<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajibm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     American Journal of Industrial and Business Management
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2164-5167
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2164-5175
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ajibm.2025.153025
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajibm-141682
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Business 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Economics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Motivational Factors to Multi-Level Marketing: The Moderating Role of Trust
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Françoise Delphine Ngo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Omam
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Bertrand Sogbossi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bocco
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aManagement and Human Resources Laboratory (MHRL), Department of Management, Strategy and Prospective, Faculty of Economics of Management, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aResearch Center for Entrepreneurship, Growth and Innovation (RCEGI), Faculty of Economics of Management, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     10
    </day> 
    <month>
     03
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    03
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    531
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    550
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      25,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Despite the numerous works done on multi-level marketing, there is still some light to be highlighted on the role of trust. This article examines the factors motivating adherence to multi-level marketing and the moderating inﬂuence of trust in the relationship between these factors and membership. On a sample of 662 distributors in the cities of Cameroon, analyzes of structural equation methods made it possible to realize that monthly income, perceived quality of products and services, organizational mode and personal development are the four factors which motivate adherence to the activity. Trust positively intensiﬁes established relationships; its inﬂuence is stronger than the income received monthly. In addition, the Credibility dimension seems to have more effect on adherence 2 factors such as benevolence.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Multi-Level Marketing
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Trust
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Perceived Quality
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Organizational Mode
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Personal Development
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Membership
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Multi-level marketing (MLM) seems to be the most effective sales method today. It represents one of the fastest growing global industries with exponential progression in recruitment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-5">
     Bosley &amp; Mckeage, 2014
    </xref>). According to World Federation of Direct Selling Associations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-59">
     WFDSA, 2016
    </xref>), the number of distributors in the world, increased from 10.3 million in 2005 to 117 million in 2018, with an estimated sales volume of more than $200 billion. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-25">
     Groß and Vriens (2019)
    </xref> identiﬁed 500 MLM companies worldwide. Africa and Cameroon in particular, are not left out. Forever, JMO, Tianshi, Mary Kay, Green Word, Trevo, GN4L and most recently Qnet, represent the companies that have marked the territory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-5">
     Bosley &amp; Mckaege, 2014
    </xref>). MLM is of interest major for the company and the distributor. The company easily manages to penetrate the market and sell its products while the distributor is remunerated through various bonuses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-24">
     Gregor &amp; Wadlewski, 2013
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>This MLM growth has given rise to numerous works which have lingered on its effectiveness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-5">
     Bosley &amp; Mckeage, 2014
    </xref>); its difference from traditional marketing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-24">
     Gregor &amp; Wadlewski, 2013
    </xref>); its development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-58">
     Wadlewski, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-21">
     Geevarghese et al., 2016
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-44">
     Njoto-Feillard, 2016
    </xref>); its perception by consumers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-57">
     Vassileva, 2017
    </xref>); her contribution to the development of society (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-29">
     Hatchaleelaha, 2016
    </xref>); its ethical problems, legal and moral as well as its comparison to pyramid structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-8">
     Cardenas &amp; Fuchs-Tarlovsky, 2018
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-25">
     Groß &amp; Vriens, 2019
    </xref>). Recently, work has focused on the economic model of operation of these businesses in competitive and non-competitive markets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-51">
     Reingewertz, 2021
    </xref>), their compensation plan and the resulting possibilities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-52">
     Roman et al., 2021
    </xref>), the failure of their marketing strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-40">
     Malshe et al., 2021
    </xref>), the distinct tensions in the hierarchical levels and the mechanisms that can manage them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-39">
     Malshe &amp; Krush, 2021
    </xref>) some research has been focused on the distributors who represent the main actors. In this regard, the determinants of their satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
     Lee &amp; Loi, 2016
    </xref>); the factors explaining their performance and their maintenance in the network (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-38">
     Liman, 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-53">
     Sagarino &amp; Rubi, 2016
    </xref>); the management of conﬂictual relationships between them and their godchildren (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-36">
     Koroth &amp; Sardana, 2012
    </xref>) are discussed. The authors also sought to understand the reasons that push distributors to integrate MLM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
     Sourav et al., 2015
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-47">
     Parvin &amp; Kabir, 2011
    </xref>). It includes social responsibility, personal development, personal freedom and professional lifestyle. Along the same lines, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-13">
     Dixon et al. (2023)
    </xref> focused on the personal characteristics that increase attraction and participation in MLM, notably, Amway and Herbalife. Their research reveals that the psychological characteristics such as belief systems, thinking styles and behaviors extrinsic elements are associated with it. This research was limited to the direct relationship between motivating factors to MLM which, however, is mainly based on the relational capital of its members. The distributor is forced to exploit his social network to sell products and attract new members, which supposes a relationship of trust between the latter and his prospect. Conﬁdence is the presumption that in situation of uncertainty, the upline will react in accordance with downline expectations. Some authors have established the inﬂuence of trust in the organizations and in direct sales relationships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-2">
     Andreani et al., 2014
    </xref>). Trust represents a principal vector in favor of relational orientations, and contributes enormously to the stability and guarantee of exchanges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-19">
     Gatfaoui, 2003
    </xref>). The moderating role of trust has been established in many researches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-55">
     Shiromani et al., 2017
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-50">
     Randeree et al., 2005
    </xref>) but none of them has studied its inﬂuence on the relationship between motivational factors and MLM membership. Indeed, classic, traditional or even transactional marketing is focused on sales and seeks to generate as many sales as possible in the short term. It is based on the 4P model which today is widely called into question.</p>
   <p><sup>1</sup>New distributor under the supervision of up lines and most often located at the bottom level of the hierarchy.</p>
   <p><sup>2</sup>Distributor who already carries out the activity, recruits new members and supports them.</p>
   <p>In fact, the consumer is no longer obliged to travel to buy; advice, recommendations and trust are inseparable from consumer decision-making. These ﬁndings require multi-level marketing which is a form of relationship marketing and which is based on the idea that it is less costly to retain an existing customer than to generate a new one. It is a strategy of long term designed to encourage interaction and engagement between the product, the seller/customer and prospect. The objective is to develop close relationships with customers by providing them with information and solutions directly adapted to their needs and interests. However, MLM is a practice that does not require intermediaries, and its foundation lies in the relationships, the human interactions which require trust (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-36">
     Koroth &amp; Sardana, 2012
    </xref>). Prospects join MLM mainly due to persuasion by friends, colleagues and relatives. Earning the trust of prospects is crucial for distributors, because trust makes it easier a relationship of exchange while distrust slows it down. Although the role of trust has been established in classic marketing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-55">
     Shiromani et al., 2017
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-26">
     Gurviez, 2003
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-50">
     Randeree et al., 2005
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-27">
     Gurviez &amp; Korchia, 2002
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-20">
     Gatfaoui &amp; Lavorata, 2001
    </xref>), taking into account the differences presented (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="tableA1">
     Table A1
    </xref>), we believe that in MLM, where trust occupies a primordial place, the debates concerning it remain current. Despite the meteoric rise of MLM in Central Africa and particularly in Cameroon and the opportunities it offers, the sociologized reality leaves appear that, this new form of marketing is struggling to win universal suffrage cause of abundant criticism and limits made to it and which, consequently, lead to not only the reluctance of prospects, but also and above all, the discouragement or the abandonment of many distributors. He ﬂirts too often with pyramid selling considered a scam in which the sale of the product/service serves to mask membership which will promote the enrichment of distributors located at the upper level of the pyramid. Its recruitment practices are linked to problematic behaviors, which probably arise, among other things, from the exploitation and harassment of relationships. At Cameroon, interactions between people raise issues of trust. About it, MLM scandals followed one after another and conﬁdence deteriorated, thus sparking a major debate on the viability of this sales method for practices deemed unfair by some. If network marketing has enabled certain distributors to create a niche of opportunities, others, in this case the “godchildren”<sup>1</sup>, admit to having “left feathers”<sup>2</sup>, tired of waiting for the millions and the fallacious promises dangled to them their sponsors. How can we understand that such a widespread, vaunted and recommended by its promoters, cannot achieve unanimous support in Cameroon? It arises from then, a real problem of trust between the godchild or downline and the sponsor or upline which makes him recruit into the activity. The aim of this research is therefore to highlight the moderating inﬂuence of trust on the relationship between motivational factors and MLM membership. More precisely, we will provide answers to the following questions: What are the factors that motivate to MLM in Cameroon? Does trust moderate the relationship between motivational factors and membership in MLM? This work will contribute on a theoretical level to ﬂeshing out the literature on factors intensifying the relationship between motivational factors and membership in MLM. On a managerial level, it will allow MLM companies to better direct their strategies and communication on different factors highlighted in order to develop their business and have the most distributors possible. We present the theoretical framework, the methodology as well as the different results obtained.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Theoretical Background and Hypothesis</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Motivational Factors</title>
    <p>Multi-level marketing refers to a sales network structure in which resellers sell products to customers but also can sponsor new sellers, and be then partly remunerated by a commission assessed as a percentage on the sales of the recruits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-25">
      Groß &amp; Vriens, 2019
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-4">
      Mehdi Ba, 2016
     </xref>). The uplines or sponsors are the distributors who recruit new distributors into the activity and generate bonuses on the group’s collective sales. Downlines that represent new distributors recruited or referrals help to increase overall sales by allowing uplines to access high commissions. MLM marketing eliminates costs and offers businesses the opportunity to promote their products and services using customer relationships distributors. The literature reveals several intrinsic and extrinsic motivators that determine membership in MLM. Many researchers have established that perceived ﬁnancial rewards, the perceived quality of products and services, the organizational mode and personal development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-10">
      Choudhary, 2013
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
      Lee &amp; Loi, 2016
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
      Sourav et al., 2015
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-7">
      Cameron &amp; Spreitzer, 2012
     </xref>) constitute the main motivations for membership to network marketing. Which justiﬁes the ﬁrst hypothesis:</p>
    <p>H1. Multi-level marketing membership is inﬂuenced by numerous determinants.</p>
    <p>MLM Compensation Plan Allows Distributors to Earn Income extra monthly payments and access to ﬁnancial fulﬁllment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-10">
      Choudhary, 2013
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-47">
      Parvin &amp; Kabir, 2011
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-11">
      Coughlan &amp; Grayson; 1998
     </xref>). The latter gives the right to co2mmissions of sales and various bonuses relating to the activity of the distributor and its downlines. This activity is full time for some while for others it is a means of accessing extra monthly income. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-43">
      Nga and Soo (2011)
     </xref>, young people consider MLM as a permanent career option to supplement their income. For <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-15">
      Effiom and Archibong (2015)
     </xref>, there is a strong positive link between MLM and income generation. They maintain that it is a real source of income and creation of jobs. The highlight of MLM is that it provides opportunities to income to low-skilled workers, making it attractive to low-skill workers average (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-61">
      Wilson, 1999
     </xref>). MLM can provide access to the complement of income in addition to the main activity. These ﬁnancial rewards are likely to attract new arrivals into the network hence the ﬁrst hypothesis:</p>
    <p>H1.1. Extra monthly income perceived has a positive inﬂuence on MLM membership.</p>
    <p>MLM distributors most often rely on the appeal of their products and services to market them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-35">
      Koe &amp; Soo, 2011
     </xref>). The perceived value of the product is then linked to the expertise of the sellers and the personal relationship which links them to the buyer. In Indeed, consumers are more and more demanding and focus on the quality of products. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-54">
      Shirani et al. (2014)
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-31">
      Jumpon et al. (2013)
     </xref>, product quality is a factor which leads distributors not only to join the network, but also to join it perpetuate. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
      Sourav et al. (2015)
     </xref>, consumers want to fulﬁll their needs by consuming innovative, nutritious and good quality products. Besides, MLM offers the possibility to consumers to attest to the quality of products through tests and demonstrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-9">
      Chaubey &amp; Subramanian, 2013
     </xref>) which are generally carried out when presenting the product or activity. Meeting customer expectations is imperative to succeed in any business and not being able to provide them with the right product is considered a death trap (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
      Lee &amp; Loi, 2016
     </xref>). Users who are satisﬁed with the quality of MLM products become distributors especially when high doses of positive images were shared (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-49">
      Pratt &amp; Rosa, 2003
     </xref>). We therefore propose this hypothesis:</p>
    <p>H1.2. The perceived quality of products and services positively determines MLM membership.</p>
    <p>Organizational mode is, according to several works, one of the factors of membership and distributor satisfaction. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
      Sourav et al. (2015)
     </xref> discuss personal freedom and work techniques. According to these authors, the possibility of working freely and everywhere, easy entry, access to leadership, being your own boss, are elements that motivate membership in MLM. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
      Lee and Loi (2016)
     </xref> believe that, support from the upline is associated with MLM membership. They claim that the relationship between the two is very important and that the upline must guide and support the downline to hope for income considerable. For <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-49">
      Pratt and Rosa (2003)
     </xref>, emotional support, information sharing and practical orientation are all elements which determine the support and satisfaction of the prospects. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-32">
      Keep and Nat (2014)
     </xref>, the recruitment process is the key to MLM growth. The perception network of the recruitment process goes according to these authors, inﬂuence engagement in marketing. Organizational training undertaken by MLM organizations is important for distributors and companies because they not only help distributors develop their skills professionals but also to recruit new members (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-12">
      Dai et al., 2011
     </xref>). Perception of the quality of training programs positively inﬂuences satisfaction and adherence distributors. For many distributors interviewed, the mode of communication was inﬂuenced their membership. All these organizational aspects of MLM company’s determine the motivation of distributors to join the activity, which justiﬁes:</p>
    <p>H1.3. Organizational mode positively determines MLM membership.</p>
    <p>Personal development practices are regularly used in training initial and ongoing of managers in the development of management and leadership (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-60">
      Whetten &amp; Cameron, 2011
     </xref>) as well as in professional support such as coaching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-48">
      Persson et al., 2011
     </xref>). Personal development then adapts to self-knowledge, self-esteem, interpersonal skills, communication skills, the ability to motivate or mobilize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-7">
      Cameron &amp; Spreitzer, 2012
     </xref>). Network Marketing trains and develops its distributors by enabling them not only to become good business people but also better people in society. Regularly, the MLM organizations provide training, subject distributors to mentoring programs; undertake motivating events and sharing sessions which allow distributors to ﬂourish professionally, to mature their projects as well as their skills and to care more about others. These programs training include reading programs that contribute to the development of distributors. MLM not only allows the distributor to expand its social network but also to care more about alters. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
      Sourav et al. (2015)
     </xref> as well as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
      Lee and Loi (2016)
     </xref> argue that personal development is one of the factors that determine multi-level marketing membership, which leads us to propose the hypothesis:</p>
    <p>H1.4. Personal development positively inﬂuences MLM membership.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. The Moderating Role of Trust in the Relationship between Motivational Factors and MLM Membership</title>
    <p>Trust is a crucial concept in marketing and makes it possible to establish, develop and maintain important relational exchanges. It is the set of beliefs reassuring the client that the intentions as well as the behaviors of one’s exchange partner will produce the results expected (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-17">
      Frisou, 2000
     </xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-19">
      Gatfaoui (2003)
     </xref>, it refers to the belief that a partner has, as to the reliability of the written or verbal promises and words of another partner. Let’s consider conﬁdence as the belief that the upline is capable of achieving long-term obligations in accordance with the needs and interests of its downline. Trust is the basis of any relationship and any exchange. It represents a key variable in the development of relationships with customers and guarantees the stability of exchanges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-20">
      Gatfaoui &amp; Lavorata, 2001
     </xref>), reduces uncertainty in an uncertain environment and represents a means of security for customers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-22">
      Georges &amp; Decock Good, 2004
     </xref>). She contributes to reducing not only the opportunism of actors, their risk of deception, but also transaction costs. It ensures the longevity of social networks, represents a membership mobile. The effects of trust according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-33">
      Khlif (2014)
     </xref> are of three types: intentions of continuity and cooperation, affective attitudes which relate to orientation in the long term, commitment and satisfaction; ﬁnally, economic results. Trust represents a source of information, a quality indicator and a means of guarantee for prospects who wish to join the network. The relational approach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-27">
      Gurviez &amp; Korchia, 2002
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-3">
      Aurier &amp; N’Goala, 2010
     </xref>) oriented on the relationship with the customer and whose goal is not only to acquire, but above all to retain customers, is part of this logic and a long-term perspective. In reality, by reducing the area of uncertainty, knowledge reciprocity facilitates the establishment of trust which in turn promotes not only adhesion to products but also to MLM activity. In such a relationship, trust is a fundamental element of the life stages of the prospect-relationship distributor, namely the creation, maintenance and termination of relationships. The approach relational seeks stability between the distributor and its prospect based on mutual loyalty. Trust has been established in numerous researches as a moderating variable among others, the adoption of products and services (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-55">
      Shiromani et al., 2017
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-50">
      Randeree et al., 2005
     </xref>). We believe in the context of this research that it can moderate the relationship between the motivational factors and MLM membership. Thus, we predict that:</p>
    <p>H2: Trust moderates the relationship between motivational factors and MLM membership.</p>
    <p>H2.1. Trust moderates the relationship between extra monthly income perceived and MLM membership.</p>
    <p>H2.2. Trust moderates the relationship between the perceived quality of products and services and MLM membership.</p>
    <p>H2.3. Trust moderates the relationship between the organizational mode and MLM membership.</p>
    <p>H2.4. Trust moderates the relationship between personal development and MLM membership.</p>
    <p>This research focuses on six variables: four explanatory variables (monthly income, perception of products and services, organizational mode, personal development); a moderating variable (trust) and a variable to be explained (MLM Membership) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Research model. Source: Ourselves.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123655-rId14.jpeg?20250409014107" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Method</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Sampling</title>
    <p>Our study area is Cameroon. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
      Sourav et al. (2015)
     </xref> highlighted the limit of their research which focused exclusively on distributors when it would be more interesting to also consider consumers. For this, distributors of MLM products who have consumed products constitute the population of basis of this research, due to the fact that they can better perceive the products and services. We used the convenience method to constitute our sample, given the fact that there is no oﬃcial document indicating MLM members. The methodology used is both qualitative and quantitative. From 10 As of April 17, 2020, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 distributors. We reached saturation on 19<sup>th</sup> and added three others to reassure ourselves of this saturation the information sought focused on two key points: the factors motivating support for network marketing and the trust of the downline or godchild in the upline or godfather. The data obtained from these interviews were the subject of a thematic analysis. Of content which consisted of analyzing the signiﬁcant elements of the discussions and grouping together the sentences and responses deemed equivalent according to themes. Based on a scale of Three-point Likert ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”, we have built around several items, a questionnaire comprising two parts. The ﬁrst carried on MLM membership, contributing factors and trust; the second part was based on the socio-demographic variables of the respondents. The choice of this three-point scale is based on the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-46">
      Ouattara (1997)
     </xref> on small business managers in Africa. In reality, the general low level of these entrepreneurs and the illiteracy of the majority of populations in Africa do not often allow them to differentiate between expressions like “very good” and “good”, “bad” and “mediocre” or “rather agree” and “agree”. The confusion generally observed in these expressions renders 5 or 7 point scales ineffective. This situation recommends favoring 3-point attitude measurement scales for surveys in underdeveloped countries. The questionnaire was administered in June 2022, in the cities of Douala, Yaoundé, and Bafoussam, with 700 distributors working in various network marketing companies, regardless of their demographic characteristics. Network marketing is much more developed in these three cities, hence their choice. 673 questionnaires were collected, which expresses a rate return of 96.14%. Finally, only 662 were found to be usable. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref> summarizes the characteristics of the sample.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-"></xref>Table 1. Distribution of the sample by age and sex.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="57.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Socio-demographic criteria</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="18.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Size</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="24.24%"><p style="text-align:center">%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="57.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Male</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.20%"><p style="text-align:center">277</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.24%"><p style="text-align:center">41.84</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Female</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.20%"><p style="text-align:center">385</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.24%"><p style="text-align:center">58.16</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.56%"><p style="text-align:center">[20 - 40]</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.20%"><p style="text-align:center">269</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.24%"><p style="text-align:center">40.64</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.56%"><p style="text-align:center">over 40 years</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.20%"><p style="text-align:center">393</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.24%"><p style="text-align:center">592.36</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.56%"><p style="text-align:center">unemployed</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.20%"><p style="text-align:center">242</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.24%"><p style="text-align:center">36.56</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.56%"><p style="text-align:center">With employment</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.20%"><p style="text-align:center">420</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.24%"><p style="text-align:center">63.44</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="57.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.20%"><p style="text-align:center">662</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.24%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Results of our surveys, September 2021.</p>
    <p>Consumer distributors of network marketing products and services are mostly women (58.16%). The majority of them are over 40 years old (59.36%) and with a job (63.44%). We were unable to make a comparison with the overall population of MLM distributors in Cameroon. It is true that there are several MLM companies, but they have not disclosed the number of distributors registered for the activity. Our attempts to access this information, even from some MLM companies such as JMO or QNET where we are a distributor, were unsuccessful. For this reason, we limited ourselves to interpreting the demographic statistics of the study.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Measurements and Materials</title>
    <p>This work focuses on six variables each having one or more dimensions. Each dimension is assessed by a set of items measured on a three-way Likert-type scale points for reasons mentioned by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-46">
      Ouattara (1997)
     </xref>. This author established that the low level general of respondents from SMEs in underdeveloped countries and the illiteracy of the majority of populations in Africa do not allow them to differentiate between the ﬁve expressions present in the ﬁve-point Likert scale.</p>
    <p>Extra monthly income perceived: Based on the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
      Lee and Loi (2016)
     </xref> and our exploratory study, we retained 6 items for this one-dimensional variable.</p>
    <p>The perceived quality of products and services: it represents the difference between the expectations of the consumer regarding the performance of the product and service and their perceptions of product and service. We used the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-23">
      Giordano (2006)
     </xref> measurement scale which includes three dimensions: perceived basic quality (05 items), quality of services renderings (03 items) and the sign of quality perceived at ﬁrst glance (02 items).</p>
    <p>The organizational mode: It refers to the different work techniques used by the members of network marketing. We adapted the measurement scale from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-26">
      Sourav et al. (2015)
     </xref> which is one-dimensional and includes 6 items. Two items came from exploration. In total, eight items are used to measure this variable.</p>
    <p>Personal development: it is a heterogeneous set of practices, belonging to various currents of thought, which aim to improve self-knowledge, development of talents and potential, improvement of the quality of personal life, realization of his aspirations and dreams. The measure adopted for this work comes from the work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-30">
      Jaotombo and Brasseur (2013)
     </xref>. This measurement model considers the development personal as a second-order factor with 4 dimensions: mental development professional (05 items), private mental development (03 items), positive emotions (04 items) and mastery in the activity (03 items).</p>
    <p>Trust is understood as a one-dimensional variable by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-42">
      Morgan and Hunt (1994)
     </xref>. For other authors, it is two-dimensional and refers to credibility as well as perceived benevolence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-18">
      Ganesan, 1994
     </xref>). It is three-dimensional according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-27">
      Gurviez and Korchia (2002)
     </xref> and is based on credibility, integrity and benevolence. We can say within ourselves inspired by the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-27">
      Gurviez and Korchia (2002)
     </xref> that credibility represents the evaluation the capacity of the upline to fulﬁll its obligations concerning the network. Integrity represents the attribution of loyal motivations to the upline, with regard to respecting its promises regarding the term of the exchange. Finally, benevolence allows the downline to consider a less uncertain future given that sustainability of the conditions for a fair exchange is offered. The exploratory study highlighted two dimensions of trust: credibility (3 items) and kindness (3 items). Respondents strongly equated integrity with credibility. For this, we retained the two-dimensional measurement scale proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-18">
      Ganesan (1994)
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>MLM membership is one-dimensional and has been measured through research by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-16">
      Fredette and Guay (2014)
     </xref> through 5 items. The exploratory study ultimately allowed us to generate 4 new items emanating from the organizational mode and monthly income perceived. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tableA2">
      Table A2
     </xref> summarizes the measurement of the variables. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref> reports the validation of the measurement model.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-"></xref>Table 2. Validation of the measurement model.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="20.10%"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Alpha of Cronbach</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">Rhô of Jöreskog</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="31.87%"><p style="text-align:center">PVC of Fornell and Lacker</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.10%"><p style="text-align:center">MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.32%"><p style="text-align:center">0.929</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">0.88</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.649</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.10%"><p style="text-align:center">OM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.32%"><p style="text-align:center">0.959</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">0.926</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.764</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.10%"><p style="text-align:center">EMIP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.32%"><p style="text-align:center">0.932</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">0.966</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.727</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.10%"><p style="text-align:center">TR</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.32%"><p style="text-align:center">0. 938</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">0.943</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.782</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.10%"><p style="text-align:center">PD</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.32%"><p style="text-align:center">0.955</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">0.894</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.805</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.10%"><p style="text-align:center">PQ</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.32%"><p style="text-align:center">0.908</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.71%"><p style="text-align:center">0.927</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.730</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Our analysis. MLMM = Multi-level Marketing Membership; TR = Trust; OM = Organizational mode; DP = Personal development; EMIP = Extra monthly income perceived; PQ = Perceived quality.</p>
    <p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>, the values of the different coeﬃcients Alpha of Cronbach, Rhô of Fromell and Larker’s Jöreskog and PVC establish good reliability, validity and consistency internal of all measurement scales. To examine direct relationships, we used ﬁt indices and three others elements recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-34">
      Kline (2011)
     </xref>: determination coeﬃcients; the signiﬁcance coeﬃcients of determination or statistical tests of the causal links which is given by the value of Student’s t; the percentage of variance of the endogenous variable or squared multiple correlation (R<sup>2</sup>). To estimate the moderating role of trust in relationship motivation factors-MLM membership, we used the analysis multigroup (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-34">
      Kline, 2011
     </xref>). For this, two groups were created for each of the modalities 2 of the moderator (credibility and benevolence), i.e., four groups in total. Each of the groups was divided into absence and presence of credibility and benevolence. Afterwards, the invariance of the relationships between each of the two groups is tested. We compared the free model to a constrained model and the Chi-square difference test was carried out between the two models. The moderating effect is then proven when the Chi-square difference is signiﬁcant. Structural equations are used to test structural models and moderation links, thanks to the Amos software. For validation of the measurement model, we used SPSS software to carry out the ﬁrst-order factor analysis and using Amos software for conﬁrmatory factor analysis.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results and Discussions</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. The Determinants of MLM Membership</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> presents the results of the hypothesis of the different direct links.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-"></xref>Table 3. Test of the structural model relating to direct links.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">Hypo</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Relation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="7.37%"><p style="text-align:center">Estimate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">SE</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">CR</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="5.10%"><p style="text-align:center">P</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="6.68%"><p style="text-align:center">CMIN</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.84%"><p style="text-align:center">CMIN/DF</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="4.42%"><p style="text-align:center">P</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="6.73%"><p style="text-align:center">RMSEA</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="5.67%"><p style="text-align:center">GFI</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">TLI</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">CFI</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">NFI</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Decision</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">H1.1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.79%"><p style="text-align:center">EMIP-MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.37%"><p style="text-align:center">0.642</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">0.075</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">8.538</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="5.10%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="6.68%"><p style="text-align:center">166.780</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.84%"><p style="text-align:center">3.879</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="4.42%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="6.73%"><p style="text-align:center">0.089</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="5.67%"><p style="text-align:center">0.926</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.952</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.963</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.951</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.66%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">H1.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.79%"><p style="text-align:center">PQ-MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.37%"><p style="text-align:center">0.811</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">0.072</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">11.286</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.10%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.68%"><p style="text-align:center">284.266</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.84%"><p style="text-align:center">3.305</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="4.42%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.73%"><p style="text-align:center">0.080</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.67%"><p style="text-align:center">0.904</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.947</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.957</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.940</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.66%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">H1.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.79%"><p style="text-align:center">OM-MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.37%"><p style="text-align:center">0.288</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">0.052</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">5.563</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.10%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.68%"><p style="text-align:center">214.11</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.84%"><p style="text-align:center">6.297</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="4.42%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.73%"><p style="text-align:center">0.066</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.67%"><p style="text-align:center">0.891</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.935</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.951</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.942</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.66%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">H1.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.79%"><p style="text-align:center">PD-MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.37%"><p style="text-align:center">0.669</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">0.083</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.89%"><p style="text-align:center">8.106</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.10%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.68%"><p style="text-align:center">380.112</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.84%"><p style="text-align:center">2.304</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="4.42%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.73%"><p style="text-align:center">0.060</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.67%"><p style="text-align:center">0.905</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.969</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.973</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="5.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.954</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.66%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Our analysis.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> reveals that all values of the regression coeﬃcients, as well as the t tests of student are signiﬁcant; similarly, the Fit indices are all well-adjusted, leading to the validation of all direct links. We can therefore conclude that, extra income monthly income perceived, the perceived quality of products and services, the organizational mode as well as personal development are the factors that determine MLM membership. The effectiveness of the relationship between monthly income and MLM membership corroborates the ﬁndings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
      Sourav et al. (2015)
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
      Lee and Loi (2016)
     </xref> according to which the extra monthly income received is not only a factor in customer satisfaction distributors, but also a motivating factor for the accession of new members. Although mainly made up of employed people (60.77%), our sample reveals that Prospects are attracted to network marketing activity because of the monthly ﬁnancial extras accessible. The validation of our second sub-hypothesis conforms to the work of numerous authors who have established a link between the perceived quality of the product and the decision of the consumer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-28">
      Hasanzade et al., 2018
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
      Lee and Loi, 2016
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-45">
      Osburg et al., 2017
     </xref>). Cameroonians prospects are sensitive to the quality of MLM products which convinces them to integrate the activity. Third, in agreement with the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
      Sourav et al. (2015)
     </xref>, the mode organizational structure of network marketing companies encourages many prospects to join the activity. They are more join the network work freely, anytime and anywhere, be their own boss, communicate easily, experience fulﬁlled leadership. According to our fourth sub-hypothesis, the personal development that network marketing companies share is a factor motivating the accession of new distributors. This result corroborates with the work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
      Sourav et al. (2015)
     </xref> as well as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
      Lee and Loi (2016)
     </xref> who argue that ﬂourishing and personal development that distributors gain from network marketing motivates prospects to join the network. In fact, many people are increasingly interested more to personal development, considered a factor of business success.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. The Moderating Role of Trust between Motivational Factors and MLM Membership</title>
    <p>Results of the moderating effect of trust on established relationships are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-"></xref>Table 4. Moderating effect of credibility on the relationships between motivational factors and MLM membership.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="30.77%"><p style="text-align:center">Hypothesis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="20.10%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Low credibility</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="20.10%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">High credibility</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Over all effects</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="13.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Decision</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">Β</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">P</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">Β</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">P</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.64%"><p style="text-align:center">∆β</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="13.39%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="30.77%"><p style="text-align:left">H1.1: EMIP → MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.92</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.56</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.64%"><p style="text-align:center">0.36</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.39%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="30.77%"><p style="text-align:left">H1.2: PQ → MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.61</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.73</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.64%"><p style="text-align:center">0.12</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.39%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="30.77%"><p style="text-align:left">H1.3: OM → MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.30</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.007</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.22</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.64%"><p style="text-align:center">0.28</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.39%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="30.77%"><p style="text-align:left">H1.4: PD → MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.73</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.64</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.64%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.39%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Our analyses.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> reveals an upward variation in intensity in both relationships. There difference test value in all hypothesis are greater than the standard (0.05). We infer that credibility has a signiﬁcant and positive moderating effect on relationships established.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-"></xref>Table 5. Moderating effect of benevolence on the relationships between motivational factors and MLM membership.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="27.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Hypothesis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="21.85%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Low benevolence</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="23.06%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">High benevolence</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="14.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Over all effects</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="13.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Decision</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">Β</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">P</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Β</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">P</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="14.48%"><p style="text-align:center">∆β</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="27.43%"><p style="text-align:left">H1.1: EMIP → MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.96</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">0.68</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.48%"><p style="text-align:center">0.28</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.18%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="27.43%"><p style="text-align:left">H1.2: PQ → MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.80</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">0.71</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.48%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.18%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="27.43%"><p style="text-align:left">H1.3: OM → MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.57</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">0.44</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">0.002</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.48%"><p style="text-align:center">0.13</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.18%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="27.43%"><p style="text-align:left">H1.4: PD → MLMM</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.72</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.93%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">0.57</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.53%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.48%"><p style="text-align:center">0.15</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.18%"><p style="text-align:center">V</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Our analyses.</p>
    <p>The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref> highlight the existence of a signiﬁcant and positive moderating effect kindness in all relationships. The bond strength represented by the β is well above the recommended threshold (0.05) in all of these. Trust therefore intensiﬁes the previously deﬁned relationships. The results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref> lead us to conclude that there is a moderating effect signiﬁcant and positive conﬁdence on the relationships between extra monthly income perceived, personal development, perceived quality of products/services, organizational mode. and MLM membership, hence the validation of hypothesis H2.1, H2.2, H2.3 and H2.4. These results corroborate with the work of numerous authors who have established the inﬂuence of trust in interpersonal, intra-organizational relationships, between the consumer and the distributor; explored the moderating effect of trust in the adoption service. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-27">
      Gurviez, 2002
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-20">
      Gatfaoui &amp; Lavorata, 2001
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-50">
      Randeree et al., 2005
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-55">
      Shiromani et al., 2017
     </xref>). Indeed, trust is a crucial variable in exchanges which is all the more consolidated, that the prospect demonstrates a certain commitment. Therefore, any behavior conﬁdent adopted by uplines contributes to strengthening the conﬁdence of prospects, to lasting winning relationships and their acceptance of network marketing. Trust in upline increases belief in one’s honesty and competence. It ensures the continuity of the relationship allows you to better perceive your performance, reassures commitment to the relationship and reducing the uncertainty of conﬂicts. It promotes the existence of emotional bonds, attachment to MLM, acceptance, satisfaction and good perception products and services.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>We have highlighted the moderating inﬂuence of trust on the relationship between motivating factors and MLM membership. The results obtained thanks to the different analyzes of structural equations have shown that in the Cameroonian context, the extra monthly income received, the perceived quality of products and services, organizational method and ﬁnally personal development are the factors which persuade new distributors to join the network. In addition, trust in the upline intensiﬁes positively the relationship between these factors and membership. Our work contributes to the validation of a new moderating aspect which is trust. Highlighting this variable moderator allows us to emphasize the credibility dimension which seems to act strongly on the relationships studied. The ability of the upline to fulﬁll its obligations towards the downline seems to be stronger in MLM. Likewise, in Cameroon, trust through its two dimensions has a major impact on the monthly income received. Of This fact, prospects seem sensitive to the monthly extra ﬁnancial beneﬁts received. Our results suggest MLM organizations Focus on Financial Security members, to further develop quality products and services, to promote organizational methods favorable to the activity and ﬁnally, to support distributors in their personal development. They should also build relationships of trust between members, based above all on credibility and benevolence, with a view to increasing distributor capital and ensuring MLM growth.</p>
   <p>These findings can inform MLM strategies and improve MLM distributors’ satisfaction by facilitating understanding of motivations, building trust, aligning motivations with goals, developing incentive programs, and managing expectations. First, MLM companies can better understand distributors’ motivations, such as earning monthly income, perceived product and service quality, organizational style, and personal development. They can also manage expectations and build trust with their distributors by providing them with access to information about products and services and business opportunities. By aligning distributors’ motivations with their goals, they can build trust and improve satisfaction. They can also develop incentive programs that match distributors’ needs and motivations, such as rewards programs and training and personal development opportunities. Trust between MLM companies and distributors will allow them to put in place effective and fair conflict management processes, or even eliminate them, but also increase retention and develop a solid community of distributors sharing the same values and objectives.</p>
   <p>Many Cameroonian cultural aspects can play an important role in MLM business membership in Cameroon. In fact, Cameroonian culture is strongly dominated by collectivism. Individuals are most often concerned with the well-being of their community. So MLM companies that emphasize collaboration and community can be more attractive. Cameroonian culture is strongly characterized by a strong respect for authority. This authority is held by uplines and leaders. Downlines, who are at the bottom of the distribution chain, are then obliged to show respect towards them. MLM companies whose managers are charismatic leaders can attract the most distributors. In Cameroon, family is paramount and trust is very high. We believe that MLM companies that offer opportunities for families to work together, benefiting from the extra income, can be more attractive. Cultural practices and traditional beliefs can also influence the way Cameroonians perceive this business. For example, some Cameroonians may be reluctant to join MLM because they feel it goes against their traditional beliefs and cultural practices. Level of education can also influence the uptake of MLM companies in Cameroon. In fact, people with a higher level of education are more likely to join these companies even if they believe that it can offer them opportunities for personal and professional development. In this study, we did not take into account these cultural aspects but rather socio-demographic factors, namely age, gender and professional situation.</p>
   <p>The limit of this work depends mainly on the chosen sampling method which does not allow a generalization of the results obtained. Trust has been studied from an exclusively moderating angle even though it is the foundation of relationships. Future research can be carried out on its effect directly on membership, which would give way to new avenues relating in particular to its mediating role between motivational factors and membership. In addition, we only retained two dimensions of trust while the most studies focus on its three-dimensionality. Taking into account of the integrity dimension could make it possible to reach conclusions more interesting. We also believe that the failure to take into account the cultural aspects that nevertheless predominate in the Cameroonian context constitutes a limitation. It would therefore be interesting to undertake a study on the Cameroonian cultural determinants in membership in MLM.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Appendix</title>
   <table-wrap id="table6">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-"></xref>Table A1. Classic marketing vs multilevel marketing.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="52.98%"><p style="text-align:left">Classic Marketing</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="47.02%"><p style="text-align:left">MLM</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft pli" width="52.98%"><p style="text-align:left">Short-term orientation</p><p style="text-align:left">Interest in isolated sales</p><p style="text-align:left">Discontinuous customers contact</p><p style="text-align:left">Highlighting product characteristics</p><p style="text-align:left">Little importance to consumer service</p><p style="text-align:left">Limited commitment to customer satisfaction</p><p style="text-align:left">Moderate customer contact</p><p style="text-align:left">Quality is first and foremost the concern of production</p><p style="text-align:left">Trust is not the center of the relationship</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft pli" width="47.02%"><p style="text-align:left">Long-term orientation</p><p style="text-align:left">Interest in Customer retention</p><p style="text-align:left">Continuous customer contact</p><p style="text-align:left">Highlighting the value of the product</p><p style="text-align:left">Much importance given to customer services</p><p style="text-align:left">Strong commitment to customer satisfaction</p><p style="text-align:left">Strong customer contact</p><p style="text-align:left">Quality is the concern of all staff</p><p style="text-align:left">Trust is the basis of customer relations</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>Source: Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-41">
     McDonald &amp; Payne (1996)
    </xref>.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table7">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-"></xref>Table A2. Measurements.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">Variables</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left">Dimensions</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">Items</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="6" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">Trust</p><p style="text-align:left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-18">
         Ganesan, 1994
        </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-6">
         Boyer &amp; Nefzi, 2008
        </xref>)</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left">Credibility</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">The promises made by my upline are available</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">In case of a problem, I know that my upline will react honestly</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">My upline excels in our relationship</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left">Benevolence</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">My upline really care about me</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">My upline quiet good consider me</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">My upline will always be ready to solve my problem</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="6" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">Extra monthly </p><p style="text-align:left">income perceived</p><p style="text-align:left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-37">
         Lee &amp; Loi, 2016
        </xref>)</p><p style="text-align:left">and</p><p style="text-align:left">exploration</p><p style="text-align:left">one-dimensional</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="6" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I am financially fulfilled thanks to network marketing</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">Network marketing makes me financially independent (exploration)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">Network marketing allowed me to multiply my source of income</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I access extra income thanks to network marketing</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">Network marketing gives me a lifetime pension</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I ensure my retirement every month thanks to my network marketing activities</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">Perceived quality of product and services</p><p style="text-align:left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-14">
         Dodds et al., 1991
        </xref>)</p><p style="text-align:left">One-dimensional</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">MLM products/services are sustainable (Exploration)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">The probability that MLM products/services will bring me complete satisfaction is very high</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">MLM products/services are of good quality</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">The probability that MLM products/services will be enjoyable is very high</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">The attention paid to manufacturing MLM products/services is very high</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="8" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">Organizational mode</p><p style="text-align:left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-56">
         Sourav et al., 2015
        </xref>)</p><p style="text-align:left">one-dimensional</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="8" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I can anytime and anywhere</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I am my own boss</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I easily integrated network marketing</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I appreciated the leadership of network marketing</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">My network marketing business has a good image</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I like my network marketing company’s compensation plan</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I am accomplished in network marketing (exploration)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I like the network marketing mode of communication (exploration)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="15" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">Personal development</p><p style="text-align:left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-30">
         Jaotombo &amp; Brasseur, 2013
        </xref>)</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left">Developmental and Professional</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I had the feeling that I was happy in the professional milieu</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt that life was interesting in a professional milieu</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt satisfied with life in a professional milieu</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I had a feeling that people were fundamentally good in professional milieu</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt that I was having experiences that pushed me to develop and become a better person in a professional milieu</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left">Developmental and private</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt like life was interesting in my personal life when I am not at work</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt like I had warm, trusting relationships with others in my personal life when I am not at work</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt like my life had meaning in my personal life when I am not at work</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left">Positives feelings</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt hopeful, optimistic, or reassured</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt inspiration, aspiration or uplift</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt joyful, happy</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I felt peaceful, calm or satisfied</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left">Mastaring in the activity</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">In my activity, my mind is completely clear</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">In my activity, my thoughts or actions are fluid</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">In my business, I know what to do at each stage</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="22.11%"><p style="text-align:left">MLM membership</p><p style="text-align:left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141682-16">
         Fredette &amp; Guay, 2014
        </xref>)</p><p style="text-align:left">Unidimensionnelle</p></td> 
      <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.68%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I take part in network marketing activities</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I adhere to network marketing</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I respect the standards and value of network marketing</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I share the signs and symbols of network marketing</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="60.22%"><p style="text-align:left">I adhere to the rules and rituals of network marketing</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>Source: Authors listed above.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Andreani, J., Moulins, J., Conchon, F., Fons, C.,&amp;Boeuf, B. (2014). Une approche protéiforme de la confiance du consommateur. Le cas des médicaments. Décisions Marketing, 75, 79-94. &gt;https://doi.org/10.7193/dm.075.79.94
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aurier, P.,&amp;N’Goala, G. (2010). The Differing and Mediating Roles of Trust and Relationship Commitment in Service Relationship Maintenance and Development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 303-325. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0163-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ba, M. (2016). Les nouveaux pros de l’arnaque. Jeune Afrique.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bosley, S.,&amp;McKeage, K. K. (2014). Multilevel Marketing Diffusion and the Risk of Pyra-mid Scheme Activity: The Case of Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing in Montana. Journal of Public Policy&amp;Marketing, 34, 84-102.&gt;http://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hsb_faculty/2 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boyer, A.,&amp;Nefzi, A. (2008). La relation entre la perception de la qualité et la fidélité. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 234, 37-48. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3917/rsg.234.0037 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cameron, K. S.,&amp;Spreitzer, G. M. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford University Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cardenas, D.,&amp;Fuchs-Tarlovsky, V. (2018). Is Multi-Level Marketing of Nutrition Supplements a Legal and an Ethical Practice? Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 25, 133-138. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.03.118
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chaubey, D.,&amp;Subramanian, K. (2013). The Impact of Social Networking to Facilitate the Effectiveness of Green Marketing: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Research in Commerce, Economics and Management, 3, 53-60.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Choudhary, R. (2013). MLM for Socio-Economic Development. International Journal of Review, Survey and Research, 2, 45-55.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Coughlan, A. T.,&amp;Grayson, K. (1998). Network Marketing Organizations: Compensation Plans, Retail Network Growth, and Profitability. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 401-426. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00014-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dai, F., Wang, K. Y.,&amp;Teo, S. T. T. (2011). Chinese Immigrants in Network Marketing Business in Western Host Country Context. International Business Review, 20, 659-669. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.02.015
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dixon, L. J., Hornsey, M. J., Hartley, N., Chapman, C. M.,&amp;Brienza, J. P. (2023). The Psychology of Attraction to Multi‐level Marketing. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 57, 1213-1235. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12526
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B.,&amp;Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307-319. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379102800305 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Effiom, L.,&amp;Francis, A. E. (2015). The Role of Multilevel Marketing (MLM) in Poverty Alleviation in Calabar—Cross River State, Nigeria: A Case Study of Forever Living Product (Nig.) Ltd. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2, 28-36. &gt;https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.22.874
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fredette12, C.,&amp;Guay, J. (2014). Définir et mesurer l’adhésion à la culture des gangs de rue. Criminologie, 47, 295-315. &gt;https://doi.org/10.7202/1026737ar
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Frisou, J. (2000). Confiance interpersonnelle et engagement: Une réorientation béhavioriste. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition), 15, 63-80. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/076737010001500104
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1-19. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800201
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gatfaoui, S. (2003). La dynamique de confiance dans la relation client individu-el/prestataire de service, proposition d’un cadre de réflexion. Revue Française de Gestion, 203, 103-115.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gatfaoui, S.,&amp;Lavorata, L. (2001). De l’éthique de l’enseigne à la fidélisation du consommateur: Le rôle de la confiance. Revue Française du Marketing, No. 183/184, 213-226.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Geevarghese, K. M., Manalel, J.,&amp;Siby, Z. (2016). Network Marketing: Exploitation of Relationships: Myth or Reality? &gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242379518_Network_Marketing_Exploitation_of_relationships_-_Myth_or_Reality
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Georges, L.,&amp;Decock Good, C. (2004). La qualité de la relation prestataire de service/client: Proposition et test d’un modèle dans le domaine des services comptables. In Proceedings of the 16th international congress of the French Marketing Association. AFM.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Giordano, J. L. (2006). L’approche qualité perçue: Une nouvelle méthode projet pour concevoir, fabriquer, vendre des produits (p. 380). Organisations Edition.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gregor, B.,&amp;Wadlewski, A. A. (2013). Multi-Level Marketing as a Business Model. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organisations, 7, 2-19.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Groß, C.,&amp;Vriens, D. (2019). The Role of the Distributor Network in the Persistence of Legal and Ethical Problems of Multi-Level Marketing Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 333-355. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3556-9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gurviez, P. (2003). La confiance comme variable explicative du comportement du con-sommateur: Proposition et validation empirique d’un modèle de la relation à la marque intégrant la confiance. In Proceedings of the 15th international congress of the French Marketing Association (pp. 301-327).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gurviez, P.,&amp;Korchia, M. (2002). Proposition d’une échelle de mesure multidimensionnelle de la confiance dans la marque. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition), 17, 41-61. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/076737010201700304
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hasanzade, V., Osburg, V. S.,&amp;Toporowski, W. (2018). Sélection d’attributs de produits éthiques pertinents pour la décision pour l’épicerie. Décision de la direction, 56, 8591-8609.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hatchaleelaha, S.,&amp;Wongsurawat, W. (2016). Multilevel Marketing and Entrepreneurship in Thailand: A Case Study. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 18, 146-160. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/jrme-04-2015-0025
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jaotombo, F.,&amp;Brasseur, M. (2013). Le développement personnel: Opérationnalisation d’un modèle de mesure pour la recherche et les pratiques. @GRH, 8, 67-92. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3917/grh.133.0067
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jumpon, N. L., Smaksman, K., Suwannasatit, S., Phomsiri, S.,&amp;Lertridecle, S. (2013). Fac-tors Motivating Direct Selling Agents to Become Successful in MLM. College of Innovation Management, Rajamangala, University of Technology, Thailand.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Keep, W.,&amp;Vander Nat, P. (2014). Multilevel Marketing and Pyramid Schemes in the United States: An Historical Analysis. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 6, 188-210. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/jhrm-01-2014-0002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Khlif, W. (2014). La confiance: Un phénomène de réduction de l’incertitude. Question(s) de management, 8, 83-102.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Koe, J. H. N.,&amp;Soo, W. M. (2011). The Influence of MLM Companies and Agent Attributes on the Willingness to Undertake Multilevel Marketing as a Career Option among Youth. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 5, 50-70. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/17505931111121525 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Koroth, A. A.,&amp;Sarada, K. A. (2012). Significance of Relationship in Multilevel Marketing and Its Effect on Business Outcome. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 3, 26-36. &gt;https://doi.org/10.9790/487x-0362636
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lee, K. L.,&amp;Loi, K. Y. (2016). Driving Distributor’s Satisfaction in Multilevel Marketing (MLM) Companies. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 3, 48-64.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liman, A. M. (2023). Multilevel Marketing and Distributor’s Retention in Nigeria: An Empirical Analysis using PLS-SEM Approach. Creative Business Research Journal, 3, 80-89.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Malshe, A.,&amp;Krush, M. T. (2021). Tensions within the Sales Ecosystem: A Multi-Level Examination of the Sales-Marketing Interface. Journal of Business&amp;Industrial Marketing, 36, 571-589. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-03-2020-0125
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Malshe, A., Hughes, D. E., Good, V.,&amp;Friend, S. B. (2021). Marketing Strategy Implementation Impediments and Remedies: A Multi-Level Theoretical Framework within the Sales-Marketing Interface. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39, 824-846. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.10.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     McDonald, M.&amp;Payne, A. (1996). Marketing Planning for Services. Routledge.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Morgan, R. M.,&amp;Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nga, J. K. H.,&amp;Soo, W. M. (2011). The Influence of MLM Companies and Agent Attributes on the Willingness to Undertake Multilevel Marketing as a Career Option among Youth. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 5, 50-70. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/17505931111121525
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Njoto-Feillard, G. (2016). Le marketing relationnel de multiniveaux islamique en Indonésie. Archives de sciences sociales des religions, 175, 135-157. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4000/assr.27944
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Osburg, V., Strack, M., Conroy, D. M.,&amp;Toporowski, W. (2017). Unveiling Ethical Product Features: The Importance of an Elaborated Information Presentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1582-1591. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.112
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ouattara, A. (1997). Pratiques marketing des multinationales en Afrique. Revue Française du Marketing, 165, 67-77.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Parvin, M. M.,&amp;Kabir, M. M. N. (2011). Factors Affecting Employee Job Satisfaction of Pharmaceutical Sector. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1, 113-123. &gt;https://doi.org/10.52283/nswrca.ajbmr.20110109a13
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Persson, S., Rappin, B.,&amp;Richez, Y. (2011). Les traverses du coaching. Revue internationale de psychosociologie, Vol. XVII, 21-35. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3917/rips.042.0021
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pratt, M. G.,&amp;Rosa, J. A. (2003). Transforming Work-Family Conflict into Commitment in Network Marketing Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 395-418. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/30040635
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Randeree, E., Kishore, R.,&amp;Rao, H. R. (2005). Exploring the Moderating Effect of Trust and Privacy in the Adoption of Application Service Providers in the Healthcare Industry. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 259a). IEEE. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2005.263
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Reingewertz, Y. (2021). An Economic Model of Multi-Level Marketing. PLOS ONE, 16, e0253700. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253700
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Roman, M., Wasiak, M., Roman, M., Roman, K., Niedziółka, A., Krasnodębski, A. et al. (2021). Essence of the Compensation Plan in the Process of Motivation in Multi-Level Marketing (MLM). a Case Study. Sustainability, 13, Article 8738. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168738
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sagarino, E. V.,&amp;Rubi, O. B. (2016). Understanding Networking: Marketing Attributes Vis-À-Vis Motivation and Downside. UIC Research Journal, 20. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shirani, A., Danae, H.,&amp;Shirvani, A. (2014). A Study on Different Factors Influencing Customer Satisfaction on Industrial Market. Management Science Letters, 4, 139-144. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2013.11.022
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shiromani, B. R., Sandip, B.,&amp;Subhas, C. M. (2017). Identifying the Moderating Effect of Trust on the Adoption of Cloud-Based Services. International Journal of Communication Systems, 30, e3253. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3253
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sourav, J., Singlab, B. B.,&amp;Shashi, S. (2015). Motivational Factors in Multilevel Marketing Business: A Confirmatory Approach. Management Science Letters, 5, 903-914. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2015.8.006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vassileva, B. (2017). Consumer Activities and Reactions to Social Network Marketing. Management, 12, 133-144. &gt;https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-4231.12.133-144
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wadlewski, A. (2022). Determinants of the Development of Multi-Level Marketing in Poland in the Context of Differences between Generations X, Y, Z. Serbian Journal of Management, 17, 425-438. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm17-40532
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     WFDSA (2016). World Federation Statistical Database. &gt;http://wfdsa.org/global-statistics/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref59">
    <label>59</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Whetten, D. A.,&amp;Cameron, K. S. (2011). Developing Management Skills. Prentice Hall.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141682-ref60">
    <label>60</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wilson, T. D. (1999). Approaches to Understanding the Position of Women Workers in the Informal Sector. Latin American Perspectives, 25, 105-119. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582x9802500206
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>