<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojgas
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Gastroenterology
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2163-9450
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2163-9469
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojgas.2025.154017
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojgas-142031
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Findings at Divine Mercy Hospital-Father Bash Foundation, South Western Uganda: A 6 Years Retrospective Analysis
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       David
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mutiibwa
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Godfrey R.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mugyenyi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Stuart
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Turanzomwe
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Esther C.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Atukunda
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aEndoscopy Unit, Divine Mercy Hospital-Father Bash Foundation, Mbarara, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     08
    </day> 
    <month>
     04
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    04
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    172
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    184
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      19,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      15,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      15,
     </day>
     <month>
      April
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Background: </b>Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a procedure in which the health worker (endoscopist) uses a long flexible tube with a camera (endoscope) to pass through the mouth in order to visualize the mucosal surface of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum. It is a key investigation required for screening and diagnosis of several disease conditions involving the gastrointestinal tract such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophageal candidiasis, esophageal varices, esophageal cancer, gastritis, duodenitis and gastric cancer, among others. Symptoms attributed to such pathologies include: epigastric pain, heartburn, dysphagia, odynophagia, bloating, early satiety, postprandial vomiting, hematemesis and melena. These conditions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in various health facilities and the population at large. This study aimed at documenting the various indications and endoscopy findings in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at Divine Mercy Hospital in south western Uganda. 
    <b>Methods: </b>We conducted a 6-year retrospective review of endoscopy reports for patients who underwent EGD at DMH from October, 2018 to September, 2024. The data extracted included patient’s name, gender, indications for the EGD, findings at endoscopy and histology result where applicable. We used Stata 17 to analyse the data and it was summarized in frequency tables, means and standard deviation. A chi square p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered significant. The study was approved by Mbarara University of Science and Technology Research Ethics committee and administrative clearance was obtained from DMH to access hospital records. 
    <b>Results</b>: Endoscopy reports of 1,854 patients who underwent EGD were retrieved. The mean age of participants was 55.4 (± 18.5) years. Majority were males (56.6%). The most common indications for endoscopy were epigastric pain (n = 1249, 67.4%) and dysphagia (n = 397, 21.4%). Benign findings in the esophagus included GERD (n = 628, 33.9%), candidiasis (n = 172, 9.3%), 
    <b>b</b>enign esophageal stricture (n = 22, 1.2%), hiatus hernia (n = 21, 1.1%) and esophageal varices (n = 13, 0.7%). Esophageal tumors (n = 364, 19.6%) were found mainly in the mid esophagus (55.8%) and distal esopagus (36.8%). Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histological variant in the esophagus (n = 251, 79.2%). In the stomach, gastritis was the most common finding (n = 1167, 62.9%) followed by gastric ulcers (n = 48, 2.6%) and gastric outlet obstruction without any visible tumor (n = 40, 2.2%). 49 patients had confirmed gastric cancer and these were mainly intestinal type adenocarcinomas located in the antrum/pylorus. The duodenum was grossly normal in majority of patients who did not have any proximal obstructive lesions. 
    <b>Conclusion</b>: In south western Uganda, the most common indication for EGD was epigastric pain followed by dysphagia. Gastritis and GERD were the main benign findings at endoscopy. Esophageal malignancies were more common in the mid esophagus and majority were SCC. Gastric tumors were more common in the distal half of the stomach and they were mainly intestinal type adenocarcinomas.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Gastrointestinal Tract
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Tumors
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Background</title>
   <p>Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), also referred to as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, is a procedure in which the health worker (endoscopist) uses a long flexible tube with a camera (endoscope) to pass through the mouth in order to visualize the mucosal surface of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. It is a key investigation required for screening and diagnosis of several disease conditions involving the gastrointestinal tract such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophageal candidiasis, esophageal varices, esophageal cancer, gastritis, duodenitis and gastric cancer, among others <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-2">
     [2]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Symptoms attributed to such pathologies include: epigastric pain, heartburn, dysphagia, odynophagia, bloating, early satiety, postprandial vomiting, hematemesis and melena <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. These conditions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in various health facilities and the population at large <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-6">
     [6]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In many African countries, endoscopy services can only be accessed in a few health facilities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-7">
     [7]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-9">
     [9]
    </xref> and many patients are treated empirically while others are referred to urban centres where the service can be accessed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. Nationwide surveys have demonstrated severely limited gastrointestinal capacity in sub-Saharan Africa when compared to the developed world <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. This is attributed to few trained health personnel to handle these procedures, lack of equipment and inadequate infrastructure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. Endoscopy is quite pivotal in the care, prevention and treatment of GI related malignancies because it allows one to take biopsies and therapeutic interventions can also be done when necessary <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. In a recent population-based survey that looked at the cancer spectrum in Uganda, the most common cancers in females were cervical cancer (43%), breast cancer (22%), esophageal cancer (5.6%), ovarian cancer (5.2%) and Kaposi’s Sarcoma (4.7%) while in males, the most common cancers were those of the prostate (25%), esophagus (15.1%), KS (12.4%), liver (8.8) and stomach (4.8%) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. Since esophageal and gastric cancers are among the top five cancers, there is need for regular screening for these GI malignancies and several studies have highlighted individual experiences in endoscopy among health workers in sub-Saharan Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-11">
     [11]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Whereas EGD is considered an invasive procedure that may be associated with some discomfort and a slight risk of morbidity or mortality, the introduction of modern equipment and better endoscopy practices have greatly minimised such drawbacks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. Thus, the procedure is safe and it can be performed on an outpatient basis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. EGD is the gold standard for patients who present with upper GI bleeding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-17">
     [17]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Worldwide, a number of different endoscopy machines are under use and these include Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Olympus, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Stryker, Smith and Nephew, Pentax, Karl Storz, Fujifilm, Hoya and Cook Medical, among others. Divine Mercy Hospital uses Olympus which is one of the best companies in the endoscopy devices market because of its high image quality and compatibility with a wide range of endotherapy devices <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-18">
     [18]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-"></xref>This study aimed at documenting the various indications and endoscopy findings in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at Divine Mercy Hospital in south western Uganda.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Study Setting and Design</title>
    <p>We conducted a 6-year retrospective record review of endoscopy reports for patients who underwent EGD at DMH from October, 2018 to September, 2024. DMH is located at plot 2 - 4 Kitunzi road, Kamukuzi division, Mbarara city, south western Uganda. The hospital operates under Father Bash Foundation which is an establishment under the patronage and directorship of Reverand Father John Baptist Bashobora. The foundation was set out to help the young, needy and orphaned children to access basic education, healthcare and vocational training but the general population can access health services from the hospital at a subsidised cost. DMH offers a wide range of specialized healthcare services. There is a complete set of endoscopy equipment of the Olympus type and about 25 to 30 upper GI endoscopy procedures are done every month. The procedures are done by a trained endoscopist who is also a general surgeon. The hospital keeps record of all endoscopy reports. Samples obtained during endoscopy are analysed by lancet laboratory which is one of the reputable laboratories in Mbarara.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Study Population</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-"></xref>Endoscopy reports for patients who underwent EGD at DMH during the study period constituted our study population.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Study Procedure</title>
    <p>We used two theatre nurses, who take care of the endoscopy equipment at DMH, as our research assistants. In December 2024, they retrieved all endoscopy reports for patients done EGD from October, 2018 to September, 2024. From these reports, the study variables that were extracted included: patients age, gender, indication for EGD, findings at endoscopy and histology results where applicable. The location of esophageal strictures/tumors was stratified into three; proximal esophagus (seen at a distance of less than or equal to 23cm from the incisors), mid esophagus (between 24-32cm from the incisors) and distal esophagus (between 33-40cm). Tumors in the stomach were stratified into proximal (seen in the proximal half of the stomach and distal tumors (seen in the distal half of the stomach, predominantly in the antrum and pylorus). We were also able to retrieve histology results for patients who had biopsy samples taken during endoscopy and these reports indicated that the samples were processed by lancet laboratory.</p>
    <p>This study was approved by Mbarara University of Science and Technology Research Ethics Committee (MUST REC) and administrative clearance was also obtained from DMH administration.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Data Analysis</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-"></xref>The research assistants identified the study variables which were entered in Microsoft Excel spread sheet. The Principal Investigator confirmed correct entry of the data which was then analysed using Stata version 17 (StataCorp. 2021. Stata: Release 17. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC). Categorical variables like gender, indication for EGD, endoscopy findings and histology results were summarised as proportions (percentages). Age was the continuous variable that was normally distributed and it was summarised using mean and standard deviation. We then made a cross tabulation to compare independent variables (age, gender, indication) and the occurrence of malignancies. A chi square p-value &lt; 0.05 for categorical variables was considered significant. The results were presented in frequency tables.</p>
    <p>In this study, the methods employed during data collection and analysis were similar to what was done in our earlier publication on colonoscopy findings at DMH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-19">
      [19]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Patient Characteristics and Indications for Endoscopy</title>
    <p>Reports of 1,854 patients who underwent EGD were retrieved. The mean age of participants was 55.4 (± 18.5) years. Majority were males (56.6%). The most common indications for endoscopy were epigastric pain (n = 1249, 67.4%) and dysphagia (n = 397, 21.4%) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-"></xref>Table 1. Showing baseline characteristics and indications for endoscopy.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Variable</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Frequency</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentage</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean age (SD)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">55.4 (18.5)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Age category</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; 50 Years</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">670</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(36.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">≥ 50years</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">1,184</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(63.9%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Gender</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Female</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">805</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(43.4%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Male</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">1,049</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(56.6%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Indications</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Recurrent anemia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(1.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Dysphagia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">397</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(21.4%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Epigastric pain</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">1,249</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(67.4%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Failed NGT removal</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Odynophagia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">47</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(2.5%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Upper GI bleeding</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">87</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(4.7%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Vomiting</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.53%"><p style="text-align:center">53</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.44%"><p style="text-align:center">(2.9%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Endoscopy Findings</title>
    <p>Endoscopic findings in the esophagus, stomach and duodenum were recorded as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>. Whereas 632 patients (34.1%) had normal esophageal findings, the single most common abnormal finding was gastroesophageal reflux disease (n = 628, 33.9%). In the esophagus, tumors were observed in 364 patients (19.6%). These comprised of 27 tumors (7.4%) in the proximal esophagus, 203 tumors (55.8%) in the mid esophagus while 134 tumors (36.8%) were in the distal part of the esophagus. Benign esophageal strictures were only observed in 22 patients (1.2%) and sliding hiatus hernia in 21 patients (1.1%).</p>
    <p>In the stomach, 274 participants had normal findings whereas 286 participants (15.4%) had no assessment due to obstruction in the esophagus. The most common abnormal finding in the stomach was gastritis (n = 1167, 62.9%). Tumors were observed in 30 patients, mainly in the distal half (n = 25). In the duodenum, majority of the participants had normal findings (n = 1337, 72.1%) while 25.3% of the participants had no duodenal assessment due to proximal obstruction. Duodenal mass was observed in 0.5% of the participants (n = 9).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-"></xref>Table 2. Showing endoscopy findings.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Findings in esophagus</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Frequency</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentage</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Candidiasis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">172</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(9.3%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Benign esophageal stricture</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">22</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(1.2%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Esophageal tumors</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">364</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(19.6%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Esophageal varices</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">13</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.7%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Esophageal polyp</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Gastroesophageal reflux disease</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">628</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(33.9%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Hiatus hernia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">21</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(1.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Nasogastric tube in situ</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Normal</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">632</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(34.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Findings in stomach</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Gastritis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">1,167</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(62.9%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Gastric outlet obstruction (no visible gastric tumor)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">40</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(2.2%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Gastric polyp</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.5%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Gastric ulcer</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">48</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(2.6%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Proximal gastric tumor</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.3%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Tumor at antrum</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(1.3%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Normal</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">274</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(14.8%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Not assessed</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">286</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(15.4%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Findings in duodenum</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Duodenal mass</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.5%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Duodenal ulcer</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">11</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.6%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Duodenitis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">28</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(1.5%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Normal</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">1,337</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(72.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Not assessed</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.62%"><p style="text-align:center">469</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">(25.3%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Histology Findings</title>
    <p>Biopsy was picked from 710 participants who underwent endoscopy (380 samples from the esophagus, 316 samples from the stomach and 14 samples from the duodenum). Of the 710 patients who had a biopsy removed at the time of endoscopy, 78% had results available in their records. 366 patients had malignancy confirmed on histological examination. Squamous cell carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Adeno- squamous carcinoma and Small round blue cell tumor were found in 257 patients (36.2%), 106 patients (14.9%), 2 patients (0.3%) and 1 patient (0.1%) respectively. Other participants had benign lesions as summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-"></xref>Table 3. Showing histology findings.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Histological findings (N = 710)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Adeno squamous carcinoma</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.3%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Adenocarcinoma</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">106</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(14.9%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Duodenal ulcer</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.6%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Esophageal papillomatosis with mild dysplasia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.3%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Gastritis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">129</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(18.2%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Inconclusive</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">43</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(6.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Mucosal associated lymphoid tissue</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.4%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Polyp</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(1.0%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">SCC</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">257</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(36.2%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Small round blue cell tumor</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(0.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Missing results</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.23%"><p style="text-align:center">156</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.07%"><p style="text-align:center">(22.0%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Tumor Location for the Histology Findings</title>
    <p>Three hundred sixty-six participants had malignant lesions. Majority of the cancers were in the esophagus (n = 317, 88.7%). The most common histological type for esophageal cancers was squamous cell carcinoma while adenocarcinoma was the most predominant histological type for gastric cancers. Among the 42 patients with gastric adenocarcinomas, 30 (71.4%) were intestinal subtype, according to Lauren’s Criteria. 30 patients had overt features of gastric tumors seen at endoscopy while the other cases of gastric cancer were obtained from biopsy samples of patients who had irregular erythematous gastric mucosal lining and they were presumed to have chronic gastritis but histology results turned out to be malignant. None of the samples taken from the duodenum yielded malignancy (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-"></xref>Table 4. Showing tumor location for the histology findings.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.04%"><p style="text-align:center">Location</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="38.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Histological findings</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.15%"><p style="text-align:center">Frequency (N = 366)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentage</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.04%"><p style="text-align:center">Esophagus (n = 317)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Adeno squamous carcinoma</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.15%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.44%"><p style="text-align:center">0.3%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="38.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Adenocarcinoma</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.15%"><p style="text-align:center">64</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.44%"><p style="text-align:center">20.2%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="38.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Squamous cell carcinoma</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.15%"><p style="text-align:center">251</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.44%"><p style="text-align:center">79.2%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="38.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Small round blue cell tumor</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.15%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.44%"><p style="text-align:center">0.3%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.04%"><p style="text-align:center">Stomach (n = 49)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Adeno squamous carcinoma</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.15%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.44%"><p style="text-align:center">2.0%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="38.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Adenocarcinoma</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.15%"><p style="text-align:center">42</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.44%"><p style="text-align:center">85.7%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="38.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Squamous cell carcinoma</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.15%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.44%"><p style="text-align:center">12.2%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Characteristics of Patients with Cancer on Biopsy</title>
    <p>The table (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>) below shows the differences in characteristics of participants with and without histological diagnosis of malignancy. When compared to those without malignancy, the participants with malignancy were likely to be older (p-value = 0.005), male gender(p-value = 0.001) and with dysphagia (p-value &lt; 0.001).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-"></xref>Table 5. Showing Characteristics of participants with cancer on Biopsy (N = 710).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Variable</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center">Malignancy(n = 366)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center">No malignancy(n = 344)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.46%"><p style="text-align:center">p-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Age</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.46%"><p style="text-align:center">0.005*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; 50 years</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center">52 (14.2%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center">77 (22.4%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">≥ 50 years</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center">314 (85.8%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center">267 (77.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Gender</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.46%"><p style="text-align:center">0.001*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Male</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center">275 (75.1%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center">218 (63.4%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Female</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center">91 (24.9%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center">126 (36.6%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Indication for endoscopy</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.46%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; 0.001*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Upper GI bleeding</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (1.4%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center">21 (6.1%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Dysphagia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center">308 (84.2%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center">60 (17.4%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Epigastric pain</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center">30 (8.2%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center">219 (63.7%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Others</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.87%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (6.3%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.98%"><p style="text-align:center">44 (12.8%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>3.6. Distribution of Histopathological Types of Malignancy by Age and Gender (N = 366)</title>
    <p>The table below (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref>) stratifies the various histopathological types by age and gender. There was no statistical difference in the proportions of the histological types of cancers by age group and gender (p-value &gt; 0.05).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-"></xref>Table 6. Distribution of histopathological types of malignancy by age and gender (N = 366).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">Variable</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Adenocarcinoma (n = 106)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.08%"><p style="text-align:center">Squamous cell carcinoma (n = 257)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.37%"><p style="text-align:center">Adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 2)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.73%"><p style="text-align:center">Small round blue cell tumor (n = 1)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center">p-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">Age</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.29%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.08%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.37%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.73%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center">0.884</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; 50 years</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.29%"><p style="text-align:center">14 (13.2%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.08%"><p style="text-align:center">38 (14.8%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.37%"><p style="text-align:center">0 (0%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.73%"><p style="text-align:center">0 (0%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">≥ 50 years</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.29%"><p style="text-align:center">81 (76.4%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.08%"><p style="text-align:center">219 (85.2%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.37%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (100%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.73%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (100%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">Gender</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.29%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.08%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.37%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.73%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center">0.591</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">Female</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.29%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (21.7%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.08%"><p style="text-align:center">68 (26.5%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.37%"><p style="text-align:center">0 (0%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.73%"><p style="text-align:center">0 (0%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">Male</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.29%"><p style="text-align:center">83 (78.3%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.08%"><p style="text-align:center">189 (73.5%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.37%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (100%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.73%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (100%)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.43%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>Majority of our patients (56.6%) were males with a mean age of 55.4 (± 18.5) years. Similar studies in Uganda have also demonstrated male predominance in Mbarara at 59.8% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-2">
     [2]
    </xref> and Mbale at 56.9% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-5">
     [5]
    </xref> but there was a female predominance among patient who underwent endoscopy in one of the hospitals in the eastern region of Ghana <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. However, the reason for this occurrence remains unclear. These two related studies in Uganda also reported a mean age of 53.5 years at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital and 54.8 years at Mbale Regional Referral Hospital. These figures are comparable to the mean age that was seen in our study.</p>
   <p>In this study, the main indication for EGD was epigastric pain followed by dysphagia. A number of other studies also reported epigastric pain as the main indication for EGD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. Agyei-Nkansah et al., reported dyspepsia as the commonest indication for endoscopy at 76% followed by upper GI bleeding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. In a large study that was done in Ethiopia, Argaw et al., also reported dyspepsia as the commonest indication for EGD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-21">
     [21]
    </xref>. Dyspepsia is a symptom of postprandial distress, early satiation or epigastric pain or discomfort, or indigestion or bloating <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. Thus, all these studies essentially reported the same symptom of epigastric pain as the main indication for endoscopy, but with a slight variation in nomenclature. Doe et al., reported dysphagia as the main indication for endoscopy at Mbale Regional Referral Hospital and this was closely followed by epigastric pain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. Summing up all the above studies, the most common indications for endoscopy are epigastric pain, dysphagia and upper GI bleeding.</p>
   <p>Gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal tumors were the most common findings in the esophagus while gastritis and gastric tumors were predominant in the stomach. Duodenitis was also seen in the duodenum in 1.5% of the cases. Similar findings were also reported in Mbale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-5">
     [5]
    </xref>, Ethiopia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-21">
     [21]
    </xref> and Ghana <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. Esophageal candidiasis was the sole diagnosis identified in 9.3% of all patients done EGD. Majority of esophageal tumors were located in the mid esophagus (55.8%), followed by distal esophagus (36.8%) and about half of the patients with esophageal cancer also had esophageal candidiasis but the primary diagnosis captured was the esophageal tumors because these patients had EGD done with the main indication being dysphagia. Our findings were similar to a study done in Tanzania by Mchembe et al., who reported that the middle third esophagus was the most common anatomical site for esophageal cancers at 58.5% followed by the lower third at 27.4% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-23">
     [23]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In literature, there are two major histological types of esophageal cancer namely: Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma but SCC is the predominant type worldwide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. In our study, SCC was predominant at 79.2%. However, Schlansky et al., reported adenocarcinoma as the most common histological subtype in Philadelphia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-25">
     [25]
    </xref>. In our study, esophageal cancer was more common among males above 50 years of age. Worldwide, a higher incidence of esophageal cancer has been reported among males in the 6<sup>th</sup> and 7<sup>th</sup> decade of life <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-24">
     [24]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-25">
     [25]
    </xref>. A study done, in Tanzania reported that esophageal cancer contributed 25.3% of all malignant gastrointestinal tumors and SCC of the esophagus accounted for 96% of all esophageal cancer and the risk factors attributed to this high figure were smoking, alcohol consumption and family history of the esophageal cancer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-23">
     [23]
    </xref>. Similar studies also reported that esophageal cancer contributed 13.3 % of all GI malignancies in Nigeria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-26">
     [26]
    </xref> and 32.5% in Adis Ababa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-27">
     [27]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In the stomach, majority of the tumors had a histological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma accounting for 85.7% and these tumors were predominantly in the distal half of the stomach. Most of our patients were males above 50 years of age. In Yemen, Kassim et al., also reported adenocarcinoma as the most common histological variant among patients with gastric cancer accounting for 92.4%, with a mean age of 64.98 ± 15.15 years, and the male to female ratio was 2.5:1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-28">
     [28]
    </xref>. Another study in Nigeria also showed similar findings with gastric adenocarcinomas being more common among males aged 50 to 60 years and the tumor location was predominantly in the antrum/pylorus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-29">
     [29]
    </xref>. Similar findings were also reported in Rwanda <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-30">
     [30]
    </xref>, Ethiopia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-31">
     [31]
    </xref> and Kenya <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-32">
     [32]
    </xref>. The histologic classification of gastric cancer is largely based on Lauren’s classification, in which intestinal type and diffuse type adenocarcinomas are the two major histologic subtypes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-33">
     [33]
    </xref>. Majority of our patients had intestinal type adenocarcinoma which was in line with other studies in literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-28">
     [28]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-29">
     [29]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-34">
     [34]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-36">
     [36]
    </xref>. Whereas Borrmann’s classification can be used as a valuable factor to predict overall survival among patients with gastric cancer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-37">
     [37]
    </xref>, the findings at endoscopy that were reported for patients with gastric tumors did not indicate the Borrmann’s type. Our study did not report any case of malignancy in the duodenum, and this is not surprising since duodenal cancers are generally rare, accounting for less than 1% of all gastrointestinal tumors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-38">
     [38]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.142031-39">
     [39]
    </xref>. The available histology results for the samples taken from the duodenum only revealed duodenitis. Although the clinical stage of esophageal and gastric cancers at the time of presentation significantly affects patient outcomes; cancer staging, therapeutic interventions and treatment outcomes were beyond the scope of our study and therefore, they are not discussed here.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>In south western Uganda, the most common indication for EGD was epigastric pain followed by dysphagia. Gastritis and GERD were the main benign findings at endoscopy. Esophageal malignancies were more common in the mid esophagus and majority were SCC. Gastric tumors were more common in the distal half of the stomach and they were mainly intestinal type adenocarcinomas.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Recommendation</title>
   <p>Patients with recurrent upper GI symptoms need EGD for screening and early detection of upper GI malignancies.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>7. Limitations</title>
   <p>The main source of information for our study was the endoscopy reports. They had limited information about patient demographics and clinical presentation. Any possible risk factors for occurrence of our findings were completely missing. We also had some missing histology results because the reports could not be traced. Thus, our analysis was limited to the available study variables.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>We are very grateful for the support accorded to us by the Faculty of Medicine at Mbarara University of Science and Technology and the team at DMH.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Early, D.S., Ben-Menachem, T., Decker, G.A., Evans, J.A., Fanelli, R.D., Fisher, D.A., et al. (2012) Appropriate Use of GI Endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 75, 1127-1131. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.011
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Obayo, S., Muzoora, C., Ocama, P., Cooney, M., Wilson, T. and Probert, C. (2015) Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases in Patients for Endoscopy in South-Western Uganda. African Health Sciences, 15, 959-966. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v15i3.33
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agyei-Nkansah, A., Duah, A. and Alfonso, M. (2019) Indications and Findings of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients Presenting to a District Hospital, Ghana. Pan African Medical Journal, 34, Article No. 82. &gt;https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2019.34.82.18002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aduful, H., Naaeder, S., Darko, R., Baako, B., Clegg-Lamptey, J., Nkrumah, K., et al. (2007) Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana. Ghana Medical Journal, 41, 12.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     J Doe, M., Bua, E., SO Obbo, J., Bisso, F. and Olupot-Olupot, P. (2021) Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Findings in Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Eastern Uganda: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis. African Health Sciences, 21, 919-926. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i2.54
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mohamed-Elbagir, A., Al-Humayed, S., Al-Wabel, A. and Argobi, Y. (2010) The Changing Pattern of Upper Gastro-Intestinal Lesions in Southern Saudi Arabia: An Endoscopic Study. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology, 16, 35-37. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.58766
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Everhart, J.E. and Ruhl, C.E. (2009) Burden of Digestive Diseases in the United States Part I: Overall and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases. Gastroenterology, 136, 376-386. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.015
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mandeville, K.L., Krabshuis, J., Ladep, N.G., Mulder, C.J., Quigley, E.M. and Khan, S.A. (2009) Gastroenterology in Developing Countries: Issues and Advances. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 15, Article No. 2839. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2839
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chuks, N.S. (2011) Challenges of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Resource-Poor Countries. In: Pascu, O., Ed., Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IntechOpen, 385-389.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Doe, M., Bua, E., Bisso, F. and Olupot-Olupot, P. (2022) The Diagnostic Upper GI Endoscopy Camp: A Pilot for Enhancing Service Provision and Training in Eastern Uganda. African Health Sciences, 22, 392-396. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v22i2.45
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mwachiro, M., Topazian, H.M., Kayamba, V., Mulima, G., Ogutu, E., Erkie, M., et al. (2021) Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Capacity in Eastern Africa. Endoscopy International Open, 9, E1827-E1836. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1551-3343
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Perl, D., Leddin, D., Bizos, D., Veitch, A., N’Dow, J., Bush-Goddard, S., et al. (2016) Endoscopic Capacity in West Africa. African Health Sciences, 16, Article No. 329. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v16i1.44
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Le Moine, O., Diouf, M., Mbengue, M., Mbaye, P., Diop, P., Balme, F., et al. (2012) Creation of a Therapeutic Digestive Endoscopy Suite in Senegal: Renovation, Training and University Certification. Results of a Belgian-Senegalese Inter-University Project. Endoscopy, 44, 177-185. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1291584
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Okongo, F., Amuge, C., Jatho, A., Niyonzima, N., Ogwang, D.M. and Orem, J. (2024) The Regional Cancer Spectrum in Uganda: A Population-Based Cancer Survey by Sub-Regions (2017-2020). Ecancermedicalscience, 18, Article No. 1782. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2024.1782
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Colin-Jones, D.G. (1991) Improving the Standards of Endoscopy. Gut, 32, 725-726. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.32.7.725
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Coleman, W.H. (1988) Gastroscopy: A Primary Diagnostic Procedure. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 15, 1-11. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4543(21)01054-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dronfield, M.W., Ferguson, R., Mcillmurray, M.B., Atkinson, M. and Langman, M.J.S. (1977) A Prospective, Randomised Study of Endoscopy and Radiology in Acute Upper-Gastrointestinal-Tract Bleeding. The Lancet, 309, 1167-1169. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92713-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ko, W.J., An, P., Ko, K.H., Hahm, K.B., Hong, S.P. and Cho, J.Y. (2015) Image Quality Analysis of Various Gastrointestinal Endoscopes: Why Image Quality Is a Prerequisite for Proper Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy. Clinical Endoscopy, 48, 374-379. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.5.374
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mutiibwa, D., Turanzomwe, S., Atukunda, E.C. and Mugyenyi, G.R. (2025) Colonoscopy Findings at Divine Mercy Hospital-Father Bash Foundation, South-Western Uganda: A 6 Years Retrospective Analysis. Open Journal of Gastroenterology, 15, 91-100. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgas.2025.153010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kamdem, J., Palmer, D., Barrier, C., Bardin, R., Brown, J.A. and Topazian, M. (2018) Diagnostic Yield of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in North West Region Cameroon and Trends in Diagnosis over Time. Pan African Medical Journal, 29, Article No. 178. &gt;https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.29.178.10785
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Argaw, A., Ethiopia, S., Lelisa, G., Fisseha, H. and Mulugeta, B. (2023) Indications and Findings of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy at a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, 16, 187-196. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2147/ceg.s436329
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Talley, N.J., Napthali, K. and McQuaid, K. (2016) Dyspepsia. In: Talley, N.J., et al., Eds., Practical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Board Review Toolkit, Wiley-Blackwell, 70-73.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mchembe, M.D., Rambau, P.F., Chalya, P.L., Jaka, H., Koy, M. and Mahalu, W. (2013) Endoscopic and Clinicopathological Patterns of Esophageal Cancer in Tanzania: Experiences from Two Tertiary Health Institutions. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 11, Article No. 257. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-257
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pun, C., Aryal, G., Basyal, R., Shrestha, S., Pathak, T., Bastola, S., et al. (2012) Histological Pattern of Esophageal Cancer at BP Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital in Nepal: A Three Year Retrospective Study. Journal of Pathology of Nepal, 2, 277-281. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v2i4.6877
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schlansky, B., Dimarino, A.J., Loren, D., infantolino, A., Kowalski, T. and Cohen, S. (2006) A Survey of Oesophageal Cancer: Pathology, Stage and Clinical Presentation. Alimentary Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics, 23, 587-593. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02782.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Obafunwa, J. (1990) Pattern of Alimentary Tract Tumours in Plateau State: A Middle Belt Area of Nigeria. The Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 93, 351-354.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ali, A., Ersumo, T. and Johnson, O. (1998) Oesophageal Carcinoma in Tikur Anbessa Hospital, Addis Ababa. East African Medical Journal, 75, 590-593.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kassim, A., Thabet, S., Al-Fakih, S., Alqobaty, M., Alathwary, R. and Ameen, S. (2018) Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics of Gastric Adenocarcinoma in Yemeni Patients: A 2 Years Prospective Study. OALib, 5, e5075. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105075
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ebili, H., Oluwasola, A., Akang, E. and Ogunbiyi, J. (2015) Clinicopathological Features of Gastric Carcinoma in Ibadan, Nigeria, 2000-2011. Nigerian Medical Journal, 56, 126-131. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.150700
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shikama, F., Bensen, S.P., Giraneza, R., Ndayisaba, P., Hategekimana, E., Rutaganda, E., et al. (2022) Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers in Rwanda: Epidemiological, Clinical and Histopathological Features in Patients Presenting to a Tertiary Referral Hospital. Open Journal of Gastroenterology, 12, 286-298. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgas.2022.1210029
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gebresillasse, H.W., Tamrat, G. and Abule, T. (2019) Gastric Cancer Features and Outcomes at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A 5-Year Retrospective Study. East and Central African Journal of Surgery, 24, 105-109.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Maalim, M. (2020) Clinico-Pathological Characteristics and Outcomes of Gastric Cancer among Patients at Kenyatta National Hospital. University of Nairobi.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hwang, S.W., Lee, D.H., Lee, S.H., Park, Y.S., Hwang, J.H., Kim, J.W., et al. (2010) Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer by Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multidetector‐Row Computed Tomography. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 25, 512-518. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06106.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Polkowski, W., van Sandick, J.W., Offerhaus, G.J.A., ten Kate, F.J.W., Mulder, J., Obertop, H., et al. (1999) Prognostic Value of Laurén Classification and C-Erbb-2 Oncogene Overexpression in Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 6, 290-297. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-999-0290-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lee, J.H., Chang, K.K., Yoon, C., Tang, L.H., Strong, V.E. and Yoon, S.S. (2018) Lauren Histologic Type Is the Most Important Factor Associated with Pattern of Recurrence Following Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Annals of Surgery, 267, 105-113. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002040
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hao, Y., Liu, B.L., Liang, Y., Xiong, Y., Polydorides, A.D. and Ward, S. (2023) Further Prognostic Stratification of Intestinal Type of Gastric Adenocarcinoma by CDX2 Expression Pattern. Human Pathology, 131, 61-67. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2022.11.005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Song, X., Zhang, W., Chen, X., Zhao, L., Chen, X., et al. (2020) Prognostic Impact of Borrmann Classification on Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort from a Single Institution in Western China. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18, Article No. 204. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01987-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Overman, M.J., Hu, C., Kopetz, S., Abbruzzese, J.L., Wolff, R.A. and Chang, G.J. (2011) A Population-Based Comparison of Adenocarcinoma of the Large and Small Intestine: Insights into a Rare Disease. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 19, 1439-1445. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2173-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.142031-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cloyd, J.M., George, E. and Visser, B.C. (2016) Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: Advances in Diagnosis and Surgical Management. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 8, Article No. 212. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v8.i3.212
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>