<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    gep
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-4336
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-4344
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/gep.2025.131019
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    gep-140348
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Technical Proposal for the Recovery of Iron Tailings in Dams in the Context of a Circular Economy
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Vidal Félix Navarro
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Torres
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Geraldo Aparecido do
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Vale
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Eduardo da Rosa
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Aquino
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aInstituto Tecnológico Vale-Mineração, Ouro Preto, Brazil
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aVale S.A., Parauapebas, Brazil
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     07
    </day> 
    <month>
     01
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    01
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    387
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    396
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      18,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      January
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The objective of this study is to present a tailings recovery project in a dam located in northern Brazil; the tailings in this dam have high concentrations of iron. The sustainable recovery of mineral resources can be achieved using the dredging method. The methodology used was based on two drilling projects conducted in 2001 and 2010; these projects contained samples with information on the chemical composition and particle size fractions. The dredging system was designed to operate with four cutter suction dredgers. For operation, factors such as productivity, pumping distance and material flow were considered. The material contained in the dam was estimated using the natural neighborhood interpolation method; this resulted in approximately 192 million tons of tailings, with an average iron content of 63.37%. Based on these data, a 13-year mining plan was prepared, with the potential to maximize the use of the tailings and reduce the environmental impacts, thus contributing to a circular economy.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Tailings
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Dredging
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Iron Content
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Circular Economy
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Tailings dams are engineering structures used to store materials from the ore beneficiation process. Typically, the associated material is the material that cannot be recovered during the physical-chemical concentration process and is discarded.</p>
   <p>Given the large number of tailings dams worldwide and the increasingly low quality of the resources in mineral deposits, the reuse of tailings disposed of in dams will substantially increase. In addition, in many dams, the metallic content of the deposited material is high because mineral processing is not performed at the time of deposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-24">
     Wates et al., 2010
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-5">
     Ferrante, 2014
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-6">
     Franks et al., 2021
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Mineral extraction in aquatic environments, particularly in dams, has attracted increasing interest for its potential as an efficient and sustainable method. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-13">
     Løvik et al. (2018)
    </xref> emphasized that the reuse of tailings from dams has two main purposes: to reprocess the sediments to recover metals and valuable elements and to reintegrate the product into the industrial chain.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-4">
     Engels et al. (2004)
    </xref> noted that the characteristics of the deposit, the composition and storage conditions of the deposited sediments, and the possibilities of transport and handling of the tailings need to be determined to select the appropriate method for the extraction of tailings from dams. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-15">
     Muir et al. (2005)
    </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-19">
     Sousa (2020)
    </xref> noted that other characteristics needed to be determined to aid in the extraction method selection of the tailings; these other characteristics included topography, water flow, climatic conditions, density and homogeneity of the sediments since these characteristics directly impact the costs of the mining projects and the use of tailings.</p>
   <p>Three main methods are used to mine tailings in dams: 1) hydraulic blasting, the use of water jets with high-pressure cannons; 2) mechanical excavation, the use of conventional equipment such as excavators, bulldozers and trucks; and 3) dredging, the use of hydraulic or mechanical dredges. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-1">
     Alves (2015)
    </xref> highlighted the importance of evaluating the sediment deposition characteristics, the area available for performing the method and the alternatives for transporting the material to identify the best mining alternative since each method has its own unique characteristics.</p>
   <p>The use of dredges as a mining tool for dams has emerged as a viable alternative; dredging promotes not only the maximization of the recovery of mineral resources but also the minimization of environmental impacts. Therefore, the aims of this study are to present a dredging project of an iron tailings dam and provide the operating procedures that meet the needs of the ore treatment plant.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Dredging</title>
   <p>Dredging is defined as the excavation or removal of soil at the bottom of rivers, lakes or other bodies of water and is performed using a dredger. Generally, a dredger is a floating vessel or platform equipped with the mechanisms that are able to remove the soil.</p>
   <p>Historically, dredging has been considered a very old activity, with data dating back thousands of years. In ancient Greece, artificial canals were built for irrigation purposes, as well as to unite water bodies, such as the connection of the Nile River with the Red Sea. Historical data also revealed the construction of the Babylonian Canal, which joined the Tigris and Euphrates rivers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-3">
     Bray et al., 1997
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The longest and oldest canal that still exists today is the Grand Canal of China; this canal is more than 1600 km long and took approximately 2000 years to build (its work began in the 7th century BC and ended approximately 1280 AD). In Europe, the pioneers in the construction of canals were the Italians; however, the French valued the quantity and extension of their canals. Currently, the Dutch contributes the most in technology for the construction of channels for the drainage of their territory. All major water systems of northern Europe are interconnected by artificial channels.</p>
   <p>Although dredging is popular in engineering structures for desanding, cleaning, unclogging, widening, and deepening in rivers, lakes, seas, bays and channels, it has also been used for the exploration of mineral deposits. Several studies address dredging as a mining method, especially in placer-type alluvial deposits, for the extraction of gold and tin in various territories of the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-16">
     Nelson, 1976
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-8">
     Hearn &amp; Hargreaves, 1985
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-10">
     Kaur &amp; Diehl, 1996
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-20">
     Spence, 1996
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-14">
     Morse, 2003
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-17">
     Phillips et al., 2003
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-9">
     Hillman, 2005
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-12">
     Lloyd, 2006
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-25">
     Wegner, 2009
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-23">
     Waterhouse, 2010
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-18">
     Ross, 2014
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-21">
     Spence, 2016
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-11">
     Lawrence et al., 2021
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>In terms of dredging tailings dams, technical-scientific publications are limited. On the other hand, as highlighted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-2">
     Aquino et al. (2024)
    </xref>, the companies that supply dredgers show various projects around the world in their catalogs. Dredging projects for uranium, copper and gold, coal, iron, gold and silver tailings dams have been performed.</p>
   <p>Several types of dredgers exist and can be classified by the type of material movement (hydraulic or mechanical) and by the way the material is fragmented (centrifugal, pneumatic or aerial) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-7">
     Granato, 2005
    </xref>). The most common mechanical dredgers are the dipper, backhoe, bucket ladder and grab dredgers. The most common hydraulic dredgers are the cutter suction, tailing suction hopper, and dustpan.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Case Study</title>
   <p>The mineral deposit is located in northern Brazil, and the project is developed in an iron tailings dam (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>); in this dam, the deposition of the material in the dam has been performed since the 1980 s. Due to the lack of technological development at the time and market concerns, much of the pellet feed was not recovered in the iron ore beneficiation operation. Therefore, iron with a potential high concentration was deposited in the dam.</p>
   <p>Over the years, several studies have been conducted, and a project for the recovery of the tailings was developed. Thus, the project for reprocessing the tailings from the dam was started and was characterized by the recovery of the tailings with respect to economic use and includes the desanding of the dam.</p>
   <p>The tailings deposited in the dam are recovered using four cutter suction drums and are pumped through floating water pipelines to surface treatment facilities. In these facilities, the material is initially sieved to remove organic material and any coarse material. The retained material is then sent to the pulp thickener. Then, this material is pumped via a pipeline toward the existing structures and/or adapted to the treatment plant currently implemented; in this plant, the magnetic concentration, thickening and filtering are performed.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. Iron tailings dam.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173214-rId14.jpeg?20250205022036" />
   </fig>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Methodology</title>
   <p>The methodology consists of determining the type of dredger to be used in the project and analyzing the required production demands and operating parameters. In addition, the proposed mine plans for dredging are provided.</p>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Database</title>
    <p>Two drilling projects were conducted in 2001 and 2010. For both projects, the standard penetration test (SPT) method was used. The samples obtained have records of the contents of the main chemical components linked to the iron ore and of particle size fractions in certain ranges of interest. No record of material density samples; therefore, for the purposes of the model, an average density of 2.50 t/m<sup>3</sup> was used.</p>
    <p>In the 2001 project, 153 holes were drilled, and 272 samples were recorded. The average distance between the drillholes was 70 m, with a maximum distance of 149 m and a minimum distance of 49 m. The database consisted of 3 types of files: a) collar involves the identification of each hole, the coordinates of the hole mouth and the depth of the drilling holes; b) assay involves the identification of each hole, the identification of each sample per hole, the initial and final depths of each sample per hole, the total length of the sample, the percentage of the chemical components of each sample, such as Fe (iron), SiO<sub>2</sub> (silica), P (phosphorus), Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (alumina) and Mn (manganese) and the percentage of the particle size fractions between −0.045 mm and −0.020 mm; and c) survey involves the identification of each hole, the depth of each hole, the azimuth and dip of each hole.</p>
    <p>In the 2010 project, 153 holes were drilled, and 569 samples were recorded. Compared to the 2001 project, the 2010 project differed with respect to the characterization of the material, with 529 samples of ore and 40 samples of waste rock. The average distance between the drillholes was 100 m, with a maximum distance of 215 m and a minimum distance of 3 m. The database was composed of the same 3 types of files from the 2001 project. In the assay file, the percentages of the chemical components of each sample refer to Fe (iron), SiO<sub>2</sub> (silica), P (phosphorus), Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (alumina), Mn (manganese), CaO (calcium oxide), MgO (magnesium oxide), TiO<sub>2</sub> (titanium dioxide) and PPC (loss on calcination). The percentages of particle size fractions refer to the following sizes: +0.250 mm, +0.150 mm, +0.106 mm, +0.075 mm, +0.045 mm and −0.045 mm.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref> shows the spatial distribution of the 2001 and 2010 drillholes.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Exploration drilling.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173214-rId15.jpeg?20250205022036" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Sizing of the Dredging System</title>
    <p>When a company proposes to acquire a dredger, a market study is usually carried out on the production capacity of the dredger to verify if the production capacity matches the need required by the operation. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-22">
      Vlasblom (2016)
     </xref>, the productive capacity of a dredger can be expressed in m³/hour or in t/hour. In addition, insight into the expected average cycle time of the dredger and the type of soil to be dredged are needed. The productivity of dredgers depends on two components: a) variability in equipment operation and b) variability in the material flow.</p>
    <p>In the case of material flow variability, the productivity depends on variables such as the pumping distance and the geological characteristics of the mining fronts. The relationship between dredger productivity and pumping distance is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The flow of the planned process from the dredging of the tailings to the final pellet feed product has several stages and starts with 4 cutter suction dredges. The dredged material is suctioned by booster pumps and travels through pipelines for a distance of 950 m until it reaches the first plant. The pumped material goes through the following sieving process: 4 horizontal vibrating sieves followed by 4 linear sieves. Following the flow, the sieved material passes through a thickener</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Dredge production sensitivity as a function of the pumping distance.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173214-rId16.jpeg?20250205022037" />
    </fig>
    <p>and is then sent to 4 feed tanks of the ore pipeline. From these tanks, the material is pumped by 2 cargo pumps and 4 positive displacement pumps through an ore pipeline that covers a 7 km path until the terminal station is reached. From this station, the material is sent to the magnetic concentration tank; in this tank, the material passes through 2 protection sieves, 2 distributors and 8 magnetic concentrators. The product from the magnetic concentration passes through filter presses and disc filters and is then ready to be commercialized. The tailings from the magnetic concentration are sent to a tailings thickener and mixed with the tailings from other plants; subsequently, this tailings mixture is sent through a chute back to the dam.</p>
    <p>Dredging operations require hydraulic transport of iron ore tailings, and the design parameters were set as follows:</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s5_1">
    <title>5.1. Estimated Dam Material</title>
    <p>Based on the samples from the 2001 and 2010 drillholes, the thickness of each hole was subdivided into 5 m benches. The iron contents contained in the samples are represented by their arithmetic means on each bench.</p>
    <p>The digital surface models were generated using the natural neighbor interpolation method because of its conservative nature. In this method, the set of points (x, y, z) is processed to generate a regular grid with predetermined spacing. In this case, the spacing used was 20 m. This technique has advantages over simpler methods, such as the nearest neighbor method, because it creates a smoothed approximation of the underlying function to the real surface.</p>
    <p>The volume of tailings contained in the sampling region of the dam was calculated by multiplying the flat projections of the areas by the height of the benches of 5 m. The sum of the various levels of iron contents of the 5 m-thick benches resulted in a total volume of tailings of 76,913,267 m<sup>3</sup>. Considering the average density of 2.50 t/m<sup>3</sup>, the tonnage corresponds to 192,283,168 t. The average iron content is 63.37%, and the main contaminants are silica and alumina. In addition, approximately 82% of the material is contained in the fraction below 45 µm (0.045 mm), and no data are available on the sludge fraction (−10 µm).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5_2">
    <title>5.2. Mining Plan</title>
    <p>A mining plan was developed for an operation scheduled to last 13 years. As a</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Dredging planning and schedule.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173214-rId17.jpeg?20250205022037" />
    </fig>
    <p>premise, the annual production of dredging was defined as 14.235 Mt; this value was estimated considering the capacity of the plant. Dredging in the entire estimated region was not possible because of operational issues.</p>
    <p>In addition, some operating assumptions needed to be made, as follows:</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref> shows the distribution of the sequenced areas of the mine plan for each dredging year. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref> shows the amount of dredged material used, as well as the average iron content in each year.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.140348-"></xref>Table 1. Production scheduling.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Year</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">Tonnage (t)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">Fe (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2021</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,110,586</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.34</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2022</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,139,350</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.03</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2023</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,175,121</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.27</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2024</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,160,136</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.24</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2025</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,250,966</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.37</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2026</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,163,410</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">64.11</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2027</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,223,641</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.49</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2028</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,222,234</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.38</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2029</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,129,761</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">63.08</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2030</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,193,974</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.03</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2031</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,153,616</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.45</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2032</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,165,645</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.33</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2033</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">14,143,201</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.13</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">184,231,639</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="45.45%"><p style="text-align:center">62.48</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusion and Recommendations</title>
   <p>The recovery of iron tailings in dams using the dredging method has proven to be a promising alternative for the economic recovery of mineral resources and for the mitigation of the environmental impacts associated with the storage of tailings. The application of modern techniques, such as the use of cutter suction dredgers and efficient beneficiation processes, has enabled the extraction of materials with high iron contents and reinforced the importance of the reuse of tailings in dams.</p>
   <p>In addition, as part of a broader strategy of environmental and economic management in the mining sector, this study contributes to the circular economy since reusing previously discarded resources adds value to the mining chain. The methodology discussed enables sustainable operational planning, integrating engineering practices with technological innovation.</p>
   <p>Further research is still needed, especially with respect to the distribution of tailings along the dam. More robust geostatistical studies need to be conducted to obtain a more accurate estimate of resources using techniques such as ordinary kriging or sequential Gaussian simulation. Thus, with a better estimated model, an even more reliable dredging plan can be developed.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors would like to thank Instituto Tecnológico Vale for the resources used to prepare this study.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Alves, H. O. (2015). Estudo comparativo de duas técnicas de lavra em barragem de rejeito sob o ponto de vista geotécnico. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aquino, E. R., Torres, V. F. N.,&amp;Paniz, I. L. (2024). Tailings Dam Mining, Theoretical Considerations, and Circular Economy: A Review. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 12, 77-92. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2024.129005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bray, R. N., Bates, A. D.,&amp;Land, J. M. (1997). Dredging: A Handbook for Engineers (2nd ed.). Arnold.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Engels, J., Schönhardt, M., Witt, K. J., Benkovics, I., Berta, Z., Csövári, M., et al. (2004). Tailings Management Facilities—Intervention Actions for Risk Reduction. Report of Work Package 3 of the RTD Project Sustainable Improvement in Safety of Tailings Facilities (TAILSAFE). European Commission.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ferrante, F. (2014). Estudo de Viabilidade para Recuperação de Minério de Ferro em Rejeitos Contidos em Barragens. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Franks, D. M., Stringer, M., Torres-Cruz, L. A., Baker, E., Valenta, R., Thygesen, K. et al. (2021). Tailings Facility Disclosures Reveal Stability Risks. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 5353. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84897-0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Granato, F. C. (2005). Subsídios Técnicos para o Estabelecimento de um Plano de Gerenciamento Ambiental Integrado do Processo de Dragagem do Porto de Rio Grande-RS. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal de Rio Grande.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hearn, T. J.,&amp;Hargreaves, R. P. (1985). The Speculators’ Dream: Gold Dredging in Southern New Zealand. Allied Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hillman, J. (2005). Australian Capital and South-East Asian Tin Mining, 1906-40. Australian Economic History Review, 45, 161-185. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8446.2005.00133.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kaur, A.,&amp;Diehl, F. (1996). Tin Miners and Tin Mining in Indonesia, 1850-1950. Asian Studies Review, 20, 95-120. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/03147539608713113
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lawrence, S., Grove, J., Davies, P., Turnbull, J., Rutherfurd, I.,&amp;Macklin, M. (2021). Historical Dredge Mining as a Significant Anthropomorphic Agent in River Systems: A Case Study from South-Eastern Australia. The Holocene, 31, 1158-1174. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/09596836211003272
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lloyd, B. (2006). Gold in the North-East: A History of Mining for Gold in the Old Beechworth Mining District of Victoria. Melbourne: Histec Publications.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Løvik, A. N., Hagelüken, C.,&amp;Wäger, P. (2018). Improving Supply Security of Critical Metals: Current Developments and Research in the EU. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 15, 9-18. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2018.01.003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Morse, K. T. (2003). The Nature of Gold: An Environmental History of the Klondike Gold Rush. University of Washington Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Muir, A., Mitchell, J., Flatman, S. R.,&amp;Sabbagha, C. (2005). A Practical Guide to Re-Treatment of Gold Processing Residues. Minerals Engineering, 18, 811-824. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2005.01.027
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nelson, H. (1976). Black, White and Gold: Goldmining in Papua New Guinea 1878-1930. Australian National University Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Phillips, G. N., Hughes, M. J., Arne, D. C., Bierlein, F. P., Carey, S. P., Jackson, T.,&amp;Willman, E. (2003). Gold: Historical Wealth, Future Potential. In: W. D. Birch (Ed.), Geology of Victoria (pp. 377-432). Geological Society of Australia.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ross, C. (2014). The Tin Frontier: Mining, Empire, and Environment in Southeast Asia, 1870s-1930s. Environmental History, 19, 454-479. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emu032
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sousa, G. M. (2020). Proposta de metodologia para lavra de barragens de rejeitos de ferro construídas pela técnica de aterro hidráulico. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Spence, C. C. (1996). The Northern Gold Fleet: Twentieth-Century Gold Dredging in Alaska. University of Illinois Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Spence, C. C. (2016). A History of Gold Dredging in Idaho. University Press of Colorado. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5876/9781607324751
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vlasblom, W. J. (2016). Designing Dredging Equipment. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Waterhouse, M. (2010). Not a Poor Man’s Field: The New Guinea Goldfields to 1942: An Australian Colonial History. Halstead Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wates, J. A., Jardine, P., Robinson, B. C. S.,&amp;Marais, M. (2010). Yesterday’s Tailings are Tomorrow’s Resource—Rehabilitation of Stilfontein Gold Mine for Profit. In Proceedings of Sustainable Mining 2010 (pp. 114-127). The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.140348-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wegner, J. (2009). Sludge on Tap: Queensland’s First Water Pollution Legislation, 1944-1985. Environment and History, 15, 199-216. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3197/096734009x437981
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>