Rimsulfuron (98% m/m) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Chemie GmbH, Eschenstrasse 5, Taufkirchen, Germany). The oxalic acid (98% m/m) was sourced from Sigma-Aldrich (PESTANAL®, analytical standard, GmbH, Switzerland). All solutions were protected against light with aluminum foil and stored in a refrigerator. The chemical properties of rimsulfuron and oxalic acid were presented in Table 1 .

^aWater solubility (25˚C), ^bMelting point, ^cBolting point.

Absorption spectra were measured using a GENESYS^TM 180 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer with the following specifications: Wavelength Range: 190 nm to 1100 nm, Scanning speed: Slow, medium and fast (up to 1600 nm/min), Spectral bandwidth: 2 nm. The PULMIC brand (France) provided the Raptor 16 L sprayer for use. Solar measurements were taken using a Tenmars TM-207 BTU Solar Power Meter with remote sensor/Pyranometer (Taiwan region), with a power of 2000 W/m². A thermometer and pipette were used to measure temperature. A 50 - 1000 µL micropipette (Gilson, France) was used for dilution.

All standard solutions of rimsulfuron (10⁻³ M) and oxalic acid (10⁻³ - 10⁻¹ M) were freshly prepared in distilled water. The requisite working standard solutions were prepared by taking the appropriate quantity from the stock standard solutions. To prevent any decomposition, all solutions were protected from light with aluminium foil and stored in a refrigerator.

The distilled water was prepared at the Iba Der Thiam University in Thiès, Senegal.

Natural water samples from the Niayes agricultural area of Senegal were collected in 1.5 L glass bottles in accordance with standard procedure. The samples were filtered using a syringe filter with a PTFE membrane with a diameter of 25 mm and a pore size of 0.2 μm (Sigma-Aldrich), in order to remove any suspended organic matter.

To ascertain the herbicidal efficacy of the product, two 2 m² grass plots were established on clay soil. One of the plots is exposed to sunlight with an average energy of 1270 W/m², while the other is protected from light. We followed the evolution of the weeds for 18 days.

On each plot, we spray the grass with a pesticide solution in accordance with the instructions on the pesticide bottle (0.5 L per hectare).

Therefore, 500 mL of rimsulfuron must be used per hectare, which corresponds to an application volume of 0.2 mL of rimsulfuron per 4 m². Additionally, for 25 mL of rimsulfuron, the product must be diluted in 15 L of water. To maintain the same concentration and ensure that all the grass is sprayed, 10 mL of rimsulfuron should be added to 6 L of water. The following protocol was followed: First, 1 L of water was added to the sprayer, followed by 10 mL of rimsulfuron. The solution was stirred thoroughly to ensure uniform distribution. Finally, the remaining 5 L of water was added while stirring the solution.

Following the application of the spray, each plant is watered daily. Subsequently, the impact of our irradiated and non-irradiated products on the herbs is assessed every two days until day 18.

Figure 1 presents the electronic absorption spectra of rimsulfuron in distilled water and natural water samples (well waters and runoff water) in the absence of the photosensitiser at different irradiation times (t_irr = 0 to 120 min). In all cases, the spectra of the irradiated and non-irradiated products show a maximum band at 375 nm. This intense band is attributed to the delocalisation of the π electrons. This value is in good agreement with the results of the literature on the maximum absorption wavelength of sulfonylurea pesticides [15] .

During the irradiation process, we noted a slight variation in absorbance as a function of irradiation time. Accordingly, the quantity of rimsulfuron transformed into a photoproduct or the percentage of photodegradation over the course of 120 minutes was determined using the following equation: $\left(\frac{A_0-A}{A_0}\right)\times 100$. In this calculation, A represents the absorbance at t_irr = 120 minutes, while A₀ represents the absorbance at t_irr = 0.

The results clearly show that the photodegradation percentages in distilled water are 15.52%, while those in natural water samples are significantly lower (between 6.3% and 7.19%). The photodegradation percentage of rimsulfuron in distilled water is approximately twice that observed in water samples. The discrepancy can be attributed to the lack of ions and organic matter present in distilled water. As has been documented in numerous studies, the presence of organic matter frequently serves to reduce the rate of photodegradation of pesticides. We can cite the work of Sambou et al. on the photodegradation of the herbicide diuron by photochemically induced fluorescence (PIF) as an illustrative example [16] . As well as those of Saleck et al. on the photodegradation of diuron and metalaxyl by UV-visible and PIF [17] .

To enhance the photodegradation of rimsulfuron in water, we noticed that the use of a photosensitiser would be an effective method to accelerate the photodegradation process. To achieve this objective, we conducted photodegradation experiments with the herbicide in distilled water and natural waters using oxalic acid as a photosensitiser.

This section presents the results of the study on the photodegradation of rimsulfuron in distilled water and in natural water samples in the presence of the photosensitiser during an irradiation time of 180 min. Initially, we optimised the concentration of oxalic acid in the range of 10⁻⁴ M to 2 × 10⁻¹ M and found an effect of oxalic acid on the photodegradation of rimsulfuron at concentrations above 10⁻² M. At the above concentrations, a significant effect of oxalic acid on the photodegradation of the herbicide was observed, and the optimal concentration was determined to be 10⁻¹ M. Subsequently, the concentration of oxalic acid was set at 10⁻¹ M to study the photodegradation kinetics of the herbicide rimsulfuron in distilled and natural water. Thus, we present in Figure 2 the evolution of the absorption spectra in the presence of oxalic acid (10⁻¹ M) in well water (depth = 0.5) and runoff water. As the rimsulfuron solution is irradiated in the presence of oxalic acid (10⁻¹ M), a decrease in absorbance was observed; this indicates degradation of the rimsulfuron.

This reduction appears to be greater in distilled water and well water (depth = 0.5) than in well water (depth = 1 m) and runoff water. However, our findings indicated that the photodegradation of the herbicide in the presence of the photosensitiser was significantly enhanced. The photodegradation percentage was 68.57% in distilled water, 40.32% in well water (0.5 m), 20.71% in well water (1 m), and 16.98% in runoff water. The discrepancy in photodegradation rates may be attributed to the considerable organic matter and ion content in the water samples. The pH of water samples had no significant impact on rimsulfuron photodegradation. However, we found that the percentage of photodegradation decreases as a function of the conductivity of the water sample. The highest conductivity measurement recorded (35.15 mS/cm) in runoff water is likely responsible for the low photodegradation percentage observed ( Table 2 ). This suggests that the presence of ions in the samples contributes to the herbicide’s persistence in natural waters. The results clearly show that rimsulfuron is susceptible to solar radiation when a photosensitiser is present. To gain a deeper insight into the stability of our product in natural waters, it is crucial to examine the parameters of photodegradation kinetics, specifically the photodegradation rate constant and photodegradation reaction half-life time. To evaluate the photodegradation kinetics of the herbicide in various distilled water and natural water samples, we determined that the photodegradation kinetics of rimsulfuron is of the first order. For the first-order reactions, the following equations were used:

$\ln \frac{A_0}{A}=kt$

$t_{1/2}=\frac{\ln 2}{k}$

with k the photodegradation rate constant and t_1/2 the photodegradation reaction half-life time.

The resulting curves $\ln \frac{A_0}{A}=f\left(t\right)$ yield a straight line with a correlation coefficient close to unity, indicating first-order kinetics ( Figure 3 ). The rate constants and half-lives were determined from the slopes obtained. The kinetic parameters were presented in Table 2 .

^ak = photodegradation rate constant (min^–1) and absolute error (±). ^bt_1/2 = photodegradation reaction half-life time (min). ^cOrder = reaction kinetic order. ^dPhotodegradation percentage. ^er² = kinetic equation correlation coefficient. ^fConductivity of the water samples.

We found that in the presence of photosensitiser, the rate of photodegradation of rimsulfuron is lower in runoff water (t_1/2 = 693.15) under the effect of solar radiation. This suggests that there is a high likelihood of this product being transported in runoff water. This result is in line with the findings of Allan J. Cessna et al. [18] , who studied the persistence of three herbicides, including rimsulfuron, in ponds. However, in the presence of oxalic acid, this product is susceptible to degradation in these waters under the influence of solar radiation. Thiaré et al. also observed similar kinetics when studying the photodegradation of fenvalerate, a pyrethroid insecticide, in water using a solar simulator [19] . Another study by Scrano and collaborators demonstrated that all chemical and photochemical processes responsible for the disappearance of rimsulfuron followed second-order kinetics [14] . Other researchers, such as Vicari et al. have obtained first-order kinetics for this herbicide by studying its degradation in sandy-loamy soil [20] . Sarr et al. conducted studies on the photodegradation of fluometuron. Their findings indicated that the photodegradation reactions of this product follow first-order kinetics [21] .

The objective of this study was to assess the herbicidal activity of rimsulfuron. Following application of rimsulfuron solution to exposed, sun-protected grasses over an eighteen-day period ( Figure 4 ). From the fourth day onwards, the herbicidal effect on leaves kept away from light was found to be less significant ( Figure 4(b) ). The herbicidal efficacy of the treatment remained constant on sun-protected grasses until day 18 ( Figure 4(b) , Figure 4(c) and Figure 4(d) ).

However, a noticeable change in impact was observed on light-exposed grasses. The majority of light-exposed grasses were desiccated by day eight, and all specimens showed near-total mortality by day eighteen ( Figure 4(d) ).

The results indicate that the herbicidal activity of rimsulfuron can be attributed to either its photoproduct or its combined action with its photoproduct.

Wei et al. achieved comparable outcomes through an investigation into the herbicidal efficacy of three pesticides belonging to the same chemical family as rimsulfuron, along with their degradation products, on green algae. The results demonstrated that the parent products exhibited greater herbicidal activity. The ineffectiveness of the degradation products on these algae was due to the fact that the nitrogen in these products was used by the algae as an energy source, thereby reducing their toxicity [22] . The results of our study, when compared with those of Wei et al., demonstrate that the herbicidal activity of a compound or its degradation product may be contingent on not only the nature of the plant under study, but also on the sources of degradation, which may result in the formation of different products.