<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojpsych
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Psychiatry
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2161-7325
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2161-7333
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojpsych.2024.146032
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojpsych-137467
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Self-Administered “Flow” Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Depression Treatment in a Crisis Resolution&amp;Home Treatment (CRT) Service: Functioning, and Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Chris
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Griffiths
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sherif
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Abdalla
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mark
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mcconnochie
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Harmony
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Jiang
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aNorthamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Northampton, UK
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aLeicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     14
    </day> 
    <month>
     10
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    06
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    514
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    527
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      13,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      16,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      16,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has research evidence that it can reduce symptoms of depression. Flow FL-100 is a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) device self-administered by a patient at home in combination with a software application that delivers wellbeing behaviour therapy training. Purpose/aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate if Flow can be introduced to a Crisis Resolution&amp;Home Treatment (CRT) service and the impact of Flow in treating depression. The study addresses the questions: 1) “what are the depression reliable improvement and remission rates?” and 2) “can Flow significantly reduce depressive symptoms and improve real world functioning (every-day, social and occupational functioning) and health-related quality of life?”. Methods: An open-label patient cohort design with no control group. Pre-intervention and 6-week follow-up intervention assessments using the participant self-report measures: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), and EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D-5L). Participants were 49 CRT patients, 19 males and 30 females, with an age range of 20 to 66 years, and average age of 42 years. Results: PHQ-9 reliable improvement and remission rates were 57.1% and 14.3%. PHQ-9 scores significantly improved, from 23.1 (SD 3.44) to 14.8 (SD 6.82) at 6 weeks, with a large effect size. PHQ-9 suicide/self-harm related question significantly improved from 2.51 (SD 0.77) to 1.08 (SD 1.17), with a large effect size. WSAS scores significantly improved, from 33.6 (SD 5.22) to 21.9 (SD 10.82) at 6 weeks, with a large effect size. EQ-5D-5L results showed significant improvements in the health index score, global assessment of health EQ-VAS from 34.2 (22.26) to 51.6 (24.95), and three EQ-5D-5L dimensions (“self-care”, “usual activity”, and “anxiety/depression”). Conclusion: A CRT service effectively integrated Flow tDCS treatment. Flow was beneficial in terms of improving functioning and quality of life and reducing depression symptoms and thoughts of suicide/self-harm. Flow FL100 tDCS and wellbeing behaviour therapy training could be offered through all CRT services to treat depression, reduce thoughts of suicide/self-harm, enable better functioning, and improve quality of life.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Depression
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Quality of Life
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Functioning
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-"></xref>Globally depression causes 7.5% of all years lived with disability, the largest contributor to disability and is defined as experiencing a low mood and loss of pleasure or interest in activities, and can include symptoms such as poor concentration, feelings of low self-worth, hopelessness, suicidality, disrupted sleep, and fatigue <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. In Great Britain (GB) around one in six (16%) of the general population experience depression <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Depression symptoms can have a severe negative impact on everyday functioning and quality of life <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-3">
     [3]
    </xref> and depression is the most common mental illness factor determinant of death by suicide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. The mortality risk for suicide among patients with major depression has been calculated to be 20 times that where major depression is not present <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. Severe mental illnesses (SMI) are psychological problems causing severe functional and occupational impairment, and the prevalence of depression in people experiencing SMI is higher than in the general population <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-6">
     [6]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation by weak electrical currents (0.5 - 2.5 mA) and has been used in addressing various mental illnesses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. Electrode placement for treating depression typically involves the anode over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (F3) and cathode over the right DLPFC (F4) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. tDCS mechanisms of action include significant gray matter increases in brain regions functionally connected with the stimulation target, including the bilateral DLPFC, bilateral posterior cingulate cortex, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, the right hippocampus, thalamus and left caudate brain regions; tDCS leads to neurostructural changes at predetermined brain targets in depression, and plasticity effects may propagate over brain networks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-9">
     [9]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Meta-analyses of the results of randomised sham-controlled trials show tDCS can significantly improve depressive symptoms and clinical response, with remission being significantly better than placebo sham stimulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-10">
     [10]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. tDCS is effective as a standalone treatment or in combination with other anti-depression treatments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. tDCS is safe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-13">
     [13]
    </xref> and generally reported by patients as acceptable and well-tolerated, with mild and transient physical sensations that usually do not prevent use: burning sensations (16.2%), skin redness (12.3%), scalp pain (10.1%), itching (6.7%), and tingling (6.3%) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-14">
     [14]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Treatment resistant depression (TRD) can be defined as no response to at least two consecutive courses of antidepressant medication <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. A systematic review of evidence of tDCS for TRD found favourable evidence that tDCS is clinically effective as measured by response, symptom improvement and remission in comparison to sham treatment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-16">
     [16]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>“Flow” combines tDCS (delivered by Flow FL-100 device) and software application wellbeing behaviour training (physical exercise, nutrition, mindfulness, sleep, and choosing actions). A randomised sham-controlled trial of Flow FL-100 in major depressive disorder (MDD) found significant improvement in depression symptoms following 10 weeks of treatment, with a clinical response of 58.3% and a remission rate of 44.9% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-17">
     [17]
    </xref>. A “real world” health service open-label primary care patient study of Flow found depression reliable improvement and remission rates of 58.1% and 32.3%, and significant improvement in depression, every-day functioning, and quality of life <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-18">
     [18]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. Qualitative studies undertaken on experience of Flow found most patients reported that Flow improved depression symptoms, was acceptable, and that they would recommend it to others <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-20">
     [20]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-22">
     [22]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>This open-label patient cohort study investigates if Flow FL-100 tDCS and behaviour change wellbeing training can be successfully introduced to the treatments offered by a Crisis Resolution &amp; Home Treatment (CRT) service. It assesses the impact of Flow in treating depression for people with SMI. The study addresses the questions: “what are the depression reliable improvement and remission rates?” and “can Flow significantly reduce depressive symptoms and improve real world functioning (every-day, social and occupational functioning) and health-related quality of life?”</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Design</title>
    <p>Open-label patient cohort design with no control group.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Approval</title>
    <p>The project was undertaken from January 2024 to September 2024. This was approved by the WeImproveQ working group and ratified by the NHS Trust’s Clinical Reference Group. Reference name “Flow-CRT”. The study was undertaken in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Setting</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-"></xref>The sample was recruited from people using a Crisis Resolution &amp; Home Treatment (CRT) service within the United Kingdom’s (UK) National Health Service (NHS). The service is for adults aged 18 and over who, without this service, would require hospital admission to an acute mental health ward due to a mental health crisis which impacts on the person’s ability to cope with day-to-day activities. CRT accepts all mental health diagnoses with the exception of where drug and alcohol abuse or dementia is the primary diagnosis. CRT also facilitates hospital transfer back into the community to enhance recovery and reduce the length of hospital admissions. CRT provides care co-ordination to enable recovery, appropriate management of acute relapse, short-term interventions, signposting to other appropriate services, and decisions on in-patient admission. A patient has access to a consultant psychiatrist and a named key worker. flow Neuroscience AB (manufacturer of Flow) provided CRT staff with training.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Intervention</title>
    <p>Flow FL-100 is a Conformite Europeene Européenne (CE) marked Class IIa medical device for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and has United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “Breakthrough Device” designation, indicating its potential to provide effective treatment. Flow can be purchased directly by anyone via the manufacturer’s website in the European Union and other European countries. Flow has been used by &gt;15,000 users in UK/EU and is offered by &gt;70 private healthcare institutions.</p>
    <p>In the treatment protocol, patients remain awake and self-administers at home five sessions per week for the first three weeks and then three sessions per week for the following three weeks: 24 sessions, with a maximum of one 30-minute session per day. After the initial six-week period, patients can choose to self-administer up to 3 sessions per week for as long as they choose.</p>
    <p>Flow treatment was concurrent with any current treatment, e.g., antidepressant medication, face-to-face psychotherapy, or any online psychotherapy. The anode was positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (F3 on the international 10/20 EEG system) and the cathode over the right DLPFC (F4); stimulation is 2 mA for 30 min. On the Flow mobile phone software app, seven brief (around 20 minutes, pace of completion chosen by user) healthy lifestyle behaviour therapy training sessions are available for users to optionally engage with. These provide information about the links between behaviour and wellbeing and how to take actions to improve wellbeing and reduce depressive symptoms. They are titled: “the basics”, “choosing your actions”, “mindfulness meditation”, “exercise for your brain”, “the anti-depression diet”, “therapeutic sleep”, and “looking back and planning ahead”.</p>
    <p>The Flow mobile phone software app is used to control the Bluetooth-connected Flow FL-100 tDCS headset via the user’s smartphone. Flow also provides depression symptom level tracking that enables users to monitor their progress/symptoms. This is done by the completion of the nine-question Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Self-report (MADRS-S) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-23">
      [23]
     </xref> via the user’s smartphone prior to a tDCS session. Flow also provides an integrated platform for the patient’s healthcare provider, with the ability to monitor patients, and customise protocols remotely. A patient can decide whether or not to allow their healthcare provider access to this information.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Inclusion/exclusion criteria</title>
    <p>The inclusion criterion was age 18 or over, and PHQ score of 14 or higher (an exception was having a score above 5 but below 14 if CRT considered that a patient could benefit from Flow).</p>
    <p>Exclusion criteria:</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Procedure</title>
    <p>Patients were selected if they met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were provided with information about the treatment and evaluation. Participants stayed on the same medication and continued any current psychological interventions they were undertaking. Informed consent was obtained by their mental health practitioner prior to beginning treatment. Following informed consent, demographic, treatment, and health information was extracted from clinical records containing routinely collected data. Participants could withdraw consent or stop treatment at any point without the need to provide a reason. Following informed consent, participants were given the Flow device and instructions, and completed three self-report measures. Participants were informed about Flow Neuroscience AB’s website which provides information, training on use, and email support. Between weeks one and two, patients received a phone call from a mental health practitioner to check on usage and any concerns. Follow-up self-report measures were collected after six weeks of treatment. Protocol compliance was monitored using the clinical portal web-based dashboard, which included the patient’s daily use of Flow and the change in depression scores.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_7">
    <title>2.7. Measures</title>
    <p>The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a self-report measure of functional impairment attributable to an identified problem (e.g., depression) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-24">
      [24]
     </xref>. The five questions on impairment to work, home management, social leisure, private leisure, and close social relationships each scored zero (not at all) to eight (very severely). The WSAS is a reliable, valid, and sensitive to change outcome measure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-25">
      [25]
     </xref>. Severe functional impairment is 20 and over and scores below 10 are associated with subclinical populations; a score of 9 or below is the clinical (recovery) cut off <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-26">
      [26]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-report measure of depression; it has good sensitivity and specificity for major depression as well as good internal consistency; scores for depression severity are: 0 - 4 none, 5 - 9 mild, 10 - 14 moderate, 15 - 19 moderately severe, and 20 - 27 severe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-27">
      [27]
     </xref>. Remission is defined as a score of 9 or less, and reliable improvement is a drop of 6 points <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-28">
      [28]
     </xref>. A score of 9 or below is the clinical remission cut off. Question nine states: “Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself?”</p>
    <p>European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-29">
      [29]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-30">
      [30]
     </xref> is a 5-item question and visual analogue scale (VAS) self-rated measure of health-related quality of life and overall health status developed by EuroQol group to provide a simple, standardised measure for a clinical appraisal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-29">
      [29]
     </xref>. It comprises five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), each of which is measured within five levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems). The digits from the five dimensions are combined to create a five-digit number measuring holistic health state. Each health state can be assigned an index score based on societal preference weights for the health state. Health state index scores 1 = the value of full health, with higher scores indicating higher health utility. The EQ VAS is a subjective measure of a participant’s current health, ranging from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable). The EQ-5D-5L has good construct validity and is sensitive to change in patients with depression and anxiety <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-31">
      [31]
     </xref>. The EQ-5D-5L is a validated measure of health status widely used in national health surveys worldwide and in clinical trials of health interventions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-32">
      [32]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-33">
      [33]
     </xref>, and EQ-5D is recommended by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to estimate health state utility weights for quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-34">
      [34]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_8">
    <title>2.8. Analysis</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-"></xref>Data were analysed using the statistical software package SPSS Statistics 26.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Participant Characteristics</title>
    <p>Forty-nine participants completed a six-week Flow treatment. Their average age was 41.84 years (age range from 20 to 66 years). 30 (61.22%) were females and 19 (38.78%) were males. Participants’ mean baseline scores were in the highest “severe” range for depression. Baseline EQ-5D-5L crosswalk data values indicated participants had a low average holistic health index and EQ VAS score compared to the general population. Numbers currently prescribed antidepressants was 45 (91.84%). Forty-five participants had information on self-harm, out of these 29 (64.44%) did not self-harm and 16 (35.56%) self-harmed, the majority of these reported cutting themselves (62.5%). See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-"></xref>Table 1. Baseline characteristics (n = 39).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Variable</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean (SD)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">PHQ-9</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">23.10 (3.44)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">WSAS</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">33.61 (5.22)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">EQ Health Index</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">.25 (.25)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">EQ VAS</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">34.23 (22.26)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-"></xref>Table 2. Numbers for each type of antidepressant.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Antidepressant</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Number of participants prescribed this antidepressant</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Citalopram</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">1 (2.22%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Clomipramine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2 (4.44%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Duloxetine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">8 (17.78%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Escitalopram</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2 (4.44%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Fluoxetine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">4 (8.89%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Mirtazapine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">15 (33.33%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Olanzapine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">1 (2.22%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Paroxetine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">2 (4.44%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Sertraline</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">5 (11.11%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Trazadone</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">1 (2.22%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Venlafaxine</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter"><p style="text-align:center">9 (20%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">Vortioxetine</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter"><p style="text-align:center">8 (17.78%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. PHQ-9</title>
    <p>PHQ-9 scores significantly improved from 23.1 (SD 3.44) to 14.8 (SD 6.82) (decrease in PHQ-9 score of 8.33) at 6 weeks, p &lt; 0.001, with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 1.08). At follow-up seven participants (14.29%) experienced remission (a PHQ-9 score of 5 or less at post-intervention follow-up) and 28 participants (57.14%) reliable improvement (a reduction of 6 points or more on the PHQ-9 from baseline). PHQ-9 suicide/self-harm related questions significantly improved from 2.51 (SD 0.77) to 1.08 (SD 1.17), with a large effect size (1.38).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. WSAS</title>
    <p>WSAS scores significantly improved, from 33.6 (SD 5.22) to 21.9 (SD 10.82) (decrease in WSAS score of 11.73) at 6 weeks, with medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.7).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. EQ-5D-5L</title>
    <p>There was a significant increase in the EQ VAS score of 17.33 (p &lt; 0.001) from baseline to post-intervention follow-up. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> contains data for each of the five dimensions, the mean health index and VAS at baseline and after the six-week intervention. From baseline to week six, quality of life increased with an improvement of 0.26. Measured across ten years, this intervention adds 2.6 QALYs.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-"></xref>Table 3. Means and standard deviations within each dimension across time with corresponding mean variation, significance, and effect size.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.38%"><p style="text-align:center">EQ-5D-5L Dimension</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">Baseline</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Week 6</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.87%"><p style="text-align:center">t</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">p</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">d</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">M (SD)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="22.20%"><p style="text-align:center">M (SD)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Mobility</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">1.67 (1.01)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.20%"><p style="text-align:center">1.57 (1.04)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.87%"><p style="text-align:center">.962</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">.341</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">.137</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Self-care</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">2.37 (1.20)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.20%"><p style="text-align:center">1.76 (1.05)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.87%"><p style="text-align:center">4.054</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; .001*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">.579</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Usual activity</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">3.37 (.99)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.20%"><p style="text-align:center">2.59 (1.22)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.87%"><p style="text-align:center">4.140</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; .001*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">.591</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Pain/discomfort</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">2.08 (1.34)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.20%"><p style="text-align:center">2.08 (1.41)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">1.000</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">.000</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Anxiety/depression</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">4.61 (.73)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.20%"><p style="text-align:center">3.35 (1.20)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.87%"><p style="text-align:center">7.822</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; .001*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">1.12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Health index score</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">.25 (.25)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.20%"><p style="text-align:center">.51 (.34)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.87%"><p style="text-align:center">-6.397</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt; .001*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">-.914</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="31.38%"><p style="text-align:center">EQ-VAS score</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.35%"><p style="text-align:center">34.22 (22.26)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.20%"><p style="text-align:center">51.55 (25.00)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.87%"><p style="text-align:center">-4.244</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.001</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">-0.606</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>*Significant at p &lt; 0.05 level.</p>
    <p>Data screening permitted the use of a paired-sample t-test to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in participants’ EQ dimensions, as well as their health index score and VAS at the 6-week data point. The improvement was statistically significant for three EQ dimensions (“usual activity”, “self-care”, and “anxiety/depression”), and for the overall health index score, with medium effect sizes.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>Flow delivered tDCS can be provided to patients by a CRT service, and when offered patients will choose to use Flow. Flow reduced impaired functioning, depression symptoms, and thoughts of suicide/self-harm, and increased health related quality of life in CRT patients with symptoms of depression. This supports the evidence of effectiveness of tDCS in reducing depression symptoms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-10">
     [10]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-17">
     [17]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-"></xref>The statistically significant improvements in the “ability to perform usual activity” and “self-care” dimensions were measured by the EQ-5D-5L, and impaired functioning was measured by the WSAS. This indicates the positive impact of Flow on self-management, mental health recovery, and real-world functioning, which are factors highly valued by people in their everyday lives. They can also increase resilience, sense of meaningfulness, and purpose in life <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-35">
     [35]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>A high average PHQ-9 baseline score (depression in the highest “severe” range) was seen in this study’s participants, indicating the potential value of Flow for those with severe depression. Many of the participants in this study would meet the definition of TRD, this study’s results add evidence to the potential value of tDCS in treating TRD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. In this study, tDCS was delivered to patients, most of whom were on antidepressants, and this combination can possibly enhance overall outcomes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-13">
     [13]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The participants in this study had high rates of self-harm, which is typical of people with SMI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-36">
     [36]
    </xref>. People who self-harm have high rates of depression <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-37">
     [37]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-38">
     [38]
    </xref>. Depression is a predicting factor in suicide attempts in those with histories of self-harm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-39">
     [39]
    </xref>. Treating depression is particularly important for those self-harming, as self-harm increases the risk of suicide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-40">
     [40]
    </xref>. A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the efficacy of suicide and self-harm psychosocial interventions found interventions were no more effective than in control groups in reducing self-harm, suicidality, depression, hopelessness, or suicide attempts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-41">
     [41]
    </xref>. Meta-analyses of RCTs found that psychotropic medications to treat and prevent self-injurious thoughts and behaviours produce only small treatment effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-42">
     [42]
    </xref>, and there is no treatment effect on repetition of self-harm for newer generation antidepressants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-43">
     [43]
    </xref>. These findings highlight the need for effective self-harm treatment. tDCS at the right inferior frontal gyrus may have a positive influence on emotional regulation, i.e., lower impulsiveness agitation and, by doing so, has the potential to decrease non-suicidal self-injury frequency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-44">
     [44]
    </xref>. The potential for tDCS to reduce depression and specifically suicidal and self-harm thoughts seen in this study indicates the potential value of using tDCS.</p>
   <p>In this study, there was a relatively quick (six-week) improvement in depression symptoms, and another study showed Flow provided good rates of depression remission at three weeks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. Serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) antidepressants time course of response around 2 to 4 weeks to achieve significant benefits; but it may take longer to achieve most of the improvement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-45">
     [45]
    </xref>. Therefore, Flow might be considered as a treatment where a relatively quick relief of depression symptoms is required, of particular value in CRT patients to address or prevent a mental crisis which may lead to suicide attempt, self-harm, or acute mental health ward admission.</p>
   <p>A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that tDCS plus SSRI antidepressant medication provided significant improvement in depression and achieved a significantly higher response rate than sham intervention, and that this was more effective than tDCS treatment alone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-46">
     [46]
    </xref>. This finding is important for clinical practice, as it indicates that patients should continue their existing prescribed SSRI antidepressant use during tDCS treatment, and that patients can start using both tDCS and SSRIs at the same time (Wang et al., 2021) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-46">
     [46]
    </xref>. The majority of patients in this current study were prescribed antidepressants.</p>
   <p>For those who have failed to respond to antidepressant medication or psychotherapy or who find medication side effects intolerable, or factors related to psychotherapy unacceptable (e.g., waiting times, travel costs, time required, other commitments preventing attendance), Flow tDCS can be an alternative treatment option. The NHS “Mental Health and Wellbeing Plan” states: “We know there are limitations to the current treatment offer. More needs to be done… to diversify the range of treatments available” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-47">
     [47]
    </xref>. CRT service is well-placed to deliver Flow tDCS treatment as they provide patients with a named keyworker, access to a psychiatrist, and seeks to understand a patient’s individual circumstances and provide individualised support and treatment.</p>
   <p>Not all participants experience remission or reliable change following the use of Flow. In a CRT patients are told they may need to try a number of antidepressant treatment options and a combination of treatments. A CRT service’s active engagement with its patients enables it to prepare them for non-treatment response and ensure that they receive ongoing support, and access to other antidepressant treatments.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Limitations</title>
   <p>There were several limitations of the study. There was no control group, a relatively small sample size, and the treatment with Flow tDCS was open-label and adjunct to any existing depression or other treatments or therapies. The sample was over-represented by females, and so the results are less generalisable to males. This study collected outcome measures after six weeks of treatment, with no later follow-up data collection; it is recommended that future studies employ additional follow-up data collection points: 12, 24 and 36 weeks. The participants were from a single UK county reducing generalisability; however, this county has the most ethnically diverse population in the UK outside of London.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusions</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137467-"></xref>Flow tDCS can be fully and effectively integrated into CRT depression treatment. CRTs are willing to offer, and their patients will choose to use Flow, providing evidence of the acceptability of and demand for Flow FL-100 delivered tDCS and software app behaviour change wellbeing training. Flow tDCS can be effective against depression symptoms when offered through a CRT for patients with depression symptoms. Treating depression symptoms, thoughts of self-harm and suicide, improving functioning and quality of life using tDCS in a CRT service may prevent mental health in-patient admission, reduce A&amp;E attendance, and prevent the need for more costly transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) depression treatment; and, therefore, may reduce healthcare costs. Patient delivered antidepressant treatment at their home reduces burden on patients attending outpatient depression treatment options such as TMS or ECT.</p>
   <p>There is a need to offer patients a wide choice of effective depression treatment options. This study’s results support the use of Flow tDCS as a treatment option for people in a CRT service with symptoms of depression. More evidence is required on the long-term effectiveness of tDCS and the potential need for ongoing maintenance sessions to sustain benefits. Future studies could also look into the patient-experience of Flow tDCS for patients in CRT services through qualitative interviews.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>We wish to thank the participants and the staff at the NHS Trust for their support in recruitment.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>Funding</title>
   <p>Funding was provided by Flow Neuroscience AB, but study design, analysis, interpretation, and reporting were independent of Flow Neuroscience AB’s involvement.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     World Health Organisation (WHO) (2023) Depressive Disorder (Depression)—Fact Sheet. &gt;https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Office for National Statistics (2022) Cost of Living and Depression in Adults, Great Britain: 29 September to 23 October 2022. &gt;https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/mentalhealth/articles/costoflivinganddepressioninadultsgreatbritain/29septemberto23october2022
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lépine, J.P. and Briley, M. (2011) The Increasing Burden of Depression. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 7, 3-7. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s19617
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vigo, D., Thornicroft, G. and Atun, R. (2016) Estimating the True Global Burden of Mental Illness. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3, 171-178. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00505-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Harris, E.C. and Barraclough, B. (1997) Suicide as an Outcome for Mental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 205-228. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.170.3.205
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Public Health England (2018) Severe Mental Illness (SMI) and Physical Health in E-qualities: Briefing. &gt;https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/severe-mental-illness-smi-physical-health-inequalities/severe-mental-illness-and-physical-health-inequalities-briefing
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Grycuk, L., Moruzzi, F., Bardjesteh, E., Gaughran, F., Campbell, I.C. and Schmidt, U. (2021) Participant Experiences of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) as a Treatment for Antipsychotic Medication Induced Weight Gain. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article ID: 694203. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.694203
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fregni, F., El-Hagrassy, M.M., Pacheco-Barrios, K., Carvalho, S., Leite, J., Simis, M., et al. (2020) Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 24, 256-313. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaa051
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jog, M.A., Anderson, C., Kubicki, A., Boucher, M., Leaver, A., Hellemann, G., et al. (2023) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Depression Induces Structural Plasticity. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 2841. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29792-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mutz, J., Edgcumbe, D.R., Brunoni, A.R. and Fu, C.H.Y. (2018) Efficacy and Acceptability of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Adult Unipolar and Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Sham-Controlled Trials. Neuroscience&amp;Biobehavioral Reviews, 92, 291-303. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.015
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mutz, J., Vipulananthan, V., Carter, B., Hurlemann, R., Fu, C.H.Y. and Young, A.H. (2019) Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Non-Surgical Brain Stimulation for the Acute Treatment of Major Depressive Episodes in Adults: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. BMJ, 364, l1079. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1079
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moffa, A.H., Martin, D., Alonzo, A., Bennabi, D., Blumberger, D.M., Benseñor, I.M., et al. (2020) Efficacy and Acceptability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Major Depressive Disorder: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 99, Article ID: 109836. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109836
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Razza, L.B., Palumbo, P., Moffa, A.H., Carvalho, A.F., Solmi, M., Loo, C.K., et al. (2020) A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis on the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Depressive Episodes. Depression and Anxiety, 37, 594-608. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chhabra, H., Bose, A., Shivakumar, V., Agarwal, S.M., Sreeraj, V.S., Shenoy, S., et al. (2020) Tolerance of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Psychiatric Disorders: An Analysis of 2000+ Sessions. Psychiatry Research, 284, Article ID: 112744. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112744
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Berlim, M.T. and Turecki, G. (2007) What Is the Meaning of Treatment Resistant/Refractory Major Depression (TRD)? A Systematic Review of Current Randomized Trials. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 17, 696-707. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2007.03.009
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, J., Kung, S., Croarkin, P. and Lapid, M. (2024) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD): A Systematic Review. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 32, S99. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.181
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Woodham, R.D., Selvaraj, S., Lajmi, N., Hobday, H., Sheehan, G., Ghazi-Noori, A., et al. (2024) Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder: A Fully Remote Phase 2 Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial. Nature Medicine. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03305-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Griffiths, C., Silva, K.M.d., Jiang, H., Smart, D. and Zafar, A. (2024) “Flow” Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Depression Treatment in a Primary Healthcare General Practice—Depression, Functioning, and Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes. Open Journal of Depression, 13, 25-39. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojd.2024.132003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Griffiths, C., Jiang, H., Smart, D. and Zafar, A. (2024) “Flow” Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Depression Treatment in a Primary Healthcare General Practice—An Open-Label Cohort Study Measuring Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S) Outcomes. Open Journal of Psychiatry, 14, 386-399. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpsych.2024.144024
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rimmer, R.M., Woodham, R.D., Cahill, S. and Fu, C.H. (2022) Acceptability of Community-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Major Depression: Mixed Methods Analysis of Individual Experiences.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Griffiths, C., Walker, K., Jiang, H. and Noel-Johnson, A. (2023) A Qualitative Study Exploring the Experience and Value of “Flow” Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Device and Behaviour Therapy Training Software Application at Home for Symptoms of Depression. Open Journal of Depression, 12, 65-86. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojd.2023.124007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Griffiths, C., Walker, K. and Willis, A. (2024) A Qualitative Study Exploring the Experience and Value of Flow Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Behaviour Therapy Training Software Used at Home for Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) Patients with Symptoms of Depression. Open Journal of Depression, 13, 6-23. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojd.2024.131002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Montgomery, S.A. and Åsberg, M. (1979) A New Depression Scale Designed to Be Sensitive to Change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382-389. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Marks, I. (1986) Behavioural Psychotherapy: Maudsley Pocket Book of Clinical Management. John Wright.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mundt, J.C., Marks, I.M., Shear, M.K. and Greist, J.M. (2002) The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: A Simple Measure of Impairment in Functioning. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 461-464. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.5.461
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hammond, G.C., Croudace, T.J., Radhakrishnan, M., Lafortune, L., Watson, A., McMillan-Shields, F., et al. (2012) Comparative Effectiveness of Cognitive Therapies Delivered Face-to-Face or over the Telephone: An Observational Study Using Propensity Methods. PLOS ONE, 7, e42916. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042916
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R.L. and Williams, J.B.W. (2001) The PHQ-9: Validity of a Brief Depression Severity Measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606-613. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Richards, D.A. and Borglin, G. (2011) Implementation of Psychological Therapies for Anxiety and Depression in Routine Practice: Two Year Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 133, 51-60. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.024
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol—A New Facility for the Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life. Health Policy, 16, 199-208.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     EuroQol Research Foundation (2024) EQ-5D-5L|About. &gt;https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Peasgood, T., Brazier, J. and Papaioannou, D. (2012) A Systematic Review of the Validity and Responsiveness of EQ-5D and SF-6D for Depression and Anxiety. HEDS Discussion Paper, 12-15. &gt;https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xfvwq
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brooks, R. (1996) Euroqol: The Current State of Play. Health Policy, 37, 53-72. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., et al. (2011) Development and Preliminary Testing of the New Five-Level Version of EQ-5D (eq-5d-5l). Quality of Life Research, 20, 1727-1736. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     NICE (2019) Position Statement on Use of the EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England (up-Dated October 2019). &gt;https://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/technology-appraisal-guidance/eq-5d-5l
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Griffiths, C.A. (2009) Sense of Coherence and Mental Health Rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23, 72-78. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508095360
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Morgan, V.A., Waterreus, A., Jablensky, A., Mackinnon, A., McGrath, J.J., Carr, V. and Saw, S. (2011) People Living with Psychotic Illness 2010. Australian Government.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fliege, H., Lee, J., Grimm, A. and Klapp, B.F. (2009) Risk Factors and Correlates of Deliberate Self-Harm Behavior: A Systematic Review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 66, 477-493. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.10.013
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hawton, K., Saunders, K., Topiwala, A. and Haw, C. (2013) Psychiatric Disorders in Patients Presenting to Hospital Following Self-Harm: A Systematic Review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151, 821-830. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.08.020
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Victor, S.E. and Klonsky, E.D. (2014) Correlates of Suicide Attempts among Self-Injurers: A Meta-Analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 282-297. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.03.005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hawton, K. and Van Heeringen, K. (2000) The International Handbook of Suicide and Attempted Suicide. John Wiley&amp;Sons.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yiu, H.W., Rowe, S. and Wood, L. (2021) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychosocial Interventions Aiming to Reduce Risks of Suicide and Self-Harm in Psychiatric Inpatients. Psychiatry Research, 305, Article ID: 114175. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114175
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huang, X., Harris, L.M., Funsch, K.M., Fox, K.R. and Ribeiro, J.D. (2022) Efficacy of Psychotropic Medications on Suicide and Self-Injury: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Translational Psychiatry, 12, Article No. 400. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02173-9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group, Hawton, K., Witt, K.G., Taylor Salisbury, T.L., Arensman, E., Gunnell, D. and van Heeringen, K. (1996) Pharmacological Interventions for Self-Harm in Adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 9, 1-63.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Makowska, I., Rymarczyk, K., Puzio, D., Pałka-Szafraniec, K. and Garnier, J. (2022) Emotional Regulation in Non-Suicidal Self-Injury—Research on the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). European Psychiatry, 65, S445-S446. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1132
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jakubovski, E., Johnson, J.A., Nasir, M., Müller-Vahl, K. and Bloch, M.H. (2018) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Curve of Ssris and Snris in Anxiety Disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 36, 198-212. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22854
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, J., Luo, H., Schülke, R., Geng, X., Sahakian, B.J. and Wang, S. (2021) Is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Alone or in Combination with Antidepressant Medications or Psychotherapies, Effective in Treating Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Medicine, 19, Article No. 319. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02181-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137467-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Department for Health and Social Care (2023) Mental Health and Wellbeing Plan: Discussion Paper. &gt;https://www.gov.uk/government/calls-for-evidence/mental-health-and-wellbeing-plan-discussion-paper-and-call-for-evidence/mental-health-and-wellbeing-plan-discussion-paper#:~:text=the%20NHS%20Community%20Mental%20Health,support%20by%202023%20to%202024
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>