<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojapps
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Applied Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2165-3917
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2165-3925
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojapps.2024.1411220
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojapps-137850
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences, Chemistry 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Materials Science, Computer Science 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Communications, Engineering, Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Damage Associated with Lepidoptera Rice Stem Borers in an Integrated Cropping System in Bama, Western Burkina Faso
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Delphine
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ouattara
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Kossi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Latevi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Rabiéta
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Simdé
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Fabien Kis-Wend-Sida
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Tiendrébéogo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Innocent Sibiri
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Yaméogo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Souleymane
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nacro
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique/Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles/Laboratoire de Protection et Défense des Cultures, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique/Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles/Laboratoire de Protection et Défense des Cultures, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     01
    </day> 
    <month>
     11
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    11
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    3347
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    3365
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      17,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      26,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      26,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Lepidoptera stem borers cause significant damage in irrigated rice in Burkina Faso. This study was conducted to monitor the damage associated with these insect pests in an integrated cropping system over two consecutive years, 2020 and 2021. We used a randomized split-plot design in a latice design. Two rice varieties (FKR64 and Orylux6) were factors and four types of crop management before rice were used. Mineral fertilization (F0, F1, F2, F3) was distributed in secondary plots as the third factor. Weekly entomological assessments were conducted. Dead hearts and white heads were randomly sampled during the vegetative and the reproductive phases of the rice plant, respectively. Pre-immature populations of stem borers were recorded after laboratory dissection of rice tillers showing symptoms of damage. Chilo spp. was the most represented stem borer, irrespective of rice variety and type of treatment. Lepidoptera damage was higher in plots with higher NPK and legume than previous crops at 42 days after transplanting. The highest average rate of pre-immature stem borer populations was recorded on the Orylux6 variety. Parasitoids associated with stem borers belonged to four families of the order Hymenoptera. The highest yields were recorded in plots with the FKR 64 * F1 combination.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Insects
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Dead Hearts
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      White Heads
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Rice
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>In Burkina Faso, Lepidoptera stem borers and endophytic Diptera are the main insect pests of rice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. They are prevalent in all rice-growing ecologies and are responsible for significant yield losses of the order of 10% - 15% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. These insect pests include the African rice midge, Orseolia oryzivora Harris &amp; Gagné (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), the diopside fly (Diopsis spp.) and Lepidoptera insect pests, including several species like Chilo zacconius Bleszynski, Chilo diffusilineus de Joannis, Maliarpha separatella Ragonot and Sesamia calamistis Hampson <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-3">
     [3]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Lepidoptera stem borers and diopside fly larvae cause the formation of a characteristic symptom called “dead heart” during the vegetative phase of the rice plant. During the plant’s reproductive phase, these insects are responsible for the formation of the symptom “white head” bearing partially filled or empty spikelets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-9">
     [9]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. Damage caused by diopside flies appears earlier than that caused by Lepidoptera <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-9">
     [9]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. Maliarpha separatella larvae feed at the base of the rice plant in the first node of the stem, reducing plant vigour and causing poor grain filling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-11">
     [11]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. The number of grains per head and grain weight are reduced <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. Attacks by M. separatella can cause abortion of head flowers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. But when infestations of this insect pest are heavy, they can cause the formation of white heads like Chilo spp. and S. calamisitis (Nacro, personal observations).</p>
   <p>The economic importance of these insect pests justifies the considerable amount of research devoted to finding appropriate control methods to contain their damage. Research focuses on biological, chemical or cultural control and varietal resistance. Examples include studies on the natural enemies of Lepidoptera stem borers carried out at Bama <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-13">
     [13]
    </xref>, and on the role of alternative host plants in the survival of these insect pests in western Burkina Faso <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-14">
     [14]
    </xref> worked on the impact of climatic parameters on the relative abundance of Lepidoptera stem borers and on the influence of the rice plant development on the abundance of these insect pests. The efficacy, compatibility and cost-effectiveness of an integrated pest management strategy based on chemical control and varietal resistance against the main insect pests in irrigated rice in Karfiguéla were explored by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. The present study was initiated to assess the extent of damage associated with rice Lepidoptera stem borers in an integrated cropping system, which combines three factors: crop management prior to rice transplanting, variety and mineral fertilizer. This study aims at assessing the damage caused by rice Lepidoptera stem borers and the rate of parasitism associated with them in an integrated production system, in order to improve rice productivity.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Material and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Material</title>
    <p>The study was conducted at Bama agricultural research station (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>) during two consecutive agricultural wet cropping seasons in 2020 and 2021. The climate in the study area is South Sudanian, with an alternating rainy season from May to October and a dry season from November to April. Rainfall frequently exceeds 1000 mm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-16">
      [16]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Field sampling was carried out on damaged tillers of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) varieties Orylux6 and FKR64. The Orylux6 variety has a 100-day cycle and a potential yield of 6.5 t/ha; FKR64 has a 120-day cycle; its potential yield can reach 8 to 10 t/ha <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-17">
      [17]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The animal material consisted of the pre-immature stages of arthropods associated with rice.</p>
    <p>Field equipment consisted of:</p>
    <p>Data collection techniques depended on taxonomic group and arthropod development stage. Data were collected throughout the rice development cycle. Data collection sheets were prepared to make observations, take samples, make dissections, incubations/rearing in the field and in the laboratory.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Methods</title>
    <p>Sampling consisted in observing the damage caused by rice stem borers. Observations were made from the 28th day after transplanting (DAT) to the 84th DAT with a frequency of 14 days.</p>
    <p>Dead hearts were sampled during the vegetative phase of the rice plant, while white heads were sampled during the reproductive phase. These samples were taken randomly from 20 hills per sub-plot.</p>
    <p>Pre-immature populations of stem borers were recorded after laboratory dissection of rice tillers showing symptoms of the damage mentioned above. The number of dissections was the same as for visual observations in the field.</p>
    <p>The rearing of pre-immature stages of stem borers was carried out in the entomology laboratory of the Farako-Ba station, Bobo-Dioulasso. The biological material included chrysalids and larvae of various stages recorded during dissections of damaged tillers. Incubation of these specimens was carried out in flasks containing water-soaked cotton; one individual was placed per flask. Rearing took place under ambient laboratory temperature conditions. Daily observations were made until the complete emergence of either the adults of the rice stem borers, or the adults of their associated parasitoids. The identification of emerged individuals enabled us to monitor the level of parasitism of pre-immature populations of the insect pests.</p>
    <p>At maturity each rice variety was harvested. The rice was harvested by hand, using a sickle and covering an area of 3.5 m<sup>2</sup>. After harvesting, the paddy was sun-dried, threshed, winnowed and weighed, and the moisture content measured and corrected to 14% in order to estimate grain yield.</p>
    <p>The family identification key by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-18">
      [18]
     </xref> and the insect identification manual, general entomology by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-19">
      [19]
     </xref> were used to identify the various species of stem borers emerged from rice damaged tillers; in addition to these documents, the reference collection of parasitoids associated with rice stem borers compiled by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-14">
      [14]
     </xref> was used for parasitoid identification.</p>
    <p>The collected data were entered and grouped using Microsoft Excel 2010. The database was then imported into R software version 3.6.0 for various statistical analyses. The data were first tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To determine the individual effect of the explanatory variables (variety, previous crops and mineral fertilization) and their interactions on the response variables (arthropods, dead hearts and white heads), the data were then subjected to the Kruskall-Wallis (K-W) test at the 5% significance level. Finally, to determine the combined effects of the factors studied, the data were subjected to a multi-factor analysis of variance at the 5% level. Analyses focused on descriptive statistics (percentages, means and graphical treatments).</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Results</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref> presents the results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the factors studied on the formation of dead hearts and white heads during the consecutive wet seasons 2020 and 2021. These results revealed a very highly significant difference between subplots for the factors number of days after transplanting (DAT) and fertilization for the year 2020 with regard to dead hearts and white heads. For the variety factor, a highly significant difference in white heads was observed for the 2020 cropping season. A very highly significant difference for the interaction fertilization * DAT was recorded in the 2021 wet season for dead hearts and finally a very highly significant difference for the interaction fertilization * previous crops * variety * DAT in the 2021 wet season for dead hearts. Significant differences were also recorded between the interactions, previous crops * variety; fertilization * previous crops * DAT for dead hearts in wet seasons 2020 and 2021 and fertilization * previous crops * variety only for dead hearts in 2021. Finally, significant differences were observed for the interaction fertilization * previous crops for dead hearts in wet seasons 2020 and 2021 and the triple interaction fertilization * cultural previous * variety for dead hearts in 2020.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-"></xref>Table 1. Effect of studied factors on the formation of dead hearts and white heads for the two wet growing seasons in 2020 and 2021 in Bama, Burkina Faso.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Source of variation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="62.80%" colspan="4"><p style="text-align:center">Probability</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="32.38%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Dead hearts</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="30.42%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">White heads</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Wet season 2020</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">Wet season 2021</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Wet season 2020</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">Wet season 2021</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Days after transplanting (DAT)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;2.2e−16***</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;2.2e−16<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;2.2e−16***</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;2.2e−16<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilisation (F)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.00000005301***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.00000004647<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.00000219***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000002183<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Previous crops (PC)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.56<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.01346<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.7817<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.7816<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Variety (Var)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09582<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.02848<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; 2.2e−16***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; 2.2e−16<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * DAT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.00000002578***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.00000002053***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.099332<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.200571<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * Previous crops</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.027709*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.03292*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.223276<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.309238<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * variety</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.618866<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.40400<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.094774<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.074279<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Previous crops * DAT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.232099<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.1808<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.967134<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.9491<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Previous crops * variety</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.005838**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.008338**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.828442<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.4769<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Variety * DAT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.937446<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.8179<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; 2.2e−16***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">2.2e−16***</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * Previous crops * DAT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.003449**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.004529**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.856206<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.914661<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * Varety * DAT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.562537<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.58833<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.132254<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.2538978<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * Previous crops * Variety</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.015039*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.004407**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.191788<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.195982<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Previous crops * Variety * DAT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.179359<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.224826<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.744458<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.6291<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * Previous crops * Variety * DAT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.70%"><p style="text-align:center">0.170603ns</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000000005838***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.626079<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.6553115<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>***: very highly significative; **: highly significative; *: significative; ns: non significative.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref> illustrates the impact of mineral fertilization level on average dead heart rates observed on rice over two consecutive cropping seasons. The results of the ANOVA revealed a significant difference between the four fertilization levels at the 5% probability threshold in relation to the average rates of dead hearts recorded, even though no significant difference between the two crops seasons was observed. There was a significant difference between the F0 and F1 fertilization levels whatever the growing season.</p>
    <p>The combined effect of mineral fertilization and number of days after transplanting on dead heart formation over the two growing seasons is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>. Average dead heart rates first increased from 28 to 42 days after transplanting, before decreasing from 42 to 84 days after transplanting for the two growing seasons. The results of the ANOVA on average dead heart rates revealed significant differences between the four levels of fertilization for the two growing seasons. The highest average dead heart rates were recorded at 42 DAT in all subplots. Plots receiving F1 fertilization had the highest average dead heart rates (1.50%) over the two growing seasons. This was followed by F3 (1.15%), F2 (0.60%) and F0 (0.40%).</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>F0: Control with no fertilization; F1: NPK (200 kg/ha) + USG (72 kg/ha); F2: NPK (100 kg/ha) + simple urea (100 kg/ha); F3: NPK (200 kg/ha) + simple urea (150 kg/ha). Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 1. Effect of mineral fertilization on the average dead heart rate for the 2020 and 2021 crops seasons.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId14.jpeg?20241129020729" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Combined effect of mineral fertilization and number of days after transplanting on dead heart formation for the 2020; (b) Combined effect of mineral fertilization and number of days after transplanting on dead heart formation for the 2020 and 2021 seasons. F0: Control without fertilization; F1: NPK (200 kg/ha) + USG (72 kg/ha); F2: NPK (100 kg/ha) + simple urea (100 kg/ha); F3: NPK (200 kg/ha) + simple urea (150 kg/ha). Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 2. Combined effect of mineral fertilization and number of days after transplanting on dead heart formation for the 2020 and 2021 seasons.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId15.jpeg?20241129020729" />
    </fig>
    <p>The results of the ANOVA on the combined effect of mineral fertilization and previous crops on dead heart formation over the two consecutive growing seasons are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>. The average rate of dead hearts varied from one combination to another, with the highest rates recorded in plots with cowpea and Mucuna as previous crops, while the lowest average rates were recorded in plots with Control and Organic matter as previous crops. The highest average rate of dead hearts was recorded in the cowpea * F3 plots (0.63% and 0.63%), followed by the Mucuna * F1 plots (0.59% and 0.57%) over the two cropping seasons. Damage was low in the Control * F2 (0.13% and 0.14%) and Mucuna * F0 (0.13% and 0.14%) plots.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Combined effect of mineral fertilization and previous crops on dead heart formation over the growing seasons 2020; (b) Combined effect of mineral fertilization and previous crops on dead heart formation over the growing seasons 2021. F0: Control without fertilization; F1: NPK (200 kg/ha) + USG (72 kg/ha); F2: NPK (100 kg/ha) + simple urea (100 kg/ha); F3: NPK (200 kg/ha) + simple urea (150 kg/ha); OM: Organic matter. Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 3. Combined effect of mineral fertilization and previous crops on dead heart formation over the two growing seasons.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId16.jpeg?20241129020729" />
    </fig>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref> shows the combined effect of previous crops and variety on dead heart formation. The ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the average rate of dead hearts for the previous crops * variety interactions. There were no significant differences in average dead heart rates for Mucuna, Cowpea, Control and the two varieties, except with organic matter, where average rates were 0.46% and 0.45% (variety FKR 64) and 0.12% and 0.11% (variety Orylux6) over the two consecutive cropping seasons.</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Combined effect of previous crops and variety on dead heart formation in 2020; (b) Combined effect of previous crops and variety on dead heart formation in 2021. OM: Organic matter. Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 4. Combined effect of previous crops and variety on dead heart formation in 2020 and 2021.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId17.jpeg?20241129020729" />
    </fig>
    <p>The results of the combined effect of fertilization * previous crops * days after transplanting on dead heart formation are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>. ANOVA revealed a significant difference between treatments at the 5% threshold over the two growing seasons. Damage recorded was low at 28 DAT; some damage was observed with the F1 combination: NPK (200 kg/ha) + USG (72 kg/ha); it then increased at 42 DAT (0.86% over the two cropping seasons) and 56th DAT (0.82% over the two cropping seasons), then became rare at 70th and 84th DAT. No damage was recorded on the 28th DAT with the Mucuna * F0 * F1 * combination; the highest average rate of dead hearts (2.46%) was recorded on the 42nd DAT with the Mucuna * F1 combination, followed by the Cowpea * F3 combination (2.35%) over the two growing seasons. On the other hand, the lowest average rate of dead hearts was observed at 28 DAT (0.06% over the two growing seasons) with the Mucuna * F3 combination at 70 DAT (0.06% over the 2020 wet season and 0.07% over the 2021 wet season).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-"></xref>Table 2. Combined effect of mineral fertilization, previous crops and number of days after transplanting on the formation of dead hearts in 2020 and 2021.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="39.14%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Source of variation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="60.86%" colspan="6"><p style="text-align:center">Average dead hearts rates</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Previous crops</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilizations</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="19.64%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">28 DAT</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="21.58%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">42 DAT</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="19.64%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">56 DAT</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">2020</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">2021</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">2020</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">2021</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">2020</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">2021</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Check</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.86<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.86<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.82<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.82<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.13<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">1.28<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">1.29<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.36<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.36<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.43<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.43<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.22<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.23<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.15<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.16<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.57<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.58<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.46<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.47<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Organic manure</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.46<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.47<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.66<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.67<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.19<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.20<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">1.13<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">1.14<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.32<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.32<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.59<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.60<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.88<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.88<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.41<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.42<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.49<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.43<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.04<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.49<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.04<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.05<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Mucuna</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.33<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.33<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.34<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.35<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">2.46<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">2.46<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.39<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.40<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.13<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.51<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.52<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.40<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.24<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.06<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.06<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">1.17<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">1.17<sup>bc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09<sup>a</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Cowpea</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.86<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.87<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">1.09<sup>abc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">1.10<sup>abc</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.89<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.90<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.17<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.18<sup>b</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.59<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.60<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.38<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.38<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.50%"><p style="text-align:center">F3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.06%"><p style="text-align:center">0.31<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.32<sup>c</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">2.35<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.08%"><p style="text-align:center">2.35<sup>d</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.08%"><p style="text-align:center">0.47<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.47<sup>ab</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>F0: Control without fertilization; F1: NPK (200 kg/ha) + USG (72 kg/ha); F2: NPK (100 kg/ha) + Simple urea (100 kg/ha); F3: NPK (200 kg/ha) + Simple urea (150 kg/ha). Numbers followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref> shows the results of the ANOVA on the combined effect of fertilization * previous crops * variety on dead heart formation over the two consecutive cropping seasons. A significant difference between treatments at the 5% threshold was found over the two growing seasons. The highest average rates of dead hearts (0.94% in 2020 and 0.87% in 2021) were recorded with the Orylux6 * organic matter * F1 combination, followed by the FKR64 * Mucuna * F3 combination with an average rate of 0.72% in 2020 and 0.74% in 2021. The lowest average dead heart rates were recorded with the Orylux6 * Cowpea * F1 and FKR64 * Control * F2 combinations, each recording 0.04% in 2020, and the Orylux6 * Organic manure * F0 0.04% in 2021.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Combined effect of fertilization, previous crops and variety on dead heart damage in 2020; (b) Combined effect of fertilization, previous crops and variety on dead heart damage in 2021. F0: Control with no fertilization; F1: NPK (200 kg/ha) + USG (72 kg/ha); F2: NPK (100 kg/ha) + simple urea (100 kg/ha); F3: NPK (200 kg/ha) + simple urea (150 kg/ha). Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 5. Combined effect of fertilization, previous crops and variety on dead heart damage in 2020 and 2021.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId18.jpeg?20241129020730" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Effect of mineral fertilization on white head formation for 2020; (b) Effect of mineral fertilization on white head formation for 2021. F0: Control with no fertilization; F1: NPK (200 kg/ha) + USG (72 kg/ha); F2: NPK (100 kg/ha) + simple urea (100 kg/ha); F3: NPK (200 kg/ha) + simple urea (150 kg/ha). Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 6. Effect of mineral fertilization on white head formation for both 2020 and 2021.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId19.jpeg?20241129020731" />
    </fig>
    <p>1) Effect of mineral fertilization on white head formation</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref> illustrates the effect of fertilization levels on the average white head rate over two consecutive cropping seasons. ANOVA revealed a significant difference between treatments at 5% level. The lowest average white head rates (0.26% in 2020 and 0.31% in 2021) were recorded in plots that received no fertilization (F0); plots that received F1, F2 and F3 fertilization recorded the highest average white head rates of 0.45%, 0.50% and 0.48% respectively for the 2020 wet season and 0.56%, 0.59% and 0.46% respectively for the 2021 wet season.</p>
    <p>2) Effect of rice variety on white head production</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref> shows the effect of rice variety on white head formation. The results of the ANOVA revealed a significant difference between varieties at 5% threshold. Average white head rates were higher (0.76% in 2020) and 0.71% in 2021 with the Orylux6 variety. The FKR64 variety recorded 0.10% in 2020 and 0.11% in 2021.</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Effect of variety on white head formation in 2020 and 2021; (b) Effect of variety on white head formation in 2020 and 2021. Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at 5% probability level.Figure 7. Effect of variety on white head formation in 2020 and 2021.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId20.jpeg?20241129020731" />
    </fig>
    <p>3) Combined effect of variety and number of days after transplanting on white head formation for both seasons</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref> illustrates the effect of varieties on the evolution of the average rate of white heads. The results of the ANOVA showed a significant difference between varieties over the two growing seasons. The average white head rate increased from 42 to 70 DAT for the Orylux6 variety, before decreasing after 70 days. This curve followed the same trend for the two consecutive growing seasons. On the other hand, for the FKR64 variety, the first white heads were observed at 42 DAT; they increased slightly between 42 and 70 DAT, before rising again slightly at the end of the plant cycle (between 70 and 84 DAT). The highest average rate of white heads was recorded at 70 DAT for the variety Orylux6 (1.80% in 2020 and 1.75% in 2021) and at 84 DAT for the variety FKR64 (1.16% in 2020 and 1.13% in 2021).</p>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Combined effect of variety and number of days after transplanting on white head formation in 2020; (b) Combined effect of variety and number of days after transplanting on white head formation in 2021. Numbers followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 8. Combined effect of variety and number of days after transplanting on white head formation.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId21.jpeg?20241129020731" />
    </fig>
    <p>1) Evolution of pre-immature populations of rice stem borers as a function of variety</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref> illustrates the evolution of the number of individuals in the pre-immature populations of rice stem borers as a function of the varieties used. In the 2020 wet season, the FKR64 variety recorded 67.38 individuals of Chilo spp. and 130 in 2021, compared with 32.6 individuals in 2020 and 82 in 2021 for Orylux6. As for M. separatella, 96.15 individuals in 2020 and 04 in 2021 were hosted by Orylux6, compared with 3.85 individuals in 2020 and 34 in 2021 for FKR 64. Finally, 100 individuals of S. calamistis in 2020 and 07 in 2021 were found on Orylux6. During the 2021 wet cropping season, the Chilo spp. population was more abundant during the vegetative phase than during the reproductive one.</p>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Variation in pre-immature populations of rice stem borers by variety in 2020; (b) Variation in pre-immature populations of rice stem borers by variety in 2021. Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 9. Variation in pre-immature populations of rice stem borers by variety.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId22.jpeg?20241129020731" />
    </fig>
    <p>2) Relative importance of pre-immature populations of rice stem borers as a function of rice plant development phases</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">
      Figure 10
     </xref> illustrates the results on the evolution of pre-immature populations of rice stem borers insects as a function of rice plant development phases.</p>
    <p>Chilo spp. was the species recorded throughout the rice development cycle. An average rate of 24% of Chilo spp. populations was recorded during the vegetative phase, 59.29% during the reproductive phase and 17.25% during the maturation phase of the rice plant in 2020; 54% pre-immature population were recorded during the vegetative phase of the plant, 31% pre-immature population at rice reproduction and 15% pre-immature population at plant maturation in 2021. A percentage of 94% of M. separatella was observed during the vegetative phase and 5.55% during the reproductive phase in 2020. In the 2021 growing season, 92% of the pre-immature population of M. separatella was recorded during the vegetative phase, compared with 8% during the maturation phase of the rice plant. Sesamia calamistis showed the lowest average pre-immature population rate. This species was not recorded during the rice plant maturation phase in 2020 (50% of its population was recorded during the vegetative phase and 50% during the reproductive phase). In 2021, 14% of the pre-immature population was recorded during the vegetative phase and 86% during the reproductive phase of the plant. No individuals of this species were recorded during the rice maturation phase in any of the two consecutive growing seasons.</p>
    <fig id="fig10" position="float">
     <label>Figure 10</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Variation in pre-immature stem borer populations according to rice plant development phases in 2020; (b) Variation in pre-immature stem borer populations according to rice plant development phases in 2021. Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 10. Variation in pre-immature stem borer populations according to rice plant development phases.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId23.jpeg?20241129020731" />
    </fig>
    <p>3) Evolution of parasitism affecting pre-immature populations of rice stem borers</p>
    <p>Only pre-immature populations of Chilo spp. were parasitized (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>). Larval parasitism of Chilo spp. was observed during the vegetative (14.28%) and reproductive (5.08%) phases of rice on the Orylux6 variety and during the vegetative phase on the FKR 64 variety (16.66%). The average rate of parasitism was higher during the vegetative phase for both varieties.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-"></xref>Table 3. Variation in the average rate of parasitism affecting pre-immature populations of Chilo spp. according to rice variety.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.14%"><p style="text-align:center">Crops seasons</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Varieties</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.50%"><p style="text-align:center">Orylux6</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.48%"><p style="text-align:center">FKR64</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.14%"><p style="text-align:center">Wet season 2020</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Vegetative phase</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.50%"><p style="text-align:center">14.28%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.48%"><p style="text-align:center">16.66%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Reproductive phase</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.50%"><p style="text-align:center">5.08%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.48%"><p style="text-align:center">0.00%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.14%"><p style="text-align:center">Wet season 2021</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Vegetative phase</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.50%"><p style="text-align:center">7.40%</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.48%"><p style="text-align:center">33.45%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Reproductive phase</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.50%"><p style="text-align:center">9.80%</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.48%"><p style="text-align:center">9.84%</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> show the different parasitoids that emerged from Chilo spp. larvae. All parasitoids belong to the order Hymenoptera. The following families were represented: Ichneumonidae, Braconidae, Chalcidae and Bethylidae.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-"></xref>Table 4. Parasitoids emerged from the larvae of Chilo spp.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Family</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Genus and species</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Number of individuals</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Ichneumonidae</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Ichneumons spp.</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">15</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Ichneumonidae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Megarhyssa macrurus macrurus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">11</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Ichneumonidae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Xanthopimpla sp.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Chalcididae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Brachymeria ovata</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Braconidae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Dolichogenidae oryzae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Braconidae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Tropobracon antennatus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">16</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Braconidae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Chelonus texanus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Braconidae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Bracon sp.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Braconidae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Cotesia sesamiae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Bethylidae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Goniozus procerae</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.34%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The results of the ANOVA for paddy rice yield are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>. Fertilization and variety had a very highly significant effect on rice yield in both cropping seasons, 2020 and 2021. The study of the fertilization * variety interaction revealed a significant effect on yield during the same growing seasons.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-"></xref>Table 5. Yield analysis results.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="46.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Source of variation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="53.10%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Probability</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Yield 2020</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Yield 2021</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="46.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0000001534***</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.54%"><p style="text-align:center">7.61e-13***</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Previous crops</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.1434710<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.54%"><p style="text-align:center">0.136<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Variety</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0006308***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.54%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000404***</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * Previous crops</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.6195088<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.54%"><p style="text-align:center">0.71873<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * variety</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0144960*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.54%"><p style="text-align:center">0.3174<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Previous crops * variety</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.9311673<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.54%"><p style="text-align:center">0.1092365<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Fertilization * Previous crops * Varieties</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.56%"><p style="text-align:center">0.5975340<sup>ns</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.54%"><p style="text-align:center">0.790779<sup> ns</sup></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>***: very highly significant; *: significant; ns: not significant. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>, the following variables were examined: the effect of fertilization on yield, the average yield per variety and the combined effect of fertilization * variety on yield for the year 2020.</p>
    <p>1) Effect of mineral fertilization on rice paddy yield</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">
      Figure 11
     </xref> illustrates the effect of mineral fertilization levels on yield. The ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference between treatments at the 5% threshold over the growing seasons. The highest average yields (4321 kg/ha in 2020 and 6912 kg/ha) in 2021 were recorded with F1, followed by F3 (4,182 kg/ha in 2020 and 5669 kg/ha) in 2021and F2 (3613 kg/ha in 2020 and 5,481 kg/ha in 2021). The lowest average yield was recorded for F0 (2683 kg/ha in 2020 and 4058 kg/ha in 2021).</p>
    <fig id="fig11" position="float">
     <label>Figure 11</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Effect of mineral fertilization on paddy rice yield in 2020; (b) Effect of mineral fertilization on paddy rice yield in 2021. F0: Control with no fertilization; F1: NPK (200 kg/ha) + USG (72 kg/ha); F2: NPK (100 kg/ha) + simple urea (100 kg/ha); F3: NPK (200 kg/ha) + simple urea (150 kg/ha). Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 11. Effect of mineral fertilization on paddy rice yield.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId24.jpeg?20241129020732" />
    </fig>
    <p>2) Effect of varieties on paddy rice yields</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">
      Figure 12
     </xref> shows the average paddy yield by variety. ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference between treatments at 5% threshold over the two consecutive growing seasons. The highest average yield was recorded with the FKR64 variety, i.e. an average of 4043.98 kg/ha in 2020 and 6049.51 kg/ha in 2021, compared with an average of 3356.01 kg/ha in 2020 and 5009.56 kg/ha in 2021 for the Orylux6 variety.</p>
    <p>3) Combined effect of mineral fertilization and varieties on rice paddy yield</p>
    <p>Rice yield was influenced by varieties and mineral fertilization levels. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig13">
      Figure 13
     </xref> illustrates the effect of variety and fertilization level on average rice yield. The highest average yield was recorded with F1 fertilization for both FKR 64 (5018 kg/ha) and Orylux6 (3624 kg/ha) in wet season 2020 and (7275 kg/ha) for FKR 64 and 6549.83 kg/ha for Orylux6 in 2021 ; followed in decreasing order of average yield F3 (4796 kg/ha) with FKR 64 and 3568 kg/ha with Orylux6 in 2020, in the wet season 2021, 6464.86 kg/ha with FKR 64 and 4866.12 kg/ha with Orylux6; then F2 (3755 kg/ha) with FKR 64 and 3470 kg/ha with Orylux6 in 2020 and in the 2021 season with F2 (6051.52 kg/ha) for FKR 64 and 4911.09 kg/ha for Orylux6. The lowest average yields were recorded with F0, i.e. 2605 kg/ha with FKR 64 and 2761 kg/ha with Orylux6 in 2020 and in 2021 F0 (4006.66 kg/ha) with FKR 64 and (3711.19 kg/ha) with Orylux6.</p>
    <fig id="fig12" position="float">
     <label>Figure 12</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Effect of varieties on paddy rice yields in 2020; (b) Effect of varieties on paddy rice yields in 2021. Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 12. Effect of varieties on paddy rice yields.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId25.jpeg?20241129020733" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig13" position="float">
     <label>Figure 13</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) Combined effect of fertilization and varieties on the average yield of paddy rice in 2020; (b) Combined effect of fertilization and varieties on the average yield of paddy rice in 2021. F0: Control with no fertilization; F1: NPK (200 kg/ha) + USG (72 kg/ha); F2: NPK (100 kg/ha) + simple urea (100 kg/ha); F3: NPK (200 kg/ha) + simple urea (150 kg/ha). Figures followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other at the 5% probability level.Figure 13. Combined effect of fertilization and varieties on the average yield of paddy rice.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2312810-rId26.jpeg?20241129020732" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Discussion</title>
    <p>Damage associated with Lepidoptera rice stem borers was relatively low (with levels often below 2%) over the two consecutive years covered by this study. Infestations increased at the beginning of the rice plant cycle. The highest levels of damage were recorded at 42 DAT for dead hearts during the vegetative phase, and at 70 DAT for white heads during the reproductive phase of the rice plant. The presence of M. separatella during the vegetative phase of the rice plant seems to be associated with the presence of young plants. Our results are in line with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-20">
      [20]
     </xref>, who showed that M. separatella females only lay eggs on plants at the tillering stage of the rice plant. Average dead heart rates were higher in plots that received higher NPK and legume as previous crops, and lower in control plots. In addition, white head rates were higher in plots that received mineral fertilizers and lower in control plots. Chilo species and S. calamistis species were more present during the vegetative and reproductive phases of the rice plant, while M. separatella species was more recorded during the reproductive phase of the rice plant. Rice Lepidoptera stem borers had a preference for plots that received mineral fertilization. Our results are similar to those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-21">
      [21]
     </xref>, who showed that high doses of phosphorus favored the multiplication of Lepidoptera populations. A study of the combined effect of fertilization * previous crops * variety revealed that the highest rate of damage was recorded in the Orylux6 * Organic matter * F1 plots in 2020 and Orylux6 * Mucuna * F1 in 2021, and the lowest rate was recorded in the FKR64 * Control * F2 plots in 2020 and 2021 with the Orylux6 * Organic matter * F0. These results confirm that insect pests have a preference for nutrient-rich plots.</p>
    <p>Our results revealed significant variations in abundance levels between species during the development cycle of the rice plant. Chilo species were more representative in terms of numbers of individuals during the vegetative and reproductive phases of the two rice varieties. The permanent presence of Chilo spp. may be associated with the fact that the species has two successive generations during the cropping season. Authors of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-22">
      [22]
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-23">
      [23]
     </xref> have shown that the first generation of Chilo spp. infests the tillering stage of the rice plant, while the second generation, with a higher number of individuals, attacks the heading and flowering stages. These results, reflecting the relative importance of this genus at Bama, are in line with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-6">
      [6]
     </xref>, who studied the seasonal abundance of Lepidoptera stem borers in western Burkina Faso, where they reported that Chilo spp. was the most abundant dry-season borer at Bama. Our findings also corroborate those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-1">
      [1]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-14">
      [14]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-15">
      [15]
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-24">
      [24]
     </xref>, who reached the same conclusions. Maliarpha separatella species was present during the vegetative phase of the FKR64 variety; these results are similar to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-25">
      [25]
     </xref>. Although it has been established that M. separatella does not cause dead hearts, its presence in the stems reduces the plant’s vigor, disrupts its feeding and makes it vulnerable to fungal diseases. The presence of M. separatella during the vegetative phase of the plant could be due to the fact that this species attacks young organs, which could justify its abundance during this phase. Our results are in line with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-18">
      [18]
     </xref>, who showed that the female of M. separatella only lays eggs on plants in the tillering stage (15 days after transplanting at the earliest), and that this species becomes rare from heading onwards. The presence of S. calamistis was rare in the experiment. This result is similar to that reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-14">
      [14]
     </xref>, who noted a very low presence of this species in rice plots in Bama.</p>
    <p>With regard to parasitoids, the four families listed all belong to the Hymenoptera order, all of which are associated with stem borers, particularly the Chilo genus. These findings could be explained by the fact that Chilo spp. is the most abundant and frequent stem borer in Bama. Our results are lower in terms of parasitoid species abundance than those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-14">
      [14]
     </xref>, who listed 15 parasitoid species, and higher than those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-16">
      [16]
     </xref>, who listed six parasitoid species, all of them belonging to the Hymenoptera order and associated with Chilo spp. This discrepancy could be associated, on the one hand, to the fact that parasitism is as dynamic as the evolution of host insect populations and, on the other, to differences in entomological sampling methods. In fact, our observations were limited to hills showing damage symptoms (“dead hearts” or “white heads”), while pevious authors sampled hole hills for dissection in the laboratory. The relative high rate of parasitism during the two wet seasons could be associated with the high rainfall and humidity that favoured egg hatching and the development of stem borers. Authors of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-26">
      [26]
     </xref> have shown that rainfall and altitude influence the absence or presence of parasitoids, and therefore parasitism rate.</p>
    <p>Grain yield was influenced by variety, fertilization and fertilization * variety interaction. The results show that the lowest yields were recorded in the control plots, with an average of 2683 Kg/ha in 2020 and 4058.92 Kg/ha in 2021, while the highest yields were observed in the plots that benefited from mineral fertilization, with an average yield of 4321 Kg/ha in 2020 and 6912.41 Kg/ha. Increasing doses of NPK had an effect on yield. This could be explained by the multiple roles played by this nutrient, notably in stimulating root development, tillering, flowering and grain ripening. Our results corroborate those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137850-27">
      [27]
     </xref>, who concluded that the use of high-performance varieties and appropriate doses of mineral nutrients in irrigated lowland rice maximized yield.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Conclusions</title>
   <p>Our work revealed the presence of three genera of stem borers Lepidoptera, in order of importance: Chilo spp., M. separatella and S. calamistis. The Chilo genus is the most important, whatever the rice variety and type of treatment. Damage caused by these Lepidoptera was higher in plots receiving higher NPK and legume than previous crops, but lower in control plots. Damage was most severe at 42 days before harvest. The highest average rate of pre-immature populations of Chilo spp. was recorded on the Orylux6 variety. The rate of parasitism associated with Chilo spp. was high. Parasitoids associated with stem borers belong to four families and 10 species of the order Hymenoptera.</p>
   <p>Grain yield was influenced by variety, fertilization and fertilization * variety interaction, and the best yield was recorded in plots with the FKR 64 * F1 combination.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sanou, A.G. (2014) Influence du Système de Riziculture Intensif (SRI) sur les populations des principaux insectes ravageurs, et de leurs ennemis naturels sur les périmètres rizicoles de Karfiguéla et de la Vallée du Kou. Master’s Thesis, Université de Ouagadougou, 101 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     IRRI, Dawe, D., Pandey, S. and Nelson, A. (2010) Emerging Trends and Spatial Patterns of Rice Production. International Rice Research Institute, 35 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dakouo, D., Nacro, S. and Bacye B. (1991) Mise au point d’un système de lutte rationnelle contre les insectes ravageurs sur les périmètres rizicoles irrigués au Burkina Faso. Insect Science and Its Application, 9, 469-473.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nacro, S., Heinrichs, E.A. and Dakouo, D. (1996) Estimation of Rice Yield Losses Due to the African Rice Gall Midge, Orseolia oryzivora harris and Gagne. International Journal of Pest Management, 42, 331-334. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09670879609372016
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tankoano, H. (2005) Impact de la date de repiquage du riz sur la Cécidomyie africaine du riz, Orseolia oryzivora H.&amp;G. et son cortège parasitaire sur la plaine rizicole de Boulbi. Mémoire d’Ingénieur du Développement Rural, Institut du Développement Rural, Université Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, 103 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ba, N.M., Dakouo, D., Nacro, S. and Karamage, F. (2008) Seasonal Abundance of Lepidopteran Stemborers and Diopsid Flies in Irrigated Fields of Cultivated (Oryza sativa) and Wild Rice (Oryza longistaminata) in Western Burkina Faso. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 28, 30-36. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742758408930435
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nacro, S. (2011) Principaux insectes nuisibles au riz et leur gestion. Module de Formation, INERA, 60 p. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ouattara, D., Dakouo D. and Nacro S. (2016) La lutte intégrée contre les principaux insectes ravageurs en riziculture irriguée à Karfiguela. Science et Technique, No. 2, 7-24.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Polaszek, A. and Delvare, G. (2010) Les foreurs des tiges de céréales en Afrique: Importance économique, systématique, ennemis naturels et méthodes de lutte. CTA et CIRAD, Editions Quae, 534 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nwilene, F.E., Nwanze, K.F. and Okhidievbie O. (2006) African Rice Gall Midge: Biology, Ecology and Control. Field Guide and Technical Manual. Africa Rice Centre, 18 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Heinrichs, E.A. and Barrion A.T. (2004) Rice Feeding Insects and Selected Natural Enemies West Africa: Biology, Ecology and Identification. International Rice Research Institute and WARDA-The Africa Rice Centre, 247 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Williams, C.T., Harris, K.M., Ukwungwu, N.M., Nacro, S., Dakouo, D., Nwilene, E.F., Singh, B.N. and Okhidievbie, O. (2002) African Rice Gall Midge; Research Guide. West Africa Rice Development and CAB International, 28 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ba, N.M. (2003) Cycle annuel de la Cécidomyie africaine du riz, Orseolia oryzivora Harris et Gagné (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) en relation avec ses plantes hôtes ses parasitoïdes et certaines pratiques culturales au sud-Ouest du Burkina Faso. Thèse en Science Biologiques Appliquées, Université de Ouagadougou, 121 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Souobou, M. (2014) Ennemis naturels associés aux insectes foreurs de tige du riz à la Vallée du Kou, Burkina Faso. Mémoire de fin d’Études, Centre Agricole Polyvalent de Matourkou, 92 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dabiré, S.F. (2021) Ecologie des insectes lépidoptères foreurs de tige du riz dans l’Ouest du Burkina Faso. Mémoire de Fin de Cycle, Université Nazi Boni, 71 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Guinko, S. (1984) Végétation de la Haute Volta. Thèse de Doctorat des Sciences Naturelles, Université de Bordeaux III, 394 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     INERA (2018) Document préparatoire du plan stratégique du CNRST. Programme riz et Riziculture, Station de Farakô-Bâ, 46 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Delvare, G. and Aberleng, P. (1989) Les insectes d’Afrique et d’Amérique Tropicale. Clé pour la reconnaissance des familles. PRIFAS-CIRAD, GERDAT, 302 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ouattara D. (2011) Manuel d’identification des insectes, entomologie générale. INERA Farakô-Bâ, 111 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wopereis, M.C.S. (2008) Connaissance de la plante de riz: Les foreurs de tiges. Curriculum APRA-GIR: Manuel technique. 109-115. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Karamage, F.X. (2001) Etude de l’influence de la fertilisation phosphatée sur les attaques de la cécidomyie africaine du riz, ses parasitoïdes et les foreurs de tige en riziculture irriguée. Mémoire d’Ingénieur du Développement Rural, Université Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, 95 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Odjo, T.A. (1984) Contribution à l’étude de la biologie et de l’écologie de Sesamia calamistis Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) en Côte d’Ivoire centrale. Thèse en Science Biologiques Animales, Université de Paris-Sud, 115 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hamadoun, A. (1992) Evolution naturelle de la population de Sesamia calamitis Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) au Mali. Revue Scientifique: Nuisible-Pest Pragas, N°001/Institut du Sahel Bamako, 28-41.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sama, K. (2011) Effet des périodes de repiquage sur les populations, le parasitisme et les dégâts des lépidoptères foreurs de tige du riz sur le périmètre rizicole irrigué de la vallée du Kou, Burkina Faso. Mémoire de Fin de Cycle, Université Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, 82 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ouattara, D. (2014) Effet des dates de repiquage et des zones sur les populations, le parasitisme et les attaques des foreurs de tiges du riz sur le périmètre rizicole de la Vallée du Kou. Mémoire de Fin d’Étude, Université de Ouagadougou, 70 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mailafiya, D.M., Le Ru, B.P., Kairu, E.W., Calatayud, P. and Dupas, S. (2010) Factors Affecting Stem Borer Parasitoid Species Diversity and Parasitism in Cultivated and Natural Habitats. Environmental Entomology, 39, 57-67. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1603/en09196
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137850-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sanogo, S., Camara, M., Zouzou, M., Keli, Z., Messoum, F.G. and Sekou, A. (2010) Effet de la fertilisation minérale sur des variétés améliorées de riz en condition irriguée à Gagnoa, Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 35, 2235-2243.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>