<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    as
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Agricultural Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2156-8553
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2156-8561
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/as.2025.165031
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    as-143005
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences, Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Seed Scarification and Plant Extracts Enhanced Germination, Seed Health and Seedlings Vigour of Tetrapleura tetraptera
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Niky Joliesse Nouteka
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Koagne
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Steve Ngalle
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Tchatho
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sylver Landry Dida
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Lontsi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sylvie Essomo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Etanke
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Hans Abireche
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Utenego
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Hubert Joseph Yamdeu
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Galani
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"> 
      <sup>5</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Joseph Djeugap
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Fovo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aPhytopathology and Agricultural Zoology Research Unit, Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculty of Agronomy and Environmental Sciences, Evangelical University Institute of Cameroon (IUEC), Mbouo-Bandjoun, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aPhytopathology and Plant Protection Research Unit, Department of Plant Biology, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Crop Science, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff5">
    <addr-line>
     aSection of Natural and Applied Sciences, School of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     09
    </day> 
    <month>
     05
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    16
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    05
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    472
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    488
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      17,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Seed dormancy and seed-borne fungi are main biological constraints to the domestication of edible non-timber forest products such as Tetrapleura tetraptera fruits. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of thermal and mechanical scarification on seed dormancy and the efficacy of three plant aqueous extracts (Cymbopogon citratus, Callistemom viminalis, Tephrosia vogelii) against seed-borne diseases and seedlings vigour of T. tetraptera. Treatments consisted of soaking the seeds in water at 80˚C for 2 and 4 hours, scarification of seeds with abrasive paper at 1 mm and 2 mm depths. The antifungal activity of plant extracts was evaluated both in vitro (by the poising method on agar medium) and in vivo at 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 mg/mL. Momtaz (Imidacloprid 250 g/kg + Thiram 200 g/kg) was used as a positive control. Dormancy was lifted by scarification at 2 mm depth; this treatment had the highest germination percentage (92.33%) and the lowest infection rate (20.67%). The more frequent seed-borne fungi isolated belong to Aspergillus fumigatus, A. niger, and A. flavus (with frequence: 16.31%, 18.43% and 21.78% respectively). The pathogenicity test was positive with Alternaria alternata, A. fumigatus and Cercospora sp. T. vogelii extract totally inhibited the growth of the pathogenic fungi at all the concentrations tested. Seed infection obtained with T. vogelii (4.54%) extracts at 7.5 mg/mL was significantly similar to Momtaz (3.33%). The extract of C. viminalis had the highest vigour index (674.42) at 7.5 mg/mL. Mechanical scarification using abrasive paper and seed treatment with plant extracts of T. vogelii could be used in the domestication process of the species.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Edible Non-Timber Forest Products
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Plant Extracts
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Seed-Borne Fungi
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Seed Dormancy
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Tetrapleura tetraptera
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Forests provide essential goods and services to approximately 1.2 billion people worldwide, particularly for their food security, health, and income <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. Among these resources, edible non-timber forest products (NTFPs) play a critical role due to their nutritional, socio-economic, and cultural value, thereby contributing to improved living conditions for populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. These edible NTFPs serve as a reserve or safety net, offering sustenance and income during crop failures, shortages, unemployment, or other emergencies linked to disasters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. However, production, preservation, and processing techniques remain rudimentary, and parasitic attacks significantly affect these products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Such infestations lead to substantial losses, diminishing the impact of the edible NTFP sector in combating food insecurity. In tropical Africa, Tetrapleura tetraptera, a perennial Mimosaceae reaching 35 to 50 cm in diameter at maturity with buttresses at its base, is a notable example of an edible NTFP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. Its fruits, initially dark green with four prominent sides, turn dark brown and glossy when mature. Once dried, they are used as spices or for their medicinal properties, particularly against digestive disorders, cysts, fibroids, and obesity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. A 2017 study by the Tropenbos program in southern Cameroon revealed that the price of a bundle of T. tetraptera ranges from 50 to 200 FCFA (0.08 to 0.33 USD), while a single pod sells for 150 to 300 FCFA (0.25 to 0.50 USD) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. This spice is also exported to European markets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-8">
     [8]
    </xref>, with, for instance, 20 tons imported into the United Kingdom in 2000 from Nigeria, Ghana, and Cameroon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. Despite its socio-economic importance, T. tetraptera production faces challenges such as poor seed germination and severe fungal infections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. The rigidity of the pod and seed coat, combined with the seeds’ impermeability to water, keeps them dormant, making natural germination nearly impossible without intervention from elephants or humans <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. To break this dormancy, treatments such as 90% concentrated sulfuric acid, followed by mechanical scarification (85%), lemon juice, soaking, or hot water have been successfully tested <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-12">
     [12]
    </xref>, though these methods are often complex and inaccessible to low-income producers. It would also be important to compare the different methods of lifting dormancy in T. tetraptera in order to compare their effectiveness with the pod. Additionally, fungal seed diseases (e.g. rot, fusarium wilt) caused by soil-borne pathogens such as Rhizoctonia, Cercospora, Aspergillus, Colletotrichum, or Fusarium are typically managed with synthetic fungicides. However, their improper use, due to producers’ lack of training, poses risks of pollution, pathogen resistance, and intoxication <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. Consequently, research is shifting toward non-toxic natural alternatives for plant protection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-15">
     [15]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. This study aims to evaluate the effects of thermal and mechanical scarification on T. tetraptera seed dormancy, as well as the efficacy of four plant extracts against seed pathologies and seedling vigor.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Collection and Preservation of Plant Material</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref>Fruits of T. tetraptera were harvested from five approximately 10-year-old trees in Kekem, West Region of Cameroon. This tree was chosen according to their approximate age (more than 10 years old), their health status and the quality of fruits.</p>
    <p>After air-drying at room temperature, the fruits were broken with a hammer to extract the seeds, which were stored in sterilized, airtight glass containers. Leaves of Tephrosia vogelii, Callistemon viminalis, and Cymbopogon citratus, used for extracts, were collected between 6 and 7 a.m. at the research farm of the Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, West Region. The selection of the 3 plant extract species was based on several criteria such as:</p>
    <p>• Their antifungal activity: The chosen species have shown proven efficacy against various pathogenic fungi in previous studies.</p>
    <p>• Their accessibility and sustainability: These species are often locally available or easily grown, making them easy to use in practical applications.</p>
    <p>• The presence of bioactive compounds: Chemical analyses have revealed the presence of compounds such as flavonoids, alkaloids and terpenes, known for their antifungal properties.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Scarification of Tetrapleura tetraptera Seeds</title>
    <p>Seeds underwent thermal scarification (immersion in water at 80˚C for 2 (T1) or 4 (T2) hours) or mechanical scarification (abrasion with sand paper on the proximal part near the hilum, at 1 (T3) or 2 (T4) mm depth). The choice of these scarification depths is motivated by technical and biological considerations:</p>
    <p>• Scarification efficiency: It is known that these scarification depths promote better moisture and nutrient penetration, increasing germination <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-17">
      [17]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>• Embryo protection: Scarification that is too deep could damage the embryo, while these depths balance efficiency and safety.</p>
    <p>• Variability of the species: This choice also takes into account the specific characteristics of the seeds of the species studied, where some require more or less intense scarification. The control batches received no treatment (T0). Post-scarification, seeds were disinfected in a 3% hypochlorite solution for 3 minutes, then rinsed three times with distilled water (at 5, 10, and 15 minutes). They were placed in 15 cm-diameter Petri dishes lined with three layers of moistened blotting paper and incubated at 22˚C ± 1˚C under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark photoperiod, with watering every two days. Each treatment consisted of 100 seeds, replicated three times. Germination (G) was calculated as G = (g × 100)/N, where g is the number of germinated seeds and N is the total number of seeds sown <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-18">
      [18]
     </xref>. The infection rate (IR) was determined by IR = (i × 100)/N, where i is the number of infected seeds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-18">
      [18]
     </xref>. The germination rate (GR) was calculated as GR = Σ n/Σ (n × DAS), where n is the number of seeds germinated per day and DAS is the number of days after sowing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-18">
      [18]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Isolation and Identification of Seed-Associated Fungi</title>
    <p>Fungi were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with 1 g/L chloramphenicol, sterilized at 121˚C for 15 minutes. Seeds, symptomatic or not, were disinfected in a 3% hypochlorite solution for 2 minutes, then rinsed with distilled water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-19">
      [19]
     </xref>. Ten seeds were aseptically placed in 90 mm Petri dishes containing 20 mL of PDA and incubated at 22˚C ± 1˚C. Fungal colonies visible after 5 days were purified on PDA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-20">
      [20]
     </xref>. Isolation frequency (IF) was calculated as IF = (NF/NT) × 100, where NF is the number of samples with a given fungus and NT is the total number of samples <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-21">
      [21]
     </xref>. Identification relied on morphological characteristics (mycelium and fruiting bodies) observed under a microscope, following mycological keys <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-22">
      [22]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Pathogenicity Test</title>
    <p>For each 10-day-old isolated fungus, a spore suspension was prepared by adding 10 mL of sterilized distilled water to PDA Petri dishes, gently brushing with a fine paintbrush. A drop of Tween 80 was added to homogenize the spores, and the suspension was filtered (mesh &lt; 1 mm) to remove mycelial fragments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-23">
      [23]
     </xref>. Spore concentration was determined using a hemocytometer (Thoma cell) and adjusted to 10<sup>6</sup> spores/mL per Mathur and Kongsda’s formula <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-24">
      [24]
     </xref>. Disinfected seeds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-19">
      [19]
     </xref> were placed in Petri dishes with three layers of moistened, sterilized blotting paper (100 seeds per dish). A 10 mL suspension of each fungus was sprayed onto the seeds, the dishes sealed with parafilm, and incubated at 22˚C ± 1˚C. Each treatment was replicated three times, and the seed infection rate was assessed.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Preparation of Plant Extracts</title>
    <p>Freshly harvested leaves were washed with running water, shade-dried for two weeks, and ground into a fine powder. For aqueous extracts, 100 g of powder was macerated in 500 mL of distilled water for 24 hours with two stirrings, protected from light. The mixture was filtered through muslin and Whatman No. 4 paper, and the filtrate constituted the crude extract <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-25">
      [25]
     </xref>. Extracts were dried separately in an oven at 50˚C.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Evaluation of Antifungal Potential of Plant Extracts</title>
    <p>In vitro antifungal activity was tested using the PDA diffusion method at concentrations of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 mg/mL (The choice of the different concentrations was made on the basis of a test previously carried out and efficient concentrations used in the literature with others plant extracts) against three identified pathogenic fungi: Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Cercospora sp. The negative control for this experiment was water and the positive control was the chemical fungicides Momtaz at the recommended concentration of 5 mg/kg, this fungicide is homologated in Cameroon for seed treatment. Radial growth (RG) was measured as RG = (d1 + d2 − 2d0)/2, where d0 is the explant diameter, and d1 and d2 are orthogonal culture diameters. Inhibition percentage (%I) was calculated as %I = 100 × (Dc − Df)/Dc, where Dc is the control growth diameter and Df is the diameter on extract-amended medium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-26">
      [26]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_7">
    <title>2.7. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Extracts on Germination, Infection, and Seedling Vigor</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref>Scarified and disinfected seeds (200 per treatment) were soaked in 25 mL of aqueous extracts at concentrations of 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 mg/mL. Sterilized distilled water (25 mL) and the fungicide Momtaz (5 mg/kg) were used as negative (T−) and positive (T+) controls, respectively. Following soaking, the seeds were oven-dried at 40˚C for 15 minutes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-27">
      [27]
     </xref> and then placed in Petri dishes lined with moistened paper, maintained at 22˚C ± 1˚C under a 12-hour photoperiod. Each treatment was replicated three times. Daily observations were conducted to calculate germination and infection rates. The seedling vigor index was determined using the formula: Vigor Index = Germination Rate × (root length + shoot length) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-28">
      [28]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_8">
    <title>2.8. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>The analyses were carried out using the statistical analysis software R version 3.5.1. at the 5% probability threshold. Since the data did not follow the normal distribution and the homogeneity of the variance was not respected, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for the separation of the means.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Effect of Scarification on Germination and Infection of T. tetraptera Seeds</title>
    <p>Thermal and mechanical scarification significantly increased the germination rates of T. tetraptera seeds compared to the control, where the germination rate was zero (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>). The germination rate was highest with mechanical scarification at a 2 mm depth (92.33%), followed by mechanical scarification at 1 mm (81.52%), while thermal scarification treatments for 2 hours and 4 hours showed very low germination rates of 1.27% and 0.67%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the infection rates obtained from the different treatments, but the seed infection rate was higher in the heat scarification treatment boxes for 2 hours (42.00%). The control boxes had no germinated seeds but exhibited a fairly high infection rate (28.67%). The different treatments showed significant differences in the percentage of infection. The highest seed infection rate was observed in seeds subjected to thermal scarification (T1) for 2 hours (42.00%). In contrast, seeds scarified with sandpaper (T4) and heat for 4 hours (T2) had lower infection rates of 20.67% and 27.67%, respectively. Seeds that had not undergone any treatment did not germinate but showed fairly high infection rates. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref> shows the effect of the various treatments on the infection rates of T. tetraptera seeds at 14 days after sowing (DAS). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref> shows the germinated and infected seeds at 3 DAS, where visible mycelium of the pathogens is observed on seeds. The different results between thermal and mechanical scarification could be explained by the fact that at 2 mm, the embryo is already visible and develops without hindrance due to the integument <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-28">
      [28]
     </xref>. It has been shown that scarification using a nail clipper could increase germination capacity by 80% to 90% after three days <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-28">
      [28]
     </xref>. The dormancy-breaking methods used have been evidenced by other studies, namely mechanical scarification using sandpaper <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-29">
      [29]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-30">
      [30]
     </xref> and thermal scarification with hot water (80˚C), which made it possible to remove the waxy cuticle from the seeds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-31">
      [31]
     </xref>. Some authors highlighted the interest in involving local populations in the domestication and in situ and ex-situ conservation strategies of plant species of interest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-32">
      [32]
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Effect of different methods of scarification on germination percentage of seed of T. tetraptera 14 days after sowing.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3004922-rId12.jpeg?20250609093519" />
    </fig>
    <p>Mechanical scarification also resulted in a high germination rate (92%) and a reduction in average germination times. Similar results were obtained on the seeds of Acacia origena, Acacia pilispina, and Pterotobium stellatum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-33">
      [33]
     </xref>, and in Parkinsonia aculeata <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-34">
      [34]
     </xref>. Mechanical scarification leads to the rapid imbibition of the seed coat and the entry of water into the reserves, which allows the rapid emergence of the radicle and the triggering of metabolic reactions of the embryo and cotyledons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-35">
      [35]
     </xref>. This could therefore enable rapid and high germination of seeds with integumentary dormancy (because the integument is hard and impermeable to water and oxygen).</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Effect of different methods of scarification on infection rate of seed of T. tetraptera 14 days after sowing.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3004922-rId13.jpeg?20250609093519" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b)Figure 3. Scarified and germinated seeds of Tetrapleura tetraptera at 3 days (a) and 7 days after sowing (b) in the control (non-treated).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b)Figure 3. Scarified and germinated seeds of Tetrapleura tetraptera at 3 days (a) and 7 days after sowing (b) in the control (non-treated).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3004922-rId14.jpeg?20250609093519" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b)Figure 3. Scarified and germinated seeds of Tetrapleura tetraptera at 3 days (a) and 7 days after sowing (b) in the control (non-treated).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3004922-rId15.jpeg?20250609093519" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Effect of Treatments on the Date of First Germination</title>
    <p>Scarification treatments had significant effects on the duration of first germination. The first germination was observed on seeds scarified with heat for 4 hours (T2) and sandpaper at 2 mm (T4) at 2.33 and 2.67 days, respectively. On the other hand, seeds that had undergone mechanical scarification with sandpaper at 1 mm (T3) and thermal scarification for 2 hours (T1) showed slightly delayed first germination times of 4.67 and 4.91 days, respectively. Seeds that had not undergone any treatment (T0) did not germinate, and therefore, the duration of first germination was zero (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Effect of different methods of scarification on days of the first germination of seed of T. tetraptera 14 days after sowing.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3004922-rId16.jpeg?20250609093519" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Seed-Borne Fungi of Tetrapleura tetraptera Seeds and Their Pathogenicity</title>
    <p>Seven species of seed-borne fungi were identified: Rhizoctonia sp., Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Trichoderma sp., Alternaria alternata, Cercospora sp., and Pestalotiopsis microspora. The most frequently isolated species were A. flavus (21.78%), A. niger (18.48%), and A. fumigatus (16.31%); Pestalotiopsis microspora had the lowest isolation frequency (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>). The pathogenicity test was positive for A. alternata, A. fumigatus, and Cercospora sp., with infection rates of 45.75%, 32.25%, and 22.12%, respectively, 5 days after inoculation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>). The seeds’ response to artificial inoculation showed rapid seed death by these three seed-borne pathogens within 5 days (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>). Criteria for evaluating and classifying a seed as infected include:</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref>Table 1. Occurrence/frequency of fungi isolated from Tetrapleura tetraptera seeds.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="53.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Champignons</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="46.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Frequency of isolement (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="53.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Alternaria alternata</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="46.12%"><p style="text-align:center">10.56</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="53.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Pestalotiopsis nicrospora</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.12%"><p style="text-align:center">6.38</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="53.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergilus niger</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.12%"><p style="text-align:center">18.43</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="53.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergilus fumigatus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.12%"><p style="text-align:center">16.31</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="53.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergilus flavus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.12%"><p style="text-align:center">21.78</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="53.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Trichoderma sp.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.12%"><p style="text-align:center">15.97</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="53.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Cercospora sp.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.12%"><p style="text-align:center">10.57</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref>Table 2. Pathogenicity and infection rate of seed-borne fungi isolated from Tetrapleura tetraptera at 5 days after inoculation.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Fungi</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Pathogenicity</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Infection rate (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Alternaria alternata</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">+++</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">45.75 ± 4.65<sup>a*</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Pestalotiopsis nicrospora</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">−</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergillus niger</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">−</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergillus fumigatus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">++</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">32.25 ± 2.88<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergillus flavus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">−</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Cercospora sp</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">22.12 ± 3.66<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Trichoderma sp</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">−</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="42.86%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>*Data are means ± standard deviations. Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different as per the Kruskal-Wallis test at p = 0.05. Legend: +++ = highly pathogenic; ++ = moderately pathogenic; + = pathogenic; − = not pathogenic.</p>
    <fig-group id="fig5" position="float">
     <fig id="fig5" position="float">
      <label>Figure 5</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b) (c)--Figure 5. Pictures showing seed infection after inoculation with Alternaria alternata (c), Aspergillus fumigatus (b), and Cercopora sp. (a) at 5 days after inoculation.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3004922-rId17.jpeg?20250609093519" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig5" position="float">
      <label>Figure 5</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b) (c)--Figure 5. Pictures showing seed infection after inoculation with Alternaria alternata (c), Aspergillus fumigatus (b), and Cercopora sp. (a) at 5 days after inoculation.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/3004922-rId18.jpeg?20250609093519" />
     </fig>
    </fig-group>
    <p>• Visual symptoms: Presence of spots, discoloration, or alteration of the seed surface, damping-off.</p>
    <p>• Seed health: Observation of fungal filaments or spores on the seeds.</p>
    <p>• Germination tests: Seeds are considered infected if the germination rate is significantly reduced compared to a healthy control group.</p>
    <p>• Biochemical tests: Analysis of the production of secondary metabolites indicative of fungal infection.</p>
    <p>The isolated fungal species are well-known as damaging species of ENTFP seeds. Most of these species have already been identified on Ricinodendron heudelotii and Garcinia kola, two ENTFPs of high socio-economic value in Cameroon, as being responsible for seed losses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-36">
      [36]
     </xref>. Additionally, species like A. flavus and Cercospora sp. have been reported as fungi responsible for post-harvest losses of Monodora myristica <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-37">
      [37]
     </xref>. Most of these fungi are responsible for high post-harvest losses of some fruits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-38">
      [38]
     </xref>. Cercospora sp. was also isolated from seeds of Persea americana with high occurrence frequencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-39">
      [39]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Similar results were obtained on the seeds of other woody species. This is the case for Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma sp. in Oroxylum indicum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-40">
      [40]
     </xref>, Azadirachta indica (neem), Leucaena leucocephala, and Gmelina arborea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-41">
      [41]
     </xref>, where they cause various diseases such as anthracnose and damping-off. Highly polyphagous species such as A. flavus and A. niger have been inventoried on the seeds of several woody species: Terminalia microcarpa, Cassia fistula, Sterculia foetida, Acacia mangium, and Eucalyptus grandis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-41">
      [41]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-42">
      [42]
     </xref>. The high presence of extremely polyphagous fungi such as Aspergillus could be explained by the fact that humidity is high under the seed canopies, which favors their development. Pods for production should be collected directly from seed trees when they have reached maturity to reduce fungal infections of seeds. As these fungi are extremely polyphagous, it would be wise to exercise caution when handling them and during storage to avoid possible contamination of the seeds.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Bio-Efficacy of Plant Extracts on the Inhibition Percentage of Pathogenic Fungi of T. tetraptera Seeds</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> shows that aqueous extracts of plants at different concentrations significantly reduce the growth of pathogens. The extract of C. viminalis at a concentration of 7.5 mg/mL significantly reduced the radial growth of A. alternata and Cercospora sp. by 80.89% and 69.08%, respectively. The extract of C. citratus at the concentration of 7.5 mg/mL significantly reduced the radial growth of A. alternata, Cercospora sp., and A. fumigatus by 60.25%, 41.77%, and 19.49%, respectively. The extract of Tephrosia vogelii totally inhibited the development of the three fungi at all concentrations tested. The effectiveness of aqueous extracts of T. vogelii and C. viminalis on the development of these microorganisms varies according to concentrations and has been demonstrated by studies on C. viminalis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-43">
      [43]
     </xref> and T. vogelii <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-44">
      [44]
     </xref>. Other studies showed that C. citratus and T. vogelii extracts exhibited antifungal activity against the potato late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-45">
      [45]
     </xref>. The reduction of infection of the different fungal species by extracts of T. vogelii, C. viminalis, and C. citratus shows that these plants contain antifungal substances. The antifungal activity of these plant extracts is thought to be due to the action of oxygenated monoterpenes. The aqueous extract of T. vogelii completely inhibits the development of all three fungi. The biological actions of T. vogelii are mainly due to the presence of secondary metabolites of the alkaloid family. These include rutenones and their enantiomers, and then rutilines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-46">
      [46]
     </xref>, the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of plant extracts including C. viminalis against late blight <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-47">
      [47]
     </xref>, the inhibition of Aspergillus sp. by C. citratus extract <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-48">
      [48]
     </xref>, and the inhibitory activity of T. vogelii on the radial growth of seed fungi of cowpea in stock <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-49">
      [49]
     </xref>. This suggests that extracts from these plants are indeed effective in combating fungi.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref>Table 3. Inhibition of the mycelial growth of seed-borne fungi of Tetrapleura tetraptera by plant aqueous extracts.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="38.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Plant extracts</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Concentration (mg/mL)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="84.05%" colspan="3"><p style="text-align:center">Growth inhibition (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Alternaria alternata</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Cercospora</p><p style="text-align:center">sp.</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergillus fumigatus</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Callistemom viminalis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">2.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">27.67 ± 3.76<sup>c*</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">18.07 ± 2.33<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">5.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">73.33 ± 6.55<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">67.07 ± 4.87<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">7.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">80.91 ± 11.32<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">69.08 ± 15.26<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Cymbopogom citratus</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">2.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">62.65 ± 18.78<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">5.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">28.11 ± 6.77<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">7.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">60.25 ± 12.41<sup>b*</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">41.77 ± 13.27<sup>b*</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">19.49 ± 5.64<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Tephrosia vogelii</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">2.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">5.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">7.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="38.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Momtaz (synthetic fungicide)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">100 ± 0.0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Control (distilled water)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center"></p><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0 ± 0.0<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>*Data are means ± standard deviations. Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different as per the Kruskal-Wallis test at p = 0.05.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Effect of Plant Extracts on Germination, Seed Infection, and Seedling Vigour of Tetrapleura tetraptera</title>
    <p>The effects of plant extracts on seed germination were significantly similar. However, it is noted that the germination rate was highest with T. vogelii and C. viminalis extracts at 2.5 mg/mL (97.33%) and 5.0 mg/mL (96.67%), respectively. There was no significant difference between the different concentrations of the extracts and the two controls on the germination of T. tetraptera seeds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>). Additionally, the lowest seed infection was obtained with the same extracts, and the values obtained were significantly (p &lt; 0.05) comparable to the positive control (synthetic fungicide). Specifically, seed infection with T. vogelii was 4.54% with at the concentration of 7.5 mg/mL, while in the positive control, it was 3.33%. Significant differences were observed between the different concentrations of the aqueous extracts and the two controls on the percentage of infection of T. tetraptera seeds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref> shows that the maximum vigour index of plants (674) was obtained with C. viminalis at 7.5 mg/mL, while the positive control obtained the lowest vigour index (506). However, significant differences were observed between the different doses of aqueous extracts and the two controls on the vigour index of T. tetraptera seeds.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref>Table 4. Effect of plant aqueous extracts on the germination (%) of T. tetraptera seeds.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Concentration (mg/mL)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Cymbopogom citratus</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Callistemon viminalis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Tephrosia vogelii</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">2.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">86.67 ± 5.77<sup>a*</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">90.00 ± 7.32<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">97.33 ± 5.77<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">5.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">90.00 ± 7.00<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">96.67 ± 5.77<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">83.33 ± 15.27<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">7.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">92.00 ± 7.10<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">90.00 ± 7.32<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">93.33 ± 6.54<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Momtaz (fungicide)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">94.67 ± 5.77<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">94.67 ± 5.77<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">94.67 ± 5.77<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Distilled water (control)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">92.33 ± 5.54<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">92.33 ± 5.54<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">92.33 ± 5.54<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref>*Data are means ± standard deviations. Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different as per the Kruskal-Wallis test at p = 0.05.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref>Table 5. Effect of plant aqueous extracts on seeds infection (%) of T. tetraptera during germination.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Concentration (mg/mL)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Cymbopogom citratus</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Callistemon viminalis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Tephrosia vogelii</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">2.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">19.33 ± 5.77<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">20.03 ± 2.07<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">23.33 ± 15.27<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">5.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">13.91 ± 6.27<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">12.04 ± 7.55<sup>b</sup><sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">16.67 ± 9.77<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">7.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">12.33 ± 5.77<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">10.22 ± 7.32 <sup>b</sup><sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">4.54 ± 1.96<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Momtaz (fungicide)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">3.33 ± 1.27<sup>c*</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">3.33 ± 1.27<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">3.33 ± 1.27<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Distilled water (control)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">86.67 ± 1.52<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">86.67 ± 1.52<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">86.67 ± 1.52<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref><sup>*</sup>Data are means ± standard deviations. Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different as per the Turkey test at p= 0.05.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-"></xref>Table 6. Effect of aqueous plant extracts on the vigour index of T. tetraptera seedlings.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.31%"><p style="text-align:center">Concentrations (mg/mL)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">Cymbopogom citratus</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Callistemon viminalis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Tephrosia Vogelii</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.31%"><p style="text-align:center">2.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">541.94 ± 10.86<sup>b</sup>*</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">553.00 ± 14.01<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">603.43 ± 11.92<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.31%"><p style="text-align:center">5.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">446.96 ± 15.73<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">464.69 ± 36.99<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">467.23 ± 4.11<sup>dc</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.31%"><p style="text-align:center">7.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">634.27 ± 7.84<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">674.42 ± 11.25<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">530.33 ± 7.52<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.31%"><p style="text-align:center">Momtaz (fungicide)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">506.74 ± 10.95<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">506.74 ± 10.95<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">506.74 ± 10.95<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.31%"><p style="text-align:center">Distilled water (control)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">238.31 ± 7.57<sup>e</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">238.31 ± 7.57<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.25%"><p style="text-align:center">238.31 ± 7.57<sup>e</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>*Data are means ± standard deviations. Means with different superscript letters in the same column are significantly different as per the Kruskal-Wallis test at p= 0.05.</p>
    <p>The T. vogelii extracts protected the seeds against fungal attack more effectively than the others, followed by C. viminalis, E. saligna, and C. citratus extracts. This activity of the aqueous extracts could be due to their chemical composition of antifungal substances. These results corroborate those of studies showing the antifungal potential of E. saligna extracts against fungi responsible for the deterioration of green beans post-harvest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-46">
      [46]
     </xref>, the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of plant extracts including C. viminalis against black nightshade downy mildew <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-47">
      [47]
     </xref>, the inhibition of Aspergillus sp. by C. citratus extract <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-48">
      [48]
     </xref>, and the inhibitory activity of T. vogelii on the radial growth of fungi in stored cowpea seeds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-49">
      [49]
     </xref>. This suggests that the extracts of these plants would be effective in combating fungi associated with ENTFP seeds. The antifungal activity of these plant extracts could be due to the action of oxygenated monoterpenes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-50">
      [50]
     </xref> and phenolic compounds, including sterols, flavonoids, condensed tannins, coumarins, and alkaloids <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143005-45">
      [45]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Conclusion</title>
   <p>This work investigates effective and easily applicable solutions to the dormancy and germination of T. tetraptera seeds and proposes a biological control measure for seed-borne fungi. Scarification through mechanical abrasion at a 2 mm depth improves the germination rate up to 92%. The most frequently identified fungi on T. tetraptera seeds were A. flavus, A. niger, and A. fumigatus, which can cause seed-borne diseases. The pathogenic fungi were A. alternata, A. fumigatus, and Cercospora sp. Aqueous extracts of T. vogelii, C. viminalis, and C. citratus exhibited higher antifungal properties and inhibited the growth of the three pathogenic fungi, as well as the synthetic fungicide Momtaz. These plant extracts promoted germination, vigour, and seed protection. Since key domestication constraints of T. tetraptera have been addressed and seed-borne fungi have been identified and controlled by this work, studies on the cultivation of T. tetraptera in the nursery and in the field should now be emphasized.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The farmers from the Kekem sub-division (High Plateau Agroecological Zone) provided fruits and seeds of Tetrapleura tetraptera. This study was financed by the authors.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Betti, J.L., Ngankoué, C.M., Dibong, S.D. and Singa, A.E. (2017) Etude ethnobotanique des plantes alimentaires spontanées vendues dans les marchés de Yaoundé, Cameroun. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 10, 1678-1693. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v10i4.19
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Manfo, D. (2018) Practices and Challenges of Agroforestry in the Forest-Savannah Contact Zone: The Case of Obala in the Center Region of Cameroon. Revue Scientifique et Technique Foret et Environnement du Bassin du Congo, 11, 66-78. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Muyambo, M.-A., Kimoni, K. and Furaha, A.S. (2017) Forest Products and Rural Household Livelihood Strategies in the Kisangani Region. Tropenbos DR Congo.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Awono, A., Eba’a Atyi, R., Foundjem-Tita, D. and Levang, P. (2016) Vegetal Non-Timber Forest Products in Cameroon, Contribution to the National Economy. International Forestry Review, 18, 66-77. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816819683708
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Eyog, M.O., Ndoye, O., Kengue, J. and Awono, A. (2006) The Edible Forest Fruits of Cameroon. IPGRI/CIRAD.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Organisation de l’Unité Africaine/Centre Scientifique et Technique de Recherche (1996) Traditional Medicine and Pharmacopoeia: Contribution to Ethnobotanical and floristic Studies in Cameroon. OAU/STRC.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Walter, S. (2001) Non-Wood Forest Products in Africa: A Regional and National Overview. EC-FAO Partnership Program FAO Working Paper, FOPW/01.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sunderland, T.C.H. and Obama, C. (2000) Preliminary Market Study on Non-Timber Forest Products in Equatorial Guinea. FAO, 223-233.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tabuna, H. (2000) The European Market for Non-Timber Forest Products from Central Africa. FAO, 267-280.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ndoye, O., Ruiz-Perez, M. and Eyebe, A. (2000) The Influence of the Marketing of Non-Timber Forest Products on the Degradation of Resources in Central Africa: The Role of Research in the Balance between the Well-Being Populations and the Preservation of Forests. FAO, 193-217.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Alexandre, D.Y. (1978) Le rôle disséminateur des éléphants en forêt de Taï, Côte d’ivoire. La Terre et La Vie, Revue d’Histoire naturelle, 32, 47-72. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.1978.4994
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wakawa, L.D. and Akinyele, A.O. (2016) Effects of Pre-Treatment on the Germination Response of Old Seed of Tetrapleura tetraptera (Schum. and Thonn.) Taub. Journal of Forest Science and Environment, 1, 81-86.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     David, I.G., Matache, M.L., Tudorache, A., Chisamera, G., Rozylowicz, L. and Radu, G.L. (2012) Food Chain Biomagnification of Heavy Metals in Samples from the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 11, 69-73. &gt;https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2012.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kausik, M. and Sayan, J. (2015) A Review on the Effects of Heavy Metals on the Aquatic Animal of Three Different Districts of West Bengal. Journal of Global Biosciences, 4, 2504-2512.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Isman, M.B. (2000) Plant Essential Oils for Pest and Disease Management. Crop Protection, 19, 603-608. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-2194(00)00079-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     CABI (2011) Natural Products in Plant Pest Management. In: Dubey, N.K., Ed., Centre for Advanced Studies in Botany, Banaras Hindu University, 21-41.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ahoton, L.E. and Quenum, F. (2012) Floral Biology and Hybridization Potential of Nine Accessions of Physic Nut (Jatropha curcas L.) Originating from Three Continents. Tropicultura, 30, 193-198.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Djeugap, F.J., Bernier, L., Dostaler, D., Fontem, D.A. and Avana, M.L. (2014) Germination Constraints on Ricinodendron heudelotii in Cameroon. Seed Technology, 36, 25-36.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Djeugap, F.J., Tsopmbeng, N.G., Keuete, K.E., Yaouba, A. and Serferbe, S. (2015) Isolation and Identification of Fungi Associated with Avocado Fruits from Local Markets of the West Region of Cameroon. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 4, 64-68.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Djeugap, F.J., Nzuta, C., Temgoua, L.F., Kenmogne, G. and Tekam, P.M. (2017) Champignons pathogènes associés aux semences de Pericopsis elata et effet des substrats sur la germination, la croissance et l’infection des plantules au Cameroun. Revue Scientifique et Technique Forêt et Environnement Du Bassin Du Congo, 8, 19-27. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Iqbal, N. and Saeed, S. (2012) Isolation of Mango Quick Decline Fungi from Mango bark Beetle, Hypocryphalus mangiferae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 22, 644-648.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Champion, R. (1997) Identifier les champignons transmis par les semences. Techniques et pratiques. INRA, Editions Quae.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Imathiu, S., Edwards, S., Ray, R. and Back, M. (2014) Review Article: Artificial Inoculum and Inoculation Techniques Commonly Used in the Investigation of Fusarium Head Blight in Cereals. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica, 49, 129-139. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1556/aphyt.49.2014.2.1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mathur, S.B. and Kongsda, O. (2003) Methods for Detecting Fungi. Common Laboratory Seed Health Testing. International Seed Testing Association.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Falleh, H., Ksouri, R., Chaieb, K., Karray-Bouraoui, N., Trabelsi, N., Boulaaba, M., et al. (2008) Phenolic Composition of Cynara cardunculus L. Organs, and Their Biological Activities. Comptes Rendus. Biologies, 331, 372-379. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2008.02.008
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yaouba, A., Tchikoua, R., Tamsa, A.A. and Mpounze, P. (2017) Antifungal Activities of Some Plants Extract against Cercospora spp Causative Agent of Post-Harvest Fruits Rot. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 4, 200-203.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abdul‐Baki, A.A. and Anderson, J.D. (1973) Vigor Determination in Soybean Seed by Multiple Criteria. Crop Science, 13, 630-633. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183x001300060013x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nkongmeneck, B.A., Nwaga, D., Ndemmeze, A. and Hallé, F. (1996) Caractéristiques et capacités de germination des graines de Tetrapleura tetraptera (Shum.&amp;Thonn.) Taub. (Mimosaceae) d’après leur situation dans la gousse. Revue d’Écologie (La Terre et La Vie), 51, 117-124. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3406/revec.1996.2196
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pérez-García, F. and González-Benito, M.E. (2006) Seed Germination of Five Helianthemum Species: Effect of Temperature and Presowing Treatments. Journal of Arid Environments, 65, 688-693. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.10.008
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rao, N.K., Hanson, J., Dalloo, M.E., Ghosh, K., Nowell, D. and Larinde, M. (2006) Manual of Seed Handling in Genbanks. Handbooks for Genbanks No. 8, Biodiversity International.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, X., Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (1999) Seed Morphology and Physical Dormancy of Several North American Rhus Species (Anacardiaceae). Seed Science Research, 9, 247-258. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0960258599000252
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Harivel, A., Meunier, Q., Lemmens, R. and Morin, A. (2010) Alternatives to Exotic Species in Uganda-Growth and Cultivation of 85 Indigenous Trees. French Embassy in Uganda-Belgian Technical Cooperation.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Teketay, D., Granstrom, A. and Tegene, B. (1998) Seed Viability and Germination of Acacia origena, Acacia pilispina and Pterotobium stellatum in Ethiopia. Tropical Ecology, 39, 225-233.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Benadjaoud, A., Mihoub, Z. and Mokhtari, A. (2004) Effet de la scarification mécanique sur la germination des graines de Parkinsonia aculeata L. Revue des Sciences et de la Technologie—Synthèse, 12, 45-52. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ahoton, L.E., Adjakidje, V. and Akpo, L.E. (2012) Effet des prétraitements des semences sur la germination de Prosopis africana (Guill., Perrot. et Rich.) Taub. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 6, 1745-1754.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dongmo, G.Z., Djeugap, J.F., Fenohi, N., Kenfack, N.D., Takuete, R. and Teguefouet, P. (2017) Contribution à l’identification des champignons de post-récolte associés aux amandes de Ricinodendron heudelotii et Garcinia kola collectées dans les Hauts Plateaux de l’Ouest Cameroun. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 11, 1840-1850. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v11i4.33
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Djeugap, J.F., Nzong, C.A., Kyalo, M., et al. (2017) Morphological and Molecular Identification of Pathogenic Fungi of Monodora myristica Dunal Kernels and Their Response to Different Phytoextracts. International Journal of Advance Agricultural Research, 5, 66-75.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Erute, M.O. and Oyibo, A.E. (2008) Effects of Three Plant Extracts (Ocimum gratissimum, Acalypha wilkesiana, and Acalypha macrostachya) on Post-Harvest Pathogen of Persea americana. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 2, 311-314.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Samuel, O. and Mu, O. (2015) Fungi Associated with the Spoilage of Post-Harvest Tomato Fruits Sold in Major Markets in Awka, Nigeria. Universal Journal of Microbiology Research, 3, 11-16. &gt;https://doi.org/10.13189/ujmr.2015.030201
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pande, S. and Gupta, A. (2011) Seed Borne Fungi of Oroxylum indicum. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology, 41, 312-315.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dayan, M.P. (2004) Seed Pathology of Some Selected Forest Tree Species of Bangladesh. Journal of Forest Science, 24, 45-52.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Duda, G.P., Santos, I.S. and Souza, R.M. (2004) Fungi Associated with Seeds of Forest Species in Brazilian Cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 26, 45-50.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Salem, M.Z.M., Mervat, E.H., Nasser, R.A., Hayssam, M.A., Nader, A.E.S. and Hosam, O.E. (2017) Medicinal and Biological Values of Callistemon viminalis Extracts: History, Current Situation and Prospects. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 27, 1-9.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Masete, G.A. (2021) In Vitro Anti-Microbial Activity of Aqueous and Ethanolic Leaf Extracts of Justicia flava and Tephrosia vogelii That Grows in Uganda. Student’s Journal of Health Research Africa, 13, 1-14.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Galani, Y.J.H., Nguefack, J., Dakole, D.C., Fotio, D., Petchayo, T.S., Fouelefack, F.R., et al. (2013) Antifungal Potential and Phytochemical Analysis of Extracts from Seven Cameroonian Plants against Late Blight Pathogen Phytophthora infestans. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2, 140-154.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yaouba, A., Kemmoe, N.R., Nchoutnji, I. and Godswill, N.N. (2019) Antifungal Potential of Eucalyptus saligna and Cupressus lusitanica Extracts against Fungi Responsible for Post-Harvest Green Bean Spoilage in Dschang, West Cameroon. Cameroon Journal of Biological and Biochemical Sciences, 27, 29-37.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Djeugap, J., Fontem, D. and Tapondjou, A. (2012) Efficacité in Vitro et in Vivo des extraits de plantes contre le mildiou (Phytophthora infestans) de la morelle noire. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 5, 2205-2213. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v5i6.3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Helal, G.A., Sarhan, M.M., Abu Shahla, A.N.K. and Abou El-Khair, E.K. (2007) Effects of Cymbopogon citratus L. Essential Oil on the Growth, Morphogenesis and Aflatoxin Production. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 6, 125-131.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kpatinvoh, B., Adjou, E.S., Dahouenon-Ahoussi, E., Konfo, T.R.C., Atrevi, B., Soumanou, M.M., et al. (2017) Efficacy of Essential Oils of Three Aromatic Plants against Cowpea Spoilage Mycoflora (Vigna unguiculata L., Walp) Collected from Retail Outlets in Southern Benin. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 109, 10680-10687. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v109i1.12
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143005-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yoshimura, H., Sawai, Y., Tamotsu, S. and Sakai, A. (2011) 1,8-Cineole Inhibits both Proliferation and Elongation of BY-2 Cultured Tobacco Cells. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 37, 320-328. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-9919-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>