentally detected for a mass ratio 10<sup>20</sup> between oil drop and electron <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. In bifurcating spacetime of FZU the Millikan experiment (ME), the quantum Hall (QH) effect, atmospheric clouds and universe clouds are shown to be self-similar tight-binding models each of mass ratio of about 10<sup>20</sup> extending Dirac’s large number hypothesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. A liquid state tight-binding approach is capable to explain QH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. A charge of small mass m<sub>e</sub> floats in a quasi-homogeneous large background cloud mass M<sub>p</sub>. Accordingly, a QH tight-binding model with Born-Oppenheimer parameter κ<sub>BO</sub> of accuracy κ<sub>BO</sub> = 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> requires a thermal background cloud of Planck mass M<sub>p</sub> ≃ 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> g <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Surprisingly, atmospheric clouds move with similar mass ratio with respect to earth mass. Mass ratios of universe mass M<sub>u</sub> ≃ 10<sup>56</sup> g to that of solar system 10<sup>33</sup> g (10<sup>24</sup>), atmospheric clouds of mass 10<sup>8</sup> g of volume 10<sup>9</sup> m<sup>3</sup> with density 0.5 g∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup> to earth mass of 10<sup>27</sup> g (10<sup>19</sup>), ME oil drop of mass 10<sup>−</sup><sup>12</sup> g to electron mass 10<sup>−</sup><sup>30</sup> g (10<sup>18</sup>) are set to 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         κ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          O 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         4 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Opposed is a liquid cloud slushy mass 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> g surrounding an electron mass 10<sup>−</sup><sup>30</sup> g (10<sup>25</sup>) as a correlated thermal potential V<sub>T</sub> of path-ordered, non-dissipative, non-radiative flow lines giving κ<sub>BO</sub> = 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> whereas κ<sub>BO</sub> = 10<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup> at ME. A mass ratio of wood of 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> g to leaf mass of 3 × 10<sup>4</sup> g is 10<sup>2</sup> giving an uncertainty of about 0.3. The Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) of plant growth displays plateaus between 0.2 and 0.6 for a 120-day cycle in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. Orbits of period-doubling k-components of a quadratic map alternate with a lap number l<sub>ω</sub> of equivalent periods ω. Simplest cycles q<sub>sc</sub> of iterated quadruples k + 3 ∊ {k, k + 1, k + 2} yield a bicubic bi spinor norm solving CCP. Nanostructure experiments and cosmological and global parameter are self-similar <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. In Section 2 physical scales are introduced in the quadratic map of dimensionless curvature. Section 3 relates multi-dimensional action functionals to one-dimensional complex holomorphic functions like the Dirichlet L-function or ξ(z). The physical motivation is that a closed one-dimensional complex contour is a curvature or time-thermal Carnot cycle as a base for stress-energy stability. Section 4 confirms Feynman diagram series for all interaction which are based on the simplest cycles of iterated curvature. In Section 6 equivalence between the quadratic map and invariant substitutions of a quartic polynomial of curvature is seen in context of Friedmann equations. Inducible CR-emission is predicted by transitions between conductivity plateaus in QH in Section 7. QH plateaus are described as holomorphic leaves of a growing tree generating non-reversible Carnot cyclic clouds with quadratic-in-mass van der Waals-like interaction.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Unified Field Equations as the Simplest Cycles</title>
   <p>The quadratic map based FZU implies Lorentz-invariance by complex fixpoints of binary invariant substitutions γ(ϕ<sub>3</sub>). In Hermite variables the universe radius R<sub>u</sub> = H(ϕ<sub>4</sub>)/48ϕ<sub>4</sub> enters the time integral of the Friedmann solution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-17">
     [17]
    </xref></p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        c 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        t 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∫ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <msqrt> 
            <mrow> 
             <msub> 
              <mi>
                R 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                u 
              </mi> 
             </msub> 
            </mrow> 
           </msqrt> 
           <mtext>
             d 
           </mtext> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              R 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              u 
            </mi> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <msqrt> 
            <mrow> 
             <msub> 
              <mi>
                ϕ 
              </mi> 
              <mn>
                3 
              </mn> 
             </msub> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                ( 
              </mo> 
              <mrow> 
               <msub> 
                <mi>
                  R 
                </mi> 
                <mi>
                  u 
                </mi> 
               </msub> 
              </mrow> 
              <mo>
                ) 
              </mo> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
           </msqrt> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (1)</p>
   <p>with Hessian H(ϕ<sub>4</sub>) of a quartic polynomial ϕ<sub>4</sub> with 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Φ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         n 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         t 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <msubsup> 
        <mo>
          ∑ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mtext> 
         </mtext> 
         <mo>
           = 
         </mo> 
         <mtext> 
         </mtext> 
         <mn>
           0 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mi>
          n 
        </mi> 
       </msubsup> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           a 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           t 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. A cubic invariant polynomial ϕ<sub>3</sub>(R<sub>u</sub>) implies discriminant changes 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Δ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Δ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         ϕ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> under γ(ϕ<sub>3</sub>) with 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mn>
        4 
      </mn> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         Q 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        27 
      </mn> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Δ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         ϕ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> for invariant Q(ϕ<sub>3</sub>) ≃ g<sub>3</sub>, H(ϕ<sub>3</sub>) ≃ g<sub>2</sub>. In FZU, the simplest cycle quadruples q = {1, δ<sub>k</sub>, δ<sub>k</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>, δ<sub>k</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>} are one addition step k, k + 1, k + 2 on elliptic curves with a linear relation between three polynomial coefficients a<sub>i</sub>. This is equivalent to the singular case of a normal bicubic field 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ℕ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         [ 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Δ 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ] 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi mathvariant="double-struck">
        K 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         [ 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         ∂ 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         ] 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi mathvariant="double-struck">
         K 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ′ 
       </mo> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         [ 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         ∂ 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         ] 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi mathvariant="double-struck">
         K 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ″ 
       </mo> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         [ 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         ∂ 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         ] 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with a square discriminant of a quadratic field Δ<sub>2</sub> = ⎕. Discriminants Δ<sub>n</sub> = Δ<sub>2</sub> = Δ<sub>3</sub> = Δ<sub>4</sub> are the n<sup>2</sup>∙n<sup>2</sup> dimensional determinant 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        q 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mover accent="true"> 
           <mi>
             a 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             ^ 
           </mo> 
          </mover> 
          <mo>
            ⊗ 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            I 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            I 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            ⊗ 
          </mo> 
          <mover accent="true"> 
           <mi>
             a 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             ^ 
           </mo> 
          </mover> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. This holds for a linear relation 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         a 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          j 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         a 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ′ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ′ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         a 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ″ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ″ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> between three coefficients of 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msqrt> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
      </msqrt> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, e.g. for n = 2</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msqrt> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           q 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            j 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msqrt> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtable> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                12 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                12 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                21 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                11 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                22 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                12 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                21 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                22 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                11 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                12 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                21 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               a 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                21 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
        </mtable> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (2)</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msqrt> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
      </msqrt> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is singular if 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         a 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          11 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         a 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          22 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         a 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          12 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. A three-component linear relation (10) appears for a quadruple of shifts q = {1, δ<sub>k</sub>, δ<sub>k</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>, δ<sub>k</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>}. A linear sequence c<sub>k</sub>a<sub>k</sub> + c<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub>a<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub> + c<sub>k</sub><sub>+2</sub>a<sub>k</sub><sub>+2</sub> = 0 enters a local process. This q<sub>sc</sub> linear relation between three functionals holds e.g. for general relativity. Here a<sub>ij</sub> ≃ R, Λ, T imply the linear relation 4Λ − R = κ<sub>4</sub>T taking the trace in Einstein field equations R<sub>μν</sub> – 1/2g<sub>μν</sub>R + Λg<sub>μν</sub> = κ<sub>4</sub>T<sub>μν</sub>. Again, Dyson equation for Greens function G, mass operator Σ with a<sub>ij</sub> ∊ {G, G<sub>0</sub>, Σ} and Bethe-Salpeter equation with a<sub>ij</sub> ∊ {P, P<sub>0</sub>, Ξ} for polarization P, P<sub>0</sub> and vertex part Ξ are linear in three irreducible functionals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. In distinction, Feigenbaum renormalization −α<sub>F</sub>z<sub>2</sub><sub>k</sub> = z<sub>k</sub> is global where α<sub>F</sub> acts as a generator. A complex quadratic map γ◦R of universe radius or curvature is proportional to a product of Green’s functions as shown in Sections 6 and 7. Feynman diagram series hold for unified fields for open, closed or flat spacetime in FZU. The Lebesgue measure in the time integral (1) reflects chaotic bifurcations in a complex global potential t + iβ ≃ V + iV<sub>T</sub> ≃ ω in Equation (13).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Mass, Energy in a Dimensionless Information-Based Universe</title>
   <p>Information currents depend on binary substitutions γ(ϕ<sub>3</sub>) which are symbolic linear but quadratic maps. Complex γ-fixpoints are viewed as Lorentz-transformations giving rational coordinates. Modular and elliptic invariants j(ω), γ<sub>2</sub>(ω), γ<sub>3</sub>(ω) depend on f(ω). A Lorentz invariant f(ω) is a mass for powers f <sup>3</sup>, f <sup>8</sup>, f <sup>12</sup> and f <sup>24</sup>. The Legendre modular function λ<sub>μ</sub> = λ<sub>μm</sub>/m + 1/2 gives e.g. a mass m = 4/f <sup>12</sup>(ω) where λ<sup>2</sup> – 1/4 = m<sup>2</sup>. The Dirac-like current density 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          μ 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          m 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mover accent="true"> 
        <mi>
          ψ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ¯ 
        </mo> 
       </mover> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          μ 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          m 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          q 
        </mi> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           q 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ′ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ψ 
       </mi> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          q 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ′ 
        </mo> 
       </msup> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is invariant for equivalent substitutions of periods ω which are called laps l<sub>ω</sub>. Period-doubling bifurcating k-components of γ generate a tree of masses. Iterating the Weber invariant f(ω) is iterating over all possible masses in an universe. An iteration is like a quadratic transformation of periods ω where the Legendre modular function λ proportional to a coupling constant λ ≃ G<sub>w</sub> → 0 of invariances 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            λ 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            λ 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. The zero-energy-universe with q<sub>sc</sub> cycles is equivalent to self-similar four steps leading to gravitational waves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. In FZU energy is gained by q<sub>sc</sub> being thermal Carnot cycles. A quadratic in mass (moment of inertia, quadrupole moment Q) expansion transforms a Lorentz-invariant tree into resting, floating masses by the algorithm</p>
   <p>(fixpoints of γ) → γ (Lorentz-invariant) → q<sub>sc</sub> → ψ<sub>s</sub> → Q<sub>ij</sub> (three-dimensional resting v → 0)</p>
   <p>Pair creation rest mass energy is overwhelmed by a quadratic van-der-Waals-like potential in the limit of an infinite number of quadrupolar constituents being momenta of inertia. Unobservable ultra-high energy particles above GZK cutoff are identified with k-components between tree root in z<sub>nt</sub> and first ν<sub>Sh</sub> at k = 3. Doubling at logistic parameter r ≃ 3.54 ≃ 4 suggest a base 4 Fermat number transform. All k-components imply invariant elliptic addition steps with 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        i 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        n 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        v 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with modular unit g, Hubble parameter H<sub>w</sub> = δ<sub>k</sub>lnφ, order parameter φ ≃ K + iK', quarter periods K, K', cloud masses M<sub>w</sub> ≃ g and coupling constants (6). Interacting shells w = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 are invariant plateaus 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, i.e. 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         5 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        &gt; 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        ⋯ 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        &gt; 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           H 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           w 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          8 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           G 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           w 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           H 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           κ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           c 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           l 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        ℏ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         l 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        i 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        n 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        v 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         κ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          8 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           G 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           w 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           c 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           l 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>Invariant addition despite fluctuating elliptic curves in spacetime solves the cosmological constant problem with a w-independent mean vacuum density ρ<sub>vac</sub>. Because the Hubble parameter H<sub>w</sub> depends on k-components as 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ln 
      </mi> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> the third branch k = 3 yields a mean CMB energy density</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          M 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           H 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           5 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          8 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           G 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           5 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <msup> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
             <mrow> 
              <msup> 
               <mn>
                 2 
               </mn> 
               <mn>
                 3 
               </mn> 
              </msup> 
             </mrow> 
            </msup> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ρ 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            v 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            a 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          M 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          T 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ≃ 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2.3 
        </mn> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
          K 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>The relation between iterates, curvature and field tensor drawn in Section 7 allows to associate tree root k-components with CMB waves where periods ν<sub>Sh</sub> act as an external alternating current. A dimensionless bifurcated spacetime concludes to 3 K CMB of wavelength 1…10 cm or frequency 1…10<sup>3</sup> GHz because k-components fill out spacetime nearly isotropic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-21">
     [21]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. L-Function Regulator Process</title>
   <p>Fluid dynamics in Section 6 is reducible to one complex dimension near zeros of a holomorphic function ξ(z ≃ λ). Cyclotomic Kronecker-Weber extensions of a bicubic field are the origin for spacetime points by a bifurcating k-component spacetime tree. Invariance γ◦ξ and γ◦z in ξ(z = λ[f(ω)]) covers λ while iterating the modular invariant γ◦f(ω). Note that 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          24 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           λ 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ′ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is singular in λ where z ≃ λ. Simple ζ(z ≃ λ)-poles are linked to simple ζ(z)-zeros by a certain different substitution γ◦z<sub>nt</sub> which is regarded as a mass operator expansion. A holomorphic ξ(z = λ[f(ω)]) in λ depends on curvature tensor f(ω) ≃ R<sub>μν</sub> ≃ E where ξ(z = λ[f(ω)]) ≃ E. Dedekind zeta function ζ(z, 𝕂), Riemann zeta function ζ(z), ξ-function and Dirichlet L-function L(z, χ) satisfy</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-"></xref> 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          ζ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            z 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mi mathvariant="double-struck">
            K 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          ζ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          Γ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             z 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             / 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            z 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mi>
          ζ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            z 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mi mathvariant="double-struck">
            K 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           π 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             z 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             / 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
        <mi>
          ξ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        L 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          χ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (3)</p>
   <p>where 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        L 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          χ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           R 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           Δ 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mi>
           Δ 
         </mi> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is proportional to a regulator R<sub>Δ</sub> = R<sub>Δ</sub><sub>ij</sub> = ln<sub>b</sub>E<sub>ij</sub>, for base b, fundamental unit E<sub>ij</sub> and discriminant Δ of a cubic field. In iterates of z ≃ λ variable z<sub>k</sub> is f(ω)-like and z<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub> is λ-like. Extension fields with r-dimensional lattices of cyclotomic units E<sub>ij</sub> (1 ≤ i, j ≤ r) induce local minima of the L-function. A screened Poisson Equation (4) couples via Equation (3) with Dirichlet-character χ conveyed through chaotic periods to the Artin L-function and Dedekind zeta function ζ(z, 𝕂). The present approach opens a calculation of field Lagrangians by Epstein zeta functions 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ζ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          ℚ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           [ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msqrt> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               Δ 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               k 
             </mi> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </msqrt> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ] 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, hyperelliptic theta functions ϑ(u<sub>±</sub>) and L-functions through a regulator index. The L-function in (3) depends on a module norm function which depends on a power of the Dedekind eta function η(ω) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. A function that is holomorphic throughout the finite plane is generally called an entire function, and a distinction is made between entire rational and entire transcendental functions, depending on whether their power series expansions have finite or infinite terms. A Hecke L-series is an L-series for a character on a group that is a generalization of both residue class and ideal class groups and is an entire transcendental function. The transformation of Hecke L-series into a linear combination of Epstein zeta functions shows that the quotient of the Dedekind zeta function ζ(z, 𝕂)/ζ(z) can be extended holomorphically to the entire complex plane. The Dirichlet L-function L(1, χ) is proportional to a circulant matrix in 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           h 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           Δ 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           R 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           Δ 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mi>
           Δ 
         </mi> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            12 
          </mn> 
          <mi>
            ln 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            ln 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            λ 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            ln 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              λ 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          8 
        </mn> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mi>
           Δ 
         </mi> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            12 
          </mn> 
          <mi>
            ln 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            λ 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            ln 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            λ 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          8 
        </mn> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mi>
           Δ 
         </mi> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. For optimal units f → f + lnf the L-function L(1, χ) is proportional to a coupling constant and to a mass. A regulator process is proposed as a stationary cycle R<sub>Δ</sub> ≃ ℒ which takes lower values than that for a given extension field <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. Rational (real) coordinates imply a vanishing discriminant Δ → 0 (general relativity). To determine rational fields Δ = 0 is a highly nonlinear process by the Minkowski bound prescribing Δ → ∞ for cyclotomic limits. Two stripes ±1/2 ± im<sub>n</sub> in a holomorphic entire function ξ(z) yield a Poisson-like equation for λ-slices as two capacitor plates</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-"></xref> 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Q 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Δ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          y 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          L 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            z 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            χ 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mi>
          ξ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         μ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        L 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          χ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mi>
        ξ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        ± 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         μ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          I 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          m 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ± 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           m 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           n 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (4)</p>
   <p>Conductivity plateaus of the holomorph functions ξ(z) ≃ E with z ≃ λ [γ◦f] satisfy the hyperbolic Laplacian Δ<sub>h</sub>ξ(z) = 0 with Δ<sub>h</sub> = y<sup>2</sup>Δ<sub>xy</sub> = Imλ<sup>2</sup>Δ<sub>xy</sub>. An electric field-like ξ(z) is subjected to a λ-process as external current. Lagrange condition (μ<sub>s</sub>) is a nontrivial ξ(z<sub>nt</sub> = ±1/2 ± im<sub>n</sub>) = 0 as a screening process. Lagrange condition (μ<sub>c</sub>) is a finite charge to-mass ratio because λ depends on mass. Solutions Q(z) are modified Bessel functions which are entire functions. Four zeros Q(z ≃ z<sub>nt</sub> = ±1/2 ± im<sub>n</sub>) are related to a quadruple q<sub>sc</sub> of steps. Gravitational waves are one-dimensional waves in four-dimensions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-20">
     [20]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-21">
     [21]
    </xref>. The first Q(z) iterate is a fourth-order differential equation aΔ<sub>h</sub> + bΔ<sub>h</sub>Δ<sub>h</sub> = 0 known from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-23">
     [23]
    </xref>. Subsequent iterations yield 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> polar entire iterates Q(z)◦…◦Q(z) solving Δ<sub>h</sub>. Iterates γ◦z yield a 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>-order differential equation. This screened two-dimensional Poisson equation is invariant with respect to a simultaneous change γ◦z ≃ γ◦λ and γ◦z<sub>nt</sub>. Zeros z<sub>nt</sub> are certain values of the Legendre modular function λ where γ◦λ implies a quadratic equation for masses m<sub>nt</sub>. This quadratic equation for masses leaves Kummer surfaces K(X(γ◦f(ω))) invariant. Here γ◦f and γ◦z ∊ ℂ<sup>w</sup> yield an underdetermined system of quadratic equations. A longitudinal, transverse and rotatory vicinity of an arbitrary point in a spherical-shell in ℂ<sup>w</sup> has surface, altitude and volume components. Shells can be explained by a capacitor model. Locally, zeros of ζ(z<sub>nt</sub>) in capacitor plates-stripes ±1/2 are condensation nuclei in five atmospheric spherical shells in ℂ<sup>w</sup>. A permanent alternating current flow between capacitor plates due to seasonal and altitude variations is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>. The L(z, χ)-function gets a non-equilibrium regulator process with three constituents μ<sub>1</sub>, μ<sub>2</sub>, μ<sub>3</sub> in Equation (14) under subsequent z-maps. μ<sub>1</sub>, μ<sub>2</sub>, μ<sub>3</sub> are a conductivity plateau (holomorphic equilibrium state), air ionization (net rate) and CR bifurcation (scattering). The regulator term μ<sub>1</sub> is an entire, holomorphic conductivity plateau. The term μ<sub>2</sub> is a count rate which is a non-equilibrium air ionization rate proportional to a statistical occupation being the geometric zeta function ζ(l<sub>s</sub>, m<sub>s</sub>, z). The third term μ<sub>3</sub> is a scattering rate of occupation number changes as a bifurcation tree. Here k-components explain as well CMB and ultra-high CR shower. Inherent in any definition of a spacetime point is the uniqueness and invertibility which requires simple zeros z<sub>nt</sub> of a complex holomorphic function. Multiple of z<sub>nt</sub> are charge quanta which arise in pairs. Globally, a seasonal average counts the number of k-components as the number of particles as leaves of a tree. Locally, capacitor plates obey congruent alternating voltages 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        mod 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mrow> 
          <msup> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> which explains the phenomenon of QE. The congruence is due to a renormalized Feigenbaum Equation (9) where a second constant α<sub>F</sub> proves the existence of a generator. Zeros z<sub>nt</sub> are a singularity in the r.h.s of Equation (4) as an alternating current for equivalent laps λ(γ◦f) = λ(f).</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. A second sound in quadrupole interacting z<sub>nt</sub>: (Left) Long-wave (seasonal) motion; (Right) Short-wave motion with two stripes z<sub>nt</sub> = ±1/2 ± im<sub>n</sub> of the Riemann zeta function where stripes ±1/2 are viewed as capacitor plates.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId77.jpeg?20250711015031" />
   </fig>
   <p>A first and second sound in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref> corresponds to a growing global binary tree of particles (leaves in seasonal variation) superimposed by local capacitor voltages as a CR-shower. Spacetime forms from a Carnot cycle of longitudinal, transverse and rotatory directions. In plant growth the EVI displays plateaus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. A charge in Equation (4) is the k → ∞ limit of holomorphic leaves (plateaus) of neutral chaotic quadrupolar γ-simplest cycles in ξ(z). The QH current is a neutral oscillating complex quadrupole (inertial) moment Q<sub>xy</sub>. Experimental support for FZU is oscillation of the gradient of global temperature over 10<sup>8</sup> years (=plateaus of temperature) and microwave emission at QH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-24">
     [24]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-25">
     [25]
    </xref>. Detector dimensions for ME, QH and CR detector (Wulf’s bifilar electrometer, Wilson chamber) as well air ionization (Gerdien condenser) are comparable <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-26">
     [26]
    </xref>. FZU predicts an invariant dimensionless vacuum energy density 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          F 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          Z 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          U 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          p 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> for cycles by a power tower of modular units g<sub>k</sub>. Transitions between conductivity plateaus σ<sub>H</sub> (leaf growth) induce CR emissions. The tight-binding model with κ<sub>BO</sub> ≃ 10<sup>−</sup><sup>20</sup> <sup>×</sup> <sup>1/4</sup> = 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> of mass ratio 10<sup>20</sup> displays potential changes as relative mass changes. A first prediction of high-energy emission at QH not yet observed is extended to a model of a universal CR-atmospheric charge cloud superfluid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-27">
     [27]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-28">
     [28]
    </xref>. Iterated Weber invariants f(ω) by map (10) is regarded as a complex curvature which is proven in Section 7. Doubly-periodic cycles ν<sub>Sh</sub> due to Sharkovskii’s theorem require two constants α<sub>F</sub>, δ<sub>F</sub>. Whereas laps l<sub>ω</sub> are stationary particle orbits k-components are a bifurcating shower of particles. Particles at first periods ν<sub>Sh</sub> at k ≤ 3 are not observable. Periods ν<sub>Sh</sub> near k = 3 is spacetime oscillation felt as cosmic microwave background (CMB). k-components changes into a fluid of elastic spacetime at step k ≃ 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         5 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with dark exchange scattering coupling constant G<sub>5</sub> ≃ 10<sup>−</sup><sup>167</sup>. The most general Riemann surface 1/2w(w + 1) &lt; 3w + 3 for w ≤ 5 induces a self-similar pseudo-congruence for 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        k 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           9 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            10 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Coupling constant G<sub>w</sub> in the regulator index intersects with Legendre module 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        4 
      </mn> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            k 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Here period-doubling ω<sub>k</sub> → ω<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub> + ω<sub>k</sub><sub>+2</sub> as ω → 2ω gives a tower of the nome 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          ω 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mtext>
         e 
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            π 
          </mi> 
          <msup> 
           <mi>
             K 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             ′ 
           </mo> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           / 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           K 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> like a second Feigenbaum constant α<sub>F</sub>. FZU-emission rates of CMB at QH behave as 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         κ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          O 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Regarding k-components as identical charges QS overestimates ρ<sub>exp</sub> by factor 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         5 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> as a F<sub>9</sub>, F<sub>10</sub>-congruences with Fermat number F<sub>t</sub> in 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          QS 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≫ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          exp 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-29">
     [29]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Feynman Diagram Series for Five Interactions</title>
   <p>A bi spinor ψ is defined as a simplest cycle quadruple of norm ( 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           q 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>) = 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ψ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mover accent="true"> 
        <mi>
          ψ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ¯ 
        </mo> 
       </mover> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> averaged over laps l<sub>ω</sub> which remains valid for all interactions w. QS sets a norm 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ψ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mover accent="true"> 
        <mi>
          ψ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ¯ 
        </mo> 
       </mover> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> = 1 for all bifurcating 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>-CR air shower components which overestimates vacuum energy ρ<sub>vac</sub> by the CCP-factor 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. ρ<sub>exp</sub> contains only rare ultra-high CR counts. FZU consists of cryptographic-like pseudo-random integer addition steps on fluctuating elliptic curves. QS implies finite λ<sub>k</sub> and g<sub>k</sub>. Macrostructures imply λ<sub>k</sub> → 0 and large g<sub>k</sub> → ∞ for k → ∞. Self-similarity implies invariance 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            λ 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            λ 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. On the most general complex Riemann surface the cubic behavior of f(ω) transmits to λ and the coupling constant G<sub>w</sub> for w ≤ 5 interactions w = (1 - 5) = (strong, weak, em, grav, dark). A bicubic bi spinor norm Nm(ψ) = E<sub>i</sub>ψ'ψ'' = 1 of conjugated units is capable to formulate an invariant energy density</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ρ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </mfrac> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            w 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mstyle mathvariant="bold" mathsize="normal"> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
          </mstyle> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mi>
        E 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mstyle mathvariant="bold" mathsize="normal"> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
       </mstyle> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          F 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          Z 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          U 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          p 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          10 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         0 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ⋯ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          10 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mtext>
          
      </mtext> 
      <mtext>
        eV 
      </mtext> 
      <mo>
        ⋅ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          cm 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          R 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          M 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (5)</p>
   <p>FZU dimensionless energy E(k) is defined as a change of units E<sub>i</sub> or a change of λ<sub>k</sub> related to k-components <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. λ<sub>k</sub> defines a Dirac equation where the wave vector k is related to periods ν<sub>Sh</sub> capturing Bloch states by γ(ϕ<sub>3</sub>)-fixed points. CCP requires a cutoff for E(k → ∞) → ∞. QS implies ν<sub>Sh</sub> congruent laps l<sub>ω</sub> and k-incongruent components. FZU implies finite E(k → ∞) → E<sub>∞</sub> and predicts a congruence 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> which lowers the vacuum energy. A coupling constant</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ln 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        w 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ! 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msup> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          ln 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (6)</p>
   <p>results from a formerly constant regulator index R<sub>Δ</sub><sub>ij</sub> = ln<sub>b</sub>E<sub>ij</sub> in Equation (14) optimized by circulant process. For dark matter at w = 5 one has G<sub>5</sub> ≃ 10<sup>−</sup><sup>167</sup>. In QS the circulant behavior is reflected by a scattering process. For simplest cycles q<sub>sc</sub> the Euclidean norm ( 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           q 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>) = ∑<sub>(</sub><sub>s</sub><sub>)</sub>ψ<sub>s</sub>ψ̄<sub>s</sub> in Equation (4) recovers the until now accepted bi spinor norm. The cutoff in Equation (5) is due to Equation (6) with energy-dependent coupling constant G<sub>w</sub>(E). Local minima of the L-function are stationary states. In macrophysics the unified bi spinor norm is a tidal-like state of four curvatures of four points. CCP is a time averaging problem for rare but ultra-large mass M<sub>k</sub> ≃ g<sub>k</sub> on bifurcating clouds</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          Q 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          S 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        t 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          n 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          p 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (7)</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-"></xref>with mass M<sub>k</sub> → ∞ and R<sub>net</sub> → 0 depending on the four-dimensional volume of complex time dσ<sub>5</sub> for time interval δ<sub>k</sub>t → ∞. Number theoretic congruences 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         5 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> resolve CCP by reducing ρ<sub>QS</sub> to ρ<sub>exp</sub>. As a result, CR and CMB occur in any bifurcating spacetime also at low altitude-atmospheric layers. In FZU the order parameter φ ≃ K + iK' is linear expanded into complex curvature R ≃ f(ω). Elliptic curves represent themselves a self-similar system because quarter periods K, K' are exact theta constants. Complex scalar curvature R = γ◦R<sub>u</sub> produces bifurcating tensile forces as a perquisite for stationary spacetime or balanced ionized CR-CMB clouds. Iterated complex f(ω) enter theta constants η(ω)f<sup>2</sup>(ω) which are equivalent to a correlated path-ordered complex temperature potential V + iV<sub>T</sub>. Enveloping periods ν<sub>Sh</sub> are explained by congruent integers a<sub>k</sub>, b<sub>k</sub>, Δ<sub>k</sub> determining half-periods 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ω 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         i 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           a 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           b 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Δ 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. The most general Riemann surface includes added points on iterated elliptic curves as cryptographic, regular, pseudo-random chaotic period-doubling. Cubic roots f(ω) of ϕ<sub>3</sub>(f(ω)) are iterated by</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtable> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mfrac> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </mfrac> 
            <msub> 
             <msup> 
              <mi>
                ϕ 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                ′ 
              </mo> 
             </msup> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mi>
               f 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               ϕ 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mi>
               t 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mfrac> 
             <mi>
               f 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </mfrac> 
            <msub> 
             <msup> 
              <mi>
                ϕ 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                ′ 
              </mo> 
             </msup> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mi>
               f 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mi>
             f 
           </mi> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
        </mtable> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (8)</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-"></xref>In the context of the symbolic map (8) an orbit subgroup of equivalent lattices with detγ = 1 is called lap l<sub>ω</sub> of γ else a k-component. Laps l<sub>ω</sub> as non-turbulent Carnot cycles ν<sub>Sh</sub> of the thermal potential V + iV<sub>T</sub> accumulate a large neutral background cloud. This is enabled by quadratic-in-mass-excitations of large scale floating non-radiative bifurcations as a pre-stage of spacetime from a zero of a complex entire, differentiable function. The electric field-like holomorphic function ξ ≃ E</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ξ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtable> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mi>
             z 
           </mi> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
        </mtable> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         π 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mi>
        Γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mi>
        ζ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </mfrac> 
      <munder> 
       <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
        <mo>
          ∏ 
        </mo> 
       </mstyle> 
       <mi>
         n 
       </mi> 
      </munder> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             z 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             n 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∂ 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          j 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∂ 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>is governed current-like</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        j 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        4 
      </mn> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mo>
           ∫ 
         </mo> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           ∞ 
         </mi> 
        </msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             d 
           </mtext> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             log 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
         <msup> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              / 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              4 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
          </mrow> 
         </msup> 
         <msub> 
          <mo>
            ∂ 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
         </msub> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msup> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                3 
              </mn> 
              <mo>
                / 
              </mo> 
              <mn>
                2 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
           </msup> 
           <msub> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
           </msub> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ( 
            </mo> 
            <mrow> 
             <msub> 
              <mi>
                ϑ 
              </mi> 
              <mn>
                3 
              </mn> 
             </msub> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                ( 
              </mo> 
              <mrow> 
               <mn>
                 0 
               </mn> 
               <mo>
                 , 
               </mo> 
               <msup> 
                <mtext>
                  e 
                </mtext> 
                <mrow> 
                 <mo>
                   − 
                 </mo> 
                 <mi>
                   π 
                 </mi> 
                 <mi>
                   t 
                 </mi> 
                </mrow> 
               </msup> 
              </mrow> 
              <mo>
                ) 
              </mo> 
             </mrow> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
            </mrow> 
            <mo>
              ) 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mi>
           sinh 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mfrac> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
           </mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ( 
            </mo> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               z 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
             <mfrac> 
              <mn>
                1 
              </mn> 
              <mn>
                2 
              </mn> 
             </mfrac> 
            </mrow> 
            <mo>
              ) 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mi>
           log 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           t 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>with Jacobi theta function ϑ<sub>3</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-30">
     [30]
    </xref>. Driven by γ◦f(ω<sub>k</sub>) and invariances γ◦z, γ◦ξ(z), j(z) is a universal clock frequency in Equation (4). Like zeros z<sub>nt</sub> = λ<sub>k</sub> as quanta of charge Coulomb singularities appear for f(ω<sub>k</sub>) [λ<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub>] generalizable to n-dimensions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-21">
     [21]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-31">
     [31]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Binary Invariant Neutral Superfluid Potential Flow</title>
   <p>A relation of charge and flux to thermal convection has already been proven. The superconducting order parameter φ is a theta function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-32">
     [32]
    </xref>. Nonequilibrium electrons in semiconductors are capable for Benard convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-33">
     [33]
    </xref>. Fluid dynamics X<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub> = â<sub>Y</sub>[γ]X<sub>k</sub>, X<sub>k</sub><sub>+2</sub> = â<sub>X</sub>[γ]X<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub> ∊ ℝ<sup>3</sup> on K(X(f) = (1, −f, f<sup>2</sup>, 1)), W(Y(f) = 1, −f, f<sup>2</sup>, −f<sup>3</sup>)) ∊ ℙ<sup>3</sup> is governed by two different SE (3) steps for γ(ϕ<sub>3</sub>)◦f(ω) with orthogonal transformation â<sub>X</sub>[γ(f)], â<sub>Y</sub>[γ(f)]. Discrete ideal fluid dynamics consists in iterating singular 4 × 4 matrices for Kummer and Weddle surfaces K(X), W(Y). Kirchhoff equations for body and fluid positions are the continuous limit of X(f) and Y(f) iterates. Iterated velocities X<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub>(f(ω)) − X<sub>k</sub>(f(ω)) = ∇V<sub>T</sub> describe a non-turbulent flow with potential (13). Map (8) creates an entire, holomorphic polynomial f<sub>k</sub>(f<sub>k</sub><sub>=0</sub>) in f<sub>k</sub><sub>=0</sub> which is singular in dependence on λ. At step k = 0 a pole f<sup>24</sup>(ω)|<sub>k</sub><sub>=0</sub> = 2<sup>4</sup>/λ(λ − 1) exists on λ-plane of ζ(z = λ). Subsequent steps yield Feigenbaum renormalized invariants</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         α 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ↔ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         γ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            ren 
          </mtext> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         α 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         γ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            ren 
          </mtext> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         γ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            ren 
          </mtext> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           / 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             α 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             F 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (9)</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        ↔ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         γ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            ren 
          </mtext> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         Γ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            ren 
          </mtext> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         γ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            ren 
          </mtext> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (10)</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        F 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           t 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        z 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           t 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            z 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </mfrac> 
      <msub> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          ϕ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ′ 
        </mo> 
       </msup> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         t 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (11)</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        F 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         A 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         μ 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          s 
        </mi> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ″ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         γ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ″ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ‴ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         μ 
       </mi> 
      </msubsup> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ‴ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ′ 
         </mo> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          δ 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           A 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           μ 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          δ 
        </mi> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               G 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                s 
              </mi> 
              <msup> 
               <mi>
                 s 
               </mi> 
               <mo>
                 ″ 
               </mo> 
              </msup> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
            <msubsup> 
             <mi>
               γ 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <msup> 
               <mi>
                 s 
               </mi> 
               <mo>
                 ″ 
               </mo> 
              </msup> 
              <msup> 
               <mi>
                 s 
               </mi> 
               <mo>
                 ‴ 
               </mo> 
              </msup> 
             </mrow> 
             <mi>
               μ 
             </mi> 
            </msubsup> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               G 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <msup> 
               <mi>
                 s 
               </mi> 
               <mo>
                 ‴ 
               </mo> 
              </msup> 
              <msup> 
               <mi>
                 s 
               </mi> 
               <mo>
                 ′ 
               </mo> 
              </msup> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (12)</p>
   <p>Accordingly, binary substitutions γ envelope Feynman diagram series of Dyson-like equation for a Greens function G<sub>ss</sub><sub>'</sub>[ψ] defined in terms of a quartic roots shifted to s = ± ∞, ± i∞ as q<sub>sc</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-29">
     [29]
    </xref>. Optimal units E(ω<sub>k</sub>) and f<sub>k</sub> = f(ω<sub>k</sub>) with Euclidean norm 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <munder> 
       <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
        <mo>
          ∑ 
        </mo> 
       </mstyle> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
      </munder> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <munder> 
       <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
        <mo>
          ∑ 
        </mo> 
       </mstyle> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
      </munder> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ' 
       </mo> 
      </msubsup> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ' 
        </mo> 
        <mo>
          ' 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> reproduce a bicubic spinor norm Nm(f(ω)) = f(ω)f'(ω)f''(ω) = 2 with complex conjugates invariants f' and f''. Quantum statistics implies k-incongruent γ-orbits averaged over stable laps l<sub>ω</sub> (seasons) in a binary tree. Equation (10) is solved by a tent map giving e.g. a Cantor set ζ(l<sub>s</sub>, m<sub>s</sub>, z) and in the limit k → ∞ a complex Lebesgue measure dl<sub>xy</sub></p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            g 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            b 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            a 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∫ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ∇ 
         </mo> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            V 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              T 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               c 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               l 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               o 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               u 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               d 
             </mi> 
            </mrow> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
         </msub> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             x 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             y 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (13)</p>
   <p>The complex line element 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mtext>
        d 
      </mtext> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         l 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          y 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ↔ 
      </mo> 
      <mtext>
        d 
      </mtext> 
      <mi>
        u 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             ϕ 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ↔ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             ϕ 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is iterated by Equations (9)-(12). A high voltage measured between points on a straight line is resolved on a fractal line. Optimal entropy is given by minimizing the quadratic form of a circulant regulator R<sub>Δ</sub><sub>ij</sub> for finite geometric zeta function ζ(l<sub>s</sub>, m<sub>s</sub>, z) of string length l<sub>s</sub> and multiplicity m<sub>s</sub> and Euclidean norm N(E) = ( 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           q 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>) = 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ψ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mover accent="true"> 
        <mi>
          ψ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ¯ 
        </mo> 
       </mover> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> as</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         μ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          Δ 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          j 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         μ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        ζ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           l 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           m 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           R 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            Δ 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            j 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mtext>
         e 
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           R 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            Δ 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            j 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         μ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        N 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mtext>
           e 
         </mtext> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             R 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              Δ 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              i 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              j 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         ζ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ′ 
       </mo> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           l 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           m 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           R 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            Δ 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            j 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (14)</p>
   <p>for an entropy-based universe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. A Mandelbrot zoom sequence first unrelated explains the Huygens-Fresnel principle by μ<sub>1</sub>, μ<sub>2</sub>, μ<sub>3</sub> superposed cardioids and zoomed bulbs of spheres-in-spheres information currents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Equation (14) is solvable in complex four-dimensional space by a four-component complex rotations of units E<sub>i</sub> = exp(l<sub>i</sub>). Local plateaus in (14) are L(z, χ)-function induced elastic Lagrangians.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>7. A Classical Bi Spinor</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-"></xref>All forces are treated uniquely by Feynman diagrams for bi spinor ψ<sub>s</sub> ≃ f<sub>s</sub>(ω) with Euclidean norm ( 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           q 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         q 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>) = 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ψ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mover accent="true"> 
        <mi>
          ψ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ¯ 
        </mo> 
       </mover> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Bicubic q<sub>sc</sub> in ψ<sub>s</sub> is viewed as spacetime curvature R<sub>μν</sub> ≃ F<sub>μν</sub> ≃ E, B governed by 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mrow></mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ← 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        c 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> for z ≃ f(ω) rewritten as a quartic polynomial 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          μ 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          ν 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         4 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
      <mi>
        ℱ 
      </mi> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          μ 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          ν 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi mathvariant="script">
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with R<sub>μυ</sub> = Rez<sub>k</sub>, 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mi>
       ℱ 
     </mi> 
    </math> = 1/2Re(c − z<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub>), 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mi mathvariant="script">
       G 
     </mi> 
    </math> = 1/2Im(c-z<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub>). A finite iterated set z<sub>k</sub> with periods ν<sub>Sh</sub> can be projected onto complex plane as a generator g<sub>k</sub> or a root of unity. Optimal coordinates appear in (14) for a tower g<sub>k</sub><sub>+1</sub> ≃ exp(ig<sub>k</sub>) which interchanges wave vector and classical momentum as a classical particle. Universe anti-matter is defined as irreducible q<sub>sc</sub> vertices 1, 2, 1’2’ of a point as irreducible tidal motion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-7">
     [7]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>8. Conductivity Plateau as a Holomorphic Leaf</title>
   <p>A magnetic field B ≃ δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub>(g<sub>k</sub>) ≃ (days of the year) is equivalent to changes of topological entropy h<sub>t</sub>(g<sub>k</sub>) and seasonal changes as days of the year. Plant growth in units of EVI or conductivity at QH induced by gradient of temperature or electric field E ≃ ∇T are comparable which is symbolically shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>. A mass ratio 10<sup>3</sup> between wood and leaves yields accuracy 0.3. For k → ∞ a universal coupling constant is expected resulting from an area 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
      <mi>
        π 
      </mi> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> corrected by a high-precision factor 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mo>
           ⋮ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             g 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             n 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-8">
     [8]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. The fine structure constant at high energies (high k values) exhibits a minimum e.g. 1/128 at 10<sup>9</sup> eV <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-34">
     [34]
    </xref>. Similarly, a QH plateau describes a universal (all interaction containing) neutral quadrupolar current contained also in a definition of a bis spinor. Only a forest of trees with k-components of partial laps l<sub>ω</sub> towards define a quantum of charge. The exosphere-earth-surface-capacitor state is a flowing congruent alternating current. The concept of charge is connected with alternating capacity changes of an ergodic treetop-root symmetry. The treetop-root system of the binary tree is asymmetric, non-ergodic, non-reversible and generates matter. This asymmetry is a quadrupolar-quadrupolar weak, nearly neutral capacitor state compatible with modular units and the Macdonald denominator formula. Here η<sup>N</sup><sup>(</sup><sup>N−</sup><sup>1)/2</sup> is a product of theta functions 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <msub> 
        <mo>
          ∏ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
         <mo>
           ≤ 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           &lt; 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ≤ 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           N 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϑ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             u 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             i 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             u 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             j 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            ω 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> which is a Vandermonde determinant Δ<sub>N</sub> for the simple Lie algebra A<sub>N</sub><sub>−</sub><sub>1</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-35">
     [35]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-36">
     [36]
    </xref>. A Vandermonde determinant is exp(|u|<sup>2</sup>)Π(u<sub>i</sub>-u<sub>j</sub>)<sup>N</sup> ≃ exp(|u|<sup>2</sup>)Δ<sub>N</sub> which is known as the Laughlin-wave function similar to N<sup>th</sup> order Weierstrass sigma functions σ<sup>(</sup><sup>N</sup><sup>)</sup>(u, ω) for arguments u = aω <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-37">
     [37]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-38">
     [38]
    </xref>. Standard units of time and energy count the number of precessions n and the number of Carnot cycles m independent on fluctuating ω. A floating tidal-like phase-correlated bifurcating fluid cloud persists with balanced collision-less ionization in a stable universe. The minimum z<sub>k</sub> ≃ V<sub>T</sub>(f<sub>k</sub>) allows rare ultra-high energy CR and persistent CMB of the iterated 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> polar holomorphic fluid z<sub>k</sub><sub>+</sub><sub>N</sub> […z<sub>k</sub>] that forms a ball of string segments. A growing n-leaved tree as a 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> quadrupolar ball due to a single zero z<sub>nt</sub> opens the next zero point if all sites in ℂ<sup>5</sup> are occupied at 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>.</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. (left) Fractal zeta zeros in nature and nanostructure laboratory: Plant, green trees under blue sky and (right) Plateaus in quantized Hall conductivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-42">
       [42]
      </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-43">
       [43]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. (left) Fractal zeta zeros in nature and nanostructure laboratory: Plant, green trees under blue sky and (right) Plateaus in quantized Hall conductivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-42">
       [42]
      </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-43">
       [43]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId165.jpeg?20250711015035" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. (left) Fractal zeta zeros in nature and nanostructure laboratory: Plant, green trees under blue sky and (right) Plateaus in quantized Hall conductivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-42">
       [42]
      </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-43">
       [43]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId166.jpeg?20250711015036" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. (left) Fractal zeta zeros in nature and nanostructure laboratory: Plant, green trees under blue sky and (right) Plateaus in quantized Hall conductivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-42">
       [42]
      </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-43">
       [43]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId167.jpeg?20250711015036" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. (left) Fractal zeta zeros in nature and nanostructure laboratory: Plant, green trees under blue sky and (right) Plateaus in quantized Hall conductivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-42">
       [42]
      </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-43">
       [43]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId168.jpeg?20250711015036" />
   </fig>
   <p>Figure 2. (left) Fractal zeta zeros in nature and nanostructure laboratory: Plant, green trees under blue sky and (right) Plateaus in quantized Hall conductivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-42">
     [42]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-43">
     [43]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s9">
   <title>9. Second Sound Thermopower Cycle</title>
   <p>The cosmic-ray-charge-cloud (atmospheric) model is a capacitor-like chaotic RC oscillator which stores charge and mass. The resistance R in the circuit is the k-component congruence, the capacity is the number of nontrivial zeros and its frequency are the number of cycles ν<sub>Sh</sub>. The energy gain VI ≃ V<sup>2</sup> or ≃ I<sup>2</sup> ≃ δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>T for voltage V and current I undergoes a quadratic map where the Carnot cycle area is δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub>δ<sub>k</sub>Tdetγ. A one-dimensional zero of ζ(z<sub>n</sub>) = 0 is traversed by three-dimensional points X<sub>k</sub>(f) of a dissipation less superfluid in space with electric field ξ ≃ E(z) ≃ (∇V, ∇V<sub>T</sub>) composed from gradients of V and V<sub>T</sub>. A closed loop in complex plane yields a holomorphic potential V(z) = Q<sub>S</sub>V<sub>T</sub>(z) creates topological entropy h<sub>t</sub> per charge carrier concentration N<sub>e</sub> per z<sub>nt</sub> via the Seebeck coefficient Q<sub>S</sub> = h<sub>t</sub>/eN<sub>e</sub>. Physically a time-thermal Carnot cycle with two sounds (cycles) ν<sub>Sh</sub> and q<sub>sc</sub> yields a voltage (energy) gain up to ultra-high-energies over 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> components for k &gt; 8.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s10">
   <title>10. Global Seasonal Temperature Cycle and Local Altitude Entropy Cycle</title>
   <p>First and second sound in a Carnot cycle gains energy where one-dimension extends to three dimensions as shown in Section 3. Exact addition on fractal chaotic elliptic curves implies a sound within a sound or ν<sub>Sh</sub>[ν<sub>Sh</sub>] recursively. Waves of universe radius R<sub>u</sub> are waves of temperature R<sub>u</sub> ≃ K, K' ≃ ϑ<sup>2</sup> and entropy h<sub>t</sub>. Longitudinal, transverse and rotatory motions k<sub>i</sub>k<sub>j</sub>, δ<sub>ij</sub>-k<sub>i</sub>k<sub>j</sub>/k<sup>2</sup>, ε<sub>ijkl</sub>k<sub>k</sub>k<sub>l</sub> are global seasonal temperature waves and local altitude entropy waves where handedness creates spin. A spinor ψ<sub>q</sub> = f(ω)[λ]f(ω) has a simple pole 1/λλ' for each multiple f<sup>24</sup>(ω) entering the measure dl<sub>xy</sub> in the global temperature potential (13). A holomorphic gradient ∇V<sub>T</sub> ≃ E(z) ≃ ξ(z) in λ<sub>k</sub>[f<sub>k</sub>(ω)] gets singular in f(ω). A certain iterate f(ω) in 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ′ 
       </mo> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            24 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         4 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          n 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> meets a zero z<sub>nt</sub>. Four zeros ±1/2 ± im<sub>n</sub> in V<sub>T</sub> yield a three-dimensional quadrupole moment r<sub>i</sub>Q<sub>ij</sub>r<sub>j</sub>/r<sup>5</sup> ≃ 1/r<sup>3</sup>. The thermal potential V<sub>T</sub>(λ) has a cubic, roton-like upper valley: In dependence on defining the velocity of light 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         l 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            ε 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            μ 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> by a vacuum permittivity ε<sub>0</sub>(r) ≃ r<sup>2</sup> or not one gets V<sub>T</sub>(λ) ≃ Q/εr ≃ Q/r<sup>3</sup> ≃ mr<sup>2</sup>/r<sup>3</sup> ≃ m/r either a quadrupolar potential V<sub>Q</sub> or a Kepler-Coulomb-potential in unified space. The Fourier-component of V<sub>Q</sub> contains a contact interaction term giving a bag potential which is compatible with a cubic behavior of coupling-constants. Iterations Q(z)◦…◦Q(z) of the Poisson Equation (4) form a 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> polar cloud of segments. Segments resolve e.g. fractal a 10<sup>20</sup> eV voltage into a minimal e.g. 1 meV potential (13) and vice versa. The atmospheric equivalent of second sound is e.g. lightning bang and thunder as independent thermal and entropy cycles of q<sub>sc</sub> of an incompressible superfluid. The cubic invariant couples longitudinal and rotatory components in roton-like upper energy valleys <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-39">
     [39]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-40">
     [40]
    </xref>. The Feigenbaum diagram is a hysteresis of a Carnot cycle.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s11">
   <title>11. Cosmic Rays, Cosmological Redshift and Microwave Background in Bifurcating Spacetime</title>
   <p>Dimensionless energy is scaled by k-components up to the GZK cutoff as the onset of first ν<sub>Sh</sub>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-41">
     [41]
    </xref>. A zero-energy-universe in the vicinity of every point is capable to create large cloud masses. Second sound is a quadrupolar wave inherent to spacetime as a background permeability ε<sub>0</sub>(k) = 1/I<sub>ij</sub>k<sub>i</sub>k<sub>j</sub>. The potential 1/ε(k)k<sup>2</sup> corresponds to exchange scattering or permanent tidal waves of two objects. Its spatial dependence in 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ε 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         0 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           R 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           u 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         u 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> explains the cosmological redshift. CMB is caused by the overall first appearance of ν<sub>Sh</sub> in clock rate j(z). CR emissions have low count rate 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mrow> 
          <msup> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> but ultra-high energy. So far organic matter has been used for power plants. An associated CR generation causing air ionization has been ignored so far which could be controlled in nanostructures as a novel possible future energy technology. Its energy gain can be estimated by the T-h<sub>t</sub> hysteresis area of Carnot cycles. Besides understanding climate, second sound is implicit in a model of a universe and concerns background susceptibilities with apparent expansion and redshift.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s12">
   <title>12. Comparison with Existing Experimental Data</title>
   <p>Rare CR of probability 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> are set in context to enhanced anomalous atmospheric ionization (μ<sub>2</sub>-term), a changed air composition, nuclear disintegration stars in QH layers or plants. As a prerequisite for mass creation correlations over macroscopic dimensions in large scale CR detector arrays with a very low count rate up to 10<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup> year are also a measure of stability. This holds also for organic matter where air ionization accompanies plant growth because of a partial small amount of matter created from nothing or matter canceled out by its negative field energy. Dimensionless Q<sub>xy</sub> oscillations in Equation (4) are rather waves of the metric (gravitational waves). In form of CMB they indicate the stability of space. Accordingly, besides existing matter at plant growth matter plus radiation is created. The overall CMB is viewed as the part of first k-component cycles of bifurcating spacetime. A measured seasonal variation of CR counts confirms coupling to organic matter and atmospheric clouds in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
     Figure 3
    </xref> as well as an associated measured seasonal variation of Be activity concentration in the air in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
     Figure 4
    </xref>. FZU supposes an oscillating creation of matter by zeta zeros as zero-energy-universes. The velocity of the second sound is proportional to the entropy δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub> ≃ B and depends e.g. on magnetic field. QH microwave emission has been already detected <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-25">
     [25]
    </xref>. A diurnal air ionization in vegetation areas has been detected in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
     Figure 5
    </xref> which is classified corresponding to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>. The present paper attributes this phenomenon to a finite CR generation with low count rate at plant growth. As an indication low k-components k ≃ 1 is capable to explain the CMB amount of 10<sup>−</sup><sup>4</sup> on vacuum energy ρ<sub>vac</sub>. With increasing density of chaotic k-components quadratic and higher polynomial mass terms dominate the linear rest mass favoring growth of surrounding clouds or leaves. FZU favors creating large mass clouds near a nontrivial zero z<sub>nt</sub> in distinction to a single-particle-big-bang-scenario. In FZU, existing particles serve as catalysts of an eternal non-equilibrium process or alternating capacitor state. Various experiments support FZU which have been previously classified differently. These include microwave emission at quantized conductivities, seasonal variations of cosmic-ray intensity and diurnal variations of air ion concentrations in different vegetation areas. First-sound entropy-changes of k-congruences and second-sound temperature-variations yield an oscillation of a temperature potential (13) over a fractal line dl<sub>xy</sub> in natural history as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
     Figure 6
    </xref>.</p>
   <fig-group id="fig3" position="float">
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a)--(b)--Figure 3. (a) Seasonal correlation of temperature change of atmosphere and cosmic-ray intensity in partially shielded chambers. A temperature near ground; B mean temperature up to 16 km; (b) Correlation of temperature change at Lindenberg with cosmic intensity at Potsdam. A: CR intensity; B: temperature near ground; C: mean temperature up to 16 km [44].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId183.jpeg?20250711015039" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a)--(b)--Figure 3. (a) Seasonal correlation of temperature change of atmosphere and cosmic-ray intensity in partially shielded chambers. A temperature near ground; B mean temperature up to 16 km; (b) Correlation of temperature change at Lindenberg with cosmic intensity at Potsdam. A: CR intensity; B: temperature near ground; C: mean temperature up to 16 km [44].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId184.jpeg?20250711015039" />
    </fig>
   </fig-group>
   <p>Figure 3. (a) Seasonal correlation of temperature change of atmosphere and cosmic-ray intensity in partially shielded chambers. A temperature near ground; B mean temperature up to 16 km; (b) Correlation of temperature change at Lindenberg with cosmic intensity at Potsdam. A: CR intensity; B: temperature near ground; C: mean temperature up to 16 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-44">
     [44]
    </xref>.</p>
   <fig id="fig4" position="float">
    <label>Figure 4</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 4. Seasonal fluctuation of the Be activity concentration in the air near the ground. The circles represent the measured values of each month, the solid curve connects the monthly values averaged over almost six years and is therefore repeated periodically <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-45">
       [45]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId185.jpeg?20250711015039" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig5" position="float">
    <label>Figure 5</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 5. Diurnal variation of measured air ion concentration near definite plants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-26">
       [26]
      </xref>. (a) Diurnal Variation of air ions in Grapes vegetation area; (b) Diurnal variation of air ions in Chickpea vegetation area; (c) Diurnal Variation of air ions in Sugarcane vegetation area; (d) Diurnal variation of air ions in Onion vegetation area.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId186.jpeg?20250711015039" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig6" position="float">
    <label>Figure 6</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 6. CRs (red) and global temperature (black) assumed from geochemical findings over 5 × 10<sup>8</sup> years from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-24">
       [24]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2181307-rId187.jpeg?20250711015039" />
   </fig>
   <p>Holomorph L(z, χ), ξ(z) in z ≃ λ describe a conductivity plateau as a non-radiative, non-turbulent, non-dissipative potential flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143951-46">
     [46]
    </xref>. A conductivity plateau is a plateau of constant temperature where transitions between plateaus cause temperature oscillations. Within the atmosphere global temperature oscillations are proven over 10<sup>8</sup> years as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
     Figure 6
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s13">
   <title>13. Conclusion</title>
   <p>As a universe from nothing the zero-energy universe hypothesis proposes that the total amount of energy in the universe is exactly zero. These zero energies are implemented as one-dimensional zero of the Riemann zeta function. Dimensionless unified fields cover all orders of magnitude beyond local experimental setups. Iterated complex quadratic functions as lattices of algebraic units on elliptic curves support a universe as a quantum entangled fractal superfluid. A complex quadratic map written as real curvature 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          μ 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          ν 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         4 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
      <mi>
        ℱ 
      </mi> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          μ 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          ν 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi mathvariant="script">
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> already enters the Friedmann equations. Viewing R<sub>μυ</sub> = Rez<sub>k</sub> as iterated, bifurcated tensile forces yields a matter state with charge and mass locally surrounded by a shower of “CRs” and microwave excitations, in microstructures as well in the universe. An experimental support for a bifurcated spacetime is detected microwaves at QH as well air ionization in vegetation areas. Tensile forces of bifurcated spacetime are felt as CR and CMB. The zero-energy state of the universe described as a nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function and related Dirichlet L-functions is reduced to a holomorphic one-dimensional function. This allows to develop the fractal concept of the universe as a zero of ζ(z) contained in a zero of ζ(z) iteratively. The resulting Poisson equation allows to define a charge quantum by solving DM by a 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>-polar ball with a bifurcation tree of quadrupolar segments 1, 2 → 1’, 2’ of dashed lines as partial magnets. The segments dl<sub>xy</sub> as a series in the geometric zeta function is the fractal analog of DM for large cloud (monopole) masses due to quadratic mass terms. However, a conductivity plateaus reflects a neutral-like quadrupole-like current as a holomorphic potential. Predicted second sound, CR, CMB at QH have low count rates which solve CCP ρ<sub>exp</sub> ≠ ρ<sub>QS</sub> by relating QS to a lap number of k-components. Highly correlated k-components as unstable orbits in the bifurcation tree explain QE by the CCP factor 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> for k = 9 or k = 10. From the mathematical point of view binary substituted Dirichlet L-functions offer a new relation to quantum statistics.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bhattacharya, J., Bhattacharyya, S. and Minwalla, S. (2011) Dissipative Superfluid Dynamics from Gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011, Article No. 125. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep04(2011)125
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2024) Fractal Zeta Universe and Cosmic-Ray-Charge-Cloud Superfluid. &gt;https://www.epubli.com/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2025) Matter and Quantum Entanglement. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 13, 1125-1137. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2025.134059
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935) Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47, 777-780. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.47.777
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dirac, P.A. (1931) Quantised Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, 133, 60-72.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Weinberg, S. (1989) The Cosmological Constant Problem. Reviews of Modern Physics, 61, 1-23. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.61.1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2024) Nucleosynthesis in Thin Layers. (O. Ziep, Hrsg.) &gt;https://www.epubli.com/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hieb, M. (1995) Feigenbaum’s Constant and the Sommerfeld Fine-Structure Con-stant. &gt;https://www.rxiv.org/abs/1704.0365 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Manasson, V.A. (2017) An Emergence of a Quantum World in a Self-Organized Vacuum—A Possible Scenario. Journal of Modern Physics, 8, 1330-1381. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.88086
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ganter, B. (2020) Deciphering the Fine Structure Constant. epubli. &gt;http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ganter, B. (2013) The Emergence of the Dimensions and Fundamental Forces in the Universe, an Information-Theoretical Approach for the Explaining of the Quantity Ratios of the Fundamental Interactions, 4. rev. and enl. Ed. &gt;http://www.epubli.de/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Martin, J. (2012) Everything You Always Wanted to Know about the Cosmological Constant Problem (but Were Afraid to Ask). Comptes Rendus. Physique, 13, 566-665. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2012.04.008
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Millikan., R.A. (1913) On the Elementary Electrical Charge and the Avogadro Constant. Physical Review, 2, 109-143. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.2.109
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dirac, P.A. (1974) Cosmological Models and the Large Numbers Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 338, 439-446. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1974.0095 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Keeper, R. and Ziep, O. (1986) Theory of Quantum Hall Effect. Physica Status Solidi (b), 133, 769-773. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221330239
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moon, M., Li, D., Liao, W., Rigden, A.J. and Friedl, M.A. (2020) Modification of Surface Energy Balance during Springtime: The Relative Importance of Biophysical and Meteorological Changes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 284, Article 107905. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107905
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Friedmann, A. (1999) On the Possibility of a World with Constant Negative Curvature of Space. General Relativity and Gravitation, 31, 2001-2008. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026755309811
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schönhage, A. (1977) Die Diskriminante einer Matrix. Archiv der Mathematik, 28, 401-408. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01223943
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2025) Topological Entropy of Regular Chaotic Quadratic Maps. Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics, 12, 43-58. &gt;https://doi.org/10.36347/sjpms.2025.v12i03.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Einstein, A. (1918) Über Gravitationswellen. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 154.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2025) Charge Quanta as Zeros of the Zeta Function in Bifurcated Spacetime. Journal of Modern Physics, 16, 249-262. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2025.162011
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meyer, C. (1970) Bemerkungen zum satz von heegner-stark über die imaginär-quadratischen zahlkörper mit der klassenzahl eins. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 242, 179-214. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1970.242.179
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Slavchov, R.I., Dimitrova, I.M. and Ivanov, T.I. (2016) Electrostatics of quadrupo-larizable media. arXiv:1610.08650. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shaviv, N.J. and Veizer, J. (2003) Celestial Driver of Phanerozoic Climate? GSA Today, 13, 4-10. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1130/1052-5173(2003)013&lt;0004:cdopc&gt;2.0.co;2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bisognin, R., Bartolomei, H., Kumar, M., Safi, I., Berroir, J.-M., Bocquillon, E., et al. (2019) Microwave Photons Emitted by Fractionally Charged Quasiparticles. Nature Communications, 10, Article No. 1708. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09758-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Patil, G.B., Pawar, S.D., Bhosale, J.L. and Patil, P.G. (2021) Pollution Index and Air Ion Variation in Different Vegetation Area at the Rural Station Bhilawadi (16˚59'N, 74˚28'E). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1964, Article 032006. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1964/3/032006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (1991) Quantum Transport and Breaking of Space-Time Symmetries. Mathematical Physics X: Proceedings of the Xth Congress on Mathematical Physics, Leipzig, 6 August 1991, 494.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (1991) On Fractional Quantization and Triplet Correlations in Quantum Hall Theory. Physica Status Solidi (b), 168, K9-K14. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221680140
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2023) Linear Map and Spin I. N-Focal Tensor and Partition Function. Journal of Modern and Applied Physics, 6, 1-14. &gt;https://www.pulsus.com/scholarly-articles/linear-map-and-spin-i-nfocal-tensor-and-partition-function-11914.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Riemann, B. (1876) Gesammelte mathematische Werke und wissenschaftlicher Nachlass. BG Teubner.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hostler, L. (1971) Excited State Reduced Coulomb Green’s Function and f-Dimensional Coulomb Green’s Function in Momentum Space. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 12, 2311-2319. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665537
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abrikosov, A.A. (1957) On the Magnetic Properties of Superconductors of the Second Group. Soviet Physics-Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 5, 1174-1182.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bonch-Bruevich, V.L. (1974) The Benard Problem for Hot Electrons in Semiconductors. Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 67, 2204-2214.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fritzsch, H. (2002) Fundamental Constants at High Energy. In: Papenfuß, D., Lüst, D. and Schleich, W.P., Eds., 100 Years Werner Heisenberg: Works and Impact, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 89-95. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527610853.ch12
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Katori, M. (2019) Macdonald Denominators for Affine Root Systems, Orthogonal Theta Functions, and Elliptic Determinantal Point Processes. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 60, Article 013301. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5037805
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rosengren, H. and Schlosser, M. (2006) Elliptic Determinant Evaluations and the Macdonald Identities for Affine Root Systems. Compositio Mathematica, 142, 937-961. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1112/s0010437x0600203x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Laughlin, R.B. (1983) Anomalous Quantum Hall Effect: An Incompressible Quantum Fluid with Fractionally Charged Excitations. Physical Review Letters, 50, 1395-1398. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.50.1395
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Haldane, F.D.M. (2018) A Modular-Invariant Modified Weierstrass Sigma-Function as a Building Block for Lowest-Landau-Level Wavefunctions on the Torus. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59, Article 071901. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5042618
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ter Haar, D. (2013) Collected Papers of LD Landau. Elsevier.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Melrose, D.B. (2008) Quantum Plasmadynamics: Unmagnetized Plasmas. Springer. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73903-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Daw, E. (2012) Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays and The GZK Cutoff. &gt;http://www.hep.shef.ac.uk/edaw/PHY206/Site/2012_course_files/phy206rlec5.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     https://unsplash.com/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Quanten-Hall-Effekt. &gt;https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanten-Hall-Effekt 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Duperier, A. (1941) The Seasonal Variations of Cosmic-Ray Intensity and Temperature of the Atmosphere. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 177, 204-216. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1941.0007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kolb, V.W. (1970) Jahreszeitliche Schwankungen der 
     <sup>7</sup>Be-, 
     <sup>54</sup>Mn-und Spaltprodukt-Konzentrationen der bodennahen Luft. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 22, 443-450. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v22i4.10237
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143951-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2025) Quantized Conductivity as a Neutral Quadrupolar Generator. Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics, 12, 1-5. &gt;https://doi.org/10.36347/sjpms.2025.v12i01.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>