1. Introduction

jmp

Journal of Modern Physics

2153-1196 2153-120X

Scientific Research Publishing

10.4236/jmp.2025.163022

jmp-141336

Articles

Physics Mathematics

Normalization Methods in Algorithms for Empirical Equations in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature

Tomofumi

Miyashita

aMiyashita Clinic, Osaka, Japan

17 03 2025

16 03 390 409 2, February 2025 16, February 2025 16, March 2025

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Previously, we presented several empirical equations using the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature. Next, we propose an empirical equation for the fine-structure constant. Considering the compatibility among these empirical equations, the CMB temperature (T _c) and gravitational constant (G) were calculated to be 2.726312 K and 6.673778 × 10 ⁻ ¹¹ m ³∙kg ⁻ ¹∙s ⁻ ², respectively. Every equation can be explained numerically in terms of the Compton length of an electron (λ _e), the Compton length of a proton (λ _p) and α. After several trials, we describe the algorithms used to explain these equations. Thus, no dimension mismatch problems were observed. In this report, we describe the normalization methods in our algorithms used to explain these equations in detail. Our redefinition method is a part of the normalization in the algorithms. Furthermore, the definitions of the gravitational constant are discussed.

Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background Minimum Mass Ratio of Gravitational Force to Electric Force Dimension Analysis Normalization Method Fine Structure Constant

1. Introduction

The symbol list is shown in Section 2. Previously, we described three Equations (1), (2) and (3) in terms of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature [1] - [4] and [5] .

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{h c} = \frac{4.5}{2} \times \frac{k T_{c}}{1 kg \times c^{2}}$ (1)

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = \frac{4.5}{2 π} \times \frac{m_{e}}{e} \times h c$ (2)

$\frac{m_{e} c^{2}}{e} \times (\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}}) = π \times k T_{c}$ (3)

We then derived an empirical equation for the fine-structure constant [6] .

$137.0359991 = 136.0113077 + \frac{1}{3 \times 13.5} + 1$ (4)

$13.5 \times 136.0113077 = 1836.152654 = \frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}}$ (5)

Equations (4) and (5) are related to the transference number [7] [8] . Next, the following values are proposed as deviations of the values of 9/2 and π [8] [9].

$3.13201 (V \cdot m) = \frac{(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) m_{e} c^{2}}{e c}$ (6)

$4.48852 (\frac{1}{A \cdot m}) = \frac{q_{m} c}{(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) m_{p} c^{2}}$ (7)

Then, $(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})$ has units of $(\frac{m^{2}}{s})$ . By redefining the Avogadro number and the Faraday constant, these values can be adjusted back to 9/2 and π [9] .

$π (V \cdot m) = \frac{(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) m_{e_n e w} c^{2}}{e_{n e w} c}$ (8)

$4.5 (\frac{1}{A \cdot m}) = \frac{q_{m_n e w} c}{(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) m_{p_n e w} c^{2}}$ (9)

Every equation can be explained in terms of the Compton length of an electron (λ_e), the Compton length of a proton (λ_p) and α [10]. After several trials [11] [12] using the correspondence principle with thermodynamic principles in solid-state ionics [13] , we propose a canonical ensemble to explain the concept of the minimum mass. Next, we describe the algorithms used to explain these equations [14] . Then, every dimension mismatch problem can be solved. The ratio of the gravitational force to the electric force can be uniquely determined with the assumption of minimum mass.

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = 4.5 (1) \times π (1) \times \frac{k T_{c} / α}{1 kg \times c^{2}}$ (10)

Quantum mechanics [15] and gravity [16] have been used to provide thermodynamic explanations. Our motivation is to use thermodynamic principles in the area of solid-state ionics, which we discovered. In this report, we describe the normalization methods in our algorithms used to explain these equations. Our redefinition method is a part of the normalization methods in our algorithms.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the list of symbols used in our derivations. In Section 3, we propose normalization methods in our algorithms to explain these equations. In Section 4, using the normalization methods in our algorithms, we explain Equations (1), (2), (3) and (10). Furthermore, the definitions of the gravitational constant are discussed. In Section 5, our conclusions are provided.

<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141336-"></xref>2. Symbol List 2.1. MKSA Units (These Values Were Obtained from Wikipedia)

G:	gravitational constant: 6.6743 × 10⁻¹¹ (m³∙kg⁻¹∙s⁻²)
	(we used the compensated value 6.673778 × 10⁻¹¹ in this study)
T_c:	CMB temperature: 2.72548 (K)
	(we used the compensated value 2.726312 K in this study)
k:	Boltzmann constant: 1.380649 × 10⁻²³ (J∙K⁻¹)
c:	speed of light: 299792458 (m/s)
h:	Planck constant: 6.62607015 × 10⁻³⁴ (J s)
ε_₀:	Electric constant: 8.8541878128 × 10⁻¹² (N⋅m²⋅C⁻²)
μ₀:	magnetic constant: 1.25663706212 × 10⁻⁶ (N∙A⁻²)
e:	electric charge of one electron: −1.602176634 × 10⁻¹⁹ (C)
q_m:	magnetic charge of one magnetic monopole: 4.13566770 × 10⁻¹⁵ (Wb)
	(this value is only a theoretical value, q_m = h/e)
m_p:	rest mass of a proton: 1.672621923 × 10⁻²⁷ (kg)
	(We used the compensated value of 1.6726219059 × 10⁻²⁷ kg to explain
	137.0359990841)
m_e:	rest mass of an electron: 9.1093837 × 10⁻³¹ (kg)
Rk:	von Klitzing constant: 25812.80745 (Ω)
Z₀:	wave impedance in free space: 376.730313668 (Ω)
α:	fine-structure constant: 1/137.035999081
λ_p:	Compton wavelength of a proton: 1.32141 × 10⁻¹⁵ (m)
λ_e:	Compton wavelength of an electron: 2.4263102367 × 10⁻¹² (m)

2.2. Symbol List after Redefinition

$e_{n e w} = e \times \frac{4.48852}{4.5} = 1.59809 E - 19 (C)$ (11)

$q_{m_}_{n e w} = q_{m} \times \frac{π}{3.13201} = 4.14832 E - 15 (Wb)$ (12)

$h_{n e w} = e_{n e w} \times q_{m_n e w} = h \times \frac{4.48852}{4.5} \times \frac{π}{3.13201} = 6.62938 E - 34 (J \cdot s)$ (13)

$R k_{_}_{n e w} = \frac{q_{m_n e w}}{e_{_n e w}} = R k \times \frac{4.5}{4.48852} \times \frac{π}{3.13201} = 25958.0 (Ω)$ (14)

Equation (13) can be rewritten as follows:

$R k_{n e w} = 4.5 (\frac{1}{A \cdot m}) \times π (V \cdot m) \times \frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} = 25957.9966027 (Ω)$ (15)

$Z_{0_n e w} = α \times \frac{2 h_{n e w}}{e_{n e w}^{2}} = 2 α \times R k_{n e w} = Z_{0} \times \frac{4.5}{4.48852} \times \frac{π}{3.13201} = 378.849 (Ω)$ (16)

Equation (16) can be rewritten as follows:

$Z_{0_n e w} = 4.5 (\frac{1}{A \cdot m}) \times π (V \cdot m) \times 2 α \times \frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} = 378.8493064 (Ω)$ (17)

$μ_{0_n e w} = \frac{Z_{0_n e w}}{c} = μ_{0} \times \frac{4.5}{4.48852} \times \frac{π}{3.13201} = 1.26371 E - 06 (N \cdot A^{-2})$ (18)

$ε_{0_n e w} = \frac{1}{Z_{0_n e w} \times c} = ε_{0} \times \frac{4.48852}{4.5} \times \frac{3.13201}{π} = 8.80466 E - 12 (F \cdot m^{- 1})$ (19)

$c_{_n e w} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{ε_{0_n e w} μ_{0_n e w}}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{ε_{0} μ_{0}}} = c = 299792458 (m \cdot s^{- 1})$ (20)

The Compton wavelength (λ) is as follows:

$λ = \frac{h}{m c}$ (21)

The value (λ) should be unchanged since the unit for 1 m is unchanged. However, in Equation (13), Planck’s constant changes. Therefore, the units for the masses of one electron and one proton need to be redefined.

$m_{e_n e w} = \frac{4.48852}{4.5} \times \frac{π}{3.13201} \times m_{e} = 9.11394 E - 31 (kg)$ (22)

$m_{p_n e w} = \frac{4.48852}{4.5} \times \frac{π}{3.13201} \times m_{p} = 1.67346 E - 27 (kg)$ (23)

From the dimensional analysis in a previous report [9] , the following is obtained:

$k T_{c_n e w} = \frac{4.48852}{4.5} \times \frac{π}{3.13201} \times k T_{c} = 3.7659625 E - 23 (J)$ (24)

To simplify the calculation, G_N is defined as follows:

$G_{N} = G \times 1 kg (m^{3} \cdot s^{- 2}) = 6.673778 E - 11 (m^{3} \cdot s^{- 2})$ (25)

Now, the value of G_N remains unchanged. However, the value of G_N_{_}_new should change [9] as follows:

$G_{N_n e w} = G_{N} \times \frac{e}{e_{n e w}} = G_{N} \times \frac{4.5}{4.48852} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = 6.69084770 E - 11 (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}})$ (26)

2.3. Symbol List in Terms of the Compton Length of an Electron (λe), the Compton Length of a Proton (λp) and α

The following equations were proposed in a previous study [10] :

$\begin{array}{l} m_{e_n e w} c^{2} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{2} (\frac{J \cdot m^{4}}{s^{2}}) \\ = \frac{π}{4.5} (V \cdot m \cdot A \cdot m = \frac{J \cdot m^{2}}{s}) \times λ_{p} c (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) \\ = 2.76564 E - 07 (\frac{J \cdot m^{4}}{s^{2}}) = constant \end{array}$ (27)

$\begin{array}{l} e_{n e w} c \times (\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) (\frac{A \cdot m^{3}}{s}) \\ = \frac{1}{4.5} (A \cdot m) \times λ_{p} c (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) = 8.80330 E - 08 (\frac{A \cdot m^{3}}{s}) = constant \end{array}$ (28)

$\begin{array}{l} m_{p_n e w} c^{2} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{2} (\frac{J \cdot m^{4}}{s^{2}}) \\ = \frac{π}{4.5} (\frac{J \cdot m^{2}}{s}) \times λ_{e} c (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) = 5.07814 E - 04 (\frac{J \cdot m^{4}}{s^{2}}) = constant \end{array}$ (29)

$\begin{array}{l} q_{m_n e w} c \times (\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) (\frac{V \cdot m^{3}}{s}) \\ = π (V \cdot m) \times λ_{e} c (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) = 2.28516 E - 03 (\frac{V \cdot m^{3}}{s}) = constant \end{array}$ (30)

$\begin{array}{l} k T_{c_n e w} \times \frac{2 π}{α} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{3} (\frac{J \cdot m^{6}}{s^{3}}) \\ = \frac{π}{4.5} (\frac{J \cdot m^{2}}{s}) \times λ_{p} c \times λ_{e} c = 2.011697 E - 10 (\frac{J \cdot m^{6}}{s^{3}}) = constant \end{array}$ (31)

$\begin{array}{l} G_{N_n e w} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) \times (\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) \\ = {(λ_{p} c)}^{2} (\frac{m^{4}}{s^{2}}) \times c (\frac{m}{s}) \times \frac{9 α}{8 π} = 1.22943 E - 07 (\frac{m^{5}}{s^{3}}) = constant \end{array}$ (32)

<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141336-"></xref>2.4. Symbol List in Terms of the Avogadro Number and the Number of Electrons in 1 C

This section is omitted for the following reasons.

The Avogadro number (N_A) is 6.02214076 × 10²³. This value is related to the following value.

$N_{A} = \frac{1 g}{m_{p}} = 5.978637 E + 23$ (33)

Using the redefined values, the new definition of the Avogadro number (N_{A_new}) is as follows:

$N_{A_n e w} = \frac{1 kg}{m_{p_n e w}} = \frac{1 {kg}_{n e w}}{m_{p}} = 5.975649 E + 26 \neq \frac{1 {kg}_{n e w}}{m_{p_n e w}}$ (34)

In this report, Equation (34) is incorrect. The correct equation is as follows:

$N_{A_n e w} = \frac{1 {kg}_{n e w}}{m_{p_n e w}} = 1 kg \times \frac{e_{n e w}}{e} \times \frac{1}{m_{p_n e w}} = 5.96040380 E + 26$ (35)

However, the main point in our explanation for Equation (26) in the previous report [14] can still be useful.

2.5. Symbol List for the Advanced Expressions for kTc and GN

Furthermore, we propose the following four equations [11] :

$k T_{c_n e w} (J) = \frac{α}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{1}{π} (\frac{1}{V \cdot m}) \times q_{m_n e w} c \times m_{e_n e w} c^{2} = 3.76596254 E - 23$ (36)

$k T_{c_n e w} (J) = \frac{α}{2 π (1)} \times 4.5 (\frac{1}{A \cdot m}) \times e_{n e w} c \times m_{p_n e w} c^{2} = 3.76596254 E - 23$ (37)

In Equations (36) and (37), 2π(1) is dimensionless. For G, two equations exist, as follows:

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_n e w} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = α c \frac{4.5 (1)}{4 π (1)} \times (4.5 \times e_{n e w} c) \times e_{n e w} c \times \frac{q_{m_n e w} c}{m_{p_n e w} c^{2}} \\ = 6.69084770 E - 11 (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) \end{matrix}$ (38)

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_n e w} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = α c \frac{4.5 (1)}{4 π (1)} \times {(4.5 \times e_{n e w} c)}^{2} \times e_{n e w} c \times \frac{π (V \cdot m)}{m_{e_n e w} c^{2}} \\ = 6.69084770 E - 11 (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) \end{matrix}$ (39)

In Equations (38) and (39), 4π(1) and 4.5(1) are dimensionless.

<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141336-"></xref>2.6. Symbol List When the Planck Constant Is Changed to 1 Js

When we define the Planck constant as (1 Js), the following equations can be used:

$\begin{matrix} c_{g e n a r a l} (\frac{m_{g e n e r a l}}{s}) = c \times \sqrt{h_{n e w} (1)} = 299792458 \times \sqrt{6.62938 E - 34} \\ = 7.71893 E - 09 (\frac{m_{g e n e r a l}}{s}) \end{matrix}$ (40)

where h_new(1) (= 6.629383E−34) is dimensionless. c_general and 1 m_general are the values for c and 1 m, respectively, after Planck’s constant is changed. Thus, the unit of the meter needs to be changed. Importantly, Equation (40) does not indicate a change in the light speed.

$e_{g e n e r a l} = \sqrt{\frac{1 (J \cdot s)}{4.5 π \times m_{p} / m_{e}}} = 6.20675231 E - 03 (C_{g e n e r a l})$ (41)

$q_{m_g e n e r a l} = \sqrt{1 (J \cdot s) \times 4.5 π \times m_{p} / m_{e}} = 1.61114855 E + 02 ({Wb}_{g e n e r a l})$ (42)

$m_{e_g e n e r a l} = \sqrt{\frac{1 (J \cdot s) \times π \times m_{e} / m_{p}}{c_{g e n e r a l}^{2} \times 4.5}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} = 1.37477924 E + 03 ({kg}_{g e n e r a l})$ (43)

$m_{p_g e n e r a l} = \sqrt{\frac{1 (J \cdot s) \times π \times m_{p} / m_{e}}{c_{g e n e r a l}^{2} \times 4.5}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} = 2.52430455 E + 06 ({kg}_{g e n e r a l})$ (44)

$\frac{k T_{c_g e n e r a l}}{α \times c_{g e n e r a l}^{2}} = \frac{1 (J \cdot s)}{2 π (1)} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} = 8.66155955 E - 05 ({kg}_{g e n e r a l})$ (45)

$G_{N_g e n e r a l} = \frac{α c_{g e n e r a l}^{3}}{m_{p} / m_{e}} \times \frac{{4.5}^{2}}{4 π^{2}} \times 1 (J \cdot s) \times (\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) = 1.72273202 E - 27 (\frac{m_{g e n e r a l}^{3}}{s^{2}})$ (46)

where 1 C_general, 1 Wb_general, 1 kg_general, e_general, q_{m_general}, m_{e_general}, m_{p_general}, T_{c_general} and G_{N_gerneral} are the values for 1 C, 1 Wb, 1 kg, e, q_m, m_e, m_p, T_c and G_N, respectively, when the Planck constant is changed to 1 Js.

The minimum mass (M_min) is defined as follows:

$M_{\min} ({kg}_{g e n e r a l}) = \frac{k T_{c}}{α \times c^{2}} = \frac{1 (J \cdot s)}{2 π} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} = 8.661556 E - 05$ (47)

The ratio between the mass of an electron and the minimum mass is defined as follows:

$m_{e_g e n e r a l} \times \frac{α c_{g e n e r a l}^{2}}{k T_{c_g e n e r a l}} = 2 π (1) \times \frac{π}{q_{m_g e n e r a l} c_{g e n e r a l}} = 1.587219 E + 07$ (48)

The mass ratio of a proton to its minimum mass is defined as follows:

$m_{p_g e n e r a l} \times \frac{α c_{g e n e r a l}^{2}}{k T_{c_g e n e r a l}} = \frac{2 π (1)}{4.5 \times e_{g e n e r a l} c_{g e n e r a l}} = 2.914376 E + 10$ (49)

<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141336-"></xref>2.7. Symbol List for the Algorithms Used to Explain Our Empirical Equations

Equations (50) and (51) are important for making the first list. Using Equations (27)-(32), the following list can be obtained [14] .

$\frac{h}{m_{p}} = \frac{h_{n e w}}{m_{p_n e w}} = 3.9614871 E - 07 = experimental result$ (50)

$\frac{h}{m_{e}} = \frac{h_{n e w}}{m_{e_n e w}} = 7.2738951 E - 04 = experimental result$ (51)

$e_{n e w} c (A \cdot m) = \frac{1}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} (A \cdot m) = 4.79095067 E - 11 (A \cdot m)$ (52)

$q_{m_n e w} c (V \cdot m) = π \times \frac{h}{m_{e}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} (V \cdot m) = 1.24363481 E - 06 (V \cdot m)$ (53)

$m_{e_n e w} c^{2} (J) = \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 2} (J) = 8.19120012 E - 14 (J)$ (54)

$m_{p_n e w} c^{2} (J) = \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{e}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 2} (J) = 1.50402938 E - 10 (J)$ (55)

$\begin{matrix} h_{n e w} c^{2} (\frac{J \cdot m^{2}}{s}) = \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p}} \times \frac{h}{m_{e}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 2} (\frac{J \cdot m^{2}}{s}) \\ = 5.9581930 E - 17 (\frac{J \cdot m^{2}}{s}) \end{matrix}$ (56)

$\begin{matrix} \frac{k T_{c_n e w}}{α} (J) = \frac{1}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p}} \times \frac{h}{m_{e}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 3} (J) \\ = 5.1607244 E - 21 (J) \end{matrix}$ (57)

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_n e w} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = α c \frac{4.5 (1)}{4 π (1)} \times {(\frac{h}{m_{p}})}^{2} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) \\ = 6.6908477 E - 11 \end{matrix}$ (58)

Using the arbitrary value of the light speed, we use the second list. The following example can be used:

$c_{arbitrary} = 12345 (\frac{m_{arbitrary}}{s})$ (59)

where c_arbitrary and 1 m_arbitrary are the values for c and 1 m when an arbitrary value of light speed is used, respectively. Thus, the first list remains useful [14] .

From Equations (36) and (37),

$π (V \cdot m) = \frac{1}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{α}{k T_{c_n e w}} \times q_{m_n e w} c \times m_{e_n e w} c^{2}$ (60)

$\frac{1}{4.5} (A \cdot m) = \frac{1}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{α}{k T_{c_n e w}} \times e_{n e w} c \times m_{p_n e w} c^{2}$ (61)

Consequently, π (Vm) and 1/4.5 (Am) are unchanged in the second list.

3. Methods

In this section, the normalization methods in our algorithms used to explain these equations are proposed. The normalization methods can be performed in three steps.

Step 1: The redefinition method.

Step 2: Use the standard values of 1 m and 1 s.

Step 3: Use the standard value of 1 kg.

<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141336-"></xref>3.1. Step 1: Explanation for the Redefinition Method

The procedure of the redefinition method has already been provided. The theoretical meaning of the redefinition method is normalization of the electric constant (ε₀) and the magnetic constant (μ₀). The numerical explanation is as follows:

$\begin{matrix} \frac{1}{ε_{0_n e w} c} (Ω = \frac{kg}{C^{2}} \times \frac{m^{2}}{s}) = μ_{0_n e w} c (Ω) \\ = \frac{k T_{c_n e w} / α c^{2}}{{(e_{n e w})}^{2}} \times (\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) \times 2 π (1) \times 2 α \\ = 378.8493064 (Ω) \end{matrix}$ (62)

The value in Equation (62) is equal to the value in Equation (17). Clearly, this is not a coincidence. However, after applying the redefinition method, the calculated value only slightly changes. The unit of the electric current (1A) is, which is defined by Ampère’s force law. After several centuries, the Faraday constant was defined as 96485.332 (C/mol). The unit of mol is defined as 1 g. When the unit of mol is defined as 1 kg, the Faraday constant becomes 9.6485332 × 10⁷ (C/mol).

Our redefinition method is as follows:

$π (V \cdot m) = \frac{(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) m_{e_n e w} c^{2}}{e_{n e w} c}$ (63)

Thus, the following equation can be used:

$\frac{e_{n e w}}{m_{p_n e w}} = \frac{c}{π} \times (\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) \times \frac{m_{e}}{m_{p}} = 9.5496198 E + 07$ (64)

In Equation (64), the calculated value is very similar to the Faraday constant when the unit of mol is defined as 1 kg. Consequently, the definition of the electric current (1A) is highly suitable coincidentally. In more concrete terms, the force (2 dyn = 2 g⋅cm/s²) was used to define the electric current (1A). When the force (1 dyn = 1 g⋅cm/s²) was used, the Faraday constant changed. After the redefinition method is applied, the calculated value should change substantially. This means that the symbol list in Section 2.2 has changed substantially.

3.2. Step 2: Use of the Standard Values of 1 m and 1 s

In a previous report, an arbitrary value of light speed was used:

$c_{arbitrary} = 12345 (\frac{m_{arbitrary}}{s})$ (65)

However, the correct equation is as follows:

$c_{arbitrary} = 12345 (\frac{m_{arbitrary}}{s_{arbitrary}})$ (66)

where 1 s_arbitrary is the value for 1 s when an arbitrary value of light speed is used. Then, the following can be attained:

$1 m_{arbitrary} = \frac{1}{12345} (m) = 8.10045 E - 05 (m)$ (67)

$1 s_{arbitrary} = \frac{1}{12345^{2}} (s) = 6.56172 E - 09 (s)$ (68)

Thus, the following equations can be defined:

$c_{arbitrary} = 12345 \frac{m_{arbitrary}}{s_{arbitrary}}$ (69)

$\frac{{(1 m_{arbitrary})}^{2}}{1 s_{arbitrary}} = \frac{12345}{12345} (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) = 1 (\frac{m^{2}}{s})$ (70)

Consequently, the unit of m²/s is 1. Then, π (Vm) and 1/4.5 (Am) are unchanged in the second list.

We propose standard values of 1 m and 1 s as follows.

$1 m_{standard} = \frac{1}{299792458} (m) = 3.33564 E - 09 (m)$ (71)

$1 s_{standard} = \frac{1}{299792458^{2}} (s) = 1.11265 E - 17 (s)$ (72)

$\frac{{(1 m_{standard})}^{2}}{1 s_{standard}} = 1 (\frac{m^{2}}{s})$ (73)

where 1 m_standard and 1 s_standard are the standard values of 1 m and 1 s, respectively. The light speed using these values (c_standard) is defined as follows:

$c_{standard} = 299792458 (\frac{m}{s}) = 1 (\frac{m_{standard}}{s_{standard}})$ (74)

Then, the value of 1 J becomes equivalent to 1 kg. From the first list written in Section 2.7.1,

$\begin{matrix} e_{standard} (C) = \frac{1}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} \times (\frac{1}{c_{standard}}) \\ = 4.79095067 E - 11 (C) \end{matrix}$ (75)

$\begin{matrix} q_{standard} (Wb) = π \times \frac{h}{m_{e}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} \times (\frac{1}{c_{standard}}) \\ = 1.24363481 E - 06 (Wb) \end{matrix}$ (76)

$\begin{matrix} m_{e_standard} (kg) = \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 2} \times {(\frac{1}{c_{standard}})}^{2} \\ = 8.19120012 E - 14 (kg) \end{matrix}$ (77)

$\begin{matrix} m_{p_standard} (kg) = \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{e}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 2} \times {(\frac{1}{c_{standard}})}^{2} \\ = 1.50402938 E - 10 (kg) \end{matrix}$ (78)

$\begin{matrix} h_{standard} (J \cdot s) = \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p}} \times \frac{h}{m_{e}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 2} \times {(\frac{1}{c_{standard}})}^{2} \\ = 5.9581930 E - 17 (J \cdot s) \end{matrix}$ (79)

$\begin{matrix} \frac{k T_{c_standard}}{α} (J) = \frac{1}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p}} \times \frac{h}{m_{e}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 3} (J) \\ = 5.1607244 E - 21 (J) \end{matrix}$ (80)

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_standard} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = α \frac{4.5 (1)}{4 π (1)} \times {(\frac{h}{m_{p}})}^{2} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} \times c_{standard} \\ = 2.23182656 E - 19 (\frac{{(1 m_{standard})}^{3}}{{(1 s_{standard})}^{2}}) \end{matrix}$ (81)

where e_standard, q_m_{_} _standard, m_{e_}_standard, m_{p_}_standard, kT_{c_}_standard and G_{N_}_standard are the values for e, q_m, m_e, m_p, kT_c and G_N, respectively, when the standard values of 1 m and 1 s are used.

From Equation (62),

$\begin{matrix} ε_{0_standard} (\frac{C^{2}}{kg} × \frac{s^{2}}{m^{3}}) = \frac{{(e_{n e w})}^{2}}{k T_{c_n e w} / α} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3})}^{- 1} \times \frac{1}{2 π (1) \times 2 α} \times (\frac{1}{c_{standard}}) \\ = \frac{1}{378.8493064} \end{matrix}$ (82)

$\begin{matrix} μ_{0_standard} (\frac{kg}{C^{2}} \cdot m) = \frac{k T_{c_n e w} / α}{{(e_{n e w})}^{2}} \times (\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) \times 2 π (1) \times 2 α \times (\frac{1}{c_{standard}}) \\ = 378.8493064 \end{matrix}$ (83)

3.3. Step 3: The Use of the Normalized Value of 1 kg

In Section 3.2, the unit of m²/s can be 1. Then, the following equation can be used:

$\begin{matrix} (\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) = 1.837486 E + 03 (1) \times 1 (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) \\ = 1.837486 E + 03 (1) \times 1 (\frac{{(m_{standard})}^{2}}{s_{standard}}) \end{matrix}$ (84)

where 1.837486E+03(1) is dimensionless. We propose a normalized value of 1 kg as follows:

$\begin{matrix} m_{e_Normalized} (kg) = m_{e_standard} (kg) \times 1.837486 E + 03 (1) \\ = 1.50512154 E - 10 (kg) \end{matrix}$ (85)

$\begin{matrix} m_{p_Normalized} (kg) = m_{p_standard} (kg) \times 1.837486 E + 03 (1) \\ = 2.7636329 E - 07 (kg) \end{matrix}$ (86)

$\begin{matrix} \frac{k T_{c_Normalized}}{α} (J) = \frac{k T_{c_standard}}{α} (J) \times 1.837486 E + 03 (1) \\ = 9.48275875 E - 18 (J) \end{matrix}$ (87)

where m_e_{_}_N_ormalized, m_p_{_Normalized} and kT_c_{_Normalized} are the values for m_e, m_p, and kT_c, respectively, when the normalized value of 1 kg is used. For convenience, Equation (31) is rewritten as follows:

$G_{N} = G \times 1 kg (m^{3} \cdot s^{- 2}) = 6.673778 E - 11 (m^{3} \cdot s^{- 2})$ (88)

Thus, the following equation can be obtained:

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_Normalized} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = \frac{G_{N_standard}}{1.837486 E + 03 (1)} = \frac{2.23182656 E - 19}{1.837486 E + 03 (1)} \\ = 1.21460875 E - 22 (\frac{{(1 m_{standard})}^{3}}{{(1 s_{standard})}^{2}}) \end{matrix}$ (89)

where G_N_{_Normalized} is the G_N when the normalized value of 1 kg is used. From Equations (75)-(83), the following can be defined:

$\begin{matrix} e_{Normalized} (C) = \frac{1}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p_Normalized}} \times (\frac{s}{m^{2}}) \times (\frac{1}{c_{standard}}) \\ = 4.79095067 E - 11 (C) \end{matrix}$ (90)

$\begin{matrix} q_{Normalized} (Wb) = π \times \frac{h}{m_{e_Normalized}} \times (\frac{s}{m^{2}}) \times (\frac{1}{c_{standard}}) \\ = 1.24363481 E - 06 (Wb) \end{matrix}$ (91)

$\begin{matrix} m_{e_Normalized} (kg) = \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p_Normalized}} \times {(\frac{s}{m^{2}})}^{2} \times {(\frac{1}{c_{standard}})}^{2} \\ = 1.50512154 E - 10 (kg) \end{matrix}$ (92)

$\begin{matrix} m_{p_Normalized} (kg) = \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{e_Normalized}} \times {(\frac{s}{m^{2}})}^{2} \times {(\frac{1}{c_{standard}})}^{2} \\ = 2.7636329 E - 07 (kg) \end{matrix}$ (93)

$\begin{matrix} h_{Normalized} (J \cdot s) = \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p_Normalized}} \times \frac{h}{m_{e_Normalized}} \times {(\frac{s}{m^{2}})}^{2} \times {(\frac{1}{c_{standard}})}^{2} \\ = 5.9581930 E - 17 (J \cdot s) \end{matrix}$ (94)

$\begin{matrix} \frac{k T_{c_Normalized}}{α} (J) = \frac{1}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p_Normalized}} \times \frac{h}{m_{e_Normalized}} \times {(\frac{s}{m^{2}})}^{3} \\ = 9.48275875 E - 18 (J) \end{matrix}$ (95)

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_Normalized} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = α \frac{4.5 (1)}{4 π (1)} \times {(\frac{h}{m_{p_Normalized}})}^{2} \times (\frac{s}{m^{2}}) \times c_{standard} \\ = 1.21460875 E - 22 (\frac{{(1 m_{standard})}^{3}}{{(1 s_{standard})}^{2}}) \end{matrix}$ (96)

$\begin{matrix} ε_{0_Normalized} (\frac{C^{2}}{kg} × \frac{s^{2}}{m^{3}}) = \frac{{(e_{n e w})}^{2}}{k T_{c_Normalized} / α} \times \frac{1}{2 π (1) \times 2 α} \times (\frac{1}{c_{standard}}) \\ = \frac{1}{378.8493064} \end{matrix}$ (97)

$\begin{matrix} μ_{0_Normalized} (\frac{kg}{C^{2}} ×m) = \frac{k T_{c_Normalized} / α}{{(e_{n e w})}^{2}} \times 2 π (1) \times 2 α \times (\frac{1}{c_{standard}}) \\ = 378.8493064 \end{matrix}$ (98)

4. Results <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141336-"></xref>4.1. Explanation of Our Main Four Equations Using the Values in Section 3.2.2

In this section, we ensure that Equations (75)-(83) are correct using our four equations (Equations (1), (2), (3) and (10)). Strictly speaking, m_e should be written as m_e_{_standard}. However, we omit the subscript “standard” to avoid unnecessary notational complexity.

For convenience, Equation (1) is rewritten as follows:

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{h c} = \frac{4.5}{2} \times \frac{k T_{c}}{1 kg \times c^{2}}$ (99)

When the light speed is 1 m/s, the following equation is obtained:

$\frac{G_{N} m_{p}^{2}}{h} = \frac{4.5 (1)}{2} \times k T_{c} = 8.47341571 E - 23$ (100)

where 4.5(1) is dimensionless. When Equations (75)-(83) are used, Equation (1) is correct, because the left side is equal to the right side. For convenience, Equation (2) is rewritten as follows:

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = \frac{4.5 (1)}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{m_{e}}{e} \times h c$ (101)

When the light speed is 1 m/s, the following equation is obtained:

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = \frac{4.5 (1)}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{m_{e}}{e} \times h = 7.29580222 E - 20$ (102)

When Equations (75)-(83) are used, Equation (2) is correct. For convenience, Equation (3) is rewritten as follows:

$\frac{m_{e} c^{2}}{e} \times (\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}}) = π \times k T_{c} = 1.18311202 E - 22$ (103)

When Equations (75)-(83) are used, Equation (3) is correct. For convenience, Equation (10) is rewritten as follows:

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = 4.5 (1) \times π (1) \times \frac{k T_{c} / α}{1 kg \times c^{2}}$ (104)

When the light speed is 1 m/s, the following equation is obtained:

$\frac{G_{N} m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = 4.5 (1) \times π (1) \times \frac{k T_{c}}{α} = 7.29580222 E - 20$ (105)

Consequently, when Equations (75)-(83) are used, our main four equations are correct.

4.2. Explanation of Our Main Four Equations Using the Values in Section 3.3

In this section, we ensure that Equations (90)-(98) are correct using our four equations (Equations (1), (2), (3) and (10)). Strictly speaking, m_e should be written as m_e_{_}_N_ormalized. However, we omit the subscript “Normalized” to avoid unnecessary notational complexity.

For convenience, Equation (1) is rewritten as follows:

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{h c} = \frac{4.5}{2} \times \frac{k T_{c}}{1 kg \times c^{2}}$ (106)

When the light speed is 1 m/s, the following equation is obtained:

$\frac{G_{N} m_{p}^{2}}{h} = \frac{4.5 (1)}{2} \times k T_{c} = 1.55697826 E - 19$ (107)

When Equations (90)-(98) are used, Equation (1) is correct. For convenience, Equation (2) is rewritten as follows:

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = \frac{4.5 (1)}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{m_{e}}{e} \times h c$ (108)

When the light speed is 1 m/s, the following equation is obtained:

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = \frac{4.5 (1)}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{m_{e}}{e} \times h = 1.34059343 E - 16$ (109)

When Equations (90)-(98) are used, Equation (2) is correct. For convenience, Equation (3) is rewritten as follows:

$\frac{m_{e} c^{2}}{e} \times (\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}}) = π \times k T_{c} = 2.17395177 E - 19$ (110)

When Equations (90)-(98) are used, Equation (3) is correct. For convenience, Equation (10) is rewritten as follows:

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = 4.5 (1) \times π (1) \times \frac{k T_{c} / α}{1 kg \times c^{2}}$ (111)

When the light speed is 1 m/s, the following equation is obtained:

$\frac{G_{N} m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = 4.5 (1) \times π (1) \times \frac{k T_{c}}{α} = 1.34059343 E - 16$ (112)

Consequently, for Equations (90)-(98), our main four equations are correct.

4.3. Ratio of the Gravitational Force to the Electric Force Should Be the Fundamental Constant and Unchanged

The ratio of the gravitational force to the electric force is a fundamental constant. The ratio should not be changed, even when the unit of mass is changed. According to Einstein, the following equation applies:

$E = m c^{2}$ (113)

Therefore, the unit of mass (kg) is connected with the unit of work (J). Thus, the definition of the gravitational constant was changed from the relationship between the unit of mass to the relationship between the unit of work.

For convenience, Equations (10) and (105) are rewritten as follows:

$\frac{G m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = 4.5 (1) \times π (1) \times \frac{k T_{c} / α}{1 kg \times c^{2}} = 8.11767475 E - 37$ (114)

$\frac{G_{N} m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = 4.5 (1) \times π (1) \times \frac{k T_{c}}{α} = 7.29580222 E - 20$ (115)

So,

$\frac{7.29580222 E - 20}{8.11767475 E - 37} = 299792458^{2} = c {(1)}^{2}$ (116)

where c(1) is dimensionless. Consequently, gravity can be explained by the unit of work (J). This is very important because we strongly believe that gravity should be explained by PVs (Gibbs energy).

For convenience, Equation (112) is rewritten as follows:

$\frac{G_{N} m_{p}^{2}}{(\frac{e^{2}}{4 π ε_{0}})} = 4.5 (1) \times π (1) \times \frac{k T_{c}}{α} = 1.34059343 E - 16$ (117)

Here, the same problem occurs: the ratio should not be changed, even when the unit of mass is changed. Therefore, we changed the definition of the gravitational constant.

For convenience, Equation (38) is rewritten as follows:

Then, we consider the unit.

$\frac{q_{m_n e w} c}{m_{p_n e w} c^{2}} (\frac{Wb \times c}{kg \times c^{2}} = \frac{V \cdot s \times m / s}{J} = \frac{s}{C} \times \frac{m}{s} = \frac{1}{A \cdot m} \times \frac{m^{2}}{s})$ (119)

From Equations (91) and (93),

$\frac{q_{Normalized} \times c_{standard}}{m_{p_Normalized} \times c_{standard}^{2}} = \frac{1.24363 E - 06}{2.76363 E - 07} = 4.5 (\frac{1}{A \cdot m} \times \frac{m^{2}}{s})$ (120)

Therefore,

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_Normalized} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = α c_{standard} \frac{4.5 (1)}{4 π (1)} \times {(4.5 \times e_{Normalized} \times c_{standard})}^{2} \times 1 (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) \\ = 1.21460875 E - 22 (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) \end{matrix}$ (121)

From Equation (49), the mass ratio of a proton to its minimum mass is defined as follows:

$m_{p_Normalized} \times \frac{α c_{standard}^{2}}{k T_{c_Normalized}} = \frac{2 π (1)}{4.5 \times e_{Normalized} c_{standard}} = 2.914376 E + 10$ (122)

Therefore,

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_Normalized} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = α c_{standard} \frac{4.5 (1)}{4 π (1)} \times {(2 π (1) \times \frac{k T_{c_Normalized} / α}{m_{p_Normalized} \times c_{standard}^{2}})}^{2} \times 1 (\frac{m^{2}}{s}) \\ = 1.21460875 E - 22 (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) \end{matrix}$ (123)

In Equation (123), the unit of m³/s² can be omitted. Therefore,

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_Normalized} (1) = α \times 4.5 (1) \times π (1) \times {(\frac{k T_{c_Normalized} / α}{m_{p_Normalized} \times c_{standard}^{2}})}^{2} \\ = 1.21460875 E - 22 \end{matrix}$ (124)

where G_N_{_Normalized} (1) is dimensionless. The gravitational constant can be explained by the mass ratio of a proton to its minimum mass. Thus, the definition of the gravitational constant was changed from the relationship between the unit of mass (kg) to the mass ratio of a proton to its minimum mass. We strongly believe that the mass ratio should be explained by the ratio of PVs.

5. Conclusions

The normalization methods in our algorithms are used to explain these equations. The normalization methods can be performed in three steps.

Step 1: Redefinition methods.

Step 2: Use the standard value of 1 m and 1 s.

Step 3: Use the standard value of 1 kg.

In Step 1, normalization of the electric constant (ε₀) and the magnetic constant (₀) is performed. The value in Equation (62) is equal to the value in Equation (17). Clearly, this is not a coincidence. After the redefinition method is applied, the calculated value only slightly changes. This occurred because the definition of the electric current (1 A) by Ampère’s force law is highly suitable coincidentally. In more concrete terms, the force (2 dyn = 2 g∙cm/s²) was used to define the electric current (1A). Then, the definition of the electric current (1A) was highly suitable.

In Step 2, we defined the standard value of 1 m and 1 s. Then, the light speed using these values was 1 m/s. The unit of m²/s is 1. The value of 1 J was equivalent to 1 kg. π (Vm) and 1/4.5 (Am) remained unchanged. When these values were used, Equations (1), (2), (3) and (10) were correct. Therefore, the ratio of the gravitational force to the electric force should not be changed. However, after the calculation was performed, the ratio changed. This likely occurred because we changed the definition of the gravitational constant from the relationship between the unit of mass to the relationship between the unit of work. This is very important because we strongly believe that gravity should be explained by PVs (Gibbs energy).

In Step 3, we define the normalized value of the mass. Then, the coefficient 1.837486E+03 disappears. Using these values, Equations (1), (2), (3) and (10) were correct. After the calculation, the same problem occurred. The ratio of the gravitational force to the electric force changed. Therefore, we changed the definition of the gravitational constant. We propose Equation (124). Thus, the definition of the gravitational constant was changed from the relationship between the unit of mass (kg) to the mass ratio of a proton to its minimum mass. We strongly believe that the mass ratio should be explained by the ratio of PVs.

Appendix

In this appendix, the interpretation for Equation (22), which seems to be a numerological equation, is explained. For convenience, Equation (22) is rewritten as follows:

$m_{e_n e w} = \frac{4.48852}{4.5} \times \frac{π}{3.13201} \times m_{e} = 9.11394 E - 31 (kg)$ (A1)

Next, for convenience, Equations (6) and (7) are rewritten as follows:

$3.13201 (V \cdot m) = \frac{(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) m_{e} c^{2}}{e c}$ (A2)

$4.48852 (\frac{1}{A \cdot m}) = \frac{q_{m} c}{(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{4}{3}) m_{p} c^{2}}$ (A3)

The original concept of 4.5 and π are from the Ted Jacobson homepage.

“I suspect that there are in fact only a finite number of degrees of freedom in any finite volume. It seems difficult to reconcile this hypothesis with local Lorentz invariance, and with ordinary unitary quantum theory” https://terpconnect.umd.edu/~jacobson/ .

When we propose the following Equations (A4) and (A5),

$3.132794486 (V \cdot m) = \frac{(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{5.378178546}{3}) m_{e_n e w} c^{2}}{e_{n e w} c}$ (A4)

$4.487397553 (\frac{1}{A \cdot m}) = \frac{q_{m_n e w} c}{(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{5.378178546}{3}) m_{p_n e w} c^{2}}$ (A5)

Equation (A1) becomes as follows.

$m_{e_n e w} (kg) = \frac{4.487397553}{4.5} \times \frac{π}{3.132794486} \times m_{e} = m_{e} (kg)$ (A6)

Then, the mass of an electron is unchanged, which semes to be more suitable. Furthermore, the Boltzmann constant is unchanged. From Equation (57),

$\begin{matrix} T_{c_n e w} (K) = \frac{α}{k} \times \frac{1}{2 π (1)} \times \frac{π}{4.5} \times \frac{h}{m_{p}} \times \frac{h}{m_{e}} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{5.378178546}{3})}^{- 3} \\ = 2.725630704 (K) \end{matrix}$ (A7)

Thus, the CMB temperature is similar with the observed value as 2.72548 (K). However, From Equation (58)

$\begin{matrix} G_{N_n e w} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) = α c \frac{4.5 (1)}{4 π (1)} \times {(\frac{h}{m_{p}})}^{2} \times {(\frac{m_{p}}{m_{e}} + \frac{5.378178546}{3})}^{- 1} (\frac{m^{3}}{s^{2}}) \\ = 6.68917519 E - 11 \end{matrix}$ (A8)

Then, from Equation (26),

$G_{N} = G_{N_n e w} \times \frac{4.487397553}{4.5} = 6.67044186 E - 11$ (A9)

Then, the value is different from 6.6743 × 10⁻¹¹ (m³∙kg⁻¹∙s⁻²). The error is 5.784 × 10⁻⁴. Clearly, the compensation is needed.

References 1

Miyashita, T. (2020) Empirical Equation for the Gravitational Constant with a Reasonable Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 1180-1192. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.118074

Miyashita, T. (2021) Various Empirical Equations for the Electromagnetic Force in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 623-634. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.125040

Miyashita, T. (2021) Various Empirical Equations to Unify between the Gravitational Force and the Electromagnetic Force. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 859-869. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.127054

Miyashita, T. (2020) Erratum to “Empirical Equation for the Gravitational Constant with a Reasonable Temperature” [Journal of Modern Physics 11 (2020) 1180-1192]. Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 1559-1560. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.1110096

Miyashita, T. (2021) Erratum to “Various Empirical Equations to Unify between the Gravitational Force and the Electromagnetic Force” [Journal of Modern Physics 12 (2021) 859-869]. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, 1160-1161. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.128069

Miyashita, T. (2022) Empirical Equation for a Fine-Structure Constant with Very High Accuracy. Journal of Modern Physics, 13, 336-346. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2022.134024

Miyashita, T. (2018) Empirical Relation of the Fine-Structure Constant with the Transference Number Concept. Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 2346-2353. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.913149

Miyashita, T. (2023) A Fine-Structure Constant Can Be Explained Using the Electrochemical Method. Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 160-170. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2023.142011

Miyashita, T. (2023) Explanation of the Necessity of the Empirical Equations That Relate the Gravitational Constant and the Temperature of the CMB. Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 432-444. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2023.144024

Miyashita, T. (2023) Simplification of Various Empirical Equations for the Electromagnetic Force in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 1217-1227. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2023.148068

Miyashita, T. (2024) Correspondence Principle for Empirical Equations in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature with Solid-State Ionics. Journal of Modern Physics, 15, 51-63. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2024.151002

Miyashita, T. (2024) Ratio of Gravitational Force to Electric Force from Empirical Equations in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 15, 674-689. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2024.155031

Miyashita, T. (2017) Equilibration Process in Response to a Change in the Anode Gas Using Thick Sm-Doped Ceria Electrolytes in Solid-Oxide Fuel Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 164, E3190-E3199. >https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0251711jes

Miyashita, T. (2024) Algorithms for Empirical Equations in Terms of the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature. Journal of Modern Physics, 15, 1567-1585. >https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2024.1510066

Jarzynski, C. (1997) Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences. Physical Review Letters, 78, 2690-2693. >https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.78.2690

Jacobson, T. (1995) Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State. Physical Review Letters, 75, 1260-1263. >https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.75.1260