<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    oje
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Ecology
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2162-1985
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2162-1993
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/oje.2025.152009
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    oje-140717
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Ecological Models Reveal a Weakened Population Structure, and Distribution Drivers of Osyris lanceolata (Santalaceae) in the Karamoja Sub-Region, Uganda
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ben Belden
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mugula
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Samuel Kuria
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kiboi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       James Ireri
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kanya
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Harald
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Meimberg
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Manuel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Curto
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Paul
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Okullo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"> 
      <sup>5</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Anthony
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Egeru
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"> 
      <sup>6</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jenipher Biira
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Salamula
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"> 
      <sup>7</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Stephen F.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Omondi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8"> 
      <sup>8</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Bugema University, Kampala, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aInstitute of Integrative Nature Conservation Research, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aBIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Vairão, Portugal
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff5">
    <addr-line>
     aNational Fisheries Resources Research Institute, National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO), Jinja, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff6">
    <addr-line>
     aCollege of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff7">
    <addr-line>
     aInstitute of Development Policy (IOB), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff8">
    <addr-line>
     aKenya Forestry Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     13
    </day> 
    <month>
     02
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    02
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    153
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    173
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      13,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      17,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      17,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Osyris lanceolata is heavily and illegally exploited in East Africa for its essential oils, yet little is known about its population status and ecological requirements. This study examined its population structure and environmental factors influencing its distribution in the semi-arid Karamoja sub-region, Uganda. We surveyed 388 plots (5 m radius) at different altitudes, recording life stages, stem diameters, and regeneration patterns, and analyzed soil samples. Multivariate analyses, including Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA), Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA), Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS), and Multiple Regression Modeling (MRM), identified key environmental factors affecting its distribution. Findings show that O. lanceolata populations in Moroto, Nakapiripirit, and Amudat districts are severely degraded due to overexploitation. The species is primarily regenerating through coppicing rather than seedlings, with an exploitation intensity of 56.6%. Population densities are low, distribution is irregular, and sustainable harvesting is not viable. Soil properties, particularly Ca
    <sup>2</sup>
    <sup>+</sup>, N, P, K
    <sup>+</sup>, Na
    <sup>+</sup>, and organic matter, significantly influence its abundance. Conservation efforts should focus on identifying suitable provenances for genetic preservation and plantation establishment. Areas with at least 9 trees per hectare in Moroto, Nakapiripirit, and Amudat could serve as potential sites for ex-situ plantations. Further research should explore how biotic interactions, genetic diversity, and morphology affect oil yield and quality to support restoration, breeding, and domestication initiatives.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Plant Ecology
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Hemiparasites
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Edaphic Drivers
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Ecological Modelling
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Multivariate Analysis
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Essential Oils
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      “R”
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Osyris lanceolata Hochst. &amp; Steud. (East African sandalwood) is a root hemiparasitic plant that belongs to the family Santalaceae and genus Osyris <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Members in this family are culturally and commercially useful species providing essential oils used in the perfumery, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Locally, the bark and root extracts treat candidiasis, malaria, diarrhea, chest pain, and fever in Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-4">
     [4]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Sandalwood oils have chemo-preventive properties used to manage eruptive skin and inflammatory diseases such as dysuria, bronchitis, gonorrhea, and urinary infections. The bark and roots also provide red dye for skin tanning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-4">
     [4]
    </xref> while its shoot provides antipyretic agents for cattle. The roots have the ability to accumulate heavy metals and are thus useful in phytoremediation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. The oil has blending and anti-septic properties suitable for making fixatives in other fragrances <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Traditional oil-producing species such as Santalum alba and Santalum spicatum have been commercially exploited since the 1990s and their populations have significantly dwindled due to over-exploitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-9">
     [9]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. This trend has increased the demand for O. lanceolata as a source of essential oils with ready markets in Europe, China, and the United Arab Emirates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. The pressure on O. lanceolata populations has led to the over-exploitation of the species in East Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Some populations have completely disappeared while others are rapidly declining despite listing the species under Appendix II of CITES to ensure their survival <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-11">
     [11]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. The species survives in unique arid and semi-arid habitats, particularly on rocky and stony soils <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-14">
     [14]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-17">
     [17]
    </xref>. It also grows naturally in clumped communities along water galleys <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-16">
     [16]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-18">
     [18]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-19">
     [19]
    </xref> and is closely associated with Rhus natalensis as a suitable host. The O. lanceolata hosts occur as shrubs, trees, herbs, and succulents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. As O. lanceolata is a hemiparasitic plant, its requirements for edaphic conditions must be related to the requirements of its hosts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. However, O. lanceolata distribution may not be consistent with soil variables in low-altitude areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. Whether it shows similar behavior to edaphic variables in semi-arid savanna habitats, is yet to be investigated.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-"></xref>Elsewhere, the population and distribution drivers of aerial hemi parasites have been better explained than the distribution drivers of root hemiparasites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-20">
     [20]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-27">
     [27]
    </xref>. It was established by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-28">
     [28]
    </xref> that mistletoes abundance is significantly correlated with average levels of nitrogen for the woody plants and the overall nutrient status of a biome influences the abundance of mistletoes. Secondly, the host choice for mistletoes is significantly correlated to the mean host nitrogen. Away from hemiparasites, soil nutrients also influence the distribution of non-hemiparasites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-29">
     [29]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-35">
     [35]
    </xref>. For the root hemi parasites, some studies have linked their distribution to host quality and water availability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-20">
     [20]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-21">
     [21]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. This implies that host survival requirements strongly influence the survival of root hemiparasites. Thus, it is important to consider the distribution of O. lanceolata and its hosts as a function of edaphic variables interacting with biotic and abiotic factors in the species microhabitat <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-26">
     [26]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-34">
     [34]
    </xref>. The micro-habitat of a species is believed to exhibit different conditions from areas further away <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-36">
     [36]
    </xref>. Hence, testing soil variables within the micro-habitat of O. lanceolata and further away provides insight into specific variables that influence the species’ distribution and survival. Therefore, further studies are necessary to identify edaphic variables, if any, that influence the species survival in dry savanna habitats as a key step towards the establishment of ex-situ populations for commercial use <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-37">
     [37]
    </xref>. This study builds further on a similar approach to identify edaphic variables that influence the distribution of O. lanceolata and its hosts and how the species population structure responds to over-exploitation in the semi-arid savanna ecosystem. Two questions are addressed: i) Which population structural patterns characterise O. lanceolata in Karamoja? ii) Which edaphic variables influence the distribution of O. lanceolata and its hosts? The study assumes that: (i) O. lanceolata population structure remains stable despite over-exploitation in the past. (ii) Its distribution and survival do not correlate with edaphic variables in the semi-arid savanna ecosystem across different altitudes. (iii) There are no significant differences in edaphic variables within the microhabitat and further away from the micro-habitat of O. lanceolata.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Study Area</title>
    <p>The study was conducted in the districts of Moroto, Nakapiripirit, and Amudat of the Karamoja sub-region, located between 1˚4' - 4.24˚N and 33˚50' - 35˚E. The sub-region covers approximately 27,000 km<sup>2</sup> and is bordered by the Republic of South Sudan and Kenya to the North and East respectively. The region is characterized by distinct dry and wet seasons (Egeru et al. 2014) with an average rainfall of 400 - 1200 mm, and temperatures ranging between 28˚C and 33˚C <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-38">
      [38]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-40">
      [40]
     </xref>. The largest human population in Karamoja are mainly pastoralists, with few individuals involved in crop production, practicing on a communal land tenure system.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Location of Africa, Uganda, Karamoja sub-region and study populations. Colored dots indicate the selected sites for sampling.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId12.jpeg?20250220032133" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Data Collection</title>
    <p>To characterise the species population structure and distribution drivers, we identified eleven sites representing different altitude zones for sampling. The sites were selected after extensive surveys conducted between 2018 and 2020 in the Karamoja sub-region and these were informed by CITES reports and articles on Osyris lanceolata. The selection of target populations was based on species availability and accessibility of the sites. A further criterion was to select populations from a spectrum of altitudes categorised into low and high-altitude zones of Moroto, Nakapiripirit, and Amudat districts. Finally, eleven sites or populations were selected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>). We considered our sampling plot to be a circle of a 5 m radius with the O. lanceolata at the center. The 5 m radius was adequate to cover the whole clump of O. lanceolata including its hosts and this was the targeted microhabitat for O. lanceolata. The prevailing conditions further away from the micro-habitat were measured beyond 10 m from the O. lanceolata clump, and these were areas without O. lanceolata, and considered unconducive for the survival of O. lanceolata <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-41">
      [41]
     </xref>. In total, we inventoried 388 plots using the nearest neighbor method as described by Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg (1974). This method enabled us to encounter more species individuals than would be for quadrat sampling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-42">
      [42]
     </xref>. At each site, the initial sampling point was established after encountering the first O. lanceolata in a north-south direction. We did not specify sampling intervals due to the patchy distribution of the species, but we moved in a square-like pattern following the nearest-neighbor method. This pattern increased our chances of encountering more individuals of O. lanceolata because it offers an opportunity to spot a target species from all directions. For every sampling point, O. lanceolata was recognized by a skilled botanist and categorised into different life stages (seedlings, saplings, and adults) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-43">
      [43]
     </xref>. The seedlings were classified in size class 0.5 - 1.2 cm (diameter), saplings at 1.2 - 5.9 cm, and adults at 6.0 - 19.4 cm diameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-44">
      [44]
     </xref>. Because O. lanceolata is a multi-stemmed plant and its branching starts at lower heights, we measured the stem circumference (circ) for saplings and adults at 55 cm above the ground using a measuring tape and then converted it to diameter using the formula: D = <sup>circ</sup>/<sub>π</sub>, where; D is the diameter; circ is the circumference, and π is pi or 3.14. For seedlings, the stem circumference was measured at ≤20 cm above the ground within the 5 m radius. The altitude for each sampling point was recorded in the field by a GPS (Garmin 64 s). We assessed the species regeneration status by examining the growth mode, the number of coppiced individuals, and the proportion of seedlings and saplings within the sampling point <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-45">
      [45]
     </xref>. By exploring the species extent of coppicing, it was possible to estimate the species intensity of destructive illegal harvesting expressed as the proportion of coppiced individuals to the independently growing stems of saplings and adults per site <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-46">
      [46]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Edaphic Variables</title>
    <p>A total of 112 soil samples were randomly collected from all sites. Two locations were considered for sampling at each site: one location within the 5 m radius of O. lanceolata (Osyris samples) and another location at &gt;10 m away from O. lanceolata (control samples or non-Osyris samples). Using a soil auger, we collected samples at two depths to understand how nutrients vary with depths between Osyris and non-Osyris samples. Topsoil was collected at 0 - 20 cm while bottom soil at 20 - 40 cm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-19">
      [19]
     </xref>. All samples were packed in tight black polythene bags and labeled using non-erasable ink on a masking tape to indicate the study site, sampling point, and sample category. The labeled samples were temporarily stored under room temperature at NARO-Nabuin Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute (ZARDI) in Karamoja and later transferred to Makerere University, for analysis. Before analysis, all samples were air-dried at room temperature, ground, and sieved through a 2 mm sieve. Samples were analyzed for soil pH, measured on a 1:2.5 soil in distilled water suspension using a pH meter. Soil texture was assessed by the bouyoucos or hydrometer method. Exchangeable cations (K<sup>+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup>) were extracted with neutral ammonium acetate solution and then determined directly from emissions measured by a flame photometer. The nitrogen content (N) was determined by the Kjeldahl method, and phosphorus (P) was measured by Bray 1 method and determined using a spectrophotometer (JENWAR 6405UV/vis) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-47">
      [47]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-49">
      [49]
     </xref>. Organic matter was determined by the oxidation method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-47">
      [47]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-50">
      [50]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Data Analysis</title>
    <p>We used the species density, and size class distribution and regression analysis to evaluate the strength and stability of the species population structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-42">
      [42]
     </xref>. A strong and stable population structure was considered to show an inverse J-shaped curve, a significant number of independently growing saplings and adults, and an adequate number of seedlings with good potential for regeneration through natural seedlings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-18">
      [18]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-43">
      [43]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-51">
      [51]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-52">
      [52]
     </xref>. Poor regeneration potential was considered to indicate a population with only saplings and adults and few seedlings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-18">
      [18]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-51">
      [51]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-53">
      [53]
     </xref>. The species density (number of individuals per unit area) was calculated per site using two variables: (i) the number of O. lanceolata individuals in each site; and (ii) the total area sampled in a site <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-43">
      [43]
     </xref>. The sampled area for each site was calculated in Quantum-gis software (Q-gis) using O. lanceolata coordinates. The area and distance were measured and later used to calculate the species density as follows: Osd = <sup>nol</sup>/<sub>tas</sub>, where; “Osd” = O. lanceolata population density; “nol” = number of O. lanceolata individuals in a sampled population; and “tas” = total area sampled in a study site/population. A species density for a stable population structure was considered to be ≥45 trees per hectare, while densities ≤45 trees per hectare were considered to characterise poor, weak, and unstable population structures with low capacity for recruitment and survival <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-43">
      [43]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-53">
      [53]
     </xref>. We calculated descriptive statistics for edaphic variables using the vegan package in R version 4.1.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-54">
      [54]
     </xref>. To reveal the population structure, stem diameters were arranged into size classes of seedlings (0.1 - 1.2 cm); saplings (1.5 - 6.0 cm), and adults (6.5 cm - 19.4 cm). The frequency of individuals in each size class was graphically represented in a stem diameter curve to characterise the species’ population structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-43">
      [43]
     </xref>. The disturbed populations were expected to show irregular, reverse J-shaped curves or negative exponential curves while the less disturbed populations usually show sigmoid to bimodal-shaped mound curves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-55">
      [55]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>To establish the strength of the population structure, a regression analysis r<sup>2</sup> was computed by a plot between the midpoint of size classes and the transformed values of stem density per size class. The status of population structure in each site was inferred by analysis of the slope of the linear regression of stem diameter classes. The midpoint of each stem size class was used as the independent variable (Midpt), while the density of individuals in each class (D/ha) was used as the dependent variable. D/ha was transformed by In(D/ha + 1) to avoid zero individuals in some classes. The regression was made between In(D/ha + 1) and Midpt. Steep negative slopes indicate stable and self-replacing populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-18">
      [18]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-51">
      [51]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-52">
      [52]
     </xref>. The weak negative slopes or flat slopes indicate poor recruitment and declining populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-51">
      [51]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-52">
      [52]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The non-multidimensional scaling analysis (NMDS) was used to illustrate the difference between soil samples within the species microhabitat and those further away from the microhabitat. A plot of NMDS values of the soil was used to classify the edaphic variables according to their relationship with the distribution of O. lanceolata and its hosts. Further, the test for significance in differences between Osyris samples and non-Osyris samples was done by ANOVA. The canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was applied to explain the relationships between the species presence and edaphic variables. All edaphic data was condensed and transformed by detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) before the application of the CCA on species-transformed edaphic variables to explain the relationships between the species distribution, edaphic variables, and altitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-54">
      [54]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-56">
      [56]
     </xref>. The CCA was implemented by the vegan package in R version.4.1.2 using recommended steps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-54">
      [54]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Multivariate regression modeling (MRM) was used to predict and explain the relationship between O. lanceolata distribution and abundance and the influencing edaphic variables. In this model, the response or predictor variable was O. lanceolata density (Osd) per site/population against edaphic variables (pH, electroconductivity (EC), Na<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, N, P, and organic matter), as independent variables. We hypothesized the abundance of O. lanceolata to be a function of specific edaphic variables acting in concert with other biotic and abiotic factors. Further, we expected our model to be significant because the spatial distribution of hemiparasites is influenced by the nutrient status of the soils <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-18">
      [18]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-28">
      [28]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Population Structure Patterns in Karamoja</title>
    <p>Regression analysis of sampled populations indicated all populations to be undergoing recruitment except one population in Cheporon (CHP), Amudat district (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-"></xref>Table 1. Regression analysis slope coefficients and mean quotient of O. lanceolata populations.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Population</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Slope coefficient</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">r<sup>2</sup> values</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Akariwon (AKA)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.5608</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.2499</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Lonyilik (LON)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−27.126</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.1598</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Karengepoche (KAR)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.3863</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.2392</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Cheporon (CHP)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">0.103</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0021</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Kangisa (KAN)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−240.12</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.1688</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Korenyang (KOR)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−1.5706</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0776</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Ngaram (NGA)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−1.2702</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.1424</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Ruwotokech (RUW)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−127.38</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0798</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Lolupe (LOP)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−2E+08</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.1289</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Kopedur (KOP)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−2E+09</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0832</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Lotemwoyes (LOT)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−219.78</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.1336</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Low altitude populations(combined)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−7.729</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0965</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">High altitude populations (combined)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−3.3483</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.3178</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="51.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Overall population structure</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.65%"><p style="text-align:center">−4.7058</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">0.2617</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The Lotemwoyes (LOT) population structure was an inverse-J-shaped curve, having more individuals in the smaller size classes and extremely few individuals in the mature size classes (5 cm - 19 cm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Population structures of Akariwon (AKA) and Lotemwoyes (LOT).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId13.jpeg?20250220032138" />
    </fig>
    <p>Across the low altitudes, the populations exhibited a general irregular population structure with missing individuals in specific size classes. The populations in high altitudes exhibited a relatively bell-shaped population structure, but with missing individuals in the adult size classes (&gt;10 cm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Shows O. lanceolata stem diameter classes (SCD) across altitudes.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId14.jpeg?20250220032138" />
    </fig>
    <p>However, 45.5% of the populations revealed a bell-shaped population structure as observed in Ngaram (NGA), Kangisa (KAN), Karengepoche (KAR), and Lonyilik (LON) exhibiting more individuals in the middle size classes (3 cm - 7 cm) than smaller and larger size classes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId17.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId18.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p>Figure 4. Population structures: Kangisa (KAN), Karengepoche (KAR), Lonyilik (LON) &amp; Ngaram (NGA).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId17.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId18.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p>Figure 4. Population structures: Kangisa (KAN), Karengepoche (KAR), Lonyilik (LON) &amp; Ngaram (NGA).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId15.jpeg?20250220032139" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId17.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId18.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p>Figure 4. Population structures: Kangisa (KAN), Karengepoche (KAR), Lonyilik (LON) &amp; Ngaram (NGA).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId16.jpeg?20250220032137" />
    </fig>
    <p>The populations in Lolupe (LOP), Cheporon (CHP), Korenyang (KOR), Kopedur (KOP), and Ruwotokech (RUW) (45.45%) exhibited irregular population structures with missing individuals in a number of size classes and no clear number of dominant size classes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId21.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId22.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId23.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId24.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p>Figure 5. Populations structure of O. lanceolata in Lolupe (LOP), Ruwotokech (RUW), Kopedur (KOP), Korenyang (KOR), Akariwon (AKA) and Cheporon (CHP).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId21.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId22.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId23.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId24.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p>Figure 5. Populations structure of O. lanceolata in Lolupe (LOP), Ruwotokech (RUW), Kopedur (KOP), Korenyang (KOR), Akariwon (AKA) and Cheporon (CHP).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId19.jpeg?20250220032138" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId21.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId22.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId23.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId24.jpeg?20250220032138" /></p>Figure 5. Populations structure of O. lanceolata in Lolupe (LOP), Ruwotokech (RUW), Kopedur (KOP), Korenyang (KOR), Akariwon (AKA) and Cheporon (CHP).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId20.jpeg?20250220032138" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. General Population Structure</title>
    <p>Three hundred ninety-four (394) individuals of O. lanceolata were inventoried across all altitudes (low 1275 - 1416 m.a.s.l, and high 1721 - 1800 m.a.s.l). The adults were 196 individuals, 184 saplings, and 14 seedlings. The populations showed an irregular population structure pattern with missing individuals in the higher mature size classes (11 - 19 cm). Out of the 394 individuals, 196 were adults, 184 were saplings, and 14 were seedlings. The population age structure was thus characterised by 50% adults, 46% saplings, and 4% seedlings. Regeneration was more vegetative through coppicing than natural seedlings. The coppiced individuals constituted 56.60%, with 35.02% as saplings and 21.60% as adults. The non-coppiced individuals constituted 43.40%, with a population structure of 4% seedlings, 11.7% saplings, and 28.20% adults. The non-coppiced individuals constituted 43.40%, with a population structure of 4% seedlings, 11.7% saplings, and 28.20% adults. In both low and high-altitude areas, the species population structure showed significantly lower numbers of advanced adult individuals compared to younger individuals. The number of individuals in low and high altitudes declined rapidly between advanced adult size classes (7.2 cm - 18 cm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. General size class distribution of O. lanceolata across populations.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId25.jpeg?20250220032140" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Osyris lanceolata Distribution and Density in Karamoja</title>
    <p>The species distribution was patchy and scattered around rocks, deep galleys, streams and even on flat grounds. There was a negligible correlation between O. lanceolata density and altitude (cor. coefficient: 0.4174028; t = 1.378, df = 9, and p = 0.2015). ANOVA test indicated no significant differences in the species density across altitudes (df = 2, F-value = 0.3071, p = 0.740). The Pearson correlation coefficient(r) indicated an insignificant positive linear relationship between the species density and altitude (R = 0.42, p = 0.2). Within higher altitudes, the density of O. lanceolata stood at 1.9399 trees ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> while in lower altitudes it was lower at 0.0834 trees ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (5.1). However, the species densities varied significantly (F = 174.77, p &lt; 0.001) among populations with the lowest density in Cheporon and the highest in Akariwon (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-"></xref>Table 2. Osyris lanceolata densities per population.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">Population category</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">Altitude</p><p style="text-align:left">(m)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">Area</p><p style="text-align:left">(ha)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">Abundance</p><p style="text-align:left">(A)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">Density</p><p style="text-align:left">(ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">higher altitude (Akariwon)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1787</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">0.453</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">42</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">90.51</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">higher altitude (Lonyilik)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1721</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">8.035</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">57</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">6.09</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">higher altitude (Karengepoche)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1794</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">15.626</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">46</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">3.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">Lower altitude (Lolupe)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1407</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">1.063</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">33</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">31.04</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">Lower altitude (Kopedur)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1416</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">1.155</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">51</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">43.29</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">Low altitude (Lotemwoyes)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1382</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">3.292</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">12</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">7.59</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">Low altitude (Cheporon)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1392</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">16.081</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">24</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">1.49</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">Low altitude (Ngaram)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1345</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">7.503</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">30</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">3.99</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">Low altitude (Korenyang)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1275</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">15.435</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">28</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">1.81</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">Low altitude (Kangisa)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1327</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">1.781</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">17</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">9.55</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="40.17%"><p style="text-align:left">Low altitude (Ruwotokech)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:left">1381</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="14.97%"><p style="text-align:left">4.568</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:left">45</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="12.81%"><p style="text-align:left">10.73</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The variation in densities of O. lanceolata across altitude zones is represented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-"></xref>Table 3. Variation of O. lanceolata densities across altitudes.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="31.62%"><p style="text-align:left">Altitude</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">Area sampled (m)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="24.16%"><p style="text-align:left">Abundance (Ha)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:left">Density (h<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="31.62%"><p style="text-align:left">Lower altitude</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">50.878</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="24.16%"><p style="text-align:left">216</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:left">0.0834</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.62%"><p style="text-align:left">Higher altitude</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">24.114</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.16%"><p style="text-align:left">145</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:left">1.0399</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.62%"><p style="text-align:left">Range</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">26.764</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.16%"><p style="text-align:left">71</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:left">0.9565</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="31.62%"><p style="text-align:left">Standard Deviation (SD)</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">18.9250</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="24.16%"><p style="text-align:left">50,204</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:left">0.676348</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="31.62%"><p style="text-align:left">Variance (Var)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:left">358.1558</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="24.16%"><p style="text-align:left">2520.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:left">0.457446</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Edaphic Distribution Drivers</title>
    <p>Five soil variables were significantly different between Osyris samples and non-Osyris samples as follows: (Organic matter (OM) (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.1687, p = 0.001); N (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.2123, p ≤ 0.001), Na<sup>+</sup> (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.3282, p ≤ 0.001); Ca<sup>2+</sup> (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.3719, p ≤ 0.001) and P (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.6534, p ≤ 0.001). The ordination analysis of soil variables (NMDS1) against the category of samples (Osyris and non-Osyris samples) (NMDS2) indicated a significant difference in variables between the two sample categories with edaphic variables in the top Osyris samples (close to O. lanceolata) being the most distinctly different from non-Osyris samples. The Osyris samples (1 &amp; 2), had distinct nutrient levels from non-Osyris samples. All significant variables (N, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, OM, Na<sup>+</sup>, and K<sup>+</sup>) were clustered towards Osyris samples while non-significant variables aggregated towards non-Osyris samples as indicated in the NMDS ordination plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. Results of NMDS plot indicating the relationship between Osyris samples and non-Osyris samples: The sample categories are represented by figures in polygons as follows: 1 = Osyris-top sample (close); 2 = Osyris-bottom sample-(close); 3 = non-Osyris top sample (away); and 4 = non-Osyris-bottom sample (away). Colored dots represent the sampled sites.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId26.jpeg?20250220032142" />
    </fig>
    <p>Also, the constrained ordination undertaken under the reduced model with 999 permutations to test the goodness of fit for the model investigating differences between all edaphic variables was significant (df = 9, Chi-square = 0.048717, F = 35.639, p ≤ 0.001). There was a clear indication of a relationship between O. lanceolata presence and edaphic variables. The CCA plot also shows all significant variables to be aggregated in Component 1. The non-significant variables were clustered in component 2 which shows variables that contributed more to the presence of O. lanceolata (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>). K<sup>+</sup> and OM were closely related together than other variables. The level of significant variables increased with altitude. N increased with salinity and pH levels of the soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. CCA Ordination results indicate a relationship between O. lanceolata distribution and edaphic variables. The round dots represent the sampled points.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1381693-rId27.jpeg?20250220032141" />
    </fig>
    <p>The multiple regression interaction model (MRIM) revealed that O. lanceolata abundance was significantly influenced by nitrogen (N) (t = 2.083, p = 0.04907), phosphorus (t = 2.262, p = 0.034), potassium (K<sup>+</sup>) (t = −3.475, p = 0.00215), and sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>) (t = 3.679, p = 0.00131). The applied model was significant (p ≤ 0.001) across the altitude zones. Regardless of the differences in edaphic variables between samples, nutrient levels indicated a non-uniform pattern in variation with soil depths across sites. Some nutrients increased with soil depths while others decreased. The amount of organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus generally deteriorated with the soil depth whereas an opposite trend was observed for potassium (K<sup>+</sup>), sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>), and calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>). Nutrients that decreased with soil depth include organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Nutrient levels for calcium and sodium consistently increased with an increase in soil depth in high-altitude zones but decreased in low altitudes.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>Population structure of O. lanceolata</p>
   <p>The species population structure was weakened, irregular, and unstable with poor regeneration and recruitment. The 56.60% of coppiced individuals reflects a high intensity of species exploitation. The past illegal harvesting of mature tree individuals explains the rapid decline and persistence absence of adult individuals in all populations. The low number of seedlings could be attributed to grazing and browsing pressure, and the destructive feeding behavior of caterpillars (Dismeqistus sp) on O. lanceolata fruits and seeds hence causing poor seed viability and germination failure. The study results confirm earlier reports of the species being overexploited in the Karamoja sub-region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-11">
     [11]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-57">
     [57]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-58">
     [58]
    </xref>. The species was found to occur within altitudes ranging between 1200 m - 1800 m above sea level. This observation differed from earlier studies that found the species to occur within an altitude range of 1300 - 1760 m.a.s.l <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-58">
     [58]
    </xref>. The patchy species distribution may be related to the hemiparasitic nature of O. lanceolata, the spatial distribution of edaphic variables, and patterns of gene flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-20">
     [20]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-21">
     [21]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-30">
     [30]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-59">
     [59]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The inverse-J-shaped population structure represents a weak, dying, and poorly recruiting population as opposed to a healthy, stable, and recruiting population <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-33">
     [33]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-43">
     [43]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-60">
     [60]
    </xref>. This is due to the existence of fewer seedlings and even the majority of individuals in lower size classes were coppiced as opposed to regenerating seedlings and independent trees from natural germination. The low number of seedlings might be a result of intensive harvesting, seed germination failure due to poor seed viability, seedling mortality, and past destruction of the old mature trees capable of producing seeds. We observed field evidence of seed damage for O. lanceolata by insects and this potentially contributes to seedling mortality and thus germination failure leading to a low abundance of the species seedlings. The scarcity of seedlings is an indicator of weak, irregular, and unstable plant populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-51">
     [51]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-52">
     [52]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-61">
     [61]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-62">
     [62]
    </xref> incapable of sustaining regular commercial harvesting. These characteristics also indicate poor regeneration potential of a species attributed to germination failure, mortality of seedlings, and habitat fragmentation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-33">
     [33]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-60">
     [60]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-62">
     [62]
    </xref>. The coppiced individuals indicate past damages to mature trees due to over-exploitation through illegal harvesting of mature trees for extracting essential oils, construction poles (manyattas), and charcoal burning or firewood. Because most juvenile individuals were coppiced as opposed to growing independently from seedlings, and since the scarcity of seedlings was consistent in all populations, the species population is over-exploited across altitudes in Karamoja hence emphasizing the need for responsible management strategies to save the species from further damages. Although most mature individuals were non-coppiced, a large proportion of saplings (SP) were coppiced which points to a gradual shift to a predominantly coppicing population in the future. The 56.60% of coppiced individuals also suggests a high intensity of species exploitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-46">
     [46]
    </xref> over the years which has weakened the population structure. Thus, this observation raises some questions regarding the uncertainty of the species population structure in habitats with more coppiced individuals given the lower number of seedlings, secondly, the existing level of regeneration through coppicing has dire effects on the species’ level of genetic diversity to sustain the species against genetic erosion in the future <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-61">
     [61]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-62">
     [62]
    </xref>. Given our findings, we can then predict that the current population structure of O. lanceolata is unstable and thus has compromised genetic potential. Since most individuals regenerate through coppicing, the subsequent populations will be exposed to a high risk of reduced genetic diversity due to continued inbreeding <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-61">
     [61]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-62">
     [62]
    </xref>. Although regeneration through coppicing is believed to enhance the species continuity through regular regrowth of new individuals and thus mitigating species loss, it leads to further degeneration in genetic diversity levels, especially in subsequent populations. The low species densities, fewer seedlings, and higher number of coppiced individuals are a bottleneck to the species’ genetic stability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-63">
     [63]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-64">
     [64]
    </xref> in Karamoja. Further, the absence of individuals in certain size classes in most populations reflects an occurrence of destructive harvesting such as (whole plant uprooting) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-11">
     [11]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-57">
     [57]
    </xref> which leads to lower species densities. The low species density leads to an alteration in the mating patterns of the species and increases inbreeding which in turn reduces the genetic diversity of the species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-63">
     [63]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-"></xref>The effect of environmental gradients on plant distribution was not significant, despite its emphasis in earlier studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-31">
     [31]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-65">
     [65]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-66">
     [66]
    </xref>. The absence of a significant correlation between the species density and altitude implies that the abundance of O. lanceolata is profoundly influenced by edaphic factors in addition to other environmental factors. For instance, the fragmentation of species habitats may accelerate inbreeding with negative impacts on the species distribution which impacts their genetic diversity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-63">
     [63]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-64">
     [64]
    </xref>. The anthropogenic and environmental factors significantly contribute to alteration in the species population structure, usually manifested in irregular patterns in the species densities. In addition to environmental factors, the patterns of gene flow across altitudes are also limit the species range and density and hence contributing to the alteration in the overall species genetic structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-59">
     [59]
    </xref>. Thus, assessment of the levels of genetic diversity in line with the current population structures can also provide further insights on the impact of the species exploitation on genetic structure as well. This helps to develop meaningful programs for responsible management in terms of breeding, propagation, domestication, and long-term conservation programs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-64">
     [64]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-67">
     [67]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Edaphic distribution drivers of O. lanceolata</p>
   <p>Our study revealed that calcium, sodium, phosphorus, and potassium were significantly different between Osyris and non-Osyris microhabitats. The multivariate regression modeling predicted similar edaphic variables to significantly influence and contribute to the species abundance and density. Thus, these results suggest that the distribution and abundance of O. lanceolata are potentially driven by a combination of edaphic variables. The earlier studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-25">
     [25]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-28">
     [28]
    </xref> across different altitudes and thus, similar nutrients provide ideal conditions for the survival of O. lanceolata in natural habitats. The establishment of O. lanceolata to host species near hard rocky habitats suggests the need for Ca<sup>2+</sup> to enhance the species’ survival through the acquisition of desired nutrients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-25">
     [25]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-27">
     [27]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-28">
     [28]
    </xref> in line with our study findings because calcium was significantly different between Osyris and non-Osyris sites hence validating its influence in driving the species distribution. Also, sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>); potassium(K<sup>+</sup>); phosphorus; and nitrogen were indicated to play an important role in influencing the species density as explained by the CCA ordination results. Our results rhyme with other studies that found soil nitrogen, and phosphorus to be critical variables in determining spatial floral composition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-32">
     [32]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-68">
     [68]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-70">
     [70]
    </xref>. However, these variables act in concert with environmental gradients, climate, gene flow, and host quality to influence the distribution of root hemiparasites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-20">
     [20]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-21">
     [21]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140717-"></xref>The study revealed an irregular population structure of O. lanceolata in Karamoja. This suggests a severely exploited, altered, and weakened population. The presence of more coppiced individuals, few seedlings, and adults, irregular distribution, and low densities indicate a negative impact of exploitation on the species’ population structure. However, a combination of Ca<sup>2+</sup>, N, P, K<sup>+</sup>, and OM significantly influenced the species distribution. These variables showed significant differences between the species microhabitat and away from the microhabitat hence emphasizing their influence on the species distribution and survival. To avert the rapid decline in the O. lanceolata population, in-situ and ex-situ conservation strategies should be intensified to secure the species’ germplasm and enhance large-scale commercial harvesting. Thus, the identification of suitable provenances for ex-situ populations is urgently needed to save the species from total depletion. Further exploration of biotic drivers for the distribution and survival of O. lanceolata clumps is necessary to enhance conservation. The assessment of the species genetic diversity, oil quality, yield, and rapid propagation techniques, should be undertaken to guide the identification of superior provenances with good traits for commercial propagation. The study provides the first empirical evidence on the population structure and distribution drivers of O. lanceolata in Uganda.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>We are grateful to the local people, security officers, and district authorities in Karamoja sub-region, for their assistance during fieldwork. Mr. James Oziri, Daniel Kirchir, Ronald Kaliamoi, and Mr. Kiyonga are acknowledged for their assistance in field work. Mr. Protase Rwaburindole processed our specimens deposited, at Makerere University Herbarium. We are grateful to Ms. Gorret Aguti for the technical assistance during soil analysis. Fieldwork was partly funded by the International Foundation for Science (IFS), in Stockholm, Sweden, through the grant number: I-1-D-6336-1. Exploration studies were supported by Bugema University, Uganda. Open access funding is provided by BOKU Vienna Open Access Publishing Fund. The National Council for Science and Technology (NCST), in Uganda, Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), and the National Forestry Authority (NFA) granted permission and license to conduct this study. The Nabuin Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, of the National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO) provided technical support and collaboration during this study.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gitehi, G., Bernard, M.K., Jane, W.N., Simon, M., Nathan, K. and Celestine, I. (2023) Rooting African Sandalwood Stem Cuttings Using Low-Cost Technology Employed in the Commercial Propagation of Camellia Sinensis in Kenya. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 15, 1-11. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5897/jhf2022.0703
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kamondo, B. (2007) Domestication of Osyris lanceolata in Kenya: Propagation, Conservation, Management and Commercialization. Muguga Regional Research Center Annual Report.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shyaula, S. (2012) A Review on Genusosyris: Phytochemical Constituents and Traditional Uses. Journal of Natural Pharmaceuticals, 3, 61-70. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5119.102747
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mugula, B.B., Kiboi, S.K., Kanya, J.I., Egeru, A., Okullo, P., Curto, M., et al. (2021) Knowledge Gaps in Taxonomy, Ecology, Population Distribution Drivers and Genetic Diversity of African Sandalwood (Osyris lanceolata Hochst.&amp;Steud.): A Scoping Review for Conservation. Plants, 10, Article 1780. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10091780
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gachambi Mwangi, J., Haggar, J., Mohammed, S., Santika, T. and Mustapha Umar, K. (2023) The Ecology, Distribution, and Anthropogenic Threats of Multipurpose Hemi-Parasitic Plant Osyris lanceolata. Journal for Nature Conservation, 76, Article ID: 126478. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126478
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mumbu, D.M. (2020) Assessing the Utilization and Socio-Economic Impacts of Osyris lanceolata (Hochst&amp;Steud) and Associated Environmental Degradation in Kitui County. Master’s Thesis, South Eastern Kenya University (SEKU).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, X., Gao, Y., Khan, S., Duan, G., Chen, A., Ling, L., et al. (2008) Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in Native Plants Growing on Contaminated Sites and Their Potential Accumulation Capacity in Heqing, Yunnan. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20, 1469-1474. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(08)62551-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chavan, S.B., Uthappa, A.R., Chichaghare, A.R., Ramanan, S.S., Kumar, R., Keerthika, A., et al. (2024) Past, Present and Future of Indian Sandalwood (Santalum album) Cultivation and Commercial Prospects. Discover Applied Sciences, 6, Article No. 627. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06337-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mbuya, L.P., Msanga, H.P., Ruffo, C.K., Birnie, A. and Tengnas, B.O. (1994) Useful Trees and Shrubs for Tanzania. SIDA (Swedish International Development Authority, 542.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Page, T., Hannington, T., Bunt, C., Potrawiak, A. and Berry, A. (2012) Opportunities for the Smallholder Sandalwood Industry in Vanuatu. ACIAR Technical Reports No. 79; Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     CITES (2013) Consideration of Proposals for Amendment of Appendices I and II. 1-10. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Otieno, J.O., Omondi, S.F., Perry, A., Odee, D.W., Makatiani, E.T., Kiplagat, O., et al. (2016) Development and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers for Osyris lanceolata Hochst.&amp;Steud., an Endangered African Sandalwood Tree Species. Tropical Plant Research, 3, 701-703. &gt;https://doi.org/10.22271/tpr.2016.v3.i3.092
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bunei, E.K. (2017) The Hunt for the Precious Wood. Society and Business Review, 12, 63-76. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-04-2016-0025
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kokwaro, J. (2009) Osyris lanceolata. In: Kokwaro, J.O., Ed., Medicinal Plants of East Africa, University of Nairobi Press, 534 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mwang’ingo, P.L., Teklehaimanot, Z., Hall, J.B. and Lulandala, L.L.L. (2003) African Sandalwood (Osyris lanceolata): Resource Assessment and Quality Variation among Populations in Tanzania. The Southern African Forestry Journal, 199, 77-88. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/20702620.2003.10431751
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mwang’ingo, P.L., Teklehaimanot, Z., Lulandala, L.L. and Mwihomeke, S.T. (2005) Host Plants of Osyris lanceolata (African Sandalwood) and Their Influence on Its Early Growth Performance in Tanzania. The Southern African Forestry Journal, 203, 55-65. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2989/10295920509505219
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2016) Sandalwood Spike Disease: A Brief Synthesis. Environmental and Experimental Biology, 14, 199-204. &gt;https://doi.org/10.22364/eeb.14.26
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mugula, B.B. (2024) Population Structure, Parasitic Associations, Distribution Drivers, and Genetic Diversity of Osyris lanceolata (Hochst.&amp;Steud.) in Uganda and Kenya. PhD Thesis, University of Nairobi (UoN).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gathara, M., Makenzi, P., Kimondo, J. and Muturi, G. (2014) Prediction of Osyris lanceolata (Hochst.&amp;Steud.) Site Suitability Using Indicator Plant Species and Edaphic Factors in Humid Highland and Dry Lowland Forests in Kenya. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 6, 99-106.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Watson, D.M. (2009) Determinants of Parasitic Plant Distribution: The Role of Host Quality. Botany, 87, 16-21. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/b08-105
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Watson, D.M., Roshier, D.A. and Wiegand, T. (2007) Spatial Ecology of a Root Parasite—From Pattern to Process. Austral Ecology, 32, 359-369. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01701.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jiang, F., Jeschke, W.D., Hartung, W. and Cameron, D.D. (2008) Does Legume Nitrogen Fixation Underpin Host Quality for the Hemiparasitic Plant Rhinanthus minor? Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 917-925. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern015
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jiang, R. and Zhang, G. (2021) Distribution Patterns and Influencing Factors of Different Parasitic Angiosperm Types in China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 27, e01533. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01533
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Irving, L.J. and Cameron, D.D. (2009) Chapter 3 You Are What You Eat: Interactions between Root Parasitic Plants and Their Hosts. Advances in Botanical Research, 50, 87-138. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2296(08)00803-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     <span style="font-family:Cambria;">Těšitel</span>, J., Plavcová, L. and Cameron, D.D. (2010) Interactions between Hemiparasitic Plants and Their Hosts: The Importance of Organic Carbon Transfer. Plant Signaling&amp;Behavior, 5, 1072-1076. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.5.9.12563
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Scalon, M.C. and Wright, I.J. (2015) A Global Analysis of Water and Nitrogen Relationships between Mistletoes and Their Hosts: Broad‐scale Tests of Old and Enduring Hypotheses. Functional Ecology, 29, 1114-1124. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12418
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dueholm, B., Bruce, D., Weinstein, P., Semple, S., Møller, B.L. and Weiner, J. (2016) Spatial Analysis of Root Hemiparasitic Shrubs and Their Hosts: A Search for Spatial Signatures of Above-and Below-Ground Interactions. Plant Ecology, 218, 185-196. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-016-0676-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dean, W.R.J., Midgley, J.J. and Stock, W.D. (1994) The Distribution of Mistletoes in South Africa: Patterns of Species Richness and Host Choice. Journal of Biogeography, 21, 503-510. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/2845654
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pfenninger, M., Salinger, M., Haun, T. and Feldmeyer, B. (2011) Factors and Processes Shaping the Population Structure and Distribution of Genetic Variation across the Species Range of the Freshwater Snail Radix balthica (Pulmonata, Basommatophora). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11, Article No. 135. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-135
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, Y., Yang, X., Yang, Q., Li, D., Long, W. and Luo, W. (2014) Factors Affecting the Distribution Pattern of Wild Plants with Extremely Small Populations in Hainan Island, China. PLOS ONE, 9, e97751. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097751
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cirimwami, L., Doumenge, C., Kahindo, J. and Amani, C. (2019) The Effect of Elevation on Species Richness in Tropical Forests Depends on the Considered Lifeform: Results from an East African Mountain Forest. Tropical Ecology, 60, 473-484. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-019-00050-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anic, V., Hinojosa, L.F., Díaz-Forester, J., Bustamante, E., de la Fuente, L.M., Casale, J.F., et al. (2010) Influence of Soil Chemical Variables and Altitude on the Distribution of High-Alpine Plants: The Case of the Andes of Central Chile. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 42, 152-163. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-42.2.152
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cousins, S.R., Witkowski, E.T.F. and Pfab, M.F. (2014) Elucidating Patterns in the Population Size Structure and Density of Aloe Plicatilis, a Tree Aloe Endemic to the Cape Fynbos, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany, 90, 20-36. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2013.09.012
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rodrigues, P.M.S., Silva, J.O. and Schaefer, C.E.G.R. (2019) Edaphic Properties as Key Drivers for Woody Species Distributions in Tropical Savannic and Forest Habitats. Australian Journal of Botany, 67, 70-80. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1071/bt17241
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Amundrud, S.L. (2020) Abiotic and Biotic Processes Shape Species Distributions and Ecological Communities across Spatial Scales. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, X., Yang, X., Li, Y., He, X., Lv, G. and Yang, J. (2017) Influence of Edaphic Factors on Plant Distribution and Diversity in the Arid Area of Xinjiang, Northwest China. Arid Land Research and Management, 32, 38-56. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2017.1376004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lomolino, M.V. (2001) Elevation Gradients of Species-Density: Historical and Prospective Views. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 3-13. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00229.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Weatherby, J.M. (1988) The Secret Spirit Cult of the Sor in Karamoja. Africa, 58, 210-229. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/1160662
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Egeru, A., Osaliya, R., MacOpiyo, L., Mburu, J., Wasonga, O., Barasa, B., et al. (2014) Assessing the Spatio-Temporal Climate Variability in Semi-Arid Karamoja Sub-Region in North-Eastern Uganda. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 71, 490-509. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2014.919729
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wanyama, J., Nakawuka, P., Bwambale, E., Kiraga, S., Kiggundu, N., Barasa, B., et al. (2024) Evaluation of Land Suitability for Surface Irrigation under Changing Climate in a Tropical Setting of Uganda, East Africa. Agricultural Systems, 217, Article ID: 103937. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103937
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Terradas, J., Peñuelas, J. and Lloret, F. (2009) The Fluctuation Niche in Plants. International Journal of Ecology, 2009, Article ID: 959702. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/959702
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jensen, A. and Meilby, H. (2012) Assessing the Population Status of a Tree Species Using Distance Sampling: Aquilaria crassna (Thymelaeaceae) in Northern Laos. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2012, Article ID: 265831. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/265831
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tabuti, J.R.S. and Mugula, B.B. (2007) The Ethnobotany and Ecological Status of Albizia coriaria Welw. ex Oliv. in Budondo Sub‐County, Eastern Uganda. African Journal of Ecology, 45, 126-129. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00869.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mohammed, E.M.I., Hammed, A.M.E., Minnick, T.J., Ndakidemi, P.A. and Treydte, A.C. (2021) Livestock Browsing Threatens the Survival of Balanites Aegyptiaca Seedlings and Saplings in Dinder Biosphere Reserve, Sudan. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 41, 1046-1063. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2021.1935279
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kikoti, I.A. and Mligo, C. (2015) Impacts of Livestock Grazing on Plant Species Composition in Montane Forests on the Northern Slope of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services&amp;Management, 11, 114-127. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2015.1031179
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Osman, E.M.H. and Idris, E.Z.A. (2012) Species Dynamics and Potential Disturbances in El Nour Natural Forest Reserve. Journal of Forest Products&amp;Industries, 1, 10-20.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Olsen, S.R., et al. (1982) Methods of Soil Analysis. ASA and SSSA.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Okalebo, J.R., et al. (2002) Laboratory Methods of SOIL and plant Analysis. 2nd Edition, Sacred Africa.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nieder, R. and Benbi, D. (2024) Handbook of Processes and Modeling in the Soil-Plant System. CRC Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chenu, C., Rumpel, C., Védère, C. and Barré, P. (2024) Methods for Studying Soil Organic Matter: Nature, Dynamics, Spatial Accessibility, and Interactions with Minerals. In: Paul, E.A. and Frey, S.D., Eds., Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry, Elsevier, 369-406. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822941-5.00013-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lykke, A.M. (1998) Assessment of Species Composition Change in Savanna Vegetation by Means of Woody Plants’ Size Class Distributions and Local Information. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7, 1261-1275.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Obiri, J., Lawes, M. and Mukolwe, M. (2002) The Dynamics and Sustainable Use of High-Value Tree Species of the Coastal Pondoland Forests of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Forest Ecology and Management, 166, 131-148. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00665-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Maua, J.O., Mugatsia Tsingalia, H., Cheboiwo, J. and Odee, D. (2020) Population Structure and Regeneration Status of Woody Species in a Remnant Tropical Forest: A Case Study of South Nandi Forest, Kenya. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21, e00820. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00820
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ter Braak, C.J.F. and Verdonschot, P.F.M. (1995) Canonical Correspondence Analysis and Related Multivariate Methods in Aquatic Ecology. Aquatic Sciences, 57, 255-289. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00877430
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rao, P., Barik, S.K., Pandey, H.N. and Tripathi, R.S. (1990) Community Composition and Tree Population Structure in a Sub-Tropical Broad-Leaved Forest along a Disturbance Gradient. Vegetatio, 88, 151-162. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00044832
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anderson, M.J. and Willis, T.J. (2003) Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates: A Useful Method of Constrained Ordination for Ecology. Ecology, 84, 511-525. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0511:caopca]2.0.co;2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tajuba, P. (2015) How Oil Firm Is Burning Up Karamoja Valuable Trees. Daily Monitor.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Forest Sector Support Department (FSSD) (2021) Production, Trade, Processing, Monitoring and Control of the East African Sandalwood, Osyris lanceolata in Uganda. Ministry of Water and Environment. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref59">
    <label>59</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sexton, J.P., Hufford, M.B., C.Bateman, A., Lowry, D.B., Meimberg, H., Strauss, S.Y., et al. (2016) Climate Structures Genetic Variation across a Species’ Elevation Range: A Test of Range Limits Hypotheses. Molecular Ecology, 25, 911-928. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13528
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref60">
    <label>60</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bin, Y., Ye, W., Muller-Landau, H.C., Wu, L., Lian, J. and Cao, H. (2012) Unimodal Tree Size Distributions Possibly Result from Relatively Strong Conservatism in Intermediate Size Classes. PLOS ONE, 7, e52596. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052596
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref61">
    <label>61</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Deb, P. and Sundriyal, R.C. (2008) Tree Regeneration and Seedling Survival Patterns in Old-Growth Lowland Tropical Rainforest in Namdapha National Park, North-East India. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 3995-4006. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.046
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref62">
    <label>62</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kohira, M. and Ninomiya, I. (2003) Detecting Tree Populations at Risk for Forest Conservation Management: Using Single-Year Vs. Long-Term Inventory Data. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 423-435. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(02)00076-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref63">
    <label>63</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mehes, M., Nkongolo, K.K. and Michael, P. (2009) Assessing Genetic Diversity and Structure of Fragmented Populations of Eastern White Pine (Pinus strobus) and Western White Pine (P. monticola) for Conservation Management. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2, 143-151. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtp016
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref64">
    <label>64</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cueva-Agila, A.Y., Manchego, C., Bastidas, C. and Curto, M. (2021) Development and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers for Two Subspecies of Handroanthus chrysanthus. Rodriguésia, 72, e00722020. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860202172088
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref65">
    <label>65</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     de Groot, M. and Vrezec, A. (2019) Contrasting Effects of Altitude on Species Groups with Different Traits in a Non-Fragmented Montane Temperate Forest. Nature Conservation, 37, 99-121. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.37.37145
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref66">
    <label>66</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nepali, B.R., Skartveit, J. and Baniya, C.B. (2021) Impacts of Slope Aspects on Altitudinal Species Richness and Species Composition of Narapani-Masina Landscape, Arghakhanchi, West Nepal. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 14, 415-424. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2021.04.005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref67">
    <label>67</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gathara, M., Kamondo, B., Mwadalu, R., Omondi, S., Kivuti, M., Wairagu, N., et al. (2022) Influence of Soil Nutrients, Tree Age, and Sandalwood Provenances on Sandalwood Oil Yield and Quality. International Journal of Forestry Research, 2022, Article ID: 1577979. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1577979
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref68">
    <label>68</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cavieres, L.A., Peñaloza, A. and Kalin Arroyo, M. (2000) Altitudinal Vegetation Belts in the High-Andes of Central Chile (33˚s). Revista chilena de historia natural, 73, 331-334. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-078x2000000200008
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref69">
    <label>69</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Güsewell, S. (2004) N: P Ratios in Terrestrial Plants: Variation and Functional Significance. New Phytologist, 164, 243-266. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01192.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140717-ref70">
    <label>70</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Arnesen, G., Beck, P.S.A. and Engelskjøn, T. (2007) Soil Acidity, Content of Carbonates, and Available Phosphorus Are the Soil Factors Best Correlated with Alpine Vegetation: Evidence from Troms, North Norway. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 39, 189-199. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(2007)39[189:sacoca]2.0.co;2.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>