<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojapps
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Applied Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2165-3917
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2165-3925
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojapps.2024.1412237
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojapps-138321
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences, Chemistry 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Materials Science, Computer Science 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Communications, Engineering, Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Development of Composite Materials Based on Recycled Polystyrene and Wood Residues for Building Applications
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Edem
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Chabi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ernesto Cabral
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Houehanou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Guy Oyéniran
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Adéoti
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Edmond Codjo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Adjovi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory of Rural Engineering (LGR), School of Rural Engineering (EGR), National University of Agriculture (UNA), Ketou, Benin
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aNational Higher Institute of Industrial Technology (INSTI), National University of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (UNSTIM), Abomey, Benin
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory of Testing and Studies in Civil Engineering (L2EGC), Higher National School of Public Works (ENSTP), National University of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (UNSTIM), Abomey, Benin
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     03
    </day> 
    <month>
     12
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    12
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    3607
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    3617
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      2,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      20,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      20,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The building sector significantly influences the environment, notably through resource consumption and waste production. Evaluating locally available resources and adopting sustainable development practices are essential to mitigate this impact. This study proposes the fabrication of a wood-polymer composite by recycling polystyrene and wood sawdust. Polystyrene was dissolved in a solvent to obtain a polymer matrix, which was then reinforced with recycled wood sawdust. The mixture was cold-pressed to form composite panels. Physical properties such as density and absorption, as well as mechanical properties like the modulus of elasticity and flexural strength, were examined. Results show that the physical and mechanical properties of the composites vary with the particle size distribution of the wood particles. The modulus of elasticity and flexural strength increase with particle size. The maximum values obtained for the modulus of elasticity and flexural strength are 842 MPa and 3.16 MPa, respectively. These physical and mechanical characteristics indicate that the developed composite material can be used to manufacture elements such as furniture, false ceilings, and lightweight partitions, thereby contributing to more sustainable construction practices.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Wood-Polymer Composite
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Wood Sawdust
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Expanded Polystyrene
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Particleboard
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Sustainable Construction
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The building sector is a major contributor to global CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, accounting for approximately 37% of energy-related and process-related emissions in 2021 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. This highlights the necessity to rethink construction methods and building management, emphasizing the use of environmentally friendly materials and the evaluation of locally available resources.</p>
   <p>In Africa, a continent undergoing rapid transformation, the population is estimated to reach 2.5 billion by 2050 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. This demographic surge demands proactive anticipation of infrastructure and resource needs. The concept of sustainable building is crucial to address these challenges. It aims to minimize energy consumption and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, reduce dependence on non-renewable resources, improve occupant comfort, and optimize overall costs, principles fundamental to responsible and sustainable urban development.</p>
   <p>In the current context, where sustainable development is imperative, especially in Africa, evaluating and valorizing local resources are essential. In Benin, wood processing waste is significantly underutilized, with over 4500 tons of sawdust produced annually <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. This wood waste can be valorized in the manufacture of particleboard.</p>
   <p>The development of panels from wood residues is not new. Numerous studies have utilized various matrices or adhesives such as urea-formaldehyde resins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-4">
     [4]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-6">
     [6]
    </xref>, phenol-formaldehyde resins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-7">
     [7]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-9">
     [9]
    </xref>, melamine-urea-formaldehyde, and melamine-formaldehyde <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-10">
     [10]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-12">
     [12]
    </xref>, exploring different manufacturing techniques.</p>
   <p>However, in Benin, these technologies are less accessible, and the materials used in adhesives are excessively expensive. Additionally, conventional adhesives have significant environmental impacts due to emissions of volatile organic compounds and formaldehyde. Therefore, finding a more accessible solution for local populations is necessary. Recycling expanded polystyrene, which is also waste needing management, becomes relevant. Benin faces major challenges in managing non-biodegradable waste, with landfills receiving over 120,000 tons of various plastics annually <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-13">
     [13]
    </xref>, including packaging expanded polystyrene from commercial import activities.</p>
   <p>The fabrication of wood-polystyrene composites and exploration of various formulations demonstrate a growing interest in valorizing waste into ecological solutions. Researchers have studied the potential of composite materials using recycled polystyrene and natural or synthetic fillers to reduce environmental impact and offer sustainable construction materials.</p>
   <p>Parikh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-14">
     [14]
    </xref> demonstrated that adding wood dust-based fillers improves the mechanical and thermal properties of a PLA-wood composite, although dimensional stability issues related to water absorption persist. Adeniyi et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-15">
     [15]
    </xref> explored wood-polystyrene composites using Isoberlinia doka dust, optimizing mechanical properties through alkaline fiber treatment but identifying limitations in filler dispersion.</p>
   <p>Studies by Foti et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-16">
     [16]
    </xref> and Rofdi et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-17">
     [17]
    </xref> highlighted the role of particle size and polystyrene concentration on the physical and mechanical properties of composites, achieving better water resistance and homogeneous density, though increased flammability remains a challenge. Cherkashina et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-18">
     [18]
    </xref> introduced agricultural waste like hazelnut shells, improving mechanical strength through chemical surface treatments. Composites incorporating flax fibers and plasticizing additives, studied by Khedr and Elnahas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-19">
     [19]
    </xref>, revealed increased tensile strength and flexibility, though reliance on organic solvents is a limitation.</p>
   <p>Work by Adeniyi et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-20">
     [20]
    </xref> on hybrid composites combining polystyrene with local clay and natural fibers, and by Ighal et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-21">
     [21]
    </xref> on wood-polystyrene composites reinforced with rice husks, confirm these materials’ effectiveness for specific applications. Mastery of manufacturing techniques, notably optimizing filler/matrix ratios and thermal treatments, is essential to balance mechanical, thermal, and moisture absorption properties.</p>
   <p>In Benin, where advanced composite manufacturing technologies are less accessible and conventional materials are often costly, exploring local and economical alternatives becomes relevant. Recycling expanded polystyrene offers an opportunity for valorization, especially when combined with abundant sawdust waste. Integrating principles from these studies within a framework adapted to local constraints could develop materials meeting infrastructure needs while reducing environmental impacts.</p>
   <p>This work aims to reduce the environmental impact of wood and non-biodegradable polystyrene waste by developing particleboard using adapted technology, considering local economic and environmental constraints.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Wood Sawdust</title>
    <p>The sawdust used in this study comes from the Tectona grandis species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>). It was collected from various sawmills and sieved to separate the material into several granular classes. Five compositions were considered: particles retained on the 0.630 mm, 0.315 mm, and 0.160 mm sieves, a coarse mixture, and a fine mixture (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>). The different mixtures were obtained by reconstituting the particles from the sieved fractions. Percentages of the different fractions in a mixture were chosen to achieve a fineness modulus corresponding to the desired mixture type. The proportions used for the coarse (GC4T) and fine (GC5T) mixtures are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-"></xref>Figure 1. Tectona grandis sawdust of various granular classes.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312895-rId16.jpeg?20241223095632" />
    </fig>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-"></xref>Table 1. Characteristics of recycled sawdust.</p>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Code</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="38.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Granular Composition</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">True Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Bulk Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.88%"><p style="text-align:center">GC0T</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Retained on 1.25 mm sieve</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.258</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.119</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.88%"><p style="text-align:center">GC1T</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="38.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Retained on 0.630 mm sieve</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.270</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.126</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.88%"><p style="text-align:center">GC2T</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="38.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Retained on 0.315 mm sieve</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.278</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.161</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.88%"><p style="text-align:center">GC3T</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="38.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Retained on 0.160 mm sieve</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.294</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.171</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.88%"><p style="text-align:center">GC4T</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="38.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Coarse mixture</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.269</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.132</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.88%"><p style="text-align:center">GC5T</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="38.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Fine mixture</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.280</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.151</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-"></xref>Table 2. Proportions of granular fractions in GC4T and GC5T mixtures.</p>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Granular composition</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Coarse mixture (GC4T)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Fine mixture (GC5T)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">GC0T (1.250 mm)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">40%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">10%</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">GC1T (0.630 mm)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">30%</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">20%</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">GC2T (0.315 mm)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">20%</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">30%</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">GC3T (0.160 mm)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">10%</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">40%</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Expanded Polystyrene</title>
    <p>The expanded polystyrene was recovered from packaging materials, with densities ranging between 0.015 and 0.023 g/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Formulation of the Adhesive</title>
    <p>The adhesive results from dissolving polystyrene in an organic solvent, specifically gasoline for this study. Preparation involves introducing polystyrene into gasoline and mixing until the adhesive is obtained, following the proportion 
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         k 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           mass 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           of 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           solvent 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           mass 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           of 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           polystyrene 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>.</p>
    <p>The ratio k was determined after several tests. A known mass m of gasoline was weighed, and polystyrene was melted until complete evaporation of the gasoline, measuring the mass of melted polystyrene. The obtained ratio k is 1.4. Ratios less than 1.4 indicate insufficient gasoline to dissolve the polystyrene, while ratios greater than 1.4 reflect excess gasoline. The adhesive’s characteristics are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-"></xref>Table 3. Characteristics of the adhesive.</p>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Viscosity (Pa∙s)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.905</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.768</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Formulation of the Composite</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-"></xref>A dosing ratio 
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         d 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           mass 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           of 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           binder 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           mass 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           of 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           wood 
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mtext>
           sawdust 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> was selected. This choice was optimized to reduce structural defects, such as crumbling, and improve the composites homogeneity. Dosages higher than 2 lead to excess binder, forming an impermeable surface layer that prevents complete solidification of the composite’s interior, weakening the material. Dosages lower than 1.5 result in a friable material.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Composite Fabrication</title>
    <p>For the composite plates, a cold compaction process was implemented. The mixture, consisting of prepared wood sawdust and the polystyrene-based adhesive, was introduced into a metal mold designed for this experiment. Compaction was performed using a hydraulic press.</p>
    <p>After compaction, the plates were removed from the mold and left to dry at room temperature. They were weighed every 8 hours until reaching a constant mass, indicating “maturation” and complete evaporation of residual solvents. Finally, the plates were machined (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>) to dimensions of 11 mm thickness, 76 mm width, and 314 mm length <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-22">
      [22]
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-"></xref>Figure 2. Machined plates.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312895-rId21.jpeg?20241223095633" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Compaction Rate</title>
    <p>The compaction rate varies with the granular composition. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref> illustrates the influence of granulometry on this rate. Larger particles exhibit higher compaction rates than finer particles. The compaction rates of mixtures GC1T (0.630 mm), GC2T (0.315 mm), and GC3T (0.160 mm) are 46.67%, 43.33%, and 33.33%, respectively. This is due to a higher proportion of voids in mixtures with large particles, with compaction aiming to reduce these voids.</p>
    <p>The GC4T (coarse) mixture, although mainly composed of large particles, shows a lower compaction rate due to the presence of fine particles filling the voids, reducing compaction capacity. Conversely, the GC5T (fine) mixture presents a higher compaction rate than GC3T, mainly due to the presence of large particles promoting better granule adjustment.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-"></xref>Figure 3. Influence of granulometry on compaction rate.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312895-rId23.jpeg?20241223095633" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Mass Loss</title>
    <p>All mixtures stabilized after 48 hours. Mass losses for mixtures GC1T, GC2T, GC3T, GC4T, and GC5T are 25.31%, 25.61%, 25.88%, 25.78%, and 25.55%, respectively. Minor variations indicate that granulometry does not significantly affect the composites’ mass stabilization, which lose about 26% of their weight during the process.</p>
    <p>This mass loss is mainly due to the evaporation of residual solvents in the polymer matrix. During fabrication, polystyrene dissolved in gasoline acts as a binder, but gasoline, being a volatile organic solvent, gradually evaporates, significantly reducing the composite’s total mass. This phenomenon is uniform across different granular compositions, as the solvent’s volatile properties are not influenced by particle size.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Density</title>
    <p>The densities of plates GC1T, GC2T, and GC3T are 0.600 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, 0.693 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, and 0.727 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, respectively. With slight variations in moisture content, it appears that finer granulometry leads to higher composite density. Thus, density decreases with increasing particle size. This trend is also confirmed for mixtures GC4T (0.705 g/cm<sup>3</sup>) and GC5T (0.778 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>This is because mixtures with fine granulometry allow denser particle stacking, reducing voids and increasing overall composite density. In contrast, mixtures with large particles have more voids, decreasing density.</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-"></xref>Figure 4. Density variation by granulometry.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312895-rId24.jpeg?20241223095634" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Mechanical Properties of the Panels</title>
    <p>The mechanical properties of the composite panels show a significant influence of sawdust granulometry on the modulus of elasticity in bending (MOE) and flexural strength (MOR) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>). Panels containing coarse sawdust (GC1T and GC4T) exhibit higher MOE and MOR values, with 842 MPa and 3.16 MPa respectively for GC1T, reflecting better structural rigidity and increased capacity to withstand mechanical loads. Conversely, panels with fine granulometry (GC3T and GC5T) show decreased mechanical properties, with MOE and MOR of 748 MPa and 2.25 MPa for GC3T, possibly due to a more compact but fragile structure limiting homogeneous stress dissipation. A balanced combination of fine and coarse particles in GC4T provides an interesting compromise with intermediate performance.</p>
    <p>The results align with performance ranges generally observed in similar composites. For instance, Foti et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-16">
      [16]
     </xref> reported MOR values of 2.37 MPa for wood and recycled polystyrene composite panels, while Rofdi et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-17">
      [17]
     </xref> noted higher performance. Optimized density and control of hot pressing parameters improved mechanical properties in these studies. However, the composites developed here rely on a cold compaction process, adapted to local constraints and less sophisticated, justifying slightly lower mechanical results.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-"></xref>Figure 5. Influence of granulometry on mechanical properties.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312895-rId25.jpeg?20241223095634" />
    </fig>
    <p>Studies like Cherkashina et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-18">
      [18]
     </xref> showed significantly higher MOR, reaching 20 MPa, by incorporating reinforcing fillers like modified hazelnut shells. These improvements result from advanced chemical treatments and better matrix-particle compatibility. Khedr et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-19">
      [19]
     </xref> also confirmed that adding plasticizers or coupling agents, such as titanium dioxide, can significantly increase mechanical strength and flexibility. These processes, though effective, require resources and technologies not always aligning with local economic and environmental constraints.</p>
    <p>The properties obtained remain competitive and relevant for specific applications. The panels could be used in lightweight partitions, furniture panels, or non-load-bearing elements in construction. Akinterinwa et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.138321-23">
      [23]
     </xref>, exploring composites based on rice husk and recycled polystyrene, suggested similar applications for materials with comparable mechanical and physical properties.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Conclusions</title>
   <p>Developing composite panels from recycled wood sawdust and dissolved polystyrene is an approach that valorizes local waste while offering alternatives to conventional materials. In developing countries, where access to advanced technologies and costly materials is limited, this approach provides an adapted response to growing needs for ecological and economical construction materials.</p>
   <p>The results demonstrate that the panels’ mechanical properties, notably a modulus of elasticity in bending (MOE) up to 842 MPa and flexural strength (MOR) reaching 3.16 MPa, reflect the influences of granulometry, adhesive proportions, and the cold compaction process employed. Granular formulations containing coarse particles exhibit superior mechanical performance due to better stress distribution within the material.</p>
   <p>Comparisons with previous studies reveal that, although our results show lower properties than those achieved using sophisticated processes like hot pressing or chemical reinforcements, they remain consistent within a simplified manufacturing framework. Higher performance in some studies is due to the use of plasticizers, advanced chemical treatments, or special fillers, incompatible with an approach centered on local resource valorization and accessible processes. These differences justify the performance gaps while underscoring this approach’s relevance for local applications.</p>
   <p>The panels developed are suitable for use in lightweight partitions, furniture panels, or non-load-bearing decorative elements. These applications align with local needs for low-cost materials with reduced environmental impact. Despite the absence of advanced technologies, the obtained performance confirms the feasibility of local production of ecological composite panels. This approach addresses waste valorization challenges and the growing demand for environmentally friendly materials, particularly in developing regions.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     United Nations Environment Programme (2022) Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector, Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction, Nairobi.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Statista Research Department (2024) Forecast of the Total Population of Africa from 2020 to 2050.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chanhoun, M., Padonou, S., Adjovi, E.C., Olodo, E. and Doko, V. (2018) Study of the Implementation of Waste Wood, Plastics and Polystyrenes for Various Applications in the Building Industry. Construction and Building Materials, 167, 936-941. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.080
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Olawale, O., Mathew, C., Erinle, O., Ajao, F. and Abayomi, S. (2024) Optimization of Mixing Ratio for the Production of Particle Board from Bamboo Leaves, Saw Dust and Urea Formaldehyde. Advances in Bamboo Science, 9, Article ID: 100108. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bamboo.2024.100108
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ibe Kevin, E. (2018) Mechanical Properties of Urea Formaldehyde Particle Board Composite. American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, 2, 10-15. &gt;https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbe.20180201.12
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mamza, P.A., Ezeh, E.C., Gimba, E.C. and Arthur, D.E. (2014) Comparative Study of Phenol Formaldehyde and Urea Formaldehyde Particleboards from Wood Waste for Sustainable Environment. International Journal of Scientific&amp;Technology Research, 3, 53-61.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Naik, P., Kumar, V., Sunil Kumar, S. and Srinivasa, K.R. (2015) A Study of Short Areca Fiber and Wood Powder Reinforced Phenol Formaldehyde Composites. American Journal of Materials Science, 5, 140-145.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jaafer, H.I., Muslem, Z.R. and Naji, I.S. (2013) A Study of Some Environmental Effects for Saw Dust Wood/Phenol-Formaldehyde Composites. International Review of Physics (IREPHY), 7, 26–29.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ramesh, R.S., Sadashivappa, K. and Sharanaprabhu, L. (2018) Physical and Mechanical Properties: Hot Pressed Phenol Formaldehyde Based Wood Plastic Composite. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5, 25331-25340. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.336
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shamsian, M., Shahreki, A., Hemati, T., Nosrati, B. and Bayatkashkoli, A. (2020) Mechanical Properties of Light Weight Sandwich Panel Made of Sawdust and Waste Rubber. Iranian Journal of Wood and Paper Industries, 10, 521-530.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hazarika, A., Deka, B.K. and Maji, T.K. (2015) Melamine-formaldehyde Acrylamide and Gum Polymer Impregnated Wood Polymer Nanocomposite. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 12, 304-315. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s1672-6529(14)60123-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gindl, W. and Jeronimidis, G. (2004) Wood Pulp Fiber Reinforced Melamine-Formaldehyde Composites. Journal of Materials Science, 39, 3245-3247. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jmsc.0000025870.09117.f6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     World Bank (2022) Benin: Country Profile on Plastics. &gt;https://www.wacaprogram.org/fr/knowledge/benin-fiche-pays-sur-les-plastiques 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Parikh, H.H., Chokshi, S., Chaudhary, V., Oza, A.D. and Prakash, C. (2024) Development and Characterization of Eco-Friendly Extruded Green Composites Using Pla/wood Dust Fillers. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 238, 676-686. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/13506501241233628
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Adeniyi, A.G., Abdulkareem, S.A., Adeoye, S.A. and Ighalo, J.O. (2021) Preparation and Properties of Wood Dust (Isoberlinia doka) Reinforced Polystyrene Composites. Polymer Bulletin, 79, 4361-4379. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-021-03718-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Foti, D., E. Voulgaridou, E., Karastergiou, S., R. Taghiyari, H. and N. Papadopoulos, A. (2022) Physical and Mechanical Properties of Eco-Friendly Composites Made from Wood Dust and Recycled Polystyrene. Journal of Renewable Materials, 10, 75-88. &gt;https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2022.017759
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rofdi, M.I., Mohamed Tamat, N.S., Nuryawan, A., Sakagami, H. and Hermawan, A. (2024) Studies on Particleboard Production Using Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Waste as a Binder for Construction Applications. Construction and Building Materials, 449, Article ID: 138279. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138279
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cherkashina, N.I., Pavlenko, Z.V., Pushkarskaya, D.V., Denisova, L.V., Domarev, S.N. and Ryzhikh, D.A. (2023) Synthesis and Properties of Polystyrene Composite Material with Hazelnut Shells. Polymers, 15, Article 3212. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15153212
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Khedr, R.F. and Elnahas, H.H. (2023) Preparation of Wood Plastic Composite from Flax Fibers and Post Consumed Polystyrene Foam Based on Environmental and Economical Scales. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 37, 869-884. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057231187526
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Adeniyi, A.G., Abdulkareem, S.A., Ighalo, J.O., Oladipo-Emmanuel, F.M. and Adeyanju, C.A. (2021) Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of the Plantain Fiber/local Clay Filled Hybrid Polystyrene Composites. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 29, 7104-7114. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.1992692
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ighalo, J.O., Adeniyi, A.G., Owolabi, O.O. and Abdulkareem, S.A. (2021) Moisture Absorption, Thermal and Microstructural Properties of Polymer Composites Developed from Rice Husk and Polystyrene Wastes. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14, 1049-1058. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1892234
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     American Society for Testing and Materials (2020) ASTM D1037-12: Standard Test Methods for Evaluating Properties of Wood-Base Fiber and Particle Panel Materials. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1520/D1037-12R20 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.138321-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Akinterinwa, A., Umar Atiku, J., Eneche, J.E. and Shalbugau, K.W. (2020) Preliminary Evaluation of Composite Panels Produced from Rice Husk and Recycled Polystyrene Material. Journal of Modern Materials, 7, 45-53. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21467/jmm.7.1.45-53
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>