<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ce
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Creative Education
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2151-4755
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2151-4771
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ce.2025.164034
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ce-142308
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Social Sciences 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Humanities
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Shared Values in the Teaching Profession: A Study of Relations with Perceived Social Support, Job Satisfaction, Engagement, and Sense of Belonging
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Einar M.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Skaalvik
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sidsel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Skaalvik
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Education and Lifelong Learning, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     31
    </day> 
    <month>
     03
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    16
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    04
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    571
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    588
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      30,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      25,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      25,
     </day>
     <month>
      April
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    This study explored how teachers’ perceptions of sharing the prevailing goals and values at school (shared values) and their experiences of working in a positive and supportive social environment (social support from colleagues and the school leadership) were related to their motivation (job satisfaction and engagement) and their sense of institutional belonging. We were particularly interested in examining potential mediation processes. The participants in the study were 1145 Norwegian teachers. The data were analyzed using correlation and structural equation modeling (SEM). Two SEM models were tested: one with supportive colleagues and supportive school leadership as exogenous variables, and one with shared values as a single exogenous variable. The zero-order correlations showed that shared values, supportive colleagues, and supportive school leadership were positively and moderately intercorrelated (r = .49 to r = .53) and that all these variables were positively associated with teacher job satisfaction, engagement, and sense of belonging. The results of the SEM analysis indicate complex mediation processes, suggesting that shared values and social support influence each other reciprocally.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Teacher Motivation
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Supportive School Environment
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Shared Values
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Belonging
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Engagement
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Job Satisfaction
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Educational research in recent decades, drawing partly on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-18">
     Demerouti et al., 2001
    </xref>), underscores the demanding nature of the teaching profession. Studies from various countries consistently report high levels of stress and burnout among teachers (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-17">
     Dehne et al., 2025
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-30">
     Kyriacou, 2001
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-34">
     Liu &amp; Onwuegbuzie, 2012
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-55">
     Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2017
    </xref>). Empirical research further suggests that teacher stress and burnout may result in depression, diminished motivation for teaching, and an increased likelihood of leaving the profession (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-15">
     Collie et al., 2012
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-19">
     Den Brok et al., 2017
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-20">
     Desrumaux et al., 2015
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>According to the JD-R model, all occupations involve both job demands and job resources. Job demands refer to aspects of work that require sustained physical or psychological effort and may contribute to a health impairment process. In contrast, job resources encompass physical, psychological, social, or organizational factors that can facilitate goal achievement, reduce job demands, and foster personal and professional growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-18">
     Demerouti et al., 2001
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-7">
     Bakker &amp; Demerouti, 2006
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Whereas much of the teacher research has examined job demands and teacher stress, an increasing number of studies have also identified several internal (school-related) resources that may contribute to teacher motivation and well-being, for instance autonomy, supportive relationships with students, colleagues and the school leadership, shared goals and values, and opportunities for professional growth and development (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-25">
     Guglielmi et al., 2016
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-50">
     Simbula et al., 2011
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-59">
     Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2021
    </xref>). As pointed out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-17">
     Dehne et al. (2025)
    </xref>, there is a need to further explore resources within the school environment that foster teacher motivation and well-being and prevent teacher stress and the impact of stress. This study focuses on three key job resources: a) positive and supportive relations with colleagues, b) positive and supportive relations with the school leadership, and c) teachers’ feeling that their goals and values are in congruence with the goals and values that are emphasized at the school and by their colleagues (shared values). We tested two models examining the relations between these three job resources and teachers’ motivation (measured through job satisfaction and engagement) as well as their sense of institutional belonging.</p>
   <sec id="s1_1">
    <title>1.1. Supportive Relations with Colleagues and the School Leadership</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-"></xref>Positive social relationships in the workplace, including support from colleagues and supervisors, play a crucial role in individuals’ well-being and professional engagement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-23">
      Geisler et al., 2019
     </xref>). The significance of social relations has been explained through the fundamental human need to belong (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-9">
      Baumeister &amp; Leary, 1995
     </xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-9">
      Baumeister and Leary (1995)
     </xref> conceptualize this need as a deeply rooted psychological motivation, where fulfilling it is closely linked to both motivation and overall well-being. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-1">
      Allen et al. (2022)
     </xref> describe the need to belong as a desire for positive interpersonal connections—being accepted, respected, and valued. This need can be satisfied both through close one-to-one relationships and through a sense of inclusion within larger groups or organizations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-9">
      Baumeister &amp; Leary, 1995
     </xref>). Furthermore, Baumeister highlights two key dimensions of belongingness: frequent positive interactions and mutual care and concern (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-1">
      Allen et al., 2022
     </xref>). In line with this perspective, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-17">
      Dehne et al. (2025)
     </xref> suggest that a close relationship with the school principal, characterized by positivity, warmth, and open communication, may enhance teacher motivation and well-being.</p>
    <p>Self-determination theory provides a complementary framework, proposing that individuals have three fundamental psychological needs: relatedness, autonomy, and competence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-16">
      Deci &amp; Ryan, 2000
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-43">
      Ryan &amp; Deci, 2017
     </xref>). The extent to which these needs are supported or undermined in a given environment significantly influences motivation and well-being. Research consistently demonstrates that fulfilling the need to belong is associated with lower levels of depression and greater emotional well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-2">
      Allen et al., 2018
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-3">
      Arslan, 2021
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-4">
      Arslan &amp; Allen, 2021
     </xref>). In a study of teachers, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-56">
      Skaalvik and Skaalvik (2018)
     </xref> found that positive relationships with colleagues were linked to higher levels of teacher well-being and professional engagement. Additionally, studies suggest that strong social relationships in the workplace may reduce the likelihood of employees considering leaving their profession (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-56">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2018
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-21">
      Fiegener &amp; Adams, 2022
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-35">
      Merida-Lopez et al., 2020
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Positive and supportive relations among teachers and between teachers and the school leadership may also foster professional development by facilitating access to information that improves teaching practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-49">
      Siciliano, 2016
     </xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-49">
      Siciliano (2016)
     </xref> defines social resources as the knowledge, skills, advice, innovations, and encouragement that flow between teachers. Social cognitive theory further underscores the importance of communication and collaboration, particularly for addressing complex professional challenges and exercising collective agency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-8">
      Bandura, 1997
     </xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-8">
      Bandura (1997)
     </xref> argues that even highly skilled individuals may struggle to perform effectively as a team if they lack the ability or willingness to collaborate. This is particularly relevant in educational settings, where teamwork is integral to instructional planning. Effective collaboration is more likely to develop in environments characterized by positive and supportive social relationships, as such conditions enhance both the motivation to work together and the capacity to develop shared solutions to challenges.</p>
    <p>Previous research on teachers has consistently shown that positive and supportive social relationships—with both colleagues and the school leadership—are associated with job satisfaction, engagement, and a sense of belonging while being negatively associated with burnout (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-5">
      Avanzi et al., 2015
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-17">
      Dehne et al., 2025
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-26">
      Hakanen et al., 2006
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-31">
      Leung &amp; Lee, 2006
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-35">
      Merida-Lopez et al., 2020
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-40">
      Pines &amp; Aronson, 1988
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-50">
      Simbula et al., 2011
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-52">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2011, 2017, 2019
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_2">
    <title>1.2. Shared Values</title>
    <p>Teaching in school is deeply rooted in goals and values. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-44">
      Sahlberg (2010)
     </xref>, the teaching profession is typically driven by values, ethical motives, and intrinsic motivation. Explicitly or implicitly, teachers set goals for their teaching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-13">
      Chang, 2009
     </xref>) and through their teaching, they communicate and represent values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-52">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2011
     </xref>). Also, from the perspective of social cognitive theory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-8">
      Bandura, 1997
     </xref>), teaching is an agentic act characterized by intentionality and based on goals and values. Empirical studies strongly support this conceptualization. Although studies of reasons for seeking teacher training show a variety of motives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-10">
      Berg, et al., 2023
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-63">
      Watt &amp; Richardson, 2008
     </xref>), many studies conclude that prominent motives for teaching are the desire to work with children, help children learn and develop, and make a difference in their lives (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-10">
      Berg et al., 2023
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-37">
      Moran, et al., 2001
     </xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-10">
      Berg et al. (2023)
     </xref> characterized these motives or values as “altruistic”. Studies of schoolteachers also confirm that altruistic motives for teaching are strong among practicing teachers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-53">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2012
     </xref>). Two typical statements that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-53">
      Skaalvik and Skaalvik (2012)
     </xref> reported from an interview study of teachers are “It is exciting to be able to help convey knowledge and values to the students” (p. 70) and “I love my job and it is wonderful to see children learn ... the greatest thing about this job is seeing the development that happens” (p. 71). As noted by Mvana “… making a positive impact on students can provide profound personal satisfaction …” (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-39">
      Mvana, 2024: p. 254
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Even though the teaching profession is rooted in goals and values, teachers may endorse different values. For instance, they may hold differing views on which goals to prioritize, which content to emphasize, and which teaching methods to adopt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-54">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2016
     </xref>). However, effective collaboration between teachers requires that they work towards the same goals and values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-28">
      Hoy &amp; Miskel, 2008
     </xref>), as teachers’ practices and preferences are strongly shaped by their personal values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-60">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2023a
     </xref>). In accordance with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-61">
      Skaalvik and Skaalvik (2023b)
     </xref>, we define shared goals and values as teachers’ perceptions of sharing educational goals and values that are emphasized by the school administration and by their colleagues. Shared values may therefore be expected to facilitate collaboration both between teachers and between teachers and school administration, thereby leading to the development of positive and supportive social relationships. Moreover, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-28">
      Hoy and Miskel (2008)
     </xref>, shared values bind teachers together and help give the school a distinct identity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-28">
      Hoy &amp; Miskel, 2008
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>These expectations are supported by survey studies showing that teachers’ perception of sharing goals and values with their colleagues are positively associated with their experience of working in a supportive environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-59">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2021, 2023a
     </xref>). However, these findings purely show that shared values and social support are correlated. We suggest that shared values and social support among teachers may influence each other reciprocally. As noted, common values facilitate collaboration and may therefore contribute to the development of a supportive work environment. In turn, a positive and supportive environment provides good conditions for fruitful collaboration, which is likely to increase the development of common goals and values.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_3">
    <title>1.3. Job Satisfaction, Engagement, and Sense of Belonging</title>
    <p>As noted above, much teacher research has focused on teacher stress and teacher attrition, whereas recent research also shows that a supportive social environment at school, including positive social relations between the teachers and between teachers and the school administration are associated with teacher motivation and job satisfaction. Previous research indicates that teachers’ perceptions of social support—from colleagues, friends, and family members—are associated with job satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-27">
      Hatlevik &amp; Hatlevik, 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-67">
      Yuh &amp; Choi, 2017
     </xref>), work engagement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-22">
      Fu et al., 2020
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-36">
      Minghui et al., 2018
     </xref>), and commitment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-14">
      Chung, 2019
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-62">
      Tuna &amp; Aslan, 2018
     </xref>). Studies of teachers’ perception of sharing educational goals and values with colleagues and the school administration show a similar pattern—shared goals and values are positively associated with job satisfaction, engagement, commitment, and belonging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-32">
      Li et al., 2015
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-56">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2018, 2021, 2023a
     </xref>). These findings are further supported by a recent study on early-career teachers, showing that a supportive social atmosphere at school and a sense of belonging are positively linked to teachers’ intentions to remain in the profession (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-24">
      Göregen et al., 2024
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-64">
      Weiss (1999)
     </xref>, job satisfaction is often defined as the positive or negative assessments individuals make about their work. Aligned with this perspective, we conceptualized teacher job satisfaction as teachers’ emotional responses to their work (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-51">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2010
     </xref>). Several studies indicate that teacher job satisfaction is closely linked to teacher attrition, absenteeism, and intentions to leave either the school or the profession (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-45">
      Sargent &amp; Hannum, 2005
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-52">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2011, 2023b
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-65">
      Wriqi, 2008
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-68">
      Zembylas &amp; Papanastasiou, 2006
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Building on the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-47">
      Schaufeli and Bakker (2010)
     </xref>, this study defines work engagement as a positive, motivational state defined by high energy, strong dedication, and a deep focus on the tasks. It is often described as a fulfilling work-related mindset, characterized by vigor, commitment, and absorption in one’s work (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-47">
      Schaufeli &amp; Bakker, 2010
     </xref>). Empirical research reveals that engagement is predictive of positive outcomes, for instance lower intentions of leaving the teaching profession (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-6">
      Bakker &amp; Bal, 2010
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-54">
      Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2016
     </xref>) and commitment to the school (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-41">
      Pourtousi &amp; Ghanizadeh, 2020
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Belongingness refers to a sense of being connected and accepted by others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-43">
      Ryan &amp; Deci, 2017
     </xref>). It is conceptualized as a fundamental psychological need (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-9">
      Baumeister &amp; Leary, 1995
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-43">
      Ryan &amp; Deci, 2017
     </xref>) or a desire to be accepted and valued (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-1">
      Allen et al., 2022
     </xref>). Satisfaction of the need to belong (or a sense of belonging) has been shown to be positively associated with emotional well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-2">
      Allen et al., 2018
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-4">
      Arslan &amp; Allen, 2021
     </xref>). As already noted, belonging has been shown to be positively predicted by both social support and shared values.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_4">
    <title>1.4. The Present Study</title>
    <p>One purpose of the present study was to explore associations (correlations) between schoolteachers’ perceptions of social support (termed “social support”) from their colleagues and the school administration, shared values, job satisfaction, engagement, and sense of belonging (termed “belonging”). Another purpose was to test two theoretical models of associations using structural equation modelling (SEM). In these models, job satisfaction and engagement were used as indicators of a latent motivational variable. Model A was designed to test whether the associations between a) social support and b) teacher motivation and belonging were mediated by shared values, whereas Model B was designed to test whether the associations between a) shared values and b) both teacher motivation and belonging were mediated by social support (see section 1.1.).</p>
    <sec id="s1">
     <title>2. Method</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s2_5">
     <title>2.1. Participants and Procedure</title>
     <p>This study utilized a cross-sectional survey design. The participants were Norwegian teachers from 34 randomly selected schools across three counties in central Norway. All teachers at these schools were invited to participate and informed that the participation was entirely voluntary and anonymous. They were told that participation required only the completion of a questionnaire, which did not include names or any personally identifiable information.</p>
     <p>A total of 1145 teachers, accounting for 81% of those invited, chose to take part in the study. Their ages ranged from 23 to 68 years, with an average age of 45. To facilitate data collection, a designated time during working hours was set aside for all teachers to complete the questionnaire simultaneously. Upon completion, the questionnaires were placed in envelopes, sealed immediately, and collected to ensure confidentiality.</p>
     <p>Prior to the data collection, the teachers were informed that the study aimed to explore their perceptions of working conditions and experiences in the teaching profession. They were also reminded that participation was both voluntary and anonymous. In accordance with recommendations from the Norwegian Centre for Research Data, participants were informed that consent was considered given upon completion and submission of the questionnaire.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s2_6">
     <title>2.2. Instruments</title>
     <p>Positive and supportive relationships among colleagues were assessed using a brief, two-item version of a previously validated scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-52">
       Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2011
      </xref>). The items were: “The relationships among colleagues at this school are characterized by friendliness and mutual care” and “Teachers at this school help and support one another.” Responses were recorded on a six-point scale, ranging from “Completely disagree” (1) to “Completely agree” (6). Cronbach’s alpha for the scale was .86.</p>
     <p>Supportive relationships with the school leadership were assessed using a previously validated three-item scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-58">
       Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2020
      </xref>). The items were: “In educational matters, I can always receive helpful support and advice from the school leadership,” “My relationship with the school leadership is based on mutual trust and respect,” and “The school leadership is supportive and recognizes good work.” Responses were recorded on a six-point scale, ranging from “Completely disagree” (1) to “Completely agree” (6). In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was .89.</p>
     <p>Shared values were defined as the degree to which teachers felt that they personally shared the prevailing educational goals and values at the school where they were teaching, and were measured by means of a previously tested three-item value consonance scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-52">
       Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2011
      </xref>). The items were: “My educational values are in accordance with the values which are emphasized at this school”, “My colleagues and I have the same opinion about what is important in education”, and “I feel that this school shares my view of what constitutes good teaching”. Responses were given on a 6-point scale from “Completely disagree” (1) to “Completely agree” (6). Cronbach’s alpha in this study was .82.</p>
     <p>Job satisfaction was measured by means of a previously tested four-item scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-52">
       Skaalvik &amp; Skaalvik, 2011
      </xref>). The items were: “I enjoy working as a teacher”, “I look forward to going to school every day”, “Working as a teacher is extremely rewarding,” and “When I get up in the morning, I cannot wait to go to school”. Responses were given on a 6-point scale from “Completely disagree” (1) to “Completely agree” (6). Cronbach’s alpha in this study was .90.</p>
     <p>Teachers’ work engagement was assessed using a short, seven-item version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-48">
       Schaufeli et al., 2006
      </xref>). The scale measures three dimensions of engagement: vigor, dedication, and absorption. An example item is: “At my work, I feel bursting with energy.” Responses were recorded on a seven-point scale ranging from “Never” (1) to “Every day” (7). In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was .89.</p>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-"></xref>Teachers’ sense of belonging was measured by means of a two-item scale. The items were: “I feel that I belong at this school” and “It is at this school that I want to teach”. Responses were given on a 6-point scale from “Completely disagree” (1) to “Completely agree” (6). Cronbach’s alpha for the scale was .86.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s2_7">
     <title>2.3. Data Analysis</title>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-"></xref>The data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM analysis) using the AMOS 25 program. As noted, to explore possible mediation processes, we tested two SEM models. Model A was designed to let shared values partly mediate the impact of social support on teacher motivation and belonging. In contrast, Model B was designed to let social support mediate the impact of shared values. We used well-established indices of model fit: CFI, IFI, TLI, and RMSEA. For the CFI, IFI, and TLI indices, values greater than .90 are considered acceptable, and values greater than .95 indicate a good fit to the data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-11">
       Bollen, 1989
      </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-12">
       Byrne, 2001
      </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-29">
       Hu &amp; Bentler, 1999
      </xref>). For well-specified models, an RMSEA of .06 or less reflects a good fit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-29">
       Hu &amp; Bentler, 1999
      </xref>). Missing values were treated based on maximum likelihood (ML) estimation in the AMOS program (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-12">
       Byrne, 2001
      </xref>). Compared to both listwise and pairwise deletion of missing data and to mean imputation, ML estimation will exhibit the least bias (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-33">
       Little &amp; Rubin, 1989
      </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-38">
       Muthén et al., 1987
      </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-46">
       Schafer, 1997
      </xref>).</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3">
    <title>3. Results</title>
    <sec id="s3_1">
     <title>3.1. Descriptive Statistics</title>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref> shows zero-order correlations between the study variables as well as statistical means, standard deviations, and Cronbach’s alphas. As expected, supportive colleagues, supportive leadership, and shared values were all positively intercorrelated (correlations varying between .49 and .53). Both social support<sup>1</sup> and shared values were also positively associated with job satisfaction, engagement, and institutional belonging. The strongest association with supportive colleagues, supportive leadership, and shared values were found for institutional belonging (r. = .42, .42, and .50, respectively).</p>
     <table-wrap id="table1">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
        Table 1
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-"></xref>Table 1. Zero-order correlations and descriptive statistics.</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">Study variables</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">1. Supportive leadership</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">---</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.49*</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.51*</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.28*</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.26*</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.42*</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">2. Supportive colleagues</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">---</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.53*</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.32*</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.31*</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.42*</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">3. Shared values</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">---</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.38*</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.35*</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.50*</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">4. Job satisfaction</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">---</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.69*</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.43*</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">5. Engagement</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">---</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.41*</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">6. Commitment</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">---</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">Scale</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 6</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 6</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 6</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 6</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 7</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 6</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">M</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">4.95</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">5.26</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">4.78</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">5.04</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">5.71</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">5.19</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">SD</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">1.02</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.89</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.82</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.90</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.89</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.86</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="aleft" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:left">Alpha</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.86</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.89</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.82</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.90</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.89</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="12.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.86</p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Note: *= p &lt; .01</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_2">
     <title>3.2. SEM Analyses</title>
     <p>We tested two models (A and B) of the relationships between the study variables using SEM analyses. In both models, teacher motivation was indicated by two motivational constructs: job satisfaction and engagement.</p>
     <p>Model A was designed to examine whether the associations between a) social support from colleagues and the school leadership and b) teacher motivation and belonging were partly mediated through shared values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
       Figure 1
      </xref>). The model showed a good fit to the data (χ<sup>2</sup> (44, N = 1145) = 216.539, p &lt; .001, RMSEA = .59, CFI = .977, IFI = .977, TLI = .960). Strong factor loadings and acceptable values for average variance extracted (AVE) indicated high convergent validity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
       Figure 1
      </xref> shows that in Model A, shared values were positively predicted by social support from both colleagues (β = .41) and the school leadership (β = .38). In turn, shared values predicted teacher motivation (β = .32). Shared values also predicted teachers’ sense of institutional belonging, both directly (β = .30) and indirectly through teacher motivation (indirect effect = .11). In the SEM model, the direct effects of social support were small and inconsistent. The direct effect of support from the school leadership on institutional belonging was significant but small (β = .13), whereas the direct effect on teacher motivation was nonsignificant. The direct effect of support from colleagues on institutional belonging was significant but weak (β = .10), while the direct effect on teacher motivation was moderate (β = .19). These findings indicate that the association between social support and both teacher motivation and sense of belonging is partly indirect, mediated through shared values.</p>
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 1. Structural Model A of relations between supportive school leadership, supportive colleagues, shared values, teacher motivation, and sense of institutional belonging. The figure shows standardized regression coefficients. Non-significant paths are not included in the figure.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6308708-rId14.jpeg?20250428020714" />
     </fig>
     <table-wrap id="table2">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
        Table 2
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-"></xref>Table 2. Factor loadings and average variance extracted (AVE).</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Study variables</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Supportive leadership</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Supportive colleagues</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Sharedvalues</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Motivation</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.47%"><p style="text-align:center">Sense of belonging</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Factor loadings</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.86</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.87%"><p style="text-align:center">.92</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.25%"><p style="text-align:center">.86</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">.85</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.47%"><p style="text-align:center">.90</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="19.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.86</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.87%"><p style="text-align:center">.83</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.25%"><p style="text-align:center">.77</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">.82</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="14.47%"><p style="text-align:center">.85</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="19.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.85</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.87%"><p style="text-align:center">.83</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.25%"><p style="text-align:center">.71</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="14.47%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.36%"><p style="text-align:center">AVE</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="19.38%"><p style="text-align:center">.73</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.87%"><p style="text-align:center">.77</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.25%"><p style="text-align:center">.61</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">.70</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="14.47%"><p style="text-align:center">.77</p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Note: Factors loadings represent standardized regression coefficients. AVE = the mean of the squared factor loadings.</p>
     <p>Model B was designed to examine whether the associations between a) shared values and b) both teacher motivation and sense of belonging were partly mediated through social support from colleagues and the school leadership (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
       Figure 2
      </xref>). This model also showed good fit to the data (χ<sup>2</sup> (45, N = 1145) = 269.310, p &lt; .001, RMSEA = .66, CFI = .971, IFI = .977, TLI = .949). The difference between the two models in terms of CFI was less than .01, indicating no significant difference in model fit.</p>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
       Figure 2
      </xref> shows that in Model B, social support from both colleagues and the school leadership were strongly predicted by shared values (β = .64 for both). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
       Figure 2
      </xref> also shows positive direct effects of shared values on teacher motivation and belonging (β = .35 and .32, respectively). Support from the school leadership was significantly but only weakly related to belonging (β = .11) and was not significantly related to teacher motivation. The measure of supportive colleagues showed significant but weak associations with teacher motivation (β = .17). In SEM model B supportive colleagues were both directly and indirectly related to belonging (total effect = .14). Thus, Model B also indicates a moderate mediating process, suggesting that the impact of shared educational values on teacher motivation and sense of belonging may, in part, be mediated through social support or a supportive social environment at school.</p>
     <fig id="fig2" position="float">
      <label>Figure 2</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Figure 2. Structural Model B of relations between shared values, supportive school leadership, supportive colleagues, teacher motivation, and sense of institutional belonging. The figure shows standardized regression coefficients. Non-significant paths are not included in the figure.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6308708-rId15.jpeg?20250428020714" />
     </fig>
     <p>A further analysis of the associations was conducted by examining the standardized total effects of shared values and social support on teacher motivation and sense of belonging in both Models A and B (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref>). The total effects of shared values on both teacher motivation and sense of belonging were far stronger in Model B, which captured both direct and indirect effects, than in Model A, which only captured direct effects of shared values. In comparison, the total effects of both supportive colleagues and supportive leadership on teacher motivation and sense of belonging were far stronger in Model A, which captured both direct and indirect effects of social support, than in Model B, which only captured direct effects of social support. These results further support the idea that the associations between social support and teacher motivation and sense of institutional belonging are partly mediated through shared values, and that the associations between shared values and teacher motivation and sense of institutional belonging are partly mediated through social support. This interpretation of complex mediation processes presupposes that social support and shared values influence each other in a reciprocal manner. For example, if the causal direction flows unidirectionally, say from social support to shared values, then shared values might theoretically mediate the effect of social support, but social support could not mediate the effect of values.</p>
     <table-wrap id="table3">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
        Table 3
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-"></xref>Table 3. Total effects of shared values and social support on teacher motivation and sense of belonging in model A and B.</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.12%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.56%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Model A</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="32.56%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Model B</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Effect of</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Motivation</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.08%"><p style="text-align:center">Belonging</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Motivation</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.08%"><p style="text-align:center">Belonging</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="30.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Shared values</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.48%"><p style="text-align:center">.32</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.08%"><p style="text-align:center">.41</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.48%"><p style="text-align:center">.49</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.08%"><p style="text-align:center">.61</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="30.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Supportive colleagues</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.48%"><p style="text-align:center">.32</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.08%"><p style="text-align:center">.33</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.48%"><p style="text-align:center">.17</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.08%"><p style="text-align:center">.14</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="30.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Supportive leadership</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.48%"><p style="text-align:center">.18</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.08%"><p style="text-align:center">.30</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.48%"><p style="text-align:center">.04</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="16.08%"><p style="text-align:center">.13</p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Note: Standardized total effects derived from the Amos outputs.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4">
    <title>4. Discussion</title>
    <p>As discussed in the introduction, this study builds on previous research indicating a) that teachers’ sense of sharing educational values with their colleagues and the school leadership (shared values) is strongly correlated with their experience of positive and supportive social relations with their colleagues and the school leadership (social support), and b) that both shared values and perceived social support are predictive of teacher motivation (e.g., job satisfaction and engagement) and a sense of institutional belonging. Because shared values and perceived social support are highly correlated, it was of interest to examine possible mediating processes related to how these variables are connected to teacher motivation and sense of belonging.</p>
    <p>This study confirms the relatively strong association between shared values and social support from both colleagues and the school leadership. The zero-order correlations also confirmed that both shared values and perceived social support from colleagues and the school leadership were positively associated with teachers’ job satisfaction, engagement, and sense of belonging.</p>
    <p>We tested two SEM models that showed equally good fit to the data. Model A, with measures of social support from colleagues and the school leadership as exogenous variables, indicated that the impact of perceived support on motivation and sense of belonging was substantially mediated through shared values, whereas Model B, with shared values as the exogenous variable, indicated that the impact of shared values on motivation and sense of belonging was partly mediated through perceived support. We argue that three conditions must be met for both these findings to hold. The first condition is that social support and shared values must be positively correlated; the second is that both social support and shared values must correlate with motivation and sense of belonging. As noted, both these conditions are met (see also <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>). The third condition, which requires longitudinal studies to test, is that perceived support and shared values affect each other reciprocally.</p>
    <p>Theoretically, it is reasonable to assume that perceived support and shared values influence each other in a reciprocal manner. As argued in the introduction, teacher motivation is deeply rooted in educational goals and values. Therefore, shared values within a school are likely to be a prerequisite for effective collaboration and for fostering a positive and supportive work environment. Conversely, teachers who do not share the prevailing educational values at their school may experience being situated in a dissonant value context which, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-42">
      Rosenberg (1979)
     </xref>, may result in a feeling of not belonging (see also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142308-66">
      Yang et al., 2022
     </xref>). Likewise, a positive and supportive environment at school can contribute to effective communication among participants and, consequently, to mutual learning and the development of shared values.</p>
    <p>A possible mechanism through which shared educational values enhance teacher motivation and sense of belonging is that they increase the perceived opportunity for teachers to conduct their teaching in alignment with their own professional values. We suggest that this alignment may strengthen teachers’ experience of doing a meaningful work. In contrast, teachers who do not share the prevailing goals and values of the school—particularly in contexts involving teamwork or other forms of collaboration—may feel pressured to compromise their own values. Collaborative activities such as joint planning and co-teaching naturally involve the need for compromise and shared decision-making. When teachers hold similar underlying values, the compromises required in such collaboration are more likely to be compatible with their personal goals and beliefs.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Theoretical model of relations between teachers’ perceptions of sharing educational values with their colleagues and the school leadership, perceived social support from colleagues and the school leadership, emotional and motivational responses, and teacher retention.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/6308708-rId16.jpeg?20250428020715" />
    </fig>
    <p>Based on the findings and our interpretations, we propose a theoretical “shared values—social support” model of teacher motivation and emotion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>) that should be tested in future research. The model suggests that: a) teachers’ perceptions of sharing goals and values with their colleagues and the school leadership (shared values), and b) their experiences of working in a positive and supportive environment (social support), affect each other reciprocally. It further proposes that shared values and social support represent particularly important job resources that influence teacher motivation and emotion, which in turn are predictive of teacher retention. We underscore that this model is based on our interpretation of the present findings and that it needs to be further explored in future research. We should also note that teacher retention was not included in this study.</p>
    <p>The findings of this study have both theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, they suggest that in the teaching profession, social relations (or social support) and the sharing of educational goals and values are distinct but related constructs that influence each other reciprocally. More research is needed to further explore the relationship between these constructs, and to determine whether they might be perceived as dimensions of a broader social-relational construct. Practically, it is important to note that this study indicates that both shared values and social support strongly predict teachers’ motivation and sense of belonging. To maintain and enhance teachers’ motivation and sense of belonging, it is essential to cultivate a shared understanding of educational goals and values, and to foster positive and supportive social relations—both among teachers and between teachers and the school leadership. We regard this as a major responsibility of school principals, but also as an important area for further research and development.</p>
    <p>This study has several limitations. The analyses are built on cross-sectional data, and longitudinal studies are needed to test both our interpretations and the proposed model. Moreover, the measures of the study variables are based on short scales and although the statistical analyses show both high alpha values and high convergent validity, future research should test the findings using multiple items to indicate each variable.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5">
    <title>NOTES</title>
    <p><sup>1</sup>Social support from both colleagues and the school leadership.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Allen, K., Gray, D. L., Baumeister, R. F.,&amp;Leary, M. R. (2022). The Need to Belong: A Deep Dive into the Origins, Implications, and Future of a Foundational Construct. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1133-1156. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09633-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Allen, K., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J.,&amp;Waters, L. (2018). What Schools Need to Know about Fostering School Belonging: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1-34. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9389-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Arslan, G. (2021). Loneliness, College Belongingness, Subjective Vitality, and Psychological Adjustment during Coronavirus Pandemic: Development of the College Belongingness Questionnaire. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5, 17-31. &gt;https://doi.org/10.47602/jpsp.v5i1.240
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Arslan, G.,&amp;Allen, K. (2021). School Victimization, School Belongingness, Psychological Well-Being, and Emotional Problems in Adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 14, 1501-1517. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09813-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Avanzi, L., Schuh, S. C., Fraccaroli, F.,&amp;van Dick, R. (2015). Why Does Organizational Identification Relate to Reduced Employee Burnout? The Mediating Influence of Social Support and Collective Efficacy. Work&amp;Stress, 29, 1-10. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1004225
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bakker, A. B.,&amp;Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly Work Engagement and Performance: A Study among Starting Teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189-206. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909x402596
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bakker, A. B.,&amp;Demerouti, E. (2006). The Job Demands‐resources Model: State of the Art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-328. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Baumeister, R. F.,&amp;Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Berg, D. A. G., Skaalvik, E. M., Asil, M., Hill, M. F., Uthus, M., Tangen, T. N. et al. (2023). Teacher Self-Efficacy and Reasons for Choosing Initial Teacher Education Programmes in Norway and New Zealand. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, Article 104041. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104041
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bollen, K. A. (1989). A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods&amp;Research, 17, 303-316. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS. Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chang, M. (2009). An Appraisal Perspective of Teacher Burnout: Examining the Emotional Work of Teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 193-218. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9106-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chung, M. (2019). Teacher Efficacy, Collective Self-Esteem, and Organizational Commitment of Childcare Teachers: A Moderated Mediation Model of Social Support. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 955. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00955
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D.,&amp;Perry, N. E. (2012). School Climate and Social-Emotional Learning: Predicting Teacher Stress, Job Satisfaction, and Teaching Efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1189-1204. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029356
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Deci, E. L.,&amp;Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dehne, M., Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y.,&amp;Zee, M. (2025). Under Pressure? Exploring the Moderating and Mediating Role of Principal–Teacher Relationships in Primary and Secondary School Teachers’ Burnout Symptoms. Social Psychology of Education, 28, Article No. 64. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10023-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F.,&amp;Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The Job Demands-Resources Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Den Brok, P., Wubbels, T.,&amp;van Tartwijk, J. (2017). Exploring Beginning Teachers’ Attrition in the Netherlands. Teachers and Teaching, 23, 881-895. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1360859
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Desrumaux, P., Lapointe, D., Ntsame Sima, M., Boudrias, J. S., Savoie, A.,&amp;Brunet, L. (2015). The Impact of Job Demands, Climate, and Optimism on Well-Being and Distress at Work: What Are the Mediating Effects of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction? European Review of Applied Psychology, 65, 179-188. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2015.06.003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fiegener, A. M.,&amp;Adams, C. M. (2022). Instructional Program Coherence, Teacher Intent to Leave, and the Mediating Role of Teacher Psychological Needs. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 22, 765-786. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2021.2022164
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fu, W., Pan, Q., Zhang, C.,&amp;Cheng, L. (2020). Influencing Factors of Chinese Special Education Teacher Turnover Intention: Understanding the Roles of Subject Well-Being, Social Support, and Work Engagement. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 68, 342-353. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2020.1780553
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Geisler, M., Berthelsen, H.,&amp;Muhonen, T. (2019). Retaining Social Workers: The Role of Quality of Work and Psychosocial Safety Climate for Work Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership&amp;Governance, 43, 1-15. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2019.1569574
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Göregen, M. S., Tanghe, E.,&amp;Schelfhout, W. (2024). What Works to Retain Beginning Teachers in the Profession? a Mixed Methods Approach to Detect Determining Factors. Education Sciences, 14, Article 1319. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121319
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Guglielmi, D., Bruni, I., Simbula, S., Fraccaroli, F.,&amp;Depolo, M. (2016). What Drives Teacher Engagement: A Study of Different Age Cohorts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 323-340. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0263-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B.,&amp;Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and Work Engagement among Teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495-513. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hatlevik, I. K. R.,&amp;Hatlevik, O. E. (2024). Variations in Sources of Job Satisfaction and Teacher Efficacy between Novice and Experienced Teachers. Teachers and Teaching. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2400170
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hoy, W. K.,&amp;Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hu, L.,&amp;Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher Stress: Directions for Future Research. Educational Review, 53, 27-35. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120033628
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Leung, D. Y. P.,&amp;Lee, W. W. S. (2006). Predicting Intention to Quit among Chinese Teachers: Differential Predictability of the Components of Burnout. Anxiety, Stress&amp;Coping, 19, 129-141. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800600565476
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, M., Wang, Z., You, X.,&amp;Gao, J. (2015). Value Congruence and Teachers’ Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Autonomous and Controlled Motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 113-118. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.021
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Little, R. J. A.,&amp;Rubin, D. B. (1989). The Analysis of Social Science Data with Missing Values. Sociological Methods&amp;Research, 18, 292-326. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189018002004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, S.,&amp;Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Chinese Teachers’ Work Stress and Their Turnover Intention. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 160-170. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Merida-Lopez, S., Sanchez-Gomez, M.,&amp;Extremera, N. (2020). Leaving the Teaching Profession: Examining the Role of Social Support, Engagement and Emotional Intelligence in Teachers’ Intentions to Quit. Psychosocial Intervention, 29, 141-151. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2020a10
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mingh
     <span style="font-family:Cambria;">ui, L., Lei, H., Xiaomeng, C.,&amp;Potměšilc, M. (2018). Teacher Efficacy, Work En</span>gagement, and Social Support among Chinese Special Education School Teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 648. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00648
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moran, A., Kilpatrick, R., Abbott, L., Dallat, J.,&amp;McClune, B. (2001). Training to Teach: Motivating Factors and Implications for Recruitment. Evaluation&amp;Research in Education, 15, 17-32. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790108666980
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Muthén, B., Kaplan, D.,&amp;Hollis, M. (1987). On Structural Equation Modeling with Data That Are Not Missing Completely at Random. Psychometrika, 52, 431-462. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294365
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mvana, S. W. (2024). Exploring the Interplay between Teacher Retention and Job Satisfaction: Insights from Kalleberg and Skaalvik Models. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 11, 253-261. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pines, A.,&amp;Aronson, E. (1988). Career Burnout. Causes and Cures. The Free Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pourtousi, Z.,&amp;Ghanizadeh, A. (2020). Teachers’ Motivation and Its Association with Job Commitment and Work Engagement. Psychological Studies, 65, 455-466. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-020-00571-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the Self. Basic Books.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ryan, R. M.,&amp;Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sahlberg, P. (2010). Rethinking Accountability in a Knowledge Society. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 45-61. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9098-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sargent, T.,&amp;Hannum, E. (2005). Keeping Teachers Happy: Job Satisfaction among Primary School Teachers in Rural Northwest China. Comparative Education Review, 49, 173-204. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1086/428100
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. Chapman&amp;Hall.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schaufeli, W. B.,&amp;Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and Measuring Work Engagement. In A. Bakker,&amp;P. Leiter (Eds.), Work Engagement. A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research (pp. 10-24). Psychology Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B.,&amp;Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Siciliano, M. D. (2016). It’s the Quality Not the Quantity of Ties That Matters. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 227-262. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216629207
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Simbula, S., Guglielmi, D.,&amp;Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). A Three-Wave Study of Job Resources, Self-Efficacy, and Work Engagement among Italian Schoolteachers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 285-304. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320903513916
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher Self-Efficacy and Teacher Burnout: A Study of Relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1059-1069. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher Job Satisfaction and Motivation to Leave the Teaching Profession: Relations with School Context, Feeling of Belonging, and Emotional Exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1029-1038. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2012). Skolen Som Arbeidsplass. Trivsel, mestring og utfordringer. School as a Workplace for Teachers. Universitetsforlaget.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2016). Teacher Stress and Teacher Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Engagement, Emotional Exhaustion, and Motivation to Leave the Teaching Profession. Creative Education, 7, 1785-1799. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.713182
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2017). Dimensions of Teacher Burnout: Relations with Potential Stressors at School. Social Psychology of Education, 20, 775-790. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9391-0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2018). Job Demands and Job Resources as Predictors of Teacher Motivation and Well-being. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 1251-1275. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9464-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2019). Teacher Self-Efficacy and Collective Teacher Efficacy: Relations with Perceived Job Resources and Job Demands, Feeling of Belonging, and Teacher Engagement. Creative Education, 10, 1400-1424. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.107104
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2020). Teacher Burnout: Relations between Dimensions of Burnout, Perceived School Context, Job Satisfaction and Motivation for Teaching. a Longitudinal Study. Teachers and Teaching, 26, 602-616. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1913404
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref59">
    <label>59</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2021). Collective Teacher Culture: Exploring an Elusive Construct and Its Relations with Teacher Autonomy, Belonging, and Job Satisfaction. Social Psychology of Education, 24, 1389-1406. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09673-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref60">
    <label>60</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2023a). Collective Teacher Culture and School Goal Structure: Associations with Teacher Self-Efficacy and Engagement. Social Psychology of Education, 26, 945-969. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09778-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref61">
    <label>61</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skaalvik, E. M.,&amp;Skaalvik, S. (2023b). Shared Goals and Values in the Teaching Profession, Job Satisfaction and Motivation to Leave the Teaching Profession: The Mediating Role of Psychological Need Satisfaction. Social Psychology of Education, 26, 1227-1244. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09787-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref62">
    <label>62</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tuna, S. K.,&amp;Aslan, H. (2018). The Relationship between Perceived Social Support and Organizational Commitment Levels of Primary and Secondary School Teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6, 983-993. &gt;https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060519 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref63">
    <label>63</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Watt, H. M. G.,&amp;Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, Perceptions, and Aspirations Concerning Teaching as a Career for Different Types of Beginning Teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408-428. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref64">
    <label>64</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Weiss, E. M. (1999). Perceived Workplace Conditions and First-Year Teachers’ Morale, Career Choice Commitment, and Planned Retention: A Secondary Analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 861-879. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(99)00040-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref65">
    <label>65</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wriqi, C. (2008). The Structure of Secondary School Teacher Job Satisfaction and Its Relationship with Attrition and Work Enthusiasm. Chinese Education and Society, 40, 17-31. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932400503 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref66">
    <label>66</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yang, X., Hussain Qureshi, A., Kuo, Y., Quynh, N. N., Kumar, T.,&amp;Wisetsri, W. (2022). Teachers’ Value Consonance and Employee-Based Brand Equity: The Mediating Role of Belongingness and Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 900972. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900972
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref67">
    <label>67</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yuh, J.,&amp;Choi, S. (2017). Sources of Social Support, Job Satisfaction, and Quality of Life among Childcare Teachers. The Social Science Journal, 54, 450-457. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2017.08.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142308-ref68">
    <label>68</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zembylas, M.,&amp;Papanastasiou, E. (2006). Sources of Teacher Job Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction in Cyprus. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36, 229-247. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920600741289
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>