<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jss
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Social Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-5952
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-5960
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jss.2025.131010
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jss-139932
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Business 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Economics, Social Sciences 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Humanities
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Effect of the Implementation of Girls’ Re-Entry Policy by the Headteachers on Students’ Retention in Masinga Sub County, Kenya
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Julius Mutinda
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mutune
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ursulla Achieng
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Okoth
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mercy
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mugambi
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aSchool of Education, University of Nairobi, Kikuyu, Nairobi, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     03
    </day> 
    <month>
     01
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    01
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    175
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    188
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      16,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      13,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      13,
     </day>
     <month>
      January
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    This study explored the effect of the implementation of girls’ re-entry policy by the head teachers on students’ retention in Masinga sub county Kenya. The study employed descriptive survey research design. The target population was 50 head teachers, 50 deputy head teachers and 5022 form three and four students. Purposive, stratified proportionate sampling were employed to sample 25 head teachers, 25 deputy head teachers and 370 students. Data collection was done by use of questionnaires, interview guides and document analysis. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic approach. Validity of the research instruments was ascertained through expert judgment and piloting. Reliability was achieved through test re-test method where the instruments were piloted in a time interval of two weeks and the two results were correlated using Pearson’s product moment correlation method. The hypothesis was accepted or rejected at 0.01 level of significance. The study found out that headteachers’ implementation of the girls’ re-entry policy has a positive influence on students’ retention (r = 0.76: p = 0.00), hence the hypothesis was rejected and an alternative hypothesis accepted. The study concluded that focusing on the effective implementation of the girls’ re-entry policy by the head teachers can be a key strategy for improving students’ retention. The study recommended that policy makers should prioritize supporting headteachers through training, allocation of resources and guidance to help them fulfil this policy implementation.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Girls’ Re-Entry
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Headteachers
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Policy
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Students’ Retention
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>According to UNESCO institute of statistics, 250 million children and youth remain out of school globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-29">
     UNESCO, 2023
    </xref>). Among the out of school children are those who have never been enrolled in school or have dropped out before completing a full cycle of education. Pregnancy, both in and out of marriage is a key contributor to the non-completion of schooling by girls in the sub-Saharan region. In this region, laws, policies or measures protecting adolescent girls’ education during pregnancy and motherhood are in place in 38 out of 54 countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-#HYPERLINK  l R32">
     Wamahiu &amp; Musembi, 2023
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Access to education among teenage mothers is still a problem even in industrialized nations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-25">
     Rumberger, 2020
    </xref>). Today nations have customized the re-entry policy into suitable key actions to guarantee good and exemplary educational pursuits of their teenage students (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-34">
     Zajac &amp; Komendant-Brodowska, 2019
    </xref>). These policies explain how school age girls should be supported to remain in school while pregnant and go back to school after maternity break. To reduce wastage in education, countries should ensure that teenage mothers continue with education during pregnancy and after child birth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-1">
     Amin &amp; Ntembe, 2021
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>New York city has a school re-entry policy which stipulates that teenage mothers should be permitted in school to attain their goals, but 70% of the teenage mothers still do not participate in school after child birth due to inadequate support from community, negative self-image and stigmatization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-33">
     Webber, 2018
    </xref>). India has a school re-entry policy aimed at readmitting teenage mothers to school after maternity leave. India has prospered in executing this school re-entry policy due to targeted support offered by most learning institutions to teenage mothers during pregnancy and after child birth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-23">
     Prakash et al. 2019
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>School re-entry in South Africa allows teenage mothers re-admission (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-26">
     Tewari &amp; Ilesanmi, 2020
    </xref>). Support in form of accommodation and administration accorded to teen mothers improved their engagement in education. The needs of teenage mothers that were addressed by the school administration were however not specified. South Africa has succeeded in implementing this policy by providing social and financial support for teenage mothers and access to various contraceptive methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-5">
     Carney et al., 2019
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>In Kenya every individual has a right to an education (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-27">
     The Constitution of Kenya, 2010
    </xref>). The re-entry policy to help young mothers return to schools came into law in 1994. The re-entry policy campaign aims at encouraging students who dropped out of schools to return to schools after giving birth. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-19">
     Ogola (2021)
    </xref> revealed that the re-entry policy implementation in Kenya had several weaknesses. The teenage mothers faced a lot of challenges. The study findings revealed that in terms of practice a lot more needed to be done by the policy makers. Implementation is not well addressed since the policy guidelines are not available in learning institutions. Absence of clarity on the guidelines has forced the head teachers and principals, who are the implementers to use their own discretion. The study recommended that there is need for qualified trained, guidance and counseling teachers to provide quality services to the teenage mothers. Students, parents and the communities need comprehensive sensitization on the re-entry policy</p>
   <sec id="s1_1">
    <title>1.1. Statement of the Problem</title>
    <p>Student retention rate has been a major concern for education institutions around the world. Most countries have laws, policies or measures protecting adolescent girls’ education during pregnancy and motherhood. Adolescent pregnancy and child care have remained the biggest courses of school dropouts and failed readmission among girls (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-#HYPERLINK  l R13">
      McfairLand et al., 2018
     </xref>). Each year thousands of adolescent girls become pregnant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-30">
      UNFPA, 2022
     </xref>). Kenya has a policy in place to cater for the continued education of girls returning to school after giving birth. Despite the policy being implemented, many young girls continue to drop out of school due to challenges encountered in their pursuit of education. This study seeks to investigate the effect of the implementation of the re-entry policy by the head teachers on students’ retention.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_2">
    <title>1.2. Objective of the Study</title>
    <p>The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the implementation of the girls’ re-entry policy by the head teachers on students’ retention in secondary schools in Masinga sub county, Kenya.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s1_3">
    <title>1.3. Research Hypothesis</title>
    <p>Ho1: There is no significant relationship between implementation of the girls’ re-entry policy by the head teachers and students’ retention</p>
    <sec id="s1">
     <title>2. Literature Review</title>
     <p>Several studies have been done to establish the effect of the re-entry policy and students’ retention. A study done by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-20">
       Okwany and Kamusiime (2017)
      </xref> revealed that despite the re-entry policy in Ghana, young mothers are still out of school unable to continue their primary and secondary education. The reintegration education policies for pregnant school girls who leave school purposely for child birth have not been realized as most of these girls remain home. Scholars suggest that stigmatization against pregnant school girls and young mothers is a significant factor influencing the decision of young mothers never to return to school after child birth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-4">
       Birungi et al., 2015
      </xref>).</p>
     <p>In Tanzania, the government introduced a re-entry policy in 2021, allowing mother students who dropped out of school due to pregnancy to return (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-31">
       United republic of Tanzania, 2021
      </xref>). However, there was some political interference towards this plan, which impacted its implementation and effectiveness. Studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-14">
       Momsen (2019)
      </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-7">
       Erete et al. (2021)
      </xref> highlighted the pervasive sexual oppression and violence faced by girl children in these domains. This oppression creates an environment where some girls find themselves vulnerable to early pregnancies leading to detrimental consequences such as dropping out of school.</p>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-28">
       Thwala et al. (2022)
      </xref> found out that re-engaging teenage girls who have left school due to pregnancy involves actively reintegrating these young mothers back into formal education, providing support, tailored programs and a welcoming environment to empower them to continue with their studies and pursue their educational goals. It entails identifying and removing the obstacles that contributed to their disengagement, creating effective interventions to encourage their return and giving them the tools and encouragement they need to continue their education (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-10">
       Kubek et al., 2020
      </xref>).</p>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-11">
       Marende (2022)
      </xref> established that schools were yet to succeed with re-entry policy because only 16% of girls who took maternity leave from schools reenrolled after child birth. The study recommends for teacher training on psycho social support for teenage mothers and school support on acquisition of bursaries and parental empowerment for involvement in the academic pursuit of teenage mothers.</p>
     <p>A study done in Narok by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-2">
       Azumah et al. (2022)
      </xref> revealed that the implementation and manner of implementation of the re-entry policy is at the discretion of head teachers. The study pointed at the failure of the policy to account for the significant amount of time lost while trying to catch up with their studies upon their return. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-6">
       Chiyota and Marishane (2020)
      </xref> emphasized the nation benefits of girls’ education, referring to research that shows that educating females produces far reaching profits for girls and women themselves, their families and the societies in which they live. He further remarked that indeed, during his tenure as a chief economist of the world bank he became persuaded that once all the benefits are acknowledged, investment in the education of girls may well be the highest profit venture obtainable in the developing world.</p>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-17">
       Mulenga and Mukaba (2018)
      </xref> found that schools did not have specific programs meant to help re-entered girls and that most girls decided to stop schooling. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-18">
       Musili et al. (2020)
      </xref> most of the teenage mothers come from poor back grounds that could not offer basic needs for the mother and her baby. In Kenya most principals were reported to have no adequate experience in the proper implementation of the readmission policy of girls after teenage pregnancy in public secondary schools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-18">
       Musili et al., 2020
      </xref>).</p>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-21">
       Omondi &amp; Onyango (2008)
      </xref> report that school heads fear allowing the return to school of girls who give birth because of the stigma associated with having mothers in a student environment. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-21">
       Omondi &amp; Onyango (2008)
      </xref> observed that at the launch of the report on teenage pregnancy and school girl dropout, school heads talked of ostracism faced by schools who have implemented the ministry of education policy on readmitting the girls who give birth in the same school. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-21">
       Omondi &amp; Onyango (2008)
      </xref> noted that other schools derogatorily refer to institutions that accept teenage mothers as “maternity schools” and openly encouraged isolation of our girls in social gatherings.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3">
    <title>3. Methodology</title>
    <sec id="s3_1">
     <title>3.1. Design</title>
     <p>This study employed a descriptive research design. Descriptive research design is a method for gathering information about a population, situation or phenomenon to describe it accurately and systematically.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_2">
     <title>3.2. Target Population</title>
     <p>The study had a population of 5122 participants. The study population included 50 headteachers, 50 deputy headteachers and 5022 form three and four students of the fifty public secondary schools in Masinga sub-county. The researcher chose form three and four students because they had spent a considerable time in the school and so were information rich.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_3">
     <title>3.3. Sample Size</title>
     <p>The sample size for the students was computed using Yamane 1973 formula as follows:</p>
     <p>n = 
      <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mi>
           N 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            N 
          </mi> 
          <msup> 
           <mrow> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mi>
               e 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
      </math></p>
     <p>n = sample size;</p>
     <p>N = population size;</p>
     <p>e = margin error (0.05);</p>
     <p>1 = constant.</p>
     <p>Hence,</p>
     <p>n = 
      <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            5022 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            500 
          </mn> 
          <msup> 
           <mrow> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               ( 
             </mo> 
             <mrow> 
              <mn>
                0.05 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
             <mo>
               ) 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msup> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
      </math></p>
     <p>= 370.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_4">
     <title>3.4. Sampling Technique</title>
     <p>Sampling is a method, process or procedure used to select a subset of a population to take part in the study. It is the process of choosing a large number people for a research in a way that ensures the chosen people accurately reflect the larger population from which they were chosen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-17">
       Matula et al., 2018
      </xref>). This study used purposive sampling technique to select 25 deputy headteacher and 25 headteachers. The researcher further employed simple random sampling to select 370 students.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_5">
     <title>3.5. Instruments</title>
     <p>The researcher made use of three instruments to collect data from the headteachers, deputy headteachers and the students. These included questionnaires, interview guides and document analysis. This approach enabled the researcher to gather both qualitative and quantitative data.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_6">
     <title>3.6. Validity and Reliability</title>
     <p>Validity assess whether content in a questionnaire is able to measure what is intended to be measured (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-#HYPERLINK  l R22">
       Orodho, 2004
      </xref>). For this study, departmental supervisors examined the content validity of the questionnaire then provided the researcher with the necessary advice. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-15">
       Mugenda (2008)
      </xref>, reliability is a measure of the degree to which a research instrument yields consistent results or data after repeated trials. The study applied the test retest method to establish the reliability of the items in the questionnaire. The reliability coefficient was computed using Pearson’s product moments correlation. The questionnaires had a correlation coefficient of 0.70 which was considered acceptable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-16">
       Mugenda &amp; Mugenda, 2003
      </xref>).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_7">
     <title>3.7. Data Analysis</title>
     <p>Data analysis deals with working with the data breaking and synthesizing in search of patterns and attempting to discover what the important issues are (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-3">
       Babu-Nyarko, 2019
      </xref>). Data analysis was done using SPSS (statistical package for social sciences) version 22.0. Descriptive statistics including frequencies, means and percentages summarized demographic characteristics and key variables.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3_8">
     <title>3.8. Ethical Considerations</title>
     <p>The National Council of Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOST) as well as university of Nairobi provided permission for the study. Permission was also sought from the County Commissioner Machakos County and sub-county director of education Masinga Sub-county. The researcher ensured voluntary participation by the respondents and assured them of the confidentiality of the information collected.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4">
    <title>4. Results and Discussions</title>
    <sec id="s4_1">
     <title>4.1. Response Rate</title>
     <p>A total of 370 questionnaires were administered to students while 25 questionnaires were administered to the headteachers. Only 350 questionnaires were returned for analysis by the students which formed 95% return rate. Similarly, 25 out of 25 headteachers and deputy headteachers responded hence a response rate of 100%. The questionnaire return rate is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref> below.</p>
     <table-wrap id="table1">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
        Table 1
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-"></xref>Table 1. The questionnaire return rate.</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Category</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.08%"><p style="text-align:center">sampled</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Returned</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">Not Returned</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentage</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Head teachers</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.08%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">0</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.54%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="20.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Deputy Headteachers</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="15.08%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">0</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="21.54%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="20.27%"><p style="text-align:center">Students</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="15.08%"><p style="text-align:center">370</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">350</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="25.86%"><p style="text-align:center">20</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="21.54%"><p style="text-align:center">95</p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Source: fieldwork, 2022.</p>
     <p>Demographic characteristics of the respondents</p>
     <p>The researcher analyzed the demographic characteristics of the headteachers and deputy headteachers.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s4_2">
     <title>4.2. Distribution of Headteachers and Deputy Headteachers by Age</title>
     <p>Data displaying the distribution of headteachers and deputy headteachers by age is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref>.</p>
     <table-wrap id="table2">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
        Table 2
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-"></xref>Table 2. Distribution of headteachers and deputy headteachers by age.</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="56.86%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Headteachers</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="56.86%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Deputy Headteachers</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Age</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Frequency</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Percent (%)</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Frequency</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Percent (%)</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">35 - 39</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">8.3</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">20.83</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">40 - 44</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">37.5</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">13</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">54.16</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">45 - 49</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">8</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">29.2</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">20.83</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">50 - 55</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">12.5</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">4.18</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Above 55</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">12.5</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">0</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">0</p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Source: fieldwork, 2022.</p>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref> shows that majority 9 (37.5%) of the head teachers are aged between 40 and 44 years while 8 (29.2%) are aged between 45 - 49 years. 3 (12.5%) are aged 50 - 55 years. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-24">
       Richter (2011)
      </xref> asserted that teachers between the ages 30 - 49 years are keen on trying new ideas, have hope in the system and aggressively seek to produce results and are likely to be appointed for leadership. The implication here is that majority of the headteachers were in the right age to implement the girls’ re-entry policy because they were keen on trying new ideas. The deputy head teachers were equally of the right age to implement the re-entry policy.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s4_3">
     <title>4.3. Gender of the Respondents</title>
     <p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref>, the study sought to establish the gender of the respondents.</p>
     <table-wrap id="table3">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
        Table 3
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-"></xref>Table 3. Distribution of respondents by gender.</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="40.98%"><p style="text-align:center">Category</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.63%"><p style="text-align:center">No of male</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.05%"><p style="text-align:center">Percent</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.89%"><p style="text-align:center">No of female</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Percent</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Total &amp; percentage%</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="40.98%"><p style="text-align:center">Head Teachers</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.63%"><p style="text-align:center">19</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.05%"><p style="text-align:center">76</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.89%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.90%"><p style="text-align:center">24</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.70%"><p style="text-align:center">25 (100%)</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="40.98%"><p style="text-align:center">Deputy Head Teachers</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="24.63%"><p style="text-align:center">16</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="15.05%"><p style="text-align:center">64</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="21.89%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="15.90%"><p style="text-align:center">36</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="23.70%"><p style="text-align:center">25 (100%)</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="40.98%"><p style="text-align:center">students</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="24.63%"><p style="text-align:center">150</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="15.05%"><p style="text-align:center">42.8</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="21.89%"><p style="text-align:center">200</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="15.90%"><p style="text-align:center">57.2</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="23.70%"><p style="text-align:center">350 (95%)</p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Source: fieldwork, 2022.</p>
     <p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref>, majority of the headteachers 19 (76%) were male while 6 (24%) were female. In addition, majority of the deputy head teachers 16 (64%) were male while 9 (36%) were female. The gender ratio clearly show that more males were appointed in positions of leadership as compared to the females. In contrast there were more female students 200 (57.2%) as compared to the male students 150 (42.8%)</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s4_4">
     <title>4.4. Professional Qualifications of Head Teachers and Deputy Head Teachers</title>
     <p>Data displaying qualifications of headteachers and deputy head teachers is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref>.</p>
     <table-wrap id="table4">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
        Table 4
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-"></xref>Table 4. Professional qualification of head teachers and deputy head teachers.</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="38.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Category</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.63%"><p style="text-align:center">PHD%</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Masters%</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Degree%</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Diploma%</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Head Teachers</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.63%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">6 (25%)</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">16 (66.7%)</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="38.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Deputy Head Teachers</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="18.63%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (8.3%)</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">20 (83.3%)</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.43%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Source: fieldwork, 2022.</p>
     <p>The findings in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref> indicate that majority 16 (66.7%) of the Head Teachers were degree holders while 6 (25%) were master’s holders. 20 (83.3%) of the deputy headteachers had attained a degree while 2 (8.3%) had attained a master’s degree. The implication here is that majority of the head Teachers and the Deputy headteachers had the necessary qualifications of a degree in education for effective implementation of the re-entry policy secondary schools.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s4_5">
     <title>4.5. Headteachers Awareness of the Re-Entry Policy</title>
     <p>Headteachers had been asked to state whether they were aware of the re-entry policy. Their responses are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
       Figure 1
      </xref>.</p>
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>Source: fieldwork, 2022.Figure 1. Headteachers responses on awareness of re-entry policy and students’ retention.</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1769642-rId16.jpeg?20250116123906" />
     </fig>
     <p>Findings in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
       Figure 1
      </xref> indicate that majority 80% of the headteachers knew that there was a governments re-entry policy for teen mothers. Conversely 20% of the headteachers had never heard about the policy, or rather they gathered through media that expectant students and teen mothers should be supported to complete secondary education.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s4_6">
     <title>4.6. Number of Students Retained from 2018 to 2023 by the Headteachers</title>
     <p>The headteachers responded on the number of girls retained in school from 2018 to 2023. Their responses are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref>.</p>
     <table-wrap id="table5">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
        Table 5
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-"></xref>Table 5. Number of girls retained from 2018-2023 by the headteachers and students’ retention.</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Year</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of Expectant learners</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">No retained</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.04%"><p style="text-align:center">No. that dropped</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.81%"><p style="text-align:center">% Retained</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.79%"><p style="text-align:center">2018</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">26</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">21</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.04%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.81%"><p style="text-align:center">80.7</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="13.79%"><p style="text-align:center">2019</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">23</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">20</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="21.04%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="19.81%"><p style="text-align:center">86.9</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="13.79%"><p style="text-align:center">2020</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">90</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">75</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="21.04%"><p style="text-align:center">15</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="19.81%"><p style="text-align:center">83.3</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="13.79%"><p style="text-align:center">2021</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">19</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">17</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="21.04%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="19.81%"><p style="text-align:center">89.4</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="13.79%"><p style="text-align:center">2022</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">21</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">17</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="21.04%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="19.81%"><p style="text-align:center">80.9</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.79%"><p style="text-align:center">2023</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">22</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">21</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.04%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.81%"><p style="text-align:center">95.4</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">201</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">171</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.04%"><p style="text-align:center">29</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.81%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Source: fieldwork, 2022.</p>
     <p>Findings in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref> indicate that majority of the expectant students were retained to continue with school. This implies that the re-entry policy by the government of Kenya had a positive impact on retention of expectant students. These findings are in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-8">
       Imbosa et al. (2022)
      </xref> who found out that the re-entry policy was a major positive step towards achieving retention of expectant and parenting students.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s4_7">
     <title>4.7. Effectiveness of Re-Entry Policy on Students’ Retention</title>
     <p>The headteachers were requested to rate the effectiveness of the re-entry policy on student’s retention. Their responses are shown on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref>.</p>
     <table-wrap id="table6">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
        Table 6
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-"></xref>Table 6. Effectiveness of the re-entry policy on students’ retention.</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="47.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Frequency</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Percent</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="47.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Very effective</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">12</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="47.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Effective</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">18</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">72</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="47.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Less Effective</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">16</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="47.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="47.39%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Source: fieldwork, 2022.</p>
     <p>Majority 18 (72%) of headteachers indicated that re-entry policy was effective in increasing girls’ retention while 3 (12%) indicated that the re-entry policy was very effective. In addition, 4 (16%) indicated that the re-entry policy was less effective in increasing students’ retention.</p>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="39.65%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.62%"><p style="text-align:center">N</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">Std Deviation</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="39.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Effective implementation of the re-entry policy</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.62%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.56%"><p style="text-align:center">20.2000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.17%"><p style="text-align:center">6.35741</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
     <p>Source: fieldwork, 2022.</p>
     <p>To test whether relationship existed between effective implementation of the government re-entry policy, the following null hypothesis was formulated as follows.</p>
     <p>HO<sub>1</sub>: there is no significant relationship between implementation of the girls’ re-entry policy by the headteachers and students’ retention. The hypothesis was analyzed using Pearson correlation and the results are as given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref>.</p>
     <table-wrap id="table7">
      <label>
       <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
        Table 7
       </xref></label>
      <caption>
       <title>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-"></xref>Table 7. Correlation between effective implementation of government re-entry policy and students’ retention.</title>
      </caption>
      <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Effective implementation of re-entry policy</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">Students retention rate</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Effective implementation of government re-entry policy</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Pearson correlation</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
        <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">0.761</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Sig. (2-tailed)</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center">N</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Pearson correlation</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">0.761</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Student retention rate</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Sig. (2-tailed)</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       </tr> 
       <tr> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.53%"><p style="text-align:center">N</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
        <td class="acenter" width="35.55%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p></td> 
       </tr> 
      </table>
     </table-wrap>
     <p>Source: fieldwork, 2022.</p>
     <p>Correlation is significant at 0.01 level (2-tailed)</p>
     <p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref> show that there is a significant strong correlation between effective implementation of government re-entry policy by the headteachers and students’ retention (r (23) = 0.76, P = 0.00).</p>
     <p>Null hypothesis was rejected and an alternative hypothesis adopted. This suggests that increase in effective implementation of government re-entry policy by the headteachers will lead to increase in retention rates. These findings are supported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-9">
       Kearney et al. (2019)
      </xref> who found out that the re-entry policy has a positive impact on the girls’ education. Kearney reported that South Africa had succeeded in implementing the re-entry policy by providing social and financial support for teenage mothers and access to various contraceptive methods. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-23">
       Prakash et al. (2019)
      </xref> established that the re-entry policy in India prospered due to targeted support offered by most learning institutions to teenage mothers during pregnancy and after child birth.</p>
     <p>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.139932-33">
       Webber (2018)
      </xref> established that 70% of the teenage mothers still do not participate in school after child birth due to inadequate support from community, negative self-image and stigmatization.</p>
    </sec>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5">
    <title>5. Conclusion</title>
    <p>The study concluded that focusing on the effective implementation of the girls’ re-entry policy by the headteachers can be a key strategy for improving students’ retention. The study also concluded that although policy measures have been put in place to ensure the return of teenage mothers to school, a considerable number of girls who get pregnant are unlikely to return to school. Poor implementation of the re-entry policy in many countries has led many girls to drop out of school. The girls’ unfriendly school systems and stigmatization associated with teenage pregnancy make it difficult and almost impossible for pregnant girls to re-enter or re-enroll to continue their education after child birth. Awareness creation of the policy must be intensified, strong processes of implementation with clear roles and responsibilities must be spelled out, school environment must be equipped to be suitable for teenage parents. The headteachers did not receive any formal training on implementation of the re-entry policy, in addition, headteachers lacked policy documents on the re-entry policy.</p>
    <p>The study concluded that the implementation of the re-entry policy may have long term societal benefits such as increased literacy rates, gender equality and economic empowerment of the girl child. The implementation of the re-entry policy is faced with several challenges, including lack of awareness among headteachers, stigmatization, resources constrains and negative cultural beliefs. The study will contribute to understanding policy implementation roles in improving educational outcomes, especially in contexts with high teenage pregnancy rates.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s6">
    <title>6. Recommendation of the Study</title>
    <p>The study recommended that policy makers should prioritize supporting headteachers through training, allocation of resources and guidance to help them fulfil this policy implementation. The study recommended that the ministry of education should allocate a budget for the roll out and implementation of the re-entry policy. The study also recommended that the government create adequate awareness of the re-entry policy. This should be done through availing copies of the re-entry policy documents. Further the study recommended that it was necessary to include the re-entry policy in the curriculum so that both learners and teachers could have adequate knowledge of the re-entry policy.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s7">
    <title>Limitations of the Study</title>
    <p>The study faced difficulties in the process of data collections, first some of the respondents were unwilling to provide information for fear of portraying negative image about them. The researcher addressed this by assuring participants that the information they provided was solely for academic purposes.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s8">
    <title>Acknowledgements</title>
    <p>The authors would like to thank Prof. Ursulla Okoth and Prof. Mercy Mugambi for their guidance and all the respondents who participated in this research.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s9">
    <title>Suggestion for Further Studies</title>
    <p>Based on the findings of this study the researcher suggests that further study should be done on the teenage mothers’ perspectives on re-entry policy in Machakos, Kenya.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Amin, A. A.,&amp;Ntembe, A. (2021). Public Spending on Education and Learning Outcomes in Senegal. The Journal of Developing Areas, 55, 297-314. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2021.0091
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Azumah, C., Muriithi, G., Lusava, R.&amp;Brailovskaya, V. (2022). Encouraging Child Mothers to Return to School: Rapid Review of the Literature. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Babu-Nyarko, S. K. (2019). Basic Research Methods in Social Sciences. Woeli Publishing Services.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Birungi, H. Undie, C. C., Mackenzie, I., Katahoire, A., Obare, F.,&amp;Machawira, P. (2015). Education Sector Response to Early and Unintended Pregnancy: A Review of Country Experiences in Sub-Saharan Africa. STEP UP and UNESCO Research Report.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Carney, T., Browne, F. A., Myers, B., Kline, T. L., Howard, B.,&amp;Wechsberg, W. M. (2019). Adolescent Female School Dropouts Who Use Drugs and Engage in Risky Sex: Effects of a Brief Pilot Intervention in Cape Town, South Africa. AIDS Care, 31, 77-84. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2018.1500008
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chiyota, N.,&amp;Marishane, R. N. (2020). Re-Entry Policy Implementation Challenges and Support Systems for Teenage Mothers in Zambian Secondary Schools. In K. S. Adeyemo (Ed.), The Education Systems of Africa (pp. 1-14). Springer International Publishing. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43042-9_44-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Erete, S. L., Morris, M. R., Dillahunt, T. R.,&amp;Beckwith, R. (2021). Understanding Community Specific Barriers to Maternal Healthcare. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 1-23. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Imbosa, L. L., Majanga, E.,&amp;Onda, J. B. (2022). Re-Entry Policy and Retention of Expectant Students and Teen Mopthers in Public Secondary Schools in Vihiga Sub-County, Kenya. International Journal of Education and Research, 10, 1-16.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kearney, C. A., Gonzolvez, C.,&amp;Graczyk, P. (2019). Reconciling Contemporary Approaches to School Attendance and School Absentiseem: Toward Promotion and Nimble Response, Global Policy Review and Implementation and Future Adaptability. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2222. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02222
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kubek, J. B., Tindall-Biggins, C., Reed, K., Carr, L. E.,&amp;Fenning, P. A. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review of School Reentry Practices among Youth Impacted by Juvenile Justice. Children and Youth Services Review, 110, Article ID: 104773. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104773
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Marende, S. (2022). School Re-Entry Policy and Its Effect on Participation of Teenage Mothers in Public Secondary Schools in Narok County, Kenya. &gt;https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/24187 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Matula, P, O., Kyalo, D. N. Mulwa, A. S.&amp;Gichui, L. W. (2018). Academic Research Proposal Writing: Principles, Concepts and Structures. Acts Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mcfairland, J., Cui, J.,&amp;Stark, P. (2018). Trends in High School Dropouts and Completion Rates in the United States: 2014. National Center for Education Statistics.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Momsen, J. H. (2019). Gender and Development. Routledge. &gt;https://doi.org/104324/9781315180012
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mugenda, A. (2008). Social Science Research: Theory and Principles. Acts Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mugenda, A.,&amp;Mugenda, O. (2003). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Acts Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mulenga, I. M.,&amp;Mukaba, B. (2018). Policy and Practice: Roles of the Guidance and Counseling Teachers in the Implementation of the Girls’ Re-Entry Policy in Selected Schools in Lusaka Zambia. Journal of Education and Practice, 9, 57-67.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Musili, E. K., Mwania, J. M.,&amp;Mulwa, D. M. (2020). Influence of School Based Determinants on the Implementation of the Readmission Policy Girls after Pregnancy in Public Secondary in Kitui County, Kenya. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 10, 62-66. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ogola, J. A. (2021). Exploring Stakeholders’ Views on the Implementation of the Re-Entry Policy of 1994 on Teenage Mothers: A Case Study of a Mixed Secondary School in Kisu-mu East Constituency. Master’s Thesis, Aga Khan University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Okwany, A.,&amp;Kamusiime, A. (2017). Foregrounding the Tensions and Silences in Education Policies for Student Mother in Uganda and Kenya. Childhood in Africa, 4, 57-67.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Omondi, M.,&amp;Onyango, M. R. (2008). Down the Drain: Counting the Costs of Teenage Pregnancy and School Dropout in Kenya. Center for the Study of Adolescence.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Orodho, J. A. (2004). Techniques of Writing Research Proposals and Reports in Education and Social Sciences. Masola Publishers.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Prakash, R., Beattie, T. S., Javalkar, P., Bhattacharjee, P., Ramanaik, S.,&amp;Thalija, R. (2019). The Samata Intervention to Increase Secondary School Completion and Reduce Child Marriage among Adolescent Girls: Results from a Cluster-Randomized Control Trial in India. Journal of Global Health, 9, Article 010430. &gt;https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.010430
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U.,&amp;Ludtke, O. (2011). Professional Development across the Teaching Career: Teachers’ Uptake of Formal and Informal Learning Opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 116-126. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/J.tate.2010.07.008 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rumberger, R. W. (2020). The Economics of High School Dropouts. In S. Bradley,&amp;C. Green (Eds.), The Economics of Education (pp. 149-158). Elsevier. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815391-8.00012-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tewari, D. D.,&amp;Ilesanmi, K. D. (2020). Teaching and Learning Interaction in South Africa’s Higher Education: Some Weak Links. Cogent Social Sciences, 6, Article ID: 1740519. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1740519
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     The Constitution of Kenya, Republic of Kenya (2010). Nairobi. Government Printer.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Thwala, S. K., Okeke, C. I. O., Matse, Z.,&amp;Ugwuanyi, C. S. (2022). Teachers’ Perspectives on the Implementation of Teenage Mothers’ School Re‐entry Policy in Eswatini Kingdom: Implication for Educational Evaluators. Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 684-695. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22656
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     UNESCO (2023). Report on the Transforming Education Summit. Report on the 2023 Transforming Education Summit Convened by the UN Secretary General. UNESCO Publishing.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     United Nations Population Fund (2022). Motherhood in Childhood—The Untold Story. UNPA. &gt;https://www.unfpa.org/publications/motherhood-childhood-untoldstory 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     United Republic of Tanzania (2021). Circular on the Re-Entry Policy for Mother Students in Secondary Schools. Government Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wamahiu, S. P.,&amp;Musembu, C. N. (2023). The Right to Education in Rudman A. In C. N. Musembi,&amp;T. M. Makunya (Eds.), The Protocol to the Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa: A Commentary Pulp Commentaries on African Human Rights Law Series. Pretoria University Law Press. &gt;https://www.pulp.up.ac.za/pulp-commentaries/the-protocol-to-the-african-charter-on-human-and-peoples-rights-on-the-rights-of-women-in-africa-a-commentary 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Webber, K. C. (2018). A Qualitative Study of School Social Workers’ Roles and Challenges in Dropouts’ Prevention. Children&amp;Schools, 40, 82-90. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdy003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.139932-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zajac, T. Z.,&amp;Komendant-Brodowska, A. (2019). Premeditated, Dismissed and Disenchanted: Higher Education Dropouts in Poland. Tertiary Education and Management, 25, 1-16. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-018-09010-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>