<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jmp
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Modern Physics
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2153-1196
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2153-120X
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jmp.2025.162011
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jmp-140571
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Charge Quanta as Zeros of the Zeta Function in Bifurcated Spacetime
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Otto
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ziep
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aBerlin, Germany
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     14
    </day> 
    <month>
     02
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    16
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    02
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    249
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    262
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      12,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      11,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      11,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    In a fractal zeta universe of bifurcated, ripped spacetime, the Millikan experiment, the quantum Hall effect, atmospheric clouds and universe clouds are shown to be self-similar with mass ratio of about 10
    <sup>2</sup>
    <sup>0</sup>. Chaotic one-dimensional period-doublings as iterated hyperelliptic-elliptic curves are used to explain n-dim Kepler- and Coulomb singularities. The cosmic microwave background and cosmic rays are explained as bifurcated, ripped spacetime tensile forces. First iterated binary tree cloud cycles are related to emissions 1…1000 GHz. An interaction-independent universal vacuum density allows to predict large area correlated cosmic rays in quantum Hall experiments which would generate local nuclear disintegration stars, enhanced damage of layers and enhanced air ionization. A self-similarity between conductivity plateau and atmospheric clouds is extended to correlations in atmospheric layer, global temperature and climate.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Charge Quanta
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Zeta Function
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Cosmic Rays
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Cosmic Microwave Background
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Bifurcated Spacetime
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Cosmological redshift and cosmic microwave background (CMB) seem to confirm a big bang scenario. An origin of cosmic rays (CR) has shifted to outer universe space. However, a big bang scenario is based on a four-dimensional elastic continuum. The present note explains experimental data by discrete superfluid flow dynamics and ripped spacetime. The Friedmann solution in Equation (2) is an elliptic integral <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. Fractal zeta universe (FZU) sets period-doubling of one-dimensional maps as a complex bifurcated, ripped spacetime with ultra-high tensile forces and ultrahigh energies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Feigenbaum constants α<sub>F</sub>, δ<sub>F</sub> and periods ν<sub>Sh</sub> due to Sharkovskii’s theorem are central in FZU. Accordingly, CR origin is shifted to earth as a ripped texture of a bifurcating hyperelliptic-elliptic period-doubling discrete iterated complex spacetime. Based on dimensionless information currents FZU predicts a novel climate-weather model. S-matrix poles as masses are already shown to be related to Riemann zeta function zeros ζ(z<sub>nt</sub>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. An area 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
      <mi>
        π 
      </mi> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with Feigenbaum constant δ<sub>F</sub> corresponds strikingly to the inverse fine structure constant α<sub>f</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. A thermal diffusive theta function ϑ(uω) describes the superconducting flux order parameter φ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. For semiconducting states, a Benard convection instability has been predicted <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. Like in Large Number Hypothesis (LNH) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-8">
     [8]
    </xref>, Millikan’s experiment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-9">
     [9]
    </xref>, quantized Hall effect (QH), CR-atmospheric cloud and universe radius are shown to be self-similar <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Mediated by nontrivial zeros of the zeta function z<sub>nt</sub>[f(ω)], bifurcating iterates of the Weber invariant f(ω) create a complex Riemann surface of ripped spacetime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. A ν<sub>Sh</sub>-bifurcation tree is explained as a persistent balanced ionized state of created matter in universe. Charge quanta are defined as the number of simple nontrivial zeros z<sub>nt</sub> in FZU where the Riemann zeta function ζ(z) ≃ χ(λ-z<sub>nt</sub>) behaves volcano-like quadrupolar in shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref> for complex λ ≃ z<sub>nt</sub>.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. Volcano-like quadrupolar complex z<sub>nt</sub>-zero region of the entire function ξ(z) = −∂j<sub>cloud</sub>(z)/∂z with Δ<sub>h</sub>ξ(z) = 0 and hyperbolic Laplacian 

      <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <msub> 
   
         <mi>
          
    Δ
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mi>
          
    h
   
         </mi> 
  
        </msub> 
  
        <mo>
    
  
        </mo>
  
        <mo>
         
   =
  
        </mo>
  
        <mo>
    
  
        </mo>
  
        <msup> 
   
         <mi>
          
    y
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mn>
          
    2
   
         </mn> 
  
        </msup> 
  
        <mrow>
   
         <mo>
          
    (
   
         </mo> 
   
         <mrow> 
    
          <msubsup> 
     
           <mo>
             ∂ 
           </mo> 
     
           <mi>
             x 
           </mi> 
     
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
    
          </msubsup> 
    
          <mo>
           
     +
    
          </mo>
    
          <mo>
      
    
          </mo>
    
          <msubsup> 
     
           <mo>
             ∂ 
           </mo> 
     
           <mi>
             y 
           </mi> 
     
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
    
          </msubsup> 
   
         </mrow> 
   
         <mo>
          
    )
   
         </mo>
  
        </mrow>
 
       </mrow>

      </math>. Left: field lines in the vicinity of the first Riemann zero. Right: illustration of the field in the vicinity of two consecutive Riemann zeros of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-10">
       [10]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7505520-rId18.jpeg?20250214031823" />
   </fig>
   <p>A fundamental interaction is regarded as a susceptibility plateau χ of a nondissipative large potential. A bifurcation flow 1, 2, 1’, 2’ contains non-observable ultra-high particles in ripped spacetime. This bifurcating complex string builds lines of a two-periodic superfluid potential flow with a second sound as entropy oscillations and temperature oscillations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Within FZU expansion is apparent as a quadrupolar nonradiative scattering which explains the Hubble law as well, the cosmological redshift, and a decreasing velocity of light. This black hole van der Waals-like stability is a minimum near inflection line of a cubic potential. In FZU this note predicts a CMB and net rates of ultra-high rays in QH detectable only by large arrays <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Section 2 is devoted to link CR to complex scalar curvature. Complex curvature is regarded as equivalent to the Weber invariant of elliptic curves. A bifurcating spacetime is set equivalent to large tensile forces. Section 3 discusses the simplest cycles of iterated intervals of curvature equivalent to quadrupolar gravitational-like wave. A quadrupolar susceptibility increases with radius which is felt as apparent expansion of space inducing a redshift. Section 4 relates first k-components of a bifurcation tree where first Sharkovsky periods appear to an overall spatial wave felt as CMB. Section 5 discusses the infinite k-component limit which is viewed as capable to create Kepler and Coulomb charge singularities in the renormalized Feigenbaum function. Section 6 defines a highly correlated , non-dissipative, non-radiative potential flow as a conductivity plateau around iterated nontrivial zeros of the zeta function. Plateau transitions are responsible to generate CMB-CR. Mass ratios are compared in Section 7 which demonstrates the applicability of the two-dimensional map to field oscillations and global temperature oscillations. The concluding section relates pseudo-congruent k-components to quantum statistics. Pseudo-congruence should be related to class number one number fields. A definition of charge based on k-congruences explains quantum statistics and resolves the cosmological constant problem.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. CR as Bifurcating Spacetime Tensile Forces</title>
   <p>Zeta function ζ and ξ-function</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ξ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtable> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mi>
             z 
           </mi> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
        </mtable> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         π 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mi>
        Γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mi>
        ζ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </mfrac> 
      <munder> 
       <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
        <mo>
          ∏ 
        </mo> 
       </mstyle> 
       <mi>
         n 
       </mi> 
      </munder> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             z 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             n 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∂ 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∂ 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>with the exact integral</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         j 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          l 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          o 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          u 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        4 
      </mn> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mo>
           ∫ 
         </mo> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           ∞ 
         </mi> 
        </msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             d 
           </mtext> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             log 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
         <msup> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              / 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              4 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
          </mrow> 
         </msup> 
         <msub> 
          <mo>
            ∂ 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
         </msub> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msup> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                3 
              </mn> 
              <mo>
                / 
              </mo> 
              <mn>
                2 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
           </msup> 
           <msub> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
           </msub> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ( 
            </mo> 
            <mrow> 
             <msub> 
              <mi>
                ϑ 
              </mi> 
              <mn>
                3 
              </mn> 
             </msub> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                ( 
              </mo> 
              <mrow> 
               <mn>
                 0 
               </mn> 
               <mo>
                 , 
               </mo> 
               <msup> 
                <mtext>
                  e 
                </mtext> 
                <mrow> 
                 <mo>
                   − 
                 </mo> 
                 <mi>
                   π 
                 </mi> 
                 <mi>
                   t 
                 </mi> 
                </mrow> 
               </msup> 
              </mrow> 
              <mo>
                ) 
              </mo> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
            <mo>
              ) 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mi>
           sinh 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            [ 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mfrac> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
           </mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ( 
            </mo> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               z 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
             <mfrac> 
              <mn>
                1 
              </mn> 
              <mn>
                2 
              </mn> 
             </mfrac> 
            </mrow> 
            <mo>
              ) 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
           <mi>
             log 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ] 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>offer simultaneous maps γξ and γz where the step number k is viewed as a clock frequency. Here ϑ<sub>3</sub> is the Jacobi theta function. The elastic spacetime of smooth, differentiable real Riemann surfaces is the continuous limit of an iterated dynamical time k for the e.g. complex Ricci scalar 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> for a discrete sequence of times k. This quadratic map is a partial case of a more general Hermite-Tschirnhausen map.</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           t 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtable> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mfrac> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </mfrac> 
            <msub> 
             <msup> 
              <mi>
                ϕ 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                ′ 
              </mo> 
             </msup> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mi>
               t 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               ϕ 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mi>
               t 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mfrac> 
             <mi>
               t 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </mfrac> 
            <msub> 
             <msup> 
              <mi>
                ϕ 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                ′ 
              </mo> 
             </msup> 
             <mn>
               3 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mi>
               t 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
          <mtd> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
        </mtable> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (1)</p>
   <p>of cubic roots ϕ<sub>3</sub>(t) defining period-doublings. Elliptic time</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        c 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        t 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∫ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mrow> 
           <msqrt> 
            <mi>
              φ 
            </mi> 
           </msqrt> 
           <mtext>
             d 
           </mtext> 
           <mi>
             φ 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <msqrt> 
            <mrow> 
             <msub> 
              <mi>
                ϕ 
              </mi> 
              <mn>
                3 
              </mn> 
             </msub> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                ( 
              </mo> 
              <mi>
                φ 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                ) 
              </mo> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
           </msqrt> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (2)</p>
   <p>in Friedmann universes already indicates a relation of the Ricci scalar R or radius 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         u 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        φ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        K 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        i 
      </mi> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         K 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ′ 
       </mo> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ω 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        i 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ω 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> to an order parameter φ and quarter periods K, K'’. FZU Legendre modular functions λ[f(ω(…))] are iterated in discrete steps k giving a set of half-periods ω<sub>1</sub>, ω<sub>2</sub>. Large scalar bifurcating curvatures R<sub>k</sub> indicate strong tensile forces such as nuclear disintegration stars. A Mandelbrot map demands |R<sub>k</sub>| &lt; 2 with parameter c<sub>M</sub> ≃ Λ equivalent to cosmological constant Λ. Rare ultra-high CR of low count rate of e.g. 10<sup>−2</sup> per year producing air showers are counted as single zeta function zero <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. Large detector arrays confirm a large correlation area triggered by a new nontrivial zero of the zeta function as a charge quantum which itself has &gt;10<sup>2</sup><sup>000</sup> fractal constituents.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Apparent Expansion by Quadrupolar Gravitational Waves</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-"></xref>Apparent expansion appears by Feynman diagrams valid in FZU for interaction w = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 = (strong, weak, em, Grav, dark) as nonradiative exchange (dark) polarization giving 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ε 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         o 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         u 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. For cubic roots e<sub>i</sub> one has 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ± 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        Λ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         e 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         i 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        ℘ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          u 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          ω 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         ϑ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          0 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          ω 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        φ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         u 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, i.e. the background susceptibility ε<sub>o</sub> appears as exact ϑ<sup>4</sup> equation for theta characteristics 01, 10, 11 for all periods ω. Einsteins work on gravitational waves g<sub>k</sub> implicitly uses quadruple steps k, k + 1, k + 2, k + 3 of simplest cycles 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           { 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            k 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            k 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            k 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           } 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> of stress-energy T <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. Gravitational waves g<sub>k</sub> are proven by energy loss. FZU predicts a Carnot cycle-like energy gain due to gravitational waves g<sub>k</sub> for simplest cycles. Simple quadrupolar zeros λ<sub>k</sub> ≃ z<sub>nt</sub> are related to λ(ω) as iterates in ζ(z)</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            24 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           ω 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (3)</p>
   <p>of a cubic Weber-invariant f(ω), 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        f 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Δ 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, with Φ<sub>3</sub>(f(ω)) = 0 where iteration changes k<sup>th</sup> discriminants Δ<sub>k</sub> of the normal bicubic field. Like ξ functions with Δ<sub>h</sub>ξ = 0 for hyperbolic Laplacian 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         h 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         y 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mo>
           ∂ 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           x 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mo>
           ∂ 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           y 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> fractional γ(Φ<sub>3</sub>)∘f(ω) create an entire holomorphic polynomial f<sub>k</sub>(ω) with 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         h 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        f 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Measured (universe) radii R<sub>u</sub> ≃ φ behave like velocity and length of a traffic jam for a whole set of periods ω<sub>k</sub>. The vacuum permittivity 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ε 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         o 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         u 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> results from a potential 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        V 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           I 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            j 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          ε 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with moment of inertia I<sub>ij</sub> (quadrupole moment) and 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ε 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         0 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           I 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            j 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Then 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ε 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         0 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> for 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        k 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        ∞ 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> which exhibits ultraviolet divergence or infrared divergence implying a superconducting-super insulating duality with common features of a non-dissipative ordered state of large potential <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. A superconductor as a perfect diamagnet, is also a perfect insulator with zero dissipative current and zero magnetic field in the bulk. The light velocity c<sub>l</sub> of the traffic jam decreases with increasing R<sub>u</sub> which explains a confinement and the Hubble law H<sub>w</sub> ≃ R<sub>u</sub>. The Weber invariant f(ω) of a cubic Φ<sub>3</sub> for all periods ω enables a cubic minimum of V<sub>T</sub>(R<sub>u</sub>) as a van der Waals-like attraction due to time-thermal Carnot cycles ν<sub>Sh</sub> of iterated invariants f<sub>k</sub>. Simplest cycles apply as well to shifts δ<sub>k</sub> in quadruples 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        q 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         { 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          : 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           δ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           δ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           δ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           δ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           δ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           δ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         } 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> as an E → D → H → B field cycle for superconducting or super insulating fields which holds for all iterations. Correlated iterated nontrivial simple zeros z<sub>nt</sub> are embedded into a maximal quartic surface in Equations (12) and (13), the Kummer surface K(X = (℘<sub>±±</sub>,1)) and Weddle surface and W(Y = (℘<sub>±±±</sub>)). Hyperelliptic ℘-functions are rationalized 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ℘ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ± 
        </mo> 
        <mo>
          ± 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          f 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> and 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ℘ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ± 
        </mo> 
        <mo>
          ± 
        </mo> 
        <mo>
          ± 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          f 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> by Weber invariant f(ω) as a parameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-15">
     [15]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. CMB Temperature</title>
   <p>Unobservable ultra-high energy particles above GZK cutoff are identified with k-components between tree root in z<sub>nt</sub> and first ν<sub>Sh</sub> at k = 3. Doubling at logistic parameter r ≃ 3.54 ≃ 4 suggest a base 4 with Fermat number transforms. For all components, the elliptic addition theorem implies invariant λg<sup>2</sup> ≃ inv with modular unit g <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. Then 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with Cantor string coupling constant G<sub>w</sub></p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ln 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        w 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ! 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msup> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          ln 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (4)</p>
   <p>Bifurcations create cloud masses M<sub>w</sub> as 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, i.e. 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         5 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        &gt; 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        ⋯ 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        &gt; 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Interactions w = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 obey invariant plateaus of vacuum density</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           H 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           w 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          8 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           G 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           w 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           H 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           κ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           c 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           l 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        ℏ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         l 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        i 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        n 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        v 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (5)</p>
   <p>with</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         κ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         w 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          8 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           G 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           w 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           c 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           l 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>.</p>
   <p>Addition on fluctuating elliptic curves solves the cosmological constant problem with a w-independent mean vacuum density e.g. for dark matter G<sub>5</sub> ≃ 10<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup><sup>67</sup>. Hubble parameter H<sub>w</sub> = ln'φ depend on k-component as 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ln 
      </mi> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. First ν<sub>Sh</sub> up to third branch k = 3 yields a mean CMB energy density 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          M 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         4 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          M 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           H 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           5 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          8 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           G 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           5 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <msup> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
             <mrow> 
              <msup> 
               <mn>
                 2 
               </mn> 
               <mn>
                 3 
               </mn> 
              </msup> 
             </mrow> 
            </msup> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ρ 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            v 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            a 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          M 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          T 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ≃ 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          2.3 
        </mn> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
          K 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (6)</p>
   <p>Thus, the tree root is embedded in a dark environment of a nearly isotropic 3K CMB of wavelength 1…10 cm or frequency 1…10<sup>3</sup> GHz. This supports a bifurcated spacetime.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Kepler and Coulomb Singularity from Cosmic-Ray-Charge-Clouds</title>
   <p>One-dimensional bifurcations of iterates 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        f 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Δ 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> change the k<sup>th</sup> discriminant of the normal field Δ<sub>k</sub>. Simplest cycles form quadrupoles and can create a dipole decaying into coulomb singularities due to Feigenbaum renormalization. A self-similar simplest cycle scenario of electronic, atmospheric and universe clouds is a cloud adiabatically moving in an inert environment (e.g. electron-oil drop). The two-valley-Gunn-effect-like configuration enables a dipole. f<sub>k</sub> iterates display a hysteresis loop on Feigenbaum xy plane where x-axis displays temperature (modular units 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        g 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ω 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ω 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ϑ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          f 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             ω 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        φ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          ω 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           λ 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>) and y-axis displays entropy (Legendre modular function λ(f(ω<sub>k</sub>)) ≃ δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub> as where ω<sub>k</sub> ≠ Δ<sub>k</sub>). The area of the hysteresis loop is the Carnot cycle heat gain which is called charge for a dipole-like hysteresis. The process is driven by the quadratic map of cubic roots x<sub>3</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-17">
     [17]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-18">
     [18]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mtable> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mi>
          F 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             x 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          γ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             ϕ 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∘ 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           x 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             ϕ 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             x 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </mfrac> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            d 
          </mtext> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             ϕ 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            d 
          </mtext> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           t 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           G 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             x 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             4 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           G 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             x 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             4 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </mfrac> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            d 
          </mtext> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             ϕ 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mtext>
            d 
          </mtext> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
     </mtable> 
    </math> (7)</p>
   <p>γ(ϕ<sub>3</sub>) is quadratic in the bi spinor Green’s functions G(x̷<sub>4</sub>) in Feynman slash notation of quartic roots where 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         x 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         x 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         4 
       </mn> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> for a shift x<sub>4</sub> to ±∞ ± i∞ giving spins s = 1, 2, 3, 4. Discrete shifts δ<sub>k</sub></p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        f 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ω 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          u 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          r 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          l 
        </mi> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mstyle mathvariant="bold" mathsize="normal"> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
        </mstyle> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mi>
        z 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        f 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (8)</p>
   <p>are proportional to global temperature potential 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            g 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            b 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            a 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> as a fractal line integral</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            g 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            b 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            a 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∫ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ∇ 
         </mo> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            V 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              T 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               c 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               l 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               o 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               u 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               d 
             </mi> 
            </mrow> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
         </msub> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             x 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             y 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (9)</p>
   <p>Mean values in xy-plane are persistent rates</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            g 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            b 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            a 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          n 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>and</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            v 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            s 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          n 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>and create a pole via</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∫ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           x 
         </mi> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           y 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          u 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          r 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          l 
        </mi> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mstyle mathvariant="bold" mathsize="normal"> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
        </mstyle> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∫ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           x 
         </mi> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           y 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
      <mtext>
          
      </mtext> 
      <mi>
        G 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        G 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         a 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∮ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
      <mtext>
          
      </mtext> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          r 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          n 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (10)</p>
   <p>Feigenbaum renormalization 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        f 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> replaces k-components 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        ⋯ 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> by two-components 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msup> 
           <mi>
             f 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                r 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                e 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                n 
              </mi> 
             </mrow> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msup> 
           <mi>
             f 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                r 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                e 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                n 
              </mi> 
             </mrow> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msup> 
           <mi>
             f 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                r 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                e 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                n 
              </mi> 
             </mrow> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. Besides a single ζ(z)-pole the fractal zeta function has complex conjugated poles 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ζ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              r 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              e 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              n 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> in 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> near simple zeros 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              r 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              e 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              n 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          n 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. A Laurent series 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mo>
         ∑ 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           a 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> changes to a single pole in 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> on simplest interval cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. Moreover, scaling 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo> 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         α 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> suggests z → αz for arbitrary α <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. With increasing logarithmic 10<sup>∞</sup> zoom the mean quadrupolar thermal current in Equation (10) confirms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-5">
     [5]
    </xref> by residue</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         a 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mi>
         m 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           δ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           F 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∮ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
      <mtext>
          
      </mtext> 
      <mo>
        ∇ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (11)</p>
   <p>Iterates 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ← 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ϕ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           3 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             f 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ∘ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> are period-doublings if λ<sub>k</sub> ≠ λ<sub>k</sub><sub>+</sub><sub>1</sub> whereas invariant λ[δ℘] ≃ λ[γ∘δ℘] are laps around a quadrupolar vicinity in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref> of z<sub>nt</sub> and f<sub>nt</sub>. An air shower of bifurcating flow lines of f(ω) is a binary tree. A quadrupole f(z) capable for dipole-dipole interaction creates charges and releases heat. The Kepler singularity (ζ-pole) and Coulomb singularity ( 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>-pole) are due to bifurcations as additions on hyperelliptic quartics K(X(f)) and W(Y(f))</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mtable columnalign="left"> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           [ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            ζ 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             z 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            ζ 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <msup> 
            <mi>
              z 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              ′ 
            </mo> 
           </msup> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ] 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          → 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           [ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             R 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              n 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              e 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             R 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              n 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              e 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ] 
           </mo> 
           <mo>
             → 
           </mo> 
           <mo>
             [ 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
          <mi>
            ζ 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              z 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              , 
            </mo> 
            <mi mathvariant="double-struck">
              K 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            , 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            ζ 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <msup> 
             <mi>
               z 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               ′ 
             </mo> 
            </msup> 
            <mo>
              , 
            </mo> 
            <mi mathvariant="double-struck">
              K 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ] 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mo>
          → 
        </mo> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             σ 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              u 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              v 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             σ 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              u 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              v 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <msubsup> 
           <mi>
             σ 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             u 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msubsup> 
          <msubsup> 
           <mi>
             σ 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             v 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msubsup> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          X 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mi>
          j 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          X 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           f 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          → 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          0 
        </mn> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
     </mtable> 
    </math> (12)</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        α 
      </mi> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         m 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        β 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         m 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         m 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         m 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0. 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (13)</p>
   <p>The partial case 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        α 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        : 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        β 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        : 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        γ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        : 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        136 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        : 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        10 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> yields the Eddington equation with weights 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        W 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> in hyperelliptic characteristics (α, β, γ) giving proton stability for W → ∞. Quarter periods K(λ) as temperature potential V<sub>T</sub> obey <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-17">
     [17]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mtext>
         d 
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ′ 
       </mo> 
      </msup> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          K 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ′ 
       </mo> 
      </msup> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
        <mi>
          K 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           λ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          γ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            α 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            β 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          K 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        α 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        β 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        K 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (14)</p>
   <p>The hypergeometric 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        K 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mmultiscripts> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
       <mprescripts /> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <none /> 
      </mmultiscripts> 
      <msub> 
       <mrow></mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          α 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          β 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          γ 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mmultiscripts> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
       <mprescripts /> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <none /> 
      </mmultiscripts> 
      <msub> 
       <mrow></mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
         <mo>
           / 
         </mo> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
         <mo>
           / 
         </mo> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is linearized in 4-component quarter periods λ = λ<sub>m</sub>/m + 1/2. The Dirac bi spinor λ<sub>m</sub> ≃ ψ<sub>s</sub> transmits to invariant f<sub>s</sub> and units E<sub>s</sub> as a simplest cycle with bi spinor bicubic number field norm E<sub>s</sub>ψ<sub>s</sub>ψ<sub>s</sub> with real unit E<sub>S</sub>. Superposed units E and lnE are optimal and minimize the regulator R<sub>Δ</sub> which yields an invariance 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mtext>
         e 
       </mtext> 
       <mi>
         ℒ 
       </mi> 
      </msup> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            r 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with phase-factor 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mtext>
         e 
       </mtext> 
       <mi>
         ℒ 
       </mi> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> where 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mi>
       ℒ 
     </mi> 
    </math> is Lagrangian-like <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. With a<sub>-</sub><sub>1</sub> the Schrödinger-like Equation (11) gets a constraint</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          r 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          n 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mi>
         m 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           ℏ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           V 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            Z 
          </mi> 
          <msup> 
           <mi>
             e 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            λ 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             λ 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (15)</p>
   <p>as well as a cubic ϕ<sub>3</sub>(f<sub>k</sub>) congruence being the Higgs-Kibble-Landau-Ginzburg term. The one-dimensional Coulomb Green’s function of Equations (13) and (14) yields n-dimensional Coulomb forces applying 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Ô 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mo>
         ∂ 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          y 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mo>
           ∂ 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           x 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mo>
           ∂ 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           y 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-21">
     [21]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-23">
     [23]
    </xref>. Based on only two variables 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        x 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         r 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         r 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         r 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          12 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> and 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        y 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         r 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         r 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         r 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          12 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> which are ±π rotations on interval [0,1] the n-dimensional Coulomb force depends on simplest cycles on the real interval [0,1]. Optimal iterates are superpositions of a unit E with a definite zoom lnE. Cycles and periods ν<sub>Sh</sub> yield an optimal spatial box. Zoomed cardioids are projected onto Riemann sphere with doubly periodic boundary conditions. Zoomed iterates of period-doublings as cubic roots of elliptic curves up k &gt; 10<sup>2</sup><sup>000</sup> are capable to create a dipole in Equation (12) as a potential bifurcating flow.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. QH Plateau and CMB-CR near Nontrivial Zeros of the Zeta Function</title>
   <p>In distinction to filled Landau levels plateaus QH susceptibility plateaus χ<sub>H</sub> are iterated, bifurcating simple-zeta-zero-quadrupole clouds as charge constituents. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) and cosmic rays (CR) are explained as bifurcating ripped spacetime tensile forces below and above first ν<sub>Sh</sub> from the tree root up to third branch component. At QH CMB emissions (1…10<sup>3</sup> GHz) are predicted by the iterated binary tree cloud which are possibly already detected <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. An interaction-independent universal vacuum density allows to predict large area correlated CR in QH-experiments which would generate local nuclear disintegration stars, enhanced damage of layers and enhanced air ionization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. Longitudinal thermopower measurements yield a linear response <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-25">
     [25]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-26">
     [26]
    </xref>. In FZU quadratic thermopower cycles are the origin of charge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. A charge of small mass m<sub>e</sub> floats in a quasi-homogeneous cloud of a large background mass M<sub>p</sub>. A sequence of universe mass M<sub>u</sub> ≃ 10<sup>56</sup> g to mass of solar system 2 × 10<sup>33</sup> g (10<sup>2</sup><sup>4</sup>), mass 5 × 10<sup>8</sup> g of a 10<sup>9</sup> m<sup>3</sup> cloud of density 0.5 g∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup> to earth mass of 5 × 10<sup>2</sup><sup>7</sup> g (10<sup>1</sup><sup>9</sup>), oil drop mass 10<sup>−</sup><sup>12</sup> g to electron mass 10<sup>−</sup><sup>30</sup> g (10<sup>1</sup><sup>8</sup>) contains its ratio in brackets as the fourth power κ<sup>4</sup> of the Born-Oppenheimer parameter κ. Opposed is a liquid cloud mass 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> g surrounding an electron mass 10<sup>−</sup><sup>30</sup> g (10<sup>2</sup><sup>5</sup>) as a correlated thermal potential V<sub>T</sub> where path-ordered flow lines are a non-dissipative, non-radiative liquid slushy. The Millikan experiment for an oil drop of 10<sup>−</sup><sup>12</sup> g has a Born-Oppenheimer parameter κ = 10<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup>. Accordingly, a QH tight-binding model with measurement precision κ = 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> requires a thermal background cloud potential -mass equivalent V<sub>T</sub> of Planck mass M<sub>p</sub> ≃ 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> g <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-27">
     [27]
    </xref>. Surprisingly, atmospheric clouds have a similar mass ratio with respect to earth mass. Accordingly, an electronic tight-binding model for σ<sub>H</sub> describes a neutral quadrupolar current near z<sub>nt</sub> where σ<sub>H</sub> is a coupling constant for various topological entropies. The theory starts with a regulator R<sub>Δ</sub> of number field 𝕂[∂, {1<sup>1</sup><sup>/</sup><sup>m</sup>}] which is expanded as a Lovelock-like Lagrangian into subsequent minima as subsequent w boxes in a box of weight e<sup>−</sup><sup>w</sup><sup>!</sup> displaying coupling constants in Equation (4) for five interactions w = 1, ..., 5. A non-dissipative current j<sub>H</sub> origins from temperature cycles and entropy cycles as congruent k-components. A chaotic superfluid creates a potential 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with two Feigenbaum constants α<sub>F</sub>, δ<sub>F</sub>. Cycles in 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> depend on γ(ϕ<sub>3</sub>(f(ω)))-fixpoints, on theta constants and the Dedekind eta function. Unlike thunder and flash bang convection turbulences are not needed for the iterated superfluid flow in Equations (12) and (13). Two-periodic partial solutions 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ψ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <msub> 
        <mo>
          ∑ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           n 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ∈ 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           ℤ 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           c 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           n 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msup> 
         <mtext>
           e 
         </mtext> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            k 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            y 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           φ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           n 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           x 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> of (14)</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
        <mi>
          K 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           λ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          K 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        n 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        K 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (16)</p>
   <p>are Hermite polynomials φ<sub>n</sub><sub>,</sub><sub>m</sub> which are capable to explain the QH conductivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-27">
     [27]
    </xref>. The order parameter φ<sub>n</sub><sub>,</sub><sub>m</sub> belongs to a nearly homogeneous cloud with temperature gradient ∇T ≃ E building an electric field E and topological entropy convection cycles δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub> ≃ B as magnetic field-like B period-doublings. Electron-oil clouds (Millikan), electron clouds (QH) and atmospheric clouds differ by mass ratio 10<sup>1</sup><sup>8</sup>, 10<sup>2</sup><sup>5</sup>, 10<sup>1</sup><sup>9</sup> ≃ 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         κ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          O 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          4 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> giving accuracy κ<sub>BO</sub> ≃ 10<sup>−</sup><sup>4</sup>, 10<sup>−</sup><sup>6</sup>, 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup>, respectively. Mean values 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mo>
           ∫ 
         </mo> 
         <mn>
           0 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           ∞ 
         </mi> 
        </msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           h 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> over altitude h satisfy analogously to 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ξ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mo>
          ∂ 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∂ 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> a Laplace Equation 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         h 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        ξ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          y 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. The cloud current density j<sub>cloud</sub> is assumed perpendicular to the gradient of cloud temperature 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mo>
        ∇ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Changes of topological entropy δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub> are proportional to the number of quasiparticles N<sub>qp</sub> ≃ B realizing QH geometry 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        B 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ⊥ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         j 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          l 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          o 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          u 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ⊥ 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        ∇ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle mathvariant="bold" mathsize="normal"> 
       <mi>
         B 
       </mi> 
      </mstyle> 
      <mo>
        ⊥ 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle mathvariant="bold" mathsize="normal"> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. The cloud current 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         j 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          l 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          o 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          u 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        χ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ∇ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> depends step-like on convection change δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub> as a B -like axial vector flow over period-2<sup>k</sup> components of chaotic, regular, non-stochastic clouds. A density of residue (11) is called a fractional charge. A fractional correlated areal thermal heat density in FZU</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mi>
         m 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          π 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mi>
           δ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           F 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>is centred near z<sub>nt</sub> and vanishes for n→∞. Iterated f(ω) and iterated periods 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        ω 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        ω 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         h 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         t 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> behave as a Gaussian kernel with width δ<sub>F</sub>. The Hausdorff measure as density of states is step-like with respect to δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub>. The density of poles and residue is equivalent to a large mass M<sub>cloud</sub> as a large but non-dissipative potential</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            g 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            b 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            a 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        ∑ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          Z 
        </mi> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           e 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           λ 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           0 
         </mn> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          l 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          o 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          u 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         c 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         l 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>around a non-trivial zero of ζ(z). Complex conjugated zeros z<sub>nt</sub> enhance the correlated area by a factor 2 which is called thermal pairing. It is argued that integer QH as well superconducting pairing are thermal pairings. In FZU quarter periodK, order parameter φ and e.g. universe radius 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         u 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        K 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          λ 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ≃ 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           δ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           h 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           t 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        φ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         u 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> depend step-like on entropy changes δ<sub>k</sub>h<sub>t</sub> ≃ B as a thermal potential 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            g 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            b 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            a 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         j 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>7. A Climate-Weather Model</title>
   <p>A factor 10<sup>2</sup><sup>0</sup> self-similarity between Millikan experiment, QH, atmospheric and universe clouds consist in a superfluid with two separate cycles of entropy and temperature. A cosmic-ray-charge-cloud has a balanced net rate with elastic spacetime enveloping ripped bifurcations. CMB and CR correlations of the atmospheric layer superfluid influence global temperature and climate. Self-similar temperatures, energies and masses but constant vacuum densities apply equally well to microstructures, atmospheric clouds and to the universe.</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. A period-doubling fluid potential (9) between points 1 and 1’ correlates large distances of bifurcating fractal lateral points 1, 1′ → 2 → … → 1<sub>k</sub> → … → 2<sub>k</sub> (dotted line).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7505520-rId183.jpeg?20250214031824" />
   </fig>
   <p>Tidal tensile forces in Equation (9) explain CR and CMB as well the correlated stability of objects similar to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>. Global temperature (9) yields a climate-weather relation to CR and CMB and to a one-dimensional model. Previous hypotheses already suggest a relation between CR, atmospheric clouds and global temperature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-28">
     [28]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-32">
     [32]
    </xref>. A self-interaction between CR and atmospheric clouds as part of FZU supports a continuous creation of matter near nontrivial zeros z<sub>nt</sub> of ζ(z). A bifurcating fluid flow near z<sub>nt</sub>-quadratic maps is partially nonergodic as an irreversible Carnot cycle which defines an arrow of time. A zeta zero z<sub>nt</sub> is a catalyst for cloud growth. Created clouds are a fluid-liquid-gaseous slushy-like dark superfluid. A radiation component appears as an unnecessary turbulence. Positive ultra-high mass-energies are a counterpart to negative long-range van der Waals-like cubic forces balanced for k→∞-components and stabilized by ν<sub>Sh</sub>. Apparent stochastic cloud net rates in 5-dimensional spacetime</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           ρ 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ± 
         </mo> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        d 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        i 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        v 
      </mi> 
      <mtext>
          
      </mtext> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         j 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ± 
       </mo> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         R 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          n 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ± 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (17)</p>
   <p>reduce to complex time-thermal cloud cycles j<sub>cloud</sub> with 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         Δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         h 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        ξ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> for 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ξ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∂ 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∂ 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          z 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> for mean values 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mo>
           ∫ 
         </mo> 
         <mn>
           0 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           ∞ 
         </mi> 
        </msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           h 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
      <mo>
        … 
      </mo> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> over altitudes h. Equation (17) reduces to a quasi-two-dimensional regular chaotic equation for the zeta function ζ(z). Iterated by elliptic invariants the differential dλ ≃ dl<sub>xy</sub> for λ ≃ σ(uω) depends on e.g. the Heuman lambda function which for λ → 0 for ω → 2<sup>k</sup>ω and k → ∞ behaves plateau-like as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
     Figure 3
    </xref>. Global temperature (9) displays an entropy-based susceptibility plateau.</p>
   <p>Gradient field 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            u 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> oscillations are confirmed by temperature changes over 106 years as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
     Figure 4
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-33">
     [33]
    </xref>. Constant vacuum densities (5) represent mean densities of period-doubling (elliptic addition) in FZU. Large CR-rates are</p>
   <fig id="fig3" position="float">
    <label>Figure 3</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 3. The differential dλ ≃ dl<sub>xy</sub> where λ ≃ σ(uω) of iterated elliptic invariants depends e.g. on the Heuman lambda function which for λ → 0 for ω → 2<sup>k</sup>ω k → ∞ behaves plateau-like <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-34">
       [34]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7505520-rId194.jpeg?20250214031824" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig4" position="float">
    <label>Figure 4</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 4. Cosmic radiation (red) and global temperature (black) assumed from geochemical findings over 5 × 10<sup>8</sup> years from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-33">
       [33]
      </xref>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7505520-rId195.jpeg?20250214031824" />
   </fig>
   <p>low k-component rates with ripped spacetime. With increasing k-component thermal forces enhance elastic spacetime. The non dissipative dynamics is a unified superfluid of persistent ionization process. Standard units of time and energy count the number of precessions n and the number of Carnot cycles m independent on current values of fluctuating two-periods.</p>
   <p>Regular chaotic clouds draw a fractal line integral 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         V 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            g 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            o 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            b 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            a 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            l 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> which increases step-like with increasing disturbing convection 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         h 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         t 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Global warming decreases for negative entropy change 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         h 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         t 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        &lt; 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> by lowering cyclic atmospheric perturbations.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>8. Conclusion</title>
   <p>Central to FZU is a relation of a period-doubling chaotic map to doubly-periodic elliptic theta of iterated lattices. The regulator index R<sub>Δ </sub>of the fluctuated number field displays a number of circulant matrices. Analogous to an infinite Mandelbrot Zoom, the pseudo-random map can at best be pseudo-congruent with respect to period-doubling k-components. The pseudo-congruence is expected on a general Riemann surface where the genus is the dimension w of complex space with 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtable> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              w 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
        </mtable> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        &lt; 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        3 
      </mn> 
      <mi>
        w 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        3 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> which yields w = 5. Like an algebraic representation of π with accuracy of &lt;10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> in case of nine class number one fields the pseudo-random condition results from the coupling G<sub>5</sub> in Equation (4) which reflects a pseudo-congruent regulator index giving a factor 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         5 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msubsup> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. This factor e.g. the k = 9<sup>th</sup> component is regarded as the quantum statistics pre-factor in the experimental value 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          a 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Accordingly, quantum statistics implies k-incongruence. As a result, the maximal number of fermions in the universe seems to be 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           8 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> being the Eddington number. A pseudo-congruence 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        → 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is known as LNH. This yields the measured value of the vacuum energy density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-35">
     [35]
    </xref> corrected by 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          10 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          50 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          ⋯ 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          200 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. This congruent pre-factor can be captured as a charge. A change from dimensionless potential V<sub>T</sub> to a dimensioned potential yields an energy M<sub>cloud</sub>c<sup>2</sup> where the mass M<sub>cloud</sub> is a measure of dissipation-less, non-radiative correlation. A congruence by the parameter “charge” illustrates the difference between quantum statistics and unified fields in FZU. A pseudo-congruent correlated k = 7-component yields a factor 10<sup>38</sup>. For a unit of 1 Volt, one would get a congruent energy 10<sup>38</sup>eV→1eV despite a mean energy 1 eVcm<sup>-3</sup>. Within FZU second sound, CR, CMB is predicted at quantized susceptibility which solves CCP ρ<sub>exp</sub> ≠ ρ<sub>QS</sub> by relating QS to a lap number of k-components. Iterated invariants f<sub>k</sub>(ω) and periods ω = ω<sub>k</sub> predict a one-dimensional complex bifurcation tree of bifurcating complex curvature R. Tensile forces of bifurcated, ripped spacetime are felt as CR and CMB <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-35">
     [35]
    </xref>. Iteration by (1) around invariant zeros 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         n 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         ξ 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is E-field-like and can be visualized by strings of j<sub>cloud</sub>(z) at cycles ν<sub>q</sub> of a bifurcation tree of quadrupolar points 1, 2 → 1’, 2’. Like a Mandelbrot zoom with γ-map z<sub>k</sub> → z<sub>k+</sub><sub>1</sub>, j<sub>k</sub> → j<sub>k+</sub><sub>1</sub>, E<sub>k</sub> → E<sub>k+</sub><sub>1</sub> the normal of complex plane embeds into space where j(z) → j(z), E →E+iB. The chain of strings</p>
   <p>
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         [ 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            δ 
          </mi> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             j 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              c 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              l 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              o 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              u 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              d 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              , 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              k 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              N 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            δ 
          </mi> 
          <msubsup> 
           <mi>
             E 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              k 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              N 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
          </msubsup> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          ⋯ 
        </mo> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           [ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              δ 
            </mi> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               j 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                c 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                l 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                o 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                u 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                d 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                , 
              </mo> 
              <mi>
                k 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                + 
              </mo> 
              <mn>
                1 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              δ 
            </mi> 
            <msubsup> 
             <mi>
               E 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               k 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                − 
              </mo> 
              <mn>
                1 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msubsup> 
           </mrow> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ] 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ] 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>draws a doubly-periodic 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           N 
         </mi> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>-polar ball as a singularity in two-dimensional Laplace equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-10">
     [10]
    </xref> felt as a charge quantum. This is the fractal analog of the magnetic Dirac monopole problem for large (monopole) masses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140571-35">
     [35]
    </xref>. Subsequent quadrupolar waves yield a background 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         ε 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         0 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           I 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            j 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> in Coulomb potential 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        V 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           I 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            j 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        ≃ 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         / 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          ε 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> in k-space like an exchange scattering term. Then the cosmological redshift and CMB are both caused by simplest cycles of clock frequency j<sub>cloud</sub>(z). Predicted emissions relate nanostructures to possible future energy technology as well as to consequences for the model of universe and climate.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Friedmann, A. (1922) On the Curvature of Space. Zeitschrift für Physik, 10, 377. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2024) Fractal Zeta Universe and Cosmic-Ray-Charge-Cloud Superfluid. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14193126 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Remmen, G.N. (2021) Amplitudes and the Riemann Zeta Function. Physical Review Letters, 127, Article ID: 241602. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.127.241602
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Manasson, V.A. (2017) An Emergence of a Quantum World in a Self-Organized Vacuum—A Possible Scenario. Journal of Modern Physics, 8, 1330-1381. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.88086
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hieb, M. (1995) Feigenbaum’s Constant and the Sommerfeld Fine-Structure Constant. Feigenbaum’s Constant and the Sommerfeld Fine-Structure Constant. &gt;https://www.rxiv.org/abs/1704.0365 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abrikosov, A.A. (1957) On the Magnetic Properties of Superconductors of the Second Group. Soviet Physics-JETP, 5, 1174-1182.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bonch-Bruevich, V.L. (1974) The Benard Problem for Hot Electrons in Semiconductors. Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 67, 2204-2214.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dirac, P.A. (1974) Cosmological Models and the Large Numbers Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 338, 439-446. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Millikan, R.A. (1913) On the Elementary Electrical Charge and the Avogadro Constant. Physical Review, 2, 109-143. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.2.109
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     França, G. and LeClair, A. (2014) A Theory for the Zeros of Riemann Zeta and Other L-Functions. arXiv: 1407.4358. &gt;https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1407.4358 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2025) QH Plateau and CMB-CR Near Nontrivial Zeros of the Zeta Function. DPG-Frühjahrstagung der Sektion Kondensierte Materie, Regensburg 2025, Wednesday 16-21 March 2025. &gt;https://www.dpg-verhandlungen.de/year/2025/conference/regensburg/part/dy/session/27/contribution/10?lang=en 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Conover, E. (2023) Where Cosmic Rays Are Born. Science News for Students.&gt;https://www.snexplores.org/article/where-cosmic-rays-are-born 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Einstein, A. (1918) Über Gravitationswellen. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 154. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Reinhardt, H. (2008) Dielectric Function of the QCD Vacuum. Physical Review Letters, 101, Article ID: 061602. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.101.061602
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Baker, H.F. (1907) An Introduction to the Theory of Multiply Periodic Functions. Ulan Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schertz, R. (2006) On the Generalized Principal Ideal Theorem of Complex Multiplication. Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux, 18, 683-691. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5802/jtnb.566
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Weber, H. (1908) Lehrbuch der Algebra, Band III. Elliptische Funktionen und Algebraische Zahlen. F. Vieweg und Sohn. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Weber, H. (1961) Lehrbuch der Algebra: Vol. 2. Wentworth Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Coppersmith, S.N. (1999) A Simpler Derivation of Feigenbaum’s Renormalization Group Equation for the Period-Doubling Bifurcation Sequence. American Journal of Physics, 67, 52-54. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19190
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Epstein, H. (1986) New Proofs of the Existence of the Feigenbaum Functions. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 106, 395-426. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01207254
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Blinder, S.M. and Pollock, E.L. (1989) Generalized Relations among n-Dimensional Coulomb Green’s Functions Using Fractional Derivatives. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 30, 2285-2287. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.528556
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hostler, L. (1971) Excited State Reduced Coulomb Green’s Function and f-Dimensional Coulomb Green’s Function in Momentum Space. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 12, 2311-2319. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665537
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meixner, J. (1933) Die Greensche Funktion des wellenmechanischen Keplerproblems. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 36, 677-707. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01188644
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bisognin, R., Bartolomei, H., Kumar, M., Safi, I., Berroir, J., Bocquillon, E., et al. (2019) Microwave Photons Emitted by Fractionally Charged Quasiparticles. Nature Communications, 10, Article No. 1708. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09758-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, W., Wang, P., Skinner, B., Bi, R., Kozii, V., Cho, C., et al. (2020) Observation of a Thermoelectric Hall Plateau in the Extreme Quantum Limit. Nature Communications, 11, Article No. 1046. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14819-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yang, K. and Halperin, B.I. (2009) Thermopower as a Possible Probe of Non-Abelian Quasiparticle Statistics in Fractional Quantum Hall Liquids. Physical Review B, 79, Article ID: 115317. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.79.115317
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Keiper, R. and Ziep, O. (1986) Theory of Quantum Hall Effect. Physica Status Solidi (b), 133, 769-773. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221330239
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ney, E.P. (1959) Cosmic Radiation and the Weather. Nature, 183, 451-452. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/183451a0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dickinson, R.E. (1975) Solar Variability and the Lower Atmosphere. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 56, 1240-1248. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1975)056&lt;1240:svatla&gt;2.0.co;2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Svensmark, H. (1998) Influence of Cosmic Rays on Earth’s Climate. Physical Review Letters, 81, 5027-5030. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.81.5027
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Svensmark, H., Bondo, T. and Svensmark, J. (2009) Cosmic Ray Decreases Affect Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds. Geophysical Research Letters, 36, L15101. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl038429
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Svensmark, H., Svensmark, J., Enghoff, M.B. and Shaviv, N.J. (2021) Atmospheric Ionization and Cloud Radiative Forcing. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 19668. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99033-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shaviv, N.J. and Veizer, J. (2003) Celestial Driver of Phanerozoic Climate? GSA Today, 13, 4-10. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1130/1052-5173(2003)013&lt;0004:cdopc&gt;2.0.co;2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tölke, F. (2013) Jacobische Elliptische Funktionen, Legendresche Elliptische Normalintegrale und spezielle Weierstraßsche Zeta-und Sigma-Funktionen (Bd. 3). Springer.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140571-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ziep, O. (2025) Quantized Conductivity as a Neutral Quadrupolar Generator. Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics, 12, 1-5. &gt;https://doi.org/10.36347/sjpms.2025.v12i01.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>