<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jbm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Biosciences and Medicines
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-5081
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-509X
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jbm.2025.135014
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jbm-142681
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Latent Membrane Protein 1, CD3, and CD20 Expression Patterns in Lymphomas at a Tertiary Hospital in Southeast, Nigeria
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ramson Chinemerem
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Achilefu
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Samuel Ifedioranma
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ogenyi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Joy Chioma
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Okoli
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Daniel Chukwudi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Oti
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Christian Kelechi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Agwaraonye
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sixtus Adimchinaobi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Diala
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Abia State University Uturu, Uturu, Nigeria
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Histopathology, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Science, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Nnewi Campus, Nnewi, Nigeria
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durharm, NC, USA
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     13
    </day> 
    <month>
     05
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    05
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    169
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    184
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      18,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      18,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Background: </b>Lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies with varying immunophenotypes, clinical presentations, and associations with viral infections such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) remains a critical tool in the subclassification of lymphomas and in understanding their pathogenesis. The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a DNA virus in the herpesvirus family, has been implicated in the etiopathogenesis of various malignancies, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. 
    <b>Objective: </b>The aim of this present study is to immunohistochemically characterize lymphoma subtypes using CD3, CD20 and LMP1 markers, assess the distribution of B-Cell and T-Cell lymphomas, and explore the potential association of EBV, via LMP1 expression, with lymphoma cases. 
    <b>Materials and</b> 
    <b>Metho</b>
    <b>ds</b>: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from confirmed lymphoma cases were stained with CD3, CD20 and EBV-LMP1 antibodies. The immunohistochemical profiles were evaluated, and data were analyzed in relation to age, sex, histological subtype, and anatomical distribution. 
    <b>Results</b>: The participants in this study had an average age of 40.75 ± 21.70 years. The mean age at diagnosis was 43.1 ± 21.4 years for Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and 19.9 ± 9.7 years for Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Among the 69 lymphoma cases, 62 (89.9%) were Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, while 7 (10.1%) were Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The highest number of lymphoma cases occurred in the 5th decade of life, with 23 cases (33.3%), while the lowest number was observed in the 1st decade, with only 5 cases (7.2%). A statistically significant association between age and lymphoma was found in this study (p = 0.013). In the years under review, the incidence of lymphoma was higher in male subjects (45 cases, 65.2%) compared to female subjects (24 cases, 34.8%), resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 1.9:1. However, no statistically significant association was found between gender and lymphoma in this study (p = 0.190). The results of this study also revealed that 23 cases (33.3%) of lymphoma observed during the review period were of T-Cell lineage, while 46 cases (60.9%) were of B-Cell lineage. A total of 25 cases (36.2%) of lymphoma occurred in both the axilla and cervical regions, while 19 cases (27.5%) were located in the inguinal region. However, no statistically significant association was found between the anatomical site and lymphoma distribution according to cell lineage (p = 0.748). Only 1.4% (1/69) of Lymphoma cases were positive for EBV-LMP1, suggesting a limited role for EBV via LMP1 in this population.
    <b> Conclusion:</b> This study confirmed the predominance of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) across all age groups, particularly among older adults. The study also supports the well-known bimodal age distribution of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL), with peaks in young adults and middle-aged individuals. Limited LMP1 expression suggests alternative pathogenetic pathways in EBV-associated lymphomas. These findings underscore the importance of continued investigation into the immunophenotypic and molecular features of lymphomas to enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic decision-making.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Epstein-Barr Virus
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Latent Membrane Protein 1
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Lymphoma
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Immunohistochemistry
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms arising from lymphoid tissues, traditionally classified as Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), each with distinct biological behaviors, prognoses and responses to treatment. Globally, approximately 287,000 new cases of NHL are diagnosed each year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-1">
     [1]
    </xref>, with incidence rates increasing with age and showing a male predominance. Ugwu et al., (2023) recorded a Prevalence of lymphoma of 50.0% patients who presented with lymphadenopathy in Abakiliki, Southeast, Nigeria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Although NHL is relatively uncommon across most African populations, its relative frequency is higher in North and sub-Saharan Africa due to the high incidence of Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL), especially in children <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. Historical data indicate that Ibadan, Nigeria, once recorded one of the highest global incidences of lymphomas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Although BL remains the most common childhood malignancy in this region, its prevalence has decreased over the decades, from 50% in the 1960s to 19.4% in the 1990s—a decline attributed to improved living conditions, better malaria control, and reduced Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-6">
     [6]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>EBV, a ubiquitous DNA virus from the herpesvirus family, is implicated in the pathogenesis of several B-Cell lymphomas, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. These include endemic BL, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and other EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders such as HIV-related lymphomas and post-transplant lymphomas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. The virus encodes oncogenic proteins such as LMP1 and EBNA2, which activate signaling pathways like NFκB and JAK/STAT, and dysregulate cell survival and proliferation, contributing to malignant transformation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-8">
     [8]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>More than 90% of the global population carries latent EBV infection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-9">
     [9]
    </xref>, with earlier exposure often observed in developing regions due to environmental and cultural factors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-10">
     [10]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Ahmad et al., (2022), in a recent research, documented that the Prevalence of Epstein Barr virus infection amongst lymphoma patients in Nigeria is 13.4% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. Epidemiological and genetic studies have established a strong association between EBV and several lymphoma subtypes, including BL, diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL), plasmablastic lymphoma, and HL <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-13">
     [13]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-15">
     [15]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Recent observations indicate an increasing prevalence of lymphomas in our local environment. However, a thorough review of existing literature reveals a scarcity of published data on the prevalence of lymphomas and an absence of studies detailing the clinicopathologic patterns and treatment outcomes in our center. Regional data on the burden of lymphoma are crucial, as variations in incidence and disease characteristics may exist even within the same country. Understanding these regional trends is essential not only for informing healthcare providers and guiding timely and accurate diagnosis and management but also for assisting governmental and public health agencies in effective healthcare planning and resource allocation. Despite extensive research, the precise mechanisms by which EBV contributes to lymphomagenesis remain incompletely understood, particularly due to variability in viral gene expression and population-specific patterns. This study aims to bridge this knowledge gap by investigating EBV’s role in lymphoma pathogenesis through immunohistochemical analysis of LMP1 expression across lymphoma subtypes. By doing so, it seeks to elucidate EBV’s oncogenic influence and offer insights into potential diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, especially in high-prevalence settings.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials And Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Study Design</title>
    <p>This was a 10-year retrospective study that comparatively analyzed lymphoma in previously diagnosed samples of formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded Lymphoma tissue blocks from 2013 to 2023 retrieved from the Histopathology Department of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital Nnewi. Also retrieved from the available records were patients’ demographic data. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee (NAUTH/CS/66/VOL.16/VER.3/02/2023/02) of the hospital before commencement of the study.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Selection of Sample Blocks</title>
    <p>Paraffin wax embedded tissue blocks of subjects who were previously diagnosed and reported with various histological subtypes and grades of lymphoma in Histopathology Department, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching, Nnewi, Anambra state starting from 2013 to 2023 were used in this study. The paraffin wax embedded tissue blocks that were selected comprised all age groups and both sexes.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Inclusion Criteria</title>
    <p>All formalin fixed paraffin wax embedded blocks of lymph node tissues of subjects who had been previously confirmed lymphoma positive by the pathologist from 2013 to 2023 with detailed records were included in this study.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Exclusion Criteria</title>
    <p>The following groups of subjects were excluded from this study:</p>
    <p>1) Formalin fixed paraffin wax embedded blocks of lymph node tissues of subjects previously confirmed lymphoma positive by the pathologist from 2013 to 2023 but without detailed records.</p>
    <p>2) Formalin fixed paraffin wax embedded blocks of lymph node tissues of subjects previously confirmed lymphoma positive by the pathologist before 2013.</p>
    <p>3) Samples that were tiny and would not be enough for analysis.</p>
    <p>4) Samples that have been eaten by rodents and damaged tissue blocks.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Laboratory Analysis</title>
    <p>The archived paraffin embedded tissue blocks of the subjects were retrieved. The tissue blocks were trimmed and serial sections of 4 µ thickness cut on a Rotary microtome (HM340E Thermo Scientific. Massachusetts, United States of America). The tissue ribbons produced were floated on tissue flotation bath set at 50 ˚C. The floated sections were picked up on clean glass slides each, allowed to air dry, and then stained with haematoxylin and eosin staining technique. The stained slides of the subjects were coded for blind assessment and were reviewed by pathologists to reconfirm the diagnosis.</p>
    <p>The sections were taken to water and stained in Erlich’s haematoxylin for 20 minutes. The stained sections were rinsed in tap water, differentiated in 1% acid alcohol for 15 seconds and then rinsed in tap water. The sections were blued in Scott’s tap water and stained in 1% aqueous eosin solution for 1minutes. The sections were washed in running tap water for 30 seconds. The stained sections were dehydrated in ascending grades of alcohol, cleared and mounted using DPX (Di-N-Butyl Phthalate in Xylene) and glass cover slip <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-16">
      [16]
     </xref>. Care was taken to avoid air bubbles. Photomicrographs were taken using Olympus microscope (BHTU. New York Microscope Company).</p>
    <p>The immunohistochemical method used in this present study is the Avidin Biotin Complex (ABC) method also referred to as Avidin Biotin Immunoperoxidase method. The principle is based on a simple indirect antigen and antibody reaction. The biomarkers (antigens in the tissues), combined with their corresponding antibodies (CD3, CD20 and LMP1) to form a complex which is coupled with a secondary antibody and in the presence of an immunogen (3,3diaminobenzidine) forms a brown colour complex. The intensity of this brown colour complex is directly proportional to the concentration of the biomarkers in the tissues <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-17">
      [17]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>One block of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was selected per case and 4 micrometer thick section was cut, deparaffinized and rehydrated by passing through 2 changes of xylene, then 4 changes of descending grades of alcohol (100%, 90%, 80%, 70%) and finally to water. Antigen retrieval was performed by immersing and heating sections on a citrate buffer solution of pH 6.0 using the microwave at power 100 for 15 minutes. The sections were equilibrated gradually with cool water to displace the hot citrate buffer for at least 5 min for the section to cool. Endogenous peroxidase blocking was done on the sections by simply covering section with 3% hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) for 15 min. Sections were washed 2 times in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 3 minutes each. The slides were incubated with protein blocker (avidin) for 20 mins to prevent non-specific binding and then washed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Endogenous biotin in tissue was blocked using biotin for 15 mins and washed with PBS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-17">
      [17]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Sections were then incubated with primary antibodies; mouse monoclonal antibodies against CD3, CD20 and LMP1 proteins in a humid chamber for 1 hour at room temperature. Excess antibodies will be washed off with PBS and a secondary antibody (LINK) was applied on sections for 15 mins. Sections were washed and the (LABEL) horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was applied to the sections for 15 mins. A working DAB (3.3’-diaminobenzidine) solution was made up by mixing 1 drop (20 microns) of the DAB chromogen to 1 ml of the DAB substrate. This working solution was applied on sections after washing off the HRP with PBS for at least 5 mins. The brown reaction begins to appear at this moment especially for a positive target. Excess DAB solution and precipitate were washed off with water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-17">
      [17]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Sections were counterstained with haematoxylin solution for 5 min and blued briefly. Sections were dehydrated in alcohol, cleared in xylene and mounted in DPX. Stained sections were reviewed for nuclear reactivity. Micrographs were taken using Olympus microscope <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-17">
      [17]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>The data obtained were analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) 20.0. Fisher Exact test and chi-square test were used to determine statistical differences and the association between variables. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all statistical analyses.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <p>Over the period from 2013 to 2023, a total of 91 lymphoma cases were recorded. However, 7 of these cases were excluded due to the unavailability of tissue blocks, while 15 cases were excluded because of insufficient tissue in the paraffin blocks, which was attributed to tissue degradation and suggestive of potential issues with sample preservation. Consequently, 69 cases of lymphoma tissue blocks were selected for immunohistochemical staining.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref> present the distribution of lymphoma cases among patients at NAUTH, categorized into Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by age group. Among the 69 subjects studied immunohistochemically, the youngest was 4 years old, while the oldest was 82 years old. The mean age at diagnosis was 43.1 ± 21.4 years for Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and 19.9 ± 9.7 years for Hodgkin’s lymphoma. According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>, the highest number of lymphoma cases (23 cases, or 33.3%) occurred in the &gt;50 years age group, with all cases being Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Five cases (7.2%) were observed in the 1 - 10 years age group, while 6 cases (8.7%) were in the 21 - 30 years age group. The 31 - 40 years age group accounted for 8 cases (11.6%), and the 11 - 20 years and 41 - 50 years age groups had 13 (18.8%) and 14 cases (20.3%), respectively.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-"></xref>Table 1. Age group distribution of lymphomas cases into Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Age group</p><p style="text-align:center">(Years)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">TOTAL</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.16%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 10</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.95%"><p style="text-align:center">4 (80)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.95%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (20)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (7.2)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.16%"><p style="text-align:center">11 - 20</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.95%"><p style="text-align:center">11 (84.6)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.95%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (15.4)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">13 (18.8)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.16%"><p style="text-align:center">21 - 30</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.95%"><p style="text-align:center">4 (66.7)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.95%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (33.3)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">6 (8.7)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.16%"><p style="text-align:center">31 - 40</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.95%"><p style="text-align:center">6 (75.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.95%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (25.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">8 (11.6)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.16%"><p style="text-align:center">41 - 50</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.95%"><p style="text-align:center">14 (100.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.95%"><p style="text-align:center">0 (0.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">14 (20.3)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.16%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;50</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.95%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (100.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.95%"><p style="text-align:center">0 (0.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (33.3)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.16%"><p style="text-align:center">TOTAL</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.95%"><p style="text-align:center">62 (89.9)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.95%"><p style="text-align:center">7 (10.1)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">69 (100.0)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>X<sup>2</sup> (5, N = 69) = 10.786*, p = 0.013; Keys: n = absolute number; % = percentage, * = Fisher’s Exact Text.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. Age distribution of lymphomas cases into Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153173-rId14.jpeg?20250616103123" />
   </fig>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
     Table 2
    </xref> shows the gender distribution of lymphomas cases into Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Out of the 69 cases of lymphoma, 62 (89.9%) were Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas whereas 7 (10.1%) were Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. 42 (67.7%) cases of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas were of male subjects while 20 (32.3%) were of female subjects. The incidence of Lymphoma within the year under review was higher in male subjects than female subjects with male to female ratio of 1.9:1.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-"></xref>Table 2. Gender distribution of lymphomas cases into Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Gender</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Male</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">42 (93.3)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">3 (6.7)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">45 (65.2)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Female</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">20 (83.3)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">4 (16.7)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">24 (34.8)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">62 (89.9)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">7 (10.1)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">69 (100.0)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>X<sup>2</sup> (1, N = 69) = 1.717, p = 0.190; Keys: n = absolute number; % = percentage.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
     Table 3
    </xref> shows the distribution of lymphoma cases among patients in NAUTH into B-Cell and T-Cell lymphoma with respect to age group. From the result of this present study, it was discovered that 23(33.3%) of the lymphoma cases seen in NAUTH within the years under review were of T-Cell linage as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>. 46(66.7%) cases of the lymphomas were of B-Cell linage. Out of the 23 cases of the T-Cell Lymphomas, age groups 41 - 50 and &gt;50 years had the highest number of cases 8 (34.8%) each, while age groups 1 – 10 years and 31 - 40 years had the lowest number of cases with 1 (4.3%) each. The highest number of B-Cell Lymphoma cases 15 (32.6%) was seen among the age group of &gt;50 years. Lymphoma cases of B-Cell lineage were uncommon, with only 4 cases (8.7%) each in the 1 - 10 and 31 - 40 age groups.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table3">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-"></xref>Table 3. Distribution of lymphomas cases into B-Cell and T-Cell according to age group.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Age Group</p><p style="text-align:center">(Years)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">T-Cell Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">B-Cell Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">1 – 10</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">1 (20.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">4 (80.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">5 (7.2)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">11 – 20</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">3 (23.1)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">10 (76.9)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">13 (18.8)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">21 – 30</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2 (33.3)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">4 (66.7)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">6 (8.7)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">31 – 40</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">1 (12.5)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">7 (87.5)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">8 (11.6)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">41 – 50</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">8 (57.1)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">6 (42.9)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">14 (20.3)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;50</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">8 (34.8)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">15 (65.2)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">23 (33.3)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">23 (33.3)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">46 (66.7)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">69 (100.0)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>X<sup>2</sup> = (5, N = 69) = 5.681*, p = 0.338; Keys: n = absolute number; % = percentage, * = Fisher’s Exact Text.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
     Table 4
    </xref> shows the distribution of lymphoma cases into B-Cell and T-Cell with respect to Gender. Within the years under review, 45 (65.2%) of all lymphoma cases were of male gender, and 24 (34.8%) were of female gender according to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
     Table 4
    </xref>. Out of the 46 cases of B-Cell lymphomas, 28 (60.1%) and 18 (39.1%) were of male and female respectively, whereas out of the 23 cases of T-Cell lymphomas, 17 (73.9%) and 6 (26.1%) were of male and female respectively.</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. Distribution of Lymphoma cases into B-Cell and T-Cell.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153173-rId15.jpeg?20250616103123" />
   </fig>
   <table-wrap id="table4">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-"></xref>Table 4. Distribution of lymphomas cases into B-Cell and T-Cell according to gender.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Gender</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="40.38%"><p style="text-align:center">T-Cell Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="42.22%"><p style="text-align:center">B-Cell Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Male</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="40.38%"><p style="text-align:center">17 (37.8)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="42.22%"><p style="text-align:center">28 (62.2)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.54%"><p style="text-align:center">45 (65.2)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Female</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="40.38%"><p style="text-align:center">6 (25.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="42.22%"><p style="text-align:center">18 (75.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.54%"><p style="text-align:center">24 (34.8)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="40.38%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (33.3)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="42.22%"><p style="text-align:center">46 (66.7)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.54%"><p style="text-align:center">69 (100.0)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>X<sup>2</sup> = (1, N = 69) = 1.150, p = 0.212; Keys: n = absolute number; % = percentage.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
     Table 5
    </xref> presents the distribution of lymphoma cases based on tissue type and anatomical site. In the present study, the axillary region accounted for 25 cases (36.2%) of lymphoma, with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) comprising the majority (23 cases, 92.0%). Similarly, 25 cases (36.2%) were observed in the cervical region, of which 20 cases (80.0%) were NHL. The inguinal region showed 19 cases (27.5%), with NHL again representing the predominant subtype.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table5">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-"></xref>Table 5. Distribution of lymphoma cases with respect to the nature of tissue/anatomical site.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="36.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Nature of Tissue/Anatomical Site</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="29.57%"><p style="text-align:center">Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="24.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="36.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Axillary Lymph Node</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.57%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (92.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.53%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (8.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center">25 (36.2)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Cervical Lymph Node</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.57%"><p style="text-align:center">20 (80.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.53%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (20.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center">25 (36.2)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Inguinal Lymph Node</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.57%"><p style="text-align:center">19 (100.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.53%"><p style="text-align:center">0 (0.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center">19 (27.5)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.48%"><p style="text-align:center">TOTAL</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.57%"><p style="text-align:center">62 (89.9)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.53%"><p style="text-align:center">7 (10.1)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center">69 (100.0)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>X<sup>2</sup> = (2, N = 69) = 4.396*, p = 0.115; Keys: n = absolute number; % = percentage, * = Fisher’s Exact Text.</p>
   <p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
     Table 6
    </xref>, both the axillary and cervical lymph nodes exhibited identical distributions of lymphoma subtypes, with B-Cell lymphomas accounting for 17 cases (68.0%) and T-Cell lymphomas for 8 cases (32.0%) at each site. In the inguinal lymph nodes, T-Cell lymphomas were observed in 7 cases (36.8%), while B-Cell lymphomas were more common, with 12 cases (63.2%). Overall, B-Cell lymphomas demonstrated the highest percentage of occurrence across all anatomical sites in this study.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table6">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-"></xref>Table 6. Distribution of Lymphomas into T-Cell and B-Cell Lineage According to the Nature of Tissue/Site of Lymph Node.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Nature of Tissue/Anatomical Site</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">T-Cell Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">B-Cell Lymphoma</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Axillary Lymph Node</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">8 (32.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">17 (68.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">25 (36.2)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Cervical Lymph Node</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">8 (32.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">17 (68.0)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">25 (36.2)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Inguinal Lymph Node</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">7 (36.8)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">12 (63.2)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">19 (27.5)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">23 (33.3)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">46 (66.7)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">69 (100.0)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>X<sup>2</sup> = (2, N = 69) = 0.145, p = 0.900; Keys: n = absolute number; % = percentage.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table7">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-"></xref>Table 7. Distribution of type of lymphomas according to T-Cell and B-Cell lineage.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="48.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Type of Lymphoma</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.54%"><p style="text-align:center">T-Cell</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="31.52%"><p style="text-align:center">B-Cell</p><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="48.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.54%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (37.1%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.52%"><p style="text-align:center">39 (62.9%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">62 (89.9%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="48.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.54%"><p style="text-align:center">0 (0.0%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.52%"><p style="text-align:center">7 (100.0%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">7 (10.1%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="48.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.54%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (33.3%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.52%"><p style="text-align:center">46 (66.7%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">69 (100.0%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>X<sup>2</sup> = (1, N = 69) = 3.895, p = 0.050; Keys: n = absolute number; % = percentage.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table8">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
      Table 8
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-"></xref>Table 8. Latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) expression patterns of lymphomas cases.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="48.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Type of Lymphoma</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="64.55%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">LMP1</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="26.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="32.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Positive</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="31.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Negative</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="48.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.76%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (1.6%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.79%"><p style="text-align:center">61(98.4%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.44%"><p style="text-align:center">62 (89.9%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="48.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Hodgkin’s Lymphoma</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.76%"><p style="text-align:center">0 (0.0%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.79%"><p style="text-align:center">7 (100.0%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.44%"><p style="text-align:center">7 (10.1%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="48.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.76%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (1.4%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.79%"><p style="text-align:center">68 (98.6%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.44%"><p style="text-align:center">69 (100.0%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>X<sup>2</sup> = (1, N = 69) = 0.115, p = 0.899; Keys: n = absolute number; % = percentage.</p>
   <fig id="fig3" position="float">
    <label>Figure 3</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining of lymphoma cases with CD 3 antibody. (A)-(D) shows positive staining of T-Cells at the paracortical area. (×100 magnification).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153173-rId16.jpeg?20250616103124" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig4" position="float">
    <label>Figure 4</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-"></xref>Figure 4. Immunohistochemical staining of lymphoma cases with CD 20 and EBV-LMP1 antibodies. (A)-(C) shows positive staining of B-Cells at the follicular area. (D) shows bositive staining for LMP1. (×100 magnification).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2153173-rId17.jpeg?20250616103124" />
   </fig>
   <p>Based on the findings of this study, 23 (37.1%) of the 62 Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma cases diagnosed at NAUTH during the study period were of T-Cell lineage, while 39 cases (62.9%) were of B-Cell lineage. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
     Table 7
    </xref>, all 7 cases (100.0%) of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma were of B-Cell lineage, with no cases of T-Cell lineage observed. As presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
     Table 8
    </xref>, the study observed that only 1 (1.6%) of the 62 cases of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma exhibited positivity for the EBV-LMP1 antibody, while none of the Hodgkin’s Lymphoma cases tested positive.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>This study aimed to classify lymphoma cases into B-Cell and T-Cell subtypes using CD20 and CD3 antibodies, determine the expression of latent membrane protein (LMP1), and evaluate potential associations between EBV and lymphoma. The trends observed in this study align with established epidemiological patterns of lymphoma incidence. Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma NHL is the predominant type across all age groups, with a steady increase that peaks in individuals over 50. This aligns with previous studies indicating that NHL is more common in older adults due to factors such as genetic predisposition, immunodeficiency, and environmental exposures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-18">
     [18]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. The rising incidence in older age groups may be attributed to the accumulation of genetic mutations and age-related immune dysfunction. In contrast, Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) remains relatively low across all age groups, with only a modest increase in older adults. This supports its well-known bimodal age distribution, with incidence peaks in young adults (early 20 s) and middle-aged individuals (mid-60s) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-20">
     [20]
    </xref>, unlike NHL, which is driven by multiple genetic and environmental factors. These findings reinforce that lymphoma frequency increases with age, particularly for NHL, while HL remains less common in comparison.</p>
   <p>Several reports have indicated that NHL affects more males than females and the incidence increases with age <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-21">
     [21]
    </xref>. The male to female ratio is similar to that observed in previous studies across the world <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. The gender distribution analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
     Table 2
    </xref>) presents the gender distribution of 69 lymphoma cases, of which 62 (89.9%) were diagnosed as Non‐Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) and 7 (10.1%) were diagnosed as Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL). Males comprised 65.2% (n = 45) of the total cases, with 42 (93.3%) having NHL and 3 (6.7%) having HL. Females, on the other hand, made up 34.8% (n = 24) of the cases, with 20 (83.3%) diagnosed with NHL and 4 (16.7%) with HL. Although these figures indicate a somewhat higher proportion of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma among females (16.7% vs. 6.7% in males), the chi‐square test (p = 0.190) shows that this difference is not statistically significant. In summary, Non‐Hodgkin’s Lymphoma is the predominant subtype for both genders, with no significant gender‐based difference in the distribution of Hodgkin’s versus Non‐Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. The male predominance though had been noted in previous studies cannot be easily explained except by exposure to some occupational carcinogens peculiar to occupations predominated mainly by males <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. Although HL appeared slightly more frequent in females, statistical analysis demonstrated no significant gender-based differences. This data is similar to that reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-21">
     [21]
    </xref> suggesting a male predominance in lymphomas, particularly NHL, but without substantial sex-linked variations in HL occurrence.</p>
   <p>The characterization of lymphomas into B-Cell and T-Cell lineages (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
     Table 3
    </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
     Table 4
    </xref>) is critical for understanding their immunophenotypic distribution. The findings of this present study indicate that B-Cell lymphomas are more prevalent than T-Cell lymphomas, particularly in younger individuals. This is similar to various reports from around the world and Nigeria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-23">
     [23]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. Although T-Cell lymphomas were less common in this research, it remains significant in lymphoma pathology, especially in adult and elderly populations. According to John et al., (2018), T-Cell lymphomas represent about 3.1% of all NHL cases in Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. The 33.3% prevalence of T-Cell lymphoma in this study is higher than the global average. This could be due to regional factors or specific patient characteristics in NAUTH.</p>
   <p>The distribution of T-Cell lymphoma showing the highest frequency in the 41-50 years and &gt;50 years age groups (34.9% each) is supported by findings from Zhang et al., (2019), who noted that the incidence of T-Cell lymphoma tends to increase with age <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-25">
     [25]
    </xref>. The aging immune system may become less efficient at detecting and eliminating malignant T-cells, which could contribute to the increased prevalence of T-Cell lymphoma in older populations. Younger age groups such as 1 - 10 years and 21 - 30 years exhibiting the lowest frequency of T-Cell lymphoma (4.3% each) aligns with general findings that T-Cell lymphoma is much rarer in children and young adults. A study by Horwitz et al., (2015) also found that pediatric and young adult populations show lower incidences of T-Cell lymphoma, with the disease becoming more common in later stages of life <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-26">
     [26]
    </xref>. Older individuals tend to accumulate mutations in both T-cells and B-Cells over time, which can lead to lymphoma development. The increase in lymphoma cases with age is generally attributed to immune system aging (immunosenescence), which weakens the body’s ability to control abnormal cells, especially B-Cells and T-cells. This leads to an accumulation of malignant cells. As noted by Mancuso et al., (2018), this decline in immune function is a primary factor contributing to the higher incidence of lymphomas in elderly populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-27">
     [27]
    </xref>. These findings highlight the importance of age-specific screening and management strategies in lymphoma care, particularly for older populations.</p>
   <p>From the study, 62 cases of NHL were observed, of which 37.1% were of T-Cell lineage and 62.9% were of B-Cell lineage. The dominance of B-Cell lineage in NHL is well documented in literature, with B-Cell lymphomas constituting about 85% - 90% of all NHL cases, and T-Cell lymphomas representing a smaller proportion (typically around 10% - 15%) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-28">
     [28]
    </xref>. This matches the findings in this present study, where B-Cell lymphomas (62.9%) are more prevalent than T-Cell lymphomas (37.1%). In this study, 7 cases of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) were observed, all of which were of B-Cell lineage. The result that all cases were B-Cell lineage aligns with the general understanding of HL’s pathology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. Hodgkin’s Lymphoma is characterized by the presence of Reed-Sternberg cells, which are generally of B-Cell origin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. Unlike NHL, where both B-Cell and T-Cell lymphomas are common, HL is almost exclusively a B-Cell disease, particularly in the nodular sclerosis and mixed cellularity subtypes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. The incidence of HL is generally lower than that of NHL, but it still remains a significant concern. The dominance of B-Cell origin in HL has been consistent in multiple studies, and the result of this result is not an outlier in this context. A study conducted by Onwubuya et al., (2015) in Nigeria observed a predominance of B-Cell NHL, similar to findings in this study, though the exact proportions of T-Cell vs. B-Cell cases might differ based on the sample population and diagnostic methods used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-23">
     [23]
    </xref>. This could indicate regional patterns in the pathogenesis of NHL.</p>
   <p>Importantly, LMP1 expressions were detected in only one NHL case, with no HL cases testing positive for LMP1 expression. This finding aligns with studies indicating that not all EBV-associated lymphomas demonstrate detectable LMP1 expression <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-29">
     [29]
    </xref>. The absence of a significant association between LMP1 and lymphoma subtypes in this study suggests that EBV may not play a central role in lymphomagenesis in this population or that alternative viral or genetic mechanisms are involved <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-30">
     [30]
    </xref>. The immunohistochemical images (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figFigures 3(A)-(D)">
     Figures 3(A)-(D)
    </xref>) confirm the presence of T-cell lineage in lymphoid infiltrates, as evidenced by strong CD3 expression in the paracortical region. This distribution pattern is characteristic of T-cell–associated lymphoproliferative disorders and aligns with previous research demonstrating the diagnostic utility of CD3 in distinguishing T-Cell from B-Cell lymphomas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figFigures 4(A)-(C)">
     Figures 4(A)-(C)
    </xref> demonstrate positive CD20 staining of B-Cells localized within the follicular areas. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4(D)">
     Figure 4(D)
    </xref> shows positive immunoreactivity for EBV-LMP1. The observed staining patterns further validate the immunophenotypic classification applied in this study.</p>
   <p>This study successfully achieved its aim of immunohistochemically characterizing lymphomas and evaluating their relationship with EBV through LMP1 expression. The findings confirm the predominance of NHL and B-Cell lineage while showing no significant correlation between lymphoma type and EBV infection via LMP1 expression. The lack of a significant gender or anatomical site preference suggests that lymphoma presentation in this cohort is broadly consistent with global trends <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-23">
     [23]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-29">
     [29]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusions</title>
   <p>This study successfully employed immunohistochemical techniques to classify lymphoma cases into B-Cell and T-Cell subtypes, evaluate the expression of latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), and investigate the potential association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and lymphoma pathogenesis. The findings corroborate established epidemiological patterns, notably the predominance of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) across all age groups, particularly among older adults. The bimodal age distribution characteristic of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL), with incidence peaks in young adults and middle-aged individuals, was also reaffirmed.</p>
   <p>A clear male predominance was observed in NHL cases, while no significant gender-based differences were noted in the distribution of HL versus NHL. B-Cell lymphomas were more prevalent than T-Cell lymphomas, particularly among younger individuals, with no statistically significant age-related increase in T-Cell lymphoma incidence. Anatomically, NHL was more frequently identified across all lymph node sites, though no distinct site-based predilection was observed for either NHL or HL.</p>
   <p>LMP1 expression was observed in only one NHL case and was entirely absent in all HL cases, indicating a potentially limited involvement of EBV, specifically through the LMP1 pathway, in lymphoma pathogenesis within this cohort. These findings are consistent with previous studies suggesting that LMP1 is not consistently expressed in EBV-associated lymphomas, pointing to the likelihood of other viral or genetic factors contributing to disease development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142681-23">
     [23]
    </xref>. There is a need for further studies to substantiate these findings.</p>
   <p>Overall, the study highlights distinct immunophenotypic and epidemiological differences between B-Cell and T-Cell lymphomas within both NHL. The predominance of B-Cell lineage in NHL, coupled with the notable presence of T-Cell cases, underscores the need for further investigation into the biological and clinical implications of T-Cell lymphomas. Given the more aggressive clinical course of T-Cell lymphomas, these findings emphasize the importance of precise subtype classification for prognostication and treatment planning. Future studies with larger sample sizes, as well as integrated molecular and genetic profiling, are warranted to deepen understanding of lymphoma pathogenesis and improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Recommendations</title>
   <p>1) Future studies should incorporate molecular and genetic profiling techniques, such as PCR and next-generation sequencing, to complement immunohistochemical findings and provide deeper insights into lymphoma pathogenesis and EBV-related oncogenesis.</p>
   <p>2) To enhance the statistical power and generalizability of findings, similar studies should be conducted using larger sample sizes across multiple institutions and geographic regions.</p>
   <p>3) Although LMP1 expression was limited, routine EBV testing (including EBER in situ hybridization) should be considered, especially in younger patients and aggressive lymphomas, to better understand the virus’s role in disease development.</p>
   <p>4) The routine use of immunohistochemistry for CD markers (e.g., CD20, CD3, CD5, CD30) should be emphasized in diagnostic protocols to ensure accurate subclassification of lymphomas and guide treatment decisions.</p>
   <p>5) Given the relatively aggressive nature and clinical challenges associated with T-Cell lymphomas, targeted studies are recommended to explore their unique biology, treatment response, and prognostic markers.</p>
   <p>6) Investigating the long-term outcomes of patients with EBV-negative lymphomas may shed light on alternative oncogenic mechanisms and identify potential therapeutic targets.</p>
   <p>Future research should integrate clinical parameters (e.g., staging, treatment outcomes, survival data) to assess how immunophenotypic and EBV-related profiles influence prognosis and therapy response.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kleihues, P. and Stewart, B.W. (2003) World Cancer Report. Lymphoma. International Agency for Research on Cancer Press, 237-241.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ugwu, N., Iyare, F., Ezeokoli, E., Edegbe, F., Ugwu, C., Eni, U., Okparaoka, S. and Uzoigwe, C. (2023) Prevalence of Lymphoma and Distribution Pattern of Lymph Node Pathologies among Adult Patients with Lymphadenopathy in Abakaliki, Nigeria. Annals of Tropical Pathology, 13. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_450_23 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sitas, F., Parkin, M., Chirenje, Z., Stein, L., Mqoqi, N. and Wabinga, H. (2006) Cancers. In: Jamison, D.T., Feachem, R.G. and Makgoba, M.W., Eds., Disease and Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2nd Edition, World Bank, 289-304.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Waterhouse, J., Muir, C., Correa, P. and Powell, J. (1976) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. IARC Scientific Publication No. 15, IARC Press III, 116-119. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Akang, E.E. (2005) Epidemiology of Cancer in Ibadan: Tumours in Childhood. Archives of Ibadan Medicine, 1, 7-9. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/aim.v1i2.34537
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ojesina, A.I., Akang, E.E.U. and Ojemakinde, K.O. (2002) Decline in the Frequency of Burkitt’s Lymphoma Relative to Other Childhood Malignancies in Ibadan, Nigeria. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics, 22, 159-163. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1179/027249302125000887
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dolcetti, R. and Masucci, M.G. (2003) Epstein-Barr Virus: Induction and Control of Cell Transformation. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 196, 207-218. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.10263
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brennan, P. (2001) Signalling Events Regulating Lymphoid Growth and Survival. Seminars in Cancer Biology, 11, 415-421. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1006/scbi.2001.0408
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Prevot, S., Hamilton-Dutoit, S., Audouin, J., Walter, P., Pallesen, G. and Diebold, J. (1992) Analysis of African Burkitt’s and High-Grade B Cell Non-Burkitt’s Lymphoma for Epstein-Barr Virus Genomes Using in Situ Hybridization. British Journal of Haematology, 80, 27-32. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.1992.tb06396.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Henle, G., Henle, W. and Diehl, V. (1968) Relation of Burkitt’s Tumor-Associated Herpes-Ytpe Virus to Infectious Mononucleosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 59, 94-101. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.59.1.94
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Klumb, C.E., Hassan, R., De Oliveira, D.E., De Resende, L.M.M., Carriço, M.K., De Almeida Dobbin, J., et al. (2003) Geographic Variation in Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Burkitt’s Lymphoma in Children from Brazil. International Journal of Cancer, 108, 66-70. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11443
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Irekeola, A.A., Wada, Y., Mohamud, R., Mat Lazim, N., Yean, C.Y., et al. (2022) Prevalence of EBV Infection in 1157 Diseased Cohorts in Nigeria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 40, 420-426. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.03.008
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yawale, I., Leona, W.A., Almustapha, A.L., Garba, D.W. and Sani, M.S. (2021) Epstein-Barr Virus Association with Malignant Lymphoma Subgroups in Zaria, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Surgical Sciences, 105, 112-145.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rickinson, A. and Kieff, E. (2001) Epstein Barr Virus. In: Fields, B.N., Knipe, D.M. and Howley, P.M., Eds., Fields’ Virology, 4th Edition, Lippincott Raven, 2511-2573.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chabay, P.A. and Preciado, M.V. (2012) EBV Primary Infection in Childhood and Its Relation to B-Cell Lymphoma Development: A Mini-Review from a Developing Region. International Journal of Cancer, 133, 1286-1292. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.27858
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ochei, J. and Kolhatkar, A. (2007) Medical Laboratory Science: Theory and Practice. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dabbs, D.J. and Thompson, L.D.R. (2013) Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry, Theranostic and Genomic Application. 4th Edition, Sauders, 520-535.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hjalgrim, H., Askling, J., Rostgaard, K., Hamilton-Dutoit, S., Frisch, M., Zhang, J., et al. (2003) Characteristics of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma after Infectious Mononucleosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 349, 1324-1332. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa023141
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Swerdlow, S.H., Campo, E., Pileri, S.A., Harris, N.L., Stein, H., Siebert, R., et al. (2016) The 2016 Revision of the World Health Organization Classification of Lymphoid Neoplasms. Blood, 127, 2375-2390. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Matasar, M.J. and Zelenetz, A.D. (2008) Overview of Lymphoma Diagnosis and Management. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 46, 175-198. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2008.03.005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yakubu, M., Ahmadu, B., Yerima, T., Simon, P., Hezekiah, I. and Pwavimbo, A. (2015) Prevalence and Clinical Manifestation of Lymphomas in North-Eastern Nigeria. Indian Journal of Cancer, 52, 551-555. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509x.178435
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Madu, A., Ocheni, S., Nwagha, T., Ibegbulam, O. and Anike, U. (2014) Multiple Myeloma in Nigeria: An Insight to the Clinical, Laboratory Features, and Outcomes. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 17, 212-217. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.127561
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Onwubuya, I.M., Adelusola, K.A., Durosinmi, M.A., Sabageh, D. and Ezike, K.N. (2015) Lymphomas in Ile-Ife, Nigeria: Immunohistochemical Characterization and Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus Encoded RNA. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 9, PC14-PC19.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aluko, J., Adelusola, K., Komolafe, A., Olaofe, O. and Akinyemi, H. (2018) Immunohistopathological Characterization of Lymphomas and Their Relationship with Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 150, S105. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqy097.253
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, L., Wang, J., Liu, H., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Xu, Y. and Sun, Z. (2019) Incidence and Risk Factors for T-Cell Lymphoma in the Elderly Population. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers&amp;Prevention, 28, 1355-1363.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Horwitz, S.M., Lunning, M.A. and Moskowitz, A.J. (2015) T-Cell Lymphoma in Children and Young Adults: A Review of the Literature. Pediatric Blood&amp;Cancer, 62, 821-830.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mancuso, S., Carlisi, M., Santoro, M., Napolitano, M., Raso, S. and Siragusa, S. (2018) Immunosenescence and Lymphomagenesis. Immunity&amp;Ageing, 15, Article No. 22. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-018-0130-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Armitage, J.O. (2010) New Approach to Classifying Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas. The Lancet Oncology, 11, 609-616.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vrzalikova, K., Pugh, M., Mundo, L. and Murray, P. (2021) The Contribution of EBV to the Pathogenesis of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. Annals of Lymphoma, 5, Article No. 30. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21037/aol-21-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142681-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Uzoma, I.C., Taiwo, I.A., Granai, M., Di Stefano, G., Sorrentino, E., Mannucci, S., et al. (2021) Distinct Pattern of Lymphoid Neoplasms Characterizations According to the WHO Classification (2016) and Prevalence of Associated Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Nigeria Population. Infectious Agents and Cancer, 16, Article No. 36. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-021-00378-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>