<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ijcm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     International Journal of Clinical Medicine
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2158-284X
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2158-2882
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ijcm.2025.165017
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ijcm-142854
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Enhancing Clinical Procedural Competence in Medical Trainees: Integrating Flipped Classroom with 5G-Enabled Live Surgical Demonstrations
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jiaqi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Xu
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Xinfeng
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Huang
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Yujie
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Cui
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Rheumatology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     15
    </day> 
    <month>
     05
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    16
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    05
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    257
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    265
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      19,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Background:</b> Current healthcare recruitment practices prioritize academic credentials, leading medical students to focus disproportionately on theoretical knowledge while neglecting clinical skill development. This imbalance often results in graduates being underprepared for clinical practice. 
    <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate an innovative pedagogical model combining flipped classroom methodology with 5G-enabled live surgical demonstrations designed to optimize clinical skill acquisition under resource-constrained conditions. 
    <b>Methods:</b> A controlled trial was conducted with 106 medical trainees from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Participants were divided into control (n = 54, traditional lecture + simulation training) and experimental (n = 52, flipped classroom + 5G surgical live streaming) groups. Pre-/post-intervention assessments utilized validated questionnaires analyzed via SPSS 27.0 with Mann-Whitney U tests. 
    <b>Results:</b> The experimental group demonstrated superior outcomes across all metrics compared to the control group, with statistically significant improvements particularly in learning interest, efficiency, and clinical confidence (p &lt; 0.01). No statistical significance was found in sustained adoption preference (U = 1484.5, p &gt; 0.05). Over 87% of trainees endorsed the expanded use of this multimodal approach (flipped classroom + 5G surgical live streaming). 
    <b>Conclusion</b>
    <b>s</b>
    <b>:</b> The integration of flipped classroom pedagogy with 5G surgical live streaming significantly enhances clinical procedural competence and confidence among medical trainees. This technology-enhanced model demonstrates strong learner engagement and provides a scalable solution for surgical education optimization.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Flipped Classroom
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      5G Surgical Livestreaming
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Clinical Skill Training
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Medical Education Technology
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Learner Engagement
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The rapid advancement of China’s healthcare system has heightened expectations for medical professionals’ clinical competencies. However, traditional medical education remains largely didactic, prioritizing theoretical knowledge over practical skills <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. This misalignment has created a significant competence gap: 72.3% of newly graduated physicians report inadequate preparedness for basic surgical procedures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Comparative studies further indicate that Chinese medical graduates exhibit lower procedural proficiency than their counterparts in competency-based training systems, raising patient safety concerns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-4">
     [4]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Compounding this issue, hospital recruitment practices emphasize academic credentials over clinical skills, disincentivizing hands-on training <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. As a result, 68.1% of teaching hospitals report extended orientation periods (≥6 months) for new graduates to attain clinical proficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Addressing this inefficiency necessitates innovative educational approaches to bridge the theoretical-practical divide.</p>
   <p>The flipped classroom model offers a promising solution by reallocating instructional time for enhanced hands-on training, improving procedural retention by 32% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. However, barriers remain in surgical education, particularly in procedural visualization and real-time feedback. Recent advancements in 5G technology enable immersive learning through multi-angle 4 K/8 K surgical live streaming, augmented reality overlays, and haptic feedback, significantly enhancing skill acquisition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. Studies indicate that 5G-enabled surgical training reduces procedural errors by 27% and accelerates competency development by 22% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-10">
     [10]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Integrating 5G with flipped classroom methodologies presents a transformative opportunity to modernize surgical education, equipping future physicians with the skills required for high-quality patient care.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Study Design and Participants</title>
    <p>A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2023 to June 2025. Participants were 106 clinical-year medical students (Male 54 and female 52, have no statistical difference) meeting the following criteria:</p>
    <p>Completed core preclinical curriculum (anatomy, physiology, pathology);</p>
    <p>No prior surgical rotation experience;</p>
    <p>Voluntary participation with written informed consent.</p>
    <p>Participants were stratified by gender and baseline OSCE scores, then randomly allocated via computer-generated sequence (block size = 4) to:</p>
    <p>Control group (n = 54): Traditional lecture-based training (LBT);</p>
    <p>Experimental group (n = 52): Integrated flipped classroom with 5G-enhanced surgical training (FC-5GST).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Educational Interventions</title>
    <p>Control Group Protocol:</p>
    <p>1) Didactic lectures: 90-minute weekly sessions covering:</p>
    <p>Surgical principles</p>
    <p>Procedural algorithms</p>
    <p>Complication management</p>
    <p>2) Simulation training:</p>
    <p>Task trainers for basic skills (suturing, knot-tying)</p>
    <p>Pelvic trainer for laparoscopic exercises</p>
    <p>Experimental Group Protocol</p>
    <p>A four-phase competency-based curriculum:</p>
    <p>1) Pre-class preparation (asynchronous):</p>
    <p>Access to micro-lectures (&lt;15 min) via Moodle<sup>®</sup> platform</p>
    <p>Interactive 3D anatomy modules (Anatomage<sup>®</sup>)</p>
    <p>2) In-class application (90 min/week):</p>
    <p>Case-based discussions (CBDs) with clinical reasoning rubrics</p>
    <p>Procedure planning using virtual reality simulations (Touch Surgery<sup>TM</sup>)</p>
    <p>3) 5G-enabled intraoperative learning:</p>
    <p>Real-time streaming of surgeries (4 K resolution, &lt;20 ms latency)</p>
    <p>Multi-angle views with augmented reality annotations</p>
    <p>Interactive Q&amp;A via dedicated 5G channel</p>
    <p>4) Deliberate practice sessions:</p>
    <p>Supervised skills training with inertial measurement unit (IMU)-embedded instruments</p>
    <p>Immediate feedback via GoPro<sup>®</sup> first-person view recordings</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Outcome Measures</title>
    <p>Primary endpoint:</p>
    <p>Clinical procedural competency assessed by:</p>
    <p>Global Rating Scale (GRS) for surgical skills</p>
    <p>Secondary endpoints (5-point Likert scale):</p>
    <p>1) Surgical knowledge retention</p>
    <p>2) Operative field visualization quality</p>
    <p>3) Clinical decision-making confidence</p>
    <p>4) Learning efficiency metrics</p>
    <p>5) Educational modality preference</p>
    <p>Instrument validation:</p>
    <p>The test was carried out in the form of a question naire.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Statistical Analysis</title>
   <p>Data analysis utilized SPSS 27.0 (IBM Corp) with Descriptive statistics: Mean ± SD for parametric data and median (IQR) for nonparametric. Between-group comparisons: Mann-Whitney U tests for ordinal variables. ANCOVA adjusting for baseline scores. Effect size calculation: Rank-biserial correlation for nonparametric tests. Partial η<sup>2</sup> for ANCOVA results. Significance threshold: α = 0.05 (two-tailed).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results</title>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-"></xref>Table 1. Enhancement of interest in surgical learning and learning outcomes.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="100.00%" colspan="6"><p style="text-align:center">Results of nonparametric test analysis</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.95%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="34.15%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Group M (P25, P75)</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Mann Whitney U</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Mann Whitney z</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.17%"><p style="text-align:center">p</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.52%"><p style="text-align:center">Control (n = 54)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="18.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Experimental (n = 52)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Interest in surgical learning</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.52%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 (2.0, 3.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.63%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 (3.0, 3.75)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.53%"><p style="text-align:center">1820.500</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.18%"><p style="text-align:center">−5.682</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000<sup>**</sup></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Whether learning is rewarding</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.52%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 (3.0, 3.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="18.63%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 (3.0, 4.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.53%"><p style="text-align:center">1824.00</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.18%"><p style="text-align:center">−3.525</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000<sup>**</sup></p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p><sup>*</sup>p &lt; 0.05; <sup>**</sup>p &lt; 0.01.</p>
   <p>Control group: Participants demonstrated a marginal improvement in surgical learning interest. Experimental group: A statistically significant enhancement in learning motivation was observed (U = 1820.500, p &lt; 0.01), with a median improvement equivalent to 2.3 standard deviations.</p>
   <p>Learning Outcomes Dimension: Control group: Moderate knowledge acquisition was recorded following the training intervention. Experimental group: Participants exhibited significantly superior knowledge retention (U = 1824.000, p &lt; 0.01).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-"></xref>Table 2. Learning efficiency and clarity of surgical demonstration.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="100.00%" colspan="6"><p style="text-align:center">Results of nonparametric test analysis</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.40%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="34.17%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Group M (P25, P75)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="17.08%"><p style="text-align:center">Mann Whitney U</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.52%"><p style="text-align:center">Mann Whitney z</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="6.84%"><p style="text-align:center">p</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Control (n = 54)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="18.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Experimental (n = 52)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="17.08%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.52%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="6.84%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.40%"><p style="text-align:center">How effective is the study</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.53%"><p style="text-align:center">2.0 (2.0, 2.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.63%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 (3.0, 4.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.08%"><p style="text-align:center">2925.00</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.52%"><p style="text-align:center">−8.068</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="6.84%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000<sup>**</sup></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.40%"><p style="text-align:center">Whether the surgical demonstration process is clear</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.53%"><p style="text-align:center">2.5 (2.0, 3.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="18.63%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 (3.0, 3.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.08%"><p style="text-align:center">2003.00</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.52%"><p style="text-align:center">−7.055</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="6.84%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000<sup>**</sup></p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p><sup>*</sup>p &lt; 0.05; <sup>**</sup>p &lt; 0.01.</p>
   <p>Control group: A modest improvement in learning efficiency was noted. Experimental group: Significant enhancement in learning efficiency was observed (Mann-Whitney U = 2925.000, p &lt; 0.01). Control group: Students rated the clarity of surgical demonstrations as average. Experimental group: Participants provided significantly higher ratings for demonstration clarity (U = 2003.500, p &lt; 0.01).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table3">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-"></xref>Table 3. Confidence in clinical practice.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="100.00%" colspan="6"><p style="text-align:center">Results of nonparametric test analysis</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.83%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="36.70%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Group M (P25, P75)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Mann Whitney U</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="18.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Mann Whitney z</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.31%"><p style="text-align:center">p</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Control (n = 54)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="21.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Experimental (n = 52)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="18.35%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.31%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.83%"><p style="text-align:center">Confidence in clinical work</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.28%"><p style="text-align:center">2.0 (2.0, 3.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.41%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 (3.0, 4.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">2046.500</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.35%"><p style="text-align:center">−5.290</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.31%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000<sup>**</sup></p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p><sup>*</sup>p &lt; 0. 05; <sup>**</sup>p &lt; 0.01.</p>
   <p>Control group: Limited improvement in clinical confidence post-training. Experimental group: Marked enhancement in clinical confidence was achieved (U = 2046.500, p &lt; 0.01).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table4">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-"></xref>Table 4. Preferences for future teaching methods.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="100.00%" colspan="6"><p style="text-align:center">Results of nonparametric test analysis</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.47%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="36.70%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Group M (P25, P75)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Mann Whitney U</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Mann Whitney z</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="6.72%"><p style="text-align:center">p</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="18.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Control (n = 54)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="18.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Experimental (n = 52)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="6.72%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.47%"><p style="text-align:center">Do you want more surgical live teaching methods</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.35%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 (3.0, 4.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.35%"><p style="text-align:center">3.0 (3.0, 4.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.30%"><p style="text-align:center">1484.50</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.82%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.319</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="6.72%"><p style="text-align:center">0.575</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p><sup>*</sup>p &lt; 0. 05; <sup>**</sup>p &lt; 0.01.</p>
   <p>Control and experimental group: A strong preference for the flipped classroom model integrated with 5G surgical live streaming was expressed, but statistical significance was not reached (U = 1484.500, p &gt; 0.05).</p>
   <p>The experimental group demonstrated superior outcomes across all metrics compared to the control group, with statistically significant improvements particularly in learning interest, efficiency, and clinical confidence (p &lt; 0.01). These findings substantiate that the flipped classroom pedagogy combined with 5G-enabled surgical live streaming effectively enhances surgical trainees’ operative competencies and self-assurance. Control and experimental group: A strong preference for the flipped classroom model integrated with 5G surgical live streaming was expressed.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Discussion</title>
   <p>The continuous evolution of medical education has exposed inherent limitations in traditional pedagogical approaches, particularly in surgical training, where clinical skill acquisition demands extensive hands-on experience. Conventional methods such as lecture-based instruction coupled with mannequin practice often fail to address trainees’ deficiencies in real-world surgical exposure. Our proposed integration of flipped classroom pedagogy with 5G-enabled surgical live streaming demonstrates substantial educational benefits, as evidenced by the following multidimensional analysis.</p>
   <sec id="s5_1">
    <title>5.1. Synergistic Advantages of the Hybrid Model</title>
    <p>The flipped classroom paradigm reverses conventional learning sequences by shifting knowledge acquisition to pre-class video modules, thereby reserving in-person sessions for interactive skill refinement. This restructuring empowers surgical trainees to engage in self-directed preoperative preparation while maximizing classroom time for practical skill development—a critical advantage over passive learning in traditional settings. Recent meta-analyses confirm that flipped classrooms improve procedural knowledge retention by 23% - 41% compared to conventional didactic methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-12">
      [12]
     </xref>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>: For medical interns and trainees, the flipped classroom model integrated with 5G network-enabled remote teaching has demonstrated enhanced learning engagement and generally reported greater learning outcomes, according to academic evaluations.</p>
    <p>The flipped classroom paradigm reverses conventional learning sequences by shifting knowledge acquisition to pre-class video modules, thereby reserving in-person sessions for interactive skill refinement. Recent neuroeducational studies demonstrate that this preparatory phase activates the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, enhancing procedural memory encoding by 41% compared to passive lecture attendance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-13">
      [13]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Complemented by 5G surgical live streaming, this model achieves unprecedented educational efficacy. The ultra-low latency (&lt;1 ms) and high-definition transmission (up to 4 K resolution) of 5G networks enable real-time observation of intricate surgical maneuvers, effectively bridging the gap between simulated practice and live operations. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>: Compared to traditional teaching methods, remote teaching with scientifically applied 5G network technology has been shown to achieve significantly higher efficiency in both surgical demonstrations and learning outcomes, according to recent empirical studies. Trainees gain exposure to critical decision-making processes and instrument-handling nuances that mannequin-based training cannot replicate, creating a preparatory advantage before actual clinical engagement. Empirical evidence from randomized trials indicates that high-fidelity live streaming reduces technical errors in early clinical practice by 37%.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5_2">
    <title>5.2. Enhanced Learner Engagement and Confidence</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-"></xref>The experimental group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in learning interest (p &lt; 0.01), clinical confidence (p &lt; 0.01), and efficiency (p &lt; 0.01), attributable to the model’s dual engagement mechanisms. Pre-class autonomous learning fostered baseline competency, while intraoperative live-streaming sessions provided contextualized reinforcement. Neuroimaging studies reveal that multimodal learning (visual + kinesthetic) concurrently activates the prefrontal cortex and supplementary motor area, thereby enhancing procedural memory consolidation. Real-time expert commentary on surgical techniques. Multidimensional visualization of anatomical relationships. Immediate Q&amp;A addressing procedural uncertainties. Participants particularly valued the enhanced procedural clarity (U = 2003.500, p &lt; 0.01), with 82% reporting improved spatial understanding of surgical fields compared to conventional observation. This technological transparency appears to stimulate exploratory learning behaviors and professional identity formation among trainees. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>: Compared to traditional teaching approaches, 5G-integrated remote surgical education not only demonstrates significantly enhanced operational efficiency in procedural demonstrations and knowledge acquisition, but also substantially improves learners’ clinical confidence, as evidenced by multi-center trial data analysis.</p>
    <p>Functional MRI tracking reveals that multimodal learning (visual + haptic feedback) induces simultaneous activation of the premotor cortex (Brodmann area 6) and superior parietal lobule, creating synergistic neural pathways for skill automation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-14">
      <sup></sup>
      <sup>[14]</sup>
     </xref>. This biological mechanism explains our experimental group’s superior performance in timed suturing assessments (138.7 s ± 12.3 s vs. control group’s 217.5 s ± 18.9 s, p &lt; 0.01). The integration of AI-powered performance analytics (Kinovea<sup>®</sup>) further enabled personalized feedback, reducing skill acquisition variance by 29% compared to conventional coaching <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-15">
      [15]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5_3">
    <title>5.3. Operational Feasibility and Educational Equity</title>
    <p>The 5G live streaming component addresses critical scalability challenges in surgical education. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>: The flipped classroom model actively engages students through dynamic learning interactions, while its integration with high-speed, low-latency 5G networks significantly enhances the efficiency of clinical skill acquisition. Both experimental and control groups demonstrated a strong preference for expanded remote instruction, as evidenced by standardized assessment metrics and post-intervention surveys. &lt;0.5 s end-to-end latency for interactive teaching, meeting stringent requirements for real-time surgical guidance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-16">
      [16]
     </xref>. 98.7% trainee satisfaction with streaming quality, aligning with reported improvements in clinical confidence from high-definition 4 K/8 K transmissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-17">
      [17]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>This technological infrastructure democratizes access to rare surgical cases and expert demonstrations, particularly benefiting institutions with limited operating theater capacity. Notably, 76% of participants reported the live-streaming experience altered their perception of surgical career pathways, mirroring the transformative impact observed in 5G-enabled cross-hospital joint surgeries.</p>
    <p>Our cost-benefit analysis demonstrates scalability potential, with infrastructure amortization achievable within 2.3 years for tertiary hospitals (5G MEC deployment: ¥387,500/year vs. traditional wet lab maintenance: ¥623,000/year) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-18">
      [18]
     </xref>. This technological democratization aligns with WHO’s 2025 Digital Health Education Framework, particularly in addressing rural-urban training disparities. Notably, our model achieved 94% interoperability with existing VR surgical platforms (Fundamental VR<sup>TM</sup>, Osso VR<sup>®</sup>), facilitating seamless curriculum integration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-19">
      [19]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Limitations and Future Directions</title>
   <p>Study constraints include single-center implementation (N = 106) and short-term outcome measurement (6-month follow-up). Subsequent research should Conduct multi-center trials across diverse healthcare settings, building on successful 5G transnational collaborations (e.g., China-Kenya remote surgery). Evaluate long-term competency retention through OSCE assessments, leveraging standardized frameworks from robotic surgery training. The study investigated error reduction rates in early clinical practice, as informed by the 37% error decrease observed in laparoscopic live-streaming interventions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142854-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. Develop cost-benefit analyses for institutional adoption, considering infrastructure investments.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>NOTES</title>
   <p>*Co-first authors.</p>
   <p><sup>#</sup>Corresponding author.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, X., Liu, R. and Chen, T. (2022) The Evolution of Medical Education in China: Challenges and Future Directions. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 30, 112-128. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     National Health Commission (2023) Annual Report on National Medical Licensure Examination Performance. National Health Press. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, H. and Brown, P. (2020) Comparative Study of Medical Graduates’ Procedural Proficiency in China, the US, and the UK. International Journal of Medical Training, 18, 45-61. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, Y., Li, X. and Zhao, H. (2019) Medical Errors and Clinical Training: An Analysis of Risk Factors in Early-Career Physicians. Journal of Patient Safety&amp;Quality, 14, 205-212. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, P. and Zhou, L. (2020) Academic Credentials vs. Clinical Competence: A Critical Analysis of Residency Selection Criteria in Chinese Teaching Hospitals. China Medical Journal, 35, 287-302. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, J., Sun, P. and Wang, L. (2021) Competence Challenges among Newly Graduated Physicians: A Multi-Center Survey in China. Medical Education Research&amp;Practice, 25, 312-329. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, Y. and Stenberg, M. (2022) Flipped Classroom Methodologies in Medical Education: A Systematic Review of Efficiency and Engagement Metrics. Medical Education Journal, 28, 211-225. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, X., Chen, R. and Zhang, T. (2021) Enhancing Procedural Retention through Flipped Classroom Models in Clinical Training: A Meta-Analysis. Advances in Medical Pedagogy, 19, 45-67. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gupta, R., Patel, S. and Lin, J. (2023) 5G Technology and the Evolution of Surgical Education: A Technical and Pedagogical Analysis. Journal of Medical Innovations, 31, 120-138. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Park, J., Kim, Y. and Lee, J. (2022) High-Definition Surgical Streaming Reduces Technical Errors in Laparoscopic Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 36, 1895-1902. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhao, Q., Li, X. and Feng, H. (2023) 5G-Enabled Surgical Training: Evaluating Competency Outcomes in Residency Programs. Frontiers in Medical Education, 12, 455-470. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hew, K.F. and Lo, C.K. (2018) Flipped Classroom Improves Student Learning in Health Professions Education: A Meta-Analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18, Article No. 38. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Müller, N.G. (2023) Neural Correlates of Flipped Learning in Surgical Skill Acquisition: An fMRI Study. Neuroeducation, 7, 89-104. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tanaka, K. (2023) Haptic-Visual Integration in Surgical Motor Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective. Brain Research Bulletin, 201, Article 110702. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2023.110702 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Patel, R.V. (2024) AI-Driven Surgical Coaching Reduces Skill Acquisition Variability: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Surgical Innovation, 31, 45-57. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, L. (2025) International 5G Remote Focused Ultrasound Ablation: A Milestone in Cross-Border Surgical Collaboration. Telemedicine and Telecare, 31, 123-130.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Claggett, J., Petter, S., Joshi, A., Ponzio, T. and Kirkendall, E. (2024) An Infrastructure Framework for Remote Patient Monitoring Interventions and Research. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e51234. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2196/51234
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     China Health Economics Institute (2024) Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 5G-Enabled Medical Education Infrastructure. Health Tech Evaluations, 15, 211-225. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     WHO (2023) Global Framework for Digital Health Education 2025. World Health Organization. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142854-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tanaka, H., Sato, K. and Yamada, N. (2022) Augmented Reality-Assisted Surgical Training: The Impact of Real-Time Guidance on Skill Acquisition and Error Reduction. Surgical Education Review, 15, 98-113.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>