Worldwide, Caesarean Sections (CS) are the most common obstetric surgery [1] - [3] . It is simply a surgical incision made in the anterior abdominal wall and in the uterus to deliver one or more foetuses after viability [4] . The World Health Organization (WHO) states that a maximum of 10% - 15% of all deliveries should have CS, as per their guidelines (the ideal CS rate) [5] . Regretfully, the American Centre for Disease Control and Prevention [6] reported that the current CS rate grew from 20.7% in 1995 to 31.6% in 2016.

A caesarean section becomes one of the most common surgical procedures done in hospitals. Some health sectors now have CS rates over 50% [7] . There is no evidence that higher rates improve any outcomes, yet the CS rates continue to rise. Low-risk mothers (all pregnant women with a single, viable, mature foetus, in a longitudinal lie, cephalic with vertex presentation, without any associated medical or surgical problems) should have a chance for a trial of vaginal delivery.

However, it is crucial to note that, in cases where there is an obstetrical justification, a caesarean section can save patients’ lives. The following are among the conditions that warrant a caesarean delivery [7] - [9] :

(1) Contracted or deformed maternal bony pelvis (inlet, mid-cavity, and/or outlet) leading to cephalo-pelvic disproportion (CPD) and failed labour progress.

(2) Obstructed maternal soft pelvic tissue (large myoma, cervical atresia/stenosis, cervical fibroid/invasive cancer).

(3) Maternal past operative history of ≥ 2 previous LSCS or 1 USCS, hysterotomy, metroplasty, repaired uterine prolapse, full-thickness myomectomy, repaired genital (vesico-vaginal or recto-vaginal) fistula, and/or repaired vaginal wall prolapse, permanent cervical cerclage, or when CS-Hysterectomy is indicated, or peri-mortem CS.

(4) Maternal current infection with human papilloma virus (HPV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), or human immune deficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis-C virus, severe chorioamnionitis with maternal sepsis.

(5) Maternal medical disorders with pregnancy: uncontrolled DM with macrosomic foetus (risk of shoulder dystocia), advanced cardiac or pulmonary disease, cerebral aneurysm, severe pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, arrested labor progress due to non-corrected uterine hypertonicity or inertia, foetal distress with utero-placental insufficiency, ante-partum haemorrhage (placenta previa, abruptio placenta, vasa previa), severe oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios with unstable foetal lie.

(6) Foetal malposition: occipito-posterior position (persistent oblique occipito-posterior and deep transverse arrest of the occiput).

(7) Foetal malpresentations; such as face presentation (mento-posterior), braw presentation, shoulder presentation (transverse lie), cord presentation, breech presentation (as in primigravida, footling presentation, foetal weight is > 3.5 kg or < 1.5 kg (severe preterm), hyperextended foetal head).

(8) Multifetal pregnancy: twin pregnancy (when the 1^st twin is not in vertex, cephalic presentation, conjoined twins, mono-amniotic twins), triplets, or higher order.

(9) Congenital foetal malformation: hydrocephalus, Rh-isoimmunization (hydrops fetalis), meningo-myelocele, parasitic head or limbs.

(10) The main irrelevant indications for a cesarean delivery include advanced maternal age, precious pregnancy, CS on a maternal request ¹, patient-doctor convenience, medical malpractice, social and cultural changes, adaptation of small family norms, as well as anxiety among doctors about possible lawsuits if something goes wrong with the foetus [8] .

Fear of vaginal birth (tocophobia), avoiding labour problems such as perineal damage and pelvic organ prolapse, and a past family history of good-experienced C-sections are the most common causes for C-sections performed on demand without a medical indication [10] . Furthermore, women who had private insurance had a 40% higher likelihood of choosing C-sections than those who had public (governmental) insurance [11] [12] . Also, women with a higher income typically have a higher rate of C-sections [13] . On the other hand, some expectant mothers decide on C-sections because friends and relatives advise them that vaginal deliveries on their own are uncomfortable [14] .

Due to ineffective healthcare systems, high morbidity and mortality rates have been linked to the incapacity to execute C-sections in many rural parts of the world, including African nations [15] . Caesarean delivery has a number of risks and problems in comparison to vaginal birth [16] . The assumption that operative C-section is almost a risk-free procedure should be changed. The CS complications [16] - [22] can be listed as follows:

Complications related to Anaesthesia:

(1) General anaesthesia: failed intubation, gastric aspiration (Mendelson’s syndrome), awareness with recall of intra-operative events [22] , drug overdose, hypoxia, apnea, and cardiac arrest.

(2) Epidural/Spinal anaesthesia: hypotension and headache.

Intra-operative complications:

(1) Shock: hemorrhagic or neurogenic.

(2) Wound extension and injury to great blood vessel.

(3) Injury to urinary bladder or ureters.

(4) Injury to intestines.

Short-term post-operative complications:

(1) Severe bleeding caused by uterine atony or DIC [17] , with possible development of Sheehan’s syndrome.

(2) Ogilvie Syndrome (Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction) and Acute Kidney Injury (a life threatening condition) [17] .

(3) Risks of massive blood transfusion.

(4) Atonic post-partum hysterectomy [20] .

(5) Maternal death.

(6) Wound hematoma or infection [19] .

(7) Generalized peritonitis, localized para-metritis, and post-partum endometritis [19] .

(8) Hospital-acquired infection: Bronchitis, bronchopneumonia.

(9) Post-operative paralytic ileus, acute gastric dilatation, intestinal obstruction.

(10) Bed rest with risk of thromboembolic disorders (TEDs).

(11) Admission into intensive care units with its financial burden.

(12) Urinary tract infection.

(13) Long hospital stay and prolonged recovery time.

Long-term post-operative complications:

(1) Peritoneal adhesions leading to intestinal obstruction, ectopic pregnancy, subfertility or infertility [20] .

(2) Endometriosis leading to subfertility or infertility.

(3) Risk of scar dehiscence or rupture uterus in future pregnancies [17] .

(4) Risk of abnormal placentation (placenta previa, accrete, increta).

(5) Incisional hernia.

(6) Ugly operative scar.

(7) Low chance for future successful vaginal delivery (VBAC).

(7) Persistent pelvic pain, pelvic abscess.

(9) Medico-legal court litigations.

(10) Future repeated C-sections with its cumulative costs [17] .

Baby complications:

(1) Operative trauma (cut to baby skin or fracture clavicle).

(2) Transient tachypnea and pulmonary hypertension.

(3) Low APGAR score (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration) and frequent admission to NICU (breathing problems).

(4) Risk of acquiring hospital-infection.

(5) Increased costs for neonatal care.

(6) Difficult foetal extraction leading to hypoxia, asphyxia, or foetal death.

(7) Delay initiation of natural feeding or failure of breast-feeding.

(7) Risk of childhood bronchial asthma, obesity, allergic rhinitis, type-I DM [20] .

1) To measure the degree of awareness and knowledge about C-sections’ complications among healthcare students in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia.

2) To trace the effect of students’ awareness and knowledge about C-sections’ complications on their attitudes and decision-making towards the future mode of women’s delivery.

The current study’s students were selected from ten different healthcare programs at the Batterjee Medical College (BMC) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The total recruited students (males and females) were 502 students out of the total of 3008 already registered students in the BMC, a percentage of 16.69% ( Table 1 ). The major recorded scholars were from the General Medicine Practice program, 172 out of 754 (22.81%), while the lower recorded students were 5.12% from the Respiratory Therapy program, 15 out of 293 ( Figure 1 ).

Regarding the socio-demographic characteristics of the participating students ( Table 2 ), we can see that the age ranged from 15 years old to more than 35 years old, with a predominance of the age group (from 20 to less than 25); 255 students out of 502 (50.8%). The shared female students were higher than male students (386 by a percentage of 76.89%, comparable to 116 by a percentage of 23.11%, respectively).

Concerning parents’ education level, we can notice that most of the participating students’ parents have a university grade (212 out of 502 with a percentage of 42.23%). On the other hand, parents’ with an intermediate (grade-9) certificate were the minimum (31 out of 502 with a percentage of 6.18%).

The students who lived in the urban were 451 (89.84%) comparable to students who lived in nearby villages 51 (10.16%). In addition, we noticed that the majority of involved students in the current study were single; 432 out of 502 (86.06%). 59 married female students delivered by vaginal route, while 26 students delivered by C-section.

The majority of participating students (213 out of 502, 42.43%) have low family income (< 4,000.00 USD/month), while the minority of students (32 out of 502, 6.37%) have high family income (8,000.00: < 10,000.00 USD/month). For most of the involved students, there were no associated medical illnesses (352 out of 502, 70.12%) and no healthcare insurance (241 out of 502, 48.01%).

The main source of students’ information about caesarean section operation ( Table 3 ) was obtained from their medical study (144, 28.69%), without previous participation in neither labour awareness campaign (320, 63.75%) nor educational activity about CS operation (310, 61.75%), with a significant P-value < 0.00001.

*Statistical significance (P < 0.05).

Upon asking the participating students about possible C-section complications, including those related to anaesthesia, intra-operative complications, short- and long-term post-operative complications, as well as neonate risks ( Table 4 ), their awareness and knowledge were variable with statistical significance (P-value = 0.017978). According to our scoring system ( Table 5 ), the majority of students (256, 50.99%) had inadequate (poor) knowledge, while the remaining were grouped with a reasonable (fair) level (124, 24.70%) and comprehensive (good) knowledge (122, 24.30%) ( Figure 2 ).

*Statistical significance (P < 0.05).

*Statistical significance (P < 0.05).

For assessment of students’ attitude and practice (decision-making) in choosing the mode of women’s delivery, we asked them about the factor(s) that influenced their decision to choose either vaginal delivery or operative C-section ( Table 6 ). The students who preferred C-section were 282 (56.18%) comparable to those who advised vaginal delivery (220, 43.82%), with statistical significance (P-value is 0.00001).

*Statistical significance (P < 0.05).

The correlation between students’ knowledge and their attitude for choice the mode of delivery is shown ( Table 7 ). To know which of our study’s hypotheses is correct (H0 or H1), we used a scatter plot, where the x-axis represents the constant variables (Knowledge score) and the y-axis represents the dependable variables (choice of CS or VD). After calculation of the correlation coefficient (r) for both cases, we found that there is a strong negative linear correlation between students’ knowledge score and their choice of C-section (r = −0.96811) which means that with a higher score of knowledge, there is less choice of CS as a mode of delivery ( Figure 3 ).

*Statistical significance (P < 0.05).

On the other hand, there is a weak positive linear correlation between students’ knowledge score and their choice of vaginal delivery (r = 0.43834) which means that with a higher score of knowledge, there is more choice of vaginal delivery as a mode of delivery ( Figure 4 ). Accordingly, we can agree with the real hypothesis (H1).

The Caesarean section has become a common surgical method for giving delivery in 21st-century obstetric practices [21] .

The incidence of CS operations is increasing every day, passing far beyond WHO’s recommended rate of not exceeding 15% for all deliveries. In Canada [17] , the rate of caesarean births has increased from 5.2% in 1969 up to 25.6% in 2003. In European countries, it accounts for 25%, while in Germany, it is 31.7% and in America, it is 32.2% [20] . In China, the overall annual CS rate increased from 29% in 2008 to 40% in 2016 [23] .

In the Middle East, the rate of CS in the United Arab Emirates was 33% in 2016 [7] . In Saudi Arabia, the CS rate was 27% in Riyadh, and 26.3% in Jeddah, in the year 2016 [15] . At Tanta University Hospital, Egypt, the rate of caesarean sections was 41% in 2013, 45% in 2014, and 46% in 2015 [8] .

However, by strictly monitoring vaginal deliveries, enforcing tight standards regarding the request for CS, and establishing a legal framework for medical litigation, a number of European nations have been able to gradually reduce their rates of CS.

In a cross-sectional study carried out in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in year 2020, awareness and knowledge of CS complications have been evaluated among women during antenatal and postnatal periods. Most of the participating women had a poor knowledge score about CS complications [15] . Similar findings were reported in cross-sectional studies carried out at Kasr Al Ainy University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, in 2020 [24] , Baghdad teaching hospital, Iraq, in 2022 [25] , in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia, in 2023 [26] , and in Baha City, Saudi Arabia in 2024 [27] . These findings were a strong drive for us to carry out this study to cover the gap (between the poor knowledge of pregnant women and their choice of mode of delivery) indirectly through good preparation of healthcare providers.

In general, women’s health education, improving pregnant women’s knowledge and perceptions of CS and its possible complications are crucial for a good outcome, proper decision making, and managing any future medico-legal conditions [25] .

In a Chinese study [28] , attendance at a prenatal education course influences the mode of delivery and reduces the unnecessary caesarean section. In a Turkish study [29] aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and awareness levels among grade 4 female medical students about CS deliveries and vaginal deliveries and which type of delivery would be preferred in the future. The level of knowledge and awareness was found to be very low, generally. Up to our knowledge, no further research have studied the correlation between the level (score) of healthcare students and its impact on their future decision making for the mode of women’s delivery.

According to the results of our study, there is a need for additional training programs during the internship. We also hope that this study will be able to contribute to the planning of some changes in educational content during the gynaecology and obstetrics clerkships and increase the effectiveness of the education programs.

To combat the growing epidemic of non-indicated Caesarean sections, a comprehensive strategy is essential. At the local and international levels, a variety of interventions focused on the root reasons for excessive use of caesarean sections ought to be developed and put into action [30] .

The estimated degree of awareness and knowledge about C-sections’ complications were different among male and female healthcare students, as well as varied across different healthcare programs. The background awareness and knowledge has a subsequent effect on the participating students’ future choice of the woman’s mode of delivery. High-scoring knowledge shows a strong negative linear correlation with choice of CS and a weak positive linear correlation with vaginal delivery.

Remah M. Kamel: The main author of the study, participated in the idea and design of this study, statistical analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, critical review, and submission for publication.

Raghad Aljuhani, Yousef Albog, Husna Irfan, and Faten Yaseen: All contributed by sharing the link to the survey questionnaire across different social media and collected the participants’ responses and feedback.