<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojbm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Business and Management
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2329-3284
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2329-3292
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojbm.2025.133113
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojbm-142826
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Business 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Economics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Marketing Alternative Energy Solutions for Residential Homeowners
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Rickey D.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Luckett
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Business, Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     27
    </day> 
    <month>
     04
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    03
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    2186
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    2199
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      13,
     </day>
     <month>
      April
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      April
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Using alternative energy systems in residential homes is an increasingly popular choice for homeowners seeking to reduce their environmental impact and lower their energy costs. These systems, including solar panels, wind turbines, and geothermal heating and cooling systems, allow homeowners to generate electricity, heat, and cooling using renewable energy sources. In addition to the environmental and financial benefits, alternative energy systems offer increased energy independence and security as they do not rely on traditional grid infrastructure. Homeowners are considering switching to an alternative energy system. It is crucial to thoroughly research the diverse options and consult a qualified professional to determine the best fit for your home and budget. With proper planning and guidance, switching to an alternative energy system can be an innovative and rewarding decision for homeowners and the planet. The marketing of alternative solar energy systems would reduce the carbon footprint and promote solar energy systems as a clean, renewable, and affordable alternative to traditional electrical energy sources for the next century. 
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Clean Energy
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Photovoltaic Panels
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Photovoltaic System
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Renewable Energy
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Solar Electricity 
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction and Background</title>
   <p>As concerns about climate change and reliance on fossil fuels continue to grow, more homeowners are turning to alternative energy systems to reduce their environmental impact and save on energy costs. These systems, including solar panels, wind turbines, and geothermal heating and cooling systems, enable homeowners to generate electricity, heat, and cooling using renewable energy sources. The adoption of alternative energy systems in residential homes has increased in popularity in recent years, driven partly by technological advances and declining costs. In addition to the environmental benefits of utilizing renewable energy sources, alternative energy systems offer financial advantages, as they can significantly reduce or even eliminate energy bills. Furthermore, these systems provide enhanced energy independence and security, as they do not rely on traditional grid infrastructure and are less vulnerable to power outages. While the decision to switch to an alternative energy system can involve a significant investment, it is also a long-term one that can yield reduced energy costs and a smaller environmental footprint. Homeowners should thoroughly research their options and consult a qualified professional to determine the best fit for their home and budget. With proper planning and guidance, switching to an alternative energy system can be a wise and rewarding for homeowners and the planet. According to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-13">
     IEA (2021)
    </xref>, the Global Energy Review 2021 reported that renewable energy increased by 3% in 2020, while other fossil fuels experienced a decline. The primary driver was a 7% growth in electricity generation from renewable sources despite lower electricity demand, supply chain challenges, and construction delays in many parts of the industrialized world. According to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-13">
     IEA (2021)
    </xref>, the Global Energy Review 2021 predicts that solar PV and wind-generated power will account for two-thirds of the increase in renewable energy. China is responsible for nearly half of the global rise in renewable electricity in 2021, followed by the United States, the European Union, and India. Officials from the United States Department of Energy project that the nation’s energy needs will continue to grow across the country, with an increasing reliance on renewable sources, such as solar and wind, to meet demands with clean, safe, and reliable energy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-29">
     U.S. Department of Energy, 2021
    </xref>). Additionally, IEA data suggested that wind will significantly boost renewable generation by 275 TWh, or almost 17%, surpassing 2020 levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-13">
     IEA, 2021
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-"></xref>Formatting individual papers, 1) automatic compliance with electronic requirements that facilitate the concurrent or later production of electronic products, and 2) conformity of style throughout a journal paper. Margins, column widths, line spacing, and type styles are built-in; examples of the type styles are provided throughout this document and are identified in italic type, within parentheses, following the example. Some components, such as multi-leveled equations, graphics, and tables, are not prescribed, although the various table text styles are provided. The formatter will need to create these components, incorporating the following applicable criteria.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. The Problem</title>
   <p>The problem is that homeowners are often unaware of the lack of alternative marketing strategies and the potential benefits of utilizing alternative energy systems in their homes, which can lead to significant savings.</p>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Importance of the Problem</title>
    <p>The rapid decline in the cost of solar energy systems, combined with federal, state, and local policy changes, introduced the topic of solar energy into the mainstream. Solar energy systems are available for home use, allowing homeowners to harness the power of these renewable energy resources. Photovoltaic (PV) systems provide a viable option for renewable energy sources and energy-efficient systems that generate electricity and heat, thereby reducing the environmental carbon footprint (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-16">
      Lupangu &amp; Bansal, 2017
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Method</title>
    <p>This study is a systematic literature review. A systematic literature review analyzes a group of studies to determine a solution to the problem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-31">
      Xiao &amp; Watson, 2019
     </xref>). The primary objective of this study is to summarize, analyze, and categorize existing research on energy-efficient solutions for residential homeowners.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. The Literature Review</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-9">
     Christensen (1997)
    </xref> developed the theory of disruptive innovation in the context of managing technological change. Disruptive innovation refers to innovations that create new markets or services while continuously disrupting existing markets over several years or decades by displacing established business competitors’ technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-9">
     Christensen, 1997
    </xref>). This theory is relevant to this study as it helps researchers address consumers’ access to new products or services. Moreover, the theory enables researchers to concentrate on the disruptive innovation of energy technologies related to coal, oil, or natural gas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-9">
     Christensen, 1997
    </xref>). In their initial stages, disruptive businesses often targeted smaller markets, operated with lower gross margins, offered fewer appealing services, and provided more straightforward products than those typically measured by conventional performance metrics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-9">
     Christensen, 1997
    </xref>). A systematic review of the theory of disruptive innovation is conducted. These disruptive technologies offer distinct advantages over mainstream technologies. Initially, these innovations were often considered inferior regarding high performance and key indicators for mainstream customers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-32">
     Yu &amp; Hang, 2010
    </xref>). A key aspect of Christensen’s disruptive innovation theory is the product performance analysis over time. The performance of disruptive technologies remained lower than that of established technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-32">
     Yu &amp; Hang, 2010
    </xref>). Numerous businesses were proactively inventing products quickly, and some customers quickly adapted to these enhanced innovation cycles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-9">
     Christensen, 1997
    </xref>). Disruptive innovations were rarely disruptive to customers initially, with a lag time before their disruptive effects influenced mainstream companies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-32">
     Yu &amp; Hang, 2010
    </xref>). Christensen’s theory concluded that existing companies could withstand challenges by pursuing new business acquisitions, adapting to innovations, and altering their business model to reflect the evolving marketplace and disruptive technologies.</p>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. History of PV Cells</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-"></xref>The PV cell is a non-organic process that converts light into electricity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-22">
      National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012
     </xref>). The Greek term phos means light. The second half of the term, volt, is named after Alessandro Volta, one of the pioneers who studied electricity. Thus, the term “photovoltaics” translates to “light electricity.” Solar cells, commonly referred to as PV systems, have become an integral part of people’s lives. PV absorbs and converts sunlight into an electrical energy current and stores it for later use (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-17">
      Mäki et al., 2011
     </xref>). The light absorption that fuels the PV process has no moving parts, is environmentally benign, and involves no equipment that can be worn out. The PV effect, discovered by Edmond Becquerel in 1839, led to several modern discoveries and the development of PV devices and photographic application techniques (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-15">
      Lukasiak &amp; Jakubowski, 2010
     </xref>). During the 1950s, the emergence of the silicon industry led to the development of the first silicon solar cell, which initially achieved an energy efficiency index of 6%. Space projects adopted these early solar cells as a source of power in satellites and spacecraft. The energy crisis of the 1970s spurred interest in the potential of PV for other commercial applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-22">
      National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Solar Power Systems</title>
    <p>Many consumers require information about commercial PV systems to make informed investments that best suit their energy needs. PV systems are categorized based on their level of autonomy from the electrical grid. Consumers can choose from three types of PV systems: grid-intertied systems, grid-intertied systems with battery backup, and off-grid PV systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-22">
      National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012
     </xref>). Solar cell panels are crucial components of a photovoltaic (PV) system. These panels operate when the sun’s radiant energy strikes them, converting light into an electric current, while the semiconductors exhibit some limited PV effects. This scientific principle was first discovered in 1839, but it took over 50 years before the first solar cell was constructed. The solar cell must capture and convert the sun’s radiant energy into usable electric current (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-22">
      National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012
     </xref>). However, homeowners seek to maximize the efficiency of their energy devices; they desire devices that enhance their ability to harvest energy and achieve optimal yield for electricity production from solar PV installations. Consequently, the solar industry’s marketing strategy has focused mainly on commercial buildings. In contrast, PV systems are classified according to their use, such as thermal applications and electricity production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-16">
      Lupangu &amp; Bansal, 2017
     </xref>). PV and thermal systems are measured based on thermal output. In a follow-up study, the characteristic performance of PV-thermal and PV systems depends on electrical energy and energy efficiencies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-16">
      Lupangu &amp; Bansal, 2017
     </xref>). The PV system converts solar energy into direct current electrical power, while PV-thermal systems utilize the thermal energy of solar radiation to generate electrical energy.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Type of Solar Power Panel Materials</title>
    <p>Solar cell panels are a crucial component of a PV system. They harness the sun’s radiant energy by capturing sunlight and converting it into an electric current. The electrons generated from this energy cause various limited PV effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-29">
      U.S. Department of Energy, 2021
     </xref>). Solar panels are available in multiple sizes and shapes for commercial and residential applications. Each solar panel consists of several grids of solar cells. When purchasing a solar system, factors such as the types of solar panel cells were considered: monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and amorphous (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-22">
      National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012
     </xref>). The advancement of market-ready solar cells progressed with the introduction of organic PV panels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-23">
      Nayak et al., 2019
     </xref>). Solar cells are recognized as an innovative technology with numerous features aimed at commercialization.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-"></xref>Types of Panels</p>
    <p>Solar panels are available in several market types with different application purposes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-2">
      Abdulrazzaq &amp; Ali, 2018
     </xref>). The applications of solar panels include photovoltaic (PV) panels, solar water heating panels for warm climates, and solar water and radiant heating panels for colder climates. The development of PV technology has primarily focused on enhancing the efficiency of cells and reducing the production costs of modules. Furthermore, such technological diversity is essential for enhancing solar energy deployment, contributing to a greener and cleaner environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-20">
      Moustakas et al., 2020
     </xref>). The U.S. Department of Energy’s Solar Energy Technologies Program (SETP) collaborates with national laboratories, academic institutions, and businesses across the solar energy industry to develop cost-competitive solar energy systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-29">
      U.S. Department of Energy, 2021
     </xref>). The SETP’s objective is to advance research and development in PV technology to achieve investment-cost competitiveness by 2015. PV technology introduces new products that support long-term carbon reduction goals while maintaining a stable PV manufacturing base. The SETP aims to make PV technology competitive and cost-effective in generating electricity at costs comparable to those of conventional utility-grid electricity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-29">
      U.S. Department of Energy, 2021
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Lifecycle and Environmental Performance of Silicon Solar Panels</title>
    <p>The lifecycle environmental performance of solar panel production encompasses gas emissions from energy generation, recycled water consumption, hazardous byproducts released during production, and waste materials generated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-19">
      Meadowcroft et al., 2018
     </xref>). A key benefit of positive lifecycle environmental performance is the emission-free energy that eliminates carbon pollutants from coal and natural gas energy generation. Therefore, the positive impacts outweigh any environmental concerns related to the production and recycling of silicon panels. In Catalonia, Italy, the lifecycle analysis of PV systems has served as a crucial tool for assessing the potential environmental impact of solar technologies compared to traditional technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-19">
      Meadowcroft et al., 2018
     </xref>). This assessment tool is particularly valuable for technologies reliant on non-renewable fossil fuels, including the fabrication of PV system components and the raw materials used in production and installation. Researchers specializing in photovoltaic (PV) technologies have indicated that silicon panels generate less toxic air emissions than conventional fossil fuel technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-2">
      Abdulrazzaq &amp; Ali, 2018
     </xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-2">
      Abdulrazzaq and Ali (2018)
     </xref> noted that 89% of poisonous emissions are associated with electricity generation. This process is preventable if electricity comes from PV and is generated off the grid. PV electricity is ten times less emission-intensive than coal-fired plants but four times more emission-intensive when compared to a nuclear power plant or a wind farm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-30">
      Uddin et al., 2017
     </xref>). Solar panels contribute to an 89% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and a 60% reduction in electricity produced from the national grid mix (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-2">
      Abdulrazzaq &amp; Ali, 2018
     </xref>). Based on the national energy grid mix, producing 1,000 kilowatts per hour of solar electricity can eliminate sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and carbon dioxide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-22">
      National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Most residential homes powered by the local utility company likely use a coal-fired power plant that burns fossil fuels, emitting carbon dioxide and air pollution. When homeowners install solar panels on their rooftops to produce electricity, they transform their houses into green power plants, utilizing renewable energy. The solar panels generate abundant, clean, and efficient energy throughout the year. PV technologies have experienced considerable growth rates of up to 70% over the past year. This growth rate was supported by low total carbon dioxide emissions and a positive energy balance for PV (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-33">
      Zuser &amp; Rechberger, 2011
     </xref>). Alongside the increasing demand for energy and steady advancements in renewable energy technologies, global environmental concerns have opened new venture opportunities for utilizing renewable energy resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-12">
      Husain et al., 2018
     </xref>). Over the past decade, U.S. electricity prices have been highly volatile, making it challenging for individuals to plan their electricity budget effectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-26">
      Razykov et al., 2011
     </xref>). Once homeowners install solar panels, they no longer need to worry about rising electricity prices for the portion of their electricity sourced from solar power. If prices rise, homeowners with solar panels benefit more significantly from their prudent early investment. By utilizing solar energy, U.S. homeowners can reduce their reliance on foreign oil and gas, thereby increasing their energy independence. As domestic sources of oil and gas dwindle in the coming years, it becomes increasingly urgent to find alternative energy sources to lessen U.S. dependence on foreign fuel (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-18">
      Marques &amp; Fuinhas, 2012
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The National Solar Jobs Census 2021 Report showed that the solar industry added more jobs in 12 months than any other industry and remained optimistic regarding the solar industry’s future (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-1">
      Abareshi, 2011
     </xref>). The U.S. solar industry employed about 100,237 solar workers in 2010. The results from the survey were relevant because the overall expected 12-month growth rate in solar energy industry employment for the entire US economy was only about 1.4% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-1">
      Abareshi, 2011
     </xref>). The National Solar Jobs Census 2021 Report drew three principal conclusions about the solar industry: 1) The number of solar energy workers in the U.S. increased from 93,000 in 2010 to 100,237 in 2011. 2) The overall growth rate of 6.8% from 2010 was ten times higher than the national average of the unemployment growth rate of 0.7%. 3) Forty-four percent of manufacturing companies expected to add 3473 jobs in 2011, yielding a 14% growth rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-1">
      Abareshi, 2011
     </xref>). Data from the 2011 National Solar Jobs Census indicated that the solar industry was strong, employing thousands of people. Solar jobs increased despite an economic downturn. The solar sector outperformed other industry segments in the US economy, experiencing significant market growth over the past decade. Tax incentives, increased consumer awareness, declining prices, cost reductions, cultural shifts, and governmental support for solar energy policies drive market growth. The optimism among solar employees during periods of economic downturn suggests that solar job growth will continue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-1">
      Abareshi, 2011
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Solar energy is the fastest-growing energy technology in the US (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-1">
      Abareshi, 2011
     </xref>). The market expanded to a $6 billion industry in 2010, representing a 67% increase from $3.6 billion in 2009. However, despite spectacular growth, the market has slowed due to complexities in state-to-state regulations, incentives, utilities, and financing structures.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-"></xref>In 2010, homeowners in the US purchased 2593 megawatts (MW) of solar electric capacity. The data included approximately 2086 MW of PVs and 507 MW of utility-scale concentrating solar power. In addition to photovoltaics (PVs) growth, solar heating capacity increased by 5% in 2010, with an estimated 2.4 million square feet of solar heating capacity installed in homes and businesses throughout the US. Moreover, the US ranked fourth globally in 2010 for installing new solar-electric systems. As a result, the US became the world’s largest solar market, and photovoltaic (PV) technology became an increasingly vital energy source. Solar energy offers extensive environmental benefits and is a clean energy source; few other power-generating technologies have a significantly smaller ecological impact than PV (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-1">
      Abareshi, 2011
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>In the international solar market, the solar energy markets in China and India received little attention in the past because solar energy overshadows other fossil fuel markets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-14">
      Kang, 2009
     </xref>). In 2008, China and India developed their solar energy plans. China announced the China Solar Subsidy Plan. India released its draft of a National Solar Mission Plan, which paved the way for this country’s rapid growth of solar energy markets. China’s solar energy market was disappointing until 2007; solar power represented a negligible portion of total electricity generation, accounting for only 100 MW (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-14">
      Kang, 2009
     </xref>). China’s solar energy market entered a new phase in 2009, growing to a 1000 MW market. Solar energy enhances energy security and fosters China’s socioeconomic development. Solar thermal energy applications in China primarily focus on low- and medium-temperature applications, including solar water heating, cooling, air conditioning, building heating, solar drying, and solar power generation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-8">
      Chen et al., 2017
     </xref>). China focuses on silicon-based solar cell technology, known as thin film, instead of thermal energy for solar cells. Thin film solar cell technology is a next-generation technology. Thin-film solar cell technology is the next-generation technology in China’s research and development phase in solar power generation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-8">
      Chen et al., 2017
     </xref>). Several foreign companies have penetrated this market. In comparison, India installed a solar system to manage 100 MW, of which 97% are off-grid systems in remote operation.</p>
    <p>In other countries, solar cell systems operate on a grid-tied system connection. Many international locations operate small, on-grid solar systems. India’s approach had produced a mere 2.74 MW as of 2008, which was connected to the nation’s central electrical grid. As reported in the National Solar Mission Plan, the Indian government aims to expand the capacity of solar power plants to 20,000 MW by 2020, allocating $20 billion over the next 30 years. If the National Solar Mission Plan is implemented, solar power in India is expected to account for one-eighth of today’s total power generation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-25">
      Nykamp et al., 2012
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Storing solar energy-generated power makes electricity available during natural disasters and adverse weather conditions and sells energy reserves to other countries. The growth potential for wind and solar electricity generation has prompted Chinese and U.S. utility companies to consider energy storage as a means to manage supply and demand. The world faces dual challenges like fossil fuel depletion and carbon dioxide emissions. Using alternative energy sources, such as photovoltaic (PV) panels and wind energy conversion systems, presents new challenges for an electronic society and the solar industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-2">
      Abdulrazzaq &amp; Ali, 2018
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The main challenges facing the world’s fossil fuel depletion are coal with carbon capture and storage, nuclear, and renewable energy sources. Solar energy is a minor contributor to the energy constraints in the US due to its high cost. Nevertheless, the cost reductions in PV production have made solar technology cost-competitive with fossil fuel energy generation. Therefore, the future trend for this technology is a minor energy-distributed generation system in which consumers could function as energy sellers for local utility companies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-3">
      Amanor-Boadu et al., 2018
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Global energy demand is expected to increase over several years, with an estimated energy consumption rate of 20 gigawatts by 2013 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-11">
      Haley &amp; Schuler, 2011
     </xref>). Many government policies and business strategies related to solar PV production must overcome regulatory uncertainty in the global PV inverter market (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-24">
      Notton et al., 2010
     </xref>). Global demand caused the solar industry to change from a supply-constrained to a demand-driven market. The utility company’s concern regarding power discrepancy is the leading factor contributing to market growth. Based on the solar market outlook, economic and social threats exist within the solar industry.</p>
    <p>The economic threat to the solar energy industry is the impact of the economy, capital investments, and solar PV installations within the industry. Financial incentives make solar PV-generated electricity more attractive to consumers than electricity from fossil fuels. Nineteen states offered various solar project rebates and established renewable energy standards that required utility companies to purchase a percentage of their power from solar sources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-7">
      Bradford, 2010
     </xref>). Unfortunately, these incentives were not distributed equally among the states, and solar companies faced a complex and confusing array of financing options for consumers in various locations. The financing and installation costs for solar PV systems have been decreasing; however, 75% of solar electricity costs in the US are higher than those of grid-based electricity over the operating life of the installation. Financing options can take up to four months to finalize. The complex financing included rebates, tax credits, non-standard contracts, loans, and permits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-27">
      Sarzynski et al., 2012
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The demonstration project and trials successfully adopted low-carbon energy systems, resulting in a comprehensive review of solar PV and wind turbine systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-21">
      Munshi et al., 2018
     </xref>). The early stages of the demonstration project and trials involved experimentation with technology, followed by subsequent phases of development aimed at reducing uncertainty in adopting innovative technologies. The demonstration project and practices overcame innovation uncertainties in renewable energy for electricity supply systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-21">
      Munshi et al., 2018
     </xref>). The countries benefiting from innovation in renewable energy for electricity supply systems included the US, countries in the European Union, and Japan. In many situations, the government intervenes to mitigate market failures that affect economic opportunities, societal benefits, and national security. The urgency to implement and reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuels can mitigate or avert catastrophic climate change. The demonstration project and trials provide lessons about the initial design process and the management and coordination of future measures. Additionally, the process enabled others to leverage the knowledge gained from companies participating in the demonstration project and trials for solar PV and wind turbine systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-21">
      Munshi et al., 2018
     </xref>). Therefore, the demonstration project and practices depend on reassessing the role of bricolage. In this context, bricolage is a multifaceted learning process that combines interactive learning from science-based research and experience-based learning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-27">
      Sarzynski et al., 2012
     </xref>). The Danish used this learning-based process to advance the wind turbine system as a new competitive energy technology. In 2012, the demonstration project and trials database were updated to include programs from the European Union, the United States, and Japan, facilitating science-based research and experience-based learning coordination.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Findings</title>
   <p>The environment is the most significant benefit of installing a solar energy system, and protecting it is its most important benefit. A key benefit of a solar system is reducing energy costs, saving money, and lowering your electricity bill. Alternative energy is one of the key issues driving social change. If solar energy systems become more affordable, the study’s findings suggest that the cost and equipment will play a vital role in their decision-making process.</p>
   <p>Business Initiatives</p>
   <p>The study’s findings suggested that the research insights may prove helpful to business leaders and those responsible for establishing and implementing energy diversification programs.</p>
   <p>The business strategy aims to address the lack of knowledge about solar energy systems and establish statewide acceptance of alternative energy systems. St. Lucie County, Florida, developed a business initiative that allowed residents to reduce their utility bills by saving energy. The County introduced the Clean Energy Loan Program, offered through the Solar and Energy Loan Fund (SELF) in 2010 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-28">
     St. Lucie County, 2021
    </xref>). SELF provided county residents with a revolving loan program that offered more favorable terms than traditional banks. SELF offered the County residents financial terms for several types of energy-efficient and renewable energy options that included: 1) weatherization, 2) replacement of inefficient air-conditioning systems, 3) window tinting, 4) light-emitting diodes (LED) lighting, 5) extraordinary roof construction, and 6) installation of solar thermal and solar PV systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-28">
     St. Lucie County, 2021
    </xref>). The solar energy industry could emulate a SELF program within Franklin County, OH, as a business model for a strategic marketing campaign to promote solar energy systems for residential use. The solar industry could lead the nation in establishing a lending institution with a social mission, providing low-cost financing and facilitating energy-saving property improvements. The study results could contribute in various ways to professional literature, where little theory or no research exists to explain the viewpoints of residential homeowners. The study results may provide insight into the effectiveness of marketing strategies for solar energy systems, informing business leaders in the solar energy sector on how to effectively promote these systems.</p>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Implications for Social Change</title>
    <p>The implications for positive social change include the potential to develop a marketing strategy that promotes using alternative energy for residential purposes. The use of electricity, natural gas, and petroleum products has become a necessity of life in modern society; however, rising prices have taken a toll on the poorest citizens and individuals with fixed incomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-4">
      Andrews, 2008
     </xref>). The promotion of energy diversification includes solar, wind, and thermal energy as alternatives. Fossil fuel-based electricity generation poses significant risks to public health due to the release of greenhouse gases and the increased incidence of respiratory illnesses resulting from air pollution. Solar energy systems produce no pollution and help to improve air quality and public health. Solar energy systems can generate strong and diverse economic benefits that vary across institutions, cultures, and commercial sectors, providing significant economic benefits to Ohioans.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Recommendations for Actions</title>
    <p>The research aimed to explore the extent of residential homeowners’ awareness of solar energy systems and their knowledge about technological advancements in the solar industry related to solar energy systems. Homeowners are unaware of the ongoing phenomenon. Solar energy leaders must develop a marketing strategy to promote energy diversification solutions for residential users. The literature review revealed a lack of empirical studies on homeowners’ views regarding marketing strategies for residential solar energy systems. Solar energy technology is categorized into three basic types of solar energy systems: active, passive, and hybrid. The study highlighted the dynamic nature of the solar system due to the presence of PV panels on the rooftops of residential homes.</p>
    <p>Global energy demand has grown beyond the limits of installable generation capacity. Numerous renewable energy sources are available, and solar energy systems are a promising alternative and widely accessible for residential use. Passive solar power systems are more cost-competitive with other energy sources and are an innovative technology for achieving energy sustainability in homeowners’ homes. The application of passive solar energy devices can benefit the environment, the nation’s economy, and the lives of millions of underprivileged individuals in developing countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-10">
      Devabhaktuni et al., 2013
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-"></xref>Recommendations</p>
    <p>Solar energy industry leaders must capitalize on the opportunity to transform the nation’s alternative energy plan initiative (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-19">
      Meadowcroft et al., 2018
     </xref>). The potential impact of redistributing the nation’s alternative energy plan must include provisions to protect the most vulnerable consumers in society while ensuring the security of the nation’s electrical grid. Integrating renewable energy sources, such as solar power, into the power grid increases consumer interest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-6">
      Barsoum &amp; Lee, 2013
     </xref>). The study could help create awareness and highlight the diverse types of renewable energy options. Fossil fuel resources are expected to remain the dominant source of primary energy generation for the next 25 years.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Summary and Study Conclusions</title>
    <p>Product choice and communication channels enable millions of consumers to access emerging market products and services (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142826-5">
      Atsmon et al., 2012
     </xref>). Homeowners have become a powerful consumer group in the emerging solar industry market. Consumer empowerment has increased. Three factors influence the consumer’s decision-making process:</p>
    <p>Initial brand.</p>
    <p>The initial brand consideration set was much smaller. Initially, consumers tend to switch to another brand later if it was not their initial choice.</p>
    <p>Word of Mouth.</p>
    <p>Word of mouth plays a crucial role due to the higher rate of first-time buyers and the shorter history of brand familiarity. Word of mouth includes a culture of societal validation and a fragmented media landscape.</p>
    <p>In-store experience.</p>
    <p>The in-store experience influenced a high volume of consumers in their final decisions, and many rarely miss the firsthand in-store expertise they need to make the final decisions. Business leaders across the solar energy sector must implement effective marketing solutions to promote solar systems as alternatives to traditional energy sources. Recommendations that would help residential homeowners have access to better energy choices include: 1) improving the availability of solar energy systems for energy independence 2) increasing awareness of different energy-powered systems, 3) avoiding rising fuel costs, 4) reducing the US dependence on foreign fuel sources, and 5) reducing the carbon emissions footprint.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abareshi, A. (2011). The Antecedents of It-Business Alignment in Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 8, 322-337. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbis.2011.042412
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abdulrazzaq, A. A.,&amp;Hussein Ali, A. (2018). Efficiency Performances of Two MPPT Algorithms for PV System with Different Solar Panels Irradiancess. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems (IJPEDS), 9, 1755-1764. &gt;https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v9.i4.pp1755-1764
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Amanor-Boadu, J. M., Abouzied, M. A.,&amp;Sanchez-Sinencio, E. (2018). An Efficient and Fast Li-Ion Battery Charging System Using Energy Harvesting or Conventional Sources. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 65, 7383-7394. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2018.2793243
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Andrews, C. J. (2008). Energy Conversion Goes Local: Implications for Planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74, 231-254. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360801993531
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Atsmon, Y., Kuentz, J.,&amp;Seong, J. (2012). Building Brands in Emerging Markets. Mckinsey Quarterly, 4, 50-57. &gt;https://www.mckinsey.com/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Barsoum, N.,&amp;Lee, C. Z. (2013). Simulation of Power Flow and Protection of a Limited Bus Grid System with Injected Solar Power. Energy and Power Engineering, 5, 59-69. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2013.51008
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bradford, T. (2010). A Lifetime in the Solar Industry. Greentech Media Solar Summit 2010. &gt;http://www.greentechmedia.com
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, J., Liu, W., Jiang, D., Zhang, J., Ren, S., Li, L. et al. (2017). Preliminary Investigation on the Feasibility of a Clean CAES System Coupled with Wind and Solar Energy in China. Energy, 127, 462-478. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.088
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Christensen, M. C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Devabhaktuni, V., Alam, M., Shekara Sreenadh Reddy Depuru, S., Green, R. C., Nims, D.,&amp;Near, C. (2013). Solar Energy: Trends and Enabling Technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 555-564. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.024
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Haley, U. C. V.,&amp;Schuler, D. A. (2011). Government Policy and Firm Strategy in the Solar Photovoltaic Industry. California Management Review, 54, 17-38. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.17
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Husain, A. A. F., Hasan, W. Z. W., Shafie, S., Hamidon, M. N.,&amp;Pandey, S. S. (2018). A Review of Transparent Solar Photovoltaic Technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 779-791. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.031
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     IEA (2021). Global Energy Review 2021. IEA. &gt;https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kang, H. (2009). Solar Energy Markets in China and India. SERI Quarterly, 2, 104-107.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lukasiak, L.,&amp;Jakubowski, A. (2010). History of Semi-Conductors. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 1, 3-9.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lupangu, C.,&amp;Bansal, R. C. (2017). A Review of Technical Issues on the Development of Solar Photovoltaic Systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 950-965. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mäki, A., Valkealahti, S.,&amp;Leppäaho, J. (2011). Operation of Series‐Connected Silicon‐Based Photovoltaic Modules under Partial Shading Conditions. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 20, 298-309. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.1138
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Marques, A. C.,&amp;Fuinhas, J. A. (2012). Is Renewable Energy Effective in Promoting Growth? Energy Policy, 46, 434–442. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.006 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meadowcroft, J., Stephens, J. C., Wilson, E. J.,&amp;Rowlands, I. H. (2018). Social Dimensions of Smart Grid: Regional Analysis in Canada and the United States. Introduction to Special Issue of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1909-1912. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.106
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moustakas, K., Loizidou, M., Rehan, M.,&amp;Nizami, A. S. (2020). A Review of Recent Developments in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Systems: Key Challenges and Future Perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, Article 109418. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109418
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Munshi, A. H., Sasidharan, N., Pinkayan, S., Barth, K. L., Sampath, W. S.,&amp;Ongsakul, W. (2018). Thin-Film CdTe Photovoltaics—The Technology for Utility Scale Sustainable Energy Generation. Solar Energy, 173, 511-516. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.07.090
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2012). Photovoltaic Research. &gt;https://www.nrel.gov/
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nayak, P. K., Mahesh, S., Snaith, H. J.,&amp;Cahen, D. (2019). Photovoltaic Solar Cell Technologies: Analysing the State of the Art. Nature Reviews Materials, 4, 269-285. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0097-0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Notton, G., Lazarov, V.,&amp;Stoyanov, L. (2010). Optimal Sizing of a Grid-Connected PV System for Various PV Module Technologies and Inclinations, Inverter Efficiency Characteristics and Locations. Renewable Energy, 35, 541-554. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.07.013
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nykamp, S., Andor, M.,&amp;Hurink, J. L. (2012). ‘Standard’ Incentive Regulation Hinders the Integration of Renewable Energy Generation. Energy Policy, 47, 222-237. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.061
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Razykov, T. M., Ferekides, C. S., Morel, D., Stefanakos, E., Ullal, H. S.,&amp;Upadhyaya, H. M. (2011). Solar Photovoltaic Electricity: Current Status and Future Prospects. Solar Energy, 85, 1580-1608. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.12.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sarzynski, A., Larrieu, J.,&amp;Shrimali, G. (2012). The Impact of State Financial Incentives on Market Deployment of Solar Technology. Energy Policy, 46, 550-557. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.032
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     St. Lucie County (2021). Solar and Energy Loan Fund. &gt;https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/community-services/housing/housing-rehabilitation-assistance/solar-and-energy-loan-fund-self 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     U.S. Department of Energy (2021). Energy Sources. &gt;http://www.energy.gov/
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Uddin, K., Gough, R., Radcliffe, J., Marco, J.,&amp;Jennings, P. (2017). Techno-Economic Analysis of the Viability of Residential Photovoltaic Systems Using Lithium-Ion Batteries for Energy Storage in the United Kingdom. Applied Energy, 206, 12-21. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.170
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xiao, Y.,&amp;Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39, 93-112. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17723971
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yu, D.,&amp;Hang, C. C. (2010). A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 435-452. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142826-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zuser, A.,&amp;Rechberger, H. (2011). Considerations of Resource Availability in Technology Development Strategies: The Case Study of Photovoltaics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 56, 56-65. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>