<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ijg
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     International Journal of Geosciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2156-8359
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2156-8367
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ijg.2024.1512055
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ijg-138427
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    An Overview of the Present State of Knowledge in the Tectonostratigraphic Evolution of the West Congo Belt in Republic of Congo
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Vicky Tendresse Telange
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bouénitela
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ulrich Verne
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Matiaba-Bazika
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nelson Lekeba
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Makamba
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Hardy Medry Dieu-Veil
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nkodia
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sage Peterne Chandrich
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kebi-Tsoumou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Florent
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Boudzoumou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, République du Congo
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aInstitut de Recherches en Sciences Exactes et Naturelles (IRSEN), Brazzaville, République du Congo
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aRectorat-Académie de Paris, Paris, France
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     05
    </day> 
    <month>
     12
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    12
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    1038
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    1063
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      14,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      22,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      22,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The West Congo Belt (WCB) is one of many Proterozoic orogens considered to be mobile belts adjacent to the margins of Archean cratons. This orogen underlies the western margin of the Congo craton in central Africa and outcrops from south-west Gabon to north-west Angola. In the Republic of Congo, the Mayombe Chain in south-west has preserved a geological record of Proterozoic to early Paleozoic rocks that have been investigated to understand the evolution of the West Congo Belt within the regional tectonic context. Investigation into lithostratigraphy and structural architecture of the Mayombe Chain has been done by earlier workers since the 19th century. However, the lack of consistent and diverse geochronological data induced several interpretations of its geodynamic setting. The chain was previously thought to be the result of more than two orogenic cycles, and subsequently to be the result of a single orogenic cycle. Recent petrographic, geochronological, geochemical data and paleogeographic reconstructions allow redefining the tectonic context and the main lithostratigraphic subdivisions of the Mayombe Chain. It is currently recognized that the Mayombe Chain consists of three major tectonostratigraphic domains: Western, Central and Eastern, which are prolongated by the Niari-Nyanga foreland basin. These lithounits seem to have been formed through a complex history that included: (i) Late Paleoproterozoic sedimentation, magmatism and metamorphism between 2110 and 1970 Ma related to the Eburnean tectono-thermal event; (ii) Neoproterozoic rifting magmatism and sedimentation; and (iii) Pan-African tectono-thermal event between 620 and 496 Ma leading to the amalgamation of western Gondwana. In this contribution, we review existing literature on this part of the West Congo Belt and summarize the current knowledge of its geologic setting with a focus on structure, lithostratigraphy and metamorphism. We aim to show how current research, with multidisciplinary approaches, changed the interpretation of the Mayombe with consideration to the Araçuaí-West Congo Orogenic system.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Mayombe Chain
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Niari-Nyanga Basin
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Eburnean
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Pan-African
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      São Francisco-Congo Cratons
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The evolution of the Earth is characterised by several geodynamic processes. Crustal or continental accretion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-1">
     [1]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-3">
     [3]
    </xref> is one of the most important Earth structuring processes, leading to the formation of stable continental landmasses (cratons). The Archean-Proterozoic transition is punctuated by many episodes of continentalisation, resulting in orogenic systems of variable configuration and architecture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Archean cratons were involved in the formation of the Proterozoic supercontinents. The present-day African continent was gradually formed by orogenic amalgamation of cratonic blocks such as the Kalahari, Congo, West Africa, East Saharan and Arabian-Nubian Shields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. However, it has not always been easy to explain the juxtaposition of orogenic belts and associated cratons as crustal reworking and rejuvenation. The emplacement and reactivation of orogens during recent cycles remains a matter of debate. Several models have been proposed to characterise mobile belts surrounding cratonic landmasses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-6">
     <a href="#ref6">[6]</a>
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In central Africa, the West Congo Belt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>) corresponds to the Proterozoic mobile belt surrounding the western margin of the Archean Congo craton. It is currently identified as the counterpart of the Araçuai-West Congo Orogen System (A-WCO) of western Gondwana, which appears in the eastern margin of Brazil and the western margin of central Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-7">
     [7]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
     <a href="#ref13">[13]</a>
    </xref>. In the Republic of Congo, the belt is represented by the Mayombe chain, which outcrops in the southwest of the country (). This chain consists mainly of meta-plutonic, meta-volcanic and meta-sedimentary rocks, which have been explored since the 19th century <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
     <a href="#ref14">[14]</a>
    </xref>. However, previous works in this area were mostly focused on mining exploration and then on structural and petrological points <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
     <a href="#ref14">[14]</a>
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-28">
     <a href="#ref28">[28]</a>
    </xref>. Thus, due to its complexity and especially the lack of geochronological data, several models have been proposed to circumscribe the evolutionary context of the chain. Some of the hypotheses and lithostratigraphic subdivisions have been based on petrographic correlation with neighbouring geological units of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) or Angola <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
     <a href="#ref21">[21]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
     <a href="#ref23">[23]</a>
    </xref>. Studies combining petro-structural and geochronological approaches have not been widely integrated and have mainly been carried out on restricted units <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-29">
     <a href="#ref29">[29]</a>
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-32">
     <a href="#ref32">[32]</a>
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Recent studies and mapping of the Mayombe chain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
     <a href="#ref13">[13]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-33">
     <a href="#ref33">[33]</a>
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
     <a href="#ref38">[38]</a>
    </xref> provide additional data that allow redrawing the lithostratigraphic subdivision of the chain based on geochronological and structural data.</p>
   <p>The focus of this paper is to share the state of knowledge on the lithostratigraphic evolution of the geodynamic setting of the Mayombe chain, and to highlight current research perspectives in this area.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. Geological map of the West Congo Belt (WCB) from south-west Gabon to north-west Angola (modified after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
       <a href="#ref39">[39]</a>
      </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-40">
       [40]
      </xref> and redrawn from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
       <a href="#ref41"></a>
       <a href="#ref41  * MERGEFORMAT"></a>
       <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
      </xref>). The white dashed lines mark the boundaries between countries.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802599-rId14.jpeg?20241225020651" />
   </fig>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Geological Overview</title>
   <p>Structural, geochronological and geophysical (paleomagnetic and gravimetric) data from Africa provide strong evidence for the existence of large cratonic continental plates that were later surrounded and overridden by linear mobile belts during the Proterozoic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-6">
     <a href="#ref6">[6]</a>
    </xref>. The Archean Congo craton, located currently in central Africa, was involved in this Proterozoic dynamic which is marked by its amalgamation with other cratons, leading to the formation of several mobile belts such as the West Congo Belt, the Kaoko Belt, the Damara Belt, the Zambezi Belt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-5">
     [5]
    </xref> and the Central African Belt or Oubanguides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-42">
     [42]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-44">
     [44]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The West Congo Belt (WCB)</p>
   <p>The West Congo Belt widely exposed in the western margin of the Congo craton in central Africa, consists of a Proterozoic NW-SE trending fold-and-thrust belt that extends about 1400 km from southwest Gabon to north-west Angola (Figure 1), parallel to the Atlantic coast <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-9">
     <a href="#ref9">[9]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
     [21]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-22">
     [22]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-24">
     <a href="#ref24">[24]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-26">
     <a href="#ref26">[26]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-28">
     <a href="#ref28">[28]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-32">
     [32]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-45">
     <a href="#ref45">[45]</a>
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-47">
     [47]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The belt is an eastern and external counterpart of the Araçuaí-West Congo Orogenic system (A-WCO), which extends to the east Brazilian margin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-48">
     [48]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-52">
     [52]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The Mayombe chain, located in the southwestern part of the Republic of Congo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>), is the Congolese portion of the West Congo Belt with a width of 20 to 50 km from north to south and an altitude of 400 to 800 m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
     [14]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
     <a href="#ref36">[36]</a>
    </xref>. The chain is underlain in its southern and western parts by Meso-Cenozoic sedimentary rocks of the Congolese Coastal Basin; it extends towards the northeast with the Niari-Nyanga foreland basin and the overthrust Archean Chaillu Massif (Congo craton).</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. Geological map of the Congolese portion of the West Congo Belt: the Mayombe Chain (modified from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-33">
       [33]
      </xref>).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802599-rId15.jpeg?20241225020651" />
   </fig>
   <p>The Mayombe Chain is made up of para- and ortho-derived metamorphic rocks, which have been the subject of studies by several authors.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Lithostratigraphic Subdivisions through Time</title>
   <p>The Mayombe Chain currently acknowledged as an important component of the West Congo Belt and its lithounits have been studied since the beginning of the 1900s by different generations of Geoscientists <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
     [13]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-37">
     [37]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
     <a href="#ref39">[39]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
     <a href="#ref41"></a>
     <a href="#ref41"></a>
     <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-46">
     <a href="#ref46">[46]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-53">
     <a href="#ref53">[53]</a>
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-63">
     <a href="#ref63">[63]</a>
    </xref>. However, stratigraphic complexity and a lack of reliable geochronological data induced divergent interpretations of the Mayombe Chain history. Therefore, the tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Mayombe chain is warmly debated, with diverse models () presented below.</p>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Earlier Observations (1876-1929): Stratigraphic Features</title>
    <p>As reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-20">
      <a href="#ref20">[20]</a>
     </xref>, the geological exploration for the Mayombe region and neighbouring areas of south-western Congo started in 1875 with fieldwork of Peschuel-Loesche. These pioneering efforts have allowed a preliminary view of the geology of the Mayombe region and surrounding areas. According to this author, the Mayombe Chain consists of crystalline schists surrounded by sedimentary rocks of Congolese coastal basin in south, schisto-calcaire rocks of Niari-Nyanga Basin and granitic rocks of Chaillu basement in the north. Since then, other studies have been carried out in the southern part of the Republic of Congo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-53">
      <a href="#ref53">[53]</a>
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-57">
      [57]
     </xref>. These previous works allowed establishing the basic theme of the geology of the Congo in general and of the Mayombe Chain in particular. The construction of the “Chemin de Fer Congo Océan” (CFCO) railway, linking the cities of Brazzaville and Pointe-Noire, allowed access to fresh outcrops and a complete database on the Mayombe Chain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-15">
      [15]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-18">
      [18]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-58">
      [58]
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-64">
      [64]
     </xref> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref>. In 1929, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-17">
      [17]
     </xref> divided geologic formations of the Mayombe Chain into two series: the crystallophyllian series (supposedly archean) and the quartz-schist or metamorphic series. The first described in the western area of Mayombe in the Bilinga, Bilala and MBoulou areas consists of gneisses and micaschists, which gave way to sericite and chlorite schists. The second outcrops further east, north of MBoulou, near Kakamoéka, Mvouti and up to the Loubomo River (current Niari River) banks.</p>
    <p>Based on field mapping, many workers proposed that geodynamic setting of the Mayombe Chain could relate to multiple orogenic cycles.</p>
    <p>In the following, we present several propositions and various models developed to explain the geodynamic setting of the Mayombe Chain, as related to orogenic cycles.</p>
    <p>1. Cosson (1955): Three cycles</p>
    <p>Tectonostratigraphic events were integrated into the lithostratigraphic subdivisions of the Mayombe region during the survey of the Pointe-Noire-Brazzaville sheet at a scale of 1:500,000 carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      <a href="#ref19">[19]</a>
     </xref> who have distinguished three main systems, corresponding each to an orogenic cycle. These are, from the oldest to the most recent: (i) the Lower Mayombe system, including the Loémé, Bikossi and Loukoula series; (ii) the Bambas Mountains system, including the Mvouti and Mossouva series; (iii) the West Congo system, made up of the Lower Tillite, Louila or Bouenza, Schisto-calcaire and Schisto-gréseux series of the Niari-Nyanga foreland basin. According to Cosson, these different systems are separated by major tectonostratigraphic unconformities.</p>
    <p>2. Dévigne (1959): Four cycles</p>
    <p>In his study of the Precambrian of Gabon and neighbouring regions (including Congo), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-20">
      [20]
     </xref> added a major discordance between the Bikossi series and the Loukoula series compared to the subdivision of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      [19]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>3. Vincent (1961); Scolari and Van Daalhoff (1965): Two cycles</p>
    <p>Between 1961 and 1965, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-65">
      <a href="#ref65">[65]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-66">
      <a href="#ref66">[66]</a>
     </xref> and other authors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-67">
      [67]
     </xref> updated the lithostratigraphic subdivision of Proterozoic strata in the Mayombe Chain by distinguishing the intermediate black series and the upper series instead of the lower and upper Loukoula series and the Mvouti and Moussouva series of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      [19]
     </xref>. Vincent recognised the existence of two cycles: a pre-Bambian and a Bambian which correspond to two metasedimentary sequences, named Mayombe and West Congo respectively. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-67">
      [67]
     </xref> underlines the discordance between the Bikossi series and the Loukoula series proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-20">
      [20]
     </xref>. Then, the Loukoula series is associated with the Mvouti and Mossouva series to form the Bambian or Mayombian system.</p>
    <p>Previous reconstructions that consider the Mayombe Chain as resulting from multiple orogenic cycles were refuted by some workers who have suggested that Mayombe Chain originated from a single orogenic system based on field observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      [21]
     </xref>. In facts, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> presented the Mayombe units as having developed within a single system, which he described as a geosyncline forming the West Congo Belt. In this model, all the orogenic systems or cycles described previously correspond to a single cycle linked to the Pan-African orogeny <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      [21]
     </xref>. It reached the same conclusion as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref>. He confirmed that, except for a part of the polycyclic Guéna basement (Loémé series), the whole Mayombe Chain shows only a Pan-African style of deformation, to which he associated a regional metamorphism characterised by a grade evolving from east to west from the anchizone to the amphibolite facies. He also distinguished three main tectono-metamorphic domains from south-west to north-east: the internal, intermediate and external domains. Towards the eastern part of external domain, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      [21]
     </xref> recognised the Niari-Nyanga foreland basin. Based on petro-structural analyses of rock exposures in the Mayombe Chain, the existence of the only Pan-African cycle with an intra-cratonic geodynamic setting was admitted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-24">
      [24]
     </xref>. He also identified a third deformation phase related to the Pan-African tectono-thermal event, whereas previous studies only mentioned two phases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      [21]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Contribution of Available Geochronological Data</title>
    <p>Earlier lithostratigraphic schemes and arguments presented above have been focused upon outcrop observations, but did not integrate geochronological data. This lack of geochronological data has maintained uncertainty in the interpretation of the evolutionary context of the Congolese part of the West Congo Belt. However, geological works carried out from the early 1980s to the late 1990s resulted in the acquisition of diverse geochronological data, which provided first constraints to the revision of lithostratigraphy framework and to revisit the tectonic history of this part of the West Congo Belt.</p>
    <p>The first available age of Mayombe formation was given in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-68">
      <a href="#ref68">[68]</a>
     </xref> from the Les Saras granodiorite. Age of 1376 ± 14 Ma was found based on the Pb/α on zircons method. This Mesoproterozoic age helped <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      [23]
     </xref> to suggest that Les Saras calc-alkaline granitoid was evidence of plutonism related to subduction that occurred before the collision of western Archean cratonic blocks (Chaillu and Kasaï) and eastern Paleoproterozoic crustal landmass (Guéna, Doussa, Kimezian and basement Complex respectively located in Congo, Gabon, DRC and Angola) at 1 Ga time. Therefore, the Mayombe Chain was interpreted as formed by the closure of an oceanic basin through subduction processes with the emplacement of ophiolitic complexes. Two main tectonic phases have been described as accommodating West Congolian deformations:</p>
    <p>(i) Bambian or Mayumbian phase at 1 Ga (Kibarian)</p>
    <p>(ii) Tchibanguian or West congolian phase at 0.6 Ga (Pan-African)</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Lithostratigraphic subdivisions of the Mayombe chain, with different orogenic systems marked by a major unconformity (red wavy line) modified after <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-24">
        [24]
       </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-30">
        <a href="#ref30"></a>
        <a href="#ref30">[30]</a>
       </xref> (redraw from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
        <a href="#ref41"></a>
        <a href="#ref41"></a>
        <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802599-rId16.jpeg?20241225020654" />
    </fig>
    <p>At this stage, the lithostratigraphy of the Mayombe Chain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>) is almost fixed based on the correlation of lithologies and structures with the neighbouring regions where geochronological analyses have been involved <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-68">
      [68]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-72">
      [72]
     </xref>. However, the age of 1376 Ma, on which <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      [23]
     </xref> based their geodynamic model of the chain, was obtained using the Pb/α method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-73">
      [73]
     </xref>, which was very popular in the 1950s but has since proved obsolete.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. A Growing Body of Isotopic Data: Controversy over the Vellutini et al. (1983) Model</title>
    <p>The development of new techniques for the analysis of samples by mass spectrometry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-74">
      [74]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-76">
      [76]
     </xref> and the integration of cathodoluminescence (CL) or backscattered electron (BSE) imaging have made it possible to significantly improve age calculation methods with a certain degree of precision. For example, the isotope dilution analysis method (ID-TIMS) was used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-29">
      [29]
     </xref> to date the Guéna orthogneiss and the Mfoubou granite. Geochronological data brought out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-29">
      [29]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-32">
      [32]
     </xref> on Guéna gneiss and Mfoubou granite gave respectively ages of 2014 ± 56 Ma and 1050 ± 25 Ma for these lithounits. The first one confirmed Paleoproterozoic emplacement of Guéna basement as assumed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      [23]
     </xref>. However, the second one was a matter of discussion because Mfoubou granite displays the same petrographic features as Mont Kanda granite, which has been considered equivalent to Les Saras granodiorite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      [23]
     </xref>. The alkaline composition of this granite allowed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-29">
      [29]
     </xref> to suggest that there was no collisional setting in the Mayombe chain area at the end of the Mesoproterozoic period (1 Ga). Alkaline magmatism was evidence of an extensive dynamic during this time and attested that Mfoubou granite and Mont Kanda are anorogenic. Moreover, the redating of Les Saras granodiorite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-30">
      <a href="#ref30"></a>
      <a href="#ref30"></a>
      <a href="#ref30">[30]</a>
     </xref> brought the age of 2000 ± 80 Ma for this calc-alkaline granitoid, which was considered as Paleoproterozoic and older than its country rocks represented by Loukoula series or Ncessé series (=Loukoula + Moute series; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      [23]
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-31">
      <a href="#ref31">[31]</a>
     </xref> proposed, based on the new age of the Les Saras granodiorite, that the inner part of the West Congo Belt may correspond to an Eburnean laminar belt with a marginal basin where the Bikossi and Ncessé formations were deposited. Also, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
      [39]
     </xref> made a synthetic structural approach and identified the presence of an Eburnean cycle (2 Ga), pre-Pan-African within-plate magmatism (1 Ga), and Neoproterozoic Pan-African orogeny (0.6 Ga). Thus, the Following lithostratigraphic subdivision was proposed for the West Congo Belt in the Republic of Congo, including from the base to the top: i) the polycyclic tonalitic gneiss of Guéna; ii) the leptyno-amphibolitic Group of the Bikossi; iii) the schists and greywackes of the Loukoula Group; iv) the schists of the Mvouti Group; v) the conglomeratic Group of the Mossouva; vi) the Louila Group with the Lower and Upper diamictite; and vii) the Schisto-calcaire Group and the Mpioka molasse.</p>
    <p>An assessment of the available outcrop and geochronological data by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-77">
      <a href="#ref77">[77]</a>
     </xref> has led to the geological map of Congo, which presented the Mayombe Chain and significant revision of previous interpretations, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4A">
      Figure 4A
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-46">
      <a href="#ref46">[46]</a>
     </xref> gave additional structural data and lithostratigraphic constraints for geologic record of the Mayombe Chain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4B">
      Figure 4B
     </xref>) which he divided into tree structural domains named internal, central and eastern domains. Finally, in the light of the available vintage and sparse geochronological data, this author has suggested reassessment of the existing interpretations for the tectonic evolution of the West Congo belt. Therefore, two orogenic events have been identified in the Mayombe Chain: i) a Paleoproterozoic event (c. 2000 Ma), evidenced by the Guéna basement and Les Saras granodiorite, and ii) a Pan-African event (c. 600 Ma).</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Mayombe Chain lithostratigraphic subdivisions including geochronological data according: A) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-77">
        [77]
       </xref>, B) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
        [39]
       </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-46">
        [46]
       </xref> and C) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
        [36]
       </xref> showing important reorganisation for the basal units (ante-Mvouti) and underline the main Mesoproterozoic hiatus.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802599-rId17.jpeg?20241225020654" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. New Lithostratigraphic Subdivisions</title>
    <p>In 2015, as part of geological mapping program of Congo initiated by the “Ministère de la Géologie et des Mines” in partnership with Total E&amp;P, French geological survey (BRGM) teams <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-33">
      <a href="#ref33">[33]</a>
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      <a href="#ref38">[38]</a>
     </xref> presented new useful geological and geochronological constraints on the geology of the Mayombe Chain and Niari-Nyanga Basin; These recent data provided insight into the structure of Congolese part of West Congo Belt and permitted better understanding of its lithostratigraphy and metamorphic evolution. They have recently published efficient bedrock maps of the Mayombe Chain and Niari-Nyanga Basin with structural interpretations and refined lithostratigraphy. As noted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-46">
      [46]
     </xref>, these authors confirmed that the Congolese part of the West Congo Belt is structurally subdivided into four tectono-metamorphic domains, separated by crustal-scale structures, including (from west to east): the Western (WMC), Eastern (EMC), Central (CMC) Mayombe Chain and the Niari Basin (NB), which are characterized by distinct rock suites. Furthermore, In the light of new isotopic constraints, these authors have in fact presented a revised stratigraphic column for this part of West Congo Belt, comprising two temporarily distinct stratigraphic Supergroups, named Loémé and West Congolian Supergroups placed between the Archean- and Paleoproterozoic and the Neoproterozoic and lowermost Cambrian respectively, which in turn are subdivided into different stratigraphic units (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4C">
      Figure 4C
     </xref>), as described below by age range.</p>
    <p>The western domain, corresponding to the internal domain of the chain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      [21]
     </xref>, is complexly structured and comprises Paleoproterozoic basement terranes of the Loémé Supergroup stacked with Early Neoproterozoic rocks belonging to West Congolian Supergroup. The Paleoproterozoic basement terranes consisting of the Loémé Supergroup have been divided into three groups named the Loukoula Group, the Bilinga metatonalitic suite and the Bikossi Group.</p>
    <p>The Loukoula Group is composed of schists, amphibolites, quartzites and gneisses that were intruded by the Bilinga suite. Detrital zircons reveal a maximum deposition age of 2111 ± 14 Ma <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The Bilinga suite consists of three Eburnean-aged gneissic meta-plutonic massifs: Bilala metatonalite dated at 2014 ± 56 Ma (U-Pb on zircon, ID-TIMS, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-29">
      [29]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-32">
      [32]
     </xref> and 2048 ± 12 Ma (U/Pb on zircon, SIMS, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>; Bilinga metatonalite with emplacement age of 2028 ± 12 Ma and Les Saras granodiorite dated at 2000 ± 80 Ma (ID-TIMS, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-30">
      <a href="#ref30"></a>
      <a href="#ref30">[30]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-31">
      [31]
     </xref>) and 2038 ± 10 Ma (SIMS, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The Bikossi Group, previously known as the Bikossi series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      [19]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      <a href="#ref21">[21]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      <a href="#ref23">[23]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-24">
      [24]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-29">
      [29]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-30">
      <a href="#ref30"></a>
      <a href="#ref30">[30]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
      [39]
     </xref>, was defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      [23]
     </xref> as comprising of two parts: (i) a strongly deformed set mostly composed of biotite and garnet gneisses, micaceous quartzites, metagabbroic rocks and graphitic schists, and (ii) a group mainly composed of basic rocks and some intercalations of chloritic mica schists with garnet. Recent works carried out by the French geological survey teams <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref> have led to the splitting of the Bikossi series into two different lithostratigraphic units (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4C">
      Figure 4C
     </xref> and ). These authors have shown that the Bikossi Group corresponds to the metapelitic and meta-quartzitic sequence of the ancient Bikossi series, while the Nemba Basic Complex corresponds to a metabasic sequence made of amphibolites, epidotites, gabbros and chlorite-schists. U-Pb dating detrital zircon from the metasedimentary rocks of Bikossi Group by SHRIMP method yields an age of sources ranging between 3.08 and 2.04 Ga <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref> and 2.20 to 2.00 Ga <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
      [13]
     </xref>, indicating a maximum age of deposition at about 2 Ga. However, zircons from a metagabbro attributed to the Nemba Basic Complex have provided a Neoproterozoic age (915 ± 8 Ma, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>) which has been interpreted as a syn-rift emplacement of gabbro. This Neoproterozoic age allows linking the Nemba Basic Complex to the West Congolian Supergroup.</p>
    <p>Numerous large granitic intrusions, including the better known the Mfoubou and Mont Kanda granites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      [19]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-28">
      [28]
     </xref>, are identified as cutting across the Paleoproterozoic basement rocks of Loémé Supergroup. The Mfoubou Granite was dated at 1050 ± 25 Ma (U-Pb zircon, ID-TIMS: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-29">
      [29]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-32">
      [32]
     </xref>) whereas the Mont Kanda Granite has provided ages of 928 to 932 Ma (U-Pb zircon, LA-ICP-MS: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref>). Similar granites are known southeastwards in the Democratic Republic of Congo (e.g. Noqui Granite: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-9">
      <a href="#ref9">[9]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-71">
      <a href="#ref71">[71]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-78">
      [78]
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The central and eastern domains are characterised by northern verging thrust-folded deformations formed at the end of the late Ediacaran phase of deformations. They correspond to a fold-and-thrust belt overthrusting the foreland basin and are essentially constituted of Neoproterozoic generally weakly to moderately metamorphic, deformed rocks of the West Congolian Supergroup, including two key marker horizons, namely the Lower and Upper Tillite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
      [13]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref>. The Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks have been interpreted as deposited in a rift <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-26">
      [26]
     </xref> and/or a passive margin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The syn-rift sequences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> are represented by the Sounda Group which contains from bottom to top, the Nemba Basic Complex, the Kakamoeka and Mvouti Subgroups. The Nemba Basic Complex comprises metagabbros, metabasalts, amphibolites, and greenschists. The Kakamoeka Subgroup is made up of conglomerates, quartzites, graphitic schists, ignimbrites, rhyolites, tuffs, metabasic rocks, whose equivalent is dated between 920 ± 8 Ma and 917 ± 14 Ma in the DRC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-9">
      <a href="#ref9">[9]</a>
     </xref>. The Mvouti Subgroup comprised chlorite-schists, black schists, quartzites, meta-sandstones and meta-arkoses.</p>
    <p>The post-rift sequences are represented by the Mayombe Group which contains, from bottom to top, the Mossouva Subgroup, the Lower Tillite Formation and the Louila Subgroup. The Mossouva Subgroup is made up of quartzites and schists. The Lower Tillite is a glaciogenic or a mudflow deposit constituted by black calcareous shale matrix containing heterogeneous, heterometric and heteromorphic pebbles and boulders. The Louila Subgroup is made up of meta-sandstones, locally conglomeratic, quartzites, quartzo-schists and schists with intercalation of limestones and calcschists <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      [19]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-26">
      [26]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>In the Niari-Nyanga basin, the Lower Tillite is overlain by the Louila sub-group which in turn is overlaid in regional unconformity by the glaciogenic deposits of the Niari Group, also known as the Niari Tillite, which consist mainly of gravity deposits. These deposits are associated with the Marinoan glaciation that developed at the end of the Cryogenian <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-79">
      [79]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-80">
      [80]
     </xref>. They are covered by calcareous-dolomitic carbonate deposits of the Schisto-calcaire Group, deposited in a shallow environment favourable to the development of gypsum-type evaporites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-81">
      [81]
     </xref> and in an extensive context <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-82">
      <a href="#ref82">[82]</a>
     </xref>. The whole has been involved in Pan-African compressional dynamics.</p>
    <p>Structurally, the Neoproterozoic sequences are deformed by open, upright folds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>) whose NW-SE trending axes can be followed along strike for more than one hundred km. A few NE-verging thrusts are also recognised, and this association of structures defines the frontal fold-and-thrust belt of the Pan-African Mayombe orogen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      [21]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-26">
      [26]
     </xref>. In the innermost portions of this sequence, a penetrating schistosity, which is axial-plane to the large-scale folds, can be observed in the less competent layers. The more competent layers, like the quartzite formations, exhibit flexural slip, and lack penetrative schistosity. The metamorphic grade is consistently very low (chlorite grade, or lower), with a grading to anchizonal in the adjacent Niari-Nyanga basin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-"></xref>The Mpioka Group, which comprises the last terms of the West Congolian Supergroup, was previously described as a flysch <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> and it is currently considered to be the molasse of the chain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-9">
      <a href="#ref9">[9]</a>
     </xref>. It consists of silico-clastic conglomeratic sediments at the base and sandstone-pelitic sediments at the top. The detrital micas in this group have been dated between 580 - 500 Ma <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref>. Similarly, the detrital zircons have given major age peaks between 500 - 800 Ma and 900 - 1200 Ma <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
      [13]
     </xref>, testifying to an almost Cambrian evolution.</p>
    <p>In addition to the refinement of lithostratigraphy subdivisions, French geological survey teams have added important information on tectono-metamorphic history</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Cross sections represented structural architecture of Mayombe Chain with variance in style of deformation and lithostratigraphy in the Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic units according to A) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
        [39]
       </xref>: The Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic units accommodate Pan-African fold style as a result of NE-SW compressive constrains. S1 and S2 correspond to two main phases of schistosity related to the Pan-African event. Red lines correspond to faults mainly represented by thrusts within the chain and B) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
        [36]
       </xref>: Foliation in the Paleoproterozoic Loukoula Group is flat and Neoproterozoic Mfoubou granite seems not to accommodate the Pan-African global style of the chain. Main difference occurs also on the constitution of Bikossi Group (yellow) and Nemba Basic Complex (green).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802599-rId18.jpeg?20241225020654" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. Simplified cross-section of the Mayombe Chain (modified from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-63">
        <a href="#ref63">[63]</a>
       </xref>) showing structural architecture and metamorphic evolution of mineral assemblages from the western domain to the central domain depending on the Eburnean and Pan-African tectono-themal events. Paleoproterozoic units (Loémé Group, Loukoula Group and Les Saras metagranodiorite) are affected by both events while only Pan-African style of deformation is recorded in Bikossi Group (yellow) + Nemba Basic Complex (green), Mfoubou granite and the folded Neoproterozoic successions (grey) marked by northeast verging folds with axial plane schistosity. Abbreviation meaning: Gp—Group, Grt—Garnet (1 &amp; 2 = first and second generation of garnets), Bt—Biotite, Ms—Muscovite, Cld—Chloritoid, Chl—Chlorite, Ab—Albite, Ill—Illite.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2802599-rId19.jpeg?20241225020654" />
    </fig>
    <p>of the Mayombe Chain and Niari-Nyanga basin. They revise and better constrain the timing of tectonic events that affected the Neoproterozoic and Early Paleozoic rocks of the West Congo Belt in the Republic of Congo. As stated by earlier workers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      [21]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-24">
      [24]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
      [39]
     </xref>, French geological survey teams have confirmed that the grade of metamorphism in the West Congo Belt decreases towards Northeastern. These authors also supported the commonly accepted interpretation of the Neoproterozoic geological units of the Mayombe Chain and Niari-Nyanga basin as being subjected to regional deformation and low-grade metamorphism related to the Late Neoproterozoic to Cambrian Pan-African orogenic event at 590 - 570 Ma (M1) and at 520 - 500 Ma (M2). However, they stated that a complex structural and stratigraphic history evolved in the Western domain of the Mayombe with multi-phases of superimposed orogenies. In fact, the Paleoproterozoic basement rocks within the Western domain of the Mayombe Chain have been demonstrated to be affected by the Eburnean Orogeny ca. 2091 ± 18 Ma and partly reworked by the Pan-African orogenic event.</p>
    <p>In addition to the work of the French Geological Survey, an effort has recently been made to investigate the metamorphic history of the Paleoproterozoic terranes within the Western domain of the Mayombe Chain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-63">
      <a href="#ref63">[63]</a>
     </xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-63">
      [63]
     </xref> have constructed a structural cross-section (). Thus, considering the garnet chemical zoning, grade of metamorphism and structural features, the Paleoproterozoic Metasedimentary rocks of the Loukoula Group defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> can be separated into two main parts from north to south, named respectively the Loukoula and Loémé Groups, which preserves evidence for the long-standing polycyclic metamorphic history presumably linked to the Eburnean and Pan-African-aged orogeneses. Ancient Eburnean metamorphic assemblages seem identical from south to north, and rocks display an upper amphibolite facies characteristic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-63">
      [63]
     </xref>. However, Pan-African overprinted Paleoproterozoic rocks have been recorded differently in these two parts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>). Conversely, these authors have assumed that the metasedimentary rocks of the Bikossi Group, previously interpreted as part of Eburnean terranes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>, underwent medium pressure-temperature (MP-MT) conditions (4 - 6 kbar; 500˚C - 600˚C) related to transitional even amphibolite facies during Pan-African Orogeny and appear not to have been subjected to the Eburnean orogenic effects. However, it is pointed out that these observations are not supported by the available U-Pb radiometric age data, and so the previous model of interpretations cannot yet be replaced.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>A wide range of published literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
     [14]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
     [21]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
     [23]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-28">
     [28]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-32">
     [32]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
     [36]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
     [38]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
     [39]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
     <a href="#ref41"></a>
     <a href="#ref41"></a>
     <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-46">
     [46]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-59">
     <a href="#ref59">[59]</a>
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-63">
     [63]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-82">
     [82]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-84">
     [84]
    </xref> is available describing the geological setting of the Mayombe Chain and Niari-Nyanga basin which are collectively referred to as the portion of the West Congo Belt developed along the western margin of the Congo craton. In fact, over time, the Mayombe Chain and its foreland basin Niari-Nyanga have revealed a dual interest: i) their lithological assemblages host diverse mineralisation with economic implications, and ii) the chain represents a piece of the grand puzzle that allows the reconstruction and understanding of Precambrian lithospheric plate dynamics. The first phase of exploration in this part of the West Congo Belt was motivated by mineral exploitation and opened a window for mapping and petrographic description. The second phase, which is still ongoing, has focused on the scientific aspects of its formation and evolution through geological time.</p>
   <p>By the 1980s, the concept of plate tectonics was established, and some questions were raised to better understand the evolutionary dynamics of the Earth. Questions arose about the formation of the Earth’s inner mantle, mountain ranges and the absorption of former oceanic areas. The West Congo Belt and its Counterparts in Brazil proved to be an ideal case study to answer these questions. The synthesis of various studies carried out in these belts pointed to many contradictory opinions in the literature about the extent and age, tectonic environment, geological meaning of rock units composing this part of the west Congo. Therefore, contradictory stratigraphic subdivision schemes exist and are often based on geological fieldworks and little long-distance geochronological constraints.</p>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. An Updated Lithostratigraphic Framework</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-"></xref>There is general agreement that the Congolese portion of the West Congo Belt is constituted of Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic to Cambrian terranes showing various degrees of metamorphism from upper amphibolite to greenschist facies even anchizone, which occur in four major structural domains known as the Niari-Nyanga Basin (NB), Eastern (EMC), Central (CMC) and Western (WMC) Mayombe Chain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
      [13]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-24">
      [24]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-26">
      [26]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-27">
      [27]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-31">
      [31]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-63">
      [63]
     </xref>. However, the tectonostratigraphic reconstruction of the geological record of this part of the west Congo Belt has historically been very problematic and variously defined in terms of lithostratigraphic subdivision and associated nomenclature of rock units. Amongst existing lithostratigraphic subdivisions, the arguments have largely been based on field-based geological observations, but rarely chronostratigraphic data. For this reason, the stratigraphic positions and ages of rock units have been much debated.</p>
    <p>Initially, the earliest workers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      [19]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-20">
      [20]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-66">
      [66]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-67">
      [67]
     </xref> presented different reconstructions of the lithostratigraphy of Congolese part of composing four, three or two distinct lithostratigraphic systems, separated by major unconformities, each of which was thought to represent an orogenic cycle which was poorly age-constrained. Other authors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      <a href="#ref21">[21]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      <a href="#ref23">[23]</a>
     </xref> proposed contrasting lithostratigraphic subdivisions. Contrary to earlier lithostratigraphic reconstructions, in their stratigraphic reconstructions, the entirety of rocks recorded in Mayombe Chain and Niari-Nyanga basin, except the Guéna basement, is assumed to be considered as one main tectonostratigraphic system, defined as West Congolian Geosyncline by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref>, or as the West Congolian system by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      [21]
     </xref> or as the Mayombe Chain by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      [23]
     </xref>. Gross differences between these previous lithostratigraphy subdivisions are likely the result of lacking radiometric age constraints. As a result, these previous subdivisions into several or single lithostratigraphic systems are inconsistent or less reliable. Some of the hypotheses and lithostratigraphic subdivisions have been based on petrographic correlation with neighbouring geological units of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) or Angola <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      <a href="#ref21">[21]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      <a href="#ref23">[23]</a>
     </xref>. Studies combining petro-structural and geochronological approaches have not been widely integrated and have mainly been carried out on restricted units <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-29">
      <a href="#ref29">[29]</a>
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-32">
      <a href="#ref32">[32]</a>
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Over the last 10 years, however, new field observations and modern absolute dating have raised in Mayombe Chain and Niari-Nyanga basin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
      [13]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-33">
      [33]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-35">
      [35]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
     </xref>. A growing body of isotopic data has led to redrawing the lithostratigraphic subdivision and associated nomenclature of the chain based on geochronological and structural data and allowed clear regional correlations to be produced between this part of the West Congo Belt and neighbouring countries (Gabon, Democratic Republic of Congo and Angola). In fact, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> has published a robust and age-constrained Tectono-Stratigraphy scheme for this part of the West Congo Belt that has been the definition of new rock units and a revision of formation age, and nomenclature for many. One of significant advances with this new lithostratigraphy has been the recognition of younger detrital zircons of c. 2111 Ma that facilitates the definition of maximum depositional ages of the oldest basement rocks in the Mayombe chain older than the age of magmatism of its intruding orthogneiss of the Bilinga Suite dated at 2065 ± 13 Ma and 2028 ± 12 Ma, which constrain the minimum age in these basement rocks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
     </xref>. Based on these additional age constraints, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> proposed to include all Paleoproterozoic polycyclic metasedimentary rocks outcropping in the Western domain, previously documented as Guéna basement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      <a href="#ref21">[21]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      <a href="#ref23">[23]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-24">
      [24]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-32">
      [32]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-59">
      [59]
     </xref> into the Loukoula Group <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>. They also supported the commonly accepted interpretation of these basement rocks as a relic of the Eburnean context.</p>
    <p>Another significant advance has been the better definition of lithostratigraphic status of metasedimentary rock and metabasites overlying the basement rocks of the Loukoula (former Guéna) which was controversial due to the absence of geochronological data. Historically, these metasedimentary rocks and metabasites have been grouped within the Bikossi Group <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
      [39]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-46">
      [46]
     </xref> or the Bikossi Series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      [19]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      <a href="#ref21">[21]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      <a href="#ref23">[23]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-67">
      [67]
     </xref>. Some earlier workers consider these rock units to be part of the Pre-Mayombian system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      [19]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      <a href="#ref21">[21]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      <a href="#ref23">[23]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-67">
      [67]
     </xref>, whereas others have assigned them to the Eburnean basement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-39">
      [39]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-46">
      [46]
     </xref>. However, new geochronological data have improved age constraint of stratigraphic units. In fact, reliable ages for the siliciclastic metasedimentary rock of the Bikossi and their overlying metabasites have recently been determined <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-13">
      [13]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
     </xref>. Thus, the maximum depositional age of siliciclastic metasedimentary rocks belonging to the Bikossi Group is now constrained by detrital zircon geochronology dated at 1971 ± 40 Ma (Paleoproterozoic). This date is significantly older than U-Pb crystallization age of 915 ± 8 Ma obtained from zircons of the overlying metabasites, suggesting that it post-dates the Eburnean event and pre-dates Tonian rift magmatism <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>. These new geochronological constraints clearly show that the Bikossi Group and Nemba Basic Complex belong to two distinct tectonostratigraphic units. Thus, the Bikossi Group is assumed to be part of the Paleopoterzoic Loémé Supergroup while Nemba Basic Complex is assigned to the lower part of the West Congolian Supergroup <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>. Moreover, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>, the Paleoproterozoic allochthonous supracrustal metasedimentary rock of the Bikossi Group can be correlated with the rocks of the Paleoproterozoic Francevillian Group of the eastern Gabon.</p>
    <p>Additionally, the newly acquired geochronological data, combined with field observations, enabled mapping of metavolcanics and granitoids which are coeval with U-Pb metabasite ages discussed above, linked to the early Neoproterozoic rifting phase. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref> generated U-Pb zircon ages at 912 ± 7 Ma from bimodal metavolcanic rocks assigned to the Kakamoéka Subgroup. In turn, age constraints of the coeval granitoids have been refined through U-Pb isotopic dating of zircon yielding an age of 932 ± 8.3 Ma. These additional age constraints allowed the modification of the lithostratigraphic subdivision of the Proterozoic geological record of the Mayombe Chain. These newly documented Early Neoproterozoic metavolcanics and coeval metabasite of the Nemba Basic Complex and granitoid intrusions are grouped into a single lithostratigraphic units named the Sounda Group which is considered as the equivalent, in composition and age, of the Gangila meta-basalts from the Zadinian and the Mayumbian Group at DRC part of the West Congo Belt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-45">
      [45]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-71">
      [71]
     </xref>. Furthermore, a comparison of previous lithostratigraphic reconstructions revealed that the lithostratigraphic subdivision from the Mossouva subgroup to the Mpioka Group has remained almost unchanged for decades.</p>
    <p>More generally, recent works have clearly shown that the stratigraphic record of the Congolese portion of the West Congo Belt can be divided into two main tectono-lithostratigraphic intervals known as the Loémé and West Congolian Supergroups of Paleoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic to Cambrian in age, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>. The tectono-stratigraphy of the West Congolian Supergroup is relatively well known. This Supergroup comprises a succession of igneous, clastic rocks and carbonates that is formally divided into five tectono-lithostratigraphic units defined as groups, including the Sounda, Mayombe, Niari, Schisto-calcaire and Mpioka groups. Comparatively, little is known about the lithostratigraphy and associated structure of the Paleoproterozoic autochthonous basement terranes overlain by the Bikossi Group formations made up of allochthonous supracrustal rocks belonging to the Loémé Supergroup.</p>
    <p>Besides, there is generally well-defined boundary between the stratigraphic units, and this new toctono-lithstratigraphic reconstruction is limited by the sparsity of available geochronological data.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Tectonic History: Single Orogeny versus Multiple Orogeny</title>
    <p>Amongst existing research concerning the geology of the West Congo Belt has focused on its structure and lithostratigraphy, but rarely on its geodynamic history. Nonetheless, it is known that the present configuration of the West Congo Belt is the result of a complex succession of tectonic processes involving rifting, subduction, and collision phases. There is general agreement that the intensity of the deformation and metamorphism grade in the West Congo Belt decreases northwards. However, there is no consensus on the interpretation and dating of deformation and metamorphic events that affected the Congolese part of the West Congo Belt. Therefore, different geodynamic models have been proposed to depict the number or sequence of orogenic events that have affected the geological record in the Congolese part of the West Congo Belt, and the different scenarios of the tectono-metamorphic history. Some earlier workers argued for a scenario of multiple orogenies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-19">
      [19]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-20">
      [20]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-65">
      [65]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-67">
      [67]
     </xref>. These authors differentiated at least three orogenies in the evolution of West Congo Belt. Contrary to predictions of the multiple orogeny Hypothesis, subsequent authors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-21">
      <a href="#ref21">[21]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-23">
      <a href="#ref23">[23]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-24">
      [24]
     </xref> point to late Neoproterozoic to early Paleozoic collision during the Pan-African orogeny as the single tectonic event recorded in the entire West Congo Belt, expect in the Guéna basement. However, recent works done in Congo provided new contexts for understanding the tectono-thermal events in the West Congo Belt. These works gave increasing credence to the scenario of multiple orogenies. These authors claimed that the West Congo Belt was developed by a sequence of superposed regional orogenic events linked to the Eburnean and Pan-African collisions, which influenced its structural (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>), stratigraphic, and metamorphic evolutions. A similar scenario of multi-phases of superimposed two orogenic events has been proposed to explain the geodynamic evolution of Araçuaí Mobile Belt in Southeastern Brazil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-85">
      [85]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-86">
      [86]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>In summary, two main tectonic pulses influenced the formation of the West Congo Belt. U-Pb ages on zircon and Ar-Ar ages on biotite, muscovite and amphibole in the Loémé, Loukoula and Bikossi groups show that the Paleoproterozoic units of the Mayombe Chain have been affected by both the Eburnian orogeny (c. 2000 Ma) and the Pan-African orogeny (c. 640 - 496 Ma) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
     </xref>. Eburnian metamorphism is recorded in the upper amphibolite facies with garnet-biotite-oligoclase assemblage in the metapelites and plagioclase-brown hornblende in the metabasites of the Loémé Supergroup. These Eburnian units were subsequently involved in the rifting process associated with the break-up of Rodinia around 1 Ga <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref>, giving rise to the West Congolian Basin, in which the magmatic and sedimentary rocks of the West Congolian Supergroup were emplaced and deposited. These rocks were subsequently metamorphosed and deformed at the end of the Neoproterozoic-Early Paleozoic during the Pan-African Orogeny, leading to the assembly of western Gondwana <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-8">
      [8]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref>. The Pan-African Orogeny affected the pre-existing Eburnian units and induced metamorphism characterised by a gradient perpendicular to the chain, increasing towards the west-south-west and recorded differently in the Loémé and Loukoula Groups <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-63">
      [63]
     </xref>. In the former, the mineralogical assemblages are garnet-biotite-oligoclase with an overgrowth of new generations of garnet (Grt1) on old ones (Grt2), while in the latter, the Pan-African paragenesis is of low-grade made of chlorite-albite-epidote. The Bikossi Group shows garnet-chloritoid-chlorite-muscovite assemblages in a monocyclic evolutionary context, taking into account garnet growth zoning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-63">
      [63]
     </xref>. All the constituent units of the West Congolian Basin (Sounda Group, Mayombe Group, Niari Group and Schisto-calcaire Group) were only affected by the Pan-African orogeny <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-38">
      [38]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-41">
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41"></a>
      <a href="#ref41">[41]</a>
     </xref>. The deposition of the siliciclastic formations of the Mpioka Group marks the breakdown of the chain in early Paleozoic time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-9">
      <a href="#ref9">[9]</a>
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-36">
      [36]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusions</title>
   <p>The Congolese portion of the West Congo Belt has a long history of geological investigations dating back to the 1950s that provided the essential basis for understanding its geologic setting. According to these previous works, this part of the West Congo is composed of four major tectono-metamorphic domains from west to east, including the Western (WMC), Eastern (EMC) and Central (CMC) Mayombe Chain, and Niari-Nyanga Basin (NB), that are characterized by distinct rock suites. Although the structural, lithostratigraphic and metamorphic characteristics of this part of the West Congo are becoming better constrained with more precise isotopic ages, its historical setting has been told in many ways and is evolving with recent work in geologic mapping and academic research. This contribution provides a review of the existing literature on the geology of the West Congo Belt in Congo and provides summaries and syntheses for its structural and lithostratigraphy framework and metamorphic evolution. It led to the following conclusions:</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-"></xref>Despite knowledge gained from the recent research, there are still some fundamental questions remaining related to the chain’s structuring and evolution, particularly i) the age of Eburnean metamorphism, ii) the relationship between the Bikossi Group and the Nemba Basic Complex, which has always constituted the unique Bikossi series of ancient authors, and which as we see on the map of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-33">
     [33]
    </xref> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>) are folded together. This question leads to that of the great Mesoproterozoic hiatus in the West Congo Belt from Gabon to the DRC. The Bikossi Group and the Nemba Basic Complex were differentiated based on the ages obtained from detrital zircons and an intrusive gabbro, respectively. The nature of these samples provides several possibilities for considering these ages.</p>
   <p>The interpretation of structural characteristics of the Western domain is more complex due to the Pan-African overprint of Eburnean units. The complexity of its deformation has left numerous questions regarding its tectonic and metamorphic evolution unresolved, providing rich avenues for future research. One of these issues concerns the spatial distribution of rock units in this domain, their internal stratigraphy, geochemistry, and geochronology, which remain ambiguous and need to be addressed to create a more comprehensive view of West Congo Belt evolution. The influence of the Pan-African tectono-metamorphic overprinting Eburnean basement structures needs to be better defined through more efficient mapping with detailed structural, stratigraphic and geochronological analyses.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138427-"></xref>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors would like to thank Total E&amp;P Congo for having enabled them to carry out this work by financing the first author’s thesis. Unconditional gratitude to Geosciences Rennes, from which a large part of these considerations originated. Thanks to the geologists of the BRGM for their involvement in clarifying the geology of the Mayombe chain. For material support, we thank our administrative authorities. Thanks to the reviewers for improving the quality of this paper.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Engel, A.E.J. (1963) Geologic Evolution of North America. Science, 140, 143-152. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1126/science.140.3563.143 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Engel, A.E.J. and Kelm, D.L. (1972) Pre-Permian Global Tectonics: A Tectonic Test. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 83, Article 2325. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1972)83[2325:pgtatt]2.0.co;2 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhu, R., Zhao, G., Xiao, W., Chen, L. and Tang, Y. (2021) Origin, Accretion, and Reworking of Continents. Reviews of Geophysics, 59, 1-84. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2019rg000689 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pedrosa-Soares, A.C. and de Alkmim, F.F. (2011) How Many Rifting Events Preceded the Development of the Araçuaí-West Congo Orogen? Geonomos, 19, 244-251.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kröner, A. and Stern, R.J. (2005) Africa Pan-African Orogeny. In: Encyclopedia of Geology, Elsevier, 1-12. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-369396-9/00431-7 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kröner, A. (1977) The Precambrian Geotectonic Evolution of Africa: Plate Accretion versus Plate Destruction. Precambrian Research, 4, 163-213. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(77)90045-6 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Trompette, R. (1997) Neoproterozoic (∼600 Ma) Aggregation of Western Gondwana: A Tentative Scenario. Precambrian Research, 82, 101-112. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-9268(96)00045-9 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pedrosa-Soares, A. (2001) The Araã§uaã-West-Congo Orogen in Brazil: An Overview of a Confined Orogen Formed during Gondwanaland Assembly. Precambrian Research, 110, 307-323. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-9268(01)00174-7 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tack, L. (2001) Early Neoproterozoic Magmatism (1000-910 Ma) of the Zadinian and Mayumbian Groups (Bas-Congo): Onset of Rodinia Rifting at the Western Edge of the Congo Craton. Precambrian Research, 110, 277-306. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-9268(01)00192-9 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Alkmim, F.F., Marshak, S., Pedrosa-Soares, A.C., Peres, G.G., Cruz, S.C.P. and Whittington, A. (2006) Kinematic Evolution of the Araçuaí-West Congo Orogen in Brazil and Africa: Nutcracker Tectonics during the Neoproterozoic Assembly of Gondwana. Precambrian Research, 149, 43-64. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2006.06.007 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Noce, C.M., Pedrosa-Soares, A.C., da Silva, L.C., Armstrong, R. and Piuzana, D. (2007) Evolution of Polycyclic Basement Complexes in the Araçuaí Orogen, Based on U-Pb SHRIMP Data: Implications for Brazil-Africa Links in Paleoproterozoic Time. Precambrian Research, 159, 60-78. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2007.06.001 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nsungani, P.C. (2012) La chaîne panafricaine du Nord-Ouest de l’Angola: Etude pétrostructurale, géochimique et géochronologique. Implications géodynamiques. Université de Montpellier.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Affaton, P., Kalsbeek, F., Boudzoumou, F., Trompette, R., Thrane, K. and Frei, R. (2016) The Pan-African West Congo Belt in the Republic of Congo (Congo Brazzaville): Stratigraphy of the Mayombe and West Congo Supergroups Studied by Detrital Zircon Geochronology. Precambrian Research, 272, 185-202. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.10.020 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dadet, P. (1969) Notice explicative de la carte géologique de la République du Congo Brazzaville au 1/500 000e (zone comprise entre les parallèles 2˚ et 5˚ sud). Mémoires du Brgm, 70, 107.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Amstutz, A. (1929) Contribution à l’étude géologique du Congo français. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 149, 43-64.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Babet, V. (1928) Sur les roches cristallophylliennes du Mayombe (Afrique Equatoriale Française). Compte Rendu de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, 187, 348-350.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Babet, V. (1929) Etude géologique de la zone du chemin de fer Congo-Océan et de la région minière du Niari et du Djoué. Editions Larousse.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Babet, V. (1932) Observations géologiques dans la partie méridionale de l’Afrique Equatoriale Francaise: (Bassins du Niari, de la Nyanga, du Djoué et du Hayt Ogooné). Editions Larousse.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cosson, J. (1955) Notice explicative sur les feuilles de Pointe-Noire et de Brazzaville. Carte géologique de reconnaissance au 1/500000e. Direction des Mines et de la Géologie de l’Afrique Equatoriale Française.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dévigne, J.-P. (1959) Le précambrien du Gabon occidental en Afrique équatoriale française et régions limitrophes. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Clermont-Ferrand.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hossié, G. (1980) Contribution à l’étude structurale de la Chaîne Ouest-Congolienne (Pan-Africaine) dans le Mayombe congolais. Thèse 3e cycle. Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vicat, J.P. and Vellutini, P.J. (1982) Prolongement de la chaîne du Mayombe sous les terrains crétacé et pliopléistocène de la plaine côtière de Pointe-Noire. Compte Rendu de l’Académie de Sciences, 295, 501-504.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vellutini, P., Rocci, G., Vicat, J. and Gioan, P. (1983) Mise en évidence de complexes ophiolitiques dans la chaîne du Mayombe (Gabon-Angola) et nouvelle interprétation géotectonique. Precambrian Research, 22, 1-21. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(83)90056-6 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boudzoumou, F. (1986) La chaîne ouest-congolienne et son avant-pays au Congo: Relations avec le mayombien: Sédimentologie des séquences d’âge protérozoïque supérieur. Université d’Aix-Marseille.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vicat, J.P. and Gioan, P. (1988) La chaîne Précambrienne du Mayombe en République populaire du Congo: Géologie, métallogénie, perspective de développement. Revue des connaissances sur le Mayombe, 343, 17-45.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boudzoumou, F. and Trompette, R. (1988) La chaine panafricaine ouest-congolienne au Congo (Afrique equatoriale); un socle polycyclique charrie sur un domaine subautochtone forme par l’aulacogene du Mayombe et le bassin de l’Ouest-Congo. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 4, 889-896. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.iv.6.889 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vicat, J.P. and Vellutini, P.J. (1988) Géologie et géochimie de la série précambrienne de la Bikossi, le long du réalignement du chemin de fer congo-océan, dans la chaîne du Mayombe (République populaire du Congo). Journal of African Earth Sciences (and the Middle East), 7, 811-820. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(88)90024-3 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vicat, J. and Pouclet, A. (2000) Palæo and Neoproterozoic Granitoids and Rhyolites from the West Congolian Belt (Gabon, Congo, Cabinda, North Angola): Chemical Composition and Geotectonic Implications. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 31, 597-617. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-5362(00)80009-3 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Djama, L.-M. (1988) Le massif granitique de Mfoubou et le socle métamorphique de Guena (chaîne du Mayombe, Congo). Pétrologie-Géochimie-géochronologie. These de doctorat, Université de Nancy. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mpemba Boni, J. (1990) Contribution à l’étude du magmatisme anté-pan africain de la chaîne du Mayombe. L’exemple du Massif de Les Saras (SW du Congo, Afrique Centrale). Pétrologie structural-Géochimie-Géochronologie, Université de Nancy.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Maurin, J.C., Mpemba Boni, J., Pin, C. and Vicat, J.-P. (1990) La granodiorite de Les Saras, un témoin de magmatisme éburnéen (2 Ga.) au sein de la chaîne ouest-congolienne: Conséquences géodynamiques. Comptes Rendus—Academie des Sciences, 310, 571-575.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Djama, L.M., Leterrier, J. and Michard, A. (1992) Pb, Sr and Nd Isotope Study of the Basement of the Mayumbian Belt (Guena Gneisses and Mfoubou Granite, Congo): Implications for Crustal Evolution in Central Africa. Journal of African Earth Sciences (and the Middle East), 14, 227-237. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(92)90100-q 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Callec, Y., Lasseur, E., Gouin, J., Paquet, F., et al. (2015) Carte géologique de la République du Congo à 1/200000, feuille Pointe-noire. Editions BRGM.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Callec, Y., Lasseur, E., Le Bayon, B., et al. (2015) Notice explicative de la carte géologique de la République du Congo à 1/200000, Feuille Pointe-Noire. Editions BRGM.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fullgraf, T., Callec, Y., Gloaguen, E., Thiéblemont, D., et al. (2015) Carte géologique de la République du Congo à 1/200000, Feuille Dolisie. Editions BRGM.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fullgraf, T., Callec, Y., Thiéblemont, D., Gloaguen, E., et al. (2015) Notice explicative de la carte géologique à 1/200000 feuille Dolisie. Editions BRGM.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Le Bayon, B., Callec, Y., Fullgraf, T., Lasseur, E., et al. (2015) Notice explicative de la carte géologique de la République du Congo à 1/200 000, feuille Conkouati. Editions BRGM.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fullgraf, T., Callec, Y., Bauer, H., Boudzoumou, F., Charles, N., Gloaguen, E., et al. (2024) Structural Architecture and Metamorphism of the Mayombe Chain and Niari Basin (West Congo Belt) in Congo Brazzaville. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 220, Article 105369. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2024.105369 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Maurin, C., Boudzoumou, F., Djama, L.-M., et al. (1991) La chaine protérozoique ouest-congolienne et son avant pays au Congo: Nouvelles données géochronologiques et structurales, implications en Afrique centrale. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 312, 1327-1334.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Thiéblemont, D. (2016) Geological Map of Africa at 1:10M Scale, CGMW-BRGM.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bouenitela, V.T.T. (2019) Le domaine paléoprotérozoïque (éburnéen) de la chaîne du Mayombe (Congo-Brazzaville): Origine et évolution tectono-métamorphique. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Rennes.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Toteu, S.F., Van Schmus, W.R., Penaye, J. and Nyobé, J.B. (1994) U-Pb and Sm-N Evidence for Eburnian and Pan-African High-Grade Metamorphism in Cratonic Rocks of Southern Cameroon. Precambrian Research, 67, 321-347. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(94)90014-0 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Toteu, S.F., Penaye, J., Deloule, E., Van Schmus, W.R. and Tchameni, R. (2006) Diachronous Evolution of Volcano-Sedimentary Basins North of the Congo Craton: Insights from U-Pb Ion Microprobe Dating of Zircons from the Poli, Lom and Yaoundé Groups (Cameroon). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 44, 428-442. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.11.011 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nkoumbou, C., Barbey, P., Yonta-Ngouné, C., Paquette, J.L. and Villiéras, F. (2014) Pre-Collisional Geodynamic Context of the Southern Margin of the Pan-African Fold Belt in Cameroon. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 99, 245-260. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2013.10.002 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Franssen, L. and André, L. (1988) The Zadinian Group (Late Proterozoic, Zaire) and Its Bearing on the Origin of the West-Congo Orogenic Belt. Precambrian Research, 38, 215-234. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(88)90003-4 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Maurin, J.C. (1993) La chaîne panafricaine ouest-congolienne: Corrélation avec le domaine est-brésilien et hypothèse géodynamique. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 164, 51-60.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Frimmel, H.E., Tack, L., Basei, M.S., Nutman, A.P. and Boven, A. (2006) Provenance and Chemostratigraphy of the Neoproterozoic West Congolian Group in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 46, 221-239. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2006.04.010 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pedrosa-Soares, A.C., Noce, C.M., Vidal, P., Monteiro, R.L.B.P. and Leonardos, O.H. (1992) Toward a New Tectonic Model for the Late Proterozoic Araçuaí (SE Brazil)-West Congolian (SW Africa) Belt. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 6, 33-47. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-9811(92)90015-q 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Carlos Pedrosa-Soares, A., Vidal, P., Leonardos, O.H. and de Brito Neves, B.B. (1998) Neoproterozoic Oceanic Remnants in Eastern Brazil: Further Evidence and Refutation of an Exclusively Ensialic Evolution for the Araçuaí–West Congo Orogen. Geology, 26, 519-522. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026&lt;0519:norieb&gt;2.3.co;2 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pedrosa-Soares, A.C., Alkmim, F.F., Tack, L., Noce, C.M., Babinski, M., Silva, L.C., et al. (2008) Similarities and Differences between the Brazilian and African Counterparts of the Neoproterozoic Araçuaí-West Congo Orogen. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 294, 153-172. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1144/sp294.9 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Babinski, M., Pedrosa-Soares, A.C., Trindade, R.I.F., Martins, M., Noce, C.M. and Liu, D. (2012) Neoproterozoic Glacial Deposits from the Araçuaí Orogen, Brazil: Age, Provenance and Correlations with the São Francisco Craton and West Congo Belt. Gondwana Research, 21, 451-465. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2011.04.008 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schannor, M., Lana, C. and Fonseca, M.A. (2019) São Francisco-Congo Craton Break-Up Delimited by U-Pb-Hf Isotopes and Trace-Elements of Zircon from Metasediments of the Araçuaí Belt. Geoscience Frontiers, 10, 611-628. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.02.011 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pattison, S.R. (1883) Geology of the Congo. Nature, 28, 243-244. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/028243c0 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brousseau, G. (1886) Esquisse géologique sur le Congo et le Gabon. Bulletin de la Société des études Coloniales et Maritimes, 7, 255-259.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cholet, E. (1890) Exploration de Loango à Brazzaville. Oubangui-Sangha. Comptes Rendus de la Société Géographique de France, 455-463.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Barrat, M. (1894) Sur la géologie du Congo Français. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 119, 758-761.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Delhaye, F. and Sluys, M. (1920) Les grands traits de la tectonique du Congo occidental. Structure et stratigraphie du bassin schisto-calcareux. Note préliminaire. Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique, 43, 57-78.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lombard, J. (1928) Observations nouvelles sur les formations géologiques entre Brazzaville et la côte atlantique (Afrique Equatoriale Française). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 4, 333-340.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref59">
    <label>59</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gioan, P. and Vicat, J. (1987) Bilan géochronologique de la République Populaire du Congo. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 6, 215-220. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(87)90062-5 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref60">
    <label>60</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Joachim Djama, L.M., Matiaba Bazika, U.V., Boudzoumou, F. and Mouzeo, K. (2018) Petrology and Geodynamic Context of Metabasic Rocks of Nemba Complex in the West Congo Fold Belt (Republic of Congo). International Journal of Geosciences, 9, 1-18. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2018.91001 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref61">
    <label>61</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bazika, U.V.M., Bouénitela, V.T.T., Lekeba, N.M. and Boudzoumou, F. (2022) Petrology and Geochemistry of Loukounga Metabasites Rocks: Constraining the Geodynamic Context of Neoproterozoic Nemba Complex in the Mayombe Belt. Open Journal of Geology, 12, 919-946. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2022.1211044 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref62">
    <label>62</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Matiaba-Bazika, U.V., Lekeba Makamba, N., Bouénitela, V.T.T., Tchiguina, N.C.B., Miyouna, T. and Boudzoumou, F. (2024) Geochemical and Petrological Insights into the Neoproterozoic Moumba Metabasites: Implications for Crustal Processes in the West Congo Belt (Republic of Congo). Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 12, 1-29. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2024.122001 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref63">
    <label>63</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bouénitela, V., Ballèvre, M., Boudzoumou, F. and Kebi-Tsoumou, S.P.C. (2024) Garnet Chemical Zoning: A Clue for the Tectono-Metamorphic History of the Proterozoic Mayombe Chain (West Congo Belt), Congo-Brazzaville. Geological Magazine, 161, 1-21. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756824000232 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref64">
    <label>64</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lagotala, H. (1933) Formation continentale sous-jacente au calcaire du Niari (Congo français). Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, France, 194, 1235-1236.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref65">
    <label>65</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vincent, P.M. (1961) Etudes géologiques des bassins Loupévi et Mouimba. Rapport I.R.G.M, inédit, Brazzaville.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref66">
    <label>66</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vincent, P.M. (1965) Données nouvelles sur la stratigraphie du Mayombe congolais. Annales du Centre Enseignement Supérieur, 1, 81-90.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref67">
    <label>67</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Scolari, G. and Van Daalhoff, H. (1965) Le Précambrien de la chaîne congolaise du Mayombe; état des connaissances géologiques, le problème des orogenèses. Bulletin du Bureau de Recherche Géologique et Minière, 3, 163-181.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref68">
    <label>68</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bessoles, B., Cosson, J. and Roques, M. (1956) Age apparent de la diorite quartzite de Les Saras dans le Mayombe (AEF). Compte Rendu de la Société Géolique de France, 7, 86-87.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref69">
    <label>69</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bessoles, B. and Roques, M. (1959) Ages apparents par la méthode plomb-alpha de zircons extraits de roches cristallines d’Afrique Equatoriale Française et du Cameroun. In: Congreso Gelogico Internacional, Associacion de Sercicios geologicos Africanos, 35-37.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref70">
    <label>70</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Delhal, J. and Ledent, D. (1976) Age et évolution comparée des gneiss migmatitiques pré-zadiniens des régions de Boma et de Mpozo-Tombagadio (Bas-Zaire). Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique, 99, 165-187.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref71">
    <label>71</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cahen, L., Delhal, J. and Ledent, D. (1976) Chronologie de l’orogenèse ouest-congolienne (pan-africaine) et comportement isotopique de roches d’alcalinité différente dans la zone interne de l’orogène, au Bas-Zaïre. Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique, 89, 189-203.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref72">
    <label>72</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cahen, L., Kröner, A. and Ledent, D. (1979) The Age of the Vista Alegre Pluton and Its Bearing on the Reinterpretation of the Precambrian Geology of Northern Angola. Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique, 102, 265-275.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref73">
    <label>73</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Larsen, E.S., Keevil, N.B. and Harrison, H.C. (1952) Method for Determining the Age of Igneous Rocks Using the Accessory Minerals. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63, 1045-1052.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref74">
    <label>74</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tilton, G.R., Patterson, C.C., Brown, H., Inghram, M., Hayden, R., Hess, D. and Larsen Jr. (1955) Isotopic Composition and Distribution of Lead, Uranium and Thorium in a Precambrian Granite. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 66, 1131-1148.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref75">
    <label>75</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wetherill, G.W. (1956) Discordant Uranium-Lead Ages. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 37, 320-326.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref76">
    <label>76</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Krogh, T.E. (1973) A Low-Contamination Method for Hydrothermal Decomposition of Zircon and Extraction of U and Pb for Isotopic Age Determinations. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 37, 485-494. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(73)90213-5 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref77">
    <label>77</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Desthieux, F., Boudzoumou, F., Malounguila-Nganga, D., Diakubuka, E., Mouanda, Moumpossa, R.S., Ondongo, C., et al. (1993) Notice explicative de la carte géologique de la République du Congo au 1/1.000.000. Ministère des Mines et de L’énergie, Direction Générale des Mines, Brazzaville.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref78">
    <label>78</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Delhal, J., Ledent, D., Pasteels, P. and Venier, J. (1971) Étude du comportement isotopique de systèmes Rb/Sr et U/Pb dans le granite hyperalcalin de Noqui (République Démocratique du Congo et Angola). Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique, 94, 223-236.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref79">
    <label>79</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Halverson, G.P., Wade, B.P., Hurtgen, M.T. and Barovich, K.M. (2010) Neoproterozoic Chemostratigraphy. Precambrian Research, 182, 337-350. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2010.04.007 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref80">
    <label>80</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hoffman, P.F., Halverson, G.P., Domack, E.W., Maloof, A.C., Swanson-Hysell, N.L. and Cox, G.M. (2012) Cryogenian Glaciations on the Southern Tropical Paleomargin of Laurentia (NE Svalbard and East Greenland), and a Primary Origin for the Upper Russøya (Islay) Carbon Isotope Excursion. Precambrian Research, 206, 137-158. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2012.02.018 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref81">
    <label>81</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Trompette, R. and Boudzoumou, F. (1988) Palaeogeographic Significance of Stromatolitic Buildups on Late Proterozoic Platforms: The Example of the West Congo Basin. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 66, 101-112. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-0182(88)90083-1 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref82">
    <label>82</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mfere, A.P.A., Delpomdor, F., Proust, J., Boudzoumou, F., Callec, Y. and Préat, A. (2020) Facies and Architecture of the Scic Formation (Schisto-Calcaire Group), Republic of the Congo, in the Niari-Nyanga and Comba Subbasins of the Neoproterozoic West Congo Basin after the Marinoan Glaciation Event. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 166, Article 103776. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103776 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref83">
    <label>83</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boni, J.M. and Vellutini, P.J. (1992) Caractérisation géochimique des dykes basiques du massif de les Saras (Mayombe Congolais, Afrique Centrale): Conséquences géodynamiques. Journal of African Earth Sciences (and the Middle East), 14, 209-215. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(92)90098-w 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref84">
    <label>84</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vellutini, P. and Vicat, J. (1983) Sur l’origine des formations conglomératiques de base du géosynclinal ouest-congolien (Gabon, Congo, Zaïre, Angola). Precambrian Research, 23, 87-101. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-9268(83)80007-2 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref85">
    <label>85</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ledru, P., Johan, V., Milési, J.P. and Tegyey, M. (1994) Markers of the Last Stages of the Palaeoproterozoic Collision: Evidence for a 2 Ga Continent Involving Circum-South Atlantic Provinces. Precambrian Research, 69, 169-191. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9268(94)90085-x 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138427-ref86">
    <label>86</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhao, G., Sun, M. and Wilde, S.A. (2002) Did South America and West Africa Marry and Divorce or Was It a Long-Lasting Relationship? Gondwana Research, 5, 591-596. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s1342-937x(05)70631-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>