<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojmn
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2163-0569
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2163-0585
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojmn.2025.151002
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojmn-138341
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    The Incidence Rate of Complications among Patients of Benign Intracranial Hypertension after Lumbo-Peritoneal Shunt Procedure Operation
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Rabie Abd Alaziem
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Adham
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mohailaba
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Hany
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ahmed Abdalraheem
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Yasser
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     27
    </day> 
    <month>
     11
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    01
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    7
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    22
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      2,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      20,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      20,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Background: </b>Lumboperitoneal (LP) shunts have been used to manage benign intracranial hypertension (BIH) for an extended period. While they may swiftly and effectively alleviate symptoms, their application is accompanied by potential complications.
    <b> Objectives:</b> This research aimed to retrospectively analyze the difficulties and complications related to LP shunt implantation.
    <b> Methods: </b>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the records of 47 patients who had LP shunt placement for the treatment of BIH at our hospital throughout the research period. A thorough history and physical examination were conducted in every case. All patients were asked about age, gender, body mass index, neurological history, and oral contraceptive usage. Post-operative complications, clinical and ophthalmological follow-up occurred at 1, 3, and 6 months post-op.
    <b> Results: </b>Patients were mostly women (93.6%). The mean age of the patients was 35, and 80.9 percent had BMIs exceeding 25. Many female patients (40.9%) used oral contraceptives. Nearly all patients (93.6%) reported decreased vision, and 87.2% suffered headaches. The most common issue was shunt obstruction (51%), followed by low tension headaches (63.8%). The peritoneal side (10.6%) had higher shunt slippage than the thecal (2.1%). Superficial infections and radiculopathy affected 10.6% of patients, whereas CNS infections, arachnoiditis, and shunt failure affected just 2.1%. Five patients (10.6%) had Chiari malformation, and 60% had syringomyelia.
    <b> Conclusion: </b>Using LP shunts to treat BIH seems to be a method devoid of major risks despite the high revision rates. At the same time, more severe complications such as CNS infections, arachnoiditis, and shunt failure were less common.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Benign Intracranial Hypertension
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Lumbo-Peritoneal Shunt
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Headache
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Shunt Obstruction
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) without visible structural abnormalities or signs of aberrant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow is the hallmark of benign intracranial hypertension (BIH). Headache, blurred vision, tinnitus, diplopia, papilledema, and sometimes, sixth cranial nerve palsy are symptoms and indications essential for diagnosing ICP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-2">
     [2]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Patients who do not respond to the best medical treatment or experience disease progression are eligible for surgical procedures; otherwise, medical treatment remains the mainstay of BIH care <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-3">
     [3]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Lumbar peritoneal shunt (LPS) is the surgical procedure often used to divert CSF. LP shunts offer several advantages. Primarily, the use of LP shunts enables the surgeon to circumvent the need to access ventricular cavities inside the brain parenchyma, hence possibly diminishing the danger of brain harm, including cortical venous injury or hemorrhage, associated with catheter implantation. LP shunts are further shown to correlate with a reduced infection incidence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. This is particularly pertinent in BIH: several patients have tiny ventricles, complicating the implantation of a VP shunt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-5">
     [5]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>LP shunts have several drawbacks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-6">
     [6]
    </xref>, so this retrospective study examined patients who have undergone surgery to divert CSF by LP shunts to assess management, outcomes, and complications.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Patient and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Study Design and Participants</title>
    <p>In this retrospective study, 47 patients with BIH underwent LP shunt insertion. All patients were treated at the Neurosurgery department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University Hospital, in Beni-Suef University, for 3 years from January 2021 to January 2024. Patients were allocated in the current research according to the following criteria:</p>
    <p><u>Inclusion criteria</u>:</p>
    <p><u>Exclusion criteria</u>:</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Ethical Considerations</title>
    <p>The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Medicine at Beni-Suef University. The participant’s data were recorded and analyzed without any personal identifiers, using coded information. The source documents and identification lists were archived in a secured facility per center. Permission to access data will be documented per the investigator.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Methods</title>
    <p>A comprehensive history was obtained, and an exhaustive physical examination was conducted. All patients were asked about their age, gender, body mass index, neurological history, and use of oral contraception. The pre-operative investigation was done according to the complication. Based on clinical data, visual tests, and neuroimaging, post-operative follow-ups occurred at 1, 3, and 6 months.</p>
    <p>A comprehensive clinical evaluation, including thorough medical, neurological, and ophthalmological examinations, was performed on all patients upon admission. At the first appointment, every patient was asked to fill out a standard questionnaire about symptoms, including headache, vomiting, blurred vision, and tinnitus, all of which might be signs of excessive intracranial pressure. Headaches were examined in terms of when they started, where they stayed, what made them worse or better, how often they occurred, what factors made them worse or better, and any other symptoms that may have been present. The visual analog scale was used to measure the intensity of the headaches in frequency and severity. The scale is 10 units long and has descriptions at each end to indicate the two extremes of pain (0 = no pain and 10 = greatest agony) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-8">
      [8]
     </xref>. The eye exam included Snellen charts, fundus examinations, and Goldmann kinetic computed perimetry for visual fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-9">
      [9]
     </xref>. Documentation of clinical symptoms was done.</p>
    <p>In BIH, surgical intervention was considered for patients who had severe and acute visual impairment at first presentation, persistent, intractable headaches, long-term visual impairments that did not improve with medication and multiple lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainages. We used Meditronic, USA lumbo-peritoneal shunt without reservoir in all cases; the thecal end of the shunt has multiple small openings with markings at every 5 cm length, and the inner and outer diameters of the tube are 0.7 mm and 1.4 mm respectively. The peritoneal end has the same diameter. Both thecal and peritoneal catheters are radio-opaque (barium-impregnated), and a metal-connector is used to connect them. The total length of the shunt is 84 cm.</p>
    <p>Under general anesthesia, the surgeon slightly angled the surgical positioned the patient in a lateral decubitus posture, elevating their right side. The lumbar spine’s spinous processes on lumbar vertebrae 4 and 5 were the sites of a 3-centimeter midline incision. We inserted a 14-gauge Tuohy needle into the subarachnoid area, with the angle facing the patient’s head. A depth of 8 cm was reached by inserting the proximal end into the thecal sac. The Tuohy needle was withdrawn when cerebrospinal fluid was seen to be leaking from the end. 3 sutures are taken around the shunt, fixing it into the lumbar fascia, preventing the shunt from moving out of the spinal column. We positioned the distal end of the shunt using a flexible passer after making a 1-cm incision on the right flank. We made a 3-centimeter incision in the lower right quadrant of the abdomen and inserted the tube through the same opening. We fastened the tube with a second suture-made collar. After separating the rectus abdominis fibers, we implanted the distal end into the peritoneal cavity under vision. We applied sutures in layers to all the incisions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-10">
      [10]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>The research was carried out using SPSS 27 for Windows. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) was used to depict continuous data, while frequencies and percentages were used to indicate categorical variables. We used Fisher’s Exact Test to look at categorical variables like sex and body mass index and the independent t-test to compare continuous characteristics like age between groups. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with the occurrence of complications. Statistical significance was determined by a p-value lower than 0.05.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>: The majority of patients were female (93.6%). The average age of the patients was 35 years, and the distribution of BMI shows that most patients (80.9%) had a BMI greater than 25. Notably, a significant proportion of female patients (40.9%) reported a history of pill intake. Regarding symptoms, nearly all patients presented with blurred vision (93.6%), and a large majority also reported headaches (87.2%).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-"></xref>Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with lumbo-peritoneal shunt.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Items</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center">Values (no = 47)</p><p style="text-align:center">No (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">Age (mean ± SD)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center">35 ± 8</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">Sex</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">Males</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center">3 (6.4%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">Females</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center">44 (93.4%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">BMI</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">≤25</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center">9 (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">&gt;25</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center">38 (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">History of pill intake among females</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center">18/44 (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="100.00%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:left">Symptoms</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">Headache</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center">41 (87.2%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="55.28%"><p style="text-align:left">Blurring of vision</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="44.72%"><p style="text-align:center">44 (93.6%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
     Table 2
    </xref> highlights several complications associated with lumbo-peritoneal shunt procedures in this patient cohort. Shunt obstruction was the most common complication, affecting 51% of patients, followed by low tension headaches, which were reported in 63.8% of cases. Shunt slippage occurred more frequently on the peritoneal side (10.6%) than on thecal side (2.1%). Notably, superficial infections and radiculopathy affected 10.6% of patients. In contrast, more severe complications such as CNS infections, arachnoiditis, and shunt failure were less common, occurring in only 2.1% of the cohort. Five patients (10.6%) developed acquired Chiari malformation, with 60% of these patients also developing syringomyelia.</p>
   <p>The analysis presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
     Table 3
    </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
     Table 4
    </xref> indicates no statistically significant relationship between baseline characteristics (age, sex, and BMI) and the incidence of complications. The mean age was slightly higher in the group with complications (36.5 ± 6.2 years) compared to the no-complications group (33.5 ± 5.7 years). Yet, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.108). Regarding sex, the distribution was nearly identical between groups, with 5.9% males and 94.1% females in the no-complications group versus 6.7% males and 93.3% females in the complications group, yielding a p-value of 0.999 from the Fisher Exact Test, showing no significant association. BMI also appeared balanced between groups, as 82.4% of individuals with BMI &gt; 25 were in the no-complications group and 80% in the complications group, with another non-significant p-value of 0.999. The logistic regression analysis supported these findings, with age</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-"></xref>Table 2. LP shunt complication.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:center">Items</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">Values (no = 47)</p><p style="text-align:center">No (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">No complications</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">17 (36.2%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Shunt obstruction</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">24 (51%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Shunt slippage</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Thecal</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (2.1%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Peritoneal</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (10.6%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Difficulty insertion of the catheter in the thecal sac</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (10.6%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Superficial infection</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (10.6%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">CNS infection</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (2.1%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Acquired Chiari malformation</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (10.6%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Syringomyelia among Chiari patients</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">3/5 (60%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Arachnoiditis</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (2.1%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Failure</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (2.1%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Low tension headache</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">30 (63.8%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="63.85%"><p style="text-align:left">Radiculopathy</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.15%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (10.6%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="table3">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-"></xref>Table 3. Relation between the presence of complications and baseline characteristics.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="27.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Items</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">No complications (no = 17)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Complications (no = 30)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="19.01%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="27.76%"><p style="text-align:left">Age (mean ± SD)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">33.5 ± 5.7</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">36.5 ± 6.2</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="19.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.108 (T-test)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="27.76%"><p style="text-align:left">Sex</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.01%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="27.76%"><p style="text-align:left">Males</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">1 (5.9%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (6.7%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.999 (FET)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="27.76%"><p style="text-align:left">Females</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">16 (94.1)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">28 (93.3%)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.01%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="27.76%"><p style="text-align:left">BMI</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.01%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="27.76%"><p style="text-align:left">≤25</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">3 (17.6%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">6 (20%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.999 (FET)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="27.76%"><p style="text-align:left">&gt;25</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">14 (82.4%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.61%"><p style="text-align:center">24 (80%)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.01%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>FET = Fisher exact test.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table4">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-"></xref>Table 4. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis for factors associated with complications.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="29.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Items</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="29.38%"><p style="text-align:center">OR</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">95% CI for OR</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="29.32%"><p style="text-align:left">Age/years</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.642</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="29.38%"><p style="text-align:center">1.542</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">0.681 - 3.762</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="29.32%"><p style="text-align:left">Sex</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="29.32%"><p style="text-align:left">Males</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.986</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Reference category</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">Reference category</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="29.32%"><p style="text-align:left">Females</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.38%"><p style="text-align:center">0.964</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">0.431 - 2.615</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="29.32%"><p style="text-align:left">BMI</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.972</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.38%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="29.32%"><p style="text-align:left">≤25</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Reference category</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">Reference category</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="29.32%"><p style="text-align:left">&gt;25</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="15.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.38%"><p style="text-align:center">0.824</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">0.531 - 4.785</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>OR = Odds Ratio; CI = Confidence Interval.</p>
   <p>having an odds ratio (OR) of 1.542 (95% CI: 0.681 - 3.762, p = 0.642), sex showing an OR of 0.964 for males versus females (95% CI: 0.431 - 2.615, p = 0.986), and BMI yielding an OR of 0.824 for &gt; 25 versus ≤ 25 (95% CI: 0.531 - 4.785, p = 0.972). Consequently, these results indicate that age, sex, and BMI are not significant predictors of complications within this cohort.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>BIH, a complex multifactorial neuro-ophthalmic illness, is characterized by increased intracranial pressure without a clear cause, such as a brain tumor or another disease of the central nervous system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. The disease may manifest in a wide variety of ways clinically. Still, common symptoms include nausea, headache, back and neck pain, pulsatile tinnitus, blurred vision, and diplopia. For most people with BIH, weight loss and/or acetazolamide medication improve symptoms. For patients who do not respond to medication, surgical procedures, including shunt operations, are an option <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-12">
     [12]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Forty percent of all CSF shunt procedures are LP shunts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. The fact that the LP shunt does not involve the brain at all is one advantage that made it favored by several neurosurgeons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-14">
     [14]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. Few studies have examined the effectiveness of this method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. For 3 years, we followed 47 people in a retrospective study to learn about the complications of LP shunt.</p>
   <p>BIH mostly affects females of reproductive age and is strongly correlated with obesity. Recent years have shown a recognized increase in the incidence of BIH, along with the global rise in obesity rates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-12">
     [12]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In the present research, the predominant demographic was female patients (93.6%). The mean age of the patients was 35 years, and the BMI distribution indicated that a majority (80.9%) had a BMI above 25. A considerable percentage of female patients (40.9%) showed a history of contraceptive pill use. In the same context, previous studies noticed that obese women in their twenties to forties make up the bulk of those affected by BIH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-16">
     [16]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-17">
     [17]
    </xref>. Another compilation of prior research included a cohort of 142 patients, 80.3% female (106/132), with a mean age of 32.4 years and an average follow-up duration of 32.7 months <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-10">
     [10]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-18">
     [18]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-21">
     [21]
    </xref>. Contreras-Martin and Bueno-Perdomo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-19">
     [19]
    </xref> also reported that ten out of the forty-two women, or 23.81 percent, were found to be using hormonal contraception. Weight gain and obesity increase the risk of BIH. However, moderate weight reduction may result in illness resolution, as current research underscores the pathogenic influence of metabolic and hormonal variables <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. BIH treatment strategies focus on decreasing intracranial pressure, alleviating headaches, and safeguarding eyesight. Weight reduction is a nonsurgical method for treating BIH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. A possible pathophysiological role of obesity in BIH is metabolically active adipose tissue, which may generate various adipokines and inflammatory cytokines. This inflammatory environment may lead to cognitive impairment by disrupting neural network function. Systemic inflammation associated with obesity and heightened mechanical stress on frontostriatal networks due to elevated intracranial pressure may have a role in BIH <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. Obesity also correlates with increased intrabdominal and intrapleural pressure, which may impede CSF outflow by raising venous pressure, thus leading to raised ICT <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-23">
     [23]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Almost all patients in the current research had impaired vision (93.6%), and a significant majority also experienced headaches (87.2%) as presenting symptoms of BIH.</p>
   <p>The most often reported symptoms of BIH, as noted by González-Hernández et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-24">
     [24]
    </xref> and Rodríguez de Rivera et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-25">
     [25]
    </xref>, are headache (lacking pathognomonic features), nausea, vomiting, visual field abnormalities, diplopia, photophobia, and pulsatile tinnitus. Also, headaches accompanied by bilateral papilloedema and diminished visual acuity are the primary symptoms concluded by Contreras-Martin and Bueno-Perdomo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. According to our findings, the proportion of patients who presented with headache symptoms was comparable to the one reported before (82.25%) in previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-26">
     [26]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-28">
     [28]
    </xref>. Prominent theories suggest that factors, including sex hormones and adipokines, namely 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and leptin, contribute to the widespread instability of CSF fluid. Still, the exact process by which BIH develops is yet unknown. Disruptions to the dynamics of CSF fluid and venous sinus pressure are involved in the pathophysiology of BIH, causing its symptoms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-12">
     [12]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Kalyvas et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-23">
     [23]
    </xref> determined in their systematic review of surgical treatments for BIH that only 1.4% of patients required additional surgical intervention after LPS. The rate of severe complications was 9.4%, with shunt infection being the most prevalent severe complication. The majority of revisions were performed due to shunt obstruction.</p>
   <p>Shunt obstruction was the most common complication, affecting 51% of patients, and Shunt slippage occurred more frequently on the peritoneal side (10.6%) than on the thecal side (2.1%). This percentage is higher than the Sinha et al. series (8.6%). Ewaiss et al. reported 40% of cases of shunt obstruction in their series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-29">
     [29]
    </xref>. Kalyvas et al. reported shunt obstruction in 51.6% of operated patients <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-30">
     [30]
    </xref>. We may consider that the short length of the shunt tube, especially in females with abdominal obesity, increases the risk of shut slippage and obstruction.</p>
   <p>Research shows that 40% of LP shunt problems are mechanical failure. This generally causes clinical symptoms to recur. Shunting obstruction, catheter migration, disconnection, fracture, or malposition are reasons. Intracranial hypertension persists when LP shunt blockage fails to divert cerebrospinal fluid. Shunt obstruction is commonly suspected but confirmed only after surgery. Lumbar catheter, valve, and distal catheter obstructions may occur anywhere in the shunt system. Each shunt system component must be examined for malfunction during surgery <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-31">
     [31]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The diagnosis of blockage was established by the recurrence of symptoms (headache and visual symptom) and signs (papilledema and visual field defect) and confirmatory lumbar puncture (manometry).</p>
   <p>Laparoscopy is beneficial for diagnosing and managing shunt blockage. It is helpful for placement of the tube under vision and confirming shunt function by visualization of CSF drainage from the shunt tubing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-32">
     [32]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Laparoscopic revision was considered in most cases of shunt obstruction, removal of any fat debris, and ensuring shunt functioning, and we prefer to place the shunt tube in supra hepatic space, as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. A female patient 35 years old presented with shunt obstruction after 1 year of insertion. Laparoscopic revision of shunt showing peritoneal fat obstructing peritoneal end.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2080602-rId14.jpeg?20241223023719" />
   </fig>
   <p>Symptoms of intracranial hypotension include headache in the upright position and improvement in lying flat due to the siphoning effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-33">
     [33]
    </xref>. Sinha et al. suggest the longer the length of the lumbar catheter, the more resistance to CSF flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-34">
     [34]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>These symptoms were reported in 63.8% of cases. Five patients (10.6%) developed myelopathy and brachilagia within 2 years after shunt insertion. Usually, we don’t perform routine MRIs of cervical spine for our patients unless indicated. Acquired Chiari malformation (ACM) was reported in these five patients, with 60% of these patients also developing syringomyelia.</p>
   <p>The incidence of ACM was relatively high in Chumas et al. and Payner et al. series, whereas it was very low (0.5%) in Yadav et al. and Aoki et al. (1%) series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-35">
     [35]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Rekate et al. found no incidence of ACM in youngsters; the valve system was used in most (84%) cases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-36">
     [36]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>ACM was not discovered with the utilization of valves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-35">
     [35]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>We used a valve-less shunt in our series, which may explain the higher incidence of Chiari malformation as programmable shunts and reservoirs were not available in our institute. We consider shunt removal to limit progression and follow up with the patients clinically and radiologically.</p>
   <p>Shunt removal and medical treatment were enough to control the condition in 3 cases, one patient needed posterior fossa decompression plus shunt removal, and other cases with a large cervical syrinx needed insertion of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt, and the syrinx disappeared within one year as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>.</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>(a) (b) (c)Figure 2. Showing the disappearance of syringomyelia after ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. (a) Female patient developed chiari malformation and cervical syrinx 2 years after LP shunt insertion; (b) 6 months after LP shunt removal and VP shunt insertion; (c) 1 year after LP shunt removal and VP shunt insertion.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2080602-rId15.jpeg?20241223023719" />
   </fig>
   <p>Shunt infections have been reported in 1% - 9% of LP Shunts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-34">
     [34]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The alteration of position for abdominal-end insertion, which may lead to a risk of sterility compromise, is a potential source of infection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-36">
     [36]
    </xref>. Proper catheter care during positional changes may prevent this issue.</p>
   <p>After repositioning to the supine posture, we stabilise the catheter with a mop and repaint the abdomen. A transportation board may be used to reposition patients without altering the surgical drapes; extended surgical durations have been proposed as a potential source of infection. Certain centers use the dual-surgeon approach by concurrently inserting lumbar and peritoneal ends in the left lateral position to minimize duration and infections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-34">
     [34]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Shunt infection is among the most dangerous consequences, whereas meningitis is a potentially life-threatening consequence of the LP shunt. In our study, one patient had a shunt infection (2.1%) and was treated with shunt removal and intravenous antibiotics.</p>
   <p>Lumbo-peritoneal shunt (LPS) operation may cause radiculopathy owing to mechanical irritation of the cauda equina nerve roots <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-37">
     [37]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In a previous study, 3 patients (4.4%) suffered radiculopathy among 67 receiving LPS; two patients needed LPS removal, and one required a spinal catheter revision <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-38">
     [38]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In our study, radiculopathy affected 10.6% of patients; radiculopathy usually improved with medical treatment. One case of radiculopathy was severe, not responding to medical therapy and thecal end was mal-directed. Shunt revision was done, and shunt redirection and radiculopathy improved, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
     Figure 3
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Singh et al. do not encounter any unusual complications (excessive drainage, scoliosis, arachnoiditis, cysts, abscess, etc. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-39">
     [39]
    </xref>. Vural reports a late and extreme</p>
   <fig id="fig3" position="float">
    <label>Figure 3</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 3. A female 41 years developed sciatica one day after surgery. CT lumbosacral spine shows a mal-directed thecal end.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2080602-rId16.jpeg?20241223023719" />
   </fig>
   <p>complication of lumbo-peritoneal shunt resulting in granulation tissue formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-40">
     [40]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In our study, arachnoiditis complication occurred only in one patient (2.1%), as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
     Figure 4
    </xref>, after one year of shunt insertion, and the patient developed motor affection, shunt removal, and surgical decompression, and duroplasty was needed.</p>
   <fig id="fig4" position="float">
    <label>Figure 4</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 4. MRI lumbosacral spine showing arachnoiditis after 1 year of LP shunt.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2080602-rId17.jpeg?20241223023719" />
   </fig>
   <p>Instances of unsuccessful needle insertion have been documented in previous series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-10">
     [10]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Patients exhibiting pronounced kyphoscoliotic deformity, significant lumbar canal stenosis, and calcified ligamentum flavum should be excluded from consideration for the lumbar-peritoneal shunt operation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-38">
     [38]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Sufficient lumbar flexion, achievable under general anesthesia, diminishes unsuccessful efforts. In challenging circumstances, C-arm fluoroscopy may assist in visualizing the interspinous interval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-34">
     [34]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Difficulty insertion of the catheter in the thecal sac is reported in five cases (10.6%), getting of CSF flow occurred after the repeated time of tapping. In two instances, we had to do muscle separation to access the subarachnoid space.</p>
   <p>Also, in the study of Fang et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-41">
     [41]
    </xref>, two cases of shunt infection, two cases of subdural hematoma requiring surgical intervention, and two cases of shunt dysfunction were among the six patients (7.1%) who had severe complications as a result of LPS. Seventeen people (31.8%) had minor side effects as a result of LPS. Mild side effects, such as orthostatic vertigo, orthostatic headache, and subdural effusions, are often seen within one month after LPS. A prevalent reason for revision in LPS shunts is shunt obstruction, recognized in the literature as a significant issue that must be resolved, subsequently leading to secondary intracranial hypotension due to excessive cerebrospinal fluid outflow via the LPS, resulting in low tension headaches <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-42">
     [42]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-46">
     [46]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In the current investigation, the comparison between patients with and without complications in the context of LPS reveals no statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics studied. The age difference between the two groups (mean ± SD) shows a slight increase in the complications group. Still, the p-value (0.108) suggests that this difference is not significant. Additionally, sex distribution and BMI categories exhibit no significant differences, as indicated by the p-values (all 0.999, using Fisher’s Exact Test).</p>
   <p>In the group studied by Grech et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-47">
     [47]
    </xref>, weight and waist circumference did not serve as predictors of cognitive performance issues associated with BIH. Yri et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-48">
     [48]
    </xref> similarly discovered that the BMI of BIH patients did not serve as a predictor for cognitive function, indicating that cognition seems to be affected by the existence of weight excess in BIH rather than its extent. Obesity, whether occurring alone or with other neurological disorders, has been linked to many negative consequences, necessitating bigger cohorts to clarify this relationship <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-49">
     [49]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138341-50">
     [50]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Several restrictions are placed on this study. Even though this study collected case data prospectively from 2021 through 2024, it is still considered a retrospective case analysis since no clinical trial registration was made. A single institution’s limited case series was a part of the study. The lack of a blind technique by the observer introduces the possibility of bias. Because there was no control group in the study, comparing the results to those of other operational techniques is not feasible.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>We can conclude that the incidence of BIH is elevated in young women with greater body weight and is correlated with the use of hormonal contraception. The primary symptoms of BIH are headache and visual impairments. Our research reveals that shunt obstruction was the most common complication, followed by low-tension headaches. In contrast, more severe complications such as CNS infections, arachnoiditis, and shunt failure were less common. For better treatment results, we recommend: 1) usage of LP shunts with valves. 2) Always stressing the importance of aseptic technique management; 3) Quickly identifying and treating serious complications; 4) being sure of the adequate length of shunt tube in both thecal sac and abdomen.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Friedman, D.I. (2014) The Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome. Neurologic Clinics, 32, 363-396. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2014.01.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Higgins, J.N.P., Owler, B.K., Cousins, C. and Pickard, J.D. (2002) Venous Sinus Stenting for Refractory Benign Intracranial Hypertension. The Lancet, 359, 228-230. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07440-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hayhurst, C., Rowlands, A. and Rowe, F. (2016) Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. In: Cerebrospinal Fluid Disorders, CRC Press, 353-395.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lamba, N., Fick, T., Nandoe Tewarie, R. and Broekman, M.L. (2018) Management of Hydrocephalus in Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastases: An Ethical Approach to Decision-Making. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 140, 5-13. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2949-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, V.Y., Barbaro, N.M., Lawton, M.T., Pitts, L., Kunwar, S., Parsa, A.T., et al. (2007) Complications of Lumboperitoneal Shunts. Neurosurgery, 60, 1045-1049. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000255469.68129.81
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Krishnan, S.S., Nigam, P., Manuel, A. and Vasudevan, M.C. (2021) Lumbo-Peritoneal Shunt as Treatment Modality for Visual Symptoms in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Single Institution Experience. Neurocirugía, 32, 53-61. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucir.2020.03.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Conte, A., Defazio, G., Ferrazzano, G., Hallett, M., Macerollo, A., Fabbrini, G., et al. (2013) Is Increased Blinking a Form of Blepharospasm? Neurology, 80, 2236-2241. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e318296e99d
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Makatsori, M., Pfaar, O. and Calderon, M.A. (2014) Allergen Immunotherapy: Clinical Outcomes Assessment. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2, 123-129. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2014.01.005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Azzam, D. and Ronquillo, Y. (2023) Snellen Chart. StatPearls. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     El-Saadany, W.F., Farhoud, A. and Zidan, I. (2011) Lumboperitoneal Shunt for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Patients’ Selection and Outcome. Neurosurgical Review, 35, 239-244. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-011-0350-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kilgore, K.P., Lee, M.S., Leavitt, J.A., Mokri, B., Hodge, D.O., Frank, R.D., et al. (2017) Re-evaluating the Incidence of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in an Era of Increasing Obesity. Ophthalmology, 124, 697-700. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, M.T.M., Bhatti, M.T. and Danesh-Meyer, H.V. (2022) Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 95, 172-179. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.11.029
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     AlBakry, A., Taha, M.M. and Al Menshawy, H.A. (2019) Cranial Migration of Lumboperitoneal Shunt: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Surgical Neurology International, 10. &gt;https://doi.org/10.25259/sni-266-2019
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aoki, N. (1990) Lumboperitoneal Shunt: Clinical Applications, Complications, and Comparison with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt. Neurosurgery, 26, 998-1004. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199006000-00013
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brazis, P. (2008) Clinical Review: The Surgical Treatment of Idiopathic Pseudotumour Cerebri (Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension). Cephalalgia, 28, 1361-1373. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01778.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jordan, C.O. and Aylward, S.C. (2018) Intracranial Hypertension: A Current Review. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 30, 764-774. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1097/mop.0000000000000689
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wakerley, B., Tan, M. and Ting, E. (2014) Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Cephalalgia, 35, 248-261. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102414534329
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abu-Serieh, B., Ghassempour, K., Duprez, T. and Raftopoulos, C. (2007) Stereotactic Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting for Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Neurosurgery, 60, 1039-1044. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000255456.12978.31
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Contreras-Martin, Y. and Bueno-Perdomo, J.H. (2015) Hipertensión intracraneal idiopática: análisis descriptivo en nuestro medio. Neurología, 30, 106-110. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2013.08.009
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Piper, R.J., Kalyvas, A.V., Young, A.M., Hughes, M.A., Jamjoom, A.A. and Fouyas, I.P. (2015) Interventions for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 8, CD003434. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003434.pub3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bynke, G., Zemack, G., Bynke, H. and Romner, B. (2004) Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Neurology, 63, 1314-1316. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000140699.43019.48
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bénard, M., Camilleri, G., Etilé, F., Méjean, C., Bellisle, F., Reach, G., et al. (2017) Association between Impulsivity and Weight Status in a General Population. Nutrients, 9, Article 217. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9030217
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kalyvas, A., Neromyliotis, E., Koutsarnakis, C., Komaitis, S., Drosos, E., Skandalakis, G.P., et al. (2020) A Systematic Review of Surgical Treatments of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH). Neurosurgical Review, 44, 773-792. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01288-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     González Hernández, A., Fabre Pi, Ó., Díaz Nicolás, S., López Fernández, J.C., López Veloso, C. and Jiménez Mateos, A. (2009) Cefalea en la hipertensión intracraneal idiopática. Revista de Neurología, 49, 17-20. &gt;https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.4901.2008558
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rodríguez de Rivera Garrido, F.J., Martínez Sánchez, P., Ojeda Ruiz de Luna, J., Arpa Gutiérrez, F.J. and Barreiro Tella, P. (2003) Hipertensión intracraneal benigna. Antecedentes, clínica y tratamiento en una serie de 41 pacientes. Revista de Neurología, 37, 801-805. &gt;https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.3709.2003282
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Santos Lasaosa, S., López del Val, L.J., Pascual Millán, L.F., Mostacero Miguel, E., Tejero Juste, C., Casadevall Codina, T., et al. (2001) Pseudotumor cerebral: Análisis de nuestra casuística y revisión de la literatura. Revista de Neurología, 33, 1106-1111. &gt;https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.3312.2001346
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fontoura, P., Costa, J. and Vale, J. (2000) Pseudotumor cerebral: El lado maligno del espectro clínico. Revista de Neurología, 30, 45-47. &gt;https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.3001.99453
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Degnan, A.J. and Levy, L.M. (2011) Pseudotumor Cerebri: Brief Review of Clinical Syndrome and Imaging Findings. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 1986-1993. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a2404
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ewaiss, I., Roshdy, A., Magdy, S. and Rashid, M. (2019) Management of Lumbo-Peritoneal Shunt Complications in Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 74, 1075-1078. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2019.26355
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kalyvas, A.V., et al. (2016) Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features and Contemporary Management. Hospital Chronicles, 11, 77-84.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jusué-Torres, I., Hoffberger, J.B. and Rigamonti, D. (2014) Complications Specific to Lumboperitoneal Shunt. In: Di Rocco, C., Turgut, M., Jallo, G., Martínez-Lage, J., Eds., Complications of CSF Shunting in Hydrocephalus, Springer International Publishing, 203-211. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09961-3_14
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kavic, S.M., et al. (2007) Laparoscopic Management of Ventriculoperitoneal and Lumboperitoneal Shunt Complications. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 11, 14-19.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liao, Y.J., Dillon, W.P., Chin, C.T., McDermott, M.W. and Horton, J.C. (2007) Intracranial Hypotension Caused by Leakage of Cerebrospinal Fluid from the Thecal Sac after Lumboperitoneal Shunt Placement. Journal of Neurosurgery, 107, 173-177. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3171/jns-07/07/0173
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sinha, M., Bajaj, J., Kumar, A., Hedaoo, K., Sharma, S., Konchada, K., et al. (2021) Lumboperitoneal Shunts—Patient Selection, Technique, and Complication Avoidance: An Experience of 426 Cases. Neurology India, 69, S481-S487. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.332265
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rekate, H.L. and Wallace, D. (2002) Lumboperitoneal Shunts in Children. Pediatric Neurosurgery, 38, 41-46. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1159/000067562
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yadav, Y.R., Parihar, V., Agarwal, M., Bhatele, P.R. and Saxena, N. (2011) Lumbar Peritoneal Shunt in Idiopathic Intra Cranial Hypertension. Turkish Neurosurgery, 22, 21-26. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.4307-11.1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tanaka, T., Goto, H., Momozaki, N. and Honda, E. (2022) Incidence of Radiculopathy Following Lumboperitoneal Shunt Placement without Fluoroscopy for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Surgical Neurology International, 13. &gt;https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_791_2022
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, V.Y., Barbaro, N.M., Lawton, M.T., Pitts, L., Kunwar, S., Parsa, A.T., et al. (2007) Complications of Lumboperitoneal Shunts. Neurosurgery, 60, 1045-1049. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000255469.68129.81
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Singh, A. and Vajpeyi, I. (2013) Comparative Study of Lumboperitoneal Shunt versus Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Post Meningitis Communicating Hydrocephalus in Children. Neurology India, 61, 513-516. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.121932
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vural, M., Özkara, E., Adapinar, B., Dündar, E. and Arslantaş, A. (2015) A Late and Extreme Complication of Lumboperitoneal Shunt. The Spine Journal, 15, e7-e12. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.017
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fang, X., Deng, Y., Xu, X., Shu, W., Tang, F., Li, S., et al. (2022) One-year Outcome of a Lumboperitoneal Shunt in Older Adults with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, Article 977123. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.977123
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Menger, R.P., Connor, D.E., Thakur, J.D., Sonig, A., Smith, E., Guthikonda, B., et al. (2014) A Comparison of Lumboperitoneal and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: An Analysis of Economic Impact and Complications Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Neurosurgical Focus, 37, E4. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.8.focus14436
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Azad, T.D., Zhang, Y., Varshneya, K., Veeravagu, A., Ratliff, J.K. and Li, G. (2019) Lumboperitoneal and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Demonstrate Comparable Failure and Complication Rates. Neurosurgery, 86, 272-280. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz080
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Andreão, F.F., Ferreira, M.Y., Oliveira, L.d.B., Sousa, M.P., Palavani, L.B., Rairan, L.G., et al. (2024) Effectiveness and Safety of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt versus Lumboperitoneal Shunt for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery, 185, 359-369.e2. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.095
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yadav, Y., Parihar, V. and Sinha, M. (2010) Lumbar Peritoneal Shunt. Neurology India, 58, 179-184. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.63778
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yadav, Y.R., Pande, S., Raina, V.K. and Singh, M. (2004) Lumboperitoneal Shunts: Review of 409 Cases. Neurology India, 52, 188-190.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Grech, O., Clouter, A., Mitchell, J.L., Alimajstorovic, Z., Ottridge, R.S., Yiangou, A., et al. (2021) Cognitive Performance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Relevance of Intracranial Pressure. Brain Communications, 3, fcab202. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab202
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yri, H.M., Fagerlund, B., Forchhammer, H.B. and Jensen, R.H. (2014) Cognitive Function in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Prospective Case-Control Study. BMJ Open, 4, e004376. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004376
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     O’Brien, P.D., Hinder, L.M., Callaghan, B.C. and Feldman, E.L. (2017) Neurological Consequences of Obesity. The Lancet Neurology, 16, 465-477. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30084-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138341-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bischof, G.N. and Park, D.C. (2015) Obesity and Aging. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77, 697-709. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000000212
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>