<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    aim
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Advances in Microbiology
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2165-3402
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2165-3410
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/aim.2025.156024
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    aim-143564
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Exploring the Biodiversity of Rare Actinobacteria for Combating AMR: Screening for Anti-Quorum Sensing Properties
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sunita
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bundale
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nisha
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nikam
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ketki
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Gwalani
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jaya
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Singh
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Aaliya
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Farooqui
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nandita
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nashikkar
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aHislop School of Biotechnology, Hislop College, Nagpur, India
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Raipur, India
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Biotechnology, Kalinga University, Naya Raipur, India
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     23
    </day> 
    <month>
     06
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    06
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    343
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    370
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      10,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      23,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      23,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant global health challenge, necessitating the search for alternative therapeutic strategies. Targeting bacterial quorum sensing (QS), a communication system that regulates virulence and biofilm formation, has emerged as a promising anti-virulence approach. Actinobacteria, renowned for their prolific production of bioactive secondary metabolites, represent a valuable resource for discovering novel anti-quorum-sensing (AQS) compounds. This study explores the biodiversity of actinobacteria from diverse ecological niches to identify strains with anti-QS properties. Using Chromobacterium violaceum and Serratia marcescens as biosensors, actinobacterial extracts were screened for their ability to inhibit QS-regulated pigment production. Selected extracts were further evaluated for swarming motility inhibition and potent strains were identified. Four rare actinobacterial strains MG1, BD21, MG3 and VL9 identified as Kutzneria viridogrisea, Microbacterium barkeri, Amycolatopsis thermoflava and Yuhushiella sp. were studied for their biofilm inhibition activity and prodigiosin inhibition in pathogenic bacteria. Our findings are the first to highlight the potential of these rare actinobacteria as a source of novel anti-QS agents, contributing to the development of alternative strategies to mitigate AMR.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Actinobacteria
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Quorum Sensing Inhibition
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Quorum Quenching
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Antimicrobial Resistance
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Biofilm Inhibition
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Antibiotics have been essential in combating bacterial infections for over a century, but their widespread use and misuse has contributed to the alarming rise of antibiotic resistance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, has severely limited treatment options <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Compounding this crisis is the lack of significant new antibiotic discoveries since 1987, underscoring the urgent need for alternative strategies to combat bacterial infections.</p>
   <p>One promising approach is targeting quorum sensing (QS), a bacterial communication system that regulates virulence and pathogenicity. QS involves the production and detection of small signalling molecules, known as autoinducers, that coordinate behaviors such as swarming, biofilm formation, motility, and pigment production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis are opportunistic pathogens, especially among hospitalized and/or catheterized patients and menopausal women, the frequency of their involvement in UTI being next only to E. coli <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Both these organisms exhibit the swarming phenotype which plays a crucial role in the establishment of renal infections which begin with the colonization of the lower urinary tract followed by ascending migration of these urinary pathogens.</p>
   <p>Swarming enables Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to successfully counter the host defense mechanisms and establish disease. Also, swarm cells of both these pathogens exhibit enhanced ability to invade epithelial cells, an important aspect in pathogenicity. With their ability to grow in biofilms, especially over catheter surfaces they become highly resistant to most antibiotics leading to chronic or persistent UTIs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. With an increasing difficulty in treating such recalcitrant infections, there has been a growing interest in alternative therapies.</p>
   <p>QS inhibition has been considered a potential alternative antipathogenic therapy. It has been demonstrated to be an efficient anti-infective technique in several host-microbe systems. Unlike conventional antibiotics that exert selective pressure for resistance, quorum sensing inhibitors (QSIs) disrupt bacterial communication without killing the bacteria directly, thereby reducing virulence while minimizing resistance development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Actinobacteria, a prolific source of bioactive compounds, have historically contributed to the discovery of antibiotics such as rifamycin, erythromycin, vancomycin, and gentamycin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-9">
     [9]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. While much research has focused on well-known genera like Streptomyces, rare actinobacteria remain underexplored despite their potential for producing novel QS inhibitors.</p>
   <p>This study aims to bridge this gap by isolating rare actinobacteria from diverse environmental sources and screening them for anti-QS activity. Using indicator organisms such as Chromobacterium violaceum and Serratia marcescens, we assessed QS inhibition, while anti-swarming activity and anti-biofilm activity was evaluated against UTI pathogens like Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. By exploring the untapped potential of rare actinobacteria, this research seeks to identify novel QSIs that could serve as effective alternatives or adjuncts to traditional antibiotics in the fight against MDR bacterial infections.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials &amp; Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Chemicals and Media</title>
    <p>All chemicals and solvents used in the study were of analytical grade and were purchased from Merck, Germany. The culture media used for bacterial growth and isolation were obtained from Hi-media, Mumbai, India.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Microorganisms and Media</title>
    <p>The test strains used for screening antimicrobial activity were obtained from the Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), IMTECH, Chandigarh, India and NCMR, NCCS, Pune. The strains used were Bacillus subtilis MTCC 441, Proteus mirabilis 425, Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 424, Serratia marcescens MTCC 86, Chromobacterium violaceum MCC 4212 and Candida albicans MTCC 227.</p>
    <p>In addition, clinical strains of Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were obtained from Vishakha Clinical &amp; Microbiological Lab, Nagpur. All strains were routinely maintained on nutrient agar slants at 4˚C. An overnight liquid culture of the organisms in Luria Bertani (LB) broth was used in all experiments.</p>
    <p>Swarm Agar:</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Isolation of Actinobacteria from Environmental Samples</title>
    <p>Soil samples were collected from various sites at depths of 3 - 5 cm below the surface. The samples were carefully placed in sterile polyethylene bags, sealed tightly, and stored at 4˚C until further processing. Additionally, water samples were collected from different water bodies and stored in sterile bottles until they were needed for analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-11">
      [11]
     </xref>. The sample collection was conducted over a period of May 2022 to December 2023.</p>
    <p>Approximately 1 g of each collected soil sample was suspended in 10 ml sterile distilled water, and from this suspension, three dilutions (10<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup> to 10<sup>–4</sup>) were prepared. Each dilution was divided into aliquots, which were subjected to different treatments to isolate actinobacteria. The treatments applied included 1.5% phenol treatment, 0.3% Chloramine T treatment, Benzethonium chloride treatment, Heat treatment at 120˚C and a combination of the above treatments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-12">
      [12]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-13">
      [13]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>After treatment, the aliquots were plated on various isolation media to promote the growth of actinobacteria. The media used for isolation included Starch Casein Agar (SCA), Humic Acid Vitamin Agar (HVA), Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), Starch M-Protein Agar (SPA) and Actinomycetes Isolation Agar (AIA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-14">
      [14]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>For selective isolation of actinobacteria, the media were supplemented with antibiotics such as nystatin, nalidixic acid, gentamycin, kanamycin, and others, to inhibit the growth of non-actinobacterial microorganisms and ensure the successful isolation of actinomycete genera <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-15">
      [15]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Characterization of the Isolates</title>
    <p>To study the macroscopic features of the isolated strains, they were streaked onto Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) plates and incubated at 28˚C for 7 days. The resulting colonies were examined for various morphological characteristics, including colony size, consistency, shape, elevation, margins, color of aerial/substrate mycelium and pigments diffusing into the medium. These characteristics were observed both visually and under a microscope <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-16">
      [16]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>To further characterize the isolates, the colonies were picked and teased to separate the mycelium. The mycelial samples were then subjected to Gram staining. The stained slides were examined under high-power magnification, and the morphological characteristics, such as shape, size, and arrangement of cells, were recorded <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-17">
      [17]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-18">
      [18]
     </xref>. This approach allowed for the classification of the isolates based on their microscopic and cultural characteristics.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Production and Extraction of Bioactive Compounds</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-"></xref>The extract was obtained using liquid-liquid extraction. The isolates were cultured in Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) as shake flask cultures for 10 days at 130 rpm and 28˚C. After the incubation period, the cultures were centrifuged at 7800 ×g for 15 min. The supernatant was mixed with ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v) and shaken at 150 rpm for 24 h to recover the crude bioactive compounds. The extracts were collected and evaporated using a vacuum concentrator. The resulting crude extracts were stored at −20˚C in a deep freezer for further analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-19">
      [19]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The use of Ethyl acetate as an extraction solvent is recommended because of its medium polarity and minimum toxicity on test strains. Many biological compounds (polar and non-polar) can be extracted and evaluated for their bioactivities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-20">
      [20]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Antimicrobial Activity by Agar Well Diffusion Method</title>
    <p>The actinobacterial extracts were resuspended in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to prepare stock solutions with concentrations of 1 mg/ml, which were then used to assess antimicrobial activity using the agar well diffusion method.</p>
    <p>For antimicrobial testing, 15 ml of Mueller-Hinton agar was poured into sterile Petri dishes, followed by inoculation with the test bacteria: Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For antifungal activity testing, Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) was used, with Candida albicans as the test organism.</p>
    <p>Wells were created in the agar, and 50 µl of each extract was introduced into the wells. The plates were incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours for bacterial growth and at 28˚C for 48 hours for yeast growth. The diameter of the zones of inhibition surrounding the wells was measured to determine the antimicrobial activity.</p>
    <p>Each experiment was repeated three times to ensure reproducibility, and the mean zone of inhibition was calculated. Control wells containing 50 µl DMSO were included in each experiment to rule out any inhibitory effect of the solvent on the test organisms.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_7">
    <title>2.7. Pigment Quenching Assay</title>
    <p>The quorum sensing inhibition (QSI) activity of the bioactive extracts was evaluated by studying pigment quenching using the agar well diffusion method with Serratia marcescens and Chromobacterium violaceum as the indicator organisms.</p>
    <p>To perform the assay, agar plates were prepared by inoculating the respective indicator strains onto Luria Bertani (LB) agar. Wells were created on the agar plates, and 50 µl of the bioactive extracts were added to the wells.</p>
    <p>After incubation at 28˚C for 24 - 48 hours, the presence or absence of pigmentation around the well was observed. A positive QSI result was indicated by the lack of pigmentation in the vicinity of the well, suggesting that the bioactive extract was able to inhibit the quorum sensing mechanism of the indicator strain. In contrast, a negative result was indicated by no inhibition of pigmentation, and the indicator organism showed its characteristic pigmentation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-11">
      [11]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-21">
      [21]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-22">
      [22]
     </xref>. The zones of pigment inhibition surrounding the wells were measured and recorded to assess the extent of anti-QS activity. p-nitrophenyl glycerol (PNPG) was used as a standard anti-quorum sensing compound <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-23">
      [23]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-24">
      [24]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_8">
    <title>2.8. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration</title>
    <p>Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of extracts was determined using the broth microdilution method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-25">
      [25]
     </xref>. Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures were exposed to extracts supplemented in the medium to a final concentration of 1 to 200 µg/ml and incubated overnight. After 24 h of incubation at 37 ˚C, MIC was calculated as the lowest concentration of compound that inhibited visible growth of Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as well as read at 600 nm. Each experiment was repeated in triplicates, and the average MIC value was calculated for each extract.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_9">
    <title>2.9. Anti-Swarming Assay</title>
    <p>To evaluate the effect of potent anti-QS compounds from actinobacteria on the swarming motility of Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, swarm agar plates were prepared for each bacterial species. Extracts were incorporated into the agar plates at appropriate concentrations, based on previous screening results. Two control plates were included for each bacterial strain, one containing no additives and termed positive control and the other containing DMSO and termed solvent control. A 2 µl aliquot of overnight culture of each bacterial strain was centrally inoculated onto the swarm agar plate. All the plates were incubated at 37˚C for 20 h. Thereafter, the diameter of the swarm zone was measured and compared to the control and percent reduction was calculated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-8">
      [8]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-26">
      [26]
     </xref>. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate, and the average percent reduction was calculated for each extract.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_10">
    <title>2.10. Molecular Identification of Potent Actinobacteria</title>
    <p>The 16S rRNA gene of potent actinobacteria was amplified with Actino specific forward Primer—5'-CCTAACACATGCAAGTCGA-3' and Actino Specific Reverse primer—5'-CGTATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-5'. The reaction mixture contained 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.5 % (v/v) DMSO, 1 mM of degenerate primers, 12.5 ng of genomic DNA and 0.6 units of Ex-Taq Hot Start Version in a final volume of 25 µl of 1 × Ex-Taq PCR buffer. PCR reaction was started with denaturation at 94˚C for 5 min followed by a total of 25 cycles that consisted of denaturation at 94˚C for 30 sec, annealing at 53˚C for 30 sec and extension at 72˚C for 1 min. The reaction was terminated with a final extension at 72˚C for 5 min <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-27">
      [27]
     </xref>. The size of PCR products was around 1500 bp in length.</p>
    <p>The amplified DNA fragment was separated on 1% agarose gel, eluted from the gel and purified using gel extraction kit. The purified PCR product was sent for sequencing to Barcode BioSciences Pvt. Ltd. or Eurofins India, Bangalore.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_11">
    <title>2.11. Bacterial Growth Assay</title>
    <p>To study the effect of rare actinobacterial extracts on growth of Proteus mirabilis, growth was monitored turbidometrically for 48 hours in LB broth in the presence of extracts at a concentration of 5 μg/ml in liquid culture at 37˚C. A solvent control was also set up and both were compared to a positive control <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-8">
      [8]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-28">
      [28]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_12">
    <title>2.12. Biofilm Inhibition Assay</title>
    <p>The biofilm formation of Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the presence of rare actinobacterial extracts (2.5 - 20 μg/ml) was evaluated using the microtiter plate assay. Treated and untreated cultures of Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in LB broth were incubated overnight at 37 ˚C. Free cells were removed and biofilms were washed three times with sterile PBS and fixed with 99% (v/v) methanol. The adhered cells were stained with 0.2% (w/v) crystal violet. The additional crystal violet was removed by washing with distilled water. Finally, crystal violet was solubilized using ethanol for 20 min and the absorbance was measured at OD<sub>590</sub> nm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-29">
      [29]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-30">
      [30]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_13">
    <title>2.13. Prodigiosin Assay (for S. marcescens)</title>
    <p>Overnight culture of S. marcescens was used for development of assay. 1% of broth culture was inoculated in sterile nutrient broth tubes containing different concentrations of extracts (5 - 25 μg/ml) and incubated overnight. After incubation the cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes and resuspended in acidified ethanol solution (96 ml of ethanol containing 4% of 1 M HCl) for extraction of prodigiosin. The extracted prodigiosin was determined by reading absorbance at 534 nm and percent inhibition of prodigiosin production was calculated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-31">
      [31]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Simultaneously, Relative Prodigiosin production was determined by determining the ratio of the absorbance of the extracted prodigiosin solution at 534 nm to the turbidity of the culture suspension as optical density at 600 nm. The effects of inhibitors were evaluated using the relative prodigiosin production (A534/optical density at 600 nm), for which the control value was 100% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-32">
      [32]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-33">
      [33]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_14">
    <title>2.14. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>All the experiments were performed in triplicates and the results were expressed in the form of mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student’s t-test was performed using SYSTAT Software (Systat Software, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant unless otherwise mentioned.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Isolation of Actinobacteria from Environmental Samples</title>
    <p>A total of 192 putative actinobacterial isolates were successfully obtained by employing different soil treatment methods, selective media, and cultivation conditions. Among the various sampling sites, the highest number of isolates was obtained from the Melghat forest (37 isolates), followed by Bhushi Dam (30 isolates) and Palolem Beach (30 isolates). A summary of the sampling sites and their respective locations is provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-"></xref>Table 1. Location of soil samples collection sites.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Sampling Site</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Location</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Type of environment</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of isolates</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Bhushi Dam</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">18˚43'21.86''N 73˚23'47.26''E</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Dam</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">30</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Melghat</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">21˚26'45''N 77˚11'50''E</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Forest</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">37</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Malgund</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">17˚9'48''N 73˚16'7"E</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Marine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">27</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Guhagar</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">17˚29'21"N</p><p style="text-align:center">73˚11'34"E</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Marine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Palolem Beach</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">15˚01'35"N</p><p style="text-align:center">74˚01'60"E</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Marine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">20</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Karla</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">18˚78'36"N 73˚46'99"E</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Mountain soil</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Chikhaldhara</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">21˚24'30''N 77˚19'42"E</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Forest</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">15</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Katol</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">21˚27'33"N 78˚58'60"E</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Farm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">14</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Vena Lake</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">17˚56'3"N</p><p style="text-align:center">73˚39'54E</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Lake sediment</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Pratapgarh Fort</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.63%"><p style="text-align:center">25.8971˚N 81.9409˚E</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Mountain</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.65%"><p style="text-align:center">22</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Among the different soil treatment methods, 1.5% phenol treatment of various soil suspensions resulted in the highest number of colonies, yielding a total of 73 colonies. These were primarily obtained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) supplemented with gentamycin, followed by Starch Casein Agar (SCA) with the same antibiotic. Heat treatment at 120˚C produced 47 colonies, with 34 colonies growing on PDA and 13 on AIA supplemented with nalidixic acid. Air-dried soil samples yielded 21 colonies, 15 of which were on PDA with gentamycin, and 6 colonies were obtained on AIA supplemented with streptomycin. Benzethonium chloride treatment resulted in the isolation of 43 colonies. The effect of pretreatment on isolation of rare actinobacteria is depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Effect of pretreatment on isolation of rare actinobacteria from soil samples.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId22.jpeg?20250626112425" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Characterization of Actinobacterial Isolates</title>
    <p>A total of 192 actinomycete strains were identified based on distinct differences in colony characteristics, including color, colony size, filamentous structure, mycelial growth, and pigment production. Among the 192 isolates, 125 (65.1%) exhibited distinctive pigment production on the reverse side of the colonies, while 80 (41.6%) produced soluble pigments.</p>
    <p>The isolates were categorized based on their colony colors, and four main color classes were observed, with some intergradation between classes. The predominant colors were white (85 isolates, 44.3%), brown (42 isolates, 21.8%), yellow (29 isolates, 15.2%), orange (22 isolates, 11.5%), and gray (14 isolates, 7.2%). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref> showcases the colony characteristics of a few actinobacterial isolates.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-"></xref>3.3. Antimicrobial Activity by Agar Well Diffusion Method</title>
    <p>The antimicrobial activity of rare actinobacterial extracts was assessed using the agar well diffusion method against a variety of test organisms: Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Additionally, the resistance profiles of these test organisms to commonly used antibiotics were evaluated using the disc diffusion method.</p>
    <p>Among the test organisms, Bacillus subtilis was found to be sensitive to all antibiotics tested. In contrast, Proteus mirabilis exhibited resistance to tetracycline and vancomycin, and a clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis demonstrated resistance to multiple antibiotics, including tobramycin, trimethoprim, penicillin, tetracycline, and vancomycin. Staphylococcus aureus showed resistance to tetracycline, vancomycin, and trimethoprim, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa was resistant to tetracycline and vancomycin.</p>
    <p>Following the antibiotic resistance screening, the organic extracts of all actinobacterial isolates were tested for antimicrobial activity against the aforementioned pathogens. Among the isolates, 60% exhibited activity against Bacillus subtilis, while 10% were active against Staphylococcus aureus, 12% against Proteus mirabilis, and only 10% against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Additionally, 30% of the actinobacterial extracts showed antifungal activity against Candida albicans (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Colony characteristics of pure cultures of actinobacterial isolates.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId23.jpeg?20250626112428" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Pigment Quenching Assay</title>
    <p>Further investigation was conducted to assess the anti-quorum sensing (QS) activity of the actinobacterial extracts by testing them for pigment inhibition against Serratia marcescens and Chromobacterium violaceum. A significant proportion of the isolates demonstrated anti-QS activity, with 66% of the actinobacterial extracts inhibiting pigment production in Serratia marcescens. Additionally, 53% of the isolates exhibited anti-QS activity against Chromobacterium violaceum.</p>
    <p>These findings suggest that a substantial number of the actinobacterial extracts possess potential anti-QS properties, indicating their capacity to interfere with bacterial communication and virulence.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Antimicrobial and anti-quorum sensing activity of actinobacterial extracts.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId24.jpeg?20250626112429" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Anti-Swarming Assay</title>
    <p>The anti-swarming activity of thirty-five potent actinobacterial extracts was evaluated against Proteus mirabilis (clinical isolate) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Out of these, twenty-six extracts demonstrated significant inhibition of swarming behaviour compared to the control. The potency of the extracts varied, with a reduction in the diameter of the swarm zone ranging from 10% to 70% in Proteus mirabilis and 10% to 60% in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Notably, extracts from BD2, BD3, BD10, BD16, BD21, BD24, MG1, MG13, MG22, MG23, MG30, P5, CF20, K6, and VL9 showed substantial inhibition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>). The anti-swarming activity of a few actinobacterial extracts against Proteus mirabilis is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref> and against Pseudomonas aeruginosa is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Anti-swarming activity of actinobacterial extracts.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId25.jpeg?20250626112430" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Anti swarming activity of actinobacterial extracts against Proteus mirabilis.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId26.jpeg?20250626112430" />
    </fig>
    <p>Of particular interest, VL9 exhibited the highest inhibition (70%) against Proteus mirabilis, while MG30 and MG1 showed 60% and 55% inhibition, respectively, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These results highlight the potential of these actinobacterial extracts in modulating bacterial motility, likely by interfering with quorum sensing (QS)-mediated behaviours. Furthermore, the extracts inhibited swarming in a dose-dependent manner, as observed with MG1 and VL9, reinforcing their potential as effective modulators of bacterial motility.</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. Anti-swarming activity of actinobacterial extracts against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId27.jpeg?20250626112430" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>3.6. Identification of Potent Isolates</title>
    <p>Nineteen potent isolates were identified on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The sequences have been submitted in Genbank and accession numbers obtained as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_7">
    <title>3.7. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)</title>
    <p>MG1, BD21, MG3, and VL9, identified as rare actinobacterial species, were selected for further studies based on their demonstrated antibacterial activity. Among these, MG1 exhibited notable activity against both Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, prompting the determination of their Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) to further explore their anti-infective properties. The MIC values for all four extracts were found to be 200 μg/ml for Proteus mirabilis and 400 μg/ml for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These MIC values were used as a reference for selecting sub-MIC concentrations to evaluate the extracts’ potential to modulate biofilm formation and quorum sensing in UTI pathogens.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-"></xref>Table 2. Identification &amp; bioactivities of Actinobacteria.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Isolate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Closest Cultivated species</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">GenBank Accession Number</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of nucleotides sequenced</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Query cover</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Similarity</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.12%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Anti-swarming activity</p><p style="text-align:center">(Percent reduction of swarm zone)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.06%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Pigment Inhibition</p><p style="text-align:center">(Zone of pigment inhibition)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Proteus</p><p style="text-align:center">mirabilis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Pseudomonas</p><p style="text-align:center">aeruginosa</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">Serratia</p><p style="text-align:center">marcescens</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">Chromobacterium violaceum</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">BD24</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Amycolatopsis tucumanensis strain ABO</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV258785</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1030</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">99</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">97.46</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">MG1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Kutzneria viridogrisea strain MCRL 0044</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV262340</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1113</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">98</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">95.32</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center"></p><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center"></p><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center"></p><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center"></p><p style="text-align:center">++++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">BD 2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Streptomyces abikoensis NBRC 13860(T)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">AB184537</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1509</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">98</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">99.33</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">MG3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Amycolatopsis thermoflava strain N1165</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV257661</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1157</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">96</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">96.95</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">K 6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Amycolatopsis orientalis strain KSI 153</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV258786</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1063</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">99</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">97.34</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">BD21</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Microbacterium barkeri</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV262557</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">630</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">BD16</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Amycolatopsis sp. HW47</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV290304</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1048</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">90</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">95.78</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">MG13</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Nocardia yamanashiensis strain W8187</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV249100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1042</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">99</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">99.71</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">MG18</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Streptomyces erumpens strain DSM 40941</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">NR_114917.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1003</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">99.01</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">MG22</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Streptomyces sclerotialus strain W25</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV252810</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">818</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">99</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">99.90</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">MG23</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Streptomyces cellulosae strain MJM7075</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV252811</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">919</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">99</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">99.89</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">BD10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Streptomyces bungoensis DSM 41781(T)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">KQ948892</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1385</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">98</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">99.63</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">P5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Streptomyces salinarius</p><p style="text-align:center">SS06011(T)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">LC430995</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1273</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">99.29</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">MG33</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Streptomyces tuirus NBRC 15617(T)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">AB184690</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1208</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>99.83</u></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">MG30</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Amycolatopsis japonica</p><p style="text-align:center">MG417-CF17(T)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">CP008953</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1182</p><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>99.45</u></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">BD6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Amycolatopsis thermoflava N1165(T)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">KI421511</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1511</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">99</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>99.79</u></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">VL9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Yuhushiella sp.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">PV262564</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">980</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center"><u>100</u></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">BD13</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Nocardia nova NBRC 15556(T)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">BDBN01000167</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1439</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">99.93</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.65%"><p style="text-align:center">P7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Streptomyces ardesiacus NRRL B-1773(T)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">DQ026631</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1435</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.88%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.82%"><p style="text-align:center">99.58</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.23%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.83%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Anti-swarming activity: + (0 - 1 cm); ++ (1 - 2 cm); +++ (2 - 3 cm); ++++ (3 and above); Pigment inhibition activity: + (10% - 25%); ++ (25% - 50%); +++ (50% - 75%).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_8">
    <title>3.8. Effect of Rare Actinobacterial Extracts on the Growth of Proteus mirabilis</title>
    <p>MG1, BD21, MG3, and VL9, identified as rare actinobacterial species, were selected for further studies based on their observed activity. The swarming motility assay demonstrated that the rare actinobacterial extracts did not exhibit microbiocidal effects on Proteus mirabilis. The extracts did not kill or inhibit bacterial growth under the experimental conditions, despite effectively inhibiting quorum sensing-related behaviours such as swarming motility.</p>
    <p>To confirm their non-toxic nature, the growth of Proteus mirabilis was monitored over a 48-hour period in the presence of the extracts (5 μg/ml), comparing it to a solvent control and a positive control. The results showed that the extracts had no significant inhibitory effect on the bacterial growth rate. Proteus mirabilis reached similar cell densities after 48 hours in the presence or absence of either the solvent or the extracts, at concentrations that significantly inhibited swarming behaviour (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>). Therefore, the inhibitory effects observed in QS-related behaviours are not due to toxicity or growth inhibition. Instead, the extracts appear to specifically target QS pathways involved in regulating motility and other virulence factors, without affecting overall bacterial growth.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_9">
    <title>3.9. Biofilm Inhibition Assay</title>
    <p>MG1, BD21, MG3 and VL9 actinobacterial extracts demonstrated biofilm inhibition activity against both Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.</p>
    <p>For Proteus mirabilis, biofilm inhibition increased with higher extract concentrations, except for the MG3 extract, where the inhibition remained consistent between 43% - 45% at concentrations ranging from 10 µg/ml to 20 µg/ml. At 10 µg/ml (1/20 MIC), substantial inhibition was observed, with MG1, BD21, MG3, and VL9 showing inhibition rates of 32.2%, 27.5%, 43.6%, and 33.4%, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. Effect of rare actinobacterial extracts on the growth of Proteus mirabilis.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId28.jpeg?20250626112435" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. Biofilm percent inhibition against Proteus mirabilis. Data expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); *p ≤ 0.03.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId29.jpeg?20250626112435" />
    </fig>
    <p>In the case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, biofilm inhibition was more pronounced across all concentrations. At 2.5 µg/ml (1/80 MIC), biofilm inhibition ranged from 20% to 40%, while at 20 µg/ml (1/10 MIC), the inhibition increased to 55% to 65%. At 10 µg/ml, the highest inhibition was observed with BD21 (51.2%), followed by VL9 (40.7%), MG3 (38.5%), and MG1 (36.3%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref>). ANOVA on ranks was carried out against pH control group and the actinobacterial extracts were found to have a significant effect on biofilm inhibition at a p value of 0.03 for Proteus mirabilis, and p value of 0.01 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.</p>
    <p>Interestingly, at both the lowest and highest concentrations, all extracts showed more biofilm inhibition against Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared to Proteus mirabilis. Both Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are known to form biofilms through quorum sensing-controlled mechanisms, which play a crucial role in their ability to adhere to bladder cells and indwelling catheters. The statistically significant reduction in biofilm formation by both Proteus mirabilis (p &lt; 0.03) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p &lt; 0.01) in the presence of rare actinobacterial extracts further supports the presence of anti-QS compounds within these extracts.</p>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 9. Biofilm percent inhibition against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Data expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); *p ≤ 0.01.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId30.jpeg?20250626112434" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_10">
    <title>3.10. Prodigiosin Assay</title>
    <p>The production of prodigiosin, a red pigment synthesized by Serratia marcescens, is regulated by quorum sensing. In this study, the effect of rare actinobacterial extracts on prodigiosin production was assessed. A concentration-dependent reduction in prodigiosin pigment production was observed as the concentration of the actinobacterial extracts increased. However, at higher concentrations, certain extracts, specifically BD21 and VL9, showed a reversal of inhibition, with an increase in prodigiosin production. This effect was consistent with the pigment inhibition assay conducted using the agar well diffusion method, where higher concentrations of the extracts led to enhanced pigmentation.</p>
    <p>Maximum inhibition of prodigiosin production was observed at 10 µg/ml for all extracts, with the following inhibition percentages: MG1 (62.5%), BD21 (46.7%), MG3 (76.7%), and VL9 (35.6%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">
      Figure 10
     </xref>). There was a significant inhibition as compared to control for MG1 and MG3 (p &lt; 0.001) and for BD21 and VL9 (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
    <p>To further assess the impact of the extracts, the relative prodigiosin production per cell was calculated at various concentrations. At 10 µg/ml, a significant reduction in prodigiosin production per cell was observed compared to the control group. For MG3, the relative prodigiosin production per cell decreased from 64.3 in the control group to 17.5 at 10 µg/ml of extract (p &lt; 0.0001). Similarly, in the presence of VL9 extract at 20 µg/ml (1/10 MIC), the prodigiosin production decreased to 15.6 relative units per cell, compared to 43.5 for the control (p &lt; 0.0001). For BD21, the lowest prodigiosin production (8.82 relative units per cell) was observed at 15 µg/ml, compared to 25.07 in the control group (p &lt; 0.005). Finally, for MG1, the prodigiosin production dropped to 7.89 relative units per cell at 10 µg/mL, compared to 17.78 in the control (p &lt; 0.0001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">
      Figure 11
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig10" position="float">
     <label>Figure 10</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 10. Prodigiosin percent inhibition against Serratia marcescens. Data expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). *p &lt; 0.001; <sup>#</sup>p &lt; 0.05 vs Solvent control.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId31.jpeg?20250626112435" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>The rising global threat of antibiotic resistance has necessitated the exploration of alternative therapeutic strategies, among which, quorum sensing inhibition (QSI) has emerged as a promising approach to disrupt bacterial communication and combat the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-34">
     [34]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-35">
     [35]
    </xref>. As the search for new antimicrobial agents intensifies, the discovery of quorum sensing inhibitors (QSIs) from underexplored microbial sources, such as rare actinobacteria, represents a significant and exciting development in this field <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-36">
     [36]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Actinobacteria are known to produce an extensive range of bioactive compounds, including antibiotics and enzymes, but much of this diversity remains untapped <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-37">
     [37]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-38">
     [38]
    </xref>. Rare actinobacteria, in particular, are not as frequently studied as their more common counterparts, such as Streptomyces, and they represent an underexplored reservoir of bioactive agents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. In this context, the discovery of anti-QS compounds from these organisms is of high relevance.</p>
   <fig id="fig11" position="float">
    <label>Figure 11</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 11. Relative prodigiosin production by Serratia marcescens in presence of rare actinobacterial extracts. Data expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). <sup>#</sup>p &lt; 0.005; *p &lt; 0.0001 vs Solvent control.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2272176-rId32.jpeg?20250626112436" />
   </fig>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Isolation &amp; Characterization of Actinobacteria from Environmental Samples</title>
    <p>In the present study, the successful isolation of the rare actinobacterial strains was achieved through a combination of physical and chemical pretreatment methods, tailored to select for non-Streptomycete genera. Our study corroborates previous research, which has shown that pre-treatments such as phenol, air-drying, dry heat, and the use of selective antibiotics can be effective in isolating rare actinobacteria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-11">
      [11]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-12">
      [12]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-39">
      [39]
     </xref>. The phenol treatment method, for example, yielded approximately 38% of the total isolates, with Amycolatopsis, Kutzneria, and Yuhushiella being among the most notable genera <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-40">
      [40]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>In addition, the use of different culture media maximizes the chances of isolating a wide array of actinobacterial strains, as different media can provide varied nutritional conditions that support the growth of diverse microbial species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-41">
      [41]
     </xref>. For marine samples, specific media like Starch M-Protein agar was used to mimic the natural saline environment, further enhancing the isolation of marine actinobacteria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-9">
      [9]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-42">
      [42]
     </xref>. Of the 57 colonies obtained from marine samples, 20 each were obtained on PDA and SCA and 17 on Starch M-Protein agar plates. The use of seawater-based media led to the successful isolation of isolate P5, identified as Streptomyces salinarius from Palolem Beach.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Antimicrobial Activity by Agar Well Diffusion Method</title>
    <p>The bioactivity of actinobacteria is a critical factor in their potential to serve as sources of novel therapeutic compounds, particularly in the search for anti-quorum sensing (QS) agents. In this study, we observed that nearly 36% of the actinobacterial isolates displayed broad-spectrum bioactivity, showing both antibacterial and antifungal properties, with majority of them exhibiting activity primarily against Gram-positive bacteria (60%). This finding is consistent with previous reports highlighting the wide-ranging bioactive potential of actinomycetes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-43">
      [43]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-44">
      [44]
     </xref>. The relatively low antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, and Staphylococcus aureus may be attributed to the antibiotic resistance mechanisms that these bacteria have developed over time.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Pigment Quenching Assay</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-"></xref>We further focused on the pigment inhibition activity of rare actinobacteria and found that they exhibited significant anti-QS activity, as evidenced by their ability to inhibit pigmentation in indicator organisms, Chromobacterium violaceum (53%) and Serratia marcescens (66%). Both of these indicator organisms are known to produce pigments—violacein in C. violaceum and prodigiosin in S. marcescens—controlled by AHL-mediated QS systems.</p>
    <p>Our results are quite promising in comparison to previous studies, which reported much lower rates of positive results for anti-QS activity in actinobacteria. For example, anti-QS activity of crude extracts from actinobacterial strains against C. violaceum was demonstrated by several researchers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-22">
      [22]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-45">
      [45]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-46">
      [46]
     </xref>. Further, in a study 56 actinobacterial strains were screened for pigment inhibition activity against C. violaceum and only 5 (approximately 9%) were found to be positive <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-47">
      [47]
     </xref>. In contrast, the higher percentage of positive isolates in our study (53%) may be attributed to the diversity of actinobacterial strains isolated.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>4.4. Anti-Swarming Assay</title>
    <p>Swarming motility is a critical virulence factor for Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing urinary tract infections (UTIs). This form of collective bacterial movement on solid surfaces plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of catheter-associated UTIs, as it contributes to biofilm formation and host tissue invasion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-48">
      [48]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>In this study, several actinobacterial extracts demonstrated significant anti-swarming activity against Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In our study, MG1 exhibited the highest swarming inhibition, with 40% inhibition against Proteus mirabilis and 55% inhibition against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This was followed by BD21 and MG3, which inhibited swarming by 35% in Proteus mirabilis and 30% - 35% in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Interestingly, the most potent anti-swarming activity was observed in VL9, which showed significant inhibition against both UTI pathogens. To our knowledge, this is the first report of anti-swarming activity against these UTI pathogens by these rare actinobacterial genera.</p>
    <p>In addition to the inhibition of swarming motility, we observed significant changes in the swarm patterns of both Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the presence of the actinobacterial extracts. In the case of Proteus mirabilis, there was a marked increase in the width of the individual swarm rings, coupled with a decrease in the number of rings. This pattern alteration is similar to that reported previously <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-49">
      [49]
     </xref>. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a noticeable alteration in the radiating tendrils was observed. The tendrils, which were thin and closely spaced in the control plates, became broader and more widely spaced in the presence of higher concentrations of the extracts.</p>
    <p>The anti-swarming activity observed in this study is noteworthy when compared to the results of other studies on bacterial motility. Zhang et al. (2023) reported swarming inhibition by Streptomyces sp. at a concentration of 5 mg/mL, while Li et al. (2024) observed that Nocardiopsis metallicus inhibited the surface colonization of C. violaceum CV026 during swarming, with inhibition rates of 33.7% at 100 µg/mL and 37.8% at 150 µg/ml. In contrast, the actinobacterial extracts in this study demonstrated anti-swarming activity at much lower concentrations—specifically, at a final concentration of 5 µg/mL, which is approximately 1/40 of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). This suggests that the rare actinobacteria identified in this study may produce highly potent compounds capable of inhibiting swarming at much lower concentrations and may help in preventing or treating catheter-associated UTIs.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_5">
    <title>4.5. Identification of Potent Isolates</title>
    <p>The identification of the actinobacterial isolates was carried out through molecular methods, and despite the use of pretreatment methods of samples and selective media supplemented with antibiotics to isolate rare actinobacteria, only 60% of the identified strains were found to belong to rare genera. The most common genus identified was Amycolatopsis, a known producer of bioactive secondary metabolites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-50">
      [50]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_6">
    <title>4.6. Biofilm Inhibition Assay</title>
    <p>Biofilm formation plays a very important role in the pathogenesis of UTI pathogens. It has been amply demonstrated that in the biofilm mode of growth, bacteria can cause chronic infections and the cells growing in such biofilms are resistant to phagocytes, antibodies and antibiotics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-51">
      [51]
     </xref>. These properties are responsible for the characteristic failure of the host defense system and antimicrobial chemotherapy to clear biofilm pathogens, especially in device related infections. Hence, compounds that inhibit biofilm formation will presumably be able to control or expedite clearance of such infections.</p>
    <p>In this study, we evaluated the potential of rare actinobacterial extracts to inhibit biofilm formation by Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for the actinobacterial extracts against Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were determined to be 200 µg/ml and 400 µg/ml, respectively. At sub-MIC concentrations, the extracts of Kutzneria viridogrisea (MG1), Microbacterium barkeri (BD21), Amycolatopsis thermoflava (MG3), and Yuhushiella sp (VL9) showed significant biofilm inhibition. Specifically, at 1/10 MIC for Proteus mirabilis, biofilm inhibition ranged from 35% to 52%. The highest inhibition (52%) was observed with Yuhushiella sp. (VL9). For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, at 1/20 MIC, biofilm inhibition ranged from 55% to 64%, with Amycolatopsis thermoflava (MG3) showing the greatest inhibition (64%).</p>
    <p>The biofilm inhibition observed in this study compares favorably with previous research using actinobacteria extracts. This study represents the first report of rare actinobacterial genera exhibiting anti-biofilm activity against these UTI pathogens at such sub MIC concentrations. Biofilm inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Streptomyces rameus crude extracts at MIC values ranging from 64 - 512 µg/mL have been reported. The biofilm inhibition achieved was 83.39%, 54.33%, and 15.56% at 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 MIC, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-14">
      [14]
     </xref>. In contrast, our study demonstrated comparable or even more potent biofilm inhibition at significantly lower concentrations—at 1/20 MIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extracts showed 55% to 64% inhibition.</p>
    <p>Li et al. (2024) evaluated the anti-biofilm activity of Nocardiopsis metallicus extracts against C. violaceum CV026, reporting biofilm reductions of 36.5% and 65.9% at concentrations of 100 µg/mL and 150 µg/mL, respectively. In a study by Mulya and Waturangi (2021), eight actinobacterial extracts were evaluated for their antibiofilm activity against Bacillus cereus and Shewanella putrefaciens, with the most potent extract showing an 89.60% reduction in Bacillus biofilm and a 93.06% reduction in Shewanella biofilm at a concentration of 20 mg/ml. The rare actinobacterial extracts in this study, however, achieved similar levels of inhibition at sub-MIC concentrations (1/10 and 1/20 MIC), which suggests that these rare actinobacteria genera might be more efficient at lower concentrations compared to other strains.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_7">
    <title>4.7. Prodigiosin Assay</title>
    <p>The inhibition of prodigiosin production by Serratia marcescens, a well-established model for quorum sensing (QS) studies, offers a promising approach for exploring novel bioactive compounds with potential therapeutic applications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-52">
      [52]
     </xref>. In this study, we evaluated the effects of rare actinobacterial extracts on prodigiosin production in Serratia marcescens.</p>
    <p>The results of the prodigiosin inhibition assay reveal that rare actinobacterial extracts can inhibit prodigiosin production in Serratia marcescens in a dose-dependent manner. Specifically, at lower concentrations, the extracts of Kutzneria viridogrisea (MG1), Microbacterium barkeri (BD21), Amycolatopsis thermoflava (MG3), and Yuhushiella sp. (VL9) showed varying degrees of inhibition. Notably, at a concentration of 0.005 mg/mL, the inhibition of prodigiosin production was found to be 37.5%, 6.67%, 60%, and 15.3% for MG1, BD21, MG3, and VL9, respectively. Interestingly, higher concentrations of the BD21 and VL9 extracts were associated with an increase in prodigiosin production, suggesting a potential dose-dependent response. It is possible that at higher concentrations, these extracts induce a stress response in S. marcescens that leads to increased prodigiosin production as a defense mechanism. Prodigiosin has been associated with various physiological roles, such as antioxidative activity, cytotoxicity against competing microbes, and modulation of quorum sensing. The upregulation of prodigiosin under stress conditions may serve as a defensive strategy, allowing the bacterium to mitigate oxidative damage, enhance survival in a competitive environment, or disrupt the colonization of antagonistic species. Further investigation into these molecular mechanisms could clarify the role of actinobacterial compounds in modulating stress-induced secondary metabolite pathways in S. marcescens.</p>
    <p>Zhang et al. (2024) examined the effects of crude extracts on the purple pigment production in C. violaceum CV026, another common QS model. Their study found that at low concentrations (0.005 mg/mL), crude extracts could reduce pigment production by 27%. In comparison, our study showed higher inhibition at the same concentrations for some actinobacterial extracts, particularly Amycolatopsis thermoflava (MG3), which achieved 37.5% inhibition of prodigiosin production.</p>
    <p>Previous studies have explored pigment inhibition in Serratia marcescens by synthetic analogs of N-acylhomoserine lactone and marine-derived compounds providing valuable insights into how certain compounds can modulate prodigiosin biosynthesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-31">
      [31]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-32">
      [32]
     </xref>. Few studies on pigment inhibition in C. violaceum by Streptomyces sp. have been reported suggesting that actinobacteria possess compounds capable of disrupting QS and pigment biosynthesis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-53">
      [53]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-54">
      [54]
     </xref>. While the inhibition of prodigiosin production by actinobacteria has not been extensively studied, our results suggest that rare actinobacteria may be a promising source of novel QS inhibitors.</p>
    <p>The growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has prompted the search for novel therapeutic strategies, particularly those that do not directly kill bacteria but rather modulate their virulence mechanisms. Quorum sensing inhibition (QSI) has emerged as a promising alternative approach, and recent studies have highlighted the potential of actinobacteria as rich sources of natural products with anti-QS activity. This study further emphasizes the value of exploring rare actinobacterial genera for their ability to interfere with bacterial communication pathways, potentially offering new avenues to combat multidrug-resistant pathogens.</p>
    <p>The role of actinobacteria, particularly Streptomyces species, as prolific producers of natural products that exhibit quorum sensing inhibition (QSI) activity have been reported <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-55">
      [55]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-56">
      [56]
     </xref>. In a recent review, the contribution of Streptomyces and other rare actinobacterial genera—such as Microbacterium, Nocardiopsis, Kribella, Brevibacterium, and Arthrobacter—in producing AHL-degrading enzymes and other compounds that modulate microbial virulence has been summarized <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-36">
      [36]
     </xref>. However, the rare genera investigated in this study, such as Yuhushiella and Kutzneria, have not been previously reported for their QSI activity, adding a new dimension to the growing body of research on actinobacteria and their potential as sources of anti-virulence compounds.</p>
    <p>In the present study, we observed that rare actinobacterial extracts from Yuhushiella sp. (VL9), Kutzneria viridogrisea (MG1), Microbacterium barkeri (BD21), and Amycolatopsis thermoflava (MG3) not only inhibited pigment production in Serratia marcescens and Chromobacterium violaceum but also exhibited anti-swarming and anti-biofilm activity against Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa at sub-MIC concentrations. These findings highlight the fact that rare actinobacterial extracts may have various anti-QS compounds which interfere with various QS regulated attributes of pathogens and can be potentially tapped in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. The UTI pathogens are unlikely to develop resistance to the anti-QS compounds because they pose no selective pressure on bacteria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-57">
      [57]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143564-58">
      [58]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Such anti-QS compounds present in rare actinobacterial extracts can attenuate the virulence of these pathogens without challenging their growth, thereby preventing the emergence of resistant strains and facilitating the elimination of pathogens by the host’s immune system. These compounds could be used as coating agents in medical devices like catheters to prevent emergence of AMR strains of Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing UTI.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>The development of anti-QS agents derived from rare actinobacteria presents a promising strategy to combat the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. By interfering with the bacterial communication system, QSIs can mitigate virulence factors such as swarming and biofilm formation, without directly killing the bacteria. This approach could serve as an adjunct to traditional antibiotics, reducing the likelihood of resistance development and offering a sustainable alternative to conventional therapies.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors would like to acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for the present study under the Scheme WOS-A (DST/WOS-A/LS-306/2019).</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Salam, M.A., Al-Amin, M.Y., Salam, M.T., Pawar, J.S., Akhter, N., Rabaan, A.A., et al. (2023) Antimicrobial Resistance: A Growing Serious Threat for Global Public Health. Healthcare, 11, Article 1946. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131946 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Caliskan-Aydogan, O. and Alocilja, E.C. (2023) A Review of Carbapenem Resistance in Enterobacterales and Its Detection Techniques. Microorganisms, 11, Article 1491. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061491 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rutherford, S.T. and Bassler, B.L. (2012) Bacterial Quorum Sensing: Its Role in Virulence and Possibilities for Its Control. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2, a012427. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012427 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jiang, Q., Chen, J., Yang, C., Yin, Y. and Yao, K. (2019) Quorum Sensing: A Prospective Therapeutic Target for Bacterial Diseases. BioMed Research International, 2019, 1-15. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2015978 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Allison, C., Coleman, N., Jones, P.L. and Hughes, C. (1992) Ability of Proteus Mirabilis to Invade Human Urothelial Cells Is Coupled to Motility and Swarming Differentiation. Infection and Immunity, 60, 4740-4746. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.60.11.4740-4746.1992 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Weber, G., Riesenberg, K., Schlaeffer, F., Peled, N., Borer, A. and Yagupsky, P. (1997) Changing Trends in Frequency and Antimicrobial Resistance of Urinary Pathogens in Outpatient Clinics and a Hospital in Southern Israel, 1991-1995. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology&amp;Infectious Diseases, 16, 834-838. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01700414 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Costerton, J.W., Stewart, P.S. and Greenberg, E.P. (1999) Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections. Science, 284, 1318-1322. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nashikkar, N.A., Begde, D.N., Bundale, S.B., et al. (2011) Inhibition of Swarming Motility, Biofilm Formation and Virulence Factor Expression of Urinary Pathogens by Euphorbia trigona Latex Extracts. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 2, Article 558.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Subramani, R. and Aalbersberg, W. (2013) Culturable Rare Actinomycetes: Diversity, Isolation and Marine Natural Product Discovery. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97, 9291-9321. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5229-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sharma, S., Chauhan, A., Ranjan, A., Mathkor, D.M., Haque, S., Ramniwas, S., et al. (2024) Emerging Challenges in Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications for Pathogenic Microorganisms, Novel Antibiotics, and Their Impact on Sustainability. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, Article 1403168. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1403168
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bundale, S., Singh, J., Begde, D., et al. (2018) Culturable Rare Actinomycetes from Indian Forest Soils: Molecular and Physicochemical Screening for Biosynthetic Genes. Iranian Journal of Microbiology, 10, 132-142. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hayakawa, M. (2008) Studies on the Isolation and Distribution of Rare Actinomycetes in Soil. Actinomycetologica, 22, 12-19. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3209/saj.saj220103 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Singh, V., Haque, S., Singh, H., Verma, J., Vibha, K., Singh, R., et al. (2016) Isolation, Screening, and Identification of Novel Isolates of Actinomycetes from India for Antimicrobial Applications. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, Article 1921. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01921 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dar, M.S. and Ahmad, I. (2024) Screening and Evaluation of Antibacterial Active Strains of Actinomycetes Isolated from Northern Indian Soil for Biofilm Inhibition against Selected ESKAPE Pathogens. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Applied Sciences, 11, 340-355. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00164-8 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meenakshi, S., Hiremath, J., Meenakshi, M.H. and Shivaveerakumar, S. (2024) Actinomycetes: Isolation, Cultivation and Its Active Biomolecules. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 18, 118-143. &gt;https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam.18.1.48 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Daigham, G.E., and Mahfouz, A.Y. (2020) Isolation, Characterization, and Screening of Actinomycetes Producing Bioactive Compounds from Egyptian Soil. Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal, 19, 381-390. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/epj.epj_44_20 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ludwig, W., Euzéby, J., Schumann, P., Busse, H., Trujillo, M.E., Kämpfer, P., et al. (2012) Road Map of the Phylum Actinobacteria. In: Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Springer, 1-28. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68233-4_1 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bundale, S., Begde, D., Nashikkar, N., Kadam, T. and Upadhyay, A. (2014) Isolation of Aromatic Polyketide Producing Soil Streptomyces Using Combinatorial Screening Strategies. Open Access Library, 1, 1-16. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.preprints.1200010 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bundale, S., Singh, J., Begde, D., Nashikkar, N. and Upadhyay, A. (2019) Rare Actinobacteria: A Potential Source of Bioactive Polyketides and Peptides. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 35, Article No. 92. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-019-2668-z 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ambarwati, A., Wahyuono, S., Moeljopawiro, S. and Yuwono, T. (2020) Antimicrobial Activity of Ethyl Acetate Extracts of Streptomyces Sp. CRB46 and the Prediction of Their Bioactive Compounds Chemical Structure. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 21, 3380-3390. &gt;https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210763 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kavitha, A., Prabhakar, P., Vijayalakshmi, M. and Venkateswarlu, Y. (2009) Production of Bioactive Metabolites by Nocardia levis MK-VL_113. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 49, 484-490. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02697.x 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anne, G. and Waturangi, D.E. (2023) Supernatant of Actinomycetes Isolates with Antiquorum Sensing and Antibiofilm Activity against Food Spoilage Bacteria. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 24, 5189-5197. &gt;https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240963 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Williams, F.D. (1973) Abolition of Swarming of proteus by p-Nitrophenyl Glycerin: General Properties. Applied Microbiology, 25, 745-750. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1128/am.25.5.745-750.1973 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liaw, S.J, Ho, S.-C., Wang, W.-W., et al. (2000) Inhibition of Virulence Factor Expression and Swarming Differentiation in Proteus Mirabilis by P-nitrophenylglycerol. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 49, 725-731. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-49-8-725 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dolinsky, A.L. (2018) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 3, 27-39. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-4399(01)88009-0 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., Yi, Y., Bai, X., Zhu, L., Zhu, J., et al. (2023) Screening and Identification of a Streptomyces Strain with Quorum-Sensing Inhibitory Activity and Effect of the Crude Extracts on Virulence Factors of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Microorganisms, 11, Article 2079. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11082079 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vandamme, P., Holmes, B., Bercovier, H. and Coenye, T. (2006) Classification of Centers for Disease Control Group Eugonic Fermenter (EF)-4a and EF-4b as Neisseria animaloris sp. Nov. and Neisseria zoodegmatis sp. Nov., Respectively. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 56, 1801-1805. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64142-0 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Samreen., S., Qais, F.A. and Ahmad, P.I. (2021) Anti-Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Inhibitory Effect of Some Medicinal Plants against Gram Negative Bacterial Pathogens: In Vitro and in Silico Investigations. SSRN Electronic Journal. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3921713 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Waturangi, D.E., Purwa Hariyanto, J., Lois, W., Hutagalung, R.A. and Hwang, J.K. (2017) Inhibition of Marine Biofouling by Aquatic Actinobacteria and Coral-Associated Marine Bacteria. Malaysian Journal of Microbiology, 13, 92-99. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21161/mjm.86016 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     El-Sayed, M.H., Alshammari, F.A. and Sharaf, M.H. (2022) Antagonistic Potentiality of Actinomycete-Derived Extract with Anti-Biofilm, Antioxidant, and Cytotoxic Capabilities as a Natural Combating Strategy for Multidrug-Resistant ESKAPE Pathogens. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 33, 61-74. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2211.11026 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Morohoshi, T., Shiono, T., Takidouchi, K., Kato, M., Kato, N., Kato, J., et al. (2007) Inhibition of Quorum Sensing in Serratia marcescens AS-1 by Synthetic Analogs of n-Acylhomoserine Lactone. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, 6339-6344. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00593-07 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Annapoorani, A., Jabbar, A.K.K.A., Musthafa, S.K.S., Pandian, S.K. and Ravi, A.V. (2012) Inhibition of Quorum Sensing Mediated Virulence Factors Production in Urinary Pathogen Serratia marcescens PS1 by Marine Sponges. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 52, 160-166. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0272-0 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Khadar, S.M., Shunmugiah, K.P. and Arumugam, V.R. (2011) Inhibition of Quorum-Sensing-Dependent Phenotypic Expression in Serratia marcescens by Marine Sediment Bacillus spp. ss4. Annals of Microbiology, 62, 443-447. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0262-1 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Naga, N.G., El-Badan, D.E., Ghanem, K.M. and Shaaban, M.I. (2023) It Is the Time for Quorum Sensing Inhibition as Alternative Strategy of Antimicrobial Therapy. Cell Communication and Signaling, 21, Article No. 133. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01154-9 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Patel, K., Panchal, R., Sakariya, B., Gevariya, M., Raiyani, R., Soni, R., et al. (2025) Combatting Antibiotic Resistance by Exploring the Promise of Quorum Quenching in Targeting Bacterial Virulence. The Microbe, 6, Article 100224. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microb.2024.100224 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sarveswari, H.B. and Solomon, A.P. (2019) Profile of the Intervention Potential of the Phylum Actinobacteria toward Quorum Sensing and Other Microbial Virulence Strategies. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, Article 2073. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02073 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bundale, S., Begde, D., Nashikkar, N., Kadam, T. and Upadhyay, A. (2015) Optimization of Culture Conditions for Production of Bioactive Metabolites by Streptomyces spp. Isolated from Soil. Advances in Microbiology, 5, 441-451. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2015.56045 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Prudence, S.M., Addington, E., Castaño-Espriu, L., Mark, D.R., Pintor-Escobar, L., Russell, A.H. and McLean, T.C. (2020) Advances in Actinomycete Research: An Actino Base Review of 2019. Microbiology, 166, 683-694. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bundale, S. and Pathak, A. (2022) Anti-Quorum Sensing Compounds from Rare Actinobacteria. In: Actinobacteria—Diversity, Applications and Medical Aspects, IntechOpen, 1-19. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Istianto, Y., Koesoemowidodo, R.S., Watanabe, Y., Pranamuda, H. and Marwoto, B. (2012) Application of Phenol Pretreatment for the Isolation of Rare Actinomycetes from Indonesian Soil. Microbiology Indonesia, 6, 7-14.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Oliveira, R.C.D., Diniz, F.V., Peters, L.P. and Carvalho, C.M. (2024) Antimicrobial Activity of Actinomycetes Isolated from Soils in the Brazilian Amazon. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 67, e24230213. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2024230213
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Godbole, A.P., Wadetwar, R.N., Bundale, S.B., Nashikkar, N. and Kanojiya, P.S. (2023) Bioprospecting of Actinomycetes from Diverse Ecosystems for Antimicrobial Activity. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 57, s599-s609. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5530/ijper.57.3s.75 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Qin, S., Li, J., Chen, H., Zhao, G., Zhu, W., Jiang, C., et al. (2009) Isolation, Diversity, and Antimicrobial Activity of Rare Actinobacteria from Medicinal Plants of Tropical Rain Forests in Xishuangbanna, China. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 6176-6186. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01034-09 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yuan, M., Yu, Y., Li, H., Dong, N. and Zhang, X. (2014) Phylogenetic Diversity and Biological Activity of Actinobacteria Isolated from the Chukchi Shelf Marine Sediments in the Arctic Ocean. Marine Drugs, 12, 1281-1297. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/md12031281 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lokegaonkar, S.P. and Nabar, B.M. (2018) Broad-Spectrum Antibiofilm and Antiquorum Sensing Potential of Crude Secondary Metabolite Extracts of Microbial Isolates Obtained from Polluted Waldhuni River. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 9, 2378-2386. &gt;https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(6).2378-86 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mulya, E. and Waturangi, D.E. (2021) Screening and Quantification of Anti-Quorum Sensing and Antibiofilm Activity of Actinomycetes Isolates against Food Spoilage Biofilm-Forming Bacteria. BMC Microbiology, 21, Article No. 1. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-02060-7 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, Y., Ding, W., Yin, J., Li, X., Tian, X., Xiao, Z., et al. (2024) 2,3-Dimethoxycinnamic Acid from a Marine Actinomycete, a Promising Quorum Sensing Inhibitor in Chromobacterium violaceum. Marine Drugs, 22, Article 177. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/md22040177 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jones, B.V., Young, R., Mahenthiralingam, E. and Stickler, D.J. (2004) Ultrastructure of Proteus mirabilis Swarmer Cell Rafts and Role of Swarming in Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection. Infection and Immunity, 72, 3941-3950. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.72.7.3941-3950.2004 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Echeverrigaray, S., Michelim, L., Longaray Delamare, A.P., Andrade, C.P., Pinto da Costa, S.O. and Zacaria, J. (2008) The Effect of Monoterpenes on Swarming Differentiation and Haemolysin Activity in Proteus Mirabilis. Molecules, 13, 3107-3116. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13123107 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kisil, O.V., Efimenko, T.A. and Efremenkova, O.V. (2021) Looking Back to Amycolatopsis: History of the Antibiotic Discovery and Future Prospects. Antibiotics, 10, Article 1254. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101254 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mirghani, R., Saba, T., Khaliq, H., Mitchell, J., et al. (2022) Biofilms: Formation, Drug Resistance and Alternatives to Conventional Approaches. AIMS Microbiology, 8, 239-277. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2022019
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Marathe, K., Nashikkar, N., Bundale, S. and Upadhyay, A. (2019) Analysis of Quorum Quenching Potential of Euphorbia trigona Mill. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 10, 1372-1386.&gt;https://doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.10(3).1372-86 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Miao, L., Xu, J., Yao, Z., Jiang, Y., Zhou, H., Jiang, W., et al. (2017) The Anti-Quorum Sensing Activity and Bioactive Substance of a Marine Derived streptomyces. Biotechnology&amp;Biotechnological Equipment, 31, 1007-1015. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2017.1348253 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Younis, K.M., Usup, G. and Ahmad, A. (2015) Secondary Metabolites Produced by Marine Streptomyces as Antibiofilm and Quorum-Sensing Inhibitor of Uropathogen Proteus Mirabilis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 4756-4767. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5687-9 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hassan, R., Shaaban, M.I., Abdel Bar, F.M., El-Mahdy, A.M. and Shokralla, S. (2016) Quorum Sensing Inhibiting Activity of Streptomyces coelicoflavus Isolated from Soil. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, Article 659. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00659 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ishaque, N.M., Burgsdorf, I., Limlingan Malit, J.J., Saha, S., Teta, R., Ewe, D., et al. (2020) Isolation, Genomic and Metabolomic Characterization of Streptomyces tendae VITAKN with Quorum Sensing Inhibitory Activity from Southern India. Microorganisms, 8, Article 121. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010121 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chadha, J., Harjai, K. and Chhibber, S. (2021) Revisiting the Virulence Hallmarks of pseudomonas Aeruginosa: A Chronicle through the Perspective of Quorum Sensing. Environmental Microbiology, 24, 2630-2656. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15784 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143564-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Azimi, S., Klementiev, A.D., Whiteley, M. and Diggle, S.P. (2020) Bacterial Quorum Sensing during Infection. Annual Review of Microbiology, 74, 201-219. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-032020-093845
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>