<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojo
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Orthopedics
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2164-3008
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2164-3016
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojo.2024.1412050
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojo-137990
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Treatment of Trochanteric Mass Fractures by Dynamic Screw-Plate (DHS) in the Orthopedic-Traumatology Department of the Donka National Hospital: 25 Cases
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Barry
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Alhassane
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Diallo Mamadou
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Moustapha
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Camara Nouhou
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mangué
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Diallo Alpha Mamadou
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Felah
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sidimé
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Sory
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Diallo Ibrahima
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Gallé
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Lamah
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Léopold
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Donka National Hospital, Conakry, Republic of Guinea
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     06
    </day> 
    <month>
     12
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    12
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    547
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    554
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      7,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      3,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      3,
     </day>
     <month>
      December
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the radiological and functional results of patients treated with dynamic screw plates (DHS) for trochanteric fractures in the Orthopedics-Traumatology Department of the Donka National Hospital. 
    <b>Methodology:</b> This was a five (05)-year continuous retrospective study from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023. We used the Watson-Jones pathway without an image intensifier. Patients were evaluated according to the Postel-Merle D’Aubigné evaluation criteria. 
    <b>Results:</b> A total of 25 trochanteric fractures were recorded. The patients were 16 men and 9 women, with a sex ratio of 1.77 and an average age of 63.5 years, with extremes of 31 and 96 years. The average fracture management time was 4.04 days. Etiologies were dominated by road traffic accidents (52.00%), followed by domestic accidents (falls) (44.00%). Merchants and housewives were the most affected (32.00%). According to the Ender classification, type III fractures (n = 15; 60.00%) were the most common, followed by type VII (n = 4; 16.00%). The procedure was performed 23 times (92.00%) under spinal anesthesia, 2 times (8.00%) under general anesthesia. The average hospital stay was 9.6 days. The mean operative time was 105.6 min, with extremes ranging from 90 to 120 min. The mean time to consolidation was 14.88 weeks, with extremes of twelve and twenty weeks. Comorbidities included hypertension and diabetes. The majority of patients (76.00%) had good anterior autonomy according to the Parker index. The mean index was 8.2 [standard deviation ±1.8]. We noted three cases of post-operative death (12.00%). We evaluated nineteen patients with a mean follow-up of 24 months, and the functional results according to Postel and Merle d’Aubigné scores were excellent in 42.10% (n = 8), good in 52.63% (n = 10), and fair in 5.2% (n = 1). 
    <b>Conclusion:</b> The DHS dynamic screw-plate has enabled us to achieve good radiological and functional results, enabling us to resume daily activities as quickly as possible. It appears to be a reliable solution for trochanteric fractures. It can be performed without an image intensifier, provided we are aware of its limitations.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Massive Trochanteric Fractures
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Dynamic Plate Screw
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Donka National Hospital
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Pertrochanteric fractures are proximal fractures of the femur, bounded at the top by the base of the neck and at the bottom by a horizontal line 2.5 cm from the lower edge of the lesser trochanter. They are very common in the elderly, due to osteoporosis and muscular atrophy, but can also occur in young people following violent trauma <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-1">
     [1]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Trochanteric fractures represent a delayed surgical emergency, ideally requiring surgery within 48 hours. The frequency of these fractures will continue to increase as the population ages <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. Osteosynthesis enables early management and social reintegration, with rapid resumption of activities of daily living. The indications for osteosynthesis depend on the type of fracture, the technical resources available and the surgeon’s experience <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. In sub-Saharan Africa, various implants are used to treat trochanteric fractures trochanteric fractures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. The Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is one of the implants designed to treat these fractures. It is an open-focus, extra-medullary synthesis device. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiological and functional results of dynamic screw-plate osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures in the Orthopedic-Traumatology Department of the Donka National Hospital.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Methodology</title>
   <p>This was a five (05) year continuous retrospective study from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2023. All patients treated surgically and followed in the department during the study period were included. Patients treated orthopedically (fractures with little or no displacement) and/or with incomplete records were excluded from the study. Patient data were collected retrospectively from hospitalization registers, clinical files, operative and anesthesia report registers, telephone interviews, home visits with clinical examination, and follow-up consultations. Patients were informed of the objectives of the study. They were given the freedom to participate or not. Dignity, privacy and anonymity were respected according to the Helsinki recommendations.</p>
   <p>All patients benefited from a preoperative assessment with X-rays of the pelvis and the diseased hip (front and profile). The real-size (100%) frontal X-ray of the pelvis allowed us to measure the length of the cephalic screw, the cervico-diaphyseal angle and choose the most appropriate implant.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Surgical Technique and Postoperative Follow-Up Protocol</title>
   <p>The patient is positioned supine, on an ordinary table, under spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia, with a cushion under the buttock. We used the Watson-Jones approach. Reductions are performed using two pins (one for cervical anteversion, the other for the guide pin). All the DHS used in our series had an angulation of 135˚ with a diameter of 11 mm. The quality of the osteosynthesis was judged on the position of the cervical screw in the head, on front and side views, considering that the best position was inferior from the front and medial from the side, supporting the primary compression trabeculae. Systematic aspirated drainage was performed for 48 to 72 hours. Antibiotic prophylaxis was systematic. Post-operative thromboembolic prophylaxis was applied for six weeks. Dressings were applied twice weekly. Sutures were removed between the 18th and 21st postoperative days. At the end of the procedure, knee flexion and hip flexion are used to test the strength of the assembly.</p>
   <p>Physiotherapy began the day after the operation. The session began with exercises in bed: activating circulation with gentle knee movements to counter flexion, isometric contractions of the quadriceps and ankle flexor and extensor muscles. The next day, the first thing to do is learn to walk without a load. Walking distance gradually increases over the following days (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>).</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. (a) Clinical image showing a 47-year-old merchant patient victim of a road traffic accident (motorcycle); (b) The Watson-Jones approach.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. (a) Clinical image showing a 47-year-old merchant patient victim of a road traffic accident (motorcycle); (b) The Watson-Jones approach.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2011133-rId12.jpeg?20241206023050" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. (a) Clinical image showing a 47-year-old merchant patient victim of a road traffic accident (motorcycle); (b) The Watson-Jones approach.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2011133-rId13.jpeg?20241206023050" />
   </fig>
   <p>Analysis method: Each patient benefited from a protocolized follow-up with a systematic consultation at D45 and D120, including a radiographic assessment (face and profile) of the hip, to assess the consolidation of the fracture, the functional result and any complications. The data were entered into Excel software. We evaluated our patients according to the Postel-Merle D’Aubigné numerical rating of hip function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. The parameters evaluated (pain, mobility and walking) are rated from 0 to 6 then added and the results are quantified as continuation:</p>
   <p>Excellent: (17 - 18 points); Good: (13 - 16 points); Means: (8 - 12 points); Bad: (0 - 7 points).</p>
   <p>Limits and difficulties: During the study period, the Orthopedics-Traumatology department of the Donka National Hospital was relocated to Camp Camayenne (a military camp located opposite the hospital) for reasons of renovation and extension of the hospital. This reduced the attendance rate. The quality of certain medical documents was degraded, which forced us to eliminate these files from the study.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results</title>
   <p>Our patients ranged in age from 31 to 96 years, with a mean age of 63.5 years. There were 16 men (64%) and 9 women (36%), with a sex ratio of 1.77. Comorbidities were represented by hypertension and diabetes. Aetiologies were dominated by road traffic accidents (52.00%), followed by domestic accidents (falls) (44.00%). By socio-professional category: merchants and housewives were the most affected (32.00%), followed by blue-collar workers (12.00%), (32.00%), civil servants (8.00%), farmers (8.00%) and motorcycle-taxi drivers (8.00%).</p>
   <p>According to Ender’s classification, type III fractures (n = 15; 60.00%) were the most common, followed by type VII (n = 4; 16.00%), type VIII (n = 3; 12.00), type VI (n = 2; 8.00%), and type IV (n = 1; 4.00%).</p>
   <p>Of our 25 patients, 19 (76%) had an isolated hip injury and six (24%) had an associated injury (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-"></xref>Table 1. Associated lesions.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="70.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Lesions</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="31.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Workforce</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">%</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="70.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Fracture of the femur</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.88%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">12.00</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="70.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Fracture of the humerus</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.88%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">12.00</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="70.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Fracture tibial Plateau</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.88%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">4.00</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="70.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Open fracture of both leg bones</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.88%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">4.00</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="70.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Bimalleolar Fracture</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="31.88%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">4.00</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>The average fracture management time was 4.04 days. The procedure was performed 23 times (92.00%) under spinal anaesthesia and 2 times (8.00%) under general anaesthesia. The mean operative time was 105.6 min, with extremes ranging from 90 to 120 min. Reduction was satisfactory in 80% of cases, with the DHS screw in the correct position in 60% of cases. The mean time to consolidation was 14.88 weeks, with extremes of twelve and twenty weeks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>).</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. (a) Pertrochanteric fracture, ender type III; (b) and (c) Consolidation after DHS osteosynthesis.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2011133-rId14.jpeg?20241206023051" />
   </fig>
   <p>The average hospital stay was 9.6 days. The majority of patients (76.00%) had good prior autonomy according to the Parker index. The mean index was 8.2 [standard deviation ±1.8]. No in-hospital deaths were recorded.</p>
   <p>During the course of the operation, we noted three cases of death (12.00%): Two 72-year-old patients with hypertension died at nine months and three years post-operatively; A 75-year-old patient with hypertension and diabetes died nine months postoperatively.</p>
   <p>We evaluated nineteen patients with a mean follow-up of 24 months, and the functional results according to Postel and Merle d’Aubigné scores were excellent in 42.10% (n = 8), good in 52.63% (n = 10), and fair in 5.2% (n = 1) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
     Table 2
    </xref>).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-"></xref>Table 2. Distribution of patients according to outcome assessment (Postel Merle d’Aubigné score).</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="41.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Score</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="42.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Workforce</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="41.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Percentage (%)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="41.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="42.28%"><p style="text-align:center">8</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="41.80%"><p style="text-align:center">42.10</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="41.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Good</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="42.28%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="41.80%"><p style="text-align:center">52.63</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="41.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Fair</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="42.28%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="41.80%"><p style="text-align:center">5.20</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="41.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="42.28%"><p style="text-align:center">19</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="41.80%"><p style="text-align:center">100.00</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Discussion</title>
   <p>Trochanteric fractures are the most common, accounting for 65% of proximal femur fractures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-6">
     [6]
    </xref>, and the mean age in our series is a relatively young 63 years. The predominance of males in our series (64%), with a sex ratio of 1.77, is not the most common finding in the literature, where females are often dominant. The patient is often elderly, female and osteoporotic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. This may be explained by the low life expectancy of our population and the young working population. Fractures of the upper extremity of the femur occur most frequently in subjects with tares. In our series, associated tares are present at a rate comparable to that of foreign series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. The mean operating time in our study was 4.04 days [standard deviation ± 8.5], with extremes of 1 and 15 days. This result is comparable to that of several African series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-9">
     [9]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. These operating times contrast with the European series, where the tendency is to perform surgery for fractures of the upper end of the femur within 48 hours of patient admission <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-11">
     [11]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. The mean operating time in our series was 105.6 min [90 - 120]. The majority of patients (73.9%) were transfused with one or two units of iso-group iso-rhesus blood during the procedure. These results may be explained by the “open” approach and the absence of an orthopedic table. Similar issues have been raised by Rabemazava AA et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-9">
     [9]
    </xref> which had an average surgical intervention time of 90 min. Regarding the quality of reduction, a 2016 study in Burundi on the treatment of trochanteric mass fractures by DHS reported that the quality of reduction was satisfactory in 90% of cases, with DHS screws in a good position in 78% of cases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. This is in line with our study, in which 80.00% of trochanteric fractures were anatomically reduced. These good results could be explained by the type of stable fracture and the prior reduction of the fracture. In our series, the mean time to consolidation was 14.88 weeks, with extremes of twelve and twenty weeks. This is similar to that reported by Ndayizeye J.C et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-15">
     [15]
    </xref> which found a mean time to consolidation of 15 weeks and a recoil of at least six months. The fracture was consolidated in 81.2% (26 cases). In our series, the average hospital stay was 9.6 days. With the gamma nail, however, the average hospital stay was reduced thanks to early patient management <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-8">
     [8]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Regarding complications, according to the literature, more than half of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery will experience postoperative complications, mainly of a medical nature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. The complication rate is influenced by the time between trauma and surgery, but to a variable extent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Another study conducted by Saul D. et al. in 2019 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-17">
     [17]
    </xref> concluded that the delay in treatment had no direct impact on post-operative complications. In our series, during the course of the operation, we noted three cases of death (12.00%), essentially related to associated defects (hypertension + diabetes); three patients aged 72 and 75 at nine months and one patient aged 75 at three years postoperatively. This could be explained by the various precautions taken pre- and postoperatively: systematic antibiotic prophylaxis, anticoagulant, blood transfusion, initial management of associated pathologies before surgery and early lifting with walkers. Functional recovery is significant, and depends on a number of factors. Only 20 - 60% of survivors regain their initial level of autonomy within a year. After one year, in an initially autonomous population, 40% were walking without assistance, 25% with a cane, 25% with a walker and 10% were no longer walking <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137990-6">
     [6]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusion</title>
   <p>The DHS dynamic screw-plate has enabled us to achieve good radiological and functional results, enabling us to resume daily activities as quickly as possible. It appears to be a reliable solution for trochanteric fractures. It can be performed without an image intensifier, provided we are aware of its limitations.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Authors Contribution</title>
   <p>All authors have contributed to the clinical study and preparation of the manuscript.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boukhris, J., Boussouga, M., Jaafar, A. and Chagar, B. (2014) Intérêt du traitement chirurgical des fractures du massif trochantérien par clou gamma, À propos de 84 cas. Pan African Medical Journal, 19, Article No. 6. &gt;https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.19.6.3190
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moroni, A., Faldini, C., Pegreffi, F., Hoang-Kim, A., Vannini, F. and Giannini, S. (2005) Dynamic Hip Screw Compared with External Fixation for Treatment of Osteoporotic Pertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized Study. The Journal of Bone&amp;Joint Surgery, 87, 753-759. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.d.01789
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sharma, H. and Loomba, D. (2015) Comparison of Outcome of Management of Unstable Pertrochanteric Femoral Fractures with Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nail. African Journal of Trauma, 4, 21-26. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/1597-1112.162236
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Essoh, J.S., Kodo, M., Traoré, A. and Lambin, Y. (2006) Surgical Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures: An Ivorian Experience. Nigerian Journal of Surgical Research, 7, 187-190. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/njsr.v7i1.12275
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Merle d’Aubigné, F. (1970) Cotation chiffrée de la fonction de la hanche. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 56, 481-486.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ehlinger, M., Adam, P. and Bonnomet, F. (2014) Fractura del extremo superior del fémur del adulto. EMC—Aparato Locomotor, 47, 1-19. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s1286-935x(14)68514-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Larbi, A., Blin, D. and Cyteval, C. (2011) Traumatismes de l’extrémité supérieure du fémur et du bassin chez le sujet âgé. Journal de Radiologie, 92, 567-580. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jradio.2011.04.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Arnnaout, A., Beya, B., Delplale, J., Vial, D. and Lec Estre, P. (1993) Ostéosynthèse des fractures de la région trochantérienne par clou gammaµ: À propos de 76 cas. Acta Ortho Belgica, 59, 30-39.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rabemazava, A.A., Razafimahatratra, R., Rakotomaharo, A. and Razafimahandry, H.J.C. (2009) Aspects de prise en charge des fractures du fémur proximal à Antananarivo. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie Malgache, 1, 1-10.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Veromboahanagy Holinirina, R., Manasse Rakotoherisoa, H., et al. (2023) Aspects epidemiologique et therapeutique des fractures de l’extremite proximale du femur de l’adulte au centre hospitalier de Soavinandriana. EPH—International Journal of Medical and Health Science, 8, 11-16. &gt;https://doi.org/10.53555/ephmhs.v8i12.1956
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aubrun, F., Baillard, C., Beuscart, J., Billard, V., Boddaert, J., Boulanger, É., et al. (2019) Recommandation sur l’anesthésie du sujet âgé: L’exemple de fracture de l’extrémité supérieure du fémur. Anesthésie&amp;Réanimation, 5, 122-138. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anrea.2018.12.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Siegmeth, A.W., Gurusamy, K. and Parker, M.J. (2005) Delay to Surgery Prolongs Hospital Stay in Patients with Fractures of the Proximal Femur. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 87, 1123-1126. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b8.16357
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Charalambous, C., Yarwood, S., Paschalides, C., Siddique, I., Hirst, P. and Paul, A. (2003) Factors Delaying Surgical Treatment of Hip Fractures in Elderly Patients. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 85, 117-119. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1308/003588403321219911
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sadic, S., Custovic, S., Jasarevic, M., Fazlic, M., Smajic, N., Hrustic, A., et al. (2014) Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Treatment of Fractures of Proximal Femur. Medical Archives, 68, 173-177. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.173-177
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ndayizeye, J.C., et al. (2019) Traitement des fractures du massif trochantérien par vis-plaque dynamique au Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Kamenge, Burundi. Revue Africaine de Chirurgie et Spécialités, 13, 24-27.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Evano, M., Arrigoni, S. and Rabuel, C. (2019) Fracture du col du fémur du sujet âgé: Comment améliorer le pronostic? Revue du Rhumatisme Monographies, 86, 313-317. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.monrhu.2019.05.004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137990-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Daniachi, D., Netto, A.d.S., Ono, N.K., Guimarães, R.P., Polesello, G.C. and Honda, E.K. (2015) Epidemiology of Fractures of the Proximal Third of the Femur in Elderly Patients. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), 50, 371-377. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.06.007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>