<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajps
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     American Journal of Plant Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2158-2742
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2158-2750
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ajps.2025.162024
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajps-140877
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Evaluation of the Agronomic Performances of Eight Varieties of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato in Central Côte d’Ivoire
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Konan Evrard Brice
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Dibi
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Niambet Jean-Michel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Koffi
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Adou Emmanuel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ehounou
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Brice Sidoine
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Essis
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Kouassi Thiègba
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kouamé
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Kinampinan Adelphe
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Hala
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Adjo Christiane
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Koffi
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Guy Fernand
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Yao
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aCentre National de Recherche Agronomique (CNRA), Bouaké, Côte d’Ivoire
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     11
    </day> 
    <month>
     02
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    16
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    02
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    301
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    315
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      16,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Sweet potato is one of the most important crops in Côte d’Ivoire. However, some constraints related to climate change limit its production. This study evaluated the agronomic and technological performances of eight varieties of orange-fleshed of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) to identify the most promising ones. The results show three groups of varieties with different agronomic performances. Group 1 composed of Irene and Vita is characterized by low production of small and large tuberous roots, low number of productive plants and low yield. Group 2 consisting mainly of Kabode is characterized by high production and weight of large tuberous roots as well as high yield. Group 3, composed of Tacha-2 Ininda, Ejumula Gloria, TIB-440060, CIP-199062-1, Bela bela is characterized by high production of small and large tuberous roots, high number of productive plants and average yield. The TIB-440060 variety has a recovery rate of 100%. The Irene, Kabode, Vita, Kabode varieties were resistant to viral and fungal diseases. In terms of technological quality, the TIB-440060 and CIP-199062-1 varieties have the best organoleptic qualities. Given the agronomic performances of the Kabode, TIB-440060 and CIP-199062-1 varieties, could be selected as the elites varieties and distributed to producers.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Sweet Potato
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Agronomic and Technological Performances
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Climate Change
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Côte d’Ivoire
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Sweet potato Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., is one of the most important root crops in sub-Saharan Africa. It is widely cultivated as a staple food in several African countries <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. This crop is becoming more and more economically important due to several advantages, including the reduction of blindness, the improvement of the nutritional status and well-being of rural populations and its adaptation to relatively poor soils and irregular rainfall <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. In the current context of climate change with the scarcity of rainfall, sweet potatoes with these many advantages could contribute to guaranteeing sustainable food security <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-3">
     [3]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In Côte d’Ivoire, sweet potatoes are grown throughout the country <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Its roots and leaves are consumed and prized by the Ivorian population. The quality of the varieties depends on the color of the flesh (orange flesh is rich in provitamin A) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. In Côte d’Ivoire, sweet potatoes are increasingly consumed in pounded form (foutou) mixed with cassava which gives them their tender and stretchable texture. This form of consumption is widely observed among certain peoples in the center and north of the country <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. Indeed, 58.2% of the varieties of sweet potatoes consumed in Côte d’Ivoire have white flesh <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. However, only orange-fleshed sweet potatoes are able to combat vitamin A deficiencies. In addition, they have enormous potential in terms of organoleptic and nutritional quality, particularly in Phosphorus, Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, zinc, iron and sodium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-7">
     [7]
    </xref>; Satheesh Neela, Solomon W. Fanta, 2019 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-5">
     [5]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Thus, for more than a decade, research through the National Center for Agronomic Research (CNRA) has introduced new varieties of orange-fleshed sweet potatoes to producers in most of the country’s major producing regions. Despite this, sweet potato production in the center of the country is low due to the lack of varieties adapted to this agroecological zone. Also, the lack of quality orange-fleshed sweet potato varieties remains a concern for producers, particularly those in the center of the country. Thus, to meet the demand for quality varieties adapted to the Central production area, eight varieties of orange-fleshed sweet potato from the CNRA genetic resources collection were selected for an agronomic evaluation. The aim is to determine the agronomic performance of these eight varieties of orange-fleshed sweet potato in order to select the best performing ones. More specifically, the aim is to identify promising varieties that are resistant to climatic hazards and pests, and have good yields with good organoleptic qualities.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Material and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Plant Material</title>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Table 1. Morphological characteristics of eight selected orange-fleshed sweet potato varieties.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Varieties</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Leaf</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Central lobation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Number of lobes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Skin color</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Colour of flesh</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Origin</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Irene</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Almost split</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Linear</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.96%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Pink</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Deep orange</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Mozambique</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Ejumula Gloria</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Lobed</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Semielliptical</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.96%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Deep orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Mozambique</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Kabode</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Lobed</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.81%"><p style="text-align:center">lanceolate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.96%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Purple-red</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Deep orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Ouganda</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Tacha-2 Ininda</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Lobed</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Oblanceolate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.96%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Pale orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Mozambique</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Vita</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Almost split</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.81%"><p style="text-align:center">Linear</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.96%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Purple-red</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Intermediate orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Ouganda</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.67%"><p style="text-align:center">TIB-440060</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Lobed</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.81%"><p style="text-align:center">lanceolate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.96%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Pale orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Burkina Faso</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.67%"><p style="text-align:center">CIP-199062-1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Lobed</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.81%"><p style="text-align:center">lanceolate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.96%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Burkina Faso</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Bela bela</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Lobed</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.81%"><p style="text-align:center">lanceolate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.96%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.61%"><p style="text-align:center">creamy</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Mozambique</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Cuttings of eight sweet potato varieties from the National Agronomic Research Center (CNRA) in Bouaké were used as plant material in this study. The names of the different varieties and their characteristics are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Methods</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>This study was conducted at the food crop research station (SRCV) of the National Agronomic Research Center (CNRA) in Bouaké. Bouaké is in the center of the Côte d’Ivoire. The geographical coordinates of the site are 7˚46' north latitude, 5˚06' west longitude and 376 m above sea level. The climate in the study area is humid tropical with four seasons: a long dry season (November to February), a long rainy season (March to June), a short dry season (July to August) and a short rainy season (September to October). These periods have become less marked in recent years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-8">
      [8]
     </xref>. The vegetation consists of wooded savannah with several Poaceae species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-10">
      [10]
     </xref> and soils are ferrallitic with a sandy-clay texture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-9">
      [9]
     </xref>. The average annual rainfall is 1200 mm with an average annual temperature of 25.73˚C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-11">
      [11]
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Rainfall distribution by dekad.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2606036-rId12.jpeg?20250227091140" />
    </fig>
    <p>Since the trial was conducted under pure rainfed conditions, the meteorological parameter taken into account in this study was rainfall. The rainfall conditions at the ten-day and monthly time steps are presented graphically using diagrams, to highlight the variations in rainfall during the trial. During this period, the total cumulative rainfall recorded amounted to 397.5 mm. The ten-day distribution of this total varied, ranging from 7.6 mm (during the second ten-day period of May) to 69.6 mm during the third ten-day period of September (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The plot used for setting up the trial was characterized in order to determine the physicochemical parameters of the soil before and after setting up the trial. A sample of this fallow soil of more than 10 years was taken (1 kg) in the 0 - 20 cm layer for laboratory analyses, which focused on:</p>
    <p>- determination of the granulometric fractions (clay, fine silt, coarse silt, fine sand and coarse sand) of the soil using the Robinson pipette method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-12">
      [12]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-15">
      [15]
     </xref>);</p>
    <p>- determination of the apparent density using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-16">
      [16]
     </xref> method;</p>
    <p>- determination of the pH value of the soil by the electrometric method “glass electrode”, in a soil/water ratio of 1/2.5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-15">
      [15]
     </xref>;</p>
    <p>- la détermination de la teneur du sol en carbone organique (C) par la méthode d’attaque sulfochromique à froid, après oxydation par le bichromate de potassium (K<sub>2</sub>CrO<sub>7</sub>) en milieu fortement acide (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-17">
      [17]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-18">
      [18]
     </xref>;</p>
    <p>- determination of soil total nitrogen (N) content by the Kjeldahl method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-19">
      [19]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-20">
      [20]
     </xref>;</p>
    <p>- determination of soil exchangeable cation (Ca, Mg and K) content and cation exchange capacity (CEC) by the normal ammonium acetate extraction method at pH 7; soil Ca and Mg content was determined by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry, while soil K content was determined by flame emission spectrometry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-21">
      [21]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-23">
      [23]
     </xref>;</p>
    <p>- determination of the soil content of assimilable phosphorus by colorimetry after extraction with an alkaline solution of sodium bicarbonate by the Olsen-Dabin method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-24">
      [24]
     </xref>; the P dosage is then done by colorimetry at 600 nm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-25">
      [25]
     </xref>;</p>
    <p>- determination of the exchangeable aluminium content of the soil by titrimetry after extraction with potassium chloride (KCl) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-26">
      [26]
     </xref>;</p>
    <p>- determination of the free iron content of the soil by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-27">
      [27]
     </xref>;</p>
    <p>- determination of the aluminium content of the soil by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-26">
      [26]
     </xref>;</p>
    <p>- determination of the values of the degree of saturation of phosphorus (DSP) by the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-28">
      [28]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-30">
      [30]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>This step made it possible to specify the essential morphological and physicochemical features as well as the typology of the soil concerned by the study, and to take stock of the fertility of the soil before conducting the experiment.</p>
    <p>The trial was conducted using a Fisher block design with three replicates. Variety is the only level of comparison considered. Blocks are composed of plot separated by 2 m. Each trial plot consists of twenty-four mounds spread over an area of 6 × 4 m with a spacing of 1.5 m. The spacing between mounds was 1 m/1 m, i.e. a density of 10,000 mounds per hectare. The experiment took place over an area of 1500 m<sup>2</sup>.</p>
    <p>The data of the physicochemical parameters of the soil were the subject of descriptive analysis. This involved determining the average quantities of nutrients and organic elements available in the soil. To determine agronomic performance fourteen parameters were considered. These parameters covered the agronomic performance, health and organoleptic qualities of the eight sweet potato varieties (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>). The data collected were analyzed by a main component analysis (MCA), a hierarchical ascending classification (HCA), a discriminant factorial analysis (DFA) and a variance analysis (ANOVA). Multivariate analyses (MCA, HCA and DFA) were used to group the eight varieties according to their performance and to give the characteristics of each group. ANOVA was then used to compare the varieties according to sanitary and organoleptic parameters. These analyses were carried out using R software version 4.4.1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-11">
      [11]
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Table 2. List of parameters measured and observed for the analysis of agronomic performance, health and organoleptic qualities of the eight sweet potato varieties.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Parameters</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Indication</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Codes</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Incidence of virus diseases</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of diseased plants/number of Plants</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">IVD</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Incidence of fungal diseases</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of diseased plants/number of Plants</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">IFD</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of small roots</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of roots with a diameter of less than 4 cm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">NSR</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of large roots</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of roots with a diameter greater than 4 cm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">NLR</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Weight of small roots</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Weight of root with a diameter of less than 4 cm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">WSR</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Weight of large roots</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Weight of root with a diameter greater than 4 cm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">WLR</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Average root weight</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Total root weight/number of productive plants</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">ARW</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Incidence of pests</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of roots damaged/total number of roots</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">InP</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Yield</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Total root weight/surface area</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Yie</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Dry matter content</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Fresh weight of root subtracted from water content</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">DMC</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of productive plants</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of plants that produced roots</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">NPP</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Cooking ability</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">1-good 2-acceptable 3-not good</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">CoA</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Taste of roots</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">1-good 2-acceptable 3-not good</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">TaR</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="33.12%"><p style="text-align:left">Appearance of root flesh</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="57.48%"><p style="text-align:left">1-good 2-acceptable 3-not good</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.41%"><p style="text-align:center">ARF</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Physico-Chemical Parameters of the Test Plot</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> shows the results of physicochemical analyses of the soil taken from the 0 - 20 cm layer and used for the experiment. It reveals that the soil is sandy-silty-clayey (sand 48%; silt 31% and clay 21%). The apparent density (Da), low (1.42 &lt; 1.5 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), indicates a good state of aeration and good porosity of the soil, and therefore subject to a good water storage capacity. The organic carbon (C) content is low (3.6 g·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup> &lt; 40 g·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>) for an equally insufficient content (&lt; 1 g·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>) of total nitrogen (N) determined at 0.2 g·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup> coupled with a high (18/1) C/N ratio (&gt; 10/1). The contents of exchangeable cations Ca, Mg and K are, respectively, 5.5 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup> (&gt; 2 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>), 3.9 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup> (&gt; 0.20 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>) and 0.2 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup> (&gt; 0.10 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>), with yet a very low CEC (4.68 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>) below the critical threshold (&lt; 20 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>). The Ca/Mg (1.41 &lt; 10) and K/CEC (0.043 &lt; 0.05) ratios are low. However, the Mg/K ratio of 19.5 is high (&gt;2). The strongly acidic pHH<sub>2</sub>O (4.6) is coupled with an insufficient content of assimilable phosphorus (modified Olsen method) of 3 mg·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup> well below the threshold of 10 mg·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>). The soil is rich in free iron-Fe (25.5 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>) and exchangeable aluminum-Al (3.58 cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>) characteristic of acid Ferralsol, while the degree of phosphorus saturation (DSP) of 33.31% is higher than 20% (critical value).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Table 3. Physicochemical characteristics of the soil at 0 - 20 cm depth before the experiment.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Characteristics of soil</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">Values</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Clay (g·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">210</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Silt (g·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">310</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Sand (g·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">480</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Da (g·cm<sup>− </sup><sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">1.42</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">pH H<sub>2</sub>O</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">4.6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">pH KCl</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">4,1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">∆ pH</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">0.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Organic carbon—C (g·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">3.6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Total nitrogen—N (g·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">0.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">C/N</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">18</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">CEC (cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">4.68</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Pa (mg·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Ca (cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">5.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Mg (cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">3.9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">K (cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">0,2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Ca/Mg</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">1.41</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Mg/K</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">19.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">K/CEC</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">0.043</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Free Fe (cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">25.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Exchangeable Al (cmol·kg<sup>− </sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">3.58</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="63.69%"><p style="text-align:center">DSP (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.31%"><p style="text-align:center">33.31</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Da: Apparent density; CEC: Cation exchange capacity; DSP: Degree of phosphorus saturation.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Agronomic Performance of the Eight Sweet Potato Varieties</title>
    <p>Variation in the agronomic performance and structure of the eight sweet potato varieties was revealed by Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA). This analysis revealed six principal components, two of which had eigenvalues greater than 1 and were therefore retained for interpretation of the results. These two principal components expressed 88.49% of the total inertia (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref></p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Table 4. Eigenvalues, correlations between agronomic parameters and the first two principal components.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">PC 1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">PC 2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Eigenvalues</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">4.01</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">2.19</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">% of variance</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">57.26</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">31.23</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">% of cumulative variance</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">57.26</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">88.49</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of small roots (NSR)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.82</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.47</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of large roots (NLR)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.85</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.49</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Weight of small roots (WSR)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.86</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.45</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Weight of large roots (WLR)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.21</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.98</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Yield (Yie)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.72</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.68</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Dry matter content (DMC)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.64</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.26</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="69.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of productive plants (NPP)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">0.95</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.52%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.18</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>PC: principal component, Bold indicates the most significant correlations (|r| ≥ 0.7).</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Structuring of the eight sweet potato varieties in the PCA factorial design.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2606036-rId13.jpeg?20250227091143" />
    </fig>
    <p>Except for dry matter content (DMC), all the parameters are relevant (|r| &gt; 0.7) in explaining the variation in agronomic performance of the eight sweet potato varieties. Only large root weight (WLR) was significantly correlated with PC 2. All other parameters were significantly correlated with PC 1. Projection of the sweet potato varieties in the plane shows that four of them (Ejumula Gloria, Bela bela, TIB-440060 and CIP-199062-1) form a group. On the other hand, the other four (Vita, Tacha-2 Ininda, Kabode and Irene) are distant from each other (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Based on the correlation circle between agronomic parameters and MCA principal components 1 and 2, the varieties Ejumula Gloria, Bela bela, TIB-440060 and CIP-199062-1 are characterized by a high number of small roots (NSR), productive plants (NPP) and a high weight of small roots (WSR). Kabode variety by a high weight of large root (WSR) and Tacha-2 Ininda by a low weight of large root (WSR). Irène variety is characterized by a low number of large roots (NLR) and a low yield (Yie). Finally, the Vita variety is characterized by a low number of small roots (NSR), a low number of productive plants (NPP) and a low small root weight (WSR) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>NLR: number of large roots, WSR: weight of small roots, DMC: dry matter content, NPP: number of productive plants, WLR: weight of large roots, NSR: number of small roots, Yie: Yield.Figure 3. Structuring of the eight sweet potato varieties in the PCA factorial design.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2606036-rId14.jpeg?20250227091143" />
    </fig>
    <p>Sweet potato varieties were grouped into three homogeneous clusters by Hierarchical Ascending Classification (HAC) based on the similarity of their agronomic performance. Cluster 1 is the Irène and Vita varieties. These two varieties have very similar agronomic performances. Similarly, Ejumula Gloria, Bela bela, TIB-440060, Tacha-2 Ininda and CIP-199062-1 varieties that make up Cluster 3 have similar agronomic performances. Kabode variety alone makes up Cluster 2. The projection of the three sweet potato variety clusters in the plane shows us that these clusters are quite distinct (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Classification of eight sweet potato varieties into homogeneous groups and projection into the plane.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Classification of eight sweet potato varieties into homogeneous groups and projection into the plane.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2606036-rId15.jpeg?20250227091143" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Classification of eight sweet potato varieties into homogeneous groups and projection into the plane.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2606036-rId16.jpeg?20250227091143" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Table 5. Agronomic performance of three sweet potato variety clusters.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Cluster</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Agronomic parameter</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.63%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean ± sd in category</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Overall mean ± sd</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.15%"><p style="text-align:center">p. value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="24.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Cluster 1</p><p style="text-align:left">- Irène</p><p style="text-align:left">- Vita</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.30%"><p style="text-align:center">NLR</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.63%"><p style="text-align:center">42.17 ± 3.83</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.91%"><p style="text-align:center">63.58 ± 16.49</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.15%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.30%"><p style="text-align:center">WSR (Kg)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.63%"><p style="text-align:center">4.50 ± 0.50</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.91%"><p style="text-align:center">8.81 ± 3.31</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.15%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.30%"><p style="text-align:center">DMC</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.63%"><p style="text-align:center">41.50 ± 0.50</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.91%"><p style="text-align:center">44.40 ± 1.93</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.15%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.30%"><p style="text-align:center">NPP</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.63%"><p style="text-align:center">52.17 ± 3.50</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.91%"><p style="text-align:center">63.38 ± 7.44</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.15%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="24.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Cluster 2</p><p style="text-align:left">Kabode</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="18.30%"><p style="text-align:center">WLR</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="21.63%"><p style="text-align:center">31.67 ± 00</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="23.91%"><p style="text-align:center">19.71 ± 5.41</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.15%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td aleft" width="24.01%"><p style="text-align:left">Cluster 3</p><p style="text-align:left">- Ejumula Gloria</p><p style="text-align:left">- Bela bela</p><p style="text-align:left">- TIB-440060</p><p style="text-align:left">- Tacha-2 Ininda</p><p style="text-align:left">- CIP-199062-1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.30%"><p style="text-align:center">WSR (Kg)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.63%"><p style="text-align:center">11.10 ± 1.79</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.91%"><p style="text-align:center">8.81 ± 3.31</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.15%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.30%"><p style="text-align:center">NSR</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.63%"><p style="text-align:center">136.87 ± 32.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.91%"><p style="text-align:center">104.92 ± 48.81</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.15%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.30%"><p style="text-align:center">NPP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.63%"><p style="text-align:center">68.20 ± 3.10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.91%"><p style="text-align:center">63.38 ± 7.44</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.15%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Sd: standard deviation, *: p. value &lt; 0,05, NLR: number of large roots, WSR: weight of small roots, DMC: dry matter content, NPP: number of productive plants, WLR: weight of large roots, NSR: number of small roots.</p>
    <p>The main agronomic performance of the three sweet potato clusters is reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>. Cluster 1 consisting of varieties Irène and Vita is characterized by averages of number of large roots (NLR), weight of small roots (WSR), dry matter content (DMC) and number of productive plants (NPP) lower than the respective general averages. Kabode variety that constitutes Cluster 2 is characterized by an average of weight of large roots (WLR) well above the general average. Cluster 3, which is composed of the other five varieties, is characterized by the averages of weight of small roots (WSR), number of small roots (NSR) and number of productive plants (NPP) superiors to the respective general averages. The other agronomic parameters were not specific to any of the three groups. They are not relevant for determining the agronomic performance between the three groups of sweet potato varieties.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Health Status of the Eight Sweet Potato Varieties</title>
    <p>The eight sweet potato varieties evaluated in this study varied in their response to the presence of viral and fungal diseases. Varieties, namely Vita, Bela bela, Kabode and Irène were the least sensitive with 0%, 0%, 0% and 1% incidence of virus diseases (IVD), respectively. The most sensitive were Tacha 2 Ininda (24%) and Ejumula Gloria (38.33%), followed by varieties TIB-440060 (12.33%) and CIP-199062-1 (12.67%). Ejumula is the least sensitive variety of the eight to fungal diseases (IFD). No difference was observed in the behavior of the eight varieties against pest attacks (InP) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref></p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Table 6. Health status of the eight sweet potato varieties.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Parameters</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="6.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Irène</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Ejumula Gloria</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Kabode</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Tacha-2 Ininda</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Vita</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.18%"><p style="text-align:center">TIB-440060</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.35%"><p style="text-align:center">CIP-199062-1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Bela bela</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="6.76%"><p style="text-align:center">p. value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.00%"><p style="text-align:center">IVD</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="6.18%"><p style="text-align:center">1<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.82%"><p style="text-align:center">38.33<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">24<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.18%"><p style="text-align:center">12.33<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.35%"><p style="text-align:center">12.67<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="6.76%"><p style="text-align:center">***</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.00%"><p style="text-align:center">IFD</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.18%"><p style="text-align:center">1<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.82%"><p style="text-align:center">13.33<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">5<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.18%"><p style="text-align:center">4.66<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.35%"><p style="text-align:center">3.33<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">0<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.76%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.00%"><p style="text-align:center">InP</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.18%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.82%"><p style="text-align:center">2.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.24%"><p style="text-align:center">4.7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.18%"><p style="text-align:center">9.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.35%"><p style="text-align:center">4.7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">1.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.76%"><p style="text-align:center">ns</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>IVD: incidence of virus diseases, IFD: incidence of fungal diseases, InP: incidence of pests, ns: not significant, *: p. value &lt; 0.05, ***: p. value &lt; 0.001.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Organoleptic Qualities of the Eight Sweet Potato Varieties</title>
    <p>No differences were observed in the cooking ability of the roots (CoA) of eight sweet potato varieties. Overall, the roots of the eight sweet potato varieties have a good taste (TaR). However, Ejumula Gloria, Tacha-2 Ininda, TIB-440060, CIP-199062-1 and Bela bela are the tastiest. Irène and Kabode presented the best appearance of root flesh (ARF), followed by Ejumula Gloria, TIB-440060 and CIP-199062-1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table7">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Table 7. Taste, cooking ability and appearance of roots of the eight sweet potato varieties.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Parameters</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Irène</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Ejumula Gloria</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Kabode</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Tacha-2 Ininda</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Vita</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">TIB-440060</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">CIP-199062-1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Bela bela</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="6.55%"><p style="text-align:center">p. value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">CoA</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">1.22</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">1.11</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">1.44</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">1.33</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">1.33</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">1.11</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1.22</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="6.55%"><p style="text-align:center">ns</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">TaR</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">1.56<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">1.11<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">2.11<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">2.11<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">1.67<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">1.44<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">1.44<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1.44<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.55%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">ARF</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">1.11<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">1.55<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.36%"><p style="text-align:center">1.22<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">2.22<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.35%"><p style="text-align:center">2.22<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.30%"><p style="text-align:center">1.33<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.76%"><p style="text-align:center">1.33<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.29%"><p style="text-align:center">2.55<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="6.55%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>CoA: cooking ability, TaR: taste of roots, ARF: appearance of root flesh, ns: not significant, *: p. value &lt; 0.05.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>The results of the analysis did not reveal a significant difference between the high rework rates after planting the eight sweet potato varieties. This would be due to the potential for recovery of the varieties considered in our study. These results are in line with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-31">
     [31]
    </xref>. This author in a study conducted under Kabode pedoclimatic conditions revealed similar rates of recovery among five sweet potato genotypes.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-"></xref>Number of roots per plant varied by variety (1.57 to 3.7). The results obtained are close to those obtained in the 10 sweet potato varieties whose number of roots per plant varied from 1 to 4 in Bongor (Chad) and 3 to 5 in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-32">
     [32]
    </xref>. Our results are also similar to those of the 4 sweet potato varieties grown in western Kenya <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-31">
     [31]
    </xref>. However, in eastern Congo two varieties of sweet potato (Yan Shul and White Delite), yielded a larger number of roots per plant (15.5 and 14) than that of our study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-33">
     [33]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-34">
     [34]
    </xref>. This large number obtained from these varieties grown in Congo can be related to soil type, environmental temperature and especially rainfall. Moreover, the development of the roots depends on the supply of assimilas, which depends on the photosynthetic efficiency and the effective leaf area of the plant. However, root initiation requires a minimum level of assimilation, because the rootization phase only begins when the plant has acquired a certain development of its vegetative apparatus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-35">
     [35]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Regarding agronomic parameters, there is a strong correlation between the different parameters and the eight sweet potato varieties. Thus, the weight of large roots best characterizes the Kabode variety while the number and weight of small tuberous roots, the number of productive plants, the number of large tuberous roots characterize Ejumula Gloria, Bela bela, TIB-440060 and CIP-199062-1, and Irene. Based on these results, three distinct groups of sweet potato varieties were identified with their agronomic performances. Cluster 1 Irene and Vita is characterized by low production of small and large tuberous roots, low number of productive plants and low yield. Cluster 2 consisting mainly of Kabode is characterized by high production and weight of large tuberous roots as well as high yield. Cluster 3, composed of Tacha-2 Ininda, Ejumula Gloria, TIB-440060, CIP-199062-1, Bela bela is characterized by high production of small and large tuberous roots, high number of productive plants and average yield. These differents groups show the agronomic variability that exists within the eight orange-fleshed sweet potato varieties.</p>
   <p>Kabode’s performance in terms of yield, dry matter, large tuberous roots could be explained by several physiological, soil or agroclimatic factors. Indeed, some authors including <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-36">
     [36]
    </xref>, have shown a correlation between yield and dry matter of above-ground biomass. According to these authors a leafy plant with vigorous stems very often has a high production of roots. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-37">
     [37]
    </xref> also thought that root formation is a function of the accumulation of Photosynth states, especially carbohydrates from the aerial part. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-38">
     [38]
    </xref> showed that sweet potato plants produce higher amounts in roots when subjected to a constant soil temperature of 30˚C, combined with an air temperature of 25˚C at night. In addition, soil compactness may also have a significant influence on yield <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-36">
     [36]
    </xref>. This shows that the more foliage the sweet potato plant has, the more photosynthesis it accumulates necessary for root formation. Based on agronomic performance, Kabode variety would be a candidate variety for selection.</p>
   <p>No significant difference was observed for the cooking capacity of orange-fleshed sweet potato varieties; which would mean that all varieties presented the same cooking. For the taste and appearance of the flesh, there is a significant difference between the varieties. These parameters varied from variety to variety. For taste, Ejumula Gloria, Tacha-2 Ininda, TIB-440060, CIP-199062-1 and Bela bela had the best tastes; while Irene and Kabode have a good appearance of the flesh of the tuberous roots, followed by the varieties Ejumula Gloria, TIB-440060 and CIP-199062-1. These two parameters are very importants and constitute consumer acceptance criteria according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. In fact, the taste and appearance would therefore depend on certain characteristics or elements contained in each variety that would improve the flavor or appearance. Our results are similar to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-39">
     [39]
    </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-40">
     [40]
    </xref> who argue that the diversity of taste observed between varieties could be explained by the combination of different carbohydrate fractions to the total sugar contained in each sweet potato variety.</p>
   <p>For the incidence of viruses and fungi, the results could be explained by the fact that some varieties exhibit resistance to viral and fungal diseases than others. The most sensitive varieties in our study are Tacha Ininda, Ejumula Gloria, TIB-440060 and CIP-199062-1. Our results partially corroborate those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140877-41">
     [41]
    </xref>. In a study conducted in northern and northeastern Côte d’Ivoire, these authors observed susceptibility TIB-440060 to viral and fungal diseases of TIB-440060 and Tacha Ininda. It should be noted, however that these results are essentially based on visual observations. No laboratory tests have been carried out to confirm the resistance of these varieties to these pathogens.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>Agronomic performance, health status and organoleptic qualities taken into account in our study, allowed us to compare the eight sweet potato varieties. The results obtained in this study showed three groups of varieties with very distinct agronomic characteristics. The Kabode variety of Group 2 of agronomic diversity presented the best agronomic performances in terms of weight and number of tuberous roots, dry matter rate and yield unlike other varieties. In addition, on the organoleptic and health level, it is a variety that presents very good organoleptic qualities and resistance to viral and fungal diseases. The varieties TIB-440060 and CIP-199062-1 are from Group 3 of agronomic diversity. They have lower yields than the Kabode variety, but have good organoleptic qualities and are tolerant to viral and fungal diseases. Given the agronomic, technological and nutritional performances, the Kabode, TIB-440060 et CIP-199062-1 varieties could be selected and distributed to producers in the Central region of the country.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ndangui, C.B. (2015) Production et Caractérisation de la Farine de Patate Douce (Ipomoea batatas L.): Optimisation de la Technologie de Planification. Mémoire de Thèse en Cotutelle: Procédés et Biotechnologie Alimentaire. Université de Lorraine et Université Marien Ngouabi, 151 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huat, C. (1999) Etude de la Sensibilité de la Patate Douce aux Nématodes Phytoparasitaires du genre Meloidogyne du Sénégal. Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, 49 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ermias, T., Solomon, M. and Mengistu, U. (2013) The Effect of Barley Bran, Linseed Meal and Their Mixes Supplementation on The Performances, Carcass Characteristics and Economic Return of Arsi-Bale Sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 114, 35-40. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.05.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sangaré, A., Koffi, E., Akamou, F. and Fall, C.A. (2009) État des Ressources Phytogénétiques pour l’Alimentation et l’Agriculture: Second Rapport National, 63 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Neela, S. and Fanta, S.W. (2019) Review on Nutritional Composition of Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato and Its Role in Management of Vitamin A deficiency. Food Science&amp;Nutrition, 7, 1920-1945. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1063 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kouassi, J.H.M., Dibi, K.E.B., Boye, M.A.D., Essis, B.S., Kouakou, A.M., N'Zue B. and Dufour, D. (2024) Sweetpotato Cultivation: Characteristics, Constraints and Preferred Traits of Producers and Consumers in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 104, 4922-4929. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12923
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kelechukwu, E.C., Onu, O.O. and Ojimelukwe, P.C. (2016) Organoleptic Properties and ProxiMate Composition of Some Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Genotypes. American Journal of Agricultural Research, 1, 0014-0020.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brou, Y.T., Akindès, F. and Bigot, S. (2005) La Variabilité Climatique en Côte d’Ivoire: Entre Perceptions Sociales et Réponses Agricoles. Cahiers Agricultures, 14, 533-540.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Séka, K., Diallo, A.H., Kouassi, N.K. and Aké, S. (2009) Incidence du Yam Mosaic Virus (YMV) et du Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV) sur des Variétés de Dioscorea Spp. Cultivées dans les Régions de Bouaké et de Toumodi en Côte d’Ivoire. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Science, 3, 694-703. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v3i4.47179
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ettien, D.J.B. (2004) Intensification de la production d’igname (Dioscorea spp.) par la fertilisation minérale et l’identification de nouvelles variétés en zones forestière et savanicole de Côte d’Ivoire. Thèse de Doctorat Unique en Science de la Terre, Option Agro-pédologie, Université de Cocody.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     The R Core Team (2024) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. &gt;https://www.R-project.org 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     DIBI Konan, E.B., ESSIS, B.S. and NZUE, B. (2015) Techniques Culturales de l a Patate Douce. Manuel de Formation des Agents de Développement des Producteurs. Appui à la Promotion de la Patate Douce à Chair Orange en Côte d’Ivoire/Projet Change (CNRA)/HKI), 53 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gee, G.W. and Bauder, J.W. (1986) Particle-Size Analysis. In: Klute, A., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods, American Society of Agronomy/Soil Science Society of America, 383-411. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anderson, J.M. and Ingram, J.I.S. (1993) Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. 2nd Edition, C.A.B. International. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Girard, F. and Raffet, M. (1999) Association française de normalisation (AFNOR); LIVRE Achats et approvisionnements. 588 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Saxton, K.E. and Rawls, W.J. (2006) Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 1569-1578. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934) An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Science, 37, 29-38. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nelson, D.W. and Sommers, L.E. (1982) Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and Organic Matter. In: Page, A.L., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, ASA-SSSA, 595-579. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bremner, J.M. (1965) Total Nitrogen. In: Norman, A.G., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, 1149-1178. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.c32
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney, C.S. (1982) Nitrogen—Total. In: Page, A.L., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, 595-624. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c31
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jackson, M.L. (1967) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., 498 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Thomas, G.W. (1982) Exchangeable Cations. In: Page, A.L., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, 159-165. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chapman, H.D. (1965) Cation Exchange Capacity. In: Black, C.A., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 9.2, American Society of Agronomy, 891-901. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.c6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dabin, B. (1970) Méthode d’étude de la fixation du phosphore sur les sols tropicaux. Coton et Fibres Tropicaux, XXV, 1-44. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Murphy, J. and Riley, J.P. (1962) A Modified Single Solution Method for the Determination of Phosphate in Natural Waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27, 31-36. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Barnhisel, R. and Bertsch, P.M. (1982) Aluminum. In: Page, A.L., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, 275-300. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c16 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978) Development of a Dtpa Soil Test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese, and Copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42, 421-428. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     van der Zee, S.E.A.T.M., Gjaltema, A., Van Riemsdijk, W.H. and de Haan, F.A.M. (1992) Simulation of Phosphate Transport in Soil Columns. II. Simulation Results. Geoderma, 52, 111-132. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Breeuwsma, A. and Silva, S. (1992) Phosphorus Fertilization and Environment Effects in the Netherlands and the Po Region (Italy). Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Soil, and Water Research.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Breeuwsma, A. and Reijerink, G.A. (1993) Phosphate Saturated Soils: A New Environmental Issue. Chemical Time Bombs. Proceeding of the European State-of-the-Art Conference on Delayed Effects of Chemicals in Soils and Sediments, Veldhoven, 2-5 September 1992, 79-85.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Akassimadou, E.F. and Yao-Kouamé, A. (2014) Caractéristiques morpho-pédologiques et potentiels d’un sol de bas-fond secondaire développé sur granito-gneiss en région de savane guinéenne (Centre de la Côte d’Ivoire). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 79, 6968-6982. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v79i1.17
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Amani, N.V. (2017) Etude Comparative de Différentes Techniques Culturales (Buttes, Billons et Labour À Plat) sur le Rendement de 5 Génotypes de la Patate Douce dans les Conditions Pédoclimatiques de Kabare (Cas du Groupement de Bugorhe). Diplôme de Sciences Agronomiques et Environnement. Université Evangélique en Afrique.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Djinet, I.A., Nana, R., Tamini, Z. and Badiel, B. (2015) Etude Comparée des Paramètres Agromorphologiques de Dix (10) Variétés de Patate (Ipomea batatas (L.) Lam Cultivées au Champ dans deux (2) Conditions Climatiques au Tchad et au Burkina Faso. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 3, 1243-1251. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v9i3.9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sylla, P.M.D.D., Ndoye, F., Badiane, A., Mbaye, M.S., Tall, L., Cisse, N.S., et al. (2020) Agronomic Performances and Nutritional Assessment of Three Sweet Potato Varieties (Ipomoea batatas (L) lam.) Introduced in an Agro-Ecological Zone of Groundnut Basin in Senegal. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 42, 1-12. &gt;https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2020/v42i730548
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Phemba, P., Mutombo, T., Lutaladio, N.B. and Carey, E.E. (1998) Performance et Stabilité de Rendement des Génotypes de Patate Douce dans divers Environnements à l’Est du Congo. African Crop Science Journal, 6, 109-118. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v6i2.27806
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vernier, P. and Varin, D. (1994) La culture de la patate douce. Agriculture et développement, 3, 54-53.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sajjapongse, A. and Roan, Y.C. (1982) Les Facteurs Physiques Affectant le Rendement en Racine de la Patate Douce. Patate Douce. CTA/ACCT. Shanhua, 217-229.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zara, D.L., Guevas, S.E. and Carlos, J.T. (1982) Le Comportement des Variétés de Patate Douce Sous Cocotiers. atate Douce, CTA/ACCT, Shanhua, 251-259.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sekioka, H. (1970) The Effect of Temperature on the Translocation and Accumulation of Carbohydrates in Sweet Potato. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Tropical Root and Root Crops, Hawaii, 37-40.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Leighton, C.S., Schönfeldt, H.C. and Kruger, R. (2008) Quantitative Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Five Different Cultivars of Sweet Potato to Determine Sensory and Textural Profiles. Journal of Sensory Studies, 25, 2-18. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00188.x 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140877-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wolfe, J.A. (1992) Sweet Potato: An Untapped Food Resource. Cambridge University Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>