<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojas
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Animal Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2161-7597
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2161-7627
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojas.2025.151003
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojas-138470
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Optimization of the in Vitro Fertilization System in Cỏ Goat Oocytes
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Van Khanh
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nguyen
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Huong Thi Thu
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Vu
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Au Thi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Hoang
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Yen Thi Kim
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Pham
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Dat Van
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Le
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Quan Xuan
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Huu
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Lan Anh Thi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nguyen
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Huong Le Thi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nguyen
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Lan Doan
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Pham
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aKey Laboratory of Animal Cell Biotechnology, National Institute of Animal Sciences, Hanoi, Vietnam
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     13
    </day> 
    <month>
     12
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    01
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    39
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    50
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      3,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      23,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      23,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    This study aimed to optimization of the in vitro fertilization system in Cỏ goat oocytes to achieve the maximum possible blastocyst development rate. In Experiment 1, we assessed the effects of IVF media on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes. There was no significant difference in the cleavage, blastocyst, or hatching rates between TALP-Fert and BO-IVF media. Experiment 2 was performed to assess the concentration of sperm in the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes. The matured Cỏ goat oocytes were fertilized in BO-IVF for four sperm concentrations: 5 × 10
    <sup>5</sup>, 1 × 10
    <sup>6</sup>, 2 × 10
    <sup>6</sup> and 3 × 10
    <sup>6</sup> sperm/ml. The blastocyst rate of 2 × 10
    <sup>6</sup> sperm/ml and 3 × 10
    <sup>6</sup> sperm/ml groups was higher than that of 5 × 10
    <sup>5</sup> sperm/ml and 1 × 10
    <sup>6</sup> sperm/ml groups (P &lt; 0.05). Experiment 3 was performed to assess the IVF duration on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes. The matured Cỏ goat oocytes were fertilized in BO-IVF with sperm concentration of 3 × 10
    <sup>6</sup> sperm/ml for 18, 20, 22 and 24 h. The cleavage, blastocyst, and hatching blastocyst rates of 18 h group were lower than those of 20, 22 and 24 h groups (P &lt; 0.05). The difference in cleavage, blastocyst and hatching blastocyst rates between 20, 22 and 24 h groups was not statistically significant (P &gt; 0.05). In conclusion, the matured Cỏ goat oocytes were fertilized in BO-IVF with sperm concentration of 3 × 10
    <sup>6</sup> sperm/ml for 20 hours, which is suitable for the in vitro Cỏ goat embryo production.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Cỏ Goat Oocytes
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      In Vitro Fertilizaition Media
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      In Vitro Fertilizaition Duration
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Sperm Concentration
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      In Vitro Embryos
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The goat is one of the most important domestic farm animals and provides a large number of products, such as milk, meat and hides. In vitro embryo production technology is an important tool for genetic improvement in goats and provides a source of low-cost embryos for basic research and for commercial application of biotechnologies, such as nuclear transfer, transgenesis, embryo sexing, and stem cells. In vitro goat embryo production includes three steps: in vitro maturation of goat oocytes, In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) of mature goat oocytes, and in vitro goat embryo culture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. IVF is a complex procedure whose success depends on several factors, such as the sperm concentration, fertilization media and IVF duration used.</p>
   <p>The fertilization media used for IVF are the Synthetic Oviductal Fluid (SOF) medium used in ovine <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-2">
     [2]
    </xref>, Brackett and Oliphant (BO) medium used in caprine <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-3">
     [3]
    </xref>, and the Tyrode’s Albumin Lactate Pyruvate (TALP) medium supplemented with hypotaurine widely used in goat <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. For IVF, the final sperm concentration used in the IVF drop can vary from 0.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/ml to 12 - 15 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/ml, depending on the IVF used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. According to Souza-Fabjan et al. (2023) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-1">
     [1]
    </xref>, co-culture time is too short or long can reduce the IVF rate. These authors showed that a shorter oocyte-sperm incubation reduced IVF efficiency, but using longer co-culture time could result in higher ROS concentrations and lower blastocyst rate. In IVF goats, the duration of sperm and oocyte co-culture is inconsistent between the studies. Sperm and oocytes of goats are co-cultured for 16 to 24 hours, depending on the laboratory.</p>
   <p>Cỏ goat is an indigenous goat breed, and they are an important genetic resource for conservation of native Vietnamese goat biodiversity. Cỏ goats are a goat breed commonly raised in Vietnam for meat production. Some of the advantages of Cỏ goats include small in size and popular for disease resistance, high reproduction, limited food requirement and high adaptability in Vietnam’s climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. The development of in vitro production of goat embryos is able to support the propagation of this animal, however, IVF experiments on Cỏ goat in Vietnam have not been done in the past. Therefore, in this study, we optimized the in vitro fertilization system in Cỏ goat oocytes.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <p>All the experimental procedures used in this study were performed in accordance with Vietnam legislation and according to Decision No. 5814/QĐ-BNN-KHCN of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development in Vietnam on December 27.2023.</p>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Reagents and Chemicals</title>
    <p>All reagents and chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Petri dishes used for cell culture are originated from Corning Inc. (Corning, NY, USA).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Collection of Cỏ Goat Ovaries and Cumulus Oocytes Complexes (COCs)</title>
    <p>Cỏ goat ovaries were transported to the laboratory in Dullbeco Phosphate Buffer Saline (DPBS) supplemented with antibiotics within 2 hours after collection from the slaughterhouse. Oocytes were collected from 2 - 8 mm diameter follicles on the ovarian surface using an aspiration method with a 5 ml syringe containing Tyrode’s Albumin Lactate Pyruvate-HEPES (TALP-HEPES) oocyte collection solution supplemented with serum and an 18G needle. After aspiration, the TALP-HEPES medium with harvested oocytes was transferred to a Petri dish, and oocytes were searched by using a stereo microscope and evaluated according to the standards of Wani et al. (2000) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-8">
      [8]
     </xref>. After evaluation, cumulus oocytes complexes were selected based on: 1) uniform cytoplasm and 2) the presence of at least three compact surrounding layers of cumulus cells.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. In Vitro Maturation of Goat Oocytes</title>
    <p>The COCs of Cỏ goat oocytes were washed three times in IVM medium either TCM 199 supplemented with 10% Fetal Cafl Serum (FCS), 50 ng/ml Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), 10 ng/ml Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), 100 µM cysteamine, 100 units/ml penicillin G potassium + 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin sulphate, and then transferred to 4-well plates containing 500 µl of the in vitro maturation medium per well for 22 hours, under conditions of 38.5˚C, 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, and saturated air humidity (50 oocytes per well).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Embryo Culture (IVC)</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-"></xref>The IVF and IVC procedures were performed using the method of Widayati and Pangestu (2020) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-9">
      [9]
     </xref> with some modifications. Matured Cỏ goat oocytes were washed in in vitro fertilization (BO-IVF) medium two times. Thawed semen was centrifuged at 320 × g for 5 min in BO sperm washing medium. The supernatant was removed, and sperm pellet was diluted in BO sperm washing medium. Oocytes and sperm were incubated in IVF medium from 18 to 24 h depending on the experiment, at 38.5˚C under 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, 5% O<sub>2</sub> and humidified air. After duration co-culture, the cumulus cells surrounding the oocyte were removed by repeated pipetting in TALP-HEPES medium + 0.2% hyaluronidase. The oocytes without cumulus cells were washed in SOF medium two times and cultured in SOF medium + 2.5% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) in an incubator at 38.5˚C under 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, 5% O<sub>2</sub> and humidified air for 7 days.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Evaluation of Embryo Cell Number</title>
    <p>The cell numbers in blastocyst at Day 7 after IVF were evaluated by staining with Hoechst 33342. The embryos of Cỏ goat were washed in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) medium supplemented with 0.3% Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) solution. Next, the oocytes were transferred into a staining solution (Hoechst 33342 + Absolute ethanol in a 1:9 ratio) and left overnight at 4˚C. After incubation overnight at 4˚C in the staining solution, the embryos were washed in absolute ethanol and then transferred to a Glycerol solution. Subsequently, the embryos were transferred to a glass slide, each embryo in a drop, and aligned along the length of the slide. A cover slip was placed over the slide, and the embryos were examined under a fluorescence microscope. The cell numbers count under a fluorescence microscope.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Experimental Design (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>)</title>
    <p>Experiment 1. The effect of IVF media on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes</p>
    <p>In this experiment, matured Cỏ goat oocytes were divided into two IVF media: 1) TALP-Fert and 2) BO-IVF medium. Matured Cỏ goat oocytes and sperm were co-cultured for 20 hours and placed in an incubator at 38.5˚C, in 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, 5% O<sub>2</sub> and in saturated air humidity. The embryo developmental competence of Cỏ goat oocytes was evaluated by examination of cleavage, blastocyst and hatching rates at Day 2, Day 6, and Day 7 after IVF, respectively, and total cells per blastocyst counted on Day 7. Eight replications were performed.</p>
    <p>Experiment 2. The effect of sperm concentration on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes</p>
    <p>In this experiment, matured Cỏ goat oocytes were fertilized in the selected fertilization medium from Experiment 1 for four sperm concentrations: 5 × 10<sup>5</sup>, 1 × 10<sup>6</sup>, 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> sperm/ml. Cỏ goat oocytes and sperm were co-cultured for 20 hours and placed in an incubator at 38.5˚C, in 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, 5% O<sub>2</sub> and in saturated air humidity. The IVF of matured Cỏ goat oocytes was performed as described above. The embryo developmental competence of Cỏ goat oocytes was evaluated by examination of cleavage, blastocyst and hatching rates at Day 2, Day 6, and Day 7 after IVF, respectively, and total cells per blastocyst counted on Day 7. Eight replications were performed.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. 2 - 4 cells embryo of Cỏ goat at Day 2 after IVF (eyepiece * objective is 5×/0.12).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1401495-rId15.jpeg?20241226010508" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Blastocyst and hatching blastocyst of Cỏ goat at Day 7 after IVF (eyepiece * objective is 10×/0.25).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1401495-rId16.jpeg?20241226010508" />
    </fig>
    <p>Experiment 3. The effect of IVF duration on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes</p>
    <p>In this experiment, Cỏ goat oocytes were fertilized in the selected fertilization medium, sperm concentration from Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 for 18, 20, 22 and 24 hours at 38.5˚C, in 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, and in saturated air humidity. The IVF of Cỏ goat oocytes was performed as described above. The embryo developmental competence of Cỏ goat oocytes was evaluated by examination of cleavage, blastocyst and hatching rates at Day 2, Day 6, and Day 7 after IVF, respectively, and total cells per blastocyst counted on Day 7. Eight replications were performed.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_7">
    <title>2.7. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>All data were expressed as mean ± SEM values and analysed by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, using GraphPad Prism software (Version 7.02 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA. P &lt; 0.05 was defined as the significance level.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Experiment 1. The Effect of IVF Media on the in Vitro Fertilization of Cỏ Goat Oocytes</title>
    <p>The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref> indicated no significant difference in the cleavage and blastocyst and hatching rates and the average number of cells/blastocyst of Cỏ goat oocytes after fertilization between two IVF media: TALP-Fert and BO-IVF (67.84% vs. 68.92%, 23.82% vs. 24.76%, 4.36% vs. 4.02% and 132.96 vs. 135.08, respectively; P &gt; 0.05).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-"></xref>Table 1. Influence of IVF media on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">Medium</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.94%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of fertilized oocytes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.32%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of cleavage</p><p style="text-align:center">(% total)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of blastocyst</p><p style="text-align:center">(% total)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of hatching blastocyst</p><p style="text-align:center">(% total)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">The average number of cells/blastocyst</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">TALP-Fert</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.94%"><p style="text-align:center">98</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.32%"><p style="text-align:center">66</p><p style="text-align:center">67.84 ± 2.34</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">23</p><p style="text-align:center">23.82 ± 2.15</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p><p style="text-align:center">4.36 ± 1.98</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">132.96 ± 2.58</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.10%"><p style="text-align:center">BO-IVF</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.94%"><p style="text-align:center">102</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.32%"><p style="text-align:center">70</p><p style="text-align:center">68.92 ± 2.22</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.33%"><p style="text-align:center">25</p><p style="text-align:center">24.76 ± 2.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.22%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p><p style="text-align:center">4.02 ± 2.18</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">135.08 ± 2.21</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Eight replications were performed. Percentage data are shown as mean ± SEM.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Experiment 2. The Effect of Sperm Concentration on the in Vitro Fertilization of Cỏ Goat Oocytes</title>
    <p>Based on the results of Experiment 1, in Experiment 2 we used the BO-IVF medium to evaluate the effect of sperm concentration on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>. The cleavage rate of 5 × 10<sup>5</sup> group was lower than that of 1 × 10<sup>6</sup>, 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> groups (55.96% vs. 69.98%, 76.48%, 76.95%; respectively, P &lt; 0.05). The blastocyst rate of 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> groups was higher than that of 5 × 10<sup>5</sup> and 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> groups (35.92% and 35.96% vs. 14.72% and 24.01%; respectively, P &lt; 0.05). The difference in blastocyst and hatching blastocyst rates between 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> groups were not statistically significant (P &gt; 0.05).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-"></xref>Table 2. Influence of sperm concentration on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Concentration</p><p style="text-align:center">(sperm/ml)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.75%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of fertilized oocytes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of cleavage</p><p style="text-align:center">(% total)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of blastocyst</p><p style="text-align:center">(% total)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of hatching blastocyst</p><p style="text-align:center">(% total)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">The average number of cells/blastocyst</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">5 × 10<sup>5</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.75%"><p style="text-align:center">114</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">63</p><p style="text-align:center">55.96<sup>a</sup> ± 2.07</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">16</p><p style="text-align:center">14.72<sup>a</sup> ± 2.31</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p><p style="text-align:center">2.96 ± 1.75</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">133.24 ± 2.24</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">1 × 10<sup>6</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.75%"><p style="text-align:center">119</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">83</p><p style="text-align:center">69.98<sup>b</sup> ± 2.03</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">28</p><p style="text-align:center">24.01<sup>b</sup> ± 2.42</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p><p style="text-align:center">3.89 ± 2.76</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">134.98 ± 2.38</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">2 × 10<sup>6</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.75%"><p style="text-align:center">118</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">90</p><p style="text-align:center">76.48<sup>b</sup> ± 1.99</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">42</p><p style="text-align:center">35.92<sup>b</sup> ± 2.14</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p><p style="text-align:center">5.48 ± 2.35</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">135.01 ± 2.46</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">3 × 10<sup>6</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.75%"><p style="text-align:center">112</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">86</p><p style="text-align:center">76.95<sup>b</sup> ± 2.58</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">40</p><p style="text-align:center">35.96<sup>b</sup> ± 2.67</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p><p style="text-align:center">5.62 ± 2.32</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">135.78 ± 2.51</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Eight replications were performed. Percentage data are shown as mean ± SEM. a and b in the same column differ significantly (P &lt; 0.05).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Experiment 3. The Effect of IVF Duration on the in Vitro Fertilization of Cỏ Goat Oocytes</title>
    <p>Based on the results of Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, in Experiment 3, matured Cỏ goat oocytes were fertilized in the BO-IVF medium with a concentration of 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> sperm/ml in each IVF droplet.</p>
    <p>The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> indicate that the cleavage, blastocyst, and hatching blastocyst rates of 18 hours group were lower than that of 20-, 22- and 24-hour groups (54.16% vs. 76.22%, 77.21% and 77.09%; 17.64% vs. 35.67%, 35.82% and 35.96%; 3.58% vs. 5.92%, 6.36, 6.31%; respectively, P &lt; 0.05). The difference in cleavage, blastocyst and hatching blastocyst rates between 20-, 22- and 24-hour groups were not statistically significant (P &gt; 0.05).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-"></xref>Table 3. Influence of IVF duration on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat oocytes.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.51%"><p style="text-align:center">IVF duration</p><p style="text-align:center">(hours)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of fertilized oocytes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of cleavage</p><p style="text-align:center">(% total)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of blastocyst</p><p style="text-align:center">(% total)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of hatching blastocyst</p><p style="text-align:center">(% total)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">The average number of cells/blastocyst</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.51%"><p style="text-align:center">18</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center">115</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">62</p><p style="text-align:center">54.16<sup>a</sup> ± 2.31</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">20</p><p style="text-align:center">17.64<sup>a</sup> ± 2.06</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p><p style="text-align:center">3.58 ± 2.33</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">132.98 ± 2.46</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.51%"><p style="text-align:center">20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center">121</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">92</p><p style="text-align:center">76.22<sup>b</sup> ± 2.26</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">43</p><p style="text-align:center">35.67<sup>b</sup> ± 2.41</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p><p style="text-align:center">5.92 ± 2.09</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">134.89 ± 2.14</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.51%"><p style="text-align:center">22</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center">117</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">90</p><p style="text-align:center">77.21<sup>b</sup> ± 2.54</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">41</p><p style="text-align:center">35.82<sup>b</sup> ± 2.28</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p><p style="text-align:center">6.36 ± 2.47</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">135.12 ± 2.71</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.51%"><p style="text-align:center">24</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center">116</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">89</p><p style="text-align:center">77.09<sup>b</sup> ± 2.72</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.11%"><p style="text-align:center">41</p><p style="text-align:center">35.96<sup>b</sup> ± 2.45</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p><p style="text-align:center">6.31 ± 2.39</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.09%"><p style="text-align:center">134.86 ± 2.67</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Eight replications were performed. Percentage data are shown as mean ± SEM. a and b in the same column differ significantly (P &lt; 0.05).</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>The results of this study indicate that IVF media does not affect on the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat. There was no significant difference in the cleavage and blastocyst and hatching rates and the average number of cells/blastocyst of Cỏ goat oocytes after fertilization between TALP-Fert and BO-IVF media (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>, P &gt; 0.05). The quality of sperm has an important role in the success of the IVF process and in vitro embryo production. During the IVF process, there are some changes in membrane properties, intracellular ion concentrations, enzyme activity, protein modifications that can affect the IVF process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. To improve fertilization ability and capacitation of sperm as well as increase the number of fertilized oocytes, adding of supplements to the IVF media is necessary. According to Kharche et al. (2009) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-11">
     [11]
    </xref>, when using fetal calf serum instead of bovine serum albumin in IVF media will increase the cleavage and blastocyst rates of goat oocytes. Heparin and hypotaurine are agents to improve the ability of sperm fertilization in vitro <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-13">
     [13]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In this study, Heparin was added to the BO-IVF media to improve the effect of IVF of goat oocytes. Cox and Alfaro (2007) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-14">
     [14]
    </xref> also showed that heparin is a potent glycosaminoglycan that has been shown to improve the fertilizing ability of bovine, goat and sheep when used in IVF medium. The cause is that the presence of heparin in the IVF media will induce capacitation of sperm in the in vitro embryo production, increased calcium uptake, increased intracellular free calcium and decreased calmodulin concentration in spermatozoa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-15">
     [15]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Hypotaurine is also an antioxidant, which can induce capacitation of sperm during IVF process, and it is often oxidized to taurine to remove hydroxyl radicals in the in vitro fertilization system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. According to Pons-Rejraji et al. (2021) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-17">
     [17]
    </xref>, the presence of heparin and hypotaurine in the IVF media will increase viability and progressive motility, as well as reduce the rate of sperm that undergo chromatin decondensation, DNA fragmentation and nuclear vacuolization, which is why in our study, we added Hypotaurine to TALP-Fert medium and heparine to BO-IVF medium.</p>
   <p>In Experiment 2, our results are similar to Palomo et al. (2010) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. According to Palomo et al. (2010) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-18">
     [18]
    </xref>, sperm concentration affects the in vitro fertilization of prepubertal goat oocytes. However, there is no consensus among studies on the optimal of sperm concentration for IVF in goat. Palomo et al. (2010) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-18">
     [18]
    </xref> reported the optimum sperm concentration is 4 × 10<sup>6</sup> sperm/ml, but in our study and the report of Pawshe et al. (1994) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-19">
     [19]
    </xref>, the optimum sperm concentration is 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> or 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> sperm/ml. The reason for these different results might be the different evaluation criteria, the quality of sperm between the studies. For optimum concentration sperm, Palomo et al. (2010) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-18">
     [18]
    </xref> used the penetration rate as evaluation criteria, whereas we and Pawshe et al. (1994) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-19">
     [19]
    </xref> used cleavage and blastocyst and hatching blastocyst rates.</p>
   <p>The correlation between the polyspermy rate and sperm concentration present during IVF process show that reducing sperm concentration may be minimize polyspermy in IVF (Gil et al. 2008) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. The quality of sperm frozen-thawed is a necessary requirement to increase the fertilized oocytes rate. During in vitro fertilization, when using sperm frozen, high sperm concentration is essential to maintain the motility of sperm and increase the number of sperm capable of fertilization. Therefore, this could be the reason why the optimal of sperm concentration in this study was lower than that of the report of Palomo et al. (2010) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. When increasing sperm concentration from 5 × 10<sup>6</sup> to 10 × 10<sup>6</sup> sperm/ml, the fertilized oocytes rate decreases and the polyspermy rate increase. Therefore, in this study, we also limited sperm concentration to a maximum of 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> sperm/ml.</p>
   <p>In this study, we aimed to optimize in vitro fertilization for Cỏ goat oocytes in order to optimize the production of blastocyst goat embryo by IVF. Optimization of the IVF duration means the maximization of efficacy as measured by blastocyst stage embryos after subsequent IVF. The results of Experiment 3 showed that IVF duration affect the in vitro fertilization of Cỏ goat. Our results are similar to Cognié et al. (2003) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-21">
     [21]
    </xref> and Tan et al. (2011) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. According to Cognié et al. (2003) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-21">
     [21]
    </xref> and Tan et al. (2011) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-22">
     [22]
    </xref>, IVF duration affect the in vitro fertilization of goat oocytes. The period of sperm-oocytes exposure in goat is still controversial, and there is no consensus on the optimal IVF duration in goat between studies: 20 h <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-21">
     [21]
    </xref>, 24 h <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-23">
     [23]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-24">
     [24]
    </xref>, 16 - 20 h <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-14">
     [14]
    </xref>, 18 h <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-3">
     [3]
    </xref> and 12 h <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-25">
     [25]
    </xref>. Tan et al. (2011) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-22">
     [22]
    </xref> showed that the cleavage rate of 8 - 14 h group was higher than the 18 - 24 h group, whereas in the report of Cognié et al. (2003) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-21">
     [21]
    </xref>, the cleavage and blastocyst rates of 17 h group were higher than the 3 h group. Differences between studies may be due to the quality of sperm and matured oocytes, IVF medium, IVF protocol…</p>
   <p>According to Van Soom et al. (2002) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-26">
     [26]
    </xref>, the presence of cumulus cells around the oocytes at the time of fertilization appears to increase the blastocyst yield. dos Santos-Neto et al. (2020) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-27">
     [27]
    </xref> found beneficial effects of cumulus cells during in vitro fertilization in goat. The cumulus cells act as a physical barrier in polyspermy control, and they may exert an additional benefit in the gamete interaction. Even, Yanagimachi (2022) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-28">
     [28]
    </xref> suggested that progesterone secreted by cumulus cells can activate the acrosome reaction of sperm during IVF. That is why, in this study to increase the rate of Cỏ goat blastocyst, we used the IVF process with cumulus cells in Cỏ goat oocytes.</p>
   <p>According to Mauchart et al. (2023) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-29">
     [29]
    </xref>, increasing the co-incubator time of sperm oocytes can also cause cytotoxic damage due to increased amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Similarly, Gualtieri et al. (2021) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-30">
     [30]
    </xref> also found that using frozen sperm during IVF process produced increased amounts of ROS. ROS are by-products of metabolism and cell death, which may be related to longer fertilization duration. ROS has played an important role as it increases DNA fragmentation, modifies the cytoskeleton and produces a loss of fluidity, integrity and competence of the sperm membrane to participate in the membrane events associated with fertilization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-30">
     [30]
    </xref>. Fan et al. (2023) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138470-31">
     [31]
    </xref> showed that reducing the co-incubator time of sperm oocytes improves the viability of human embryo, possibly due to a decrease in potential damage from sperm metabolic waste products. Therefore, determining the optimal co-incubator time of sperm oocytes will improve the efficiency of in vitro goat embryo production.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>In conclusion, the present study reveals that the matured Cỏ goat oocytes were fertilized in BO-IVF medium with sperm concentration of 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> sperm/ml for 20 h, which is suitable for the in vitro Cỏ goat embryo production.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The research was carried out at the Key Laboratory of Animal Cell Technology. The authors would like to thank the Vietnamese Ministry of Science and Technology for supporting the project.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Souza-Fabjan, J.M.G., Leal, G.R., Monteiro, C.A.S., Batista, R.I.T.P., Barbosa, N.O. and Freitas, V.J.F. (2023) In Vitro Embryo Production in Small Ruminants: What Is Still Missing? Animal Reproduction, 20, e20230055. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-ar2023-0055
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, Z., Lin, P. and Yu, S. (2013) Effects of Ghrelin on Developmental Competence and Gene Expression of in Vitro Fertilized Ovine Embryos. Theriogenology, 79, 695-701. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.11.026
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kharche, S.D., Goel, A.K., Jindal, S.K., Goel, P. and Jha, B.K. (2011) Birth of Twin Kids Following Transfer of in Vitro Produced Caprine Embryos. Indian Journal Animal Science, 81, 1132-1134.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hammami, S., Morató, R., Romaguera, R., Roura, M., Catalá, M., Paramio, M., et al. (2012) Developmental Competence and Embryo Quality of Small Oocytes from Pre‐pubertal Goats Cultured in IVM Medium Supplemented with Low Level of Hormones, Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium and Ascorbic Acid. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 48, 339-344. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02160.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bai, J., Hou, J., Guan, H., Yan, F., Cui, X., Liu, L., et al. (2008) Effect of 2-Mercaptoethanol and Cysteine Supplementation during in Vitro Maturation on the Developmental Competence of Oocytes from Hormone-Stimulated Lambs. Theriogenology, 70, 758-764. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.053
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Herrick, J.R., Lane, M., Gardner, D.K., Behboodi, E., Memili, E., Blash, S., et al. (2005) Metabolism, Protein Content, and in Vitro Embryonic Development of Goat Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes Matured with Physiological Concentrations of Glucose and L‐Lactate. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 73, 256-266. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20407
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dang, P.K. and Mui, N.B. (2015) Physical Appearance and Growth Performance of Indigenous Goat Co, F1 (Bach Thao × Co) and Three Way Crossbred Goat [Boer × (Bach Thao × Co)] Raised in Nho Quan, Ninh Binh Province. Journal Science &amp; Development, 13, 551-559.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wani, N.A., Wani, G.M., Khan, M.Z. and Salahudin, S. (2000) Effect of Oocyte Harvesting Techniques on in Vitro Maturation and in Vitro Fertilization in Sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 36, 63-67. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4488(99)00097-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Widayati, D.T. and Pangestu, M. (2020) Effect of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone on Bligon Goat Oocyte Maturation and Embryonic Development Post in Vitro Fertilization. Veterinary World, 13, 2443-2446. &gt;https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.2443-2446
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jin, S. and Yang, W. (2016) Factors and Pathways Involved in Capacitation: How Are They Regulated? Oncotarget, 8, 3600-3627. &gt;https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12274
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kharche, S.D., Goel, A.K., Jindal, S.K., Yadav, E.N., Yadav, P., Sinha, R., et al. (2009) Effect of Serum Albumin Supplementation on in Vitro Capacitation and Fertilization of Caprine Oocytes. Small Ruminant Research, 81, 85-89. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.11.013
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ledda, S., Kelly, J.M., Nieddu, S., Bebbere, D., Ariu, F., Bogliolo, L., et al. (2019) High in Vitro Survival Rate of Sheep in Vitro Produced Blastocysts Vitrified with a New Method and Device. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 10, Article No. 90. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-019-0390-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rahman, M.M., Rahman, M.M., Juyena, N.S. and Bhuiyan, M.M.U. (2020) Optimization of in Vitro Fertilization Technique for Oocytes of Indigenous Zebu Cows. Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology, 35, 142-148. &gt;https://doi.org/10.12750/jarb.35.2.142
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cox, J. and Alfaro, V. (2007) In Vitro Fertilization and Development of OPU Derived Goat and Sheep Oocytes. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 42, 83-87. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00735.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rahmatullah, R., Setiadi, M.A. and Supriatna, I. (2023) Heparin and Hypotaurine Supplementation Improve the Fertilization Rate of Sheep Oocytes Matured in Media Containing L-Carnitine in Vitro. Jurnal Kedokteran Hewan—Indonesian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 16, 121-126. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21157/j.ked.hewan.v16i4.27339
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, P.R., Spate, L.D., Leffeler, E.C., Benne, J.A., Cecil, R.F., Hord, T.K., et al. (2020) Removal of Hypotaurine from Porcine Embryo Culture Medium Does Not Impair Development of in Vitro‐Fertilized or Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer‐Derived Embryos at Low Oxygen Tension. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 87, 773-782. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23393
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pons-Rejraji, H., Vorilhon, S., Difrane, A., Dollet, S., Bourgne, C., Berger, M., et al. (2021) Beneficial Effects of Hypotaurine Supplementation in Preparation and Freezing Media on Human Sperm Cryo-Capacitation and DNA Quality. Basic and Clinical Andrology, 31, Article No. 26. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-021-00144-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Palomo, M.J., Mogas, T., Izquierdo, D. and Paramio, M.T. (2010) The Influence of Sperm Concentration, Length of the Gamete Co-Culture and the Evolution of Different Sperm Parameters on the in Vitro Fertilization of Prepubertal Goat Oocytes. Zygote, 18, 345-355. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199410000055
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pawshe, C.H., Totey, S.M. and Jain, S.K. (1994) A Comparison of Three Methods of Recovery of Goat Oocytes for in Vitro Maturation and Feritilization. Theriogenology, 42, 117-125. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691x(94)90668-9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gil, M.A., Almiñana, C., Roca, J., Vázquez, J.M. and Martínez, E.A. (2008) Boar Semen Variability and Its Effects on IVF Efficiency. Theriogenology, 70, 1260-1268. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cognié, Y., Baril, G., Poulin, N. and Mermillod, P. (2003) Current Status of Embryo Technologies in Sheep and Goat. Theriogenology, 59, 171-188. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01270-0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tan, W.L., Wan Khadijah, W.E. and Abdullah, R.B. (2011) Effect of Sperm Insemination Duration on in Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Performance in Goats. Malaysian Journal of Science, 30, 105-111. &gt;https://doi.org/10.22452/mjs.vol30no2.4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nagar, D. and Purohit, G.N. (2005) Effect of Epidermal Growth Factor on Maturation and Fertilization in Vitro of Goat Follicular Oocytes in a Serum Free or Serum Supplemented Medium. Veterinarski Arhiv, 75, 459-467.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Palomo, M.J., Quintanilla, R., Izquierdo, M.D., Mogas, T. and Paramio, M.T. (2016) Variability in in Vitro Fertilization Outcomes of Prepubertal Goat Oocytes Explained by Basic Semen Analyses. Zygote, 24, 831-838. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199416000162
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Malakar, D., Das, S.K., Mukesh, M., Sodhi, M. and Goswami, S.L. (2007) Production of Kids from in Vitro Fertilized Goat Embryos and Their Parentage Assessment Using Microsatellite Markers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 20, 842-849. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.842
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Van Soom, A., Tanghe, S., De Pauw, I., Maes, D. and De Kruif, A. (2002) Function of the Cumulus Oophorus before and during Mammalian Fertilization. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 37, 144-151. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2002.00345.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     dos Santos-Neto, P.C., Vilariño, M., Cuadro, F., Barrera, N., Crispo, M. and Menchaca, A. (2020) Cumulus Cells during in Vitro Fertilization and Oocyte Vitrification in Sheep: Remove, Maintain or Add? Cryobiology, 92, 161-167. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.01.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yanagimachi, R. (2022) Mysteries and Unsolved Problems of Mammalian Fertilization and Related Topics. Biology of Reproduction, 106, 644-675. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioac037
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mauchart, P., Vass, R.A., Nagy, B., Sulyok, E., Bódis, J. and Kovács, K. (2023) Oxidative Stress in Assisted Reproductive Techniques, with a Focus on an Underestimated Risk Factor. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 45, 1272-1286. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45020083
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gualtieri, R., Kalthur, G., Barbato, V., Longobardi, S., Di Rella, F., Adiga, S.K., et al. (2021) Sperm Oxidative Stress during in Vitro Manipulation and Its Effects on Sperm Function and Embryo Development. Antioxidants, 10, Article No. 1025. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071025
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138470-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fan, Y., Wu, Z., Peng, F., Peng, H., Liang, X. and Zhu, S. (2023) Brief and Long Co-Incubation of Sperm and Oocytes for in Vitro Fertilization: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23, Article No. 200. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05490-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>