<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ijis
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     International Journal of Intelligence Science
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2163-0283
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2163-0356
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ijis.2025.152004
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ijis-141724
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Computer Science 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Communications
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Validation of a Digital Dietary Survey Tool (Food Survey) Adapted to Elite Chadian Athletes
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Allaissem
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Moyengar
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Brahim Boy
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Otchom
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Moussouami Simplice
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Innocent
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mbainaissem
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Denis
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mbemba
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       François
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory of Nutrition, Health and Human Motor Skills of Higher Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Marien Ngouabi University, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aNatural Substances Resources Laboratory, Faculty of Exact and Applied Sciences, University of N’Djamena, N’Djamena, Chad
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory of Physiology of Effort and Biomechanics (LPB), Higher Institute of Physical Education and Sports (ISEPS), Marien Ngouabi University, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aHuman Nutrition and Food Laboratory (LANAH), Faculty of Sciences and Technology, UMNG, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     31
    </day> 
    <month>
     03
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    02
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    79
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    95
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      19,
     </day>
     <month>
      January
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      January
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    To ensure effective nutritional surveillance of athletes on a national scale, it is essential to collect reliable and representative data on dietary intakes. This requires the design and validation of standardised tools that are regularly updated to reflect recent changes in the composition of food products and the nutritional habits of the population. The aim of this study was to create and validate a digital tool designed to assess the dietary profiles of elite Chadian martial arts practitioners. A total of 63 elite Chadian martial artists (33 men and 31 women) with an average age of 18.58 ± 2.36 years participated in this study. Anthropometric parameters, including height, body weight and body mass index (BMI) were measured. To validate the Food Survey software package, energy, macro- and micronutrient intakes were assessed using a 24-hour food intake recall (reference method) and compared with the same data collated from Food Survey (tested method) in order to analyse reconciliation agreements between the results of the two methods. The comparison of energy and nutrient intakes for women and men revealed similar results for most nutrients, indicating overall consistency. Analyses of the various Bland-Altman distribution curves indicate that the majority of the parameters from the two methods studied show good agreement: the biases (y = absolute bias) are, for the most part, perfect, with most of their values close to 0. The limits of agreement (y = absolute bias ± 1.96 × standard deviation) are also narrow for all the data analysed, with the exception of phosphorus (−371.299; 250.113). This IT tool represents an innovative alternative for assessing food choices, particularly in contexts where dietary behaviour is measured only once. Unlike 24-hour dietary recalls or food frequency questionnaires, which require repeated administrations to provide a more comprehensive assessment of dietary habits, this tool stands out for its ability to be effective in studies with limited time and budget. It is a practical solution for rapidly collecting reliable data on food choices in constrained research environments.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Digital Tool
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Validation
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Nutritional Intake
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Dietary Survey
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Combat Sport
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Nutrition plays a crucial role in sports performance, directly influencing physical capacity, recovery and endurance. For elite athletes, a balanced diet adapted to the specific requirements of their discipline is essential to optimise their performance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-1">
     [1]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Accurate assessment of dietary intake is therefore essential to help athletes make informed decisions about dietary recommendations for athletes.</p>
   <p>Several methods are used to assess diets, each with its own advantages and limitations. Commonly used tools include 24-hour dietary recalls, food frequency questionnaires (FFQs), food diaries and direct observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-5">
     [5]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. These methods make it possible to obtain qualitative and quantitative data on people’s eating habits. For example, food recalls provide a snapshot of food consumption, but are highly dependent on the memory and sincerity of the respondent. FFQs, on the other hand, provide an overall view of dietary trends over an extended period, although they are often biased by reporting errors.</p>
   <p>In recent years, however, a number of food survey tools have been designed and validated using computer software, the Internet and the Web, thanks to the work of leading researchers. These tools are now used worldwide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-8">
     [8]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Although these technological innovations do not guarantee greater dietary accuracy than traditional dietary assessment methods, they offer interesting prospects for minimising dietary reporting bias <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-8">
     [8]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The majority of researchers working on new dietary survey technologies validate them by relying on traditional reference tools and methods, such as the 24-hour dietary recall or the food frequency questionnaire, combined with statistical analyses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-8">
     [8]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. These tools also seem unsuitable for certain countries, due to the wide range of environmental factors that determine dietary behaviour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-13">
     [13]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In the Chadian context, assessing the diets of elite athletes faces several challenges. Limited resources, restricted access to country-specific dietary databases, and cultural and regional variations in dietary habits complicate the application of standard methods. In addition, Chadian sportsmen and women live in an environment where sports facilities and nutritional resources are often inadequate, making understanding their needs even more critical.</p>
   <p>This problem highlights the importance of choosing assessment tools that are adapted to the local context. The integration of modern technologies, such as mobile applications for dietary monitoring, could offer a promising solution for collecting accurate data while overcoming some of the limitations of traditional methods. It is also essential to train athletes and their coaches in the basics of sports nutrition so that they can better understand the impact of their dietary choices on their performance. The aim of this project was to create and validate a digital tool designed to assess the dietary habits of elite martial arts practitioners in Chad. This new tool will also be validated using more sophisticated methods such as isotopes and accelerometers.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Material and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. how Food Survey was Developed</title>
    <p>Preliminary investigations using the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), carried out in accordance with international and scientific database standards, enabled us to draw up a booklet of food portions. To this end, 10 food groups (cereals; tubers; legumes; vegetables; fruit; meat; fish and eggs; dairy; oils and fats; beverages and other foods) comprising 190 foods were identified. Units of measurement were also listed: kitchen utensils (ladle, soup and coffee spoon, piece of carved calabash, glass...) and others (coins and banknotes, pinch of fingers, wrist of hand, palm of hand...). An electronic dietary scale with a capacity of 5 kg, brand Téfal, and model: copper 5 and accuracy 1 g, test tubes, beakers etc. and a camera were used for this purpose. The raw foods were weighed by Nutritionists assisted by students from the National Institute of Younth and Sports of N’Djamena and photographed by a professional photographer directly with women market vendors, in food stores or in households in the study area (3, 6, 7, and 9th Arrondissement of N’Djamena Commune). A portion of food corresponds to the standard unit of measurement or its equivalent (coin) customary in Chad for each foodstuff. For cooked foods, the research team weighed and photographed some purchased from vendors, informal traders and restaurateurs, and others prepared in the households selected for the occasion. In the case of multi-ingredient dishes, for example, the “bouillie composée”: a Chadian dish whose gross weight is measured and estimated at 700 g of its portion, containing the standard unit of measurement commonly known as a “gobelet”. The net weight of the main ingredient, grain rice, is estimated at 66g. Added to this is water, calculated and estimated at 517 g, cow’s curd (57 g), peanut paste (20 g) and sugar (40 g). Portions of main and accessory ingredients are quantified using the Dop method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-8">
      [8]
     </xref>. Measurements are carried out a minimum of three times in different locations for the same foods, in order to retain the average values, which are recorded in the “Food Survey”.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. How Food Survey Works</title>
    <p>The Food Survey application facilitates the assessment of dietary intakes in four main stages, illustrated by the figures shown.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Home page.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId14.jpeg?20250514050943" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. File/Edition menu.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId15.jpeg?20250514050943" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. File sub-menu.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId16.jpeg?20250514050942" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Registration of sud-menus.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId17.jpeg?20250514050942" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Menu edition.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId18.jpeg?20250514050942" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. Registration of respondents.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId19.jpeg?20250514050942" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. Entering a food.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId20.jpeg?20250514050942" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. Parameter analysis.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId21.jpeg?20250514050943" />
    </fig>
    <p>Double-click on the Food Survey icon to open the main screen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>). Then click on the File/Edit menu (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>1) Managing sub-menus in the File menu</p>
    <p>Selecting the File menu gives you access to various sub-menus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>) such as the unit of measurement, meal types or the food composition table. To save a data item (for example, a unit of measurement), enter the necessary information, add an image if you wish, then click on Add to confirm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>2) Accessing the Edit menu </p>
    <p>Click on Edit to display the sub-menus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>), such as Entering respondent information and Dishes served. Before any analysis, identify the respondents by filling in their information in the corresponding sub-menu (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>3) Entering meals and analysing data </p>
    <p>For each food consumed, enter the respondent, the meal (breakfast, lunch, dinner, etc.), the quantity and click Save (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>). Finally, to calculate the energy and nutrient intakes, go to Data analysis, select the dishes served, and validate to obtain the cumulative results in energy, macronutrients (proteins, lipids, carbohydrates) and micronutrients (Calcium, Iron, vitamins, etc.) as shown in figure 8.2.2.</p>
    <p>Indeed, the algorithms are based on the data contained in the food booklet, i.e. the food portion and its ingredients, the unit of measurement and the weight of each ingredient, combined with a food conversion sheet for macro and micronutrients per 100g of edible food. From this food portion, the rule of three is applied according to the quantity of food ingested by the subject, and recorded to determine the lipid, protein and carbohydrate content in g, the Calcium, Iron and Phosphorus content, and the vitamin B1, B2, B6 and C content in mg. Energy intake is then calculated by multiplying the cumulative content of carbohydrates in g by 4 Kcal, protein in g by 4 Kcal and lipids in g by 9 Kcal, according to the standards for converting g into Kcal for these substrates. Energy intake is the sum of the three results. For Calcium, Iron, Phosphorus and vitamins, the total constitutes the subject’s intake.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Validation of the Food Survey Tool</title>
    <p>The study carried out in 2021 involved a group of 63 practitioners of combat sports: Taekwondo (n = 26), Wrestling (n = 14), Karate (n = 13) and Judo (n = 10) in preparation for the African Games in Brazzaville. According to a statistical estimate carried out using the G*Power programme for four sports disciplines, the minimum sample size required, with a significance level of 0.05 and statistical power of 0.95, should be between 76 individuals (for strong effects) and 92.</p>
    <p>The selection criteria for participants included competitive practice of a combat sport at the highest level of the federation in Chad and at least three years’ experience. Conversely, exclusion criteria included a low level of sporting performance, less than three years’ professional experience or an injury-related interruption in training.</p>
    <p>The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (reference no. 101/LBT/OIL/2021, dated 11 April 2021).</p>
    <p>A team consisting of a nutritionist and a professional photographer collected data over a four-week period. They used a food frequency questionnaire <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-14">
      [14]
     </xref> to identify the main foods consumed. A booklet containing photos of food portions, their standard household measurements, their gross weights and the ingredients that make them up was produced <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-15">
      [15]
     </xref>. Equipment such as a dietary scale, experiments and a camera were used for this task.</p>
    <p>In the absence of a food composition table for use in Chad, a rigorous compilation of data from existing tables in accordance with FAO/INFOOD guidelines was used to create the databases. The conversion of food into macronutrients (proteins, lipids, carbohydrates), vitamins (B1, B2, B6, C), minerals (Calcium, iron, phosphorus) and energy was carried out using the improved FAO food table for use in Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-16">
      [16]
     </xref>, the Souci table (2004), data from the US Department of Agriculture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-5">
      [5]
     </xref>, the Department of Health of England <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-17">
      [17]
     </xref>, studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-18">
      [18]
     </xref>, as well as the food composition table for countries in the Congo Basin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-19">
      [19]
     </xref> and West Africa. The results of scientific publications on food content in Chad’s neighbouring countries (Cameroon, Nigeria) are also included. For local foods whose composition does not appear on the tables identified, the results of physico-chemical analyses of local foods are carried out at the N’Djamena biochemical laboratory: CECOQDA (Centre de Contrôle des Qualités des Denrés Alimentaires) and the Pointe-Noire laboratory in Congo.</p>
    <p>A computer engineer has designed an innovative application called Food Survey, which integrates food data and photographed portions. The tool can be used to record and project data to help participants make their choices. This computerised, dynamic and adaptable application modernises traditional methods such as the 24-hour dietary recall.</p>
    <p>Two research teams worked simultaneously for 7 days. The first, made up of a nutritionist and trained students, conducted surveys using the classic 24-hour recall method. It recorded the names of the foods, their quantities (using household measurements such as a ladle or cup), the ingredients, as well as the times and types of meal. Three non-consecutive days were chosen to minimise errors.</p>
    <p>The second team, also led by a nutritionist and assisted by students, used the Food Survey. The data was projected onto a screen, and the participants made their choices directly. This tool overcomes the challenges associated with quantifying food, managing collective meals and the errors of manual methods.</p>
    <p>Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, completed independently by the participants. The questionnaire included information on socio-demographics, weight, height and body mass index (BMI), in accordance with the usual measurement standards.</p>
    <p>1) Anthropometry</p>
    <p>Anthropometric data were collected using precise, standardised protocols from barefoot and lightly clothed athletes. Body mass was measured using a digital impedance meter (Tanita brand model: BC-545) with an accuracy of 0.1 kg, and height was measured using a portable stadiometer (Sanny brand, American Medical of Brazil) with a maximum height of 2.20 m and an accuracy of 0.1 cm. BMI in Kg/m<sup>2</sup> was calculated using the Quételet formula: BMI= [Weight (kg)/Height<sup>2</sup> (m)].</p>
    <p>2) Dietary profile</p>
    <p>The 24-hour recall questionnaire was completed by each athlete on a self-report basis on non-consecutive days. It covered the food and drink consumed the previous day. To promote accurate recall and limit potential bias, detailed written instructions were provided to the athletes prior to completion.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>The data were analysed using SPSS 21.0 and STATA 14 software. Firstly, a t-test for independent samples was used to assess the differences in indices between the various types of addicts. The Bland-Altman plot was used to assess the agreement between the values recorded in the RA24H and Food Survey methods. The Shapiro-Wilk test confirmed that the data followed a normal distribution (P &gt; 0.05). The threshold for statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <p>A total of 63 combat sports athletes took part in the study, 49.2% of whom were women and 50.79% men. The average age of the participants was 15.58 ± 2.36 years, with a height and body mass index of 1.69 ± 0.04 m and 21.79 ± 2.27 kg/m<sup>2</sup> respectively. The athletes came from a variety of specialities, including taekwondo (41.26%), wrestling (22.22%), karate (20.63%) and judo (15.87%).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-"></xref>Table 1. General characteristics of participants. (n = 63)</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center">m ± SD</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Gender</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">- Men’s</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">32 (50.79)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">- Ladies</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">31 (49.20)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Speciality</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">- Taekwondo</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">26 (41.26)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">- Lutte</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">14 (22.22)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">- karaté</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">13 (20.63)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">- Judo</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">10 (15.87)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Age (years)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center">18.58 ± 2.36</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">/</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Height (m)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center">1.69 ± 0.04</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">/</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.92%"><p style="text-align:center">BMI (kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.93%"><p style="text-align:center">21.79 ± 2.27</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.84%"><p style="text-align:center">/</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
     Table 2
    </xref> compares mean energy and macronutrient intakes between female (n = 31) and male (n = 32) participants obtained using two assessment methods: RA24h (24-hour dietary recall) and Food Servey. These two assessment methods showed very similar results for most nutrients, suggesting overall consistency. The greater variations for certain micronutrients, such as iron, Calcium and Phosphorus in women, may reflect greater sensitivity of the data to the method used. The variations in vitamin C in men, with a notable drop in Food Servey, merit further exploration.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-"></xref>Table 2. Energy, macro- and micronutrient intakes of participants.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="40.73%" colspan="3"><p style="text-align:center">Ladies (n = 31)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.81%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Men’s (n = 32)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">RA24h</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">Food servey</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">∆ (%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">RA24 h</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Food servey</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">∆ (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">DEI (kcal)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">2665.54 ± 257.0</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">2667.43 ± 250.5</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">0.07</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">3414.44 ± 210.2</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">3470.89 ± 316.76</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">1.65</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Proteins (g)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">96.72 ± 27.69</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">98.12 ± 26.06</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">1.44</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">123.89 ± 23.61</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">124.12 ± 23.95</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.17</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Lipids (g)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">84.01 ± 30.0</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">82.72 ± 28.56</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">1.53</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">113.48 ± 34.02</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">117.95 ± 36.06</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">3.93</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Glucides (g)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">380.37 ± 80.24</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">382.61 ± 79.75</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">0.58</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">474.38 ± 84.75</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">478.22 ± 87.93</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.80</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Calcium (mg)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">337.52 ± 133.85</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">362.18 ± 185.32</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">7.83</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">411.11 ± 122.67</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">417.29 ± 108.41</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">1.50</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Fer (mg)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">20.78 ± 4.54</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">22.54 ± 4.05</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">8.49</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">27.27 ± 5.79</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">27.37 ± 5.41</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.28</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Phosphore (mg)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">1401.54 ± 309.1</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">1524.52 ± 573.0</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">8.77</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">1777.51 ± 399.8</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">1777.55 ± 376.9</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.002</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Vitamine B1</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">1.13 ± 0.25</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">1.22 ± 0.19</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">8.42</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">1.55 ± 0.30</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">1.52 ± 0.24</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">2.57</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Vitamine B2</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">1.95 ± 0.44</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">1.91 ± 0.48</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">2.10</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">2.43 ± 0.87</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">2.46 ± 0.82</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">1.19</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Vitamine B6</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">2.14 ± 0.45</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">2.19 ± 0.47</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">2.56</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">2.84 ± 0.79</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">2.82 ± 0.72</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.63</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.19%"><p style="text-align:center">Vitamine C</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.25%"><p style="text-align:center">114.68 ± 45.0</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.94%"><p style="text-align:center">115.95 ± 45.82</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="7.54%"><p style="text-align:center">1.09</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.46%"><p style="text-align:center">146.12 ± 54.13</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.35%"><p style="text-align:center">136.54 ± 54.27</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="8.26%"><p style="text-align:center">6.5</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>The figures in the tables are expressed as averages ± standard deviations and as percentages. ∆: difference between the values recorded by the RA24h (24-hour recall) and Food Survey; DEI: daily energy intake</p>
   <p>Bland-Altman curves of energy-adjusted carbohydrate, protein, and fat intakes between methods are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9(a)-9(c)">
     Figure 9(a)-Figure 9(c)
    </xref>. The reported intakes were within the limits of agreement for most individuals; however, the differences between methods appeared to be greater at moderate levels of intake <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9(a)">
     Figure 9(a)
    </xref>. The bias value (zero mean difference) is −0.802 close to zero, a perfect but negative bias (−0.802), which means that the Food Survey (new method) underestimates the series by 0.802 g (negligible) of protein compared with RA24h (reference method). Intakes adjusted for fat content <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9(b)">
     Figure 9(b)
    </xref> and carbohydrate content <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9(c)">
     Figure 9(c)
    </xref> showed acceptable agreement.</p>
   <fig-group id="fig9" position="float">
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--Figure 9. Bland-Altman plot of protein (a), fat (b) and carbohydrate (c) intakes of all Chadian martial arts practitioners (n = 63). The graphs present the mean difference between the two methods and the limits of agreement at 95%.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId22.jpeg?20250514050946" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--Figure 9. Bland-Altman plot of protein (a), fat (b) and carbohydrate (c) intakes of all Chadian martial arts practitioners (n = 63). The graphs present the mean difference between the two methods and the limits of agreement at 95%.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId23.jpeg?20250514050946" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--Figure 9. Bland-Altman plot of protein (a), fat (b) and carbohydrate (c) intakes of all Chadian martial arts practitioners (n = 63). The graphs present the mean difference between the two methods and the limits of agreement at 95%.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId24.jpeg?20250514050946" />
    </fig>
   </fig-group>
   <p>The Bland-Altman curves of mineral content; Calcium, Iron and Phosphorus between methods are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10(a)-10(c)">
     Figure 10(a)-Figure 10(c)
    </xref>. Reported intakes were within the limits of agreement for most individuals; however, differences between methods appeared to be greatest at moderate levels of intake <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10(b)">
     Figure 10(b)
    </xref>. Calcium <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10(a)">
     Figure 10(a)
    </xref> and phosphorus <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10(c)">
     Figure 10(c)
    </xref> intakes showed acceptable agreement.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId25.jpeg?20250514050946" /></p></p>
   <p>(a)</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId26.jpeg?20250514050946" /></p></p>
   <p>(b)</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId27.jpeg?20250514050946" /></p></p>
   <p>(c)</p>
   <p>The Bland-Altman plots of Vit B1, Vit B2, Vit B6 and Vit C intakes between the methods (RA24H and Food Survey) are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11(a)-11(d)">
     Figure 11(a)-Figure 11(d)
    </xref>. The reported macronutrient values were within the limits of agreement (y = absolute bias ± 1.96 × S.D) for most individuals. However, the differences between the methods appeared to be greater at more moderate levels of intake <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11(a)">
     Figure 11(a)
    </xref>. Energy-adjusted intakes of Vit B2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11(b)">
     Figure 11(b)
    </xref> and Vit B6 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11(c)">
     Figure 11(c)
    </xref>) and Vit C <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11(d)">
     Figure 11(d)
    </xref> showed acceptable agreement, while agreement for Vit B1 intake (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11(a)">
     Figure 11(a)
    </xref>) was higher between methods (i.e. 15% outliers of the 95% limits of agreement).</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId28.jpeg?20250514050946" /></p></p>
   <p>(a)</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId29.jpeg?20250514050946" /></p></p>
   <p>(b)</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId30.jpeg?20250514050946" /></p></p>
   <p>(c)</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1680422-rId31.jpeg?20250514050946" /></p></p>
   <p>(d)</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>The aim of this study was to create and validate a digital tool designed to assess the dietary habits of elite Chadian martial arts practitioners. The results show that, with regard to the Bland-Altman diagrams of the various parameters investigated, all the points are homogeneously dispersed around the lines averaging the differences in all the parameters (AEJ, macro and nutrients) with limits on either side of zero representing the upper and lower limits of agreement at 95%. This suggests that energy, mineral and macronutrient intakes were in normal agreement between the two methods: Food Survey (new) and RA24h (reference).</p>
   <p>Comparison of energy and macronutrient intakes between female (n = 31) and male (n = 32) participants obtained by the RA24h and Food Servey showed very close results for most nutrients, suggesting overall consistency. The greater variations in certain micronutrients, such as iron, calcium, and phosphorus in women, could reflect a greater sensitivity of the data to the method used. However, the variations in vitamin C in men, with a notable drop in Food Servey, merit further exploration.</p>
   <p>These energy values are similar to those found in the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-20">
     [20]
    </xref> study of archery athletes. For these authors, these nutritional loads correspond to the daily physical loads of archers. This implies that the values recorded from the Food Survey are not sufficiently biased. Our results are in line with those of a recent study which suggested that Bland-Altman diagrams revealed no systematic bias concerning energy, protein, fat or carbohydrate intake <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-21">
     [21]
    </xref>. For these authors, the data collected via the IOS application can be exploited to assess the distribution of food consumption within a target group. On the basis of these results, it appears that IOS data could be used effectively to monitor dietary habits on campus, in particular to identify sub-groups with potentially insufficient or excessive dietary intake. However, this method is not suitable for directly comparing observed dietary intakes with absolute dietary recommendations.</p>
   <p>The results obtained using the Blan-Atman method for vitamin B2, B6 and vitamin C intake showed concordant intakes on average for both methods, as reported by other authors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. These authors suggest that the Bland-Altman diagrams showed no serious bias for any of the 25 nutrients examined by the FFQ and RA24h. However, the vitamin B1 intake values showed higher mean intakes for Food Survey than those reported by RA24h. This trend may be explained by the fact that participants under-reported vitamin C intakes in the RA24h method compared with the Food Survey. Previous studies have reported similar results <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-23">
     [23]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-24">
     [24]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>However, the findings of the present study contrast with those of the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-25">
     [25]
    </xref> on the validation of an online quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess dietary intake in the adult Emirati population. These authors reported inconsistent agreement in the validation of the 2 methods used with a moderate level of validity for most nutrients after analysis of the Bland-Altman diagram. Previous research has reported significant variability in the validation of dietary assessment methods for estimating nutrient intake. The Bland-Altman diagrams reported showed limited and inconsistent agreement, with no significant advantage over other approaches used to assess nutrient intake in the same studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-26">
     [26]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-28">
     [28]
    </xref>. A study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141724-20">
     [20]
    </xref> investigated the use of the online dietary assessment tool RiksmatenFlex in Swedish adolescents. The results showed that the energy intake reported via this tool was higher than that obtained using the traditional 24-hour dietary recall interview method (reference tool). As a result, macronutrient intakes were also higher with RiksmatenFlexDiet. This highlights a low level of agreement between the two methods, in contrast to the high level of agreement observed between the validated Food Survey method and the RA24H for the same parameters.</p>
   <p>This difference in validation levels can be explained by the context in which each method is applied. The Food Survey approach, carried out in a collective setting, allows better control of the survey process, thus reducing potential bias. On the other hand, the individual nature of the survey carried out with RiksmatenFlexDiet may lead to reporting bias, particularly due to difficulties in checking the information entered by the participants themselves.</p>
   <p>The Food Survey offers several notable advantages. First of all, it has the particularity of associating a computerized composition table and the photography of foods and their units of measurement with a “software package” housing the algorithms allowing to obtain the automatic results of individual food consumption surveys in a community diet. Advantageous, also because each subject can, based on their usual consumption, have a mental representation of the portions of food consumed and make a connection with those of the photographs to solve the problem of the individual quantification of rations during collective meals common in Chad where several people share the same meal in a single dish. Then, it takes into account in the calculations, the nutrient content of each ingredient in the mixed dishes. The consideration of traditional units of measurement in digital technology reconciling cultural values with new information and communication technologies (NICT) is also put in the asset of this new tool. Finally, the Food Survey stands out from other technological tools in use today by its dynamic profile, unlike the latter which are static, limited in time and space of their maneuvers. It has the capacity to modify the parameters in existing databases, record new data to complete or reconstruct existing ones. It has the privilege of being operational at all times and in all places.</p>
   <p>Although this study provides valuable and still little-explored data, it has certain limitations that deserve to be highlighted. First, The study focused on a small sample of elite Chadian combat athletes, which makes it impossible to generalize the results to all Chadian athletes and other populations. For this reason, a study with a representative and inclusive sample of the entire sporting and/or non-sporting population would be desirable. Second, the data collection took place at a specific time of the season (the pre-season), a period when weight management requirements are often less strict than during competition periods. Furthermore, only certain age categories were included, which could mask potential differences in nutritional needs among young athletes. Thus, future research should verify whether the conclusions of this study are valid for all sports and for various age groups. Finally, conducting a study with large samples would allow for further generalization of the use of this tool to all Chadian athletes.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>The data show overall consistency between the two methods (RA24h and Food Servely) for the majority of macronutrients. Differences between methods remain overall small for most parameters (&lt;5%), indicating that and RA24h produce similar results. This reinforces the reliability of Food Servely methods for estimating mean energy and nutrient intakes of Chadian martial arts athletes. Developing dietary assessment methods to achieve a limited degree of underreporting is therefore a major challenge for future research.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Author Contribution</title>
   <p>All authors reviewed and validated the final version of the manuscript</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     De Keyzer, W., Bracke, T., McNaughton, S., Parnell, W., Moshfegh, A., Pereira, R., et al. (2015) Cross-Continental Comparison of National Food Consumption Survey Methods—A Narrative Review. Nutrients, 7, 3587-3620. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7053587</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Department of Health (2013) Department of Health Annual Report and Accounts 2013 to 2014 [Annual Report and Accounts]. 
     <u>&gt;https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-of-health-annual-report-and-accounts-2013-to-2014</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Baranauskas, M., Jablonskienė, V., Abaravičius, J.A. and Stukas, R. (2020) Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Diet Quality Profile of the Lithuanian Team of Deaf Women’s Basketball Players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, Article 6749. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186749</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     CIFOR (2023) Infléchir la trajectore. Impact Report. 
     <u>&gt;https://www.cifor-icraf.org/impactreport2023/fr/accueil/</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brown, K.A., Timotijevic, L., Barnett, J., Shepherd, R., Lähteenmäki, L. and Raats, M.M. (2011) A Review of Consumer Awareness, Understanding and Use of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines. British Journal of Nutrition, 106, 15-26. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114511000250</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Burke, L.M., Hawley, J.A., Wong, S.H.S. and Jeukendrup, A.E. (2011) Carbohydrates for Training and Competition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29, S17-S27. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.585473</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Casazza, G.A., Tovar, A.P., Richardson, C.E., Cortez, A.N. and Davis, B.A. (2018) Energy Availability, Macronutrient Intake, and Nutritional Supplementation for Improving Exercise Performance in Endurance Athletes. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 17, 215-223. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1249/jsr.0000000000000494</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dop, M., Gomis, M., Gourdon, M. and Lesauvage, S. (2003) Outils d’enquête alimentaire par entretien: Élaboration au Sénégal. IRD Éditions. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.10574</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Eyles, H., Jiang, Y. and Ni Mhurchu, C. (2010) Use of Household Supermarket Sales Data to Estimate Nutrient Intakes: A Comparison with Repeat 24-Hour Dietary Recalls. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 110, 106-110. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.005</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     FAO. (2007) L’état des ressources zoogénétiques pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture dans le monde.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huybrechts, I., Aglago, E.K., Mullee, A., De Keyzer, W., Leclercq, C., Allemand, P., et al. (2017) Global Comparison of National Individual Food Consumption Surveys as a Basis for Health Research and Integration in National Health Surveillance Programmes. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 76, 549-567. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665117001161</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kerksick, C.M., Wilborn, C.D., Roberts, M.D., Smith-Ryan, A., Kleiner, S.M., Jäger, R., et al. (2018) ISSN Exercise&amp;Sports Nutrition Review Update: Research&amp;Recommendations. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 15, Article ID: 38. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-018-0242-y</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lindroos, A.K., Petrelius Sipinen, J., Axelsson, C., Nyberg, G., Landberg, R., Leanderson, P., et al. (2019) Use of a Web-Based Dietary Assessment Tool (Riksmatenflex) in Swedish Adolescents: Comparison and Validation Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21, e12572. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.2196/12572</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lombard, M.J., Steyn, N.P., Charlton, K.E. and Senekal, M. (2015) Application and Interpretation of Multiple Statistical Tests to Evaluate Validity of Dietary Intake Assessment Methods. Nutrition Journal, 14, Article No. 40. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-015-0027-y</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Medin, A.C., Hansen, B.H., Astrup, H., Ekelund, U. and Frost Andersen, L. (2017) Validation of Energy Intake from a Web-Based Food Recall for Children and Adolescents. PLOS ONE, 12, e0178921. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178921</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     El Mesmoudi, N., Al Dhaheri, A.S., Feehan, J., Stojanovska, L. and Ali, H.I. (2022) Validation of a Quantitative Web-Based Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Dietary Intake in the Adult Emirati Population. PLOS ONE, 17, e0262150. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262150</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moussouami, S.I., Nigan, I.B., Boussana, A.M., Biniakounou, P.V., Nouatin, B. and Mbemba, F. (2020) Evaluation de l’efficacité d’un programme d’entrainement combiné à une éducation nutritionnelle chez les adolescents obèses. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 14, 353-363. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i2.4</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Murphy, J., Holmes, J. and Brooks, C. (2017) Measurements of Daily Energy Intake and Total Energy Expenditure in People with Dementia in Care Homes: The Use of Wearable Technology. The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 21, 927-932. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-017-0870-y</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pelly, F.E., Thurecht, R.L. and Slater, G. (2022) Determinants of Food Choice in Athletes: A Systematic Scoping Review. Sports Medicine—Open, 8, Article No. 77. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-022-00461-8</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pendergast, F.J., Leech, R.M. and McNaughton, S.A. (2017) Novel Online or Mobile Methods to Assess Eating Patterns. Current Nutrition Reports, 6, 212-227. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-017-0211-0</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Peralta, M., Heskey, C., Shavlik, D., Knutsen, S., Mashchak, A., Jaceldo-Siegl, K., et al. (2021) Validity of FFQ Estimates of Total Sugars, Added Sugars, Sucrose and Fructose Compared to Repeated 24-H Recalls in Adventist Health Study-2 Participants. Nutrients, 13, Article 4152. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13114152</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vepsäläinen, H., Nevalainen, J., Kinnunen, S., Itkonen, S.T., Meinilä, J., Männistö, S., et al. (2021) Do We Eat What We Buy? Relative Validity of Grocery Purchase Data as an Indicator of Food Consumption in the Locard Study. British Journal of Nutrition, 128, 1780-1788. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114521004177</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wong, J.E., Parnell, W.R., Black, K.E. and Skidmore, P.M. (2012) Reliability and Relative Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Food Group Intakes in New Zealand Adolescents. Nutrition Journal, 11, Article No. 65. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-11-65</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, Y., Gu, D., Luo, M., Liu, S., Peng, H. and Jia, Y. (2024) Relative Validity of an Intelligent Ordering System to Estimate Dietary Intake among University Students from a Medical School in Shanghai, China. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 21, Article No. 70. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01619-1</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Susanto, Siswantoyo, Prasetyo, Y. and Putranta, H. (2021) The Effect of Circuit Training on Physical Fitness and Archery Accuracy in Novice Athletes. Physical Activity Review, 9, 100-108. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.16926/par.2021.09.12</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tabacchi, G., Filippi, A.R., Amodio, E., Jemni, M., Bianco, A., Firenze, A., et al. (2015) A Meta-Analysis of the Validity of FFQ Targeted to Adolescents. Public Health Nutrition, 19, 1168-1183. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980015002505</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Thomas, D.T., Erdman, K.A. and Burke, L.M. (2016) American College of Sports Medicine Joint Position Statement. Nutrition and Athletic Performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 48, 543-568. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000852</u> 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141724-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     USDA (2020) Composition of Foods Raw, Processed, Prepared USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 28 [Dataset]. Nutrient Data Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, ARS, USDA. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/1324304</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>