<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojas
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Animal Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2161-7597
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2161-7627
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojas.2025.151005
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojas-138751
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Effect of Moringa stenopetala and Pigeon Pea Supplements on Growth Performance of Short-Eared Somali Goat Breed
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mahamed
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Hassen
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Abdihakim
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ma’alin
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Abdisayid
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mohamed
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aLivestock and Forage Research Directorate, Somali Region Pastoral and Agro-Pastoral Research Institute (SoRPARI), Jigjiga, Ethiopia
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Animal and Range Science, College of Dry Land Agriculture, Jigjiga University, Jigjiga, Ethiopia
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     13
    </day> 
    <month>
     12
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    01
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    69
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    76
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      12,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      4,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      4,
     </day>
     <month>
      January
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    This study was conducted at Fafan Research Center, Golajo research site to evaluate the effect of Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea leaf supplementation on growth performance of short-eared Somali goat breed. A total of fifteen yearling indigenous short-eared Somali goat breeds with an initial weight of 15.2 ± 0.30 kg were assigned to three treatment groups using completely randomized design. Pigeon pea (Pp) and Moringa stenopetala (MS) feeds were formulated using 0%, 5%, and 10% inclusion levels of MSLM and PPLM as experimental diets, respectively. The feed of the experiment was prepared in two levels (2 kg of Moringa stenopetala and 2 kg of pigeon pea) and was supplemented to experimental animals in treatments one and two, respectively. The average e initial body weight of selected male goats was 18.82 ± 0.37, 18.8 ± 0.37 and 17.8 ± 0.37 kg under treatment groups T1, T2 and control respectively. Data was analyzed using general linear model (GLM) procedure of SAS computer package Version 9.0 (SAS, 2002). The final weights gain (FWG) of goats on T1 and T2 of experimental group was significantly (P &lt; 0.05) higher than T3 (control group) with the average mean of 26.63 ± 0.49, 26.32 ± 0.49 and 24.06 ± 0.49 kg, respectively. There was no significant difference between (P &gt; 0.05) the final weight gain of goat supplemented on Moringa stenopetala (T1) and pigeon pea levels (T2). The mean average weight gains (AWG) obtained from the supplemented group in this study were 7.50 ± 0.37 and 7.82 ± 0.37 kg for T1 and T2, whereas mean weight gains for un-supplemented goats were found to be 6.26 ± 0.37 kg. Feeding of dried Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea leaves mixture improved body weights and average daily body weight gain without affecting feed intake and overall health of Somali goat breed. As Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea leaves are rich nitrogen/protein source, they can be used effectively as substitute for conventional concentrate in the diet of growing goats at small holder farmer’s level where they can be grown in abundance. Therefore, for higher quality of forage and higher total DM yield for animal feeding, moringa should be harvested at wider harvesting intervals of at least 6
    <sup>th</sup>- to 8
    <sup>th</sup>-week intervals. Similarly, for pigeon peas, 4- to 6-week harvesting interval can result in optimum forage as well as feed quality and resulted in better growth performances for Somali short-eared goat breeds.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Effect
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Growth Performance
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Moringa
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Pigeon Pea
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Supplementation
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Somali Goat
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Small ruminants play a significant role in almost all farming systems in the tropics and sub-tropics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. A recent report shows that Ethiopia has the largest goat population (45.76 million) among African countries <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Goats are primarily kept for meat production, although milk is equally important in pastoral and agro-pastoral areas. They are usually raised and finished on natural pastures, and as a result, they take a long time (over 2 years) to reach slaughter weight, not more than 20 kg <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. The carcass weight produced is not higher than 8.5 kg per goat in the country <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Goats fed with low-quality roughage have satisfactory fattening performance when supplemented with concentrate having optimum contents of CP and energy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. It reduces age of slaughter and increases carcass quality and meat output, thereby improving access to animal protein and income to households in the subsistence production system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Moreover, there is limited information on whether the growth and carcass characteristics of Ethiopian indigenous goats are differently influenced by genotype and nutritional regimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. They have not been compared and characterized adequately in terms of their growth, carcass, and meat quality attributes. Regardless of their attributes, the productivity of goats in many tropical countries is low and has been related to diseases, nutrition, genotype and management <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. The limitations of nutrition could be attributed to seasonal fluctuations in feed quantity and quality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. The notable effect of feed scarcity is observed particularly in dry seasons when natural pastures are mature, dry and inadequate with low nutritive value as low as 2% crude protein <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. Supplementary feeding with high nutritive feeds could therefore be a prerequisite for viable and sustainable good goat production in such instances. Supplementing goats with nutritious feed could increase the average daily gain, carcass weight and dressing percentage, resulting in the improvement of the meat quality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. Usually, farmers feed their animals with crop residues and low-quality standing hay, which are low in nitrogen, high in lignocellulose, and in short supply of vitamin and mineral contents, which leads to low digestibility and reduced voluntary feed intake <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Moreover, some of the crop residues require expensive inputs, such as urea, to provide alternative nitrogen. Urea is known to have toxic effects on animals, which is highly likely if feeds are improperly mixed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. Consequently, the energy and nitrogen intake of animals raised on these feeds can not sustain adequate levels of performance, leading to low growth, delayed animal sexual maturity, poor reproductive performance, poor meat quality, and low milk yield <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of moringa and pigeon pea leaf meal supplementation on performance of yearling short-earned Somali goats fed a basal diet of native grass hay.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Material and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Study Area</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-"></xref>The experiment was conducted in Fafan Research Center, 605 km far from Addis Ababa, 45 km west of Jijiga, lying between 9˚24'N latitude, 42˚6'E longitude, where the average annual rainfall, temperature and altitude ranges 200 - 600 mm, 24 - 450 C and 200 - 1600 m.a.s.l. respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-13">
      [13]
     </xref>. The region experiences erratic and insufficient rainfall, making it unsuitable for regular crop farming. It is dominated by extensive rangelands, with the population primarily engaged in pastoralism and agro-pastoralism. Communities often migrate in search of pasture and water for their livestock and themselves. The region has surface area of approximately 375,000 square kilometers which divide the area into arid and semi-arid agro ecological zone.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Collection of Moringa stenopetala and Pegeon Pea Leaves</title>
    <p>Fresh mature leaves of Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea were manually harvested. The leaves were air-dried under shade by spreading on clean plastic sheets for 72 hours. They were turned several times to facilitate the drying process. The grass was mowed at a frequency of 14 days, pre-dried in the sun for 24 hours by spreading on a concrete floor, and turned several times, thereafter air-dried in a shaded place and kept until use.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Preparation of Experimental Feeds</title>
    <p>Preparation and proportion of feed supplementation levels are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>. Fresh moringa and pigeon pea leaves were collected, defoliated, and dried under shade until they are crispy to the touch while retaining their greenish coloration. The leaves were then milled to obtain a product herein referred to as Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea leaf meal which were stored in sacks until needed for inclusion in the concentrate diet. The two feeds of pigeon pea (Pp) and Moringa stenopetala (Ms) feed were used as experimental diets and formulated using 0%, 5%, and 10% inclusion levels of Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea leaf meal. The goats were freely grazing during the daytime, and the experimental diets were served as supplements in the evening.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Animal Management and Experimental Design</title>
    <p>Fifteen male yearling indigenous short-eared Somali goat breed with the initial weight of 15.2 ± 0.30 kg was used in this study. The goats were purchased from local markets in Dhegahle kebele and transported to the Golahajo research site. All the groups of animals were ear-tagged and treated against internal and external parasites before the beginning of the experiment. The experimental animals were quarantined for 3 weeks being vaccinated for diseases such as pest des petitis ruminants (PPR), ovine pasteurellosis, and goat pox, and anthrax. After fifteen days of the adaptation period, the animals were randomly allocated to three treatment groups of five animals each in a completely randomized design (CRD). The goats were provided with individual feed and water troughs, and clean water was available all the time.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-"></xref>Table 1. Fodder supplementation levels.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.40%"><p style="text-align:center">Treatments</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Number of goats</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Feed types</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Amount provided</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.40%"><p style="text-align:center">Control</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.70%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Natural pasture</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.71%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Control group</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.40%"><p style="text-align:center">T1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.70%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Natural pasture + MS<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.71%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">2 kg of MS</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.40%"><p style="text-align:center">T2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.70%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.18%"><p style="text-align:center">Natural pasture + Pp<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.71%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">2 kg of Pp</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>T = Treatments, <sup>a</sup>Moringa stenopetala, <sup>b</sup>Pigeon pea.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Data Collection Procedure and Measurements</title>
    <p>Body weights were recorded at the beginning of the trial and every 2 weeks. Goats were weighed in the morning hours after overnight fasting by using hanging scale. Average weight gains (ADG) were calculated as the difference between final body weight and initial body weight divided by the number of feeding days. Feed conversion efficiency was calculated by dividing ADG by daily total dry matter intake.</p>
    <p>The two types of feed leaves were assessed for the value of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), crude fat, calcium, magnesium, potassium, zinc, copper, iron, manganese, and phosphorus using the procedures of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-14">
      [14]
     </xref>. Neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), and acid detergent cellulose (ADC) were determined according to Van Soest and Robertson procedure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-15">
      [15]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>Data was analyzed using general linear model (GLM) procedure of SAS computer package Version 9.0 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-16">
      [16]
     </xref>. Mean comparisons were determined by using Duncan multiple range test, and significance at P &lt; 0.05. The model used for the data analysis was:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mi>
          Y 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         μ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <msub> 
        <mi>
          T 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <msub> 
        <mi>
          B 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          j 
        </mi> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <msub> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </msub> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>,</p>
    <p>Where: Y<sub>ij</sub> is the response variable;</p>
    <p>μ is the overall mean;</p>
    <p>T<sub>i</sub> is the treatment effect;</p>
    <p>B<sub>j</sub> is the block effect;</p>
    <p>e<sub>ij</sub> is the random error.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Result and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Animal Feeding of Moringa stenopetala and Pigeon Pea</title>
    <p>The effect of Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea leaves on body weight gain of Somali male goat breed intake was shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>. The average initial body weight of selected male goats was 18.82 ± 0.37, 18.8 ± 0.37 and 17.8 ± 0.37 kg as T1, T2 and T3, respectively. The final weights gain of goats on experimental group of treatment one and two was shown 26.63 ± 0.49 and 26.32 ± 0.49 with average weight gains of 7.50 ± 0.37 and 7.82 ± 0.37 kg, respectively. The control group of the final weight gain was shown 24.06 ± 0.49 kg with average weight gains of 6.26 ± 0.37 kg. Hence, the present study revealed a significantly higher FWG in experimental group (T1 and T2) than the control group (T3) (P &lt; 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the final weight gain of goat supplemented on Moringa stenopetala (T1) and pigeon pea levels (T2) (P &gt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>). On the other hand, the average daily weight gains for goats supplemented with Moringa stenopetala, pigeon pea leaves and the control group were obtained, 0.042 ± 0.002, 0.043 ± 0.002 and 0.035 ± 0.002 g/day, respectively. The total weight gains of the animal supplemented with different levels of ration in general followed the trend of the daily weight gains. The highest total weight gain per animal was received for the treatment group two, which was supplemented with 2 kg of pigeon pea, while the control group exhibited the lowest weight gain. Considering the weight gain over the entire experiment there was a significant difference among the treatment group and the control group with regard to overall average live weight gains, average total weight gains and final weight gain (P &lt; 0.05). The present findings are in lined with previous works of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-17">
      [17]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-18">
      [18]
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-19">
      [19]
     </xref> who were reported that feeding of moringa leaves had significantly increased the body weight gain in Sudan Nubian goat kids.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-"></xref>Table 2. Effect of Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea supplementation on growth performance of short-eared Somali goat breed.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Treatments</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Initial weight</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Final weight</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Monthly weight gain</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Total weight gain</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Daily weight gain</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean ± S.E.</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean ± S.E.</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean ± S.E.</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean ± S.E.</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="18.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean ± S.E.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">T1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">18.82 ± 0.37<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">26.32 ± 0.49<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">1.25 ± 0.06<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">7.50 ± 0.37<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.042 ± 0.002<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">T2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">18.8 ± 0.37<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">26.63 ± 0.49<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">1.30 ± 0.06<sup>ba</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">7.82 ± 0.37<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.043 ± 0.37<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Control</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">17.8 ± 0.37<sup>abc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">24.06 ± 0.49<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">1.04 ± 0.06<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">6.26 ± 0.37<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.035 ± 0.37<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Significance</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">N.S.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.16%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.70%"><p style="text-align:center">*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Mean values in a column having different superscripts differ significantly from each other; *P &lt; 0.05; SEM: Standard error of mean, N.S.: Non-significant; T: Treatments.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Chemical Composition of Experimental Fodder</title>
    <p>The chemical composition of Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea leaves used in this study are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>. Moringa stenopetala leaves contained dry matter (89.9%), ash (12.2%), NDF (26.5%), crude protein (26.7%), ADF (16.9%) ADL (6.9%), the crude protein content of moringa foliage used in the study was in line with the fining of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-20">
      [20]
     </xref> (29.7%, 25.95% and 22.6%) obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-21">
      [21]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-22">
      [22]
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-23">
      [23]
     </xref> respectively, but higher than the values (19.5% and 19.3% in DM) reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-24">
      [24]
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-25">
      [25]
     </xref> respectively. The variations in nutritive value of moringa foliage could be due to the age of harvest, soil type and fertility, proportion of leaf and stem and the agro-ecological zone where trees are growing. On the other hand, pigeon pea contained Dry matter (92.1%), NDF (50.6%), crude protein (32.9%), ADF (30.8%), ADL (12.1%) is higher than the dry matter (89.9%), NDF (26.5%), crude protein (26.7%), ADF (16.9%) ADL (6.9%) of Moringa stenopetala.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138751-"></xref>Table 3. Chemical composition of moringa and pigeon pea leaves fed to experimental Somali goat breed.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">Diet</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="71.98%" colspan="6"><p style="text-align:center">Chemical composition</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">DM</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Ash</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">NDF</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">CP</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">ADF</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">ADL</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">Moringa stenopetala</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">89.9</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">12.2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">26.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">26.7</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">16.9</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">6.9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.02%"><p style="text-align:center">Pigeon pea</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">92.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">8.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">50.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">32.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">30.8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.00%"><p style="text-align:center">12.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>DM = Dray matter; CP = Crude protein; NDF = Neutral detergent fiber; ADF = Acid detergent fiber; ADL= Acid detergent lignin; Ash= Total mineral content of forage.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Conclusion and Recommendations</title>
   <p>Feeding of dried Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea leaves mixture improved body weights and average daily body weight gain without affecting feed intake and overall health of Somali short-eared goat breed. Moringa stenopetala and pigeon pea leaves, which are rich in nitrogen and protein, can be harvested at their first cutting stage, typically around 10 weeks after planting and can be used effectively as substitute for conventional concentrate in the diet of growing goats at small holder farmer’s level where it can be grown in abundance. Therefore, for higher quality of forage and higher total DM yield for animal feeding, moringa should be harvested at wider harvesting intervals of at least 6<sup>th</sup>- to 8<sup>th</sup>-week intervals. Similarly, for pigeon peas, 4- to 6-week harvesting interval can result in optimum forage as well as feed quality. Furthermore, due attention should be given while collecting, drying and storing fodder crops that produce food borne diseases. Alternative drying methods should be addressed to continue the drying of fodder crops during rainy season.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors would like to acknowledge Somali Region Pastoral and Agro-Pastoral Research Institute (SoRPARI) and GIZ for their financial support.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anaeto, M., Tayo, G.O., Chioma, G.O., Ajao, A.O. and Peters, T.A. (2009) Health and Nutrition Practices among Smallholder Sheep and Goat Farmers in Ogun State Nigeria. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 21, Article 197.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2022) Agricultural Sample Survey. The 2021/22 National Statistics. Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristic with Statistical Bulletin 594, Volume II.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tadesse, D., Urge, M., Animut, G. and Mekasha, Y. (2016) Growth and Carcass Characteristics of Three Ethiopian Indigenous Goats Fed Concentrate at Different Supplementation Levels. SpringerPlus, 5, Article No. 414. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2055-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     FAO (2004) Livestock Sector Brief: Ethiopia. Livestock Information, Sector Analysis and Policy Branch (AGAL).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mushi, D.E., Safari, J., Mtenga, L.A., Kifaro, G.C. and Eik, L.O. (2009) Growth and Distribution of Non-Carcass Components of Small East African and F1 Norwegian Crossbred Goats under Concentrate Diets. Livestock Science, 126, 80-86. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.06.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mtenga, L.A. and Kitaly, A.J. (1990) Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Tanzanian Goats Fed Chloris Gayana Hay with Different Levels of Protein Supplement. Small Ruminant Research, 3, 1-8. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(90)90025-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sebsibe, A., Casey, N., Van Niekerk, W., Tegegne, A. and Coertze, R. (2007) Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Three Ethiopian Goat Breeds Fed Grainless Diets Varying in Concentrate to Roughage Ratios. South African Journal of Animal Science, 37, 221-232. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v37i4.4094
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Oni, A.O., Arigbede, O.M., Oni, O.O., Onwuka, C.F.I., Anele, U.Y., Oduguwa, B.O., et al. (2010) Effects of Feeding Different Levels of Dried Cassava Leaves (Manihot Esculenta, Crantz) Based Concentrates with Panicum Maximum Basal on the Performance of Growing West African Dwarf Goats. Livestock Science, 129, 24-30. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.12.007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mendieta-Araica, B., Spörndly, R., Reyes-Sánchez, N. and Spörndly, E. (2011) Moringa (Moringa oleifera) Leaf Meal as a Source of Protein in Locally Produced Concentrates for Dairy Cows Fed Low Protein Diets in Tropical Areas. Livestock Science, 137, 10-17. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.09.021
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Safari, J., Mushi, D.E., Mtenga, L.A., Kifaro, G.C. and Eik, L.O. (2009) Effects of Concentrate Supplementation on Carcass and Meat Quality Attributes of Feedlot Finished Small East African Goats. Livestock Science, 125, 266-274. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.05.007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gebregiorgis, F., Negesse, T. and Nurfeta, A. (2011) Feed Intake and Utilization in Sheep Fed Graded Levels of Dried Moringa (Moringa stenopetala) Leaf as a Supplement to Rhodes Grass Hay. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44, 511-517. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9927-9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Antonelli, A.C., Mori, C.S., Soares, P.C., Kitamura, S.S. and Ortolani, E.L. (2004) Experimental Ammonia Poisoning in Cattle Fed Extruded or Prilled Urea: Clinical Findings. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, 41, 67-74. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-95962004000100010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     National Meteorological Services Agency (NMSA) (2005) Annual Climatic Bulletin. Ministry of Water Resources.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     AOAC (2006) AOAC International Final Report and Executive Summaries from the AOAC International Presidential Task Force on Best Practices in Microbiological Methodology Contract Deliverable Due to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Presidential Task Force on. AOAC International Final Report and Executive Summaries from the AOAC International. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Van Soest, P.J. and Robertson, J.B. (1985) Analysis of Forages and Fibrous Foods. A Laboratory Manual for Animal Science 613. Cornel University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (2002) SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 9.0 Editions. SAS Institute Inc.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Babeker, E.A. and Bdalbagi, M.M. (2015) The Effect of Feeding Moringa oleifera Leaves on the Performance of Sudan Nubian Goat Kids. Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research, 3, 1-9.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Melesse, A., Steingass, H., Boguhn, J. and Rodehutscord, M. (2015) Screening of Potential Feed Resources Based on in Vitro Nutritional Evaluation of Some Moringa Species, Sesbania sesban and Chamaecytisus palmensis Leaves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 99, 125-132.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sultana, N. (2015) The Feeding Value of Moringa (Moringa oleifera) Foliage as Replacement to Conventional Concentrate Diet in Bengal Goats. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 3, 164-173. &gt;https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2015/3.3.164.173 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Damor, S.V., Singh, M.K., Naik, M.M., Patel, J.B. and Patel, J.H. (2017) Nutritional Composition and Utilization of Moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.): Review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6, 46-50.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fadiyimu, A.A., Alokan, J.A. and Fajemisin, A.N. (2010) Digestibility, Nitrogen Balance and Haematological Profile of West African Dwarf Sheep Fed Dietary Levels of Moringa oleifera as Supplement to Panicum Maximum. Journal of American Science, 6, 634-643.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Manh, L.H., Dung, N.X. and Trung, T. (2005) Moringa oleifera as a Solution for Improving Small-Scale Farmers’ Access to High-Quality Feed in Northwestern Vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 17, Article 104.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sánchez, N.R., Ledin, S. and Ledin, I. (2006) Biomass Production and Chemical Composition of Moringa oleifera under Different Management Regimes in Nicaragua. Agroforestry Systems, 66, 231-242. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-8847-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kakengi, A.M.V., Shem, M.N., Sarwatt, S.V. and Fujihara, T. (2005) Can Moringa oleifera Be Used as a Protein Supplement for Ruminants? Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 18, 42-47. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.42
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138751-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aregheore, E.M. (2002) Intake and Digestibility of Moringa oleifera-Batiki Grass Mixtures by Growing Goats. Small Ruminant Research, 46, 23-28. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4488(02)00178-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>