<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajps
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     American Journal of Plant Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2158-2742
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2158-2750
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ajps.2025.161002
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajps-138869
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    A Comparative Study of the Technological Characteristics of Cotton Fibers from Two Types of Gins in Côte d’Ivoire
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Brou Julien
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kouakou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Tièba Victor
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ouattara
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Koffi Christophe
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kobenan
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Kouadio Emmanuel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       N’Goran
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nogbou Ferdinand
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Amangoua
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Malanno
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kouakou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       N’Guessan Maxime
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kouame
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aCentre National de Recherche Agronomique, Programme Coton, Bouaké, Côte d’Ivoire
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aUFR Agroforesterie, Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé, Daloa, Côte d’Ivoire
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     09
    </day> 
    <month>
     01
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    16
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    01
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    11
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    21
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      15,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      10,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      10,
     </day>
     <month>
      January
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Production of this crop is experiencing significant challenges, resulting in a decline in seed and fiber quality. To address this challenge, generations of high-performance cotton plants of the Gossypium hirsutum L. species have been developed and are currently being commercialized. This study evaluated the impact of gin types on the agro-industrial quality of cotton in Côte d’Ivoire. To this end, cotton from the G3, R1, and R2 generations was harvested, sampled, and ginned on machines with 10 and 170 saws in the localities of Ouangolodougou, Ferkessédougou, Korhogo, M’Bengué, Boundiali, Séguéla, and Mankono, as well as at the Centre National de Recherche Agronomique CNRA) in Bouaké. The results demonstrated that cotton fibers obtained from ginning on 10-saw machines exhibited superior quality compared to those from 170-saw machines. Fiber length, fiber length uniformity, and short fiber rate exhibited the highest deviations according to gin type. The use of 170-saw gins resulted in a notable decline in quality. Conversely, micronaire index, fiber tenacity and elongation, and reflectance remained consistent across machine types. These results will enable us to more effectively regulate and advise cotton-processing factories, which primarily utilize 170-saw gins to enhance agro-industrial quality in Côte d’Ivoire. Furthermore, these results will assist breeders in incorporating them into their processes to enhance the quality of the varieties they offer to farmers.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Agro-Industrial Quality
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Technological Characteristics
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Gossypium Hirsutum L.
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Saw Gin
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Côte d’Ivoire
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Cotton is a plant fiber derived from the cotton plant, a shrub belonging to the Malvaceae family. From 2017 to 2018, the total area of cotton cultivated worldwide was estimated at 35 million hectares, with a global production of approximately 25.6 million tons of fiber <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. The African countries that produce cotton using the CFA Franc are among the world’s most significant production regions, according to the Comité Consultatif International du Coton (CCIC) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. In Côte d’Ivoire, cotton is cultivated on approximately 300,000 hectares with an average seed cotton yield of 1200 kg/ha <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-3">
     [3]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Furthermore, the quality of the cotton, and thus the price set on the international market, is significantly influenced by the ginning techniques employed. Ginning is the process of separating the fibers from the seed. This is the initial stage of processing seed cotton. The quality of the fiber for spinning mills and the seed for oil mills and seed companies is determined by this process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Thus, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-5">
     [5]
    </xref> demonstrated that roller ginning produces higher performance fibers than saw ginning. The same author and his collaborators, during the tours organized in the ginning factories in Cameroon showed that the speed of ginning in the factories, as well as the state of the different components of the ginning system influence the quality of the fiber <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. It is therefore crucial to implement effective ginning techniques in order to ensure the optimal financial value of this crop. Consequently, when developing new varieties, breeders consider this stage to assess their agronomic performance. Furthermore, the Centre National de Recherche Agronomique (CNRA) has only one 10-saw gin. However, the gins used in the various factories in Côte d’Ivoire are primarily composed of 170 saws. In response to persistent concerns from industrialists regarding the technological attributes of Ivorian cotton, the CNRA, responsible for developing the varieties cultivated in the country, initially sought to evaluate the impact of two gin types (10 and 170 saws) under identical harvesting conditions. This assessment aimed to ascertain their influence on the agro-industrial quality of the cotton.</p>
   <p>With this objective in mind, this study was initiated to determine the impact of different gin types on the agro-industrial quality of cotton.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>2. Materials</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Study Sites</title>
    <p>Cotton ginning was conducted at seven locations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>), which are major production areas comprising eight mills (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>), as well as at the Centre Nationale de Recherche Agronomique (CNRA) in Bouaké.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Table 1. Number of tests per mill on 170-saw gins.</p>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="53.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Factories</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="47.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Number of tests</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="53.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Ouangolodougou</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="47.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="53.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Ferkéssédougou</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="47.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="53.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Korhogo 1</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="47.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="53.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Korhogo 2</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="47.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="53.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Korhogo 3</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="47.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="53.00%"><p style="text-align:center">M’Bengue</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="47.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="53.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Boundiali 1</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="47.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="53.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Séguéla</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="47.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Figure 1. Map of Côte d’Ivoire with study sites.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2605996-rId13.jpeg?20250113024409" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>2.2. Plant Material</title>
    <p>The plant material used in this study was seed cotton of three varieties: CI-123, CI-128 and Gouassou Fus1, all from the Gossypium hirsutum species grown in Côte d’Ivoire. These are the varieties currently being popularized in Côte d’Ivoire. They have been selected and sold to cotton companies for cultivation.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3 Technical Equipment</title>
    <p>Gins, including a 10-saw gin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(a)">
      Figure 2(a)
     </xref>) used for ginning seed cotton samples at research level and a 170-saw gin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(b)">
      Figure 2(b)
     </xref>) used for ginning seed cotton in factories. These two types of gin are the only gins involved in cotton ginning in Côte d’Ivoire. Additionally, an integrated measurement chain (CMI) type HVI was employed to determine the technological characteristics of fiber (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(c)">
      Figure 2(c)
     </xref>). Finally, a scale type (CAMRY Price camputing scale) was used to weigh samples of seed cotton and lint (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(d)">
      Figure 2(d)
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Technical equipment used for the study.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2605996-rId14.jpeg?20250113024410" />
    </fig>
    <p>a: 170-saw gin; b: 10-saw gin; c: HVI integrated measuring chain (CMI); d: electronic scale.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>3. Methods</title>
   <p>The study was based on ginning trials carried out on lorries of seed cotton selected at random from the factories, with 4 replicates per variety. Thus, 12 trials were carried out on the 3 varieties undergoing extension, i.e. 4 trials per variety.</p>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Stages of Data Collection at the Mill (170-Saw Gin)</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>The data collection process commences with a verification of the measuring instruments, followed by a cleaning of the ginning system. This is then followed by the collection of data and finally the preparation of cotton samples for processing on the 10-saw gin.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Checking Measuring Instruments</title>
    <p>At the factory, the measuring instruments were calibrated to ensure accurate lint and seed cotton weights. This involved checking the weighing bridge and the bale weigher. It is of the utmost importance that these instruments provide accurate values during the weighing process, as any discrepancies could lead to errors in the subsequent data processing.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Gins Cleaning</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Prior to commencing the ginning process, a comprehensive cleaning of the machine circuit was conducted, encompassing the area where the gin cars are positioned and extending to the point where the fiber bales are formed. This process also included cleaning the saw teeth and replacing any that were no longer functional.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Factory Data Collection</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>The data collected primarily included mass measurements for seed cotton, fiber bales, seed, and waste.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Preparation of Cotton Samples for Processing and Comparison with the 10-Saw Gin (CNRA)</title>
    <p>The samples taken at the mill included 5 kg of seed cotton and seed cotton free of waste taken from transport trucks and gin aprons, respectively, as well as 500 g of cotton fiber, fiber after Lint Cleaner, and from bales. The 5 kg of seed and waste-free cotton were ginned on 10-saw machines at CNRA in 1 kg batches, with three replications. The remaining 500 g samples (cotton lint, lint after Lint Cleaner, and lint on bales) were utilized as relative controls to assess the comparative agro-industrial performance of the two gin types (10-saw and 170-saw).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>3.6. Agro-Industrial Seed Cotton Quality Parameters Calculated</title>
    <p>The parameters calculated were cotton fiber and waste rates.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_7">
    <title>3.7. Waste Content of Seed Cotton</title>
    <p>The percentage of waste contained in seed cotton (%), determines the proportion of waste in relation to seed cotton. As the percentage increases, the fiber content per unit mass decreases. The percentage is calculated using the following formula:</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Waste rate 
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext> 
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mtext>
          % 
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           Weight 
         </mtext> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mtext>
            g 
          </mtext> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mtext>
           of waste 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           Weight 
         </mtext> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mtext>
            g 
          </mtext> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mtext>
           of seed cotton 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_8">
    <title>3.8. Cotton Fiber Content</title>
    <p>The percentage of cotton fiber content (%), in relation to seed cotton, determines the proportion of fiber in the overall composition. The calculation is made according to the following formula:</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Fiber rate 
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext> 
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mtext>
          % 
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           Fiber weight 
         </mtext> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mtext>
            g 
          </mtext> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           Cottonseed weight 
         </mtext> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mtext>
            g 
          </mtext> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
       <mo>
         × 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         100 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_9">
    <title>3.9. Agro-Industrial Quality Parameters of Seed Cotton Determined</title>
    <p>Cotton samples collected in the mills and those obtained after ginning on the 10-saw gin were analyzed using an integrated HVI 1000/1000 measuring chain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-7">
      [7]
     </xref>. This fully automated device has three modules for determining technological characteristics from a 100 g sample of fiber, offering a high level of efficiency and precision. The primary technological characteristics evaluated were fiber length (UHML), fiber tenacity (Str), fiber length uniformity (UI), short fiber index (SFI), fiber elongation (Alg), and reflectance (Rd).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_10">
    <title>3.10. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>A Student’s T-test was used to compare the technological characteristics of gins with 10 saws (CNRA) with those of factories with 170 saws. To evaluate the effect of waste on the quality of the cotton produced by the agro-industrial process, all the aforementioned analyses were conducted using Excel 2016 and STATISTICA version 7.1 software.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>4. Results</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Cotton Technological Characteristics According to Two Gin Types (10-Saw and 170-Saw)</title>
    <p>The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in fiber length for the same cotton, with a value of 29.03 mm after ginning on 10-saw gin and 27.52 mm when the cotton was processed at the factory, which uses gins with 170-saw (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref></p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Figure 3. Cotton fiber length by gin type.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2605996-rId19.jpeg?20250113024418" />
    </fig>
    <p>Diagrams bearing the same letter are not statistically different according to the Student-Newman-Keuls test with a threshold of 5%.</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Figure 4. Micrometric index (Mic) of cotton fibers according to gin type.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2605996-rId20.jpeg?20250113024418" />
    </fig>
    <p>Diagrams bearing the same letter are not statistically different according to the Student-Newman-Keuls test with a threshold of 5%.</p>
    <p>The type of gin had no impact on the micronaire index (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>). The micronaire index of fibers obtained after ginning on 10-saw gin (3.71) and that of fibers ginned at the mill with 170-saw gin (3.62) were found to be statistically identic.</p>
    <p>The results for cotton fiber tenacity are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>. The average fiber tenacity values obtained by using gin with 170 saws and gin with 10 saws were 27.49 g/tex and statistically identical. There was no observed variation in tenacity according to gin type.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Figure 5. Fiber tenacity (Str) by gin type.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2605996-rId21.jpeg?20250113024419" />
    </fig>
    <p>Diagrams bearing the same letter are not statistically different according to the Student-Newman-Keuls test with a threshold of 5%.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>The rate of short fibers (15.08%) at the factory (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>) was found to be statistically higher than that obtained after ginning on 10-saw gin (10.28%).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref></p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Figure 6. Short fiber content by gin type.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2605996-rId22.jpeg?20250113024419" />
    </fig>
    <p>Diagrams bearing the same letter are not statistically different according to the Student-Newman-Keuls test with a threshold of 5%.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>The average rate of uniform fibers obtained with a gin equipped with 10 saws (81.66%) was higher than that of cotton processed at the factory with 170-saw gin (78.70%).</p>
    <p>The results of the cotton lint elongation tests are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figFigures 7-8">
      Figures 7-8
     </xref>. The statistical analysis demonstrated that there was no significant difference between the elongation values obtained with the 10-saw machine (6.09%) and those obtained with 170-saw machine (5.76%).</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Figure 7. Uniformity of fiber length according to gin type.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2605996-rId23.jpeg?20250113024421" />
    </fig>
    <p>Diagrams bearing the same letter are not statistically different according to the Student-Newman-Keuls test with a threshold of 5%.</p>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Figure 8. Fiber elongation by gin type.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2605996-rId24.jpeg?20250113024421" />
    </fig>
    <p>Diagrams bearing the same letter are not statistically different according to the Student-Newman-Keuls test with a threshold of 5%.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Differences in Technological Characteristics between Gins with 10 and 170 Saws</title>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>Table 2. Differences in technological characteristics between fibers from 10-saw gin and 170-saw gin.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="60.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Parameters</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">UHML</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Mic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.95%"><p style="text-align:center">UI</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.95%"><p style="text-align:center">SF</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Str</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Alg</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Rd</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="60.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Deviation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1.51</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.95%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.95%"><p style="text-align:center">2.96</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.95%"><p style="text-align:center">4.79</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.87</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.80%"><p style="text-align:center">0.31</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.19</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="60.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Standards</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">≤ 1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.95%"><p style="text-align:center">≤ 1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.95%"><p style="text-align:center">≤ 1.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.95%"><p style="text-align:center">≤ 2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.80%"><p style="text-align:center">≤ 1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.80%"><p style="text-align:center">≤ 1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">≤ 1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>UHML: Cotton fiber length; Mic: Cotton fiber micronaire index; UI: Cotton fiber length uniformity; SF: Short fiber rate; Str: Cotton fiber tenacity; Alg: Cotton fiber elongation; Rd: Reflectance.</p>
    <p>The deviations between the technological characteristics of cotton ginned on a 170-saw gin and a 10-saw gin and the tolerable deviations are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>. The differences between the characteristics of fibers from the two types of gins are 1.51 mm for length, 0.09 for micronaire index, 2.96% for uniformity, 4.79% for short fiber content, 0.87 g/tex for tenacity, 0.31% for elongation, and 0.19 for brightness. In accordance with the tolerable values, the differences obtained in length (1.51 mm), length uniformity (2.96%) and short fiber content (4.79%) are out of the norm.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-"></xref>5. Discussion</title>
   <p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of gin type on the agro-industrial quality of cotton in Côte d’Ivoire.</p>
   <p>The analysis of technological parameters as a function of gin type revealed notable differences in lint quality between the two machines. The length (UHML), uniformity (UI), and short-staple content (SF) of the cotton were found to be of poor quality when seed cotton was ginned at the mill. Saw gins are machinery utilized primarily in the cotton industry for the separation of cotton fibers from seeds. The following outlines the key distinctions between 10-saw and 170-saw gins. Machines with 10 saws have a lower processing capacity, making them well-suited for smaller operations or small-scale processing requirements. These machines are less efficient in terms of processing speed, which can result in longer processing times. However, 170-saw gins are designed for large-scale operations, capable of processing large quantities of cotton in a short time. They are more rapid and efficient, enabling faster processing and higher productivity. It should be noted that the use of gins with 170 saws results in shorter, less uniform fibers. The inferior quality of the cotton is attributed to either the sizing or the extended circuit of the 170-saw machine <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. It should be noted that the use of a highly efficient machine for the purpose of optimizing profitability may also result in the degradation of fibers and seeds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. The distinction between the two gins also hinges on machine maintenance, as malfunctioning saws and bars diminish cotton fiber size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-10">
     [10]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. It is crucial to prevent deterioration in fiber quality due to improper adjustment or excessive speed, particularly in West and Central Africa, where value chains are highly dependent on the prices paid for superior fiber quality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. It is important to note that lint classification alone does not provide a reliable measure of the impact of ginning. There are many factors that can influence the outcome, including the quality of the incoming seed cotton, the type of equipment used, and the number and settings at each stage of the ginning process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. The quality gap between industries and small farms appears to be largely attributed to differences in working speed, saw settings from seed cotton cleaning to ginning, and varietal selection.</p>
   <p>Indeed, 170-saw gins are designed for large-scale operations, capable of processing large quantities of cotton in a short space of time. They are equipped with cleaning systems that degrade the fiber when the cotton is dirty and clean it thoroughly. This is what <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-8">
     [8]
    </xref> found in his work on ginning in West African mills in 2006. Work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-9">
     [9]
    </xref> comparing the characteristics of fiber from micro-gin and industrial gin also showed that the length and uniformity of laboratory ginning were 1.02 mm and 1.7% higher than those of industrial ginning respectively. The poor fibre quality is thought to be due either to the calibration of industrial gins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-10">
     [10]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-11">
     [11]
    </xref>, or the speed of industrial gins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-12">
     [12]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>On the other hand, machines with 10 saws have a lower processing capacity, which is suitable for small-scale ginning requirements. They are less efficient in terms of processing speed, which may result in longer processing times, but, like roller gins, produce much better quality fibre <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-13">
     [13]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>It is essential to avoid deterioration in fibre quality due to poor setting or excessive speed, particularly in West and Central Africa, where value chains are highly dependent on the prices paid for superior fibre quality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-14">
     [14]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138869-15">
     [15]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusions</title>
   <p>The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of different gin types on the agro-industrial quality of cotton in Côte d’Ivoire. The results demonstrated a clear impact of gin type on the agro-industrial quality of the cotton, particularly in terms of length, uniformity, and short-staple rate. The differences in these technological parameters were significant and exceeded the norm. However, the differences in micronaire index and reflectance were minimal in comparison to the standard. It is recommended that breeders using the 10-saw machine integrate the 170-saw machine before the varietal releases. Furthermore, industrialists will be able to examine the impact of gin settings on the economic viability of these improvements to the agro-industrial quality of seed cotton in Côte d’Ivoire.</p>
   <p>Good adjustment, a reduction in machine speed, and awareness of producers so that they harvest sufficiently clean seed cotton are the solutions to produce good-quality fiber in factories.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     FAOSTAT (2018) Coton. &gt;https://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#data/QV 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Soumaré, M., Havard, M. and Bachelier, B. (2020) Le coton en Afrique de l’Ouest et du Centre: De la révolution agricole à la transition agro-écologique. Cahiers Agricultures, 29, Articel No. 37. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020037
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ochou, G., N’Guessan, E., Koto, E., Kouadio, N., Ouraga, Y., Téhia, K.E. and Touré Y. (2006) Bien produire du coton en Côte d’Ivoire. CNRA, Fiche technique coton, 4.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gergely, N. and Estur, G. (2010) Analyse comparative de l’organisation et des performances des secteurs du coton en Afrique. Les principes économiques de la technologie d’égrenage à rouleaux et ses implications pour les secteurs africains du coton. Africa region working paper series N
     <sup>o</sup> 129 (b), 52.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Estur, G. and Gergely, N. (2010) Les principes économiques de la technologie d’égrenage à rouleaux et ses implications pour les secteurs africains du coton. Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 129.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gawrysiak, G., Francalanci, P., Oumarou, P., Guiziou, C., Abadji, A., Lassus, S. and Poitel, M. (2011) Tournée des usines SODECOTON du Cameroun. Rapport technique, 92. &gt;http://www.cirad.fr 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gourlot, J.P. (2013) Fibres de coton: Caractérisations, harmonisation des caractérisations, et transformation. Document CIRAD, 223.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Smith, J. and Johnson, L. (2021) Comparative Analysis of Cotton Ginning Technologies. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 45, 123-135.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Smith, P.J. and Patel, R.C. (2015) Optimization of Gin Saw Tooth Geometry for Improved Fiber Extraction. Textile Research Journal, 85, 945-957.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Soulama, S. (2010) Culture du coton et biodiversité des sols de la zone de guiaro: Impact socio-environnemental de l’utilisation des pesticides. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Moncton.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dedamirza, I.M., Soomro, N., Insopaliyevna, K.O., Ravshanbekovna, J.G. and Mirzaakbarov, A.A. (2024) Geometry of the Gin-Saw Teeth Effect on Sepration of Fibers from Seed Cotton during the Ginning Process. Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology, 21, 114-119. &gt;https://doi.org/10.34016/pjbt.2024.21.01.875 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chanselme, J.L., Kinre, H. and Bachelier, B. (2006) Égrenage du cotongraine. Manuel qualité pour les filières cotonnières UEMOA, Guide technique, 71.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Knowlton, C., Li, A., Brown, S. and Ritchie, G. (2011) A Comparative Study of a Microgin, with a Laboratory Gin and Commercial Gins in South United States. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 27, 167-175. &gt;https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.36488
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Doe, J. and Brown, A. (2023) Efficiency and Cost Analysis of Modern Cotton Gins. International Journal of Cotton Research, 50, 45-582.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138869-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Estur, G. (2008) Analyse comparative de l’organisation et des performances des filières cotonnières africaines: Qualité et commercialisation du coton fibre en Afrique. Rapport final de la Banque Mondiale, 75.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>